O
`
MIDCOAST COUNCIL TOWNS & VILLAGES
PAMP AND BIKE PLAN
Updated April 2021
This document has been prepared for the benefit of MidCoast Council. No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for an application for permission or approval to fulfil a legal requirement.
QUALITY STATEMENT PROJECT MANAGER Alexandra Kavanagh PREPARED BY Ben Cove CHECKED BY Alexandra Kavanagh REVIEWED BY Fred Gennaoui APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY Fred Gennaoui
MidCoast Council Reviewed By Richard Wheatley Approved for Release By Scott Nicholson
SYDNEY Level 4, 99 Walker Street, NORTH SYDNEY, NSW 2060 TEL +61 2 9493 9700, FAX +61 2 9493 9799 Stantec │ MidCoast Council │ Updated April 2021 Project No.: 300303090 │ Our ref: 300303090
REVISION SCHEDULE Rev No.
Signature or Typed Name (documentation on file) Date
Description
Prepared by
Checked by
Reviewed by
Approved by
1
20/03/2020
Draft for comment
BC
BC
FG
FG
2
07/05/20
Final Preparation
BC
FG
AK
FG
3
17/06/20
Final Reviewed
FG
FG
12/04/21
Updated to include additional information in 8.5 Hallidays Point & 8.8 Nabiac, and Public Consultation Comments table
4
RW
SN
Stantec │ MidCoast Council │ Updated April 2021 Project No.: 300303090 │ Our ref: 300303090
SN
MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan
CONTENTS 1.
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1
Background ................................................................................................................................................ 1
1.2
Reference Documentation ....................................................................................................................... 1
1.3
Study Area .................................................................................................................................................. 1
1.4
Aim of Study ............................................................................................................................................... 2
2.
Objectives .................................................................................................................................................. 3
3.
What is a PAMP and Bike Plan .................................................................................................................. 4
4.
Projects and Facility Types ........................................................................................................................ 5
4.1
Pedestrians ................................................................................................................................................. 5
4.2
Bicycle facilities ........................................................................................................................................ 10
5.
Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 13
5.1
Crash Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 13
5.2
Site Inspections ......................................................................................................................................... 15
5.3
Stakeholder Meetings .............................................................................................................................. 15
5.4
Off Road Facilities .................................................................................................................................... 15
6.
Community Consultation ........................................................................................................................ 16
6.1
Survey ........................................................................................................................................................ 16
6.2
Public Meeting Sessions ........................................................................................................................... 19
7.
Issues and Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 21
7.1
Regional .................................................................................................................................................... 21
7.2
Bulahdelah ............................................................................................................................................... 25
7.3
Forster/ Tuncurry ....................................................................................................................................... 26
7.4
Gloucester / Stroud .................................................................................................................................. 29
7.5
Hallidays Point .......................................................................................................................................... 32
7.6
Harrington ................................................................................................................................................. 35
7.7
Hawks Nest/ Tea Gardens ....................................................................................................................... 38
7.8
Nabiac ...................................................................................................................................................... 41
7.9
Old Bar ...................................................................................................................................................... 43
7.10
Pacific Palms ............................................................................................................................................ 46
7.11
Taree ......................................................................................................................................................... 49
7.12
Wingham .................................................................................................................................................. 52
7.13
Other Locations ........................................................................................................................................ 53
8.
Recommendations and Projects ........................................................................................................... 57
8.1
Regional .................................................................................................................................................... 57 Stantec │ MidCoast Council
│ Updated April 2021
Status: Draft for Comment │ Project No.: 300303090 │ Our ref: Draft PAMP and Bike Plan MidCoast Council 12 Apr 21
8.2
Bulahdelah ............................................................................................................................................... 58
8.3
Forster/ Tuncurry ....................................................................................................................................... 59
8.4
Gloucester / Stroud .................................................................................................................................. 61
8.5
Hallidays Point .......................................................................................................................................... 63
8.6
Harrington ................................................................................................................................................. 64
8.7
Hawks Nest/ Tea Gardens ....................................................................................................................... 66
8.8
Nabiac ...................................................................................................................................................... 68
8.9
Old Bar & Wallabi Point ........................................................................................................................... 70
8.10
Pacific Palms & Smith Lake ..................................................................................................................... 72
8.11
Taree ......................................................................................................................................................... 74
8.12
Wingham & Tinonee ................................................................................................................................ 75
8.13
Other ......................................................................................................................................................... 77
8.14
Maps ......................................................................................................................................................... 78
9.
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................... 93
LIST OF TABLES Table 4-1 Types of bicycle facility ........................................................................................................................ 10 Table 5-1: Crash Severity ( 5-year priod 2014-2019) .......................................................................................... 13 Table 5-2: Crash Road Speed ( 5-year priod 2014-2019) ................................................................................... 13 Table 6-1: Survey Response Summary .................................................................................................................. 16 Table 6-2: Public Meeting Locations .................................................................................................................... 19 Table 8-1: Assessment Function Weightings ....................................................................................................... 57 Table 8-2: Cost Banding ....................................................................................................................................... 57 Table 8-3: Bulahdelah Projects ............................................................................................................................. 58 Table 8-4: Forster / Tuncurry Projects .................................................................................................................... 59 Table 8-5: Gloucester Projects .............................................................................................................................. 61 Table 8-6: Hallidays Point Projects ........................................................................................................................ 63 Table 8-7: Harrington Projects............................................................................................................................... 64 Table 8-8: Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens Projects .................................................................................................... 66 Table 8-9: Nabiac Projects .................................................................................................................................... 68 Table 8-10: Old Bar Projects .................................................................................................................................. 70 Table 8-11: Pacific Palms & Smith Lake Projects ................................................................................................ 72 Table 8-12: Taree Projects .................................................................................................................................... 74 Table 8-13: Wingham Projects .............................................................................................................................. 75 Table 8-14: Other Projects ..................................................................................................................................... 77
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 4-1 Typical Urban Footpaths........................................................................................................................ 6 Figure 4-2: Suburban road with no formal path ................................................................................................... 6
Stantec │ MidCoast Council
│ Updated April 2021
Status: Draft for Comment │ Project No.: 300303090 │ Our ref: Draft PAMP and Bike Plan MidCoast Council 12 Apr 21
Figure 4-3 Typical Walking Trail ............................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 4-4 Typical Shared Path ............................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 4-5: Kerb Buildout at Uncontrolled Crossing ............................................................................................... 8 Figure 4-6: Controlled Crossing .............................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 4-7: Shade and Seating .............................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 5-1: Cycle Crash Locations ( 5-year priod 2014-2019)............................................................................ 14 Figure 5-2: Pedestrian Crash Locations ( 5-year priod 2014-2019).................................................................... 14 Figure 6-1: Overall Survey Word cloud................................................................................................................ 17 Figure 6-2: Overall survey Responses by Age ...................................................................................................... 18 Figure 6-3: Consultation Sessions ......................................................................................................................... 20 Figure 6-4: Consultation Plans ............................................................................................................................. 20 Figure 7-1: Do you use a Mobility Device? .......................................................................................................... 21 Figure 7-2: Tricycle ................................................................................................................................................ 21 Figure 7-3: Mobility Aid ......................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 7-4: How often do you walk? .................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 7-5: Why do you walk?............................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 7-6: How often do you Cycle? .................................................................................................................. 23 Figure 7-7: Why do you Cycle? ............................................................................................................................ 23 Figure 7-8: What are the key issues for you with walking and cycling? ............................................................ 24 Figure 7-9: Pathway in shopping area ................................................................................................................ 25 Figure 7-10: Local Waymarking ........................................................................................................................... 25 Figure 7-11: Midblock Crossing ............................................................................................................................ 26 Figure 7-12: Wayfinding and Riverside Shared Path .......................................................................................... 26 Figure 7-13: Age - Forster / Tuncurry..................................................................................................................... 27 Figure 7-14: Why do you walk - Forster / Tuncurry ............................................................................................... 27 Figure 7-15: Why do you Cycle - Forster / Tuncurry ............................................................................................ 28 Figure 7-16: Retail areas is Stroud (Top) and Gloucester (Bottom) .................................................................. 29 Figure 7-17: Mobility Scooter in Gloucester ........................................................................................................ 29 Figure 7-18: Age - Gloucester / Stroud ................................................................................................................ 30 Figure 7-19: Why do you walk - Gloucester / Stroud .......................................................................................... 30 Figure 7-20: Why do you Cycle - Gloucester / Stroud ........................................................................................ 31 Figure 7-21: Red Head Road ............................................................................................................................... 32 Figure 7-22: Diamond Beach Road ..................................................................................................................... 32 Figure 7-23: Age - Hallidays Point ......................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 7-24: Why do you walk - Hallidays Point ................................................................................................... 33 Figure 7-25: Why do you Cycle - Hallidays Point ................................................................................................. 34 Figure 7-26: Harrington Road near Lazzarini Drive ............................................................................................. 35 Figure 7-27: Road Crossing near Wards Creek ................................................................................................... 35 Figure 7-28: Age - Harrington ................................................................................................................................ 36 Figure 7-29: Why do you walk - Harrington .......................................................................................................... 36 Figure 7-30: Why do you Cycle - Harrington ....................................................................................................... 37 Stantec │ MidCoast Council
│ Updated April 2021
Status: Draft for Comment │ Project No.: 300303090 │ Our ref: Draft PAMP and Bike Plan MidCoast Council 12 Apr 21
Figure 7-31: Local Waymarking ........................................................................................................................... 38 Figure 7-32: Singing Bridge – Narrow Pathways ................................................................................................. 38 Figure 7-33: Age - Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens ..................................................................................................... 39 Figure 7-34: Why do you walk - Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens ............................................................................... 39 Figure 7-35: Why do you Cycle - Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens ............................................................................. 40 Figure 7-36: Constrained Pathway ...................................................................................................................... 41 Figure 7-37: Robertson Street ............................................................................................................................... 41 Figure 7-38: Main Shopping area ........................................................................................................................ 43 Figure 7-39: Suburban Path .................................................................................................................................. 43 Figure 7-40: Age - Old Bar ..................................................................................................................................... 44 Figure 7-41: Why do you walk - Old Bar ............................................................................................................... 44 Figure 7-42: Why do you Cycle - Old Bar ............................................................................................................. 45 Figure 7-43: Boomerang Drive between Elizabeth Beach and Boomerang Beach ....................................... 46 Figure 7-44: Pathway near Pacific Palms School ............................................................................................... 46 Figure 7-45: Age - Pacific Palms ........................................................................................................................... 47 Figure 7-46: Why do you walk - Pacific Palms ..................................................................................................... 47 Figure 7-47: Why do you Cycle - Pacific Palms ................................................................................................... 48 Figure 7-48: Central area pathway ..................................................................................................................... 49 Figure 7-49: Crossing with central median ......................................................................................................... 49 Figure 7-50: Age - Taree ........................................................................................................................................ 50 Figure 7-51: Why do you walk - Taree .................................................................................................................. 50 Figure 7-52: Why do you Cycle - Taree ................................................................................................................ 51 Figure 7-53: Bent Street Crossing ......................................................................................................................... 52 Figure 7-54: Primrose Street Crossing ................................................................................................................... 52 Figure 7-55: Age - Other ........................................................................................................................................ 54 Figure 7-56: Why do you walk - Other .................................................................................................................. 54 Figure 7-57: Why do you Cycle - Other................................................................................................................ 55
APPENDICES Survey A.1
Survey Form
A.2
Survey Comments
A.3
Survey Issues Price and Cost Estimate Assumptions Project Register
Appendix D
Public Consultation Comments
Stantec │ MidCoast Council
│ Updated April 2021
Status: Draft for Comment │ Project No.: 300303090 │ Our ref: Draft PAMP and Bike Plan MidCoast Council 12 Apr 21
1.
Introduction
1.1
Background
The MidCoast Local Government Area (LGA) is located on the Mid North Coast of NSW, covering an area of 10,000km², including 196 settlements, 192km of coastline and home to a population of around 90,000. Mid-Coast Council is committed to developing pedestrian access, accessible footpaths, shared pathways, cycleways, bike facilities and community pedestrian / cycle systems to ensure effective links for its community. These links will contribute to health and wellbeing outcomes of our communities by encouraging active recreation and to encourage the incorporation of active transport networks into future development thus promoting positive environmental and social outcomes. •
The Mid Coast Council commissioned this study to develop a Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP) and a Bike Plan to Review of existing pedestrian, cycleway and access plans;
•
Determine the existing and future pedestrian and cycle key routes;
•
Identify opportunities for developing and enhancing pedestrian and cycle related activities and attractions for community members and visitors (including mountain biking and road cycling); and
•
Liaise with key stakeholders and the community to establish new priority programs for future planning and investment.
1.2
Reference Documentation
Greater Taree City Council’s Bike Plan Greater Taree City Council’s Pedestrian Access & Mobility Plan Great Lakes Council Bike Plan
1.3
Study Area
The Study Area included the whole Council area but more specifically the towns and villages locations noted on the plan below:
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 1
1.4
Aim of Study
The principal aims of the project are to: •
Determine improvements in the level of pedestrian access and priority, especially in areas of pedestrian concentration;
•
Provide links with other transport services, schools and other education facilities, retail and tourism areas;
•
Provide insights to make informed decisions regarding the optimisation of tourism opportunities for pedestrian links and cycle usage;
•
Review the existing Bike Plans, PAMPs, Disability Inclusions Access Plan along with any other plans related to pathway and cycleway programs;
•
Identify existing and proposed pedestrian and cycle routes, including missing links and facilities;
•
Undertake a review of current trends in the cycling market (e-bikes, women, mountain biking) plus identify existing and potential cycling destinations and experiences for visitors
•
Liaise with key stakeholders and local communities for both plans in coordinated approach;
•
Establish priority programs and projects for footpaths, shared paths and bicycle facilities that meet best practice and accessible requirements;
•
Prepare a PAMP and Bike Plan that covers the above aims plus set out the future requirement priorities for Council, with the two plans inter-related (i.e. shared pathways),
•
These plans are to be developed using best practice, current Australian guidelines and standards to ensure they provide the best outcomes for the community and Council.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 2
2.
Objectives
Pedestrians: •
To facilitate improvements in level of pedestrian access, particularly in areas of higher pedestrian concentration
•
To facilitate improvements in the level of personal mobility and safety for pedestrians with disabilities and older persons through the provisions of infrastructure and facilities which cater to the needs of all pedestrians.
•
To provide continuity of pedestrian access by identifying and enhancing safe and convenient crossing opportunities on major roads.
•
To identify and priorities infrastructure that can be implemented by Council through the operational and delivery plans.
•
To provide a framework for Council to apply for external funding primarily from other levels of government.
Bicycle: •
Provide a planning framework for the necessary infrastructure to provide for a safer and more comfortable cycling environment.
•
Increase the proportion of all trips undertaken by bike – by residents, workers and visitors.
•
Identify and improve bicycle tourism opportunities
•
Identify the short- and longer-term actions to be considered in the development of the operational and delivery plans.
•
Increase general health and fitness, reduce car dependency, improve air quality and decrease greenhouse gas emissions.
•
Provide a focus to advocate the lobbying of State and Federal Government for funding assistance
•
Ensure new developments align with the overall bike plan
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 3
3.
What is a PAMP and Bike Plan
There are a number of connections between walking and cycling (“active transport”) requirements given that cyclists / pedestrians often share the same facilities e.g. shared cycle / walking paths, pedestrian / cycle crossings including signalised facilities. This also is true of the document development processes for both PAMPs and Bike Plans. Both plans also link closely to the broader state and local government strategic transport and planning policies and vision statements. Mid Coast Council has adopted an approach to combine both a PAMP and Bike Plan into a single document (this report). The plan is a combination of measures to improve facilities for walking and cycling across the Mid Coast Council Region. Mid Coast Council is an amalgamation of three LGA areas of Gloucester Shire, Great Lakes and Greater Taree Councils. The amalgamation occurred in May 2016. Prior to amalgamation the development of these plans was at varying stages for the three councils. This document brings the full region to a common level allowing the prioritisation of projects across the region and providing a basis for funding applications to deliver the projects through internal council budgets and external funding including state and federal programs. This Plan combines elements from the PAMP and Bike Plans previously developed in the region and provides an overall structure for the future planning and implementation of projects. Background of PAMPs A PAMP is a comprehensive strategic and action plan that sets out policies and a framework for planning and developing pedestrian facilities to cater for all pedestrian requirements including recreation and commuter routes and may include provision for cyclists as well (shared facilities). The facilities should provide access for persons of all age groups and are suitable for wheelchairs. A PAMP’s focus is on co-ordinating investment and strategies to provide the community with safe, convenient and connected walking access and routes which have been identified through community engagement and collaboration with state and local authorities, developers and other key stakeholders. The PAMP identifies short, medium and longer-term objectives to meet policies, and targets such as health benefits and targets, safety, connectivity, tourism and sustainable economic growth. Background of Bike Plans A Bike Plan is similar to a PAMP except that the main focus is on setting policies and frameworks for planning and provision of cycling facilities. The plan will generally highlight past and current key projects and future aspirations including future funding targets along with objectives, priorities and programs to achieve these. Bike Plans are developed through local and state governments in conjunction with key stakeholders such as businesses, bicycle user groups and the wider community. Bike Plans look at connectivity and connecting the cycle network, encouragement of active transport, options/ treatments and projects and the barriers to making cycling as a viable alternative to motorised transport, safety and access for cyclists both for on or off road facilities, including the interaction between vehicles and pedestrians and provision of commuter, recreational and tourist routes.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 4
4.
Projects and Facility Types
4.1
Pedestrians
There are a number of standardised physical treatments available when identifying new projects and upgrades to existing infrastructure. There is also significant design resources available including: •
Australian Standards AS1742.9:2018
•
Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices - Bicycle Facilities
•
Austroads Guide to Road Design, Guide to Traffic Management and Guide to Road Safety
•
Cycling aspects of Austroads Guides (this is a compilation of cycling design elements across all of the Austroads Guides)
•
Australian-Spec Development Design Specifications
•
IPWEA Specifications and Guidelines
4.1.1
Pedestrian footpaths and walking trails
Footpaths are generally provided in urban areas sometimes on one or both sides of the road and can be sealed or unsealed. Walking trails tend to be in more rural areas or at access to open areas and bushlands, and they may or may not be sealed and may have a defined surface of crushed rock and other granular materials. They can also vary in width and gradient (slope) and sometimes have tactile ground surface indicators (TGSIs) at crossing points and intersections. Typically, weather / rest shelters are not provided on footpaths specifically for pedestrians seeking shelter from adverse weather and lighting requirements may vary depending on need and other requirements. Footpaths are generally two way and pedestrian movements are not controlled, however blocking of footpaths (except for approved works) is not permitted e.g. parking on a driveway where the vehicle protrudes across the footpath right of way. Cyclists are not permitted to ride on footpaths. However, children under 16 are permitted to ride on footpaths unless there is ‘no cycling’ signage installed. The exception to this is shared paths where cyclists and pedestrians share the same path. NSW road rules state cyclists must ride on the left and wear a helmet on shared facilities and ride at a speed suited to the to the environment. The following figures show typical footpaths and pedestrian facilities.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 5
Figure 4-1 Typical Urban Footpaths
Figure 4-2: Suburban road with no formal path
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 6
Figure 4-3 Typical Walking Trail
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 7
Figure 4-4 Typical Shared Path
Figure 4-5: Kerb Buildout at Uncontrolled Crossing Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 8
Figure 4-6: Zebra Crossing
Figure 4-7: Shade and Seating Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 9
4.2
Bicycle facilities
Providing separated, off road, dedicated cycle facilities can be very expensive and most of the existing road networks don’t have the land space and capacity for separated facilities. In some areas, footpaths can be widened so that shared facilities can be provided but uptake on those paths will be dictated by demand, directness of travel and budgets. On road cycle facilities provide a better level of connectivity along desirable routes, however these facilities are dependent on whether there is enough available road space to be able to provide adequate separation of vehicles from cyclists. Because bicycles mostly rely on human pedal power to travel forward, they can be susceptible to steep changes in grade so for cycling to be attractive to more people road grades need to be considered when choosing network routes. Bicycle facilities that encourage tourism is increasing as more people are wanting to experience cycling as part of their holidays. Research states in 2019 that 2.2% of domestic overnight visitors went cycling and three-quarters of people cycling on a domestic holiday did it in a regional destination. Should bicycle facilities be designed to support tourtist attarctors then they are more likely to encourage people to visit these areas. Because cyclists can travel on-road, they are subject to the same road rules as all other vehicles. This means that they require some specialised treatments at high risk locations such as intersections and rail level crossings. Cyclists travelling to work require end of trip facilities such as lockers, bike storage and shower / changing rooms to be available. Table 4.1 shows the different types of cycle path facilities. Table 4-1 Types of bicycle facility Off Road
Separated Path
Provides separation from vehicles and pedestrians and are exclusively for cyclists. They are typically two way and located away from main traffic areas where space is available. They are generally expensive to construct and require considerable land.
Off Road
Shared Path
Provides separation from vehicles (except at intersections) and allows access for pedestrians and cyclists to use the same facility. There is no physical separation for cyclists and pedestrians, however sometimes a painted line delineating the cycle and pedestrian areas (usually for high volume areas). Shared paths are not always direct and more experienced cyclists may choose to ride on the road. Shared paths vary in width with a desired minimum width of 2.0m depending on space and demand.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 10
On Road
Exclusive Lane
Bicycle
These are typically dedicated road space exclusive for cycles (except when vehicles need to make turn into or from driveways or intersections). Often the lanes are coloured green or sometimes red to clearly show the demarcation from vehicle traffic lanes to the cycle lane. Lane width varies depending on cycle demand and are usually between 1.2m and 2.0m wide, depending on road space availability.
On Road
Advisory or Marked Bicycle Lane
These lanes are similar to the exclusive lane but vehicles can drive on them when cyclists are not present and are provided where road space is limited and traffic volumes are lower. They have broken line rather than a solid line and are typically similar in width to exclusive cycle lanes.
On Road
Shoulder
Shoulders are not technically a cycle lane but offer a better level of separation from traffic. Wide sealed shoulders can and are used by cyclists, however on road parking means cyclists have to pull out to pass parked vehicles increasing the risk of a collision from passing traffic and being “doored” from drivers opening the door of the car. Debris can be a concern along these shoulders
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 11
On Road
On Road
Bicycle Awareness Zone (BAZ)
Typical 4 - Way Intersection signalised
These are painted bicycle markings positioned in the traffic lanes and are generally used to indicate to motorists that bicyclists may be in the road environment. Often these are used on roads where cyclists travel but there is limited road space to provide desiccated facilities. These markings have caused some confusion to all road users about what message they convey. Their use is becoming less common and many local authorities are not renewing these as the marking fades over time. Cycle lane treatments through intersections typically do not have any markings but do have advanced stop line areas where cyclists can position ahead of the traffic queues.
Source: Qld Police
Source: Georgiou Group Or
Source: Bicycle Network (Qld) On Road
Typical 3 - Way Intersection (T) – unsignalised
Cycle lanes at Tintersections operate the same way as normal vehicular conditions. In some cases a lane is marked across the intersection so motorists from the minor road are aware that cyclists are in the area.
Source: IRap toolkit (and VicRoads)
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 12
5.
Existing Conditions
5.1
Crash Analysis
Mid Coast Council supplied crash history information for incidents involving pedestrians and cyclists for the 5 years period between 2014 and 2019. Analysis of this data found a total of 68 incidents were recorded involving cyclists and 42 incidents with pedestrians (2 incidents included a bicycle and pedestrian). A breakdown of incidents by injury type and road speed limit are presented in Table 5-1and Table 5-2 Table 5-1: Crash Severity ( 5-year priod 2014-2019) Injury Type Minor / Other injury Moderate Injury Serious Injury Fatal Total
Cyclists 7 17 4 0 28
Pedestrians 11 17 14 0 42
Total 18 34 18 0 70
Table 5-2: Crash Road Speed ( 5-year priod 2014-2019) Speed Limit 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Total
Cyclists
Pedestrians
Total
1 12 8 1 1 1 3 1 28
3 24 7 1 2 1 3 1 42
4 36 15 2 3 2 6 2 70
The majority of recorded crashes occurred on roads with a speed limit of 60 kph or lower for both pedestrians and cyclists. This is potentially reflective of higher levels of use of lower speed roads by active travel users. The location of recorded crashes in the region is shown on Figure 5-1and Figure 5-2 for pedestrians and cyclists respectively. These heatmaps have stronger colours where a higher number of incidents are recorded. Generally, the recorded crashes are clustered near population centres including Taree, Forster and Wingham for both pedestrians and cyclists.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 13
Figure 5-1: Cycle Crash Locations ( 5-year priod 2014-2019)
Figure 5-2: Pedestrian Crash Locations ( 5-year priod 2014-2019)
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 14
5.2
Site Inspections
During the consultation period Stantec Staff undertook site inspections in each community visited in advance of the community consultation. Follow up inspections were undertaken to investigate specific issues raised at the community sessions and inform the projects included in this plan.
5.3
Stakeholder Meetings
Through the development of the report Stantec consulted with key stakeholders including council staff from the Transport and Tourism and Economic Development Teams and representatives of local organisations.
5.4
Off Road Facilities
The Kiwarrak Mountain Bike Park trails have been constructed by private users over the past 20 years and historically combine trails of a fast and flowing nature with purpose-built technical features using the natural contours of the land. The exclusively hand-cut trails have grown in popularity over the past five years due to the club’s efforts to promote them through races and events. Consequently, the Kiwarrak Mountain Bike Park is regarded by the wider mountain biking community as one of the best trail network systems on the East Coast of Australia. The Taree Criterion Track is 1.4km long sealed bicycle track that is located within the Taree Recreation Grounds. It is managed by the Manninhg Cycling Club that hosts regular timed race events and it one of the few tracks in NSW that has lighting allowing for night events.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 15
6.
Community Consultation
6.1
Survey
Residents of Mid Coast Council were invited to complete an online survey between Monday 15 November 2019 and Friday 17 January 2020. Paper copies of the survey were also available at Council offices and the consultation sessions. The survey aimed to gather information on how often and where people walked and cycle, issues they face while walking and cycling and the type of facilities which the community would like to see provided. Details of the Survey Questions are provided in Appendix A.1 The survey was promoted through the Council webpage, Facebook and at the community consultation sessions. A total of 396 response were received to the online survey. 150 respondents provided contact information and a follow-up message allowed them to provide additional comments not captured in the survey. Table 6-1 below provides a summary of the number of responses received from the towns and villages within the Mid Coast Council. Table 6-1: Survey Response Summary Locality
Number of Responses
Bulahdelah
0
Forster/ Tuncurry
114
Gloucester / Stroud
50
Hallidays Point
30
Harrington
14
Hawks Nest/ Tea Gardens
44
Nabiac
1
Old Bar
33
Pacific Palms
29
Taree
17
Wingham
8
Wallabi Point
8
Smiths Lake
6
Other (please specify)
40
The level of response to the survey was considered to be acceptable and to have gathered information from the wider region to supplement the data from the community consultation sessions.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 16
The Wordcloud below shows the key issues raised in the survey across the region as a whole, the size of the words shown reflects the frequency of their use in the comment boxes in the survey relating to issues and things that would encourage greater use of walking and cycling for travel.
Figure 6-1: Overall Survey Word cloud Analysis of the survey responses showed that the key issues raised were •
A lack of footpaths and cycle paths within communities
•
Problems with having to share space with vehicles
•
Maintenance of existing paths
•
Problems with crossing roads
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 17
Overall the survey responses were from 65% Female 35% Male and the gender split was reasonable consistent by location. Age of respondents is show in Figure 6-2.
Age - Overall (n=387) 0
5
10
15
20
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Figure 6-2: Overall survey Responses by Age Further details from the survey are provided in Section 7, Appendix A.2.and A.3
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 18
25
30
6.2
Public Meeting Sessions
Stantec facilitated Public Meetings at 11 locations through the Council region as detailed in Table 6-2. These sessions included presentation of the project objectives and interactive discussions based around local area and any issues or concerned raised by the attendees. Table 6-2: Public Meeting Locations Time & Date
Location
Attendees
25 November 6:00pm
Old Bar
8
26 November 11:00am
Pacific Palms
33
26 November 6:00pm
Tuncurry
7
27 November 10:00am
Taree
2
27 November 6:00pm
Halliday’s Point
16
28 November 6:00pm
Harrington
35
3 December 10:00am
Bulahdelah
4
3 December 6:00pm
Gloucester
12
4 December 6:00pm
Wingham
14
5 December 10:00am
Nabiac
5
5 December 10:00am
Hawks Nest
20
The project team appreciated and acknowledges the time given by members of the public to attend the community sessions and contribute to the development of the plan. At all the sessions there was active involvement and a willingness to participate in discussion while respecting different views.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 19
Figure 6-3: Consultation Sessions
Figure 6-4: Consultation Plans
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 20
7.
Issues and Analysis
7.1
Regional
7.1.1
Survey
Some of the key findings from the project survey are presented in the following section expanding on the content from Section 6.1.
Mobility Device Use
Yes
No
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Figure 7-1: Do you use a Mobility Device? While only a small portion of respondents have stated that they use mobility devices the need to use these can significantly restrict accessibility for users where there are no formal path facilities or where the design of routes introduces barriers for their use including footway cross fall and no or sub-standard pram ramps.
Figure 7-2: Tricycle
Figure 7-3: Mobility Aid
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 21
Walking > 10 Minutes - Overall (n=390) Every day A few times a week About once a week A few times a month Once a month Less than once a month Never 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percentage Figure 7-4: How often do you walk? The significant majority of respondents walk a few times a week or more reflecting that walking forms a key part of many trips even when a car is used for part of the journey.
Walking Reason - Overall (n=729) For exercise
For recreation
While on holiday / tourism
To work
To school / education 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Percentage Figure 7-5: Why do you walk? The main reasons given for walking are for exercise and recreation. Only a small proportion of respondents specifically gave traveling to work or education as a reason for walking.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 22
Cycle > 20 minutes - Overall (n=390) Every day A few times a week About once a week A few times a month Once a month Less than once a month Never 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Percentage Figure 7-6: How often do you Cycle? The levels of cycling reported in the survey responses are much lower and more infrequent than walking. Although slightly less than 30% never cycle the next largest group is those cycling a few times a week.
Cycle Destination - Overall (n=614) For exercise
For recreation
While on holiday / tourism
To work
To school / education 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Percentage Figure 7-7: Why do you Cycle? As with walking the main reasons given for cycling are exercise and recreation. The low proportion reporting cycling for work and education is an area where benefits could be realised if this can be increased.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 23
50
Issues - Overall (n=266) Accessibility Cycle paths Footpaths Maintenance Pedestrian crossings Poor bike use Traffic 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Percentage of Issues Figure 7-8: What are the key issues for you with walking and cycling? A common theme in the survey responses was that a lack of suitable pathways or routes for walking and cycling is a key issue for people who would walk and cycle. There is a concern around traffic and vulnerability for active travel users where the lack of alternative facilities results in a need to mix with larger vehicles.
7.1.2
Consultation
Overall comments received in the public consultation session indicated that: •
Some people would like to walk and cycle more but were put off by factors including lack of facilities, traffic, distance and convenience.
•
Longer distance routes linking communities would be nice to have.
•
Time between planning and delivery of projects was considered to be an issue in some areas with projects that have been in planning for a long time highlighted.
•
Standards of maintenance and including management of vegetation varied through the region. Some small changes such as cutting so clippings were not left on pathways would be a welcome change.
•
Measures like increased shade on routes, benches and water fountains would make the environment for walking and cycling better.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 24
7.2
Bulahdelah
7.2.1
General
Bulahdelah is a small town with a compact grid-based street system located just west of the Pacific Highway
Figure 7-9: Pathway in shopping area
Figure 7-10: Local Waymarking
There is a formal path network in most of the town centre shopping area but there are some missing links connecting key destinations. Waymarking is provided to assist in locating points of interest.
7.2.2
Questionnaire Survey
Specific survey data for Bulahdelah is not available with no local responses received.
7.2.3
Consultation
The Public consultation session at Bulahdelah was held at the school of arts and attended by 4 members of the community. Issues raised at the consultation included: •
A need to link existing pathways particularly in the core area by the shops and locations including the Tourist information Centre, Museum and Recreational Vehicle Park.
•
Lack of clarity around the use of the pathway on Stroud Street where the shoulder is separated using kerb sections (required for road drainage)
•
Opportunity to formalise some existing fire trails and pathways including waymarking to create longer local recreations loops
•
Pathway connecting new skate park to existing paths
•
Current informal crossings in the shopping area function reasonably despite long crossing distances and impact on parking would be a key issue for changes in this area. Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 25
7.2.4
Other
The key destinations identified in Bulahdelah are: •
Bowling Club
•
Swimming Pool
•
Showground
•
Nursing Home
•
School
•
Shopping Area
•
Tourist Information
•
RV Park
•
Courthouse Museum
•
Mountain Park
7.3
Forster/ Tuncurry
7.3.1
General
Forster and Tuncurry are coastal towns located to the south and north of the Coolongolook River. They are a popular tourist destination and serve as a key local centre with provision of Employment, Retail, Education and other services for the surrounding area. Within the Town Centres there is a high level of provision for formal pathways and cycle facilities including options for recreational walking and cycling along the coast and river.
Figure 7-11: Midblock Crossing
Figure 7-12: Wayfinding and Riverside Shared Path
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 26
7.3.2
Questionnaire Survey
Specific survey data results for Forster / Tuncurry are presented in the following figures.
Forster/Tuncurry - Age (n=114) 18-24
Under 18
25-34
65+
35-44
55-64
45-54
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Figure 7-13: Age - Forster / Tuncurry In Figure 7-13 it can be seen that the main responses were reasonably even across the 35 and up age bands.
Walking Reason - Forster / Tuncurry (n=204) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Percentage Figure 7-14: Why do you walk - Forster / Tuncurry
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 27
As with the overall survey response pattern Figure 7-14 shows that the main reasons given for walking are for exercise and recreation.
Cycling Destination - Forster / Tuncurry (n=170) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percentage Figure 7-15: Why do you Cycle - Forster / Tuncurry Again, as with the overall survey response and walking the main reasons given for cycling are for exercise and recreation. The main concerns raised in the survey for Forster / Tuncurry relate to footpaths and traffic. Crossings and maintenance also feature in the provided survey comments. Specific Issues raised through the survey included: •
Lack of pedestrian and cycle facilities along The Lakes Way with high vehicle speeds, varying width and no shoulder in some areas.
•
A need for separate facilities from areas with traffic
•
Difficulty getting round using a mobility scooter due to uneven paths and lack of paths / pram ramps.
•
Many roads where there was no pathway on the nature strip
7.3.3
Consultation
The Public consultation session for Forster and Tuncurry was held at the Forster Council Chambers and attended by 7 members of the community. Issues raised at the consultation included: •
Disjointed and unconnected sections of pathway and cycle routes
•
Lack of controlled crossings on some main roads meaning it was hard to cross over
•
Would like to see longer distance paths as existing ones in the town were quite short so limited for recreation and exercise on bikes
•
The Lakes way was not suitable for walking and cycling with no separate facility of continuous shoulder
7.3.4
Other
The key destinations identified in Forster / Tuncurry are: •
Schools
•
Beaches
•
Ocean Pool Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 28
•
Holiday Parks
•
Surf Lifesaving Club
•
TAFE
•
Skate Park
7.4
Gloucester / Stroud
7.4.1
General
Gloucester and Stroud are located in the west of the LGA along the Bucketts Way. Gloucester acts as a local centre and provides retail, employment and education services while Stroud is a smaller village with lower levels of services.
Figure 7-16: Retail areas is Stroud (Top) and Gloucester (Bottom)
Figure 7-17: Mobility Scooter in Gloucester
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 29
7.4.2
Questionnaire Survey
Specific survey data for Gloucester / Stroud is presented in the following figures.
Gloucester/Stroud - Age (n=50) Under 18
65+
25-34
18-24
35-44
55-64
45-54
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Figure 7-18: Age - Gloucester / Stroud In Figure 7-18 it can be seen that most respondents were over 35 in age.
Walking Reason - Gloucester / Stroud (n=102) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Percentage Figure 7-19: Why do you walk - Gloucester / Stroud Figure 7-19 shows that the majority of respondents walk for exercise and recreational reasons.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 30
Cycling Reason - Gloucester / Stroud (n=92) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Percentage Figure 7-20: Why do you Cycle - Gloucester / Stroud Figure 7-20 indicates that the main reasons given for cycling are also exercise and recreational. However, in this area tourism and on holiday also feature as reasons given. The survey text responses showed that the main concerns raised in the survey for Gloucester / Stroud included •
Links to neighbouring towns and villages
•
Cycle paths
•
Footpath
•
Traffic
•
Maintenance
•
Crossings
7.4.3
Consultation
The Public consultation session at Gloucester was held at the Senior Citizens Hall and attended by 12 members of the community. Issues raised at the consultation included: •
Links along Thunderbolts Way to Barrington
•
Conflict between bikes and pedestrians on the Heavy Vehicle Routes past the town centre
•
Need to replace the damaged bridge in the parklands
•
Missing sections of footpath to link to newly built areas
•
Hard to access the quiet roads in the local areas without using busy main roads
•
Steep pram ramps in some places
•
Issues with conflict between parking needs and access.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 31
7.4.4
Other
The key destinations identified in Gloucester / Stroud are: •
Schools
•
Aged Care Disability and Community Services
•
Council Offices
•
Aged Care Facilities
•
Parklands
7.5
Hallidays Point
7.5.1
General
Hallidays Point includes the settlements of Diamond Beach, Red head, Black Head and Tallwoods Village. These areas are generally linked by Diamond Beach Road and Blackhead Road which is a rural road with limited or no facilities for walking and cycling. Otherwise while the villages are close travel between them by active modes like walking and cycling is indirect and unattractive. Local facilities are located in Diamond Beach and Black Head
Figure 7-21: Red Head Road
Figure 7-22: Diamond Beach Road
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 32
7.5.2
Questionnaire Survey
Specific survey data for Hallidays Point is presented in the following figures.
Hallidays Point - Age (n=30) 65+
25-34
18-24
35-44
45-54 55-64
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Figure 7-23: Age - Hallidays Point It can be seen from Figure 7-23 that most respondents were over 35 in age.
Walking Reason - Hallidays Point (n=54) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Percentage Figure 7-24: Why do you walk - Hallidays Point Figure 7-24 shows that the majority of respondents walk for exercise and recreational reasons.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 33
Cycling Reason - Hallidays Point (n=50) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Percentage Figure 7-25: Why do you Cycle - Hallidays Point Figure 7-25 indicates that the main reasons given for cycling are also exercise and recreational. The survey text analysis showed that the main concerns raised in the survey for Hallidays Point included: •
Access between villages including Tallwoods separate from the main roads
•
Poor conditions for walking and cycling on Diamond Beach Road
•
A desire for longer distance routes to the north and south
7.5.3
Consultation
The Public consultation session at Hallidays Point was held at Black Head SLSC and attended by 30 members of the community. Issues raised at the consultation included: •
Connections between settlements
•
Conflict with traffic and poor options for cycling on existing roads
•
Desire for interim links as development may be many years away
•
Better facilities on Diamond Beach Road
•
Opening of easements and access from Tallwoods Village to Red Head
7.5.4
Other
The key destinations identified in Hallidays Point are: •
School
•
Red Head
•
Black Head
•
Skate Park
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 34
7.6
Harrington
7.6.1
General
Harrington is located in the north of the region at the mouth of the Manning River and is a popular tourist destination. There are 2 commercial areas with the main shopping facilities located among the newer development to the west of the original village. Further development is expected to the west in the area towards the Big 4 Park.
Figure 7-26: Harrington Road near Lazzarini Drive
Figure 7-27: Road Crossing near Wards Creek
There is an existing pathway along most of the waterfront with varying width and some missing sections. The crossing of wards creek results in a need to cross the road twice due to the width of the bridge and pedestrian facilities only on the north side. Crowdy Head is located to the north east and there are no formal facilities on the road which is used by vehicles including ones towing boat trailers which is intimidating to many active travel users.
7.6.2
Questionnaire Survey
Specific survey data for Harrington is presented in the following figures.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 35
Harrington - Age (n=14) 65+
25-34
35-44
55-64 45-54
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Figure 7-28: Age - Harrington In Figure 7-28 it can be seen that a large proportion of the survey responses were received from people over 55 followed by the 35-44 age group. The needs of older users can be different to younger ones but addressing their issues and concerns results in better facilities for all users.
Walking Reason - Harrington (n=20) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percentage Figure 7-29: Why do you walk - Harrington Figure 7-29 shows that while the main reasons given for walking are exercise and recreation which is consistent with the region as a whole some of the survey respondents do walk to work and school.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 36
Cycling Reason - Harrington (n=21) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Percentage Figure 7-30: Why do you Cycle - Harrington Figure 7-30 shows the main reason given for cycling is for exercise. Some respondents cycle to work but no responses showed cycling to school. Analysis of survey responses found that the main concerns raised in the survey for Harrington relate to Footpaths, Traffic and Cycling. Specific Issues raised through the survey included: •
Access for elderly and less able to the training wall pathways
•
Connection to the Harrington Waters foreshore
•
No path connection to the childcare centre resulting in a need to walk in road with prams
•
Desire for a path connecting to Crowdy Head
7.6.3
Consultation
The Public consultation session at Harrington was held at Club Harrington and attended by 35 members of the community. Issues raised at the consultation included: •
Connections between Harrington and Crowdy head
•
Pathway connection by Wards Creek Bridge requiring multiple road crossings
•
Connections from areas to the south through to the shops
•
Lighting on the waterfront pathway
•
Links around Beach Street Park
•
Gaps in existing pathway along waterfront (near boat ramp and Club Harrington)
7.6.4
Other
The key destinations identified in Harrington are: •
Bowling Club
•
Beach
•
School
•
Seafront
•
Caravan Park Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 37
•
Gold Course
•
Shops
•
Boat Ramp
•
Training wall (Breakwater)
Additionally, the Lighthouse and Beach / 4WB Beach at Crowdy head were highlighted.
7.7
Hawks Nest/ Tea Gardens
7.7.1
General
Hawks Nest and Tea Gardens are located in the south of the region and are connected by the Singing Bridge which crosses the Myall River. The towns are a popular tourist destination and have significant tourist volumes at peak seasons due to the location and beach access.
Figure 7-31: Local Waymarking
Figure 7-32: Singing Bridge – Narrow Pathways
There is a waymarked East – West walking and cycle route the largely avoids the main traffic route but in some areas there is no formal facility and considerable conflict between pedestrian,cycles and traffic exists. This is particularly apparent between Hawks Nest and Winda Woppa
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 38
7.7.2
Questionnaire Survey
Specific survey data for Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens is presented in the following figures.
Hawks Nest/Tea Gardens - Age (n=43) 25-34 45-54
65+ 55-64
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Figure 7-33: Age - Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens It can be seen in Figure 7-33 that a large proportion of the survey responses were received from people over 55 followed by the 45-54 age group. The needs of older users can be different to younger ones but addressing their issues and concerns results in better facilities for all users.
Walking Reason - Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Percentage Figure 7-34: Why do you walk - Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens Figure 7-34 shows that the main reasons given for walking are exercise and recreation which is consistent with the region as a whole.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 39
Cycling Reason - Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens (n=74) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Percentage Figure 7-35: Why do you Cycle - Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens Figure 7-35 shows the main reasons given for cycling are for exercise and recreational. A small number of respondent’s cycle to work but no responses showed cycling to school. The survey response analysis showed that the main concerns raised in the survey for Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens included: •
Cycle Paths
•
Footpaths
•
Singing Bridge with narrow paths and difficulty crossing the road on the west side
•
Accessibility
•
Traffic
•
Maintenance
7.7.3
Consultation
The Public consultation session at Hawks Nest and Tea Gardens was held at Tea Gardens Baptist Church and attended by 20 members of the community. Issues raised at the consultation included: •
Paths and connections by the Singing Bridge
•
Road Crossings
•
Lack of pathways connecting Peter Sinclair Gardens to Shops and local facilities
•
Streets with no formal pathways
•
Conflict between vehicles and pedestrians at peak times.
•
Lack of walking and bike link to Winda Woppa
•
Inconsistent waymarking
7.7.4
Other
The key destinations identified in Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens are: •
Tourist Information Centre
•
Shops
•
Church Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 40
•
Pub
•
Boat Ramp
•
Myall Quays Shopping Precinct
•
Jimmys Beach
•
Singing Bridge
•
Caravan Park
7.8
Nabiac
7.8.1
General
Nabiac is a small settlement adjacent to the Pacific Highway and provides a popular stopping point for passing traffic. The town is largely linear with most attractions and facilities located in the southern area.
Figure 7-36: Constrained Pathway
7.8.2
Figure 7-37: Robertson Street
Questionnaire Survey
Specific survey data for Nabiac is not available as no respondents gave Nabiac as their location.
7.8.3
Consultation
The Public consultation session at Nabiac was held at The Showgrounds and attended by 5 members of the community. Issues raised at the consultation included: •
Connections between town and the showground / library
•
Narrow paths in the shopping area Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 41
•
Vehicles speeds in the shopping area due to close location to highway off ramps
•
Road Crossings near the shops
•
Opportunities to provide loop walks in the area near town
•
Short missing links with no formal paths
7.8.4
Other
The key destinations identified in Nabiac are: •
Childcare - Martin Street
•
Boat Ramp - Wharf Street
•
Church - Clarkson Street
•
Museum - Clarkson Street
•
School - Hoskins Street
•
Shops
•
Pre-School - Nabiac Street
•
Library - Nabiac Street
•
Show Ground & Playing Field on Showground Lane
•
Swimming Pool
•
Doctors Surgery
•
Free Camping
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 42
7.9
Old Bar
7.9.1
General
Old Bar and Wallabi Point are located on the coast east of Taree. Local facilities including shops and schools are located in Old Bar and the two settlements are connected by Saltwater Road which offers no dedicated facilities for walking or cycling. In the central area formal pathways are provided but these are very limited or absent away from this area.
Figure 7-38: Main Shopping area
7.9.2
Figure 7-39: Suburban Path
Questionnaire Survey
Specific survey data for Old Bar is presented in the following figures.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 43
Old Bar - Age (n=32) Under 18 65+
25-34
55-64
35-44
45-54
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Figure 7-40: Age - Old Bar In Figure 7-40 it can be seen that most age groups were represented in the survey responses.
Walking Reason - Old Bar (n=79) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Percentage Figure 7-41: Why do you walk - Old Bar
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 44
Figure 7-41 shows that in common with other areas that most respondents walk for exercise and recreation with a small but significant number of responses stating for work, education and on holiday.
Cycling Reason - Old Bar (n=51) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
10
20
30
40
50
Percentage Figure 7-42: Why do you Cycle - Old Bar Figure 7-42 shows main reasons given for cycling is for exercise and recreation. Specific Issues raised through the survey included: •
Traffic
•
Footpaths
•
Cycle Paths
•
Maintenance
7.9.3
Consultation
The Public consultation session at Old Bar was held at Club Old Bar and attended by 8 members of the community. Issues raised at the consultation included: •
A lack of pathways making access and walking difficult
•
A need for better links for walking and cycling between Old Bar and Wallabi Point
•
A desire flor long distance coastal routes for recreation and tourism
7.9.4
Other
The key destinations identified in Old Bar are: •
School
•
Playing Fields
•
Bowls Club
•
Shops
•
Beach
•
Camping Grounds
•
Nursing Home Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 45
7.10
Pacific Palms
7.10.1 General The Pacific Palms community includes a number of settlements along Boomerang Drive and The Lakes Way. While there are formal pathways within the settlements connections between them are on roads with no pathways and often with limited shoulders and higher vehicle speeds. There is access to a number of beaches in the area and it is popular with tourists in peak seasons leading to issues with parking affecting access for other modes.
Figure 7-43: Boomerang Drive between Elizabeth Beach and Boomerang Beach
Figure 7-44: Pathway near Pacific Palms School
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 46
7.10.2 Survey Specific survey data for Pacific Palms is presented in the following figures.
Pacific Palms - Age (n=26) 65+
18-24
35-44
45-54 55-64
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Figure 7-45: Age - Pacific Palms In Figure 7-45 it can be seen that the majority of responses were from people over 45.
Walking Reason - Pacific Palms (n=50) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percentage Figure 7-46: Why do you walk - Pacific Palms Figure 7-46 shows that the majority of respondents walk for exercise and recreation
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 47
Cycling Reason - Pacific Palms (n=40) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percentage Figure 7-47: Why do you Cycle - Pacific Palms It can been seen in Figure 7-47 that the main reason given for cycling is for exercise and recreation with work and for education not featuring which reflects the limited opportunities to access these by bike in the area. Specific Issues raised through the survey included: •
Lack of Footpaths
•
Lack of Cycle Paths
•
Traffic
•
Maintenance
7.10.3 Consultation The Public consultation session at Pacific Palms was held at the Community Hall and attended by 33 members of the community with equal numbers from Pacific Palms and Smiths Lake. Issues raised at the consultation included: •
A need for pathways along Boomerang Drive connecting areas
•
A desire for a recreational loop
•
Issues with walking and cycling on The Lakes Way
•
Problems with longer distance cycling due to traffic volumes and speed on the Lakes Way
•
High parking demand at peak times causing problems for access by bike and foot
7.10.4 Other The key destinations identified in Pacific Palms are: •
Beaches
•
School
•
Shops and Cafes
•
Community Hall
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 48
7.11
Taree
7.11.1 General Taree is the largest town in the Mid Coast Council Region and is a major centre for employment and retail. The town is located on the banks of the Manning River with the majority located on the northern side where a grid based street network allows a high level of accessibility and permeability for active travel.
Figure 7-48: Central area pathway
Figure 7-49: Crossing with central median
There is a high quality pathway network in the town centre but this has areas where path surfaces and levels make accessibility difficult for less mobile users.
7.11.2 Survey Specific survey data for Taree is presented in the following figures.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 49
Taree - Age (n=17) 65+ 18-24 25-34
35-44 55-64
45-54
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Figure 7-50: Age - Taree In Figure 7-50 it can be seen that survey responses were mostly from older respondents but that a larger number of people under 18 responded than in other areas.
Walking Reason - Taree (n=33) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
10
20
30
40
50
Percentage Figure 7-51: Why do you walk - Taree Figure 7-51 shows that while exercise and recreation are still the main reasons given for walking that a significant response of work is also given. This reflects the nature of Taree as a major employment centre in the region and accessibility of employment locations to nearby residential areas.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 50
Cycling Reason - Taree (n=24) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percentage Figure 7-52: Why do you Cycle - Taree In Figure 7-52 the main reasons given for cycling by respondents from Taree are for exercise and recreation. This potentially reflects the available cycling facilities and shows there is potential to increase the number of cyclists in the town. Analysis of the survey responses showed that the main concerns in the area related to •
Footpaths
•
Cycle Paths
•
Maintenance
•
Accessibility
•
Traffic
•
Crime
Specific Issues raised through the survey included: •
Lack of formal paths outside the centre of town
•
Extension of the riverside path and link along Browns Creek
•
Better links to surrounding towns and areas
7.11.3 Consultation The Public consultation session at Taree was held at the council offices and attended by 2 members of the community. Issues raised at the consultation included: •
Quality of path surfaces and maintenance
•
Long delays when crossing at signals
•
Green time for pedestrians sometime short if less mobile
•
No path on High Street
•
Missing or steep pram ramps
•
Links in and around Brown Creek
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 51
7.11.4 Other The key destinations identified in Taree are: •
Railway Station
•
Town Centre
•
Shopping Areas
•
Schools
•
Biripi Way – Proposed new Council offices.
•
Sports Centre
•
Riverfront
•
Rowing and Sailing Club
7.12
Wingham
7.12.1 General Wingham is located to the west of Taree and provides local service for a large surrounding catchment. The main retail, services and employment areas are located to the south of the railway which limits connections between the north and south of the town to the Overhead Bridge and level crossing on Primrose Street. The main route connecting Wingham and Taree is constrained by the bridge over Cedar Party Creek to the north of the town.
Figure 7-53: Bent Street Crossing
Figure 7-54: Primrose Street Crossing
Within the southern portion of the town there is a good formal path network but there are a number of wide road crossings with limited provision for pedestrians.
7.12.2 Questionnaire Survey Due to the low number of responses from Wingham no detailed analysis is available. However, the received responses were generally in line with the wider area and analysis of survey text showed key issues related to: •
Paths
•
Accessibility
Specific Issues raised through the survey included: •
Lack of a walking and cycle link to Taree
•
Need for better paths and tracks around town
•
Lack of a path to the sports complex Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 52
7.12.3 Consultation The Public consultation session at Wingham was held at the Services Club and attended by 14 members of the community. Issues raised at the consultation included: •
Lack of paths on streets north of the railway
•
Links towards Taree and access past Bridge and Railway Crossing to the north
•
Road crossings
•
Desire for a route giving greater access to the river
•
Need for better path connections to the School on Murray Road
•
New Developments with paths not connecting to wider existing path network
7.12.4 Other The key destinations identified in Wingham are: •
Park
•
High School
•
Pre-School
•
Abattoir
•
3 x Primary Schools
•
Town Centre Shops
•
Wingham Brush
•
River
•
Men’s Shed
7.13
Other Locations
In addition to the locations identified for specific consultation input for the project was also received from other communities where members attended consultation sessions and responded to the online survey. Key locations in this category included: •
Coomba Park
•
North Arm Cove
•
Smiths Lake
•
Tinonee
•
Wallabi Point (included in Old Bar section)
7.13.1 Survey Specific survey data for the remaining locations is presented in the following figures.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 53
Other - Age (n=52) 25-34
65+
35-44
45-54
55-64
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Figure 7-55: Age - Other In Figure 7-55 it can be seen that survey responses were mostly from older respondents but that a larger number of people under 18 responded than in other areas.
Walking Reason - Other (n=91) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percentage Figure 7-56: Why do you walk - Other Figure 7-56 shows that while exercise and recreation are still the main reasons given for walking that some trips in the wider region are for work and education.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 54
Cycling Reason - Other (n=75) For exercise For recreation While on holiday / tourism To work To school / education 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Percentage Figure 7-57: Why do you Cycle - Other In Figure 7-57 the main reasons given for cycling by respondents from other areas are for exercise and recreation. Tourism and to work also feature as a reason for tips more than in most other areas. Analysis of the survey responses showed that the main concerns in the other areas related to •
Footpaths
•
Cycle Paths
•
Maintenance
•
Traffic and conflict with cycles and pedestrians where there are no specific facilities
Specific Issues raised included: •
•
•
Coomba Park ○
Hard to walk between sections of village with no walkable verge or shoulder on Mooroomba Road where vehicle speeds are higher
○
Formalisation of path around lakefront including improved access for less able people, Aquatic Club hosts sailability events so greater viewing opportunities of activities would be beneficial.
North Arm Cove ○
Vehicle speeds and conflict where no paths provided
○
Missing connection on the Esplanade
Smiths Lake ○
Lack of pathways and narrow roads with no verge, very hard to walk when cars parked on the roads
○
Vehicle Speeds on narrow local roads
○
Access to the Shops
○
Desire for greater access along the lakeshore
○
Completion of the pathway from the skate park to bowling club past shops to Mackwood Road and Casson Road
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 55
•
Tinonee ○
Lack of formal pathways in town
○
Issue with upgrade works where a level verge has become steeper so no suitable for walking on
○
Desire for a recreational loop path
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 56
8.
Recommendations and Projects
The Tables in the following section present projects identified through the development of the plan which can be considered for future development and delivery. A score is allocated to each project which has been developed though an assessment of the project benefits under the following categories: •
Tourism – where a project has benefit for tourism use
•
Recreational – where a project offers benefit for recreational use
•
School – where a project enhances access to a school or other education facility
•
Shopping – where a project provides access to shopping facilities
•
Employment – where a project improves access to employment areas
•
Elderly – where a project improves access for elderly or less mobile users
•
Safety – where a project addressed potential safety issues
Following a workshop with Council it was decided to apply the following weightings to the categories to reflect the overall Council priorities. This approach allows the relative merits of projects to be considered within settlements and across the region as a whole. Table 8-1: Assessment Function Weightings Function
Weighting
Tourism
1
Recreational
1
School
2
Shopping
1
Employment
1
Elderly
2
Safety
3
High level project costings have been developed using standard rates and assumptions supplied by MidCoast Council and the following approach has been used to summarise these in the following sections. Further details are provided in 0 Table 8-2: Cost Banding Cost
Weighting
Low
Under $50,000
Medium
$50,000 to $200,000
High
$200,000 to $1,000,000
Very High
Over $1,000,000
8.1
Regional
The following projects are recommended for consideration across the whole council region: •
Ongoing maintenance of pedestrian and cycle facilities including vegetation management
•
Review of compliance of existing pathways and crossings with current legislative requirements including provision of pram ramps.
•
Ongoing review of waymarking and promotion for pathways and connecting routes
•
Preference for any new or upgraded pathways to be suitable for shared cycle and pedestrian use and constructed at a minimum width of 2m
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 57
8.2
Bulahdelah
Following consideration of the information gathered through the study the following issues and interventions have been identified for consideration as future projects for the area. Full details including the function weightings are provided in Appendix D Table 8-3: Bulahdelah Projects Number
8.2.1 8.2.2 8.2.3 8.2.4 8.2.5 8.2.6 8.2.7 8.2.8 8.2.9
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Crawford Street, btw Blanch Street to Meade Street Meade Street, btw Stroud and Crawford Stroud Street (whole length)
Connectivity
New Footpath
220
-
Connectivity
New Footpath
60
-
Clarifying Shared Use
Signage & Linemarking
700
-
Existing Fire Trail between Alum Mountain Park and Stuart Street Old Pacific Highway, btw Stroud Street and information centre Courthouse Muesum to Old Pacific Highway
Formalisation of Bike Track
Way Finding & Path Upgrade
1400
-
Connectivity
New Footpath
60
-
Connectivity
New Footpath
180
-
Skate Club to bowling club Retain informal crossing points
Connectivity
New Footpath
1600
-
Upgrade required
Linemarking
-
Linkage
New / Upgraded FP Regrading
300
retention of parking very important, preference to retain informal crossings -
100
-
Link to RV Park
Score
Cost Band
20
Medium
17
Low
22
Low
9
Low
17
Low
15
Medium
20
High
13
Medium
16
Medium
14
Low
8.2.10
Stroud Street, btw Post Office and Bakery
Pedestrian Safety
8.2.11
Ann Street, beyond the courthouse
Connectivity
New Footpath
500
path from Ann Street to the picnic area located on top of the hill
13
High
Pedestrian Safety
Signage
-
Request for a "Watch Out, Scooters About " Sign
12
Low
8.2.12
Stuart Street
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 58
Number
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Score
Cost Band
Recreation
New Footpath
200
-
10
Medium
8.2.14
Buladelah Way Bridge to the lake Lakes Way, Buladelah to Foster
Township Links
Shared Path
-
Connectivity for cyclists between the two townships is desired
13
High
8.2.15
The Wootton Way (Old Highway)
Township Links
Shared Path
-
13
High
Other
Council Consideration
-
Opportunity to use Old Highway as part of a strategic longer distance route Heavy Vehicle driving between Bulahdelah Way Bridge to Pacific Highway utilising Stroud Street.
8.2.13
8.2.16
8.3
Stroud Street (whole length)
14
Forster/ Tuncurry
Following consideration of the information gathered through the study the following issues and interventions have been identified for consideration as future projects for the area. Full details including the function weightings are provided in Appendix D Table 8-4: Forster / Tuncurry Projects Number
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Score
Cost Band
lack of controlled crossing points makes access between homes and school / shops difficult
16
Medium
provide shared path along foreshore to Forster Public School
0
High
8.3.1
Macintosh Street (south Steet and Head street highlighted)
Connectivity
crossing points
8.3.2
Pebbly Beach to Hadley Street
connectivity
shared path
8.3.3
Little Street
Connectivity
shared path
existing pathway is discontinuous
13
Medium
8.3.4
Lakes Way between Breese Parade and King George Parade
shared path
no continuous shared path, link between school and residential to retail area. Some sections on road shoulder.
15
High
Connectivity
800
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 59
Number
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes no pathway so currently need to walk on verge. Path on northern side - second path on southern side and widen. no formal bike provision, opportunity for link of quieter north south street avoiding local hill
Score
Cost Band
15
Low
7
Low
8.3.5
The Southern Parkway from Cape Hawke Drive to Forster retail
connectivity
shared path
8.3.6
Underwood Road Strand Street to Cliff Road
connectivity
bike provision
8.3.7
The Lakes Way from Forster township to Pacific Palms
connectivity
shared path
Link adjacent to the lakes way to Pacific Palms
14
Low
8.3.8
Riverside Pathway
connectivity
shared path
13
Very High
8.3.9
Extend Riverside path on Point Road to Caravan Park
desire for an extended riverside path as an alternative to the lakes way and possible tourist attraction
connectivity
shared path
8.3.10
South Street near Capel Street, Tuncurry
safety
crossing points
no crossing near oval and school
10
Low
8.3.11
North of Tuncurry
Connectivity
shared path
Long distance link to Hallidays Point
16
Very High
8.3.12
The Lakes Way
safety
cycle facility
14
High
8.3.13
The Lakes Way
Connectivity
Shared Path
10
Low
Low
80
Missing link to Motel
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 60
8.4
Gloucester / Stroud
Following consideration of the information gathered through the study the following issues and interventions have been identified for consideration as future projects for the area. Full details including the function weightings are provided in Appendix D Table 8-5: Gloucester Projects Number
8.4.1
8.4.2
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Town Centre to Council offices link required
Connectivity
New footpaths
220
Pram Ramps around town
Grade
Review of Pram Ramp Design Standards
-
Trees in Gloucester
Trees
Council Consideration
-
Eucalyptus Red drop branches and Crate Myrles have dangerous trip hazard sprouts. Council should consider this when selecting vegetation adjacent to footpaths, roads and cycleways.
Town Centre to Council offices link required
discontinuity
Connect existing paths
220
-
Phillip Street between Church Street (east of Ravenshaw) Clement Street between Rodgers Street and High School Intersection of Phillip Street & Boundary Street to Thunderbolts Way Dennison Street car park
Connectivity
New footpath
350
-
Connectivity
New footpath
350
Connectivity
New footpath
1200
New nursing being constructed will be installing the missing section. This is the signpost heavy vehicle route
Connectivity
New footpath
50
Anzac Park
Connectivity
New footpath
300
Only half of the car park has a path 3x100 for the edges
Church Street
General Maintenance
Resheet
10
trip hazard in front of IGA
8.4.3
8.4.4 8.4.5 8.4.6 8.4.7 8.4.8 8.4.9 8.4.10
Notes Consideration for road crossing on Ravenshaw Street should be required Pram ramps are too steep which results in mobility scooters using the road
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 61
Score
Cost Band
17
Medium
10
Low
17
Medium
15
Medium
14
High
8
Low
14
Medium
7
Number
Location Intersections along Ravenshaw Street x 5
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Intersection Upgrade and provision of crossings
-
Connectivity
Shared Path
Pedestrian bridge out of Commission Connectivity
Safety
8.4.13 8.4.14 8.4.15 8.4.16 8.4.17 8.4.18 8.4.19
Score
Cost Band
State Route? Conflict between Movement and Place function with 5 intersections
21
High
3000
Highschool runs a program taking students cycling 1/week
16
Very High
New Bridge
20
Has been repaired
New Footpath
1000
-
14
High
Connectivity/ tourism/ recreation Surface of Road Tourism/ Recreation
Shared Path
6500
Desire for a cycle link between the two townships
13
Very High
regrading
-
trip hazards along this road
9
Medium
Way finding
18000
Opportunity for longer recreational bike roads
9
Low
Thunderbolt way between Gloucester and Barrington Pathways at rear of Henderson Street
Road Safety
Speed Zoning Review
Maintenance
Maintenance
Local Road Network
Opportunity
Way finding
8.4.11
8.4.12
Notes
Links from Highschool to wider quiet road network Path in Gloucester Park, pedestrian bridge Argyle Street, Barrington between Skye Road and Red Gum Road Thunderbolt way between Gloucester and Barrington Queen Street Barrington West Road Loop
For Transport for NSW consideration, request to reduce from 100km to 80 km Drive mower such that clippings do not land on the path Potential way finding mapping would allow various groups already riding to Gloucester to utilise more paths
8.4.20
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 62
8.5
Hallidays Point
Following consideration of the information gathered through the study the following issues and interventions have been identified for consideration as future projects for the area. Full details including the function weightings are provided in Appendix D Table 8-6: Hallidays Point Projects Number
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Score
Cost Band
There is a desire to have the three beaches connected
12
Very High
17
High
22
Very High
8.5.1
Diamond Beach, Red Head and Blackhead
Connectivity
New Footpaths
5000
8.5.2
Baywood Drive to Scarborough Circuit
Connectivity
New footpaths
1000
Diamond Beach Road between Blackhead Road and Fantail Rise
Connectivity/ Safety
Shared path
2600
Blackhead connection to tuncurry cycle path, tuncurry footpath and to Tuncurry Diamond Beach
Connectivity
tbd
Connectivity
Disable access to beach required Re-open Road
8.5.3
8.5.4
8.5.5
8.5.6
8.5.7
8.5.8
Re Opening western leg of intersection Diamond Beach Road & Red Head Road Intersection of Red Head Road, Diamond Beach Road and Eastern Valley Way Blackhead Road between Diamond Beach Road and The Boulevard, Tallwoods
tbc
3.0m shared path design was approved for this location before Council amalgamation
Very High
800
Road Safety
Road Safety Audit
n/a
Connectivity
New footpath
2000
Road could also be formalised as Bike/ foot path
19
High
Link to existing pathway to Blackhead
12
Medium
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 63
8.6
Harrington
Following consideration of the information gathered through the study the following issues and interventions have been identified for consideration as future projects for the area. Full details including the function weightings are provided in Appendix D Table 8-7: Harrington Projects Number
8.6.1
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Harrington & Crowdy Head
Connectivity
create links
-
existing path links along most of the waterview, issues with connectivity on bridge
Beach Street Park
Connectivity
New footpath
300
8.6.2
8.6.3
Seafront Connection past bowling club
Connectivity
new footpath or boardwalk
370
difficulty extreme
Wards Creek Bridge
Creates Multiple crossing manoeuvres for pedestrians
crossing improvement
50
interim solution recognising bridge will be upgrade in the medium term
connectivity
new footpath
8.6.4
8.6.5
8.6.6
8.6.7
providing access within parkland and to rear of parking bays, key missing link for continuous pathway through the community
Connection of path to boat ramp adjacent to Oyster farm Scott Street between Beach Road and Muir Road Beach Road near IGA
100
sealing of car park could be complete concurrently
connectivity
new footpath
100
link with approved DA site and developer will construct path
connectivity/ crossing to Bus Stops
crossing
-
-
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 64
Score
Cost Band
21
Medium
16
Very High
21
Medium
11
Low
15
Low
12
Low
24
Medium
Number
8.6.8
8.6.9
8.6.10 8.6.11
Location Lazzarini Road to Faith Court
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
connectivity
new footpath
600
no connection for house development to IGA, mobility scooter utilise road. Very dangerous conditions popular route and desires to see two townships connected with safe shared pathways
Crowdy Head Road between Harrington and Crowdy Head
Safety
Provide shared path
6500
Harrington Road between Lazzirini and the Big 4 Waterfront Pathway
Connectivity
New footpath
1400
Pathway lighting
Lights
-
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 65
Score
Cost Band
17
Very High
17
Very High
21
Medium Medium
8.7
Hawks Nest/ Tea Gardens
Following consideration of the information gathered through the study the following issues and interventions have been identified for consideration as future projects for the area. Full details including the function weightings are provided in Appendix D Table 8-8: Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens Projects Number
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Score
Cost Band
-
-
Hawkes Nest
8.7.1
Throughout
8.7.2
East West Cycle Route
8.7.3
Singing Bridge
Amenity
n/a
-
Hawkes Nest identity is the natural bush landscape and the community is adamant that they do not want infrastructure that will later it. Consideration should be given to any proposed infrastructure enhancing the existing landscape
Consistency
Review of line marking and signage
-
To be determined
-
-
100
Loop exists on north side would be good to have a loop on south side which would allow one way usage. Clarification of signage in regard to cyclist dismount. Impossible to pass if two mobility scooters/ prams or wheelchair are on same pathway. Under bridge on south side could be difficult then pedestrian refuge on road
25
High
Narrow Pathway
signage, path
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 66
8.7.4
Swan Bay to Shops
8.7.5 8.7.6 8.7.7 8.7.8 8.7.9 8.7.10 8.7.11
Mirreen Steet Tuloa Street between Mirreen Street to Shops Existing Bush track behind Peter Gardens Tloa Avenue to Winda Whoppa Kingfisher Avenue from Singing Bridge to Ibis Av The Anchorage at Winda Whoppa
Location to be determined
No Footpath
new footpath
No Footpath
new footpath
800
-
15
High
No Footpath
new footpath
250
-
24
Medium
No footpath
new footpath
200
-
24
Medium
Wayfinding/ all ability access
regrading & signage
350
-
25
Low
No footpath
new footpath
600
-
18
High
no path
Shared Path
650
Shared path on bushland section
16
High
River Side Path
Pathway
1200
-
13
High
Informal Car park
Formalise Car park
-
-
12
8.7.12
Jimmy's Beach
8.7.13
Mirreen Street to the Anchorage
Mangroves Walk
Boardwalk
500
8.7.14
Coastal Connections
Connectivity
Multiple
-
Possible alternative to work on Tuloa Avenue Strategic Coastal links between Hawkes Nest to north and south
13
High
0
-
Tea Garden
8.7.15
Myall Street Crossing
Difficult (busy Road)
Investigate Crossing provision & kerb build outs
-
-
19
Low
8.7.16
Settlers Way crossing
Difficult (busy Road)
Investigate Crossing provision & kerb build outs
-
-
19
Low
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 67
8.7.17
8.7.18 8.7.19
8.7.20
8.8
Maxwell Street Waterfront Pathway from Iluka Street to Coopland Avenue Myall Street from Coopland Street toMaxwell Street Myall Quays Boulevard access to service station corner of Myall Street and Myall Quays Boulevard
Difficult (busy Road)
Investigate Crossing provision & kerb build outs
-
-
19
Low
no path
new footpath
500
-
12
Medium
no path
new footpath
1200
-
16
High
Local Traffic Management movements
Investigation into right turn bay from Myall Quays Boulevard
-
-
0
-
Nabiac
Following consideration of the information gathered through the study the following issues and interventions have been identified for consideration as future projects for the area. Full details including the function weightings are provided in Appendix D Table 8-9: Nabiac Projects Number
Location Throughout Nabiac
8.8.1
8.8.2
8.8.3 8.8.4
From Farnell Street/ Hoskins Street to Abbotts Street/ Roberston Street Clarkson Street btw Bridge and Abbott Street Hoskins Street btw Clarkson to Farnell
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Condition & consistency on existing paths
Review & Maintenance
-
Connectivity
New footpath
800
Connectivity
New footpath
150
Connectivity
New footpath
200
Notes
Formalise connection Extension of existing footpath on Clarkson Street
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 68
Score
Cost Band
9
High
14
Medium
19
Medium
19
Medium
Number 8.8.5 8.8.6 8.8.7 8.8.8 8.8.9
Location Nabiac Street / Farnell Street (around park) Hoskins Street path Extension Nabiac Street footpath extension to showground Recreational loop to south to Clarkson crossing Showground to River via Nabiac Street
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Score
Cost Band
Connectivity
New footpath
450
Completion of loop around park
7
High
Connectivity
New footpath
550
-
13
Medium
Connectivity
New footpath
200
-
4
Very High
Tourism / Recreation
New footpath
2500
-
10
High
Connectivity
New footpath
880
-
Other
Council Consideration
-
Other
Council Consideration
-
Vehicle Speeds and Pedestrian Crossing Faciltiies around shopping precinct Formalisation of existing bush trails
Connectivity
New footpath
500
8.8.10
8.8.11
8.8.12
Showground land from Nabiac Street to Aub Ferris Sporting Complex
High
12
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 69
Medium
8.9
Old Bar & Wallabi Point
Following consideration of the information gathered through the study the following issues and interventions have been identified for consideration as future projects for the area. Full details including the function weightings are provided in Appendix D Table 8-10: Old Bar Projects Number 8.9.1 8.9.2 8.9.3
8.9.4
8.9.5
8.9.6
8.9.7 8.9.8
8.9.9
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Old Bar
Lack of Footpaths Lack of Footpaths
New Footpath
-
New Footpath
-
Informal Route
Way finding, Sealing & formalisation
No Footpath
New Footpath
Wallabi Point Informal tracks and Paths
Medowie Road between Mistral Place and Aged Care Facility Bushland Trails east of Richardson Street Completion of pathway along Creek Line north of Old Bar Road David Street from Old Bar Public School to Old Bar Road Forest Lane between Saltwater Road and BlueHaven Road Waterman Street, between Old Bar Road and Belford Road
Notes
Score
Cost Band
3500
Connection between Wallibi Point and Old Bar
13
High
75
15
Low
6
High
6
Medium
22
Medium
7
Medium
7
High
Unformalised Paths
Formalisation of Bushland Trails
800
-
connectivity
new footpath
200
-
connectivity
new footpath
250
Dust
Seal Road
700
-
Uneven footpath
new footpath
350
-
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 70
Number
8.9.10
8.9.11 8.9.14 8.9.15
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Saltwater Road between Walter Fay Road and Marine Drive Coastal Walk from Wallabi Point to Old Bar Wallabi Point Beach
connectivity
New Footpath
700
-
Old Bar to Taree Shared Pathway along Old Bar Road
Tourism
Council Consideration
-
Strategic long term opportunity
Amenities
Provide Amenities
-
Community would like to see bathrooms at this beach
Connectivity Tourism
New footpath
11,000
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 71
Score
Cost Band
14
High
Very High
Very High
8.10
Pacific Palms & Smith Lake
Following consideration of the information gathered through the study the following issues and interventions have been identified for consideration as future projects for the area. Full details including the function weightings are provided in Appendix D Table 8-11: Pacific Palms & Smith Lake Projects Number
Location Throughout
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Connectivity
Desire for connection throughout the beach towns Boomerang, Blueys, Elizabeth Beaches and further south to Seal Rocks
n/a
Connectivity Tourism
Bike Path loop around
7,500
Connectivity
New Path
650
Connectivity
New Path
175
8.10.1
Notes
Score
Cost Band
Very High
Pacific Palms
8.10.1A
8.10.2
8.10.3
8.10.4
8.10.5
The Lakes Way, Lakeside Crescent, Boomerang Drive, The Lakes Way Boomerang Drive, north west of Croll Street Boomerang Drive between Red Gum Drive and Karnang Drive Boomerang Beach Road Existing path parallel to Boomerang Beacg Lakeside Drive between Boomerang Beach Drive and The Lakes Way
Formalization
Connectivity
Wayfinding Signage
New Path
Very High
5
High
17
Medium
16
Low
9
High
953
1300
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 72
Number
8.10.6
8.10.7
8.10.8
8.10.9 8.10.10
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Existing path "Palmtops Avenue" extended through bushland to Boomerang Drive Existing path "Palmtops Avenue" extended through bushland to Boomerang Drive Boomerang Beach, Blueys Beach and Elizabeth Beach Accesses Lakeside Crescent near intersection of Mariana Avenue
Recreation
New Path
570
Private Property
Boomerang Drive from Headland Drive
Tourism/ Recreation
BMX bike Track
Facilities
Bike Racks
1000m
Score
Cost Band
6
High
Private Property 6
n/a
Crossing
Pedestrian Crossing Facility
n/a
connectivity
New path
220
no path
shared path
6
Low
19
Low
8
Medium
15
High
Smiths Lake 8.10.11
Macwood Road from Paradise Drive to Casson Street
1300
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 73
8.11
Taree
Following consideration of the information gathered through the study the following issues and interventions have been identified for consideration as future projects for the area. Full details including the function weightings are provided in Appendix D Table 8-12: Taree Projects Number
8.11.1
8.11.2
Location Tareee Park, Taree Bowling Club
Near Brown Creek, between Coolahba and Bushland Drive
Taree Centre 8.11.3
8.11.4 8.11.5
High Street in Town Centre Traffic signals in Taree
8.11.6 Traffic signals in Taree 8.11.7
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Score
Cost Band
Lack of formal paths outside the centre of town Lack of footpath
Footpath Installation
various
General request for footpath installation on all streets.
18
-
Extension of the riverside path and link along Browns Creek
540
Footpaths for areas frequently accessed by elderly/ disabled such as banks, pharmacy, community organisations
15
High
Quality of path surfaces and maintenance
New pavements throughout centre & Kerb ramps at paths connecting at kerbs
2,500
Footpaths for areas frequently accessed by elderly/ disabled such as banks, pharmacy, community organisations
21
Very High
No path on High Street Missing or steep pram ramps Long delays when crossing at signals Green time for pedestrians sometime short if less mobile
Footpath Installation
1400
16
High
New pram ramps
n/a
16
Medium
Review Phasing
n/a
Review pedestrian wait times at Victoria Street with Pulteney Street and Manning Street
23
-
Review Phasing
n/a
Review pedestrian wait times at Victoria Street with Pulteney Street and Manning Street
23
-
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 74
8.11.8
8.12
Links between Taree & Old Bar
Better links to surrounding towns and areas
On Street cycleways
11,000
Old Bar Road
8
Very High
Wingham & Tinonee
Following consideration of the information gathered through the study the following issues and interventions have been identified for consideration as future projects for the area. Full details including the function weightings are provided in Appendix D Table 8-13: Wingham Projects Number
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Condition & consistency on existing paths Connectivity
Review & Maintenance
-
No formal pathways through suburban areas, especially on the northern side of the railway
No crossing
Provide PDX crossing facility
50
New footpath
2300
Score
Cost Band
23
Medium
9
High
Wingham
8.12.1
8.12.2
8.12.3
8.12.4
Throughout Wingham Throughout Wingham Pedestrian Crossing at Bent Street & Farquhar Street Pathway connection between over head bridge to sports ground
Connectivity
Pathway Connections to New Developments (e.g. golf course) No crossing for major movement on very wide road
-
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 75
Number
8.12.5
8.12.6
8.12.7
8.12.8
8.12.9
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Murray Road Pathway Connection, between Overhead Bridge and Skyline Drive Gloucester Road between Little Street & Cangett Street Dennes Street between overhead bridge and Primrose Street Riverside Pathway
Connectivity
New Footpath
950
-
Recreation / Tourism
Boardwalk
2600
Access to water at Riverview Drive and Dawson Street
Bend on Murray Road west of Boundary Road
Road Safety Concerns
Council Consideration
-
General Road safety concerns in regards to site conditions and speed of vehicles around the bend.
Connectivity
New footpath
950
-
Connectivity
Recreation / Tourism
New Footpath
New footpath
1300
600
Score
Cost Band
19
High
13
High
10
High
6
Very High
17
High
Connection to Showgrounds and Abattoir
-
Tinonee
8.12.10
Beecher Street between Ridge Road and Manchester Street
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 76
Number
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Connectivity
New footpath
700
-
8.12.12
Manchester Street between Beecher Street and Cotton Street Beecher Street
Pedestrian Safety
Council Consideration
-
Recent council road rehabilitation has made verge difficult to walk on.
8.12.13
Around town
Recreation / Tourism
Share path
1200
Desire for a loop around the town utilising Burdett & Cotton Streets
8.12.11
8.13
Location
Score
Cost Band
16
High
10
High
Other
Following consideration of the information gathered through the study the following issues and interventions have been identified for consideration as future projects for the areas outside the specific locations detailed in previous sections. Full details including the function weightings are provided in Appendix D Table 8-14: Other Projects Number 8.13.1
Township North Arm Cove
8.13.2
Coomba Park
8.13.3
Green Point
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Completion of connection at the esplanade for walking and bikes
missing link
shared path
550
Moorooba Road from Yallambee Street and Wallaroo St
no path
shared path
1000
from Green Point to The Lakes Way
no path
shared path
1200
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 77
Notes
connection between 2 sections of the community
Score
Cost Band
10
High
10
High
10
High
Score
Cost Band
600
12
Medium
1200
12
High
Number
Township
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
8.13.4
Coolongolook
Coolongolook School to highway underpass
no path connectivity
Shared path
8.13.5
Krambach
The Bucketts Way from Krambach Public School to Pool
No path connectivity
Shared path
8.14
Notes
Maps
These are the maps of towns and districts showing a number of the proposed requests and projects rasied at the community consultation as listed in the above tables.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 78
Hallidays Point PAMP and Bike Plan
Legend Wheelchair accessible New Footpath Shared Path Imagery © Nearmap
Nabiac PAMP and Bike Plan
Legend New Footpath Crossing Point Imagery © Nearmap
9.
Conclusion
This report presents the outcomes of the project to review existing Bike and PAMP plans from the Mid Coast Council area and to develop an updated schedule of projects to enhance facilities and opportunities for walking and cycling throughout the region. Public consultation was held through community session and a survey to establish the barriers and issues facing the communities and to identify gaps in the existing active travel networks. Based on the outcomes from the survey and background research potential projects through the region have been identified. This plan is intended to be a starting point for future project planning and delivery including use in supporting applications for available funding to deliver a network which will support community needs for walking and cycling. The plan should be updated to reflect delivery of projects and changing community needs through changing land use over time.
Updated April 2021 │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP & Bike PLan Page 93
Appendices
Survey A.1 A.2 A.3
Survey Form Survey Comments Survey Issues
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 95
A.1 Survey Form
Survey Form
Midcoast Council - Pedestrian, Cycleway and Access Survey 2019 This survey is to support the Council in creating plans for future investment in pedestrian and cycle access through the Council region. This information gathered will be used to help Council understand where future projects will address community problems and best encourage greater levels of walking and cycling. More information including details of community consultation sessions is available here https://www.midcoast.nsw.gov.au/Events/Pedestrian-cycleway-and-access-planning-sessions First, please tell us a bit about you 1. What is your age? Under 18 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+
2. What is your gender? Female Male Other Prefer not to say
1
3. Where do you live? Bulahdelah Forster / Tuncurry Gloucester / Stroud Hallidays Point Harrington Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens Nabiac Old Bar Pacific Palms Taree Wingham Other (please specify)
2
Midcoast Council - Pedestrian, Cycleway and Access Survey 2019 Walking 4. Do you use a mobility scooter or other aids to assist you with local travel? Yes No
5. How often do you walk for longer than 10 minutes? Every day A few times a week About once a week A few times a month Once a month Less than once a month Never (go to Q8)
6. Generally, where do you walk? (can select more than one) to work to school / education for recreation for exercise while on holiday / tourism Other (please specify)
7. Where do you regularly walk to and from?
3
Midcoast Council - Pedestrian, Cycleway and Access Survey 2019 Cycling 8. How often do you cycle for more than 20 minutes? Every day A few times a week About once a week A few times a month Once a month Less than once a month Never (go to Q11)
9. Generally, where do you cycle? (can select more than one) to work to school / education for recreation for exercise while on holiday / tourism Other (please specify)
10. Where do you regularly cycle to and from?
4
Midcoast Council - Pedestrian, Cycleway and Access Survey 2019 Walking and Cycling 11. Do you walk or cycle with others? (can select more than one) On own with kids with friends with an organised group or club Other (please specify)
12. What would encourage you to walk more often
13. What would encourage you to cycle more often
If you have any issues or problems relating to walking and cycling please use the following questions to let us know where are what they are.
14. Do you have any specific issues or problems relating to walking and cycling? Yes No
5
Midcoast Council - Pedestrian, Cycleway and Access Survey 2019 Issues Page 1 15. Is your issue or problem related to Walking Cycling
16. Where is the issue? Town Street Number
17. What is the issue?
18. Do you have any other problems or issues to raise? Yes No
6
Midcoast Council - Pedestrian, Cycleway and Access Survey 2019 Issues Page 2 19. Is your issue or problem related to Walking Cycling
20. Where is the issue? Town Street Number
21. What is the issue?
22. Do you have any other problems or issues to raise? Yes No
7
Midcoast Council - Pedestrian, Cycleway and Access Survey 2019 Issues Page 3 23. Is your issue or problem related to Walking Cycling
24. Where is the issue? Town Street Number
25. What is the issue?
26. Do you have any other problems or issues to raise? Yes No
8
Midcoast Council - Pedestrian, Cycleway and Access Survey 2019 Issues Page 4 27. Is your issue or problem related to Walking Cycling
28. Where is the issue? Town Street Number
29. What is the issue?
30. Do you have any other problems or issues to raise? Yes No
9
Midcoast Council - Pedestrian, Cycleway and Access Survey 2019 Issues Page 5 31. Is your issue or problem related to Walking Cycling
32. Where is the issue? Town Street Number
33. What is the issue?
34. Do you have any other problems or issues to raise? Yes No
10
Midcoast Council - Pedestrian, Cycleway and Access Survey 2019 Issues Page 6 35. Is your issue or problem related to Walking Cycling
36. Where is the issue? Town Street Number
37. What is the issue?
38. Do you have any other problems or issues to raise? Yes No
11
Midcoast Council - Pedestrian, Cycleway and Access Survey 2019 Thank you for raising so many things for us to consider. If you would like to add more please contact our team directly and we will work with you to record and include them all. either email Ben.cove@stantec.com or leave your details on the next page and we will get in touch.
12
Midcoast Council - Pedestrian, Cycleway and Access Survey 2019 Thank you for your time completing this questionnaire and contributing to the development of Council's planning
39. If you would like to be contacted to discuss this survey or any issues please provide details Name Email Address Phone Number
13
A.2
Survey Comments
The following table has detail of the online survey responses which are summarised for each location in Section 7. Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
barrington
longer walk,cycle to barrington where i live
Bundabah
Paths, level areas designated areas fir kids so they are safe
Burrell Creek Coomba Bay
Coopernook
Pathways where I felt safe to walk - we have nothing in this area A proper pathway along the waters edge from the boat ramp at Coomba Park to the aquatic Club footpaths, footpaths
Craven
More pathways so my children don’t have to walk on the road footpaths so I don't have to push a pram on our bad roads Even footpaths
Cundletown
Nothing
Darawank
More shared pathways - run out of pathways often, better gutter lips ( no big bumps pushing prams. Destinations to walk to, scenic walks.
Forster / Tuncurry
More tracks away from roads, not necessarily sealed.
Coomba Park
I don’t need encouragement More bushwalks across the region.
Footpaths. I have a 6 month old baby and am regularly forced to walk on the road with the pram due to lack of paths extended walkways/tracks along the beaches and waterfront
seating bench
What would encourage you to cycle more often cycle/walk from my home and return from barrington to gloucester and return Paths, level areas designated areas fir kids so they are safe Bicycle paths - we have nothing in this area Nothing I have no desire to cycle, my husband is the cyclist in our family. safe roads Cycleways Better cycleways between towns and localities. A bike path from Cundletown to Taree. Cycle ways off the road, or at least substantial enough to not need to be on the lane shared with cars. Cycle ways I feel safe enough for my kids to ride with me. Unsealed or sealed tracks, North to Taree, South to Pacific Palms. More cycle ways- off road Making it safer for road riders to get from Forster to Pacific Palms. More mountain bike tracks or parks closer to Forster. Maybe when my baby is old enough to join me better shoulders on some parts of the Lakes Way, cycleway extensions and links, organised and marked bike routes -Safer/less interactions with traffic Better cycling paths
Better road crossings Footpaths. Proper built walkways and paths
Footpaths and safe and cycle paths.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 109
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
Irrelevant I walk two hours a day
What would encourage you to cycle more often 1. Better quality road way (Lakes Way Smiths Lake Buladelah) 2. Better maintenance of existing roadway (sweep the road shoulder for cyclists) 3. Off road trails (formed trails / paths along existing roadways for safety, or thru easements I.e under powerlines) 4. Considered Master Bike Plan - to connect with tourism features (lighthouses, lookouts, loop trails) , Accom centers/villages, Adventure potential for road and trail riding. Designated cycleways particularly from Tuncurry to Black Head.Try to avoid busy roads such as The Lakes Way and Black Head Road, it is frightening with the traffic and lack of tarred verges so cyclists end up in the gravel. Prefer cycleways and quiet back streets. As above
Forster / Tuncurry
Scenic and Bushwalking tracks near townships.
Nothing
Nothing
N/A-already walk often.
Connected pathways. Pathways along waterfronts. More appealing playground equipment More pedestrian paths on nature strips. Better footpaths near my home.
More pathways
cycle path out to Greenpoint and Pacific Palms. More off road/paedestrian cycle pathways, more edging on the side of roads More connected pathways. There are some great sections but then there are some missing links or opportunities to extend More cycle/pedestrian paths on nature strips. Better cycleways that connect residential zones to Stockland or the main part of town. Our kids are still developing their confidence. For us to cycle we pack our bikes up, drive somewhere with footpaths then bike ride.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 110
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
Forster / Tuncurry
Having better pathways that allowed people so see and access all that foresters nature has to offer. I feel as though the pathways we have now are limited and often stop/start. Council should look at port Macquaries pathways system and construct a similar pathway to that, particularly with having them wide allowing bikes and walkers as well as them covering a large distance to allow people to walk as far as they want and not limit it. Better footpaths that are connected More pathed walkways, water filters on the way. We need more to keep everyone active!! We live on such a big coastline, why don’t we have something running along the whole way!! Footpath, as I walk on the road edge. Better infrastructure to keep us off the road Safe walkings paths Better pedestrian facilities
What would encourage you to cycle more often
Better cycle ways that are connected and safe from traffic We need many more options for this. If we were to ride our bike along the pathed walkways it would take 5 minutes. Barely any point in getting out the bikes. Better infrastructure to keep us off the road Designated lanes Wider roads on the pacific palms lakes ways Bike paths
Areas where there are a few trees for shade to stop with kids Lakeside path
Wide paths
More decent footpaths.
Nothing
Better cycle paths that are not on the roads. It's too dangerous for myself and my family to ride on the roads . Nothing
Better pathways
Good cycle ways on the lakes way either south of Forster or north. Better cycle paths
Trails by the lake
Not applicable
N/A
A more continuous bike path. Better defined bike path.
Safe something nice along the beach areas and parklands
Safe not on roads in parklands with wide pathways Same as above
A concrete pathway from Bennetts head to main beach Safer pedestrian environment along little street. Road too narrow, motorists not driving to conditions More path ways or easy ways to get across roads
Cycleways along lake
Above Cycle paths
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 111
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
Forster / Tuncurry
More shade, especially along the southern parkway. If there was a walking path on the dirt/tree side of the road I would be grateful. I also can not walk or go to certain shops during Jasmin flowering season. No matter the dose of antihistamine I take it is never enough to block the effects of Jasmin. It should not be planted by Council or in community areas. It makes me so sick and the migraine lingers for days afterwords. Especially at road crossings where I need to wait to cross the street. It's horrible at the crossing near the Main St/Post Office at Forster. Also at the intersection near the cinemar/adult education place. It stops me from walking and going into shops nearby. Better walking paths Bike riders to ring their bike bells, mobile scooters to go much slower, they just about run you over A footpath on Kularoo drive and onto underwood st
More walking paths with better lighting
More scenic views along foreshore with stable walkways Walking is no challenge
A dedicated cycleway between Forster and tiona would be great. And MTB track near water tower Forster. Nothing much
More walkways, shade
What would encourage you to cycle more often Sculptures, mosaics, plants to look at. Wide paths so it's easier to walk dogs. Shady spots so the dogs don't over heat and I don't get as sunburned.
Safer areas to cycle. Proper riding paths away from traffic.
1. Safe path, esp with kids, along MacIntosh it’s not safe. 2. Driver education esp around looking when turning into streets or driveways from main road and also exiting same Safe cycle ways and dedicated cycle lanes, roads and car drivers are dangerous Same answer as questions 12 Decent and more bike paths, if there was one along the Lakes Way from the south to the north would be outstanding Safer cycleways.
Better cycle areas especially more suited to slight off road More cycle tracks.... forster to Pacific Palms would be amazing. Safe Cycleways
Should be walk ways around our whole water front like in other tourist towns around this country. more cycle paths that are not near walkers Wider footpaths, longer routes that don’t stop and start
Wider footpaths, longer routes that don’t stop and start
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 112
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
Forster / Tuncurry
A boardwalk along little street all the way along the lake for shore to the main shops would be an amazing feature for Forster More pedestrian crossings and better access for prams. Coming from a mobility scooter user, it can be very difficult to get around town useing the provided foot paths, due to them starting and stopping and also not having an access point up into the path and having very rough surfaces inbetween forcing me onto the unsafe road's, also people parking there cars across the foot path's is also a big problem that I have faced with trying to get around.This really needs to be looked into further. More pedestrian crossing especially near roundabout on mackintosh street and definitely more footpaths More hours in the day. However, a dedicated path that has an interesting sights along the way. More dedicated walkways
More tracks
What would encourage you to cycle more often A boardwalk along the lake foreshore around little street to connect the main shops to the stocklands area Cycleways. I don’t feel safe riding on the road.
A extra long stretch of track that is away from traffic. Somewhere young kids could be safe from cars. More cycleways away from vehicles and roads. ie NOT a line drawn on the road for cyclists. More tracks
More scenic pathways
More scenic pathways that connect together
More paths
More cucle paths for sure
Longer shared walking and cycle ways
As above
Dedicated path
Dedicated path
Safer walking places
Smooth riding paths
Walk/run a lot any way
Wider road shoulders
I already walk a lot. Maybe a special group.
Nothing.
It would be great to see better lighting for late evening walks along the tanks or down around the YMCA.
Better cycle ways so you don’t feel a car will kill you... it gets pretty hairy heading out of town. More pathways, particularly by the sea or bushland A decent designated cycle path. The one in town is short and disjointed. A track from blackhead to pacific palms or seal rocks would be aweome and increase tourism and take advantage of our beautiful area. The roads are narrow and unsafe currently I'm fine no encouragement needed
More pathways, particularly by the sea or bushland Lighting along pebbly beach, more walkways such as over breckenridge channel and around the island, a long coastal path
I'm fine
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 113
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often More lighting along paths, more paths. A bridge over breckenridge channel and path around the island would be amazing. Lights along Pebbly beach, more coastal paths
Still working & time poor. Me getting into a routine. More bush tracks
Safe walkway with night lighting I walk every day but prefer to have a designated footpath for safety concerns I walk alot
Tar pathways along pebby beach Having walkways around the entire waterfront, continual paths rather than just ending no where. Have you considered a recycled walkway around the lake for shore Forster little st and Tuncurry point road. Also access for prams mums and bubs groups not just mobility scooters. A several day walk from blackhead to tea gardens with camping along the way in conjunction with national parks, let’s open areas up for recreation use not close down and limit access. Paths and pram access Properly maintained paths and more of them. Use our lovely environment. Port Mac or Nambucca Heads are excellent examples. More waterfront tracks Better pathways, connected walks, lakefront walk, trails in national parks, capacity to do 2-3 day walks in this beautiful part of the world that is so underused for its natural resources. Wider paths in better spots e.g. little street
What would encourage you to cycle more often The cycle paths in Forster tuncurry are short and disjointed. A designated cycle and walkway from blackhead to pacific palms would attract people from everywhere and showcase our beautiful area. It would soon become a world renown cycling and walking area Still working & time poor. Me getting into a routine. More cycle tracks Forster to the Palms Tuncurry to Halliday's point Tuncurry to Old Bar All safe cycle tracks Some where safe not on roads Designated cycle ways More bike tracks please. A bike track from Forster to the Palms. A bike track from Tuncurry to Halliday's point . Tuncurry to Old Bar Tar pathways along pebby beach Same as above
The cycleways we have are in poor condition and way too short. More waterfront tracks and tracks off roadways Better cycle paths so can keep off roads, mountain bike trails
More accessible pathways with good contrast Steps with good contrast on the nosing More pedestrian crossings as people who are blind or vision impaired are unable to cross many roads and roundabouts are particularly dangerous Bike paths and parks. See wolf bike tracks for children. They’re amazing
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 114
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
Forster / Tuncurry
Safer even surface pedestrian pathways and Signposted wider pathways to share with cyclists and mobility scooters and mobility aids Safe paths and lighting Scenic walking paths. Better pathways
Gloucester / Stroud
Proper pathway at Pebbly Beach which would also improve accessibility for Saturday community park runners/walkers Pedestrian crossings and traffic calming installations More trails
What would encourage you to cycle more often
Safe paths that went somewhere. Tracks that were safe and lengthy Cycle ways Better bike paths to get to main beach or pebbly beach or Bennetts head from Tuncurry Cycle way (not a lane on the road) linking Green Point and Forster as above More trails
Having footpaths that we could walk on so that myself and my children could access the main street safely, the medical centre as well Better footpaths
Sfet pathways in town to access the main street and the parks safer roads
Better joints and back
Nothing.
having a bit less to do and bit more time available
same as above
Better/safer walking paths and improved footpaths
Cycle tracks would encourage me to take my children
Better access foot paths in town and to parks etc in Gloucester, plus points of interest eg rivers and existing riverside locations.
There are no cycleways in Gloucester, so any cycle ways would be an improvement. Cycle ways offer healthy egress and can offer an enormous untapped tourism potential for Gloucester and surrounds.
Wider footpaths
Dedicated off-road tracks
Pedestrian access on King st accessing all amenities, safe crossing area of Ravenshaw st at top of king st. Path to medical centre. Increased foot paths around high school. A safer walking path
More bike paths so the lower trafficked roads can be accessed. Path connecting Barrington and Gloucester, path from town to Jacks rd and town to Waukivory rd. A safer cycle path
Smoother paths that connect key points
as above
Better and safer walkways
Safer off- road cycle paths
Shared Walk/Cycle paths
Off road cycle paths or roads with wide verges Cycle path to Gloucester along Bucketts Way
Walking tracks in nature, bush, off road
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 115
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
Gloucester / Stroud
More accessible walking tracks in nature, off road Easier access Foot paths linking to local schools and the main street Better pathways from new estates on the norther side of Gloucester into Gloucester Things like the exercise trail are great, other walks which have been thought out with walkers/runners in mind. Incentive More friends who like to walk.
What would encourage you to cycle more often Cycle pathway to Gloucester
Path ways linking to Barrington. This would make this cycle safer for my children. Better pathways from new estates on the norther side of Gloucester into Gloucester Road quality and/or cycle pathways would be great Nothing A flatter landscape. Availability of bike ways
Lighting
Cycleways
Better footpaths
More varied Cycle ways
Less smokey days
Safer bike trails
Safe pathways near my home and in the directions I need to go eg to Barrington store from my home; to Gloucester from my home. More room for a pram
Safe pathways/pathways off the road. A bike that holds weight Safe cycling tracks
Better and more interesting walks
More cycle paths
Better walking paths.
I have a road bicycle that I've barely used because of the dangerous roads around Gloucester. If there were dedicated cycle/walk paths around Gloucester & Barrington village I would ride every day. A link to Barrington village would be ideal for residents and visitors too. This would also open up a business opportunity for bike hire in Gloucester. A safe cycle way
Better walk way from Barrington into town - we definitely a cycle way along there !!! Improved walking trails and the garauntee of the Bucketts (Buchan Buchan) walking trail not closing on property sale.
More activity for my kids along the way Gloucester / Stroud
Additional cycle ways (Proposed connection of Gloucester and Barrington via pathway sounds fantastic), introduction of a local cycle club and supporting funding, creation of local bicycle trails (similar to Kiwarrak, Dungog common, Glenrock etc.) Getting a bike and something to transport them in
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 116
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
What would encourage you to cycle more often Safer places to cycle
More walk paths
Safer and more cycle paths
Need no encouragement
Need no encouragement though more paths would be great so I can cycle safely with my young children
Footpaths. No footpath on King Street. Makes it difficult to use pram.
A dedicated cycle way between Gloucester and Barrington would get me cycling more.
If there was a proper walkway/path from Gloucester River to Barrington river
If there was a cycle path from Gloucester to Barrington
Green Point Footpaths in my neighbourhood instead of having to walk on the road and dodge the traffic. Safer spaces, more removed from traffic
Hallidays Point
Having a footpath/cycle way from the last house at Green Point Drive to The Lakesway just like the walking track at Pebbly. It would be perfect. At the moment, the grass is so long you can't walk along there. It is too dangerous to walk on the road. My dream would be to see a boardwalk from the end of Green Point around to Pipers Bay along the edge of Wallis Lake. It would bring more tourists to the area. I have seen and walked on a 10km boardwalk like this down at the South Coast at Eden. It could be done here too. Walk enough Paved excercise tracks
Safer spaces, either more removed from traffic or on roads with a wide enough verge to be safely separated from traffic. Especially on The Lakes Way between Forster & Green Point & further south.
Cycleways that link Hallidays Point to Tuncurry and maybe even Wallabi Point Cycling tracks
Longer and safer pathways more great bush tracks.
Less heat walk in winter Don’t need encouragement
mountain bike tracks leading to all facilities eg shops, soccer fields, Red head, Diamond beach etc. A bike Better path ways around Hallidays Point. Too dangerous on the roads
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 117
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
Hallidays Point
Higher priority on walking for leisure. I have just returned from NSW south coast (Dalmeny, Narooma area) & there is a cucle/walking path connecting the two towns plus a boardwalk over the river. Would it not be great to seek funding from NSW government for a cycle path from Hallidays Point to Tuncurry behind the dunes & through Darawank Nature Reserve. Our reserves are supposed to be for the public to use. This would open it up. It would also be a tourist attraction in its own right to rival Port Macquarie Hastings Council's planned path. (You can employ me to attempt to arrange it). Ideally any paths would be linked with trails, tracks, car parking & be made to encourage visitation to multiple MCC regions. Safer paths
What would encourage you to cycle more often Same as above
Cycle paths
More walkways
Cycleways along roads
Specified local tracks
As above
A pedestrian path. Walking tracks of longer lengths. Pathway between Diamond Beach and Blackhead and connecting the 3 villages (as the community has been talking about and telling Council it was a top priority for the last 20+ years) Better paths Better pathways. Better paths Having safe walk way between Homestead Estate and the Blackhead Beach.
More extensive cycle paths so I can keep off the roads Pathway between Diamond Beach and Blackhead and connecting the 3 villages (as the community has been talking about and telling Council it was a top priority for the last 20+ years) Better cycle tracks protected from traffic Better cycleways. My children would cycle more if they had dedicated bike tracks to do so. Having a safe cycle way between Homestead estate and the beach along Blackhead rd.
Better paths Better shared paths that we interconnected.
Hallidays Point
Safe paths
As Above. I would like to see a shared path connecting communities from Forster to Harrington. Safe paths
An upgraded path way
An upgraded cycle way
More connected pathways
More connected pathways
A designated path for pedestrians
Safer walkways
Great paths
Good paths connecting our local villages, especially from homestead estate to blackhead. A cycle path like along the side of old bar road would be fantastic.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 118
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often Better, wider paths A safe shared bike/foot path along blackhead road connecting the communities of hallidays point
Harrington
Pathway from the 60kmzone on Harrington road to the shopping centre
What would encourage you to cycle more often Wider paths A safe shared bike/foot path along blackhead road connecting the communities of hallidays point I would cycle every day if i didn't have to ride along the main road (Harrington road)
Safer pathways to the shopping center and safer pathways from the boat ramp heading towards Harrington bowling club and beyond. Seating along pathway for a brief rest
As above.
better footpaths
better and safe cycle tracks
better footpaths and walk ways.
again better walk ways and bicycle tracks - need to safe travel.
a more diverse riverfront More paths that are connect along the foreshore Better pathways between the beginning of Harrington waters to the shopping village along the main road
More access on the foreshore connecting the caravan park throughout Harrington waters Same as before
A footpath down from josephine boulevard along Harrington rd Lighting on the path all along the foreshore. Better footpaths between the hotel and the skate park (there is a section just missing there). I would like to see a loop created, so that from the end of the wall a bridge comes across to the footpath maybe near the boat ramp A cement (or gravel) pathway going from Harrington to Crowdy Head. Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens
Safer and a wide path all through town and out to Crowdy head
Dedicated walkways
A cement (or gravel) pathway going from Harrington to Crowdy Head. Dedicated cycle ways
Safer sealed footpaths
More links between venues
More designated walking trails and paths Continuation of existing footpaths
A knee replacement
Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens
outdoor exercise equipment ,where there are water views preferably More interesting walks More extensive dedicated walkways
Continuation of existing cycleways to fill in missing links and more bike racks at parks and community spaces. A set of outdoor exercise equipment would be a good destination. An integrated cycle network is a great form of public transport safer marking on the road
Safer cycleways avoiding road traffic
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 119
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
Safer walkways No problems walking
Better footpaths /cycleways to the river and along the main road to the library etc
What would encourage you to cycle more often Better pathway on Myall Way to industrial area and into TG village. Safer cycle paths Cycle path from Shearwater estate to shops avoiding busy Myall street - or dedicated cycle path Cycle path over Singing bridge linking Tea Gardens to Hawks Nest. I recall a cantilevered structure was suggested a few years ago. Same as above
More time
More time
More time
More time
Shade along Spinifex Avenue
Cycle lanes on either footpath or road Safer cycling paths
More bush/beach walks
More bike paths
Better walking paths in and around Tea Gardens/Hawkes Nest. N/a
Better and safe cycleing areas. Better cycling infrastructure e.g. marked cycle lanes on ALL major roads and across the Singing Bridge.. I.e unbroken lines for bike only lanes and broken lines and green markings on roads where bikes have priority but cars may use the lane when there are no bicycles using the lane. Remove the stupid sign and confusing sign that says bike riders must dismount and walk across the Singing Bridge. There is not enough room for 2 bikes and riders to pass safely which will eventually cause someone to fall ander a car on the roadway. Better up keep of roads and foot paths that join up. Along tea Gardens Rd and Myall St. Yes
Foot paths Foot paths that go from Spinifex Avenue down year gardens road
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 120
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens
I would prefer to ride my bicycle more often than walk
Better walkways I prefer to exercise on a tricycle when my partner is available (he will ride his bicycle) or will use my mobility scooter when my partner is not available. I need my partner to assist me stay safe on the roads and footpaths (that are not yet converted into shared pathways) when I use my tricycle as the shared pathway network is not yet available from my home to the shopping or restaurant areas in Tea Gardens.
Maintain tree canopy and shade to provide comfortable and safe walking environment
What would encourage you to cycle more often A complete network of shared pathways that would allow me to safely cycle from my home in Spinifex Avenue Tea Gardens to: (i) the Myall Quays shopping complex, (ii) the industrial area at the north western end of Tea Gardens; and (iii) the restaurants along the entire length of Marine Drive from the Oyster Hut to the boat ramp near the Police Station to connect up to the existing shared pathway that goes to Singing bridge; and (iv) extend the existing shared pathway from the corner of Myall Street / Coupland Ave down to the old shopping centre on Myall Street and further south east to the visitor information centre and library. A complete network of shared pathways that would allow me to safely cycle from my home in Spinifex Avenue Tea Gardens to: (i) the Myall Quays shopping complex, (ii) the industrial area at the north western end of Tea Gardens; and (iii) the restaurants along the entire length of Marine Drive from the Oyster Hut to the boat ramp near the Police Station to connect up to the existing shared pathway that goes to Singing bridge; and (iv) extend the existing shared pathway from the corner of Myall Street / Coupland Ave down to the old shopping centre on Myall Street and further south east to the visitor information centre and library.
Nice cycle ways Footpaths and shade.
Cycle paths.
Foot Paths in Swan Bay Area Hawks nest
Footpaths in swan bay Hawks nest
More foot paths
Safer Cycleways
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 121
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
Hawks Nest / Tea Gardens
Footpaths. Many areas in Tea Gardens don’t have footpaths and we have to walk on the roads. Better paths. Some areas don’t have any footpaths especially going to Winda Woppa.
NA More footpaths, I often have to walk on the road.
More places to take dogs on local Hawks Nest Beaches. eg western end of Jimmy's Beach
Kolodong
What would encourage you to cycle more often More cycle ways. They are virtually non-existent in Tea Gardens and Hawks Nest Better cycleways. Once you get over the bridge to Hawks Nest there are no cycleway. It is not safe for children or adults for that matter. NA Safe, wide cycle tracks, separate from the road & traffic, especially along the roadway behind Jimmys Beach.
Already walking an hour + each day. No problem accessing where I want to walk. Even surface footpaths. Kerb and guttering on all major roads
I cycle as much as I wish to so nothing. Even cycling surfaces. Kerb and guttering on all major roads
Nice Scenic walk ways with smooth surface
safer cycle ways
Safe footpaths
Cycleways
The bloody foot paths are a disgrace
Learn the road rules
designated safe paths avoiding vehicle traffic Kundle Kundle
Safer walkways/footpaths
Laurieton
Beautiful paths in nature.
Marlee
motivation
Bike paths that are not full of potholes and limit the risk of being hit by a car. Bike path from Cundletown to Taree, a dangerous stretch of road for cyclists and pedestrians Good bike paths away from traffic. a modified bike
Mitchell Island
Nothing
Safe cycleway
Nabiac
Loosing more weight and walking on even ground not gravel A through road all the way round North Arm Cove Local walking groups
Same as above
North Arm Cove
Old Bar
Educational experiences. Groups. Events. Nothing
Cycle lanes along major roads Same as above
-
A bike trail in old bar near the skate park Do not cycle.
Better pathways
Better pathways
Walking circuits/loops (preferably cleared and marked but not suburban paving), trails through bush land, signage on walks e.g. history, plant names, security in areas such as Mud Bishops with currently trashed
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 122
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
More energy & time
What would encourage you to cycle more often Legal cycle tracks through the bush..Knappinghat National Park. More cycle paths suitable for ordinary bikes. Nothing
Old Bar
A beach boardwalk Old Bar to Saltwater to Diamond beach.
I am more interested in running than walking.
Good pathways and toilets
Not sure
Cycle pathways as I’m not confident to ride my bike through traffic ie on the road better cycle way along old bar rd, saltwater rd Better road surface and foot paths. You can't push prams or ride bikes on roads full of pot holes. No foot paths, to keep young ones away from cars.
More footpaths in Old Bar
Better road surface and foot paths. You can't push prams or ride bikes on roads full of pot holes. No foot paths, to keep young ones away from cars.
More paths. Especially one is needed for kids to the school from Old Bar Road down David street to the school. Also need a path down Cross street to connect main road to Flow cafe and parks. Paths are good for little kids with bikes too and strollers in this young family growing area. We really like the curvy paths done last year and use them all the time but they are limited in scope. Maintained, interesting tracks along the coastline. Also for tourists?
a proper walking track that doesnt include having to walk on the roads A direct path to the beach Old Bar
The roads are very poor here and large parts are reverting to dirt so not good for bikes.
Not necessarily more often, but allow us to ride further if the carriageway was wider and have a designated signed area for cyclists to share the road with cars. The road between Old Bar and Taree barely has a shoulder in parts and is so dangerous for cylists to ride on. The surface on the Old Bar Wallabi Point road is perfect for bike riding. The road to Manning Point would be great for a decent ride. At the moment the surface is bad and it's way too narrow and dangerous for bike riding. It would be great to get a group r and ride out to Manning Point from Old Bar, have coffee,lunch or breakfast then ride back home.
Time off work!!
More rec time
More footpaths
More footpaths and cycleways so it’s safer for my child’s
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 123
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
What would encourage you to cycle more often
Pathway to Bluehaven Dedicated off leash dog park in Old Bar
Same as above
Having more tracks! Especially after old bar primary down next to the beach and if there was a better connecting track to Wallabi point or to the existing track that goes to Wallabi point. And also a path from Wallabi to salt water. Hey Also more tracks along the coastal side of mud bishops. Definitely proper, safe pathways on busy streets
As above
A dedicated walking path along Old Bar Road from Half Chain Road.
Concrete paths and laybacks. Especially when teaching young children to walk, or walking with a pram gravel is difficult to walk on More footpaths
Better footpaths! We have some many locations in Old Bar where there either aren't any footpaths or there is to a point then they abruptly stop. Prime example - walking from Bluehaven Estate into Old Bar - paths goes all the way to the intersection of Wyden Street and Forrest Lane then nothing! More footpaths, as population ages safety is an issue without footpaths.
Pacific Palms
Pacific Palms
Safe cycle way/ footpath connecting Smith lakes and pacific palms and connecting Charlotte bay to blueys
. A tarmac cycle path - not gravel A dedicated cycle track along Old Bar Road from Half Chain Road (or the highway/Taree). We were so excited to see it started but looking forward to seeing it finished. Concrete paths and laybacks. Especially when teaching young children to ride gravel is difficult to ride on More footpaths, especially with the kids, they would love to cycle to school but it is not safe at their age on the road
Better road surfaces and designated road shoulder / bike paths suitable for all bike types. I would commute to work in Taree if it was safer. Safe cycle way/ footpath connecting Smith lakes and pacific palms and connecting Charlotte bay to blueys
Safer walking tracks
N/A
A better path to ensure kids safety on way to school. A better path to ensure kids safely on way to school. Better footpaths and walking trails ass well as beach board walks in dune areas and national park trails. Crushed granite bike / walking tracks
As above.
Being able to walk on a pathway not on the road.
Nothing
as above Better and safer bicycle lanes and cycle ways away from roads Safer roads and trails
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 124
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often Better footpath access
What would encourage you to cycle more often Better Cycle paths around pacific palms connecting Coomba Road to bluey’s & Boomerang & Smith’s Lake.
Better footpaths Pacific Palms
More cycle ways between Pacific Palms and Forster
safe roadside connections between Blueys, Boomerang and Elizabeth Beaches, circuiting back via the lake. Better facilities with walking paths. Better maintained lookouts. Spaces to take the dog
Love walking!
Safer pathways in Pacific Palms
Safe bike path at Pacific Palms Better paths
Pathways so I wouldn’t have to walk on the road. Pedestrian path between Elizabeth beach and north boomerang Better paths
Nothing
Pedestrian path between Elizabeth beach and north boomerang Cycle way on road
More walking tracks Better walking paths and tracks. N/a Better sealed pathways
Specific cycle paths,eg Pacific Palms to Forster. Safe places to cycle without competing with traffic Allocated bike lanes and bike paths
Better clearance between vehicles and walkers
Safer distance between vehicles and cyclists
a cycle path or continuous footpath off the road A dedicated cycle/pedestrian ways
a cycle path or continuous footpath off the road A dedicated cycle/pedestrian ways, particularly in allowing my kid to ride and run Safer conditions—bike paths!
I am happy with the frequency of my walking.
Possum Brush
A paved pavement around the palms beaches area. More safe walk and cycle ways
Rural out of Stratford
Safe walking tracks
Smiths Lake
Footpaths
A cycle track around the above area. More safe walk and cycle ways
Footpaths Safe walking path
Safe Riding path
better pathways Somewhere flat to walk in Smiths lake. Nothing. I do heaps of exercise
Better roads for dog walking on the beach
Nothing. I don't have/want a bicycle Safer roads and bridges to cross improved road shoulder
Better walking tracks
Improved road ways
Stratford Tarbuck Bay
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 125
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often
What would encourage you to cycle more often
Taree
Safer and cleaner environment
Safer and cleaner environment Dedicated cycleways off the vehicular carriageway Cycle lanes on secondary roads
Clear footpaths legal sortcuts in CBD More shaded parhways
Better path ways
Nothing I have knee problems that I've been advised to cycle more and walk less
Better walkways Being able to use a footpath rather then having to walk on the road with a pram because it’s minutely smoother then the dirt/grass
better mobility but footpaths that are not broken or needing repair would help. Even ones in Taree are sometimes damaged. Better paths
Safer places to ride especially streets around Taree cycle lanes are usually just car parking lanes with a continuous white line they are very dangerous
A mini cycle track around the outskirts of Edinburgh Park Taree West would be great for adults & kids as the one at the Rec Grounds is too far to cycle for my kids & we can’t fit all the bikes in the car & there aren’t any footpaths in our area to cycle on only the very busy roads
Same as above
A better sealed road as we have no footpath. A small portion of road recently upgraded, thank you, but so much more needed to make it safer. I have had 2 falls which resulted in a broken ankle due to the pot holes and rough surface in areas. Better walking paths, ones that are wider. More public water fountains during the summer months. Foot paths to walk on. TINONEE
to have designated cycle/walking areas around the Tinomee village Nice walking trails through the Bush or along waterways.
as above
Safer well lit paths, especially along faster stretches of road & better pavements. This is especially poor for strollers or wheelchairs
Safer cycle paths along faster roads such as Saltwater Road or down towards Manning Point. Roads too fast & narrow especially with children
Wallabi Point
Wallabi Point
More cycleways around towns away from busy, narrow, dangerous roads. Designated cycle paths of good construction More tracks
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 126
Location
What would encourage you to walk more often 2 dogs.
More time off
Better cycleways
In Old Bar- more paths
Bike paths or lanes in Wallabi Point along Saltwater rd specifically Paths to the park and beach to make it safer for children to travel on rather than the road. Better condition and safer roads.
Paths that make it safer for children to travel on rather than walking along the road. Warranulla
Wingham
What would encourage you to cycle more often Better tracks and trails, bike racks outside estalblishments, general more welcoming culture of cycling and it's benefits in everday life. If I'm honest....not having to wear a helmet! Wider verges along new roads to make room. Education for car drivers. Revolution!!
Safer roads! As we live on a dirt road (Upper Myall Road) Road users don’t respect other users (log truck, garbage trucks, passenger vehicles) - as such, they travel at 80km+ When passing you, so you are blanketed in dust, hit with debris - mind you this happens whether in car, bike or on foot! Also the debris (gravel&rocks) on Road is a major slips, trips and falls hazard. Trying to run on gravel road is dangerous for those of us in rural areas where there is no footpath option - the road is our footpath/cycle way. Established and maintained tracks/paths in my town.
scenic routes near water or river
Safer cycle ways. For years my husband and I were regular bicycle commuters to work in Taree until he had a disastrous accident on Youngs Road. I was astounded when the road between Wingham and Taree was improved there was no space to ride a bike safely. Missed opportunity there. safe cycleways
decent footpaths to taree
decent cycleway to taree
Mind over Mattress !! maybe an early morning or evening walking group Better paths around town
Better bike tracks
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 127
A.3
Survey Issues
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Pacific Palms
Cycling
All over the area
Walking
Barrington
Cycling
Barrington
Cycling
Barrington
Walking
Thunderbolts Way
Barrington
Walking
All
Barrington to Gloucester
Cycling
Billabong Park Gloucester
Walking
Black head
Cycling
Lakes way
All the way
Black head
Walking
In general
Poor paths
Blueys Beach
Cycling
Boomerang Drive
Coomba Bay Road
Roadside dangerous; Concrete trucks causing near misses from overtaking cyclists. You would not know how to make a smooth surface if it bit you The shoulder is narrow, not allowing safe riding on the busy road. No foot or bike path available for safe access. Safe cycling opportunities.
Thunderbolts way
Between the Barrington Recreation Reserve and the Barrington Store
The RMS is building a new bridge that will now have two vehicle lanes and a footpath (the old bridge had one vehicle lane and no footpath). This will significantly increase traffic speeds in the 100km/hr zone because vehicles won't need to give way at the bridge any more. At the same time, pedestrians will now wish to walk between the picnic area and the store due to the new footpath. The bridge footpath needs to be augmented with a footpath that links the recreation reserve to the store. No pathways to walk or cycle off the road.off the No off road cycleway/ pathway for school students, those exercising or those needing to go between Barrington and Gloucester to walk or ride safely. The pathway through the park is uneven and a hazard to those on walking frames or walking sticks - stones needs to be replaced and better pathways around park Would be fab to ride to black head or the valley view cafe for lunch. Narrow roads again Uneven services & having to cross to opposite sides of the road to be able to use the paths There is an urgent need for a cycleway between the beaches to allow safe passage for cyclists between Blueys, Boomerang and Elizabeth beaches.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 128
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Blueys Beach
Walking
Headland Road to blueys beach shops and beach and boomerang beach
Blueys Beach
Walking
Blueys Beach
Walking
Shops, Boomerange Drive
Blueys Beach / Elizaeth Beach
Walking
Boomerang Beach
Walking
Boomerang Beach
Walking
Pedestrian crossings are urgently needed to allow safe access to beaches and shops. speed bumps are urgently needed to slow traffic between boomerang beach and blueys beach. there are no safe crossings from the footpath side of the road to access the beaches. Need Pedestrian crossing Dog walking hours too limited
Boomerang Drive
Boomerang Drive
Dangerous width plus quality of road for cyclists and pedestrians
166
I'd like to see a boardwalk area along and within the dune at Boomerang Beach connecting the beach access boardwalks that are currently there. There are a number of people who for a number of reasons, can't walk on the sand at the beach and miss out on enjoyable walks that take in the beach and ocean views. Having to walk along Boomerang Beach Road is not very attractive and there is no view of the beach. A boardwalk in the dune similar to what other councils have included such as Jervis Bay, Byron Bay etc would be a tourist facility as well as a local facility that would enhance the enjoyment and tourism attraction of the area. we are on the eastern side of Boomerang Drive and the current footpath is on the western side of the road. We have to cross Boomerang Drive at a dangerous blind spot to access the western side pathway then opposite the beach entry, have to again cross Boomerang Drive to go to the beach. A bike/pedestrian lane allocation on the eastern side of Boomerang Drive from Headland Road to the beach entry at south Boomerang Beach would be a safe option and eliminate the need to cross busy Boomerang Drive especially during the busy summer and warm weather times.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 129
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Boomerang Beach
Walking
Boomeragn Drive
Boomerang Beach to Elizabeth Beach
Walking
Boomerang Drive
Boomerang Drive between Blueys beach and Boomerang beach
Walking
Charlitt Bay / Blueys Beachs
Walking
Boomerang Drive
166 unit 2
260
safety - pedestrians crossing the road - low visibility on the peak of the hill - speeding traffic - i have sent emails to Council and Safety Roads NSW - but no action so far. I'd like to see a boardwalk area along and within the dune at Boomerang Beach connecting the beach access boardwalks that are currently there. There are a number of people who for a number of reasons, can't walk on the sand at the beach and miss out on enjoyable walks that take in the beach and ocean views. Having to walk along Boomerang Beach Road is not very attractive and there is no view of the beach. A boardwalk in the dune similar to what other councils have included such as Jervis Bay, Byron Bay etc would be a tourist facility as well as a local facility that would enhance the enjoyment and tourism attraction of the area. also the walkway from Boomerang Beach to Elizabeth beach- needs a concrete cycle/walk path safely away from the road In January 2015 My Daughter wrote to Council requesting urgent consideration of a pedestrian Crossing ref. 3087379 and the request was refused. WH, traffic engineer deemed that a crossing in this location was not warranted. He assured us that traffic speed monitors would be installed to monitor the situation. We received no further communication on the issue. the issue has only become increasingly urgent in subsequent years as traffic and pedestrian usage has increased. Do we have to wait for an accident to happen before Council attends to this urgent problem. Needs a path from bus stop to shop and doctors for community safety
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 130
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Charlotte Bay
Cycling
Coomba Bay
Cycling
Coomba Bay
Walking
Coomba Park
Cycling
Coopernook
Walking
Coomba Rd and the lakes way Macquarie
Coopernook
Walking
All
There is no safe place to ride from the start of Coomba road. I once tried to ride with my children from the start of Coomba Road to Pacific Palms Public School and I didn’t feel it was safe so we have not done this again. Its unsafe to cycle anywhere in this area its unsafe to walk in the area as there are no pathways Cycles being ridden in groups blocking off half of the road and being a hazard on blind corners near motel the road is pot holed and very narrow, from the post office to the school, the footpath is so steep often with long grass. There are NO concreted footpaths in Coopernook and everyone must walk on the road. That includes people with walkers, parents with prams and dog walkers. We seem to have been forgotten by council, we don't even get a mention in the list of towns. Shame on council. No safe footpath
Coopernook
Walking
Council area
Cycling
Macquarie street
Council area
Cycling
Crowdy head
Cycling
Crowdy head rd
Darawank
Cycling
The lakes way
Diamond beach
Cycling
behind motel, and from post office to school
dangerous roads
1
There should be a cyclist on the Traffic committee to ensure all new work is cycle friendly and meets the relevant requirements for the provision of cycling infrastructure. I often travel along the highway and see many touring cyclists riding the edge. The area is missing out as these tourists are not encouraged to come into the major centres due the poor quality of roads like the Lakes Way. There are many options to Link the major towns by carrying out some work on fire trails and the like and promoting these routes Widening of the road to allow a bike way from Harrington to Crowdy head Every time they Redgrave, only carry it to just over the white line, leaves super rough surface to cycle on if you want to keep as far away from the traffic as possible. Inadequate space to cycle safely and not hold up traffic. Safety on the roads
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 131
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Diamond Beach
Cycling
Diamond Beach
Walking
Diamond Beach
Walking
Diamond Beach to Black Head
Cycling
Diamond Beach to Black Head
Cycling
Diamond Beach to Blackhead
Walking
There is no suitable, safe, roadside pathways A roadside multi user pathway will be required even with a future coastside pathway. Residents and particularly holiday makers will continue to take the direct route along Diamond Beach road to Black Head. This must be included in planning. Cannot wait for land developments to begin before the 3 villages connecting pathways are implemented. There needs to be a roadside multiuser pathway along Diamond Beach Road connecting with the new roadside pathway on Black Head road installed asap. This is a major safety issue not only for locals cycling, riding or walking between the villages, but is an accident waiting to happen with holiday makers (adults and children and particularly during summer) riding along the side of the roads. This is an extremely dangerous issue - there is nowhere for them to 'go'. Council recently rebuilt/upgraded Diamond Beach Road and did not address this (already clearly and long, identified safety issue) in any way. Paths should definately be multiuser - walkers, horse riders, cyclists,. There are no safe, multiuse, roadside pathways
Elizabeth Beach
Walking
Hillside Parade
43
Elizabeth Beach
Unsafe access to roads, uneven surfaces Why don't we have an ocean pool where people can do laps or nippers/surf club training if the ocean is rough. It is unbelievable to me that we have ONE 25m indoor pool for this entire area. in the afternoon with swimming lessons there is ONE lane available at The Aquatic Centre. Look around you .. people need exercise, stress relief and connection with nature. PLEASE give us an Ocean Pool.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 132
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Entire Council
Cycling
Everywhere
Walking
Hawks Nest
Walking
Forster
Cycling
Forster
Cycling
Lakesway (south of Forster)
Forster
Cycling
Little
Forster
Cycling
Forster
Cycling
Forster
Cycling
Forster
Cycling
Forster
Cycling
Forster
Cycling
Forster
Cycling
Forster
Walking
All streets being upgraded
Mirren st Hawks Nest and Tuloa ave Little st.
most of the way to the shop
Everywhere
Little Street
When a major thorough fare such as the Lakes Way is being upgraded Cycling facilities should be provided. Diamond Beach road was recently upgraded and the opportunity was lost to improve cycling between the 3 Villages. I spoke to Engineer in charge and it was quite evident that cycling was not on his radar even though the community have wanted upgrades to cycle infrastructure for 25 plus years. It would seem the old Taree Council attitude of not listening to the community lives on Pathways are uneven and dangerous, lack of seats and safe footpath, for some people uneven ground grass no footpath is an issue Squeeze points along road creating dangerous conditions for cycling. Speed humps would have been safer for all. Lack of safety for road riders. Cars drive too close to cyclists and are inpatient. Many women have decided not to cycle for this reason. Even a safe route to Green Point would help. No room to cycle along water front Drivers, bikes and roads just don't mix Cars parked in rare and inadequate cycle lanes Bicycle tracks need to be separated from vehicle traffic Lack of bike paths Motorists not being aware of the rules pertaining to cyclist's right to use the roadway. I have had a few close calls with motorists trying to force their way past me when I'm riding through roundabouts and 'chicanes'. Bike track in ill repair all adjacent to the lakesway near the high school Poorly maintained. pot holes, weeds, negelect I visit elderly friend at evermore can’t walk to town/mainstreeet and back completely on footpaths, spaces where there are no paths and have to walk on road - not safe or ideal for our elders in the community.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 133
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Forster
Walking
Kularoo Dr
Forster
Walking
Head Street
Forster
Walking
Little street
Forster
Walking
Little st
Forster
Walking
Forster
Walking
Little street
Forster
Walking
Likely Street
Forster
Walking
Little street
57
No footpaths and the grass strip is too narrow in many areas so I am regularly forced onto the road with my pram or walking to the beach There should be overhead pedestrian crossings with lifts to assist locals and holiday makers to cross over Head Street safely without causing a car traffic jam - its disgraceful - especially during the holiday periods People riding on that narrow footmpath The share path at the end of the boardwalk at the courthouse kind of stops and then starts again at the lake pool and then stops again. It would be great to have a share path for cycling and walking all the way to Barclays marina or even mac Donald’s. I walk and ride with my little boy but find it quite difficult to navigate this area without going on the road. It’s a great area that is under-utilised with foot and cycling traffic. Limited pathways, either being not long enough, bad quality (eg too small) particularly around the lake, not very scenic in terms of allowing you to see everything that forster has Road too narrow. Motorists speeding. The road is narrow to drive let alone share with walkers. There is long grass that snakes could be in and walkers tend to walk on the narrow very busy road then move off when car comes by. It needs a footpath badly. It's a main walking track to stocklands/business. Especially the part of the street near Kularoo drive it is an open field plenty of room for a walking path. Cars speeding and making it dangerous walking along with children. Please put in speed bumps or proper zebra crossings
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 134
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Forster
Walking
Little street
All of it
Forster
Walking
The Lakes Way
1
Forster
Walking
Little Street
Forster
Walking
LIttle St
Forster
Walking
Boundary St ( near Baptist Care)
Forster
Walking
Little Street
54
The crossings don’t have zebra stripes so there’s ZERO purpose to the refuges along the street as cars don’t stop I get stuck in the middle of the road with my kids. It’s completely unsafe to cross little street to access the lake and I’m constantly fearful for my children crossing. Also no crossing or lights near McDonald’s in Forster, it’s a nightmare crossing. You can’t walk to stocklands also from the main part of town without many dangerous and illegal j-walking attempts There is nowhere for pedestrians to safely cross The Lakes Way anywhere from McDonalds down to Stocklands, it is crazy seeing the number of school kids and other people trying to dodge cars across The Lakes Way. Every day people are putting their lives at risk because there isn’t a set of lights or a pedestrian crossing. The pedestrian refuges are completely useless as cars don’t have to give way. How about the idea of extending a walkway all along that water front The path that comes from the bridge past the boat sheds just runs out in places - it would be fantastic if this could be one continuous walk along the water to Barclays at the end of Little St. No pedestrian crossing on this street between Kularoo Rd and Breese Parade this makes Stocklands very difficult to access for people who live east of Boundary St Have to give way constantly to all cyclists on the narrow pathway at times unsafe to do so..the lake walkway signed as no bikes skateboards and scooters..pedestrians and children only is used as a bike path without regard to pedestrians
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 135
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Forster
Walking
Little Stree and Bruce St
Forster
Walking
Little St
Forster
Walking
People beach
Forster - Bennetts Headland walk
Walking
Forster to Boomerang Beach
Cycling
Lakesway. Bike path needed very dangerous to ride
Forster tuncurry
Cycling
Lakes way
Forster Tuncurry
Walking
Length of Little and Bruce Sts
Pavement surface especially from Bruce St into Town and next to phone boxes in Little Street...missing footpath sections in Bruce and Short St..over 55 community and retirement units residents forced to use the roadway to walk and use mobility aids A Pedestrian Crossing is required at the pool area..vehicles do not stop for pedestrians at any time of the year.. Ranger not patrolling the 15min parking in Little Street The gravel paths are lumpy and uneven and the gravel is slippery This walk has very pooorly contrasted steps that are covered in shade and appear as a ramp to people with less than perfect vision. The path alsao does not connect with the Pebbly Beach walking track so you have to walk on the road. At the end of the path you end up at the top of One Mile sand dune and there is no path that connects with the track at One Mile or connects to the board walk. I would also love to see a better pathway from South One Mile around to Burgess Beach. Currently people have to walk on the road but this is stunning coastal scenery. very dangerous to ride Or drive when cyclists are on the road and you have to be 1 metre away to pass on the wrong side of the road! Narrow, no shoulders for safe cycling We have such a great spot to live but we seem so far behind in being proactive in building and adding to our walking and bike tracks. If money was put into this it would encourage more people to use them and with longer cycleway say from Blackhead to Forster as an example it would be a great tourist attraction.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 136
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Forster Tuncurry
Coming from a mobility scooter user, it can be very difficult to get around town useing the provided foot paths, due to them starting and stopping and also not having an access point up into the path and having very rough surfaces inbetween forcing me onto the unsafe road's, also people parking there cars across the foot path's is also a big problem that I have faced with trying to get around.This really needs to be looked into further. Coming from a mobility scooter user, it can be very difficult to get around town useing the provided foot paths, due to them starting and stopping and also not having an access point up into the path and having very rough surfaces inbetween forcing me onto the unsafe road's, also people parking there cars across the foot path's is also a big problem that I have faced with trying to get around.This really needs to be looked into further. We need to be proactive
Forster Tuncurry
Forster tuncurry Forster/Tuncurry
Cycling
Forster/Tuncurry
Cycling
Glocester
Cycling
Gloucester
Cycling
Thunderbolts Way
Neotsfield Avenue to Irrawang Road
Gloucester
Cycling
Irrawang Rd
54
Walkers not understanding that when they hear a bike bell it means a bike might be approaching. Don't think they realise there are shared paths. Pedestrians not aware of rules pertaining to shared paths. There is no designated bike ways away from traffic There is nowhere safe to ride in this 80km/hr section of road. This cuts me and my children off from being able to visit my parents (my children's grandparents) by bike, even though they live less than 4km from us. The dangerous section also cuts us off from a number of our friends. From Irrawang Rd to Gloucester Town cars and trucks do not slow down to the 80km zone
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 137
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Gloucester
Cycling
Gloucester
Cycling
Gloucester
Cycling
Gloucester
Cycling
Gloucester
Cycling
Gloucester
Cycling
Gloucester
Cycling
Ashworth
6
Gloucester
Cycling
All
1
Gloucester
Walking
KIng,Church, Hume, Elliot, Gregson, Philip, Denison
Closest to the railway line side
Gloucester
Walking
Gloucester
Walking
King St and Ravenshaw Gardeners Lane
Gloucester
Walking
Denison Street
Gloucester
Walking
Thunderbolts way
Gloucester to Barrington
Thunderbolts way Bucketts Rd
the whole way
Billabong Park
This stretch of rd is 100 km/hr and has no shoulder. Local cyclists ride this rd daily and our local cycle group ride it most Sundays. It would be of great benefit to have a safe cycle path between the towns of Gloucester and Barrington. It would not only benefit current local cyclists but encourage many more locals to ride into town. Not forgetting to mention the tourism benefit of having great cycle paths. Gravel riding is becoming more popular so we need safe ways for cyclists to be able to access these quieter roads. Multiple dangerous narrow potholed roads Not enough off road riding infrastructure Very heavy traffic and no cycleway Not safe to ride with no shoulder Vehicle not give cyclists enough room because of poor road No safe way to ride to town with family Have to cross main road as there is enough road on the edge of the road to ride More cycle paths required There are no pathways to access the medical centre, there are no pathways to walk people that are in wheel chairs down the street, we have to walk on the road, my children have to ride on the road, elderly and disabled people have to ride on the road for part of the way access a driveway to get onto the current paths near the school, then some of the "pram ramps are so steep that we have to walk to another driveway to get across the other side in barrington street to be safe. unable to view with safety crossing this intersection Potholes, very uneven road surface, no room for footpath so condition of road is important. I have difficulty walking on uneven surfaces. Can the path through Billabong park (both side of the bridge) be widened to accommodate walkers, bikes and wheelchairs? safety of pavement and crossing of main roads
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 138
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Gloucester
Walking
Church
Gloucester
Walking
Too many to list
Gloucester
Walking
Denison st
Medical centre
Gloucester
Walking
Denison Street
Between CBD (Church Street) and the Swimming Pool
Gloucester
Walking
King st
78
GLOUCESTER
Walking
IRRAWANG RD
54
Gloucester
Walking
Ravenshaw st
Gloucester
Walking
Most
Gloucester
Walking
Boundary st
0
Gloucester
Walking
King St
78
Gloucester township
Walking
Billabong park
Gloucester/Barrington
Cycling
Thunderbolts Way
7
The whole way
Obstructing trees. I'm allergic to bottlebrush and grevillea trees. Can anything be done about so many of the old, uneven footpaths around the town? Very unsafe to access as a pedestrian as no footpath. With a pram it’s near impossible and I end having to drive even though it is a few hundred meters from my home. 1) There is a blind spot due to a fence where pedestrians and cars can't see each other when crossing Billabong Lane (entrance/exit to carpark). 2) Boundary Street is very wide for crossing pedestrians and cyclists. The volume of crossing traffic is very high at times, eg. market days, when soccer/netball is on. Pedestrian access at eastern end of King st to amenities. Busy rd with no footpath, we have to push a pram on the rd with no safe way to cross ravenshaw st. Between Irrawang Rd and town the log trucks do not slow down enough following the 100km zone There is no foot path linking the high school to residential houses. Also footpaths linking to the primary school do not have wheel access from footpath to road. Some are still curb and gutter, no ramp. This does not provide safe access for families walking to and from school- trip hazard and prams have no access. No disabled access on pathways to street No foot paths on side of road Disabled access for scooters and wheel chairs. Not all cross roads have ramps. No footpath to access the services of the council or neighborhood centre, forced to walk on the road with a pram. Existing paths are uneven and are a hazard to those using walkers or walking sticks and also too narrow Not safe to ride this stretch with 100km speed limit and no shoulder
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 139
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Green Point
Cycling
Green Point
Walking
Green Point Drive
Green Point
Walking
Green Point Drive
Green Point
Walking
Green Point
Walking
Green Point
Walking
Green Point Dive Green Point Drive Green Point Drive
There is no safe access for cycling from Green Point into Forster. Cyclists must contend with traffic at 100km/hr+ on a road that is quite narrow & has a poor surface in patches. The distance is a manageable one where kids could ride into school if it was safer. Constant overgrown vegetation along a suggested route to Lakes Way Residents have been asking for years for a dedicated cycle/pedestrian pathway along Green Point Dive to Lakes Way. No dedicated cycle/pedestrian pathway No footpaths
Green Point
Walking
Halliday’s Point
Cycling
Hallidays Point
Cycling
Hallidays Point
Cycling
Green Point Drive Black Head Rd & Diamond Beach Rd Diamond Beach Road Heritage cl
Hallidays point
Cycling
Federation drive
Hallidays point
Walking
Black head road
415
Hallidays Point
Walking
415
Hallidays Point to Tuncurry
Cycling
Blackhead Road Lakes Way
harrington
Cycling
harrington
Cycling
1 through 105
Road narrows drastically & many holiday houses have insufficient off road parking meaning walkers have to walk in traffic line - there are a number of poor visibility spots (especially with sun at certain times) & traffic seems to often speed. No footpaths Too dangerous
10
The part between the Tuncurry Tip and Tuncurry
harrington road
No p r division for pedestrians which is very hazardous We cannot cycle safely with our children to friends at Tallwoods, or to Homestead or to Blackhead beach. Blackhead rd is very unsafe for walking or cycling. No safe path to walk/cycle anywhere from our street. Have to get in the car every time bad for the environment, bad for health. Not safe for pedestrians.. council does not mow Blackhead Road enough No linked villages for pedestrians There is no separate path and the family doesn't like cycling that section as it is dangerous
cars are too fast road not wide enough to cycle
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 140
Where is the issue?
Mode
Harrington
Cycling
Harrington
Cycling
Harrington
Walking
Pretoria Pde
Harrington
Walking
Harrington rd
716
Harrington
Walking
Beach
In front of ljhooker
Harrington
Walking
Beach Street
The Park near the break wall.
Harrington
Walking
Jabiru Drive
7. To beach street
Harrington
Walking
Beach
All the way along from the hotel to the boat ramp From about 63 Pretoria along the river to the end.
Harrington
What is the issue? Beach Street
Various
Pretoria Parade
Harrington Beach State Park
Walking
Crowdy Head Road
Hawks Nest
Cycling
Albatross Ave (at Muneela Ave) thru wetland to Singing Bridge
No pathway between Pretoria Parade and Harbour Blvd. No pathway near the boat ramp to connect to the next pathway. No pathway or safe crossing at the bridge near River and Jabiru. All of these are unsafe from traffic and uneven. Would be good to have a cycle path out to crowdy Need somewhere to rest Very concerned about river bank erosion Would like to see pathway continue to the Manor Rd development to help with parking in Pretoria Pde No connection to Harrington waters foreshore Cats reverse parking and no footpath, so walking with prams or cycling you have to dodge traffic and the condition of the road is not the best either No pedestrian access for elderly and wheelchairs to safely go along the park to get to and from Harrington Breakwall. There is no path to the childcare centre, so with the prams staff and children must walk on the road. The prams are 4 seaters and wide. No lighting, so if walking at night you have to walk on the road, solar lights need to be put in There is an increasing number of vehicles parking on the narrow street as more houses are being built. These vehicles are from families coming to enjoy the river and parklands. There is an area near the pathway that could be utilised for a car park to make it safer for these families and the residents of the area. No pathway for pedestrians to walk/cycle from Harrington to Crowdy Head. lack of connection
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 141
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Hawks Nest
Cycling
Myall Way
Hawks Nest
Cycling
Jimmys Beach Boulevarde
Hawks Nest
Cycling
The Anchorage.
Hawks Nest
Cycling
Tuloa rd that continues to Winda Woppa.
Hawks Nest
Cycling
Hawks Nest
Walking
The Anchorage
Hawks Nest
Walking
The Boulevarde and Winda Woppa in general
Hawks Nest & Winda Woppa
Cycling
From the singing bridge to Mungo Brush road through the Koala reserve the road is very narrow and the “bike lane” is not suitable for road bikes. The bike lane under the bridge and through the back of Hawks Nest is not easily accessible if you ride over the bridge an almost completely impossible to get back on the road when coming back to Tea Gardens. Please consider constructing a bike/walking track along here. Particularly in holiday time, many young families cycle along thus relatively narrow roadway & with the high volume of holiday traffoc which includes caravans & boats being towed it is very dangerous. This road and Winda Woppa in general is popular for cycling especially in holiday times. There is plenty of room for cyclists and traffic but the verges can be hazardous. This needs to be looked at rather than a cycleway which the resident do not want. No walking or cycle path. Lots of people want to access the beach at Winda Woppa but it is unsafe to ride especially for children who we want to encourage to keep fit and exercise. It is unclear what the cycling regulations are for crossing the Singing Bridge between HN/TG No designated path. Jimmy's Beach is popular, especially in holiday times and can get quite busy. Winda Woppa needs to be made a 40km speed zone or there I going to be a serious pedestrian incident. I do NOT want to see cycleways and formal walking paths introduced to the area. The primary attraction of the area is its informality and it should stay that way. Public funds should not be wasted on such activities.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 142
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Hawks Nest Winda Woppa
Cycling
The Anchorage
Hawks Nest Winda Woppa
Walking
The Boulevarde, The Anchorage and cross streets
Kolodong
Cycling
Kolodong Rd
Little street pool and boardwalk
Walking
Mcc areas
Walking
Old Bar
Cycling
Road edges rough and uneven. The road verges are wide enough to get onto to allow cars to pass but the edges of the tar are pot holed and very unsafe for bike wheels. If just the edges are fixed there is no need to put in expensive bike tracks. The residents certainly don’t want them! And they certainly do not want one way traffic on The Anchorage! Speeding cars. Speed limit MUST be dropped to 40 kph around Winda Woppa peninsular. There will be a fatality in a holiday period when families are trying to access Jimmy’s Beach, the roads are made narrower by tourist’s parked cars and some drivers still adhere to their right to do 50 kph. poorly maintained road and shoulders. Blind corners and narrow for dual passage traffic. That stupid little (as in tiny sign) on theboardwalk saying no bikes or skateboards if council was serious make make the sign bigger and police it as I'm constantly dodging these bikers especially in the holidays Incompetence of the first degree I would like to see a walking/cycling trail through the bush from Badgers Park (near Rose Street bridge) to E.G. Trad playing fields which would then link to the existing track to Wallabi. This could follow Racecourse Creek and the exiting sewerage easement which was recently mowed. I realise this would pass through private property earmarked for a golf course development and previously approved by Taree Council. However, as this is an existing easement I believe the current council should be able to negotiate to achieve not only excellent walking/cycling access but also maintain an essential wildlife corridor linking the littoral rain forest behind OB Public School via Racecourse Creek to Koorainghat and Khappinghat reserves.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 143
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Old Bar
Cycling
Old Bar
Cycling
Old Bar
Cycling
Old bar
Cycling
Old Bar
Cycling
Old Bar
Cycling
Old Bar
Cycling
Old Bar
Cycling
Old Bar Road
Walking and cycling with grandchildren is dangerous as there is nowhere safe to do this in Old Bar. Would love to cycle in to Taree but track too scary. Holistic planning is needed to ensure that the inevitable development of OB is coordinated and takes into account community amenity, ambiance and environmental concepts as well as infrastructure needs. I think most people settle here because of the relaxed seaside/rural atmosphere and don't want over development/commercialisation to ruin this. Please finish the path out of town to saltwater rd The is no safe passage from Old Bar Rd to the school. There is no safe passage from the beach to Bluhaven estate to then get to Wallabi Point. There is no safe passage from Wallabi Point to Saltwater Reserve. All would be used a lot , by families if you started to link these up. It’s actually both cycle and walking. Cars parked on nature strips forcing you to walk on the street. This is an ongoing problem at 20 Old Bar rd and crn old bar Rd and David Street. Poor surfaces on roads - lots of gravel because roads have not been swept. Old Bar ‘cycleway’ is poor and only useable by people on mountain bikes. Old Bar road is dangerous and road bikes would prefer to be on a cycle path Unfinished cycle track
Old Bar
Cycling
Old Bar rd
Old Bar
Cycling
Old bar rd
The path is gravel and goes into the house ie is not direct to old Bar town/ beach The cycle way near the new men’s shed adjacent to the sports ground . The path is uneven and boggy when wet
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 144
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Old Bar
Walking
Old Bar
Walking
Old Bar
Walking
old bar
Walking
Old bar
Walking
Old bar
Walking
Old Bar
Walking
David St
Old Bar
Walking
Waterman St
Old Bar
Walking
Intersection of Wyden St and Forrest Lane
Many people are requesting concrete foot paths in OB but I think these should be limited to the high walking traffic areas e.g. Waterman Street from OB Road to access Club Old Bar, down David Street from OB Road to OB Public School and Flow Bar. I think too many formed footpaths will make OB less of a village and damage the current ambiance Beach walking is a problem with tides and street walking is dangerous for families. A shared boardwalk for cycling and walking from Old Bar to Diamond Beach would be an asset to the area and a real draw card for tourists to the area Walking and cycling for seniors in Old Bar is non existent. Again, a boardwalk along the coast to Diamond Beach would benefit so many people in the community. no walking path you have to walk on the road and it is very uneven in many areas Very dangerous gravel rd with cars and pedestrians mixed We need a track from old bar to Wallaby that follows the sewage line that would be a really good track Very busy primary school st with no footpaths, and lots of prams, cars and kids on bikes Very busy st as it leads to the main st. It’s without footpaths, meaning disability scooters, walkers and people with prams are dodging parked cars and moving traffic and it is definitely unsafe As mentioned before, there is no footpath along Wyden Street. I know for a fact there is a person who is in a wheelchair who lives in Wyden Street and I see them out on the road on a daily basis. So many areas in Old Bar that don't have footpaths. With the large amount of children in Bluehaven Estate who go to School at Old Bar Public, they either have to get a lift to school, walk their bikes on the grass nature strip or ride them on the road. So dangerous.
Mud bishops rd
no number
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 145
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Old Bar Road, Manning Point ,Tinonee
Cycling
Pacific Palms
Cycling
Lakes Way
Pacific Palms
Cycling
All main streets
Too narrow and unsafe to ride road bike on. Inadequate shoulders so you can't get off road so roads can pass and biggest problem is the state of the surface of these roads ....so dangerous and we are getting so many punctures because of the state of the riad surface. Narrow road - it is an awsome ride if u survive there and back food and coffee inbetween is fab Safety
Pacific Palms
Walking
Pacific Palms
Walking
Boomerang Drive Boomerang Drive and Lakes Way
Pacific Palms
Walking
All main streets
Red Head
Walking
Red Head Road
Seal Rocks
Cycling
Lakes way
All the way
Smith Lake
Walking
Keith Crescent
12
Smiths Lake
Walking
Patsys Flat Rd
Smiths Lake
Walking
Amaroo Drive
Between 32 and 42 (30km/h
Smiths Lake
Walking
Amaroo Drive
Smiths Lake
Walking
Amaroo Drive
Smiths Lake
Walking
Amaroo Drive
Smiths Lake
Walking
Smiths Lake
Walking
Smiths Lake
Walking
From Forster
Debert Reserve
26
Macwood between Casson and Patsys Flat Rd Corner Macwood & First Ridge Rds.
Lake of safe connection on Boomerang Drive footpaths not continuous and in some cases such as near old oasis caravan park or Elizabeth Beach there is not even a road shoulder. it's dangerous! Dedicated pedestrian and cycle ways will benefit locals and support tourism. Uneven nature strip so have to walk on road Narrow roads. Riding in risky and almist not worth the risk. But the destinations are fabulous. Why drive when u can ride. No footpath and no bike paths unsafe for all pedestrians due to no footpath and narrow roadway A footpath is needed to address pedestrian safety on this street that see heavy traffic, in partifcular from Macwood Road to lake Foreshore via Casson Road. Lack of feedback from council about urgent repairs required to children's playground that present a risk. Emails sent - No reply. No footpaths to playground reserve Small dam which supplies water for wildlife and is a reserve for fire fighting, is overgrown and unusable and full of weeds. The roads are narrow. The edges are not sealed so it is difficult to walk on the edge. Road rather narrow for passing cars and pedestrians Exposed tree roots - tripping hazard - and a dangerous spot for walking on road.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 146
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Smiths Lake
Walking
Amaroo Dr
Tallwoods
Walking
The Knoll
9
Tarbuck to Blueys and beyond
Cycling
We can not walk or ride beyond Tallwoods without having to put our bikes in the car because it is not safe for a young family to ride/walk along blackhead road too narrow
Taree
Cycling
Commerce St
Busy road and not a clear passage way for cyclists
Taree
Cycling
Cars parked along the safest part of the road for cycling
Taree
Cycling
Taree
Walking
Taree
Walking
River St
Taree
Walking
High St north
Taree
Walking
Whitbred St
Taree
Walking
Taree
Walking
Playground is dilapidated.
All
High Street/Edinburgh Drive
There is so much theft of bikes in the area I dare not use mine and have kept it secure and hidden for all the years I've lived here. I ride alone cos most cyclists are discourteous and aggravate motorists. Motorists tend to be aggressive towards all cyclists probably for that reason. Even Taree is growing and becoming congested so I ride my bike into town whenever possible which saves someone else a car park understanding of this would be a great help to our community multiple issues (provided a list to meeting The riverside park is a fabulous asset. Parkrun has helped people to discover it's beauty. Could we link up with cycle paths through the business district? No footpath and too many cars due to mechanics parked on roadside and on green strip. No footpath, lack of trees to provide shade for walking. Lack of trees to provide shade in many areas throughout town. Extreme ignorance of community who insist on littering and noone policing the behaviour. Town requires surveillance in specific areas of town to prevent further crime: such as Coles carpark, Macquarie St carpark, Bushland Drive bush etc. The footpath stops at Fleet Street & doesn’t appear again till the retirement village at Balmaringa Place it is a very busy road & so dangerous for walkers & cyclists
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 147
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Taree.
Cycling
Commerce
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Spinefex Ave near Palm Lake to Country Club via Dunshea Estate western end of Marine Dve Myall st
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Marine parade
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Cnr Myall and Settlers Way Myall street
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Myall
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Myall Way
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Marine Drive
#1 - #59
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Corner of Settlers Way & Myall Street
#2 Settlers Way & #17 to #13 Myall Street
Whilst there are signs saying that Lane nearest to gutter is a cycling lane. It is barely the width of a parked car there are many parked cars so it is actually non-existent as a cyclinglane Lack of connection
Singing bridge Western end
Extend existing path along waterfront to Coupland St Cyclists need to be separated from pedestrians and traffic Cycleway ends abruptly. Needs to be continued to Budgaree st Poor cycle access to cross both roads. There is nowhere to ride the cycle heading east along myall street after 100 meters past Settlers Way I don’t feel safe cycling there Bad surface and broken edge on road. Nowhere for bicycles to safely cross Myall Was to get to Coles. The existing shared pathway on Marine drive from #59 towards the Singing Bridge needs to be extended along the entire length of Marine Drive so that bicylces can stay off the roadway that is narrow in parts this would improve the safety There is a 90m section of existing footpath at this corner that my partner has asked Council to convert into a shared pathway that will allow her to safely move from Settlers Way to the Myall Quays shopping centre via the pedestrian refuges without needing to ride on Myall Street (which would be a safety issue due to her mobility impairment that slows down the speed that she can ride her tricycle)
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 148
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Singing Bridge
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Corner Settlers Way & Myall Street
#2 Settlers Way / #17#15-#13 Myall Street
The ability to ride a bicycle across Singing Bridge without impeding vehicle traffic or pedestrians would be an improvement. Currently the pedestrian pathways on the bridge are too narrow to ride on due so bicycle riders must dismount to remain safe and walk across the bridge. If a pedestrian is on the same pathway then they can only pass if either the bike or the pedestrian moves onto the roadway I have previously raised a cycling safety issue with MidCoast Council about improving an existing 90 metre section of footpath into a shared pathway at the corner of Settlers Way and Myall Street in Tea Gardens but Council has not yet scheduled the improvement work. I originally wrote to Council in November 2018 about this issue. Council responded in February 2019 to confirm the improvement was being actioned but to date (November 2019) the work has not been commenced even though Council has done some work on the Pedestrian Refuge on Settlers Way that is exactly where the footpath issue is located. Council should hold a record of my request and a bunch of photos and map screenshots that I sent in regarding this request.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 149
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Marine Drive
Tea Gardens
Cycling
Marine Parade
Tea Gardens
Walking
Myall St
Tea Gardens
Walking
Tea Gardens
Walking
#1 to #59
0
Budgeted St
There is no shared pathway along this section of Marine drive so I need to ride my tricyle or mobility scooter on the narrow roadway in order to cycle to the restaurants further south east along Marine Drive. I currently get to the restaurants by riding along the existing shared pathways along Spinifex Ave, Settlers Way and use the footpath to cross over to the eastern side of Myall street, then ride along Boston Street, Budgeree Street and Coupland Ave to get to Marine Drive, and ride along Marine Drive until I can access the shared pathway that commences at the boat ramp Cycling along the waterfront there is a very big, rocky drop to the river from the Ogden St boat ramp to The Boatshed restaurant with no barrier, bump bar or fencing to stop a bike, mobility scooter or toddler from falling if they misjudge, become distracted or are crowded out by oncoming pedestrian traffic. Having taken my young grandchildren down there we have had several hair raising incidents when they have turned around to talk to me & have forgotten to steer or have got the wobbles because they are just learning to ride. Also dangerous when they ars walking because they become excited when they see something in the water & rush to the edge. Also, please consider continuing the path to at least the Oyster Hut, it runs out too early. No continues foot path along tea gardens road and Myall st No footpaths This relates to all of Tea Gardens. I re gently had a total knee replacement as have many inour town. In recovery mode it is necessary to walk each day, but it is difficult & can be dangerous esp In the early stages of recovery to walk on uneven ground, so footpaths are needed. Many streets have footpaths that start & stop for no apparent reason.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 150
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Tea gardens
Walking
Myall way
0-2
Tea gardens
Walking
Myall Street
100-140
Tea Gardens
Walking
riverfront street
Tea Gardens
Walking
Shared use pathways
Tea Gardens
Walking
Myall Road,
Tea Gardens
Walking
Myall Road,
Tea Gardens
Walking
Tea Gardens
Walking
Pedestrian refuge access opposite Coles on Myall Road.
There is no footpath along Myall way from the main shopping g centre to the industrial area yet there are dozens of pedestrians walk this route through sometimes long grass alongside an 80kmh zone. There is a stretch along the main road on the bend near the ambulance station that is incredibly dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists as there is NO FOOTPATH AND NO ROOM FOR ERROR. Blind corner at night when patrons leave the Country Club. It amazes me someone hasn’t been killed. Noticed that proposal to reduce speed limit in this street was unpopular with one resident at least. Surely a speed reduction need only apply during peak tourist time. I imagine Christmas and Easter wd suffice. Speed limits on mobility scooters, bicycles, electric bicycles and tricycles. Some don't use or even have bells to warn pedestrians. Should slso have rear vision mirrors. Particular difficulties in high tourist season. Access to pedestrian refuge opposite Coles is not suitable for a dual scooter, I transport both myself and husband who is unable to drive due to health issues and I don't drive. We now rely on the scooter to take us to the shops and medical center and find this access difficult as it is narrow and has acute corners with a drop on one side. No footpath for use of mobility scooters to access the industrial area, nursery and warehouse. Lack of footpaths we could use to access the industrial center, nursery and warehouse and the local shopping center in Myall road other than just Coles. When constructing these accesses there is no consideration for people using mobility scooters and the maneuvering needed to stay on these narrow paths and acute corners.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 151
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Tea Gardens
Walking
Tea Gardens
Walking
all footpaths
Tinonee
Cycling
Claxton Street
Tinonee
Walking
Manchester Street
Tinonee
Walking
Cotton Street
Tinonee village
Walking
Bucketts Way
Forster / Tuncurry
Cycling
Tuncurry
Cycling
Lakes Way north to the recycling centre
Tuncurry
Cycling
Point road
Tuncurry
Cycling
Lakes way
As this is an aged community with two retirement villages we need more and wider shared footpaths to access all the facilities all able bodied people take for granted (speaking for mobility scooter users). All footpaths need to wide enough to be shared footpaths. We are are an aged community with two retirement villages and we need to be able to access shopping and medical centers in safety. Limited pedestrian / cycle access No footpath for school children of both local and Taree School pupils who catch buses in this street. No Pedestrian / cycle access from school to Ridge Road Since road construction, there has been no provision made for pedestrians/mobility scooter access or cyclists Traffic everywhere...magpies in spring! much of this road has reasonable shoulders for riding completing those parts that are missing would allow MTB riders to access the gravel road to Black Head Memorial park. Great little park with some new fantastic shades (Thankyou!) which have helped attract more families to utilising the equipment throughout the day even when it is hot and sunny. This park like some others around could do with some sort of track for the kids to cycle around on a loop within the parks perimeter. Currently kids just go up and down the angled pathway through the park which is limiting. Not too much concrete but maybe something that connects the current concrete paths and loops around the playground No defined cycle path
Tuncurry
Walking
Taree st
From Ridge Road to Manchester Street
Ohma reserve. Path way along road blocked by overgrown bushes. Trees were cleared 16/12/2019. This has helped some, could’ve been better. Thank you
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 152
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Tuncurry
Walking
Manning st
?
Tuncurry
Walking
Heath Ave
20
Tuncurry
Walking
Parkes st
Tuncurry
Walking
Stewart parade
Tuncurry
Walking
Tuncurry
Walking
Tuncurry track behind the College
Cycling
Tuncurry, Forster, Black Head
Cycling
Wallabi point
Cycling
Pallman
15
Saltwater rd
Near the deck cafe and slipway the concrete pathway stops for about 20 metres. Small but significant for people’s walking needs experience. Tight bend urgently requires a path around the nature strip. Lack of connected share path between Tuncurry beach bowling club and the sporties. As well as the length of north st. There are some spots with a section of path and then parts without which means people walk/motorise scooter on the road when they’d prefer the sharepath as it would be safer Lack of sharepath for cycling and walking. Another great location that could be enhanced with some added or connected sharepath along the length of Stewart parade on the park side and also a connection between Stewart and Capel streets either between the cricket and soccer fields or at the end of the soccer fields Uneven foot paths The path goes around the corner to the left but needs to extend Straight to wharf street to connect with the oath across the road, then giving complete access to the Main Street 2 posts (to prevent car access) are placed on the track making passing impossible on a blind corner - a single central post would be preferable I try to avoid busy roads such as The Lakes Way and Black Head Road, it is frightening with the traffic and lack of tarred verges so cyclists end up in the gravel. Even the streets around Tuncurry and Forster (such as Manning and Head Streets)have limited space between cyclists, the traffic and parked cars. There is no path from the top of Wallabi Point that makes it safe for children to scooter or ride down to the beach or park. Also pushing a pram is difficult and not safe. The issue is between Walter fay st and pacific St along saltwater rd.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 153
Where is the issue?
Mode
What is the issue?
Waterfront around Smiths Lake foreshore
Walking
wingham
Cycling
No clear walkway and impossible for disabled persons . It is an iconic location and many people walk the foreshore especially in holiday season. A quality walkway around the lake would be an incentive and if a good one perhaps could be an event for tourism activities. no cycleways in town or to taree
Wingham
Walking
Bungay Rd
Wingham
Walking
Comboyne road wingham
Wingham
Walking
wingham
Walking
Forster / Tuncurry
Cycling
Hallidays Point
Cycling
Old Bar
Cycling
Old Bar
Cycling
Pacific Palms
Cycling
Pacific Palms
Cycling
Forster / Tuncurry
Walking
Forster / Tuncurry
Walking
Forster / Tuncurry
Walking
Forster / Tuncurry
Walking
Hallidays Point
Walking
No path to walk on
Old Bar
Walking
Uneven foot paths
Pacific Palms
Walking
There is nowhere to walk safely.
28A
My husband is in a wheelchair (since previously mentioned cycling accident) and we cannot go “walking” as the footpaths and even the road are so rough. There’s no adequate path for walking or riding to the main sports complex in WINGHAM hundreds over kids walk to the complex for there sporting activity Access to drinking water. The refill station is good but you need to be carrying a drink bottle. Bubblers would be good around town. no footpath to taree Cars get too close - disrespect for cyclists - aggressive drivers
Blackhead road
There is no cycle path or even a shoulder to ride on, my children would love to ride blackhead road from lakes way turnoff however I will not take them as there is no safe place for them to ride. Safe cycling limited by lack of bike paths Road surfaces and needing to walk on roadway. Old Bar road, Manning point road. Multiple streets with uneven surface. I don’t feel very safe cycling on The Lakesway Loose gravel as I have bad knee
Little st near vinnies
Telegraph pole in middle of pathway uneven walkways path lifting
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 154
Where is the issue?
Mode
Possum Brush
Walking
Rural out of Stratford
Walking
What is the issue? Macwood Road, Patsys Flat Road - Amaroo
No pathways in heavy road use areas Smiths Lake is part of Pacific Palms. Why do we always get left out at any improvements. We need to be able to share in walking and cycle ways. We respectfully ask that in any future discussions we are included in improvements.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 155
Appendix B
Price and Cost Estimate Assumptions
The following assumptions were used to establish high level order of magnitude cost estimates for projects identified in this plan. •
Construction of 2m wide concrete path per linear meter - $375
•
Construction of pram ramp – $2000 each
•
Path costs have an allowance of 2 x pram ramps per 100m of pathway
•
Mid-block Controlled Crossing - $20,000
•
Mid-block zebra crossing – $12,000
•
Waymarking route - $2 per linear meter
•
Upgraded Signs and lines - $25 per linear meter
•
Kerb build outs for uncontrolled crossing - $25,000
•
Sign Upgrades - $500 per location
Projects were banded into the following cost categories:
Cost
Weighting
Low
Under $50,000
Medium
$50,000 to $200,000
High
$200,000 to $1,000,000
Very High
Over $1,000,000
Subsequent refinement of project costs will be required to take into account site specific details including land ownership, service conflicts, planning and environmental constraints etc.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 156
Appendix C
Project Register
These tables done by Stantec differ to the main report’s equivalent tables as they have been further reviewed by Council. The main changes relate to measurments and location details.
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 157
Buladelah
Township
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Score
Cost Band
Buladelah
Crawford Street, btw Blanch Street to Meade Street
Connectivity
New Footpath
220
-
20
Medium
Buladelah
Meade Street, btw Stroud and Crawford
Connectivity
New Footpath
60
-
17
Low
Buladelah
Stroud Street (whole length)
Clarifying Shared Use Signage & Linemarking
700
-
22
Low
Buladelah
Existing Fire Trail between Alum Mountain Park and Stuart Street
Formalisation of Bike Track
Way Finding & Path Upgrade
1400
-
9
Low
Buladelah
Old Pacific Highway, btw Stroud Street and information centre
Connectivity
New Footpath
60
-
17
Low
Buladelah Buladelah
Courthouse Muesum to Old Pacific Highway
Connectivity
New Footpath
180
-
Skate Club to bowling club
Connectivity
New Footpath
1600
-
15 20
Medium High
Buladelah
Retain informal crossing points
Upgrade required
Linemarking
-
retention of parking very important, preference to retain informal crossings
13
Medium
Buladelah
Link to RV Park
Linkage
New / Upgraded FP
300
-
16
Medium
Buladelah
Stroud Street, btw Post Office and Bakery
Pedestrian Safety
Regrading
100
-
14
Low
500
path from Ann Street to the picnic area located on top of the hill
13
High
Buladelah
Ann Street, beyond the courthouse Stuart Street
Connectivity
New Footpath
Pedestrian Safety
Signage
-
Request for a "Watch Out, Scooters About " Sign
12
Low
Recreation
New Footpath
200
-
10
Medium
Buladelah
Buladelah Way Bridge to the lake
Buladelah
Lakes Way, Buladelah to Foster
Township Links
Shared Path
-
Connectivity for cyclists between the two townships is desired
13
High
Buladelah
The Wootton Way (Old Highway)
Township Links
Shared Path
-
Opportunity to use Old Highway as part of a strategic longer distance route
13
High
Buladelah
Stroud Street (whole length)
Other
Council Consideration
-
Heavy Vehicle driving between Bulahdelah Way Bridge to Pacific Highway utilising Stroud Street.
14
Forster & Tuncurry
Township
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Forster
Macintosh Street (south Steer and Head street highlighted)
Connectivity
crossing points
Forster
Pebbly Beach to Hadley Street
connectivity
shared path
800
Forster
Little Street Lakes Way between Breese Parade and King George Parade The Southern Parkway from Cape Hawke Drive to Forster retail
Connectivity
shared path
300
Connectivity
shared path
connectivity
shared path
500
Underwood Road Strand Street to cliff road
Connectivity
bike provision
350
Forster Forster Forster Forster Forster Tuncury Tuncury Tuncury Tuncury
Riverside Pathway Extend Riverside path on Point Road to Caravan Park South Street near Capel Street North of Tuncurry The Lakes Way
connectivity
shared path
Connectivity
shared path
safety Connectivity safety
crossing points shared path cycle facility
Length (m)
Notes lack of controlled crossing points makes access between homes and school / shops difficult provide shared path along foreshore to Forster Public School existing pathway is discontinous no continous bike or pathway, link between school and residential to retail area. no pathway so curentley need to walk on verge no formal bike provision, opportunity for link of quieter north south street avaiding local hill Link adjacent to the lakes way to pacific palms desire for an extended riverside path as an alternative to the lakes way and possible tourist attraction
Score
Cost Band
16
Medium
0
High
13
Medium
15
Low
15
High
7
Low
14
Low
13
Very High Low
no crossing near oval and school Long distance link to Hallidays Point Long distance link to Pacific Palms
10 16 14
Low Very High High
Gloucester
Township
Location
Gloucester
Town Centre to Council offices link required
Gluoucester
Pram Ramps around town
Cost Band
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Score
Connectivity
New footpaths
750
Consideration for road crossing on Ravenshaw Street should be required
17
High
Grade
Review of Pram Ramp Design Standards
-
Pram ramps are too steep which results in mobility scooters using the road
10
Low
Trees
Council Consideration
-
Eucalyptus Red drop branches and Crate Myrles have dangerous trip hazard sprouts. Council should consider this when selectiv vegetation adjacent to footpaths, roads and cycleways.
discontinuity
Connect existing paths
400
-
17
High
-
15
Medium
350
-
21
Medium
New footpath
1200
This is the signpost heavy vehicle route
14
High
Connectivity Connectivity
New footpath New footpath
50 300
Only half of the car park has a path 3x100 for the edges
8 14
Low Medium
General Maintenance
Resheet
10
trip hazard in front of IGA
7
Intersections along Ravenshaw Street x 5
Safety
Intersection Upgrade and provision of crossings
-
State Route? Conflict between Movement and Placefunction with 5 intersections
21
High
Gloucester
Links from Highschool to wider quiet road network
Connectivity
Shared Path
3000
Highschool runs a program taking students cycling 1/week
16
Very High
Gloucester
Path in Gloucester Park, pedestrian bridge
Dbridge out of Commission
New Bridge
20
-
10
Medium
Connectivity
New Footpath
1000
-
14
High
Shared Path
6500
13
Very High
regrading
-
9
Medium
18000
9
Low
Gluoucester
Trees in Gloucester
Gloucester
Town Centre to Council offices link required
Gloucester
Phillip Street between Church Street (east of Ravenshaw)
Gloucester
Clement Street between Rodgers Street and High School
Connectivity
New footpath
Gloucester
Boundary Road from Intersection of Phillip Street & Boundary Street to Thunderbolts Way
Connectivity
Gloucester Gloucester
Dennison Street car park Anzac Park
Gloucester
Church Street
Gloucester
Connectivity
Gloucester / Barrington Glucester
Argyle Street between Skye Road and Red Gum Road Thunderbolt way between Gloucester and Barrington Queen Street
Connectivity/ tourism/ recreation Surface of Road
Gloucester
Barrington West Road Loop
Tourism/ Recreation
Way finding
Gloucester
Thunderbolt way between Gloucester and Barrington
Road Safety
Speed Zoning Review
Gloucester
Pathways at rear of Henderson Street
Maintenance
Maintnenance
Gloucester
Local Road Network
Opportunity
Way finding
Barrington
350
New footpath
Desire for a cycle link between the two townships trip hazards along this road Opportunity for longer recreational bike roads For Transport f NSW consideration, request to reduce from 100km to 80 km Drive mower such that clippings do not land on the path Potential way finding mapping would allow various groups already riding to Gloucester to utilise more paths
Halliday's Point
Township
Location
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Score
There is a desire to have the three beaches connected
17
Very High
17
High
22
Low
0
Very High
19
High
Halliday's Point
Diamond Beach, Red Head and Blackhead
Connectivity
New Footpaths
5000
Halliday's Point
Baywood Drive to Scarborough Circuit Diamond Beach Road between Blackhead Road and Fantail Rise
Connectivity
New footpaths
1000
Halliday's Point
Cost Band
Issue Type
Connectivity/ Safety
Shared path
Connectivityi
tbd
3.0m shared path design was approved for this location before Council amalgamation
Halliday's Point
Blackhead connection to tuncurry cycle path, tuncurry footpath and to Tuncurry
Halliday's Point
Re Opening western leg of intersection Diamond Beach Road & Red Head Road
tbc
Re-open Road
n/a
Halliday's Point
Intersection of Red Head Road, Diamond Beach Road and Eastern Valley Way
Road Safety
Road Safety Audit
n/a
Road could also be formalised as Bike/ foot path
0
Harrington
Township
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Score
Cost Band
Harrington
Harrington & Crowdy Head
Connectivity
create links
-
existing path links along most of the waterview, issues with connectivity on bridge
17
Harrington
Beach Street Park
Connectivity
New footpath
300
providing access within parkland and to rear of parking bays, key missing link for continuous pathway through the community
21
Medium
Harrington
Seafront Connection past bowling club
Connectivity
new footpath or boardwalk
370
Significant Constraints
16
Very High
Harrington
Wards Creek Bridge
interim solution recognising bridge will be upgrade in the medium term
21
Medium
Harrington Harrington
Connection of path to boat ramp adjacent to Oyster farm Scott Street between Beach Road and Muir Road
Harrington
Beach Road near IGA
Harrington
Lazzarini Road to Faith Court
Crowdy Head
Crowdy Head Road between Harrington and Crowdy Head
Harrington Harrington
Harrington Road between Lazzirini and the Big 4 Waterfront Pathway
Creates Muliple crossing manouveres crossing improvement for pedestrians connectivity
new fotopath
100
sealing of car park could be complete concurrently
11
Low
connectivity
new footpath
100
link with approved DA site
15
Low
connectivity/ crossing to Bus Stops
crossing
-
-
12
Low
connectivity
new footpath
450
24
Medium
Safety
Provide shared path
6500
17
Very High
Connectivity
New footpath
1400
17
High
Pathway lighting
Lights
-
no connection for house development to IGA, mobility scooter utilise road. Very dangerous conditions popular route and desires to see two townships connected with safe shared pathways
Medium
Hawks Nest & Tea Gardens
Township
Location
Hawkes Nest
Throughout
Hawkes Nest
East West Cycle Route
Hawkes Nest
Singing Bridge
Hawkes Nest
Swan Bay to Shops
Hawkes Nest
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Cost Band
Length (m)
Notes
Score
-
-
-
-
25
High
16
Low
Amenity
n/a
-
Hawkes Nest identity is the natural bush landscape and the community is adement that they do not want infrastruture that will later it. Consideration should be given to any proposed infrastruture enhancing the existing landscape
Consistency
Review of linemarking and signage
-
-
100
Loop exists on north side would be good to have a loop on south side which would allow one way usage. Clarification of signage in regard to cyclist dismount. Impossible to pass if two mobility scooters/ prams or wheelchair are on same pathway. -
Narrow Pathway
signage, path
No Footpath
new footpath
No Footpath
new footpath
800
-
15
High
Hawkes Nest
Mirreen Steet
No Footpath
new footpath
250
-
24
Medium
Hawkes Nest
Tuloa Street between Mirreen Street to Shops
No footpath
new footpath
320
-
24
Medium
350
-
25
Low
Hawkes Nest
Existing Bush track behind Peter Gardens
Hawkes Nest
Hawkes Nest Hawkes Nest
Tloa Avenue to Winda Whoppa Kingfisher Avenue from Singing Bridge to Ibis Av The Anchorage at Winda Whoppa Jimmy's Beach
Hawkes Nest
Mirreen Street to the Anchorage
Hawkes Nest
Hawkes Nest
Coastal Connections
Tea Gardens
Myall Street Crossing
Tea Gardens
Settlers Way crossing
Tea Gardens
Maxwell Street
Tea Gardens Tea Gardens
Tea GArdens
Waterfront Pathway from Iluka Street to Coopland Avenue Myall Street from Coopland Street toMaxwell Street
Wayfinding/ all ability regrading & signage access No footpath new footpath
600
-
18
High
no path
Shared Path
650
Shared path on bushland section
16
High
River Side Path Informal Car park
Pathway Formalise Car park
1200 -
-
13 12
High
Mangroves Walk
Boardwalk
500
Possible alternative to work on Tuloa Avenua
13
High
-
Strategic Coastal links between Hawkes Nest to north and south
0
-
-
-
19
Low
-
-
19
Low
-
-
19
Low
new footpath
450
-
12
Medium
new footpath
1200
-
16
High
Investigation into right turn bay from Myall Quays Boulevard
-
-
0
-
Connectivity
Multiple
Investigate Crossing Difficult (busy Road) provision & kerb build outs Investigate Crossing Difficult (busy Road) provision & kerb build outs Investigate Crossing Difficult (busy Road) provision & kerb build outs no path no path
Myall Quays Boulevard access to service Local Traffic station corner of Myall Street and Myall Quays Management Boulevard movements
Nabiac
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Condition & consistency on existing paths
Review & Miantenance
-
From Farnell Street/ Hoskins Street to Abbotts Street/ Roberston Street
Connectivity
New footpath
Clarkson Street btw Bridge and Abbott Street
Connectivity
Hoskins Street btw Clarkson to Farnell
Cost Band
Notes
Score
800
Formalise connection
9
High
New footpath
150
Extension of existing footpath on Clarkson Street
14
Medium
Connectivity Connectivity Connectivity
New footpath New footpath New footpath
450 550
Completion of loop around park -
19 19 7
Low Medium High
Connectivity
New footpath
200
-
13
Medium
Recreational loop to south to Clarkson crossing Tourism / Recreation
New footpath
2500
-
4
Very High
Showground to River via Nabiac Street
Connectivity
New footpath
1000
10
High
Other
Council Consideration
-
Vehicle Speeds and Pedestrian Crossing Faciltiies around shopping precinct
Other
Council Consideration
-
Throughout Nabiac
Hoskins Street path Extension Nabiac Street footpath extension to showground
Formalisation of existing bush trails
Old Bar Wallabi Point
Township Old Bar Wallibi Point Old Bar & Wallibi Point
Location Old Bar Wallbi Point Informal tracks and Paths
Old Bar
Medowie Road between Mistral Place and Aged Care Facility
Old Bar
Bushland Trails east of Richardson Street
Old Bar Old Bar Old Bar Old Bar Wallibi Point
Completion of pathway along Creek Line north of Old Bar Road David Street from Old Bar Public School to Old Bar Road Forest Lane between Saltwater Road and BlueHaven Road Waterman Street Saltwater Road between Walter Road and Marine Drive
Wallibi Point & Old Bar
Coastal Walk from Wallibi Point to Old Bar
Wallibi Point
Wallibi Point Beach
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Lack of Footpaths Lack of Footpaths
New Footpath New Footpath Way finding, Sealing & formalisation
-
Informal Route
Cost Band
Notes
Score
3500
Connection between Wallibi Point and Old Bar
13
High
No Footpath
New Footpath
400
-
15
Medium
Unformalised Paths
Formalisation of Bushland Trails
800
-
6
High
connectivity
new footpath
200
-
6
Medium
connectivity
new path
250
22
Medium
Dust
Seal Road
700
-
7
High
Uneven footpath
new footpath
150
-
7
Medium
connectivity
New Footpath
700
-
14
High
Tourism
Council Consideration
-
Strategic long term opportunity
Amenities
Provide Amenities
-
Community would like to see bathrooms at this beach
Very High
Pacific Palms & Smith Lake
Township
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
n/a
Notes
Score
Cost Band
Pacific Palms
Throughout
Connectivity
Desire for connection throughout the beach towns Boomerang, Blueys, Elizabeth Beaches and further south to Seal Rocks
Pacific Palms
Boomerange Drive, north west of Croll Street
Connectivity
New Path
650
5
High
Connectivity
New Path
175
17
Medium
Formilisation
Wayfinding Signage
16
Low
Pacific Palms Pacific Palms Pacific Palms
Boomerang Drive between Red Gum Drive and Karnang Drive Boomerang Beach Road Existing path parallel to Boomerang Beacg
Smiths Lake
Connectivity Exisiting path "Palmtops Avenue" extended Recration through bushland to Boomerang Drive Exisiting path "Palmtops Avenue" extended Tourism/ Recreation through bushland to Boomerang Drive Boomerang Beach, Blueys Beach and Elizabeth Facilities Beach Accesses Lakeside Crescent near intersection of Crossing Mariana Avenue Mackwood Road no path
Pacific Palms
Blueys Beach
Pacific Palms Pacific Palms Pacific Palms Pacific Palms
Vegetation
New Path
1300
9
High
New Path
570
6
High
BMX bike Track
1000
6
High
Bike Racks
n/a
6
Low
Pedestrian Crossing Facility shared path
n/a
19
Low
600
15 0 0 0
High
maintenance
n/a
Overgrown Tree at the lookout at Blueys Beach which results in kids climbing to have the view the lookout should have.
Taree
Township
Taree
Location
Issue Type Lack of formal paths outside the centre of town
Taree
Tareee Park, Taree Bowling Club Near Brown Creek, between Coolahba and Bushland Drive
Taree Taree Taree
Taree Centre High Street in Town Centre
Lack of footpath Quality of path surfaces and maintenance No path on High Street Missing or steep pram ramps
Traffic signals in Taree
Long delays when crossing at signals
Taree
Taree
Traffic signals in Taree
Taree
Links between Taree & Old Bar
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Score
Footpath Installation Extension of the riverside path and link along Browns Creek
various
General request for footpath installation on all streets.
18
New pavements throughout centre Footpath Installation New pram ramps
2,500 1400 n/a
Review Phasing
Green time for pedestrians sometime short if less mobile Review Phasing Better links to surrounding towns and areas On Street cycleways
540
n/a
Footpaths for areas frequently accessed Review pedestrian wait times at Victoria Street with Pulteney Street and Manning Street Review pedestrian wait times at Victoria Street with Pulteney Street and Manning Street
9000
Old Bar Road
n/a
Cost Band -
15 21 16 16
High Very High High -
23
23 8
Very High
Wingham
Township
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
Notes
Review & Miantenance
-
No formal pathways through suburban areas, especially on the northern side of the railway
Wingham
Throughout Wingham
Condition & consistency on existing paths
Wingham
Throughout Wingham
Connectivity
Wingham Wingham
Pedestrian Crossing @ Bent Street & Farquhar Street Pathway connection between over head bridge to sports ground
Wingham Wingham Wingham
Gloucester Road between Union Street & Cangett Street Dennes Street between overhead bridge and Primrose Street
No crossing
Provide PDX crossing faciltiiy
50
Connectivity
New footpath
2300
Connectivity
New Footpath
Connectivity
Medium
-
9
High
1200
-
19
High
New Footpath
1300
Connection to Showgrounds and Abbatoir
13
High
Recreation / Tourism
New footpath
600
-
10
High
Recreation / Tourism
Boardwalk
3000
6
Very High
Riverside Pathway
Wingham
Bend on Murray Road west of Boundary Road Road Safety Concrens Council Consideration
Tinonee
Beecher Street between Ridge Road and Manchester Street Manchester Street between Beecher Street and Cotton Street
Tinonee
Beecher Street
Tinonne
Around town
Cost Band
23
Wingham
Tinonee
Pathway Connections to New Developments (e.g. golf course) No crossing for major movement on very wide road
Score
-
Access to water at Riverview Drive and Dawson Street General Road safety concerns in regards to site conditions and speed of vehicles around the bend.
Connectivity
New footpath
950
-
17
High
Connectivity
New footpath
700
-
16
High
Pedestrian Safety
Council Consideration
-
Recreation / Tourism
Share path
1200
10
High
Recent council road rehabilitation has made verge difficult to walk on. Desire for a loop around the town utilising Burdett & Cotton Streets
Other
Township
Location
Issue Type
Treatment Type
Length (m)
North Arm Cove
Completion of connection at the esplanade for walking and bikes
missing link
shared path
550
no path
shared path
1000
no path
shared path
2000
Coomba Park Green Point
from Green Point to The Lakes Way
Notes
connection between 2 sections of the community
Score
Cost Band
10
High
10
High
10
High
Appendix D
Public Consultation Comments
These tables provide a summary of the comments made by community members during the consultation undertaken by Council from 3 November 2020 to 18 December 2020. Location
Comment
Action
Blackhead
no new pathways through littoral rainforest
Design stage will determine precise location of paths with environmental review
Bulahdelah
Support upgrade of footpath in Mead Street to mountain Park Lion park has become an attraction and needs path upgraded to it Pathway under bridge is a benefit not all the way to Anne Street Pathway from Theatre Lane to Crawford St needs to be upgraged Footpath along Bulahdelah way from Crawford St heading east needs upgraded. Difficult to walk because of drain Footpath along Bulahdelah way at Jackson St has no access to service stations Footpath along Stroud St between Nursing Home and along Stewart Street to allow access to shopping Centre instead of upgrade along Crawford st Pathway along Bulahdelah way all the way up to the Golf Club
Noted and added to plan
Cundletown
Wheelchair access to footpath Crown St Cundletown
Noted
Darawank
Shared pathway on northern side of aquatic rd to both boat ramps on Riverplace Darawank
Noted
Forster
Likely street Forster between South Street and Strand Street requires footpath
Noted
Forster
Pedestrian pathways along King George Parade, Goldens Rd, Underwood Road and top part of Kularoo Drive
Noted
Forster
provide sharded pathway west side Lakes Way south of Tree View place to Breeze parade.
Noted
Forster
Pathway from Mark Street to Kendall Street Forster treversing the lakeside and foreshore
Noted
General Comments
Supports the PAMP and bike plan Road crossing points need to be visable
Noted
General Comments
Report needs a summary (too Long) Shopping centres not considered in bicycle usage Priority criteria and cost estimate are not clear
Noted
General Comments
further consultation with youth is needed links to council disability action plan
Specific area prelude policy to accompany plan
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 170
General Comments
EIS to be done for each new Littoral rainforests are protected Buffer of 100m between rainforest and development ie paths concerns re track from Lewis St past the sewerage ponds to Wallabi as it runs through Littoral Forests Concern over negative impacts over natural areas
Design stage will determine precise location of paths with environmental review
General Comments
Plan lacks connectivity and lacks strategic frameworks for improvements. minimal improvements in the Taree area Upgrade of road should have wider shoulders for cyclists, poor condition of road is dangerous for cyclists New paths should take in physical constraints such as the foreshore at Wingham
Design stage will determine precise location of paths with environmental review plus prelude policies
General Comments
Ensure shared pathways are wide enough
Noted
General Comments
Provided documents for created an excessible environment for Travellers with Vision Impairment - guide dog stds for pathways
Design standards cover accessible requirements
Gloucester
Supports shared pathway between Gloucester and barrington
Noted
Gloucester
Pathway along Denison St between CBD and Swimming Pool included in Section 8.4 within Gloucester District Park
Noted
Gloucester
Shared pathway along boundary st
Noted
Gloucester
Shared pathway along boundary st shared pathway between gloucester and barrington Offroad shared pathway long Thunderbolts & Bucketts Way
Noted
Green Point
8.3.7 Onroad bike lane along The Lakes Way, either of Dunns Creek / Sweet Pea Rd 8.13.3 Shared pathway from Green Point village to the Lakes Way
Noted
Hallidays Point
Plan needs to take into account shared pathways between, blackhead, diamond head, red head and tallwoods village. And connection to homestead and federation estates.
Noted
Hallidays Point
4.5 Kerb build out forces cyclists traffic lane 4.2 Bicycle facilities battery powered bicycles are increasing 5.2.2 Criterium track shows the benefits of such facilities Council should lobby state government to sweep the road shoulder for cyclists Item A exercise has been excluded yet is most common type of cycle
Noted
Hallidays Point
Roads need to be fixed
Noted
Hallidays Point
Supports shared pathways around all villages in Hallidays Point
Noted
Hallidays Point
Shared pathway along Blackhead Road
Noted and added to plan
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 171
Hallidays Point
Shared pathways to connect villages within Hallidays Point Connect Federation Drive Oak View Dr in Homestead Estate using easement
Noted and added to plan
Hallidays Point
Supports projects in Hallidays Point area Concerned about impact on Littoral Rainforest
Design stage will determine precise location of paths with environmental review
Hallidays Point
Footpath along Blackhead to Tallwoods estate.
Noted and added to Plan
Hallidays Point
villages in Hallidays Point should be linked by shared pathways. Shared pathway shouldn't go through forested areas
Design stage will determine precise location of paths with environmental review
Hallidays Point
Extend shared pathway along Blackhead to Tallwoods Village
Note and added to Plan
Hallidays Point
Shared pathway linking Blackhead, Red Head, Diamond Beach and Tallwoods with shopping centre Link Redhead with seascape with existing concrete path Redhead to Blackhead use path south 11 Hope Street to Pump Stn then to Beachfront lifestyle village. Path outside Blackhead flora reserve to Baywood Dr to connect Blackhead village (private Land) Pathway through rainforest reserves are problematic Purple path through sensative vegetation through Jubilee Parade in Diamond Beach
Design stage will determine precise location of paths with environmental review
Hallidays Point
Cycle path linking Blackhead to Diamond Beach public School Proper cyclepath the full length of Blackhead Road
Added to Plan
Hallidays Point
Item 21A supports submissions for Hallidays point area particulary for Public School walk and access.
Noted
Hallidays Point
Shared pathway between Tallwoods Village and Hallidays Point
Added to Plan
Hallidays Point
Shared pathway between Tallwoods and Blackhead beach
Added to Plan
Hallidays Point
Supports shared pathway between diamond head, red head and blackhead Coastal pathway would be a great benefit to tourists
Noted
Hallidays Point
Improve pathway between Tallwoods Village and Blackhead Beach
Added to Plan
Hallidays Point
Shared pathways between schools, commercial centre blackhead beaches and sporting venues planned shared pathway East of Julilee Parade is inappropriate due to sand dunes Shared pathway between Red Head road and Eastern Valley Way is unnecessary other than for suitable access at western end No upgrading of walking tracks through rainforests and native reserves
Design stage will determine precise location of paths with environmental review
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 172
Harrington
Pathway along Beach street from industrial area to existing pathway
Noted
Harrington
Shared pathway along Harrington road to Big4 Holiday Park Shared pathway from Caravan Park to Crowdy Head with alternate route to National Park (8.6.9 & 8.6.10)
Noted
Harrington
Supports the Harrington rd pathways Supports the pathway to Crowdy Head
Noted
Harrington
Signage on Shared pathway for cyclists to give way to pedestrians
Noted
Harrington
Improved signage along pathways in Harrington particularly to encourage cyclists to take care
Noted
Harrington
Extend shared pathway from Josephine Drive through to Marine Boulavard
Noted
Harrington
Footpath along Harrington Rd from Caravan Park to harbour boulevade. Pathway from East oxley reserve to carpark then to discovery caravan park Shared pathway from discovery caravan carpak to crowdy head.
Noted
Harrington
8.6.1 & 8.6.2 & 8.6.3 should be considered as one project as a high priority 8.6.4 very high priority 8.6.5, 8.6.6 Low priority 8.6.7 high priority 8.6.8 & 8.6.10 should be treated as one project with high priority 8.6.9 high priority 8.6.77 high priority and will need consultation with residents
Noted
Harrington
Pathways required for future development in Harrington 8.6.3 Same priority 8.6.2 8.6.10 should be Same priority as 8.6.8 Riverside pathway should have way finding signs Improved connection past the bowling club Riverside pathway should be extended further west the Big4 Caravan Park
Noted
Hawks Nest
Support proposals for hawsk nest
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.3, 8.7.6-8.7.18 Supports Boardwalk across wetlands and swan bay singing bridge Sinclaire Gasrds to Winda Woppa Anchorage
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.3 to 8.7.18 support plus boardwalk from Swan bay to singing bridge and sinclair gardens to Winda Woppa
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.3, 8.7.10, 8.7.18 Supports
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7 Supports
Noted
Hawks Nest
Supports 8.7.3 & 8.7.6
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 173
Hawks Nest
Cycling through Hawks Nest at Shopping area, needs signs and pavement markings for cyclists to dismount
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.9 & 8.7.13 pathway from Mirren St along Tuloa ave and the anchorage to the Boulevarde on Winda Woppa 8.7.8 no changes as it would damage the bushland 8.7.11 Supports
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.3 Does not support, recommends widened footpath on western side 8.7.5 no location shown 8.7.10 Pathway needs upgrading 8.7.15 needs to be more specific 8.7.19 Only missing section between coupland street and Yalinbah St 8.7.20 only supports residents from myall keys. Review for upgrade that resolves all issues Shared pathwya between develpoing area of Myall downs and Tea Gardens waterfront
Noted
Hawks Nest
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7 Supports
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.7 Supports pathway from peter sinclair gardens to Tulna St shops
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.7 Supports pathway from peter sinclair gardens to Tulna St shops
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.7 Supports pathway from peter sinclair gardens to Tulna St shops
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.3 , 8.7.17 Supports
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.3 Supports
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.11 Does not support Anchorage at Winda Woppa 8.7.9 Supports Tuloa Av to WindaWoppa
Noted
Hawks Nest
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19 Supports
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19 Supports
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.1 bushland enviroment to be protected 8.7.3 supports and better signage for bike riders to dismount 8.7.6 Wrong directon on map, should be Peter Sinclair to Tuloa Ave 8.7.8 Protect bushland, may not be necessary 8.7.9 & 8.7.13 pathway from Tuloa Ave to Winda Woppa urgently needed 8.7.13 not preferred as it goes to wetland 8.7.11 shared pathway difficult along water frontage and speeding on this road is a problem in this area
Noted
Hawks Nest
Mermaid Avenue Submission Footpath requested along Mermaid Ave Mermaid Avenue needs to be upgraded
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 174
Hawks Nest
No footpaths on Mermaid ave. road needs rebuilding
Noted
Hawks Nest
8.7.6 & 8.7.13 Supports
Noted
Manning Point
Shared pathway between Manning Point Village and Sand Ridge Road Manning PoInt area has been overlooked
Noted
Nabiac
8.8.4 & 8.8.5 No. 1 Priority 8.8.3 & 8.8.2 No.2 Priority Pathway down showground lane to Aub Ferris Sports field
Noted
Nabiac
8.8.1 is a essential Pathway down showground lane to Aub Ferris Oval 8.8.3, 8.8.4, 8.8.5, 8.8.7,Showground Lane, 8.8.2, 8.8.6, 8.8.8, 8.8.9 order of priority
Noted
Nabiac
8.8.4 & 8.8.5 Highest priority at nabiac 8.8.3 & 8.8.2 next in priority Path along showground land to aub feris sporting complex Pathway between pool and bbq and play equip to memorial park
Noted and added to plan
Nabiac
Priority no.1 8.8.4 & 8.8.5 Priority no.2 8.8.3& 8.8.2 Supports footpath along showground lane to Aub Ferris Sporting complex
Noted and added to plan
Old Bar
8.9.5 Convert to a loop trial 8.9.3 Between Trad Oval and Wallabi Point Extend along to new developments 8.9.11 is through protected littoral rainforest. May not be a viable option Need more recreation pathways in Old Bar wallabi point
Design stage will determine precise location of paths with environmental review
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Does not support the pacific palms loop as it will restrict acces to residents The link between Boomerang Beach and Headland Road will be dangerous Funds should be spent on fixing roads
Noted and design stage will cover issues raised
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports Pacific Palms Projects
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports Pacific Palms Projectfs
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the projects for Pacific Palms
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports Pacific Palms & Smiths Lakes Projects
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports planned bike routes Drainage issue along lakeside crescent, and new footpath shouldn’t impact drainage system
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 175
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Projects particularly between Elizabeth & Boomerang Beaches
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports Pacific Palms Loop (number of questions on the design of pathway. )
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms projects
Noted
Pacific Palms
Extend the bike paths to Charlotte Bay shops
Pacific Palms
Shared pathways to the villages of Pacific Palms, such as Tarbuck Bay, Smiths Lake , Blueys Beach, Boomerang Beach, Elizabeth Beach and Tiona.
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop supports a pathway between Forster and Pacific Palms
Noted
Pacific Palms
8.7.9 Pathway should be on the Nth side of Anchorage not Sthn 8.7.8 Join existing bushtrack Join mangroves whalf 8.7.13 8.7.13 Incorrectly positioned should be from Wstn end of Mirreen St to the Anchorage
Design stage will determine precise location of paths with environmental review
Pacific Palms
Supports 8.10.1A & 8.10.5
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Pathway from Elizabeth Beach to end of Boomerang Drive
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific Palms look and Macwood Drive smiths Lake
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Bike loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the need for pathways in pacific palms, especially for people with disabilities. Busy with tourist and local residents
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports 8.10.1A & 8.10.5
Noted
Pacific Palms
Support the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Support proposals pacific palms and smiths lake
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Support the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific Palms Loop & macwood Drive Pathway
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop Supports 8.10.5
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 176
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Projects particularly between the beaches
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
No pathway in Moona Street Boomerang Beach
Noted
Pacific Palms
Pathway along Moona St Boomerang Beach
Noted
Pacific Palms
Pathway along Moona St Boomerang Beach
Pacific Palms
Shared pathway between smiths lakes and pacific palms
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports shared pathway pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports Pacific Palms projects slow vehicles down through shops
Noted
Pacific Palms
Shared pathway between boomerang and elizbeth beaches loop connecting the beaches instead of lakes way use Mariana Ave, Hillside Parade into palms top estate then bush access palms oasis caravan park new bluesys ridge estate. Blueys shopping precinct improved pedestrian safety with speed humps and spped reduction to 40km/hr
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Support proposals pacific palms and smiths lake
Noted
Pacific Palms
8.10.1A Supports the pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Shared pathway linking beaches up.
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports projects for Pacific Palms
Noted
Pacific Palms
Concerned about the wording of trends 8.10.7 & 8.10.1A needs to be shared pathway Speeding in Boomerang Beach area Request traffic calming issues New pathway shouldn't effect existing bushlands
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Projects
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports 8.10.1A & 8.10.5
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports project for Pacific Palms between the beaches
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports Projects Traffic Too Fast
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 177
Pacific Palms
Supports Pacific Palms Loop Boardwalk on the perimeter of Booty Booty National Park
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the macwood pathway & Pacific Palms Projects
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports project for Pacific Palms between the beaches
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supporting the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports Pacific Palms Loop and other projects Shared pathway along the Lakes Way
Noted
Pacific Palms
Maintenance of road pavements and removal of trip hazards Path behind crash barrier between Sunset picnic area and community centre Low speed cycle paths for children Boomerang Beach and Park to be connected by path
Noted
Pacific Palms
Shared pathway at Elizabeth Beach to caravan park drainage issue
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop Beach side walking track
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Support the Pacific Palms Loop Especially between Nth Boomerang Carpark & Elizabeth Beach
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Shared Pathway for Blueys and Boomerang Beaches Loop (form not completed)
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports 8.10.1A & 8.10.5
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports projects for Pacific Palms and Smiths Lake
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific palms Projects
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Projects
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Projects
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 178
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific Palms Loo
Noted
Pacific Palms
8.10.5 Nth Boomerang to Elizebeth beach path required 8.10.1A Support the Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Projects particularly 8.10.1A & 8.10.5 as a priority
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports Pacific Palms Projects Neighbouring villages should be connected Link to Forster
Noted
Pacific Palms
Support the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Support the pacific Palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop Additional toilet facilities Widen stairway at nthn end Blueys Beach Additional parking around tourist areas
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports 8.10.1A & 8.10.5
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports 8.10.1a & 8.10.5
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Macwood Rd Shared pathway request a loop pathway around Smiths Lake
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports Pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Shared pathway between beaches and Smiths Lake
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms & Smiths Lakes Projects
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Suports the Pacific palms & Smiths Lakes Projects
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports shared pathways in Smith Lakes and Pacific Palms
Noted
Pacific Palms
Support the pacific palms loop & Macwood Road pathway Smiths Lake 23 responses for Palms loop and 11 for macwood road path and 272 signatures for the pacific palms loop. Major concern Lakeside for Nth Boomerang Beach carpark to the Lakes Way Elizabeth Beach THe Lakes Way and Boomerang Dr High speed the Lakes Way and no connect from skate park to Smiths Lake village to be given highest priority.
Noted
Pacific Palms
Support the Pacific Palms area projects
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports safe shared paths particularly to school and beaches
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 179
Pacific Palms
Supports footpath between Boomerang and Elizabeth beaches
Noted
Pacific Palms
Support the Pacific Palms projects
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific Palms Loop & macwood Drive Pathway
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports project 8.10.1A and 8.10.15 supports pacific palms loop shared pathway from Nth Boomerang Beach to the surf club
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports Pacific Palms Loop and Elizabeth Beach link to Boomerang Beach
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Proijects
Noted
Pacific Palms
Footpaths needed to get people of the roads, such as Newman Avenue, Boomerang Drive & Elizabeth Beach
Noted
Pacific Palms
Coastal walk form Wallabi point to old bar. Support of cost is prohibitive. Supports pathway between Walter Fay st and Marine Dr supports pathway from saltwater rd into saltwater national park
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports 8.10.1A 8.10.10 not required Dangerous between Oasis Caravan park and Blueys Ridge - no room for pedestrians Pathway from Ingenia to Charlotte Bay Shops
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms Loop particularly the part between Elizabeth and Boomerang Beachs.
Noted
Pacific Palms
Nth Boomerang drive along Lakeside Crescent where the road meets Lakes Way Boomerang Beach intersection Nth Boomerang From Karnang Drive to end of housing at 1 Boomerang Drive high risk area. Improved footpath around Blueys beach shops support the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the Pacific Palms & Smiths Lakes Projects Need a pathway from Smiths Lakes villages to the Beaches
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the proposed projects Concern how they will be build on the existing road network and be safe Where is the money coming from?
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific palms loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Supports the pacific Palms Loop
Noted
Pacific Palms
Item 21A Greater than 180 signatures.
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the smiths lake projects
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the pacific Palms Loop & macwood Drive Pathway
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 180
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the pacific Palms Loop & macwood Drive Pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd Pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the pacific Palms Loop & macwood Drive Pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the macwood pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd Pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Pathway on Amaroo Road, from Casson St to Water
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the pacific Palms Loop & macwood Drive Pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Support the Smiths Lakes Macwood Pathway Needs shared pathway between Pacific Palms & Smiths Lake
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
smiths Lake
Fix roads lakes way
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Full approval of proposal
Noted
Smiths Lake
Full approval of proposal
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Support the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
smiths lake rangers to stop roaming dogs in smiths lake and upgrade roads.
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd Pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd Pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway & Pathway along the Lakes Way
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 181
Smiths Lake
Supports the smiths lake projects
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the pacific Palms Loop & macwood Drive Pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway & Pathway along the Lakes Way
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the pacific Palms Loop & macwood Drive and a link between the two.
Noted
Smiths Lake
Support the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd Pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Pathways Macwood shared proposed pathway needs connections to local streets use porous paving instead of concrete for environment
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd Pathway
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports Smith Lakes Projects
Noted
Smiths Lake
Supports the Macwood Rd pathway
Noted
Stroud
Footpaths within Stroud Need for pedestrian crossing on the Bucketts Way
Noted
Stroud
Consultation in small villages should have been undertaken Pathway alongthe Bucketts way stroud linking town to commercial centre, industrial areas etc
Noted
Taree
Better access to the Taxi rank between shopping centres in Taree
Noted
Taree
Footpath along Edinburgh Drive from Smith and High St to Ingenia Gardens 60 Edinburgh Drive Then down to Petken Drive
Noted
Taree
improve crossing along Victoria st in Chatham area Shared pathway from Recreation grounds to cundletown.
Noted
Taree
Shared pathway between Cundletown and Taree recreation ground along Manning River Drive
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports the identified projects
Noted
Tea Gardens
Uturn vehicles are dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.10, 8.7.16 Road too narrow for kerb buildouts, 8.7.18, 8.7.19, 8.7.20
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 182
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Supports Marine Drive Walkway continue to Coupland Ave
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19 Supports these projects Action immediately.
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3 Supprots one way pathway on singing bridge 8.7.7 nursing home needs footpath 8.7.17 Supports current situation dangerous
Noted
Tea gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19 Supports these projects Action immediately.
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Join up pathway from Sthn end of Budgeree St to Nthn end of Marine Drive join Up sthn end Myall St path to Coupland Avenue Extend existing path down Myall St to Singing Bridge Install proper pathway along Singing Bridge
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea gardens
8.7.3 oneway pathways on bridge 8.7.10 Proper pathway on kingfisher ave side
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.30, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports project in Hawks Nest and Tea Gardens
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 183
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
supports 8.7.18, 8.7.19, 8.7.3
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports 8.7.3, 8.7.7, 8.7.18
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports the Hawks Nest Projects
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.30 Supports the project
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports the Tea Gardens projects
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Waterfront walkway - continue to coupland st
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3 Singing bridge underneath bridge path on Hawks Nest side one way travel on footpaths
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Waterfront walkway
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3 Singing Bridge
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3 full length of Marine Drive, 8.7.18 Supports
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3 & 8.7.18 SUpports
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports the boardwalk across wetlands from Winda Woppa to the Anchorage
Noted
Tea Gardens
Shared pathway along Myall way into Settlers Way starting at pedestrian refuge on Myall Way
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports 8.7.3
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.30, 8.7.31, 8.7.37, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17 pedestrian crossing needed, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports 8.7.3, Supports 8.7.10, Supports 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3 Needs pathway under Singing Bridge 8.7.10 New path from Kinfisher Ave to Ibis Ave 8.7.18 Pathway from Iluka St to Coupland Avenue 8.7.19 Myall St from Copeland Ave to Maxwell St and from Sthn End of Anzac Park to Fish Coop.
Noted
Tea Gardens
Singing bridge narrow pathway southside loop Maxwell St requesting zebra crossing
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Supports Marine Drive Walkway continue to Coupland Ave
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3 Needs pathway under Singing Bridge
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 184
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Supports Marine Drive Walkway continue to Coupland Ave
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3 Needs pathway under Singing Bridge
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3 very important, 8.7.6, 8.7.7 very important, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17 very important, 8.7.18, 8.7.19 very important
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports 8.7.3, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Pathway from coles to lookout Move skatepark to Hawks Nest Supports 8.7.3,8.7.10, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19, 8.7.11, 8.7.6
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.10, 8.7.18, 8.7.19 to assist people with disabilities
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Supports
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports 8.7.18 & 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Should be no Kerb & Guttering in the Winda Woppa area & no footpaths Only a pathway from Hawks Nest to Winda Woppa
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3, 8.7.18 Supports
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7 Supports
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports the pathway from Peter Sinclair shops to Hawks Nest Shopping Centre
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports 8.7.6 & 8.7.7
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports 8.7.18 Contiuous pathway to coupland Avenue
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports 8.7.3
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports 8.7.18
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports 8.7.3 Singing Bridge
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.11 Support
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.18
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Supports Marine Drive Walkway continue to Coupland Ave
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 supports
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 supports
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3 high priority Supports 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 185
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports 8.7.18 & 8.7.10 Extended boardwalk to and through Parry's Cove Development
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.10, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19 Especially for disabled people
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.19 Supports
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3 Narrow Path 8.7.6 Mirreen St No Footpath 8.7.7 Tuloa St No footpath 8.7.10 Kingfisher Ave No path 8.7.19 Myall St From Coupland Avenue to Maxwell Ave No Footpath
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Supports Marine Drive Walkway continue to Coupland Ave
Noted
Tea Gardens
Request marked foot crossings on settlers way and myall way improved kerb ramps for mobility scooters.
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Supports Marine Drive Walkway continue to Coupland Ave
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Shared pathway along the anchorage road winda woppa repair road surface
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.10 Extend shared pathway from Iluka St to Budgeree St
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Extend shared pathway from Iluka St to Budgeree St
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3 Singing Bridge Widen path on one side and reduce pathway on other side of bridge 8.7.8 needs pathway from Iluka to coupland ave Road nth of golf course hawk nest to national park needs to be widened
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Lanes on bridge need to be widened
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3 One way usage and additional signs for cyclists for dismount, 8.7.6, 8.7.10, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports 8.7.3, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19 Supports
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3 Supports
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 186
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 & 8.7.16 Supports
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.20 Supports
Noted
Tea Gardens
supports 8.7.10
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19 Supports
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
Supports 8.7.3
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Supports Marine Drive Walkway continue to Coupland Ave
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Supports Marine Drive Walkway continue to Coupland Ave
Noted
Tea Gardens
Support 8.7.3, 8.7.6, 8.7.7, 8.7.10, 8.7.11, 8.7.17, 8.7.18, 8.7.19
Noted
Tea Gardens
8.7.18 Support this project with preferred options 8.7.11 Support this project due to narrow road and danger to pedestrians 8.7.3 Ramp needed on Nth Side of bridge. One way pedestrian and scooter should be implemented. 8.7.6 Supported 8.7.7 Supported
Noted
Tinonee
Footpaths desperately needed along the bucketts way at Tinonee
Noted
Tuncurry
Parking concerns in Recreation Drive
Noted
Tuncurry
Shared pathway behind Lachlan ave Tuncurry Slipway area large palmtree in middle of path should be removed. Pathway around Tuncurry slip way needs to be sealed
Noted
Winda Woppa
Boardwalk from Peter Sinclaire to Winda Woppa Shared path from winda woppa reserve to pump station shared pathway nth side of river Make boulevade a shared zone Winda Woppa a 40km/hr zone
Noted
Winda Woppa
Path on Sthn side Anchorage of Corella St to Boulevade supports shared pathway form Peter Sinclaire Gardens to Anchorage Path nthn side of Anchorage to Boulevade to Guya 40km/hr speed limit in Winda Woppa Wetlands boardwalk Upgrade pathway form Winda Woppa reserve to sand transfer stn viewing platform Shared zones on narrow roads
Noted
Wingham
Improved safety between Taree and Wingham for cyclists ie separate pathway / cycleway
Noted
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 187
Blackhead
no new pathways through littoral rainforest
Design stage will determine precise location of paths with environmental review
Bulahdelah
Support upgrade of footpath in Mead Street to mountain Park Lion park has become an attraction and needs path upgraded to it Pathway under bridge is a benefit not all the way to Anne Street Pathway from Theatre Lane to Crawford St needs to be upgraged Footpath along Bulahdelah way from Crawford St heading east needs upgraded. Difficult to walk because of drain Footpath along Bulahdelah way at Jackson St has no access to service stations Footpath along Stroud St between Nursing Home and along Stewart Street to allow access to shopping Centre instead of upgrade along Crawford st Pathway along Bulahdelah way all the way up to the Golf Club
Noted and added to plan
Updated April 2021 │ Status: Draft for Comment │ MidCoast Council Towns & Villages PAMP and Bike Plan Page 188
Sydney Level 4, 99 Walker Street, NORTH SYDNEY, NSW 2060 Tel +61 2 9493 9700 Fax +61 2 9493 9799 Please visit www.stantec.com to learn more about how Stantec design with community in mind.