defe-24-2086 by mi pod

’..

(6)

In an effort to give these events some clarity they have been separated into groups with each group being given its own heading, they are as follows:-

Event

,A’

, B’

Place Innis, Ireland

* Wales, Cornwall,

Date 31/3/93 Devon

Time

1.0Sam

31/3/93

1.1.

lOam to 17am

’c’

and Somerset. Bridgewater, Somerset

31/3/93

2.00am

’0’

North Devon

30/3/93

7.00pm to ll.00pm

St Ives & Penzance, Cornwall

31/3/93

,E t

F’

** Wales,

Westcountry, Avon, Shropshire, Sth Yorkshire

30-31/3/93

30am

Various

The reports associated with this event include those received from the police officers who initially saw the objects at Ol.lOam on 31/3/93.

~7 These reports are the subject of a

letter received from the MoD (Sec Air)2a giving some details of reports received by them. They are thought to be associated with the events of 30-31/3/93 because of the similarities between them and those already known to me.

(9) At this point, given all the known facts, what we are dealing with is the following scenario:At sometime between 1.10am and 1.17am two very bright white objects with some sort of vapour trails, were observed flying and N.W. to S.E. at high altitude and parallel to each other I appear to have been on a pre-determined course. There were I believe the remnants of a Russian Space Rocket that had earlier deposited a Cosmos Radio Satellite into orbit. But, at the same time i.e. 1.10am, two brightly lit objects or a very large one with two lights attached, crossed the Bristol Channel, flew low over Lynton and somewhere between there and Liskeard came to a halt and hovered for a few seconds. They lit then ascended at great speed to about 10,000â&#x20AC;&#x2122; and then altered course taking a southerly course over the English Channel. If the information contained in the letter from the MoD is correct, then the object or objects were later seen over or near Bristol, Avon, at approx 1.15am heading ~outh easterly! Also, if the MoD information is correct, similar objects were seen between9.10pm on the 30th March 1993 and 2.40amon the 31st covering area from Cornwall to South Yorkshire! The implication of this being that some 4 hours before the re-entry an unknown , object or objects were flying across the Westcountry up into Avon and on to South Yorkshire with the last known sighting over Shropshire at 2.40am. It also indicates that the objects appeared to be crisscrossing these areas during this period.

(10)

(17) What all this means is anybody’s guess. Was the information correct and I see no reason why it shouldn’t be, or was it incorrect and a deliberate ploy to confuse the issue and try to I really don’t know. put me off the scent? If correct, and lets suppose it is, then this surely means that 1 not only were there ’unknown’ objects flying and hovering over the westcountry between 8.00pm and 2.00am on the night, but were also tracking across the Midlands, South Yorkshire and what were they doing? Hampshire

Conclusions As a Ufo researcher, it’s my job to try and evaluate all reports and information received in an objective and hopefully methodical way. This case has, to date, shown all the hallmarks of a typical ufo event with evidence swaying the urgently sought answers one way and then the other. Were the events on this night nothing more or less than the re-entry of a man made space vehicle, or was it a ufo phenomenon related to that event? I think it may well be the latter. My reasons for thinking this are twofold. Firstly, there is no doubt that the re-entry took place and that this occurred at approximately 01.0Sam on the 31st. From the evidence collected and collated it is almost certainly a fact that the reports describing the events at 1.lOam indicate that what these people witnessed was the re-entry of this missile. The heights given are synonymous with a re-entry of this kind and the length of ’sighting time’ likewise. All the ’sighters’ give the objects direction of flight as N.W. to S.E. or N. to S. giving some margin of error and this would certainly been the spent rockets course. /18

(18) This I believe, is evidence enough to suggest that this is a rocket re-entry. exactly what these people saw

What is also evident is that on the evening before, between 8.00pm and 11.00prn, objects were seen traversing the North Devon sky and indeed hovering N.W. of the same area; In addition it is fairly certain that at 2.00am on the 31st, an object of some considerable size, flew over the River Parrot at Bridgewater, disturbing not only the local fishermen, but also the cattle in the adjacent fields. Also at this time we have the mystery of the 3 helicopters seen. They were almost certainly of a military type, but as with the 2 fighter aircraft over East Devon earlier, their presence has been Why? denied by the MoD In association with this we have the 1.30am sightings at St Ives and Penzance and the other numerous sightings over Shropshire, South Yorkshire and Hampshire, Cornwall, starting at 10.10pm on the 30th and ending at 2.40am on the 31 s If these reports are correct, and as I said earlier, I have no reason to doubt them and my reports are also correct, then it must be the case that at least one, if not more, unidentified flying objects were active over these areas on the night in but what was their purpose? Were they / it here on a question specific mission, or just carryingout a nighttime surveillance operation. The latter scenario is of course quite feasibly given what we already know from their well documented past, but what about the first proposition? Well if we examine the evidence and what we already know about this alleged mode of operation, there is clearly a case for this line of thinking. In Timothy Goods latest book â&#x20AC;&#x2122;Alien Updateâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; he edits a whole chapter on this very subject. He cites a number of cases from

~evon,

/19

0\. . .

/i.fo 5111 lJt ,ot4/("’~7 3/1[. l1~rt N4t}

/u. Mf~ s/v. - e<);~ J.(a.l.

All b.ut5 few:1

’j1

~,j’f’"

J.I

. ,

Z’1P! <. f./ X

f’

I’

flt.ifp f"’1

[<J

.’ ..>--

~ /,....

[11fi~ I . . .

’’l~~l’ - .

.."

....-

~-pt ,Jv. ~J

~ ?~

.. ,"

,,’

E:tZ1

’3tjljd

{.J

I Ij {.J 0 d :J

O : 8

E:6, ddlj 6 I

!,;try

.....;

~t’Vtl }

lllAt 7V’-/Ctf/(j

Ndt)

’.

All fe’VICl

)1-

,,..,~.,

(. sJv. - e.5b-v Jd. J. (~

b.ut~ ~((,- /

,,’

._-_._~---_._"---

~ ;~:,;’;: t;:(,~ ~ :.’;:’

."!lp.j.il t1).e.H

altlJanq Safety Executive come into force has had sufficient time to put appropriate safety plan to bring the in arrangements . Gas Safety Act into .. (Installation arid Use) Regulations 1984 are in place, ’,"",;..:.;~ {’.!’~ :.

,:-WATER CHARGES: ASSISTANCE WITH: :; ::"~’; ,;d":~,:;:: { ".

~~d~at

/;iMo’t~,(~: ;i,;asked :{",: ,~,’~

~ 9n,si.4~r~~:

f ~ E ~ Pr:~ ~ ~y’e~.~l~ ~~J?,?4j"’;i.d"r:

pl~.~..We ~~~sed -’~.!1~_ ._~,h.ethere~ore

Her Majesty’s.p(?:V~fI1!11ent,:,,’.

’,mean~ w~ll",

forI ,he~ping

poorer families who have difficulty in meeting rising ’..<-! i:"; ?’: t. :.:,j:’:<’,{;’f: :""’; :,’:water bills. : . Lord Henley:In Apr;il, income~re!ateq benefits will

’,<>..-:.~,

ALDERMASTON: SAFETY::," ’.;., .:’

be uprated

f~r

"’~".

suppor~ .’willincoin,fk ;’~ ’,.:;.:.:, ’~,::’,.::" :’~ i

p~yriie*~fr~~~~n

:,BUS~~E~SES. . ;.:’

:...i...".:tJS

r-Se’ i-et r

’*

cent. x delive;e~ ,

~ ~ontehi ~hat .

tl).e

ua~tity" ’"

~iac

’

18 LW55/21ob

~ . ~i{~~~,fJia~~~(H ~Maj Q.~y’ern.n1 ~ :~ .

.;,n (

’:

..........

t".", or":-

,";

. .."

’i ;’"

I’ .

. r ,:’:,.c:i;" In ~ach year from 1985, how many incidents \

~j,~’~’,i:.~~"~eys~;:~’~ ~

there were of diseased kidneys. being discovered

b~ef

from (a)pigs, (b)sheep and (c) how many incidents there were of illness,r sultirig :,’ , therefrom in humans.. .. ";,..::’, The Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Earl Howe): .This. is not available. information _.... ..... .,.. --.. -..- -.... ...._ . .. SCHOOLS: ELECTION GRANT-IviAIl\/TAINED ~ o.

-.’

OF GOvERNORS .~. .,,. Lord Finsberg asked Her Majesty’s Government:

.,1

;:;,,:~~../

,!-~

;

~;’What provisions _:- : opted-out schools for .....

’

in respect of when any governors ecting

,.are made

..:;;;. t,

1. .

1-4

,...

-.’

’"

’:

..:

.’

~ ..’.

. ’.....’ "-:,’,.

’.

?, ..

vacancy occurs and for periodic retirements, .’

" ’-: "’,’

",:

{:r." ’:’C

:’:’: ~.-. r,....t:3;~:.!:~.).::::.. .. ’::.::: ..~,...i~~~’: : ; . . . i , ,.,., DISEASE KIDNEYS: .- . ANIMAL . . . ~ ~ .. -. ....... . ~,,1 . . . ~’r.’. . ::1~ ....:/\f’ ~".,~ ".;1.;sty’.~..

c.’ :

Majesty’s Lord Cochrane of Cults asked Her . :. . 1 . Governri1 nt: of What are their plans for’the coming. into" force . ", the Gas (Exempt Supplies) Act 1993. , . Baroness Denton of Wakefield: We h ve’made it clear that the Gas (ExemptSupplies)Act 1993 will not

~~nd

and to expe~~ntal aircraft~ . . ov~r’’;::.t e~..islands ..’’’;.’~-’.>~’’~!.’.

~ater t~fs .

AI~ RAFT’

1’d Kennet asked Her Majesty’s Governm~nt:

an h re..:\~il::!,’.~:’" .

ovy

GAS(EX~MPT ~VPP~IES)J:CT: l.??~

EXPERrMENTAL

i ~; Y.){~r: iMaj~~t ’,sGQy’~~~pt

desi~ed "’. , ~-t oper~t ;"

";’.’

to :ih~ n:,jiiv: US other body) to flY United States Air Forc (or any

fo~

cent. n

,:, ,;

~ ~h of.wt.h~ t~r’.’the

’t’

m~ximum

~inim

Under-Secretary

~nd -’d

’Whatis the level ofaccuracy ofwater meters ’. whether they consider this satisfactory.;, ;’.’ G; ’;:. . "or. St , The’ P rliam ritary Und Department ofTrade and Industry (BaroneS’s ) ton of Wakefield)~ The permissible .erro.r lin:rits, "a11!e~er used for measuring the consumption of cold potable water are det il d’in the’British’St dard 5728,Part I, ’;....,....... " SectionS.,.. :’.: !’j.;’:.: / ! :,:r_ .0 ’.’ ..’ .,!.. .. . error 1irn)t of 5 This standard llows a in’ deficiency’.of th ’quantity per’ In ’. ess or. flow . _’" , Jand there is’a ..’, . .r’when. . . ’. .. ,~ .,..J. , In excess or a maximum .error limit.of 2 per, f i’ate deficiency’of q d~ljveI:ed the’ and minimum nal tr ns ra’nge is between ’at. to is meter maximum that the ’. ’. .... ~ ’"1 . " . :""", " ,I: . ~, .., ., ...’. . .. . The National Weights and Measures L b rat ry is 1TI. " ofac.’ fc ld., the i.ev .... .:" is satisfacto,rY. ".’ . . . M~

~ritish

’

Whether the United States Air Force (or other US body) has been authorised to fly an experimental aircraft over these islands,and to land it; what conditions govern its use of . airspace; what, assurances have been recei",ed concerning its’possible environmental impacts, ’. the atmosphere; and whether’this - . locally or to s~ tivii ’agr dUin-NATO" <ir lopmeni bilaterally with the United States. , ~’.".: ;:....:.:_..:.~;: >Ii’" ::>".:, ::~;:J’:;;: ,< . .~ :’L ,.:.’ .,,’The ,Viscount Cranborne:,No authorisation has

,"’-’

- .~

::~~

Act 1974. ’:<:,.1";’:

The Minister of State, Department !>f 1:ransport

,"j

’:. ,."~_ rliai Jit~

(The Earl of Caithness): Between 1st November 1992 and 1st February 1993 we have received some ’750 complaints from small busitiessesabout their bankS, . of which around 320 were about interest rates. .1: . METERS: . ". .. . ’,WATER ~,ACCURACY . ’. ..: . . t. .."’ .,.; I’ . Governpient: Her Majesty’s asked Molloy Lord .,",....’ ’;.’f" . ’. ,~. ’: j ::.1 ; ;.’ ; . .’: . .’ . .

:’ ....:

. . t,

A:idenn

)’:’1’

.i’o :Jt:-r

. of’ State, The Cranborne): Viscount Defence of (The Ministry Government o -not,:intend to. halt .’ work at ton (f,.ih ve no :’plans to rder an I d en ent"safety’i!l estigation, Safety IS, and Win remain;of para nt import nce "at the’ ’stablishment, which is subject to independent inspection under the pr yisioi1s ofthe Health and Safety at Work .

::~.:~’::

.._.

i:;-The’,!’P

Lord Inchyra asked H ’Majesty’s Government: ,. How many complaints they have received from small businesses about their banks and ho\’(. many . of those complaints were ab ut’ interest r tes or . . ",’ :

interest~ar~ns...

’;.

BANKS: COMPLAINTS FROM SMALL -’ ,.’

G- "-; ~ :.:} ’.::;r.i.i~:~<t.~~

;.di~ect .:. . .

, -.J {Whether,’Alder :in,view. of.. the larg number of aston, they will haIt work there accidents at until, as ,suggested.,by G.reenpeace, an independent ’::;~._ f~ty’i~ s?g~~i’Lil’~ s’i~k..:n’pla~:’" _ :. .: ~ ,i.: j. .

’.:’,

. ~.: ,-. :.j ....’.. i . sked . Her’ Majesty’s Jei1kins’j".’of ’Putney .:r:;,f,.: ’~: ". ." :.:., ’.,:’,’,-" ;

.fullyi

tl~5

. ’wi-ii ve’i-ieh"t:’I’J.

. L’ . ...’ ’... 1_’ ."’ .’. i ....... ’.,.

line .witJ1 ,inflation.’:In ~ddition, will no longer be required support income on people to meet local taxes. Effectively, this means th t inc me support rates will be iIcreasedbyt7S0 million b ve couple. in worth up t<? infl ,"tiori; ~__.a full-;’year .~ ..~ . . . .a .....:--~.......~ ..... "._’ .’ ....~., 1...,’, ..,.J ,_ wh ’have w ter charg ...Famil ison continue,. to "’have)ccess’ to debts bills ,

’"

,~*,--’" ’

-’:~ tY

.. "

1)10

’’l~

J ("it 70r~ I

Nit>

9’;’;’’’.’

I-I . .

X I

il ’

\.LI.J . . .

J.,XI~,

2-40f.,

f J-IJ r. "

’

’.

X I-/f ""’"

,51"

r’1/1<r’~

All bl5 tU(, lucul ff/YICI

5Jv.,., e’Jl,~

J.-L

._r_~"’’’;_,’’ ,’_"~~q,.._

_.~’.._;"..~_""..._’ _m._’~_"

’~~~,,;,,". ._"~~m’_.’"

,__’~_~m.__’" ._.~~ ......._ ’_’_,_,~"""."_".___._~m.,...__,_>,._.~",

M.~’.. _,.,>..,~". ’.’’’’’..,,,..~.’_""__ *_’." h",".~_",’" d.,.

~,’-’-’---"",^..~-~~-’-,"~.,.~-~~.-~,,,.’..~--~

"".._._~_,..-_...._._._._M,~._

.....~".~,,__.......__m.M~..__._ ".__m._,,_’__ __",_.,,__"m__~_...__n’.......~ __._ ".’_."_____.,,"___,,,,""""~’," _....’"..’__~"M..

..~_._._’M’:~~""~_’’_"*’M..~._’_’~_ _..~._’...~m’.~_...._.M...._..

...

."".

’,^

/If{)

$:f,J lJt ~of~hlP~1 IVAi} .

3/11’ I1l1r"

’1J

(Uf.-’ IG(. e5b~ J.taJ. t

~ sh-

All bVAts fe’V’l:/

~’

1-’ ,

’fM

I".,fpf"’?

z-+~!~.

>< /-

".,., -. . . .’,

-’

tlf

’.

J- ~

Pd~ $t~ k.t.{

(

UFO

.H"

~tt "’v.

M~(,~ 11’-#1(

. , ..

’1711

. ::J~

H.-!

~ WOd~

00:8

86,

dd~ 61

(5) In all the reports received, there was no mention of any noise being associated with the lights / object, in fact the reverse appears to be the case, i.e. complete silence! Whilst collating all these reports, I also received some reports concerning bright lights flying in formation and hovering over Bridgewater and Bishops Lydiard between 9pm and 10pm on the evening of 30th March 1993. I also received one report, again from a police officer, who was off duty and with s’Ome SCQtitS .1.1p Qn the Quantoc.k Hills at about 9piilontfie 30th. He reports seeing a large object flying in from the north, fairly low and said it resembled ’two concord aircraft fixed together’ and covered in a number of white bright lights. Obviously this could not have been two ’Concords’ but its not a bad description in comparison with the ’Elvers’ description at 2am i.e. a large ’Catamaran’.

Since these reports I have received three more, only these have come from St Ives, Cornwall. again two very bright lights are reported flying parallel to each other and very high in the sky. This is some twenty minutes later than the earlier sightings on the 31st and indicates that the objects or objects were seen over the West Country and Wales, on at least three separate occasions i.e. 1.10am, 1.30am and 2am.

From the general description given, it would appear that the object seen was about 500’ in width, carrying two very bright light sources at its outer edges with a number of smaller lights surrounding its main body. It left a tail of light, something like a vapour trail, only illuminated or lit up.

.J.

/t e/ - he /

v<>n

~77Y~m ~~t~n/

~e~

d- G:.~# ~n

hk/at;Y

CIi?

,. REPORT OF AN UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT

I A. j I I I I B. I I I I I C. I ! I ! I D. I I I I I E. I I I I I I F. I I I I G I I I I H. I I I I I I I I I J. I I I I I I I I I

Date, Time &

fvt/~}/l 0.>; t$!tf}’J I’I f).?i"~:7 :.i;"~/f’- "~ ’f’t’ --

/lo

{

Duration of Sighting

"- ;1

- J((cS;;

’I

, 1-

it.. ’~i,’(f’J’>...~<,,:I". ’l"’;iiP’->.’.

I ........ j} "’,..;,1~-. I r i’} "J.I",~..~, J ( rJ hf:’Jlri),.(/l’jN(:.b (4\:;N’4V;;)@r I (Il.! 4,’’’"#1/,,[/{vj;’ft I I I I I l(;z:l~ .’ ",<t( ///IV0:: t’Vr:::::r? .::1\/ f} J:& t1ktP ~ .1..... Exact Position of Observer it,.."- <;v’I/,’ .(’ (’ 1:~-. .;. #. . . ~,.( I t...--~~; i-~."t.... ,~ ~w!!!fi’",,-’" Location, indoor/outdoor, ) r /t: -Le’{j;,:’tr;{g{ /f ;:"" C;. : 1.rll:t~ <’;;",:;) stationary/moving I (~’~A. :Z ..."f!,J:~v’#’:J;;~Jj~.r I .;t."..f;"/!;’’1’ ~’.:.,.l1 ;rr4 .. I I 1 1. : >"-< 1 """’~.._.’"’....u..__,."’~ 1 I How Observed \Q!aked I I binoculars, other optical I I device, still or movie) I I I I I t?’I ’" t.( Direction in which Object N’ ~’"ln’1 I first seen (A landmark may be I I more useful than a badly I I estimated bearing) I I I II 1 1’;’;’ LI...?’1,;.,.n.,..- t!’j I C<:. .; ;:>C-t?=Angle of Sight (Estimated I I heights are unreliable) 1 I I I I /", ,J’’\ ,"--4.,... A/’J I Distance (By reference to a ,,~V~_..> 11#~t~.frT~j(.,..~~ I known landmark) I I I I ~ ;..t ~ >,J"’j..,.t"l I " ,.~, i!",1>lt"-" .",".[ ";1,,. Movements (Changes in E, F & G .c, J". ’" I>.+~j/ \..p be of more use than may C~:r""Lr.:: I’V!"{ .f’}t(j;-r;.’t estimates of course and speed) I 1’,M,.;}N N’Ii.::l;l .r.:~,.{?’?{ I I C.y ,~’t. , . .,. At1/f~?iJ-:;?’, { Met Conditions during Observations {’ .I/’~’ I’" I,{ (Moving clouds, haze, mist etc) I I I I I I Nearby Objects (Telephone lines, I I high Voltage lines, reservoir, lake I I or dam, swamp or marsh, river, high I ..’"..-’ I /’1! A." buildings, tall chimneys, steeples, I p!J’""’"",. . o’{;/j/," L’ I spires, TV or radio masts, I I airfields, generating plant, I I factories, pits or other sites with I I floodlights or night lighting) I I I J Description of Object (No of objects, size, shape, colour, brightness)

<::A~:~L,< ~

,~,,"

I. :-;?.; >/~a;.’ .s~-?E

,..;It

’

ey~....7

(,. .

II~L-

e-"

: :’LA.JO Va-t; -. I-t.V..!~~’~1~/V>iJ6:- . . .- - /;J~ ,,~ I’ ~ ~ -~ I’ 1

.l~ ,.

’WI/

\’>i,j

., --’

.iitoo .

.rig

REPORT OF AN UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT

Date, Time & Duration of Sighting

Wt. . . ’1 j

’-

Description of Object (No of objects, size, shape, colour, brightness)

Exact Position of Observer Location, indoor/outdoor, stationary/moving

t~;4

.A.

Distance (By reference to a known landmark)

Movements (Changes in E, F & G may be of more use than estimates of course and speed)

Met Conditions during Observations (Moving clouds, haze, mist etc)

Nearby Objects (Telephone lines, high Voltage lines, reservoir, lake or dam, swamp or marsh, river, high buildings, tall chimneys, steeples, spires, TV or radio masts, airfields, generating plant, factories, pits or other sites with floodlights or night lighting)

’

i.l(P%~1f l’I !f

f.,

lit

Vni;~ i

fy@-ft!

Nvf

(,. if

A I i. f

.1",ufUl ,J.A I, f~""\ .

S;v..lA..

hi t""’f",t(;.

Vwff1#~i’"

{V(1.11/,&,,\

-’I

.ft<tA1

t\jJYt5t

’I f

;j*’I{I{

Direction in which Object first seen (A landmark may be more useful than a badly estimated bearing)

Angle of Sight (Estimated heights are unreliable)

81 k ! L , r7

,. r"’f \ ,.fI\ f

How Observed (Naked eye, binoculars, other optical device, still or movie)

!vlt/lILh

A .1 .1’1’ ’i~1;;{1r\f~’ . J") iJ~ f",’’’:~ L ,

’1

f. .;.:rk

4>1

I?)t

1,’1fv

If ,i

f\;/A ~\ld

" ..

!.tV~fk f

l..

k-r

/\ ,7>. ’"

7((J~

’.

I;:’(< .-

REPORT OF AN UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT

I I A. I I I I B. I I I I I C. I I I I I D. I I I I I E. I I I I

, I wU’. 1-t (}/o’1 I I ,I I ~~$-,I I I 1. ’ I’ k tNd.ltJ1..,~fJ 2. ti(ul.; I I ’5,,.~1 ,(t-ifU{ I

Date, Time &

Duration of Sighting

ft’

~wJ.

e<<’1’!t’r ’j:h . () I

/: .,.ff/{l 11’.

{

lrH!(

it.

f (h(st .

!!Vv’ hI’’’’’! .

A’1!-f’lt

i~ R’lt"1 ’:J.!

{.1

I I I I I ! I I !

IV1 p’l/{J.Ii

(

I I I I I I " . I 4’ !!McSf t tNto/lV!4t.v’li ! 1 {,W4 bwwrlj I / ,4, r} i.~ , .;t," I J. 4",. ’).uU:. . I I I m)uf 1/&"1 I,vv f I J I ftt"’t I . , ’.’ I l,NC,;-eA.I !’/1IA’1 ,lt5{~""4’;’ ;" I ;)~Jed’ . T.4t’\.V&t i,’, [Ii" I I I

f,’r~t:

lOt,

e(.+1.;1 ;vlv.tt

" 4,t/’h iVV’t

A5af. I

I I Exact Position of Observer I Location, indoor/outdoor, I stationary/moving I I ! How Observed (Naked eye, I binoculars, other optical I device, still or movie) I I I Direction in which Object I first seen (A landmark may be I more useful than a badly I estimated bearing) I I I I F. Angle of Sight (Estimated I heights are unreliable) I I I I I I I G Distance (By reference to a I known landmark) I I I I I I I H. Movements (Changes in E, F & G I may be of more use than I I estimates of course and speed) I I I I I I Met Conditions during Observations I I (Moving clouds, haze, mist etc) I I I I I I J. Nearby Objects (Telephone lines, II high Voltage lines, reservoir, lake I I or dam, swamp or marsh, river, high I I buildings, tall chimneys, steeples, I I spires, TV or radio masts, I I airfields, generating plant, I I factories, pits or other sites with I I floodlights or night lighting) I I I

i 1/t!\

O\~.

Description of Object (No of objects, size, shape, colour, brightness)

2’5?

flfl"’

v.-lj;’I ", ;f J,li’fdl, ~tt’M( M~(

’t.l ~

1’.,-" i,<. 4-, . .

""V

ltJl’’1r ’"ii.

,1 ,

If’

(:’,.,.’

t /

REPORT OF AN UNIDENTIFIED FLTING OBJECT

Date, Time & Duration of Sighting

, ~Vf,v~l(fd~ ,I r}’1~ I’ I, {fW""~ !.;.~v <.{ ~ ~ 5’: . h.",. ~{ V’J. , , J.’1<~)L ~Jilf(~ I V i "J’ 1’"Jnil-""d,

’

. 10 ,

[

’!l’1

1. J.

Description of Object (No of objects, size, shape, colour, brightness)

Exact Position of Observer Location, indoor/outdoor, stationary/moving

(}i’lt crvi

j’J

. ’M’’I\!I’’!’’’~ h II

,lA/v

Angle of Sight (Estimated heights are unreliable) Distance (By reference to a known landmark)

Movements (Changes in E, F & G may be of more use than estimates of course and speed)

5t["I

A/v~i ’vw/.;.Jkjf .!’>ie,.,,},~4 .

tltre.d.

I’4

I’,

11.

(. ,Pt.?~!; PCM,’;,1.’!J.":~ri.l ~ - ~ It _ k,,/c5 I

MIf’,d.

.! .: {!; !

-/ I Mf~U:

11 ""

<l ! t!fi’&’;’/VI

." v.’r. J

[;yst" i I

tN1~~

;

,,’<IV&(

}1;.Z(, lldL

ft5{f

J, ,)f\W"4\<;’ I I’

H,’;’ #

,,’/1". I yaM, ""[f"PI( . ~tlt’ I

I I

{

(7yt/(’

~v~

fl’V",’W

f"’-II" .

!’ii’ f!

tfi

Met Conditions during Observations (Moving clouds, haze, mist etc)

’

How Observed (Naked eye, binoculars, other optical device, still or movie) Direction in which Object first seen (A landmark may be more useful than a badly estimated bearing)

f/("/;f"W.4~.

,r’bJlif /

2 ".11",4/"" ,

5/,1\’\/

’it

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

.. ~;

tI. ~ REPORT OF AN UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT

Date, Time & Duration of Sighting Description of Object (No of objects, size, shape, colour, brightness)

I I if) .W"V~{ ,,,,,,, ’v I !;Jfi’ ?! fl.?U/rdl I 1’1 tJN~M. ,/ J ,p! 11.. / /-i" I 1. ,IM#,..~tfl l~’t.{,L :,-(J . : ’ Vv~utt: I t ’,I !" A’ ,it! I 1 ,4:1\e.t;1if!il,t ~?~i.tL l1e.. , 1,1; ~f"~’( I tl..; d ,}/,&o(j:J.. v ftlk, r rvt ,; !flY1 1 I 1 PWb.~~Yl ,(f""’" I .Al !("!J,-" t.n, lr-!:f~1Jbf 1" b~. . . I I I I "

l.-

’C’

(

’

Exact Position of Observer Location, indoor/outdoor, stationary/moving

How Observed (Naked eye, binoculars, other optical device, still or movie)

1,/V,iJtd. r-P’

1 1 1

I I 1 .’~ iY J~{..fh"f (11~1 r;)~’v I ! I I I . (;"J&.ytj A..""’lll’!<, ;~ F. Angle of Sight (Estimated I iheights are unreliable) 1 2 P.iV 1,,,,"/t J L/) 11 : I 1 ve’’1 Distance (By reference to a G I !~;l~. ’1t4!"~t.r JI~1.\ of ,! known landmark) 1 9 ",!:(.,f I 1 H. Movements (Changes in E, F & G I may be of more use than ’\f~5~vJ: I 5 estimates of course and speed) I I I 5’/")1 /1.9 , Met Conditions during Observations I (Moving clouds, haze, mist etc) I ,’1 ’~! I q !1k-V!&~, I J. Nearby Objects (Telephone lines, I high Voltage lines, reservoir, lake I or dam, swamp or marsh, river, high I ,. buildings, tall chimneys, steeples, I IVtVV:’spires, TV or radio masts, I airfields, generating plant, I factories, pits or other sites with I I" floodlights or night lighting) I E.

Direction in which Object first seen (A landmark may be more useful than a badly estimated bearing)

l:.

}.1i I

,.")

’7

/fr’

fe~l

df~)

III

fi.

, ij,t>\iq!>t1’

l"w

I I I

I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I