Little thesis / Volume 1, Issue #2 / Spring 2010
1
C o n t e n t s Introduction 1 8 8 1
A Thesis
Mark Jarzombek
Little thesis is a report on the current state of the Masters of Architecture thesis at MIT. This publication also marks the conclusion of the academic portion of the journey of the MArch class of 2010, as we move on to professional practice and other adventures. We began the Little thesis project at the advent of our ‘big’ thesis semester, certain that as a milestone in the architect’s career, the MArch thesis is worthy of reflection not only by the MArch graduate, but also by the school, the profession at large, and the society who hopefully reaps the benefits of the architects’ experience. However, thesis is not necessarily just the ‘crowing achievement’ of the architect’s academic career, but a threshold between her academic and professional life. Thesis is a transition. And the purpose of Little thesis, is to shed light on this transitional moment, a moment of germination when the student invents a version of architecture, of what architecture is, and what it could be.
Mark Jarzombek
Haruka Horiuchi
Introduction
In 1996, thresholds– MIT’s journal of architecture, art, and media culture– explored the subject of ‘thesis’ as its critical topic. In that issue, MIT Professor Mark Jarzombek wrote an article, “A Thesis,” (reprinted here) discussing the nature and challenges of the MArch thesis– and its importance as a learning tool both for the student and for the institution. Thesis is a personal journey, as each student invents her own version. It is also an exhausting, even painful process, but it introduces a unique tool for honing an independent learning, researching and working style. In order to benefit a strong institutional memory, and to alleviate the inevitable isolation experienced by the thesis student, we argue for the relevance of broadcasting the experience of thesis today. We hope the opinions expressed in this review will provide a valuable tool for the school to reveal, reflect, and redirect its concerns while also inviting consideration and response both from within its own walls and from the world outside.
ON THESIS PREP:
2 3
Inside Out or Outside In?
Deborah Buelow
2
Notes from the Future
3
Testing Pedagogy
an Interview with Timothy Hyde
PROJECTIVE POTENTIALS:
6 6 7 1 7
Mary Hale
an interview with Dan Smithwick
Zachary Lamb
Outlines of a Stance
Stacey Murphy
A l s o
I n s i d e
Advice for Thesis Students 2
Haruka Horiuchi with
4
The Last Mile A Final Decisions
3
Laura Rushfeldt.
Thesis Adventure!
6
A Thesis
Outlines of a Stance
At some moment in the early twentieth century, architecture students stopped producing a projet rendu1 and began producing a thesis. And one can see why. A thesis makes a cultural claim. It is not just a building, where the rendering embodies the argument, but first of all an argument, and then a building. A thesis accepts architecture’s unsteady position in the dialectics of modern thought. A thesis also creates a distinction between practice and academe. But there was another aspect in the shift from projet rendu to thesis that needs to be considered. A thesis has language at its foundation whereas a projet rendu had image at its foundation. Is it a reduction for architecture to be language as opposed to image? The two poles, words and images, are often seen as antagonistic, but why would an image be necessarily closer to architecture than words? When taken together it is possible to claim that though we have a relatively stable notion of what words and images are, the same cannot be said for architecture, which is very much dependent on both words and images. Architecture borrows certain certainties from words and images to compensate for its disciplinary inadequacies.
“Somehow the thing that matters has eluded us” 1 - Max Wethimer, Gestalt Theory, 1924
Back in the Renaissance, Leon Battista Alberti argued that “painting and mathematics” were the foundation of the architectural discipline. If painting produced – or reproduced – what a building would look like in a particular context, mathematics made sure a building lasted the test of time. In other words the tension that architecture was meant to resolve was between image and construction. But somewhere along the line, perspective was no longer the dominant mode of representation. It was replaced in painting by Cubism and in architecture by the equally unstable axonometric; and that in turn gave way to the computerized fly-through. In the process, mathematics was abandoned (most math requirements were dropped in schools of architecture during the 1980s), and with it architecture’s traditional attachment to gravity. The culture of words grew ever more important in the framing of architecture’s promissory co-efficient.
A thesis is, in this sense, not a mere explanation and positive) of architecture’s disciplinary fluidity and uncertainty.
Christopher Tohru Guignon. 3
3 Questions for the Specialized Reader John Ochsendorf. 7
Here is our attempt at initiating a productive discussion between all the parties involved. We have done the legwork. We are providing a snapshot of the MArch thesis today. Now let’s have a conversation about thesis. A note on the material format: We believe in the importance of marking the current state of the architectural thesis with a physical artifact, a newspaper you can hold in your hands, you can mull over, you can fold and put away. And it will age. Over time it will register this moment for future readers. This tangible format is critical in conjunction with all the ephemeral voices whispering and shouting from the blogosphere. The ambient awareness that comes with the infinite network most of us inevitably reside in creates a site with fewer and fewer tangible markers. As architects, we create space, but we also work with material. We organize little pieces into larger wholes. Little thesis is an edited collection of little thoughts that we now broadcast. You will probably encounter bits of it in the ether, but it will also exist as a piece of paper that will hopefully attract more than your ambient awareness!
A thesis makes a cultural claim.
Plan for Uncertainty
This publication includes articles from professors and practitioners, and current and former students in the field of architecture: Mark Jarzombek updates us with his observations of the current most pressing concerns of thesis. Haruka Horiuchi outlines a theory of ‘little’. Timothy Hyde illuminates the recent history of thesis preparation that has been going on down the street from MIT. Andrew Scott reviews the current state of thesis preparation at MIT. Deborah Buelow provides an intermediary perspective as the incumbent thesis prep teaching assistant. Sarah Hirschman and Ann Woods give us a peek into what the immediate future holds. Neeraj Bhatia argues the case for thesis as the beginning of a professional trajectory. Dan Smithwick talks about the capacity for entrepreneurial exploration during thesis. Mary Hale traces her path from architecture student to interdisciplinary artist-designer. Zachary Lamb reminds us of the generative power of messiness. ‘Outside thesis committee reader’ Stacey Murphy surmises on the similarities between thesis and all new ventures into the uncertain. And to keep the mood playful, we solicited graphic submissions from the MArch class of 2010: a retrospective 2009 thesis + “news we missed” timeline by Laura Rushfeldt, comics drawn by Christopher Guignon, and a ‘decision assistant’ from Marissa Cheng. Previous graduates who made it through the thesis gauntlet provide invaluable advice and John Ochsendorf offers a short perspective as an engineer (and non-architect) who frequents MArch thesis committees. Choose Your Own Thesis Adventure is a map-game to help visualize the journey that is the thesis process.
A handful of essays about the state of the architecture thesis have been popping up recently– for example, “Between Mission Statement and Parametric Model” by Tim Love, and “How to Do a Thesis: Practice Models as Instigators for Academic Theses” by Sergio López-Piñeiro– but there has not been a collection of ruminations on the MArch thesis or an assessment of its status since thresholds #12. For such an important part of the MArch education, we find there is a lack of conversation between all parties involved in the making of a thesis. Students are too busy trying to make a thesis– and then, when the theses are finally done– all too happy to move on (and try to recuperate from the experience). The teaching team– advisors, committee members and reviewers– are also running their lives on scant enough time. Who has the time to ruminate on thesis? Critics’ writings about thesis are certainly valuable to read, but their words may not have a direct effect on how thesis is done. Practitioners sometimes make brief guest appearances during the thesis process, but don’t often enter actively into the debate. As
Mark Jarzombek
Big Thesis
for the world outside architecture schools– the MArch thesis, often our field’s most public expression of academic work, is many times deemed esoteric, or simply misunderstood– if registered at all.
A thesis is, in this sense, not a mere explanation of architecture but an expression (both negative and positive) of architecture’s disciplinary fluidity and uncertainty. It is an expression of architecture’s liberation from fixed representation and the requirements of gravity and durability. An architectural thesis looks past or perhaps through the materiality of the building to something else. It is a risky move for all involved – students and teachers - for the image is no longer the sole basis of the argument, but now part of a shared system in which words, images and various floating signifiers are all entangled. The more this entanglement is probed, the better the thesis. In fact, I would say that a thesis should bring to light the operative dis-functionality of both language and image as it crosses the domain often known as “architecture.” _______________ Mark Jarzombek is a Professor of the History and Theory of Architecture at MIT and is also the Associate Dean of the School of Architecture and Planning. He has taught at MIT since 1995, and has worked on a range of historical topics from the Renaissance to the modern; his most recent book was entitled Global History of Architecture, co-authored with Vikramaditya Prakash and Francis D.K. Ching. ____________________ 1. ”Project record” (French), refers to the Beaux Arts tradition of producing a set of perfectly rendered drawings for a student project.
The ability to be projective with one’s work rests largely on being conscious of directing a trajectory. This may sound simple, but in fact it questions the basic outlines of one’s stance or position. While particular aspirations will inevitably differ amongst individuals, without this awareness, the multitude of divergent paths within Architecture and Architectural Praxis can impose a destination. Thesis can play a critical role in forming a trajectory of exploration– a task that is often difficult to uncover in the preceding or subsequent years. In the novel Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World2 by Japanese writer Haruki Murakami, two parallel stories are woven together in alternating chapters that involve the same protagonist’s helpless journey through the ‘real world’ (End of the World) and a ‘fantasy world’ (Hard-Boiled Wonderland), revealing a tension between conscious and unconscious choice. As the story (or stories) unfolds, we learn that a neurological experiment in the ‘real world’ has resulted in the loss of this character’s memory and mind, which, in the fantasy world translates to the loss of his shadow. As his shadow is separated from his body, he lives an increasingly uncritical, unquestioning, and passive life and fades deeper into the Wonderland. Ironically in Murakami’s novel, the protagonist who insists on holding onto his memory and mind (not to mention his comfortable lifestyle as a ‘Calcultec’ or human data processor/computer programmer) is largely indifferent to the world transpiring in the Tokyo streets that surround him, and chooses to lead a life dictated by routine that centers primarily on his work. So, despite his efforts – in both stories – to retain his mind, the chosen lifestyle that was vanishing as a result of this experiment was not so dissimilar from the life he was unconsciously inheriting. Underlying the structure of Murakami’s novel is the pretense that the loss of the mind and its ability to retain memories leads to an unquestioning life, which does not allow for change, progress, or criticality. Many would argue that while we look to several great Architects to direct the trajectory of our discipline, a much larger group of Architects exists who have lost their shadows – or ability to critically examine their work, trajectory, and meaning of their projects. The key to creating critical work that not only adds to the growth of the discipline but also creates a platform to structure a career path is having a clear stance or position. Thesis is an intriguing moment in the development of an Architect because it exists at a curious intersection between academic growth and praxis and is therefore well suited to cultivating the seeds for such a stance. The development of a clear stance is difficult in the formative years of Architecture school where the acrobatics of juggling site, program, structure and concept, and translating these forces into an Architectural Form takes precedence. During these years, one is gathering the basic tools to create meaningful form, with the aid of critics and instructors. Thesis provides the first glimpses of autonomy – the instructor now takes the role of the advisor, and the individual defines the terms of their thesis – its site, programme, concept and agenda. Unbeknownst to developing students, throughout Architecture school a series of external reviewers has been cultivating an internal critic that exists within each student. This critic will need to weigh and observe opposing views, and be able to hold both simultaneously before selecting the most appropriate trajectory. Architecture is a result of hundreds if not thousands of decisions – each of which demands the criticality of the designer. This criticality also allows one to frame a larger interest or frustration that is worthy of deeper examination. In my own case, it was a frustration that the discipline of urban design had a growing inability to animate ‘public’ space without the use of commercial activity. When was there a disciplinary
...continued on page 8