Access your data don’t expose your network LEARN MORE cogentdatahub.com
www.controleng.com
Don’t break the bank... ...use CLICK PLCs and save.
Customer Feedback: CLICK Micro PLC unit - approximately 2”(W) x 3”(H) x 3”(D)
CLICK - The almost free PLC The CLICK micro-brick PLC is undoubtedly the best PLC value in the industry. With basic models starting at just $69.00 and FREE programming software, CLICK is by far the most practical PLC for the smallest of applications. • Basic PLC units with 14 discrete I/O points and 2 serial ports starting at $69 • Standard PLC units with 14 discrete I/O points, 3 serial ports and a real time calendar/clock - starting at $99 • Analog PLC units with 8 discrete I/O points, 4 analog I/O channels and 3 serial ports - starting at $129 • Basic Ethernet PLC units with 14 discrete I/O points, 1 Ethernet port and 1 serial port - starting at $129 • Standard Ethernet PLC units with 14 discrete I/O points, 1 Ethernet port and 2 serial ports - starting at $149 • CLICK PLC units can also be expanded up to 142 discrete or 48 analog I/O total
“This little PLC is superb!!! Now with Ethernet and online programing it is almost unstoppable...I have 14 running and will be adding more. In Love with this thing!” Paul in OCONOMOWOC, WI “Have used this model Click in many small applications, and it has worked, reliably, for many years. We even talked some customers out of using “programmable relays” for they are not as versatile or as cost effective as this PLC.” Todd in ONTARIO, CA See more reviews under the Reviews tab on the CLICK PLC units’ product page at www.automationdirect.com Get more than you paid for . . .
www.CLICKplcs.com
• All CLICK PLCs use our FREE programming software with a simple but practical instruction set
Order Today, Ships Today! * See our Web site for details and restrictions. © Copyright 2016 AutomationDirect, Cumming, GA USA. All rights reserved.
1-800-633-0405
input #1 at www.controleng.com/information
the #1 value in automation
When things just work, work gets done. Kepware’s industrial connectivity software provides secure and reliable data from the shop floor to the top floor, so you can focus on productivity. Learn more at kepware.com/CE
input #2 at www.controleng.com/information
MAY 2017 Vol. 64 Number 5
Features 24 Robots, humans collaborate on safety Cover Story: A new age of collaborative robots put people closer to technology, with risks, opportunities.
28 Robotic safety: What you don’t know Cover story: With robotic safety, what you don’t know CAN hurt you. Get what you need to know about robotic safety, terms, and standards affecting robotic implementations.
24 COVER: While moving a collaborative robot’s arm to “teach” it a task is an important part of collaboration, it’s not the same as hand guiding a robot, one of the four methods of collaborative operation: Courtesy: RIA/Yaskawa
30 Four things to remember about DCS migration At a refinery, chemical plant, or other process-related facility, the primary control system must operate efficiently, safely, and economically. If it doesn’t, perhaps it’s time for an upgrade.
33 IT, OT teams need to keep manufacturing systems running Security professionals in information technology (IT) and in operations technology (OT) must the manufacturer’s systems running at all times.
34 How to navigate the future of IIoT systems It’s critical to understand which IIoT connectivity technologies to use for each application in the IIoT space.
30
36 Control Engineering Salary and Career Survey Control Engineering salary and career survey research shows an average salary of $96,045 in 2017, up slightly from the 2016 results; job satisfaction continues among respondents. Lifelong learning remains critically important. Invest more in science, technology, engineering, and math education and in high-profile projects, respondents said.
43 Engineering advice: Get lifelong education, consider workplace strategies Control Engineering career and salary survey respondents offer advice on education, workplace strategies, attitude, and more.
45 Top 4 job-hunting tips Finding a job in engineering takes skill, focus, and persistence.
46 Defining and measuring project quality Using a standardized methodology to define project quality ensures deliverables fit customer specifications and receive high customer satisfaction when managing projects.
57 Digital Edition Exclusives Machine vision technologies boost warehouse efficiency, transparency Learning tough lessons from ICS attacks.
2
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
36 CONTROL ENGINEERING (ISSN 0010-8049, Vol. 64, No. 5, GST #123397457) is published 12x per year, Monthly by CFE Media, LLC, 1111 W. 22nd Street, Suite #250, Oak Brook, IL 60523. Jim Langhenry, Group Publisher /Co-Founder; Steve Rourke CEO/COO/ Co-Founder. CONTROL ENGINEERING copyright 2017 by CFE Media, LLC. All rights reserved. CONTROL ENGINEERING is a registered trademark of CFE Media, LLC used under license. Periodicals postage paid at Oak Brook, IL 60523 and additional mailing offices. Circulation records are maintained at CFE Media, LLC, 1111 W. 22nd Street, Suite #250, Oak Brook, IL 60523. E-mail: customerservice@cfemedia.com. Postmaster: send address changes to CONTROL ENGINEERING, 1111 W. 22nd Street, Suite #250, Oak Brook, IL 60523. Publications Mail Agreement No. 40685520. Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to: 1111 W. 22nd Street, Suite #250, Oak Brook, IL 60523. Email: customerservice@ cfemedia.com. Rates for nonqualified subscriptions, including all issues: USA, $150/yr; Canada/Mexico, $180/yr (includes 7% GST, GST#123397457); International air delivery $325/yr. Except for special issues where price changes are indicated, single copies are available for $30.00 US and $35.00 foreign. Please address all subscription mail to CONTROL ENGINEERING, 1111 W. 22nd Street, Suite #250, Oak Brook, IL 60523. Printed in the USA. CFE Media, LLC does not assume and hereby disclaims any liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions in the material contained herein, regardless of whether such errors result from negligence, accident or any other cause whatsoever.
www.controleng.com
Slimmest. Smartest. Easiest to Use. NE
W
Industry’s slimmest at 2 cm wide Modbus, PROFINET, EtherNet/IP built in
LEDs visible from front and side Flexible DIN rail mounting
Rugged steel housing
Designed for Today's Machine Builders and OEMs If you're working with limited cabinet space, a tiny budget, and little to no formal network training, your life just got a little easier. The affordable new SDS-3008 smart switch fits into the tightest spaces and can be monitored over SCADA. • • • •
Easier, more cost-effective alternative to full managed switches Rugged, ultra-slim form factor with multiple mounting options Simple one-page configuration requires zero network training Integrates with HMI/SCADA for network monitoring
Learn more at www.moxa.com/smartswitch.
input #3 at www.controleng.com/information
Re-Route Your Temperature Measurements Around Potential Roadblocks The new THZ3/TDZ3 Dual Input Smart HARTÂŽ temperature transmitters can help you avoid costly process interruptions and maintenance delays by ensuring your measurements always make it safely to your control system. Our Sensor Backup and Failover protection feature means you will never miss those critical readings - even if something goes wrong with one of the sensors. Plus, with Device Intelligence, a series of new and advanced features that enable smarter control and monitoring, the THZ3/TDZ3 gives you the conďƒždence that your temperature measurements will get from Point A to Point B despite any potential roadblocks.
Demand Moore Reliability
input #4 at www.controleng.com/information
To learn more about our Dual Input p Temperature p www.miinet.com/THZ3TDZ3 Transmitter, go to: 900 Or call 800-999-2900
MAY 2017 Vol. 64 Number 5
‘
Namur sensors may have the opposite contact action of existing simple dry contact position switches and require inverted control system logic.
Inside Process
P1
’
Appears after page 48; Also, see the Digital Edition: www.controleng.com/DigitalEdition
P1 Signaling considerations for control system migrations Not every analog field instrument can be wired to any given analog input (AI) module, nor can any discrete output (DO) module be wired to any given discrete final control element.
P3 Understanding upstream and downstream pipe diameters for flow measurement While there are some creative ways to get flowmeters piped, certain installation best practices should be adhered to whenever possible.
Departments 8 Think Again Automation careers: Inspire, engage, teach.
10 Control Engineering International
Products
60 ABOVE: Automated checkweigher system; RIGHT: Differential measurement system; Also on page 60: Touchless rotary angle sensor series; Data logger; Power supplies for automation, process control
Sensors have Industrie 4.0 capabilities.
Integrator Update 12 Your most valuable asset: Managing your system integration business as an investment 14 The changing landscape for buyers and investors in growing technology markets
64 Back to Basics Six tips for testing motor insulation systems
News 16 18 18 19 20 22 22
Roundup: Hannover Messe 2017 collaboration Five positive IIoT impacts on manufacturing Frank Lamb joins Editorial Advisory Board.
61 ABOVE: Software package for schematic generation; RIGHT: Combustion analyzer for hazardous conditions; Also on page 61: Surface sensing temperature measurement; Rugged dc/dc converter; Ceramic chip resistors
Events and online headlines Faster automation and robots Services for obsolete electronics Cloud-based SaaS contact platform
www.controleng.com
62 LEFT: Radar level transmitters with diagnostics and instrument verification
CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 5
More resources posted daily at:
MAY
IIoT
www.controleng.com
New Products
Control Systems
Process Manufacturing Discrete Manufacturing
System Integration
Manufacturers still not embracing IIoT There’s a lot more to read online. Go to www.controleng.com/news to read Control Engineering’s exclusive Web content. Six questions to ask when choosing an open-loop or closed-loop hydraulic system Scientists develop method to control water movement Shop floor marketplace emerges with Industrie 4.0 IIoT security a major concern, according to survey.
Control Engineering provides unique automation-related research: See more on the salary and career survey in this issue. Read other research summaries and sign up to download the full reports at www.controleng.com/ce-research.
NEWSLETTER: MACHINE CONTROL
Matrix drives reduce energy consumption for transporter system Keep up with the latest industry news by subscribing to Control Engineering’s 16 newsletters at www.controleng.com/newsletters: Motion controllers can adapt themselves Proof of concept, testing for integrated vision applications Alliance for robotics in manufacturing will improve innovation, industry growth.
Point, click, watch GAMS 2016: How Maintenance and Big Data Can Coexist The 2016 Global Automation and Manufacturing Summit (GAMS), presented by CFE Media, will bring together experts from all areas of the Industrial Internet of Things (lloT) to look at not just the current state of lloT but also at the potential benefits of deployment for the manufacturing industry.
Networking & Security
Info Management
Education & Training
Upcoming Webcast Series: Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) is a suite Webcasts of applications for the integrated management of core business processes, from manufacturing to distribution, finance and human resources, using a common process and data model. This webcast series, starting in March 2017, will focus on topics such as critical implementation, how ERP streamlines operations for the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), and when to move ERP to the cloud. Couldn’t catch a recent webcast? See it on-demand at www.controleng.com/webcasts.
Oil & Gas Engineering April issue Oil & Gas Engineering provides industry-specific solutions designed to maximize uptime and increase productivity through the use of industry best practices and new innovations, increase efficiency from the wellhead to the refinery by implementing automation and monitoring strategies, and maintain and improve safety for workers and the work environment. Read the digital edition at www.oilandgaseng.com
Read this on your tablet Tablet and digital editions of this publication have unique content for digital subscribers. This month has digital exclusives on: Machine vision technologies boost warehouse efficiency, transparency; Learning tough lessons from ICS attacks.
Access your data don’t expose your network LEARN MORE cogentdatahub.com
www.controleng.com
www.youtube.com/user/controlengineeringtv.
6
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
www.controleng.com
Your Total Power Solution The most trusted brands, all under one roof. Phoenix Contact, Siemens, TDK-Lambda, Square D, AP, Telemecanique, SolaHD, Bel Power Solutions, SL Power, Cosel, Schneider Electric, Panasonic, Meanwell, Dantona Industries, Power-Sonic, XP Power, and hundreds more.
thinkallied.com
•1.800.433.5700
Š Allied Electronics, Inc 2017.
input #5 at www.controleng.com/information
THINK AGAIN career help 1111 W. 22nd St. Suite 250, Oak Brook, IL 60523 630-571-4070, Fax 630-214-4504
Automation careers: Inspire, engage, teach To develop a workforce for an automated future provide inspiration about automation, engage youth and teach the next generation and others about how rewarding automation careers can be, including robotics, said advanced technology professionals at Automate 2017 in April.
F
Filling the skills gap in manufacturing requires inspiring potential candidates about automation, then engaging and teaching youth and others about rewards in manufacturing automation. More can be done to inspire young people to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) careers, including robotics and manufacturing. More than 300,000 U.S. manufacturing jobs are unfilled for lack of qualified candidates, said Ted Rozier, engineering development manager, Festo Didactic. Bob Doyle, Association for Advancing Automation (A3) media contact, introduced the Automate 2017 conference session, “Developing your workforce for an automated future.” Doyle said robots increase the number of jobs in manufacturing by increasing efficiency, competitiveness, and market growth. Rozier, in charge of designing equipment, technical education, and competence development for technology education in North America, said: “It gives me goosebumps when I peer into the future of automation technology” and how it’s adding productivity. In addition to training, Festo Didactic helps inspire STEM youth toward manufacturing by using innovative educational materials. Festo Bionic Learning Network displays fun technologies, such as automated animals, insects, and an exohand controller that moves a robotic hand. “Parents think manufacturing’s dark and gloomy, and there’s no future in it, but that’s just not so,” Rozier said, noting that 84% of executives agreed about a U.S. manufacturing MORE
ADVICE GO ONLINE See the career survey and advice coverage in this issue. Link to more on training, with photos, and more about robotics with this article online, search the headline at www.controleng.com. Also see www.bls.gov, www.nam.org, and www.robotics.org.
8
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
talent shortage, citing an inability to recruit and hire personnel with the right skill sets to match hiring needs. Association of Manufacturing Technology research points to opportunities in computer, mechanical, and electrical engineering. In North America, the greatest need is for service technicians. Mechatronics (combining computer science, mechanical engineering, and electrical engineering) must be the foundation for the training, Rozier said. Hot areas include system integration, mobile robots, highly flexible transport, intelligent products, wireless communications, mobile devices, simulation, and programming. Robotic coworkers save jobs
Integrating robots as team members in plant-floor applications can add efficiency, increase quality, compete against low-cost countries, fill the skills gap, fill vacancies for mundane work, and reduce human hazards and injuries, explained Matthew Bush, cofounder of Hirebotics LLC, which provides robots to manufacturers as a service. Communicating the right message within companies about robots is important to alleviate apprehension, Bush said. Involve employees early and often when bringing in robots to provide valuable insights into the benefits. Throughout the process, think again about how robots are introduced and used, Bush advised, along with related communications. Any replacement is best by attrition. Seeing the need firsthand, Bush advocates for the mechatronics program at his local high school. Manufacturing technology experts, robotics and automation need to work together early and often. ce
Mark T. Hoske, Content Manager MHoske@CFEMedia.com
Content Specialists/Editorial
Mark T. Hoske, Content Manager 847-830-3215, MHoske@CFEMedia.com Jack Smith, Content Manager 630-907-1622, JSmith@CFEMedia.com senior contributing Kevin Parker, Senior Contributingeditor, Editor,IIoT, IIoT,O&GE OGE 630-890-9682, KParker@CFEMedia.com Emily Guenther, Associate Content Manager 630-571-4070 x2220, eguenther@cfemedia.com Amanda Pelliccione, Director of Research 631-320-0655, APelliccione@CFEMedia.com 978-302-3463, Joy Chang, Digital Project Manager 630-571-4070 x2225, JChang@CFEMedia.com Chris Vavra, Production Editor 630-571-4070 x2219, CVavra@CFEMedia.com
Contributing Content Specialists Frank J. Bartos, P.E., braunbart@sbcglobal.net Peter Welander, PWelander@CFEMedia.com Vance VanDoren, Ph.D., P.E., controleng@msn.com Suzanne Gill, Control Engineering Europe suzanne.gill@imlgroup.co.uk Ekaterina Kosareva, Control Engineering Russia ekaterina.kosareva@fsmedia.ru Wojciech Stasiak, Control Engineering Poland wojciech.stasiak@trademedia.us Lukáš Smelík, Control Engineering Czech Republic lukas.smelik@trademedia.us Aileen Jin, Control Engineering China aileenjin@cechina.cn
Publication Services
Jim Langhenry, Co-Founder/Publisher, CFE Media 630-571-4070, x2203; JLanghenry@CFEMedia.com Steve Rourke, Co-Founder, CFE Media 630-571-4070, x2204, SRourke@CFEMedia.com Trudy Kelly, Executive Assistant, 630-571-4070, x2205, TKelly@CFEMedia.com Elena Moeller-Younger, Marketing Manager 773-815-3795, EMYounger@CFEMedia.com Kristen Nimmo, Marketing Manager 630-571-4070, x2215, KNimmo@CFEMedia.com Brian Gross, Marketing Consultant, Global SI Database 630-571-4070, x2217, BGross@CFEMedia.com Michael Smith, Creative Director 630-779-8910, MSmith@CFEMedia.com Paul Brouch, Director of Operations 630-571-4070, x2208, PBrouch@CFEMedia.com Michael Rotz, Print Production Manager 717-766-0211 x4207, Fax: 717-506-7238 mike.rotz@frycomm.com Director Infogroup Targeting Solutions Maria Bartell, Account Director, Infogroup Targeting Solutions 847-378-2275, maria.bartell@infogroup.com 847-378-2275, maria.bartell@infogroup.com Rick Ellis, Audience Management Director Rick Ellis, Audience Management Director 303-246-1250, REllis@CFEMedia.com 303-246-1250, REllis@CFEMedia.com Letters to the editor: Please e-mail us your opinions to Letters to the editor: Please e-mail us your opinions to should MHoske@CFEMedia.com or fax 630-214-4504. Letters MHoske@CFEMedia.com or fax us at 630-214-4504. include name, company, and address, and may be edited. Letters should include name, company, and address, Information: For a Media Kit or Editorial Calendar, and may be edited for space and clarity. email Trudy Kelly at TKelly@CFEMedia.com. Information: For a Media Kit or Editorial Calendar, Marketing consultants: See ad index. email Trudy Kelly at TKelly@CFEMedia.com. Custom reprints, electronic: Brett Petillo Reprints Wright’s Media, 281-419-5725, bpetillo@wrightsmedia.com For custom reprints or electronic usage, contact: Brett Petillo, Wright’s MediaBoard www.controleng.com/EAB Editorial Advisory 281-419-5725, bpetillo@wrightsmedia.com Doug Bell, president, InterConnecting Automation, www.interconnectingautomation.com Publication Sales: ad index David Bishop, president andSee a founder Matrix Technologies, www.matrixti.com president, Diversified Technical Services Inc. Daniel E. Capano, Editorial Advisory Board of Stamford, CT, www.linkedin.com/in/daniel-capano-7b886bb0 www.controleng.com/EAB Frank Lamb, founder and owner David Bishop, president and a founder Automation Consulting LLC, www.automationllc.com Matrix Technologies, www.matrixti.com Joe Joe Martin, Martin, president president and and founder founder Martin Martin Control Control Systems, Systems, www.martincsi.com www.martincsi.com Rick Rick Pierro, Pierro, president president and and co-founder co-founder Superior Superior Controls, Controls, www.superiorcontrols.com www.superiorcontrols.com Mark Mark Voigtmann, Voigtmann, partner, partner, automation automation practice practice lead lead Faegre www.FaegreBD.com Faegre Baker Baker Daniels, Daniels, www.FaegreBD.com\ www.controleng.com
input #6 at www.controleng.com/information
CONTROL ENGINEERING international
Sensors have Industrie 4.0 capabilities A sensor’s process data and its metadata can be transferred directly to the Azure Cloud via OPC UA without an intermediate gateway, after collaboration between Microsoft and Leuze electronic, as explained by Control Engineering Europe.
T
The result of collaboration between
‘
The lowest level device can be addressed from the cloud without the need for another
Moving data
’
gateway. MORE
ADVICE
KEY CONCEPTS Cooperation between Microsoft and Leuze resulted in a sensor that communicates with the Microsoft Azure cloud. Sensor-cloud-communications help enable the goals of Industrie 4.0 OPC UA helps with communication. GO ONLINE www.controleng.com/international The April 3 article, “A sensor solution with Industrie 4.0 capabilities” has more information. www.controlengeurope.com CONSIDER THIS How can your sensor communications better enable Industrie 4.0 or Industrial Internet of Things?
10
|
MAY 2017
Microsoft and Leuze electronic GmbH has been the creation of a sensor whose process data and metadata can be transferred directly to the Microsoft Azure Cloud via OPC UA from the OPC Foundation without the need for an intermediate gateway. A prerequisite for high data transparency is an intelligent and standardized data interface. However, this alone is not enough to be able to realize Industrie 4.0 systems. The Reference Architecture Model of Industrie 4.0 (RAMI) model of the Industrie 4.0 platform offers a representation for industry. RAMI depicts the properties of Industrie 4.0 components in three dimensions. In the product life cycle description, product data is collected. In the next dimension, a hierarchy is recorded, while the third dimension is the information technology (IT) representation. Industrie 4.0 components need to be describable using the RAMI 4.0 model, so a true Industrie 4.0 sensor must be able to communicate across IT levels. This impossible for a sensor with a classic fieldbus interface, which communicates with the control and does not pass data to the upper IT levels. Unlike classic fieldbus interfaces, an interface that is expanded with the OPC UA communication model can transport data to higher IT levels of the RAMI model. OPC UA includes a security implementation that consists of authentication, authorization, encryption and data integrity with signatures. Unlike communication methods typically used in industrial environments, it allows for secure communication. From the field level of the automation pyramid, OPC UA can communicate via two mechanisms—either via client/server communication or via a publisher process. With client/server communication, an OPC UA server is integrated in the data source—a sensor that can deliver data to a data recipient. With the publisher process, an OPC UA publisher is integrated in the data source. This can then make its data available to various data recipients. If there is more than one data source in the system, the data recipient can decide which data it would like to receive from which publisher. This means that the recipient does not always need to accept the data
CONTROL ENGINEERING
from all publishers. Using this process, communication from data sources to data recipients is possible. A data cloud can also retrieve data directly from the data source. Communication in the opposite direction—from the cloud to the sensor—also will be possible in the future. Industrie 4.0 requires compatible communication and OPC UA can virtually “tunnel through” the layers of the automation pyramid and transport data to the higher levels of the RAMI model. This makes standardized communication of sensors and actuators from various manufacturers directly with a cloud-based ERP system possible. With secure communication, even the exchange of data between different systems via public channels is conceivable. Microsoft Azure cloud
The provision of data from components via OPC UA communication alone is not enough for an Industrie 4.0 application. Additional mechanisms are needed for data acquisition from the cloud. To realize telemetry data without more components, such as an Industrie 4.0 gateway, Leuze electronic and Microsoft have collaborated on a solution demonstrated at the SPS IPC Drives event in November 2016. Sensor data from a barcode reader can be transmitted via the OPC UA Publish/Subscriber Communication Model (PSCM) to Microsoft’s Azure IoT Hub. Data is recorded by the IoT hub for the Azure Cloud Services for analysis and visualization. The collaboration demonstrates how an embedded device can be controlled from the Azure Cloud. Using the barcode reader as an example, Leuze electronic has shown how a device can be addressed from the cloud on the lowest RAMI level without needing another gateway. The reading gate of a barcode reader can be controlled from anywhere in the world by any mobile device via the Azure Cloud. The sensor data recorded by the IoT hub also can be analyzed by analysis tools of the cloud according to predetermined criteria and this can trigger events in the Industrie 4.0 total system. ce
Edited from an April 3 Control Engineering Europe post, “A sensor solution with Industry 4.0 capabilities,” by Mark T. Hoske, content manager, Control Engineering, mhoske@cfemedia.com. www.controleng.com
Industrial Wireless Sensor Networking SmartMesh
®
In a commercial building, factory, smart grid, industrial plant or for transportation, you need a wireless sensor network that performs in tough RF environments, in extreme environmental conditions, and operates reliably for many years. With over 50,000 customer networks in over 120 countries, SmartMesh is field-proven to deliver >99.999% data reliability and >10 year battery life. Customers trust SmartMesh to deliver their business-critical data and enable their Industrial IoT businesses. Reliable Wireless Sensor Network Streamlines Manufacturing Operations
Features
Learn More www.linear.com/SmartMesh
• The Only Network Built for Industrial IoT • Complete Networking Software Speeds
1-800-4-LINEAR
Development
• Engineered for Years of Trouble-Free Operation video.linear.com/7254
input #7 at www.controleng.com/information
Find your local sales office: www.linear.com/contact
, LT, LTC, LTM, Linear Technology, the Linear logo, and µModule are registered trademarks of Analog Devices, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
INTEGRATOR UPDATE business value
Managing your system integration business as an investment There are many factors to consider to manage a business now, and for the future, to maximize value.
A
As a business owner
who wears many hats, it’s easy to get caught up in the day-today workings of the business. However, it’s critical to the company’s long-term success (and any retirement goals) to carve out time to look at the business as you would any other investment. Whether there is a plan to sell the business in the coming years or pass the business on to the next generation, knowing the value of the business investment and how that changes over time is critical. Once the value of the business is determined, it is then possible to increase value or to know if management decisions are resulting in increasing value over time. Is the business going to attract buyers?
MORE
ADVICE KEY CONCEPTS How to drive value to a business. How to attract potential buyers. Identifying what to consider when potentially selling a business. GO ONLINE For more about business valuations and links to parts 1 through 9 of this series, read this article online. In the digital edition, click on the headline or search the headline for www.controleng.com. Read more online on how to drive business value and creating a buy-sell agreement. CONSIDER THIS How often should a business valuation be considered?
12
|
MAY 2017
Before getting into the details of business valuation first determine if the business is “transferable,” meaning it would be worth more than liquidation value and therefore attractive to a potential buyer. There are two questions to consider: 1. Are there profits available to the business owner to provide a return on investment? Is the business profitable? 2. Is the business too dependent on the business owner? If the business is profitable after adjusting for market compensation so the business owner can earn a return on investment and the business can continue without the business owner, the business would be considered to be transferable by appraisers. If the answer is “no” to the first question, or “yes” to the second question, unfortunately the business is likely not transferable. It is possible to become a transferable business; however, this takes time and investment. Buyers for a system integration business?
Once the business is transferable, it’s time to think about the type of buyer who may be interested in the business. Again, whether there is a plan to sell now or in the future, understanding who the potential buyers might be and making sure they know about the business can help define how to transition out of the business smoothly. Interestingly, every privately owned business has many different values depending on the buyer.
CONTROL ENGINEERING
Different types of buyers are willing to pay different values for a company because each group is motivated differently and perceives risk differently. Before selling, identifying who the buyers might be and what their expectations and concerns might be will position you to make changes to maximize business value. Business valuation: It is not about a multiple
Many business owners have a number in their head that they need the value to be, but are left unsure how much the business is actually worth. So, in an effort to save time and/or money, some owners will ballpark value with their accountant using multiples of earnings or revenues. There is so much more to a business than a number on an income statement multiplied times a baseless number. Since we should not just rely on multipliers of a number on an income statement, experienced business appraisers will look at three approaches to value a business: the asset approach, the market approach, and the income approach. All three should be considered when determining a meaningful conclusion of value. Creating a buy-sell agreement
Protecting the ownership interest, or “share,” of the business is critical. Don’t get into business with anyone without first defining how to get out of business. The way to define and document how to handle the buy-out of one (or more) of the owners is by creating a buy-sell agreement. The buy-sell agreement outlines what happens to the shares of an owner who leaves the business, for any reason. It is a legally binding agreement that is typically drafted by an attorney. If you walk away with nothing else, take the time to review (or create if needed) the buy-sell agreement if there is more than one owner in the business. ce
Catherine J. Durham is accredited senior analyst, principal, and president, Capital Valuation Group; edited by Emily Guenther, associate content manager, Control Engineering, CFE Media, eguenther@cfemedia.com. www.controleng.com
Make your machines even smarter. Easily.
Achieve business excellence with future-ready machine solutions As a pioneer in smart automation technologies, Schneider Electric makes it easier for you to offer your customers safe, better connected, more flexible, and more efficient machines. We simplify the integration between products, machines, and processes to boost business efficiency and sustainability. Both today and tomorrow.
SAFE
CONNECTED
FLEXIBLE
EFFICIENT
Understanding smart machines – How will they shape the future? Download our FREE white paper to learn more today! schneider-electric.us/smartmachines © 2017 Schneider Electric. All Rights Reserved. Life Is On Schneider Electric is a trademark and the property of Schneider Electric SE, its subsidiaries and affiliated companies • 998-19598767_GMA
input #8 at www.controleng.com/information
INTEGRATOR UPDATE automation business
The changing landscape for buyers and investors in growing technology markets Due to controls and automation and Internet of Things (IoT) markets growing, buyers and investors are taking advantage.
T
services segment
The past four years have seen a rapidly changing landscape for potential buyers and investors in the controls and automation and Internet of Things (IoT) industry segments. The business world continues to focus on methods to improve productivity through the adoption of software, robotics, and monitoring tools. The result has been rapid growth in the controls and automation and IoT markets, which is attracting a new group of private equity and growth equity investors, as well as industry, or strategic, buyers focused on taking advantage of this growth. The options available to business owners for growth capital and/or selling a business have increased substantially over the past few years.
is producing a
Private and growth equity
‘
The rapidly
evolving demand for quality technology offerings and engineeringdriven technical
non-traditional, aggressive class of strategic buyers.
MORE
’
ADVICE KEY CONCEPTS Buying and investing in growing markets. A business owner’s options for selling the business. What the growth in technology means for business owners in the control and automation and Internet of Things (IoT) industry segments. GO ONLINE For related links about investing, read this article online. In the digital edition, click on the headline or search the headline for www.controleng.com. CONSIDER THIS Will business owners and investors be ready during the next market plateau or slowing?
14
|
MAY 2017
Private equity groups are private pools of capital, managed by investment professionals, which typically acquire a majority equity percentage, but not 100%, of a company. Growth equity groups are similar in profile, but usually are focused on completing minority equity investments, or a combination of debt and minority equity, in high-growth companies. Private and growth equity groups are focused on investing in growth markets and finding ways to help management expand through organic growth opportunities and add-on acquisitions. Within the past few years, a wave of private and growth equity groups have entered the market, validating the controls and automation segment as an attractive segment. A critical mass of other private and growth equity groups are eager to break into the controls and automation market through a platform investment.
Classical versus new strategic buyers
Strategic buyers have been active and continue to be very relevant players in the controls and automation segment. The legacy, or classical, strategic buyers maintain a relatively consistent acquisition strategy that focuses on obtaining new market share and augmenting existing capabilities.
CONTROL ENGINEERING
The rapidly evolving demand for quality technology offerings and engineering-driven technical services segment is producing a non-traditional, aggressive class of strategic buyers. These groups are using acquisitions to redefine their overall strategy. The enormous opportunities that the controls and automation segment offers are motivating strategic buyers to redefine their strategy and consider any number of acquisitions, so they can stay ahead of the competitive business curve. Internet of Things
The IoT emergence is driven by the market demand for more information, gathered through any manner of sensors, with the primary purpose of maintaining and improving productivity at the most basic level of a machine or piece of equipment. Plamen Nedelrchev, IT engineer with Cisco, stated that there were “1,000 internet devices in 1984, 1 million internet devices in 1992, and 10 billion in 2008. Fifty billion devices are expected to be connected by 2020.” Nedelrchev highlighted that in 2011, the number of new things connected to the internet exceeded the number of new users connected to the internet. The IoT explosion also has been driven by cloud computing and the technological ability to store, access, and interpret data at any given time. Recognizing that we are still in the early stages of the IoT market expansion, strategic buyers and growth equity investors are the key suitors for the burgeoning IoT technologies and companies currently in the market. Increased strategic, private equity, and growth equity demand for acquisitions and investments in the controls and automation and IoT markets lead to stronger business valuations, which plays to the advantage of shareholders and managers active within these segments. ce Clint Bundy is a managing director with Bundy Group. Edited by Emily Guenther, associate content manager, Control Engineering, CFE Media, eguenther@cfemedia.com. www.controleng.com
Call 1-800-322-3225 or visit: www.phoenixcontact.com/confidence_relays
input #9 at www.controleng.com/information
INDUSTRY NEWS and events
Hannover Messe 2017 collaboration The robots are looking more like humans, and the humans are looking more like robots. At the Opening Ceremonies of Hannover Messe 2017, the world’s largest industrial trade show, Schunk won the 2017 Hermes Award for innovation for its intelligent gripper module for robots that interacts with humans. Its flexible jaws can measure and learn the tactile strength needed, and the module includes two cameras so the gripper can “see.” The grippers were on display as part of the pre-show press tour preceding the gala opening ceremony. In the tour demonstration, a human-looking robot was grabbing, fastening and staging small toy cars, as part of a larger robotic application. Attendees at the opening ceremony reacted strongly to Swiss-based Noonee’s wearable leg exoskeleton, which allows a worker free movement while wearing the device can fully support the worker in a seated position. The “Chairless Chair” allows workers to switch between standing, sitting, and walking at the push of a button.
Schunk won the 2017 Hermes Award for innovation for its intelligent gripper module for robots that interacts with humans. Its flexible jaws can measure and learn the tactile strength needed for its work, and the module includes two cameras to allow the gripper to see its surroundings. Courtesy: Bob Vavra, CFE Media
16
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
IIoT will be built with pieces from a With Poland as the Partner Country, the opening of the 70th Hannover Messe variety of hardware and software ven(Hannover Fair, in English) was a consid- dors and driven by separate analytics and erably lower-key affair than the 2016 event, co-located on a series of cloud-based data which featured President Obama lead- platforms. At Hannover Messe 2017, it ing the U.S. delegation. But while his suc- was clear that the pace of the partnercessor’s name was not mentioned by the ships between disparate companies is speakers, Obama’s name was mentioned accelerating. Schneider Electric and Microsoft on a few occasions as German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Poland Prime Minister announced a collaboration around mixed reality (what Beata Szydlo opened the event. IIoT pieces from a variety company officials describe as a cross Perhaps the most of vendors, driven by between augmentspontaneous applause ed reality and virof the night came separate analytics, will tual reality) even as during the remarks Schneider Electric of Professor Dieter be co-located on cloudwas announcing its Kempf, president of new EcoStruxure the Federation of Gerbased data platforms. for Industry, which man Industries. “Trade relations are a win-win situ- is a full suite of connected devices, edge ation,” Kempf said. “They can benefit computing, and applications using the everyone’s prosperity. In view of increas- Microsoft Azure cloud platform. Microing attempts to support protectionism and soft announced its own collaborations, isolationism on both sides of the Atlantic, with robotics manufacturer Comau and the message from the former President of with end users such as Tetra Pak and Jabil. the United States, Barack Obama, that we It also held a press conference Monday to heard last year, was quite important. But tout its new Azure IoT Suite Connected Factory that will collaborate as part of the this is a task we must all rise to.” Kempf praised Merkel for her message OPC UA protocol from OPC Foundation. Another innovation is Phoenix Consupporting free trade discussions between Europe and the United State during her tact’s PLCnext Technology, which offers visit with President Trump last month in a collaborative environment. PLCnext Washington. Kempf also called the deci- will enable open-source programming sion of Great Britain to leave the Europe- for traditional PLC functions on a Linux an Union “regrettable,” adding that he was platform. The product will be available disappointed that “the British government in conjunction with the SPC show in did not succeed in explaining that Europe Nuremburg in November, company officials said; PLCnext will combine “classic is the solution and not the problem.” The Partner Country message of “Smart PLC programming and high-level lanis Poland” emphasized by Szydlo during guage programming and enables the creher opening remarks. “The Poland you ation of modern applications within the will see at Hannover Messe 2017 is a young context of Industrie 4.0.” Poland, with new and innovative ideas.” Poland’s high-tech, high-energy artis- Mexico is 2018 Partner Country Hannover Messe announced Mexico tic presentation honored the contributions of three major Polish scientists—Coperni- will be the 2018 Partner Country. Hancus, Marie Curie, and Jacek Karpinski, who nover Messe officials see Mexico’s emerdeveloped the first mini-computer with gence as a manufacturing power very an expandable memory—in an innovative differently than some political leaders in the U.S. “Mexico is Latin America’s secondcomputer-generated opening number. largest economy and has steadily grown in Collaboration, hardware, software importance as a market and investment Just four months into 2017, if manu- location for companies in many European facturing were to have a word of the year it countries, including Germany,” fair officials would be “collaboration.” said in a press release.
‘
’
www.controleng.com
Digital edition? Click on headlines for more details. See news daily at www.controleng.com/news
HMI expands scope
The human-machine interface (HMI) has had a long and storied history in manufacturing, and its use as a simple way to manage and control machine operations at the machine has dramatically improved plant floor efficiency. But with the increasing digitization of manufacturing and the use of tablets, smartphones, and handheld devices, every device is now an HMI, among trends related to Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and Industrie 4.0 observed at Hannover Messe 2017. Once limited to the smarts inside the HMI box, the device-driven displays can pull real-time data from the system analytics in the cloud computing world or via Wi-Fi and make everything about the machines—its health, maintenance record and full parts list—with the tap of a button. Another major trend was the discussion of opening the digital plant to outside application developers. More downloadable apps for manufacturing are coming. The Predix platform by GE is expanding, and the OPC UA press conference touted collaborative efforts among OPC Foundation members to drive a more open platform among users. The digital platform of sensors and controls feed data to the cloud for analytics and return the knowledge to plant employees ready to act on that data. In reality (another word used often at Hannover Messe), manufacturing will use many HMIs. But the HMI as we know it will need to be reconsidered, as a tool and as an offering from a supplier community firmly embracing a digital future. Maybe HMI will retire as a noun, and continue as a verb.
today, but get them better for the jobs of tomorrow. We need to use technologies to get those individual to work together.” Rob McKeel, vice president of automation at GE, said: “Let the data flow, and use technology to find the right answer,” he said. “In the absence of data, everyone will keep doing it the way they’ve always done it.” Bob Vavra is content manager, Plant Engineering, bvavra@cfemedia.com; edited
by Mark T. Hoske, content manager, Control Engineering, mhoske@cfemedia.com.
MORE
ADVICE Read this story online at www.controleng.com for more information including a story about how IHS Markit’s survey on how manufacturers still aren’t embracing the IIoT and what this means for the industry as a whole.
IBM partnership announced
ABB and IBM announced a partnership around IBM’s Watson cognitive computing and ABB’s Ability digital platform. During that event, Harriett Green, group general manager of IBM Watson, took a step beyond the idea of artificial intelligence. “We don’t talk about AI in this context,” she said. “We’re talking about augmenting intelligence-enhancing intelligence.” Sanjay Ravi of Microsoft said, “We’re able to augment new employees doing machine learning modules.” Paul Brooks of Rockwell Automation said, “The way people work needs to change. We have to make sure we are educating people for the jobs they are doing today, but they need to be not just good at the jobs they are doing CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 17
input #10 at www.controleng.com/information
Digital edition? Click on headlines for more details. See news daily at www.controleng.com/news
Headlines online Industry events At www.controleng.com, on the right side, click on the events box and scroll by month to see related industry events including: Rockwell Automation TechED, Orlando, June 11-16 www.rockwellautomation.com/global/events/ra-teched/usa/overview.page Sensors Expo, San Jose, Calif., June 27-29 www.sensorsexpo.com
CUSTOMAXIMIZED! Sensor? Housing? Lens holder? Plug orientation? It´s your choice! The uEye LE USB 3.1 Gen 1
Process Expo 2017, Chicago, Sept. 19-22 www.myprocessexpo.com Pack Expo and Healthcare Packaging Expo, Las Vegas, Sept. 25-27 www.packexpolasvegas.com
BOARDLEVEL VERSIONS
SINGLE-BOARD CAMERA
OPTION: PLUG ORIENTATION
MIC OPTION
USB TYPE-C
USB POWER DELIVERY
OPTION: LENS HOLDER
WIDE RANGE OF SENSORS
FABTECH, Chicago, Nov. 6-9 www.fabtechexpo.com/about 2017 Global Automation and Manufacturing Summit, McCormick Place, Nov. 7 http://www.controleng.com/single-article/hannover-fairs-usa-fabtech-topartner-on-iana-event/0fa4780c3b5f4986b296b6ad14e2b8f9.html
Top five Control Engineering articles April 17-23: The most visited articles included Ethernet benefits, safety integrity levels, matrix drives, sensors and control system inputs, and liquid level measurement sensors. Reverse engineering reduced repair time, costs for steel manufacturer A steel manufacturer that needed two impellers repaired found a solution through reverse engineering that was faster and more cost-effective. Estimate how safety pays a company OSHA’s “$afety Pays” program is designed to help employers assess the impact of injuries and illnesses on profitability and find ways to mitigate those potential costs. Shop floor marketplace emerges with Industrie 4.0 The shop floor marketplace is becoming a reality with Industrie 4.0 as companies are required to make products quickly and cost-effectively, as well as make unique products that are tailored to a specific user. Graphene used to create cheaper semiconductor wafers MIT engineers have developed a technique to reduce the overall cost of wafer technology by using graphene as a copy machine to transfer intricate crystalline patterns from an underlying semiconductor wafer to a top layer of identical material. Manufacturers still not embracing IIoT Seven manufacturing market trends for 2017, according to an IHS Markit report at Hannover Messe, include more growth and an attention shift from remote cloud-based analytics to local and edge computing. Seven benefits of modular project design Modular project design provides engineers many potential benefits such as saving time and money and also making customization much easier. Energy company to collaborate with artificial intelligence company to improve operations Dover Energy Automation (DEA) and SparkCognition announced the two companies would collaborate to bring predictive capabilities. See webcasts at www.controleng.com/webcasts.
CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
®
www.ids-imaging.com/usb3.1
| 19
input #12 at www.controleng.com/information
INDUSTRY NEWS and events Digital edition? Click on headlines for more details. See news daily at www.controleng.com/news
Faster automation and robots Automate 2017 at McCormick Place in Chicago demonstrated plenty of advances in robotics, software development, and other advances that are taking manufacturing in places that seemed unthinkable just a few years ago. As the technology becomes more intertwined, the possibilities grow. Highlights from the show floor follow. Expanding into e-commerce
Honeywell’s 2016 Intelligrated acquisition has allowed both companies to look for new ways to expand in the material handling and packaging industries. There’s a focus on helping companies in the e-commerce business, dominated by Amazon. Other companies are looking to follow suit and improve productivity. With fierce retail competition, “companies are trying to find new ways to capture and retain customers in an industry where is a tremendous amount of growth,” said Chris Cole, chairman and general manager, Intelligrated, at a press conference. There is a huge premium, Cole said, on efficiency and labor is becoming more expensive and harder to retain in the picking and packing industry. Downtime, he said, is not an option. “The relationship between the employer and the employee is changing and it’s becoming more difficult.” Companies developing their e-commerce business, Cole said, are realizing it is a 24/7 business. “In e-commerce, business stops if
you can’t ship. Developments are all about keeping uptime.” “Whatever we develop for companies is all about keeping the customers safe,” said Brian Hovey, chief marketing officer, Honeywell Safety and Productivity Solutions (SPS). Honeywell and Intelligrated are focused on expanding operations beyond North America and developing sortation technologies, software, and support services, to improve productivity. “The industry has evolved from reactive to proactive,” said Chuck Adams, chief commercial officer and general manager, Intelligrated. “It’s about maximizing uptime and being cost-competitive.” Robotics consortium goes global
ROS-Industrial (ROS-I), an opensource industrial robotic software and working group established by Southwest Research Institute (SwRI), has expanded with partnerships in Europe and the United States. In May 2017, it will become a global outfit with the official launch of ROS Asia-Pacific in Singapore. “We will truly have a worldwide network, and we’re glad to have Asia-Pacific in our group,” said Paul Evans, director, SwRI. Having a global entity that spans three continents “allows each group to focus on addressing regional manufacturing issues. It also allows each group to collaborate and deal with crosscutting issues. More people are supporting the leadership team from each side,” Evans said. Each entity also brings its own priorities, which allows the group to learn and grow in an open, collaborative environment. While the U.S. is more focused on advanced applications, Europe is more focused in code quality, and the issues feed into one another, which creates a stronger overTM Robotics moved golf tees and balls, and the robot all robot software putted a ball into a hole. Courtesy: Chris Vavra, CFE Media that can do more.
20
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
Robots: smarter, safer
Rethink Robotics’ Intera 5 software was on display with the collaborative robot, Sawyer, at Automate. Intera’s features include an embedded sensor and direct interaction with an intuitive interface. It allows the user to start a task from scratch and create a program that allows the robot to pick-and-place items up to 5 kg. Sawyer is already used for tending and inspection applications and the updated software allows it to work faster and perform more intuitive tasks for pick-and-place jobs. It can be used in industries including “automotive, electronics, and other industries where you have human-scale repetitive tasks,” said Mike Fair, customer success manager, Rethink Robotics. In another display, Sawyer inspected spark plugs. Mobile Industrial Robots (MiR) recently released the MiR200, an autonomous mobile robot, and several of the robots roamed the booth without help or assistance. When a person moved in front of the robot, sensor helped the robot stop. Thomas Visti, MiR’s CEO, believes there’s a place for autonomous mobile robots in the workplace now and in the future. “We see a trend where companies redesign facilities to change to cell production and you need to have mobile transportation to move items from place to place.” Mobile robots, he said, offer flexibility. “You never know what next year will bring and having something fixed can cost you a few years down the road.” MiR robots have a basic core design that can be redesigned and retrofitted for many manufacturing and medical applications to give the user a greater amount of freedom in how they use the product. TM Robotics’ president Nigel Smith admitted that collaborative robots have been a strong trend in the industry the last five years. “The question is, though: Do customers need it? It depends on their application and what they want to do. TM Robotics’ focus remains on industrial robots by developing Cartesian, Selective Compliance Assembly Robot Arm (SCARA) and axis robots for many applications across multiple industries. Chris Vavra, production editor, Control Engineering, cvavra@cfemedia.com.
www.controleng.com
Being knowledgeable of the proper safety measures, codes, and regulations in both new and existing facilities is an absolute necessity. It just might even save your life one day. Safety First: Arc Flash 101 is a new online and on-demand course CFE Edu is offering for you to stay up to date on the latest electrical safety information. CFE Edu is an interactive online platform taught by industry experts that offers exclusive, multi-media content on engineering topics that are critical to your work.
Safety First: Arc Flash 101 will:
✓ Explain the importance of electrical safety ✓ Define codes and standards as they relate to electrical safety ✓ Explore arc flash and safety measures ✓ Summarize codes and standards for electrical safety (i.e. NFPA 70E)
Led by industry experts Lanny Floyd and Hugh Hoagland, this on-demand online course offers instructor-led discussions, videos, and high-quality presentations on an interactive and intuitive platform. The course is self-paced, accessible 24/7, and approved for one (1) AIA CES learning unit and one (1) HSW credit.
What’s included in all CFE Edu courses:
✓ Exclusive content--not found anywhere else--that includes research and expert knowledge from instructors working within the industry ✓ Interaction with course authors ✓ Videos, quizzes, and interactive content designed for a proven learning experience with associated CEU credits ✓ Full access to your course 24/7 with a computer, tablet or smartphone ✓ Course cost is $39.99
Learn more and register at CFEedu.cfemedia.com * Contact CFE Edu Manager, Emily Guenther, at eguenther@cfemedia.com for more information or with any questions about CFE Edu.
INDUSTRY NEWS and events Digital edition? Click on headlines for more details. See news daily at www.controleng.com/news
Services for obsolete electronics Industrial processes have relied on electronic controls for decades and as the technology has advanced, these controls have also become more complex and usually more compact. As competition in this sector has increased, some of the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) have gone out of business, leaving end users with some considerable challenges in the event of a failure.
but often with no reference material. This control inoperative, the power supply card was missing and the components—such can prove to be quite a challenge. Since programmable logic controllers as the semiconductors—dated back to the (PLCs) took on the mainstream role of 1990s. The scale of the challenge was process control in the 1980s, their complexity, size, and general design have increased by the fact that the OEM was changed immeasurably. However, some of no longer in business, leaving no spares this pioneering equipment is still in ser- and no replacement products, while the client needed the convice and the end users trol panel back in need to have spare A new controller service as soon as posparts available in order Keeping systems operational to minimize any downcreated from modern sible. In many applicaFor many businesses, the easiest option time. One failed card tions a new controller is to replace the control equipment with a could potentially precould be created from components offers more modern equivalent that also offers vent a million pound modern components, more functionality new features, improved efficiency, and machine from operatoffering more functakes up considerably less space. Although ing, so creating more tionality and reliability, and reliability. this may not always be the most cost effi- spare parts is a proacall from a more comcient solution, the long-term benefits and tive method of maintepact enclosure. the improved availability of spares will nance management. As specifying new equipment for the reduce the total cost of ownership. oil and gas industry can be a very drawn However, some industrial sectors, such Re-manufacturing a solution out process, this meant the best solution This can be illustrated by a recent would be to re-manufacture the elecas nuclear, military, and oil and gas have very strict protocols regarding the replace- example from the oil and gas industry tronic circuits, down to component level ment of components, meaning that retain- where the control system for a recipro- and to the original specification. ing proven systems and keeping them cating compressor had failed and needed The repair process can be used to genoperational is essential. In such situations to be repaired at the earliest opportunity. erate design drawings if they are unavailit is necessary to replicate existing compo- The initial inspection showed that a multi- able, source obsolete semi-conductors and nents—ideally from existing drawings— ple card failure had rendered the sequence create test procedures for final testing. The complete reverse engineering procedure can replicate printed circuit boards (PCBs) and if necessary, hand drawing the Cloud-based SaaS contact platform complete circuit diagram for both design and future use. CFE Media’s ContactStream is a software as a service (SaaS) cloud-based delivery platSimilar situations arise in the nuclear form that provides engineering contacts who buy or specify products at all stages of the industry as well as with military applisales cycle. Through prequalification, ContactStream provides current and relevant contact cations where there is a requirement to data such as name, company, title, phone, and email address to the marketer. The prequalifiprove functionality at the beginning, cation process also provides information designed to position the contact in a specific stage document the whole process, and witof the buying journey while identifying vendor preferences and preferred product characterness functionality at the end, before istic ratings. the new components are signed off and “This is exactly the type of purchasing intent information that our customers have been accepted. looking to acquire,” said CFE Media CEO Steve Rourke. “Marketers can now use a simple In this way, applications that require online interface to identify and download contacts that can be used by their marketing autoobsolete electronics to be repaired or mation systems to generate marketing qualified leads and sales qualified leads.” replaced can be effectively maintained With more than 13,500 contacts within the vertical industries and markets serviced by using a preventative servicing regime. In CFE Media, ContactStream’s interface allows the marketer to refine and segment a puraddition, for those industries that allow chase intent search based on product category, purchase time frame, buying stage, indusit, more modern technology and software can be incorporated into existing try, and other relevant criteria. Contacts can be imported directly into a marketing automacontrol packages, increasing productivtion system or a client relationship management system. Contacts also can be exported into ity and flexibility. local Microsoft Excel or .csv files for specific feeds, searches, and applications. Brian Park, regional sales manager for ContactStream also is designed to work in tandem with CFE Media’s ContentStream, a Scotland, Sulzer. Edited by Chris Vavra, cloud-based platform designed to provide relevant engineer-centric content. production editor, Control Engineering, Edited from a CFE Media press release. CFE Media, cvavra@cfemedia.com.
‘
’
22
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
www.controleng.com
WEBCAST SERIES
The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) is a transformational strategy that is revolutionizing manufacturing operations across the world. CFE Media publications take an in-depth look at IIoT-related issues, strategies, and opportunities in the 2017 IIoT Webcast series.
The 2017 Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Webcast Series: Webcast One: Get your head into the cloud Available On-Demand This Webcast focuses on how emergent IIoT technologies change the way process and automation engineers execute projects and sustain productivity in today’s, and tomorrow’s, cyber-physical world.
Sponsored by:
Webcast Two: Take sensing and control to the edge Thursday, June 8, 2017 This Webcast will focus on how better sensing leads to big data, and how in future, process control will be found—at the process.
Sponsored by:
Webcast Three: IIoT transforms predictive maintenance Thursday, August 24, 2017 Connecting complex machinery and equipment to operations and enterprise systems enables machine learning, predictive maintenance and secure monitor and alarm. IIoT addresses significant integration challenges posed by the unique data types generated by the many kinds of machinery and equipment found in plant environments, from CNC machines to robotics.
Sponsored by: Bosch Rexroth, Deublin, GTI, Rittal
Webcast Four: How IIoT helps cybersecurity efforts Thursday, October 19, 2017 Cybersecurity is a threat to enterprises large and small, at risk of being attacked from unexpected sources both inside and outside the enterprise. IIoT can reduce the cybersecurity risks inherent in legacy automation, instrumentation, equipment, and devices.
Register for the IIoT series today at www.controleng.com/lloT
COVER STORY robotic safety
Robots, humans collaborate on safety A new age of collaborative robots put people closer to technology, with risks, opportunities.
I
MORE
ADVICE Key Concepts Collaborative robots have gone from being a novelty to a growing force in manufacturing. Manufacturing companies and standards groups are working on improving safety for collaborative robots for human workers. Risk assessments are a key aspect to ensure that human/robot interaction is safe on the plant floor. GO ONLINE Read this story online at www.controleng.com for more information about collaborative robots and links to additional stories from the Robotic Industries Association (RIA) CONSIDER THIS What else must be done to make sure collaborative robots can work safely with humans?
24
|
MAY 2017
n 2008, collaborative robots were a mere curiosity. In 2012, they were largely viewed as a fad. But just a year later, the industry began to take note. Now, collaborative robots are here to stay. Many would say they’re the future. “Collaborative applications is that next new frontier and it’s really going to drive business and applications, and probably applications we don’t even know yet,” said Roberta Nelson Shea, global technical compliance officer for Universal Robots, headquartered in Odense, Denmark. An ABI Research study predicts the collaborative robotics market will surge to $1 billion by 2020, populating manufacturing with more than 40,000 collaborative robots. As that population grows, so does concern over robotics safety. One of the most anticipated technical specifications in the collaborative robotics realm was released in February 2016. ISO/ TS 15066:2016 Robots and Robotic Devices — Collaborative Robots provides data-driven guidelines for designers, integrators and users of human-robot collaborative systems on how to evaluate and mitigate risks. Nelson Shea is convener for the ISO Technical Committee 299 Working Group 3 (ISO/TC 299 WG3) that was responsible for developing the new technical specification. Nelson Shea has been involved with the robot safety standards since the first committee meeting in 1982, and as convener for ISO/TC 299 she continues to hold an impartial position in the standards community. She was chair of the ANSI/RIA 15.06 robot safety standards committee for 23 years, and is now chair emeritus. She says the initial idea of collaborative robotics was met by strong skepticism. “The premise about safety was to keep people away from robots. But then the conversation changed to say if the robot with its tool and part touches you and there’s no injury, why not allow contact?”
CONTROL ENGINEERING
Factoring in people
“Traditionally, the design of automated systems has not factored in people. But with robots becoming mobile and developing a greater capacity to interact with humans, that design paradigm is not the way of the future,” said Roland Menassa, leader of GE’s Global Research Automation Center in Van Buren Township, Mich. “Now I can place a robot with fairly decent capability on the factory floor next to people and they can operate side by side,” he said. The Global Research Automation Center focuses on four main areas: robotics, controls, material handling, and work system integration, which tracks the flow of data on the factory floor. GE has embraced the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and automation as a key ingredient. It’s taking the lead on factory optimization, or what it calls Brilliant Manufacturing, to optimize the flow of materials, people and processes within the organization and across its global supply chain. “When I came to GE, collaborative robots were starting to move on the market, so I visited different factories within GE to do an assessment,” said Menassa. “We are either a low-volume manufacturer of very large industrial goods such as gas turbines that weigh thousands of pounds, or human-scale, mid- to high-volume products like lighting fixtures and circuit breakers, where you have hundreds of SKUs on the line. “We’re still going to weld and have robots handling heavy equipment and performing very difficult processes,” Menassa added, “but when you look at where robotics has gone in the last 55 years, we still see a lot of people on the assembly line. And that’s primarily because of the challenges in compliant material. When we make our circuit breakers or lighting fixtures, there are wires and flexible materials that are very hard to handle. The challenge becomes, how do you interject automation in a manual process to handle compliant parts?” Power and force limited robots are specifiwww.controleng.com
cally designed to have safe contact with humans by way of inherently safe features of the robot or the control system. These types of robots are typically made from lightweight materials, have force and torque sensing in their joints, and may have soft padded skins. Four methods of collaborative operation
Under the ANSI/RIA 15.06 and ISO 10218 harmonized robot safety standards and the new TS 15066, there are four methods, or types, of collaborative operation: Safety-rated monitored stop Hand guiding Speed and separation monitoring Power and force limiting.
These tend to be the most misunderstood aspects of human-robot collaboration. To avoid confusion, Nelson Shea suggests manufacturers
‘
The annex contains
guidance on how to establish pain threshold limits for various parts
’
of the body.
think of each of the four methods of collaborative operation as scenarios rather than distinct modes. In every instance, there is a shared space between a robot and a human operator. In a safety-rated monitored stop, the premise is that in a shared space with a human a robot does not move at all. With hand guiding, a common misconception is that this method is used for teaching. Nelson Shea says that’s not the case. “When you’re moving the robot’s arm around to teach it certain tasks, this is not hand guiding in the collaborative sense. It’s not running in automatic when you’re doing that,” she said. When used to describe collaborative operation, hand guiding indicates a condition where a robot and a person occupy a shared space and the robot is only moving when it is under direct control of the person. “In speed and separation monitoring, both the robot and the person can be moving in that space,” said Nelson Shea, “but if the distance between the robot and the person becomes too www.controleng.com
close, the robot stops, effectively becoming just like the first scenario (safety-rated monitored stop). In power and force limiting, there can be contact between the person and the robot, but the robot is power and force limited and sufficiently padded or otherwise, such that if there’s any impact, there’s no pain and no injury.” She said it’s also possible to have any mix of the four methods of collaborative operation represented in one robot system, even all four of them. The new TS 15066 standard includes formulas for calculating the protective separation distance for speed and separation monitoring. But perhaps the most interesting part of the technical spec is the annex, which contains guidance on how to establish pain threshold limits for various parts of the body, particularly for power and force limiting applications. The data can then be extrapolated to determine speed limits for the collaborative application. “Although there is information about the four modes of collaborative operation, the more interesting stuff is for power and force
COVER: While moving a collaborative robot’s arm to “teach” it a task is an important part of collaboration, it’s not the same as hand guiding a robot, one of the four methods of collaborative operation: Courtesy: RIA/Yaskawa
CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 25
COVER STORY worker safety Industry leaders say the addition to collaborative robots on the plant floor are designed to achieve more productivity and flexibility while creating a safer workplace for humans. Courtesy: RIA/ Robotiq
limited robots,” said Jean-Philippe Jobin, CTO at Robotiq, a manufacturer of adaptive grippers for collaborative robots in Lévis, Quebec, Canada. “More types of these robots are on the market now, but there was no clear guidance except ISO 10218 to help people safely install those robots in their factories.”
The bottom line for any collaborative robotic installation is to conduct a risk assessment. Courtesy: RIA/GE
26
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
Start with a risk assessment
Both Nelson Shea and Jobin stress that the bottom line for any collaborative robot integration is a risk assessment. “The risk assessment is the most important aspect,” said Jobin. “If your application requires a little bit higher force or power than what is stated in the document, it does not mean it is not safe. The data we have from this technical specification is relative to pain, while what is required from ISO 10218 is that no injury should occur. “There’s a difference between pain and injury,” he added. “A user could do tests to show that even if they are a bit above what it states in ISO/TS 15066, it’s still safe because they can prove that the robot cannot hurt or injure the people in those specific circumstances.” Jobin said it’s very important to note that the application is the main concern, not the robot, when assessing risk. “If you look at the document, it rarely states ‘robot,’” he said. “It states collaborative work cell or collaborative application. It involves the cables, jigs, clamps, the robot and the gripper, everything which is inside that cell.” He said it’s a common misconception that if the robot is “inherently safe” then the operation is safe. For instance, if your robot is manipulating sharp objects, then it is not safe to have a human beside it without protective safety measures. Another case is if the robot is handling a heavy object, which could cause injury if it’s www.controleng.com
Collaborative robots safely work side by side with humans on a production line assembling street light fixtures. Courtesy: RIA/GE Global Research
dropped or become a projectile at a particular rate of speed. Safety was a major factor in the robot adoption process at GE Lighting and for instilling worker confidence in the new collaborative robotics paradigm. “At GE, safety is our overriding priority,” Menassa said. “With any application it’s not about if the robot is safe, it’s about ‘is the task safe?’ So we do the task assessment risk-based analysis. We observe all the rules and all the RIA standards. We brought people in from RIA to train us. We make sure we understand what the robot is doing, the shape of the end effector, is there anything sharp, and is there anything that could eventually hurt someone? “If we feel there is a need for protection beyond just the force or torque limiting capability of the robot, then we’ll place the appropriate safety device, such as a light screen or laser scanner, so we can mitigate the risk,” he added. The ANSI-registered technical report, RIA TR R15.306-2016 Task-based Risk Assessment Methodology, describes one method of risk assessment that complies with requirements of the 2012 R15.06 standard and was updated in 2016. “RIA publishes the method by which we do a task assessment. We go through the steps of the process, and we use their methodology to assess if there’s any risk and how severe it is,” Menassa said. “We try to do any of the engineering designs around it to mitigate that risk.” ce www.controleng.com
‘
Understand what the robot is doing, the shape of the end effector, if anything is sharp, and if anything that could eventually
’
hurt someone.
NUMBERS: 2017 Control Engineering salary survey respondents said 54% had a mature safety program; 24% developing; 15% underway; and 4% had none. More research: www.controleng.com/CE-research.
Tanya M. Anandan is contributing editor for the Robotic Industries Association (RIA) and Robotics Online. RIA is a not-for-profit trade association dedicated to improving the regional, national and global competitiveness of the North American manufacturing and service sectors through robotics and related automation. This article originally appeared on the RIA website. The RIA is a part of the Association for Advancing Automation (A3), a CFE Media content partner. Edited by Chris Vavra, production editor, Control Engineering, CFE Media, cvavra@cfemedia.com. CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 27
COVER STORY robotic safety
Robotic safety: What you don’t know With robotic safety, what you don’t know CAN hurt you. Get what you need to know about robotic safety, terms, and standards affecting robotic implementations.
W
MORE
ADVICE KEY CONCEPTS Robot Safety Standard (R15.06 2012) is a unified international standard. It requires a risk assessment, unlike the 1999 version in which it was optional. GO ONLINE With this article online, see more about a robotic risk assessment, more definitions, more help for robot safety, and working group information, with links to related resources. Also see the Control Engineering robotics page under the discrete manufacturing pull-down menu at www.controleng.com. CONSIDER THIS If time or money is preventing creation of a low-risk safety culture, have you calculated the all the costs related to a major injury accident?
28
|
MAY 2017
ith robotic safety, the adage, “What you don’t know won’t hurt you” doesn’t apply, which is why the Robotic Industries Association (RIA) continues to teach about applicable robotic safety standards and risk mitigation strategies. At the A3 Business Forum in January, Jeff Fryman, RIA director emeritus of standards development, offered a day-long “Robot Safety Standard (R15.06 2012) & Robot Risk Assessment Training Seminar.” Complying with existing standards and guidelines, training, documentation, and using experts, like Certified Robotic Integrators—which RIA offers—are among Fryman’s suggestions for reducing risk and staying safe. In 2016, Fryman gave similar training 33 times. Education is particularly relevant, even as the update cycle for R15.06 has begun, with possible completion in 2018 or 2019, Fryman said. The committee can target a one, two, or three-year update timeline. A recently available technical report (TR) offers the U.S. national standard version of the TR606 technical specification for collaborative robots. Note about standards: TRs are voluntary, meaning a TR shall not use “shall” in its language, staying only with advice, using the word “should,” instead, Fryman said. That specification is expected to be updated in a future international standard for collaborative robotics. Unified robotic safety standards
Fryman has been involved as chair to the international robotic safety and secretary to the U.S. national committee and is among those who advocated and helped unify national and international robotic safety standards, which simplifies compliance. He is among the RIA trainers for robotic safety, drawing on the 2012 R15.06 standard, three technical reports written since the 2012 standard, and his experiences. Information Fryman offered in the January class includes the information below. The Canadian standard is interchangeable with the U.S. standard, with some cleanup edits offered two years after the U.S. standard’s release.
CONTROL ENGINEERING
Importantly, U.S. and international safety experts worked on ISO 10218-1 and -2 of 2011, two parts legally required in Europe. Part 1 is harmonized; by law, original equipment manufacturers must produce a safe machine. The U.S. adopted Part 1 and Part 2 of the ISO standard; R15.06 2012 fully incorporates both parts of the international standard, with introduction and bibliography; “national deviations” are limited to spelling and formatting only. The standards speak to the supply chain and do not tell users how to run robots or even how to turn them on. Canada did add value by offering user-directed information in annexes to its standard rather than in separate technical reports like in the U.S. version. Machine builders know that if they’re producing a machine for use in the EU, documentation must use ISO and IEC references, rather than U.S. or Canadian references. Must do a risk assessment
Those familiar with the R15.06 robot safety standard from 1999 will recognize that a major change in the 2012 standard includes the need for a risk assessment for robot safety. Previously an option, a risk assessment is now required. It’s mentioned in clause 4 in parts 1 and 2. Any task-based methodology will do, but the TR R15.306 from the 1999 standard will work. In the standard, Table 2 provides a risk level decision matrix. Control reliability is a term used in North America and refers to the steps needed to make something unreliable into something reliable. In Europe, categories have been used instead. Control reliable is understood as greater than Category 3 and less than Category 4. Functional Safety language in the international standard overlays “Performance Level d” (PLd) with “Structure Category 3.” Why were the changes made? Control reliable is only a concept and cannot be quantified. ISO 13849-1 provides performance metrics. Math formula proves level requirement with a look up chart. A controls engineer can prove requirements are met. Related terms are functional safety, Performance Level (PL) and category. www.controleng.com
Robotic safety responsibilities
Stakeholders are identified in the R15.06 standards. Part 1 talks to robot manufacturers. Part 2 talks to the rest of supply chain, integrators, consultants, installers and suppliers. But, the user is ultimately responsible for the safety of industrial robot installations. User stakeholder responsibilities are information for use (ensure safeguards are in place and are used, and training and safe work practices are in place); compliance with all codes and regulations (such as OSHA lockout/tagout); and risk assessment: Participation in risk assessment and maintenance of related risk-assessment documentation. Do these things early in the process. By waiting until delivery of the robot or machine, it’s often only possible to enclose the robot or system with safeguards. Often it’s easier to design hazards out. Note that if a user makes modifications, the user qualifies as a system integrator and is responsible for Part 2 of the standard. See the related table about the hierarchy of safeguarding controls. Robot safety retrofits
While R15.06 began in 1986, those involved often ask if older robots or systems require compliance. A robot and system should be compliant with the standard in effect on the date of manufacture. New robots should comply with the latest R15.06 or ISO 10218-1:2011 standard. Rebuilt robots, if equal to their original configuration, should comply with the standard in effect on the date of manufacture. A remanufactured robot with a new configuration should comply with the new standard, including if the robot gets a new controller. (A software upgrade doesn’t count.) A moved robot system or cell must comply at least with the 1999 standard. TR R15.506 provides guidance and includes a flow chart of circumstances. It is possible to have a fully compliant 1999 standard robot without a risk assessment, but for compliance to the 2012 standard, a minimum risk assessment must be performed as outlined. OSHA General Duty Clause requires employers to provide a safe workplace. OSHA looks if industry standards exist, such as R15.06, and others. Language is important. R15.06 is written in ISO English, which might not be the words many people normally would use. English is not precise, but ISO English is, which is important, because France and Germany use one word for safety and security. Robot standards
To help in understanding standards, know that: American National Standard Institute (ANSI) is www.controleng.com
Jeff Fryman, Robotic Industries Association director emeritus of standards development, gave a day-long “Robot Safety Standard (R15.06 2012) & Robot Risk Assessment Training Seminar” at the A3 Business Forum in January. Images courtesy: Mark T. Hoske, Control Engineering, CFE Media
voluntary; Normative means shall; Informative means should; Notes are generally explanatory; tatements and permission differ; Can means there’s a possibility; and May is permissive. According to the standard, what qualifies as an industrial robot requires answering five bullet points affirmatively. If any answer is no, it might be useful to use R15.06 anyway, which helps for any highly automated machine, although other standards may apply. An industrial robot: ◾ Is automatically controlled ◾ Has a reprogrammable multipurpose manipulator ◾ Is programmable in three or more axes... ◾ ...which can be either fixed in place or mobile ◾ Is for use in industrial automation applications. Review of R15.06 is likely to start later this year, with possible revision in 2019.
Provided with the Robotic Industries Association Robot Safety Standard (R15.06 2012) & Robot Risk Assessment Training Seminar is a table showing the hierarchy of safeguarding controls, showing the most to least effective safeguards: elimination or substitution, engineering controls, awareness means, training and procedures, and personal protective equipment, with examples of each.
The RIA Robot Safety Conference is Oct. 10-12 in Pittsburgh. ce Mark T. Hoske is content manager, CFE Media, Control Engineering, mhoske@cfemedia.com. The RIA is a part of the Association for Advancing Automation (A3), a CFE Media content partner. CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 29
4
PROCESS migration
Four things to remember about DCS migration Whether it’s a refinery, chemical plant, or other process-related facility, the primary control system must operate efficiently, safely, and economically. If it doesn’t, perhaps it’s time for an upgrade.
P
lant and operations managers don’t wake up one day and realize their distributed control systems (DCSs) and programmable logic controllers (PLCs) may be approaching obsolescence and a plan of action should be formulated. Unfortunately, the realization that a process plant’s control platform is becoming ineffective typically comes too late, speaking from practical and economical perspectives. When that realization comes, it’s time to do some type of control system upgrade. Whether piece by piece replacement over time or a full rip-and-replace migration is in order, there are four things to remember about DCS migration: ◾ Decide that DCS migration necessary ◾ Decide the appropriate justification ◾ Plan the migration path ◾ Implement the migration plan.
MORE
The necessity of migration
ADVICE KEY CONCEPTS Even though a legacy control system may still work well after 30 years or even longer doesn’t mean that it is operating efficiently, reliably, safely, or cost-effectively. Companies that migrate to a newer, more effective control system gain a key advantage over competitors that wait for assets to reach end of life. Although the initial decision to upgrade and justifying the migration project are necessary, the actual project planning is probably the most point to consider so far. ONLINE EXTRA Read this story online and find more information about distributed control system (DCS) migration at www.controleng.com. CONSIDER THIS How old is the distributed control system (DCS) running your critical process? If it is approaching 30 years old, do you have a migration plan in place?
30
|
MAY 2017
John Rudolph, vice president of Lifecycle Solutions and Services at Honeywell Process Solutions, wrote in an article that appeared in the July 2016 issue of Control Engineering titled “Surviving a control system migration project”: “In its 2015 report, ‘Distributed Control Systems Worldwide Outlook,’ the ARC Advisory Group estimated that $65 billion worth of installed process automation systems in the world today are nearing the end of their useful lifecycles, which, in many cases, can exceed 25 years. Many of these systems—as much as $12 billion worth— are some of the original distributed control systems (DCSs) installed in the late 1970s. Ironically, many manufacturers treat their business systems and email servers very differently than their process control systems. Companies make a concerted effort to keep IT infrastructure current. The same level of emphasis is not yet common practice for plant automation.” Even though a legacy control system may still work well after 30 years or even longer doesn’t mean that it is operating efficiently, reliably,
CONTROL ENGINEERING
safely, or cost-effectively. Jeff Morton, a sales manager at Cross Company Integrated Systems Group, wrote in an article that appeared in the January 2017 issue of Control Engineering titled “Six action items for an aging DCS/PLC”: “Budgets are always a constraint and capital expenditures may be tight, especially for full distributed control system (DCS) or programmable logic controller (PLC) replacements, which are often multi-million dollar investments. That investment, though, is nothing compared to the cost if the production facility went down and could not recover for a week or more. What’s even more concerning than that is there are many facilities that are unprepared for system failure or obsolescence, which can have catastrophic consequences. Operations, facility, or engineering managers need to begin preparing for migration of your control system from a legacy system to current and supported architectures.” DCS migration justification
According to Rudolph, when it comes to keeping automation technology up to date, proactive is the new normal. Companies that migrate to a newer, more effective control system gain a key advantage over competitors that wait for assets to reach end of life. The “doing nothing” option is no longer viable. In a Control Engineering article titled “Distributed control system upgrades for process control systems,” Aneel Shahzad Baig, senior project manager at Intech Process Automation, wrote that reasons to upgrade a DCS include: ◾ End of life ◾ End of support ◾ Lack of knowledge or skilled resources to support legacy systems ◾ Performance issues ◾ Lack of openness for expansion or integration with newer systems ◾ Lack of features required for enhancing the control philosophies www.controleng.com
◾ Maintenance costs. Emerson’s Laurie Ben, director of global modernization business development, and Aaron Crews, director of global modernization solutions, offer additional reasons for a control system modernization project. Their article, “Using automation modernization for business success,” appeared in the April 2017 issue of AppliedAutomation. ◾ Expense—the automation system is expensive to keep healthy. ◾ Decreasing value—the automation system has few tools and technologies to help meet current business needs and market pressures. Plan the migration path
Although the initial decision to upgrade and justifying the migration project are necessary, the actual project planning is probably the most point to consider so far. There are so many decisions to which the classic engineering answer is applicable: “It depends.” Rudolph suggests the following upgrade possibilities for a legacy DCS: ◾ Technology refresh involving replacement of legacy electronics ◾ Technology upgrades involving replacement of existing equipment ◾ Intellectual property upgrades transitioning to more advanced technology. Typical migration alternatives, according to Rudolph, can include: ◾ Moving control to the current hardware to preserve the installed inputs/outputs (I/O) and all of the existing engineering ◾ Moving control to the current hardware to preserve the installed I/O and re-engineering the current control software ◾ Moving control to the current hardware, www.controleng.com
upgrading to new I/O, and re-engineering the current control software ◾ Removing the control system—including I/O—and completely re-engineering all of the control software.
Oil refineries and other process plants rely on control systems that must operate at peak performance. Courtesy: Emerson
Ben and Crews suggest three behaviors for achieving success in a DCS modernization: 1. Begin with the end in mind 2. Actively manage project risk 3. Use a forward-engineering philosophy. When planning any kind of DCS migration, one must not leave out the training aspect. “A DCS migration, particularly one in which a new platform is introduced, requires much thought and can unleash a variety of problems if not executed well. Training is a significant issue and should be approached carefully,” wrote Peter Welander, contributing content specialist for Control Engineering, in an article titled “DCS migrations: Opportunity for improvement, or operational disaster” in the July 2016 issue of the magazine.
‘
There are many things to consider when faced with an aging DCS, but they can be summed up into these four things to remember:
Implement the migration plan
There are many things to consider when faced with an aging DCS, but they can be summed up into these four things to remember: necessity, justification, plan, and implementation. By the same token, there are many challenges to consider as well. “If properly planned and implemented, control system migrations enable industrial organizations to migrate legacy control platforms at their own pace, allowing new controllers to be added at any time and integrated with existing equipment,” Rudolph said. “A well-executed strategy to address technology obsolescence delivers significant operational and business benefits through seamless integration of new and existing automation assets.” ce
necessity, justification, plan, and
’
implementation.
Jack Smith is a content manager, CFE Media, Control Engineering, jsmith@cfemedia.com. CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 31
DIGITAL REPORTS Control Engineering is excited to introduce our new Digital Reports Sponsored by: Cisco, Iconics
Sponsored by: Maple Systems, Pepperl+Fuchs
2017 D igital R epoRt
2017 D igital R epoRt
IIoT
HMI
www.controleng.com/DigitalReport/lloT
www.controleng.com/DigitalReport/HMI
Sponsored by: Kepware, Rittal
Sponsored by: Mitsubishi, Yaskawa 2017 DIGITAL REPORT
2017 DIGITAL REPORT IIoT: OPERATIONS & IT
MOTION CONTROL
www.controleng.com/ DigitalReport/lloTOpsandIT
www.controleng.com/ DigitalReport/MotionControl
Sponsored by: Beckhoff, Bosch Rexroth, ePlan, Hilscher 2017
D igital R epoRt IIoT: Machines, Equipment & Asset Management
www.controleng.com/ DigitalReport/lloTMEAM
IT, OT manufacturing
IT, OT teams need to keep manufacturing systems running Security professionals on the information technology (IT) and the operations technology (OT) sides of the house have to truly understand the main goal, which is keeping the manufacturer’s systems up and running at all times.
S
ecurity professionals on the informaOT side. You have to get the two groups togethtion technology (IT) and the operaer so they understand the packet that is going tions technology (OT) sides of the through does not brick the system. Now, they house have to not only be able to work both understand they have a common enemy— together, they have to truly understand the and (that enemy) does not care what they do.” main goal. That goal is keeping the manufacAttackers really don’t play by the rules, they turer’s systems—from the IT enterprise to the don’t follow standards, but they know what they OT processes—up and are. Instead, their goal is very running at all times. single minded, they want to As cybersecurity “You have to understand get into a system and they the business outcome,” said want to get in via the easiest attacks ratchet up, Caglayan Arkan, general method as possible. manager of Microsoft’s “We monitor threat landmanufacturers need to scape daily,” Rotoloni said. worldwide manufacturing and resources sec“Bad guys try to use the elevate their ability to tor enterprise and partner most basic attack, whatever group during a panel disis the easiest. As the devicmonitor and adjust to cussion at the Automation es get more hardened, they Perspectives conference just get more sophisticated. what they are facing. at Rockwell Automation’s Advanced persistent threats Automation Fair in Atlanta. are more advanced and The panel, hosted by Sujeet Chand, senior vice attackers are more sophisticated.” president and chief technology officer at RockWhile some end users understand the secuwell Automation, featured major IT companies rity threat and are doing something about it, Microsoft and Cisco and a leading university there are others, however, that are aware, but focused on security, Georgia Tech. not moving forward with a security program. “It is about humans working together,” said Either way, attackers will continue to probe and Jeff Reed, senior vice president and general when the time is right jump in and take what manager, Enterprise Infrastructure and Solu- they want. That is why as attacks ratchet up, tions, Cisco. “It is really about getting the teams manufacturers need to elevate their ability to together and ensuring security. IT and OT need monitor and adjust to what they are facing. to work together, and manufacturing needs to “There are more sophisticated ways to monihelp bridge that divide.” tor security,” Reed said. “Networks (can end up In talking about IT and OT working used to) identify behavior and use the network together, Francis (Bo) Rotoloni, deputy director as a sensor.” ce of research and principle research engineer for the Information and Cyber Sciences Gregory Hale is the editor and founder of IndusDirectorate, Georgia Tech Research Institute, trial Safety and Security Source (ISSSource.com), a CFE Media content partner. Edited by Chris likened it to dogs and cats getting along. “You get to start them young and they get Vavra, production editor, CFE Media, Control along well. Enterprise IT didn’t understand the Engineering, cvavra@cfemedia.com.
‘
’
www.controleng.com
RESEARCH 30% of end users are seriously concerned about the cybersecurity of wireless communications devices and protocols within their facilities. Source: Control Engineering 2016 Cybersecurity Study www.controleng.com/CE-Research
MORE
ADVICE KEY CONCEPTS Information technology (IT) and operations technology (OT) need to work together to prevent possible cyber attacks. Management needs to work to bridge the divide between IT and OT, which have very different focuses when it comes to work. Manufacturers need to elevate their ability to respond to potential attacks as they become more sophisticated. GO ONLINE Read this story online at www.controleng.com and see other stories from EASA. CONSIDER THIS What else can manufacturers do to ward off potential cyber threats?
CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 33
IT/OT convergence
How to navigate the future of IIoT systems It’s critical to understand which IIoT connectivity technologies to use for each application in the IIoT space.
T
MORE
ADVICE KEY CONCEPTS Understanding the IIoT space and IIoT systems. Determining which technology to use for each application/project. How to choose the right technology for the IIoT space. GO ONLINE For related links about IIoT technologies, read this article online. In the digital edition, click on the headline or search the headline for www.controleng.com. Read more about IIC use case examples and choosing technology for the IIoT online. CONSIDER THIS Once the proper technology is chosen, what is the next step in implementing a true IIoT solution in the industrial space?
34
|
MAY 2017
he Industrial Internet Consortium (IIC) recently published the Industrial Internet Connectivity Framework (IICF) after two years of analyzing Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) technologies. The IICF includes the insights and strong opinions from many experts, including those from the top industry consortia, many companies, and most important standards. The most surprising conclusion: the IIoT is big. It’s so big that the technologies don’t really overlap. Designers may think to choose any standard, including the data distribution services (DDS from the Object Management Group), OPC Unified Architecture (OPC UA), MQ Telemetry Transport (MQTT), or oneM2M and succeed. But this implies the IIoT connectivity solution space overlaps, as shown in Figure 1. The reality is very different. The IIoT covers many industries and with very different use cases. In fact, the IIoT space is so big that the technology options rarely, if ever, overlap. Today’s architecture challenge in the IIoT space is therefore not one of choosing among overlapping technologies that may each be able to reasonably solve a problem. The challenge is understanding the technologies, comparing the intended use to the application, and choosing the one that best addresses the particular challenge the applications faces. If you look at a more realistic map of the situation, it looks more like the sparse Venn diagram shown in Figure 2 than the overlapping one in Figure 1. The real problem isn’t choosing between similar options, it’s understanding the very different options and overcoming biases. The IICF directly addresses this. How to choose technology for the IIoT
Let’s take this process a bit further. It’s possible to ask a few questions for each technology option and quickly narrow the choices. These questions may somewhat oversimplify the problem, but they are a great starting point. The IICF identifies four potential “core connectivity standards” DDS, OPC UA, oneM2M, and RESTful HTTP. The first three are analyzed below. RESTful HTTP is well
CONTROL ENGINEERING
understood, so it’s not analyzed here. MQTT is also examined because of its wide awareness, even though it doesn’t qualify as an IICF “core connectivity standard” because it doesn’t have a standard typing system required for interoperability. DDS
DDS is the standard that defines a databus. A databus is data-centric information flow control. It’s a similar concept to a database, which is datacentric information storage. The key difference: a database saves old information that can be searched by relating properties of the stored data. A databus manages future information by filtering by properties of the incoming data. Both understand the data contents and let applications act directly on and through the data rather than with each other. Applications using a database or a databus do not have a direct relationship with peer applications. With knowledge of the structure, contents and demands on data, the databus can manage the dataflow. The databus can control Quality of Service (QoS) like update rate, reliability and guaranteed notification of data liveliness. It also can discover and control and secure data flows, offering them to applications and generic tools alike. This accessible data greatly eases system integration and scale. OPC UA
OPC UA technology targets device interoperability. Before OPC UA (or its predecessor OPC), applications simply accessed devices directly through proprietary application program interfaces (APIs) provided by device vendors. Unfortunately, this meant that applications became dependent on the particular device they controlled. Worse, higher-level applications such as human-machine interfaces (HMI) had no easy way to find, connect to, or control the various devices in factories. OPC UA divides system software into clients and servers. The servers usually reside on a device or higher-level Programmable Logic Controller (PLC). They provide a way to access the device through a standard “device model.” There are standard device models for dozens of types of devices. Each manufacturer is responsible for prowww.controleng.com
Technology appropriateness: Overlapping choices
OneM2M
OneM2M results from cooperation among many mobile wireless providers. It targets networks of mobile devices that communicate mostly or only through the base-station infrastructure. The core design of oneM2M is to define services that mobile devices can use to cooperate and integrate. If you are going to use those services, plainly, you need to connect to them. They will be running in the platform layer (cloud) connected mostly through the cellular data infrastructure. Other technologies also use the IP traffic over the cell network, but they usually also heavily leverage LAN, local wireless, or WAN networking technologies in their designs.
MQTT
MQTT is a simple protocol designed mostly for the “data collection” use case. It does not qualify as a “core connectivity standard” per the IICF guidelines, because it has no standard type system. Thus, it can communicate only opaque data types, not typed data structures. Without a type system, it cannot offer a standard ability to interoperate at the “syntactic” data-structure level. Nonetheless, MQTT enjoys significant awareness. Because of its simplicity, simple questions about your system will help determine if it’s appropriate. Working together
Much of the IICT is dedicated to an architecture for integrating these technologies. This is critical for the emergence of the “Internet” part of the IIoT. The reference architecture requires standards-based core gateways between core connectivity standards. Someday, there will be integrations, such as manufacturing systems integrated with transportation and power. Sophisticated autonomy software will reconfigure workcells, creating a bold new www.controleng.com
Your application: Choose B or C
Choose A
X B
Choose A or B
C
A
Requirement 1, e.g. latency Figure 1: This diagram shows a common misconception: that many technologies meet requirements in the IIoT connectivity space. The choices, given each application (X marks the spot), are B or C. If these technologies in fact overlapped, either B or C would work. All graphics courtesy: Real-Time Innovations, Industrial Internet Consortium
Technology appropriateness: Get close and make it work Choose B
Requirement 2, e.g. fan-out
viding the server that maps the generic device model to its particular device. The servers expose an object-oriented, remotely-callable API that implements the device model. Clients can connect to a device and call functions from the generic device model. Thus, client software is independent of the actual device, and factory integrators are free to switch manufacturers or models as needed. So, OPC UA provides the connectivity needed to drive the system. Note that the device model also provides a level of “semantic” interoperability, because the device model defines the generic object APIs in known units and specified reference points.
Requirement 2, e.g. fan-out
Choose B
Your application: Choose B; it’s the best you’ll get Choose A
A
B
X
C
Nothing fits well
Requirement 1, e.g. latency
world for component device vendors. Wireless 5G systems will interoperate with freeway controllers and autonomous vehicles. Wireless 5G may even directly control factory devices, eliminating wiring in manufacturing. However, designers should consider the vastness of the space. Today, there are few concrete needs to bridge the light years between connectivity systems. That doesn’t mean the industry isn’t responding to the obvious need. Long term, these integrations will allow bigger systems to combine technologies. For now, designers must understand the vast differences between technologies and choose the one that best fits their problem space. ce
Figure 2: This diagram is closer to reality. The connectivity technologies turn out to not overlap. Most applications can only logically use one technology. The challenge is often choosing something imperfect and making it work.
Stan Schneider, PhD, CEO of Real-Time Innovations Inc., and member of the Industrial Internet Consortium Steering Committee. Edited by Emily Guenther, associate content manager, Control Engineering, CFE Media, eguenther@cfemedia.com. CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 35
2017 CAREER UPDATE
Control Engineering
Salary and career survey Control Engineering salary and career survey research shows an average salary of $96,045 in 2017, up slightly from the 2016 results; job satisfaction continues among respondents. Life-long learning remains critically important. To get youth interested in engineering, more investments in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education and high-profile projects need to be made, respondents said.
T Image across the top courtesy: Bosch Rexroth Above: NexDefense
MORE
ADVICE KEY CONCEPTS Most engineers like their jobs, and technical challenge and feeling of accomplishment rank higher than financial compensation. See engineering salaries by various benchmarks. GO ONLINE In the digital edition, click on the headline to get to more analysis online, or click in at www.controleng.com/CE-research. Online see more including respondents’ businesses, primary job functions, size of employers, management responsibilities, growth expectations, process evaluation, maturity levels in four areas, and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) level of understanding and implementation plans. CONSIDER THIS How do you document your value? See advice on p.43; job hunting tips, p.45; and project management help, p.46.
36
|
MAY 2017
he average salary for respondents of the 2017 Control Engineering Salary and Career Survey increased less than 1.4% to $96,045, from $94,747 in 2016, about 5% more than the average salary of respondents in 2015. Data analyses of engineering salaries and career-related topics here include tables showing compensation by eight criteria for benchmarking: age, education, years with current employer, years with current industry, business, job function, number of people supervised, and location in the U.S. Technical challenge and feeling of accomplishment top the next two factors for job satisfaction— financial compensation and relationship with colleagues—by more than 20 percentage points. More than 80% were satisfied with their jobs, and 46% love going to work. Among the biggest threat to manufacturing business remains the economy at 19% (down from 29% last year), with lack of available skilled workers a statistical dead heat at 17%.
Expected change to 2017 base annual salary Increase more than 6% Increase 4% to 6%
Decrease Stay the same
Worker shortage, cyber-insecurity
The survey asked for opinions related to the continuing concern about lack of skilled workers. Among responses 33% “strongly agree” that: More public, private, and/or academic partnerships related to science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) need to be made to get more youth interested in engineering-related studies. More inspirational, high-profile STEM-related investments need to be made to get more youth interested in engineering-related studies (such as space exploration and colonization, big science, advanced energy projects, Manufacturing USA Innovation Institutes, etc.). Similarly, 17% strongly agree that their company needs to be more involved in STEM activities. Just 9% of respondents felt they personally should be more involved with STEM activities. Also among respondents: 14% strongly agreed there wouldn’t be a
Expected change to 2017 non-salary compensation Increase more than 6%
4 2% 2 9% 4%
4% 6% 29%
Decrease
Increase 4% to 6%
11%
17%
56%
62%
Increase 1% to 3%
Increase 1% to 3%
Figure 1: Among respondents, 69% expect a salary increase in 2017; 29% expect the same salary; and just 2% expect less. All figures courtesy: Control Engineering 2017 Salary and Career Survey research report.
Figure 2: Among respondents, 27% expect more nonsalary compensation in 2017, 62% expect about the same, and 11% expect less.
CONTROL ENGINEERING
Stay the same
www.controleng.com
shortage if companies would pay enough. 12% strongly agreed greater investments in time and resources need to be made in standards to enable interoperability and easier system integration to more easily get by with fewer workers. 11% strongly agreed greater investments in time and resources need to be made in advanced technologies so we can more easily get by with fewer workers (like in many agriculture industries).
Compensation statistics
And in the 3% to 5% strongly agree range: We cannot get the talent we need at any price. We cannot pay an adequate amount for talent because that would make us uncompetitive. Immigration policy needs revising so we can get the talent needed to remain competitive. H1-B worker visa policies need revising so we can get the talent needed to remain competitive. Despite consistent warnings and related coverage on the topic, 14% of respondents said no cybersecurity program was in place at their site, no better than last year. (See a separate cybersecurity research report from Control Engineering at www.controleng.com/CE-Research.) Online, methods
See related articles on engineering advice, jobhunting tips, and on project management, one of the skills identified as important for success in this survey. More information and graphics appear with the online version of this article; search on the headline at www.controleng.com or, if reading the digital edition, click on the headline. Thank you to survey respondents; with 218 responding between March 13 and April 10 via a web-based survey, the margin of error is plus or minus 6.6% at a 95% confidence level. A gift card incentive was used.
Salary increases
The average base annual salary for the 2017 set of respondents to Control Engineering Salary and Career Survey was $96,045, up from $94,747 in 2016, and up from $90,367 in 2015. In 2017, 69% expect a salary increase about the same as 2016. Among respondents, 56% expect a 1% to 3% increase, 9% expect a salary increase of 4% to 6%, and just 4% expect a more than 6% increase. About 29% of respondents expected salaries to stay the same, and only 2% expect a pay cut in 2017 (see Figure 1). The salary expectations are similar to 2016, although year to year those answering the survey differ; this year’s demographic information is provided in text later. The nonsalary compensation average among the 67% of respondents getting a bonus was $14,216 www.controleng.com
Compensation statistics Average of 203 respondents
$96,045
Minimum
$25,000
Maximum
$216,513
Non-salary compensation Average (all respondents)
$9,594
Percentage of respondents that receive bonus
67%
Average (respondents that receive bonus)
$14,216
Figure 3: Average salary is $96,045, and average nonsalary compensation is $9,594 among all respondents, with $14,216 among the 67% of respondents getting any extra.
Criteria for non-salary compensation Company profitability
59%
Personal performance
43%
Safety metrics
23%
Product profitability
21%
Quality metrics
18%
Plant or line productivity
17%
Reducing plant costs
14%
Uptime/downtime
12%
Energy efficiencies
6%
Other
6%
in 2017, and among all respondents, the average is $9,594. In 2017, 38% of respondents expect more nonsalary compensation, 11% expect less, and 62% expect the same (see Figures 2 and 3). A larger majority of survey takers, 59%, said bonuses are tied to company profits compared to 80% last year. Among criteria, personal performance was 43%, down from 59%, and safety at 23% compared to 31%. Other criteria were product profitability at 21%, quality at 18%, plant or line productivity at 17%, reducing plant costs at 14%, uptime/downtime at 12%, and energy efficiencies at 6% (see Figure 4).
Figure 4: Company profits and personal performance were the leading criteria for nonsalary compensation, followed by safety, product profitability, quality, plant or line productivity, plant cost reduction, uptime/ downtime, and energy efficiencies.
Salary benchmarks
Figure 5 tables show totals for each benchmark area by age, sample sizes, and with additional trends, graphics, and analysis; download the salary survey report at www.controleng.com/CE-research. Showing upward pressure on engineering salaries for younger respondents, salary averages under 30 years of age increased significantly to $66,924 from $58,376 in 2016. Average nonsalary CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 37
2017 CAREER UPDATE
Salary and non-salary compensation benchmarks Average compensation by age Current age
Average compensation by primary business
Average base annual salary
Average non-salary compensation
Primary business
Average base annual salary
Average non-salary compensation
Under 30
$66,924
$4,291
Agriculture or construction
$184,000
$0
30 to 39
$93,447
$8,547
40 to 49
$91,671
$11,455
Oil, gas, and petroleum, including refining
$119,075
$23,456
50 to 59
$99,316
$9,957
Chemical manufacturing
$110,529
$14,262
60 to 69
$104,007
$10,908
$107,333
$1,000
70 or over
$87,444
$3,528
Plant/facilities engineering or maintenance services Computers, communications, consumer electronics, and electronic product manufacturing
$106,167
$13,000
Electrical equipment, appliance, and component manufacturing
$106,040
$13,682
Pharmaceutical manufacturing
$105,975
$5,833
$102,583
$14,857
Average compensation by highest level of education Highest level of education
Average base annual salary
Average non-salary compensation
High school diploma
$65,000
$333
Trade/technical school diploma
$80,175
$1,389
College attendance
$79,729
$7,922
Associate’s degree
$87,882
$6,313
Automotive and other transportation equipment manufacturing
Bachelor’s degree
$98,591
$10,880
Other
$102,083
$4,217
Dual bachelor’s degree
$102,860
$13,833
Master’s degree
$101,854
$13,005
Wood, paper manufacturing, and related printing activities
$101,483
$8,789
Doctoral degree
$109,114
$5,379
Instrumentation, control systems, test, measurement, or medical equipment manufacturing
$100,273
$9,770
Average compensation by number of years with current employer Number of years with current employer Fewer than 5
Average base annual salary
Average non-salary compensation
$85,097
$6,454
5 to 9
$93,116
$8,103
10 to 14
$90,675
$4,573
15 to 19
$95,729
$14,288
20 to 24
$105,677
$7,937
25 to 29
$120,903
$19,442
30 to 34
$108,700
$6,725
35 to 39
$109,125
$33,313
40 or more
$82,000
$2,100
Average compensation by number of years in current industry Number of years in current industry
Average base annual salary
Average non-salary compensation
Fewer than 5
$85,486
$12,888
5 to 9
$83,328
$8,256
10 to 14
$91,403
$3,189
15 to 19
$84,349
$8,714
20 to 24
$99,630
$10,355
25 to 29
$101,922
$8,513
30 to 34
$99,464
$8,824
35 to 39
$104,102
$11,506
40 or more
$97,168
$12,554
Figure 5: Benchmark salary and other compensation by age, education, years with employer and in current industry, primary business (see 15 more online), primary job function, number of employees supervised, and U.S. location (see page 41).
38
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
Average compensation by primary job function Primary job function
Average base annual salary
Average non-salary compensation
General or corporate management
$104,415
$20,159
Operations or maintenance
$88,994
$10,814
Other engineering, including evaluation, QC, standards, reliability, test, project, software, plant, electrical, mechanical, or electronic engineering
$102,495
$7,991
Process, production, or manufacturing engineering
$92,768
$9,695
System integration or consulting
$87,993
3,814
System or product design, control or instrument engineering
$94,602
$8,836
Other
$119,933
$9,659
Average compensation by number of employees managed/supervised Number of employees managed/ supervised
Average base annual salary
Average non-salary compensation $8,174
0
$94,581
1 to 5
$93,801
$7,300
6 to 25
$98,539
$17,185
26 to 100
$111,380
$20,860
More than 100
$120,000
$0
www.controleng.com
Job satisfaction factors Technical challenge Feeling of accomplishment Financial compensation Relationship with colleagues Benefits Job security
2017 2016
Relationship with boss Location Feeling of recognition
Figure 6: Leading job satisfaction factors are technical challenge and feeling of accomplishment in a statistical tie, followed by financial compensation, and relationship with colleagues, tied for second, closely followed by a tie between benefits and job security.
Advancement opportunities Company's financial health Workload Leading a team Managing people Physical or ergonomic environment Company size Travel Relationship with subordinates Other
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Areas of operations Automation and controls Operations Safety Training, education
Highest emphasis Should have highest emphasis
Equipment upgrades Systems Maintenance
Figure 7: The area getting the highest emphasis was operations, but automation and controls should have had that top spot.
Instrumentation Energy Manufacturing IT Human Resources Other
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Highest level of education Master's degree
High school diploma 2% Doctoral degree Trade/technical school diploma College attendance
19%
7%
5%
7%
11%
46% Dual bachelor's degree 3%
Job satisfaction Associate's degree Bachelor's degree
Figure 8: Bachelor’s and master’s degrees are the two most common. www.controleng.com
compensation for this age group decreased to $4,291 in 2017 from $7,211 in 2016. Salary averages increased to $93,447 for those in their 30s (up from $86,113 in 2016), nearly $91,671 for those in their 40s (down from $96,939), $99,316 for those in their 50s (up from $94,928, perhaps trying to dissuade talent from early retirement), $104,007 in their 60s (down from $106,100), and $87,444 for 70 or older (down from $105,592). More education resulted in more salary. Compared to last year, however, those with a trade/ technical school diploma received significantly more, an average of $80,175, compared to $71,906 in 2016. Those with a high-school diploma had the highest level decrease, to an average of $65,000 from $77,916 in 2016. While sample sizes for cross-tabulated results are smaller and have a higher margin of error than general questions, these trends do match greater expressed need for tech school education beyond high school training. Average salaries by number of years with current employer seemed designed to reward those with tenure in the 5 to 9 year group at $93,116, up significantly from those in the fewer than five year group, $85,097. Those with under five years in their current industry received the largest average non-salary compensation, even topping those with 35 or more years of industry experience. While sample size is small, it is in line with hiring pressures. Best three industries for overall compensation (salary plus non-salary compensation) were: 1) agriculture and construction at $184,000; 2) Oil, gas, and petroleum, including refining at $142,531; 3) Chemical manufacturing at $124,791; 4) Electrical equipment, appliance, and component manufacturing at $119,722; and 5) Computers, communications, consumer electronics, and electronic product manufacturing at $119,167. Highest total compensation for primary job functions in named categories (other than general “Other”) were “General or corporate management” at $124,574, and “Other engineering, including evaluation, QC, standards, reliability, test, project, software, plant, electrical, mechanical, or electronic engineering” at $110,486. Compensation increased with numbers of employees managed, except for those who manage no one (higher that those who manage one to five employees, perhaps reflecting pressure to attract new engineers. For salary by regions, see Figure 12. Job satisfaction remains high, at more than 80%; 37% responded that they thought their jobs were satisfactory, and 46% reported that they love going CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 39
2017 CAREER UPDATE
to work; 15% are tolerating it and are willing to consider a change; only 2% said they’re leaving soon. The survey found that the top five factors contributing to job satisfaction were technical challenge, 46% (up from 39% last year), about the same as feeling of accomplishment, 45% (up from 33%). Financial compensation, 25% (down from 37%), tied with relationship with colleagues, 25% (same as last year). Benefits at 21% was nearly a tie with job security at 20% (both about the same as last year). Job security, relationship with the boss, and location were statistically equal, also, at 16%, 15%, and 14% respectively. See Figure 6 for other factors. The large majority—73%—considered manufacturing secure, about the same as last year. Control Engineering subscribers often have different views about what areas should get emphasis compared to areas that actually get emphasis. According to respondents, the three areas that should get the highest emphasis are operations (29%), automation and controls (23%), and safety (15%). Just 12% of respondents said operations should get the highest emphasis; 27% (the highest) said automation and controls should get the highest emphasis; 17% said safety should get the highest; and training and education is the most neglected area, getting 2% of the emphasis, when it should get 13%, respondents said (see Figure 7). Education, skills
Survey respondents are well-educated. When asked about their highest level of education, 46% have one bachelor’s degree (another 3% have two), 19% have a master’s degree, and 7% have a doctoral degree. Other responses included associate’s degree (11%), some college (7%), trade or technical school diploma or certificate (5%), and high school diploma (2%) (see Figure 8). Among engineering disciplines studied by respondents, electrical and electronic were the most popular by far, followed by controls, instrumentation, mechanical, industrial, and chemical, all in double digits (see Figure 9). Among skills needed to advance, respondents not surprisingly agreed that engineering skills are most necessary, 67%, with project management at 56%, computer at 45%, communication and presentation skills at 44%, and team building at 38%, rounding out the top five (see Figure 10).
Outsourcing and why
When outsourcing was needed, maintenance and system integration were the two most common functions, statistically equal, at 20% and 19% respectively; 40% didn’t outsource. See Figure 11. Reasons for outsourcing were better cost
40
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
Engineering disciplines studied Electrical (EE) or electronic Controls
2017 2016 2015
Instrumentation Mechanical (ME)
Figure 9: Electrical or electronic engineering remained the largest group of engineering discipline studies, more than twice that of controls, solidly in second; instrumentation and mechanical engineering were tied for third.
Industrial Chemical Civil Other
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Skills needed to advance Engineering Project management Computer
2017 2016 2015
Communication/ presentation Team-building Language
Figure 10: The top five skill sets needed to advance are: engineering, project management, computer, communication/presentation, and team-building.
Finance/accounting Marketing/sales Other
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Outsourced functions Maintenance
Figure 11: Nearly 40% of respondents said there’s no outsourcing at their location; among those that do outsource, maintenance and system integration are the functions outsourced the most.
System integration Human resources/ recruitment Logistics/procurement System management Asset management Other None
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
www.controleng.com
Average compensation by location within U.S. $91,250 $96,177 $99,929
$96,267
$17,825 $107,139
$76,202 $7,798
Middle Atlantic
$14,519
$3,282 $9,100
West W est North Central
East North Central
New England $92,979
Mountain
Pacific
$6,107
$102,429
$123,915
$5,817
$82,857
South Atlantic $4,857 $20,056
East South Central
$10,012
West W est South Central Centra
Based outside of the U.S.
management (45%), better focus on core competencies (34%), and lack of skilled staff (28%). Other factors, such as competitiveness at 8%, and quality control 4%, were considerably less important. In a question about threats to manufacturing business, just 4% chose outsourcing or downsizing or lack of investments for equipment software upgrade/replacement, all significantly behind the economy at 19%, lack of available skilled workers at 17% (up from 13% in 2016), inadequate management at 9%, government or political interference at 8%, and regulations, codes, standards, etc., at 7%.
14 years, 12%; 15 to 19 years, 9%; 20 to 24 years, 12%; 25 to 29 years, 9%; and 30 or more years, 12%. Similarly, the large majority of respondents, 75%, reported having been in their industry for 15 years or more, about the same as last year. The largest five-year-period for respondents in their industry was 30 to 34, 18%. For hours of work per week, the most common range is 40 to 44 hours at 41%, 45 to 49 at 29%; 50 to 54 at 17%. Just 4% worked 55 or more hours per week and 9% worked fewer than 40 hours per week.
Age, experience, hours
The region where the most respondents work is East North Central at 22%. Reported next was outside the U.S., 15%, and South Atlantic, 13%, Pacific, 10%, Mountain, West South Central, Middle Atlantic all were 8%, New England and West North Central each with 7%, and East South Central, 3%. Looking at salary regionally, West South Central had the highest average base annual salary, $123,915, and highest average other compensation, $20,056, perhaps reflecting petrochemical industry competition. The Pacific region was next (Figure 12). ce
Among respondents, the largest 10-year age period is 50 to 59 at 34%, down from 40% in 2016 and 37% in 2015. The largest five-year age period is 55 to 59 at 18%. In 2016, 50 to 54 was the largest group at 23%. The 50s decade had more respondents (34%) than everyone under 45 combined (28%); and 40% of respondents are 60 and older. An aging workforce may increase pressure to find enough engineers with the desired skill sets. Again in 2017, more than half of respondents reported working for current employers for more than 10 years, the largest single group. Respondents who have been with their current employer less than five years is now 31%, up from 27%. Continuing up the scale, five to nine years, 16%; 10 to www.controleng.com
Figure 12: Looking at salary among regions, West South Central (AR, LA, OK, TX) had the highest average base annual salary, $123,915, and highest average non-salary compensation, $20,056, perhaps reflecting petrochemical industry competition for engineering talent.
Region and salaries
Mark T. Hoske, content manager, Control Engineering, CFE Media, mhoske@cfemedia.com, with data from Amanda Pelliccione, CFE Media research director, apelliccione@cfemedia.com. CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 41
CFE Media’s
New Products for Engineers Database Looking for new products? Look no further! The New Products for Engineers Database is a platform that provides an opportunity for engineering and technical professionals to access the latest NEW product information for the manufacturing, commercial construction, and manufacturing control industries.
Start searching now! www.controleng.com/NP4E
2017 CAREER UPDATE
Get lifelong education, consider workplace strategies Control Engineering career and salary survey advice is offered by survey respondents. Educationrelated advice was the biggest topic for engineering advice, then workplace strategies, and attitude.
I
mportance of lifelong learning is among engineering career advice offered as a write-in option on the Control Engineering salary survey. Among subscribers taking the Control Engineering salary survey in 2016, 89 respondents offered write-in advice, grouped for analysis and presentation into six categories: education, workplace strategies, attitude, communication, project management, and engineering tips. While some advice could be grouped into multiple categories, one was chosen for the table, far right. A sampling of advice follows. Education
Always build on your knowledge to move ahead. Be proactive. Always learn new aspects of your field. Be an expert in Industrial Internet of Things. Continue to study. When you stop learning new things, you lose flexibility to adapt to change. Get experience. Co-op while in school. Learn the ins and outs of different engineering fields. Get an engineering degree, preferably with a double major in two engineering disciplines or with engineering and business. The pay jump for engineering versus non-engineering is large. Industrial technical experts are unlikely to be let go. A technical degree with an MBA is a good choice if you plan on getting into management. Invest in formal education early in your career and keep updating your skills. Focus on business development and communication skills. Keep current on technology trends. Get involved with science, technology, engineering, and math and encourage youth to get interested. Seek novel ideas to apply to your product. Read or view short articles or videos to stay current. Ask questions of those willing to help. Learn many skills and software/hardware platforms. Look to systems, industrial, electrical engineering or computer engineering to develop into automation engineering. Read, take courses, experiment; keep a journal.
Workplace strategies
Ask for mentoring and help, early and often. Learn early so you don’t have to figure all of it out. Avoid large corporations; work for a small www.controleng.com
company. There are job security risks, but job satisfaction will be much higher. Be prepared to move around to several different employers during your career. Find what you like to do and become the best at it, then your job is your hobby and not a drag. Don’t give up until you get the job you’re looking for. Research the company prior to the interview. Attitude
Be flexible to industry changes. Engineering is absorbing and time consuming; it gives a great satisfaction when projects are finished. Sometimes the market goes low; be patient.
Communication
Share skills and working knowledge of the company systems and products with existing and new employees. Work on people skills. To excel develop people skills. Learn how to work, and work with all types of people. Take care of the details, and listen to your team!
Project management
Be a guru at automating your own processes. Do your best to identify your customers’ problems and develop practical solutions that can be implemented by and with your customers. If you have a business-oriented mind, seek project management roles initially. Learn how to program so you can communicate with programmers. Look at the big picture. Engineering tips
Automation and controls, manufacturing IT, instrumentation, maintenance, and systems Electronic engineering, industrial engineering, food engineering, alternative energy engineering Learn the technology to develop adequate skills to perform engineering analysis, design, evaluation, and implementation. ce
Mark T. Hoske is content manager, Control Engineering, CFE Media, mhoske@cfemedia.com. Data provided by CFE Media research director, Amanda Pelliccione, apelliccione@cfemedia.com.
2017 Career advice 42
Education
23
Workplace strategies
9
Attitude
6
Communication
6
Project management
3
Engineering tips
MORE
ADVICE GO ONLINE www.controleng.com/CE-Research This article has more than double the advice online; if reading the digital edition, click on the headline. If not, search for the article headlines at www.controleng.com. GET MORE EDUCATION: www.controleng.com/enewsletters www.controleng.com/webcasts www.CFEedu.cfemedia.com
CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 43
CFE Media’s
Global System Integrator Database CFE Media’s Global System Integrator Database is an interactive community of global end-users and system integrators hosted by Control Engineering, Plant Engineering, and our global partners in Asia and Europe. The newest version of the online database is even easier to use. Features and updates:
• Relevancy score indicates how closely
• New feature allows an end-user to
• Users can now preview the most
• The most relevant data about an
an integrator’s qualifications match a user’s search criteria
pertinent data of a System Integrator before clicking to view the full corporate profile
“
request a quote for a project directly from the database site
integrator’s engineering services appear on one page on their corporate profile – other details are organized by tabs.
As a Systems Integrator there are quite a few options available for online advertising. They vary in functionality and design, but the Global System Integrator Database has been our go to. It is easy to use, professionally designed, and has given us a great deal of exposure to clients we wouldn’t normally be able to reach. We have had more clients contact us with this solution than any other System Integrator database combined. We not only going to renew our profile this year, we plan on upgrading.
”
William Aja, Panacea Technologies
Find and connect with the most suitable service provider for your unique application.
www.controleng.com/global-si-database
2017 CAREER UPDATE
Top 4 job-hunting tips Finding a job in engineering takes skill, focus, and persistence.
F
inding a job in today’s job market can be challenging, especially for new graduates. Here are some key tips to follow for putting your best foot forward when job hunting within the engineering industry:
1. Be concise
Have a 2-minute speech ready highlighting the value you would bring to the firm—think of it as an executive summary of your resume. Ask yourself questions like: How do your passions align with the firm’s core values? Did a recent job or experience further affirm your interest in this career? Avoid long, drawn-out explanations where the recruiter is forced to interrupt and hurry you along. A concise summary of your experience and what you’ve learned is a great foundation for the interview.
2. Be interested
When you love something, learning is not limited to the classroom. There is nothing more uninspiring than someone who wants to be an engineer because he or she didn’t know what else to be, or because someone told them that they should be. Companies want to hire the next generation of leaders who can not only grow into management roles, but also can provide crucial thought leadership. If you are passionate about a topic, elaborate on what inspires you about it. The engineering industry changes fast, and there’s a need to stay aware of news and debates both in the field and in general. Updated energy code amendments, the Paris Agreement, and debates over the value of integrated project delivery are just a few examples of important topics to be knowledgeable about. Additionally, following companies that you’re interested in as well as thought leaders on various social media channels is a great way to stay in the know.
3. Be focused
As a new graduate, you may be familiar with a few big-name companies in the industry. However, it is best to focus your search so it suits your specific interests based on size, niche, location, etc. www.controleng.com
For example, I remember speaking with a candidate and realizing his passions were in were in façade design. When I recommended firms that specialized in façade design, he didn’t know such firms existed. The best way to discover these firms is by conducting online searches and researching what is available. Top firms often produce a range of engaging content such as white papers, op-eds, and videos you can look into. Also, ask your professors, mentors, and alumni for recommendations and review lists of companies that recruit at your college.
4. Be persistent
Job hunting is not for the faint of heart. For most, rejection letters will be a part of the journey, but they must not deter you from your goal. Look frequently and apply often. For example, I mentored a woman who recently graduated and wanted to find a job in the United States. Her visa-sponsorship requirements made her job hunt even more challenging, and she endured a number of rescinded offers once her visa status was understood. After applying for two or three jobs a day for 6 months, she landed an offer from a firm willing to sponsor her. Her peers who were not as persistent also weren’t as successful in reaching their goals. Additionally, be sure to attend job fairs. Network with industry professionals at conferences, seminars, and networking events. Join local chapters of professional associations, such as ASHRAE, U.S. Green Building Council, and the American Society of Civil Engineers. Following these tips will help you succeed in interviews and separate you from other applicants. Employers look for applicants who are poised and engaged in their future career. ce
Rebecca Delaney is the mechanical team leader at Skidmore, Owings & Merrill’s sustainable engineering studio. She is a hiring manager and engineer recognized for her industry leadership in mentoring students and sharing her passion of engineering around the globe. Edited by Emily Guenther, associate content manager, Control Engineering, CFE Media, eguenther@cfemedia.com.
MORE
ADVICE KEY CONCEPTS Learn how to job hunt in the engineering industry. What to do in order to get more exposure within the industry. How to prepare for a successful interview. GO ONLINE For related links about career advice, read this article online. In the digital edition, click on the headline or search the headline for www.controleng.com. CONSIDER THIS Should additional steps be taken for job seekers who aren’t breaking into the industry for the first time?
CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 45
2017 CAREER UPDATE
Project management help
Defining and measuring project quality Using a standardized methodology to define project quality ensures deliverables fit customer specifications and receive high customer satisfaction when managing projects.
U
MORE
ADVICE KEY CONCEPTS How to define project quality. What to consider when measuring project quality. The differences between quality control and quality assurance. GO ONLINE For related links about quality control and project management, read this article online. In the digital edition, click on the headline or search the headline for www.controleng.com CONSIDER THIS How should a quality assurance plan be tailored for a particular industry or particular products?
46
|
MAY 2017
sing a standardized methodology to define project quality ensures deliverables are fit for their intended purpose with high customer satisfaction. Quality is often described in vague terms that are difficult, if not impossible, to make quantitative measurements. Quality is apparent to the customer, especially when lacking, but what exactly is quality? Quality may have different meanings to various project stakeholders, and it’s important to figure out what that meaning is for each. The idea of quality, on the surface, is abstract, ambiguous and difficult to define and measure. Measuring and managing quality in the context of project-based work further complicates matters as individual projects are often unique making it difficult to develop a set of criteria to measure against. Project quality relies on identification of the customers and of their requirements. At the early phases of a project, requirements might be vague and unmeasurable. As the project progresses, requirements must be refined into specifications that are measurable. The definition of quality as it relates to the project should be determined up front and well-defined with customer input so that at the end of the project, the customers perceive the deliverables as being high quality. Defining quality
To manage project quality, it is imperative to understand what quality is and how it relates to the project. Joseph M. Juran, widely held to be the father of quality, defined quality as “fitness for use” which was later revised to “fitness for purpose” in the 6th edition of “Juran’s Quality Handbook.” Juran also emphasized two components of quality that are critical to managing it: features that meet customer needs and freedom from failures.
CONTROL ENGINEERING
In the context of project quality, it is important to meet the customer’s needs while not “gold plating” the deliverables with expensive features that add little or no value to the customer. The Project Management Institute defines quality as “the degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfills requirements.” While it is important not to gold plate the deliverables, it is also important not to simply meet the bare minimum of requirements as specified in the project contract. Kenneth Rose, author of “Project Quality Management: Why, What and How,” describes a simple set of statements related to project specifications: If you don’t meet the specifications, you are in breach. If you want to complete the current contract, meet the contract specifications. If you want to win the next contract, meet or exceed the customer’s expectations. Exceeding the minimum requirements is important so the customer is satisfied. However, this must be done in a way that exceeding the project requirements adds value to the customer and not adding features that won’t benefit them. Quality assurance versus quality control
Quality assurance and quality control are terms that are often used interchangeably but have different meanings. Quality assurance focuses on the process and preventing defects before they occur. Quality control focuses on the products and identifing and correcting defects after they have been produced. Another way to compare the two is that quality assurance is performed by people that need to understand the quality of a product but are external to the production. Quality control is www.controleng.com
performed by those responsible for producing the product. Understanding the customers of a project is very important when trying to define quality as it relates to a project. The most obvious customer of a project is the person or organization that is paying the bills. However, this is often not the only customer. Customers can include multiple organizations and multiple people within each of those organizations. The client commissioning the project is often different from the end user for the project. Regulatory bodies are also customers as applicable requirements that apply to the project have to be met. Some customers may be difficult to identify for a project as some may not be readily apparent or may not appear to later on in the project. The cost of project quality
Quality is often misunderstood as an additional cost to the project, which is incorrect. When quality is integral to the project from the beginning, the time required to maintain quality is covered by the savings produced. For quality to produce savings, it is important that it is included in the project from the beginning. If quality is ignored during a project, the defects will be discovered at the end of the project by the customer (see Figure 1). Letting defects exist to this point are not only very costly to correct, but can cause extreme damage to reputation. Often, quality is thought of as a process that occurs at the end of a project prior to shipping or turning over a product. Discovering defects during the testing /inspection phase is better than letting the customer find them, however, this still results in costly rework to correct the defects. Identifying and correcting defects during the implementation phase of the project is an improvement, but may result in some degree of rework. Ideally, quality plans are created upfront during the specification/design phase of the project. At this phase of the project, correcting potential defects produces the least amount of additional cost and rework. For quality, there is a rule known as the 1:10:100 rule that explains this concept: what costs $1 to correct in the specification and design phase would cost $10 to correct in the implementation phase and $100 to correct in the testing and inspection phase. During the project’s customer turnover phase, the cost of a dissatisfied customer or damaged reputation is impossible to measure. www.controleng.com
Quality and project constraints
Projects tend to follow the triple constraint: scope, schedule, and budget. When considering quality, this is still a triple constraint. At no time, should quality be traded off in favor of scope, schedule, or budget. Practicing project quality management is important for maintaining the project scope. Proper quality assurance during the project ensures that all of the project scope items will be met adequately. Quality control during the project inspects each scope item to ensure the requirements are met without defect, or remedies scope items that are found to have defects. Scope and quality should not be confused. If tradeoffs during a project occur, as a member of the project team, you may feel that only the scope is being reduced. However, to a customer of the project, they may feel that the quality of the deliverable(s) is being reduced. A project often may have an aggressive and tight schedule for implementation. Even in this case, it does not mean that quality should be compromised. The old adage, “there is never enough time to do it right, but always enough time to do it over,” applies here. A project that maintains its schedule, but cannot perform what it is intended to do, provides little value to anyone. Correcting the project defects at the end of the schedule will not only require costly rework, it will still be late. For the project budget, quality is not an item that should be restricted by a budget. When properly implemented, a quality project will pay for itself by reducing waste, defects, and rework. In the 4th edition of the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) Guide, quality was
Figure 1: Quality issues must be addressed during all phases of a project from the start through final customer turn-over. All images courtesy: Huffman Engineering
‘
For the project budget, quality is not an item that should be restricted by budget. When properly implemented, a quality project will pay for itself by reducing waste, defects, and rework.
CONTROL ENGINEERING
’
MAY 2017
| 47
2017 CAREER UPDATE
added as a project constraint in addition to the traditional triple constraint along with risk and resources, shown in Figure 2. While quality is a constraint of the project, it remains imperative that it is not omitted in favor of scope, schedule, or budget.
process is the link between quality planning and quality control. It involves auditing the quality requirements and results from quality control to ensure appropriate quality standards and operational definitions are used. A quality assurance plan should be developed for tracking quality activities. This provides a manageable list of quality activities and results for future reference. A quality assurance plan should contain the following information: Task/work breakdown structure reference Requirement Specification Assurance activity Schedule Responsible party.
Figure 2: Project constraints have evolved from the traditional budget, scope, and schedule (left) to include risk, resources, and quality as well (right).
Project quality management methodology
The PMBOK Guide lists three processes for project quality management: quality planning, quality assurance, and quality control. Juran did not distinguish between quality assurance and quality control, but he did add one more important process: quality improvement. Good project quality starts with planning for quality during the early stages of a project, and not relying on inspection near or at the end. Quality planning is a three-step process: identify customers, identify quality requirements, and develop specifications. Identifying all the customers of a project is the first step. This is important to consider any potential customers that may not be readily apparent at the start of a project but may appear during or after the project is over. Identifying these customers earlier in the project will result in a smoother project. The next step is to identify the quality requirements. This step will involve working with the customers to identify what the requirements are. Some requirements may also be implied. Requirements now can be used to formulate specifications. A requirement is generic in nature, such as “the coffee will be hot.” A specification, on the other hand, specifies what will be measured and how to measure it. Fulfilling quality requirements
Quality assurance provides confidence that the quality requirements will be fulfilled. This
48
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
This plan contains the necessary information to define what will be done (assurance activity), when it will be done (schedule), and who will perform it (the responsible party). Auditing the project quality may be performed by a member of the project team but should be someone removed from the actual development of what is being audited. Trying to audit one’s own work may not identify every defect. Quality control and improvement
Quality control is the process of accessing the products and validating the scope of the project. Products are checked against the specifications for conformance. If a product is out of spec, then quality control is the process in which it is corrected. The second part of quality control is recommending updates for quality assurance to correct the process and reduce defects. This is the last part of the quality process, improvement. Quality is a constant process of change and improvement— not a destination. Effective quality management is a tool to increase competitiveness and performance as it relates to the project. While difficult to define, quality management is an essential aspect of the broader topic of project management. A systematic approach to quality should be used as a method to identify customers, define requirements and specifications, and perform quality planning, assurance, and control. ce
Jay Steinman is a mechanical engineer at CSIA Certified system integrator, Huffman Engineering. Edited by Emily Guenther, associate content manager, Control Engineering, CFE Media, eguenther@cfemedia.com. www.controleng.com
INSIDE PROCESS migration
Signaling considerations for control system migrations Not every analog field instrument can be wired to any given analog input (AI) module, nor can any discrete output (DO) module be wired to any given discrete final control element.
C
ontrol system migrations inherent- ac discrete signals unless the project designs and ly require a large variety of technical installs interposing relays. The variations in I/O details to be analyzed and addressed module types referenced above can result in sigin preparation for installation and nificant variations in I/O densities (channels per start-up. In addition to software con- module), which then affect the physical cabinet figuration and development, this also applies space and I/O rack infrastructure required for a when connecting the software to the process. given I/O count. At a high level, and Signal isolators or conespecially during early ditioners may be required Namur sensors also project scoping stages, it is to make existing field siguseful and appropriate to nals compatible with the may have the opposite base control system migraI/O modules offered on contact action of existing the new system or to pretion analyses largely on input/output (I/O) counts vent purchasing different simple dry contact by general types: analog I/O module types for only inputs (AI), discrete inputs a small quantity of unique position switches and (DI), analog outputs (AO), field signals. DIs on the discrete outputs (DO), and new control system could require inverted control soft tags. After the early have higher input impedsystem logic. scoping stages—but before ances than the existing sysbudgets are finalized and tem, which makes them detailed design begins—the project team should more vulnerable to induced voltage on long cable consider signaling details that can impact project runs than DIs on the existing control system. costs and schedule. Existing solid-state, output discrete, field device signals, unlike dry contacts, normally Control system criteria require a minimum current to fully conduct and There are many signaling details that need to switch on such that a dropping resistor may be be considered during a migration project. This is needed if the input impedance at the new conespecially true if the project is based on retaining trol system’s DI modules is too high. In addition existing field instrumentation. to field instruments, solid-state output signals The control system could require a mix are encountered when hard-wiring DOs from of single-ended and isolated DO modules to one control system, such as a small, packaged be compatible with existing field signals that unit equipment programmable logic controller include both simple solenoid valves and start/ (PLC), to a supervisory control system, such as a stop signals that are wired directly into and pow- plant distributed control system (DCS). ered by existing motor control circuit transformAs a part of the migration project, the plant ers. The control system could require a mix of also could be installing discrete field instruments single-ended, differential, HART-capable, and with Namur sensors that may not be compatiisolated AI module types to be compatible with a ble with all of the DI modules on the new conmix of existing loop powered transmitters, self- trol system. Also, when Namur sensors are newly powered transmitters, HART transmitters, and introduced to an existing plant, maintenance known ground loop issues. personnel should be trained on the operation The new control system could require several of Namur signals that, unlike simple dry condifferent DI and DO module types to be com- tact position switches, require excitation voltpatible with a mix of existing 24 V dc and 120 V age to function. Namur sensors also may have
‘
’
www.controleng.com
MORE
ADVICE KEY CONCEPTS It is useful to base control system migration analyses on input/output (I/O) counts by general types, which includes analog inputs (AI), discrete inputs (DI), analog outputs (AO), discrete outputs (DO), and soft tags. There are many signaling details that need to be considered during a migration project, especially if the project is based on retaining existing field instrumentation. The field excitation voltage for analog inputs (AI) on the new control system can be significantly different than the existing control system, which can lead maintenance personnel troubleshooting efforts astray. GO ONLINE Read this story online at www.controleng.com for more information on control system migration, as well as related stories from Maverick Technologies. CONSIDER THIS Do you know how the control system in your plant is wired?
CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| P1
INSIDE PROCESS migration the opposite contact action of existing simple dry contact position switches and require inverted control system logic. Additional requirements
As part of the migration, the plant may want to change motor control circuits (MCCs) from two-wire control (single maintained signal) to three-wire
control (momentarily requiring an additional DO) to enhance safety or for other process reasons associated with recovery from power interruptions. Existing MCCs in older facilities could use 480 V ac signaling (tapped from two power phases) for motor start, stop, and run confirmation signals that would almost certainly require interposing relays on the
new system unless the existing motor starters are replaced. Existing AOs that currently drive a pair of split-range control valves may need to be implemented on the new system as two separate AOs to ensure sufficient voltage drop or to provide an intuitive operator interface on humanmachine interface (HMI) graphics. The
‘
There are many signaling details that need to be considered during a
’
migration project.
plant could use obsolete thermocouplesensing temperature transmitters whose 4-20 mA outputs do not vary linearly with temperature and are supported by the existing, legacy control system but are not compatible with the new control system. The plant could have field transmitters with an older, primitive fieldbus technology that was never widely adopted and hence is not supported on the new control system but is providing critical process data to operations personnel on the existing, legacy control system. Although many newer control system DO modules have internalized this functionality, some 24 V dc DO modules require reverse bias diodes across their outputs to prevent the energy from the collapsing magnetic fields on inductive loads from generating excessive voltages that then damage electronics. The field excitation voltage for AIs on the new control system can be significantly different than the existing control system, which can lead maintenance personnel troubleshooting efforts astray. ce Shane Hudson is a senior engineer at Maverick Technologies. Maverick Technologies is a CFE Media content partner, a CSIA Level 1 member, the Control Engineering System Integrator of the Year in 2011, and was inducted into the Control Engineering System Integrator Hall of Fame in 2012. Edited by Jack Smith, content manager, CFE Media, Control Engineering, jsmith@cfemedia.com. input #13 at www.controleng.com/information
P2
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
INSIDE PROCESS flow measurement
Understanding upstream and downstream pipe diameters for flow measurement While there are some creative ways to get flowmeters piped, there are certain installation best practices that should be adhered to whenever possible.
O
ne of the most common issues with flow measurement is an incorrectly sized flowmeter, followed by poor installation. While there are some creative ways to get flowmeters piped, they can neglect the fact that there are certain installation best practices that should be followed for each flowmeter type, and those should be adhered to whenever possible. Incorrect flowmeter installation
After all the trouble you went through selecting the proper meter for an application, why not ensure it’s installed in a manner that will produce optimal measurement results? A lot has changed over the years in terms of flowmeter technology. However, you can’t argue with physics. Fluid flowing through a pipe generally assumes a desirable flow profile at or near the center of the pipe. Flow disturbances (distortion and swirl) can occur via improper flowmeter installation, thus reducing measurement accuracy. Aside from improper sizing, material incompatibility, and meter misapplication, a number of issues with flow measurement arise from improper piping practices. A lot of time, effort, and money can go into the purchase of a flowmeter. However, it seems that not as much consideration is given to its installation. Perhaps this is due to limited changes that can be made to existing piping (time and expense), the end users having a technology they are not familiar with and making assumptions based on what they have done in the past, or a mechanical contractor having limited experience with various flowmeter technologies, etc. In this case, when talking about improper installation, the focus is on the placement of the meter in the process piping and its relation to valves, elbows, strainers, reducers, and a host of other devices that can be inserted into the piping that can have an www.controleng.com
effect on the flow profile. There are some general guidelines and best practices that all users should follow. The old adage, “If you don’t know something, ask,” applies here. There are no bad questions when trying to determine proper meter placement. Ask the manufacturer
Each technology has specific recommendations for meter placement and recommended pipe diameters upstream and downstream. Perhaps one of the most overlooked resources is speaking with the account manager/sales resource for that particular vendor. Most, if not all, flow measurement professionals have been through extensive training on their products and are familiar with a host of applications. They should be the first call when you have questions or concerns about where the meter should be placed in the pipe. In many cases, these professionals will assess each installation and give you the recommendations needed to ensure proper performance. One size does not fit all
MORE
ADVICE
One technology does not fit all applications. We all may have our favorite technology that we swear by, but you can’t fit a round peg in a square hole, and the same goes for flowmeters. Just because there’s a spare meter lying in the storeroom doesn’t mean it will be the most suitable. There are many options to consider, especially if you have existing piping that can’t be modified easily. It’s important to start thinking about the importance of installation effects and how this could impact the type of meter that is chosen. If you find that your flowmeter performance is suffering from installation effects, all is not lost. Ideally, the meter could be moved to a more suitable location that would ensure proper upstream and downstream straight pipe. Another option would be to change the type
KEY CONCEPTS There are installation best practices that should be followed and adhered to for each flowmeter type. One size does not fit all with flowmeters and there are many options to consider. Use relevant standards and ask questions to get the most out of your flowmeter investment. GO ONLINE Read this story online at www.controleng.com for more information on flowmeter measurement, as well as related stories from Cross Co. CONSIDER THIS What other questions should be asked when measuring flowmeters?
CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| P3
INSIDE PROCESS flow measurement
‘
As there are
of meter or change to a different design of the same kind of meter. For example, changing from a standard vortex to a reducer vortex.
multiple flow technologies
Upstream and downstream requirements
available, so
for proper meter
As there are multiple flow technologies available, so too are the recommendations for proper meter placement in process piping. While each manufacturer may have different guidelines, below is a general overview of typical upstream and downstream piping requirements.
placement in
Magnetic flowmeters
too are the recommendations
process piping.
upstream piping runs. Elbows, reducers, and other devices upstream of the sensor will distort the flow profile, so adequate straight runs need to be accounted for. Typical recommendations suggest 35 straight pipe diameters upstream and five straight pipe diameters downstream. If you don’t have sufficient upstream straight run, some manufacturers allow for K-factor corrections that could reduce this requirement. If using temperature and pressure compensations to derive mass flow, then the temperature and pressure transmitters should be installed downstream of the flowmeter at a minimum of four to six straight pipe diameters.
’
Magnetic flowmeters are fairly forgiving in terms of varying flow profile. To ensure specified accuracy over a broader range of process conditions first, ensure that the meter is piped in a manner so it always remains full. Second, install the flowmeter a minimum of five straight pipe diameters upstream and a minimum of two straight pipe diameters downstream from the electrode plane.
Coriolis flowmeters
Coriolis flowmeters are designed to measure mass flow and density directly. Their measurements are insensitive to fluid profile, have very few installation limitations, and therefore don’t require upstream and downstream straight pipe runs. The main guidelines for Coriolis sensors are to make sure the sensor tubes remain full. If installed in a vertical pipe, make sure the fluid (liquid and slurries) flows up and gasses flow down and do not use the meter to align misaligned pipe.
Vortex flowmeters
Vortex flowmeters like a fully developed flow profile and typically require long straight
PROTECT PUMPS
DRY RUNNING • CAVITATION • BEARING FAILURE • OVERLOAD MONITOR PUMP POWER • Best Sensitivity • Digital Display
COMPACT EASY MOUNTING Only 3.25" x 6.25" x 2" • Starter Door • Panel • Raceway • Wall
TWO ADJUSTABLE SET POINTS • Relay Outputs • Adjustable Delay Timers
UNIQUE RANGE FINDER SENSOR • Works on Wide-range of Motors • Simplifies Installation
4-20 MILLIAMP ANALOG OUTPUT
WHY MONITOR POWER INSTEAD OF JUST AMPS?
PUMP POWER
Power is Linear-Equal Sensitivity at Both Low and High Loads NO LOAD
AMPS
POWER
VALVE CLOSING PUMPING
FULL LOAD
No Sensitivity For Low Loads NO LOAD
VALVE OPENING
NO FLUID
FULL LOAD
CALL NOW FOR YOUR FREE 30-DAY TRIAL 888-600-3247 WWW.LOADCONTROLS.COM input #14 at www.controleng.com/information
MORE OPTIONS. MORE FEATURES. MORE POWER SUPPLIES. EPSI
TRO
N®
EPSITRON®
EPSITRON®
EPSITRON®
EPSITRON® Professional power with TopBoost, PowerBoost, and Monitoring (RS-232)
COMPACT Power
ECO Power
CLASSIC Power
/RZ SURƮOH with no mounting restrictions
Economical power plus Hazardous Location ratings
Slim style single and three-phase power with -40 °C cold start
PRO Power
Round out your application with EPSITRON® 836 FDSDFLWLYH EXƬHU redundancy and electronic circuit breaker modules. Get More: www.wago.us/epsitron
input #15 at www.controleng.com/information
INSIDE PROCESS flow measurement
‘
Ultrasonic flowmeters require fully developed flow conditions to ensure the meters will perform as specified.
’
Turbine flowmeters
Turbine flowmeters must be installed in a manner that minimizes measurement errors caused by turbulence or damage to the moving parts caused by high flow rates. It also is recommended that a strainer is used upstream of the turbine meter to capture any contaminants that could damage the moving components. Sufficient back pressure also should be maintained to avoid any potential flashing or cavitation. The general guidelines suggested by manufacturers of turbine flowmeters are 15 to 20 straight pipe diameters (inclusive of the strainer) straight pipe runs upstream and five straight pipe diameters straight pipe runs downstream. The upstream requirement can be increased if, for example, there are two elbows in different planes (up to 50 straight pipe diameters). Alternatively, the upstream straight run requirement can be reduced if some form of flow straightening is used, down to 10 straight pipe diameters upstream.
Ultrasonic flowmeters
Ultrasonic flowmeters require fully developed flow conditions to ensure the meters will
perform as specified. There are two basic types of measuring principles, Doppler and transit time, with the latter being more commonly used for fiscal custody transfer applications of gas and petroleum liquids. As with other technologies, these sensors do require adhering to basic installation guidelines to minimize errors caused by flow profile disturbances. Consult the standards, ask questions
Requirements vary by manufacturer, which could lead to some confusion. In a fiscal custody transfer application of either a liquid or gas, make sure to be fully versed in the current standards. By asking the right questions, consulting with the manufacturer, and having a good understanding of the existing guidelines and standards, you should be well on your way to getting the most for your flowmeter investment. ce Jeff Weiss is an account manager with Cross Co., a CFE Media content partner. Edited by Chris Vavra, production editor, Control Engineering, CFE Media, cvavra@cfemedia.com.
For Kyle, automation is a team sport. Festo helps him make customer dreams a reality. Plexus is The Product Realization Company™ - transforming customer concepts into products. For Kyle, the process starts and ends with collaboration. That’s why when he needs a control or automation solution, he trusts Festo to provide the best advice. And the best products. Solutions through teamwork. That’s what moves Kyle. What moves you?
Kyle Huebner Manager of Manufacturing Automation Plexus
Access Our Latest Best Practices Report.
Visit festo.us/OEE © 2017, Festo Corporation. All rights reserved. PLEXUS and The Product Realization Company are trademarks of Plexus Corp. and Plexus Corp. owns such trademarks, trade names, service marks and logos. ®
TM
input #16 at www.controleng.com/information
My operators have poor visibility to potential issues. They need to view, process, and make informed decisions - clearly and quickly.
YOU CAN DO THAT Improve operations performance. Operator performance can impact plant safety and process availability. Emerson sets your operators up for success by using best-of-class technology, proven processes, and an understanding of human limitations and strengths. The DeltaV distributed control system can help reduce operator stress, limit human error, and provide intuitive data to run your plant more efficiently. Better visibility – better performance. Learn more at www.emerson.com/operationsperformance/
The Emerson logo is a trademark and a service mark of Emerson Electric Co. Š 2017 Emerson Electric Co.
input #17 at www.controleng.com/information
NONMETALLIC ENCLOSURES & PREMIUM ACCESSORIES Fiberglass Reinforced Polyester (FRP) or Polycarbonate Enclosures For your Toughest Applications
• Lightweight
HMI Cover Kits New Sizes Include 10" x 8" & 16" x 14"
• Non-corrosive • Non-conductive
L
AV A
NEW
NO
W
AILABLE • AV
• Custom modifications
LE • NO
VA W A ILAB
NOW
PRODU CTS
• NEMA Type 4X rated • Premium accessories
•
AB
• UV resistant
E
IL
NEMA 4X Vent Kits
12" x 12" AM & AM-R Series FRP Enclosures
Scan to learn more about Allied Moulded enclosures!
• 3D model library for easy download Oil & Gas • Solar Power • Security Systems • Automation Controls Telecommunications • Wastewater Treatment • Agriculture • And Many More!
222 North Union Street • Bryan, Ohio 43506 Ph: 800-722-2679 • Fx: 800-237-7269 © 2017 Allied Moulded Products, Inc.
w w w. a l l i e d m o u l d e d . c o m input #18 at www.controleng.com/information
Engineering is personal. So is the way you use information. CFE Media delivers a world of knowledge to you.
Personally.
CFE Media is home to some of the most trusted names in the business. To do your job better each day, you need a trusted source of information:
CFE Media — Content for Engineers
www.cfemedia.com
CFE_General_HalfHorizontal.indd 1
2/9/2017 2:25:34 PM
More resources posted daily at:
www.controleng.com
digital edition Exclusives, Online Extras: Benefits of the Control Engineering Digital Edition include tablet-friendly viewing (HTML5), exclusive content in every issue; headlines link to the longer version posted online; links are live where a URL is provided; and an email link arrives when ready. In addition, link to additional “Online Extra” articles.
DIGITAL EDITION EXCLUSIVES
DE1 Machine vision technologies
boost warehouse efficiency, transparency The machine vision industry is providing warehouses with technology to leverage the data generated by cameras, sensors and imagers across the entire enterprise in order to maximize efficiency and productivity.
DE3 Learning tough lessons from ICS attacks
A security incident can cause damage to brand reputation, loss of competitive advantage, legal or regulatory non-compliance issues, considerable financial damage, and harm to the environment and community.
ONLINE EXTRAS
(Click on the headlines or search www.controleng.com.)
Researchers design coatings to prevent pipeline clogging Researchers at MIT have developed a coating that could stop the buildup of hydrate ices that slow or block oil and gas flow, which could help prevent another disaster such as Deepwater Horizon.
Reverse engineering reduced repair time, costs for steel manufacturer A steel manufacturer that needed two impellers repaired found a solution through reverse engineering that was faster and more cost-effective.
Predictive, preventive, and breakdown maintenance tips Predictive, preventive, and breakdown maintenance are common maintenance programs that provide their own unique benefits and plant managers should know when to employ them.
Three ways to increase efficiency at a spirit manufacturing plant Manufacturers at a spirit manufacturing plant can increase production and efficiency by setting realistic expectations, simplify their model, and asking for a third-party’s input with an overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) analysis.
Cybersecurity attacks on IIoT infrastructure expected to increase in 2017 A survey by security company Tripwire found that 96% of IT security professionals expected attacks on critical Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) infrastructure segments such as energy, utilities, government, health care, and finance.
www.controleng.com
CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 57
DIGITAL EDITION exclusive
Machine vision boosts efficiency, transparency The machine vision industry is providing warehouses with technology to leverage the data generated by cameras, sensors and imagers across the entire enterprise to help maximize efficiency and productivity.
A
mazon has gotten warehouse efficiency down to a science, and vision and imaging technologies share in the credit. Meanwhile, human pickers are equipped with handheld image-based barcode readers, and merchandise gets scanned at a series of points throughout the fulfillment process. It’s not just retail giants. Warehouses of all types and sizes are realizing they don’t have to be an e-commerce gorilla to benefit from vision and imaging offerings ranging from 3-D empty tray detection to smartphone-based scanners. Not only is the vision industry providing the hardware, but they’re helping their warehouse customers leverage the data generated by cameras, sensors and imagers across the entire enterprise in order to maximize efficiency and productivity. Moving beyond the barcode
MORE
ADVICE KEY CONCEPTS The machine vision industry is providing hardware and the tools to allow warehouse customers to leverage the data they are receiving. Companies need to effectively manage the data they receive from all of their mobile devices. Embracing mobility could be a major boost for the machine vision industry and for workers in the warehouse. GO ONLINE Read this story at www.controleng.com for more information about machine vision technologies and additional stories from the AIA. CONSIDER THIS What other developments could have a major impact on machine vision technologies in the warehouse?
DE1
|
MAY 2017
Barcode readers continue to be the bread and butter of imaging applications in the warehouse. These industrial imagers may require less complexity than their traditional machine vision system counterparts, but they nevertheless have a demanding job. “Compared to factory automation and its many applications, the warehouse is more focused and contained because you are just trying to read a barcode and guide a box where to go,” said Bryan Boatner, director of product marketing - mobile and handheld products for Cognex. “But in another sense, because the boxes are moving so fast and throughput is at such a premium, it can be a lot more challenging.” When image-based industrial barcode readers first debuted, their primary value proposition was providing better read rates and capturing more data than their laser scanner counterparts ever could. In reading direct part mark (DPM), 1-D, and 2-D barcodes, image-based devices allowed warehouses to save images of codes that couldn’t be read in order to perform
CONTROL ENGINEERING
troubleshooting and root cause analysis to help improve the process. Once customers saw that benefit, they started to explore ways to use other information available from the barcode image. Until recently, much of that data was tossed aside, said Bradley Weber, manufacturing industry product specialist and application engineering manager at Datalogic. “It used to be taking that image, running it through algorithms such as reading the barcode, and processing it right then and there, and then moving onto the next package,” Weber said. “It’s changing now where a lot of that information is being stored and analyzed for later so you can identify trends over time.” To help keep its customers’ data from languishing, Cognex developed the Cognex Explorer real time monitoring (RTM) system. When an unread barcode is detected, it automatically transfers the image to RTM, which is designed to evaluate each image and categorize it into a group based on the error—for example, missing labels and poorly printed labels. Categorized images are stored in a database accessible via a web browser. Just as warehouses are relying on the additional data generated by barcode readers, they’re embracing a multipart vision system to track a product from the front end to the back end. “Datalogic is helping our customers to build a fingerprint of the package traveling through the facility using different vision technologies, including barcode readers that integrate optical character recognition (OCR) functionality, sensors that detect the presence or absence of a package, dimensioners that scan the package to provide its volume, and machine vision cameras capturing what is on that package,” Weber said. For its part, Cognex is investigating ways to employ its vision technology on its handheld readers and mobile terminals to automate OCR. “We plan to demonstrate to customers how they can use vision on handheld readers to read ZIP www.controleng.com
codes off the label in addition to scanning the bin location barcode,” Boatner said. “You can even conceive the ability to do the entire form reading where you convert printed fields to an automated data collection service.” Image-based warehouse management machine vision systems are enabling companies to be more transparent—and therefore better partners—to their customers. Datalogic’s Weber says that all information gathered together from dimensioner, weight, images, or other sensors can be combined to have a unique ID for a package. “The customers will be able to access it all,” Weber said. Shop floor to top floor
Delving this deep into the data, of course, depends on the ability of the manufacturing plant or distribution center to connect disparate business activities, enabling dataflow for centralized decision-making. But many of these systems, including warehouse management, continue to operate in silos. To tie warehouse activities into front office operations—colloquially known as “shop floor to top floor”—vision products and systems ideally will integrate with an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, which centrally manages an organization’s business activities and the data generated by them. But an ERP comes with its own challenges. “The ERP does just enough to get by, and it’s not very nimble,” said Dan Hare, vice president of Matrix SSI, which provides technology solutions to centralize inventory control. “It doesn’t do a good job at device management, which is part of the inventory control because you’re printing labels and scanning. We understand the workflow that happens in the warehouse better.” Of particular focus for manufacturers is automatically tracking work-in-process inventory, or the raw materials that are being transformed into finished goods. “A lot of this is being done with serialization and lot-type tracking, and older systems just don’t do a good job of that,” Hare said. “We’ve seen a big uptick in our solution used as an overlay for [ERP systems such as] SAP and Oracle, and that’s even in brand-new installations.” And without being responsive to the needs of the warehouse worker, workflow is likely to suffer. “Many ERPs are designed for big computer screens with a mouse at a desk,” Hare said. “Matrix SSI is designed to run on handhelds on the shop floor.” Matrix SSI, which is hardware-agnostic, has spent the past 15 years building an integration tool to connect all silos and disparate systems in a warehouse. It’s an engineering effort that vision companies are starting to make for their customers as well. www.controleng.com
Cognex’s RTM, for example, is designed to harness all the data it collects on images, which can be distilled and presented to office managers so they can assess the information and make changes. The vision-enabled mobile terminal employs technology used across the entire enterprise and leverages a variety of Android and iOS smartphones as the user interface of the device. The phones are set within a ruggedized housing equipped with barcode reading algorithms. Boatner said, “It’s a much
NUMBERS: Control Engineering 2016 research on system integration said 58% of respondents integrate discrete sensors, which inclwude machine vision technologies. More research: www.controleng.com/CE-Research
‘
Integration opportunities: optical character recognition, sensors that detect the presence or absence of a package, dimensioners that scan the package to provide its volume, and
’
machine vision cameras.
easier solution to deploy because you have one device that is managed by IT that is deployed in your warehouse, front office, field team, and so on.” Today, the machine vision industry is chasing every opportunity to catch the “killer app,” which is usually associated with the massive installed base of smartphones around the world. The warehouse—with its controlled, demanding environment—may be the gateway that brings machine vision technology to everyone’s pocket, whether they are a distribution center manager or a customer. ce Winn Hardin is contributing editor, AIA. This article originally appeared on the AIA website. The AIA is a part of the Association for Advancing Automation (A3), a CFE Media content partner. Edited by Chris Vavra, production editor, Control Engineering, CFE Media, cvavra@cfemedia.com.
CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| DE2
DIGITAL EDITION exclusive
Learning tough lessons from ICS attacks A security incident can cause damage to brand reputation, loss of competitive advantage, legal or regulatory non-compliance issues, considerable financial damage, and harm to the environment and community.
I
MORE
ADVICE KEY CONCEPTS Industrial control systems (ICSs) are vulnerable to cyber attacks just like a computer. Companies need to be better educated and more proactive in their defense measures. GO ONLINE Read this story at www.controleng.com for more information about ICSs and stories from ISSSource. CONSIDER THIS What other preventive measures should be taken to prevent a breach to an ICS?
DE3
|
MAY 2017
ndustrial control systems (ICSs), much to the industry’s chagrin, are not immune to data breaches, ransomware attacks, viruses, malware, insider attacks or any other form of assault. On top of that, there are some experts that say they need tangible proof attacks really happen. Well, there is. Just take a look at the Verizon 2016 Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR). The report details 16 common breach scenarios, and the cases are each told from the perspective of the stakeholders involved, such as corporate communications, legal counsel, or the human resources professional. In one poignant scenario, a manufacturer fell victim and had to get their house in order fairly quickly. Here is what the report said about this one incident: “A company, we’ll call Gator-Grasp Fasteners, retained the Verizon RISK Team to perform a health check of their industrial environment. This particular customer was in the business of fabricating specialized fasteners, which were required to pass very specific engineering requirements, such as meeting or surpassing certain strength, tensile stress, mechanical properties and material content thresholds. “At the onset of the health check, Gator-Grasp Fasteners’ automation engineers expressed skepticism and mild dissent, arguing that a “health check” was not necessary. In their many years of being on the job, the “patient” had always functioned well and had shown no signs of being “unhealthy.” So why mess with things? They assured their management that the operational technology (OT) environment was secure and that they expected there would be no significant findings. After all, the automation engineers were experts and they knew what they were doing. Nonetheless, management insisted and the automation engineers reluctantly agreed to work with the RISK Team.
CONTROL ENGINEERING
Not in my house
“As with any engagement, there was a kickoff meeting, which was used to introduce everyone, set initial expectations, discuss the in-scope environment, request additional information and schedule the onsite visit. “The requested information included a list of network segments, IP address ranges, IP address assignments, and an asset inventory. “The GatorGrasp Fasteners Team was instructed not to create any new documentation in order to avoid a situation where the creation of new documentation would potentially mask a procedural deficiency. In assembling the requested documentation, Gator-Grasp Fasteners quickly realized that what it did have was inadequate. “During the on-site visit, the automation engineers, the RISK Team’s critical infrastructure protection/cybersecurity (CIP/CS) specialists and other subject matter experts (SMEs) discussed the various OT systems, in-place security measures and other operational procedures. This included processes and practices (aka “institutional knowledge”) that are followed, but were not necessarily documented. These discussions revealed that over the past few months, the network seemed “sluggish,” which the automation engineers and SMEs attributed to older, legacy equipment. With an understanding of the situation in mind, we visited various locations where we walked the manufacturing floor and made additional observations. “One of the first things we noticed was some OT systems had anti-virus protection while others didn’t. For those that didn’t, we were told that, since they were isolated, they didn’t need protection. Incredibly, when we looked at the anti-virus logs on the OT systems that had malware protection, we found them replete with malware detections, deletions, and quarantine alerts. Of the 57 systems in total, 33 systems had at least one malware alert, and many had multiple alerts. www.controleng.com
“When we inquired about these alerts, we found that the automation engineers and operators were well aware. They reasoned that since the malware protection was correcting and “repairing” the problems, everything was acceptable. We explained that there was clearly an underlying problem leading to the repeat infections and recommended a more detailed review to identify the root cause.” Need logging
“Gator-Grasp Fasteners had no documented incident response (IR) process for investigating incidents, so we took the lead. The company did not have a centralized logging solution and what devices did log did not provide insight into how the malware was getting into the network. The problem? We needed more visibility. “With the cooperation of Gator-Grasp Fasteners, we set up a Switched Port Analyzer (SPAN) port and deployed a passive network analyzer to collect and analyze the traffic. Using indicators related to the identified malware, we reviewed network traffic and quickly identified multiple potentially infected systems. As we expected, the network traffic revealed malware infections associated with the legacy OT systems that did not have antivirus protection. Further analysis revealed that a number of misconfigurations existed —which had allowed unauthorized network communication. “The infected systems, many of which were very actively searching for new systems, were a good candidate for the “slow network” problems identified during earlier interviews. Using the collected network traffic, we ran statistics on data transfer rates and quickly realized that the scanning attempts were saturating legacy network connections with probes. With a concrete list of infected systems, we targeted the population of compromised endpoints. “Despite the widespread infection, GatorGrasp Fasteners had been fortunate. Review of the malware resident on each system revealed common drive-by infections, all targeted at stealing banking credentials. As none of the infected OT systems were utilized for anything other than process management, it was unlikely that further damage had occurred. The network trouble was an unintended side effect of the malware’s attempts to find new systems compounded with overly permissive firewall rules. “We provided a list of known infected systems to Gator-Grasp Fasteners, which quickly began rebuilding them from known good images. www.controleng.com
To keep remediated systems remediated during this process, we continued network traffic monitoring for known indicators and behaviors associated with the identified malware. With the current issue well on the path to being resolved, we turned our attention to the uninfected, but still “troubled” OT systems.” Verizon RISK team broke down some recommendations into three categories covering the company’s entire OT environment:
1. Unnecessary legacy systems in unmanned locations. These systems ended up removed from the network and decommissioned. These were difficult to track down as they were not documented, making them hard to find, which ultimately delayed the containment and eradication activities.
‘
Network traffic revealed malware infections associated with the legacy OT systems that did not have anti-virus protection; a number of misconfigurations had allowed unauthorized network communication.
’
2. Necessary legacy systems unable to end
up protected by an anti-virus solution. The RISK team manually removed the existing malware and the systems ended up hardened from a best practices standpoint. Stringent firewall rules ended up deployed to prevent access to and from these systems, designed to limit the reach of any future compromises.
3. New systems not patched or protected by an anti-virus solution. These computer systems ended up patched and malware protection installed. Best practices
Just as in the non-ICS world, a security incident can cause damage to brand reputation, loss of competitive advantage, legal or regulatory non-compliance issues, considerable financial damage, and harm to the environment and community. The biggest lessons learned could be summed up in one automation engineer’s comments: “…Well, being here for over 25 years, I thought I knew all the ins and outs. I didn’t CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| DE4
DIGITAL EDITION exclusive
NUMBERS: 30% of end users are seriously concerned about cybersecurity of wireless communications devices and protocols in their facilities. Source: Control Engineering 2016 Cybersecurity Study. More research: www.controleng.com/CE-research
consider documentation very important, but in the end, I realized, there was a lot that I didn’t know, and what I didn’t know ended up being a big part of the problem.” The RISK team found there were multiple corrective actions that Gator-Grasp Fasteners needed to take to shore up their detection, mitigation, and response efforts, including: Perform IR planning. An IR plan is critical to resolving security issues by providing direction and guidance to responders. Conduct first responder training. Train those most likely to identify security issues about the IR Plan; educate them to collect information and triage immediately. Harden OT systems. Devices with overly permissive default configurations should end up reviewed and unneeded configuration options disabled, to reduce the risk of misuse. Patch and patch often. Develop a patch management program to properly secure assets and networks. Security patches fix known vulnerabilities and mitigate the spread of malware. Use anti-virus/intrusion detection system (IDS) protection. Install a host-based
anti-virus solution or intrusion detection system on all IT/OT systems and keep the definitions up-to-date. Configure logging, monitoring and alerting. Centralize logging from all devices into one location and periodically review logs for signs of suspicious activity such as antivirus alerts, failed log-in attempts, or network communications involving external systems. Maintain IR/disaster recovery plans. It is essential to have well-documented and runtested IR and disaster recovery (DR) plans. If not, the response and recovery process will be disorganized, potentially incomplete, and take much longer. ce
Gregory Hale is the editor and founder of Industrial Safety and Security Source (ISSSource.com), a news and information Website covering safety and security issues in the manufacturing automation sector. This content originally appeared on ISSSource.com. ISSSource is a CFE Media content partner. Edited by Joy Chang, CFE Media, jchang@cfemedia.com.
eNewsletters
Control Engineering covers relevant topical articles in a variety of eNewsletters each and every month:
Energy Automation IIoT: Machines, Equipment and Asset Management IIoT: Operations and IT IIoT: Process Control and Automation Industrial Networking Information Control Machine Control New Products for Engineers Showcase Oil & Gas Engineering Process and Advanced Control
Process Instrumentation and Sensors Safety and Cybersecurity System Integration Whitepaper Connection Products For Engineers
PE Control Systems
SHOWCASE Process Manufacturing
Discrete Manufacturing
System Integration
Netwroking & Security
Info Management
Wednesday, October 22, 2015 One Chip. One Company. All Your Network Solutions. The netX network controller chip family from Hilscher integrates fieldbus and industrial Ethernets for transparent protocol conversion. One chip, 12 networks, 24 protocol stacks. All stacks have the same Driver Interface. Master stacks include FDT-based Configuration Tool. Register to learn more.
One Chip. One Company. All Your Network Solutions. Solutions Direct offers discounted prices on over 8,000 Electrical Enclosures and Thermal Management Products. Sizes range from 2” x 2” to 86” x 187” and meet NEMA/UL Ratings. Click to learn more.
On-demand webcasts
Kepware Releases KEPServerEX V5.16 with New Local Historian Plug-In The plug-in captures data at the source to prevent data loss and improve operational efficiency with an easy to configure, flexible, open, and cost-effective solution. Download a free Demo.
Engineers' Choice Awards finalists Official Engineers’ Choice ballots are open for voting for Control Engineering North American print and digital edition qualified subscribers. Based on your experience, vote for the best Engineers’ Choice finalists of 94 products in 26 categories. Vote Now!
One Chip. One Company. All Your Network Solutions.
It's never been easier to earn continuing education credits! Attend our 1-hour-long webcasts now available on-demand. Learn More.
The netX network controller chip family from Hilscher integrates fieldbus and industrial Ethernets for transparent protocol conversion. One chip, 12 networks, 24 protocol stacks. All stacks have the same Driver Interface. Master stacks include FDT-based Configuration Tool. Register to learn more.
Subscribe today by visiting
www.controleng.com/newsletters
2017_CE_eNews_HalfHorizontal.indd 1
1/3/2017 4:45:47 PM
stay informed Stay current with technology and trends in electrical, mechanical, instrumentation and automation.
To subscribe, visit
www.controleng.com/subscribe
MEDIA SHOWCASE FOR ENGINEERS Your place for new products, literature, Apps, Videos, Case Studies and White Papers.
CORD DROP
ROBUST AND STRONG IN FACTORY AUTOMATION
DISCONNECT SWITCHING SIMPLIFY DESIGN & STARTUP Switch-rated plugs and receptacles are ideal for cord drop applications. Technicians can easily deenergize equipment without having to wear cumbersome PPE and without having to climb a ladder to disconnect power.
The new GigE uEye FA
OFF Button
Provides push button circuit disconnection
IP65/67 WATERPROOF
SCREWABLE CONNECTOR
Safety Shutter
M12 CONNECTOR X CODING
Simplifies NFPA 70E compliance
UL Switch-Rated: Up to 200A, 75hp, 600V
®
meltric.com 800.433.7642
www.ids-imaging.com Input #100 at controlengineering.hotims.com
Input #101 at controlengineering.hotims.com
control-engineering-ids-ueye-le-usb3-gen1-customaximized-sixth-page.indd 20.04.2017 10:33:35 1
TMG Series New miniaturised fully encapsulated 7–50 Watt AC/DC power modules for PCB mount.
Want to receive your Control Engineering magazine as a
digital publication?
Update your subscription, and get our digital edition, on a more interactive and user-friendly platform, in your email in-box. Reliable. Available. Now. www.tracopower.com
Update now at:
Input #103 at controlengineering.hotims.com
58
|
MAY 2017
stay
informed Stay current with technology and trends in electrical, mechanical, instrumentation and automation.
To subscribe, visit
www.controleng.com
www.controleng.com/subscribe
Input #104 at controlengineering.hotims.com
Input #105 at controlengineering.hotims.com
ce2014_digitlEditn_6th.indd 1
CONTROL ENGINEERING
Input #102 at controlengineering.hotims.com
ce_stayInformed_6th.indd 1 2/24/2014 11:44:33 AM
2/24/2014 10:15:42 AM
www.controleng.com
MEDIA SHOWCASE FOR ENGINEERS Flexible Temperature Sensor Saves Time and Money
The WORM
Slimmest. Smartest. Easiest to Use.
Factory Automation: RS232/422/485/Profibus/Modbus/Bacnet/Tnet Industrial Ethernet (LAN): 10/100/1000 Mbps SCADA: Modem/Multiplexers/Point to Point/Multidrop Video/Audio/Data: CCTV Systems/Robotics Optical Hubs & Repeaters USB Modems Extended Temp. Range & Ruggedized Products
Limited Cabinet Space?
www.miinet.com/TheWORM 800-999-2900
FIBER OPTIC SOLUTIONS
Machine builders and OEMs your life just got a little easier. The new SDS-3008 smart switch fits into the tightest spaces and can be monitored over SCADA.
Toll Free 866-SITech-1 Phone 630-761-3640 Fax 630-761-3644 www.sitech-bitdriver.com Input #108 at controlengineering.hotims.com
www.moxa.com/smartswitch Demand Moore Reliability Input #106 at controlengineering.hotims.com
Input #107 at controlengineering.hotims.com
Webcasts
www.controleng.com/webcast
Control Engineering Webcasts help you obtain educational information on specific topics and learn about the latest industry trends. Check out some of our Webcasts on topics like: • Choosing sensors for the application • lloT series: OT/IT convergence, collaboration • lloT series: Edge, cloud, fog computing • lloT series: Maintenance optimization • System Integration case studies • lloT series: Network integration, cyber security • Motors and drives • Human-machine interface hardware, software
NEW PRODUCTS and software Automated checkweigher system for in-motion items Hardy Process Solutions’ Dynamic Checkweigher is a fully automated system designed to weigh items automatically in-motion. The checkweigher controller can communicate both upstream and downstream across the Connected Enterprise Network. Automated control is done with an embedded programmable logic controller (PLC) while communicating with the Hardy HI 4050CW check weighing controller. The checkweigher system can process between 20 to 350 pieces per minute. Each checkweigher has a stainless steel base and cabinet, for maximum durability and easy washdown. Flexible and highly accurate, it weighs products of virtually any shape or size in containers such as boxes, cans, bottles, rigid shrink-wrapped packages, or flexible packages. Hardy Process Solutions,
www.hardysolutions.com,
Input #200 at www.controleng.com/information
Touchless rotary angle sensor series Novotechnik’s RFC4800 series of touchless rotary angle sensors provide absolute, rotary position. They use a magnetic pickup to provide a touchless measurement range of 0 to 360 degrees and make measurements through air and non-magnetic materials. A magnetic pickup mounts to a shaft on users application with seven size markers available for dimensional flexibility and to optimize detection for different applications. Key specifications include ingress protection from liquids and dust up to the IP69K standard, resolution of 14 bits, and independent linearity of ±0.5%. Versions include CANopen and IO-Link, and they have an operating temperature range of -40 to 125°C. Novotechnik,
www.novotechnik.com,
Input #201 at www.controleng.com/information
Differential measurement system for space-limited applications Kaman Precision Products’ KD-5100 differential measurement system is designed to provide resolution to a nanometer of positional change and can be used for applications such as night vision systems, precision telescope positioning, fast steering mirrors (FSM) for space-based and airborne applications, and image stabilization systems. Featuring a small package size of 2 x 2.12 x 0.75 in., the KD-5100 is designed for applications where space is a limiting factor. The KD-5100 features rugged construction, with a mean time between failures of more than 238,000 hours in a space flight environment and 55,000 hours in a tactical environment. Kaman also offers a commercial version. Kaman Precision Products,
www.kamansensors.com
Input #202 at www.controleng.com/information
Power supplies for automation, process control applications XP Power’s DPC series of DIN rail ac/dc power supplies are available in 30, 50 and 70 W single output models, and they accept the universal input range from 90 to 264 V ac without the need for any input selector switches. Offering all the nominal output voltages from 5 to 48 V dc, the single output can be adjusted up to 30% of stated nominal to accommodate non-standard voltage requirements or to make up for line losses. All models feature a green LED to indicate output on. The DPC series is designed for applications such as include factory automation, process control and other industrial applications. It uses screw terminals for input and output connections. XP Power,
www.xppower.com
Input #203 at www.controleng.com/information
60
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
Data logger for profiling painted, powder-coated products Fluke’s Datapaq EasyTrack 3 system is a data logger designed to make profiling oven cure of painted and powder-coated products easier. The data logger has a polycarbonate casing that can withstand harsh treatment and heat up to 100°C without distortion and without harm to the electronics. Versions with four or six thermocouple channels are available. Data is stored in a non-volatile memory—the capacity has been tripled to up to 18,000 readings per channel. Calibration certificates stored aboard the logger can be printed anytime. For remote diagnostics, status data can be emailed to the manufacturer’s tech support. The software includes advanced analysis functions such as rise/fall, peak difference, area under curve calculation, marking of up to six oven zones in the temperature graph, a probe map for high repeatability, saved zooms for even more comfortable reviewing and sharing of data, and customized profile reports. Fluke,
www.fluke.com
Input #204 at www.controleng.com/information
www.controleng.com
See more products at http://gspplatform.cfemedia.com/pe.
Software package for schematic generation Eplan’s Cogineer is software package that generates schematics automatically and is designed to be a deployable tool for occasional users and power users alike. Expert knowledge about configuration or variant management isn’t required. A mechatronic rulebook and configuration interfaces can be put together without knowledge of any high-level programming languages. Cogineer can generate complete electro-technical documentation, which is designed to ensure error-free implementation of all defined rules and structures, guaranteeing high quality documentation and potentially shortening the entire order fulfillment timeline. Cogineer is integrated into the Eplan Platform, which allows users to create project data in another Eplan program and then generate the schematics using that data in Cogineer without duplication. Eplan,
www.eplanusa.com,
Input #205 at www.controleng.com/information
Surface sensing temperature measurement transmitter Emerson’s Rosemount X-well Technology surface sensing temperature measurement solution uses a Rosemount 3144P transmitter, designed for plants and facilities where wired networks are already installed, or where WirelessHART has not yet been deployed. X-well Technology works by measuring the pipe surface temperature and ambient temperature, and combining this information with an understanding of the thermal conductivity properties of the installation and process piping to produce an accurate process temperature measurement. It is designed to take the measurement without process intrusions or penetrations, allowing for quicker and easier installation along with simplified long-term maintenance. Wake frequency calculations are eliminated, as well as time spent determining material compatibility, the correct insertion length, and the necessary profile. Emerson,
www.emerson.com,
Input #206 at www.controleng.com/information
Combustion analyzer for hazardous conditions
Ruggedized dc/dc converter for harsh environments Traco Power’s THN 15WIR family of ruggedized dc/dc converters are designed for harsh environments and offer increased resistance against electromagnetic interference, shock/vibration, and thermal shock. They are ideal for harsh industrial environments, railway, and transportation systems. There are 27 models, and the input range satisfies a ±40% deviation of nominal required of today’s railway and transportation systems. These models feature I/O isolation of 3000 V dc and efficiency of 88-91% (model dependent). They have a full-load operating temperature range of -40 to 75°C (up to 90°C with load derating), input under-voltage-lockout, short circuit protection, remote on/off, and output voltage trim. Traco Power,
www.tracopower.com
Input #207 at www.controleng.com/information
www.controleng.com
The Thermox WDG-V combustion analyzer from Ametek Process Instruments is certified for Zone 1 hazardous locations, which allows the unit to operate in areas in which hazardous vapors and gases will continuously be present. The analyzer offers redundancy and diagnostics that provide end users with digitally transmitted information via Modbus and Ethernet that can be used to implement predictive and proactive asset management maintenance programs. The reliable detection of low-combustion oxygen and/or high combustibles (CO) in a fired heater or boiler is critical to the effectiveness of burner management systems. It is IEC 61508 capable of implementation into SIL-2 applications and is suitable for process streams up to 3200°F (1760°C). Ametek Process Instruments,
www.ametekpi.com
Input #208 at www.controleng.com/information
Ceramic chip resistors with metal foil TT Electronics’ MFC series of metal foil chip resistors are designed for current sensing duties in power electronics applications and can be used in industrial and medical applications. The parts are ideal for power supplies, dc/dc convertors, small motor drives, actuator drives, and lighting drives. The MFC resistors’ metal foil resistance material is bonded onto a 96% alumina substrate and features a protective coating that is resistant to all normal industrial cleaning solvents suitable for printed circuits. Metal foil on ceramic technology has better surge tolerance than thickfilm, offering improved reliability in the presence of current surges. The resistors’ operating temperature is -55 to 155°C. TT Electronics,
www.ttelectronics.com
Input #209 at www.controleng.com/information
CONTROL ENGINEERING
MAY 2017
| 61
NEW PRODUCTS and software See more products at http://gspplatform.cfemedia.com/pe.
Radar level transmitters with diagnostics and instrument verification Endress+Hauser’s Micropilot FMR5X free-space radar and FMP5X levelflex guided radar level transmitters feature Heartbeat Technology, which is an on-board diagnostics and instrument verification system. It is designed to continuously monitor the status of mechanical, electromechanical and electronic components in the sensor, and sends alerts when it detects a problem. Heartbeat Technology also is able to perform device verification in accordance with requirements of the pharmaceutical, food and beverage, oil and gas, chemical and other industries. Such requirements call for level instruments to be removed and calibrated unless in-situ verification proves the device is operating properly. Verification information, reports, diagnostics alerts and instrument data can be viewed at the control and monitoring system, or via a web browser running on a PC, tablet, or smartphone. Endress+Hauser,
www.us.endress.com/en,
Input #210 at www.controleng.com/information
PRODUCT & LITERATURE SHOWCASE Signal Conditioners & Ethernet I/O
www.Acromag.com/CE
877-295-7057
We have the experience to help you solve your monitoring and control challenges. Get your new product guide today 4-20mA Isolators & Splitters Ethernet, Modbus, Profibus I/O Input #102 at controlengineering.hotims.com
Input #100 at www.controleng.com/information
Bergotech Inc. We are looking for an experienced engineer in Process Instrumentation and Control to teach in the evening a university-based online course. This course is already loaded on the university server, and is part of the university’s Continuing Education program. The students attending such courses are typically working engineers, technologists, and designers. If you are interested, and for more information, please visit us at: http://www.bergotech.com - and, submit your resume to: info@bergotech.com.
Go online to view the weekly Top 5 Reader Favorites! www.controleng.com
eNewsletters
The topics covered in this online course are taught over sixteen 1-hour evening CE_ProdMart_JAN_Top5.indd 1 1/6/2016 sessions (spread into three parts over a calendar year) and cover: PART 1 - ISA Identification Symbols, Analyzer Systems Overview, as well as Flow, Level, Pressure and Temperature measurements. PART 2 - Control Loops, Programmable Electronic Systems (DCS, PLC, etc.), Alarm and Trip Systems (including SIS overview), Control Centers and Enclosures, and Control Valves. PART 3 - Engineering Design and Documentation, Installation, Project Implementawww.controleng.com/newsletters tion and Management, and Decision Making.
3:30:28 PM
Subscribe today by visiting:
Input #101 at www.controleng.com/information
62
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
www.controleng.com
Advertising Sales Offices ContentStream
Patrick Lynch, Director of Content Marketing Solutions 630-571-4070 x2210 PLynch@CFEMedia.com AL, FL, GA, MI, TN
ad index Company
Page#
RSN
Web
Allied Electronics . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 . . . . . . . . . . 5. . . . . . . .www.alliedelec.com AutomationDirect . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C2 . . . . . . . . . 1. . . . . . . .www.automationdirect.com Beckhoff Automation LLC. . . . . . . .17 . . . . . . . . 10 . . . . . . .www.beckhoff.com CFE Edu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .http://CFEedu.cfemedia.com CFE Media’s Global System Integrator Database . . . . . . . . . . . .44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .www.controleng.com/global-si-database CFE Media’s New Products for Engineers Database . . . . . . . . .42 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .www.controleng.com/NP4E COGENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .www.cogentdatahub.com Control Engineering Digital Reports. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .www.controleng.com Control Engineering Webcasts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .www.controleng.com/webcasts
Maggie Hatcher, Classified, Product Mart, Media Showcase 630-571-4070, x2221 MHatcher@CFEMedia.com AR, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MN, MO, MS, NE, ND, OK, OH, SD, TX, WI, Central Canada
Bailey Rice (630) 571-4070 x2206 BRice@CFEMedia.com AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY, Western Canada
Iris Seibert (858) 270-3753 ISeibert@CFEMedia.com CT, DE, MD, ME, MA, NC, NH, NY, NJ, PA, RI, SC, VA, VT, WV, DC, Eastern Canada
EZAutomation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Bellyband . . . . . . . . . . .www.EZAutomation.net
Julie Timbol (978) 929-9495 JTimbol@CFEMedia.com
IDS Imaging
Internation (outside U.S., Candada)
Development Systems . . . . . . . . . .19 . . . . . . . . 12 . . . . . . .www.ids-imaging.com IIoT Webcasts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .www.controleng.com/lloT Kepware Technologies . . . . . . . . . .1 . . . . . . . . . . 2. . . . . . . .www.kepware.com/CE LINEAR TECHNOLOGY . . . . . . . . . .11 . . . . . . . . . 7. . . . . . . .www.linear.com/SmartMesh Moore Industries - Intl. Inc . . . . . . .4 . . . . . . . . . . 4. . . . . . . .www.miinet.com Moxa Technologies . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 . . . . . . . . . . 3. . . . . . . .www.moxa.com Phoenix Contact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9, 15 . . . . . . 6, 9. . . . . . .www.phoenixcontact.com/confidence_relays Schneider Electric . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13 . . . . . . . . . 8. . . . . . . .www.schneider-electric.us/smartmachines SEW-EURODRIVE, Inc. . . . . . . . . . .C4 . . . . . . . . 20 . . . . . . .www.seweurodrive.com TRACO POWER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 . . . . . . . . .11 . . . . . . .www.tracopower.com Yaskawa America, Inc. . . . . . . . . . .C3 . . . . . . . . 19 . . . . . . .www.yaskawa.com
Inside Process Allied Moulded Products, Inc. . . . .P8 . . . . . . . . 18 . . . . . . .www.alliedmoulded.com CFE Media, Engineering Is Personal . . . . . . . . .P8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .www.controleng.com Emerson Automation Solutions . .P7 . . . . . . . . 17 . . . . . . .www.emersonprocess.com/operationsperformance Festo Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . .P6 . . . . . . . . 16 . . . . . . .www.festo.com Load Controls Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .P4 . . . . . . . . 14 . . . . . . .WWW.LOADCONTROLS.COM TDK-Lambda Americas Inc. . . . . . .P2 . . . . . . . . 13 . . . . . . .www.us.tdk-lambda.com WAGO Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .P5 . . . . . . . . 15 . . . . . . .www.wago.us
REQUEST MORE INFORMATION about products and advertisers in this issue by using the http://controleng.com/information link and reader service number located near each. If you’re reading the digital edition, the link will be live. When you contact a company directly, please let them know you read about them in Control Engineering. www.controleng.com
Stuart Smith +44 208 464 5577 stuart.smith@ssm.co.uk
CFE Media Contributor Guidelines Overview Content For Engineers. That’s what CFE Media stands for, and what CFE Media is all about – engineers sharing with their peers. We welcome content submissions for all interested parties in engineering. We will use those materials online, on our website, in print and in newsletters to keep engineers informed about the products, solutions and industry trends. www.controleng.com/contribute explains how to submit press releases, products, images and graphics, bylined feature articles, case studies, white papers, and other media. * Content should focus on helping engineers solve problems. Articles that are commercial in nature or that are critical of other products or organizations will be rejected. (Technology discussions and comparative tables may be accepted if non-promotional and if contributor corroborates information with sources cited.) * If the content meets criteria noted in guidelines, expect to see it first on our Websites. Content for our e-newsletters comes from content already available on our Websites. All content for print also will be online. All content that appears in our print magazines will appear as space permits, and we will indicate in print if more content from that article is available online. * Deadlines for feature articles intended for the print magazines are at least two months in advance of the publication date. Again, it is best to discuss all feature articles with the appropriate content manager prior to submission. Learn more at: www.controleng.com/contribute CONTROL ENGINEERING MAY 2017
| 63
6
BACK TO BASICS motor insulation
Six tips for testing motor insulation systems Insulation resistance (IR) tests are useful for motor insulation systems and users should take steps such as recording conditions and watching for factors that may have an impact on the test to ensure maximum accuracy.
A
Although there
MORE
ADVICE KEY CONCEPTS Insulation resistance (IR) tests are useful for determining whether a motor should be removed. During the test, the user should discharge for safety and accuracy and record important test conditions. Users should also be aware of factors that might affect the IR test. GO ONLINE Read this story online at www.controleng.com and see more tables associated with this story, as well as links to other stories from EASA. CONSIDER THIS What other aspects should users watch for while performing an IR test on a motor?
are many ways to assess motor insulation systems, the insulation resistance (IR) test remains a useful tool for determining if a motor should be removed from or placed into service. When conducting the test and evaluating the results, consider these six tips. 1. Discharge for safety and accuracy. Discharge the winding to ground before and after IR testing. A good rule of thumb is to ground the winding for 15 minutes or four times the test time, whichever is greater. 2. Winding configuration for testing. If possible, isolate and test each phase separately and ground the two phases not under test. This allows for testing of the phase-to-phase insulation as well as the ground insulation. 3. Record important test conditions. Document the ambient temperature, relative humidity, dew point, winding temperature, time since service, test voltage and connection arrangement. 4. Simple test procedure. Energize the winding for one minute at an appropriate voltage (see Table 1) and correct the measured IR value to 40°C by multiplying by a KT from Table 2, online. Most modern insulation falls under the “Thermosetting” category. Use the “Thermoplastic” values if you know it is a much older winding with an asphaltic or shellac mica system.
Table 1: Recommended dc voltages for insulation resistance tests Winding rated voltage V(a)
Insulation resistance test direct voltage (V)
<1000
500
1000-2500
500-1000
2501-5000
1000-2500
5001-12000
2500-5000
>12,000
5000-10,000
a: Rated line-to-line voltage for three-phase ac machines, line-to-line ground (earth) for single phase machines, and rated direct voltage for dc machines or field windings. Reference: IEEE Stds. 43, Table 1
Table 1 Guidelines for dc voltages to be applied during insulation resistance tests. Courtesy: EASA, IEEE
64
|
MAY 2017
CONTROL ENGINEERING
‘
Document the ambient temperature, relative humidity, winding temperature, and other
’
attributes in the test.
5. Watch for factors that can affect the IR test. During the test, watch out for these four factors that can have an impact on the test and its results: Surface contamination such as oil, dust and salts may be conductive, causing lower IR. Cleaning and drying the winding will usually improve the IR. If the winding temperature is at or below the dew point, moisture may accumulate on the surface, causing low IR values. When the winding is otherwise in good condition, drying will resolve this issue. Winding IR decreases when winding temperature increases, which is why correction to a baseline temperature is recommended. Voltage magnitude and existing charge also can affect IR, but selecting the voltage from Table 1 and following proper grounding practices before testing should eliminate this issue. 6. Evaluate the test results. Table 3 online shows the recommended values for the corrected IR. Lower values warrant further investigation before the unit is placed into service. Some machines do operate below these values. Having historical data on-hand is valuable. ce Mike Howell is a technical support specialist at the Electrical Apparatus Service Association (EASA), a CFE Media content partner. Edited by Chris Vavra, production editor, Control Engineering, CFE Media, cvavra@cfemedia.com. www.controleng.com
ACTION PACKED
At first glance, the Sigma-7SIEC is likely to fool you. You wouldnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t guess from its trim size that Yaskawa has packed a single-axis motion controller and a world class SERVOPACK servo amplifier into a space slimmer than most normal servo amps take up. That means less crowding in control cabinets, plus the easy familiarity of IEC61131-3 programming. Ready for more capability in less space? Take action by contacting a Yaskawa representative about Sigma-7Siec.
For more info: http://budurl.me/YAI1030
YASKAWA AMERICA
input #19 at www.controleng.com/information
DRIVES & MOTION DIVISION
YASKAWA.COM
1-800-YASKAWA
Byte Me! Go ahead...talk nerdy to us. We’ll byte back. That’s because our fieldbus cards and gateways can speak your language. We can also eliminate all of your C++ or C# programming. That’s right...no special language needed! Finally, you can easily and dramatically reduce the startup time on conveyors, hoists, turntables and many other applications. So, keep your bus and leave the driving to us.
seweurodrive.com / 864-439-7537 input #20 at www.controleng.com/information