Monday, A pr il 2 4 , 2 017
w w w. m u s t a n g n e w s . n e t
C a l P o l y, S a n L u i s O b i s p o
E s t a b l i s h e d 1916
$4,177
$4,128
Winners
SPENDING LIMIT
$3,000
$2,869
$2,696
Campaign expenses ($)
A first for ASI presidential elections
$1,783
Losers
$1,916
$1,867
$1,780
$1,000
$82 2013-14
2014-15
2016-17
2015-16
ASI PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN SPENDINGS BY TERM Total spending of each ASI presidential campaign by year
CAMPAIGN CASH CAP
PHOTO ILLUSTRATION BY BRENDAN MATSUYAMA, CHRIS GATELEY AND ZACK SPANIER | MUSTA NG NE W S
| The ASI Board of Directors have set a spending cap of $2,000 on presidential candidate elections for the first time at Cal Poly, making it the CSU with the highest spending limit.
Brendan Matsuyama @ CPMustangNews
This year’s Associated Students, Inc. (ASI) elections are the first to feature presidential campaign spending limits. The $2,000 spending limit was passed by the ASI Board of Directors Jan. 11 as part of the ASI Election Code. This spending limit only applies to presidential candidates; there is no cap for ASI Board of Directors candidates. Prior to this policy change, Cal Poly’s ASI was among the few at California State Universities
(CSUs) to not have a mandatory presidential spending limit outlined in its election code. Not including Cal Poly, the average presidential campaign spending cap for CSUs with mandatory limits is about $540. Including Cal Poly, this average was raised to about $628. Currently, Cal Poly’s spending limit of $2,000 is equivalent to about 10 cents spent per student. This is down from last year’s winner who spent approximately 17 cents per student. Over the past four years, the winner of the ASI presidential
election spent the most money on their campaign. Current ASI President and agricultural sciences senior Jana Colombini spent more than twice the amount her opponent, mechanical engineering senior Isaias Diaz, spent in last year’s election. The candidate who spent the most money since 2013 was Jason Colombini, who served as the ASI President during the 2013-14 school year, at $4,177. Candidate opinions A spending limit on presidential campaigns has been universally
supported by ASI presidential candidates. Riley Nilsen, ASI presidential candidate and agricultural sciences junior, stated that the new limit is one of the factors that enabled her to run. “I personally have only spent $1,200 as of [April 19],” Nilsen said. “If I had to spend more than $2,000, [I] more than likely wouldn’t be able to run as I am dependent on student loans, scholarships and my job to pay for my expenses. ... I have absolutely seen the difference in regards to the presence of elections on campus this year because of
limited marketing, and I hope the amount of candidates all together will help us reach our traditional voter turnout.” Other candidates advocate for decreasing the spending limit even further. Davis Negrete, ASI presidential candidate and biomedical engineering junior, proposes further lowering the cap to $200. This would tie Cal Poly with California State University, Monterey Bay for the lowest spending cap in the CSU system. CAMPAIGN SPENDING continued on page 2
Organic vs. conventional food: Is one better than the other? Maddie Reid Special to Mustang News
MEGAN FRIZZIE | COURTE SY PHOTO
DECREASE | Last year, Relay for Life raised $27,000. They have raised $3,000 so far this year.
Relay for Life committee extends outreach to SLO community Cassandra Garibay @ CPMustangNews
Year after year, students join the fight against cancer with the help of the Cal Poly Relay for Life committee. However, this year, Cal Poly students aren’t going to be the only ones fighting alongside the campus committee.
Consolidating In previous years, San Luis Obispo High School, San Luis Obispo county and Cal Poly held separate Relay for Life events. However, the American Cancer Society retired and combined several relay committees in a nationwide analysis of their spending efficiency verses funds raised for cancer research. This
is an ongoing process that has been in the making for several years, Relay for Life Community Manager Nicole Takeda said. Both the county and high school committees were not able to continue this year due to reevaluation. RELAY FOR LIFE continued on page 4
Nutrition senior Rachel Del Toro-Gipson owns a health and wellness blog called “Viva La Vegan.” However, she chooses not to spend extra money on organic produce. Organic foods have a reputation of being healthier and better for the environment than conventional foods, yet there is still some debate about whether they live up to that reputation. A 2014 Gallup poll found that 45 percent of Americans actively seek out organic foods, 15 percent actively avoid them and 38 percent don’t consider how their food is produced when shopping. What’s the difference? Organic food is grown without artificial chemicals. This includes avoiding the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) to alter the DNA of the plant seed to make the produce more appealing or larger. Conventional farming methods rely on synthetic chemicals
to create pesticides and antibiotics used for production and preservation. These chemicals are used in several ways, such as adding nutrients into the crop soil or enhancing crop seeds with GMOs. Organic farming methods avoid the use of most synthetic chemicals The Cal Poly preference Many Cal Poly students say they would prefer to eat organic food, but high prices and lack of availability are sometimes obstacles. “I think that it’s good to have [food] that isn’t necessarily super processed or has a lot of genetic modifications ... Definitely not having as many pesticides is a good thing because they don’t have a lot of long term studies on the effects of pesticides or how it will affect you,” Del Toro-Gipson said. Avoiding the use of synthetic chemicals to preserve produce and opting for a more natural way of production sounds like a better way to get food, so why doesn’t everyone jump on the organic food trend? VIVA LA VEGAN continued on page 4
DANI ORLANDI | MUSTA NG NE W S
News 1-3 | Arts 4-5 | Opinion 6 | Classifieds 7 | Sports 8
Layla Lopez RVG endorsed | ABM/NAMA endorsed
for CAFES Board of Directors
Vote April 26th 9am to April 27th 9am on your Poly Portal.