North Pointe Vol. 49, Issue 10 - March 15, 2017

Page 1

SPORTS PAGE 11 Senior Izzy Nguyen was named Jimmy John's athlete of the week. To read more go to page 11.

NORTH

POINTE COURTSEY OF IZZY NGUYEN

GROSSE POINTE NORTH HIGH SCHOOL

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 15, 2017

SI NC E 1968

Core of the discussion

Anti-Common Core legislation proposed to the Michigan House of Representatives Since 2010, Common Core has been a matter of controversy for the Michigan Board of Education and the nation. When it was introduced, it added new standardized testing requirements to the curriculum. Recently, an anti-Common Core bill was proposed to the Michigan House of Representatives. The bill attempts to give parents and families more control over which tests they take. However, some students do not see the current volume of standardized testing as an issue. Freshman Hannah Hicks is among them and supports the Common Core standards. “I feel like there’s a pretty good amount of standardized testing. It’s necessary for us so that we can learn,” Hicks said. “Every student should be able to take a standardized test to see where they are in their education and see if they need to retake something or take the test again so that they can move forward in their education." There have been several attempts at replacing the national education standards, but this one holds more promise than past attempts. If passed, House Bill 4192 will repeal the Common Core standards in Michigan and instead adopt a set of educational standards that were used in Massachusetts in the 2008-09 school year. Massachusetts is known for being a highly competitive state for public education, which is why the Michigan legislature looked to the state’s requirements as a guide. Republican Representative Gary Glenn introduced the bill on Feb. 9. It includes a section that would give students’ parents the authority to opt their child out of “public school and out of any public

school activity, practice, or testing that the parent finds unacceptable with no negative repercussions.” This allows parents to have more control over their children’s education and make it more individualized to meet a student’s needs. But, it also becomes an issue not only in assessing school-wide achievement, but in School Accountability Scorecard measures, which Deputy Superintendent Jon Dean explains is the ranking system used by the Michigan Department of Education based on the percentage of students who attend a mandated standardized testing day. “Currently parents can elect to opt their children out of state mandated assessments such as the M-STEP. The challenge for schools is that assessments are used by schools, like GPPSS, to gauge how we are doing on our primary goal, student learning. When large numbers of students opt out, it becomes more difficult for us to gauge how our students are doing,” Dean said. “Also, certain state accountability measures such as accreditation are predicated on a school testing a set percentage of students. If too many students do not take the assessments, schools could experience negative consequences.” English teacher Charles Crimando also has some concerns regarding the ability of parents to opt their children out of tests. “I think that would affect education greatly because it would be removing the expertise of the teachers and the administration, essentially, a little bit from the equation of what is going to make a successful student in our century,” Crimando said. “I think that that’s a little concerning that a parent could come in and decide that this assessment or

By Lindsey Ramsdell, Amber Braker & Sofia Ketels EDITOR-IN-CHIEF & STAFF REPORTERS

that assessment is useless for (his or her) child. That would change the dynamic of the classroom greatly. That’s going to change the way that we grade things. That would change the way that we teach things. I think it would make things far more difficult to navigate.” This bill holds more weight than previous attempts to do away with federal e d u c a t i o n standards in Michigan because of the Trump Administration’s initiative against the Common Core and the support of newly elected Republican members to the Michigan State Board of Education. Common Core was enacted with the prospect of creating comprehensive, consistent and rigorous standards for public education across the nation, according to Dean. It is also meant to prepare students to enter the workforce or a two- to four-year university after high school. Crimando said most of the Common Core curriculum standards are reasonable. He also appreciates that it gives teachers themselves room to adapt their lesson plans as long as they are providing their students with the skills that Common Core requires. However, he acknowledges the demand for

a more localized approach. “I think it’s hard to place common objectives on any nation-wide group of students, and I think that’s why states like to have a little more control, so I kind of understand that aspect of (repealing) it. You want to have control over what’s going on in your locality because you probably understand those students a little bit better. So there are benefits to it, but there are also some downsides.” The goal of localizing education is reflected in the very method of passing OM K R .C House Bill 4192. Even if it is enacted FL I C by the state, adopting the Massachusetts standards would still be voluntary to each district. After watching the district’s smooth transition to Common Core in the 201011 school year, Dean said that whichever direction the state decides to take will not have a significant impact on district education. “If the State of Michigan elects to move away from the Common Core, I think it will have little impact on GPPSS. GPPSS already has incredibly rigorous and extensive standards for all students,” Dean said. “I would imagine that our expectations will continue to exceed any standards adopted by the State of Michigan.”

Teachers adapt cell phone policies to meet classroom needs By Trevor Mieczkowski & Katelynn Mulder ASSISTANT EDITORS As time goes on, technology is continuing to advance. With such advancements, we are forced to incorporate cell phones into our everyday lives. However, because of how involved technology is in the world today, some teachers restrict its use in class, and administration has taken steps to ensure students are appropriately using it. Math teacher Julie Pappas said that when students use cell phones in class, they experience a break in concentration that hinders their learning. Pappas does not allow cell phones in her classroom. “I've been here 15 years, and they didn't have a lot of cellphones when I first started, and I noticed that students really used their class time wisely, doing their homework and asking questions many, many years ago,” Pappas said. “Now, as the years have progressed, students are more interested in playing on their phones, or watching Netf lix, or doing anything but using the time that they are given to work on their classwork or their homework.” Math teacher Brad Armbruster has a similar policy. He said that he expects students to put their phones in their backpacks, pockets or purses before they enter his room and keep them put away until class ends.

“Let’s put this issue in perspective,” Armbruster said. “Is it considered strict to ask my students to refrain from touching their phones for 49 minutes? If so, then perhaps my ‘no phone’ policy is also serving as a first step to phone addiction rehab.” An article from www.edweek.com details the ‘addiction’ Armbruster refers to. It compares drug addiction to the controlling effect cell phones have on a student’s life, even though they may claim they have the ability to multitask— using a phone and listening at the same time. However, many studies have debunked that theory. Mark Trupkovich is the head of the technology department and helps monitor what students do while on the school WiFi. He said that the school administrators have the authority to monitor and even confiscate students’ phones if the content is deemed inappropriate for school or a threat to the school’s technology system. “We will get notifications if something like that is happening, if they are doing something illegal, or they are raising a f lag, let’s say like breaking a firewall,” Trupkovich said. “We will get their device ID, and we will report it to the principal, and again, it depends on what they are doing on the device.” According to Trupkovich, if you are posting something that the administration sees as inappropriate, the consequences are

EDITORIAL - PAGE 9

up to them, like if a student is wearing an inappropriate outfit, they’re breaking the school rules. “They have a right to investigate, so you’re asking why can they look through my phones, and it is because they need to gather more evidence of what was alleged,” Trupkovich said. However, while it’s common for students to use their phones to chat with friends during class, class policies and consequences are largely left up to the teachers. Social studies teacher Patrick Hicks said that phones are a distraction not only to the

IN-DEPTH PAGE 10

"Whether you're first class or coach, no one wants to be on a ship whose crew members want it to sink." CHLOE RIBCO

@thenorthpointe www.northpointenow.org

VOLUME 49 | ISSUE 10

News.......... 2 Calendar... 3

On Campus... 4 Life.................... 5-6

Physics held their annual cardboard boat regatta on Tuesday, Feb. 28. To see more head to page 10.

On Pointe... 7 Reviews.... 8

ALL PHOTOS BY TREVOR MIECZKOWSKI

student, but to others around that student. He deducts responsibility points (part of a student’s grade) and may even confiscate their phones if it becomes an issue. CONTINUED ON PAGE 2

FLEX - PAGE 6 “Everyone was so friendly and accepting, whether you’re from a Democratic or Republican family, like it was very open and really cool.” Editorial..... 9 In-Depth.... 10

Sports...11-12


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
North Pointe Vol. 49, Issue 10 - March 15, 2017 by North Pointe - Issuu