A.3 COMPUTATION/GENERATION Impact of Computation There is a difference in “computation” and “computerisation”. The human imagination and creativity, although powerful, is still limited to a certain extent. Human ideas are als often subconsciously influenced by cultures, previous experiences, education, emotions which sometimes limit what could have been explored and experimented with. Humans often work subjectively, affected by many variety of external environment, factors that we do not even realise sometimes. Michael Hansmeyer in his TED talk, explained that if we could remove all these bias in us, what could we have possibly designed? In his projects, he attempts to explore this using the mathematical logic of algorithm. Perhaps it is because computers are the machines that helps remove the subconscious bias of humans. It works on fixed and finite set of information which we consciously set and ensure that it is not affected by personal factors. When impersonal, these computers could generate a great amount of unimaginable forms not possible by humans. It allows for so much more explorations of form which we would have otherwise limit ourselves to. Essentially, we are not designing the form, but the process. In the design of columns by Hansmeyer, he did not imagine the end result of the forms of the columns, and this is a form of computational design. The complexity of the folds is too detailed for the human imagination that we could not have possibly imagined every detail (or we might have to take a long time to do so).
As mentioned in the previous week, computational design impacts greatly on the design process. It shift from being more traditional to integrated. This also impacts on the structure of some contemporary architectural firm. Technical skills of computational programs has become one of the most important skills in designing. However, not all designers are skilled in technical aspects and vice versa. This is a challenging problem as technical skills are extremely important in. This is similar to the traditional approach to architecture where skills of hand drawing is essential. Can architects still design if they do not have the sufficient skills? We have moved on so much from hand drawing to computeraided design (CAD). In the context of Studio Air, our chosen method of representation is through logic of algorithm. As not everyone is skilled at both designing and technical skills, architectural firms have restructured to allow both aspects to overlap. As explained by Peters, there are 4 types of structure: 1) Specialist group - an internal specialist group where designers will also be integrated in design process (to certain degree depending on each project)
2) External specialist consultancy - independent practices where architectural firms will hire them without having an If that is the case, who are the designers? Humans or the internal specialist group. computers? 3) Computationally aware & integrated practice - where both Since we do not actually design the forms, are we designing and computational techniques are integrated designers of the objects? If computers are doing the together. work, wouldn’t designing be passed to the computers? Computers work on finite and unambiguous set of rules. 4) Lone software developer/designer - hybrid designer/ For example, 1+1=2. The inputs are definite and exact engineer where they create their own software which produces the specific output, hence computers will have to follow the rules of the input and have only The ideal situation would be where designing and certain output. We, humans, on the other hand, are the computatational techniques becomes a natural combination. ones making a decision on tweaking and changing For example, the traditional hand drawing was thought to be the input which then produces a different output. For the default skills needed for designing.It is hoped that one day, example, changing it to 1.1+1= 2.1. Therefore, although computational design would be as important as hand drawing we do not explicitly design a form, the power of making was in the past and only then, “we no longer need to discuss a decision still lies in us and hence, it is us that controls digital design as something different” and “computation the machines. Therefore, computational programs are becomes a true method of design for architecture”. We are still essentially just a tool that helps make our job easier and not at that stage yet as computer design is adopted mostly faster. However, the choice of tools that we are using, by younger contemporary architects. The older generation makes an impact on our design. Understanding how of architects might still not be familiar However, we are the inputs affect the outputs is known as algorithmic developing and perhaps in the future, computer design will be the “true method”. thinking.