OSU CAR - External Advisory Board, April 1, 2022

External Advisory Board Meeting April 1, 2022

Welcome and State of the Center Giorgio Rizzoni Director Center for Automotive Research

2

Agenda 10:00 a.m. Welcome and State of the Center

10:25 a.m. Report on Regional Technology Hub 10:40 a.m. College of Engineering Update 10:50 a.m. Research Activity Updates 11:15 a.m. BREAK 11:30 a.m. Research Activity Updates cont’d

12:00 p.m. Partnerships in Mobility 12:30 p.m. ERIK Update 12:45 p.m. Blaser Award 12:55 p.m. Lunch and Networking 3

Together as Buckeyes • Masks are now optional in most indoor spaces across campus • Ohio State positivity rates well below 1% • More than 93% of Ohio State community members are vaccinated

4

Recognitions

2 Led by Qadeer Ahmed, Ohio State is the primary research university supporting the PACCAR team, one of 5 teams chosen by the DOE for the SuperTruck 3 initiative.

PhD candidate Deb Banerjee, advised by Professor Ahmet Selamet, was selected as a recipient of The Ohio State University Presidential Fellowship.

3 Professor Ümit Özgüner received the 2021 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Society Lifetime Achievement Award.

5

Recognitions

PhD candidate Pranav Sriganesh, advised by Professor Ahmet Selamet, placed first in the 2021 SAE Noise and Vibration Conference and Exhibition, Student Paper Competition.

Research Associate Professor Qadeer Ahmed received the SAE Forest R. McFarland Award recognizing individuals for their outstanding contributions towards SAE engineering events.

CAR Research Scientist CG Cantemir and Materials Science and Engineering Professor Michael Sumption were awarded by ARPA-E for their project Cryogenic Thermal Management Of High Power Density Motors And Drives.

Promotions and New Hires

David Perez Software Engineer Joined CAR Nov. 2021

Danny Freudiger Instructional Development Specialist Joined CAR Feb. 2022

Xiaoling Chen Research Associate 2 Joined CAR May, 2021

7

Promotions and New Hires

Darrin Orr Promoted to Facilities Manager Oct. 2021 backfill Frank Ohlemacher retired Feb. 2020

Sarah Vanadia Associate Business Manager backfill Layla Mohmmad-Ali retired Dec. 2021

Max Wright Student Projects Program Director new position to backfill previous role in combination with Darrin’s former duties anticipated April 2022 8

Promotions and New Hires

Manfredi Villani Sr. Research Associate promoted from Research Associate 2 anticipated April 2022

Kaveh Khodadadi Sadabadi Research Associate 2 promoted from Research Assistant anticipated April 2022

9

Politecnico di Milano

11 Visiting Scholars During the 2021-2022 academic year

University of Brescia

Hyundai in South Korea Politecnico di Torino

…

10

Facilities

3 New administrative office space to accommodate hybrid work schedules

Updated flooring in Energy Storage Lab

Updated flooring and lighting in Machine Shop

Front office renovations

11

Facilities

Thank you, Darrin, Max, Bill and Jim!

Upcoming projects: • Collaborative research suite • Front office renovation • Administrative conference room • PI office upgrades 12

Continuing Education Marcello Canova Associate Director Graduate and Continuing Education

13

Preparing practicing engineers for success in the automotive, transportation, energy and mobility industry Twenty-five years of specialized engineering education offered to industry partners, leveraging CAR research and Ohio State engineering courses

CAR curriculum has evolved from individual engineering courses to specialized certificates and customized educational products that fit diverse training and professional educational needs

Accredited, world-renowned Ohio State faculty bridge the gap between academia and industry Expanded offerings in Electrification and CEUs available 14

Curriculum CAR’s curriculum offers topics of strategic interest to industry, such as powertrain electrification and energy storage systems, powertrain dynamics and control, advanced modeling and simulation methods.

Graduate credit courses can be taken individually, transferred and/or utilized to pursue a graduate degree (MS or Ph.D.).

Credit and non-credit offerings can be combined into Certificates, which provide a comprehensive, focused and cutting-edge analysis of emerging new technologies in a specialized program.

Certificates in Electrification, Powertrain Modeling and Control are available.

15

Curriculum

Customized non-credit programs combine online content with live instructor-led sessions and labs.

New non-credit short courses in Electrification: •

Intro to Powertrain Electrification (Prof. G. Rizzoni)

•

Energy Storage Systems (Prof. M. Canova)

•

Electric Machines (Prof. J. Zhang)

•

Power Electronics for Automotive Applications (Prof. J. Wang)

16

Partners

17

Customized Electrification Programs

1 Four hybrid (online with 2 live sessions weekly) short courses for 235 engineers: •

Intro to Powertrain Electrification

•

Energy Storage Systems

•

Electric Machines

•

Power Electronics for Automotive Applications

•

Two new advanced seminars (Battery Testing and Motor Control/EMC/EMI)

Graduate-level courses and certificate programs

2 Summer School in Advanced Propulsion Systems and Electrification: •

Offered live (99P Labs) in Summer 2021 to 75 associates

Workshop on Li-ion Battery Modeling and Calibration •

3 Three hybrid (online with live Q&A) short courses scheduled for Summer 2022: • Gear Design & Analysis • Electric Machines • Intro to EMI/EMC

Offered Winter 2022 (Online) 18

Report on Regional Technology Hub Giorgio Rizzoni Director Center for Automotive Research

19

Regional Technology Innovation Hubs Two pending bills awaiting conference, the COMPETES Act (H.R. 4521) and the US Innovation of Competition Act (S.1260), would establish a new program to be administered by the Department of Commerce The goal of the Regional Technology and Innovation Hub Program would be to develop and implement regional strategies in order to: • •

Enable the US leadership in technology and innovation sectors that are critical to national and economic security Support regional economic development and resilience, including small cities and rural areas, and promote increased geographic diversity of innovation across the United States

•

Promote benefits of technology development and innovation for all Americans, including underserved and vulnerable communities

• •

Support domestic job creation and broad-based economic growth Improve the pace of market readiness, industry maturation, and overall commercialization of innovation research

20

Regional Technology Innovation Hubs Desired Outcomes/Metrics

Potential Federal Funding

➢ Domestic job creation

➢ 10-20 Hubs funded over 5 years

➢ Business formation and expansion, entrepreneurship

➢ $150M/Hub, first 2 years

➢ Increased supply chain resilience

➢ $300-$400M, final 3 years

➢ Research, development, and deployment of critical technology

➢ Figures uncertain until appropriation legislation

➢ Workforce training and development

➢ Cost-share will be required ➢ Hubs will need long-term business plans to sustain impact beyond federal funding

Key Features ➢ Hubs must be cross-sector consortia (e.g., industry, universities, state/local government, economic development agencies, non-profits, finance, education orgs) ➢ Hub activities must be regional (multiple states) ➢ The main goal is economic development (this would be administered by DOC’s Economic Development Agency) 21

Intel Announces Next US Site in Ohio •

Intel initial investment of more than $20 billion in construction of two new leading-edge chip factories

•

Will help boost production to meet surging demand for advanced semiconductors

•

“Intel’s new facilities will be transformative for our state, creating thousands of good-paying jobs in Ohio manufacturing…” Gov. DeWine

•

On March 28, 2022, U.S. Senate approves $52B chips bill •

Two decades ago, the U.S. produced nearly 40% of all chips while today it accounts for only 12% of global production.

•

The Senate vote moved the U.S. “one step closer toward revitalizing American semiconductor manufacturing…”

U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo

22

Smart Mobility at Ohio State The OSU Enterprise for Research, Innovation and Knowledge (ERIK) has established a Smart mobility task force with the objective to assess our collective strengths and determine gaps in the areas that, with modest investment, could significantly strengthen our capabilities and competitiveness in the national arena.

Photo Credit Hyundai Motor Company

23

Thank You Giorgio Rizzoni (rizzoni.1@osu.edu)

24

College of Engineering Update Ayanna Howard Dean College of Engineering

25

Research Activity Updates

26

FTA Low and No Emissions Transit Program Proposed Scope Under the New Legislation = > Approved in IIJA 11/15/2021!!!

• Capital Investment In Facilities Supporting the Testing of Low and No Emissions Vehicles and Components • Component Assessment Program – Testing For Industry • Directed Research - In support of low or no emission vehicles as well as new and emerging technology components intended for use in low or no emission vehicles.

27

FTA Low and No Emissions Transit Program Directed Research – Early Project Targets • Real world range of electrified transit vehicles • Effect of driver behavior on energy consumption -> driver training • Development of future testing standards for electrified and automated transit technologies

28

ADD A HEADING TO MATCH YOUR ICON Add context here to match your heading and icon.

CAR Expansion

ADD A HEADING TO MATCH YOUR ICON Add context here to match your heading and icon.

ADD A HEADING TO MATCH YOUR ICON Add context here to match your heading and icon.

Photo credit pharmaceutical-technology 29

EV Battery and Alternative Fuels Safety Research Program David Cooke Senior Associate Director Center for Automotive Research 30

ADD A HEADING TO MATCH YOUR ICON EV Battery and Alternative fuel Safety Research Opportunities

Add context here to match your heading and icon.

ADD A HEADING TO MATCH YOUR ICON Add context here to match your heading and icon.

ADD A HEADING TO MATCH YOUR ICON Add context here to match your heading and icon.

Components of the program • Market research – technology trends, market penetration, standards, best practices • Assessment of installed testing capacity • Needs assessment and recommendations for laboratory expansion 31

ARPA-E NEXTCAR 2 STUDENTS: Karinne Bernanke, Shobhit Gupta, Olivia Jacome, Griffin Leisenring, Mayur Patil, Jacob Paugh RESEARCH STAFF: David Cooke, Stefano D’alessandro, Dennis Kibalama, Matteo Spano, Ekim Yurtsever FACULTY: Giorgio Rizzoni, Marcello Canova, Shawn Midlam-Mohler, Stephanie Stockar, Punit Tulpule 32

NEXTCAR 2 – Main Tasks Objective: 30% Efficiency Improvement over Baseline (Level 0)

1

2

3

AI-BASED OSU CAV CONTROL

VIRTUAL VALIDATION

IN-VEHICLE IMPLEMENTATION

Adaptive to changing route conditions,

• •

Comprises of VD&PT optimization (Eco-driving) and Auxiliary Load Optimization (Eco-aux).

•

Efficiently integrate V2V/V2I information.

• Simulation framework for Reinforcement Learning training, •

Validation of OSU control in real-world scenarios using a well-calibrated traffic simulator.

Upfit Chrysler Pacifica with L4 functionality,

• •

Integrate OSU controls with Autonomous Vehicle (AV) stack.

33

NEXTCAR 2 Vehicle The demonstration vehicle is a 2021 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid (PHEV).

This requires the extension of the NEXTCAR 1 algorithm to charge depleting operations.

34 Anselma, P. G., et al., Accelerated sizing of a power split electrified powertrain. SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0843, 2020.

Pittel, M., Martin, D., eFlite dedicated hybrid transmission for Chrysler Pacifica . SAE Technical Paper No. 2018-01-0396, 2018.

The equations describing the powertrain are: Road load equation:

𝑑𝑉𝑣𝑒ℎ 1 2 = 𝐹𝑅𝐿 − 𝜌𝐶𝑑 𝐴𝑓 𝑉𝑣𝑒ℎ − 𝐶𝑟 𝑀𝑣𝑔 𝑑𝑡 2 State of charge of the battery: 𝑑 𝐼𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑡 𝑆𝑂𝐶 = − 𝑑𝑡 𝐶𝑛𝑜𝑚 Kinematic equations of the PGS: 𝑁𝑆 + 𝑁𝑅 𝑉𝑣𝑒ℎ 𝑁𝑅 𝜔𝑀𝐺1 = 𝜔𝐼𝐶𝐸 − 𝜏𝐹𝐷 𝑁𝑆 𝑅𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑁𝑆 𝑁𝑆 1 𝑁𝑀𝐺2 𝑁𝑆 𝑇𝑀𝐺1 = − 𝑇𝐼𝐶𝐸 = 𝑅𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝐹𝑅𝐿 + 𝐹𝐵 − 𝑇𝑀𝐺2 ) 𝑁𝑆 + 𝑁𝑅 𝜏𝐹𝐷 𝑁𝑇 𝑁𝑅 𝑀𝑒𝑞

Simplified Powertrain Model A model that describes all the operating modes of the Chrysler Pacifica has been developed.

𝑇𝐼𝐶𝐸 = 𝑇𝐼𝑀𝐸𝑃𝑔 𝜔𝐼𝐶𝐸 − 𝑇𝑃𝑀𝐸𝑃 𝜔𝐼𝐶𝐸 , 𝑇𝐼𝑀𝐸𝑃𝑔 − 𝑇𝐹𝑀𝐸𝑃 𝜔𝐼𝐶𝐸 , 𝑇𝐼𝑀𝐸𝑃𝑔

𝑇𝐼𝑀𝐸𝑃𝑔 is the control input: • Can only be non-negative; • When zero: vehicle is assumed operating in EV mode.

Pumping and friction torques are assumed speeddependent 35

Offline, Full Route Optimization of VD&PT Control:

• Objective: Nonlinear, distance-based trajectory optimization problem to minimize the vehicle fuel consumption and travel time over an entire route (same formulation in ARPA-E NEXTCAR 1): • A tuning weight 𝛾 is considered to trade-off the two objectives in the cost function: Cost Function:

VD&PT Optimization Extension to the PHEV problem.

States and Inputs:

Vehicle velocity MG2 torque

Battery SOC

Engine firing torque

Engine speed

Constraints:

36

Selected route with random traffic and SPaT [*]

Inclusion of Traffic for Eco-Driving Effect of traffic and traffic light patterns on energy consumption

Distribution of Fuel Economy for Baseline and Fuel Economy Percent gain of DP-ECMS over Predictive Controller (DP_ECMS)[*] Baseline [*]

• Variation of speed limit for various traffic light patterns and traffic conditions • Even with similar driver-style, the energy consumptions is greatly dependent on traffic light and traffic conditions • Need to incorporate realistic traffic behavior for DRL-based value function approximation 37

[*] Pérez,W.; Tulpule, P.; Midlam-Mohler, S.; Rizzoni, G. Data-Driven Adaptive Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy for Hybrid Electric and Connected Vehicles. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2705. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052705

Vehicle Counts for each entry/exit

DUAROUTER

ODOT AADT Data

SUMO Traffic Model Random vehicles & trips

Queue length Lead vehicle speed SPAT of next traffic light

SPAT

Virtual Testing in Calibrated Traffic Environment SUMO and ODOT Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) data are used to calibrate traffic volumes (low, medium, high) for each route.

Co-simulation Environment: 38 • Leveraging calibrated SUMO traffic models to co-simulate driver behavior for Baseline EDM Driver, Eco-Driver

• Methodology is extendible to simulate traffic during track-testing.

Sample route used for calibration with defined traffic entry and exit points

Virtual Testing in Calibrated Traffic Environment Traffic Flow Calibration: • Traffic flows for a given route calibrated for low, medium and heavy traffic conditions to match (AADT) data for the route 39

Windows

Linux

Environment Simulator

ROS Bridge LiDAR Point Scan

Enabling SAE L4 Automation Capabilities Virtual validation framework for evaluation of vehicle automation features using open-source AV stack

Vehicle Commands

HD Map

Unity Scene Developer Tools

PCD Map

Co-simulation Environment: • Generating a digital replica of the driving environment to evaluate automation functionalities e.g., Localization, path planning and vehicle control • Integration of software hooks to implement custom path planning algorithms i.e., OSU VD+PT optimizer • Integration of traffic information from calibrated SUMO environment 40

Thank You Stephanie Stockar stockar.1@osu.edu

Shawn Midlam Mohler midlam-mohler.1@osu.edu

42

AutoDrive Challenge II Qadeer Ahmed Faculty Advisor Buckeye AutoDrive Student Team

43

Buckeye AutoDrive Student Team

Ohio State students will develop and demonstrate an autonomous vehicle (AV) that can navigate urban driving courses as described by SAE Standard (J3016™) Level 4 automation

• The 4-year STEM focused challenge kicked off on September 30, 2021 • 10 teams including Ohio State • Areas of focus in Year 1 (In the order of importance) • Perception • Safety • Perception Cart demo (HW/Sensors/CAN) • Innovative solutions for emission and containment • AV Controls and simulation • Project Management • M-City will be testing playground • 1st year with Perception cart • 2nd year onwards with Bolt EUV

Student Team Composition MAE

ECE

2

CSE

3

Total: 6 students

Total: 25 Students

Total: 8 students

1 PhD student

2 PhD students

3 PhD students

2 MS students

17 MS students

5 MS students

3 BS students

7 BS students

0 BS students

ME Advisors: Qadeer Ahmed, Giorgio Rizzoni

ECE Advisor: Lisa Fiorentini

CSE Advisor: Harry Chao 45

First year timeline NOVEMBER-DECEMBER ’21 Hardware selection and acquisition, Fall Checkpoint Deliverables, Perception algorithm Development, Controls development, Research for mobility innovation Challenge 1

SEPT-OCT ’21 Project Kickoff, Recruitment of Students for Project, Work Breakdown and Planning, Training

FEBRUARY’22 Perception algorithm Development, Controls development, Winter Workshop, System Safety guide development

JANUARY ’22 Hardware acquisition, Perception algorithm Development, Controls development, Research for mobility innovation Challenge 1, Midpoint Checkpoint deliverables, Winter Workshop

APRIL ’22 Complexity reduction and performance improvement of Perception Algorithms, Mobility innovation challenge 2, System Safety

MARCH ’22 Performance and Complexity analysis of Perception Algorithm, MATLAB Simulation and control algorithm development, System Safety analysis

JUNE ’22 Year 1 Final competition

May ’22 Perception model deployment and Integration, CAN bus deployment and testing CAN signals, Final Deliverables of PM, Mobility innovation and System Safety.

46

Year 1 Goals Concept Design for Perception Cart • Onboard computer selection • CAN setup and debugging • Camera Calibration • Joint LiDAR & Camera Calibration Perception • Highway signs and objects, Intersection traffic light and Dynamic object challenges • Dataset generation and its labeling • ML based model development MathWorks Simulation Challenge • Waypoint Following • Interaction with traffic lights and signs, decision logic • Collision Avoidance

Object Detection Sensors Camera LiDAR …

Car

Detector

Lane Detection Sensors Camera LiDAR …

Distance? Interactive? Status?

Traffic light

Detector

Distance? Direction? Velocity?

Speed Sign Distance? Limit?

Stop Sign Distance?

Vehicle Dynamics

47

Year 1 Goals Systems Safety • Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) • Single Element Fault Analysis (SEFA) • Safety Concept Report (SCR) Mobility Innovation Challenge • Prevent or detect/remove a contaminate from the autonomous vehicle sensors • Maximize their return of investment on the autonomous vehicle • Evaluate and optimize the power consumption of electrical systems including the sensors and Compute platform 48

Thank You Qadeer Ahmed ahmed.358@osu.edu

49

Break

50

Upcoming Connected Communities Project @ Ohio State Jordan D. Clark, PhD Assistant Professor College of Engineering 51

High-Level Overview Demonstrate how groups of gridinteractive efficient buildings combined with other types of DERs can reliably and cost effectively serve as grid assets by strategically deploying efficiency and demand flexibility.

US Department of Energy “Connected Communities” FOA • Led by Buildings Technology Office • Vehicles TO • Solar Energy TO • Office of Electricity

Award • 10 teams selected • OSU only university selected • 5 year project starting ~now • Final budget $4.9M federal + $2.1M cost share = $7M

52

“These projects will help universalize technology that can maximize the efficiency and sustainability of America’s nearly 130 million buildings and make significant headway in the fight against climate change.”

- Jennifer M. Granholm, US Secretary of Energy 53

DOE Goals •

Show how buildings can reliably and costeffectively serve as grid assets

•

Decreased time and disruption for set up

•

Increased insights on occupant impact, comfort, willingness to change timing of energy use

•

New business models for demand flexibility and DER coordination, aggregation and optimization

•

Online solutions portal with case studies, best practices, analysis and associated analytical tools 54

Assets automated BUilding Control with Knowledge of distributed EnergY resources and Electrical Systems for Grid Offerings

(BUCKEYES GO!)

• • • •

20 centrally connected and controlled buildings 65k ft2 photovoltaics, 29 EV charging stations Combined heat and power plant & co-located central chiller plant.

• Wind power purchase agreement • New EAIC + Innovation District • Battery???

Goals • Energy Efficiency: 35% energy reduction from 2017 baseline • Demand Flexibility >2 MW flexibility at peak times • Asset Value: 20% increase in NPV of renewable assets (vs 2019) • Improved Resilience to Extreme Events

55

Project Participants

56

PJM Interconnection L.L.C

Identified Stakeholders

American Electric Power Service Corporation

Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission

Ohio Power Company

Smart Columbus

More to come…

City of Columbus

57

Campus Modeling

Control

Working with NREL, ENGIE Research, XENDEE to build out modeling and decision making tools

Coordinated control through ENGIE Smart Institutions, DeepMind, others

Advancing state of the art in building and district modeling

Tasks

Moving to fully automated AI-driven control by end of project

Techno-Economic Analyses

Occupant Experience

Coordinated dispatching/control of buildings and DERs to improve asset value

Goal to measurably improve occupant experience

Market Design

Distributed sensing and app-based surveys

Resilience Improvement

Stakeholder Buy-in

Extensive modeling analysis to demonstrate resilience improvements from CC approach

Focus groups and interviews

Cybersecurity

Demonstration and development

Extensive analysis @ start of project

Business Model

Regulatory Analysis

Demonstration and development

New Tech Piloting

Indoor Air Quality sensing, plug load management, occupant sensing, potentially others

58

Demonstration, Dissemination De-risking CC approach, tech Education and outreach

Project Timeline MONTHS 0-14

Budget Period 1: Planning, Baselining, Instrumentation NOVEMBER -21-MARCH ’22

MONTHS 56-60

Budget Period 5: Analysis and Scale-Up MONTHS 24-36

Budget and Scope Revisions, Negotiations

Budget Period 3: Manual Control

APRIL ’22

OCTOBER ’21

MONTHS 37-55

Budget Period 4: Automatic Controls

Planned Project Start

Award Announced

MONTHS 15-23

You are here

Budget Period 2: Modeling and Controls Development, Pilot

59

Thank You Jordan Clark clark.1217@osu.edu

60

Ohio State Energy Partners – ENGIE Updates Caitlin Holley Program Manager ENGIE 61

ENGIE, Ohio State Energy Partners and the 50 Year Partnership • 50-Year Concession – started in July 2017 • Ohio State Energy Partners – A 50/50 joint venture between ENGIE and Axium Infrastructure • District Energy Operation of a campus with over 480 buildings, including 7 hospitals and medical research centers • $1.165 billion upfront payment, including $150 million investment in academic collaboration (internships!)

• $1.7 billion total infrastructure investment in 50 years • Responsible for utility system capital improvements • 25% committed reduction of energy consumption over 10 years • Selected over a 2-year period as the top bidder amongst 40 participants in the RFI phase • ENGIE is the "operator" doing the day-to-day operations of the utility network on behalf of the Ohio State Energy Partners partnership 62

A Comprehensive Approach To Energy Management

63

Footprint & Energy Profile • 490 buildings on ≈ 1,670 acres • 100,000+ people daily • 1,882 hospital beds

• 16,000+ student residence beds • 3 stadiums = 120,000 seats • Elect., gas, steam, chilled water • 110 MW peak demand

• 2.9 million MMBTU of steam • $115 million annual spend • High reliability requirements 64

Utility System Components and How the Campus Utility is Interconnected

McCracken Plant

Geothermal Plant

East Chiller Plant

South Chiller Plant

West Campus Substation

65

Where Does Ohio State Get Energy?

66

Campus Network size • Chilled Water Supply = 26,074 LF = 4.94 Miles • Chilled Water Return = 26,684 LF = 5.05 Miles • Steam – • Existing Supply Lines = 57,594 Linear Feet = 10.91 Miles • Existing Condensate Lines = 50,594 LF = 9.58 Miles • 5.7 miles of walkable steam network tunnels • Gas Pipes = 72,883 LF = 13.8 Miles • Electrical Ductbanks = 188,470 LF = 35.7 Miles

67

Smart Meters and Energy Use Intensity Reduction

68

• Upgrades, retrofits, repairs and replacements that can extend and maximize the useful life of a utility system • Improves reliability and resiliency of distribution network • Ex: repairing steam lines underneath the Oval to prevent energy loss

Expansion

• Upgrades, retrofits, repairs and replacements that focus on increasing the building’s energy efficiency • Provides O&M benefits by reducing maintenance cost and improving outdated equipment • Ex: replacing lights with LEDs

Lifecycle

Energy Conservation

Project Types and Activity

• Providing utilities for buildings being built on Ohio State’s campus • Ex: new hospital tower that is being constructed will be connect to the electric and chilled water systems

69

ENGIE's Energy Conservation Measure Program

70

71

Combined Heat and Power Plant

72

Upcoming Work to Move into the Future

https://engineering.osu.edu/news/2021/10/department -energy-selects-ohio-state-one-10-connectedcommunity-sites

https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-invests-61-millionsmart-buildings-accelerate-renewable-energy-adoptionand-grid

73

Thank You Caitlin Holley Caitlin.Holley@engie.com

74

Planning Tool for Assessing Ohio State Options for a Sustainable and Responsible Energy Usage Matilde D’Arpino Research Scientist Center for Automotive Research

75

Introduction With the launch of a 105-MW Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant and the increase in controllable loads, OSU campus is quickly becoming an advanced microgrid and living energy laboratory.

105MW Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant

65 k ft2 solar power plant (in progress)

29 Electric vehicles and charging

50 MW wind power (power purchase agreement)

Steam plant and several chiller plants

485 Buildings’ flexibility

https://buildingthefuture.osu.edu/combined-heat-and-power-plant 76

Introduction 105MW combined heat and power (CHP) plant

65 k ft2 solar power plant (in progress)

50 MW wind power (power purchase agreement)

Steam plant and several chiller plants

29 electric vehicles and charging

485 building flexibility

• Ohio State is achieving: • Power generation flexibility • Loads flexibility

• OSU-Engie DOE Connected Community project is investigating the capacity of OSU existing on-campus connected community to provide essential but overlooked ancillary grid services from a diverse range of grid-interactive technologies in a cyber- and datasecure environment. (Award amount: $4.2M) • In the future, with more flexibility in the campus distributed energy resources (DERs), there will be large financial opportunities for OSU in applying in more grid service programs like ancillary services and demand response.

77

Current Research Interests 105MW combined heat and power (CHP) plant

65 k ft2 solar power plant (in progress)

50 MW wind power (power purchase agreement)

Steam plant and several chiller plants

There are SO MANY options of grid service programs provided by: • RTO (e.g. PJM) and • utilities (e.g. AEP) It is very difficult to assess which program/s have the higher techno-economic benefit and when to use the provided generators/loads flexibility.

Some of these programs requires a dynamic modulation of the user power. Storage and EVs become an important asset.

29 electric vehicles and charging

485 building flexibility

78

Demand Response Programs Participants earn money or discount on bill if responding to specific programs: • Emergency Demand Response: pays consumers to reduce their demand during specific peak power events; RTO sends notice to customers; customers are paid on MWh basis even of on stand-by; • Economic Demand Response: consumers can voluntarily reduce their load to respond to high wholesale electricity market price; usually triggered by a price threshold; payment is a portion of the local marginal price;

https://www.enersponse.com/

• Synchronized Reserve Market: costumers provide capacity availability to support reserve operation and help with system reliability; event called

by RTOs; payment is provided for the ability to potentially shed 100kW within 10 minutes; • Frequency Regulation: respond to 2-second resolution signal requesting shed or increase of power to maintain electricity quality and quantity; requires automated control; paid for performance and capacity.

• And more….

Sources of grid reliability services

Current Research Interest My team is working on the development of a tool to perform a cost-benefit analysis of a wide variety of operational and financial energy decisions as well as their effect on carbon emissions in the energy domain, including purchase of commodities and grid services.

Impact of electricity market and tariff strategies (variable market price, 2/3 tiers,…)

Impact of price of natural gas on CHP operation

Trade off between selling vs storage excess energy

Revenue streams and trade offs in participating in Demand Response or ancillary services programs

Cost and benefits of possible future investments, such as sizing and topology of storage 80

Current Research Interest 105MW combined heat and power (CHP) plant

65 k ft2 solar power plant (in progress)

50 MW wind power (power purchase agreement)

Steam plant and several chiller plants

My team is working on the development of a tool to perform a cost-benefit analysis of a wide variety of operational and financial energy decisions as well as their effect on carbon emissions in the energy domain, including purchase of commodities and grid services.

• Build different scenarios considering: • DER flexibility, • energy consumption, • EV penetration (OSU fleet and/or private cars, charging level), • commodity forecast,

29 electric vehicles and charging

485 building flexibility

• regulatory market scenarios, • seasonality.

81

Current Research Interest

Expected outcome: •

Assess revenue stream/saving for Ohio State: o Reduction of demand charges; o Remuneration/Incentives from participating to the specific program; o Time shift and peak shaving; o Accessing to time-based pricing mechanisms.

• •

Potential reduction of Ohio State’s carbon footprint; Potential reduction of Ohio State’s impact on the grid (access to more convenient electricity prices) and implementation of responsible load management;

•

Utilize/optimize the flexibility of the available DERs;

•

Increase internal power system reliability thanks to additional funding and continuous dynamic operation;

•

Increase Ohio State support to the grid and limit future substations’ expansion;

•

Showcase Ohio State commitment for energy efficiency and energy optimization.

82

Thank You Dr. Matilde D’Arpino darpino.2@osu.edu

83

LG Energy Solutions Project Update: Real-Time Observations of Mechanical Behaviors of Si-Based Anodes Marcello Canova, Professor Hanna Cho, Associate Professor Jung-Hyun Kim, Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 84

Background & Challenges Gravimetric Capacities

Mechanical Failure

McDowell et al. (2013). Advanced Materials, 25(36), 4966-4985.

Main technical barriers: • Poor cyclability and high-rate capability due to significant volume change (250%-280%) of active material during cycling • Slow reaction kinetics • Low Li-ion diffusivity • Low electronic conductivity

SEM images of 325 mesh crystalline Si particles before (a) and after (b) lithiation Obrovac et al. (2014). Chemical reviews, 114(23), 11444-11502.

85

Strategies Nano Si

Micro Si materials

(nanowires, nano hollows, nanotubes) • Pros: • Alleviated particle fracture and isolation • Extended cycle life • Cons: • Low tap density and volumetric capacity • Safety and health-related issues during manufacturing • Difficult to scale-up for mass productions

• Pros: • Higher tap density and volumetric capacity • Safer to handle during manufacturing • Lower manufacturing cost

• Cons: • Vulnerable to particle fracture and pulverization • Poor cycle life

86

Research Questions and Approach • Finding optimal operating conditions of µ-Si anode to maintain mechanical integrity during battery cycling • Fill a knowledge gap on the mechanical evolution of micron-Si

• Design in-situ Atomic Force Microscopy experiments and computational modeling

87

In-situ AFM during Electrochemical Cycling

701 mV

88

Evolution of the µ-Si interfaces Particle crack

SEI regeneration

Before crack generation

Particle Isolation

µm 0.8

Right after crack generation

After resting for 2 h

0

-0.8

Second discharge at ~ 700 mV

5µm 89

Controlled LIB Cycling

0.1 C-rate, 25oC 90

Model Overview • Modeling the charge/discharge of Silicon anodes is a critical research challenge.

• Volume change and related stress in the anode material need to be captured along with the lithium transport.

• A continuum model[1] was adapted from literature with necessary modifications.

• The model results into a system of stiff nonlinear Index-2 Partial Differential and Algebraic Equations (PDAEs).

Nonlinear Spherical Diffusion + Flux Law Stress/Strain and Momentum Balance + Concentration Constraint

Anode Particle Lattice Displacement and Volume Change

Symbol 𝜃

Physical Description

Symbol

Physical Description

Concentration

𝑢 ത

Lattice Displacement

𝑥 𝐿𝑖𝑆

State of Charge

𝑤

Radial Lattice Gradient

𝜒

Particle Radius

𝜎𝑟

Radial Stress

Flux of Lithium Occupied Sites

𝜎𝑡

Tangential Stress

Flux of Lithium Unoccupied Sites

𝜋

Pressure on Particle

𝑁𝐿𝑖𝑆 𝑁𝑆

91

[1] Christensen, John, and John New man. "Stress generation and fracture in lithium insertion materials." Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 10, no. 5 (2006): 293-319.

Methodology Variation in Particle Surface Concentration and Volume during Lithiation (results for 𝑳𝒊𝑪𝟔 anode)

Implementation Benchmark Solution was implemented by directly discretizing the model equations using finite difference method

An original semi-explicit scheme was proposed: system is reformulated into decoupled set of nonlinear Differential and Algebraic Equations (DAEs)

Computational Improvements Sensitivity study performed to select optimal time step size to achieve the desired accuracy. A 3-hour simulation can be completed in 5.3min.

Index reduction applied to obtain semi-explicit solution that reduces the size of the Jacobian matrix in the implicit solver. This enables use of a larger time step size, resulting from increased temporal discretization accuracy.

Sample Results Simulation of a 3-hour lithiation under galvanostatic conditions indicates that proposed model implementation matches well against benchmark solution and literature (error of 10^(-5) on average mole fraction).

Next Steps Verify semi-explicit scheme with benchmark solution and literature results.

Calibrate model to experimental data for Silicon.

92

[1] Christensen, John, and John New man. "Stress generation and fracture in lithium insertion materials." Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 10, no. 5 (2006): 293-319.

Research Summary

Implementation Benchmark

PDE+AE

Improvement

AE

PDE+AE

PDE

AE

Computational Improvements Implementation

• Benchmark: Full implicit (AE solver) • Improvement: Semi-explicit (ODE+AE)

Computational Improvements

• Benchmark: Time step size sensitivity • Improvement: Jacobian matrix size reduction

Sample Results

• Full lithiation with galvanostatic charge at C/3 • 𝑥𝐿𝑖𝑆 has an error at the order of 10-5

Next Steps

• Validate semi-explicit scheme accuracy • Model calibration to experimental data

PDE

AE

• Larger Δ𝑡 leads to faster simulation times • Explicit solver for PDE does not need iteration • Iterative solver for AE has a smaller Jacobian matrix

Sample Results

Raw In-Situ AFM Images of a group of Si Particles (a – Before Cracking; b – After Cracking)

Next Steps

• Semi-explicit solver validation • Model calibration

Qualitative behavior of Silicon during Lithiation Change in concentration results in lattice displacement.

During delithiation, tensile stress at the particle surface may contribute to cracking.

93

[1] Christensen, John, and John New man. "Stress generation and fracture in lithium insertion materials." Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 10, no. 5 (2006): 293-319.

Thank You Hanna Cho (cho.867@osu.edu) Marcello Canova (canova.1@osu.edu) Jung-Hyun Kim (kim.6776@osu.edu)

94

Partnerships in Mobility DriveOhio

Rich Granger Managing Director, Workforce Development DriveOhio

95

CONNECTED

AUTOMATED

Smart mobility on the ground, in the air, everywhere

SHARED

ELECTRIC

How it started…

How it’s going…

Automated and Connected Vehicles

BELLEFONTAINE

MARYSVILLE

EAST LIBERTY

DUBLIN

COLUMBUS

61 Roadside Units

I-70 Truck Automation Corridor

Electric Vehicles

EV Charging and Freight Electrification Studies

Read the reports at: drive.ohio.gov

DriveElectric.gov

Advanced Air Mobility

SkyVision

Advanced Air Mobility at Springfield Airport

Electric Charging Station

Vertiport

Unmanned Traffic Management Research

AAM Emergency Services Demonstration

Ohio Advanced Air Mobility Economic Impact Analysis

Read the report at: uas.ohio.gov

Workforce Initiatives

Workforce Development ENGAGING

PREPARING

UP-SKILLING

PreK to 12

Career Tech + Higher Ed

Incumbent

Problem-Based Learning

Work-Based Learning

Industry Credentials

2022 Workforce Initiatives Smart Mobility Ambassador

#STEMbuildsOhio Design Challenge

CaseLAB® Industry Sector Partnership FlyOhio Vertiport Innovation Challenge

EV Workforce Development

Smart Mobility Capstone Challenge

Vertiport Innovation Challenge

Advanced Air Mobility Capstone Project

How can you improve your school, community, or world by

reimagining air mobility to be more equitable, accessible, or efficient?

DesignChallenge.OSLN.org

Smart Mobility Ambassador Program

drive.ohio.gov/ambassador

Electric Vehicle Workforce Training

ADAS Overview

Hybrid Vehicle Repair

CAN Data

aaatechtraining.com

evitp.org

Rich Granger Managing Director, Workforce rich.granger@drive.ohio.gov drive.ohio.gov

Partnerships in Mobility JobsOhio

Jonathan Bridges Managing Director, Automotive, Steel and White Goods JobsOhio

96

Ohio’s Competitive Advantage in Economic Development 2022

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04( C)(1) and (2)

JobsOhio is a private non-profit corporation designed to drive job creation and new capital investment in Ohio through business attraction, retention and expansion efforts.

MISSION Drive job creation and new capital investment in Ohio through business attraction, retention and expansion efforts.

VISION Consistently lead the nation in private sector job growth.

Become top economic development organization in the US.

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

VALUES Act With Integrity — Value People — Make a Difference

98

One Firm, One State

One of the most important decisions made when creating JobsOhio was to build out capacity across the state.

JobsOhio partners with six regional economic development organizations around the state to deliver economic development services.

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

99

JobsOhio Support The outcome of the rationalization process is reflected in the services and support JobsOhio provides today: • Site selection services • Streamlined permitting process • Introduction to service providers • Workforce recruitment and training support

• Financial incentives

JobsOhio provides comprehensive support to companies looking to invest in Ohio.

• Long-term partnership for business success

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

100

Low Natural Disaster Risk

The map overlays Earthquake (both moderate and high risk), Flood, Tornadoes and Hurricane risks in the continental United States.

Earthquakes - Moderate Earthquakes - High Floods Hurricanes Tornados

Data for this map was provided by Redcross.org and Noaa.gov.

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

101

JobsOhio 2021 Record Performance Generational Opportunity

2021*

Jobs Created

~29,000 NEW all-time high

~$1.6B

Payroll Created

NEW all-time high

Projects Won

>400 NEW all-time high

Business Retention & Expansion

2,346 NEW all-time high

All-time high score in Customer Satisfaction

*Unofficial year end results as of December 31, subject to finalization This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04( C)(1) and (2)

102

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Has Grown in Ohio

103

FDI in Ohio Has Grown Dramatically Composition by Country

Top Sources of FDI in Ohio 452 Announced Greenfield Projects

#4 in U.S. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)

Japan Germany

>1,100 employers

27%

33%

Canada United Kingdom

France

>270,000 Ohio jobs directly supported

Other

13% 7%

11%

9%

~6.5% of all Ohio jobs

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

104

JobsOhio is a U.S. Partner of Choice Other Geographies

Advanced Manufacturing Automotive Energy & Chemicals

Food Processing Information Technology Healthcare Other

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

105

Ohio’s Largest Manufacturing Employer • Marysville is first U.S. auto plant by a Japanese automaker in America • Began in Ohio in 1982.

• Honda’s largest vehicle production facility in the U.S.A.; 16,750 associates • Honda’s 2nd largest R&D Center in world • Partnered to test V2X smart mobility technology in a real-world environment

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

106

Success Story

LG Chem Vice Chairman & CEO Hak-Cheol Shin: “Our joint venture with the No. 1 American automaker will further prepare us for the anticipated growth of the North American EV market, while giving us insights into the broader EV ecosystem. Our long-standing history with General Motors has proven our collective expertise in this space, and we look forward to continuing this drive for zero emissions.”

THE COMPANY: Ultium Cells LLC is a JV between General Motors and LG Chem. The operation will manufacture lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. Ultium Cells plans to establish a lithium-ion battery cell production facility to serve the electric vehicle market. At the completion of the project, this facility will be one of the largest cell manufacturing plants in the world.

THE PROJECT: • Location: Lordstown, Northeast Ohio • Jobs created: 1,100 • Capital invested: $2.3B

INCENTIVES: JobsOhio Economic Development Grant:

$

50,000,000

JCTC Job Creation Tax Credit

$

13,800,000

TOTAL: $63,800,000 GM Chairman and CEO Mary Barra: “With this investment, Ohio and its highly capable workforce will play a key role in our journey toward a world with zero emissions.

Combining our manufacturing expertise with LG Chem’s leading battery-cell technology will help accelerate our pursuit of an all-electric future.

We look forward to collaborating with LG Chem on future cell technologies that will continue to improve the value we deliver to our customers.”

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

107

Automotive Industry In Ohio

108

$15.97 billion Gross State Product

111,000+ Automotive Workforce, 2nd Largest

670+ Establishments

1.1 million vehicles produced, 4th Largest

#1 Producer of Engines

Committed to the Future of Automotive Mfg.

#2 Producer of Transmissions This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

6 OEM Light Vehicle Assembly Plants, 2 Commercial Vehicle OEMs and the iconic Airstream company

109

Ohio’s Extensive Logistics Infrastructure Seattle

Toronto, Canada 75

One day’s drive to >60% of US & Canadian populations.

FREETRADE ZONE Largest presence of foreign trade zones in the Midwest.

70

Boston

90

Detroit Chicag o

New York City

80

90

70

Washington DC

70 77

Norfolk

St. Louis 75

65

Charlotte

Los Angeles

Charleston Atlanta

4th-largest interstate highway system

13 Intermodals; 4th largest network of railroads

9 commercial ports Only Midwest state w/direct shipping to Europe for container & heavy goods.

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

7 commercial airports 97 general aviation airports.

North American OEM Assembly Plants Within One-Day Drive – 1,000km/600mi Radius of Ohio o 96% of U.S. and Canadian Auto Production • • • • • • • • •

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

Honda BMW Daimler Stellantis Ford General Motors Nissan Toyota Other OEMs

111

Motor Vehicle Industry Snapshot 5 3 1 1 2 4 1 7 5

5

1

4

2 3

10 1 1

8

3

4

7 3 1

10

6 3 2 4 1 2 4

9

10

1 1

13

9

1.

2.

3.

4.

Ford Ohio Assembly Plant Ford Engine Plant 1 Ford Sharonville Transmission Ford Lima Engine

Honda ~14,700

6

2 2 3

1. Navistar 2. Paccar 3. Airstream

Ford ~6,500

8

5

12

14

1 8

Commercial Vehicles / Specialty ~4,900

9

Source: 2018.4 QCEW; DSA The Ohio Motor Vehicle Report 2016 Facility locations generalized. * Foxconn planned 2022 This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Honda Motor Co Honda Engineering Honda Motor Co. East Liberty Honda Motor Co. (PMC) Honda Celina Aluminum Honda Russels Point Transmission 7. Honda Motor Co. Anna 8. US Yachiyo 9. AY Mfg. 10.Cardington Yutaka Technologies

Stellantis ~7,250 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Hyundai MOBIS (FCA Integration) Chrysler Toledo N Assembly Plant Chrysler Toledo Assembly Plant Kuka Toledo Chrysler Toledo Machining

General Motors ~6,500 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Ultium Cells (GM & LG JV) General Motors DMAX General Motors Parma Metal Center General Motors Defiance Foundry General Motors Toledo Transmission

Tier 1 / Large Suppliers ~10,150 1. KTH Parts Industries 2. Kth Parts R&D 3. Schaeffler Technologies 4. Moriroku Technology 5. Flex-N-Gate Ventra 6. Fuyao Auto Glass 7. Norplas Industries Inc 8. Delphi Automotive 9. American Showa 10.Nissan Brake 11.Dana Inc. 12.F&P America Inc. 13.EG Industries Inc. 14.Lordstown Motors & Foxconn *

112

End-to-End Supply Chain

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

113

EV Production in the U.S. Ohio

Michigan Indiana

Colorado Planned Battery Plant: SolidPower in 2024

Plant: Fort Wayne, Princeton Brand: GMC, Toyota Model: Sierra, Highlander Type: HEV

Kansas

Plant: Wayne, Lake Orion, Hamtramck Brand: Ford, Chevy, Buick Model: Focus, Bolt, C-Max, Lacrosse, Impala Type: EV, HEV, PHEV

Plant: Marysville, Lordstown Brand: Acura, Honda, Lordstown Motors Model: ILX, MDX, NSX, Accord, Endurance Type: HEV, EV

Planned Battery Plant: Samsung SDI Battery Plant: LG Chem, A123, Akasol Battery Sales Office: CATL

Planned Battery Plant: Ultium Cells, LG Chem in 2022

Battery Plant: Tesla Planned Battery Plant: iM3NY in 2022

Kentucky Plant: Georgetown Brand: Toyota Model: Avalon, Camry Type: HEV

Plant: Fairfax Brand: Chevy Model: Malibu Type: HEV

Tennessee

California Plant: Fremont, Moreno Valley Brand: Tesla, Karma Model: Model S, X, Y, 3, GS-6, Revero Type: EV, PHEV

Battery Plant: Tesla/ Panasonic, SILA in 2021, QuantumScape in 2024

New York

South Carolina Plant: Spartanburg, Ridgeville Brand: BMW, Volvo Model: X3, X5, X7, S60 Type: PHEV

Alabama Texas Planned Battery Plant: Tesla 2021

Plant: Vance Brand: Mercedes-Benz Model: GLE Type: PHEV Toyota/Mazda JV Plant for EV production in 2021

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

Georgia Planed Battery Plant: SK Innovation

Plant: Smyrna Brand: Nissan, Infiniti Model: Leaf, LeafSV/SLQX60, Rogue Type: EV, HEV Battery Plant: LG Chem, Microvast in 2023

Florida Battery Plant: saft 114

JobsOhio projects with suppliers to EV battery manufacturing companies 10 companies that were listed

by S&P Capital have been a supplier to one of the 36 global EV battery manufacturing companies

This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04( C)(1) and (2)

115

Talent Strategic Initiative

Workforce and Talent • Ohio’s manufacturing workforce

Top Engineering Universities

includes nearly 700,000 Ohioans • Ohio’s auto industry employs more

than 108,000 people (EMSI, 2017) • Ohio has the 2nd largest

automotive workforce when adding up OEM assembly and motor vehicle parts manufacturing workforce • 54 OTC (Ohio Technical Centers) This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

Trade Schools Cuyahoga Community College (Tri-C), Fortis College, Mahoning County Career and Technical Center, Tolles, Ohio Technical College, Butler Tech 117

Ohio is Investing in the FUTURE Talent Strategy

Ohio To Work™ 2K Served

• Expand Ohio To Work™ Markets, offer statewide opportunities • Columbus, Mahoning Valley, Toledo and Cincinnati / Dayton

2K Served

500 Reskilled

500 Reskilled

1K Placed

1K Placed 17K Served

Statewide impact to date:* • Served: 32,905 • Reskilled: 3,469 • Placed: 4,314

1,100 Reskilled 4K Placed 19K Served

1,250 Reskilled 4K Placed

* As of March 1, 2022 This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)

118

Thank You

119

Largest Economic Development Project in Ohio History (PHASE 1) Generational Opportunity for Ohio

$20B 3K 7K 10K This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04( C)(1) and (2)

Capital Investment Intel Jobs Avg $135K Construction Jobs Indirect Jobs

120

Enterprise for Research, Innovation and Knowledge Update Dorota Grejner-Brzezinska Vice President of Knowledge Enterprise Office of Research

121

April 1, 2022

Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinska Vice President for Knowledge Enterprise grejner-brzezinska.1@osu.edu

ENTERPRISE MISSION STATEMENT

The Enterprise for Research, Innovation and Knowledge empowers and supports the university community to excel in research and creative expression, innovation and entrepreneurship, and partnership engagement that drives discovery, transforms lives, serves society and fuels economic growth.

ENTERPRISE STRATEGIC PRIORITIES • Enable Curiosity-Driven Discoveries and Creative Expression

• Build Large-Scale, Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation Centers • Design and Develop the Innovation District • Nurture Innovation and Entrepreneurship

ENTERPRISE ORGANIZATIONAL CHART EVP for Research, Innovation and Knowledge Grace Wang

Vice President for Research Peter Mohler ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

✓ ✓ ✓

Sponsored Programs Animal Research Facility Research Compliance Institutional Research and Strategic Intelligence Research Centers Arts and Humanities Faculty Fellow Research IT Support

Vice President for Knowledge Enterprise

Vice President for Innovation and Economic Development Scott Osborne

Dorota Grejner-Brzezinska

✓ ✓

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

✓

Strategic Research Development Center Proposal Development Research Faculty Development Research Faculty Planning Seed Funding President’s Research Excellence Program

Chief of Staff for EVP

✓ ✓ ✓

✓ ✓

Corporate Partnerships Keenan Center for Entrepreneurship Student Accelerators Technology Commercialization Ohio State Innovation Foundation (OSIF) Economic Impact Study for the University

Business Development and Innovation District Dawn Larzelere

Brad Harris

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

✓ Office Operation HR Support Budget Planning Financial Management

✓ ✓

✓

✓

Communication and Marketing Event Planning Coordination of Innovation District Business Development Support of Innovation District Leadership Committee Board of Trustees coordinator

“By backing great ideas emanating both from our faculty and from administrative leaders, Ohio State aims to double its sponsored research within this decade.”

– President Kristina M. Johnson State of the University Address | February 18, 2021

ENTERPRISE HIGHLIGHTS 41 AT O H I O S TAT E

$1.2B in Total Annual Research Expenditures (Fiscal Year 2021)

Faculty led, interdisciplinary teams awarded funding in the first three rounds of the President’s Research Excellence Program

306 Invention disclosures filed (Fiscal Year 2021)

KEY RESEARCH AND INNOVATION DRIVERS FOR GROWTH Addressing critical societal challenges will require cross-cutting approaches that bridge multiple disciplines including the Arts, Engineering, Humanities, Medicine, Physical Sciences, Public Policy, and Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences.

Food

Energy and Sustainability

Water

AI/ML/IoT Life Sciences Quantum Healthcare and Aging

Mobility

Security

OFFICE OF KNOWLEDGE ENTERPRISE • Established in spring 2021 to enable strategic growth of Ohio State’s research portfolio • Supports and empowers researchers in both curiosity-driven and large-scale convergence research to •

bolster Ohio State’s research reputation, expand the societal impact of our work, and grow research talent

• Positions Ohio State for national leadership in research and creative expression •

by leveraging collaboration with organizations and units across campus to integrate activities across the sciences, arts and humanities, engineering, policy, business, medicine and other fields. https://erik.osu.edu/knowledge-enterprise

PRESIDENT’S RESEARCH EXCELLENCE PROGRAM The President’s Research Excellence (PRE) program provides seed support for crossand interdisciplinary research • Grow research and innovation enterprise • Increase research eminence • Attract more externally sponsored research funding • Address large, complex societal challenges

TWO COMPONENTS OF THE PRE PROGRAM

Catalyst

• Up to $200,000 • Large cross- and interdisciplinary teams • Large-scale, high-impact research addressing challenges of societal importance • Generates long-term, sustained and significant impact

Accelerator

• Up to $50,000 • Small teams • Curiosity-driven, novel, high-risk and high-reward research

August 18, 2021

YEAR 1: ACCELERATOR PROPOSALS

70

19

$947,000

Accelerator applications received

projects awarded

total dollars awarded

47%

15

107

of awarded principal investigators are women

of 15 academic colleges submitted proposals

units and departments represented in submitted proposals

August 18, 2021

YEAR 1: CATALYST PROPOSALS

50

13

7

Catalyst concept papers received

13 papers invited for full submission

7 awards made

28%

12

of awarded principal investigators are women

of 15 academic colleges submitted proposals

$1,399,115 total dollars awarded

January 3, 2022

YEAR 2: ACCELERATOR PROPOSALS

33

15

$749,968

Accelerator applications received

projects awarded

total dollars awarded

40%

11

116

of awarded principal investigators are women

of 15 academic colleges submitted proposals

units and departments represented in submitted proposals

March 30, 2022

Thank you!

136

Dwight Blaser Meritorious Service Award

137

The Dwight Blaser Meritorious Service Award is presented annually to individuals whose sustained and extraordinary personal services have had a significant and lasting effect on the advancement of Ohio State’s Center for Automotive Research (CAR).

138

Dwight Blaser, PhD, was an alumnus of The Ohio State University and a retiree of the General Motors Corp. where he served as the Director of Research and Development.

He was a member of the CAR External Advisory Board since its establishment in 1993.

Dwight passed away on July 19, 2017 139

Jeff Hemphill Jeff is the Chief Technical Officer for Schaeffler in the Americas where he is responsible for research and new product development for automotive transmission, engine, chassis and industrial components and systems.

Most recently he served as President of SAE International in 2021, and Automotive Vice President from 2013 - 2016.

Jeff has 33 years of experience in automotive and industrial product development, including manufacturing, product design, testing and vehicle development.

140

Schaeffler and CAR collaboration: • CAR residential engineers from Schaeffler group • Lab access to Energy Innovation Lab at Ohio State and share battery equipment

• Access to Ohio State centers and analytical labs for multi-scale characterizations • Engage students in preparation for future careers in the industry • Training advanced techniques to students via interactive engineering program between Schaeffler 141 – Ohio State teams

Thank You Save the Date Fall 2022 EAB September 30, 2022

142