External Advisory Board Meeting April 1, 2022
Welcome and State of the Center Giorgio Rizzoni Director Center for Automotive Research
2
Agenda 10:00 a.m. Welcome and State of the Center
10:25 a.m. Report on Regional Technology Hub 10:40 a.m. College of Engineering Update 10:50 a.m. Research Activity Updates 11:15 a.m. BREAK 11:30 a.m. Research Activity Updates cont’d
12:00 p.m. Partnerships in Mobility 12:30 p.m. ERIK Update 12:45 p.m. Blaser Award 12:55 p.m. Lunch and Networking 3
Together as Buckeyes • Masks are now optional in most indoor spaces across campus • Ohio State positivity rates well below 1% • More than 93% of Ohio State community members are vaccinated
4
Recognitions
2 Led by Qadeer Ahmed, Ohio State is the primary research university supporting the PACCAR team, one of 5 teams chosen by the DOE for the SuperTruck 3 initiative.
PhD candidate Deb Banerjee, advised by Professor Ahmet Selamet, was selected as a recipient of The Ohio State University Presidential Fellowship.
3 Professor Ümit Özgüner received the 2021 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Society Lifetime Achievement Award. 5
Recognitions
PhD candidate Pranav Sriganesh, advised by Professor Ahmet Selamet, placed first in the 2021 SAE Noise and Vibration Conference and Exhibition, Student Paper Competition.
Research Associate Professor Qadeer Ahmed received the SAE Forest R. McFarland Award recognizing individuals for their outstanding contributions towards SAE engineering events.
CAR Research Scientist CG Cantemir and Materials Science and Engineering Professor Michael Sumption were awarded by ARPA-E for their project Cryogenic Thermal Management Of High Power Density Motors And Drives.
Promotions and New Hires
David Perez Software Engineer Joined CAR Nov. 2021
Danny Freudiger Instructional Development Specialist Joined CAR Feb. 2022
Xiaoling Chen Research Associate 2 Joined CAR May, 2021
7
Promotions and New Hires
Darrin Orr Promoted to Facilities Manager Oct. 2021 backfill Frank Ohlemacher retired Feb. 2020
Sarah Vanadia Associate Business Manager backfill Layla Mohmmad-Ali retired Dec. 2021
Max Wright Student Projects Program Director new position to backfill previous role in combination with Darrin’s former duties anticipated April 2022 8
Promotions and New Hires
Manfredi Villani Sr. Research Associate promoted from Research Associate 2 anticipated April 2022
Kaveh Khodadadi Sadabadi Research Associate 2 promoted from Research Assistant anticipated April 2022
9
Politecnico di Milano
11 Visiting Scholars During the 2021-2022 academic year
University of Brescia
Hyundai in South Korea Politecnico di Torino
… 10
Facilities
3 New administrative office space to accommodate hybrid work schedules
Updated flooring in Energy Storage Lab
Updated flooring and lighting in Machine Shop
Front office renovations
11
Facilities
Thank you, Darrin, Max, Bill and Jim!
Upcoming projects: • Collaborative research suite • Front office renovation • Administrative conference room • PI office upgrades 12
Continuing Education Marcello Canova Associate Director Graduate and Continuing Education
13
Preparing practicing engineers for success in the automotive, transportation, energy and mobility industry Twenty-five years of specialized engineering education offered to industry partners, leveraging CAR research and Ohio State engineering courses
CAR curriculum has evolved from individual engineering courses to specialized certificates and customized educational products that fit diverse training and professional educational needs
Accredited, world-renowned Ohio State faculty bridge the gap between academia and industry Expanded offerings in Electrification and CEUs available 14
Curriculum CAR’s curriculum offers topics of strategic interest to industry, such as powertrain electrification and energy storage systems, powertrain dynamics and control, advanced modeling and simulation methods.
Graduate credit courses can be taken individually, transferred and/or utilized to pursue a graduate degree (MS or Ph.D.).
Credit and non-credit offerings can be combined into Certificates, which provide a comprehensive, focused and cutting-edge analysis of emerging new technologies in a specialized program. Certificates in Electrification, Powertrain Modeling and Control are available.
15
Curriculum
Customized non-credit programs combine online content with live instructor-led sessions and labs.
New non-credit short courses in Electrification: •
Intro to Powertrain Electrification (Prof. G. Rizzoni)
•
Energy Storage Systems (Prof. M. Canova)
•
Electric Machines (Prof. J. Zhang)
•
Power Electronics for Automotive Applications (Prof. J. Wang)
16
Partners
17
Customized Electrification Programs
1 Four hybrid (online with 2 live sessions weekly) short courses for 235 engineers: •
Intro to Powertrain Electrification
•
Energy Storage Systems
•
Electric Machines
•
Power Electronics for Automotive Applications
•
Two new advanced seminars (Battery Testing and Motor Control/EMC/EMI)
Graduate-level courses and certificate programs
2 Summer School in Advanced Propulsion Systems and Electrification: •
Offered live (99P Labs) in Summer 2021 to 75 associates
Workshop on Li-ion Battery Modeling and Calibration •
3 Three hybrid (online with live Q&A) short courses scheduled for Summer 2022: • Gear Design & Analysis • Electric Machines • Intro to EMI/EMC
Offered Winter 2022 (Online) 18
Report on Regional Technology Hub Giorgio Rizzoni Director Center for Automotive Research
19
Regional Technology Innovation Hubs Two pending bills awaiting conference, the COMPETES Act (H.R. 4521) and the US Innovation of Competition Act (S.1260), would establish a new program to be administered by the Department of Commerce The goal of the Regional Technology and Innovation Hub Program would be to develop and implement regional strategies in order to: • •
Enable the US leadership in technology and innovation sectors that are critical to national and economic security Support regional economic development and resilience, including small cities and rural areas, and promote increased geographic diversity of innovation across the United States
•
Promote benefits of technology development and innovation for all Americans, including underserved and vulnerable communities
• •
Support domestic job creation and broad-based economic growth Improve the pace of market readiness, industry maturation, and overall commercialization of innovation research
20
Regional Technology Innovation Hubs Desired Outcomes/Metrics
Potential Federal Funding
➢ Domestic job creation
➢ 10-20 Hubs funded over 5 years
➢ Business formation and expansion, entrepreneurship
➢ $150M/Hub, first 2 years
➢ Increased supply chain resilience
➢ $300-$400M, final 3 years
➢ Research, development, and deployment of critical technology
➢ Figures uncertain until appropriation legislation
➢ Workforce training and development
➢ Cost-share will be required ➢ Hubs will need long-term business plans to sustain impact beyond federal funding
Key Features ➢ Hubs must be cross-sector consortia (e.g., industry, universities, state/local government, economic development agencies, non-profits, finance, education orgs) ➢ Hub activities must be regional (multiple states) ➢ The main goal is economic development (this would be administered by DOC’s Economic Development Agency) 21
Intel Announces Next US Site in Ohio •
Intel initial investment of more than $20 billion in construction of two new leading-edge chip factories
•
Will help boost production to meet surging demand for advanced semiconductors
•
“Intel’s new facilities will be transformative for our state, creating thousands of good-paying jobs in Ohio manufacturing…” Gov. DeWine
•
On March 28, 2022, U.S. Senate approves $52B chips bill •
Two decades ago, the U.S. produced nearly 40% of all chips while today it accounts for only 12% of global production.
•
The Senate vote moved the U.S. “one step closer toward revitalizing American semiconductor manufacturing…” U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo
22
Smart Mobility at Ohio State The OSU Enterprise for Research, Innovation and Knowledge (ERIK) has established a Smart mobility task force with the objective to assess our collective strengths and determine gaps in the areas that, with modest investment, could significantly strengthen our capabilities and competitiveness in the national arena.
Photo Credit Hyundai Motor Company
23
Thank You Giorgio Rizzoni (rizzoni.1@osu.edu)
24
College of Engineering Update Ayanna Howard Dean College of Engineering
25
Research Activity Updates
26
FTA Low and No Emissions Transit Program Proposed Scope Under the New Legislation = > Approved in IIJA 11/15/2021!!! • Capital Investment In Facilities Supporting the Testing of Low and No Emissions Vehicles and Components • Component Assessment Program – Testing For Industry • Directed Research - In support of low or no emission vehicles as well as new and emerging technology components intended for use in low or no emission vehicles.
27
FTA Low and No Emissions Transit Program Directed Research – Early Project Targets • Real world range of electrified transit vehicles • Effect of driver behavior on energy consumption -> driver training • Development of future testing standards for electrified and automated transit technologies
28
ADD A HEADING TO MATCH YOUR ICON Add context here to match your heading and icon.
CAR Expansion
ADD A HEADING TO MATCH YOUR ICON Add context here to match your heading and icon.
ADD A HEADING TO MATCH YOUR ICON Add context here to match your heading and icon.
Photo credit pharmaceutical-technology 29
EV Battery and Alternative Fuels Safety Research Program David Cooke Senior Associate Director Center for Automotive Research 30
ADD A HEADING TO MATCH YOUR ICON EV Battery and Alternative fuel Safety Research Opportunities
Add context here to match your heading and icon.
ADD A HEADING TO MATCH YOUR ICON Add context here to match your heading and icon.
ADD A HEADING TO MATCH YOUR ICON Add context here to match your heading and icon.
Components of the program • Market research – technology trends, market penetration, standards, best practices • Assessment of installed testing capacity • Needs assessment and recommendations for laboratory expansion 31
ARPA-E NEXTCAR 2 STUDENTS: Karinne Bernanke, Shobhit Gupta, Olivia Jacome, Griffin Leisenring, Mayur Patil, Jacob Paugh RESEARCH STAFF: David Cooke, Stefano D’alessandro, Dennis Kibalama, Matteo Spano, Ekim Yurtsever FACULTY: Giorgio Rizzoni, Marcello Canova, Shawn Midlam-Mohler, Stephanie Stockar, Punit Tulpule 32
NEXTCAR 2 – Main Tasks Objective: 30% Efficiency Improvement over Baseline (Level 0)
1
2
3
AI-BASED OSU CAV CONTROL
VIRTUAL VALIDATION
IN-VEHICLE IMPLEMENTATION
Adaptive to changing route conditions,
• •
Comprises of VD&PT optimization (Eco-driving) and Auxiliary Load Optimization (Eco-aux). •
Efficiently integrate V2V/V2I information.
• Simulation framework for Reinforcement Learning training, •
Validation of OSU control in real-world scenarios using a well-calibrated traffic simulator.
Upfit Chrysler Pacifica with L4 functionality,
• •
Integrate OSU controls with Autonomous Vehicle (AV) stack. 33
NEXTCAR 2 Vehicle The demonstration vehicle is a 2021 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid (PHEV). This requires the extension of the NEXTCAR 1 algorithm to charge depleting operations. 34 Anselma, P. G., et al., Accelerated sizing of a power split electrified powertrain. SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0843, 2020. Pittel, M., Martin, D., eFlite dedicated hybrid transmission for Chrysler Pacifica . SAE Technical Paper No. 2018-01-0396, 2018.
The equations describing the powertrain are: Road load equation:
𝑑𝑉𝑣𝑒ℎ 1 2 = 𝐹𝑅𝐿 − 𝜌𝐶𝑑 𝐴𝑓 𝑉𝑣𝑒ℎ − 𝐶𝑟 𝑀𝑣𝑔 𝑑𝑡 2 State of charge of the battery: 𝑑 𝐼𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑡 𝑆𝑂𝐶 = − 𝑑𝑡 𝐶𝑛𝑜𝑚 Kinematic equations of the PGS: 𝑁𝑆 + 𝑁𝑅 𝑉𝑣𝑒ℎ 𝑁𝑅 𝜔𝑀𝐺1 = 𝜔𝐼𝐶𝐸 − 𝜏𝐹𝐷 𝑁𝑆 𝑅𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑁𝑆 𝑁𝑆 1 𝑁𝑀𝐺2 𝑁𝑆 𝑇𝑀𝐺1 = − 𝑇𝐼𝐶𝐸 = 𝑅𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝐹𝑅𝐿 + 𝐹𝐵 − 𝑇𝑀𝐺2 ) 𝑁𝑆 + 𝑁𝑅 𝜏𝐹𝐷 𝑁𝑇 𝑁𝑅 𝑀𝑒𝑞
Simplified Powertrain Model A model that describes all the operating modes of the Chrysler Pacifica has been developed.
𝑇𝐼𝐶𝐸 = 𝑇𝐼𝑀𝐸𝑃𝑔 𝜔𝐼𝐶𝐸 − 𝑇𝑃𝑀𝐸𝑃 𝜔𝐼𝐶𝐸 , 𝑇𝐼𝑀𝐸𝑃𝑔 − 𝑇𝐹𝑀𝐸𝑃 𝜔𝐼𝐶𝐸 , 𝑇𝐼𝑀𝐸𝑃𝑔
𝑇𝐼𝑀𝐸𝑃𝑔 is the control input: • Can only be non-negative; • When zero: vehicle is assumed operating in EV mode.
Pumping and friction torques are assumed speeddependent 35
Offline, Full Route Optimization of VD&PT Control:
• Objective: Nonlinear, distance-based trajectory optimization problem to minimize the vehicle fuel consumption and travel time over an entire route (same formulation in ARPA-E NEXTCAR 1): • A tuning weight 𝛾 is considered to trade-off the two objectives in the cost function: Cost Function:
VD&PT Optimization Extension to the PHEV problem.
States and Inputs:
Vehicle velocity MG2 torque
Battery SOC
Engine firing torque
Engine speed
Constraints:
36
Selected route with random traffic and SPaT [*]
Inclusion of Traffic for Eco-Driving Effect of traffic and traffic light patterns on energy consumption
Distribution of Fuel Economy for Baseline and Fuel Economy Percent gain of DP-ECMS over Predictive Controller (DP_ECMS)[*] Baseline [*]
• Variation of speed limit for various traffic light patterns and traffic conditions • Even with similar driver-style, the energy consumptions is greatly dependent on traffic light and traffic conditions • Need to incorporate realistic traffic behavior for DRL-based value function approximation 37
[*] Pérez,W.; Tulpule, P.; Midlam-Mohler, S.; Rizzoni, G. Data-Driven Adaptive Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy for Hybrid Electric and Connected Vehicles. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2705. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052705
Vehicle Counts for each entry/exit
DUAROUTER
ODOT AADT Data
SUMO Traffic Model Random vehicles & trips
Queue length Lead vehicle speed SPAT of next traffic light
SPAT
Virtual Testing in Calibrated Traffic Environment SUMO and ODOT Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) data are used to calibrate traffic volumes (low, medium, high) for each route.
Co-simulation Environment: 38 • Leveraging calibrated SUMO traffic models to co-simulate driver behavior for Baseline EDM Driver, Eco-Driver
• Methodology is extendible to simulate traffic during track-testing.
Sample route used for calibration with defined traffic entry and exit points
Virtual Testing in Calibrated Traffic Environment Traffic Flow Calibration: • Traffic flows for a given route calibrated for low, medium and heavy traffic conditions to match (AADT) data for the route 39
Windows
Linux
Environment Simulator
ROS Bridge LiDAR Point Scan
Enabling SAE L4 Automation Capabilities Virtual validation framework for evaluation of vehicle automation features using open-source AV stack
Vehicle Commands
HD Map
Unity Scene Developer Tools
PCD Map
Co-simulation Environment: • Generating a digital replica of the driving environment to evaluate automation functionalities e.g., Localization, path planning and vehicle control • Integration of software hooks to implement custom path planning algorithms i.e., OSU VD+PT optimizer • Integration of traffic information from calibrated SUMO environment 40
Thank You Stephanie Stockar stockar.1@osu.edu
Shawn Midlam Mohler midlam-mohler.1@osu.edu
42
AutoDrive Challenge II Qadeer Ahmed Faculty Advisor Buckeye AutoDrive Student Team
43
Buckeye AutoDrive Student Team
Ohio State students will develop and demonstrate an autonomous vehicle (AV) that can navigate urban driving courses as described by SAE Standard (J3016™) Level 4 automation
• The 4-year STEM focused challenge kicked off on September 30, 2021 • 10 teams including Ohio State • Areas of focus in Year 1 (In the order of importance) • Perception • Safety • Perception Cart demo (HW/Sensors/CAN) • Innovative solutions for emission and containment • AV Controls and simulation • Project Management • M-City will be testing playground • 1st year with Perception cart • 2nd year onwards with Bolt EUV
Student Team Composition MAE
ECE
2
CSE
3
Total: 6 students
Total: 25 Students
Total: 8 students
1 PhD student
2 PhD students
3 PhD students
2 MS students
17 MS students
5 MS students
3 BS students
7 BS students
0 BS students
ME Advisors: Qadeer Ahmed, Giorgio Rizzoni
ECE Advisor: Lisa Fiorentini
CSE Advisor: Harry Chao 45
First year timeline NOVEMBER-DECEMBER ’21 Hardware selection and acquisition, Fall Checkpoint Deliverables, Perception algorithm Development, Controls development, Research for mobility innovation Challenge 1
SEPT-OCT ’21 Project Kickoff, Recruitment of Students for Project, Work Breakdown and Planning, Training
FEBRUARY’22 Perception algorithm Development, Controls development, Winter Workshop, System Safety guide development
JANUARY ’22 Hardware acquisition, Perception algorithm Development, Controls development, Research for mobility innovation Challenge 1, Midpoint Checkpoint deliverables, Winter Workshop
APRIL ’22 Complexity reduction and performance improvement of Perception Algorithms, Mobility innovation challenge 2, System Safety
MARCH ’22 Performance and Complexity analysis of Perception Algorithm, MATLAB Simulation and control algorithm development, System Safety analysis
JUNE ’22 Year 1 Final competition
May ’22 Perception model deployment and Integration, CAN bus deployment and testing CAN signals, Final Deliverables of PM, Mobility innovation and System Safety.
46
Year 1 Goals Concept Design for Perception Cart • Onboard computer selection • CAN setup and debugging • Camera Calibration • Joint LiDAR & Camera Calibration Perception • Highway signs and objects, Intersection traffic light and Dynamic object challenges • Dataset generation and its labeling • ML based model development MathWorks Simulation Challenge • Waypoint Following • Interaction with traffic lights and signs, decision logic • Collision Avoidance
Object Detection Sensors Camera LiDAR …
Car
Detector
Lane Detection Sensors Camera LiDAR …
Distance? Interactive? Status? Traffic light
Detector
Distance? Direction? Velocity?
Speed Sign Distance? Limit?
Stop Sign Distance?
Vehicle Dynamics
47
Year 1 Goals Systems Safety • Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) • Single Element Fault Analysis (SEFA) • Safety Concept Report (SCR) Mobility Innovation Challenge • Prevent or detect/remove a contaminate from the autonomous vehicle sensors • Maximize their return of investment on the autonomous vehicle • Evaluate and optimize the power consumption of electrical systems including the sensors and Compute platform 48
Thank You Qadeer Ahmed ahmed.358@osu.edu
49
Break
50
Upcoming Connected Communities Project @ Ohio State Jordan D. Clark, PhD Assistant Professor College of Engineering 51
High-Level Overview Demonstrate how groups of gridinteractive efficient buildings combined with other types of DERs can reliably and cost effectively serve as grid assets by strategically deploying efficiency and demand flexibility.
US Department of Energy “Connected Communities” FOA • Led by Buildings Technology Office • Vehicles TO • Solar Energy TO • Office of Electricity
Award • 10 teams selected • OSU only university selected • 5 year project starting ~now • Final budget $4.9M federal + $2.1M cost share = $7M
52
“These projects will help universalize technology that can maximize the efficiency and sustainability of America’s nearly 130 million buildings and make significant headway in the fight against climate change.” - Jennifer M. Granholm, US Secretary of Energy 53
DOE Goals •
Show how buildings can reliably and costeffectively serve as grid assets
•
Decreased time and disruption for set up
•
Increased insights on occupant impact, comfort, willingness to change timing of energy use
•
New business models for demand flexibility and DER coordination, aggregation and optimization
•
Online solutions portal with case studies, best practices, analysis and associated analytical tools 54
Assets automated BUilding Control with Knowledge of distributed EnergY resources and Electrical Systems for Grid Offerings
(BUCKEYES GO!)
• • • •
20 centrally connected and controlled buildings 65k ft2 photovoltaics, 29 EV charging stations Combined heat and power plant & co-located central chiller plant. • Wind power purchase agreement • New EAIC + Innovation District • Battery???
Goals • Energy Efficiency: 35% energy reduction from 2017 baseline • Demand Flexibility >2 MW flexibility at peak times • Asset Value: 20% increase in NPV of renewable assets (vs 2019) • Improved Resilience to Extreme Events
55
Project Participants
56
PJM Interconnection L.L.C
Identified Stakeholders
American Electric Power Service Corporation
Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission
Ohio Power Company
Smart Columbus
More to come…
City of Columbus
57
Campus Modeling
Control
Working with NREL, ENGIE Research, XENDEE to build out modeling and decision making tools
Coordinated control through ENGIE Smart Institutions, DeepMind, others
Advancing state of the art in building and district modeling
Tasks
Moving to fully automated AI-driven control by end of project
Techno-Economic Analyses
Occupant Experience
Coordinated dispatching/control of buildings and DERs to improve asset value
Goal to measurably improve occupant experience
Market Design
Distributed sensing and app-based surveys
Resilience Improvement
Stakeholder Buy-in
Extensive modeling analysis to demonstrate resilience improvements from CC approach
Focus groups and interviews
Cybersecurity
Demonstration and development
Extensive analysis @ start of project
Business Model
Regulatory Analysis
Demonstration and development
New Tech Piloting
Indoor Air Quality sensing, plug load management, occupant sensing, potentially others
58
Demonstration, Dissemination De-risking CC approach, tech Education and outreach
Project Timeline MONTHS 0-14
Budget Period 1: Planning, Baselining, Instrumentation NOVEMBER -21-MARCH ’22
MONTHS 56-60
Budget Period 5: Analysis and Scale-Up MONTHS 24-36
Budget and Scope Revisions, Negotiations
Budget Period 3: Manual Control
APRIL ’22
OCTOBER ’21
MONTHS 37-55
Budget Period 4: Automatic Controls
Planned Project Start
Award Announced
MONTHS 15-23
You are here
Budget Period 2: Modeling and Controls Development, Pilot
59
Thank You Jordan Clark clark.1217@osu.edu
60
Ohio State Energy Partners – ENGIE Updates Caitlin Holley Program Manager ENGIE 61
ENGIE, Ohio State Energy Partners and the 50 Year Partnership • 50-Year Concession – started in July 2017 • Ohio State Energy Partners – A 50/50 joint venture between ENGIE and Axium Infrastructure • District Energy Operation of a campus with over 480 buildings, including 7 hospitals and medical research centers • $1.165 billion upfront payment, including $150 million investment in academic collaboration (internships!) • $1.7 billion total infrastructure investment in 50 years • Responsible for utility system capital improvements • 25% committed reduction of energy consumption over 10 years • Selected over a 2-year period as the top bidder amongst 40 participants in the RFI phase • ENGIE is the "operator" doing the day-to-day operations of the utility network on behalf of the Ohio State Energy Partners partnership 62
A Comprehensive Approach To Energy Management
63
Footprint & Energy Profile • 490 buildings on ≈ 1,670 acres • 100,000+ people daily • 1,882 hospital beds
• 16,000+ student residence beds • 3 stadiums = 120,000 seats • Elect., gas, steam, chilled water • 110 MW peak demand
• 2.9 million MMBTU of steam • $115 million annual spend • High reliability requirements 64
Utility System Components and How the Campus Utility is Interconnected
McCracken Plant
Geothermal Plant
East Chiller Plant
South Chiller Plant
West Campus Substation
65
Where Does Ohio State Get Energy?
66
Campus Network size • Chilled Water Supply = 26,074 LF = 4.94 Miles • Chilled Water Return = 26,684 LF = 5.05 Miles • Steam – • Existing Supply Lines = 57,594 Linear Feet = 10.91 Miles • Existing Condensate Lines = 50,594 LF = 9.58 Miles • 5.7 miles of walkable steam network tunnels • Gas Pipes = 72,883 LF = 13.8 Miles • Electrical Ductbanks = 188,470 LF = 35.7 Miles
67
Smart Meters and Energy Use Intensity Reduction
68
• Upgrades, retrofits, repairs and replacements that can extend and maximize the useful life of a utility system • Improves reliability and resiliency of distribution network • Ex: repairing steam lines underneath the Oval to prevent energy loss
Expansion
• Upgrades, retrofits, repairs and replacements that focus on increasing the building’s energy efficiency • Provides O&M benefits by reducing maintenance cost and improving outdated equipment • Ex: replacing lights with LEDs
Lifecycle
Energy Conservation
Project Types and Activity
• Providing utilities for buildings being built on Ohio State’s campus • Ex: new hospital tower that is being constructed will be connect to the electric and chilled water systems
69
ENGIE's Energy Conservation Measure Program
70
71
Combined Heat and Power Plant
72
Upcoming Work to Move into the Future
https://engineering.osu.edu/news/2021/10/department -energy-selects-ohio-state-one-10-connectedcommunity-sites
https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-invests-61-millionsmart-buildings-accelerate-renewable-energy-adoptionand-grid
73
Thank You Caitlin Holley Caitlin.Holley@engie.com
74
Planning Tool for Assessing Ohio State Options for a Sustainable and Responsible Energy Usage Matilde D’Arpino Research Scientist Center for Automotive Research
75
Introduction With the launch of a 105-MW Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant and the increase in controllable loads, OSU campus is quickly becoming an advanced microgrid and living energy laboratory. 105MW Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant
65 k ft2 solar power plant (in progress)
29 Electric vehicles and charging
50 MW wind power (power purchase agreement)
Steam plant and several chiller plants
485 Buildings’ flexibility
https://buildingthefuture.osu.edu/combined-heat-and-power-plant 76
Introduction 105MW combined heat and power (CHP) plant
65 k ft2 solar power plant (in progress)
50 MW wind power (power purchase agreement)
Steam plant and several chiller plants
29 electric vehicles and charging
485 building flexibility
• Ohio State is achieving: • Power generation flexibility • Loads flexibility
• OSU-Engie DOE Connected Community project is investigating the capacity of OSU existing on-campus connected community to provide essential but overlooked ancillary grid services from a diverse range of grid-interactive technologies in a cyber- and datasecure environment. (Award amount: $4.2M) • In the future, with more flexibility in the campus distributed energy resources (DERs), there will be large financial opportunities for OSU in applying in more grid service programs like ancillary services and demand response. 77
Current Research Interests 105MW combined heat and power (CHP) plant
65 k ft2 solar power plant (in progress)
50 MW wind power (power purchase agreement)
Steam plant and several chiller plants
There are SO MANY options of grid service programs provided by: • RTO (e.g. PJM) and • utilities (e.g. AEP) It is very difficult to assess which program/s have the higher techno-economic benefit and when to use the provided generators/loads flexibility. Some of these programs requires a dynamic modulation of the user power. Storage and EVs become an important asset.
29 electric vehicles and charging
485 building flexibility
78
Demand Response Programs Participants earn money or discount on bill if responding to specific programs: • Emergency Demand Response: pays consumers to reduce their demand during specific peak power events; RTO sends notice to customers; customers are paid on MWh basis even of on stand-by; • Economic Demand Response: consumers can voluntarily reduce their load to respond to high wholesale electricity market price; usually triggered by a price threshold; payment is a portion of the local marginal price;
https://www.enersponse.com/
• Synchronized Reserve Market: costumers provide capacity availability to support reserve operation and help with system reliability; event called by RTOs; payment is provided for the ability to potentially shed 100kW within 10 minutes; • Frequency Regulation: respond to 2-second resolution signal requesting shed or increase of power to maintain electricity quality and quantity; requires automated control; paid for performance and capacity. • And more….
Sources of grid reliability services
Current Research Interest My team is working on the development of a tool to perform a cost-benefit analysis of a wide variety of operational and financial energy decisions as well as their effect on carbon emissions in the energy domain, including purchase of commodities and grid services.
Impact of electricity market and tariff strategies (variable market price, 2/3 tiers,…)
Impact of price of natural gas on CHP operation
Trade off between selling vs storage excess energy
Revenue streams and trade offs in participating in Demand Response or ancillary services programs
Cost and benefits of possible future investments, such as sizing and topology of storage 80
Current Research Interest 105MW combined heat and power (CHP) plant
65 k ft2 solar power plant (in progress)
50 MW wind power (power purchase agreement)
Steam plant and several chiller plants
My team is working on the development of a tool to perform a cost-benefit analysis of a wide variety of operational and financial energy decisions as well as their effect on carbon emissions in the energy domain, including purchase of commodities and grid services. • Build different scenarios considering: • DER flexibility, • energy consumption, • EV penetration (OSU fleet and/or private cars, charging level), • commodity forecast,
29 electric vehicles and charging
485 building flexibility
• regulatory market scenarios, • seasonality. 81
Current Research Interest
Expected outcome: •
Assess revenue stream/saving for Ohio State: o Reduction of demand charges; o Remuneration/Incentives from participating to the specific program; o Time shift and peak shaving; o Accessing to time-based pricing mechanisms.
• •
Potential reduction of Ohio State’s carbon footprint; Potential reduction of Ohio State’s impact on the grid (access to more convenient electricity prices) and implementation of responsible load management;
•
Utilize/optimize the flexibility of the available DERs;
•
Increase internal power system reliability thanks to additional funding and continuous dynamic operation;
•
Increase Ohio State support to the grid and limit future substations’ expansion;
•
Showcase Ohio State commitment for energy efficiency and energy optimization. 82
Thank You Dr. Matilde D’Arpino darpino.2@osu.edu
83
LG Energy Solutions Project Update: Real-Time Observations of Mechanical Behaviors of Si-Based Anodes Marcello Canova, Professor Hanna Cho, Associate Professor Jung-Hyun Kim, Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 84
Background & Challenges Gravimetric Capacities
Mechanical Failure
McDowell et al. (2013). Advanced Materials, 25(36), 4966-4985.
Main technical barriers: • Poor cyclability and high-rate capability due to significant volume change (250%-280%) of active material during cycling • Slow reaction kinetics • Low Li-ion diffusivity • Low electronic conductivity
SEM images of 325 mesh crystalline Si particles before (a) and after (b) lithiation Obrovac et al. (2014). Chemical reviews, 114(23), 11444-11502.
85
Strategies Nano Si
Micro Si materials
(nanowires, nano hollows, nanotubes) • Pros: • Alleviated particle fracture and isolation • Extended cycle life • Cons: • Low tap density and volumetric capacity • Safety and health-related issues during manufacturing • Difficult to scale-up for mass productions
• Pros: • Higher tap density and volumetric capacity • Safer to handle during manufacturing • Lower manufacturing cost
• Cons: • Vulnerable to particle fracture and pulverization • Poor cycle life
86
Research Questions and Approach • Finding optimal operating conditions of µ-Si anode to maintain mechanical integrity during battery cycling • Fill a knowledge gap on the mechanical evolution of micron-Si
• Design in-situ Atomic Force Microscopy experiments and computational modeling
87
In-situ AFM during Electrochemical Cycling
701 mV
88
Evolution of the µ-Si interfaces Particle crack
SEI regeneration
Before crack generation
Particle Isolation
µm 0.8
Right after crack generation
After resting for 2 h
0
-0.8
Second discharge at ~ 700 mV
5µm 89
Controlled LIB Cycling
0.1 C-rate, 25oC 90
Model Overview • Modeling the charge/discharge of Silicon anodes is a critical research challenge. • Volume change and related stress in the anode material need to be captured along with the lithium transport. • A continuum model[1] was adapted from literature with necessary modifications. • The model results into a system of stiff nonlinear Index-2 Partial Differential and Algebraic Equations (PDAEs).
Nonlinear Spherical Diffusion + Flux Law Stress/Strain and Momentum Balance + Concentration Constraint
Anode Particle Lattice Displacement and Volume Change
Symbol 𝜃
Physical Description
Symbol
Physical Description
Concentration
𝑢 ത
Lattice Displacement
𝑥 𝐿𝑖𝑆
State of Charge
𝑤
Radial Lattice Gradient
𝜒
Particle Radius
𝜎𝑟
Radial Stress
Flux of Lithium Occupied Sites
𝜎𝑡
Tangential Stress
Flux of Lithium Unoccupied Sites
𝜋
Pressure on Particle
𝑁𝐿𝑖𝑆 𝑁𝑆
91
[1] Christensen, John, and John New man. "Stress generation and fracture in lithium insertion materials." Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 10, no. 5 (2006): 293-319.
Methodology Variation in Particle Surface Concentration and Volume during Lithiation (results for 𝑳𝒊𝑪𝟔 anode)
Implementation Benchmark Solution was implemented by directly discretizing the model equations using finite difference method
An original semi-explicit scheme was proposed: system is reformulated into decoupled set of nonlinear Differential and Algebraic Equations (DAEs)
Computational Improvements Sensitivity study performed to select optimal time step size to achieve the desired accuracy. A 3-hour simulation can be completed in 5.3min. Index reduction applied to obtain semi-explicit solution that reduces the size of the Jacobian matrix in the implicit solver. This enables use of a larger time step size, resulting from increased temporal discretization accuracy.
Sample Results Simulation of a 3-hour lithiation under galvanostatic conditions indicates that proposed model implementation matches well against benchmark solution and literature (error of 10^(-5) on average mole fraction).
Next Steps Verify semi-explicit scheme with benchmark solution and literature results. Calibrate model to experimental data for Silicon. 92
[1] Christensen, John, and John New man. "Stress generation and fracture in lithium insertion materials." Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 10, no. 5 (2006): 293-319.
Research Summary
Implementation Benchmark
PDE+AE
Improvement
AE
PDE+AE
PDE
AE
Computational Improvements Implementation
• Benchmark: Full implicit (AE solver) • Improvement: Semi-explicit (ODE+AE)
Computational Improvements
• Benchmark: Time step size sensitivity • Improvement: Jacobian matrix size reduction
Sample Results
• Full lithiation with galvanostatic charge at C/3 • 𝑥𝐿𝑖𝑆 has an error at the order of 10-5
Next Steps
• Validate semi-explicit scheme accuracy • Model calibration to experimental data
PDE
AE
• Larger Δ𝑡 leads to faster simulation times • Explicit solver for PDE does not need iteration • Iterative solver for AE has a smaller Jacobian matrix
Sample Results
Raw In-Situ AFM Images of a group of Si Particles (a – Before Cracking; b – After Cracking)
Next Steps
• Semi-explicit solver validation • Model calibration
Qualitative behavior of Silicon during Lithiation Change in concentration results in lattice displacement. During delithiation, tensile stress at the particle surface may contribute to cracking. 93
[1] Christensen, John, and John New man. "Stress generation and fracture in lithium insertion materials." Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 10, no. 5 (2006): 293-319.
Thank You Hanna Cho (cho.867@osu.edu) Marcello Canova (canova.1@osu.edu) Jung-Hyun Kim (kim.6776@osu.edu)
94
Partnerships in Mobility DriveOhio
Rich Granger Managing Director, Workforce Development DriveOhio
95
CONNECTED
AUTOMATED
Smart mobility on the ground, in the air, everywhere
SHARED
ELECTRIC
How it started…
How it’s going…
Automated and Connected Vehicles
BELLEFONTAINE
MARYSVILLE
EAST LIBERTY
DUBLIN
COLUMBUS
61 Roadside Units
I-70 Truck Automation Corridor
Electric Vehicles
EV Charging and Freight Electrification Studies
Read the reports at: drive.ohio.gov
DriveElectric.gov
Advanced Air Mobility
SkyVision
Advanced Air Mobility at Springfield Airport
Electric Charging Station
Vertiport
Unmanned Traffic Management Research
AAM Emergency Services Demonstration
Ohio Advanced Air Mobility Economic Impact Analysis
Read the report at: uas.ohio.gov
Workforce Initiatives
Workforce Development ENGAGING
PREPARING
UP-SKILLING
PreK to 12
Career Tech + Higher Ed
Incumbent
Problem-Based Learning
Work-Based Learning
Industry Credentials
2022 Workforce Initiatives Smart Mobility Ambassador
#STEMbuildsOhio Design Challenge
CaseLAB® Industry Sector Partnership FlyOhio Vertiport Innovation Challenge
EV Workforce Development
Smart Mobility Capstone Challenge
Vertiport Innovation Challenge
Advanced Air Mobility Capstone Project
How can you improve your school, community, or world by
reimagining air mobility to be more equitable, accessible, or efficient?
DesignChallenge.OSLN.org
Smart Mobility Ambassador Program
drive.ohio.gov/ambassador
Electric Vehicle Workforce Training
ADAS Overview
Hybrid Vehicle Repair
CAN Data
aaatechtraining.com
evitp.org
Rich Granger Managing Director, Workforce rich.granger@drive.ohio.gov drive.ohio.gov
Partnerships in Mobility JobsOhio
Jonathan Bridges Managing Director, Automotive, Steel and White Goods JobsOhio
96
Ohio’s Competitive Advantage in Economic Development 2022
This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04( C)(1) and (2)
JobsOhio is a private non-profit corporation designed to drive job creation and new capital investment in Ohio through business attraction, retention and expansion efforts.
MISSION Drive job creation and new capital investment in Ohio through business attraction, retention and expansion efforts.
VISION Consistently lead the nation in private sector job growth.
Become top economic development organization in the US.
This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
VALUES Act With Integrity — Value People — Make a Difference
98
One Firm, One State
One of the most important decisions made when creating JobsOhio was to build out capacity across the state.
JobsOhio partners with six regional economic development organizations around the state to deliver economic development services.
This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
99
JobsOhio Support The outcome of the rationalization process is reflected in the services and support JobsOhio provides today: • Site selection services • Streamlined permitting process • Introduction to service providers • Workforce recruitment and training support
• Financial incentives
JobsOhio provides comprehensive support to companies looking to invest in Ohio.
• Long-term partnership for business success
This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
100
Low Natural Disaster Risk
The map overlays Earthquake (both moderate and high risk), Flood, Tornadoes and Hurricane risks in the continental United States.
Earthquakes - Moderate Earthquakes - High Floods Hurricanes Tornados
Data for this map was provided by Redcross.org and Noaa.gov. This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
101
JobsOhio 2021 Record Performance Generational Opportunity
2021*
Jobs Created
~29,000 NEW all-time high
~$1.6B
Payroll Created
NEW all-time high
Projects Won
>400 NEW all-time high
Business Retention & Expansion
2,346 NEW all-time high
All-time high score in Customer Satisfaction
*Unofficial year end results as of December 31, subject to finalization This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04( C)(1) and (2)
102
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Has Grown in Ohio
103
FDI in Ohio Has Grown Dramatically Composition by Country
Top Sources of FDI in Ohio 452 Announced Greenfield Projects
#4 in U.S. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
Japan Germany
>1,100 employers
27%
33%
Canada United Kingdom
France
>270,000 Ohio jobs directly supported
Other
13% 7%
11%
9%
~6.5% of all Ohio jobs
This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
104
JobsOhio is a U.S. Partner of Choice Other Geographies
Advanced Manufacturing Automotive Energy & Chemicals
Food Processing Information Technology Healthcare Other
This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
105
Ohio’s Largest Manufacturing Employer • Marysville is first U.S. auto plant by a Japanese automaker in America • Began in Ohio in 1982. • Honda’s largest vehicle production facility in the U.S.A.; 16,750 associates • Honda’s 2nd largest R&D Center in world • Partnered to test V2X smart mobility technology in a real-world environment
This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
106
Success Story
LG Chem Vice Chairman & CEO Hak-Cheol Shin: “Our joint venture with the No. 1 American automaker will further prepare us for the anticipated growth of the North American EV market, while giving us insights into the broader EV ecosystem. Our long-standing history with General Motors has proven our collective expertise in this space, and we look forward to continuing this drive for zero emissions.”
THE COMPANY: Ultium Cells LLC is a JV between General Motors and LG Chem. The operation will manufacture lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. Ultium Cells plans to establish a lithium-ion battery cell production facility to serve the electric vehicle market. At the completion of the project, this facility will be one of the largest cell manufacturing plants in the world.
THE PROJECT: • Location: Lordstown, Northeast Ohio • Jobs created: 1,100 • Capital invested: $2.3B
INCENTIVES: JobsOhio Economic Development Grant:
$
50,000,000
JCTC Job Creation Tax Credit
$
13,800,000
TOTAL: $63,800,000 GM Chairman and CEO Mary Barra: “With this investment, Ohio and its highly capable workforce will play a key role in our journey toward a world with zero emissions. Combining our manufacturing expertise with LG Chem’s leading battery-cell technology will help accelerate our pursuit of an all-electric future. We look forward to collaborating with LG Chem on future cell technologies that will continue to improve the value we deliver to our customers.”
This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
107
Automotive Industry In Ohio
108
$15.97 billion Gross State Product
111,000+ Automotive Workforce, 2nd Largest
670+ Establishments
1.1 million vehicles produced, 4th Largest
#1 Producer of Engines
Committed to the Future of Automotive Mfg.
#2 Producer of Transmissions This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
6 OEM Light Vehicle Assembly Plants, 2 Commercial Vehicle OEMs and the iconic Airstream company
109
Ohio’s Extensive Logistics Infrastructure Seattle
Toronto, Canada 75
One day’s drive to >60% of US & Canadian populations.
FREETRADE ZONE Largest presence of foreign trade zones in the Midwest.
70
Boston
90
Detroit Chicag o
New York City
80
90
70
Washington DC
70 77
Norfolk
St. Louis 75
65
Charlotte
Los Angeles
Charleston Atlanta
4th-largest interstate highway system
13 Intermodals; 4th largest network of railroads
9 commercial ports Only Midwest state w/direct shipping to Europe for container & heavy goods.
This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
7 commercial airports 97 general aviation airports.
North American OEM Assembly Plants Within One-Day Drive – 1,000km/600mi Radius of Ohio o 96% of U.S. and Canadian Auto Production • • • • • • • • •
This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
Honda BMW Daimler Stellantis Ford General Motors Nissan Toyota Other OEMs
111
Motor Vehicle Industry Snapshot 5 3 1 1 2 4 1 7 5
5
1
4
2 3
10 1 1
8
3
4
7 3 1
10
6 3 2 4 1 2 4
9
10
1 1
13
9
1. 2. 3. 4.
Ford Ohio Assembly Plant Ford Engine Plant 1 Ford Sharonville Transmission Ford Lima Engine
Honda ~14,700
6
2 2 3
1. Navistar 2. Paccar 3. Airstream
Ford ~6,500
8
5
12
14
1 8
Commercial Vehicles / Specialty ~4,900
9
Source: 2018.4 QCEW; DSA The Ohio Motor Vehicle Report 2016 Facility locations generalized. * Foxconn planned 2022 This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Honda Motor Co Honda Engineering Honda Motor Co. East Liberty Honda Motor Co. (PMC) Honda Celina Aluminum Honda Russels Point Transmission 7. Honda Motor Co. Anna 8. US Yachiyo 9. AY Mfg. 10.Cardington Yutaka Technologies
Stellantis ~7,250 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Hyundai MOBIS (FCA Integration) Chrysler Toledo N Assembly Plant Chrysler Toledo Assembly Plant Kuka Toledo Chrysler Toledo Machining
General Motors ~6,500 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Ultium Cells (GM & LG JV) General Motors DMAX General Motors Parma Metal Center General Motors Defiance Foundry General Motors Toledo Transmission
Tier 1 / Large Suppliers ~10,150 1. KTH Parts Industries 2. Kth Parts R&D 3. Schaeffler Technologies 4. Moriroku Technology 5. Flex-N-Gate Ventra 6. Fuyao Auto Glass 7. Norplas Industries Inc 8. Delphi Automotive 9. American Showa 10.Nissan Brake 11.Dana Inc. 12.F&P America Inc. 13.EG Industries Inc. 14.Lordstown Motors & Foxconn *
112
End-to-End Supply Chain
This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
113
EV Production in the U.S. Ohio
Michigan Indiana
Colorado Planned Battery Plant: SolidPower in 2024
Plant: Fort Wayne, Princeton Brand: GMC, Toyota Model: Sierra, Highlander Type: HEV
Kansas
Plant: Wayne, Lake Orion, Hamtramck Brand: Ford, Chevy, Buick Model: Focus, Bolt, C-Max, Lacrosse, Impala Type: EV, HEV, PHEV
Plant: Marysville, Lordstown Brand: Acura, Honda, Lordstown Motors Model: ILX, MDX, NSX, Accord, Endurance Type: HEV, EV
Planned Battery Plant: Samsung SDI Battery Plant: LG Chem, A123, Akasol Battery Sales Office: CATL
Planned Battery Plant: Ultium Cells, LG Chem in 2022
Battery Plant: Tesla Planned Battery Plant: iM3NY in 2022
Kentucky Plant: Georgetown Brand: Toyota Model: Avalon, Camry Type: HEV
Plant: Fairfax Brand: Chevy Model: Malibu Type: HEV
Tennessee
California Plant: Fremont, Moreno Valley Brand: Tesla, Karma Model: Model S, X, Y, 3, GS-6, Revero Type: EV, PHEV
Battery Plant: Tesla/ Panasonic, SILA in 2021, QuantumScape in 2024
New York
South Carolina Plant: Spartanburg, Ridgeville Brand: BMW, Volvo Model: X3, X5, X7, S60 Type: PHEV
Alabama Texas Planned Battery Plant: Tesla 2021
Plant: Vance Brand: Mercedes-Benz Model: GLE Type: PHEV Toyota/Mazda JV Plant for EV production in 2021
This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
Georgia Planed Battery Plant: SK Innovation
Plant: Smyrna Brand: Nissan, Infiniti Model: Leaf, LeafSV/SLQX60, Rogue Type: EV, HEV Battery Plant: LG Chem, Microvast in 2023
Florida Battery Plant: saft 114
JobsOhio projects with suppliers to EV battery manufacturing companies 10 companies that were listed by S&P Capital have been a supplier to one of the 36 global EV battery manufacturing companies
This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04( C)(1) and (2)
115
Talent Strategic Initiative
Workforce and Talent • Ohio’s manufacturing workforce
Top Engineering Universities
includes nearly 700,000 Ohioans • Ohio’s auto industry employs more
than 108,000 people (EMSI, 2017) • Ohio has the 2nd largest
automotive workforce when adding up OEM assembly and motor vehicle parts manufacturing workforce • 54 OTC (Ohio Technical Centers) This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
Trade Schools Cuyahoga Community College (Tri-C), Fortis College, Mahoning County Career and Technical Center, Tolles, Ohio Technical College, Butler Tech 117
Ohio is Investing in the FUTURE Talent Strategy
Ohio To Work™ 2K Served
• Expand Ohio To Work™ Markets, offer statewide opportunities • Columbus, Mahoning Valley, Toledo and Cincinnati / Dayton
2K Served
500 Reskilled
500 Reskilled
1K Placed
1K Placed 17K Served
Statewide impact to date:* • Served: 32,905 • Reskilled: 3,469 • Placed: 4,314
1,100 Reskilled 4K Placed 19K Served
1,250 Reskilled 4K Placed
* As of March 1, 2022 This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04(C)(1) and (2)
118
Thank You
119
Largest Economic Development Project in Ohio History (PHASE 1) Generational Opportunity for Ohio
$20B 3K 7K 10K This document is not a public record and its content should not be reprinted in any other document. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(A)(1)(bb) and 187.04( C)(1) and (2)
Capital Investment Intel Jobs Avg $135K Construction Jobs Indirect Jobs
120
Enterprise for Research, Innovation and Knowledge Update Dorota Grejner-Brzezinska Vice President of Knowledge Enterprise Office of Research
121
April 1, 2022
Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinska Vice President for Knowledge Enterprise grejner-brzezinska.1@osu.edu
ENTERPRISE MISSION STATEMENT
The Enterprise for Research, Innovation and Knowledge empowers and supports the university community to excel in research and creative expression, innovation and entrepreneurship, and partnership engagement that drives discovery, transforms lives, serves society and fuels economic growth.
ENTERPRISE STRATEGIC PRIORITIES • Enable Curiosity-Driven Discoveries and Creative Expression
• Build Large-Scale, Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation Centers • Design and Develop the Innovation District • Nurture Innovation and Entrepreneurship
ENTERPRISE ORGANIZATIONAL CHART EVP for Research, Innovation and Knowledge Grace Wang
Vice President for Research Peter Mohler ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
✓ ✓ ✓
Sponsored Programs Animal Research Facility Research Compliance Institutional Research and Strategic Intelligence Research Centers Arts and Humanities Faculty Fellow Research IT Support
Vice President for Knowledge Enterprise
Vice President for Innovation and Economic Development Scott Osborne
Dorota Grejner-Brzezinska
✓ ✓
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
✓
Strategic Research Development Center Proposal Development Research Faculty Development Research Faculty Planning Seed Funding President’s Research Excellence Program
Chief of Staff for EVP
✓ ✓ ✓
✓ ✓
Corporate Partnerships Keenan Center for Entrepreneurship Student Accelerators Technology Commercialization Ohio State Innovation Foundation (OSIF) Economic Impact Study for the University
Business Development and Innovation District Dawn Larzelere
Brad Harris
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
✓ Office Operation HR Support Budget Planning Financial Management
✓ ✓
✓
✓
Communication and Marketing Event Planning Coordination of Innovation District Business Development Support of Innovation District Leadership Committee Board of Trustees coordinator
“By backing great ideas emanating both from our faculty and from administrative leaders, Ohio State aims to double its sponsored research within this decade.” – President Kristina M. Johnson State of the University Address | February 18, 2021
ENTERPRISE HIGHLIGHTS 41 AT O H I O S TAT E
$1.2B in Total Annual Research Expenditures (Fiscal Year 2021)
Faculty led, interdisciplinary teams awarded funding in the first three rounds of the President’s Research Excellence Program
306 Invention disclosures filed (Fiscal Year 2021)
KEY RESEARCH AND INNOVATION DRIVERS FOR GROWTH Addressing critical societal challenges will require cross-cutting approaches that bridge multiple disciplines including the Arts, Engineering, Humanities, Medicine, Physical Sciences, Public Policy, and Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences.
Food
Energy and Sustainability
Water
AI/ML/IoT Life Sciences Quantum Healthcare and Aging
Mobility
Security
OFFICE OF KNOWLEDGE ENTERPRISE • Established in spring 2021 to enable strategic growth of Ohio State’s research portfolio • Supports and empowers researchers in both curiosity-driven and large-scale convergence research to •
bolster Ohio State’s research reputation, expand the societal impact of our work, and grow research talent
• Positions Ohio State for national leadership in research and creative expression •
by leveraging collaboration with organizations and units across campus to integrate activities across the sciences, arts and humanities, engineering, policy, business, medicine and other fields. https://erik.osu.edu/knowledge-enterprise
PRESIDENT’S RESEARCH EXCELLENCE PROGRAM The President’s Research Excellence (PRE) program provides seed support for crossand interdisciplinary research • Grow research and innovation enterprise • Increase research eminence • Attract more externally sponsored research funding • Address large, complex societal challenges
TWO COMPONENTS OF THE PRE PROGRAM
Catalyst
• Up to $200,000 • Large cross- and interdisciplinary teams • Large-scale, high-impact research addressing challenges of societal importance • Generates long-term, sustained and significant impact
Accelerator
• Up to $50,000 • Small teams • Curiosity-driven, novel, high-risk and high-reward research
August 18, 2021
YEAR 1: ACCELERATOR PROPOSALS
70
19
$947,000
Accelerator applications received
projects awarded
total dollars awarded
47%
15
107
of awarded principal investigators are women
of 15 academic colleges submitted proposals
units and departments represented in submitted proposals
August 18, 2021
YEAR 1: CATALYST PROPOSALS
50
13
7
Catalyst concept papers received
13 papers invited for full submission
7 awards made
28%
12
of awarded principal investigators are women
of 15 academic colleges submitted proposals
$1,399,115 total dollars awarded
January 3, 2022
YEAR 2: ACCELERATOR PROPOSALS
33
15
$749,968
Accelerator applications received
projects awarded
total dollars awarded
40%
11
116
of awarded principal investigators are women
of 15 academic colleges submitted proposals
units and departments represented in submitted proposals
March 30, 2022
Thank you!
136
Dwight Blaser Meritorious Service Award
137
The Dwight Blaser Meritorious Service Award is presented annually to individuals whose sustained and extraordinary personal services have had a significant and lasting effect on the advancement of Ohio State’s Center for Automotive Research (CAR).
138
Dwight Blaser, PhD, was an alumnus of The Ohio State University and a retiree of the General Motors Corp. where he served as the Director of Research and Development. He was a member of the CAR External Advisory Board since its establishment in 1993. Dwight passed away on July 19, 2017 139
Jeff Hemphill Jeff is the Chief Technical Officer for Schaeffler in the Americas where he is responsible for research and new product development for automotive transmission, engine, chassis and industrial components and systems. Most recently he served as President of SAE International in 2021, and Automotive Vice President from 2013 - 2016. Jeff has 33 years of experience in automotive and industrial product development, including manufacturing, product design, testing and vehicle development. 140
Schaeffler and CAR collaboration: • CAR residential engineers from Schaeffler group • Lab access to Energy Innovation Lab at Ohio State and share battery equipment
• Access to Ohio State centers and analytical labs for multi-scale characterizations • Engage students in preparation for future careers in the industry • Training advanced techniques to students via interactive engineering program between Schaeffler 141 – Ohio State teams
Thank You Save the Date Fall 2022 EAB September 30, 2022
142