ERIC RICHARDS: THE COMPOSER AND HIS NOTATION To present the fact that the unpresentable exists. To make visible that there is something which can be conceived and which can neither be seen nor made
visible'
Iean Francois Lyotard
I use notation itselfto help the performer create and sustain sounds of a wispy and ambiguous character, rhythmically indeterminate attack, and unevenly broken up duration... I am trying to look at certain sounds from a multiple perspective... This, then, is a deliberately paradoxical endeavor: the notation and bringing into being ofthe unformed, the ambiguous, and the unfinished,.. trying to make visible the invisible.
Eric Richards Without description, without echo: the desire for the intrinsicality of a thing, which cannot come to be, unless we give something of ourselves: The Fury of a hermetic language. Roland Barthes
Music notation is a visual representation of both musical sound and thought. The relationship between the musical idea and its notation is a reciprocal one. Musical notation is the means by which the composer projects the musical idea into time. The score is the means by which musical time is made intelligible. The musical score comprises a system of both phonic and graphic notational signs. In the true Saussurean sense, the notational sign is made up of a "signifier" (a sound-image or its graphic equivalent) and signified (the musical concept or sound-idea). In Western Music, these signs are spatially situated on an implied grid-like background-a visual corollary to the vertical (pitch) and horizontal (time) aspects of music. As a means of communication, music notation acts as both a descriptive
record of musical sound (either imagined or heard) and a prescriptive directive for' performance. As a vehicle of expression, music notation lies suspended between memory and expectation. In the chain ofmusical meaning, the notational sign functions as the point ofarrival for the composer's musical thought, and the point ofdeparture for the performer's realization of the work.
The notational sign comes to stand for both a partial presence and partial absence of sound and, by extension, musical meaning. The musical work cannot be solely represented by the score alone. The musical score can only approximate all the properties of the performance. The structural anthropologist Claude Levi-Strauss suggests that both music and mythology are framed by shadow:
Music and myth bring us face to face with potential objects of which only the shadows are actualized with conscious approximations (a myth and a musical score cannot be more) of inevitably unconscious truths, which follow from them.
The score can never fully encompass the multiplicity of interpretative possibilities but instead opens the way to them. The process of interpretation is set in motion by the score. The composer Igor Stravinsky addresses the question of the identity of the musical work: No matter how scrupulously a piece of music is notated, no matter how carefully it may be insured against every possible ambiguity through indications of tempo, shading, phrasing, accentuation, and so on, it always contains hidden elements that deff definition.