The election edition - pgs 3, 6 and 7
Perdeby Tuks se amptelike studentekoerant / Official Tuks student newspaper / Kuranta ya baithuti ya semmušo ya Tuks
31August2015
year77issue15
EFFSC-UP intimidation reigns after student forum meeting MICHAL-MARÉ LINDEN AND MICHAEL BONGANI REINDERS Following the collapse of the third quarterly Student Forum on Thursday 27 August in the Louw hall, altercations broke out between several groups present in the venue which led to members of the EFFSC-UP intimidating and assaulting a photographer for Perdeby and two members of Afriforum. Perdeby photographer Mothusi Mosibi was present at the forum and recorded footage throughout the meeting. When members of the floor started creating commotion, Mosibi moved to the back of the venue to take footage of the members of the floor as well as the panel and SRC speakers. He realised that he could not get adequate footage of the members of the floor creating commotion and asked friend Bradley Duck to take footage of the members of the floor on his phone on behalf of Perdeby. Many of these rowdy individuals were wearing EFF regalia. Duck explains that, “I recorded for about a minute or so and then one of the guys noticed and they [EFFSC-UP] started shouting that I mustn’t record”. One of the members came to Duck and told him that he would take his phone and break it if he didn’t stop recording. An end was called to the meeting and as Duck stood up to leave a group formed around him. “They were shouting and screaming that I must take out my phone and show them that I am deleting the footage” says Duck. Mosibi advised Duck to leave but EFFSC-UP members grabbed and held Duck. SRC President Mosibudi “Rassie” Rasethaba then stepped in and helped Duck out of the venue where the footage was deleted. Afriforum members noticed the EFFSC-UP members were intimidating and assaulting Duck. A female member of Afriforum took out her phone to record and photograph the EFFSC-UP assault. Marthinus Jacobs of Afriforum started walking towards Duck to help him however, some of the members of EFFSC-UP started moving towards the female from Afriforum busy filming and he returned to aid her. Jacobs and the female left the venue as Rasethaba diffused the situation with Duck and the EFFSC-UP. Jacobs and the female Afriforum member then returned to the venue to check up on the situation and members of the EFFSC-UP “charged” and “blocked” her, trapping her and Jacobs in the back corner of the venue. EFFSCUP insisted that they delete the video. The members of Afriforum refused and shouted back at the EFFSC-UP. Rasethaba then approached the group to help diffuse the situation, also recommending that the video be deleted while telling the EFFSCUP members to leave them alone because they would delete the video. As Jacobs and the female Afriforum member tried to move past the EFF members however, the EFF members retaliated by attempting to grab the phone from the female Afriforum member’s hand, shouting and pushing her and
Images: Twitter
Jacobs. Jacobs managed to then pull the female Afriforum member through the back of the group and out the door at the back of the venue. Rasethaba confirmed that he advised Duck and the female Afriforum member to rather delete their footage in order not to escalate the volatile situation. EFFSC-UP published a media release on Twitter on the evening of 27 August named #AfriforumTurnsIntoJournalists. In the media release they stated, “The EFFSC-UP notes with grave concern the continuous collapse of the Student Form”. In an interview with Perdeby, acting chairperson for EFFSC-UP, Sam Mphuti explained that they [the EFFSC-UP] felt victimised on campus because security services constantly recorded members who wear EFF regalia wherever they went on campus. Johannes Ranoko, EFFSC-UP war councillor stated that Duck’s camera was fixed on them the whole time and even whilst Sasco members left the hall the camera did not move from them. “We tried to raise this with the chairperson but he failed to recognise us” said Ranoko. Ranoko went on to say that the problem with Student Forum lies with Chief Justice, Sanan Mirzoyev, calling him incompetent. Ranoko believes the only Student Forum that was successful was the second one this year which wasn’t chaired by Mirzoyev. In the media release the EFFSC-UP states that the “SRC President failed to protect members of the EFFSC-UP from being recorded by a white male and female member of Afriforum without consent”. As previously explained, Duck (the reffered to white male) is not affiliated with Afriforum and was asked to take video footage from a different angle in the hall for Perdeby’s multimedia section. The unrest of the floor before the incidents occured, began with members of the floor
questioning the point of Student Forum and demanding for their question to be answered at Student Forum despite not having submitted them at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. “The Student Forum was created in terms of the new Constitution as an attempt to create a more structured platform that would alleviate the ineffectiveness and chaos that had been caused by its predecessor [the Student Parliament]. The Constitutional Tribunal, as the judicial arm of student governance, was chosen to chair the meeting in order to ensure impartiality and that the exact procedure as envisioned by the Constitution was complied with”, explains Chief Justice of the Constitutional Tribunal Mirzoyev according to the Constitution for Student Governance (CSG). Regarding members asking that Mirzoyev does not chair the next meeting. Mirzoyev explained: “I do not hail from a political background, nor do I seek to advance any particular structures agenda or create the law. As a custodian of the Constitution, my only job is to ensure compliance with the rules and regulations of the institution. Now this may seem rigid, given the discretionary powers that a constitution contains relating to substantive issues, but I must emphasise that the nature of Student Forum is purely procedural and therefore arguments that are made for more “judicial activism” are sadly misplaced.” Mirzoyev further stated how he had explained the procedure of Student Forum at the beginning of the meeting. “Students were to submit questions in writing 48 hours in advance. After the SRC President had given the quarterly report, the students would be given an opportunity to direct their submitted questions at a particular SRC portfolio and would be entitled to ask follow up questions until such time that they received a satisfactory
response. I noted that this process had often left students disgruntled in the past and informed them that if they wanted to have a more open or conversational platform with the SRC, then they should petition for or request a mass meeting in terms of section 46 of the CSG. The purpose of Student Forum, I explained, was to facilitate the transparency aspect of good governance and that accountability should be sought through the mechanism of mass meetings”, Mirzoyev added. Mirzoyev also explained how he addressed the disruptions that occured during the question and answer session. “I emphasised that no questions would be taken from the floor... this news was not received well and several students proceeded to leave the venue... At this point students started interrupting the process by making “points of order” and “points of clarity”. There is absolutely no provision for these “points of order” to be made in terms of the Constitution...I refused to allow students to ask questions from the floor (which are contained within the “points of order”) as this would undermine the rights of those students who had followed the correct legal process and who wished to have their questions answered,” Mirzoyev explained further. “In keeping with my role as chairperson and upholder of the rules, I was unwilling to submit to disruptive behaviour and as such I requested that the SRC respond to the submitted questions in writing and I stood the Student Forum down,” Mirzoyev concluded. Perdeby spoke to a number of witnesses and political societies that were attending Student Forum. Daso chairperson Miné Vorster said: “In my opinion, the EFF doesn’t read the constitution so they don’t know the process. At every single Student Forum, the same thing happens because they don’t follow procedure and they think that the Chief Justice is wrong but he’s actually just following the rules.” She added that “she doesn’t know why this [the disruption of Student Forum and the assault] is happening again because this should have stopped the first time. So I don’t know why they got away with it in the first place but I feel glad that it happened in such a public space because there are so many witnesses and video recordings of the incident.” Daso wants to lay a complaint against the EFFSC-UP with the registrar. “We live in a democracy and the media is part of a democracy. So you can’t have a democracy without free media to report and to hold whoever is in office to account. It’s very important. You can’t have an accountable society where the media is not free and fair and allowed to publish what they find. That’s why it was so shocking to us. It was public space so you were allowed to take recordings but just because they know they might get into trouble with what was said and what was captured they wanted to [prevent footage being published]”, Vorster concluded. The Louw Hall has CCTV cameras installed and security services confirmed that footage of the meeting exists.