OECD Public Governance Reviews Supreme Audit Institutions And Good Governance

Page 81

2 – SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTIONS’ INPUT INTO POLICY FORMULATION – 79

Key Function 4: Setting internal control and managing risk Box 2.10. The SAI of Portugal – strengthening controls in state owned enterprises Objective Portugal’s SAI, the Tribunal de Contas (TCU), assessed the internal audit function within state owned enterprises for the year 2008, with a view to strengthening overall governance of the selected entities.

Type Performance audit, guidance.

Scope and methodology Looking at 20 state owned enterprises, the performance audit sought to: evaluate the internal audit function in public sector enterprises, compare it to international best practices, and assess the influence of governance models of entities on the effectiveness of the internal audit function.

Criteria Country laws and regulations, government wide indicators, public sector entities’ objectives/indicators, foreign laws and regulations, standards/guidance from international organisations.

Resources Four auditors (managers and economists) and over 300 man-hours.

Outcomes Of the 20 entities that were involved in the audit and that responded to the survey, 16 reported having an internal audit unit, and others expressed their intent to establish one. Of the 16 with an internal audit unit, only 5 were aware of, and applied, the full breadth of internal audit concepts. Half of the entities’ internal audit units reported to the board, although some boards did not include non-executive members, which risked compromising the independence of the internal audit function. The Tribunal de Contas quantified the costs of the surveyed companies at 15.9 million euros. Given the costs involved, the Tribunal recognised that there was room for valuefor-money to be integrated into the function. The Court recommended that the companies’ boards of directors revived the internal audit function and provided the necessary skills for it to play a significant role in evaluating the effectiveness of risk management and control and governance. It identified the Institute of Internal Auditors’ internationally recognised principles as guidance for the company boards to follow.

Good practices used Following the audit, principles of good governance applicable to state-owned enterprises were integrated in a legal diploma (Decree Law 133/2013 of 3 October). In 2014, a Code of Corporate Governance (article 229 of Código dos Valores Mobiliários) was issued, requiring that all entities belonging to the public enterprise sector have a benchmark of good governance, regardless of their scope.

Lessons learned This was an innovative approach adopted by Portugal’s SAI as only a few companies had addressed this issue at the time of the audit. Through a cross-sectional evaluation of the internal audit function in public sector enterprises, this audit enabled the Tribunal to synthesise information and guidance in order to inform the government of the effectiveness of internal controls in state owned enterprises.

Further reading www.tcontas.pt/en/reports/audit_report_08-2011-2s_abstract.pdf. Source: OECD Survey of Peer Supreme Audit Institutions; further reading links above.

SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTIONS AND GOOD GOVERNANCE: OVERSIGHT, INSIGHT AND FORESIGHT © OECD 2016


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

References

7min
pages 153-159

Notes

2min
page 152

in EU agencies

3min
pages 150-151

4.7. The SAI of Brazil – audit for national development policy

4min
pages 148-149

4.6. The SAI of South Africa – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

4min
pages 146-147

4.5. The SAI of the Netherlands – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

2min
page 145

4.4. The SAI of Korea – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

3min
page 144

4.3. The SAI of Canada – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

7min
pages 141-143

systems (iSA-Gov

2min
page 140

4.3. SAI activities in assessing policy evaluation and oversight

2min
page 134

Taking stock: SAI activities in supporting policy evaluation and oversight

1min
page 133

4.1. Key elements of evaluating for results and performance improvement

7min
pages 123-126

Notes

1min
page 115

References

6min
pages 116-120

Chapter 4 Supreme Audit Institutions’ input into policy evaluation and oversight

1min
page 121

Government

4min
pages 113-114

3.3. The SAI of the Netherlands – assessing financial risk exposure of government

3min
page 112

3.2. The SAI of Poland – the annual state budget execution audit

3min
pages 110-111

3.1. Level of SAI activity in assessing key elements of policy implementation, by country

2min
page 105

3.5. SAI activities in assessing policy implementation

2min
page 104

3.4. Key elements in the exercise of internal control and risk management

6min
pages 100-102

Taking stock: SAI activities in supporting implementation

2min
page 103

Key Function 8: Exercise of internal control and risk management

2min
page 99

3.1. Key elements of co-ordinating and communicating

7min
pages 89-92

Chapter 3 Supreme Audit Institutions’ input into policy implementation

1min
page 87

References

9min
pages 81-86

Notes

1min
page 80

2.10.The SAI of Portugal – strengthening controls in state owned enterprises

1min
page 79

workforce sustainability and population ageing

2min
page 75

2.8. The SAI of South Africa – budget and strategic plan review

4min
pages 76-77

regulatory reform in Korea

2min
page 78

Congress and the Executive

6min
pages 72-74

2.5. The SAI of the Netherlands – linking evidence-based decisions with efficiency gains

2min
page 71

2.6. Types of assessment of key functions of policy formulation, by 10 surveyed SAIs

2min
page 66

2.5. SAI activities in assessing policy formulation

2min
page 65

Taking Stock: SAI activities in supporting policy formulation

2min
page 64

2.3. Key elements of establishing regulatory policy

7min
pages 56-58

Key Function 3: Establishing regulatory policy

2min
page 55

Key Function 4: Exercise of internal control and risk management

2min
page 59

2.3. Spending reviews: Australia, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom

12min
pages 50-54

2.4. Key elements of setting internal control policy and managing risk

9min
pages 60-63

2.2. Innovative and joint approaches to policy-making: Peru’s “Edu-Lab”

7min
pages 45-47

2.1. The Government of Finland’s OHRA “Steering System Reform Effort”

11min
pages 40-44

2.1. Key elements of strategic whole-of-government steering and planning

0
page 39

References

4min
pages 35-36

Chapter 2 Supreme Audit Institutions’ input into policy formulation

1min
page 37

Notes

2min
page 34

Key messages to SAIs: Being aware and prepared

5min
pages 32-33

Key Function 1: Strategic whole-of-government steering and planning

1min
page 38

The outcome: Considerations for all governance actors

3min
pages 29-30

1.2. Select SAI activities across the policy cycle

6min
pages 23-25

Chapter 1 Supreme Audit Institutions’ input into the policy cycle

2min
page 15

Why is the OECD undertaking this work? Integrating evidence into the policy cycle

2min
pages 16-17

Executive summary

0
pages 13-14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2min
page 8

Acronyms and Abbreviations

1min
pages 11-12

1.1. Key functions of the policy cycle in a strategic and open state

2min
page 21

The report’s main findings: SAIs are active in assessing functions of the entire policy cycle

2min
page 22

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2min
page 7
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.