OECD Public Governance Reviews Supreme Audit Institutions And Good Governance by Perpustakaan_Integriti

OECD Public Governance Reviews Supreme Audit Institutions And Good Governance

2 – SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTIONS’ INPUT INTO POLICY FORMULATION – 85

NAO and CIIA (n.d.), Internal Audit in Practice: A series of case studies produced in collaboration with the National audit Office, National Audit Office of the United Kingdom and the Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors, www.nao.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2013/04/Internal-audit-in-practice-case-studies.pdf. NAO (2014a), the Centre of Government, NAO, London, www.nao.org.uk/report/centregovernment/. NAO (2014b), Better Regulation Executive: Using alternatives to regulation to achieve policy objectives, NAO, London, www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06 /Using-alternatives-to-regulation-to-achieve-policy-objectives1.pdf. NAO (2014c), Forecasting in government to achieve value for money, NAO, London, www.nao.org.uk/report/forecasting-government-achieve-value-money-2/. NAO (2012), Better Regulation Executive: Submission of Evidence: controls on regulation, NAO, London, www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/controls_on _regulation_2012.pdf. National Audit Office of Finland (2014), Annual Report, National Audit Office of Finland, Helsinki, www.vtv.fi/files/4593/R182014vp_Annual_report_netti.pdf. NCA (2012), Central Government personnel: strategy and planning, Netherlands Court of Audit, the Hague, www.courtofaudit.nl/english/Publications/Audits/Introductions/2 012/05/Central_government_personnel_strategy_and_planning. TCU (2014), Follow-up: Revenue forecast evaluation of the federal budget bill 2015 (Judgement 3013/2014), Tribunal de Contas da União, Brasilia, www.tcu.gov.br/Cons ultas/Juris/Docs/judoc/Acord/20141107/AC_3013_44_14_P.doc. TCU (2013), Regulatory Governance Review: Infrastructure Regulatory Agencies, (Judgement 031.996/2013-2), TCU, Brasilia, www.tcu.gov.br/Consultas/Juris /Docs/judoc/Acord/20150304/AC_0240_05_15_P.doc. TCU (2009a), Audit Report, Department of Planning and Strategic Investments (Relatório de Auditoria - Secretaria de Planejamento e Investimentos Estratégicos), TCU, Brasilia, www.tcu.gov.br/Consultas/Juris/Docs/judoc/Acord/20110204/AC_011 7_02_11_P.doc. TCU (2009b), General Criteria for Internal Control in Public Administration, TCU, Brasilia, http://portal2.tcu.gov.br/portal/pls/portal/docs/2056688.PDF. TCU (2008), Performance Audit, “Regulatory agencies operating in the care sector”, TCU, Brasilia, www.tcu.gov.br/Consultas/Juris/Docs/judoc/Acord/20101026/AC_279 9_39_10_P.doc.

OECD Public Governance Reviews Supreme Audit Institutions And Good Governance

Articles inside

References

Notes

in EU agencies

4.7. The SAI of Brazil – audit for national development policy

4.6. The SAI of South Africa – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

4.5. The SAI of the Netherlands – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

4.4. The SAI of Korea – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

4.3. The SAI of Canada – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

systems (iSA-Gov

4.3. SAI activities in assessing policy evaluation and oversight

Taking stock: SAI activities in supporting policy evaluation and oversight

4.1. Key elements of evaluating for results and performance improvement

Notes

References

Chapter 4 Supreme Audit Institutions’ input into policy evaluation and oversight

Government

3.3. The SAI of the Netherlands – assessing financial risk exposure of government

3.2. The SAI of Poland – the annual state budget execution audit

3.1. Level of SAI activity in assessing key elements of policy implementation, by country

3.5. SAI activities in assessing policy implementation

3.4. Key elements in the exercise of internal control and risk management

Taking stock: SAI activities in supporting implementation

Key Function 8: Exercise of internal control and risk management

3.1. Key elements of co-ordinating and communicating

Chapter 3 Supreme Audit Institutions’ input into policy implementation

References

Notes

2.10.The SAI of Portugal – strengthening controls in state owned enterprises

workforce sustainability and population ageing

2.8. The SAI of South Africa – budget and strategic plan review

regulatory reform in Korea

Congress and the Executive

2.5. The SAI of the Netherlands – linking evidence-based decisions with efficiency gains

2.6. Types of assessment of key functions of policy formulation, by 10 surveyed SAIs

2.5. SAI activities in assessing policy formulation

Taking Stock: SAI activities in supporting policy formulation

2.3. Key elements of establishing regulatory policy

Key Function 3: Establishing regulatory policy

Key Function 4: Exercise of internal control and risk management

2.3. Spending reviews: Australia, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom

2.4. Key elements of setting internal control policy and managing risk

2.2. Innovative and joint approaches to policy-making: Peru’s “Edu-Lab”

2.1. The Government of Finland’s OHRA “Steering System Reform Effort”

2.1. Key elements of strategic whole-of-government steering and planning

References

Chapter 2 Supreme Audit Institutions’ input into policy formulation

Notes

Key messages to SAIs: Being aware and prepared

Key Function 1: Strategic whole-of-government steering and planning

The outcome: Considerations for all governance actors

1.2. Select SAI activities across the policy cycle

Chapter 1 Supreme Audit Institutions’ input into the policy cycle

Why is the OECD undertaking this work? Integrating evidence into the policy cycle

Executive summary

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acronyms and Abbreviations

1.1. Key functions of the policy cycle in a strategic and open state

The report’s main findings: SAIs are active in assessing functions of the entire policy cycle

TABLE OF CONTENTS