Unimelb_Studio 20_The Shape of Wine by Phanthep.th

Studio C, Semester 1, 2020 Instructors: Alberto Pugnale & Alessandro Luiti

# 1147847 Phanthep Thiengthamcharoen

STUDIO 20:The Shape of Wine

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank both of my instructors Alberto Pugnale and Alessandro Luiti for the guidance and insight through out the studio. With their feedback and advice I was able to grasp new approach for the development of the design. Also many thanks to my studio mates who were helpful in participate strongly all around and espcially help me deal with some difficult moldeling issues.

Phase 1

TABLE OF CONTENT

1.1. Timber Gridshells

Pg. 1-4

1.2. Caternary Shells

Pg. 5-9

1.3. Reinterpretation of a Case Atudy and Prototyping

Pg. 10-15

Phase 2

2.1. The Shape of Wine: Design Brief & Site Analysis,

Pg. 16-17

2.2. Initial Design Response

Pg. 18-24

Phase 3

3.1. Span and Space

Pg. 25-36

Phase 4 4. Final Design Proposal

Glossary Introduction

Pg. 37-59 Pg. 60

In Studio 20 the Shape of Wine explores the form resisting structure using computational design as the main tool to discover and experiment with variations of form. The project consists of four phases, firstly the form-finding/optimization and a case study to get familiar with the form resisting structure. Then the project shifts to designing a preliminary phase of the winery located in Yarra Glenn,Victoria, Australia. In this second phase, the project deals with site analysis and finding the location for the architectural layout, and deciding on which form-resisting structure to use in the proposal. After the initial concept, the development began to take shape when span and space are condensed into the project. In this phase, plans/sections are explored and the parametric model is made including a draft of the computational workflow. Lastly, the project development is combined in the final presentation. drawings are developed and design choices are refined. Also, construction methods and computational workflow are considered to create a process on how to create a physical building from a digital realm.

PHASE 1: FORM FINDING and CASE STUDY

Phase 1.1: Grid Shells, apply on Cafe

Feedback from instructors

Group 1: Phanthep Thiengthamcharoen, Lingeke Zhang, Guangen

Form- Finding Method Study Model by Guangen

Fg.1. Wall supported grid shell structure, the project is led by professor Sergio Pone, University of Naples

Precedent Study Located in Leece, Italy, the parametric shade structure is a grid shell is constructed by lightweight timber that gradually shifts its grid density. As the grid is supported by a wall structure and gracefully flows down the ground. The form was created by a diagonal grid structure and was deformed through twisting, bending, and heights. Some parts of the grids are added to give structure and stability that also creates shade in the patio of the Masseria Ospitale restaurant[1].

Group Approach For the group assignment, members began to explore with paper models. Forms are generated through a folding corner and rolling paper to form a round shape that expresses the flow of the grid. Later the models are pinned with tape to simulate the support points of the shell.

1. “Gridshell’s Parametrically-Designed Canopy Shades Masseria Ospitale Restaurant in Lecce, Italy.” Accessed August 23, 2020. https://inhabitat.com/gridshell-creates-a-parametrically-designed-shade-structure-for-masseria-ospitale-restaurant-in-lecce-italy/ gridshell-canopy/.

Phase 1.1: Grid Shells, apply on Cafe, Form Exploration with Paper Model Individual Approach Anticlastic forms

Feed back: â&#x20AC;&#x153;Grid should be at 45 as the geometry support more loadâ&#x20AC;?

A 20x20 grid was planed out and by cutting the top corners of the parameter. Then the side was also cut off to create the tapering geometry that flow down the ground. At the ground (support points), an anticlastic curve was decided to help the structure more balance.

Individual Approach Double Hyperbolic P. In this approach, the idea was to have a hanging form created by hyperbolic geometry. with only one geometry, it does not achieve the wall supported grid shell. So the decision was made by mirroring the two forms it created a dropping effect where one side with supported by the wall and the other opposite side drops down the ground.

Feedback from instructors

Phase 1.1: Grid Shells, apply Cafe on Site

Feedback from instructors

Form Finding Model

Fg.2. DMZ Sattlelight image from Google Earth

Site Narrative In July 1953, after World War II, the Korean Peninsula was divided by the two political ideas by the US and the Soviet Union. These ideological lines have been the symbolism of conflict, which creates a big time gap as our world move toward technology.

Along this â&#x20AC;&#x153;lineâ&#x20AC;? of separation lies a joint Securi-

ty Area for both sibling nation. The architectures express themselves in a perilous way to the other side not to cross the line. This tension has caused uneasiness from both sides, suspecting and always beware of each other.

Although for many years, leaders have their plan to

reunite the land, the vision of Korea seems to be just a hazy vision for the people. With the long separation of time and exposure to technology, both nations need to gradually meet up and slowly progress their goals towards their unification. 2. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Joint+security+area/@37.955483 4,126.6745724,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x357cf7463b04ad1b:0x18ea59fcc4ed1434!8m2!3d37.9554834!4d126.6767611

Phase 1.1: Grid Shells, apply Cafe on Site

Feedback from instructors

Site Diagram The location of the pop-up cafe will be between the two middle buildings that face the House of Unification and Freedom. It will be a meeting point between both sides to drink coffee and ease out the tension that always occurs in the security zone.

Fg.3 Joint security Between North and South Korea, photograph by Kin Hong- Ji

1. Grid should be at 45 as the geometry support more load” 2. Form seems to ne too thin.

Flip grid 45 degrees

Floor Plan

Roof Plan

Flip grid 45 degrees

Section A

Section B

Elevation 1

Elevation 2

Form too complex, make the boundary simple so that the geomery can be control. Need to Simplify form. 3. Hong-Ji, Kim. “A South Korean Soldier Stands Guard at the Truce Village of Panmunjom...” Accessed August 23, 2020. https:// www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/south-korean-soldier-stands-guard-at-the-truce-village-of-news-photo/1164452498.

Phase 1.2: Caternary Structures apply of Passage Way Group 2: Phanthep Thiengthamcharoen, Lingeke Zhang, MukumMukumov, Callan Grima

Form- Finding Method Study Model by Mukum

Fg.4. Catenary Pavilion at The Singapore University of Technology, design by City form lab

Precedent Study The SUTD Library Pavilion is a catenary formed passageway located behind the library. The form is found by using the principles of catenary hanging strings or chain and mirror the images into an arch. This temporary structure allows multipurpose outdoor activities and as a sound barrier from the expressway near by[4].

Group Approach The approach to this assignment is to find the category lines that will create an interesting pattern. Since the form is already fixed by its curve properties nothing much can be done to distort it. In Fig 5, the series of models of the hanging structure remains slightly the same form, only the line crossing is changing.

4. â&#x20AC;&#x153;SUTD Library Pavilion: City Form Lab,â&#x20AC;? January 16, 2020. https://www.arch2o.com/sutd-library-pavilion-city-form-lab/.

Series of models to explore the form of the catenary archs

Phase 1.2: Caternary Structure, Passage Way, Digital Explorations

Feedback from instructors

Individual Approach Crossing Lines

2 Cordinate (10,0)

1 Cordinate (5,0)

5 Cordinate (5,0)

4 Cordinate (10,0)

3 Cordinate (10,0)

Forms could be expore in a irregular (asymmetric way)

Individual Approach Crossing Lines, adding segment to create a pasaage way

10.00

15.08

7 Cordinate (5,0) 40.00

10.00

8 Cordinate (10,0)

8.45

3.00 5.45

The pathway could be explore with more variartions and directions

15.08

Phase 1.2: Applying Caternary Structures on Site

Feedback from instructors

Form Finding Method 1 Using similar methods to explore the final design, the approach by using hanging catenary to see the overall shape. Model is too small, need to try with longer paper clips

Paper clip caternary models by Lingke, one of the group members

Form Finding Method 2

Fg.5 View from the lake to the Denton Winery building,Victoria, Australia, Photo by Tim Griffith

Another method use is from Rhino, Grasshopper and Kagaroo. The form is composed of multuple catenary shell joining together to form a shell passgae way through the winery.

Site Narrative

The Denton vineyard, Victory is a site that has a shifting topography with an isolated hill in the middle of the site which gives the architecture a hierarchy. Below the hill lies a lake that by looking from above gives a dramatic view of the field. The terrain has a granite plug that is from the active volcano back I the Devonian age 370 years ago, which gives a unique character to the site[5a].

Design approach

The group decided to capture the journey through the lake looking up to the building on top of the hill. Also, the passageway could serve as a photography spot, shading, and a spot for the visitor to rest and enjoy the scenery that the site has to offer.

Lingke’s approach in the digital exploration

5 “Tim Griffith.” Accessed August 23, 2020. https://www.timgriffith.com/Architects/Denton-Corker-Marshall/thumbs. 5a. “Denton Wine.” Accessed August 23, 2020. https://www.dentonwine.com/.

Phase 1.2: Grasshopper exercise Grasshopper Definition

Architectural Drawings By Mukum

Need to show the â&#x20AC;&#x153;processâ&#x20AC;&#x153;, and not just the finish model

Phase 1.2: Grasshopper exercise

Feedback from instructors

Karamba Analysis

Digital Model in Kangaroo

Form is from mesh that is not clean. None of the Karamber material match the model, which is why the analysis is not correct. Note: Due to miscommunication among groups, the data input in the component (RC shells) does not match the material in the final design (steel+ wood panels).

Model baked with surfaces

Phase 1.3: Case Study, Smithsonian Courtyard Group 4: Phanthep Thiengthamcharoen,Tong Su Key Design 1. Key design: Sound how to you draw sound? Concept of space > volume resonance absorbs ion and geometry give space to the sonic character. 2.Climate conditions: in the past, it can only be used in the spring and fall. 3. Enclosure floats above existing building, not interfering with apply more load to an existing building.

Fg.6 The Smithsonian Courtyard encloure with a twisting beam diagonal grid shell Completed in 2007, The Smithsonian Institution courtyard enclosure located in Washington DC is a winning invitation project by Fosters and Partner along with the Specialist Modeling Group.

Fg.8 Surface design for the best acoustic quality

Fg.9 Grid segments that are transfered to be welded on site

Constraints/Challenges:

Fg.7 Initial sketch by Norman Foster

Some challenges of the construction are finding the edge beam location, specify the optimum dome height, drainage of the roof, and planning of the prefabrication & assemble on sight for contractors to weld the grid segment on site,

The sketch produced by Norman foster illustrates the diagonal grid surface with three domes flowing along the forms roof of the existing building.

8. Peters, Brady, and Xavier DeKestellier. “The Work of Foster and Partners Specialist Modelling Group,” n.d., 4. 9-9a. Details,2009, Pg 88-90

6. “Smithsonian Institution: Foster + Partners.” Accessed August 18, 2020. https://archinect.com/fosterandpartners/ project/smithsonian-institution. 7. Peters, Brady. “The Smithsonian Courtyard Enclosure,” 2007, 11.

Phase 1.3: Case Study, Smithsonian Courtyard, Form Generation

Feedback from instructors

Karamba Analysis

Make sure the steel dimention is correct from the actual dimentions Could apply thickness for the column for more accurate Karamba result

Surface from Rhino Grasshopper Definition

1. Analyze proportion, and create flat surface

2. Pull points Rebuild surface: U:11 V:7

3. Adjust surface

4. Create diagonal grids with Grasshopper

Phase 1.3: Case Study, Smithsonian Courtyard, Tectonics

Feedback from instructors

Grasshopper Definition Karamba Analysis

Make sure the steel is correct from the actual dimensions. Could apply thickness for the column for more accurate Karamba result. Surface from Rhino

1. Analyze support proportions, and create flat surface

4. Restrain the boundary points and make it only moves vertically

2. Set the diagonal grid 2m x 2m

5. Set boundary points fixed

3. Set the supporting columns and load facing up

6. Allocating 6 lines to restrain the surface

Phase 1.3: Case Study, Smithsonian Courtyard, Tectonics Team Reflection After the geometry generation, some key points that are missing which can affet the Karamba results.

1. Since the enclosure has a log span, modular assembly is needed.

2. The grid component a broken down segment, prefabricated before assemble.

Tapering thickness at support points column) Fg.9a Beam thickness Fg.10 Another view of the thickness Photo by Prokos 3. Column top is cast and connected to the grid element.

4. After fabrication, the grids are spot welded, with the support of a scaffolding.

Fg.11 Screen shots from Youtube, showing the assembly of the column

5. Beams are cladded and insulated with acoustic panels.

6 Double curve glass is placed on the grid creating enclouse, protecting from rain and direct sunlight.

11.Youtube. 2020. Foster + Partners - Smithsonian Institution Courtyard. [online] Available at: <https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=U8A4U0m2M_c> [Accessed 19 August 2020].

Section of the column head (Redrawn from Details, 2009) 13

Assumption of the ground detail

Phase 1.3: Case Study, Smithsonian Courtyard, Design Interpretation Variation 1

1. Using the same method for geometry generation, surfaces are controlled by points

2. By swapping site, the context change, from a tall enclosure to a long narrow strip that flow along the landscape

3. Frames and Panels are added with GH + Lunch Box Panel and frame component then extruded the frames

4. Transparency is created from all sides to emphasize the landscape.

3. Using â&#x20AC;&#x153;points on meshâ&#x20AC;? to stimulate the shape of our case study

4. Convert the grid shell into Karamba to analyze the structure

Variation 2

1. According to our case study design brief, the shape of the roof designed to be symmetrical

2. Set out the grid of 2m x 2m and trimmed according to the shape boundary

Phase 1.3: Case Study, Smithsonian Courtyard, Design interpretation

Hero Shot 15

Entry View

PHASE 2: DENTON WINERY

Phase 2: Introduction

Fig.1 Satlellite image of Yarra Glen

Fig.2 Denton Hill View,Vic, Australia

Fig.3 Denton Vineyard,Victoria, Australia, Photo by Tim Griffith

Context The Denton hill view is located at the far right of Yarra Glenn has a terrain which forms a stand-alone hill that creates the unique characteristic of this site, this makes the Denton Brand unique. At the location, there is a house, that acts as the most dominant element that exists at the top of the vineyard. and as we can see from the images from their website, they wanted to emphasize this hill view and the house as their advertisement.

Denton House

The view hill Denton house is a two-story with a cantilever structure that is designed above the hill of the sight. The plan of the house is designed to take a view from four sides of the architecture creating a cross geometry and has become a sculptural land art to the landscape.

Fig.4 View from Lake to Denton House, Photo by Tim Griffith

Design Approach As the house that already existed on top of the landscape, it has become the main selling point standing alone to the hill. Our approach to the design of the new vision is to emphasize the house and to elevate the view up to the hill. Also, the site has two lakes that are located on the east and west. Both give another potential to the site that the new proposal can bring to elevate the characteristics of the hill. Fig.5 Denton House, Photo by Tim Griffith Fig 3-5 â&#x20AC;&#x153;Tim Griffith.â&#x20AC;? Accessed August 23, 2020. https://www.timgriffith.com/Architects/Denton-Corker-Marshall/thumbs.

Phase 2: Site Analysis and Preliminary Sketch Site Analysis First, we began with the vehicle circulation, to grasped the sense of entry and exit to the site, both for the visitors and the pathway for the staff in the winery. Then we take a look at the vineyard axis, this pattern creates a distinct line that might have a potential for our layout design. The lake that was discovered later

1.Vehicle Circulation

was one of the aspects that we want to emphasize the new architecture layout.

2.Vineyard Axis

3. Context Lake

As the Denton house has no interaction with the landscape, it acts as the dominant element, sitting above the hill. However, the approach for the proposal will deal with implementing the programs into the landscape and not interfere with the view of the Denton House.

4.View to Lake

5. Building Placement

Fig.8 Site anlysis diagram and layout sketches of the programs

Fig.6 Preliminary sketch of the first layout design

Programs This conceptual layout allows the arrival point to have two paths for the visitors.Either to the restaurant to the east of the winery. Our main idea from this layout is to emphasize the Denton Hill View by positioning the programs along with the topographic changes in the site. We decided to put the winery to the west due to a weaker slope of the topography, compared to the one each which the restaurant will be placed.

Fig.9 Bubble diagram of the winery

Fig.7 Early sketch of the entry of the winery

Phase 2: Winery Precedent Studies

Fg.10 Exterior of the winery showing the catenary form of the roof

Fg.12 Exterior view into the entry, ampatherater, and production area Photo by Chybik Kristof

Fg.14 Exterior view from Google review Photo by Joe Varanza

Fg.11 Drawings showing hiearchy of programs in linear arrangement Fg.13 Arc structure function as an ornament creating an identity to the space Photo by Laurian Ghinitoiu

Fg.15 Section of the programs which decents from arrival point

Bodegas Ysios Winery, Spain, 2001

Lahofer Winery, Czech, 2019

Marchesi Antinori winery, Italy, 2012

Design and Structure: Santiago Calatrava

CHYBIK + KRISTOF Structural Engineer:HladĂk a Chalivopulos s.r.o.

Archea Associati Engineering:HYDEA

This avant-garde construction uses an undulate form in the roof to

The key design for the winery is its multi-level entry. This creates a

The points taken from the project are the underground programs

cover up the combination of programs such as wine production, tast-

space in different levels in the programs such as the amphitheater at

that enhance the landscape by reducing the impact on the vineyard.

ing, and sales. The main idea of this form is to attract attention to the

the rooftop and a wine tasting space on the lower floor.The architec-

The roof also functions as a terrace which allows visitors to take the

visitors. The elongated form created a linear production process in

ture also aligns with the vineyard giving a regular angle towards the

view to the field. The section in Fig6. shows the descending path from

winemaking

landscape. Also the structure component acts as an ornament.

the arrival to the wine cellar, following the topographic change of the site.

10-11. Kccnyc. (1970, January 01). Bodegas Ysios Winery. Retrieved September 11, 2020, from http:// arch3611f10kccnyc.blogspot.com/2010/09/bodegas-ysios-winery.html

12-13. Luco, A. (2020, August 06). Lahofer Winery / CHYBIK KRISTOF. Retrieved September 09, 2020, from https://www.archdaily.com/945154/lahofer-winery-chybik-plus-kristof

14-15. Reichle &amp; De-Massari. (n.d.). Marchesi Antinori Chianti Classico Winery supported by R&amp;M Solutions. Retrieved September 09, 2020, from https://www.rdm.com/References/All-references/Marchesi-Antinori-Chianti-Classico-Winery-supported-by-R-M-Solutions

Phase 2: Exploration of Form-resisting Structures Exploration 1, gridshell

Exploration 2, repetitive element

Fig.16 Initial sketch of the spacial arrangement and level Fg.20 Interior of the Johnson Wax Headquaters at the Great Workroom Photographer: Unknown

Fg.18 Exterior View howing the gridshell decending down functioning as a column Photo by Hiroyuki Hirai

Fg.21 Interior of the Johnson Wax Headquaters, from another level Photographer: Unknown

Fg.22 Underground parking the south lawn carpark at Universerity of Melbourne Photo by Mario Mirabile Fg.19 Tectonic elements of the gridshell, showeing parts of the assembly process

Fig.17 Skethes of the program along the topography o f the site

18-19. ArchiloversCom. (n.d.). Haesley Nine Bridges Golf Club House: Shigeru Ban Architects. Retrieved September 11, 2020, from https://www.archilovers.com/projects/29555/haesley-nine-bridges-golf-clubhouse.html

20-21. SC Johnsonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Frank Lloyd Wright Buildings: Youâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;re Always Welcome for Tours. (n.d.). Retrieved September 11, 2020, from https://www.scjohnson.com/en/a-family-company/architecture-and-tours/scjohnsons-frank-lloyd-wright-buildings-youre-always-welcome-for-tours 22. Mirabile, M. (2018, February 12). No parking. Retrieved September 11, 2020, from http://www.miralightimaging.com/blog/2018/2/12/no-parking

Phase 2: Precedent of Form-resisting Structures

Fg.25 Interior of the Station, using arch module in a a comtempary design approach Photo by Hufton and Crow

Fg.23 Ribbed vaults in the modern Cathedral of Hallgrimskirkja Photo by Mark Williford / Danita Delimont

Cathedral of Hallgrimskirkja Iceland, 1986

Fg.24 Petal vaults module assembled creating a pavilion Photo by Casey Dunn

Fg.26 View looking up to the vault

Confluence Park / Lake, USA

Doha Metro Network,Qatar

Guðjón Samúelsson

Flato Architects + Matsys Design Petal Formwork: Kreysler & Associates

UNStudio Structure, MEP: RHDHV

After some exploration of the forms, the vault structure is the most

This module is mirrored and composed of space that functions as a

The concept of the Metro is to create fluidity into space. The vault

suitable for our design. It allows order and span to the architecture

pavilion. The modular system created by the concrete petals gives a

structure creates a space that forms from a grid layout that defines

creates a linear form to the overall design. The ribbed vault creates

form resisting structure element to the architecture.This key idea will

the structure.The form from the vault that is scaled to a massive level

a high ceiling space giving more volume to space. This allows more

be used to implement the structural element of the architecture for

that creates a high ceiling space that creates a continuity for that the

light to enter the building which is our intention for the design in the

a new proposal in the Denton Vineyard.

column drops down to the grounds.

24. Sagredo, R. (2018, June 18). Confluence Park / Lake: Flato Architects Matsys Design. Retrieved September 10, 2020, from https://www.archdaily.com/896460/confluence-park-lake-flato-architects?ad_ medium=gallery

25-26. Gallery of UNStudio Completes First 37 Stations on the Doha Metro Network, in Qatar - 9. (n.d.). Retrieved September 09, 2020, from https://www.archdaily.com/947301/unstudio-completes-first37-stations-on-the-doha-metro-network-in-qatar/5f574898b3576580c20001f6-unstudio-completesfirst-37-stations-on-the-doha-metro-network-in-qatar-photo

vineyard.

23. Mediastorehouse. (2019, September 25). Print of Iceland, Reykjavik, ribbed vaults in the modern Cathedral of Hallgrimskirkja. Retrieved September 10, 2020, from https://www.danitadelimontprints. com/europe/iceland-reykjavik-ribbed-vaults-modern-19313251.html

Phase 2: Design implementation

Master Plan

After the preliminary sketch and site analysis, we attempt to put the programs into the site, the vision is still

Lesson learned: Our approach seems to have a conventional style,

unclear, but the goal is to create a linear pathway for visitors to move along the architecture while passing by

which sometimes can be restricting when design in the first phase.

the vineyard.The form resisting structure will be used as a roof structure and also function as furniture for the

This leads to creating boxes with form resisting roofs on top, which

restaurant.

made it limiting of what the structure can do.

Fg.27 First overall section of the program Master Plan

Our group began to develop the design by narrowing down the design brief. We kept the winery into one

Lesson learned: Although arches were used in the design (Fig.37),

building and the reception, communal space, and restaurant into another. The layout of the building is similar

form arches, it is is not considered a form of resisting structure, more

to the initial layout design, by putting the winery to the west and the restaurant facing both of each end to the

like a beam and column system. A surface is needed to make it into a

lake view. At this stage, we attempt to create a module system for a structural element that forms the space.

vault which then can be considered a form resisting structure.

An example that we use is the arch column in fig. 37 by Toyo Ito.

Fg.28 Overall section with arch column/beam elements by using the method similar to Tama Art University Library Master Plan

This is where our idea has different directions. The elements used in the restaurant has changed into a vault

Lesson learned: The overall building is disconnected. One deals with

structure, but the winery remains the same. It seems like the other group member wants to keep the arch

vault and one deals with arch-shaped columns and beams. Both of the

beam can column and the form of the building, which makes the overall buildings disconnected.

architecture uses a regular grid system which makes the space rigid and disconnected from the fluidity of the vault.

Fg.29 Overall sections with changes from the arches to column and beam, as noted the winery remanis the same with the arch and beam systerm, creating disconnectivity to both building

Phase 2: Midterm Review

Fig.30 Rendering image of the arrival to the winery (Left: Restaurant Right:Winery)

Project Brief Located in Yarra Valley the new vision for Denton winery is a hub for wine enthusiasts and retreatment centers from the city. Other than producing the Denton Wine, the location also serves as a Restaurant and cafe below the iconic hill in the site.

Section A

Restaurant/ Winery For the Restaurant, this creates a narrow pathway at the reception and leads the visitor down to the wider space at the end of the building which serves at the restaurant. Same as the winery, the pathway leads to the wine tasting room at the end of the corridor with the open view to the vineyard however, due to the production constraints, such as machinery maintenance, we cannot put the building into the topography as deep as the restaurant.

Fig.31 Sattlellight image with the preliminary layout of the programs

Fig.32 Plan layout of the Restaurant and Winery

Fig.33 Section of the modsemester review 22

Lesson Learnt and improvement (post mid-semester feedback) 1.Vineyard Alignment The

notion

ement

seems

aligning to

the a

vineyard

loss

when

the

designing

For the individual approach to this issue, I tried to break the mass down el-

My argument for this is that it is not a form resisting struc-

further while keeping the same location, but with a staggering plan con-

layout.

ture, but a beam/column system which is not the learning ob-

figuration so that each part of the plan can be aligned to the vineyard

jective. However, the other group member seems to disagree

without extruding into the site (Fig. 40).

and use the same system until the mid-semester review which

structure the

This might be the reason that the mass of the building does not match the lines of the vineyard, creating disconnectivity to the site. We are too committed to the design during that moment in time which leads to constraints in changing up the plan layout.

gives us a small amount of time to explore the spacial quality.

2. Structure Element

Comparing with the is the Forest of meditation, another work by

Our main disagreement among the group is the usage of the

Toyo Ito. with the collaboration with engineer Mutsuro Sasaki, the

vault and the beam-column rather than the vault or pneumat-

form seems to respond to the design intent with the site in which the

ic hill. At first, we were looking at the Tama Art University Li-

building is a pneumatic hill with columns. descending from the form

brary, it is composed of the arches along the grid randomly placed.

creating continuously to the form.

We use this as a precedent in week 4-5 and changed it in week 6.

Fg.34 Communicate sketches with the group member on alugning to building to the vineyard

Fg.36 Arch openening at the exterior Photo by Rasmus Hjortshoj

Below is an individual approach to this issue, I tried to break the mass

Fg.38 Undulating roof forms , creating space for people to walk on Photo by OpenBuildings

down further while keeping the same location, but with staggering plan configuration so that each part of the plan can be aligned to the vineyard without extruding into the site. By separating each program into each mass, it creates a form that complies with the vineyard.

Fg.37 Interior of the library using arches as a coulumn and beam Photo by Rasmus Hjortshoj

Fg.35 Diagramic plan of the design changes based on the feedback given (Left:Wine production, Right: Restaurant)

36-37.Toyo Ito &amp; Associates, Rasmus Hjortshøj - COAST · TAMA Art University Library. (n.d.). Retrieved September 13, 2020, from https://divisare.com/projects/322210-toyo-ito-associates-rasmus-hjortshoj-tama-art-university-library

Fg.39 Exterior view showing the form resisting structure exclosed with glass Photo by Daijirou Okada 38. Photoset ‘meiso-no-mori’ by arfogram. (n.d.). Retrieved September 13, 2020, from https://www.flickriver.com/photos/arfogram/sets/72157594279396426/ 39. Keskeys, P. (2018, December 13). Architectural Details:Toyo Ito’s Flowing Concrete Canopy - Architizer Journal. Retrieved September 13, 2020, from https://architizer.com/blog/inspiration/stories/architectural-details-toyo-ito/

Lesson Learnt and improvement (post mid-semester feedback) The idea of the alignment of the structure seems to be lost as the design progresses, the feature should be kept and implement in the design. Also, some juries have two opinions about the irregularity of the vault, the rhythm and width seem disconnected to the vineyard. In terms of structures, it is heavy and too much for space. Space needs to be more precise. In summary, our main disagreement among the group is the usage of the vault and the beam-column system that imitates the vault. Since the feedback aimed at the heavy structures from the restaurant (refer to Fig. 35-36). In this attempt to respond to the feedback, the structure is simplified with less column and increase the span of the Fig.43 Space in the restaruarnt, looking back to the Entry passage(during mid term review)

space

Fig.44 Quick conceptual massing showing the alignment of the vineyard and reduction of structure element of the restaurant (attemp to create connectivity) Fig.40 Conceptual site plan layout, aligning the vineyard to the architecture

Fig.41 Section of the wine production for comparison with the post feedback design

Fig.45 Space in the restaruarnt, looking up to the vineyard

Fig.42 Section of the Cafe & Restaurant for comparison with the post feedback design

Fig.46 Quick conceptual massing showing the alignment of the vineyard and reduction of structure element of the wine production (attempt to create connectivity)

PHASE 3: SPAN AND SPACE

Phase 3.1: Preliminary skethes of Plans and Section Plans and Section At the beginning of this phase, each team member explores the developed layout of the program from the feedback from the Mid-semester. The attempt is to find the geometry of the plan that brings the vineyard and topography into the architecture. This leads the design into a staggering rectangular shape in which the lines are perpendicular to the vineyard. We decided to locate the architecture at the threeway intersection of the entry so that the architecture would maintain the vineyard as much as possible.

For the section, we want to create a descending circulation to the architecture, flowing along with the

vineyard landscape. By doing this it creates a view looking doing the hill, while at the same time looking up to the hill view where the Denton House is located. Fig.03 Concept sketch of an attempt to arragement programs according to the vineyard

Fig.01. Initial Concept, viewing from entry, looking towards the vineyardâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s sloping topography

Fig.04. Concept sketch of an attempt to connect carpark to the building, creating continuity to the space

Fig.02. Section concept, showing different ground levels with vault elements decending down to the ground

Fig.05 Concept sketch of wall corners that are fillet in order to have a smooth wall surface

Phase 3.1: Precedents

Fig.10.The Hyperbolic Paraboloids of the Prairie 1961 Photo by: Unknown

Fig.06. Upshot view of the “island“ modules Photo by Luke Hayes Fig.11. Another hypar umbrella forming spaces, by Felix Candella Photo by: Unknown

Fig.07. Modular components used to compose the project, both program and structure Image by AKTII

Fig.8-9. Conceptual visualisation of utilising column & roof as a container for lanscape and tress Images by BAKOKO

Fig.12. Section of the hypar surface connecting to an another module by Felix Candella Images by: Unknown

The Tide Linear Park in London, 2019

Kyoai Gakuen University

Hyperbolic Paraboloid Umbrellas

Diller Scofidio + Renfro and Neiheiser Argyros

BAKOKO

Felix Candela

We are interested in the way the project uses modular components

The structure of the project merges with the roof creating a smooth

To simplify our project’s complexity has a look back into Felix Can-

to create programs and structure for the project. The linear elevated

surface joining wall, columns, and roof. Similarly to The Tide, the roof

dale’s umbrella hyperbolic paraboloid structure. The concrete form

park is composed of the unique geometry of the “island” modules.

of the structure become a place for landscape. At the Denton Site,

resisting structure allows a wide span and the double curve surface

Although they are the same component, each module has its charac-

there is not much tree and by using this feature the architecture also

allows the umbrella to take on weight with its thin concrete surface.

teristics and roles in the site.

creates a park in which people can access a higher view of the site.

6. Erman, M. (2019, May 10). Diller Scofidio + Renfro and Neiheiser Argyros Unveil Design for The Tide Linear Park in London. Retrieved October 17, 2020, from https://www.archdaily.com/916798/diller-scofidio-plus-renfro-reveals-the-design-for-the-tide-linear-park-in-london 7. MSD FABRICATE-2020 Pg. 57

Fig.10. The Hyperbolic Paraboloids of the Prairie. (2019, February 10). Retrieved October 17, 2020, from https://flashbackdallas.com/2014/04/15/the-hyperbolic-paraboloids-of-the-prairie/ 8-9. Jordana, S. (2010, August 23). Kyoai Gakuen University / BAKOKO. Retrieved October 17, 2020, from https://www.archdaily.com/74423/kyoai-gakuen-university-bakoko

Fig.11-12. Emami, Niloufar, Harry Giles, and Peter VON Buelow. “Performative Perforations: Structural and Daylighting Performance Assessment of Candela’s High Life Textile Factory,” 2018, 8.

Phase 3.1: Conceptual Exploration of Sections Section A

Feedback and Lesson Learned

I was tasked to explore mostly the section of the architecture. At first, the section is formed accordingly

I knew in mind that the sloping floors are a bit unpractical, but somehow challenging to explore. If the slope is not steep

to the vault geometry. By using the same shape with different span programs that begin to take form I

enough it can create a smooth transition for pedestrian circulation. Also, The problem with these initial designs from

begin to integrate the floor topography into the project. The first option deals with curving floors, cre-

the mid-semester is scale. I knew it all along that scale is exaggerated to see the visual element more clearly. However,

ating continuity on each floor. The attempt to merge floors into a curve is to explore how space can be

weekly feedback from week 7 was told to exaggerate the diagrams even more. So from week 7-8 most of the section

connected with curve floors. The second option is creating two surfaces type for each program, flat for

diagrams are over scale for visual communications purposes. As the week progresses I need to begin thinking about

roof gardens, and more slopping in the restaurant.

simplification.

Section B

Feedback and Lesson Learned

In the second section, I attempt to create a span with the structural elements to create a void that can reveal some hidden parts in the architecture, for this case viewing the wine cellar from the dining hall. The three sections show different spaces explored by the placement of the structure creating spans with different visuals sight into the void and outside to the vineyard.

Similar the section A, the space of the cellar is too deep, and in practical terms, can cause cluster phobic moments. Also, they are concern about the sloping floors, which is not so desirable for dining areas. At this moment, the visuals are not so clear, and I need to add more details to support the diagrams, which currently only has porches and trees.

Phase 3.1: Conceptual Exploration of Plans and Sections

Fig.13. Basement (Wine Cellar) Plan by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Fig.14. Ground Level Floor Plan by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Explore and Developt Phase

Fig.15. Roof Floor Plan by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Floors in the dining area are flatter with steps that lead down the building and the cellar.Voids are still consid-

As for this week, I combined all buildings into one section to see the whole overall circulation. Option

ered in the design for visual connectivity between each floor. For example, while dining visitors can look at the

1 has a flat roof surface while the second one deals with curvature roof along with the architecture. As

wine cellar on the lower floor while at the same time can look out to the vineyard, or at the winery, visitors

for parking space, the difference from the plan that the other member did was placing it directly into the

can see the fermented space below the ground level from the office floor above. Furthermore, a skylight was

buildings, while his approach is to locate it separately.

also added in the roof garden to bring natural light in the space.

Phase 3: Plan and Section Developement

Fig.16. Ground floor plan by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Fig.17. Underground floor plan by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Feedback and Lesson Learned Since we both work separately, our sections and plan are not fully synced. To be honest, there is not much exploration in the plan, which makes the overall design still a bit unclear and with the time constraints, I decided to follow along with the plan so that our design will move in the same direction, As for feedback, we need to simplify the span and programs further. At this point, some areas in the space are a bit unclear and some areas in the space are overscale.

WINERY SECTION A

WINERY SECTION B Fig.18. Section showing vertical circulation

Fig.19 Section showing vertical circulation

RESTAURANT SECTION A Fig.20. Section showing floor level with vertical circulation

RESTAURANT SECTION B Fig.21. Section showing floor level in different elevations

Phase 3.2: Update Plan and Sections, Detail, Computation Workwflow

Development Site Plan

Building Layout

During the mid-semester break, I created a new site plan to summarize the design decision we have made so

The layout consists of three built projects, the winery, restaurant, and parking space. It is located at the three

far and compile them to make it easier to understand.While the other member began to explore the compu-

intersections of the site which lead further to the Denton house, the east lake, and the entry and exit. this

tational model for the project. Overall the slope direction and the vineyard axis were added to the site plan

creates a fortress of buildings with trees as a screen blocking the Denton Hoise making architecture into an

and also traffic circulation we also considered. the objective is to develop the site plan to communicate the

exclusive view only to be seen from inside the site. Plans of the winery and restaurant are formed into steps

design purpose further.

that allow the vineyard to take part in the architecture creating a connecting element to the site.

Week 3.2: Plan Development Restaurant Section ASection A

Section A

Section ASection A

Section A

H TC KI -1

+0.00

H TC KI -1

H TC KI -1 FD.

FD.

-1.00

FD.

0M 2.5M

5M 0M 2.5M 10M 5M

0M 10M 2.5M

5M 20M

10M20M

ITOR

FD.

ITOR

FD.

JAN

FD.

RESTAURANT RESTAURANT RESTAURANT UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND PLANPLAN PLAN

RESTAURANT RESTAURANT RESTAURANT FLOOR FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN PLAN 0M 2.5M

20M

5M 0M 2.5M 10M 5M

0M 10M 2.5M

5M 20M

10M20M

0M 2.5M

20M

5M 0M 2.5M 10M 5M

In this drawing, the structure lines are shown. However, the roof plan of the building intends to fill with soil for landscape. Trees are planted into these grid umbrella components which allows shading and outdoor activity areas.

0M 10M 2.5M

5M 20M

10M20M

20M

SCALE 1:SCALE 200 1: 200 SCALE 1: 200

Roof

JAN

FD.

-2.00

RESTAURANT RESTAURANT RESTAURANT ROOF ROOF PLANPLAN ROOF PLAN

-2

FD.

JAN

FD.

-2.00

FD.

-2.00

FD.

-2 C

FD.

ITORFD.

FD.

-1.00

FD.

-2

FD.

-1.00

Section B

+0.00

Section BSection B

LL CE 0 ±

Section B

LL CE 0 ±

Section BSection B

IO PT CE RE

Section B

Section ASection A

IO PT CE RE

Section BSection B

Section A

Ground Floor

Underground Floor

The main area of the building, consisting of terraces, dining areas in which

The services and back of the house are located in this area. However,

the floors are pushed down for each zone allowing the architecture to

wine Cellars and pubs are on this floor for visitors who want a private

blend in with the sloping topography. This floor level is where the vine-

room underground.

yard axis meets with the structure line in the architecture, which allows the landscape to communicate with the architecture

Winery

Roof

5M 0M 2.5M 10M 5M

10M

20M 0M 2.5M

5M 20M

SCALE 1:SCALE 200 1: 200

10M

20M

SCALE 1: 200

LO AD FD.

FD.

WINDERY WINDERY GROUND GROUND WINDERY PLANPLAN GROUND PLAN

WINDERY WINDERY ROOF ROOF WINDERY PLANPLANROOF PLAN 0M 2.5M

FD. FD.

FD.

0M 2.5M

Ground Floor

ING

Section A

FD.

Section B

LO AD

Section ASection A

Section A

ING

Section ASection A

Section A

Section BSection B

Section B

ING

Section ASection A

Section BSection B

Section B

LO AD

Section BSection B

5M 0M 2.5M 10M 5M

10M

20M 0M 2.5M

5M 20M

SCALE 1:SCALE 200 1: 200

10M

20M

Underground Floor

SCALE 1: 200

WINDERY WINDERY UNDER UNDER WINDERY GROUND GROUND UNDER PLANPLAN GROUND PLAN 0M 2.5M

5M 0M 2.5M 10M 5M

10M

20M 0M 2.5M

Similar to the roof plan on the restaurant. The roof functions as

Since the wine production area is mostly for staff members, the area is

This is the floor where wine is collected and fermented in barrels. Also,

a garden area for those who want to enjoy the view from the

closed to the public. Only a pathway at the south elevation that is allowed

it is the floor where grapes are taken in for production. This floor is at

upper ground looking out to the Yarra Valley or engage with the

for visitors to visit and observe how wine is being produced in the winery.

-3M to 4M which gives the potential for quality space for wine storage.

Denton site.

Also, the administration and offices on this floor.

5M 20M

SCALE 1:SCALE 200 1: 200

10M

SCALE 1: 200

Phase 3.2: Section Development Programs and spaces are simplified more compared to the previous week. The umbrella element consists of 6 parts (3 for each building) and the dimensions of the architecture are reduced. This allows us to focus on the computational workflow and details/ tectonic of the project in the next phase.

Phase 3.3: Tectonics and Details ROOF GARDEN

Up shot view of the hyperpolic surface umbrealla

Detail 5&6

Capping Component Material : Concrete

Umbrella Component Material : Concrete

DETAIL 2

Enclousure Component Material : Glass+Aluminum

Herperblic surface Concrete shells

DETAIL DETAIL 11

DETAIL 1

Detail 4 Colum Component Material : Concrete

DETAIL 3

Top Mid

DETAIL 2

Detail 1 DETAIL

DETAIL 1

DETAIL DETAIL 22

Detail 2 DETAIL

DETAIL 2

DETAIL Detail 33

Base

Ground Foundation

Column exploration with morphing shape

Detail 2&3

Detail 7

DETAIL 1

DETAIL 2

Detail 4 Umbrella component at defferent levels Connected with glass panel Detail 1 DETAIL 5

DETAIL 4 6 DETAIL

DETAIL 3 Detail 565 DETAIL DETAIL

Detail 454 DETAIL DETAIL

The main material would be concrete, with a prefabrication process, but the ground foundation is cast-in. Since the building is

DETAIL 5

made up of individual umbrella part 4connection details are exDETAIL 4 DETAIL

DETAIL 6 DETAIL 5

DETAIL 5

plored in this case. Mostly, when connection concrete to avoid ISOMETRIC VIEW OF THE ARCHITECTURE ELEMENTS

TECTONICS AND ASSEMBLY

cracking an expansion joint is considered, since the side deals with uneven ground, an expansion joint is an option we tried to

By using what we have so far, my part was to explore the details and tectonics of the architecture. Since all buildings are using the same component with just different locations, and the column, the materials, and construction methods are the same.

DETAIL 4

put it in (Detail 5). Skylight details are also added in with the extra void gap between profiles to create elastic properties similar to expansion joints with regular joinery (Detail 6). Also, glass railing is considered in the roof garden area.

DETAIL 5

Detail 76 DETAIL

Phase 3.3:

Geometry: Hypars and Structure Analysis

1. Plan Generator

2. Column Placement

3. Generating Umbrealla Hypars Fi

xe d

i Po ol tr

Po in

ro l

Po in

ro l

Po in

i Po ol tr

Winery

Restaurant Fi s

t in

First, to generate the parameter model, the boundary is set

Po ol tr

xe d

Materialisation

Po in

on the “genetic pool” component in GrassThe grid is placed Cby C

The umbrella, which will be placed on top of the column is

by the using plan layout. Since the geometry is based on a

oin hopper.The points are moved along the X and Yl Paxis, creating ts

created by lofting the points and segments linking into the

regular grid structure, the columns will be set perpendicular

a moving indicator inCthe direction to create variations of the on

center point of the boundary. The center point is the place

o column span. In this case, the points are moved along the Y ts lP ro

for the columns, which are shifted.

tro

t in

lP oin

to the vineyard

5. Combine modular Elements

6 4

fac

t Use component “Genetic Pool” for controlling center points for column placement (1Gene pool for similar boundary ) nt

bin

Grid boundary from Rhino Curve

6. Structure Analysis

2 3

Created 3d Robotic arm c m

direction.

4. Column Exploration

Construct

ro l

Assemb

Material: Reinforce prefab. concrete Load: Gravity, soil, glass railing and trees

Displacement 0.12 cm Elasticity energy 0.23 Shell thickness 250mm

Weak points

Strong points

component From the center points, a line is generated into gon a column. The

From the genetic pool, components are moved along the axis,

Structural Displacement As for structure analysis, we set the hypar shells at 250mm

atingparameters curve” adjusting geometry of the columns is explored by using

creating variations of the column span. Then the hypar sur-

thick to support the gravity load, soil, and trees at the roof

and entwine components. This allows

face is assembled with the column creating one segment of

area. Also with the help of the hypar surface, the form has a

the overall architecture.

greater strength compared to a planer concrete shell.

the columns.

Shape is controled by poly-

with “entwining” and “evaluthe segment and radius. it is flips into with the datadifferent Then variables matrix and lofted together

ro l

Materialisation

Construct

Created 3d Robotic arm c

Phase 3.3:

Reflection and Lesson Learned

Work Flow

I was able to set the control point at the hypars and columns only as a single unit. There is still an unsolved issue that still re-

Objectives

quired some more experiments with the rhino script. 1. I need to find a way to imply the combined hypar and column units into the gene pool grid, which currently I was able to set

1. Set 6 different hypar arrangement

only the columns in, but not the hypar.

2. freely adjust the column parametric values

2. I still haven’t found a way to put diffrent variations of hypar module (6 types)in the building grid and adjust them to create patterns.

The attempt to set this parametric model is to

control the center point of the top and bottom column.The second points are the points along

xe d

t in

Po ol tr

Materialisation

Po in

the boundary which creates the hypar surface. Lastly is the control of the column shapes, with the use of parametric workflow, shapes can be changed accordingly to the points that create a

ro l

Po in

ro l

Construction Methods

Po in

i Po ol tr

Created 3d printing moulds Robotic arm carving into foam for moulds

segment of the columns. 1

2 5 3 2

6 4

Grid boundary from Rhino Curve

Use component “Genetic Pool” for controlling center points for column placement (1Gene pool for similar boundary )

Assemble on Site

Material: Reinforce prefab. concrete Load: Gravity, soil, glass railing and trees

Displacement 0.12 cm Elasticity energy 0.23 Shell thickness 250mm Weak points

Structural Displacement

Shape is controled by polygon component with “entwining” and “evaluating curve” adjusting the segment and radius. Then it is flips with the datamatrix and lofted together

Materialisation

Column Shape Morphing

Strong points

ro l

Column

Materialisation

Design 35

Construction Methods Created 3d printing moulds Robotic arm carving into foam for moulds

Construction

Phase 3.3:

Work Flow

Module Unit

Hypar Surfaces

Column Genetic Pool grid control points (work in progress)

PHASE 4: DESIGN PROPOSAL

Phase 4:

Site Analysis

OLD HEALEVILLE RD.

OLD HEALEVILLE RD. 1 50 M R A

DIU S

PARKING SPACE

RESTAURANT WINERY

SLOPE

LAKE (WEST) SLOPE

LAKE (EAST)

SLOPE

OP SL

SLO

SLOPE DENTON HOUSE

Regional Site Map

DENTON HILL VIEW SITE PLAN YARRA GLEN, YARRA VALLEY, VIC., AUSTRALIA PHOTOGRAPHS FROM WEBSITE

1.Vehicle Circulation

2. Building Axis

50M

100M

200M

300M

SCALE 1: 2000

3. Context Lake

OLD HEALEVILLE RD.

4.View to Lake

5. Building Placement

“Tim Griffith.” Accessed August 23, 2020. https://www.timgriffith.com/Architects/Denton-Corker-Marshall/thumbs.

Phase 4:

Overall Concept

1. Vineyard Axis

2. Column Control Points

3.Define Geometry

The vineyard axis counters each other on both sides. So the approach

The plan is generated by a grid system, which is placed perpendicular

The geometry is assigned to the grid. The Hyperbolic paraboloid

for the architecture layout is to utilize the vineyard patterns and the

to the vineyard, allowing the control points (which will become the col-

umbrella and the shape morphing columns in which the shape

views that the Denton brand has already created, which is the view that

umn) to move along the same path as the vineyard.

aligned with the vineyard axis.

leads up to the Denton Hill View House.

4.Combined Modules The modules are assembled to create the space for the programs.These

5. Placement in Topography The segments are then placed accordingly to the site topography.

6. Add Roof Garden The roof garden is placed at the top of the hypar shells. With its form resisting properties the modules can support the soil.

spaces are constructed based on the position of the columns. 38

Fig.1. Exterior view from Old Healesville Road, by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Fig.1. Overall project from Old Heacville road, by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Fig.2. Exterior view Restaurant, by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Phase 4:

Winery Plan

A N

Roof Foor Plan

0M 2.5M

0M 2.5M 10M

10M 20M

0M 2.5M

5M 20M

10M

20M

Scale: 1:200

The boundary of the plans is staggered, which creates pockets allowing the vineyard to connect with the architecture.The design approach for the plans is to emphasize the lines created by the vineyard, which enhances the views throughout the fields. The program is also placed on different levels depending down according to the topography. For example, the Restaurant is located at the lower point of the location to emphasize the view looking up into the field. 40

Phase 4:

Winery Plan

B 2M

10M

20M SCALE 1:200

Reflective Ceiling Plan

0M 2.5M

10M

20M

Winery Plan

NT AK

-0

)

(-0

)

(-0

) FD

)

NT AK

(-0

-0

)

(-0

)

OF (+

0M .5 2.5M

)

.510M 0M )

20M

0M 2.5M

5M 20M

Scale: 1:200

0M 2.5M 10M

)

-0

FD .

)

-0

NT AK

FD .

NT AK

)

Ground Floor Plan

)

FD .

A B

)

. FD

)

NT AK

Phase 4:

10M

Winery Plan

-0

NT AK

-0

)

(-0

TO R

(-0

)

AG E

FD FD

)

TO R

(-0

AG E

)

TO R

(-0

AG E

TO R

(-0

)

00M 0M

)

0M 2.5M 10M

AG E

(-0

M 10M )

20M

Scale: 1:200 FD

2.5M

)

-0

NT DU AK CT C E ( TIO IO -0 N N .3 (-0 .0 (-03 3. 0M .0 00 0M ) M ) ) .

-0

NT AK

FD .

NT AK

)

FD .

(-0

)

AG E

Underground Floor Plan

(-0

FD .

TO R

FD . FD

AG E

A B

(-0

TO R

)

-0

(-0

NT AK 3.

)

NT AK

Phase 4:

0M 2.5M

5M 20M

Phase 4:

Winery Section

Space of the programs is created by the umbrella module, which allows the soil to fill up the voids created by rooftop gardens. Programs such as the exhibition space/ restaurant created by these modules are differentiated by

the spacing of the column and the height of the Hypar shells.

0M 2.5M

Section A

0M 2.5M

10M

+5.50M

ROOF GARDEN

+5.50M

+0.00M

ADMIN/OFFICE

+0.00M

-3.50M

WINE PRODUCTION -3.50M

10M

0M 2.5M

20M 20M

10M

20M

Scale: 1:200

+5.50M

ROOF GARDEN

+5.50M

+0.00M

ADMIN/OFFICE

+0.00M

-3.50M

WINE PRODUCTION -3.50M

Section B

0M 2.5M

10M

0M 2.5M

20M

Scale: 1:200

10M

20M

Phase 4:

Winery Elevation

0M 2.5M

North Elevation

10MWINERY NORTH ELEVATION 20M

Scale: 1:200

Glass is used as the main material for the enclosure. The objective of using glass is to reveal the

10M

20M SCALE 1:200

hypar shells from inside the building.Walls in a shape of Hypars which created a slight opening are also used to control natural light.

0M 2.5M

10M

20M

Scale: 1:200

WINERY SOUTH ELEVATION 2M

10M

20M SCALE 1:200

South Elevation 45

Fig.3. Basement (Wine Production), by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Fig.4. Winery, East Elevation, by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Fig.5. Winery, West Elevation, by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Phase 4: Restaurant Plan

A B

0M 2.5M

Roof Foor Plan

0M 2.5M 10M

10M 20M

0M 2.5M

5M 20M

10M

20M

0M 2.5M

0M 2.5M 10M 5M

10M

20M

0M 2.5M 20M5M

10M

20M

+5.50M

ROOF GARDEN Scale: 1:200

+5.50M

+0.00M

ADMIN/OFFICE

+0.00M

-3.50M

WINE PRODUCTION -3.50M

0M 2.5M

A B

10M

0M 2.5M

10M

20M

+5.50M

ROOF GARDEN

+5.50M

+0.00M

ADMIN/OFFICE

+0.00M

-3.50M

WINE PRODUCTION -3.50M

10M

20M

0M 2.5M

0M 2.5M 10M

10M 20M

0M 2.5M

5M 20M

10M

20M

B B

Reflective Ceiling Plan

B 2M 0M 2.5M

0M 2.5M 10M 5M

5M 10M

10M

0M 20M

2.5M 0M 2.5M5M 20M5M

20M 10M

SCALE 1:200 10M

20M

+5.50M Scale: 1:200

+5.50M

ROOF GARDEN

+0.00M

ADMIN/OFFICE

+0.00M

ADMIN/OFF

-3.50M

WINE PRODUCTION -3.50M

WINE PROD

ROOF GAR

Phase 4:

Restaurant Plan

A )

A YH TR

.1 00

A YH TR

)

.1 00

)

.00

-1 L(

)

0 2.0

)

.00

(-2

N TIO

CE RA

)

.20

(-2

CE RA

R TE

N) NMI .20I -( 2 D

)

YH TR

.1 00

)

YH TR

.1 00

)

.1 00

L AL ) Y H .00M R T 1 EN L (L A H ON

IBI

H EX

IBI

H EX

)

0 2.0

H EX

RDEN

CE RA

Ground Foor Plan

.0 (-1

)

.0 (-2

IBI

)

CE RA

)

.20

(-2

R TE

.0 (-1

)

.00

(-2

R TE

A N

.1 00

+ L( AL ) ) H Y 0M 0M TR 1.0 1.0 N ( ( E LL LL HA HA N N TIO TIO IBI IBI H H EX EX

) ING 0M DIN 2 . -2

)

(-2

)

CE RA

.0 (-2

0M 2.5M

(

CE RA

(-2

0M 2.5M 10M

10M 20M

0M 2.5M

5M 20M

0M 2.5M

0M 2.5M 10M 5M

10M

20M

0M 2.5M 20M5M

Scale: 1:200 +6.00M

FICE

DUCTION

10M

)

ROOF GARDEN

+6.00M

+0.00M

ENTRY/ RECEPTION

+0.00M

ENTRY/ RECEPTION

-1.00M -2.00M

EXHIBITION SPACE DINING AREA

-1.00M -2.00M

EXHIBITION SPACE DINING AREA

-5.00M

KITCHEN/TOILET/CELLAR -5.00M

ROOF GARDEN

KITCHEN/TOILET/CELLAR

10M

Phase 4:

Restaurant Plan

A H

)

.00

3 -0

(

)

.00

3 -0

(

) R

N OU

AR R LL R G ) CE DE 0M UN 03.0 (-

N OU

AR R LL R G ) CE DE 0M UN 03.0 ) (0M 3.0 0 (N HE C KIT

N OU

AR R LL R G ) CE DE 0M N ) U 3.0 M (- 0 .00

(

3 -0

CH KIT

(

N H

)

.0 03

)

.0 03

)

.0 03

CH KIT

(B B H D D BO UN UN O O R R R R A A LL R G ) LL R G ) CE DE 0M CE DE 0M N N U 03.0 U 03.0 ) ) ((0M 0M 3.0 3.0 0 0 ((N N HE HE C C KIT KIT

Roof Foor Plan

B ND

U R RO LA R G ) L CE DE 0M UN 03.0 (-

)

.00

3 -0

A N

.00

3 -0

(

)

.00

3 -0

CH KIT

0M 2.5M

0M 2.5M 10M

10M 20M

5M 20M

0M 2.5M

0M 2.5M 10M 5M

10M

20M

Scale: 1:200

0M 2.5M

0M 2.5M 20M5M

Phase 4: Restaurant Section

+5.50M

ROOF GARDEN

+0.00M

ADMIN/OFFICE

-3.50M

0M 2.5M

+0.00M

-3.50M

ROOF GARDEN

+6.00M

ROOF GARDEN

+0.00M

ENTRY/ RECEPTION

+0.00M

ENTRY/ RECEPTION

-1.00M -2.00M

EXHIBITION SPACE DINING AREA

-1.00M -2.00M

EXHIBITION SPACE DINING AREA

-5.00M

KITCHEN/TOILET/CELLAR -5.00M

WINE PRODUCTION

+5.50M

+6.00M

10M

0M 2.5M

20M

10M

KITCHEN/TOILET/CELLAR

20M

ROOF GARDEN

ADMIN/OFFICE

WINE PRODUCTION

+6.00M

ROOF GARDEN

+0.00M

ENTRY/ RECEPTION +0.00M

-1.00M -2.00M

EXHIBITION SPACE DINING AREA

-5.00M

KITCHEN/TOILET/CELLAR -5.00M

+6.00M

-1.00M -2.00M

ROOF GARDEN

ENTRY/ RECEPTION EXHIBITION SPACE DINING AREA KITCHEN/TOILET/CELLAR

B W

0M 2.5M

10M 0M 2.5M

20M

10M

20M

NT AK

-0

Phase 4:

Restaurant Elevation

0M 2.5M

10M

20M

Scale: 1:200

North Elevation

0M 2.5M

10M

20M

Scale: 1:200

South Elevation 53

Fig.6. Restaurant, Dining Area, by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Fig.7. Restaurant, East Elevation, by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Fig.8. Restaurant, East Elevation, by Dan Tantiwatanapisal

Phase 4:

Construction method

First, prepare land-work. Then pour concrete (transfer by truck) for floor structure (Floor slab and retaining wall, the foundation for column). 3d printing column on-site with the support of scaffolding. The form-work for hypar shells is made onsite using a robot arm with hot wire to cut foam, this method will reduce the labor cost and time. Also, The foam formwork can be reused for other similar modules. Next, the shells are assembled with the column creating the module by using a crane.This can be easily done as the connection to be tightened by bolting and interlocking between columns and umbrella structures. Facade and roof garden soil was later added to enclose the project.

ne ya rd A

xis

ne ya rd A

xis

1. Prepare Landwork

4. Hypar Shell Construction

2. Pour Concrete Slab

3. 3D Print Columns

5. Hypar Shell Assemble

6. Enclosure + Soil

Phase 4:

Computaional Work flow

The two-parameter (the Hypar Shells and shape morphing column) that we use to create the form of the

The design begins from the boundary box that stacked down the slope. Then the location and height of the

structure. By using the plan as a generator, the geometry is the main driver for our project. The module set is

column are put into parametric modeling to generate the form of our design. The variation of umbrella mod-

placed within the plan. Each model has a column that aligns with the axis of the vineyards which the span be-

ules creates a different quality of the spaces. The structural analysis diagram shows the performances of the

tween each column is varies depending on the program. The height of the umbrella also varies. Furthermore,

concrete shell thickness of the structures. Both buildings have a similar kind of modules, so the displacement is

the structural analysis helps us to explore the behavior of the structure by allowing adjustments to the design

similar. We take into account the weight of the soil and trees we put on the rooftop.

for a better outcome. Fi

xe d

s nt

i Po ol tr

Materialisation

Po in

ro l

Po in

ro l

Construction Methods

Po in

i Po ol tr

Created 3d printing moulds Robotic arm carving into foam for moulds

2 5 3 2

6 4

Grid boundary from Rhino Curve

Use component “Genetic Pool” for controlling center points for column placement (1Gene pool for similar boundary )

Assemble on Site

Material: Reinforce prefab. concrete Load: Gravity, soil, glass railing and trees

Displacement 0.12 cm Elasticity energy 0.23 Shell thickness 250mm Weak points

Structural Displacement

Shape is controled by polygon component with “entwining” and “evaluating curve” adjusting the segment and radius. Then it is flips with the datamatrix and lofted together

Materialisation

Column Shape Morphing

Strong points

ro l

Column

Materialisation

Design 57

Construction Methods Created 3d printing moulds Robotic arm carving into foam for moulds

Construction

Phase 4:

Computaional Work flowSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Legend Strong

Weak

CAFE & RESTAURANT

WINERY Displacement : 0.56 cm.

Displacement : 0.39 cm.

Loads applied

Gravity load 1 Kn/ m² Live load* 4.5 Kn/m² *including soil and trees loads on the rooftop shell thickness 10 cm.

FROM THE ANALYSIS THE STRUCTURE PERFORM VERY WELL. THE THICKNESS OF THE CONCRETE IS SET TO 100 mm. THE WEAK POINT OF THIS MODULAR STRUCTURE IS THE SPAN OF THE COULMNS THAT WE RANDOMISE. IN SOME AREA, IT APPEARS TO BE TO FAR APART. THE MODULE ALSO NEED TO BE NEXT TO EACH OTHER TO BE ABLE TO SUPPORT BY THE SURROUNDING MODULE. 58

Phase 4:

Tectonics

ROOF GARDEN

Up shot view of the hyperpolic surface umbrealla

DETAIL 3 Capping Component Material : Concrete

Umbrella Component Material : Concrete

DETAIL 1

DETAIL 2

DETAIL 4

Colum Component Material : Concrete Morphing Shape Column Ground Foundation

Umbrella component at defferent levels Connected with glass panel

Reinforced concrete creates the umIS

R YA E N

PA R

brella modules, which are cast on-site and assemble to the column, with bolting and an interlocking design. The connection between modules using expansion

W AL

rubber joints is allow the structure to move dependently as the support itself.

ISOMETRIC VIEW OF THE ARCHITECTURE ELEMENTS

DETAIL 5

TECTONICS AND ASSEMBLY 59

GLOSSARY Active-Bending: Curved beam and surfaces that is based on elastic deformation of initailly straight elements, the method can be use for form finding to explore shapes through bending the forms into their optimum geomertry Anchor Point: Support points which the structure is fixed to the surface Caternary: a curve that is formed from a hanging chan and cable supported by it own weight which is support by each end point Form Finding: process of designing finding optimal form through exploring mechinical properties The Hanging Method: A form finding method to explore arches and dome related to inverse caternary geometry Grasshopper: A plug-in tool for Rhinoceros through parametric design Kangaroo: A plugin for grasshopper which implies Karamba: FEM (Finite element method) plugin for ditialized form in grasshopper used for structural anallysis Gridshell: Space forms by curve frame work made from rods and rigid joints Parametric Design: Design method using numbers based on algorithmatic thinking to minipulate complex geometry and structure Hyperbolic Paraboloid: a double curved surface(convex in one axis and concave in the other) which the geometry resembles a saddle