Handmade
Handmade describes something made by hand or by a hand process, not by machine, especially with care or craftsmanship, and typically therefore of superior quality. Handmade urbanism is the way of providing urban change carried out by local residents in their own neighborhoods or communities, with their own hands and means. It starts with the residents recognizing a problem, followed by the active realization of an idea to solve that immediate issue. Community initiatives evolve from those active gestures and support the citizen’s active participation at the local scale. Their acts recognize chances in challenges, make creative use of existing resources, and forge partnerships and relationships to achieve predefined goals that address their daily needs and, eventually, ensure an improved quality of life for communities. The actions of handmade urbanism are unique, each shaped by the individuals and the field of operations that define them. They are carried out at the local scale, as products of culture and environment, and deal as much with soft infrastructure—physical and emotional wellbeing, education, etc.—as with the reshaping of the built environment. The study of handmade urbanism acknowledges that large parts of cities have been built by the residents themselves, without help from governments, planners or designers. It suggests alternative ways to approach planning other than the traditional methods currently employed. At a global level, handmade urbanism reveals overlaps in the characteristic ways of life of urban societies, clarifying common threads and differences among them. These provide us with opportunities to learn from the ways needs and problems have been addressed. The operative modes of handmade urbanism contribute to the discussion around participatory models. Its creation and appreciation is transformative to individuals and communities.
4
Acknowledgements
Since 2007, the Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award has
This book compiles twenty-five interviews—or, five
Tom Unverzagt, who carefully conceived the graphic
been organized by the Alfred Herrhausen Society
for each one of the five cities—giving voice to different
as an outcome of the Urban Age conference series,
stakeholders who have played an important role in the
jointly organized with the London School of Econom-
rebuilding of these cities on a local scale. Each inter-
ics, and initiated by Wolfgang Nowak (AHS) and Ricky
viewee generously shared their knowledge—unveiling
Burdett (LSE).
subjects that are key to understanding how the projects
contributed to our image archive, which has been
are organized, the mechanisms behind them, as well as
growing over the years.
For five years, Ute E. Weiland has coordinated all of
design that structures all of these ideas. Inez Templeton who greatly refined the text through her review and proofreading. We graciously thank all of the photographers who
the awards in five cities, organizing the content and
providing arguments for the importance of small-scale
compilation with the local researchers chosen to carry
developments to face important challenges posed by
the idea of this publication from the beginning and
out the communication, organization, and fieldwork in
each one of these cities. All of the voices intertwine
have given us guidance throughout the production
each city.
and organize layers that allow a complex understand-
process. We thank them for their constant support,
ing of the projects, highlighting their potential for the
discussions, and critical input.
Jessica Barthel and Anja Fritzsch have also made valuable contributions in the organization of the award.
city at large.
Jochen Visscher and Philipp Sperrle have supported
Most importantly, none of this would exist without
We would like to acknowledge the work of our local
This publication has also benefited from the invalu-
the courage and entrepreneurship of those individuals,
researchers, who have coordinated the DBUAA in each
able support of four people who had the chance to see
active in their own cities, who have shown other ways
of the cities: Priya Shankar in Mumbai (2007), Marcos
the projects in all five cities. Ricky Burdett, Olaf Jacobs,
to fight against shortages and urgencies of all kinds.
L. Rosa in São Paulo (2008), Demet Mutman in Istan-
Wolfgang Nowak, and Anthony Williams share their
Their pioneerism transforms challenges into opportu-
bul (2009), Ana Alvarez in Mexico City (2010), and
point of view in interviews, helping us trace common
nities making use of available resources, identifying
Lindsay Bush in Cape Town (2012). They have worked
threads among the showcased community initiatives.
potentials, and employing them in proactive ways that
Olaf Jacobs produced the documentary Zukunft der
generate benefits to the built environment and, espe-
on the ground, rediscovering their own cities and unveiling networks of local practices that have been
Städte (The Future of Cities), which brings us stories from
built throughout a year of fieldwork. To a great extent,
the community projects presented in this book, allowing
these are the researchers that kept in contact with
the general public to experience these projects closely.
the local projects, giving continuity to the work that
cially, to the users and residents. Finally, we are grateful for those who have provided guidance and for every partner in each city. We would
Richard Sennett and his writings and lectures on
also like to thank all of the institutions, organizations,
started with our compilation, through the develop-
“cooperation” and “the open city,” as well as his re-
and associations that took part in the initiative during
ment of their own research and work. And they have
flections about some of the projects in São Paulo and
these five years.
collaborated on this publication, a project coordinated
Istanbul, have strongly influenced the work on this
by Marcos L. Rosa, by participating in a critical review
publication from the beginning.
of the findings. In this review, we look back at the
His contribution serves as a theoretical background
developments and current status of the projects that
for considering these projects. We also highly appreci-
are showcased, conduct a comparative analysis, and
ate his generous comments and advice in the process
suggest common points among all of the five cities.
of producing this book.
Specifically, we would like to acknowledge the critical
Paulo Ayres, who visualized each of the showcased
input of Priya Shankar, who organized the first award
projects in illustrations created with Marcos L. Rosa
in Mumbai and made a valuable contribution to this
and Lindsay Bush and informed by all of the local
book, and the constant support and discussions with
researchers. Working with him has been a delightful
Lindsay Bush, who has influenced the format of this
experience. He has employed his expertise in graphic
publication, as well as the debates with Ana Alvarez
drawings that illustrate the processes, mechanisms,
who reviewed our ideas and contributed with insight-
operational modes, as well as the impact and changes
ful concepts.
in each one of them.
8
INDEX
Introduction 10 Introductory Interview Returning to the Roots Wolfgang Nowak
12 Initial Thoughts Make the Invisible Visible Ute E. Weiland
14 Foreword
59
São Paulo
Marcos L. Rosa
127
Mexico City
Initiatives
Initiatives
197 Four Interviews: Five Cities, One Gaze
68 Union Building
136 Miravalle Community Council
198 The Significance of Space in Urban Society
72 ACAIA Institute
140 Cultural Center Consejo Agrarista
76 Biourban
144 Recovering Spaces for Life
Interviews
Interviews
80 Workshops as a Communication Facilitator:
148 Weaving Efforts:
Understanding Community Needs
Working for the Common Good
Ana Cristina Cintra Camargo
Francisco Javier Conde González
82 Preexistence in Socially Vulnerable Areas
150 Reality Surpasses Us:
Elisabete França
We Need to Be More Flexible and Porous
of their Environment
84 Scaling Up Micro Actions
Felipe Leal
Marcos L. Rosa, Ute E. Weiland, with Ana Álvarez,
Fernando de Mello Franco
152 Unfolding New Professional Profiles for
86 How to Live Together
Bottom-up Urban Planning
Lisette Lagnado
Arturo Mier y Terán
88 The Challenge of Derelict and Residual Spaces.
154 Cultural Acupuncture over the City
Is Anyone Thinking on the Local Level?
Argel Gómez and Benjamín González
Nevoral Alves Bucheroni
156 Braiding the Physical and the Social:
The Community Richard Sennett
18 Editorial An Urban Trend: Residents Taking Ownership
Lindsay Bush, Demet Mutman, Priya Shankar
Five Cities 23 Introduction to Five Cities 25
Mumbai
Priya Shankar
Initiatives 34 Mumbai Waterfronts Center 38 Triratna Prerana Mandal 42 Urban Design Research Institute Interviews 46 Dreams, Dignity and Changing Realities: The Story of a Community Toilet Dilip Kadam, Dayanand Jadhav, Dayanand Mohite
48 Network, Intermediate, Integrate:
93
Istanbul
Initiatives 102 Music for Peace 106 Nurtepe First Step Cooperative 110 Children of Hope—Youth House Interviews 114 Presence and Vision of a Grass Roots Initiative Yeliz Yalın Baki
116 New Planning Approaches for Building Up Cities Erhan Demirdizen
118 Action and Participation in Planning
Seema Redkar
Özlem Ünsal
50 Elastic Urbanism:
120 Curating Artists and Cultural Practices
Sustainability and Informality in the City
Behiç Ak
Rahul Mehrotra
122 Advocating Sustainable and Participatory Models
Shabama Azmi
54 Democratizing Public Space P. K. Das
A New Social Contract for the City Jose Castillo
Demet Mutman
Reaching out to the Grassroots
52 Making Voices Heard: Art and Activism
Common Points
Ana Álvarez
Aslı Kıyak ˙Ingin
161
Cape Town
Lindsay Bush
Initiatives 170 Mothers Unite 174 Rocklands Urban Abundance Center 178 Thrive Interviews 182 Incidental Urban Acupuncture Carol Jacobs
184 Breaking it Down to Build it Up Michael Krause
186 Reimagining the City from a Different Viewpoint Edgar Pieterse
188 Lighting the Fire within Us Malika Ndlovu
190 Going Local: The Lavender Hill Area Councilor Shaun August
Ricky Burdett
2 00 Reporting from Local Initiatives Olaf Jacobs
202 Cities are an Expression of Human Needs Wolfgang Nowak
2 04 Focus on Results: Attention to Real Needs Anthony Williams
2 06 Project Categories, Programs and Common Clouds 212 Final Considerations Marcos L. Rosa and Ute E. Weiland
221 Credits
10
Introductory Interview
Returning to the Roots Wolfgang Nowak was the initiator of the Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award
What inspired the Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award?
What fascinated me, if you start in Mumbai’s
Why go to five cities to award best practices
Triratna Prerna Mandal, and then go to Mexico City’s
such as the ones we can see in this book? What
The idea for the award goes back to February 2006,
Miravalle, or even to the Sao Paulo’s Instituto Acaia, or
can we do with what we found?
when we hosted an Urban Age conference in Mexico
to any other of these five cities, you can find a “center”
I think the most urgent problem we face is our cities—
City. I had an opportunity to visit a slum. Despite being
with a facility, the square, an area that is somehow
it is a global problem. You cannot rethink cities without
a really awful crime-ridden neighborhood, its inhab-
protected, secured not by a fence, but by the common
acknowledging the experience of grassroots projects
itants had nonetheless created a marketplace and a
will that collectively does something. Today, if you
that are designed by the people, not urban planners
school. They had tried to improve their own situation,
travel from the center outside of the city, which does
and architects. The award allows us to compare all
creating a new city inside a situation of hopelessness.
not have clear borders, suddenly the city becomes just
these projects.
You find the same thing in Mumbai and São Paulo,
an agglomeration of houses, there is nothing else of
people resisting their environment by building some-
what makes a city—there is nothing. And if you look
tives indicating the different ways in which people
thing. This is what prompted us to create the Urban
at a famous picture of Mexico City that depicts “the
forge partnerships to create a better urban environ-
Age Award. The aim of the award is to enable people
endless city,” it looks like a horror vision of the city
ment and, as a result, a better life for themselves and
to find better solutions and become active citizens. I
that started to sprawl and is not a village but an ocean
their communities.
am not one of these people, like a Florence Nightingale,
of hopelessness where people live. My idea and what
who stands and gives soup to the poor. What we want
fascinated me is that inside this ocean of dwellings,
partners and visions in the organization of a better
is to enable the poor no longer to accept soup queues
people started to build what could be the beginning of a
environment in some of the largest cities in the world.
and produce their own soup.
new city. And you could see this, for instance, in India’s
Along with that, it is intended to serve as a platform
world’s mega-cities in the twenty-first century jointly organized
slum of Khotwadi, inside of which a community project
that organizes a network of urban initiatives at the
with the London School of Economics. He has held various
projects, and sometimes we even enable mayors and
started building a city. In Miravalle, another initiative
grass roots level.
senior positions in Germany’s state and federal governments,
citizens to meet. We honor alliances that improve the
looks like the center of a village. We like Paris because
I think we can encourage mayors and urban plan-
quality of life in cities and the prize celebrates the
if you go away from the large boulevards you will find
ners to look around their environment to see if there
shared responsibility between residents, companies,
little centers, with markets, trees and restaurants, and
is something happening. For me, it was interesting to
NGOs, universities, public bodies, etc.
these cities are cities with different centers. This is
see that whenever we told mayors about these initia-
Political Analysis and Planning at the German Federal Chancel-
also the charm of Berlin. In that sense, the vision of
tives in their cities, they were surprised. They were
lery from 1999 to 2002. He lectures and publishes widely on
We remember that after coming back from Cape
that “endless city” is not a vision of horror. If you look
astonished about how many of these initiatives existed.
Town earlier this year your first words were
carefully, you see that people are starting to build their
City leaders should link these initiatives together. Such
“Déjà vu.” Can you tell us that story?
own cities or centers. It is different from the faceless
initiatives and those who manage them should be part
This is a fascinating story about Cape Town and about
cities being built by star architects and investors, with
of urban planning and not excluded. If we want to re-
all of the other cities. People start building their own
the skyscrapers and shopping centers. These small
invent cities in the twenty-first century, this means re-
“city centers” inside big “deserts” of agglomerated
centers are surrounded by people who build their
turning to the roots, linking urban planning with com-
houses, they start building these oases based on the
own “city within the city,” one that is surrounded by
munity initiatives in order to learn from each other. I
same pattern: it is the tree in the center and around
several others centers alike. They are the reinvention
think we can learn a lot from the grassroots level.
this tree there are benches and gardens, and they plant
of cities inside of areas that we call slums, favelas,
some crops and then there is the spiritual center, which
gecekondus, barrios, townships. Indeed, their efforts
Bank. Founded in 1992, its work focuses on new forms of
might be a library, or a school or some teaching or
make sense, because they do not destroy the existing,
governance as a response to the challenges of the 21st century.
health facility, and the kitchen, where one learns how
but build on it.
We encourage citizens to take forward their
to prepare a good meal. They also have small places, squares, playgrounds where there is entertainment. These are safe environments where people can meet.
We found that there is a variety of creative initia-
The Award looks for projects that bring together
Wolfgang Nowak is Director of the Alfred Herrhausen Society, the International Forum of Deutsche Bank. Wolfgang Nowak initiated the Urban Age program, an international investigation into the future of the
France’s Centre national de la recherche scientifique (French National Center for Scientific Research) in Paris, and UNESCO. After unification, he was State Secretary of Education in Saxony from 1990 to 1994. In addition, he was Director-General for
academic issues and is a regular commentator for German television and newspapers. He is honorary Vice President of the British think tank Policy Network, Senior Fellow of the Brookings Institution in Washington, and Fellow at the NRW-School of Governance at the University of Duisburg-Essen. The Alfred Herrhausen Society Named after Alfred Herrhausen, a German banker and former chairman of Deutsche Bank who was assassinated in a roadside bomb attack in 1989, the non-profit Alfred Herrhausen Society (AHS) is a corporate social responsibility initiative of Deutsche
The Urban Age conference series and award program is one of three major initiatives supported by AHS. Broadly speaking, the AHS seeks traces of the future in the present, and working with partners in government, academia and business, aims to conceptualize relevant themes for analysis and debate globally.
12
Initial Thoughts
Make the Invisible Visible Ute E. Weiland has coordinated the award process in all five cities
Cities—and megacities in particular—have become way
ture, or urban planning) is assigned for the fieldwork
construction of the city, as well as to document and to
“Make visible what, without you, might perhaps never
too complex to be governed from a centrally located
in each city. Their overall function has been to trace
share it. These activities received considerable media
have been seen.” (Robert Bresson, director)
city hall. Nowadays, successful urban politics are large-
projects in which people proactively improve their en-
coverage, which informed the civil society about the
ly based on temporary alliances, created for the solu-
vironment by forging partnerships and sharing respon-
potential of those initiatives and about their impact on
tion of concrete challenges. With different stakeholders
sibilities. While coordinating the award, each Manager
citizen’s lives.
partaking, they prevent the alienation of citizens from
has been in constant contact with those initiatives,
one another. Alienation has already seized whole living
learning about their aims and methods, visiting their
though most of the projects are modest in size, the
districts of this world’s megacities; suggesting they
sites, and documenting their work.
procedure organizes a network that reveals innovative
The mapping has taken place ever since. Even
form part of the city by labeling them “city districts”
Their first task has always been to communicate the
would certainly be wrong. They are isolated from the
award to a network of different stakeholders—local au-
traditional quarters, not only geographically but also
thorities and administration, academia, journalists, art-
On a critical note, it is important to remember
through sordid living conditions, high crime rates, and
ists and designers, NGOs, community associations, etc.
that the award has been successfully communicated
inadequate housing situations.
In a second step, they created a platform for networks
through public relations activities and extensive
With the Urban Age conferences, organized jointly
of different societal parts that are active in shaping the
documentation; to reach and induce local authorities
with the London School of Economics, Alfred Herrhaus-
urban environment. These platforms were designed to
to get involved, however, it requires a strong net-
en Society has established a network of architects, ur-
mobilize the civil society of the respective city as well
work between decision-makers and active citizens, a
ban planners, mayors, scientists, and NGOs, in order to
as to circulate the call for initiatives.
temporal alliance to make use of the dedication that
find solutions for the cities of the twenty-first century.
The Award Managers were sent on the ground in
modes of spatial organization and disseminates this information to other stakeholders.
was experienced in desperate environments. In other
With the help of the Urban Age Award, this “network
order to be in direct contact with a network of local ac-
words, it needs urban planning that is willing to benefit
from the top” is supposed to be complemented by a
tors involved in collective practices. The whole process
from the open spaces that the participating projects
“network from the bottom” to merge these to a better
of organizing the award provides an enormous poten-
have created despite adverse circumstances.
overall picture of the respective urban region.
tial for field research, as it allows exploring a number
Starting in 2007, the Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award distinguishes “partnerships of shared respon-
of projects in the urban local sphere. By the immediate observation of these initiatives,
This was accomplished in Cape Town for the first time, where a vigorous Governor, an interested municipality, and the Cape Town Partnership were willing
sibility” between citizens, politicians, the economy,
the researcher no longer contemplates the world
to interlink the 250 applying projects not only with
and NGOs, which contribute to an improved quality of
passively; he or she rather starts to experience it
each other, but also with the City of Cape Town and the
living in their cities. The award was designed to en-
actively through the contact with people active in
Provincial Government. The result was an alliance that
courage people to assume responsibility for their living
their own environment. In every city, the fieldwork
connects in a sustainable way what had not been con-
environment. It is awarded annually, usually in the city
continued with the search for local leadership im-
nected before.
that hosts the Urban Age conference of that year. After
mersed in their realities, or in the scale of their own
an open application process, an independent interna-
neighborhoods.
tional jury awards the prize, which is worth 100,000
Ute Elisabeth Weiland has been the Deputy Director of the Alfred Herrhausen Society,
The Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award is designed
Deutsche Bank’s international forum since 2007, a member of
to initiate such developments; it can make visible that
the Executive Board of the Urban Age conference series at the London School of Economics since 2004, and since 1 January
In São Paulo in 2008, corresponding projects were
the borders between historical urban quarters and
located by systemic mapping, and subsequently related
slums do not symbolize walls between citizens and
to the dimensions of the city as a whole for the first
slum dwellers. Active citizenship exists even where the
dia Law and Media Management at the University of Potsdam
Award is to make the invisible visible, to show what
time. Furthermore, the intensive investigation of the
concept itself is unknown.
and was its deputy managing director until 2003. Born in the
potential there is in the slums, townships, barrios,
local projects started to produce actual knowledge; the
gecekondus, or favelas of this world, and to constitute
amount of information gathered from there was un-
jects documented during these years, the compiled ma-
a lobby for those who have never had one.
foreseen until that moment. It opened up opportunities
terial allows us to critically reflect on commonalities
to reveal practices, to pinpoint fields of opportunity
between the projects, about their exemplariness, their
for actions, and to highlight their importance to the
potential, as well as about their impact and innovation.
USD, to the winning project. The overall aim of the Deutsche Bank Urban Age
For the implementation of the project, a local Award Manager (from the field of political science, architec-
After five cities, five awards, and hundreds of pro-
2010 member of the Governing Board of LSE Cities. In 1997, she co-founded the Erich Pommer Institute for Me-
former German Democratic Republic, she graduated from the Academy of Music in Weimar. After unification, she became chief of staff to the Secretary of State for education in Saxony. Ute E. Weiland is a member of the German-Israeli Young Leaders Exchange of the Bertelsmann Foundation and young leader of the Atlantik Brücke.
14
Foreword
The Community Richard Sennett is Professor of Sociology at LSE and New York University and author of ‘The Craftsman’
Practising Commitment
children; domestic interiors stuffed with knick-knacks
the 1960s, those political gains didn’t figure so much
department, but the youngsters in the project a gen-
I would like to visit the scene of a settlement house in
and carefully brushed furniture, again a contrast to the
in their own thinking about their personal survival; if
eration later were hostile to people who offered them-
Chicago where informal cooperation helped provide a
bare, scuffed interiors which before had counted for us
a door opens, you do not automatically walk through
selves as helping hands, as ‘role models’. As always,
social anchor for poor children like myself. Coopera-
as ‘home’.
it. Yet when we got down to the grit of discussing our
the message ‘If I can do it, so can you’ can be turned
own children’s adolescent angst, few people applied
around: ‘If I made good, why aren’t you succeeding?
tion’s difficulties, pleasures and consequences appeared
At the settlement-house reunion, people spoke with
among the people who passed through this dilapidated,
wonder at what had happened to the neighbourhood
Scripture to that perennial, particular hard case. So
What’s wrong with you?’ So the role model’s offer to
bustling building on the city’s Near West Side. Or so it
since we had all left. It had sunk further than any of us
too at work; rather than moralizing, people think
give something back to the community, to reach out,
seemed to me, when decades later I returned to share
could have imagined, and was now a vast archipelago
flexibly and adaptively about concrete behaviour.
was rejected by the young people in the community
a weekend, sponsored by the settlement house, with
of abandoned houses, isolated apartment towers in
On the job, for the first time, many of these young
who most needed help.
thirty or so African-American adults who had grown up
which the elevators stank of urine and shit, a place
African-Americans were working side by side with
All three of these issues—the fragility of morale,
in this small corner of the Chicago ghetto.1
where no policemen responded to telephone calls for
whites, and they had to feel their way. Even twenty
conviction, cooperation—were familiar to me, but for
Memory played the same trick on my childhood
help and most adolescents carried knives or guns. The
years later they had to do so, as when my child-
me as a white boy they cut a different way. My mother
neighbours that it does on everyone; the experience of
magic talismans of a place or a face seemed even more
hood next-door neighbour became the supervisor of
and I moved to the housing project when my father left
years of change can be compressed in the memory of a
required to explain the luck of escape.
a group of mostly white subordinates in the motor
in my infancy and left us penniless, but we lived there
bureau of Chicago.
only about seven years; as soon as our family fortunes
face or a room. The black children I grew up with had a
The administrators of the settlement house, like the
compelling reason to remember in this way. They were
elderly cop representing the Police Athletic League,
And then there was the matter of cooperation.
survivors. Their childhoods disorganized by poverty,
were of course happy to hear these testimonials to
As children, the ‘fuck you’ version of cooperation
gers for me but not mortal dangers. Perhaps thanks to
doubting as adolescents that they had much of value
their saving presence, but too realistic to believe
dominated our lives, since all gangs in the community
this distance, the reunion sparked in me the desire to
in themselves to offer the larger world, they puzzled
entirely in their own transforming potency: many kids
subscribed to it, and the gangs were powerful. In the
understand how the three pieces of unfinished busi-
later in life about why they survived while so many
who banged on instruments in the settlement house or
immediate post-Second World War era, gangs dealt in
ness among my childhood friends might be seen in a
of their childhood mates had succumbed to addiction,
played basketball on a nearby paved court eventually
petty theft rather than in drugs, as they would a gener-
larger context.
crime or lives lived on the margins. So they singled out
wound up in jail. And the past remained unfinished
ation later; small children were sent to ‘front’ shoplift-
a person, place or event as a transforming experience
business for the survivors; issues they faced as chil-
ing, since, if these children were caught, they could not
for themselves, as a talisman. The settlement house be-
dren they continued to face as adults. That unfinished
be sent to jail. To avoid being sucked into gang life, kids
Self-sacrificing, long-term, wilful and so fragile: these
came a talisman, as did the strict local Catholic school
business falls under three headings.
had to find other ways of associating with one another,
measures of commitment make it an experience
ways that flew under the radar-screen, as it were,
inseparable from the ways we understand ourselves.
one’s spirits up in difficult circumstances. So simple
of the gang’s control. This meant hanging out in bus
We might want to reframe these experiences by saying that strong commitment entails a duty to oneself.
and the sports club run by an organization called the Police Athletic League. My childhood companions were not heroic; they did
The first concerns morale, the matter of keeping
returned, we moved out. The community posed dan-
Vocation
to state, morale was less clear to explain in practice,
shelters or other places than those marked out as gang
not rise from rags to riches, becoming racial exem-
since my neighbours had every rational reason to suc-
turf, or staying late at school, or heading directly to the
plars of the American Dream. Only a few made it to
cumb to low spirits as children, and even now could
settlement house. A place of refuge meant somewhere
word ‘duty’ by thinking of commitment as a road map,
university; most steadied themselves enough to get
still wake up at night, when worried about an unpaid
you could talk about parents, do homework together,
the map of what you should do with your life.
through secondary school, thereafter taking jobs as
bill or a problem at work, thinking the whole edifice of
or play checkers, all intermissions from ‘fuck you’
secretaries, firemen, store-keepers or functionaries in
their adult lives might suddenly collapse like a house
aggression. These intermissions in retrospect seemed
commitment by the single German word Beruf, which
local government. Their gains, which might seem mod-
of cards.
enormously important, since the experiences planted
roughly translates into English as a ‘vocation’ or a ‘call-
the seed for the kind of behaviour, open rather than
ing’. These English words are saturated with religious overtones from the time of the Great Unsettling.
est to an outsider, were to them enormous. Over the
The second issue concerns conviction. At our gath-
And then shift again the oppressive weight of that
Max Weber sought to explain this kind of sustaining
four days of our reunion, I went to visit some of their
ering, people declared they had survived thanks to
defensive, which had served people to make their way
homes, and recognized domestic signs of the journey
strong, guiding convictions—all were devoted church-
outside the community.
we had all taken: tidy backyards with well-tended
goers, and all had faith in family writ large. Though
plants, unlike the broken-bottle-strewn play areas
the African-American adults had passed through, and
wanted to ‘give something back’, in the words of a
for others, remaining engaged in society, choice didn’t
surrounded by chain-link fences we had known as
benefited from, the American civil rights upheavals of
childhood neighbour, a foreman in the city’s sanitation
enter the picture in the same way; faith was natural-
Now some of those who had survived by leaving
The medieval Catholic imagined a religious vocation as the monk’s decision to withdraw from the world;
18
Editorial
An Urban Trend: Residents Taking Ownership of their Environment Marcos L. Rosa, Ute E. Weiland, with Ana Álvarez, Lindsay Bush, Demet Mutman, Priya Shankar
Increasingly, people across the globe are engaging in improving the urban environments they live in. They
• benefited communities, improving quality of life and the
This publication intends to make the mechanisms
tors involved, and the organizational steps that were
urban environment in their neighborhoods and cities.
of these projects legible, to draft their complexity
taken. These drawings extract commonalities through
act in response to urgent issues and compelling needs
The 741 initiatives that applied for consideration
systematically and clarify their strategies and opera-
the reoccurrence of similar programs, organized dif-
such as shelter, security, employment, health, and edu-
cross every sector. Projects deal with collective built
tional modes:
ferently according to local challenges and overlapping
cation. Community-based initiatives indicate the ability
space, the recovery of public space, communal clean-
of citizens to present solutions to challenges posed
ing of garbage dumps, sanitation programs, slum
ships were created? What are the main challenges in
ing out of these actions are resourceful experiments in
by everyday life, and use creativity to transform and
upgrade, and housing retrofit. A large proportion
implementing a collaborative project? Was there a desire
city-shaping that demonstrate the power of our shared
multiply existing resources.
relates to the environment, through waste manage-
to improve the urban environment? How did these im-
“humanness” and its capacity to cut across physical,
ment programs, recycling, greening, and urban ag-
provements take shape?
cultural, and geographical differences.
Inadvertently political by nature, these initiatives
In response to what do projects start? Which partner-
each other in interesting schemes. The situations aris-
are a response to the incapability of today’s cities to
riculture practices that make available high-quality,
cope with urban challenges via traditional planning
fresh, affordable produce in disadvantaged neighbor-
culture and its instruments. They invite different ac-
hoods. Some are of an economic nature, through
With these questions in mind, this publication allows
tors to cooperate towards a new urban scheme driven
shared entrepreneurial activities that work to reduce
one to dive into some of the projects showcased for
More than just narrating the stories of these projects,
by participation and a proactive attitude. They build
unemployment.
each city. Analysis of the projects is intended to reveal
this book intends to organize a platform for discussion
the driving logics of problematic urban environments
that engages different stakeholders in conceptualizing
as they are read by their residents and users.
the impact of local initiatives at various levels:
collective space, collectively. They reveal a shared layer
Many projects activate public or collective space by
The Spirit of Entrepreneurship
The Capacity of Negotiating and Building Alliances
of the city that is complex, incremental and difficult to
promoting leisure activities such as sports, recre-
articulate, as it does not organize systems, but rather
ational, and cultural events—sometimes leading to
operates on a local level, fulfilling micro-agendas
the improvement of these spaces and the construc-
measures employed to fight serious problems prove
what are its operational mechanisms at this scale? What
through direct action.
tion of new facilities. By creating local startups,
highly effective in using existing minimal resources
is the attitude of municipalities towards urban improve-
services, and infrastructures, these initiatives have
to catalyze social and economic gains. As Arturo Mier
ment and the redressing of inequality? Can grassroots
a positive impact on their neighborhoods, enhanc-
y Terán says, referring to Mexico City, “In the places
complement the efforts of the public sector to integrate
This book investigates a series of grassroots initiatives
ing social cohesion. Local organization often gives
where these projects are being carried out, one can
the city and improve livability in all areas? Is there a
that provide social infrastructures to neighborhoods
rise to a community center, a collective kitchen, or
clearly see a change.” Without aiming to romanticize
move towards integrating bottom-up with top-down
with shortages of all kinds. It is the product of a five-
a social enterprise—structures that work as focal
the contexts where the projects take place, we under-
planning initiatives? What are the long-term prospects
year program (2007 to 2012) that used the platform of
points within existing social networks. They offer
stand that, as modest as some of these initiatives may
for bottom-up practices? What future scenarios might be
the Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award to compile and
classes, courses, skills training, child care, and health
be, they are successfully improving residents’ lives and
envisaged?
map out community projects in five cities in emerging
programs that address the symptoms of poor urban
transforming collective space in cities.
countries: Mumbai, São Paulo, Istanbul, Mexico City,
environments (poverty, substance abuse, violence,
and Cape Town. In each one of the five cities, the award
and crime), and support and empower individuals to
documentation of these initiatives, an action protocol
nineteen-eighties and nineties and later evolved from
called for existing projects that:
study, find work, and become active and enterprising
depicted through illustrations, and a set of interviews
independent to negotiating and demanding co-respon-
• were already implemented and functioning, and
in their daily lives.
drawing out different perspectives on the subject.
sibility to institutions and the government.
Community Initiatives
demonstrated engagement and innovation
Not all of these categories, programs and mecha-
• shared responsibility for building collective space
nisms are necessarily obvious at first glance. For
• proved their ability to forge partnerships with dif-
example, a peaceful meeting space with a tree and
What some may describe as naive gestures, simple
This book consists of a collection of photographs, the
The mode of enquiry was systematically repeated in each city, from Mumbai to Cape Town. It showcases fifteen projects, three from each of the
What is the importance of “bottom-up” urbanism and
Having started responding to urgent needs, these community initiatives had become evident in the
A series of interviews deepens the discussion, inviting representatives in each city to reflect on these practices and bringing different perspectives to the
ferent stakeholders: local and cultural associations,
a bench can hide a great complexity. This simple
five cities. This gives us a wider perspective that allows
table: grassroots projects and local leaderships, the
community leaders, residents, users, NGOs, artists,
arrangement of objects can host a number of overlap-
us to compare these cities.
government, academia and researchers, artists and
architects, activists, government, planning insti-
ping programs, actions that change and adapt accord-
Detailed illustrations made individually for each
tutes, businesses, academia, etc.
ing to local demands, populating an open framework.
project depict their operational modes, reveal the ac-
cultural figures, and individuals connected to the local challenges of each city.
20
Editorial
Five Cities Embedded Productive Capacities
Participatory Modes for Future Scenarios
“We are recognizing what an immense natural resource
The book outlines existing operations, identifies in-
is right there to help the transformation, to generate
novative tools and planning instruments, and seeks
income and shared entrepreneurship.� (Malika)
to shape grammars of action. Based on this, it aims to
Despite their geographic and temporal distinctions,
explore possible future scenarios that could emerge
all of these actions rely on a collaborative process
from these localized practices. Could they be scaled up?
that is, in each case, dominant and fundamental. They
Might they make a larger and more systemic impact?
explore the capacity for production within urban
Investigating small-scale and sometimes invisible
settlements, contesting the model of urban vs. rural, or
urban processes can reveal not only opportunities for
agricultural vs. industrial vs. service economies. These
action, but methods of operation that could be relevant
projects demonstrate how the agricultural, industrial,
to others. This approach suggests a transversal way of
and service economies that historically divide the evo-
thinking about planning, one that acknowledges the
lution of our cities, nowadays coexist in urban areas.
equal importance of all the different voices compiled
Incorporating these initiatives into mainstream
here. It drafts arguments that might lead to partici-
planning would require a drastic change in the concep-
patory models, and envisages a scenario where the
tion of city. In this new form of planning, metropolitan
knowledge and findings compiled from these real world
systems would need to not only support the service
experiences can begin to feed back into planning and
economy, but also allow for production: urban farming,
policy. It is not a finished work, but rather an open pro-
small-scale manufacturing, social enterprises, creative
cess of investigation that gives rise to further inquiry.
practices, informal economies, and so on. How can we make efficient use of what we have? How do we engineer a future based on the productive capacities of our cities? How can we build a framework accessible enough to enable and encourage people to take part? How might a developed scenario look? Are these temporary projects, and how might they develop over time? Can they impact upon the urban fabric in the future? What is their collective productive capacity to generate change?
24
Five Cities
Introduction
5 x 3 Initiatives
Compilation
Three projects from each city are presented here
The last part of each city’s chapter is a photo essay
through photography, a text-based portrait, and an
that showcases some of the other initiatives compiled
illustration. We explain why these projects began and
in that city. These images illustrate a much broader
what inspired them, illustrate where they are located,
range of projects of similar nature, suggesting further
what they do (programs and activities), and what
commonalities between community initiatives in the
situations they generate, how they developed and how
five metropolitan regions.
their outcomes have impacted upon the community. These snapshots aim to make visible the mechanisms through which these projects operate: how they mobilize the community to contribute, how they create partnerships and leverage support, how they built on existing capacity to sustain themselves, and how they benefit—both directly and indirectly—the users, residents, and the urban environment itself. The illustration organizes a systematic comparison among different initiatives in different cities, making use of common elements through which civil society improves the living conditions and upgrades spaces. In the drawings, one can find these elements be rearticulated differently in every project, thus generating diverse urban situations, making use of local potential. 5 x 5 Voices | Interviews A set of interviews intends to unveil key aspects in the process of implementing the initiatives and to draft common threads among them. The interviews reveal different perspectives on the same topics for every city, not only organizing local voices around a common platform, but also prompting for similarities in the ways our cities—and citizens—are evolving to address urban challenges. The five voices are: Community: insiders, local activists and leaderships, local residents, non-governmental and non-profit organizations, cultural agents, and activators Government: governmental agencies, public offices, official secretaries, municipal representatives and their agents Academia: teachers, theorists, architects, planners, and researchers who investigate and plan cities Arts and culture: curators, artists, and cultural agents involved with local projects. Intermediaries: those operating at the middle level (between top-down and bottom-up interventions), intermediating scales and different layers of knowledge and action
Mumbai Priya Shankar
26
Mumbai
Profile
Population [metro/city]
20.75 12.4
million
million
Area occupied [metro/city]
1,176 438
km2
km2
Gross domestic product (GDP)
209
[$bn at PPPs]
Average density [metro/city]
17,637 20,038
Inhabitants/km2 Inhabitants/km2
Diversity
Maharashtrians, North Indians, South Indians, Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Christians, Jains, Sikhs, Parsis
30
Mumbai
Overview
Participatory Developments in Mumbai
Projects compiled in Mumbai demonstrate the remark-
1
able initiative, creativity, and tenacity of citizens from
Triratna Prerana Mandal is a community toilet that
different walks of life to address the challenges in their
evolved into a comprehensive community center, pro-
city. These initiatives respond to the nature of the city—
viding educational and entrepreneurial activities.
in particular, to the large degree of informality and the constraints of space due to its specific geography. The seventy-four submissions are concentrated
2
Mumbai Waterfronts Center reclaims the city’s wa-
primarily in the city of Mumbai rather than in the
terfronts by constructing promenades and improving
wider metropolitan region, although they are spread
beaches, making them usable as open, public spaces
across different parts of the city. They reflect a variety
for all.
of concerns, but the most prevalent are public space, housing, education, and sanitation. They demonstrate
3
the involvement of multiple stakeholders—from local
Urban Design Research Institute has worked to pre-
communities to the city government to private actors.
serve and improve the city’s historic downtown core as
Much of the city has grown informally; and it shows
a quality urban space and cultural hub.
a mixed geography with rich and poor settlements existing side by side in various parts of the city. The nature of both the growth and governance of the city has made even basic public service delivery difficult in many areas. Therefore, a number of projects are
1
concerned with cleaning, waste management, and recycling. At the same time, the geography of the city has prevented outward expansion, leading to incredible levels of density and limited open space. As a result,
2
several initiatives are concerned with public and community spaces.
3
3 km
38
Mumbai
INITIATIVES
Triratna Prerana Mandal
In the Khotwadi informal settlement in Mumbai’s Santa Cruz district, an area not far from the airport, Triratna Prerana Mandal (TPM) began as just a group of boys hanging out together and playing cricket. In 2002, it transformed into a “community-body organization,” which in Mumbai parlance means a residents’ association of slum-dwellers that partners with the local government in civic activities. Community toilets were constructed in the area as part of the Slum Sanitation Program, which was funded by the World Bank, led by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), and implemented by SPARC (a major NGO). TPM was meant to maintain the toilets constructed for the residents in its local shantytown. But TPM didn’t just maintain toilets. The group utilized the toilet premises to set up its office, from where it started a range of activities. The first floor of the toilet complex was made into a space for a computer lab, where computer classes were run and English language instruction provided. The space is also used as a kitchen where women cook for schoolchildren as part of a government-related employment program. TPM has now “adopted” a local derelict building in the area, where it has established a gym, yoga classes, dance classes, and expanded its women’s self-help and skill groups. It has installed solar panels on its community toilet building, generating its own electricity, and has also set aside space for rainwater harvesting. It is involved in a number of recycling, waste sorting, and gardening activities, improving the environment in its neighborhood. In an area that many would dismiss as a “slum,” the project demonstrates the ingenuity, capacities, and capability of the local community to improve its environment and circumstances through partnerships and alliances. It shows how even basic infrastructure and limited space (the community toilet building) can provide an impetus for much wider community activism and urban change.
46
Mumbai
INTERVIEW
Community
Dreams, Dignity, and Changing Realities: The Story of a Community Toilet Dilip Kadam and Dayanand Jadhav and Dayanand Mohite are involved in Triratna Prerana Mandal, a communitybased organization
How did the project start? What motivated you
project, community support became essential because
to their needs and demands rather than designing
to become engaged?
all of the maintenance would be through contributions
abstract projects. But this is only the start and we have
We started out as a cricket club. Later, we began other
from the local community. We needed to make the
to go ahead and do many more things.
activities such as cleaning the area. This slum is our
project sustainable and we needed to convince people
neighborhood. We are living in it and we found it
that it would be beneficial for them. Ten to fifteen of us
How has the project changed or grown? What
wrong to be in such a dirty environment. We real-
worked on it at the start. Everyday, after our daily jobs,
are the next goals? Where do you envision the
ized that illnesses and diseases spread through filth,
we would each visit five to six households to talk to
so we started to work on it ourselves. After a while,
people. We would explain the impacts of bad sanitation
The award was vital in helping us achieve recogni-
it became a habit to keep things clean. We wanted to
on health and what the benefits of the project would
tion and visibility, and in helping us reach out to other
improve the area and take pride in it. When the slum
be. Through this outreach, we usually managed to
new partners and figures to support our activities. We
sanitation program started in Mumbai, people from
convince three to four families each on a regular basis.
have expanded our work a lot since then. We now have
large NGOs and the municipal corporation (BMC) came
But many were opposed to this. They had seen too
solar energy panels and a stronger rainwater harvest-
to visit us and we got involved in providing a commu-
many projects fail and were also used to getting things
ing system, making our project more sustainable. Our
nity toilet for the area because this matched well with
for free. But once the toilet was built and they saw how
waste segregation center has expanded so that we can
our aims.
clean it was, even those who had earlier resisted began
help with much more recycling and waste manage-
to use it and realized what a difference it made.
ment. Partly due to the recognition from the award,
Which partnerships were created to strengthen
project five years from now?
the BMC agreed to let us “adopt” the neighboring park
your project? What needs did they fulfill and
Did the desire to improve the urban environ-
and derelict building there. We have revitalized this
when were they formed?
ment play a role from the outset? How do you
building and set up a gym, yoga classes, dance classes,
assess this achievement?
tailoring classes, and a table tennis and sports center
Although we had existed as an informal group for a while, the community toilet project started as a result
From the start, we thought about improving our living
in the space. Our women’s self-help group has also
of partnerships. The World Bank provided funding for
environment but we weren’t able to focus on it. This
increased its activities, which now include tailoring
the slum sanitation program and the BMC implemented
only became concrete later on. We would clean aspects
and grinding flour, in addition to its earlier cooking for
it on a citywide basis. Major NGOs such as SPARC were
of the area; we began planting some trees and plants.
schools project. We have a better-equipped computer
It was the space that provided us the inspiration to start
involved. For us, the most significant partnerships have
We tried to remove garbage. The support of our part-
lab now and are working on setting up a library. Since
this work (the women’s self-help group). In our homes
been with the local community and the BMC. They have
ners has been vital in what we’ve achieved. But there
the refurbishment, the toilets are also better. We would
in the slum, in this neighborhood, there was no space to
made the project feasible. As we have progressed, we
were also frustrations along the way. For example,
like to improve the park and building to become a re-
start any work. We have this space above the toilet so we
have also sought out new partners for specific needs,
when we first started using the space above the toilet
ally nice community area. Although we have done some
thought we need to utilize it. We women had so many
such as for our computer lab or for women’s training
for other activities, this was considered illegal. The
work on it, there’s still much to be done—both in terms
problems—going to bad toilets or having no access to toi-
activities.
idea came to us because we never had space for our
of gardening and renovating the building. We would
lets. And not having any finances, always struggling. We
meetings and an office atop the toilet was symbolically
also like to use our experience to help create successful
thought we women could get together and do something,
Was community support important to the setup
important in demonstrating its cleanliness. We faced
community toilets in other areas, especially near the
so we founded our women’s organization. We help each
and continuation of the project and how was it
difficulties with this but now the use of the top room
railway lands. We’ve been thinking about a biogas plant
other and have more confidence now. And dignity. People
mobilized? What challenges did you face and
has been legalized and even been turned into a policy
but need to explore the technology and get support.
respect our work and they respect us. We have made our
how were they overcome?
for other areas. What we’ve realized is that what is
We’ve also been thinking about collaborating more with
own society, our own community.
Even when we were just a cricket club, people would
more important than the person who builds the toilet
the local municipal school on educational activities.
Deepa Mohite is part of the Triratna Mahila Kalyan Sarva Seva
help us, and community support was significant for our
is the person who maintains the toilet. And it’s also
Sanstha, a women’s self-help group affiliated with Triratna Pre-
work in cleaning the area. When we started the toilet
important to find out what people want and respond
rana Mandal
58
Mumbai
biographies
P. K. Das
Dilip Kadam is President of Triratna Prerna Mandal (TPM), Dayanand Jadhav is Executive President of TPM, and
is an architect and activist. He has aimed to establish connec-
Dayanand Mohite is Secretary of TPM. Dilip Kadam studied
tions between architecture and people by involving them in a
until the tenth grade and does occasional work in the certifi-
participatory planning process. His work includes organizing
cate office of Mumbai University. Dayanand Jadhav also studied
slum dwellers for better living and evolving affordable hous-
until the tenth grade and now works as an electrical contractor.
ing models, engaging in policy framework for mass housing,
Dayanand Mohite graduated from high school and works with
reclaiming public space in Mumbai by developing the wa-
Jet Airways at the Mumbai airport. They all grew up and live
terfronts, urban planning, architectural and interior design
in the Khotwadi informal settlement in Mumbai and together,
projects. He is Chairperson of the Mumbai Waterfronts Center
along with other members of the local community, founded
and founder of P.K. Das & Associates architectural practice. He
Triratna Prerna Mandal.
has written and lectured widely and recently curated the Open Mumbai exhibition.
Seema Redkar is an Officer on Special Duty, Municipal Corporation of Greater
Chapter author and interviewer Priya Shankar
Mumbai (MCGM.) She is working with the Solid Waste Management department, in charge of a program called Advance
is a sociopolitical researcher, writer, and commentator. She
Locality Management (ALM), which focuses on good gover-
is currently Senior Researcher and Project Developer at the
nance and increased citizen participation. She has worked with
Alfred Herrhausen Society. She helped conceptualize, frame,
the slum upgradation program and slum sanitation program,
and initiate the Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award as well as the
funded by the World Bank for MCGM. She has been involved in
Foresight project on the rise of the BRICS. Her research inter-
community development work with a focus on education and
ests are centered on issues of governance, globalization, and
urban poverty alleviation and is also committed to voluntary
development. She has edited a series of Foresight readers and
work, mentoring several local community organizations.
contributed to other publications. Her writings have appeared in New Statesman, Global Policy, Internationale Politik, Estadao
Rahul Mehrotra
São Paulo, Times of India, India Today and others. She worked at
is a practicing architect and his firm, RMA Architects, which
the think tank, Policy Network and with the Urban Age project
was founded in 1990 in Mumbai, has executed many archi-
at the London School of Economics. She previously worked
tectural projects in India. He has also written extensively on
with educational projects in informal settlements and youth
issues to do with architecture, conservation, and urbanism in
NGOs in Delhi. She holds an undergraduate degree from Delhi
India. His latest book is Architecture in India Since 1990 (2011).
University and a postgraduate degree from Oxford University,
He has taught at the University of Michigan and at the School
both in history.
of Architecture and Urban Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Currently, Rahul Mehrotra is Professor
Members of the Jury for the Award in Mumbai
and Chair of the Department of Urban Planning and Design at
the Graduate School of Design at Harvard University. He was a member of the jury for the Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award in 2007. Shabana Azmi
Richard Burdett
Director, Urban Age & Centennial Professor in Architecture and Urbanism, London School of Economics
Shabana Azmi
Actor and social activist
is a renowned actress and social activist committed to
women’s rights, housing rights, and inter-religious dialogue.
Architect and Professor of Urban Planning and Design, Harvard
Nivarra Hakk in Mumbai and the Mijwan Welfare Society in
University
rural Northern India are two major social initiatives that she
has been involved in. She was a member of the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of the Indian parliament and has also been a Goodwill Ambassador for UNFPA. Her latest films are Kalvpriksh, The Reluctant Fundamentalist, and Midnight’s Children. She was on the jury for the Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award in 2007.
Rahul Mehrotra
Suketu Mehta
Author and Associate Professor, New York University
Enrique Norten
Founder, TEN Arquitectos, New York and Mexico City & Miler Chair of Architecture, University of Pennsylvania
Anthony Williams
Former Mayor of Washington, DC and is the Executive Director of the Global Government
São Paulo Marcos L. Rosa
60
Sテバ Paulo
Profile
Population [metro/city]
19.9 10.8
million million
Area occupied [metro/city]
8,000 1,500
km2 km2
Gross domestic product (GDP)
388
[$bn at PPPs]
Average density [metro/city]
2,420 7,139
Inhabitants/km2 Inhabitants/km2
Diversity
Indigenous, Portuguese, Spanish, Italians, Japanese, African,Lebanese, Syria, Korean, South Americans, Brazilian
64
SÃo Paulo
Overview
Urban Creative Practices in São Paulo
Projects compiled in São Paulo show how self-organization responds to urgent needs, generating quality col-
1
lective spaces that encourage community participation.
Edificio União (Union Building) is a formerly occu-
We found 133 initiatives concentrated primarily in
pied high-rise in the center of the city, which has been
the central area, but spread over the whole metropoli-
successfully converted into residences for forty-two
tan area. They test the collective use of space through
families, including a communal space.
1 2
cultural, arts, and education production, as well as the creation of recreational opportunities, recycling alternatives, social housing, etc. The rapid urbanization process, experienced the late twentieth century, faced major problems related to the
2
Instituto Acaia is a cultural facility, with a nursery and a workshop, which has carved a common space within the dense slum tissue.
3
lack of infrastructure—from electricity and water to education and culture. This is still an ongoing process,
3
which has fragmented the city, producing urban waste-
Biourban transformed the pathways of the Mauro
lands and residual spaces of different natures; it has
slum, stimulating inhabitants to activate unused spaces
also polarized wealth. This urbanization process has
and upgrade them.
created both a verifiable lack of quality spaces for human coexistence, and unused space with the potential to host urban creative practices. In São Paulo, these are drivers to a restructuring of the urban environment committed to the level of the user.
5 km
76
SÃo Paulo
INITIATIVES
Biourban
Pioneered by the young sociology student Jeff Anderson, the initiative intended to improve life in slums, through social action and do-it-yourself measures, in which he and members of the community were involved. The project engaged in a series of aesthetic measures that have transformed the spatial quality of the neighborhood within a short period of time. They include the cleaning up of small spaces and areas in front of peoples’ homes, creating flower beds in place of concrete curbs, using color and recycled materials to humanize the façades of buildings and exposed infrastructures, creating public artworks, and the staging of collective activities such as painting sessions. All materials used in the project come from waste and garbage found in the neighborhood. The project spread throughout the entire Mauro favela—a compact and dense slum in an inner-city area of São Paulo—with mixed use and typologies, suffering from socioenvironmental degradation and violence. Hailing from a nearby neighborhood, Jeff Anderson moved to a small house in the slum to carry out a residency research project. The collective activity began with the installation of a library open to the residents, and followed with the organization of workshops that transformed waste into objects that supported daily activities and beautified the paths and alleys. The activities have led to a stronger sense of community and to an intense use of the open space (street and alleys), which gave rise to new situations created by the articulation of the created objects and daily activities. The use of open space and the collective contacts has had a positive impact on the built environment and its safety.
80
SÃo Paulo
INTERVIEW
community
Workshops as a Communication Facilitator: Understanding Community Needs Ana Cristina Cintra Camargo, Director of the ACAIA Institute
How did the project start? What motivated you
and a demand that does not come from us, but from the
in a similar manner: there was a demand, particularly
to become engaged?
process. That’s what we learned and continue learning
for drying clothes, since there is a shortage of space
The project began with the sculptor Elisa Bracher, who
here. Their support is crucial, since the work only exists
to do this.
had her workshop in Vila Leopoldina, which was on the
if it is aligned with community interests, with their
way of children who lived in wooden shacks near the
desire, and that makes sense.
How has the project changed or grown? What are the next goals? Where do you envision the
CEAGESP. The project began in response to the great sociocultural and economic discrepancy that exists in
Your project creates a small plaza in the middle
São Paulo. In 1997, Elisa opened the gates of her studio,
of a dense slum in São Paulo, offering diverse
Realizing the unpreparedness of older youth—aged
offering a carpentry workshop for these children.
activities, such as playground, tree shadow,
fourteen and older—to face the world, we decided to
project five years from now?
benches, etc. Did the desire to improve the
increase the educational classes after the workshops.
Which partnerships were created to strengthen
urban environment play a role from the outset?
We also increased the cultural repertoire on Fridays,
your project? What needs did these partner-
How do you assess this achievement?
offering pocket cinema and concerts open to the com-
ships fulfill and how/when were they formed?
The work was born here at the Institute, with the chil-
munity, in an effort to get people to mix. In addition,
You can only propose a project to a municipal secretary
dren coming to the atelier, where we received them. In
the Santa Cruz School (a private school) developed a
or to a major funder after you’ve struggled about four
2004, a boy arrived with a message from the commu-
partnership, in which the ethics and citizenship class
to five years for the work to gain consistency, and get
nity saying that from that moment on we could enter
happens here; however, they do not come to offer
the numbers to present the project. In our case, the
the favela (slum). In 2005, the work began weekly in a
something for students, but come learn by working
first five years were financed by Elisa’s family, which
small area in the favela. We spread a cloth on the floor
side by side with students—one loses the fear of the
gave us ample freedom to work. And then came the
and took a basket with graphic material.
other.
partnership with the Secretary of Participation and
This happened where the atelier shack is located
Partnership and later with the Secretary of Education,
today. That was the only space where the narrow alleys
Is there a dialogue with other stakeholders
for example. Another important thing is that the pro-
widened, allowing the activity to take place without
(municipality, for instance)? What impact does
jects themselves define what to do, and are not created
disturbing their routine. In the first contact, some chil-
to fit the interests of a sponsor. We are not flexible in
dren and mothers joined and eventually those meetings
The Secretary of Social Housing maintains the policy
that, since it could jeopardize the work.
started to take place three times a week. Back then,
of removing these slums. We are aware of how this
this dialogue have on the project?
that space was not built, but was full of garbage. We
happens. In the case of the slum “da Linha,” there were
Was community support important to the setup
started cleaning it very slowly, until one day we organ-
improvements, but the city intends to remove them,
and continuation of the project, and how was
ized the population in a collective effort, which filled
not to urbanize the existing settlement. The architect
this mobilized? Which challenges did you face
two garbage containers. Twice a week we also offered
responsible visited to understand what works, to get
and how were they overcome?
nursing, a different approach to the atelier, because
acquainted with the laundries, the local atelier, so that
In the early years, we had little support from the
there are many people who do not have access or who
work remains if the slum is removed or redeveloped in
community and many years later, having lunch with a
are not authorized to the use of the public health sys-
a new settlement.
community agent, she explained something important
tem. The improvements followed with the purchase
movement, people are closer to each other … you know,
to me: it is believed that when people go to the com-
and renovation of the shack—expanding with permis-
for me it makes my body shake, I like to work and I am
munities, they think they know what the community
sion from whoever owned the plaza. The playground
busy then. I do the laundry, run the daily errands at home
needs. I think we have a very respectful relationship
came when they wanted a space for children, and dis-
and come back to dry them. It helped to organize my life.
with the community. We do not know, and we are al-
appeared when it no longer made sense. Today, there
Soraia Alves de Oliveira, 33, lives at Favela da Linha and runs the
ways learning. Action is always caused by observation
is a big bench where they sit. The laundry appeared
new laundry, which is part of the initiative.
The idea of the laundry was very good. It generates
86
SÃo Paulo
INTERVIEW
Arts & culture
“How to Live Together” Lisette Lagnado is an independent curator, professor at Santa Marcelina Faculty
Do you think it is possible that art and culture
Many projects count on artists to identify ur-
How can the impact of grassroots projects be
(artistic & cultural production), in some form,
ban challenges and present creative responses
maximized? How might artists and cultural
provide the “spark” for beginning a grassroots
to them. What is your personal experience of
practitioners contribute to this?
initiative? In which form?
how arts and culture can improve urban life?
For me, the best “cooperation” should take place in
Yes, but only as a “kickoff,” because once it config-
“How to Live Together,” title of the 27th São Paulo Art
the educational field. I’ll explain: the artist can teach
ures a daily and repetitive practice, we are leaving
Biennale, involved artists dealing with urban problems
workshops, give lectures, present their work, and
the sphere of the investigative art and entering the
and challenges.
expose themselves as subject and participative citizen.
field of the crystallization of forms, a phenomena that
The work of Renata Lucas (Matemática Rápida),
He must know his place at the wheel. I imagine their
has other names such as tradition, folklore, etc. What
though almost imperceptible because it mimicked
ideas fertilizing projects like the CEU (Unified Educa-
I understand as culture is an amalgam of different
existing elements of the urban situation, was the one
tional Centers), with creative workshops linked to the
practices.
closest to urban intervention. She shed light on local
municipal education program, making regular visits to
problems (the uneven pavement, poor lighting, lack
museums.
How does the artist/cultural activist play a role
of green), and managed simultaneously with much
as a communicator, bridging different parts and
simplicity to also bring a solution, albeit on a mi-
intermediating conversations and negotiations
croscale. In the case of artists in residence, I think the
that would otherwise rarely take place?
gain was of another kind: artists like Marjetica Potrc
It is desirable that the artist does not let himself be
(Acre), Francesco Iodice and Shimabuku (in São Paulo)
“domesticated” by the institutional rules. Grassroots,
produced works inspired so strongly in the context,
for me, makes more sense when I think of musical
that when exposed abroad contribute to the dissemina-
manifestations (such as samba and rap), than the artist
tion of symbolic content. They operate outside of their
who express himself through images. This is the differ-
places of origin. This is also part of an economy that
ence between the street graffiti, which effectively has
reverberates about reality.
political and social connotations, and does not allow itself to become institutionalized, and the other graf-
Do you think there is something particular
fiti, which today has became a product as any other, to
about the culture of São Paulo that contributes
serve the frivolous and aestheticizing embellishment.
to the nature of the projects? Only later, I was in contact with practices outside São
We urgently need to learn how to work with conflict and
but an institutional critique that marked my formation
Paulo, where it seems that the formalist Greenbergian
to keep these tensions in the public space, to learn how
was done in the dead of night because they were times
tradition have dominated the scene for too long. In
to make them agencies, update them and incorporate
of military regime. The group 3Nós3 covered public
cities such as Vienna, Berlin, and New York, I learned
them into theories, urban practices; and critical art—the
monuments without negotiating anything with those in
about artistic practices aimed at local communities.
sensitive experience as micro-resistance on or in public
power! Other artists that influenced me when I started
Characteristically, São Paulo is overly market-oriented.
space—might indeed be a big help. Perhaps artists, who
working were Julio Plaza and José Resende, whose ideo-
That’s changing, although it is still a city that has the
already work critically with these “hotspots,” can ef-
logical statement has always been anti-communicative.
most powerful galleries, which nowadays excessively
fectively help us to invent … to arrive at a more incorpo-
participate in art fairs, formatting the “back to the
rated, dissenting and vivacious urbanism.
object,” for the collector.
Paola Berenstein Jacques, architect and urbanist, is a professor at
My generation did not use the word “negotiation,”
To show, to point out, and to comment are ways to intervene. One must understand that there is artwork of more direct intervention—such as Jamac on the
the Architecture Faculty of the UFBA, coordinator of the Urban
outskirts of São Paulo, presented at the 27th Biennial of
Laboratory (http://www.laboratoriourbano.ufba.br) and co-
São Paulo in 2006)—but also films and cartoons play a role in addressing urban problems.
organizer of the platform Corpocidade (http://www.corpocidade. dan.ufba.br).
92
SÃo Paulo
Biographies
Ana Cristina Cintra Camargo
Chapter author and interviewer Marcos L. Rosa
is currently one of the directors of the Ateliê ACAIA. She has been in the atelier since the beginning of its activities in 1997,
received his diploma in architecture and urban planning from
when the artist Elisa Bracher decided to open her workshop
the University of São Paulo. He received a scholarship from
space to some children from surrounding poor communities.
the European Union for his PhD thesis at the TU Munich. He
Initially working as a psychologist, she engaged in thinking
has been a guest lecturer and researcher at the Swiss Federal
forms of therapeutic work out of the traditional settings, and in
Institute of Technology in Zurich, Department of Architecture
the organization of the physical and psychical space of ACAIA,
and Urban Planning. Marcos organized the DBUA Award in São
aiming to listen to and train the group of educators from the
Paulo, in 2008, when he set up a research platform based on
beginning
the 133 compiled projects. He is the author of a publication of that research entitled Microplanning, Urban Creative Practices
Elisabete França
(São Paulo, 2011). He exhibited worldwide, among which, in the
is an architect and urbanist, and has twenty-five years of expe-
Rotterdam International Architecture Biennale 2010 and in the
rience in urban planning, social housing, slum upgrading, and
International Biennale in São Paulo 2011. He wrote and contrib-
management of participatory projects. Her PhD thesis is on the
uted to several international publications. He was awarded the
slums of São Paulo (1980–2008). She was the Social Housing
Young Architects Award from the Brazilian Architects Institute
Superintendent and Deputy Secretary of the Municipality of
for Microplanning. He works as an independent designer and
São Paulo until 2012, where she coordinated the activities of
won the first prize for “Collective Retrofit” at the 2009 Alcoa
the Slum Upgrading programs, Water Source Program, Cortiço
Design Prize and the Prestes Maia Award for “Urban Paran-
(Slum Tenement) Requalification Program, Social Renting,
golé,” among others. Both his practical work and research
among others, assisting more than 160, 000 families. França is
studies stand for an interdisciplinary and integrative approach
author and editor of several publications on architecture and
in the fields of architecture, urban design, and urban planning.
urbanism.
His current research focuses on the operational mechanisms embedded in these projects and their scaling potential within
Fernando de Mello Franco
existing and proposed urban infrastructural networks.
is an architect and PhD at Facudade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de São Paulo. He was professor at USP São
Members of the Jury for the Award in São Paulo:
Carlos, USJT, Mackenzie, and Harvard. He is founding partner
at MMBB Architects in São Paulo. Currently, he is Curator at URBEM—Instituto de Estudos e Urbanismo para a Metrópole, based in São Paulo. Lisette Lagnado
Richard Burdett
Director, Urban Age & Centennial Professor in Architecture and Urbanism, London School of Economics
Tata Amaral
Brazilian filmmaker
has her PhD in philosophy from the University of São Paulo.
She was the general curator of the 27a São Paulo Biennale
Art critic and professor at Faculdade Santa Marcelina
(2006) and of “Drifts and Derivations” at the Museo Nacional
Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Madri (2010). She coordinated the Leonilson Project (1993–96) and the Hélio Oiticica Project (1999–2002), initiatives that systematize the artists’ archives. She has written several articles and essays. In 2013, she will present the curatory of the 33a edition at the Panorama of the Museum of Modern Art of São Paulo.
is the Deputy mayor (Subprefeito) of the Sé district, one of São Paulo’s thirty-one administrative districts, subordinate to the Secretary of coordination of Subprefeituras. He worked on the Coordination of Urban Safety City Hall (Coordenadoria de Segurança Urbana da Prefeitura, 2005–08). He is colonel in the Reserve Military Police and formerly served in diverse units of the Military Police. He graduated with a degree in electric engineering and business administration, with extra training in the Police Academy, with extensions in technical, operational, and community police.
Fernando de Mello Franco
Founder MMBB Architects
Raí Souza Vieira de Oliveira
Former soccer player, co-founder and director of the “Foundation Gol de Letra”, a UNESCO model for supporting at-risk children worldwide
Nevoral Alves Bucheroni
Lisette Lagnado
Anthony Williams
Former Mayor of Washington, DC and is the Executive Director of the Global Government
Istanbul Demet Mutman
94
Istanbul
Profile
Population [city]
12.5
Average density [metro/city]
million
Area occupied [city]
5,343
km2
Gross domestic product (GDP)
182
[$bn at PPPs]
2,622
Inhabitants/km2
Diversity
Romans, Greeks, Armenians, Jews, Arabs, Gypsies, Caucasian, Balkans, Turks
108
Navigation INITIATIVES Istanbul X
Nurtepe First Step Cooperative
Headline AUThOR’s Name Author’s position in the project etc.
Functions / program: women’s capacity building and community center, skills training, income generation, workshop activities, child care, recreational activities, and leisure. Benefits to the Community: offers a cultural facility with workshops, child care space, a small backyard, garden, and mural; fosters interaction in a learning environment and increases solidarity Positive impact on the built environment: visibility of the community and attachment to the neighborhood via the physical presence of the center; users feel safer in their neighborhood. People involved: cooperative is run by a group of community women and the neighborhood’s families.
2004 ≥ 2012
118
Istanbul
INTERVIEW
Academia
Action and Participation in Planning Özlem Ünsal works closely with Istanbul-based civil initiatives and neighborhood organizations
What trends dis you recognize in the grassroots
The urban community, the governmental mechanisms,
How do you see these projects impacting on the
projects in Istanbul? Do you think they unveil
and the cities of today are trying to catch up with
urban fabric in the next five to ten years? Do
fields of opportunity for urban design?
new strategies. Interventionist decisions are being
they have the capacity to make a difference?
Grassroots initiatives tend to differ as resistance and
made, new tools and units are brought to life, and the
I am drawn to pessimism based on a dark scenario,
local (working with women and children) organiza-
power difference among the actors during this process
where the city is shaped by the persistent, oppres-
tions, and their impact differs depending on their
increases rapidly. The increasing pressure creates even
sive methods that eventually destroy all civil initia-
objectives. Their biggest problems are raising funds
more fragments, which in turn breaks down the “resis-
tives. On the other hand, I would base my optimistic
and having their statements heard by the ruling
tance,” inevitably diminishing the collective movement.
prediction on non-government initiatives, which are
mechanisms. Despite that, various civil organizations
realized through encouraging local projects, learning
focus and embrace the city’s current needs. I believe
Do solutions germinating in the communities
from various accomplishments, and strengthened by
that this approach has potential, however, the criti-
contribute to livability in some areas? To which
international connections. Small initiatives, which act
pressing issues do they respond? If so, how?
for their own rights, can do more consciously regard-
would enable the realization of such formations. The
It is important to emphasize that their action responds
ing their communal needs, eventually leading the way
needs and requirements of a participatory community,
to the lack of participation in planning. If these kinds
to healthier cities. Ten years ahead, I would wish to
which is formed by diverse crowds and actors, have to
of initiatives start to become a compulsory element
see that these small initiatives, which are born today,
be brought to life through an implementable project.
of the urban planning process, and if such a transfor-
are still alive, with their motivational resources
“Negotiation” in fact, embodies all these concepts.
mation indeed happens, then, the “citizen” not only
strengthened, their strategies sharpened, and having
embraces a key element to improve his/her life quality,
secured a firm and well-defined place inside the gov-
Some of the projects are directly having an
but also takes on responsibility to achieve quality of
ernmental frame.
impact on the built environment and create
life. When the fulfilling of “citizen” demands is guar-
new spatial qualities. Would you identify these
anteed, the form of his/her existence in the city will
In Turkey, a mayor’s use of authority is not always trans-
as potential planning tools? How do you think
inevitably improve as well.
parent. Meanwhile, the demands on behalf of civic groups
cal missing ingredient is the reliable legal base, which
they could inspire or give feedback into architectural/ urban planning practices? And policy?
for increased municipal authority in the name of national Which projects would you say have good poten-
decentralization and participatory democracy have at
Of course it is possible to enable the local initiatives’
tial for replicability? What features should they
times exacerbated this misuse of discretionary powers.
impact on the built environment; however, rather
exhibit in order to be replicable?
This is because Turkey’s city administrations have not
than seeing them as a “tool,” local initiatives should
In order for the local projects to be replicable, their
been completely democratized yet, and strong municipal
become a “subject” and “actor,” within a well-defined
success has to be proven. This does not only rely
authority has created, in most cases, local fiefdoms rather
system. Mixing these actors in the planning process
on civil initiative. The goals have to be realized. An
than widespread civic engagement.
and making their needs a part of the urban planning
initiative can feed on another initiative’s experience—
Ilhan Tekeli, city and regional planner at the Middle East Techni-
might guarantee and improve the quality of life and the
successful or not—and reshape itself. This, in turn, can
cal University and member of the Turkish Academy of Sciences
environment in the city.
create some sort of database. This kind of experience
Small-scale interventions indeed have potential,
transfer is actually a type of mobility, a state of experi-
however, in order to achieve sustainable interventions,
ence transforming itself for repetition; something that
we need two things: a revolution in the governmental
should be able to make the governmental mechanisms
system, and a civil community that is determined and
content. This kind of exchange requires the existence
persistent regarding its demands. Even though its tools
of a platform where different actors can put forward
might not necessarily be equally strong as the govern-
their diverse experiences on diverse grounds. For that
mental mechanisms, urban community has to develop
to happen, the problems in the system’s methodology
pressure mechanisms, which are as strong as possible.
must be fixed in the context of “governmental culture.”
122
Istanbul
INTERVIEW
mediation
nity to its system. Yet, it is highly critical for the “local statement” and micro-visions to increase, unite, and transform into a powerful and single voice.
Advocating Sustainable and Participatory Models Aslı Kıyak ˙Ingin is architect, designer, and activist
What is your role in combining the missing links of top to down or bottom up? How do you proceed? There are many missing links. Primarily, there is a communication gap and unawareness between the institutions. At this point, our mission is to closely monitor the processes in order to inform the institutions. More importantly, I spend time with the commu-
What is the role of culture, art, economy, politics, politicians, stakeholders, and citizens for rebuilding a city?
How do you think civil initiatives could feed
nity, in order to better understand the spatial, social,
back into the planning process?
and economic infrastructures, and to cooperate with
Civil initiatives and the meetings/workshops we take
them in order to achieve participatory resolution to the
Politicians must transform this debate into a broad
part in as individual participants progress too slowly.
existing problems.
participatory public platform. An open system would
The community still does not perceive its own value;
enable culture and arts to provide an integrationist
and the people are not aware that they have the power
conduct participatory meetings; to cultivate new vi-
impact, shaped by both the environment and the com-
to make a statement. Thus, at this point, it is still not
sions through these meetings; to support and even
munity. The community, on the other hand, must come
easy for “urban awareness” to take shape. While the
improve the participation of diverse social fragments;
out of its passive position to generate its own state-
top-down systems progress rapidly with the impact
and to reach to a larger audience through these newly
ment and put forward its own vision on the reconstruc-
of the decisions that are being taken, the impact of
cultivated visions.
tion of their city. Rather than the generic solutions
bottom-up systems is unfortunately not as efficient.
imposed and executed by the authorities, original and
Even though micro-scale approaches are more imple-
How would you define a good planning model
local approaches developed by civil initiatives must be
mentable and sustainable, a participatory planning is
for the city of Istanbul? What is the difference
supported.
still not possible regardless of many strategies that
My intention is to make the “existing” visible; to
from today’s practice?
The existence of a sustainable economy must be
have been tried to clear the way for such an action. In
When considering urban practices, it is not only the
composed of a system that has close relationships with
order for the participatory action to have an impact on
plans that come to mind, but also field management,
the local dynamics inside the city and supports the
urban and strategic planning, administrative traditions
heritage zoning plans, hierarchy, and inter-institutional
existence of smaller production units. There is also the
have to change and the administrative mechanisms
relationships. These, in turn, transform into a more
need for an economic vision, which takes into consid-
have to be redesigned for enabling it.
intricate and sophisticated system. Most of the time,
eration the micro-dynamics and relates and supports them with the macro-dynamics. You are one of the main actors causing an
the community cannot understand nor perceive the In that sense, are there any policies being
patterns in-between these non-transparent and sophis-
How do we gain participation? We do try to get attention
developed to merge top-down and bottom-up
ticated relationships; thus, decisions are made under
through press releases and Hasanpasa Gaswork festivals.
practices to any extent?
ambiguity. The mechanisms have to be simplified and
Through these small-scale interventions, the initiation
impact on the built environment, what is your
Unfortunately, there is no such merging or reconcil-
made transparent so that the local communities can
would possibly develop however there are absolute facts
role?
ing political moves at the moment. However, at the
understand these patterns, decisions, and their impli-
that are cutting the sustainability of the process. If there
Basically, my duty is to actively stand against the
Sulukule Platform, we worked very hard to create such
cations. At this very point, my role is, in fact to expose
is a political issue, such as strategic planning included
ongoing transformation in the city and try to show
reconciliation during the Sulukule demolition pro-
these gaps and disconnections. New steps should be
among the process, then an obstacle appears on the road.
the decision-maker mechanisms alternative solutions.
cess. We did our best to ensure the solution would be
taken in light of the feedback and lessons learned from
We aim to work with the politicians, however, we are
In other words, I try to make the “invisible,” “vis-
achieved through the participation of the residents, but
existing actions. In other words, the subject, objective
seen as competitors for a plot of the city.
ible,” or to reveal that the cities own dynamics can
unfortunately, it did not happen.
and method of a project should be created and under-
Nesrin Uçar, volunteer for the Revitalization of Hasanpasa Gas-
lined through participative action.
works Neighborhood Initiative, private interview by D. Mutman,
suggest alternatives to the current transformation.
There is a very powerful vertical relationship be-
From an architect’s perspective, I try to expose the
tween the higher authorities and the local authority
architectural identity and the economic, social, and
during the process, where the decisions are executed
physical life forms that exist during the urbanization
from the top down. While the local authority is ex-
process. I also concentrate on how existing macro and
pected to represent a diverse and multifaceted com-
micro settlements can be supported by those existing
munity, it inevitably becomes a mere reflection of the
dynamics.
ruling party. The ruling party, in turn, cannot incorporate and mix the dynamism coming from the commu-
April, 2010.
126
Istanbul
biographies
Yeliz Yalın Baki
Chapter author and interviewer
is co-founder of Barıs¸ ˙Için Müzik (Music for Peace), which is
Demet Mutman
a privately financed social project of Mehmet Selim Baki. As
is an architect who focuses on cities, urban development strat-
a devoted volunteer and an academician, she supported the
egies, and possibilities of alternative spatial transformations
initiative from 2004 to 2011. In 2012, the initiative became the Barıs¸ ˙Için Müzik Foundation, and she has been its manager
by using short-term activities. She has a PhD from Istanbul
since then.
of urban transformation by examining short-term activities
Technical University, where she researched alternative models and designs as spatial catalysts. In 2009, she was responsible
Erhan Demirdizen is an urban planner and lecturer, with a Masters degree in
for the management of the Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award Istanbul. She is part of the Archis Interventions Divided Cities
urban policy planning and local governments. He has worked at
Network, which concentrates on the politics of space within
several sections of the Ministry of Public Works and Settle-
divided regions that do not necessarily have visible borderlines.
ment, as well as at several local authorities. Besides being a
Mutman currently works at T.C. Maltepe University Faculty of
board member of the Chamber of Urban Planners in Ankara,
Architecture in Istanbul and focuses on architectural and urban
he was respectively a member, general secretary and head of the Chamber of Urban Planners, ˙Istanbul branch. He was also a
design, alternative readings of the city, and public spaces.
member of a publishing board for several urban, planning and
Members of the Jury for the Award in Istanbul:
city related journals.
Özlem Ünsal is a PhD candidate at City University of London, Department of Sociology. Among her main research interests are neoliberal urban policies, grassroots resistance movements, and rights to the city. Her thesis focuses on neighborhood movements,
Richard Burdett
Director, Urban Age & Centennial Professor in Architecture and Urbanism, London School of Economics
Arzuhan Dog˘an Yalçindag˘
Chair, Turkish Industrialists and Businessmen’s Association (TUSIAD)
originating from the inner-city poverty and conservation zones
of Istanbul. As part of her doctoral research, she works closely
Professor of Sociology, Bosphorus University
with the volunteers for Istanbul-based civil initiatives and
neighborhood organizations, critical of current urban change. Behiç Ak is a cartoon artist, playwright, children’s book author, director, and architect. His children’s books and cartoons have been
Çag˘lar Keyder Behiç Ak
Cartoonist, author, architect
Enrique Norten
Founder, TEN Arquitectos, New York and Mexico City & Miler Chair of Architecture, University of Pennsylvania
published in Turkey, Germany, Japan, Korea, and China, and
featured in several exhibitions worldwide. His documentary
Former Mayor of Washington, DC and is the Executive Director
film, The History of Banning in Turkish Cinema—The Black Cur-
of the Global Government
tain, won the best documentary film award in Ankara in 1994.
He also received an honorary award in 2012 for “Contribution
Architect, Mimarlar Design, & Visiting Professor, Harvard
to Architecture,” from the Chamber of Architects for his car-
Graduate School of Design
toons, writings, plays, and his position on environmental and architectural issues. Aslı Kıyak ˙ Ingin architect, designer, and activist. She works in various fields— such as design, architecture, city, production and art—with a focus on social, cultural, and economic aspects. She is also active in the city where urban regeneration or gentrification developments take place, by advocating sustainable and participatory models for the alternative visions. She is the president of the NGO, Human Settlement Association; and also developed the concept of the Made in S¸is¸hane project and initiative, as well as participatory and sustainable practices in order to stop the demolishment of Sulukule.
Anthony Williams
Han Tümertekin
Mexico City Ana Álvarez
128
Mexico City
Profile
Population [metro/city]
20.4 11.2
million million
Area occupied [metro/city]
7,854 1,495
km2 km2
Gross domestic product (GDP)
390
[$bn at PPPs]
Average density [metro/city]
9,300 5,937
Inhabitants/km2 Inhabitants/km2
Diversity
Indigenous, Spanish, British, Irish, Italian,German, French, Dutch, Syria, Lebanon, Chinese, Korean, South and Central American, Mexican
144
Mexico City
INITIATIVES
Recovering Spaces for Life
Santa Fe is a neighborhood on the west side of Mexico City characterized by extreme socioeconomic contrasts: one can find an “edge city” with office towers that embody Mexico’s participation in the global economy and shanty towns over ravines existing side by side. In 2005, Iberoamericana University—a private institution located in Santa Fe—created the Coordination of Social Responsibility to build a bridge of cooperation between the different university departments and the marginalized areas of the surroundings. Among other initiatives, they fostered the project Recovering Spaces for Life, which focuses on the recovery of public spaces in the neighboring ravines, through different activities that create a sense of belonging in dwellers and promotes the leadership of community members. Under the guidance of the university, different local groups worked together to recover the riverbank, which was previously used as a sewer. They fixed the façades of houses along one kilometer of the river and built a green pedestrian corridor that goes from the riverbank to a formerly abandoned alley uphill, now accessible to disabled people and featuring a playground. They also built a greenhouse for growing tomatoes in what used to be a garbage dump, and transformed a residual space in a corner street with stairs into an open cultural forum. They also run programs for psychosocial risks prevention, technological literacy, job training; and they created a network that allows the people from those marginalized neighborhoods to find jobs at the business area of Santa Fe. Recovering Spaces for Life shows how in highly segregated societies, such as Mexico City, bridges among apparently untouchable sectors can be built and used to transform reality.
150
Mexico City
INTERVIEW
Government
Reality Surpasses Us: We Need to Be more Flexible and Porous Felipe Leal is Head of the Department of Housing and Urban Development
Can you summarize the current attitude/policy
Which governmental agencies/programs recog-
need to have flexible tools to adapt. I am quite self-
of the municipality towards urban improve-
nize the importance of community-led initia-
critical about most of the borough and partial pro-
ment and the redressing of inequality?
tives?
grams because they become so rigid that they tend to
Stop the city expansion over conservation land and
At the borough level it varies a lot, for it depends to a
complicate rather than rationalize the problems, often
give all the normative elements to make it grow in-
great extent on the sensibility of the authorities. But at
pushing people towards informality. I think we need
ward. We are working for a compact, vertical, shared,
the city’s central government level, there are several
to become more porous in those programs to allow
inclusive, and extroverted city, improving the existing
entities: the Social Development Department, which
grassroots initiatives to find their place in official plan-
infrastructure and offering social housing in the central
supports initiatives from vulnerable groups; the Insti-
ning. On the other hand, the authority has missed the
city to take people out of risk zones and give them
tute of Housing serves many such initiatives, because
opportunity to communicate its vision for urban de-
property certainty. We are also broadening the concept
there is a lot of housing in risk zones; and finally us,
velopment. And for better or worse, it is the authority
of the public realm, looking at it in a more holistic way,
the Department of Housing and Urban Development,
that has the panoramic vision and technical knowledge.
with high-quality infrastructure as a priority.
which in many cases has to legalize or relocate infor-
Local projects can greatly enrich urban development
mal settlements.
with their timely and deeper sight, but they might not
Do you think grassroots can complement the
have the complete overview.
efforts of the public sector to integrate the city
How does this recognition affect the planning
and improve livability in all areas? If so, how?
process in these areas? Can you give an ex-
How do you see the development of local
ample?
bottom-up initiatives in the long term? What
I think we should overcome the extremely formal
possible development scenarios might be envis-
vision about public policies connected with urban plan-
Citizens proposed to us a very interesting legal status
ning. Almost all cities have their urban development
of “family condominium.” In Mexico City, the condo-
departments and programs, but in most cases, they
minium generally consists of a building divided into
All of these initiatives—Miravalle, Codeco—suggest
are a set of charters and norms consolidated within
clearly defined spaces with several owners. However,
that Mexico City is like an hydraulic system with many
the institutional policies and the limits of government
it is common to have a property for a family of fifteen
rusty closed valves, which only need to be oiled and
Public infrastructure is gaining a new role in how we
action. That is not bad, but we shouldn’t miss the other
members with three or four couples and where each
opened for an amazing flow to come. We have to use
design and envision the future of our city. I think that his-
perspective that comes from a more refined observer,
uses a room or set of rooms. Land use would say it
the local culture and look at the everyday city—the
torically, Mexico City has been a place of neighborhoods
which is the specific citizen. The problem with those
is single-family property, but it is not, because it is
little square, the garden, the remaining corner, the bas-
and we should move back to that. For instance, something
general programs is that they standardize the physical
a subdivided family. So now family condominium is
ketball court—to dignify them and create activities.
we have lost and should try to recover, are the markets.
and social conditions of cities, when it is really not like
recognized as a subdivided property and this helps in
I think we need to work on that scale.
We have 325 public markets built during the nineteen-six-
that, not even in developed cities. And those who live
services and credits for house improvements.
aged for the future?
ties and nineteen-seventies, which were created for many reasons; of course economic and supply reasons, but also
in physical or social marginalization are in many cases the ones who find new non-formal or non-traditional
Do you see scope for change to current plan-
to build community. These are big opportunities: 325 mar-
ways of organizing space.
ning methods based on the experiences of such
kets organized all around the territory. These spaces have
projects? Do you think that there is a move in
an amazing potential to be transformed into real public
government towards integrating bottom-up
spaces, they can be more permeable, grow, have parallel
with top-down planning initiatives?
services. That is the kind of infrastructure that brings
In Mexico City we have incorporated roundtables or committees that serve local proposals from all kinds of organizations. It all has to be based on dialogue, on understanding the other side, on acknowledging that
Most of the urban planning is still based on the nine-
communities together, because those are places where
there is a degree of specificity that doesn’t allow us to
teen-eighties urban zoning, without an understanding
many things happen.
do things mechanically.
of social problems. But it is not enough to draw things
Laura Janka is an Advisor for the Department of Housing and
on a map, because reality always surpasses us and we
Urban Development.
156
Mexico City
INTERVIEW
mediation
Braiding the Physical and the Social: A New Social Contract for the City Jose Castillo is an architect, principal of Arquitectura 911SC, and visiting professor at Harvard Graduate School of Design
Did the set of grassroots projects compiled by
To what extent do these grassroots initiatives
a broadening of the stakeholders, but also a broadening
the award open another perspective over the
have a role in creating new citizenship besides
of topics—understanding that urbanity and the experi-
city?
having physical impact?
ence of the city happen in many arenas.
I think that the range, scope, and geography of the pro-
I think that as much as space produces new kind of
posals showed the multiplicities of the city: multiple
citizenship, new citizens produce a different kind of
When one looks at these successful grass-
geographies, topics, and groups—both highly organized
space, and it is not a causality. It is not a chicken or
roots initiatives it is inevitable to think about
and sometimes less organized—but above all multiple
egg dilemma, it is truly a correlation between how
replicating them. How should replicability be
stakeholders involved in the definition and production
new, informed citizens can create new and better
of what an urban project means. In a way, the award
forms of city. And in that regard, those kind of new
I believe that replicability can mean many things. It
showed how many Mexico Cities there are and this
spaces of the city—let us think of a community kitchen,
can mean the enthusiasm for social engagement and
diversity talks about a vitality that was not present
of a PET recycling facilities, of a plaza that is now
the possibility of transformation. It is also about find-
twenty or thirty years ago.
used for dancing lessons—those forms of occupation
ing the way in which the scale of different programs
empower citizens in different ways: from nutrition and
gets played out physically. And it is not a matter of
What was the most remarkable thing about the
fitness to social and leisure activities, from economic
just identifying a successful formula—think of el Faro
award process?
retribution to learning. And I like this relationship in
de Oriente—and sort of using it as a cookie-cutter but
When one goes below the radar, one finds and discov-
which it is not the physical that precedes the social, but
about actually finding the specific contingencies of
ers that there are many narratives already taking place
is actually more of a braid. In braiding the two is that a
groups, site, geographies, and problems and redefining
in the city, some of them supported by social programs
new kind of citizenship is being created.
what an urban action and urban intervention means to-
of the local governments and in some cases by the fed-
understood?
day. The other issue of replicability has to do with the
eral government, but also other narratives taking place
Mexico City has a strong tradition of bottom-up
rapport of different stakeholders. I would say the form
by NGOs that we do not necessarily associate with the
initiatives, partly because it is pretty much a
social projects take in the next few years will have to
visible urban actions. I find this incredibly refreshing in
self-made city, but also because after the 1985
do with ingenuity in finding new social relationships.
the context of Mexico. It is fundamental to assume that
earthquake civil society became very active.
alized areas of the city—in suburbs with severe access
the production of politics, the production of citizen-
What was new about the projects compiled in
restrictions. So if they were able to develop themselves
ship, the production of the polis, of the discussion of
2010?
separately from the center, I think their potential is
Many of these projects are in the fringes of the margin-
conflicts and resolutions in the city can involve many
I would say there is a new social contract when it
very large; they have a great power. And the problems
diverse agents, and not only traditional ones. The other
comes to urban projects and this social contract
throughout the city are similar, so solutions can also be
remarkable thing is that all these projects have strong
involves different forms of resistance but also differ-
similar, however they must be created within communi-
physical components—a school over here, a set of steps
ent forms of engagement. If I have to say, the big shift
ties; they cannot come or be imposed from the outside.
going down to a ravine, a shed that it is used to cover
from the nineteen-sixties, seventies, and eighties to
Expansion cannot come from the top, because horizontal
a plaza and next to a communal kitchen—that produce
the transformation of the city today has to do with
structures are what make these projects deeply rooted in
social relationships. And I don’t mean to minimize
when the stakeholders have determined it is important
communities. In fact, the most consolidated projects, the
other forms of social transformation, but to go back to
to resist, and when it is important to engage. I think
ones that have been able to expand beyond basic needs
some of the arguments of the Urban Age project: space
it was quite emblematic that the final projects were
and open the social tissue to incorporate other actors, are
matters and sometimes it matters more than we give
not projects created in absolute autonomy. They were
the projects with long trajectories, but also with horizon-
credit for.
projects that shift from autonomy to engagement. They
tal and open structures.
showed different levels of maturity, but the oldest
Betsabe Romero is a visual artist and jury member Deutsche Bank
projects have a learning curve, which includes not only
Urban Age Award—Mexico City 2012
160
Mexico City
biographies
Francisco Javier Conde González
in Mexico City and visiting professor at Harvard University’s
Doctorate in Education from the National Autonomous Universi-
Graduate School of Design. Since 2005, Castillo has been cura-
ty of Mexico. Conde has been working for the Miravalles Marist
tor of various international exhibitions. He is a member of the
School for thirteen years and has promoted educational environ-
Advisory board of SCIFI at SCI-Arc and of the advisory board of
ment programs and social development in the area. Founding
Urban Age.
member of Miravalle Community Council, created in 2007. Chapter Author and Interviewer: Ana Álvarez
Felipe Leal Degree in Architecture from the National Autonomous Univer-
Researcher, editor, curator, and manager of interdisciplinary
sity of Mexico (UNAM). Head of the Department of Housing
projects, focusing on the urban and cultural contemporary
and Urban Development in Mexico City. First Public Space
life of Mexico City. She graduated with a degree in Mathemat-
Authority in the Federal District. Honorary member of the Na-
ics from the National Autonomous University of Mexico, but
tional Academy of Architecture. Coordinator of Special Projects
since 2003 has been engaged in exploring, portraying, and
at UNAM, an area that fostered the inclusion of the Central
narrating her hometown. Founding member of Citámbulos,
University Campus in UNESCO’s World Heritage List and that
an interdisciplinary collective of urban researchers formed by
created a new transport system within the university campus.
Fionn Petch, Valentina Rojas Loa, Christian von Wissel. With a
Principal of the School of Architecture at the National Autono-
special focus on daily life and street-level urban phenomena,
mous University of Mexico from 1997–2005. Broadcaster of the
the collective first published Citamblers: the Incidence of the
radio program “Architecture in Space and Time.”
Remarkable, Guide to the Marvels of Mexico City and has since then produced several national and international publications,
Arturo Mier y Terán
exhibitions, workshops, dérives, urban interventions, reaching
Degree in Architecture from the National Autonomous Univer-
a wide variety of audiences and spaces—including the National
sity of Mexico (UNAM) with a Masters in Urban Design and
Museum of Anthropology in Mexico City, the German Center of
Regional Planning from the University of Edinburgh, and PhD
Architecture in Berlin, and the Swiss Museum of Architecture
candidate in urban planning at UNAM. Researcher, professor,
in Basel. She also worked as coordinator and curatorial advi-
and lecturer at different national and international universities. Since 1990, Director of Technology and Habitat in Large Cities, HABITEC. He is currently a technical advisor on various projects of the Federal District Government Housing Improvement Program and Community Program for Neighborhood Improvement.
sor in Mexico City for the international exhibition Our Cities, Ourselves, which was sponsored by the Institute of Transportation and Development Policy. She was the coordinator of the Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award in Mexico City. Members of the Jury for the Award in Mexico City:
Argel Gómez Visual artist, graphic designer, and cultural promoter. Current coordinator of Central del Pueblo, a new cultural space in downtown Mexico City. He managed the arts and handcrafts workshops at Faro de Oriente, a cultural center in Mexico City, which has become a referent for cultural public policies. At the Faro, Gómez edited six books about cultural policies and teaching experiences in the art field. He studied a postgraduate curse of cultural policies given by Organization of Ibero-American States.
Vanessa Bauche
Actress and social activist
Richard Burdett
Director, Urban Age & Centennial Professor in Architecture and Urbanism, London School of Economics
Jose Castillo
Architect, co-founder of arquitectura 911sc, professor at School of Architecture, Universidad Iberoamericana
Denise Dresser
Writer, political anaylist and academic, professor of political Benjamín González
science at Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México
Cultural manager. Cofounder and former principal of Faro
de Oriente Cultural Center. Former director of Culture at the
Founder, TEN Arquitectos, New York and Mexico City & Miler
Greater Metropolitan Municipality of Ecatepec and current
Chair of Architecture, University of Pennsylvania
principal of Central del Pueblo Cultural Center. Jose Castillo Degree in Architecture from the Universidad Iberoamericana and Doctorate in Design from Harvard University. With Saidee
Enrique Norten
Betsabeé Romero
Visual artist
Anthony Williams
Former Mayor of Washington, DC and is the Executive Director
Springall, he is the principal of Arquitectura 911sc, a practice
of the Global Government
based in Mexico City. His writings have been published exten-
sively in international journals and publications. He is a profes-
Architect, Mimarlar Design, & Visiting Professor, Harvard
sor at the Universidad Iberoamericana’s School of Architecture
Graduate School of Design
Han Tümertekin
Cape Town Lindsay Bush
162
Cape Town
Profile
Population [city]
3.74
Average density [metro/city]
million
Area occupied [city]
2,454
km2
Gross domestic product (GDP)
103
[$bn at PPPs]
1,425
Inhabitants/km2
Diversity
Khoisan, Dutch, English, French, Madagascar, Mauritius, Ceylon, India, Malaysia, Indonesia, Germans, Portuguese, Italians, Chinese, Xhosa, Zulu, Other Africans, South Africans,
168
Cape Town
TIME LINE AND population growth
20
10
2
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
1652
1814
1870s–80s
1924
1948
1960s
1970s–80s
1990
1994
2000s
Jan van Riebeeck estab-
Capital of the British
Trade to the port is
Growth of planned
Urban planning aims
Large industrial areas
Steady growth of Cape
Abolishment of the last
First democratic elec-
Central City Improve-
lishes a way-station for
Cape Colony. Urban
increased by Highveld
townships on the Cape
for complete “separate
grow up on the outskirts
Flats townships and
of the Apartheid laws by
tion in South Africa sees
ment District (CCID)
ships. Town laid out on
growth continues hap-
gold rush.
Flats: slums Act allows
development”: National
of the city. Railway lines
informal settlements,
President F.W. De Klerk.
Nelson Mandela elected
established with a focus
a Dutch grid pattern and
hazardly at the hands of
Segregation begins,
for forced removals in
Party elected on a plat-
and roads are used to
most notably Khayelit-
president.
on safety and urban
farmlands established.
developers.
as native Africans are
the inner city.
form of Apartheid,
strategically separate
sha and Mitchell’s
1990s
maintenance.
leading to the Group
areas.
Plain. Violent clashes
Urban sprawl: end of
Integrated Development
and forced removals
influx control leads to
Plan (IDP), a 5-year gov-
continue.
rural migration and
ernment plan, lays solid
rapid growth of under-
framework for urban improvement.
moved to Ndabeni. 1930s-40s
1688
1836
French Huguenots ar-
The Great Trek: 10,000
1910
Foreshore reclamation
rive.
Dutch families leave the
Legislative capital of the
begins, linking harbor to
1950s
District Six declared
Colony to travel north.
Union of South Africa is
the central city.
Slum clearance acceler-
a whites-only region
1988
serviced, overcrowded
ates, forcing thousands
and 60,000 forcibly
Touristic development
Cape Flats settlements.
into hostels and tented
removed, many to Lav-
of the V&A Waterfront.
Informal economy and
2010–11
“emergency camps.”
ender Hill and surround-
It becomes the country’s
violence levels boom
Soccer World Cup builds
ings.
most popular tourist
due to unemployment
on infrastructure and
1660–1806
Cape Town.
Areas Act. 1965
40,000 slaves are
1865–1905
imported from West
Immigration: working-
1910–1941
Africa, Madagascar,
class immigrants arrive
Suburban development
India, Ceylon, Malaya,
from all over Europe to
along racial lines is
destination with 1.5 mil-
and inequality.
public space improve-
and Indonesia to work
settle in the city.
influenced by the British
lion visitors monthly.
Gated communities for
ments underway in
on farms.
German farmers de-
garden city movement,
the rich spring up in
the city. World Design
velop Philippi for market
and the oversized, zoned
response to widespread
Capital 2014 bid won by
gardening.
planning of Modernism.
lawlessness.
Cape Town.
170
Cape Town
INITIATIVEs
Mothers Unite
Born in a mother’s home in 2007, Mothers Unite provides an alternative for children aged three to fifteen: a safe haven from the gangs, drugs, and violence characterizing street and home environments in the Lavender Hill area. A core volunteer staff of six mothers from the neighborhood provides 120 kids with educational programs and healthy meals, three afternoons a week. Programs include storytelling, literacy, computers, and art therapy. Operating on the grounds of the municipal Seawinds Multipurpose Hall, they have built an “infrastructure village” from donated shipping containers, arranged around the perimeter to create an oasis-like space. Facilities include a number of activity rooms, a library, kitchen, office, sheltered area, playground, and vegetable gardens. Mothers Unite have partnered with a range of organizations: securing donations-in-kind from international aid agencies, corporations, and the Church; working with other NGOs to train gardeners and plant trees, and with universities to start training in emergency first aid response. Their newest additions are a wendy house training and yoga center, and a retrofitted container with toilets. In an area suffering from high levels of unemployment, poverty, and domestic violence, the project’s success lies in the way it addresses the family unit. Through providing a safe place for children to play, explore, and develop, the mothers reach out to families to encourage a commitment to community development, and children have shown great improvements in both social interaction and school performance.
184
Cape Town
INTERVIEW
government
Breaking it Down to Build it Up Michael Krause is team leader of the Violence Prevention through Urban Upgrading (VPUU) program
Can you summarize the current attitude/policy
We need to establish who the intermediary is between
In Cape Town, most of the land occupied by
of the municipality towards urban improve-
government, the public sector, and the community,
projects belongs to the public sector. Many who
ment and the redressing of inequality?
because in practice they are often unable to communi-
take the initiative to “just do it” start out as
We are seeing a big shift from a sectoral focus to an
cate. A forum where different stakeholders can talk to
lawbreakers, yet support from the government
area-based focus. Most of the project entries were
each other is key to any development strategy.
has generally followed. What is your opinion on this?
around people making a change in a particular small area in their neighborhood. The city has understood
Do you see scope for change to current plan-
With nearly a third of people living in informal settle-
this as a positive thing, and it becomes apparent in
ning methods based on the experience of such
ments, it’s almost the norm that you have to begin as
their strategy document, the IDP. The VPUU is a good
projects? Do you think there is a move towards
a lawbreaker. Within any government framework, it
example as its neighborhoods are still manageable for
integrating bottom-up with top-down planning
is very difficult to move change, so you need to have
the city, yet the level of detail makes it possible for
initiatives?
those champions … change always requires action.
people to understand and influence the process.
A current international trend is the “people’s budget,”
Government is realizing that their policies are not
translated in Cape Town as Ward allocations. VPUU,
always applicable on the ground and that people have
Do you think grassroots can complement the
for example, uses a Social Development Fund that’s
needed to embark on a “detour” to get things done,
efforts of the public sector to integrate the city
linked to a local development strategy (the Community
however criminal or violent activities cannot be seen
and improve livability in all areas? If so, how?
Action Plan) and to the broader IDP, opening up many
as a solution to our current problems.
From my perspective certainly, grassroots initiatives
more possibilities. Again, it is about scale. Govern-
are important. Again it’s a question of a scale that
ment favors large-scale projects, and bottom-up initia-
people understand and feel comfortable working with.
tives require small, localized interventions and invest-
Most of these programs have tried to combine strategy
ments. That vehicle needs to be found and the Ward
with implementation, and that’s often the missing link
allocation is a good start. As 99% of these projects sit
within the City: the IDP tries to do it, but it’s often very
within the framework of the IDP, they certainly play
difficult because line departments work in sectoral ar-
an important role. Government organizations face grave difficulties—such
eas. We have to recognize the value of cross-pollinating between strategy and local knowledge. Which governmental agencies/programs recognize the importance of community-led
How do you see the development of local
as lack of capacity and finance, politicization of service
bottom-up initiatives in the long term? What
delivery, vexed inter-governmental relations, cumbersome
possible development scenarios might be envis-
decision-making processes, and lack of flexibility—which
aged for the future?
inhibit cross-cutting analysis and decision making. While
initiatives? How does this affect the planning
I believe the bottom-up approach is the best way to
there is a strong argument for civil society organizations
process in these areas? Can you give an example?
embed democracy in South Africa and fulfill the man-
to become more involved in local development processes,
With the shift in approach, funding is increasingly
date of the Constitution. We are moving from a closed
many have been demobilized, have few resources, or are
allocated on a local-area basis according to need. The
system in the past into a society that is much more
themselves divided. Private sector organizations have re-
city has gained the support of Province and National
open and equal, and the bottom-up approach is part of
sources, but are often out of touch with the complexities
Treasury to work in transversal teams and follow
this shift. What is difficult is for the public sector to
of community and city needs. In many cities, cross-sector
proper methodology, so they begin with a baseline
be open enough to allow these initiatives to flourish.
partnerships are becoming increasingly popular in areas
survey followed by a Community Action Plan, and then
However, I do think there are many opportunities to be
of policy making and implementation that were previ-
seek funding accordingly—that’s a positive move. An
found in the IDP, especially if we focus on that inter-
ously the primary domain of the state. Partnerships, it is
example is the Neighborhood Development Partnership
mediary between government and grassroots.
argued, can be seen as a “new model of governance.”
grants—where the city seeks national funding for focus
Andrew Boraine, CEO of the Cape Town Partnership and DBUAA
areas—and international funding as with the VPUU.
2012 jury member
194
Cape Town
Biographies
Carol Jacobs
Chapter Author and Interviewer: Lindsay Bush
Carol is a proud single mother of three who lives in an RDP house in Seawinds, a neighborhood in the Lavender Hill area.
Lindsay is an architect and urban designer who recently
She finished grade seven and went on to initiate Mothers
relocated to Cape Town to manage the 2012 DBUA Award.
Unite, an inspiring, award-winning organization that is gaining
Born, raised, and educated in Durban, her family emigrated
increasing recognition for rebuilding a community through the
to Australia in the mid-nineteen-nineties and she chose to
hearts and minds of its children.
stay behind. She has traveled widely, working and studying in numerous places around the world. Her professional interests
Michael Krause
include urban regeneration, housing, community and educa-
Michael is a place-maker who believes in negotiating solutions
tional spaces, and the in-situ upgrade of informal settlements.
to shape urban environments. He grew up in East Germany,
Lindsay’s work has been profiled in several local publications
studied Urban Design and Spatial Planning, and relocated to
and her most recent contribution was to the book Building
South Africa in 1995. Since 2006, he has led a highly dedicated
Brazil compiled by the MAS Urban Design researchers at the
transversal team of people to implement and develop the VPUU
ETH in Zürich. Since the award, she has been living in Cape
program, which has had significant impact on crime in parts of
Town, setting up a legacy network called Urban Agents, and in
Khayelitsha, creating safe, vibrant public spaces in one of the
the coming years will be applying her skillset to the facilita-
city’s poorest areas.
tion of the World Design Capital 2014 Ward projects. Lindsay is passionate, energetic, and fiercely optimistic about the
Edgar Pieterse
future of her beloved country.
Director of the African Center for Cities at UCT, Edgar is a native Capetonian whose research and publications cover such
Members of the Jury for the Award in Cape Town
themes as African urbanism, cultural planning, regional and
macro development, and governance. He fills several teaching and advisory roles and holds the DST/NRF SA Chair in Urban Policy. Malika Ndlovu Malika is an internationally published South African poet, play-
Andrew Boraine
Chief executive of the Cape Town Partnership, adjunct professor at African Centre for Cities, University of Cape Town
Richard Burdett
Director Urban Age & Centennial Professor in Architecture and Urbanism, London School of Economics
wright, performer, and arts activist. She has lived most of her
adult life in Cape Town, has wide range of experience in arts
Poet, playwright, performer and arts consultant
management and currently operates as an independent artist
under the brand New Moon Ventures, working towards healing through creativity. Councilor Shaun August Shaun August grew up playing on the streets of Lavender Hill.
Malika Ndlovu Enrique Norten
Founder, TEN Arquitectos, New York and Mexico City & Miler Chair of Architecture, University of Pennsylvania
Edgar Pieterse
Director of African Centre for Cities, University of Cape Town
His strong organizational skills, discipline, and familiarity
with the criminal element come from ten years as a warden at
Civil rights campaigner and clinical psychologist, chief execu-
Nonfundo Walaza
Pollsmoor prison. A committed family man, he is well known
tive of Desmond Tutu Peace Center
in the community and was elected as the Democratic Alliance
Councilor for his very own Ward 67.
Former Mayor of Washington, DC and is the Executive Director
Anthony Williams
of the Global Government
Common Points
202
common points
Interview
Cities Are an Expression of Human Needs Wolfgang Nowak was the initiator of the Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award
In your view, what do the projects associated
and urban environments? This is the lesson learned
Town’s Mothers Unite, for example. It could become
with the DBUA Award achieve? What simi-
from these initiatives, the tremendous power and
an aflourishing, fantastic center for that area, which is
larities and differences stood out between the
capability of what local residents and ordinary people
secure, inviting, and has something to offer through an
projects in different cities?
can do and achieve.
educational project hosted in a civic space. That is the
These projects are very similar. There is always a
vision of one center, which would also be connected to
meeting place, a garden, a kitchen, an educational
How do you see the potential for the develop-
facility; a place where people come together to learn,
ment of such projects impacting cities in the
to teach, to share and exchange experiences and ideas,
future? Are they scalable and/or replicable?
and to be citizens. In most of the cities, we found these
Or, which features that you recognize as being
similar formations. In my opinion, the only difference
specific to the nature of these projects have the
was in Istanbul, where these spaces seemed to be
potential to develop further?
introverted; there we found a music school for young
We should not replicate them. (We have replicated
students that learn how to play an instrument.
shopping malls!) I imagine we should have a thousand
If we look back to the first settlements in human
other “centers” throughout that city.
different “centers,” like in the jungle where we find a
history, it has always been about providing residents
diversity of beautiful new plants. These initiatives are
with safety, food, a spiritual center; and one might also
a great experiment of people finding out what a better
notice the similarity of their plans. I think cities are the
city can be. They imply the argument that we should
expression of human needs and that we have a “plan”
enable people to initiate and build something, not ex-
of what a city should be inside us.
actly replicating them, but encouraging their participation within a framework.
Overall, do you think these initiatives have
I think we should protect those community initia-
been successful? If so, what key lessons might
tives, which keep cities livable and enrich them. We
we learn from them?
should protect them from investors. We should take
Cities are no longer built for humans, they are built
these initiatives as a reference and learn from them.
for investors. They have become like machines, not to house people and to create an environment that en-
Can you envision possible future scenarios re-
ables them to live a better quality of life. They consist
sulting from the pioneerism displayed in these
of iconic buildings designed by star architects but are
projects?
Wolfgang Nowak is Director of the Alfred Herrhausen Society, the International Forum of Deutsche Bank. Wolfgang Nowak initiated the Urban Age program, an international investigation into the future of the
in the danger of becoming as boring as shopping malls.
If we want to be successful, the city of the twenty-first
world’s mega-cities in the twenty-first century jointly organized
Every mayor seems to be happy to have these super-
century cannot, for instance, have only one center.
with the London School of Economics. He has held various
stars designing cities, but they are only designing sky-
These cities can be enriched by having multiple, dif-
senior positions in Germany’s state and federal governments,
lines. Instead of concentrating on skylines, we should
ferent centers built by a multitude of people with
be building cities thinking of human needs and ground
different backgrounds. I don’t mean to build ghettos,
realities. It is not only the investor and the architect
but many centers where different communities and
who should participate in planning. It is important to
ethnicities can mix and thus foster diversity. In this
Political Analysis and Planning at the German Federal Chancel-
engage and involve the people who live there as well.
scenario, we should have a multitude of city centers
lery from 1999 to 2002. He lectures and publishes widely on
Finally, we should have an assessment of what is being
created by citizens. This could look a bit like the dif-
built by the inhabitants themselves. We should ask: is
ferent markets in different neighborhoods—which are
this environment enabling people to have a better life
all very attractive, as we know from London, Paris,
or is it only creating static monument-like buildings
Berlin or São Paulo—that greatly enrich a city. See Cape
France’s Centre national de la recherche scientifique (French National Center for Scientific Research) in Paris, and UNESCO. After unification, he was State Secretary of Education in Saxony from 1990 to 1994. In addition, he was Director-General for
academic issues and is a regular commentator for German television and newspapers. He is honorary Vice President of the British think tank Policy Network, Senior Fellow of the Brookings Institution in Washington, and Fellow at the NRW-School of Governance at the University of Duisburg-Essen.
212
common points
Final Considerations
and facilities. The social mechanisms behind these initiatives reveal new modes of negotiation, participa-
cities, we would like to draft some conclusions that
Marcos L. Rosa and Ute E. Weiland, editors
tion, and cooperation. Spatially, they reveal fields: the
might point out pathways towards the planning and
spaces they occupy, in which they install or take place.
construction of this open, inclusive, participatory city.
Their tactical nature produces operational knowledge
We aim to identify and pull together common threads,
through the design of strategies that change specific
assess the potential of their combined efforts and find-
Based on the material compiled for each of the five
spots, applied over short or longer timeframes. They
ings, and indicate actors that might lead the way in
Spatiale (1960), among many others. Authors such as
rarely design to determine, tending rather to arrange
developing possible new scenarios.
The discussion around participatory processes in urban
Jane Jacobs were dedicated to the study of the neigh-
open, flexible frameworks that can evolve over time
planning is by no means a new one. In recent decades
borhood scale and diversity in local design (1961). Jan
and accommodate several overlapping programs. These
however, we notice an increasingly humanistic ap-
Gehl’s work in Copenhagen demonstrates the success
three aspects introduce perspectives that give us clues
1. The Social Mechanisms and Operational
proach towards the revindication of cities.
of “cities designed for people,” (1987, 2010) and par-
as to how we may begin to approach modifying the
Modes of Community Initiatives
It can be seen in the work of art collectives with
ticipatory experiences and processes have also found
planning “status quo.”
local communities during the nineteen-nineties (Bour-
fertile ground in developing countries such as Brazil
riaud, 1998; Kester, 2004; Bishop, 2006), and more
(Lagnado, 2006; França, 2012). Yet, with a few excep-
pronouncedly in the last decade in architecture, urban
tions, participatory planning has, to a great extent,
A marked improvement can be seen to result from
Projects start in response to issues that directly affect
design, and urbanism: community initiatives, “Do-it-
remained in the realm of theory. In light of a growing
each of the initiatives profiled in this book. They re-
people’s lives. The nature and intensity of problems
yourself” building, and other means by which tactical
culture of participation, could we then propose that we
move garbage, plant new trees and gardens, organize
varies from city to city, as do the projects and pro-
knowledge is implemented and tested on site (Smith,
are moving from a theoretical discourse to a practical
community meeting places, upgrade open spaces for
grams implemented to solve them.
2007; Borasi and Zardini, 2008; Christiaanse, 2010; Seji-
approach?
activities, construct clean toilets, build playgrounds,
Participation
ma, 2010; Lepik, 2010; Ho, 2012). These processes allow
Small-scale, self-driven community initiatives
Recognizing Problems, Unveiling Potential, Making Community Initiatives Visible
Inspiring Solutions
In Mumbai, the lack of sanitation, the prevalence
libraries, and classrooms for workshops and skills
of disease, and the lack of communal space and
for direct and proactive participation in the construc-
provide immediate solutions to urgent, everyday
training. They have added value to the built environ-
services in slums are the sort of problems that act
tion and adaptation of cities according to local needs.
problems, in the form of social innovation. Do they also
ment, whether by conscious acts or by experimental
as strong motivators for community projects. As ob-
contribute towards a better scenario? Can they effect
evolution over time. They upgrade derelict spaces
served, sanitation and recovery programs often start
unable to provide for large portions of their cities’
positive transformation? Will these initiatives remain
into more harmonious and beautiful places, creating
by cleaning an area with the help of a community, an
inhabitants. Imbalances are rife: some have too much,
local, or will they be incorporated by governmental
qualities that forge encounters and coexistence, and
important step as it tackles not only the problem of
while others have too little, and the latter can justifi-
frameworks and policies? Should these innovations
transform residents’ perceptions of everyday life. We
waste, but also the culture of littering and dumping
ably become distrustful of or lose faith in governance,
influence the rules that determine the way we act in,
are interested in understanding how these processes
on the city’s streets and vacant lots. Jeff Anderson
its policies, and plans.
educate, govern, plan, and build our cities?
take place, how the operative notion of the “common”
who started Biourban (p. 76) in São Paulo explains
is generated. It is our intention to make the processes
how the cleaning of those garbage dumps repre-
For a whole host of reasons, governments have been
Does this motivate people to participate, to make
The innovation here is not necessarily about a
their voices heard and be actively involved in the inher-
final product, or about physical built space. These are
visible, document them and share the compiled
sents a sudden change in attitude towards collective
ently political process of city-making? Both in spite of
important pioneer testing grounds, where process is
knowledge.
space; a change that fosters community organization
poor relationships, and because of sound partnerships
paramount. They uncover inventive ways of reading
with municipal governments, citizens are becoming
and responding to urban realities, and present learning
present enormous potential to catalyze urban change,
such as the addition of plants, urban furniture and
active.
opportunities by way of exchange in observing other
based not only on their accomplishments, but also
playgrounds—new meeting spaces that are used by
cultures, experiences, and cities. They reveal the fragil-
on what they can teach us. Their mechanisms and
residents like small, open-air living rooms.
ety is becoming increasingly engaged in actions that
ity of a deterministic urban model that relies on aged
operational models have the potential to feed back
aim to improve the common urban environment. The
instruments and regulations that fail to respond to the
into the architecture and urban planning disciplines,
explains how the reality of hungry kids playing in the
nineteen-sixties was a decade in which a participa-
complexity inherent in our cities. What kind of plan-
augmenting the palette of tools with which they shape
street with nowhere to do homework or research,
tory culture was marked by radical political moments
ning knowledge might we draft from these projects?
the city. A new culture of planning and design informed
inspired her to make the first move. A high number of
by grassroots initiatives would involve assembling a
education and skills training programs, often combined
When we talk about active participation, civil soci-
and demonstrations that made a call for participation
We might start by questioning the importance of
The community initiatives showcased in this book
and further translates into physical improvements
In Cape Town, Carol Jacobs of Mothers Unite (p. 182)
(Debord, 1961), focused in the everyday (Lefebvre,
these initiatives to the adaptation of urban space.
more inclusive, transversal, transparent, and porous
with urban farming, address the city’s most pressing
1947, 1961,1981; de Certeau, 1980), and this gave rise
Politically, they are fundamental to unveil real demands
framework inside which these projects could flourish.
issues. Problems of similar nature have inspired action
to participatory urban design and planning. Concepts
and make legible flaws in current policy, a prereq-
These initiatives also have potential to impact upon
in Mexico City. Communities realized they were los-
of open frameworks that invite interaction have been
uisite to moving forward. Socially, they act as soft
urban policy, and can provide valuable lessons for
ing areas for much-needed public space and services,
translated in visions such as Constant Nieuwenhuys’
infrastructure, working with the city at a local level
governance, not least around strategies for community
and reacted by defending and appropriating existing
New Babylon (1959–54), and in Yona Friedman’s La Ville
to provide neighborhoods with much-needed services
engagement.
derelict land to create facilities for health, food, work,
4
Navigation
X
Headline AUThOR’s Name Author’s position in the project etc.