February

Page 1

The Playwickian

February 14, 2017

Issue 3

Volume 85

Photo/Wikimedia Commons Millions gather in Washington D.C. in support of women’s and civil rights. By Catherine Hilliard After the inauguration festivities wrapped up on Jan. 20 to celebrate the newly elected President Donald Trump, millions of men and women gathered in the nation’s capital and other cities across the United States to rally on President Trump’s first day in office. The event was held to highlight the degree to which the President has unsettled people domestically and internationally. A major cause of the march was a demonstration in support of women’s rights and civil rights. However, clear undertones towards the newly elected president were also connected to the march. The turnout in the capital was so large that the designated march route along the National Wall was impassable. Protesters were told to make their way to the Ellipse near the White House by way of other streets, causing a chaotic scene in downtown Washington. As marchers walked the streets of Washington D.C., many with pink hats and signs, they chanted, “Welcome to your first day. We will not go away.” The Washington rally alone attracted over 500,000 people with similar marches in cities in New York, Philadelphia, Chicago and Los Angeles

to Mexico City, Paris, Berlin, London, Prague and Sydney. The rally featured speeches from Madonna; actresses America Ferrera, Ashley Judd and Scarlett Johansson; women's rights activist Gloria Steinem; Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards and director Michael Moore. A large group of senators and politicians also took the stage at one point during the event, including Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida and Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey. Neshaminy alumni Zoey Joyce also attended the march on Washington D.C., and described the crowd as ever increasing and positive. “We had lots of positivity toward women, members of the LGBT community and people of different races,” Joyce said. “There was a small group I encountered that actually gathered to sing at the march. It was very touching that they were compelled to speak out in such a peaceful but powerful way.” Joyce was motivated to take part in the march based on the speech and actions that have happened in the past few months from politicians and the current president. “I believe that the event was successful but not at what it was created for,” she said. It set a tone for future matches and protests

by showing the general public that we can peacefully assemble and be heard. It also showed that it’s better to get out there and try than to worry about those worse scenarios and not attending. I believe it’s integral for that same crowd to continue being socially and politically active in our government and I think this was a stepping stone toward that possibility.” Steinem suggested that the size and energy of the event was a positive result of Trump's election and inauguration. "This is the upside of the downside. This is an outpouring of energy and true democracy like I have never seen in my very long life. It is wide in age. It is deep in diversity," Steinem said. The activist also praised “our great leaders” Barack and Michelle Obama, Sen. Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton and their support for women’s rights. Hours after the event ended, demonstrators continued to march and chant down the streets of the city, some with homemade signs related to Hillary Clinton, President Trump’s campaign rival. One read, “Lock him up,” flipping a chant Trump supporters directed at Clinton during the campaign. Another read, “Still with her,” a play on Clinton’s campaign slogan. Several “Stronger Together” signs were displayed as well. Although not present at the rally, Clinton turned to Twitter to give her support posting, “Thanks for standing, speaking & marching for our values @womensmarch. Important as ever. I truly believe we're always Stronger Together.” "We march today for the moral core of this nation, against which our new president is waging a war," Ferrera told the Washington crowd. "Our dignity, our character, our rights have all been under attack, and a platform of hate and division assumed power yesterday. But the president is not America ... We are America, and we are here to stay."

Senate attempts to gut ethics committee

www.playwickian.com

n

nguage C La

n um ol

Women’s March draws millions

The Newspaper of Neshaminy High School

Fore ig

2001 Old Lincoln Highway, Langhorne, PA

Photo/Wikimedia Commons

Trump eliminado de la version de sitio web de la Casa Blanco

De Grace Marion La administración nuevo de Trump comenzó sus plazo eliminado de la versión de sitio web de la Casa Blanco en español. Viendo esto, oficiales y periodistas de España alarmaron. Más temprano, el sitio web mostró un mensaje de error, pero el sitio web redirecciona a la versión inglesa en enero. “Lamentamos que el versión español de el sitio web fue borrado, no lo parece igual una idea bueno… dado que esto es un país con 52 millón hablantes de español,” ministro forense de España Alfonso Dastis dijo en una entrevista con La Local en inglesa. La Estados Unidos población hispana tiene una estimación de 57 millón gente ahora de acuerdo a el Censo Oficina de Estados Unidos. Clamar el preocupaciones de la oficiales de España, secretario prensa de Estados Unidos Sean Spicer liberado una declaración reclamando el sitio web estaba actualizando. A pesar de esto, algunas personas todavía te preocupas sobre de estado de el lenguaje español en el gobierno y sociedad de Estados Unidos, porque la cuentas de redes sociales para la Casa Blanco en español y la coordinador de prensa para español hablando agencias de noticias ambos sigue apareciendo irse.

For a translation, visit: www.playwickian.com

By Regina Thomas

To start off their first day of 2017 in power, House Republicans took a closed-door vote to decide the fate of the independent ethics office. They came close to eliminating it, but backed off once they faced harsh criticism from watchdog ethics groups and Democrats. It was a 119-74 vote in favor of renaming the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) to Office of Congressional Complaint Review and placing it under the oversight of the House Ethics Committee. The OCE is an independent body which oversees and investigates ethics complaints. It is led by eight people: four from the Democratic Party and four from the Republican Party. They are not allowed to be current members of Congress or work for the federal government.

Page 1/News

Its main job is to evaluate and investigate Congress members. Their website explains that their mission is “to assist the U.S. House in upholding high ethical standards with an eye toward increasing transparency and providing information to the public.” The Independent Ethics Office was created in 2008 in the midst of congressional scandals such as the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal where he was sentenced to six years in prison for tax evasion, mail fraud, and bribing public officials. Also, Republican Party House member Tom DeLay was convicted of money laundering and conspiracy charges. The House already had a committee to investigate members of Congress called the House Ethics Committee- which is run by Congress members, but they decided they needed an

extra committee; thus, the OCE was established. Some lawmakers do not like the OCE because they claim the office treats them unfairly while others do not like that the OCE’s findings are made public. Congress wants to be in control of what findings should be made public, which is why they want to gut the OCE, according to The Washington Post. The House has been criticized for this vote, even by President President Trump criticizes actions of the Congress on Donald Trump. Twitter.

The Playwickian

February 14, 2017


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.