the
POLY PREP’S Student Newspaper VOL. CVI ISSUE I September/October 2020
POLYGON
The First
PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE
STUDENT-LED
INITIATIVES
How does the student body feel following the debate?
BEATRICE LARKIN CONTRIBUTING WRITER
M
any Poly students agree that the presidential debate did not influence them to think from the perspective of the opposite party or reconsider their political affiliation. The debate contained very little useful discussion about policy and largely came off as childish bickering which negatively impacted the public’s image of both candidates. Sophomore Rayeeda Mahmud said, “from what I saw, those who support Donald Trump will not be swayed to vote Biden and those who support Biden will not have been swayed to vote for Trump. Neither of them capitalized on viewpoints that swing voters would agree with.” Students largely agree that the candidates failed to cater to undecided voters and even made statements that could lose them votes. Mahmud echoed this sentiment saying that the debate “simply gave each candidate’s supporters more of a reason to dislike the opponent, everyone was just waiting for the other side to mess up.” Most people’s main takeaways from the debate were the errors made by their least favorite candidate, and this is largely due to the lack of substance and real discussions of pertinent policy. There was no shortage of these small slip-ups to focus on. The debate was filled with interruptions, name-calling, and bickering. Sophomore Summer Hornbeck said, “They definitely had a lack of self-control.” Other candidates interrupted more than they should have based upon the prior agreed-upon debate rules, with Trump interrupting 71 times and Biden 22, according to the Washington Post. Hornbeck also added, “Understandably, many were critical of Biden’s
name-calling and childish behavior, but Trump was worse. Biden asked Trump to shut up as a last resort after being interrupted four times in the same sentence.” Most students agreed that while Biden was childish, it was in retaliation to Trump’s behavior. Some students were angered by Trump’s mentions of Biden’s college records, viewing those comments as off-topic and not valuable to the American people. While the comments on intelligence and the interruptions were largely classified as “bickering,” many were outraged by Trump’s comment about Biden’s son Hunter Biden and his drug problem. Sophomore Brianna Kwan said, “It was disgusting to use Biden’s past pain and loss against him” and “it added nothing to the debate while dredging up a hard past.” In addition to being disrespectful to Biden, many felt that Trump was disrespectful to the moderator of the debate, Chris Wallace. These events have proven to be detrimental to Trump’s public image. Trump’s failure to condemn white supremacy also outraged many and has worsened the president’s reputation. Sophomore Hannah Gross said, “Trump had the opportunity to condemn white supremacy but did not take that chance. This tells us something about whose vote he is trying to get.” Furthering this point, Hornbeck said, “Trump’s failure to condemn white su-
polygonnews.org
premacy was frightening even after all that we already know about him” Student’s opinions differed on whether Biden’s public image was somewhat tarnished by the debate. Sophomore Hannah Crowley said, “when Biden looked directly into the camera and empathized with the struggles of the American people, it showed us that he cares. Biden came out looking more professional, especially by comparison.” Some, however, believe that they are both worse off than when the debate started. Sophomore Olivia Umeh said, “both of them did not come off well because of the lack of order and patience, and the debate was a whole lot of nothing” Most viewed the debate as useless in providing any policy views that were not already known by the general public. Mahmud said, “we did not learn anything new about where they stand as there was little talk of policy and nor really anything of substance.” While most viewed the debate as insignificant, there was a consensus that it was still necessary. Kwan said, “they are a staple of democracy” and “are a reminder of who we are voting for.” The universal opinion of the debate was negative with many finding it embarrassing to watch and with some even describing it as “scary” and “frightening.” Crowley said, “I did debate in seventh grade and the kids there were more articulate than either of the candidates. I am afraid that these are the types of people who will run our country.”
VoTE NYC:
Voter Registration Campaign “High school students represent the next evolution of political beliefs. The sooner we establish ourselves as agents of change, the sooner representatives and politicians will cater to us. We must make it known that our future is at stake, and we will do all we can to make sure our voices are heard and concerns are translated into legislation.”
Mental Health: Poly BC2m “Our mission statement encompasses exactly what we want to come out of BC2M “In the midst of the chaos that surrounds us, we need to know that we can rely on our community more than ever. Our goal is to encourage dialogue and to raise awareness, understanding, and empathy. We strive to end the stigma around mental health and to create a much-needed supportive environment at our school, focusing on emotional health and well being.”
Black Students Demanding Change “This year, we will continue to partner with the administration to improve the experience of Black students, as well as host BSDC sponsored workshops and forums. There is a lot of work still to be done, but the existence of BSDC represents a call for change from students at schools across the nation, demonstrating that racial inequity is not unique to any one place.”
Read more about these new organizations on Features Pages 8 &9
Clubs Adapt to the Pandemic
Club and Affinity Group leaders are adapting, looking for new ways to create bonds and engage students virtually EMILY NG over being virtual in order to encourage social interaction. trieving the software at Poly that extracurricular activiBoynton said, “Even though the club is working fairly ties have relied on in the past. More specifically, school EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
A
midst the confusion since the start of the school year, extracurricular activities have not been forgotten. From the Polyglot to the juggling club, Poly intends to keep their clubs and affinity groups thriving. The only difference this year, however, is that most of these activities and meetings will be done virtually. Every Friday, there is about forty-five minutes allotted to club activities, and there is a separate slot of the same duration given to affinity groups. With most of these interactions taking place on Zoom, club leaders have expressed their concerns for bonding and efficiency. In particular, performing arts groups are frustrated with going online, for being physical is a defining aspect of their productivity. Senior Gauri Purohit, who is leading Acappella this year, said, “We had to hold auditions for Acapella, and it’s quite challenging to hold them virtually because Zoom often lags. Rehearsals are also difficult since one of the most valuable aspects is being in each other’s physical presence and working off of each other’s voices, which isn’t possible over Zoom.” Going online has also presented problems with re-
publications are finding it difficult to proceed with their intended plans. The Poly Arts Journal, for instance, is preparing to put forth another journal this school year. Leading this initiative is senior Samarra Sanker, and she said, “Going online is definitely harder because we don’t have access to Poly’s publication center, so we’re working on getting software as of now. My biggest hope, however, is to have a really good turnout for submissions this year, or a great journal won’t be possible. I’m also hoping that some underclassmen will step up and join us because it is not as intimidating as it seems.” On the other hand, there are some clubs that have fared well with the transition. Senior Tyson Boynton, who co-leads the Trading Financial Markets/Economics club, said, “We weren’t planning on being in-person at all, and a lot of what we’re doing uses technology to effectively analyze the technicals and fundamentals of the financial markets. In this way, it’s actually helped our club thrive so far since we can share our screens to present certain topics over Zoom.” Yet, it seems that being in-person is still favorable
well over Zoom, we haven’t gotten to truly meet each other! So, it can be difficult to communicate in that way.” Similarly, affinity groups are trying to establish stronger bonding through the computer screen. These groups rely on enriching dialogue and intimacy, and going online has taken away this fundamental part of unity within these affinity groups. Senior Talia Bieler, who is co-running Women’s Affinity, said, “Going virtual has made it more difficult to make stronger bonds with some of the younger or newer students, who may feel intimidated to participate virtually. Yet, it’s also enabled us to engage with the group in creative ways, such as through slideshows and videos. What’s great about meeting virtually is that anyone can tune in from anywhere!” Although clubs and affinity groups are still situating themselves in these new circumstances, there is no doubt that they are doing as much as they can to stay engaging. Since the start of the school year, Poly students have been grappling with creative ways to accomplish this, and it’s been a testament to the community’s dedication to making sure we make this school year as normal as possible.