Clean Energy Trust July 27, 2010
Organization Ecosystem Discussion
Agenda
Mission and Purpose • Mission: To accelerate the development of clean energy technologies and businesses in the State of Illinois • Vision o Clean energy will define the future. Regions with industrial strength in this sector will be the most competitive and have the highest quality of life for their citizens. Illinois can be a global leader in clean energy.
• Purpose: o Facilitate new companies and expansion of existing businesses in the sector
• Desired Outcomes o New businesses that will produce long term job growth o New clean energy-friendly business environment and policy o Alignment of regional stakeholders
3
Founding Board Civic leaders and business professionals with a passion for Illinois and clean energy • • • • • •
Michael Polsky, Invenergy Nick Pritzker, Hyatt Corporation Paula Crown, Henry Crown & Company Richard Sandor, Chicago Climate Exchange Tim Schwertfeger, ex-Nuveen Antonio Gracias, Valor Equity Partners
4
Offerings and Sector Focus •
Offerings: o Business development support to clean energy start-ups o Financial assistance: grants, loans, equity o Education and advocacy: help advance policy conducive to clean energy
•
Customer segments: o Ecosystem development o Technology transfer o Start-up companies
•
Energy sectors of interest: o o o o o
•
Renewable energy Next generation transportation Energy efficiency Smart grid and energy IT Carbon abatement and environmental finance
What has been completed to date: o Funded and staffed Clean Energy Trust; incorporated as non-profit, awaiting IRS approval on 501(c)3 tax-exempt status o Begun providing business services and advocacy support o Developed support and momentum from numerous stakeholders: City, State, foundations, corporations, investors, trade groups
5
DOE Grant: Innovation Ecosystem Development Initiative (FOA 356)
• The purpose is to help create or enhance an environment to accelerate the commercialization of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies developed at universities. • Fund the creation of new programs or the expansion of existing, successful programs
Estimated Total Funding Per Grantee Grant Period Cost Share Minimum Expected Number of Grantees
$1,050,000 3 years 20% 5
Proposed Cluster Strategy • Leverage and scale 4 existing initiatives at the Clean Energy Trust o o o o
Clean Energy Business Plan Competition Clean Energy Boot Camp Business Development Support Regional Education and Awareness
• Drive financial and programming support from a diverse group of stakeholders Clean Energy Trust +Trade Groups +Illinois Venture Capital Community +Corporations +Foundations +State of Il and City of Chicago +Illinois Labs and Universities =Total Contribution from Cluster Members + Total DOE Contribution from Grant Total Cluster Contributions
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
FY1 86,667 87,461 30,000 44,167 18,333 31,667 203,000 501,295 350,000 851,295
7
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
FY2 86,667 87,461 30,000 44,167 18,333 31,667 203,000 501,295 350,000 851,295
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
FY3 86,667 87,461 30,000 44,167 18,333 31,667 203,000 501,295 350,000 851,295
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Total 260,000 262,384 90,000 132,500 55,000 95,000 609,000 1,503,884 1,050,000 2,553,884
Organization Ecosystem Discussion
Agenda
Candidate Technology Platforms for This Region •
Renewable Energy Production and Distribution o o o
•
Smart grid Development and Deployment o
•
New software and hardware and other system integration opportunities
Building technologies and Industrial process improvement o o o
•
Biomass/Biofuels and other alternative fuels Growing wind cluster for installation, manufacturing Solar ramp-up
Combined Heat and Power Significant install base with existing architectural assets Strong corporate representation including Siemens Building Technologies
Energy Storage Technologies o o
Battery expertise from Argonne Johnson Controls-Saft (Advanced Battery Manufacturing) Awarded $300M from DOE $169M in tax credits and other incentives from State of Michigan
•
Electrification and vehicle charging o
•
Build upon Chicago’s RFP
Advanced manufacturing o
Propulsion Technology Strategy which leverages our proximity to automotive supply chain (Michigan, Indiana and Wisconsin) as well as the existing Illinois' manufacturing capacity of Deere, Cat and Navistar
9
Renewable Energy Production and Distribution • Illinois is rich in biomass assets which can be used for energy generation and transportation fuels • Illinois is now home to an existing wind cluster of developers, manufacturers and investors • While Illinois’ solar generation capacity will remain limited there is still a reasonable amount of activity o Exelon City Solar $60M project 10MW
o ComEd currently installing PV panels on 100 homes Include battery storage Includes webportal to display consumption information, renewable energy produced, hourly pricing and battery capacity
o Solar Ramp Up – “ramps up” installed solar capacity to 750 MW by 2015 to meet the 6% RES solar carve out
10
Recovery Act: Batteries and Electric Vehicles • $12 Billion Dollar investment in advanced vehicle technologies o 30 new electric vehicle battery and component manufacturing plants 2009 US Manufacturing Capacity for advanced batteries was 2% 2010 predicted to be 20% 2015 predicted to be 40%
o Support large electric vehicle demonstration projects o $2.6B in Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing (ATVM) loans to Nissan, Fisker and Tesla o 3 new Michigan facilities to produce advanced batteries for vehicles, grid storage, and other applications o $90M awarded to Indiana based Delphi Automotive Systems to build a power electronics manufacturing facility Capacity for 200,000 electric drive vehicles by 2013
• DOE is “invigorating a nationwide advanced vehicle supply chain centered in the Midwest” (source Whitehouse) • 14 Vehicle awards went to Michigan o Several large battery factories (A123, GM, Johnson-Controls, Dow & LG) o Electric drive component factories (GM, Ford, Magna) o Workforce training programs 11
Electrification Ecosystems: Electrification Coalition • •
Non-profit comprised of 14 companies including automakers, battery manufacturers, utilities, smart grid companies and investors Electrification Roadmap: Proposes a set of policies in which geographic areas would compete to be selected as electrification deployment communities and receive amplified incentives for consumers, infrastructure and utilities o Electric Vehicle Deployment Act of 2010 – Senate Bill Overwhelming bipartisan support (19-4 vote) by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on July 21 Concern, however, that this may not be included in the Energy Bill Provides up to $250M per community
o Electric Drive Vehicle Deployment Act of 2010 – House Bill Provides up to $800M per community
•
Biggest challenges o o o o
•
Cost of the vehicles: excess battery capacity and the price of batteries drive up the cost Charging Infrastructure: current business models do not present profitable strategies Electric power sector interface: smart grid capabilities needed for large deployment Consumer acceptance: acceptable substitutions needed for either cost or performance
Overcome these challenges by developing policy which creates programming to support Electrification Ecosystems 12
Electrification Ecosystems: City of Chicago • Chicago Clean Cities Grant Project o $15M for alternative fuel vehicles and infrastructure o Deploy 554 alternative fuel and hybrid vehicles o Install 149 alternative-fuel fueling and electric vehicle charging stations throughout Chicago region
• Competitive sub-grant “Plug-In Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Project” o o o o
$2M RFP for public charging infrastructure Level II chargers Quick chargers Distribution to support current car-sharing fleets including IGo and Zip o All stations must be installed by December 2011 and operational for 3 years 13
Electrification Ecosystem: ComEd • EPRI Electric Transportation Program o GM Collaboration o PHEV truck demonstration o PHEV impacts on the grid o Infrastructure Working Council
• PHEV Demonstration o 10 PHEVs in fleet with integrated smart charging technology and dynamic charge management 14
Nationwide: Electric Vehicles and Charging • Nissan Leaf and Electric Transportation Engineering (charging station maker) o Through partner, Electric Transportation Engineering, installing 11,000 charging stations in Arizona, California, Oregon, Tennessee and Washington, using $100M from DOE
• General Motors (Volt) o Electric Power Research Institute (500 experimental public charging stations) $30 M Federal Grant Focus on charging at home Partners include PG&E, Sacromento Municipal Utility District
• Better Place (San Francisco, San Jose and Oakland) • Coulomb Technologies: Charging station maker o 6 installed in Michigan for study funded by Michigan Public Service Commission
• Customers include municipalities, fleets, retailers, home owners, and corporations 15
Energy Systems Network (ESN) • An initiative of the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership (CICP) which brings together the CEOs of Indiana’s largest employers • The companies include those which produce advanced batteries, engines, transmissions and electronics for hybrid and electric vehicles • Current Project Portfolio o Cooperative partnership between Cummins, Delphi, Allison Transmission, Remy International and Duke Energy seeking to develop fully integrated hybrid power train systems o Commercial scale pilot of plug-in electric vehicles and smart grid technology working together to demonstrate an energy efficient transportation system o Distributed power generation microgrid system to provide scalable power for military and commercial markets
• Recently hosted US China Advanced Technology Vehicle Summit which brought together 100 executives from Chinese auto manufacturing companies and the automotive suppliers from this cluster • We know them well through GLASER 16
Stimulus Funds: Smart Grid and Smart Meters • $3.4B in overall ARRA funding to smart grid o Illinois received $11M (Naperville) ď śDeploy 57,000 smart meters and install infrastructure and software necessary to support and integrate various smart grid functions and the two-way flow of information between the utility and the customers
o $17.2M to Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator (includes 10 states)
17
Statewide Smart Grid and Smart Meter Efforts • ComEd o Installed AMI smart meters in nine towns o In some cases have installed in-home devices to view real-time electricity usage data and real time pricing o Behavioral analysis through different pricing plans
• Real time pricing o CNT, Ameren, ComEd
• Galvin Electricity Initiative o The development of a perfect microgrid on the IIT campus which generates, distributes and regulates local flow of electricity
• Illinois Smart Grid Initiative o Public private working group to examine the nature and benefits of grid modernization and development of policy initiatives
• State of Illinois - Republic of Korea o $20M investments in building technologies for energy efficiency technologies in downtown Chicago buildings o $25M in smart grid R&D 18
Regional Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Platforms • All power propulsion technologies including hybrids, internal combustion engine and transmission improvements (Navistar, Deere, Caterpillar) • Biomass and waste to energy turbines (Caterpillar) • Smart grid components (S&C Electric) • Alternatives fuel technologies (UOP, GTI, ADM) • Building technologies (Siemens) • Original equipment manufacturers (Tenneco, Anixter)
19
Local Efforts • The Clean Energy Trust is strongly supported at state and local levels o ICC Chairman Mannie Flores o Scheduled to meet with a few of the most tenured alderman o Close allies in both the DCEO and Governor Quinn’s office
20
Other Regional Energy Consortia • • • •
New England Clean Energy Council NIREC Colorado Collabatory GLASER
21
Organization Comparison Discussion
Agenda
Example Questions • What is in Federal funding pipeline that we can organize around? • What type of advanced manufacturing could exist here to support various subsectors of energy? • How can the Clean Energy Trust support your organizations? • What are some potential candidates for public/private partnerships? 23