Developing the future energy workforce

Page 74

6.1.1 Knowledge development There are several ways to consider how new knowledge is developed in an innovation system, and indeed the types of knowledge involved. Types of knowledge include technological, organisational, financial and business, behavioural and social, among others. R&D expenditure and patent counts are widely used as a form of output to measure levels of technological innovation. It is well acknowledged that these are imperfect measures, but they are often used due to the lack of alternative data sources. Developing more relevant, timely and rich innovation metrics is an ongoing focus, as identified recently by the Australian Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (DIIS, 2019) and more than a decade ago in the Productivity Commission’s Inquiry into public support for science and innovation (2007). According to these two measures, Australia has varied performance. Figure 11 shows the energy-related R&D expenditure16 as a proportion of GDP for Australia and several comparable OECD countries. Australia has always had less expenditure on overall and energy-related R&D; this expenditure increased throughout the first decade of the 2000s before declining from 2013 and stabilising at a lower rate. Of the five countries shown in Figure 11 below, Australia is the only one where energy-related public R&D declined as a percentage of GDP over this period.

Australia performs well when it comes to patents. It is ranked 7th in the G20 and 8th globally for its share of successful green patents filed between 2000 and 2016. Twenty-one per cent of these patents were in energy, followed by 20% in processes (including adoption of energy efficiency in manufacturing), 11% in transport (including electric vehicles, smart cars and hybrids), 6% in waste and 5% in buildings (ClimateWorks and CPD, 2020). In terms of technological knowledge development, the literature review shows Australia performed well and this is supported by the stakeholder interviews and workshops. Where gaps exist, it is in knowledge development for translation of technological innovation into transformational change.

The main emphasis needs to be on the adoption of technology and the development of skills around those technologies. And indeed, the development and implementation of non-R&D innovation in the form of new business models, systems integration, design, work and management practices, all of these things that are less tangible, not easy to measure, but nevertheless are a key element of an innovation ecosystem and which require both entrepreneurial skills and the ability to collaborate with both complementary firms in a value chain and with research and education institutions.

Interview participant.

Figure 11. Energy-related public R&D as a percentage of GDP 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0

1995

1997

1999 2001 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Australia

Canada

France

Germany

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

UK

From OECD (2019)

16 Energy-related R&D includes all forms of energy research and development activities including for fossil fuel related energy.

OECD statistics average this to be ~30.2% of total public energy-related R7D over the same period (OECD, 2019).

74

E3 Opportunity Assessment: Developing the future energy workforce

2017

2018


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Appendix 6 – Literature reviewed for Work Package 1

6min
pages 120-123

6.3 Strengthening innovation pathways

3min
page 82

Appendix 3 – Work Package 1 and 2 survey

5min
pages 112-114

Table 15. Opportunities to strengthen Australia’s energy innovation system

9min
pages 83-87

Appendix 2 – Selected Australian studies reporting on the clean energy sector

3min
pages 110-111

Appendix 7 – Research roadmap

16min
pages 124-132

7.1 Summary of findings

15min
pages 88-95

Appendix 4 – Studies included in the Work Package 2 rapid review

2min
page 115

Figure 11. Energy-related public R&D as a percentage of GDP

19min
pages 74-79

Table 11. Summary of barriers and facilitators of a clean energy transition

2min
page 59

Figure 6. The energy efficiency market

5min
pages 49-50

Figure 8. How participants foresee shortages in skills/ roles will change in the next five years (N=35

2min
page 56

Figure 5. Preference for survey and projections to be clean energy or energy sector as a whole (N=38

2min
page 46

Figure E-1. Stakeholder involvement

10min
pages 6-9

2.2 Unclear pathways for skills and occupations required to deliver a clean energy transition

1min
page 22

Figure 1. Information priorities from a survey of the clean energy workforce (N=140

7min
pages 18-20

4.2 Methodologies for measuring and projecting the clean energy workforce

9min
pages 35-37

4.3 International approaches – overview

3min
page 38

Table 4. International approaches to energy sector employment – IEA countries

4min
pages 39-40

3.1 Literature review

2min
page 29

2.1 Lack of robust measures to characterise and project the future energy workforce in Australia

2min
page 21
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.