Monday Mailing
Year 26 • Issue 17 6 January 2020 1. The Rise of the Rural Creative Class (Emily Bradley) 2. Forest Service Wilderness Fee Plan Gets Negative Comments (Katie McFall) 3. Foraging, and Forging, Connections in Cities 4. Where Does ‘The West’ Begin? 5. In Rural Areas Without Pain Or Addiction Specialists, Family Doctors Fill In The Gaps (Katie McFall) 6. Proposed Clean Water Act Changes Will Mean Uncertainty, Loss Of Protections For Arizona Waterways 7. World’s Second-Largest Ferry Operator Switching From Diesel to Batteries 8. Oregon Coastal Towns Confront A Fate Tied To Antarctica's Melting Glaciers 9. Insights & Impact: Disaster Response - From Relief to Resiliency 10. WEBINAR – New Discoveries and New Work: Jeff Speck and Jarrett Walker Explore Lessons Learned from Walkable City and Human Transit
1. The Rise of the Rural Creative Class
Quote of the Week:
What a wonderful thought it is that some of the best days of our lives haven't even happened yet. - Anne Frank
Oregon Fast Fact #20
In 1880 a sea cave was discovered near what is now known as Florence. Sea Lion Caves is known to be the largest sea cave in the world.
One of the most persistent myths in America today is that urban areas are innovative and rural areas are not. While it is overwhelmingly clear that innovation and creativity tend to cluster in a small number of cities and metropolitan areas, it’s a big mistake to think that they somehow skip over rural America.
A series of studies from Tim Wojan and his colleagues at the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service documents the drivers of rural innovation. Their findings draw on a variety of data sets, including a large-scale survey that compares innovation in urban and rural areas called the Rural Establishment Innovation Survey (REIS). This is based on some 11,000 business establishments with at least five paid employees in tradable industries—that is, sectors that produce goods and services that are or could be traded internationally—in rural (or non-metro) and urban (metro) areas. The survey divides businesses into three main groups. Roughly 30 percent of firms are substantive innovators, launching new products and services, making data-driven decisions, and creating intellectual property worth protecting; another 33 percent are nominal innovators who engage in more incremental improvement of their products and processes; and 38 percent show little or no evidence of innovation, so are considered to be non-innovators. The first table below charts this breakdown for rural and urban areas. Establishments in urban areas are more innovative, but not
Page 1 of 6