Impact of COVID-19 on household incomes and access to SRHR services by young people

Page 36

Baitambogwe. Whereas the results in the figure above show that contraceptive use was slightly higher in the intervention area (53.85%) than the control (46.15%), the difference is not that striking. This is further confirmed by the results of Pearson chi-square analysis where the P-value of 0.384 is much higher than the alpha of 0.05 to suggest a statistically significant relationship. Likewise, analysis by respondent sex, age and marital status did not also show a significant relationship to explain the slight difference in the use of contraceptives by young people. Results on the contraceptive method used indicate that majority and indeed more than half of (55%) all the young people interviewed used male condoms, followed by injectables (26%) and withdrawal (8%) as shown in figure 11 below. Figure 11: Contraceptive method used during last 12 months. The least used contraceptive methods were female condoms (1%), lactational amenorrhea and implants. The limited Injectables, 26.15 use of lactational amenorrhea as a Male condoms, 55.38 contraceptive method is not surprising considering that majority of the young people who participated in this survey were not married/not in a union, and therefore more likely not to have had children or been breastfeeding. On the other hand, the preference for male condoms may be explained by their availability at the health facility as well as in the community where peer educators reportedly distributed them in open and public places such as trading centres and their homes: Lactational Withdrawal, 7.69 amenorrhea, 1.54 Implants, 3.08 Female condoms, 1.54

Pills, 4.62

We used to receive condoms at home, that we would give to the young people that needed them during the COVID-19 period. I believe every peer educator had condoms in their homes. So that was one of the measures that we had during the lockdown (Reach A Hand Peer Educator) One of the interventions during the lockdown was the distribution of male Condom by putting them at an open place in public like at trading centres and places of convenience (Secretary for Health and Social Services, Mayuge)

Page 24 of 118


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Annex 8: Case Study Documentation Guide

0
page 105

Annex 11: Letter of introduction endorsed by the District Authorities

2min
pages 115-129

Annex 7: Interview Guide for Health Workers / In charges of Health Facilities

1min
page 104

Annex 6: Interview Guide for Peer Educators

3min
pages 102-103

Figure 46: Overall coping strategies adopted by households

10min
pages 70-74

Annex 4: FGD Guide for Caregivers of Young People (Male and Female Annex 5: Interview Guide for District/Sub-county Health Officials and Political Leaders89

5min
pages 99-101

Figure 42: Young people’s satisfaction with SRH services received

1min
page 67

Annex 3: FGD Guide for Young People (Male and Female) Aged 10-24 years

3min
pages 97-98

Figure 21: Community leaders’ support towards SRH of young people

5min
pages 48-50

Figure 41: Who paid for SRH services accessed by young people

2min
page 66

3.4.6 Impact on health spending and utilization of SRH services

2min
page 65

Table 12: Young people’s source of information of SRH during the lockdown

2min
page 47

Figure 8: Reasons for not seeking SRH services

1min
page 32

Figure 11: Contraceptive method used during last 12 months

1min
page 36

Figure 7: SRH services sought and obtained during the lockdown

2min
page 31

Table 4: Demographic characteristics of caregivers

1min
page 23

Figure 6: Young people who sought and obtained SRH services

1min
page 30

1.4.1 Objectives and research questions

2min
page 15

Figure 9: Reasons for not obtaining the services sought

2min
page 33

Figure 2: Forms of paid work engaged in by young people

1min
page 25
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.