Nautilus Telegraph February 2016

Page 1

Generation game Past, present and future seafarers compare notes 28-29

Bridge building Researchers seek to make systems more friendly 22-23

NL nieuws Vier pagina’s met nieuws uit Nederland 32-35

Volume 49 | Number 02 | February 2016 | £3.50 €3.70

Alarm at box sector losses call to the Port of Southampton F last month is the 19,224TEU ultra-

Pictured right making a maiden

large containership MSC Zoe. The 192,237gt Panama-flagged vessel is the third in MSC’s series of 20 ‘Oscarclass’ mega-ships. Experts warned last month that losses in the container shipping sector could rise to US$5bn in 2016 as a result of falling freight rates, deteriorating demand and a growing surplus of tonnage. A report from the consultancy group Drewry said rates in the sector may have fallen by as much as 9% last year — when freight volumes increased by just 0.8% and ships totalling 1.7m TEU came into service. Failure to cut capacity will lead to ‘an acceleration of freight rate reductions and industry-wide losses in 2016,’ it warned. Picture: Gary Davies/Maritime Photographic

IMO urged to act on ship stability Union voices support for research recommending higher passengership survivability standards

P

Nautilus International is backing top-level moves to improve the standards governing the survivability of cruiseships and ro-pax vessels. Proposals for stricter safety measures have been tabled at the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) as a result of research conducted in response to the Costa Concordia disaster in January 2012. The IMO’s ship design and construction sub-committee (SDC) will debate calls for changes to the SOLAS Convention rules on subdivision and damage stability. The recommendations are based on studies examining grounding and collision risks, watertight doors, raking damage, and damage stability. ‘The hard reality is that passengerships and ro-pax vessels are not built to the standard to which they could be built,’ said Nautilus senior national secretary Allan Graveson. Speaking at the IMO on behalf of the International Federation of Ship Masters Associations, he supported International

01_front.indd 1

Transport Workers’ Federation concerns over the ‘safe return to port’ concept. ‘Although this is a laudable aim, the assumption that any ship is “unsinkable” is a dangerous one and is certainly not a situation that has been achieved to date,’ Mr Graveson added. ‘For this reason we are fully supportive of measures to improve the watertight integrity and stability of passenger vessels and to enable the master to make a correct decision.’ A paper submitted to the SDC by 28 EU member states and the European Commission says studies commissioned by the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) show the need for a new level of the required subdivision index ‘R’ which is used to determine the probability of survival of a ship. The EMSA research examined the levels of risk to six different ship types arising from grounding and contact accidents and concluded that risks from side grounding were significantly higher than from collision and bottom grounding. The EU member states propose amend-

ments to SOLAS that would raise the ‘R’ subdivision index in line with a formula related to the number of people onboard a ship. A document submitted by the United States notes that the gradual increase in the ‘R’ index proposed by the EMSA research ‘reflects the stark reality that mass evacuation to life-saving appliances for very large passengerships is extremely difficult and undesirable’. However, the proposals are set to face some opposition — with European shipbuilders submitting a paper arguing that raising the ‘R’ level would widen the ‘significant safety gap between new and existing ships, which — due to resulting economic differences — could lead to significant market distortions’. The European yards argue that the IMO should instead focus on ways to implement ‘appropriate and cost-effective safety standards on existing ships through retrofitting and/or operational measures’. Mr Graveson said the EMSA research

had made the case for change clear and had vindicated the Union’s arguments about the watertight integrity and stability issues affecting the safety of passengerships and ro-ro ferries. The IMO will be examining measures to improve damage stability, including double side skins and double bottom protection. ‘There are questions about the depth to which double side skins should go,’ Mr Graveson said. ‘While double side skins and double bottoms may give some protection against raking damage, they will not necessarily give adequate protection against oblique or acute collisions involving two or more bulkheads. ‘We believe, therefore, that the ultimate solution is adopting the recommendation made in Lord Mersey’s inquiry into the Titanic — giving ships greater longitudinal and transverse sub-division,’ he added. ‘Such construction will give the ability to cross-flood to avoid heavy lists and capsize and to enable a damaged vessel to settle in the water,’ he pointed out.

Inside F Slater support

How Nautilus fund has helped another seafarer to develop his career — page 19 F Central question

Maritime welfare leader opens a debate on the future of seafarers’ centres — page 21

F A capital idea

The Port of London Authority reveals plans to boost Thames traffic — page 25

20/01/2016 14:02


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.