Pond Side Newsletter of the Friends of Killens Pond November, 99
5k Run A Success
Stream Watch
On October 9th the Friends Group hosted our first 5k walk/run. Forty boys, girls, men and woman participated and by all accounts the event was a success. The winning time of 17:02 was posted by Leslie Wright. That’s a very respectable time for 5 kilometers and Mr. Wright deserves an extra measure of respect because he ran another 5k race in Rehoboth hours before winning ours.
By Rob Crimmins
Angela Brown was the fastest woman. She finished in 21:30. The Delaware Striders running club handled the timing and recording of place winners. As usual, park personnel were very helpful. The men and women on Killens Pond’s staff are worth their weight in ostrich feathers. Thanks again for everything you do. Friends members manned the route, handed out racing numbers, poured drinks, hauled ice and cheered the runners, many of whom expressed their approval of how everything was handled. It was fun for them and us and we made a few hundred dollars from the registration fees and sponsorships. The companies that helped were Penninsula Oil (they own Uncle Willie’s), Van Sants Orchards, Food Lion, Comcast Cable and Pond Productions. In our regular meeting the following week the group agreed that we would do it again next year. Thanks to all the members that helped.
A stream’s health can be determined through chemical analysis but testing for individual chemicals can be expensive. Volunteers in the Delaware Stream Watch Program observe wildlife, primarily insect larvae and other macroinvertabrates, to gauge the health of a stream. On October 9th Chris Brown with the Delaware Nature Society was at the Abbott’s Mill Nature Center, and in the stream behind it, to describe how. The workshop was well attended. Most of the participants were educators in a Wilmington College teacher certification program and the others were landowners who wanted to know more about the waterways on or near their property. Two members of the Friends of Killens Pond were among them. Chris is from the Ashland Nature Center in Hockessin, which is on the Red Clay Creek. The ground there is different from the land around Abbott’s Pond and Johnson Branch so the first aspect of stream survey that he explained was the effect of geography. Hockessin is in the piedmont of the Appalachians. Bedrock is at the surface in places and elevation can vary quite a bit along a stream’s length. The Red Clay flows more swiftly than almost any stream in Sussex or Kent Counties where the bedrock is under thousands of feet of sand and the slopes are gentle. A rapidly flowing stream will not support the same wildlife in the same way as one that flows as slowly as the Johnson Branch. The other major geographic influence is whether or not the stream is in a tidal area. Salinity and the water’s daily rise and fall are the issues in streams that are affected by tides. These factors are among those that establish what can live in any given stream but they don’t change the basic method of determining whether or not a stream is healthy. That’s done mostly by identifying and counting the critters that live there. If a stream is well populated by a wide variety of plants, animals and insects than it is a
Vol 1 Issue 1
healthy stream. If there are very few insect larvae or few species are represented the stream is probably sick. The Stream Watch Program enlists the help of volunteers to monitor streams to identify the ones that need help and protect the ones that don’t. If you adopt a stream, what they ask you to do is to survey a stream or “tax ditch” either once a month or quarterly. To complete the survey you make qualitative and quantitative observations of a 100-yard length of stream and record what you found on a data sheet, which you send to DNREC. Over fifty categories of information are recorded and they include the name of the surveyor and the name of the stream, it’s watershed and location, velocity, width, depth and bottom type, the water color and odor, the surface coating if any and the streambed coating. The data sheet also asks about algae, vegetation, fish, reptiles, birds, mammals, amphibians, trees, shrubs and small plants. When pressed Chris admitted that the survey appears far more scientific than it is. The main purpose is as a starting point for investigation by professionals if a stream shows signs of damage and as a means of educating the volunteers so that they will appreciate and assist in protecting their neighborhood streams. The back page of the data sheet asks for information that requires some detective work. The “macroinvertebrate survey” is the fun part for those who are fascinated by
a living world that is normally unseen and according to Chris it’s the most important aspect of the survey. If you were (or are) a kid who kept (or keeps) bugs in jars you might want to consider adopting a stream. Macroinvertibrates on the Tidal Survey Data Sheet include crabs, shrimp,
1