茩嫚 特辑 : 滨水空间
8
12 20 28 36
142
曐賂俋㭠犦㫅橭
146
羠䂏嗴鲺
敤詇醮婩僨
152
琒㫅抴鬣⿺
斾諦瓟烐㡊瑧䯖怇㬬牆撾裶䄄
156
艁鎽䇗筧暚啹跤宆
呚曗雲
160
雲趼壎餱俋叧蹉儫熅翵霎壚販釴
＃酽焎酽熅￥蛵餱醣艊䂏醑㓕瓟烐鰱嶼僨嗴
164
荢嘪趼髕霎䅳
梲蘇㝰
170
䉣杚怷墕膗㒂琒旝誼
怇㬬謚墡趵梥棾烐嚩ⅩⅩ㛅醢犦椂犑瓟焎悅㡊婩僨桹䅡駡誒鮂鲇䂏墢氈趼
176
橁艤䨺轄偡咇
〔婠詀呺㣻〕釆㪝㯵
180
Legend 梥棾鳏嗋頯梮䒛
人物
184
囑嬱鄮僔䯖慘鍖昦躐ⅩⅩ豕㛅覈暺
关注
198
叧∥誤尓
釆鍎艊㛣
New Office Works 婠詀 妷㳚
贜≧㳚婠詀㛄㚧鲇烏忞跤蹺 暀玜㛄㚧
XAA 婠詀鲇烏忞㕼狣墡慘咇 䒛
偧峐㛄㚧蔠裮咇
姃㓇陝㛄㚧 LWK + PARTNERS
醢犦㒂嚩頯梮烐嚩婩僨醮婠㛄ⅩⅩ 㛅醢犦㒂嚩䯒䇗筧䯓桹䅡駡誒鮂鲇䂏棜寋㪕
〔婠詀呺㣻〕釆㪝㯵
╙壈㓇陝醮㛄㚧 48
烐粶乵啂謭醣鲷爠謎鰱嶼╙壈㓇陝僨嗴醮呺㣻
54
鏅磍㒂嚩
62
獿鰷瑌㢋鄀岄㯵▕鰱╙壈㛄㚧
66
妭墕煱瓈 CBD 縟烏嶼㓇陝
202
呏贜忂烐㭠 & 孭蹺 RSAA 婠詀鲇烏忞 / 妵厸籾墡慘咇
204 嗴㓋
剓珜䯖抲緣瓟烐旝誼裶䄄閔㠮
䅘俍
棜呯 椂杒
Henning Larsen 婠詀鲇烏忞
70
澓烲䂏焎踽㪀瓟烐駡艤
74
▕鲋羠尓醮鳏旝艊瓟烐╙壈㛄㚧䯤唻㛣 Sasaki
200 趵翨㡊㚵
205
Sasaki 媑旽 鵛㿼鳙
杛㓅醮羠尓㛄㚧 䟳䞽鐒瓟焎駡艤
嚟蟍杛㓅婠詀㛄㚧鲇烏忞
86
夠孭鍈㒂䃸酽梕䯒鮋顲訥䯓敘㬬
90
䂏曗烐旝誼羠尓艤
94
䦺琒羠尓╙ G1 頯嗴駡艤
98
醢犦頯鹘銊梮䒛烐嚩駡艤
曀賣㓇陝㛄㚧䅳
烐蓴㛄㚧
謚㚶䯤杛㓅㛄㚧壎艊屒鍊
GVL 屗乵蹺䅕䇗筧䂏煛昷橉忞 酽呍㛄㚧
楁㭄圐
婠詀醮⺸鉝 106
醢犦韅陣岄鉢㓇陝
110
艀驎燰 M2 珪韅蔅俧
116
䅖咲鐒瓟焎㳟
120
B.I.G 犦紒瑌攝嶯艤
TFP Farrells Architects 讜牨囑慘㛄㚧墡慘咇
╙嗴㓋跤宆
OMA 婠詀㛄㚧鲇烏忞
襹檕蛼
謚㚶䯤饅鲋瓟烐婩敡裶䄄艊㛄㚧屒鍊
126
檚璏琒旝誼跤宆
132
䅃痺琒珪咃䇗斞跤宆
138
醎珜旝誼烰
㾮獰絑
忶閾 · 閾㫶孭婠詀鲇烏忞 䆙蔠犖婠詀㰊壈㛄㚧鲇烏忞
Kohn Pedersen Fox
㛀韃螻䎐 婠詀恖梮
206 婠詀棞旿 207
82
LAAB Architects
㛄㚧鲲閔
〔婠詀呺㣻〕釆㪝㯵
CONTENTS Feature: Waterfront Space
8 Editorial
142
Harbour Kiosk LAAB Architects
146
Growing Up Pavilion New Office Works
POLICY & DEVELOPMENT
152
Lakeside Plugin Tower People’s Architecture Office
12
Integrating Waterfront Resources, Creating Dynamic Space
156
Bailian Group Fashion Centre Yanqingli Stefano Boeri Architetti China
SONG Chunhua
160
Liva Riverside Book Bar Renewal Lacime Architects
20
Yangtze River Delta Waterfront Development under “the River and the
164
Dongpo Academy Janson Xian Architect+Associates (XAA)
Creek” Demonstration
170
Tsingpu Yangzhou Retreat Neri&Hu Design and Research Office
ZHU Jianhao
176
Taoyuan Greenhouse BIAS Architects
28
Shaping the Future Waterfront of Post-Industry: An Interview with
180
Legend Gallery LWK + PARTNERS
184
Practice Persistently, Regenerate Consistently:
Shanghai Yangpu Riverside Investment and Development Co., Ltd. Chairman ZUO Weidong
Editorial Office of Architectural Practice
36
Shanghai West Bund Art Waterfront Development and Construction:
Figure
A Dialogue with ZHANG Ming Editorial Office of Architectural Practice
An Interview with Shanghai West Bund Development (Group) Co., Ltd. Chairman LI Zhonghui
Editorial Office of Architectural Practice
Focus
198
Society News
URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN
48
Development and Practice of Urban Planning for Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
202 Forum Review
Region under Guidance of Water Environment CHEN Tian
204 Exhibitions
West Bund Media Port to Enhance Cultural Space Quality
205 Building Technology
in Waterfront LI Ding, YANG Chen
206 Materials
Urban Design of Shenzhen Bay Headquarters
207 Design Products
54 62
Henning Larsen Architects 66
Urban Planning of Guangzhou Lijiao CBD Ramboll Studio Dreiseitl & RSAA / Büro Ziyu Zhuang
70
Wuhan Yangtze Riverfront Park Sasaki
74
Waterfront Urban Design Based on Ecology and Humanity: A Dialogue with Sasaki ZHANG Dou, HSUEH Ming-Jen
LANDSCAPE & ECOLOGICAL DESIGN
82
Manli Cape Agence TER
86
Urban Transformation of Old West Gate (Laoximen) Phase I Ecoland Planning and Design Corp.
90
Changchun Water Culture Ecological Park SHUISHI
94
Luxelakes Eco-City Art Expo Park GVL International Changsha Scheme Institute
98
Shanghai MOMA Museum Waterfront Park YIYU design
Epilogue: The Thinking of Landscape Architects LIN Yifeng
ARCHITECTURE & INSTALLATION
106
Shanghai Shipyard General Planning TFP Farrells Architects
110
M2 Tourist Terminal TJAD Original Design Studio
116
Lujiazui Exhibition Centre OMA Architects
120
B.I.G Haizhu Bay Creative Zone Atelier cnS
Epilogue: About Waterfront Public Space Design ZHONG Guanqiu
126
Meixihu International Culture & Arts Centre Zaha Hadid Architects
132
Yangcheng Lake Tourist Transportation Center Kengo Kuma and Associates
138
Victoria Dockside Kohn Pedersen Fox
200 Industry Information
▕鲋羠尓醮鳏旝艊瓟烐╙壈㛄㚧䯤唻㛣 Sasaki
寚㬫艊╙壈誼醭鳢繳羠鑫俋㳝艊昦╙䯖雩懲╙壈鳏訥哣
WATERFRONT URBAN DESIGN BASED ON ECOLOGY AND HUMANITY: A DIALOGUE WITH SASAKI
嶗桖䗮艊懲羮䎣籹、㫥喥㒄烢謾跤桹瀷籌荁唻㪏俋艊薴
媑旽䯤Sasaki䗮鄀踽諎䯖醢犦駡誒岄苳䯖銊蹺杛㓅㛄㚧壎鄖∥彾蘚䯖 銊蹺燍謀杛㓅婠詀壎䯖SITES嶗LEED BD+C㚪㛇豕趵鳏蘚 ZHANG Dou: Senior Associate of Sasaki, Director of Sasaki Shanghai office, ASLA, PLA, SITES AP, LEED AP BD+C 鵛㿼鳙䯤Sasaki䗮鄀踽諎䯖銊蹺杛㓅㛄㚧壎鄖∥彾蘚䯖銊蹺燍謀杛㓅婠詀壎 HSUEH Ming-Jen: Senior Associate of Sasaki, ASLA, PLA
“滨江地块的重点应放在空间的对话 与多样性上，物理空间上的宽度也 让设计具有更多的包容性。”
AP
㓉屟￥㒄踃䯖崯偧駁荱嬜詵㓉屟鮪㛄㚧跤艊嶯躏䯩
姪㫧酽澒鎢俋䯖懲╙壈駡邁婩敡裶䄄恔㪉桖侸艊懲羮鍎 㠮杛㓅䯖嶗桖侸唻醎悜䈑烢㪏濱艊杛㓅、醮澑讜暚䯖䆠菑
媑旽鍈壎䯖崯桪鮪蔠裮醢犦瓟焎暚抲勢╙壈㛄㚧跤艊＃詵
媑旽
詵㓉屟醮詵㫊屟㰊曧彿鮪瓟烐嶼㛄㚧跤酽茻㳛㓉艊㒄踃、
粶乵嶯㛌艊㬜玪亱媰䯖敤姛艊噴詇鍎髦婩僔哣賽饅燍╙
鳏貙俍羠唻烐艊賜㡜㬬喥鑫證諍醢㬜烐鍖嗋艊浧媀、烐
壈跤艊䇹烐諎絔倀炚鎬黌誼詵镾夃棾艊疦鮪儨鑚䯖唻杛
跀酓鳏貙夃棾羠牆㡊瑧䯖烐艊侸蟢嫮尓雩酓鳏貙夃棾羠
㓅艊䋸屟抲熱鑫桖䗮艊㒄烢、偧駁妕
俋㳝艊懲羮䈑烢
牆跤艊蠻倐砎、烐跀酽茻曧瓟烐羠牆艊跤宆䯖啔烐嚩㡊
嶗䋸屟㛄㚧䯖嬔嬔彾踵㛄㚧彾嗚醮壠艊饅䀽嬁閼罌踃、
瑧婜輩勢╙壈廟㯵嫮彾瓟烐嶼䯖曧墮慁瓟烐╙壈逫駥艊 樮宆撾㳝、偧楇烐嚩醮╙壈躐䄄鈇貂鎽跀䯖㮰躅烐嚩艊
AP
Sasaki 贋醮㫓跤蹺嬟侸瓟烐╙壈㛄㚧艊覅㡡䯖饅鲋醭讜
嗚镾倀謾唻╙壈羠牆艊嶯躏啔俋怇悈怬、㫥㳚艊鎽跀藥
営姪艊瓟烐裶䄄㛄㚧䯖Sasaki 桹瀟鲢鄽䖢嶗絔㓦䯩
愥鑫呺鉢醢艊鎽跀ⅩⅩ偧詵㫊屟。羠尓鈫酖艊㫪醁屟。懲 羮嗚镾艊饅鎽訵䯥雩藥愥㓉鄡醢艊鎽跀ⅩⅩ㬦㫓荱勢烐。
“水系一直是滨水生活的中心，将水 岸资源延伸到城市内部形成滨水区， 是保持滨水城市繁荣的核心力量。”
㳕㛅䯤鐞呂髤 Interviewer: XIAO Ningfei 旝叄斾絔䯤㯞曂 Text editing: ZHENG Xin
鵛㿼鳙 嬁閼踮烐鰱鱖艊饅䀽罌踃躐酽曧鲮㬦跀酛艊鄩鄬、鮪㫓 詛飨㫜㪟浧媀醮鄽牨僨嗴踵魯艊屒㣵嬁閼醣䯖醭諎曧妕 艊瓟烐鰱鱖醮烐嚩徏╙壈鐍絔䄄艊體⺲、詆酽跣踽㒄罌
媑旽
Sasaki 鮪跤蹺壈鯫艊呺㣻僔鲋 1999 妘、熱鲋酽跣記磢 艊梽∥䯖鄽粷麇雲攢絔墡俋叧斊戦艊叆酽炓魯羠鞯鄻䯖
Sasaki 鮪醢犦飝墕熅跏嚩艊╙壈㛄㚧覅㡡跤䯖唻醢犦艊 烐㠮嶗羠尓粶乵㫧
嶗╙壈翨䉳醢艊賠韌䯖㰊曧瓟烐鰱鱖㛄㚧婩僨忞䉳踮艊
蠿跤䯖崯㓌嬱醢犦艊烐㠮嶗羠尓粶乵桹抲䗮讖䯩㫤桹瀟
椥俋慙徔、
鲢䈑㒄敘櫞艊鰱昷䯩 媑旽
鑫獿駱艊蔠裮、鮪㫝竊妘艊斾熎㫓
2012 妘玜獣謚䯖飝墕熅艊烐㠮嬱勢嬟俋艊抲䗮䯒蹕 1䯓、
婠襫跏嚩艊鄖讜敱姉、濕羮烐跀艊窹㠮裶䄄慘踵駡邁艊
貶羾鲋╙壈跤宆嶼䇹焑諦牐艊䃾䎪妛梥㓦噴䯖鹾熅嚩薴
幆
㠮誼䃾䎪賜磢跛㳛䯖飝墕熅艊烐㠮鮪澑躐謚妛晹㫧酽澒
㡶娡徏牆撾翨䉳䯖婠襫飨烐踵踽㪀艊瓟烐羠牆、儂
躐䯖瓟焎鰱鱖艊㳛砎姉敡鮪裶䄄艊唻㛣醮侸樭屟醢䯖窹
敘櫞、鮪粷桹艊╙壈烐跀跤䯖鮪梥㫧
絔裶䄄醢艊哃姪雩㚯㛄㚧錨桹桖侸艊藥咷屟、
騙醣䯖侸斶誆㬦㫓亱鎢蟢歓犛妽訵昷媀䯖懲烐㠮嬱勢桹 䅡艊敘櫞、鍖鮪酽鲢桹梽∥㫧
俋㓇浧敘㬬艊嵔
斾鉢熎絔艊暃熅㭠䯖徏
醭讜営姪躐䄄艊瓟烐鰱鱖唻鲋炚鎬黌㫍醮╙壈䋸屟艊㬎
鄽㫓跀酛屟㛄㚧艊昦熅㭠跤䯖烐㠮嶗羠尓粶乵賒桹暺朄
姉屟䯖㬦夠婠襫鮪唻▕蕬㛄昻艊薴屟㒄烢醢䯖雩㬬彾㛄
艊抲䗮、羾 Sasaki 踽慁㛄㚧艊醢犦鈷呯踕炚趼棾杛㓅㪀
Sasaki 鮪跤蹺艊呺㣻跤䯖㛄㚧艊擔㳛砎嶗謾骼蹺咲荁瀷
㚧醮墡蠿。羠尓躐䄄艊贜婳、Sasaki 踽慁艊瓟烐䎋茩㬦
鄡跤艊侸棷熅㭠䯖醮嬨烰㣗㭠駡艤跤艊梽鯫熅喥曧嬟偡
桹瀟鲢箏竑躐侐䯩
夠∥㬛㫓㣮叧蟨艊諦慘䯖妕
艊籌厸、
誼艊㛄㚧䯖妛踵謾桹敱魖鰱醮呺昻抲辭鑫墮䆭、 AP
AP
踃曧睏茻鲋烐嚩艊橯檕墡蠿、橯醢醮橯醣裶䄄唻鲋幆
鲋 2012 妘澐媀彾襫䯖踵彿髦謭跤蹺艊趵踽抲辭桖鎢鮪鰱
雩墱桹 20 妘䯖嫕設崯艊筧䄯曧偧駁惼嗴跤蹺壈鯫艊䯩
妛啔鳏髦煢媆勢瓟烐艊婩敡裶䄄㳚、
鲋烐跀艊╙壈踽妔㭠㫤曧䗮楯㭠㣵䯖啂靪鑫嬟侸╙壈
荁㪏鲋瓟焎㪏哃艊営姪䯖瓟熅鰱鱖桹荁唻桖侸艊梽∥詛
〔婠詀呺㣻〕䯒AP䯓 Sasaki 彾襫墱桹 60 蠶妘䯖㫧駱跤蹺壈鯫
瓟烐艊婩敡裶䄄徏曧熅唻嚩䯖懲鳏髦巃糴勢㦳侐瓟烐嶼䯖
諤昷躐䄄艊濕苩、
Sasaki 贋鎢鑫羾單㽺䇗筧鄩鄬艊妭墕烰杛昦╙艊╙壈 㛄㚧覅㡡、嫕暚彿捨捨贋鎢墡慘䯖慘踵駡誒跤鳢桹艊跏謖
媑旽
跤蹺鄽證鑫鄽牨䗮㬫僨嗴。蛼∥寚㬫黌誼艊蠐鴛妘䯖妭俋
雲⻈杛㓅㛄㚧壎躐酽䯖雩桹妟贋醮鑫㫥跣䎋茩、Sasaki
炓
唻昦䞸鲇窹艊扟糴姪䉯夠䗮、鳏髦嬟咷曀㬎姉黌誼䯖
筧䄯桭鄮鮪覅㡡跤驔嬱〓钂䯖妛羾澑㫧駱跤蹺壈鯫、鮪
鹾夠夠愗悹黌誼、㫥喥懲嬱昦艊㛄㚧屒嶎嶗昷媀鮪懲羮
躐謚艊竊妘㳚䯖Sasaki 鮪跤蹺艊㛄㚧䎋茩侸䇗跤鮪╙壈
鍎艊嗃䉳醢荁唻咷曀驔嬱㚪詵、磢鍖䯖㫥妛醭訵鲋忞桹
㛄㚧嶗樍艤㓇陝䎘╪、
艊昦䞸鲇窹㰊∥䎌絔彾覈鰱羠樰僨颿。㭚鰱婩颭、驔嬱 醢嗃噴詇鍎艊敆慁鞣磢曧鮪茩頌艊蛼∥棷鬣醣 , 懲㛄㚧
鮪 2002 妘嶗 2003 妘䯖彿髦鰓時贋鎢鑫 2008 譯鲷倿
僉嬱彾嗚艊饅䀽、玜毞鰱鑫㓦嫕醣艊敤詇啂謭䯖妛鞲跤
㫜∥艊╙壈㛄㚧覅㡡嶗杛㓅㛄㚧覅㡡䯖妛跏漛惽嬱俧誈、
啀烢敆慁䯖∥唻僉嬱㛄㚧攝昦艊彾嗚夃棾墤俋夎錫、
慘踵驔钂雜瀕䯖麹磢踽窩昷桭鄮妛梥鏂羮彿髦呺昻㛄㚧 昷橉䯖磢鍖 Sasaki 鮪╙壈㛄㚧嶗杛㓅㛄㚧昷䉳艊䇕驟呺
䗮㬫艊僨嗴夃棾鑫俋㳝艊婠㛄䯖鍖唻鄫頺艊饅尒鞣磢䈑
撾鮪跤蹺嬱勢鑫桖妭熼艊㚪詵䯖彿髦鮪跤蹺艊呺㣻雩婩
㒄暚䄄艊煆猭、茩頌艊杛㓅昻墡恖梮嶗墡頯烐妕䯖飨倀
僔謭桖俋艊䎘╪怳嗴、
飰躡趵艊恖梮塒㳝䯖鞣磢醮蹺廟暀昦桸婬艊㛄㚧攝慘嬟 醭與㱚、誖雜鰱蠩歓鮪謾呅蹺咲詵飨㪇曀驔嬱彾嗚艊恖
2008 妘䯖彿髦恔扟鑫鮪跤蹺艊訅酽跣俋矇駡艤䎋茩ⅩⅩ
梮嶗會熴䯖嬔嬔嬟䇏夃棾魑鳏瓕嶯艊酁楇、鞲㛄㚧黥僔䯖
醢犦鈷呯踕炚趼棾杛㓅㪀鄡艊㛄㚧、證鄽 5 妘艊暚䄄䯖彿
㛄㚧壎喥䈑㒄唻夠羮棞旿倀嫕鰱瀷㪏彾祾艊昻墡恖梮嶗
髦鞲㓇陝斾絔。駡艤㛄㚧䯖勢昻墡粷鯫桽烏䯖瑪蠿贋醮
會熴鑫祾鲋宆䯥鍖㛄㚧昷橉雩䈑㒄婠襫鮪飨澑踵▕蕬艊
嶗㣥㤱鑫㫥跣荁嫕鲋鄟郿跤俖駡艤蠐鰓躐酽䉳蠘艊俋矇
恖梮㭇㪝躐醢䯖忴镾呝彾䗮㠮㳝艊慘閔、
駡艤艊侸豕趵㛄㚧嶗婠㛄、鮪澑梕䄄䯖Sasaki 醢犦駡誒 74
竑㪝䯤瓟烐裶䄄 | ╙壈㓇陝醮㛄㚧
Feature: Waterfront Space | Urban Planning and Design
1. 飝墕熅跏嚩╙壈㛄㚧蛵嶯蹕 Suzhou Creek urban design diagram
2020.01
婠詀呺㣻 Architectural Practice
75
鮪踕炚趼棾䎋茩跤䯒蹕 2䯓䯖給錫婠㛄駡艤艊梽∥䯖彿髦
AP
瓟烐鰱嶼艊婩僨醮婠㛄∥狇倀勢╙壈㛄㚧。婠詀㛄㚧。杛
㬦㫓唻粷桹侸棷熅㭠呺昻玜獣。妕䉳鄡嫮詛茻僉媣。怳
㓅㛄㚧訵侸跣粶頺、偧駁荱嬜嫕鞔跤蹺╙壈婠㛄㫓蠿跤
俋昢䉳。㩻誼䖉嚩。亱鎢瑍鰱訵忲瀇䯖醭鳢椥俋鰱敘櫞
叅鮪艊諤粶頺躐䄄闛頺艊粷㝧䯩唻梥棾艊婩僨婠㛄桹瀟
鑫烐㠮䯖啔囑棾艊蠐貙烐抲緣踵醑貙烐䯖鍖鹾鮪熕熅攝
鲢婠㚴䯩
㬬鑫俋㳝艊羠窹槼峗鰱䯖懲烐嚩嶼╪彾踵鳏嶗靕磢邁羠 艊㳛㒄鯫忞、鮪嬨烰㣗㭠駡艤䎋茩跤䯒蹕 3䯓䯖彿髦㬦㫓
鵛㿼鳙 鞲證諍艊㓕姪棾荱䯖╙壈㛄㚧薶呺曧酽跣㪏昦艊叧蟨、
唻梽鯫熅䖉嚩艊攝昦侐絔䯖藥愥瑪䉳㩻誼䖉嚩。亱鎢鳏
婠詀。杛㓅。㓇陝㰊桹謾桖獿㫨艊證諍醮嬁閼撾、鮪㫓
墡瑍鰱慘踵
㭠䇹烐㫧駱熅㭠艊頌焏䯖熕熅蟢歓瑍鰱歓
詛竊鴛妘跤䯖╙壈艊僨嗴俋㰊婠襫鮪唻㓇陝咷蠘籹艊㬉
窹墮慁烐㠮訵忲瀇䯖墮䆭鑫梽鯫熅烐㠮艊䂏蹼擊姾䯖雩
烢醮婩僨㬫姪艊鲅悘醢、㫝妘棾鮪╙壈桖昦醮叅㳝僨嗴
抲緣鑫熅㭠艊槼峗鰱麽過、
艊俋粶乵醣䯖唻鲋╙壈䏣㞒。裶䄄鐍絔㫤桹╙壈㡊瑧艊 姉羮玪玪嬱勢㳛㓉、╙壈㛄㚧忞怹甡艊＃橯檕￥㓕頥詵飨 鑫俋夿姪
啔裶䄄詇耚扢甡熱窹絔裶䄄醮呺䅕艊撋慘豈賒䯖媆啂敤
艊敘櫞䯖磢鍖㫥貙扥昻茩頌鞣磢誆鮪酽鲢啢矇熅㭠跤嬱
姛。婩僨縟。㫜鬫縟醮婠詀壎訵贋醮呺昻婠㛄雜瀕䯖邁
勢呺昻、鮪╙壈艊踽妔熅㭠跤䯖偧䧫犑焎嶗飝墕熅䯖謾
婠酽跣唻㛣妕詬、
麹磢飨醢橉籌唻熅㭠艊烐㠮嶗羠尓粶乵㰊㫧
熅㭠㛄㚧艊㳛宆鞣磢鮪鲋䅂焈、㫝跏妘㩼㩼砮砮艊㠵㬦 墡蠿雩鳢鳢匯翽鮪幆
鲮㬦鉢跀艊婠㛄嶗㫪扟醢䯖妛梥
唻熅㭠烐㠮。羠尓粶乵倀瓟烐嶼艊懲羮嗚镾㫧
酛酽鍊
㳝䯖䀨俢鑫瑪䉳抲緣瓟烐裶䄄閔㠮艊梽∥䯖懲謾鮪暀謚 桹椥俋詵镾䈑㒄㫧 AP
㫝妘棾 , 羾鲋敤姛唻駡邁婩敡裶䄄艊㳛㓉 , 醢犦艊瓟焎裶 䄄墱鄽嫮彾酽跣㪏䗮艊㡽砎䯖唻鲋幆
跀酛艊櫕絔醮㠵
㬦。墡趵㭤鯰艊敘㬬醮斾諦㰊桹朄魳艊抲緣、
鲈漛敘㬬䯖㬬彾侸昷䉳艊犗㠿、
Architectural Practice (AP) Sasaki was founded over 60
瀷㪏詵嵲艊曧䯖羾鲋杛㓅艊羠尓鼷䄂嗚镾鮪鄽牨麽過醢
years ago and has worked in China for 20 years. How did
醢犦艊瓟烐粶乵薟粷熱醭讜艊╙壈営姪嶗婠詀嫮媀䯖偧
艊無獻䯖踮烐艊杛㓅㡊瑧嬔嬔⺖╙壈婩僨悘魯擇懪 , 啂靪
you decide to get into China market in the beginning?
駁荱嬜㬦㫓＃酽焎酽熅￥㫧
駡邁婩敡裶䄄⺖慼紙徏⺖鉝駱醭㬎嫕艊嗚镾䯖俋矇艊╙
╙壈嶼╪艊釟諦醮㫪扟䯩
壈駡艤醮╙壈謾骼踽㒄婩敡裶䄄儂鍖曧蕚藣誼艊、荁㪏 鵛㿼鳙 鰱絔醢艊裶䄄竑嬕䯖㙲偧熅牐徏曧嘪閙鄡䯖夠慘踵陝鰓 嶼╪艊俍磢㫅翨、
敤嶼╪醢艊陝鰓賒曧鳏踵㚪呯艊跀
鲋醢跫鄅㫧
Sasaki’s practice in China ? ZD China has gone through rapid economic and social
ZHANG Dou (ZD) Sasaki began practicing in China in 1999.
development over the past forty years, which resulted
Introduced by Professor SUN Yimin from South China
in a high acceptance of new things. It is rather easy for
University of Technology by chance, Sasaki entered
people to adapt to changes and even embrace them. In
the urban design competition of Guangzhou Fareview
this case, new design ideas and approaches are relative-
艊瓟焎裶䄄婠㛄 , 犑趼頌瓡艊跫贜旝誼駡
艤醮嬨烰㒂嚩瓟烐穻嶼澐鮪㫧
AP Compared with other countries, what’s different from
艊㓇陝醮婠㛄䯖墱鄽婩
酛䯖婠襫鮪證諍艊閗酖醢䯖雩醮蛼∥鄽牨艊牆誤踎哣荁
僔菑菋鲋瓟焎艊羠尓醮旝誼麽過唻鲋壈炓羠牆醮╙壈裶
Palace, organized by the KINGOLD Group. As one of the
ly easily accepted by users. However, it doesn’t mean
饅、瀯跣陝呯艊嶼╪鮪覅鲅醮鄖讜艊粶乵醣䯖玪玪僨嗴
䄄艊媆啂屟、彿髦梕㚾梥棾艊㛄㚧扢㫧䯖詵飨啔瓟烐嶼
only two Chinese landscape designers at Sasaki then, I
that all new things will root and flourish everywhere.
╪艊杛㓅醮╙壈㛄㚧會熱酽跣瀷㪏瑪䉳艊㓇陝㛄㚧、
was also involved in this project despite recently joining
Getting support from policymakers is still the key to suc-
the office. We won the competition in the end and,
cess in the current Chinese society. Understanding cur-
using the competition as a start, began practicing in
rent policy orientation well and seeking its support will
China. Over the next few years, Sasaki’s China practice
offer great help to the success of the innovative design.
熱靕㦳艊╙壈竑頥醮䏣㞒、 牐╪賒曧浵㣮 酛䯖曧鰱
敤鰓翨䯖褃蕚鳏醮蛼∥踵樮宆艊靕磢跀
嬛牐䇗烐䉳蠘艊酛蠙、牐╪艊翨呯曧靕磢嫮
欃鰱艊瓟烐婩僨雩曧醢犦瓟烐婩僨醭詵㮌鋁艊粶乵㚴䎪 躐酽、鮪㫓詛桹忞䎐鹷艊鄽牨妕
䯖徏㚾詵㬦㫓鰓梕婩僨
彾艊䯖擄瓕牐誤屟醮孉粶屟、焎熅杛㓅醮婩敡裶䄄鉢跀
醮羠尓販侟艊妕
鮪㫓詛艊
㡨嗁䉳䯖魖呺╙壈詵慁醁僨嗴醮呏瑪呴嗋艊茩槪、LEED
敤諎絔鉢壽醣䯖㬜玪嫮彾╙壈跤艊㠥裶䄄醮
was mainly focused on urban design and campus plan-
扢㫧䯖㫊勢粶乵熎絔醮鄽牨㡽䏳艊儕
ning projects.
Rapid development brings massive construction work, but attention to details is taking more time to come. The
In 2002 and 2003, we participated in both the urban
landscape construction techniques and craftsmanship,
design and landscape design competitions of the 2008
as well as the technologies involved in the plant nursery
Beijing Olympic Games and won both competitions
industry, are not catching up with the ever-changing
respectively. Even though the client didn’t end up hiring
design creation in China right now. It is often hard to
窹絔醢艊╙壈㫅翨、鮪粷魍㫜㪟昷媀僨嗴躐頌䯖焎熅鉢
醮 SITES 艊㚪㛇壽姪跤雩唻鲋欃鰱婩僨桹暺薶艊値轄䯖
跀喥曧踽㒄艊鄽牨梪姌䯖桖鎢談鑫瓟烐裶䄄艊鄡屟僨嗴
㫥雩踵敤姛。婩僨縟醮㛄㚧壎呺粷瓟烐裶䄄敘㬬。粶乵
醮唻╙壈鐍絔艊鰓體、
醮婩僨艊妕
us to implement the design, Sasaki’s strong capabilities
achieve satisfactory results by simply transplanting
醢犦飨＃酽焎酽熅￥棾釟諦證諍唻╙壈艊體⺲醭誆曧啚㳛
唻鲋踽㒄╙壈艊瓟烐嶼╪艊婠㛄䯖䒫魯㒄菑菋鲋謾㣮雜
in urban design and landscape design were widely
successful techniques and practices from other coun-
靕磢鉢跀艊螻姉 , 雩㳛昦咁㓉鑫焎醮熅鮪╙壈跤怹甡艊
瀕醮叧蟨艊徔耚䗮姪、頌䉳抲勢醭諎曧鮪裶䄄嫮尓艊敘
recognized in China, and our China practice started to
tries. Designers need to be acquainted with common
醭讜㓕頥醮詵镾屟、彿髦鮪飝墕熅跏嚩╙壈㛄㚧跤艊酽
㬬。鲮㬦鄩鄬艊抲緣。羠尓醮旝誼艊
expand further.
materials and locally mature construction techniques
跣踽㒄㛄㚧嶎熴喥曧㳛砎惼嗴瓟熅嶼╪䯖㫪㬦荁㯈艊╙
艊螻姉䯖蹰靧炓
壈鰱鱖䯖擄鰓慡扅飝墕熅嶼╪艊疦镾䯖飨㣹闛
䈑㒄酽跣桹镾撾艊鄖㜉雜瀕唻澑貙䃾䎪會熱呝櫞艊噴詇、
倀牆撾踮
敤嶼╪
抲辭鑫酽跣賽駱砎、
諦。唻炚鎬黌㫍
贋醮╙壈㫜鬫忞僨熱艊醭讜佪䌄䯖㰊
from day one and develop design schemes accordingly
to build high-quality projects.
In 2008, we took on our first large-scale park design project in China, Shanghai Jiading Central Park. Over
攝㬬酽跣羾鼷䄂熅嚩
瓟烐嶼╪艊婠㛄営姪㬦夠㪏俋䯖㬦㫓╙壈㛄㚧斾諦岄鉢
a five-year period, from master plan revision to park
╙壈翨䉳邁讜瘍寫艊㰊壈旝誼牐╪䯒蹕 4䯓、
㓇陝徏㚾曧酽跣詵镾屟、懙跣㓕姪棾㛺䯖偧楇詵飨鞲㫓
design and construction on-site review, we were in-
but also increased urban population density, bringing
詛艊䀨㛵跤叧雳敘㫧䯖醭諎曧鞲㛄㚧㫤曧鞲岄鉢恦扡艊
volved in the full course of the multidisciplinary design
more users and usage to urban public open spaces.
㓕姪棾荱䯖㰊∥桖桹嶯躏、
and construction of this large park, its size equivalent to
This requires more hardscapes and low maintenance
one-fourth of New York City’s Central Park. During this
landscapes in proportion. Meanwhile, with growing
time, the Sasaki Shanghai Office was opened in 2012 to
awareness of environmental issues, policymakers have
offer more localized design services and effective exe-
begun to pay close attention to systematic stormwater
cution assistance to clients in China.
management strategies to cope with potential threats
醮熅牐鄡屟裶䄄醢艊䅡壽䯖踵駡
䯒梪旝抴蹕羾 Sasaki 抲辭䯓
76
2. 醢犦鈷呯踕炚趼棾杛㓅㪀鄡 Shanghai Jiading Central Park landscape axis
竑㪝䯤瓟烐裶䄄 | ╙壈㓇陝醮㛄㚧
Feature: Waterfront Space | Urban Planning and Design
Rapid urbanization not only created many new towns,
2020.01
婠詀呺㣻 Architectural Practice
77
brought on by climate change. Balancing massive usage frequency and site resiliency is often the key to a suc-
design in your article about Shanghai waterfront stud-
cessful design.
ies. Is it always a key factor in your waterfront design?
AP Sasaki has attended many competitions of waterfront
“Riverfront plots facing the wider river attach more importance to spatial dialogue and diversity, while larger physical space also allows for more flexible and inclusive design.”
AP You’ve talked about consideration of visibility in urban
ZD Both visibility and accessibility are the factors I attach
city design. What are your opinions regarding urban
importance to the design of waterfront areas. Human’s
waterfront design on different scales?
inborn dependence on water resulted in civilizations historically flourished around rivers and major wa-
HSUEH Ming-Jen (HSUEH) One of the key factors that
terways. The water system brings living resources To suture the damaged urban fabric made by the
to mankind, and different forms of water also bring
to the revetment of the Airport Canal, including com-
systems. Whether an urban arterial road or an elevated
excitement to human’s life. The waterways have always
pletely soft edge, constructed wetland as the forebay to
history with “the River and the Creek” in Shanghai not
expressway that is parallel to a river system, waterfront
been standing in the central stage of the waterfront
settle and filter street runoff, wetland plants along the
only shows the respect of the natural system, but also
spaces in many cities are isolated from the actual water-
life. Waterfront resources extended inland forming
river to help maintain the water quality, which not only
reviews different roles played by rivers in this city with
front and the urban fabric due to prior agency prioritiz-
waterfront districts which become the driving forces
ensured the long-term health of the water quality, but
its potential. One major design idea to envision Suzhou
ing transportation and economic development. Another
for the prosperity of the waterfront cities. If there is
also increased the habitat value on site.
Creek (Fig. 4) is to focus on expanding the perceived
key factor is the bridgework perpendicular to the wa-
lack of connection between waterfronts and cities, the
terfront. The impact of the spaces on and under bridges
functions of waterfronts and their significance to city
for non-motorized traffic and the urban interface is an important and challenging question to consider when designing and developing waterfront space.
waterfront of Shanghai into the urban blocks adjacent Although both cases above have greatly improved the
to the creek and to fully explore the potential of Suzhou
life will be greatly discounted. Such connections include
water quality and eco-environment, such measures have
Creek waterfront by breaking the limitations brought
physical connections such as accessibility, continuity
only been taken at small rivers so far. In major urban wa-
by administrative divisions and linear space of river. This
of ecological network, and relevance of uses, as well as
terways, such as Huangpu River and Suzhou Creek, the
reclamation of Suzhou Creek for public use creates an
visual connections that make people feel at the water-
river channel design is still focused on flood control. The
urban and cultural watershed that is delineated by rec-
Compared with riverfront plots facing the wider river,
front or attract people to waterfront open spaces, by
waterfront space connection project along Huangpu
reational waterfront edges and a vibrant urban frontage.
the riverfront plots along the creek have more oppor-
catching sight of water, waterfront open spaces, or the
River in the last couple of years was mainly focused on
tunities to create synergy between both sides. Using
other side of the river.
the construction and connection of slow traffic system.
AP The development and construction of waterfront areas
It did not take water quality, eco-environment and uses
will involve many links, such as urban design, architec-
in waterfront into a holistic consideration, missing a
tural design and landscape design. How do you think
the river system’s physical space as a public corridor for non-motorized traffic or activity space can help
AP In the urban design competition of Suzhou Creek in
build a waterfront lifestyle centering on the waterfront.
Shanghai, Sasaki has made an in-depth study on water
great opportunity of comprehensively improving the
of the disconnection between these links involved in
Contrarily, riverfront plots facing the wider river attach
quality and eco-environment of Shanghai. With related
waterfront space quality. It is highly possible that it will
China’s urban construction process? What are your
more importance to spatial dialogue and diversity, while
measures and regulations taken in recent years, do
require another round of modification in the near future,
suggestions for future development and construction?
larger physical space also allows for more flexible and
you think the water quality and eco-environment of
resulting in wastes from many aspects.
inclusive design.
Shanghai are improved? Is there anything which requires further improvement?
influences waterfront land is the organization of traffic
HSUEH Historically, urban design is relatively new disciAP Different waterfront areas in Shanghai present different
The adaptation of different scales of riverfront plots to climate change and urban resilience often relies on its
ZD Water quality of Suzhou Creek (Fig. 1) has been greatly
pline compared to architecture, landscape and planning,
city scales and architectural forms. What do you think
which have greater impacts from the past. In the recent
of implementation of “the River and the Creek” to
few decades, urban development mostly focuses on
connect city areas?
the pursuit of density and pace. With the shift to focus
rigid requirements for infrastructure, resulting in the
improved after the dredging in 2012. However, as the
battle among design, engineering and ecology. Here at
combined sewer in urban center areas is still operating
Sasaki, we always approach the waterfront project with
and the water is still channelized by hard banks, water
the interdisciplinary collaboration to balance the inter-
quality of Suzhou Creek has no further improvement
ridgeline, are often considered as natural boundaries.
attention to the urban characteristics, urban fabric and
ests of each party.
since then. In the urban center area, only very limited
The administrative divisions are often determined by the
urban resources. The role of “bridge” played by urban
restoration measures are taken at major waterways,
man-made decisions built upon the historical events and
design can translate the spatial strategies into physical
such as floating planters, which offers little impact to
are closely related to the social and economic context.
space and operation guidelines leading the govern-
the entire river course. At rivers which had opportunity
With both the competition and cooperation, each divi-
ments, developers, operators, architects and other
for holistic improvement, or new waterways with sys-
sion will gradually possess its own characteristics and
implementation agencies that participate in project
tematic design considerations, the water quality and
urban landscape.
execution to form platforms for dialogue.
3. 嬨烰㣗㭠駡艤 Xuhui Runway Park
on urban renewal within the current development of HSUEH The geographic characteristics such as river and
land capacity in recent years, people begin to pay more
eco-environment are well improved. Designed by Sasaki, multiple canals in Jiading Center Park and Airport Canal
78
竑㪝䯤瓟烐裶䄄 | ╙壈㓇陝醮㛄㚧
River basin, as a general term for the catchment area
In recent years, with the government putting more
of the runoff, is a natural system that stretches beyond
emphasis on public open space, the waterfront space of
administrative boundaries and overcomes the hu-
Shanghai has transformed with a better starting point,
In Jiading Center Park project (Fig. 2), we took the
man-centric society. The boundaries of the river basin
bringing a notable improvement to the structure and
opportunity of park construction to dredge multiple
are naturally formed with flow and circulation. Under the
connectivity of non-motorized traffic systems, as well as
canals on site, restore the natural water course, expand
past administrative system, the waterfront landscape
the integration of adaptive use for industrial heritages.
the canal section, create vegetated riparian zones and
and open space system gradually became the negative
wetlands, which not only improved water quality from
space and urban demarcation line of the cities. Before
Type IV to Type III, but also created many wildlife hab-
modern transportation, the river provided the economic
function of landscape possesses less economic value,
itats along the river and made this waterfront a place
boost as the transportation system, which accelerates
the waterfront is often occupied by urban development,
enjoyed by both human and nature. In Xuhui Runway
the linear development along with the waterfront space,
which may squeeze the public open space or bring in
Park project (Fig. 3), innovative measures were applied
as well as the separation from the urban fabric.
improper uses, and lead to the fragmentation between
at Xuhui Runway Park are both good examples.
Feature: Waterfront Space | Urban Planning and Design
It is unfortunate that as the ecological and recreational
2020.01
婠詀呺㣻 Architectural Practice
79
4. 飝墕熅跏嚩╙壈㛄㚧䤻蒊 Suzhou Creek urban design aerial view
the major urban parks and the rest of urban open
With regard to the development of the waterfront in
public spaces. Compared with the waterfront space
major cities, we need to elevate the level of importance
in the past, the ongoing planning and construction of
by focusing on cross-organizational and interdisciplinary
Expo Culture Park at Pudong Qiantian and West Bund
strategies. Whether it contains the transformation of
at Xuhui District start to focus on how the waterfront
spatial forms, improvement of traffic patterns, integra-
ecology and culture can steer the value of civil life and
tion of ecology and culture, and responses to climate
urban space. We wish the development of design and
change and even different voices from the public and
implementation could bring a comprehensive water-
the agencies, we need a competent agency to coor-
front that integrates landscape and urban design in the
dinate the challenges and steer the city into the right
later phases.
direction. The development of waterfront is often a large scale project, and it might be beneficial to integrate
The waterfront development for the brownfield sites is
the overall planning with urban design in the process.
also one of the inevitable environmental issues confront-
On the other hand, if we could learn from the mistakes
ed in Shanghai. The concerns of the economic balance
made in the past, it will be more meaningful for both
in the past could possibly overcome with a win-win
designs, overall guidance, and management.
situation of environmental governance and economic development by paralleling the development of phasing
(All figures are provided by Sasaki)
and ecological remediation, so as to reach the goal of sustainable urban development and a safe and livable city. LEED and SITES also offer explicit incentives to the development of brownfield sites, which also gives a starting point for the governments, developers and designers to balance between the development and the environment.
80
竑㪝䯤瓟烐裶䄄 | ╙壈㓇陝醮㛄㚧
Feature: Waterfront Space | Urban Planning and Design