PGA%20Framework%20Structure%20etc1

Draft of PGA’s Framework, Structure and Flow of Indicator Measurement on REDD+ Implementation in Indonesia PGA expert Panel Discussion Results, February 15, 2012Novotel Hotel, Bogor West Java

Measurement Framework Forest Management Issues

Pillars Law and Policy Framework

Actors’ Capacity (Government, Civil Society, Adat and local Community , Business Entity )

Implementation

Spatial Planning

Indicators

Indicators

Indicators

Rights Regulation

Indicators

Indicators

Indicators

Forest Organization

Indicators

Indicators

Indicators

Forest Management

Indicators

Indicators

Indicators

Forest Control

Indicators

Indicators

Indicators

REDD+ Infrastructure

Indicators

Indicators

Indicators

1. The indicators in the above cells reflect good forest governance principles.

2. The term of measurement items proposed to replace “verifier” term in the existing concept ” and they will be included in data collection instruments.

3. The meaning of law and policy framework here is the content of law and policy framework which want to be measured through the assessment. In order to measure the content of law and policy framework, measurement items will assess whether the certain law or policy cover one or more good forest governance principles, clarity, harmony and comprehensive.

4. The meaning of actors’ capacity here is the capacity of actors to implement one or more good forest governance according to their respective actors’ tasks and functions related to tackling forest management issues 5. The meaning of implementation here is a process of tackling forest management issues as well as the results of forest management issues applying good governance principles.

Measurement Structure

Pillar

Issue

Law & Policy

Spatial & Forest Planning

Rights Regulation

Forest Organization

Forest Management

Forest Governance

Actors’ Capacity

Implementation

Spatial & Forest Planning

Spatial & Forest Planning

Rights Regulation

Rights Regulation

Forest Organization

Forest Organization

Forest Management

Forest Management

Forest Control

Forest Control

REDD+ Infrastructure

REDD+ Infrastructure

Forest Control

REDD+ Infrastructure

From Data Collection to Pillars

Pillars (3)

Note: This flow reflects the process of how data is collected and used to explain the pillars. Based on data collection for each measurement items, they will be used to examine the indicators.

The aggregate of the examined indicators will measure the condition of forest management issues.

The aggregate of forest management issues will measure the PGA pillars and the aggregate of Pillars will measure forest/REDD+ governance.

Forest Management Issues 6)

Indicators

Measurement Items

Data Collection

Measurement Flow Regulation Review Document Review In-depth Interview

Scoring (each indicator)

Aggregate

Level of Good Forest Governa nce

Weighting for each Indicator?

FGD

5

Next Steps ‌ Activities

Schedule

1.

Reviewing and agreeing the proposed framework, structure, measurement flow prepared by some of PGA expert panel members on Feb 14-15, 2012 in Novotel Hotel, Bogor

Feedback accepted February 20, 2012

2.

PGA expert panel reviews the existing indicators by using the following criteria: whether the existing indicator is relevant, significant, discriminating power and data availability.

Draft revised indicators accepted February 27, 2012

3.

Reviewing the revised indicators as stated in activity 2, applying the following criteria: linkage one to another indicator, comprehensiveness, relevance, significance and data availability.

Working Meeting to discuss the revised indicator together February 27, 2012

4.

Reviewing and finalizing measurement items for each indicator

5.

Reviewing and finalizing data collection instrument

Working Meeting to discuss draft data collection instrument First week of March 2012