South Dakota
VOLUME XCVII, NO. 10
HURON, SD
DECEMBER 2014
UNION FARMER A PUBLICATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA FARMERS UNION SDFU Celebrates SD Farm and Ranch Families
2014 State Convention
Page 18
Page 3
Greg Peterson Shares Advocacy Message
Page 23
Coast-to-Coast Coalition Urges Congress to Reject Changes to Country of Origin Labels in Budget Battle MORE THAN 200 FARM, CONSUMER, RURAL, FAITH AND OTHER GROUPS DEMAND CONGRESS TO KEEP COOL ON COOL
D
ecember 2, 2014, a coalition of 207 farm, faith, environmental, labor, rural and consumer organizations delivered a letter to the Senate urging the
legislators to reject any effort to repeal, rescind or weaken country of origin labeling (COOL) in any federal spending legislation. “Congress needs to stay the course on COOL and leave it alone, especially now that the Obama administration has appealed the current decision to the WTO,” said Roger Johnson, President, National Farmers Union. “COOL has been embraced by consumers who want to know where their food comes from and by family farmers who are proud to provide that information.” Congress enacted
COOL in both the 2002 and 2008 Farm Bills and chose to expand COOL coverage to additional products such as venison in the 2014 Farm Bill. The World Trade Organization (WTO) has been considering a dispute over COOL since 2008. At each stage of the WTO dispute, the trade body has been increasingly receptive to the legitimacy of the COOL labels. The broad-based coalition of groups on the letter demonstrates the continued strong support for COOL from all sectors of the food system. “U.S. consumers overwhelmingly support country of origin labeling,” said Chris Waldrop, Director of the Food Policy Institute at Consumer Federation of America. “In fact, they want even more information about the source of their meat including where the animal was born, raised and slaughtered. Congress should not deny consumers this important information.” COOL is being attacked by a coalition of Continued on Page 9
South Dakota Farmers Union Leads the Way in Renovating Beef Checkoff
D
uring the 99th South Dakota Farmers Union State Convention, members passed a resolution that could ultimately lead to changing the oversight of beef checkoff funds. Specifically, the Beef Checkoff Reform Resolution encourages Congress to expedite a vote on the beef checkoff under the 1985 Food Security Act and urges its elimination. Matt Sibley In addition, South Dakota Farmers Union supports a national beef checkoff under the 1996 Commodity Promotion Act. “South Dakota Farmers Union members believe that those paying the checkoff tax need to be better represented,” explained Doug Sombke, S.D. Farmers Union President. “This would create a more hands-on approach and allow for the allocation of checkoff dollars to be determined by a producer-elected board. This is Continued on Page 22