Water Saving by Shoaib Iqbal

AirJet Showerheads JD Item TX, Inc

Save up to 40% Water with Guaranteed High Pressure

How It Works: An engineering breakthrough of three years in the making has brought us the technology of AirJet showerheads and its patented vacuum valve pressure system. A vacuum valve is built at the end of the showerhead designed to increase water pressure via air intake. Along with this, AirJet also utilizes the Venturi Effect of fluid mechanics, which states that due to the Equation of Continuity and the Conservation of Energy, pressure is increased when the speed of flow is decreased. So, the vacuum valve intakes air through atmospheric pressure differences and forms highly compressed air bubbles which are intermixed with the water. This high density mixture of compressed air and water at the base of the AirJet showerhead will move to the top of the shower head where there is more space. Here, the compressed air bubbles are expanded very rapidly, while simultaneously, the speed of the water slows because of there is more room. This ultimately produces explosive air expansions and increased pressure by the Venturi Effect to generate a high pressured shower while using only half of the water!

JD Item TX, Inc â&#x2014;? 1

JD Item TX, Inc www.EFandBioTech.com

> AirJet Fixed-Mount

> AirJet Hand-Held

www.EFandBioTech.com

> Fixed-Mount Showerhead Features:

•High efficiency 1.5gpm plus guaranteed high pressure •Made with durable ABS resin for a study, lasting product •Internal UV coating prevents any slime buildup •Compatible with all typical home showers •Bell-shaped design for the maximum coverage area •Dimensions: 13cm X 8cm X 8cm •Available in chrome, white, black

JD Item TX, Inc ● 2 / 3

JD Item TX, Inc www.EFandBioTech.com

> Hand-Held Showerhead Features:

•High efficiency 1.5gpm plus guaranteed a high pressure •Built for durability with shock-resistant ABS resin •Made with Silicon O-rings which endure high temperatures •Uses a 4-ring connective assembly to the water hose for added durability •Perfectly engineered curvature angle for the most satisfying shower •Dimensions: 21cm X 8cm X 6cm

www.EFandBioTech.com

> Statistics & Comparison Approximately 73% of the water used in a typical shower is hot water, which means reducing hot water usage also reduces the amount of energy needed to heat the water. In this way, AirJet shower heads help to cut the emission of 376 pounds of climate-changing carbon dioxide each year! The Federal Energy Policy Act of 1992 requires that all shower heads manufactured in the United States restrict maximum water flow at or below 2.5 gallons per minute (gpm). Although typical showerheads meet these standards, it sacrifices comfort by giving a weak, low-pressured wash. AirJet comes with a satisfying high-pressure of up to 80 psi and using as little as 1.5 gallons per minute.

Save up to 40% compared to conventional showerheads under the same conditions

JD Item TX, Inc â&#x2014;? 4 / 5

JD Item TX, Inc www.EFandBioTech.com

> Estimated Energy Savings for AirJet Showerheads Gallons per minute flow for regular showerhead

2.5

Gallons per minute flow for AirJet showerhead

1.5

Estimated gallons saved

Average length of time in minutes that a person spends in the shower

Estimated number of people that use a showerhead

Total use in minutes per showerhead per day Number of days in academic year Total number of minutes spent in shower per academic year per showerhead *Cost per gallon of water

40 238 9,520 $0.0086

Retail price of 1 showerhead

$29.99

Price of showerhead wholesale

$16.00

Estimated cost of water per school year with regular showerhead

$204.68

Estimated cost of water per school year with AirJet showerhead

$122.81

Estimated savings per year per showerhead Estimated savings per month

$81.87 $6.82

Return on $29.99 investment (ROI) in months

4.40

Return on $16.00 investment (ROI) in months

2.35

* Price for tap water in Houston is $8.60 per thousand gallons according to Richard Johnson ** Usage does not include summer. Savings and ROI would be higher and if this usage is factored in.

~Calculations conducted by Rice University Office of Sustainability â&#x20AC;&#x153;I ran the numbers and I am really impressed by how much we can save. Please see my attached calculations. We could save a lot of money and the showerheads pay for themselves in under 5 months! You should definitely use this kind of info to promote your product.â&#x20AC;?

www.EFandBioTech.com

> Water and Energy savings of AIRJET Showerheads in University Dormitories 1) KOREA UNIVERSITY - SEOUL CAMPUS Name of place Division Name of staff

KOREA University - Seoul Campus Dormitory Ms. Sun Hee, Woo

Tel No.

822-3290-1551

Address

Anam-Dong, SungBuk-Gu, Seoul

Installation place

Shower stall

Installation Q'ty

100 pcs(Hand-held), 100 pcs(Fixed-mount)

Total Buying Cost

Categories

Before

After installation

Year 2009

Year 2010

Using term

2010 Apr ~ July ( 4 months )

Saving rate (%)

Saving amount (Ton)

Saving amount (Kwon)

Saving amount (USD)

Amount of GAS (㎥)

132,491

120,242

9.25

12,249

10,290,997

US$9,355.45

Amount of WATER (㎥)

56,081

41,530

25.95

14,551

24,271,068

US$22,064.61

34,562,065

US$31,420.06

Total Amount * Remarks : a. The figures are the data which were measured by 4 month. b. http://www.korea.ac.kr/ c. All calculation is based on the government water bill.

JD Item TX, Inc ● 6 / 7

JD Item TX, Inc www.EFandBioTech.com

3) HONGIK UNIVERSITY - Jochiwon CAMPUS Name of place

HONGIK UNIVERSITY - Chochiwon CAMPUS

Division

Dormitory

Name of staff

Mr. Soon Gon, Park / Manager of Facility team

Tel No.

8210-3445-2601(Mobile)

Address

Shinan-Li, Jochiwon-Eup, Yunki-Goo, Choongnam-Do

Installation place

Shower stall

Installation Q'ty

300 pcs(Hand-held)

Total Buying Cost

Categories Amount of WATER (㎥)

Before

After installation

Year 2009

Year 2010

11,749

8,055

Using term

2010 Apr ~ June ( 3 months )

Saving rate (%)

Saving amount (Ton)

Saving amount (Kwon)

3,694

6,161,030

US$5,600.94

6,161,030

US$5,600,94

31.44

Total Amount

Saving amount (USD)

* Remarks : a. The figures are the data which were measured by 3 month. b. http://home.hongik.ac.kr/ c. All calculation is based on the government water bill. d. Couldn’t get the Gas bill. But, according to the staff of university guessed that Gas saving rate will be 20% comparing previous year.

Efficiency Comparison Performance

Base Model

AirJet

Water Use Only Gallons per minute

2.5 gpm

1.5 gpm

Annual Water Use

18,250 gallons

10,950 gallons

Electric Water Heating Annual Energy Use

2,370 kWh

1,422 kWh

Gas Water Heating Annual Energy Use

131 therms

78 therms

http://www.fypower.org/res/tools/products_results.html?id=100160

www.EFandBioTech.com

> Disadvantages of Other Products: Method: Inserting a metal screw with a smaller hole to block water flow Disadvantages: Drastic drop in pressure. Frequent clogging. Method: Pause button to stop water temporarily Disadvantages: Still wastes water due to high flow rate. Inconvenient for children, elderly and the handicapped. Easily broken.

> Advantages of AirJet Shower Heads: • AirJet technology is anti-clog. The face of the AirJet has an easy accessible screw to open up for a simple annual cleaning. •AirJet saves water and money without sacrificing pleasure. •Durable and easy to use for everyone. •All AirJet Showerheads come with a Limited Lifetime Warranty •Free replacements for a whole year

> Diverse Applications: 1. AirJet showerheads can also save over 20% of the energy (gas or electric) that we use to heat our water. Gyms that run 30 showers under one water heater often run low on hot water. Because AirJet showerheads use up to 50% less water, the water heater does not have to spend so much gas and energy on unnecessary, wasteful heating. AirJet showerheads will provide an efficient and satisfying shower, without people having to worry when the hot water will run out. 2. Many old buildings have old piping, resulting in a low pressure water system that trickles rather than sprays during a shower. It is not economical to replace the entire piping system, so AirJet steps in. AirJet showerheads can produce a comfortable, high pressured shower even if the water pressure from the pipes are lacking.

JD Item TX, Inc ● 8 / 9

IAPMO RESEARCH AND TESTING, INC. 5001 E. Philadelphia Street, Ontario, CA 91761-2816 • (909) 472-4100 • Fax (909) 472-4244 • www.iapmort.org

CERTIFICATE OF LISTING IAPMO Research and Testing, Inc. is a product certification body which tests and inspects samples taken from the supplier's stock or from the market or a combination of both to verify compliance to the requirements of applicable codes and standards. This activity is coupled with periodic surveillance of the supplier's factory and warehouses as well as the assessment of the supplier's Quality Assurance System. This listing is subject to the conditions set forth in the characteristics below and is not to be construed as any recommendation, assurance or guarantee by IAPMO Research and Testing, Inc. of the product acceptance by Authorities Having Jurisdiction.

Effective Date:

June 2011

Void After:

Product:

WaterSense® Showerheads

Issued To:

JD ITEM TX, INC 1220 BLALOCK RD #150 HOUSTON TX 77055

IDENTIFICATION:

Each product shall be marked per the marking requirements in the latest version of their applicable performance standard. The products shall bear the UPC® certification mark, and the maximum flow rate value in gpm and L/min as specified by the manufacturer.

File No.

June 2012 6882

The product packaging shall be marked with the maximum flow rate value in gpm and L/min as specified by the manufacturer, and the minimum flow rate value in gpm and L/min at 45 psi. The flow rate markings shall be in gpm and L/min in two or three digit resolutions, and either the product or packaging shall bear the EPA WaterSense logo. CHARACTERISTICS:

Products are manufactured in compliance with the applicable requirements of the EPA WaterSense® Specification for Showerheads. To be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. Products comply with the applicable sections of the latest edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code®. Manufactured in compliance with EPA WaterSense® Specification for Showerheads (version 1.0, 03-04-2010 edition). Products listed on this certificate have been tested by an IAPMO R&T recognized laboratory. This recognition has been granted based upon the laboratory’s compliance to the applicable requirements of ISO/IEC 17025.

This listing period is based upon the last date of the month indicated on the Effective Date and Void After Date shown above. Any change in material, manufacturing process, marking or design without having first obtained the approval of the Product Certification Committee, or any evidence of non-compliance with applicable codes and standards or of inferior workmanship, may be deemed sufficient cause for revocation of this listing. Production of or reference to this form for advertising purposes may be made only by specific written permission of IAPMO Research and Testing, Inc. Any alteration of this certificate could be grounds for revocation of the listing.

TEST REPORT Ph: 909.472.4100 • Fax 909.472.4243 • Web: www.iapmo.org 5001 East Philadelphia Street • Ontario, California 91761-2816 - USA

Report Number:

1444-10001-002

Report Issued:

June 4, 2010

Project No.: 17510

Client:

JD Item TX, Inc. dba: EF & Bio-Tech 1220 Blalock Rd, Room 150 Houston, TX 77055

Contact: Bo Yu

Source of Samples:

The samples were sent by JD Item TX, Inc. and received by IAPMO R&T Lab in good condition on April 12, 2010.

Date of Testing:

April 16, 2010 through May 5, 2010.

Sample Description:

Plastic showerhead

Scope of Testing:

Kosdo’s Model No.

Description

KSAJ-100

AirJet Fixed-Mount (Black)

The purpose of the testing was to determine if the sample tested of the plastic showerhead met the applicable requirements of ASME A112.18.1-2005/CSA B125.105, entitled, “Plumbing Supply Fittings”.

Conclusion: The samples tested of the plastic showerhead, model KSAJ-100, from JD Item TX, Inc. COMPLIED with the applicable requirements of ASME A112.18.1-2005/CSA B125.1-05. By our signatures below we certify that all the testing and sample preparation for this report was performed under continuous, direct supervision of IAPMO R&T Lab, unless otherwise stated.

Tested by,

Reviewed by,

Simon Hadi, Test Technician

_____________________________ Andy Ho, Manager, Fitting Testing

SH: ah

Page 1 of 5 This report may not be copied, except in its entirety, without the written permission of IAPMO R&T Lab

Primary Standard:

ASME A112.18.1-2005 / CSA B125.1-05, clauses tested / evaluated: 4.1 4.4 4.9 4.14 5.2 5.4 5.6

Supply Fittings Threaded Connections Toxicity Materials Coatings Flow Rate Life Cycle

4.2 4.7 4.11 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.0

Servicing Backflow Prevention Showerheads General Pressure and Temperature Operating Requirements Markings

Clauses of ASME A112.18.1-2005 / CSA B125.1-05 not listed above were considered not applicable to subject product. Test Results: All tests and evaluations were conducted per the written procedures specified in the standard.

ASME A112.18.1-2005 / CSA B125.1-05

4.1

Supply Fittings 4.1.1 Rated Pressure – COMPLIED 4.1.1.1 The showerhead was designed for a rated pressure of 100 psi. 4.1.1.2 The showerhead was designed to function at pressure between 20 psi and 125 psi. 4.1.2 Rated Temperatures – COMPLIED The showerhead was designed for rated supply temperatures from 40° F to 160° F.

4.2

Servicing – COMPLIED The showerhead was designed so that the replacement of wearing parts could be accomplished without removing the fittings from the supply system, without removing the piping from the body, without disturbing the finished wall, and by using standard tools or manufacturer provided tools.

4.4

Threaded Connections – COMPLIED 4.4.1(a) The ½” NPSM pipe threads conformed with ASME B1.20.1. 4.4.4 The showerhead was capable of being connected to a ½” NPT male thread.

4.7

Backflow Prevention – COMPLIED The showerhead was designed to prevent backflow as required by an air gap when evaluated per Clause 5.9. Refer to Clause 5.9.

Report No. 1444-10001-002

Page 2 of 5

4.9

Toxicity 4.9.1 NSF 61-9 – NOT APPLICABLE. The NSF 61-9 test was not applicable to shower fittings. 4.9.2 Metal Alloys – COMPLIED All metal alloys in contact with potable water contained less than 8% lead as required. Findings: The stainless steel parts did not contain any lead. No solder and flux were used in the fittings.

4.11

Shower Heads – COMPLIED The flow-restricting insert of the showerhead was mechanically retained at the point of manufacture to withstand a removal force of not less than 8.0 lbf.

4.14

Materials – COMPLIED The coupling nut was made of plastic.

5.1

General – FOLLOWED All applicable tests were conducted in accordance with Table B.1 of this standard.

5.2

Coatings (Chrome Finish on Pivot Ball and Bonnet) 5.2.1

General – COMPLIED The significant surfaces of the coated components were free of blisters, pits, roughness, cracks and uncoated areas, and were not stained.

5.2.2

Corrosion – COMPLIED After being subjected to the corrosion test of ASTM B117 for Service Condition 2 for 24 h as specified in Clause 5.2.2.2.1, the coating did not show more than one surface defect in any 1.0 in2 area of the significant surface, or up to three surface defects on a 1.0 in. length of parting line. The surface defects were not larger than 0.03 in. any dimension.

5.2.3

Adhesion – COMPLIED 5.2.3.2 The coating on metals met the grind-saw test requirements as defined in ASTM B 571. 5.2.3.3 The coating on plastics met the thermal cycling test requirements when tested per Clause 5.2.3.3.2. The coated plastic parts had: a) b) c) d)

No cracks, blisters, peeling, or discoloration on significant surfaces. No cracks longer than 0.25” with a loss of adhesion between the base material and the coating. No blisters exceeding 0.01 in2 in the area of an injection point. No warpage affecting the performance of the fitting or component.

Report No. 1444-10001-002

Page 3 of 5

5.3

Pressure and Temperature 5.3.1 Static and Dynamic Seals – COMPLIED The seals of the showerhead did not leak or otherwise fail when tested in accordance with Clauses 5.3.1.3 to 5.3.1.4 of the standard. The unit was tested with flowing pressures of 20 psi and 125 psi for 5 minutes each. 5.3.5 Ball Joints – COMPLIED The ball joint of the showerhead did not leak in any position more than 0.01 gpm measured over 5 minutes when tested at 50 psi flowing. The actual leakage was measured 0.00 gpm.

5.4

Flow Rate – COMPLIED 5.4.1 The showerhead met the maximum flow rate requirement specified in Table 1, at the flowing pressure as specified in Clause 5.4.2.3. Findings: The maximum flow rate at 80 psi was 2.04 gpm. The maximum allowable flow rate was 2.5 gpm.

5.5

Operating Requirements – COMPLIED 5.5.4 The ball joint of the showerhead did not require a moving force greater than 10 lbf at the farthest point from the ball joint when tested at a supply pressure of 125 psi with water at 100 ºF. The actual force was 2.5 lbf .

5.6

Life Cycle 5.6.1.4 Ball Joints – COMPLIED When tested in accordance with Clause 5.6.3.5.6 for 10,000 cycles as specified in Table 3 of the standard, the showerhead assembly did not develop any defects that would adversely affect the serviceability of the unit. The ball joint did not leak more than 0.01 gpm in any position when tested in accordance with Clause 5.3.5. The actual leakage was 0.0 gpm. There was no need to tighten the ball joint packing nut more than once during the test to reduce leakage. The moving force was not greater than 10 lbf when measured at the farthest point from the ball joint with a supply pressure of 125 psi and the water temperature of 100 oF. The actual moving force was 2.0 lbf.

5.7

Resistance to Installation Loading 5.7.2 Thread Torque Strength – NOT APPLICABLE The ½” NPSM inlet connection was made of plastic.

5.9

Backflow Prevention 5.9.2 Fittings with Plain Outlets – COMPLIED The showerhead was designed to prevent backflow from the outlet with an air gap in accordance with ASME A112.1.2. The actual air gap was dependent on field installation.

Report No. 1444-10001-002

Page 4 of 5

6.0

Markings 6.1 General – COMPLIED The showerhead was permanently marked with the manufacturer’s trade name “KOSDO” and the marking could be visible after installation. 6.3 Packaging – COMPLIED (Per manufacturer’s provided packaging labeling) The packaging will be marked with the manufacturer’s trade name and model number.

Photograph of Sample Tested:

Report No. 1444-10001-002

Page 5 of 5

TEST REPORT Ph: 909.472.4100 • Fax 909.472.4243 • Web: www.iapmo.org 5001 East Philadelphia Street • Ontario, California 91761-2816 - USA

Report Number:

1444-10002-002

Report Issued:

June 4, 2010

Project No.: 17510

Client:

JD Item TX, Inc. dba: EF & Bio-Tech 1220 Blalock Rd, Room 150 Houston, TX 77055

Contact: Bo Yu

Source of Samples:

The samples were sent by JD Item TX, Inc. and received by IAPMO R&T Lab in good condition on April 12, 2010.

Date of Testing:

April 16, 2010 through May 5, 2010.

Sample Description:

Plastic showerhead Kosdo’s Model No.

Description

KSAJ-100

AirJet Fixed-Mount (Black)

Note: Refer to IAPMO R&T Lab test report No. 1444-10001-002 for the ASME A112.18.1-2005/CSA B125.1-05 test portion. Scope of Testing:

The purpose of the testing was to determine if the samples tested of the plastic showerhead met the applicable requirements of EPA WaterSense Specification for Showerheads (Version 1.0, March 4, 2010 Edition).

Conclusion: The samples tested of the plastic showerhead, model KSAJ-100, from JD Item TX, Inc. COMPLIED with the applicable requirements of EPA WaterSense Specification for Showerheads (Version 1.0, March 4, 2010 Edition). By our signatures below we certify that all the testing and sample preparation for this report was performed under continuous, direct supervision of IAPMO R&T Lab, unless otherwise stated.

Tested by,

Reviewed by,

Simon Hadi, Test Technician

_____________________________ Andy Ho, Manager, Fitting Testing

SH: ah

Page 1 of 4 This report may not be copied, except in its entirety, without the written permission of IAPMO R&T Lab

Primary Standard:

EPA WaterSense Specification for Showerheads (Version 1.0, March 4, 2010 Edition), sections tested / evaluated: 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

General Requirements Water-Efficiency Criteria Spray Force Criteria Spray Coverage Criteria Marking

Test Results: All tests and evaluations were conducted per the written procedures specified in the specification. EPA WaterSense Specification for Showerheads (Version 1.0, March 4, 2010 Edition) 2.0

General Requirements – COMPLIED 2.1 The showerhead was tested and conformed to the applicable requirements in ASME A112.18.12005/CSA B125.1-05. Refer to IAPMO R&T Lab report No. 1444-10001-002 for details. 2.2 NOT APPLICABLE – The showerhead had only one mode. 2.3 The showerhead was not packaged, marked, or provided with instructions directing the user to an alternative water-use setting that would override the maximum flow rate, as established by the specification. Note: No maintenance instruction was provided.

3.0

Water-Efficiency Criteria – COMPLIED 3.1 The flow rate of the showerhead was tested in accordance with the procedures in ASME A112.18.12005/CSA B125.1-05 and met the following criteria: 3.1.1The manufacturer specified a maximum flow rate value (rated flow) of the showerhead and this specified value was equal to 2.0 gpm (7.6 L/min). 3.1.2 The maximum flow rate (highest value) obtained through testing at flowing pressures of 20, 45 and 80 ± 1 psi did not exceed the maximum flow rate value specified in Section 3.1.1, when evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 430 Subpart F, Appendix B, Step 6(b). See tables below. Finding: Sample ID 1 2 3 4

Measured Flow Rate (gpm) 20 psi 45 psi 80 psi

1.20 1.18 1.19 1.19

(Maximum Flow Rate) Flowing Max. Specified Pressure Flow Rate (EPS) 20 psi 2.0 45 psi 2.0 80 psi 2.0 Report No. 1444-10002-002

1.56 1.50 1.49 1.48

2.04 2.01 2.04 1.99

Upper Limit (UCL1)

Lower Limit (LCL1)

Mean (X1)

2.0 2.1 2.0

2.0 1.9 2.0

1.2 1.5 2.0

Page 2 of 4

3.1.3 The minimum flow rate, determined through testing at a flowing pressure of 20 ± 1 psi and when evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 430 Subpart F, Appendix B, Step 6(a), was not less than 60% of the maximum flow rate value specified in Section 3.1.1. See table below. 3.1.4 The minimum flow rate (lowest value) obtained through testing at flowing pressures of 45 and 80 ± 1 psi was not less than 75% of the maximum flow rate value specified in Section 3.1.1, when evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 430 Subpart F, Appendix B, Step 6(a). See table below. Finding: (Minimum Flow Rate) Flowing Min. Allowable Upper Limit Pressure Flow Rate (EPS) (UCL1) 1.2 20 psi 1.2 1.6 45 psi 1.5 1.5 80 psi 1.5

4.0

Lower Limit (LCL1)

Mean (X1)

Actual % of Max. Specified Flow Rate

1.2 1.4 1.5

1.2 1.5 2.0

60.0% 75.0% 100.0%

Spray Force Criteria – COMPLIED 4.1 The spray force of the showerhead was tested in accordance with the procedures outlined in Appendix A and met the following criteria: 4.1.1 The minimum spray force was not less than 2.0 ounces at a pressure of 20 ± 1 psi at the inlet when water was flowing.

5.0

Spray Coverage Criteria – COMPLIED 5.1 The spray coverage of the showerhead was tested in accordance with the procedures outlined in Appendix B and met the following criteria: 5.1.1 The total combined maximum volume of water collected in the 2- and 4- inch annular rings did not exceed 75% of the total volume of water collected, and; 5.1.2 The total combined minmum volume of water collected in the 2-, 4-, and 6-inch annular rings was not less than 25% of the total volume of water collected. Finding: Volume of Water in Each Ring (gallons) 2" 4" 6" 8" - 20" 0.006 0.936 0.558 0.000

Total Collected

Volume (gallons) 1.50

Total Recorded Flow (gallons) 1.55

% Difference 3.2%

Percent of Water in Each Annular Ring 2"

8" - 20"

Total % in 2"and 4" Rings

Total % in 2", 4" and 6" Rings

0.4%

62.4%

37.2%

0.0%

62.8%

100.0%

Report No. 1444-10002-002

Page 3 of 4

6.0

Marking – COMPLIED (Per manufacturer’s provided drawings) 6.1 The product will be marked with the maximum flow rate value in gpm and L/min as specified by the manufacturer, verified through testing and in compliance with this specification. 6.2 The product packaging will be marked with the maximum flow rate value in gpm and L/min as specified by the manufacturer, verified through testing and in compliance with this specification. 6.3 The product packaging will be marked with the minimum flow rate valve in gpm and L/min at 45 psi, calculated in Section 3.1.4 as 75 percent of the manufacturer’s specified maximum flow rate value, verified through testing and in compliance with this specification. 6.4 The flow rate marking is in gpm and L/min in 2 digit resolutions.

Photograph of Sample Tested:

Report No. 1444-10002-002

Page 4 of 4

(J) C t\)

:r:

t\)

"O=:(I)

CD .., CD

CD :::J < 0 CD ..,

CD - CD .., ...•. o ~ :f t\)

'o" 'oo"

0;::::;:.0

'"'"

....•..

-c

(J)

C ::;-

CD c CD :::J"O CD 3 ••••• "0 ()=:::J

o ~

cO-+'

s::

:::J ''"" 0.., =< o

c: cc

(")

c....

,...p

en CD

o ::+ "0::::;; 3 0-

en c

0"0

=: t\)

:::J

(")

t\)

(I)

Ocn

t\)

@g:

.••••••. CD

(j):'

_.3: :J o .., _. ,..

("')'<

:::J :::J

..•. 0

~ o

t\)

Q.O"

()

- 0

(J)

0 .,

:r.?-

:J-c

(J):::J

()3: @'<

-OJ t\) C

:r:

.(")-c _. _. ..,

z~ --

5t~ ':-:'" » 3 ~. (l)

iil

a ~:::J

::J

(J)

::I: en ,..

-i

:::J 0 •..•.

'< 0 o _ -::::I

::::I

():::J

>I>I-

CC,<

cc_. "tJ

::::I DI CC VI ~

e. ..

~ s::

Ig ::::I

3.:c

o Ql ::J ::J

VI·, 0

cC s::

l»

~ o

(I)

(f)

....•..

-e

(I)

!:l) (I)

~ ~ o ~

S-

o o

(I)

a.m

(I)

ii1 3

~ z

CJ.) ()'1

o .,

ce:

:::J

••.•.

CD~ 0."0

0" ~-

'< ...•. ~

:::J"t\)

(I)

:r:o. o m,

C -(I) :::J ••••• CD o a. :::J 0"

~(f)

::::I

~ o (I) ~ ~ o

~'<...•.

:::J :::J" CD

~...•.

(I)