COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON SPATIAL PLANNING FOR SOUTH ASIAN CITIES (SEOUL, TOKYO AND AHMEDABAD)

Page 1

COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON SPATIAL PLANNING FOR SOUTH ASIAN CITIES CASE OF SEOUL, TOKYO, AND AHMEDABAD


URBANISATION IN SOUTH ASIA World Map : Population in 2018

Europe in total 711 million 9.4 % of the world population North America, Central America & Caribbean in total 587 million 7.8 % of the world population

Oceania in total 41 million 0.6 % of the world population

South America total 428 million 5.6 % of the world population

URBANISATION

Africa total 1,288 billion 16.9 % of the world population

PROPOSAL

CASE STUDY

Asia in total 4,568 billion 59.7 % of the world population

SCOPE AND LIMITATION

2


URBANISATION IN SOUTH ASIA

UN find more than half of people now lives in cities More than half of the global population currently lives in urban area, with that proportion projected to reach two – thirds by 2050

Countries

% Urban Pop.

Actual Urban Pop.

India

33.60

450 Millions

S. Korea

61.68

15.7 Millions

Japan

91.53

116 Millions

100

7.3 Millions

49.20

33.9 Millions

100

5.6 Millions

Hongkong Thailand Singapore

URBANISATION

PROPOSAL

CASE STUDY

SCOPE AND LIMITATION

3


DECADAL CHANGES Singapore

Seoul

Tokyo

With the increasing pace of

urbanization

in

developing country like India,

managing

the

growth becomes much Bangkok

URBANISATION

Hongkong

PROPOSAL

CASE STUDY

SCOPE AND LIMITATION

more important.

4


CURRENT PLANNING SYSTEM IN INDIA National Institution for Transforming India aims to target cooperation and active participation in the economic policymaking process led by the State governments of India. •

• The central government Urban Development (MoUD), Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation (MoHPA), and the Town and Country Planning Organization (TCPO) facilitates and support the nationwide urban and regional development planning URBANISATION

TYPE OF PLANS • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

LANDUSE PLANS

ECONOMIC PLANS

STRUCTURAL PLAN Singles out attention of certain aspects of development and influence vocational decisions • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Prescription for all aspects of city over a certain time frame • DEVELOPMENTAL PLAN Development of area within a jurisdiction of planning authority. It includes regional plan, master plan

PROPOSAL

CASE STUDY

SCOPE AND LIMITATION

INCREASED RELIANCE ON MASTERPLAN • Have objectives very general in nature & regardless of nature of town • change in plan is a very cumbersome process

OVERLAPPING INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK • The multiplicity of functions and reach leads to delay in policy planning and implementation • dependency of ULB’s on state impairs their capacity towards development

PARTICIPATION AND TRANSPARENCY • Inactive inclusion of local stakeholders and actors • No continuous monitoring and evaluation of plans

5


PROBLEM STATEMENT

URBANISATION

PROPOSAL

CASE STUDY

SCOPE AND LIMITATION

6


ABOUT THE STUDY Aim

Objective

Task

1. To review spatial planning

Understand the Evolution of Spatial Planning

publications

legal framework and planning

To identify

spatial planning systems required for better implementation of

Understand the Legal and Institutional Framework

2. To review spatial plans of

Understand city plans and local level plan for Seoul, Tokyo and Ahmedabad

South Asian and Indian Cities and detailed out the factors that have led to successful implementation of plans.

OECD) • Plans and Documents by Government Bodies and Authorities

• Critique documents from journals and other

3. Identify learnings from the Indian Cities

• Critique documents from journals and other

Understand the plan implementation and monitoring • Documents and reports International Research strategies in case of Seoul, Tokyo and Ahmedabad organization (World Bank, WRR, JICA, KRIHS,

Compare the plans of Seoul, Tokyo and Ahmedabad

study and identify reforms for

OECD) • Plans and Documents by Government Bodies and Authorities

publications

plans in Indian cities.

• Documents and reports International Research organization (World Bank, WRR, JICA, KRIHS,

Indian Cities.

reforms related to

• Plans and Documents by Government Bodies and Authorities • Critique documents from journals and other

systems like governance and

process in South Asian and

Source

Identify best practices, if any amongst the planning system of three case cities.

publications • Documents and reports International Research organization (World Bank, WRR, JICA, KRIHS, OECD)

URBANISATION

PROPOSAL

CASE STUDY

SCOPE AND LIMITATION

7


CASE STUDIES

URBANISATION

PROPOSAL

CASE STUDY

SCOPE AND LIMITATION

8


PARAMETERS FOR THE STUDY

Governance structure for spatial planning

Spatial plans

Land development

Evolution of spatial plans

Land assembly models

Current city plans

Legislative framework for city planning systems

Sectoral focuses of the plans Changes in proposed landuse Plan making Authorities involved Plan financing Zoning and regulations

URBANISATION

PROPOSAL

CASE STUDY

SCOPE AND LIMITATION

9


SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS

LIMITATIONS

SCOPE • understanding land use planning and management in South Asian cities, which in recent years has gained international recognition as a good practice for land management and policies.

• In current situation any departures from a plan may be also considered implemented if they are rational or inevitable since the Reliability on the secondary literature. • not be possible to understand detailed analysis of the decisions and actions taken during the preparation of plan, through of a number of actors that are supposed to receive the planning outcomes

• examining the development planning and development control processes in these cities, and discuss how it can be used to build better and more sustainable places for people.

• considerations of the planning outcomes and the linkages between plans and actual development from the case studies can not be totally dependent upon to be assumed a rational model of planning, which is specific enough to be taken in an Indian context

• analyzing the institutional framework, legislative basis, development objectives, plans and policy instruments, performance and contradictions of the Cities’ development planning and control system.

URBANISATION

PROPOSAL

CASE STUDY

SCOPE AND LIMITATION

10


URBAN PLANNING IN SEOUL Planning Framework | Evolution of Spatial Plans | Plan Making and Financing | Zoning and Regulations | Methods of Land Management

URBAN PLANNING IN TOKYO Planning Framework | Evolution of Spatial Plans | Evolution of Building Byelaws | Plan Making and Financing | Zoning and Regulations | Methods of Land Management

URBAN PLANNING IN AHMEDABAD Planning Framework | Evolution of Spatial Plans | Plan Making and Financing | Zoning and Regulations | Methods of Land Management

LEARNINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Learnings From the case studies | Practices that can be adopted for Indian Case

11


PARAMETERS OF THE STUDY

Governance structure for spatial planning

Legislative framework for city planning systems

Spatial plans

Land development

Evolution of spatial plans

Land Assembly Models

Current city plans Sectoral focuses of the plans Changes in proposed land use Plan making Authorities involved Plan financing Zoning and Regulations

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

12


Seoul

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

13


SEOUL As the capital

city of the Korean Peninsula for 600 years, Seoul is a historic & cultural city with over 2000 years of history, and has a beautiful natural environment. Seoul's terrain is mainly mountainous.

Is a city remembered by various international all over the world.

events, and is a global city with foreigners from

Has shown economic

development at an

unprecedented rate around the world.

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

14


PLANNING STRUCTURE NATIONAL LAND PLANNING AND UTILIZATION ACT National Level

Comprehensive National Territorial Plan

MoLIT

20 years

Urban Planning Bureau

20 years

Regional Plan Regional Level

Comprehensive Province Plan Metropolitan City Plan

Basic Urban Plan Local Level

20 years Urban Planning Bureau

Urban Management Plan District Unit Plan

10 years -

URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT Local Level

Land Readjustment Plan / Urban Development Projects

Urban Planning Bureau /

Basic Urban Plan

-

Urban Management Plan

Spatial structure, establishment of living zones and distribution of population

Designation or change to the use region, district or area.

The conservation and management of the environment

Installation, Renewal or Improvement of Urban Planning Facilities

Sceneries - response to climate change and energy conservation and the prevention of disasters and safety

District Unit

Urban Development / Renewal Project

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

15


EVOLUTION OF SPATIAL PLANS

1966

1972

1978

1984

Growth Direction

To the North of Han River

To the North of Han River

Shifting focus to develop the North South Connection across Han River

To have a balanced growth on both the sides of Han River

Urban Structure

Central Region 1 Sub Central Region 5

Central Region 1 Sub Central Region 5

Central Region 1 Sub Central Region 2 Sub Centers 5

Central Region 1 Sub Central Region 2 Sub Centers 7

Plan Area and Population

500 Sq., Km. Approx. and 5 Million

605 Sq. Km. and 7.6 Million

605 Sq. Km. and 7.5 Million

605 Sq. Km. and 10 Million

Plan Concept

Development of Street Network

Additional Street Network is developed to make a Ring Radial Pattern

Development of Gangnam Area, Grid Road Network

Rearranged arterial road system along with creation of Large Green Belt

Reason

To Connect the Central and Sub Central Region

Realizing the Importance of Gangnam Region

To Facilitate Subways System, To Preserve the natural environment

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

16


EVOLUTION OF SPATIAL PLANS Basic Urban Plan 2000 Issues: • • • • •

Large influx of population due to economic opportunities Growing economic opportunities Increasing homelessness Deteriorating city center Hosting of International Games

Plan Concept: • • • • Plan Area and Population - 605 Sq. Km. and 12 Million

Balanced development of Gangnam and Gangbuk Transition into a multi-nucleic city Plans for a city metro network (13 routes) and a city highway network 1 center - 5 sub-centers - 59 district

Projects: • • •

Historic Preservation Metropolitan Traffic System Urban Railways

Growth Direction - Balance development in Gangnam and Gangbuk areas. Urban Structures - Central Region 1 Sub Central Regions 5 Plan Features - The limits of the plan were fixed, however certain areas under green belt reservation were opened for development INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

17


TRANSPORTATION AND LANDSCAPE

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

18


EVOLUTION OF SPATIAL PLANS Basic Urban Plan 2020 Issues: • • • • •

Increasing congestion, both traffic and population Increasing environmental pollution and undermined urban environment due to discreet development Lack of unique identity of Seoul Integration of industrial policies to socio economic changes for social welfare Lack of citizen participation

Plan Concept:

• Balance Development in the entire city • Improving public transport system • Development of monitoring index

Projects: Plan Area and Population - 605 Sq. Km. and 9.8 Million

• River Rehabilitation • Public transportation • E governance

Growth Direction - Balance development in Gangnam and Gangbuk areas. Urban Structures - Central Region 1 Sub Central Regions 11 Plan Features - Built on socio economic aspects the plan reflected expert and public opinion, proposed goals and a monitoring index INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

19


TRANSPORTATION Goals

• Convenient and Safe P.T. System • Reasonable Scientific Road Operation • Environmental and Human Centric Traffic System • Efficient Logistics System • Parking Demand Management • Efficient Traffic Administration

Strategies

• Planning Dedicated Bus Routes • Improving Road Network • Increasing the reach of metro rail transport

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

Monitoring Mechanism: A yearly monitoring of progress in the sectoral proposals of Basic Urban Area Plan

Measuring Hierarchy: Goal – Strategies – Sub Strategies – Monitoring Indicator

Monitoring Indicators: 1. 2. 3. 4.

Seoul City public transport Transportation share ratio Metropolitan area Urban railway Total length In Seoul Urban railway Congestion rate Seoul City Urban railway station elevator, escalator Installation rate 5. Seoul City Highway Total length 6. Metropolitan highway Total extension 7. Highway Real-time signal system Installation rate 8. Number of Traffic Accidents 9. pedestrian Traffic accident rate 10. Bicycle Means share 11. On the whole road Walk to pedestrians Ratio 12. Seoul City Housing Parking Lot Securing rate

20


OTHER SECTORS Sector

What

How

Enlargement of Public Rental Housing

• • • • • • •

Expansion of Marginalized Class Housing

• Improvement of tenancy status for integrated management • Improvement of rent charging system - Establishment of tenant database Integrated management system • Removal of self-help, family homeless, urban development projects Entitlement to tenants for tenants

Urban Housing Maintenance

• Improving the neighborhood environment through public investment improves the residential environment of low-income residential areas, In addition to maintaining the environment of the area

Housing

Participation By partnership Environmental Management System build Environment Conservation

Parks and Green Spaces

Redevelopment Project Purchase of a leased house Purchase of a multi-family house, utilization of rental housing Permanent rental housing for the lowest income class Existing municipal land, existing land development district Securing the traditional market place with lost function Securing the availability of rental apartments Securing the land in the city

• Strengthening Seoul's 21st practice - Introduction of environmental audit system - Introduction of sustainability evaluation index - Re-establishing the status of green Seoul Citizen's Committee

Integrated Wide Environmental Management System Establish

• Establishment of Seoul City sustainability evaluation system • Evaluation of environmental compatibility of urban development project Use standard business process guidelines • Introduction of ecological budget system • Development and application of environmentally friendly residential complex model

To Increase the amount of green open spaces and improve the conditions of existing spaces

• • • • •

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

Designation of park districts Establishment of Ecological Axis Han River Specialization plan City Centre green axis Plan Landscape policy plans

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

21


EVOLUTION OF SPATIAL PLANS Basic Urban Plan 2030 Issues: • • • • •

Inter regional Disparity Aging City infrastructure Demographic change Climate Change Intensified competition among growing metropolis

Plan Concept: •

Need for a plan that considers issues at Individual as well as urban level

Projects:

• Development plan for City Centre • Development plan for Han Rive Management • Development Plan for Gangnam Area Plan Area and Population - 605 Sq. Km. and 10.2 Million Growth Direction - Balance development in Gangnam and Gangbuk areas.

Basic Urban Plan 2030

Urban Structures - Central Region 1 Sub Central Regions 7 Plan Features - Built upon public participation, the plan switches back to multi nuclei structure, with an emphasis on governance INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

Spatial Structure Plan

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

Plans by Action

Plans by Issues

22


2030 SEOUL PLAN

3 Main Centre | 7 Regional Centre | 12 Local Centre

Major Transportation linkages between the development centers

Environmental Conservation

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

Regional Sphere Plan

5 Regional Spheres | 100 Neighborhoods The Plan resulted into Specific Spatial Structure

Zoning Urban Facilities Detailed Road Network Improvement in the Existing Areas

To strengthen competitiveness & pursue balanced development, & connects urban axes for better spatial communication & mutual development.

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

23


PLANNING TRANSITIONS

BASIC URBAN PLAN 2000 Development of Public Spaces and Public Transportation system Identification of eco sensitive areas Goals to Achieve Sustainability

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

BASIC URBAN PLAN 2020

BASIC URBAN PLAN 2030

Balanced Development

Environmental Conservation

Improve public transportation system

Focus on Social and Welfare aspects

Goals on monitor the plan implementation AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

Goals to improve Public Participation

24


LAND USE Use

2000

2020

2030

Residential

275.1 Sq. Km.

309.0 Sq. Km.

314.7 Sq. Km.

Commercial

62.5 Sq. Km.

28.0 Sq. Km.

27.9 Sq. Km.

Industrial

18.8 Sq. Km.

28.0 Sq. Km.

27.2 Sq. Km.

Green Spaces

248.6 Sq. Km.

240.0 Sq. Km.

235.2 Sq. Km.

Total Area

605 Sq. Km.

605 Sq. Km

605 Sq. Km.

2000

41%

2020

2030

40%

46%

Residential

39%

Commercial 51%

52%

Industrial Green Spaces

10%

4%

3%

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

5%

4%

SUMMARY

5%

25


PLAN MAKING AND FINANCING

The costs incurred in formulating the Urban Master Plan or An Urban Management Plan is to be borne under state budget if the implementation of plan is to be done by the state or the local government if the implementation is to be done by the local government. By Local Governments

An expert advisory group was formed to identify the basic direction and implementation structure of the Plan. To develop the vision in line with the direction, the 100-member citizens’ group was created to come up with the vision and key tasks for Seoul in 2030.

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

The head of a Si/Gun may require other local government that significantly benefits from an urban or planning facility project performed by him/her to partially bear costs incurred in implementing the said urban planning facility project. In case of failure of the agreement among the local authorities it shall be governed by a determination made by the Do Governor.

SUMMARY

26


ZONING AND REGULATIONS Determined by BUILDING ACT and SEOUL METROPOLITAN ORDINANCE ON BUILDINGS

National Zones

Specific Use Districts

Urban Areas Control Areas Agricultural and Forest Area Natural Environment Conservation Areas

Scenic District Height Restriction District Fire Prevention District Disaster Prevention District Protected District Settlement District Development Promotion Districts

Commercial Central Commercial General Commercial Neighboring Commercial Distribution Commercial INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

Industrial Quasi Industrial Green Preserved Green Belts Productive Green Belts Natural Green Belts Natural Scenery City Limits Scenery Waterside Scenery

TOKYO

Residential Areas – 70% Commercial Areas – 90% Industrial Areas – 70% Green Areas – 20% Conservation and Control Areas – 20 % Production Control Areas – 20% Planned Control Areas – 40% Natural Environment Conservation Area – 20%

DISTRICT UNIT PLAN

Urban Area Zones Residential Class 1 Exclusive Residential Class 2 Exclusive Residential Class 1 General Residential Class 2 General Residential Class 3 General Residential Quasi Residential Areas

Building to Land Ratios

AHMEDABAD

• Part of City Management Plan • Can alter regulations specified in the national act • Subdivision or alteration of land use Zones • Arrangement and size of certain infrastructure facilities • Restrictions on the use of buildings • Maximum or minimum lot coverage • floor area ratio • Building heights

SUMMARY

Floor Area Ratios

Residential Areas – 500% Commercial Areas – 1500% Industrial Areas – 400% Green Areas – 100% Conservation and Control Areas – 80 % Production Control Areas – 80% Planned Control Areas – 100% Natural Environment Conservation Area – 80%

FSI RELAXATION AREAS • Area selected by mayor for urban maintenance • A balanced development project district • A readjustment promotion zone • A traditional marketplace

27


ZONING AND REGULATIONS Determined by BUILDING ACT AND SEOUL METROPOLITAN ORDINANCE ON BUILDINGS

Building Line

Landscaping

• 0.75 times the width of road from the median line of the road

• • • • • •

For having a secured sunlight, irrespective of the Zone 1. Distance between part of the building and boundary line • Less than or equal to 4 m. – 1 m. • 4 m. – 8 m. – 2 m. • More than 8 m. – ½ the height of the part of the building

Public Spaces

2. Distance between buildings • If walls with windows for natural light face one another0.8 times the height of each building • In the case of a multi-household housing complex, 4 m. or 0.25 times height of each building, whichever is greater

Building Height As per the Zone Class exclusive residential area – 8 m. and 2 floors.

Mandatory for sites more than 200 Sq. m. Based on the size of the plot and location On preserved green belt – 30% Less than 1000 Sq., m.- 5% 1000 – 2000 Sq. m. – 10% More than 2000 Sq. m. – 15%

• For total Floor area exceeding 5000 Sq. m. (a) Facilities for cultural activities or gathering; (b) Sales facilities (c) Business facilities; (d) Accommodation facilities; (e) Medical facilities; (f) Sports facilities; (g) Amusement facilities; (h) Religious facilities; (i) Transportation facilities ( j) Funeral halls.

Incentives for Development of Public Spaces 1. Addition of the floor area ratio 2. Relaxation of restrictions on the height of buildings:

• 5000 – 10,000 Sq. m. – 5% • 10,000 – 30,000 Sq. m. – 7% • More than 30,000 Sq. m. – 10% INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

28


METHODS OF LAND MANAGEMENT Determined by URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT

LAND READJUSTMENT •

Started as a post war restoration projects

The program achieved its pace during 1960s and 1970s

Supported the national policy for supply of public housing

Helped in initial supply of housing as a detached units and infrastructure

Deterioration of Detached Housing & Growing Demand for Reconstruction.

Increase of Residential-Commercial Buildings, increased demand for infrastructure services

Shortage of Public Lots & Reduction of Lot Size

Initiator

1960

1970

1980

Number of districts implemented

20

14

5

Local Govt., Land owner, Ministry of construction, National government development Corporations

Reservations

Varies depending on the project

Land Contribution

Cost Equivalent Land Contribution

Average percentage of public lots

28.4%

30%

47.5%

Cost Equivalent Land Contribution

Average Percentage of Private lots

31.6%

43.7%

55.0%

Ratio Cost Recovery Mechanisms INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

29


Tokyo

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

30


TOKYO southern Kanto region. It is bordered to the east by the Edogawa River and Chiba Prefecture, to the west by mountains and Yamanashi Prefecture, to the south by the Tamagawa River and Kanagawa Tokyo Metropolis is located in the

Prefecture, and to the north by Saitama Prefecture

Natural as well as man made disaster have impacted Japanese urban planning to a deeper impact

Tokyo excels in venture capital investments, and is home

to a dizzying number of

tech giants, many of which are already preparing for the 2020 Olympic Games.

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

31


LEGISLATION COMPREHENSIVE NATIONAL LAND DEVELOPMENT ACT National Level

National Spatial Strategy Plan

MoLITT

10 years

MoLITT

10 Years

NATIONAL LANDUSE PLAN ACT National Level

National Land Use Plan

CITY PLANNING LAW Basic Land Use Plan

10 – 15 Years

Master Plan for City Planning Areas

Prefectural Level

Bureau of Urban Development

10 Years

City Plan for Prefectures

10 Years Urban Planning Department of Municipal Government

Municipal Master Plan

Municipal Level

Master Plan for City Planning Areas

-

Municipal Master Plan

Preparation of plan for metropolitan areas

Detailed Zoning Plans as per the Master Plan for City Planning Areas

Designation of National Facilities like National Highway, City Level Parks and other infrastructure

Development of Neighbourhood Level Facilities

Development direction for the city

Development of Municipal Roads

Details upon FAR, and Volume Restrictions for building Development

Housing Master Plan

Policies for Development and Redevelopment in Urban Areas

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

32


EVOLUTION OF CITY PLANNING 1889

1919

1931

1945 Post War Recovery and City Planning

City Ward Improvement Design

Earthquake Recovery and City Planning

City Planning in Pre war and War Periods

Water Works Road Construction Urban Area Development

Urban Area Development through Land Readjustment Earthquake Recovery and Residential Construction

Development of Housing areas in Suburbs due to development of railways Suburban Location of Factories Planning of Green Areas

High Density INTRODUCTION

1958

1970

High Growth and City Planning

Enactment of new city planning law

National Capital Region development Plan Olympics and Provision of Basic Facilities Floor Area Ratio District System and Super High Rise Buildings Large Scale Apartment Complex

Revision of City planning law and Building Standards law Introduction on district planning

Low Density SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

33


EVOLUTION OF BUILDING BYELAWS 1919

Formation of City Planning Law and Urban Buildings Law • Introduction of Slant Plane Restriction and Building Envelope (To Prevent issues of Light and Ventilation and Congestion)

1970

Removal of 30 m. Height Restriction, coming up of Condominium Apartments

1972

Designation of Powers to Local Authorities to create height control zones

1982

Political Envisioning Tokyo as Manhattan Order from the MOC to relax regulations, increase FAR allowances and rezone residential areas to commercial areas to allow higher-density development

1987

Revision to Building Standard Law • Changes in Slant Plane Restriction

1994

Relaxation in FAR (Removal of Basements from counting towards FAR), Revision in FAR Provisions, which excluded shared spaces of corridors, stairs, elevator shafts and lobbies in the calculation of the total floor area of condominium buildings.

2003

Introduction of the Concept of Building Envelope along Side Slant Plane Restriction Relaxation of FAR controls through the introduction of the ‘High-rise Residential Building Promotion District’

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

34


GRAND DESIGN FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT – TOKYO 2040

Harmony with Nature Sphere

Tama Innovation Exchange Zone

Core Regional Sphere

Tama Regional Sphere

International Business Exchange Zone

The urban structure Tokyo defines 4 new spheres divided based on each area’s characteristic features and 2 zones that serve as the driving force for Japan and Tokyo.

New Urban Life Creation Sphere

A highly developed mature city that is relaxing and full of vitality

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

35


MASTER PLAN FOR CITY PLANNING AREAS – TOKYO 2040 Urbanization Promotion Area Urbanization Adjustment Area

The Plan resulted into Specific Spatial Structure Due to geographical constrains as well as conservational concerns, and hence have extended road Network only to certain regions

Urbanizable Area INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

36


DEVELOPMENT OF SPATIAL PLANS Zoning Detailed Road Network Ward Level Urban Facilities Floor Area Ratio Purchasable Floor Area Building Coverage Ratio Building Height Restriction Volume Restriction

Chiyoda Ward Area Plan

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

37


ZONING AND REGULATIONS Determined by BUILDING STANDARDS LAW

Land Use Zones Residential Exclusively Low Rise 1 Exclusively Low Rise 2 Mid Rise / High Rise 1 Mid Rise / High Rise 2 Residential 1 Residential 2 Quasi Residential

Other Land Use Zones Special Land Use District (Changes in the Uses) Efficient Land Utilization District (Changes in the Regulations) Special Land Use Restrictions Zone (Restrictions on Land Uses)

Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Commercial

Fire Protection Zone

Usually designated as an overlay zone or districts

Industrial Quasi Industrial Industrial Exclusively Industrial

Options of multiple FAR | Max. in Commercial Districts – 1300% Options of multiple BCR | Max. in Commercial Districts – 80%

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

38


ZONING AND REGULATIONS Determined by BUILDING STANDARDS LAW

Height Restriction for low rise districts only INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

39


PLAN MAKING AND FINANACING Opinions of the Municipality

Public Review

Draft Plan

Proposals From Land Owners, etc.

Consent after due deliberation by MLIT

Consultation with related organizations

City Planning Council of the Prefectural Government

Co-ordination with Related Ministries

City Planning Decision

Submission of Concerned Residents Opinion

Public Hearing & Explanation Meeting

Financing of Municipal Master Plan Investment from Local Government • • • • •

Budgetary Provisions Local Allocation Tax Local Transfer Tax Local Government Bonds City Planning Tax

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

Subsidies from Central Government • •

TOKYO

Subsidies in Major Infrastructure Subsidies for Development of other projects

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

Road Development Special Account • 1. 2. 3.

Charging Fees from the User Fuel Taxes Auto – Weight Tax Gasoline Tax

40


METHODS OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND READJUSTMENT PROJECTS • Started in the 19th century as restoration to war damages

Consists of

The description of land replotting Plot Level Land Uses Reserve land Development restrictions The fair share of costs and benefits.

Considerations from Municipal Master Plan • Inclusion of project area in city planning map • To be urbanized and where urbanization shall be controlled and not intensified • Existing infrastructure, and proposals • Land Uses can be continued from the municipal master plan, or as per the special district plans Initiator

Local Government, Land Owner’s Association Reservations for Public Purposes and Reservations to fund the project based on the Proposed public areas and Project

Reservations

Finances

Land Contribution Ratio

Based on Proportion Ratio

Cost Recovery Mechanisms INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

Based on ratio of reserved land carved out from the entire project TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

41


Ahmedabad

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

42


AHMEDABAD

Ahmedabad is located on a flat

Sabarmati

terrain around the banks of the River

in the northern part of Gujarat and the western part of India.

From what emerged as a residential settlement on the banks of River Sabarmati, Ahmedabad evolved with its trade and textile linkages, It is now evolving metropolis of India. INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

43


LEGISLATION National Level

Policy Plans and Economic Plans

MoHUA

-

State Level

Regional Plan

Town Planning Department

20 years

GUJARAT TOWN PLANNING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT Development plan Local Level

Urban Development Authority

Local Area Plan / Town Planning Schemes

Urban Development Authority / Urban Local Bodies

Development Plan

20 Years -

Town Planning Schemes

New Growth Areas

Neighbourhood Level Road Network

Land Use Zoning

Land Reconstitution and Details

City level Road Infrastructure

Neighbourhood level physical and social infrastructure

Development Control Regulations

Financial provisions for neighbourhood infrastructure facilities

INTRODUCTION

LITERATURE REVIEW

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

44


28

EVOLUTION OF SPATIAL PLANS Issues:

Development Plan 1965

• • • • •

Intensive use of land within the walled city Ill distributed open spaces Arterial Roads incapable to handle the increasing traffic Inadequate road widths and Linear Commercial Development along the roads Development of wholesale markets on the suburbs increases traffic movement from the center of the city

Plan Concept: • • •

Zoning plan to segregate industrial and residential uses Development of open spaces Development of Ring Roads – Outer Ring Road, Intermediate Ring Road, Inner Ring Road

How:

Mainly through Zoning and TP Schemes

Growth Direction - Along the East – West axis of Sabarmati River

Residential Residential Old City Villages

Industrial light Industrial General Industrial Special Industrial

Commercial Office and Business General Commercial

Agriculture Recreation and Open Spaces

Urban Structures - Urban Centre 1

Reservations

Plan Features - Green Belt Reservation along with Reservations for Public Areas and Transport Nodes INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

Highest FSI - 3 | Lowest FSI – 1.5 TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

45


28

EVOLUTION OF SPATIAL PLANS Issues:

Development Plan 2011

• • • •

Mix of Industrial and Residential Uses Untreated discharge of waste water in water bodies Lack of open spaces Creation of slums

Plan Concept: • • • • • • • •

Residential Residential Zone 1 Residential Zone 2 Residential Zone 3 Walled city / Gaamtal Village Extension

Growth Direction - Along the North – South Axis Urban Structures - Urban Centre 1 Satellite Centers 5 Plan Features - Removal of Green Belt Reservation, Zoning Based on the kind of Density required. Planning in accordance with Transportation, Development of Satellite centers INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

Objective based plan and not vision based Three Tier Hierarchical System of Development Removal of Green Belt (Formed Under ULC) Emergence of Idea of Riverfront Low lying areas along Vasna Barage and Hansol to be marked as Recreational Zoning Satellite Centers as a result of Integrated Development of Small and Medium Towns Scheme Spread towards the satellite centers due to industrial and commercial development Provide and Promote low cost housing by development control regulations

TOKYO

Industrial Predominantly light Industrial Zone General Industrial Special Industrial Institutional Educational Purpose Health Purpose

Commercial Commercial Zone 1 Commercial Zone 2

Other Zones Transport Node Recreational Zone Agricultural Zone Gardens and Open Spaces Flood Control Area Science park Multi Purpose Use Service and Institutional Purpose

Highest FSI – 1.8 | Lowest FSI – 0.3 AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

46


28

EVOLUTION OF SPATIAL PLANS Development Plan 2011

Ahmedabad Urban Complex (First Tier)

Sector

What

How

Transport

Development of Road Network, Railways and 5 Transportnagars

Shall be worked out precisely at the time of implementation

Housing

Provide housing facilities to increasing population

Through Zoning (Residential Zone) and land Reservations in Development Plan

Open / Recreational Spaces

Provide for required open spaces and recreational facilities

By zoning reservations, TP Schemes and Afforestation Tracks

Environment

Safety and Precautionary measures for release of Industrial waste

Growth Centers (Second Tier)

Agricultural Area (Third Tier)

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

To Have a Barrier on Rural to Urban migration To divert population to the growth centers To develop large scale and obnoxious types of industries

Identifying the potentials of the growth center and prepare a plan for development of growth centers accordingly

To develop rural settlements falling under AUDA region

Development of matrix to analyze and classify the current situation of rural settlements and provide them basic facilities accordingly.

SUMMARY

47


28

EVOLUTION OF SPATIAL PLANS Development Plan 2021 Issues: • • • • • •

Lack of LIG and MIG housing lack of sufficient city and regional level recreational facilities. Integration between transportation and land use plan is required to make city livable and sustainable. Lack of green Streets and Parking facilities High reliance on ground water and No proper measure to conserve the surface runoff water Lack of preservation of natural resources

Plan Concept:

• Special focus on affordable housing • Land use Transport Integration • Sectoral level projects and interventions Residential Residential Zone 1 Residential Zone 2 Residential Zone 3 RAH Zone Walled city Gaamtal Village Extension

Growth Direction - Along the Western Side of Sabarmati River Urban Structures - Urban Centre 1 Satellite Centers 5 Plan Features - RAH Zone, Development of dense Transit Corridors and CBD Areas, Land Use Transport Integration

Commercial and Logistics zone

Industrial General Industrial Special Industrial

General Agricultural Prime Agricultural Special Development Zone

Knowledge and Institutional Other Zones Transit Oriented Development Central Business District Parks and Gardens

Highest FSI – 5.4 | Lowest FSI – 0.3 INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

48


28

EVOLUTION OF SPATIAL PLANS Development Plan 2021 Sector

What

How

Simplified and Unified Street Classification

Classifying Streets based on Character and Context

Complete Streets with Pedestrian and Bicycle Network

Redesigning the Model Street Sections

Expansion of Road Network

Identification of Major Streets in Development Plan and Detailed Network in TP Schemes

Network Improvement

Connecting the missing links By Flyovers, Rail over bridges, and Underpass

Parking Management

Parking Management Plan

Logistic Parks

Designation of Logistic Parks in Zoning

Provision of EWS Housing

Through TP Scheme Reservation

Increase supply of Affordable Housing

Through Residential Affordable Housing Zoning Relaxed provisions for building regulations

New Parks and Gardens

Through TP Scheme Reservations

Green Network

Street Design aspects

Waterfront Development

Comprehensive Lake Development Plan Riverfront Development Project

Transport

Housing

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

49


28

EVOLUTION OF SPATIAL PLANS Development Plan 2021 Sector Open / Recreational Spaces

Environment

INTRODUCTION

What

How

New Parks and Gardens

Through TP Scheme Reservations

Green Network

Street Design aspects

Waterfront Development

Comprehensive Lake Development Plan Riverfront Development Project

Encourage Energy Efficient Buildings Groundwater Recharge through Recharge wells

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

Through relaxed building control regulations and Other Provisions in DCRs.

SUMMARY

50


PLANNING TRANSITIONS

DEVELOPEMNT PLAN 1965

DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2011

COMPREHENSIVE D.P. 2021

Development of Open Spaces and Transportation system

Development of city level Recreational Spaces

Densification of development

Segregate Residential and Industrial Uses through Zoning

Growth of satellite centers

Affordable Housing, TOZ, and CBD development

Density based Detailed Zoning

Land Use Transportation Integration

51


28

LAND USE Zones

1965 (Area in Sq. Km.)

2011 (Area in Sq. Km.)

2021 (Area in Sq. Km.)

R1

28.9

222.38

248

R2

-

41.12

42

R3

-

44.90

44

Gaamtal and Walled City

6.8

27.65

27

Commercial Zone

1.4

12.50

43

Industrial Zone

11.4

47.56

103

Transportation

11.5

84.29

86

Agriculture Zone

18.5

706.49

1066

Gardens and Open Spaces

8.5

2.12

2

Multi Purpose

-

0.04

-

Municipal Plots

-

4.01

-

Waterbody

-

90.66

85

Public Purpose

4.45

2.0

-

RAH Zone

-

-

75

Gaamtal Extension

-

-

57

CBD

-

-

2

TOZ

-

-

16

Knowledge & Institutional

-

-

20

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

52


28

LAND USE Zones

1965 (Area in Sq, Km,)

2011 (Area in Sq. Km.)

2021 (Area in Sq. Km.)

Special Development

-

-

11

Airport and Cantonment

-

-

9

Other Areas

1.23

-

19

Total Area

92.68

1285

1866

2011

1965

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

2021

53


28

EVOLUTION OF ZONING Determined by CITY DCRS, AND NOW GUJARAT CONPREHENSIVE DEVLEOOPMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

54


28

EVOLUTION OF ZONING Determined by CITY DCRS, AND NOW GUJARAT CONPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS

Floor Space Index

Residential Affordable Housing • •

Core Walled City – 2

Along the S.P. Ring Road Chargeable FSI at Subsidized Rate

Gaamtal - 2 Gaamtal Extension – 1.2 Residential 1 – 2.7 / 2.25 Residential 2 – 1.8 / 1.2 Residential 3 – 0.3

Transit Oriented Zone •

Common DCRs

RAH – 2.7 Transit Oriented - 4 Central Business District – 5.4

Increasing FSI along Transit Corridors (BRTS and MRTS)

Commercial and Logistics – 2.7 / 2.25 Industrial General – 1 Industrial Special – 1

SEOUL

• The provisions for FSI remains unchanged for any city

• However, gives a common ground of regulating development by other aspects according to categories of cities

General Agriculture – As Applicable Prime Agriculture – As Applicable

5.4 FSI in CBD areas Simplified Volumetric DCR for Special Areas

INTRODUCTION

• 47 over all Zones

Knowledge Zone – 1.8

Central Business District • •

• Classified Authorities into 9 categories

Special Planned Area Development – As Applicable TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

55


28

METHODS OF LAND MANAGEMENT TOWN PLANNING SCHEMES •

Mainly through Urban Development Projects (Land Readjustment)

Appropriation of portion of land from original land

The proportion of land for appropriation depends upon objective of the development, size of the area, and requirement of space for public uses

Providing regular shaped plots with proper access

Initiator

Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority / Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation SEWSH – 10%, Transportation – 15%, Green and Open

Reservations

Spaces – 5%, Social Infrastructure – 5%, Land for Sale – 15%

Land Contribution Ratio Cost Recovery Mechanisms INTRODUCTION

Based on the total area of reservation Betterment Charges, Development Fees, etc. SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

Some of the implications of adopting a TPs Mechanism in Ahmedabad are: 1.

Lands for Public Purposes

2.

Land for Social Housing

3.

Higher Road Density

4.

Selling lands for infrastructure financing

5.

Development of city level infrastructure and open spaces

SUMMARY

56


SUMMARY TOKYO

SEOUL •

Conceptual Development plan as a guiding principle – actually giving flexibility for lower order plans.

Influence of National Level Zoning

A Comprehensive master plan which includes policies for development and redevelopment of urban areas making it statutory

Integration of Economic Development with Sustainable Planning Practices

Continuous focus on development of public transport

Development of Land Use - Transport Integration Planning

Continuously integrating modes of transport, making them more accessible

Presence of rail integrated communities – mixed use, Pedestrian Friendly Development

Development of Urban Landscape and Open Spaces

Monitoring Implementation of Development Plan

A strong hold upon the capital city by framing of national policies for development of the Seoul

Integration of land readjustment projects with city planning

The formula of Plan – Implement – Evaluate

Integrated Functioning of Authorities

Flexible building development guidelines for private realm

Continuous and efficient revision of plans

Mechanisms of District Unit Plans to develop urban forms for specific areas of importance

Integrations of considerations of natural topography, Geography, Environment, Economic growth and City Residents,

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

57


RECOMMENDATIONS TOKYO

SEOUL •

Conceptual Development plan as a guiding principle – actually giving flexibility for lower order plans.

Influence of National Level Zoning

A Comprehensive master plan which includes policies for development and redevelopment of urban areas making it statutory

Integration of Economic Development with Sustainable Planning Practices

Continuous focus on development of public transport

Development of Land Use - Transport Integration Planning

Continuously integrating modes of transport, making them more accessible

Presence of rail integrated communities – mixed use, Pedestrian Friendly Development

Development of Urban Landscape and Open Spaces

Monitoring Implementation of Development Plan

A strong hold upon the capital city by framing of national policies for development of the Seoul

Integration of land readjustment projects with city planning

The formula of Plan – Implement – Evaluate

Integrated Functioning of Authorities

Flexible building development guidelines for private realm

Continuous and efficient revision of plans

Mechanisms of District Unit Plans to develop urban forms for specific areas of importance

Integrations of considerations of natural topography, Geography, Environment, Economic growth and City Residents,

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

58


DEVELOPMENT PLAN MONITORING Seoul

Ahmedabad

The formula of Plan – Implement – Evaluate from 2006

Resource Cell, 2013

Monitoring Mechanism: A yearly monitoring of progress in the sectoral proposals of Basic Urban Area Plan

Measuring Hierarchy: Goal – Strategies – Sub Strategies – Monitoring Indicator

Monitoring Indicators: 1. Seoul City public transport Transportation share ratio 2. Metropolitan area Urban railway Total length 3. In Seoul Urban railway Congestion rate 4. Seoul City Urban railway station elevator, escalator Installation rate 5. Seoul City Highway Total length 6. Metropolitan highway Total extension 7. Highway Real-time signal system Installation rate 8. Number of Traffic Accidents 9. pedestrian Traffic accident rate 10. Bicycle Means share 11. On the whole road Walk to pedestrians Ratio 12. Seoul City Housing Parking Lot Securing rate INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

59


DEVELOPMENT PLAN MONITORING Tokyo

land ownership, consumption of floor space area by different uses, changes in land prices, changes in land use

Published by TMG

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

60


DEVELOPMENT PLAN MONITORING Proposal

Sector

What

Assessment indicator

How

Densification of existing zoned areas

By Incentivizing Payable FSI

• Percent of Utilized FSI in the identified Zone

By Local Area Plan Development of Central Business

By Local Area Plan

district

Through Purchasable FSI

Development of TOD

By Local Area Plan Through Purchasable FSI

Development around existing zoned

By Zoning Measures

areas to incentivize affordable housing Through reduction in costs of Purchasable FSI

Zoning and Development

• Percent of Usage of Extra Provided FSI in the overall area • Percent of Usage of Extra Provided FSI in the overall area • Percent of Land being constructed as Affordable Housing Scheme • Total amount collected through purchasable FSI for Affordable Housing Scheme

Development in growth centers

Through preparation of Development Plan for the Growth Regions By developing SEZs and SIRs in the Growth Regions

• The changes in share of Industries in SEZs and SIRs in the Growth Centers • The changes in share of residential buildings in the Growth Centers • The actual share of land developed as compared to Development Plan

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

61


IMPROVEMENTS IN LAND MANAGEMENT Seoul Initiator

Local

Govt.,

Land

construction,

owner,

Tokyo Ministry

National

Ahmedabad

of Local Government, Land Owner’s Association

Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority

government

development Corporations Reservations

Varies depending on the project

Reservations

for

Public

Purposes

and SEWSH – 10%, Transportation – 15%, Green

Reservations to fund the project based on the and Open Spaces – 5%, Social Infrastructure – Proposed public areas and Project Finances

5%, Land for Sale – 15% Based on the total area of reservation

Land Contribution Ratio

Cost Equivalent Land Contribution

Based on Proportion Ratio

Cost Recovery

Cost Equivalent Land Contribution

Based on ratio of reserved land carved out Betterment Charges

Mechanisms

from the entire project

Land Valuation 1.

The street coefficient -

2.

The accessibility coefficient - accessibility

street conditions

of plot to various public amenities and facilities.

3.

Land coefficient - kind

of development permissible on the parcel of land, the installed infrastructure, etc.

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

Land Contribution Area of plot after deduction = (Pr*Ai*ai / ei) Based on proportion ratio Proportion Ratio = (Total value of all the land parcels before the project / Total Value of all the land parcels after the project)

Price Contribution r = R *e/ ΔV r – the coefficient of contribution by land owners R – Share of land reserved for financing the scheme e – unit price of land after completion of the project ΔV – Increase in the price of land (only the private lands left after deduction and reserved land)

Pr – Proportion Ratio Ai – Area of plot Before deduction ai – Unit land price before deduction ei – Unit land price after deduction

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

62


DEVELOPMENT OF OPEN SPACES Seoul

1960 – 1970

Haphazard expansion of city Increasing population in the 1960s The concern of sustainability and creating public open spaces Continuous focus in the master plan as well as strengthened policy for it

1980 – 1990

Park Act

Revision in Urban planning

act •

Distinguishing urban parks and green spaces

1990 – 2010

Urban Park act and Natural Park •

Transformation of old sites into

act

park areas

Preservation

of

natural •

environment •

Parks and green spaces plan

Efforts to develop urban parks as ecological sites

National efforts for building parks across the nation

Han river park basic plan

Parks as cultural, leisure and

welfare facility

Ahmedabad Identification of issues of open space in the first plan Plan to obtain the land through TP schemes. Some parcels of the land remained un developed due to lack of details on how to develop these land parcels Success of which is still a question!!

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

63


DEVELOPMENT OF OPEN SPACES CHONGGYECHEON RESTORATION PROJECT

In the year 2002 Demolition of highway for making room for open space Chonggyecheon Restoration Master Plan Reviving the natural ecology of the stream, develop human – oriented public spaces, restoration of the historical assets Financed by the resources allocated for renovation of the highway and by cutting down from the projects that are not urgent and city budget.

Planning Measures Acts and

Initiative by Government bodies

Adaptive use of historical landmarks

National Efforts Introduction of Green Belt Policy

Policies Plan

Designation of Scenic district in city plans with Conversion of old landfill sites into open spaces separate regulations

Short Term

Rezoning the unusable spaces and public buildings

By adapting changes into streetscapes

Specific projects by Landscape division of SMG

By Government sponsored contest of developing

Initiatives

open spaces as a concept of Seoul Village Squares Olympics – development of Green Streets, Parks, Han

River Park, etc. through development plan projects.

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

64


ADMINISTRATION SEOUL

TOKYO Citizens of Seoul

Governor

Mayor

Vice Governor

Vice Mayor Governer’s Bureau Urban Space Improvement Bureau Bureau of Urban Development Urban Planning Bureau • • • • • •

Urban Planning Division Strategic Planning Division Urban Management & Design Division Facility Planning Division Land Management Division Urban Light Pollution Policy Division

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

Other bureaus for implementing the proposals of basic urban plan

AHMEDABAD

• Formulation of total urban development policies and housing policies • Construction of roads, railways and other urban infrastructure • Improvement of built-up areas through land readjustment and urban redevelopment projects • Provision of guidance for housing land development and architectural structures • Construction and management of metropolitan housing • Measures for US military facilities

SUMMARY

Other bureaus for planning for Metropolitan area

65


ADMINISTRATION Major Functions of a Development Authority • • • • • •

Preparation of Development Plan Preparation of Town Planning Schemes Background work for preparing a development plan Guide and Assist Local Authority in urban development planning Control development activities according to DP Execute city level infrastructure works

A framework for INTEGRATED FUNCTIONING OF ELECTED AND DESIGNATED AUTHORITIES for city planning can be beneficial for the development of the city

INTRODUCTION

SEOUL

TOKYO

AHMEDABAD

SUMMARY

66


BY SHRUJAL PATEL (PP0006017) UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF PROF. RUTOOL SHARMA MASTER’S IN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING (LANDUSE) MAY 2019 | CEPT UNIVERSITY AHMEDABAD


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.