International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) – volume 8 number 3– Feb 2014
WLan Architecture Ishu Mittal1, Mr. Anshul Anand2
1 2
(Computer Science, Shri Baba Mastnath Engg. College/ Maharashi Dayanand University,Rtk, India (Computer Science, Shri Baba Mastnath Engg. College/ Maharashi Dayanand University,Rtk, India)
ABSTRACT : It is the review paper of Architecture of Wireless local area networks. In this paper we are discussing the architecture of wlan. A wireless LAN (WLAN) is a local area network based on wireless technology. Most modern local area networks now employ some wireless network infrastructure because it allows existing networks to be extended without the expense of additional cabling, and allows users of portable network devices to maintain connectivity with the network as they move around. Wireless networks can be set up quickly and can be configured in either ad hoc or infrastructure mode. In ad hoc mode, two or more portable computers can communicate with each other in the wireless equivalent of a peer-topeer network. There is no connection to a wired network and a wireless access point is not required. In this paper I also explaining the advantages, architecture, layers, frame format of wireless Local Area Networks.
Keywords
Introduction, Advantages, Architecture, Access Points,BSS, ESS, Frame Format, Layers,. INTRODUCTION A wireless local area network (WLAN) links two or more devices using some wireless distribution method (typically spread-spectrum or OFDM radio), and usually providing a connection through an access point to the wider Internet. This gives users the ability to move around within a local coverage area and still be connected to the network. Most modern WLANs are based on IEEE 802.11 standards,
I. 1. 2. 3.
4. 5.
ADVANTAGES
It is easier to add or move workstations. It is easier to provide connectivity in areas where it is difficult to lay cable. Installation is fast and easy, and it can eliminate the need to pull cable through walls and ceilings. Access to the network can be from anywhere within range of an access point. Portable or semi permanent buildings can be connected using a WLAN.
ISSN: 2231-2803
6.
7.
8.
9.
II.
Although the initial investment required for WLAN hardware can be similar to the cost of wired LAN hardware, installation expenses can be significantly lower. When a facility is located on more than one site (such as on two sides of a road), a directional antenna can be used to avoid digging trenches under roads to connect the sites. In historic buildings where traditional cabling would compromise the façade, a WLAN can avoid the need to drill holes in walls. Long-term cost benefits can be found in dynamic environments requiring frequent moves and changes
WIRELESS NETWORK
There are two major approaches today for deploying WLAN networks in the enterprise. Both approaches require Wireless 802.11 based Access Points (APs) and some method for managing these network elements. However, the two approaches have some basic philosophical differences which can have a major impact on deployment costs, security and manageability. The first architecture to be presented is the socalled “Centralized” WLAN Architecture. The Centralized Architecture requires one or more servers or special purpose switches to be deployed in conjunction with Wireless Access Points. In the Centralized approach, all wireless traffic is sent through the WLAN switch. Another approach is the “Distributed” Access Point WLAN Architecture. The Distributed Architecture adheres closely to the principles of the IEEE 802.11 standard. In the Distributed approach, APs have built-in WLAN security, layer 2 bridging, and access control features. Depending on the number of APs required, Centralized Management may be required. Distributed AP vendors may provide Centralized Management tools or the APs may be managed by the existing Network Management Infrastructure. The AP is connected directly to the trusted wired infrastructure and “extends” the wired network by providing wireless connections to wireless client devices. One of the advantages of the Distributed or Wireless Extension approach is that the wireless traffic load is literally distributed across the APs and does not depend on a centralized element to
www.internationaljournalssrg.org
Page 148