3
court space reForm
Data Analysis Population Demographics It is necessary first to analyze the population's demographics served by the courts. Communities and architecture are interlinked, and when designed correctly, architecture can help build and strengthen a sense of community. The location of a space, the size required for that function, and how it connects represent cultural significance. Architectural design practices should incorporate cultural traditions, be inclusive, and address the needs of the people and the communities in which they live. As with all services, depending on the planned initiative, different cohorts of the local population may need to be analyzed. However, it is essential to understand that it is rare that service is limited to a single population or demographic cohort. Additionally, the nuanced influences impacting the day-to-day assignments of staff may have marginal differences in the built space in which those services are occurring. For long-term, multiyear planning efforts, macro-level trend analysis can provide the most reasonable range to anticipate growth. Historic Case Trends
The constituency’s needs are essential to understand and are often reflected in the caseloads entered into the court. A strength of the court system is the reliance on past precedent to help predict and decide the future outcome. So, courts should use this skill to their advantage. Historical case filings should be examined to identify a trend that can be used to make informed inferences about probable future activity. Projections based on past filing trends implicitly assume that caseloads change fairly consistently over time or that the factors that influenced caseload growth in the past will continue to affect case filings in the future. Any dramatic changes to court jurisdiction, laws, or demographics may affect the level of case filings.
While examining the historic trends in new cases and proceedings filed with the courts, it is important to recognize that while there may be significant fluctuations in new filings, the impact on the courts' total workload is not equal across all case types. Multiple forecasting models should be tested to simulate the case filing trends’ evolvement. Understandably, each model has its inherent strengths and weaknesses; the averaging of models attempts to counter one model's weakness with the strength of the others. Regardless of the estimating technique used, projections become more tenuous the further into the future they extend.
