A sermon preached by the Rev’d Dr Daniel Dries The Epiphany Christ Church St Laurence – 6 January 2017 May the words of my mouth and the meditations of our hearts be acceptable in your sight: O Lord, our strength and our Redeemer. Amen. From the Second Chapter of the Gospel according to Matthew: When they saw that the star had stopped, they were overwhelmed with joy. I’m sure that most of you would realise that our much-loved Christmas traditions are a little like a clunky jig-saw puzzle, in which several contrasting episodes have been wedged uncomfortably together. Mark’s Gospel makes no attempt to document the birth of the Christ child, while John speaks of a divine incarnation in mystical and supremely beautiful prose. Christmas cards and nativity scenes rely entirely on the Gospels of Luke and Matthew. Luke presents us with the shepherds; the first visitors to the manger, while Matthew introduces us to the magi—wise men from the east who offered impractical gifts to the unknowing saviour of the nations. There are so many questions we might ask about Matthew’s spectacular, yet mysterious wise men. For example, what do these costly gifts of gold, frankincense and myrrh symbolise? Much has been suggested about the meaning of the gifts, while others have reflected at length about when these symbolic gifts were presented. It is generally accepted that the all-important day of presentation was the 6th of January (or after 12 days had passed, whenever that really was). There is also a theory that the momentous visit occurred 40 days after the birth. Another tradition suggests that a least 2 winters had passed before the so-called wise men managed to find their illusive destination. During this last week, I have been observing the supposed wise men gradually shuffling their way through chancel of this church. I have noted that their sense of direction does not seem to be particularly good, thus giving merit to the theory of a 2-year journey. However, even more concerning in this church; a parish that prides itself on liturgical correctness, is the fact that our wise men seem to have come from the south; something we may have to correct next year. Like so many figures in Scripture, the magi present us with various inconsistencies and unanswered questions. This would be a significant problem if we were committed to a fundamental or literal interpretation. The Christmas story is full of unanswered questions and inconsistencies. The tradition of the shepherds does not sit well with the tradition of the magi. This is highlighted by the fact that the shepherds have seemingly been knocked out of our crib by the luminaries from the east (or the south in our case). These exclusive visitation rights are also reflected in most renaissance paintings depicting the adoration of the magi. It seems that shepherds and wise men do not sit well together in this maternity ward. However, it could be argued that the wise men have no right to be there at all. We can focus on their gifts, or the direction and length of their journey, but surely it is more important to ask why supposedly wise and intelligent gentiles or non-Jews would make a dangerous and costly journey to worship a Jewish Messiah? Why on earth would pagan foreigners ‘drop by’ to pay homage to a Jewish King, when his own people have not yet recognised and honoured him. Although they know something of Jewish prophecy, the magi are not qualified to venerate a Jewish messiah. They can’t possibly know who or what they are worshipping. Page | 1