Refresh: Sustainability

Page 1

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

SUSTAINABILITY


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

CLIMATE CHANGE


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Most polluted metropolitan regions by particulate matter

Most polluted cities by ozone pollution

1. Visalia-Porterville-Hanford, CA

1. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA

2. Bakersfield, CA

2. Bakersfield, CA

3. Fresno-Madera, CA

3. Fresno-Madera, CA

4. San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA

4. Visalia-Porterville-Hanford, CA

5. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA

5. Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ

6. Modesto-Merced, CA

6. Modesto-Merced, CA

7. El Centro, CA

7. San Diego-Carlsbad, CA

8. Pittsburgh-New Castle-Weirton, PA-OH-WV

8. Sacramento-Roseville, CA

9. Cleveland-Akron-Canton, OH

9. New York-Newark, NY-NJ-CT-PA

10. San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA

10. Las Vegas-Henderson, NV-AZ

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


COURTESY OF ARUP

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

RESILIENCE


INCREASE IN AVERAGE GLOBAL TEMPERATURE

8° C RCP 8.5 Business as usual 2.2 trillion tons carbon

7° C 6° C

RCP 6.0 emissions peak 2080 2.2 trillion tons carbon

5° C 4° C

RCP 4.5 emissions peak 2040/2050 1.3 trillion tons carbon

3° C 2° C 1° C

RCP 2.5 0.53 trillion tons carbon zero CO₂ emissions ~2050

2014 0 1950

2000

2100

2050

2150

2200

GLOBAL TEMPERATURE PROJECTIONS FOR VARIOUS RCP SCENARIOS

THE 2 C SCENARIO O

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


30

RCP 8.5 2.05 trillion tons carbon

FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS (GTC / YEAR)

25

20 emissions peak 2080

15

RCP 6.0 1.43 trillion tons carbon

emissions peak 2040/2050

10 emissions peak 2020

RCP 4.5 1.15 trillion tons carbon

5 ~ 33% above 2°C

RCP 2.6 (2° C) 0.64 trillion tons carbon

~ 66% below 2°C

0 1960

1980

2000

2020

2040

2060

2080

2100

PATHWAYS FOR FOSSIL FUEL CARBON EMISSIONS TO 2100

THE 2 C SCENARIO O

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


30

RCP 8.5 2.05 trillion tons carbon

FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS (GTC / YEAR)

25

20 emissions peak 2080

15

RCP 6.0 1.43 trillion tons carbon

emissions peak 2040/2050

10 emissions peak 2020

RCP 4.5 1.15 trillion tons carbon

5 RCP 2.6 (1.5° C) >85% below 2° C -0.53 trillion tons carbon

RCP 2.6 (2° C) 0.64 trillion tons carbon

0 1960

1980

2000

2020

2040

2060

2080

2100

PATHWAYS FOR FOSSIL FUEL CARBON EMISSIONS TO 2100

THE 1.5 C SCENARIO O

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


HIGH PERFORMANCE DESIGN

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

DEEP EFFICIENCY RENOVATIONS

RENEWABLE ENERGY

PATH TO 80% BY 2050


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Typical building Office 2008

Building Stock Office 2012

Title 24 - 2013 Title 24 - 2016

Tier 1 - 15% Stretch Code Tier 2 - 30% Stretch Code

Title 24 - 2013

Title 24 - 2016

Title 24 - 2019 (EDR Efficiency) Title 24 - 2019 (EDR PV Solar)

100

80 84

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

60 72

40 51.5 50 47.6 45 40.5 33.3

20 24.3

0 Net Zero

PATH TO NET ZERO


RPS RENEWABLE CAPACITY INSTALLED IN CALIFORNIA (IN MW) BY RESOURCE TYPE

STATEWIDE AND U.S. BASELINE ELECTRICITY ANNUAL CONSUMPTION PER CAPITA

25,000 14,000

600

NAMEPLATE CAPACITY (MW)

12,000

10,000

500

KWH

400

8,000

6,000

300

Per Capita Consumption - CA

20,000 Solar PV Solar Thermal

15,000

Wind Geothermal Small Hydro

10,000

Biomass

4,000

5,000 Per Capita Consumption - US

200

2,000

SOURCE: California Energy Commission, Tracking Progress web page. Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, updated December 20, 2016.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2014

2011

2008

2005

SOURCE: California Energy Commission, 2016. California Energy Demand 2016-2026. Revised Electricity Forecast. California Energy Commission. Publication Number: CEC-200-2016-001-V1 Adopted 2016.

NOTE: Not shown is California’s 2050 goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 as set in Executive Order B-30-15.

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

2002

2030

1999

2025

1996

2020

1993

2015

1990

2010 YEAR

1987

2005

1984

2000

1981

1995

1978

1990

0

0

0

1975

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (MMTC02e)

CALIFORNIA’S PATH TO PROGRESS TO MEET CLIMATE GOALS

SOURCE: California Energy Commission, prepared with data from Tracking Progress, Renewable Energy, updated December 22, 2016, and posted December 27, 2016. (This approximates RPS eligibility but it should not be used for evaluating compliance.)

CONSUMPTION


7.25

14.0

13.5 BILLION SQUARE FEET

BILLION SQUARE FEET

7.00

6.75

6.50

6.25

13.0

12.5

6.00

12.0

0

0

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2000

2014

2002

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (FLOOR SPACE 2000 - 2014)

350,000

18,000

300,000

16,000 MILLIONS OF THERMS

MILLIONS OF KWH

CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS (FLOOR SPACE 2000 - 2014)

2004

250,000

200,000

14,000

12,000

10,000

150,000

California 2014-2015 Record warm years

100,000

8,000

0

0

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

CALIFORNIA ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION (BUILDINGS)

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

CALIFORNIA BUILDING

2012

2014

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

CALIFORNIA GAS CONSUMPTION (BUILDINGS)

CONSUMPTION


16

& PG

Equivilent to emitting

METRIC TONS OF CO2 on a monthly basis.

Average of

E

E SC

30,000

kWh per month.

Equivilent of CO2.

16

ENERGY WP D A

METRIC TONS OF

S

F

C

NI A IFOR L A

L

Biomass & Biowaste Geothermal Hydro Solar Wind Natural Gas Nuclear Coal Other Unspecified Sources

STAT EO

UNDERSTANDING OUR CONSUMPTION

Equivilent of

& DG

5

E

annual vehicles.

40,000

30,000

2

20,000

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

homes’ annual

October

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

(kWh) 0

December

30’

November

10,000

September

Equivilent of consumption.

GHG emissions: Monthly average GHG emissions: Year to Date GHG emissions: Anticipated annual generation

15

Requires sequester.

Acres of forest to


AB 32 CA GLOBAL WARMING SOLUTIONS ACT

AB 802 ENERGY EFFICIENCY (ENERGY STAR)

SB 775 AB 32 - CAP + TRADE EXTENSION

2006

2016

2017 - TBD

requires California to reduce its GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, a reduction of approximately 15 percent below emissions expected under a “business as usual” scenario.

establishing as a market-based compliance mechanism, basically a revamp of the current Cap + Trade program by increasing the minimum reserve prices for GHG(e) allowances and increasing over time.

mandates the establishment of a new (extension of the) statewide building energy use benchmarking and public disclosure program known as Energy Star for the sale or refinancing of a facility.

SB 32 AB 32 EMISSIONS LIMIT EXTENSION

SB 375 SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ACT

2016

2008

Extendes the GHG Emission reductions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030.

supports the State’s climate action goals to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through coordinated transportation and land use planning with the goal of more sustainable communities. (Driven by ARB 2020 and 2035 regional targets).

AB 197 AB 32 EMISSIONS REGULATION 2016

AB 341 COMMERCIAL RECYCLING LAW 2011

sets a 75% waste diversion goal for all commercial facilities, and those generating greater than 4 cubic yards of waste on a weekly basis by 2020.

increases legislative oversight of ARB and provides additional direction about how to achieve the new SB 32 2030 goals.

SB 1383 SHORT-LIVED CLIMATE POLLUTANTS 2016

establishes specific reduction goals for nonCO2 climate pollutants such as methane, black carbon and HFCs.

SB 350 CLEAN ENERGY & POLLUTION 2015

REDUCTION ACT

Increases renewable targets for utilities to 50% by 2030. Driven by the PUC.

2006

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

2008

2011

2015 2016

POLICY


DESIGN HEALTH + + CONSTRUCTION WELLNESS

URBAN DENSITY REPORTING + ESG COMMUNITY GRI CSR

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT

WELL LIVING LAB

CLIMATE ACTION PLANS

VARIOUS CERTIFICATIONS

DISTRICT SCALE INITIATIVES

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY GOVERNANCE GLOBAL REPORTING INITATIVE

OWNER DRIVEN CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

TRENDS


1,000+ RESPONDENTS 27% Architects 25% Contractors / Builders 22% Specialist 13% Owner / Developer 13% Engineering Firm

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

LOS ANGELES


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Defining the PIVOT

100,000

Owners of existing green buildings reported that their ROI improved by

100,000 LEED Certified Projects to date

80,000

And new projects increased by

19.2% 9.9%

60,000 40,000

Operating costs decreased by for new construction

20,000

400 WELL Projects Registered / 20 WELL Certified Projects to date

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

0

And existing building projects decreased by

10.9% 6.8%

New Construction building value increased by And existing building retrofits saw an increase of an average of

400 350 300 250

Increased asset valuation: New green building projects: 2017

2016

2015

200

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

13.6% 8.5%

Green building retrofits:

5% 4%


Summary Statement Market Sector Regional Locations Accredidation Requirements

A holistic approach to reducing the impact GHG emissions and overall enviornmental impact in the built enviornment. New Construction and Existing Buildings Worldwide, primarily US LEED AP

Reviewing Entity

GBCI

Year Established

2000

GSF Certified Number of Projects Certified

In the Billions 101,501

Major Players

GSA, Kohls, Hines, Brookfield,

Sub-Systems

BD+C, ID+C, O+M, ND, Homes

Scoring System Levels of Certification Tracking Mechanism Bulk Phase Required by Governmental Entities Financial Benefits % overlap with CA Code Registration Fees Consulting Fees Review Fees

Point Based: 40 - 110 Certified, Silver, Gold, Platinum Prescriptive, Performance and Policies Design / Construction / Post Occupancy GSA - 25% of market is required to be in a LEED certified space. Many cities within CA has adopted LEED into their local codes Tax benefits in several states 40% in California $ $900 $$ - $$$ $30,000 - $120,000 $$ ~ $.03 / SF - $15,000 Max

Most Valued Take-Away

Driving force behine environmental stewardship in buildings. The basis for GRESB

Notes

The quantity of registration has finally plateaued, though are still consistently pursuing

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Summary Statement Market Sector

Aims to protect, improve and regenerate ecosystems through it’s projects. Largely landscape architecture (of first 150 beta projects, 25% were open space, followed by institutional‌ etc.)

Regional Locations Accredidation Requirements

Worldwide Sites AP

Reviewing Entity

GBCI

Year Established

2006 / 2015

GSF Certified Number of Projects Certified

46

Major Players

Federal Government, States, Counties, Cities

Sub-Systems

None

Scoring System Levels of Certification Tracking Mechanism Bulk Phase Required by Governmental Entities Financial Benefits % overlap with CA Code Registration Fees Consulting Fees Review Fees Most Valued Take-Away Notes

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

2 year pilot 6/2010 - 6/2012 with 46 projects (30,000,000+ SF). Currenlty have 40,000,000 SF registered across 40 projects.

Points, same as LEED Cert / Silver / Gold / Platinum Same as LEED Design and Construction Yes - see market research notes (Government and Cities adoption) (CA, NJ adopting) No Federal, but looking at other incentives. TBD. TBD $2,500 - $3,000 TBD, likely $20k - $50k $6,500 - $9,000 Great for landscape architecture.


Project Name: _____________________________________________________________________

SITES v2 Scorecard Summary YES

0 Y Y Y Y

0 Y Y Y

0 Y Y

0 Y Y Y

0 Y

?

0

0

0

0

0

NO

0 1: SITE CONTEXT CONTEXT P1.1 CONTEXT P1.2 CONTEXT P1.3 CONTEXT P1.4 CONTEXT C1.5 CONTEXT C1.6 CONTEXT C1.7

Possible Points: Limit development on farmland Protect floodplain functions Conserve aquatic ecosystems Conserve habitats for threatened and endangered species Redevelop degraded sites Locate projects within existing developed areas Connect to multi‐modal transit networks

0 2: PRE‐DESIGN ASSESSMENT + PLANNING Use an integrative design process PRE‐DESIGN P2.1 Conduct a pre‐design site assessment PRE‐DESIGN P2.2 Designate and communicate VSPZs PRE‐DESIGN P2.3 Engage users and stakeholders PRE‐DESIGN C2.4

Possible Points:

0 3: SITE DESIGN ‐ WATER WATER P3.1 WATER P3.2 WATER C3.3 WATER C3.4 WATER C3.5 WATER C3.6

Possible Points:

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

?

0

0

0 6: SITE DESIGN ‐ HUMAN HEALTH + WELL‐BEING Possible Points: 30 Protect and maintain cultural and historic places HHWB C6.1 2 to 3 Provide optimum site accessibility, safety, and wayfinding HHWB C6.2 2 Promote equitable site use HHWB C6.3 2 Support mental restoration HHWB C6.4 2 Support physical activity HHWB C6.5 2 Support social connection HHWB C6.6 2 Provide on‐site food production HHWB C6.7 3 to 4 Reduce light pollution HHWB C6.8 4 Encourage fuel efficient and multi‐modal transportation HHWB C6.9 4 Minimize exposure to environmental tobacco smoke HHWB C6.10 1 to 2 Support local economy HHWB C6.11 3

0 Y Y Y

0

0 7: CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION P7.1 CONSTRUCTION P7.2 CONSTRUCTION P7.3 CONSTRUCTION C7.4 CONSTRUCTION C7.5 CONSTRUCTION C7.6 CONSTRUCTION C7.7

3

23

4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 5 4 to 6 Possible Points:

0 5: SITE DESIGN ‐ MATERIALS SELECTION Possible Points: Eliminate the use of wood from threatened tree species MATERIALS P5.1 Maintain on‐site structures and paving MATERIALS C5.2 Design for adaptability and disassembly MATERIALS C5.3 Use salvaged materials and plants MATERIALS C5.4 Use recycled content materials MATERIALS C5.5 Use regional materials MATERIALS C5.6 Support responsible extraction of raw materials MATERIALS C5.7 Support transparency and safer chemistry MATERIALS C5.8 Support sustainability in materials manufacturing MATERIALS C5.9 Support sustainability in plant production MATERIALS C5.10

5/12/2017

YES

3 to 6 4 2 to 3

3

Manage precipitation on site Reduce water use for landscape irrigation Manage precipitation beyond baseline Reduce outdoor water use Design functional stormwater features as amenities Restore aquatic ecosystems

0 4: SITE DESIGN ‐ SOIL + VEGETATION Create and communicate a soil management plan SOIL+VEG P4.1 Control and manage invasive plants SOIL+VEG P4.2 Use appropriate plants SOIL+VEG P4.3 Conserve healthy soils and appropriate vegetation SOIL+VEG C4.4 Conserve special status vegetation SOIL+VEG C4.5 Conserve and use native plants SOIL+VEG C4.6 Conserve and restore native plant communities SOIL+VEG C4.7 Optimize biomass SOIL+VEG C4.8 Reduce urban heat island effects SOIL+VEG C4.9 Use vegetation to minimize building energy use SOIL+VEG C4.10 Reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire SOIL+VEG C4.11

13

Project ID#:_______________ Date: __________________

40

4 to 6 4 3 to 6 4 to 6 1 to 6 4 1 to 4 4 41 2 to 4 3 to 4 3 to 4 3 to 4 3 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 5 1 to 5

0 Y Y

0

NO

Possible Points: Communicate and verify sustainable construction practices Control and retain construction pollutants Restore soils disturbed during construction Restore soils disturbed by previous development Divert construction and demolition materials from disposal Divert reusable vegetation, rocks, and soil from disposal Protect air quality during construction

3 to 5 3 to 4 3 to 4 2 to 4

0 8. OPERATIONS + MAINTENANCE Possible Points: Plan for sustainable site maintenance O+M P8.1 Provide for storage and collection of recyclables O+M P8.2 Recycle organic matter O+M C8.3 Minimize pesticide and fertilizer use O+M C8.4 Reduce outdoor energy consumption O+M C8.5 Use renewable sources for landscape electricity needs O+M C8.6 Protect air quality during landscape maintenance O+M C8.7

3 to 5 4 to 5 2 to 4 3 to 4 2 to 4

Possible Points:

11 3 to 4 3 4

Bonus Points:

9 3 to 9

0

0

0 9. EDUCATION + PERFORMANCE MONITORING Promote sustainability awareness and education EDUCATION C9.1 Develop and communicate a case study EDUCATION C9.2 Plan to monitor and report site performance EDUCATION C9.3

0

0

0 10. INNOVATION OR EXEMPLARY PERFORMANCE Innovation or exemplary performance INNOVATION C10.1

YES

?

NO

0

0

0

TOTAL ESTIMATED POINTS

KEY YES Project confident points are achievable ?

17

Project striving to achieve points, not 100% confident

NO Project is unable to achieve these credit points

Total Possible Points: SITES Certification levels CERTIFIED SILVER GOLD PLATINUM Page 1 of 1 Copyright © 2014

22

200 Points 70 85 100 135


Summary Statement

Living Buildings are self-sufficient and remain within the resource limits of their site. Living Buildings produce more energy than they use and collect and treat all water on site.

Market Sector

New Construction

Regional Locations Accredidation Requirements

Worldwide, primarily US NA

Reviewing Entity

Living Building Institute

Year Established

2000

GSF Certified Number of Projects Certified

14 Million+ GSF 300+ most on the US West Coast

Major Players

Institutional / Environmental

Sub-Systems

Buildings, Renovations and Landscape + Infrastructure

Scoring System Levels of Certification Tracking Mechanism Bulk Phase

100% Compliance with system Living Buildings Challenge / Living Communities Challenge / Petals Prescriptive, Performance and Policies Design / Construction

Required by Governmental Entities

NA

Financial Benefits

NA

% overlap with CA Code

NA

Registration Fees Consulting Fees Review Fees Most Valued Take-Away Notes

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

$ $900 $$ - $$$ $30,000 - $120,000 $$ $1,250 - $10,000+ A true challenge for designers. Energy and Water issues vary depending on location / climate.


SUMMARY MATRIX Imperative omitted from Typology

The 20 Imperatives of the Living Building Challenge: Follow down the column associated with each Typology to see which Imperatives apply.

Solutions beyond project footprint are permissible

LIVING COMMUNITY CHALLENGE 1.1

SM

LIVING BUILDING CHALLENGE 3.1 BUILDINGS

RENOVATIONS

A Visionary Path to a Regenerative Future

LANDSCAPE + INFRASTRUCTURE

PLACE

01. LIMITS TO GROWTH SCALE JUMPING

SCALE JUMPING

02. URBAN AGRICULTURE

SCALE JUMPING

03. HABITAT EXCHANGE

LI BU CH

04. HUMAN-POWERED LIVING WATER

SCALE JUMPING

05. NET POSITIVE WATER

ENERGY

SCALE JUMPING

06. NET POSITIVE ENERGY

HEALTH + HAPPINESS

LIVING BUILDING CHALLENGE 3.1

07. CIVILIZED ENVIRONMENT

SM

08. HEALTHY INTERIOR ENVIRONMENT 09. BIOPHILIC ENVIRONMENT MATERIALS

A Visionary Path to a Regenerative Future

10. RED LIST SCALE JUMPING

11. EMBODIED CARBON FOOTPRINT 12. RESPONSIBLE INDUSTRY 13. LIVING ECONOMY SOURCING

LIVIN PROD CHAL

14. NET POSITIVE WASTE EQUITY

15. HUMAN SCALE + HUMANE PLACES 16. UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO NATURE + PLACE SCALE JUMPING

LIVING PRODUCT CHALLENGE 1.0

17. EQUITABLE INVESTMENT 18. JUST ORGANIZATIONS

BEAUTY

SM

19. BEAUTY + SPIRIT

A Visionary Path to a Regenerative Future

20. INSPIRATION + EDUCATION

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

Living Building ChallengeSM 3.1

|

21


Summary Statement Market Sector Regional Locations Accredidation Requirements

To create healthy, productive, enjoyable environments Primarily office, followed by residential Worldwide, largest market is California followed by Guangdong Sheng WELL AP / Assessor

Reviewing Entity

3rd Party Entity - IWBI (International Well Building Institute)

Year Established

2013

GSF Certified

TBD

Number of Projects Certified Major Players

CBRE, Delloitte, HOK, Glumac, HSK

Sub-Systems

CS, NB and EB

Scoring System Levels of Certification Tracking Mechanism Bulk Phase Required by Governmental Entities Financial Benefits % overlap with CA Code Registration Fees Consulting Fees Review Fees Most Valued Take-Away Notes

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

33+ projects certified, 400+ registered

Feature based, Pre-Conditions = Silver, 40% = Gold, 80% = Platinum Silver, Gold, Platinum Primariliy visual inspection and performance verification, also policy and documentation based. More about implementation over documentation. Design None Productivity increases, talent retention, etc. Mostly with ASHRAE standards $ - $$$ $11,800+ $$ $0.05 - $.17 / SF (recertification) TBD The standard is still evolving. Essential for stakeholders to be involved from the beginning. Assessor costs can be a hurdle.


Core and Shell Nourishment 38 Fruits and vegetables

P

P

39

Processed foods

P

P

P

40

Food allergies

P

P

P

41

Hand washing

P

P

42

Food contamination

P

P

43

Artificial ingredients

O

P

P

44

Nutritional information

O

P

P

45

Food advertising

O

P

P

46

Safe food preparation materials

O

O

47

Serving sizes

O

O

48

Special diets

O

O

49

Responsible food production

O

O

50

Food storage

O

O

51

Food production

O

O

O

52

Mindful eating

O

O

O

Light 53

Visual lighting design

P

P

54

Circadian lighting design

P

P

55

Electric light glare control

P

P

P

56

Solar glare control

O

P

P

57

Low-glare workstation design

O

O

58

Color quality

O

O

59

Surface design

O

O

60

Automated shading and dimming controls

O

O

61

Right to light

O

O

O

62

Daylight modeling

O

O

O

63

Daylighting fenestration

O

O

O

P

O

P

Fitness 64 Interior fitness circulation 65

Activity incentive programs

P

P

66

Structured fitness opportunities

O

O

67

Exterior active design

O

O

O

68

Physical activity spaces

O

O

O

69

Active transportation support

O

O

O

70

Fitness equipment

O

O

O

71

Active furnishings

O

O

P

P

P

P

Comfort 72 Accessible design

P

73

Ergonomics: visual and physical

74

Exterior noise intrusion

P

O

P

75

Internally generated noise

O

P

P

76

Thermal comfort

P

P

P

77

Olfactory comfort

O

O

78

Reverberation time

O

O

79

Sound masking

O

O

80

Sound reducing surfaces

O

O

81

Sound barriers

O

O

82

Individual thermal control

O

O

83

Radiant thermal comfort

O

O

WELL Building Standard v1 Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

New and Existing New and Existing Interiors Buildings

O

Introduction

20


Summary Statement Market Sector

Aims to create healthy environments for employees using a government tested pilot and minimal fees. Largely office, open to all facility types - New Construction and in Existing Buildings

Regional Locations Accredidation Requirements

United States Fitwel AP

Reviewing Entity

CfAD - Center for Active Design

Year Established

2015, open to the public as of 2017

GSF Certified

100+ projects tested through GSA

Number of Projects Certified

< 20

Major Players

Federal Government, Offices, opportunity for retail

Sub-Systems

None

Scoring System Levels of Certification

90 - 144 points 1 - 3 stars

Tracking Mechanism

Online platform - very user friendly

Bulk Phase

Design / Construction / Operations

Required by Governmental Entities Financial Benefits

No, however it was generated by the CDC and GSA Branding, talent recruitment

% overlap with CA Code

NA

Registration Fees

$0

Consulting Fees Review Fees Most Valued Take-Away Notes

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

TBD, approximately $10,000 $6,000 Simple process, easy to implement from a documentation perspective. Quick timeline in early phase.


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Summary Statement

A rigorous sustainable urban development framework based on stakeholder engagement. The policy based, goal oriented protocol aims to enhance community and culture in a sustainable manner.

Market Sector

1. Municipalities + Government

4. Civic Organizations

2. Planning, Architecture and Design

5. University’s and Schools

3. Community Development

6. Developers

Regional Locations Accredidation Requirements

$$ ($200 - $300 - First group going through AP’s now)

Reviewing Entity

3rd Party

Year Established

2016

GSF Certified

84+/- Cities / Municipalities 40+ Architecture Firms 60+ Community Development

Number of Projects Certified Major Players

https://ecodistricts.org/get-started/clients-and-partners / ~ 200 projects and ~ 90+ cities interested as of 2015. Predominantly Cities / Municipalities

Sub-Systems Scoring System Levels of Certification Tracking Mechanism Bulk Phase Required by Governmental Entities Financial Benefits % overlap with CA Code Registration Fees Consulting Fees Review Fees Most Valued Take-Away Notes

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

6 Categories Plan only, no pre-requisites. Performance is determined by stakeholders’ own goals NA Largely policy and performance Ongoing Aligns with Climate Action Plan requirments for the State of California. Any other states? Grants and Private Investment NA $ $900 $ $9,500 $ $1,200 (bi-annual report) Info Exchange for members only and access to cities $45 for reference guide / Membership = $150/year or $500 min for organization. Participant data available to members only


IMPERATIVES

Table 2.1: Protocol Framework

Table 6.2: Priorities and Objectives PRIORITIES WITH OBJECTIVE CATEGORIES

OBJECTIVES

PLACE Engagement + Inclusion

EQUITY

RESILIENCE

Civic engagement is strong and processes are inclusive and representative. Sharing programs are robust.

CLIMATE PROTECTION

Culture + Identity

Historic and culturally significant places are preserved and celebrated. Participation in cultural events is high.

Public Spaces

Public spaces are accessible to all. Public spaces are high quality, engaging and active.

Housing

Housing is affordable and well-maintained.

PRIORITIES

Housing is available to meet a diversity of dwelling needs. Housing is close to facilities that offer a complete set of daily needs. PROSPERITY Access to Opportunity

PLACE

PROSPERITY

HEALTH + WELLBEING

CONNECTIVITY

LIVING RESOURCE INFRASTRUCTURE REGENERATION

Income and racial inequality are reduced. Schools provide quality education. Career pathways and training are available.

Economic Development

Employment in the district is retained.

Engagement + Inclusion

Access to Opportunity

Culture + Identity

Economic Development

Public Spaces

Innovation

Active Living

Street Network

Health

Mobility

Safety

Digital Network

Food Systems

Natural Features

Air

New job creation occurs through economic development. Innovation

Water

Ecosystem Health

Waste

Interaction between entrepreneurs is fostered. Job growth in emerging sectors is higher than in traditional sectors.

HEALTH + WELLBEING Active Living

Access to recreation facilities and services is improved. Walkability is enhanced.

Connection with Nature

Housing

IMPLEMENTATION

OBJECTIVE CATEGORIES

Job quality in the district is enhanced.

Health

Health outcomes and life expectancy are more equitable. Affordable, high-quality health care is accessible. Toxic environments are remediated and regenerated.

Safety

Public safety is enhanced. The built environment is designed for public safety.

Food Systems

Healthy and affordable fresh food is accessible. Food production in the district is encouraged.

Chapter 3: Certification Process This chapter describes the major steps in the certification FORMATION ROADMAPprocess.

PERFORMANCE

CONNECTIVITY Street Network

The street network supports all travel modes. The street network accommodates people of diverse ages and abilities.

Mobility

District travel, internally and externally, is safe, efficient and multimodal.

Digital Network

Shared mobility options are increased. Quality wired and wireless connectivity is available throughout the district. Local government data is open and accessible for public consumption.

LIVING INFRASTRUCTURE

Figure 3.1: Protocol Certification Process BEGIN

3 PROTOCOL

CERTIFICATION

Natural Features

The quality and functions of habitat are enhanced. Natural features are protected.

Ecosystem Health

Rainwater is managed in the district. Soil fertility and farmland are protected.

MAINTENANCE

Contaminated land is remediated for productive reuse. Connection with Nature

Access to nature is improved.

RESOURCE REGENERATION Air

IMPERATIVES COMMITMENT Within one year of registration Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

Greenhouse gas emissions are reduced in all sectors through energy efficiency and carbon-neutral fuels. Renewable power and thermal energy are produced onsite. The urban heat island effect is mitigated. Air quality is protected from pollutant emissions.

FORMATION

ROADMAP

Within two years of Imperatives Commitment endorsement. Certification is obtained upon endorsement of Formation and Roadmap submissions.

50 ROADMAP REQUIREMENTS

PERFORMANCE

Water

Within two years of certification.

Potable water is used efficiently. Alternative water sources are used for nonpotable purposes. Water quality is protected from pollutants.

Waste

Waste is diverted from landfills through reduction, reuse and recycling. The residual value of organic waste is captured.

51 ROADMAP REQUIREMENTS


Summary Statement Market Sector

Aims to reduce energy, water and waste consumption in buildings through benchmarking and transparency. Covers 99% of all building types

Regional Locations Accredidation Requirements

United States PE, CEM or AIA for certification only

Reviewing Entity

Department of Energy

Year Established

1992

GSF Certified Number of Projects Certified

Enough 30,000+

Major Players

Supermarkets, Warehouses, Offices

Sub-Systems

Design to Meet Energy Star

Scoring System Levels of Certification Tracking Mechanism Bulk Phase Required by Governmental Entities

Score of 1 - 100 Certified = minimum score of 75 Benchmarking Energy Model or operations Branding, talent recruitment

Financial Benefits

NA

% overlap with CA Code

$0

Registration Fees

$0

Consulting Fees

$1,500

Review Fees

$1,500

Most Valued Take-Away Notes

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

Simple process, easy to implement from a documentation perspective.


®

ENERGY STAR Statement of Energy Performance

96 ENERGY STAR® Score

1

The CalEdison DTLA Primary Property Type: Office Gross Floor Area (ft²): 277,750 Built: 1931 For Year Ending: June 30, 2016 Date Generated: October 13, 2016

1. The ENERGY STAR score is a 1-100 assessment of a building’s energy efficiency as compared with similar buildings nationwide, adjusting for climate and business activity.

Property & Contact Information Property Address The CalEdison DTLA 601 W 5th St Los Angeles, California 90071

Property Owner __________________ , (____)____-______

Primary Contact ____ ________ , (____)____-______ __________________

Property ID: 4207140

Energy Consumption and Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

Site EUI 35.7 kBtu/ft²

Annual Energy by Fuel Electric - Grid (kBtu) 7,609,646 (77%) Natural Gas (kBtu) 2,312,987 (23%)

Source EUI 94.8 kBtu/ft²

National Median Comparison National Median Site EUI (kBtu/ft²) National Median Source EUI (kBtu/ft²) % Diff from National Median Source EUI Annual Emissions Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons CO2e/year)

Signature & Stamp of Verifying Professional I ___________________ (Name) verify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Signature: _______________________Date: ___________ Licensed Professional ____ ________ , (____)____-______ __________________

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

Professional Engineer Stamp (if applicable)

80.4 213.2 -56% 743


Summary Statement Market Sector

Aims to reduce energy, water and waste consumption in buildings through benchmarking and transparency. Covers 99% of all building types

Regional Locations Accredidation Requirements

United States PE, CEM or AIA for certification only

Reviewing Entity

Department of Energy

Year Established

1992

GSF Certified Number of Projects Certified

Enough 30,000+

Major Players

Supermarkets, Warehouses, Offices

Sub-Systems

Design to Meet Energy Star

Scoring System Levels of Certification Tracking Mechanism Bulk Phase Required by Governmental Entities

Score of 1 - 100 Certified = minimum score of 75 Benchmarking Energy Model or operations Branding, talent recruitment

Financial Benefits

NA

% overlap with CA Code

$0

Registration Fees

$0

Consulting Fees

$1,500

Review Fees

$1,500

Most Valued Take-Away Notes

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

Simple process, easy to implement from a documentation perspective.


2015 GRESB Response Rate Management & Policy

Investor Members

328

115

151

378

155

2013 2012 51 2014 46 46

7

7

Globally diversified

10

92

104

10

Average size

North America

Europe

Asia

170

41

69

41

1,339,733

521,529

377,088

290,919

7,881

12,720

5,465

7,096

56%

55%

74%

39%

67%

537

114

311

63

35

9

0

2

12

1

4

962,149

434,036

372,860

73,167

72,704

3,230

1,792

3,807

1,199

1,161

2,077

707

155

380

104

47

10

0

2

12

1

4

2,301,881

955,565

749,948

364,086

156,751

4,415

3,256

6,165

1,974

3,501

3,335

441

based on GAV in USD million

Market coverage*

Development only participants

Gross asset value

19

USD million

Average size based on GAV in USD million

Total no of participants Development only participants

Gross asset value

19

58

359

USD million

Average size based on GAV in USD million

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

7

56,000

61,000 *

Company and Fund Manager Members

48

Based on the regional FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Index

Private no of participants

Assets covered

50

3,329

4,127

100

87

56

Clearly, the awareness of sustainability issues in the In 2015, the performance of listed property companies and 47 real estate industry is increasingly reflected in both 21 entities is evaluated separately through dedicated Associate Members private 28 strategic development as well as actual implementation of peer groups in those markets where market coverage sustainability measures. Also, as further described in the is sufficiently large. The GRESB Quadrant Model also 12 Partners Disclosure & Assurance section of this Report, the quality of separately presents the13 average GRESB Scores of public the data and of documents provided as supporting evidence companies and private entities. The average GRESB Score of for sustainability programs and private entities is 54, as compared to an average score of 60 Australia/ South Globally NZ America policies has been improving for listed companies. This performance difference between 2015 GRESBAfrica ESG diversified scores 100 Investor Members Institutional Capital GRESB Participants 12 1 3 3 rapidly, leading to more positive listed property companies and private property funds is validation outcomes (and thus consistent with the performance differences observed in 84,048 1,185 9,151 55,813 higher scores). 2014. 7,004 1,185 3,050 18,604 Environment

Total

USD million

$2.3 trillion

69

2015

51 Model$6.1 The GRESB Quadrant also trillion

Management & Policy

Gross asset value

$2.1 trillion

Implementation & Measurement

2014

Listed no of participants

$5.5 trillion

Property value

New Construction and Major Renovations Assets

42 44

2015

707 637

Key Figures

4

2014

2015 $6.1 trillion

* Excluding single-family residential assets

0

2013

Listed

74

2

5

GRESB Participants

2011

0 10

Institutional Capital

Private

50

292

2015

2014

100

2

Private

Listed

707

$5.5 trillion 2015 2013 46 46 reflects improved performance 637 2012 2014 as measured by the fraction of 1,423 4,730 In 2015, GRESB introduced a breakdown of the GRESB 50 companies and funds that are Score into separate scores for Environmental, Social and 2011 Social 1,423 1,182 Green Starters, Green Walk, Governance (ESG). These scores are calculated based on 4 7 Green Talk, and Green Stars. the allocation of individual questions to E, S, or G. The ContinuingProperty the trend $2.1 trillion valueof previous 10,574 60,543 trillion results show$2.3 that GRESB participants score relatively high years, the number of Green 2,644 8,649 on Governance, with an average score of 69, a score of 58 Star-rated entities increased * 48 on Environmental. The Regional on Social, and a score of Governance 56,000 Assets covered 61,000 significantly in 2015, and now 0 Snapshots show how these scores vary by region. stands at a total of 387 entities, 0 50 100 New Construction Major or 56% of the and total. There3,329 is still Implementation & Measurement 4,127 Renovations Assets significant variation in scores among Green Stars, from those entities that areofonsustainability or just issues in the In 2015, the performance of listed property companies and Clearly, the awareness 1

4

0

0

0

0

ESG scores

* Excluding single-family residential assets


Entity and Reporting Characteristics:

The list of 2016 winners includes:

Management

Data Center: Equinix, Inc.

Policy & Disclosure

Retail: Macerich

Risks & Opportunities

Residential: Equity Residential

Monitoring & EMS

Office: Kilroy Realty Corp.

Performance Indicators

Industrial: Prologis

Building CertiďŹ cations

Lodging: Hersha Hospitality Trust

Stakeholder Engagement

Health Care: Welltower

New Construction & Major Renovations

Diversified: Vornado Realty Trust

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Creating shareholder value is not the same as maximizing shortterm profits and companies that confuse the two often put both shareholder value and stakeholder interests at risk. Tim Koller, Author of Valuation, Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies via McKinsley&Company

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


PEOPLE

IMPACT

VALUE

Invest in people for return on investment Chart Title

Design impacts for new construction

Value for Investor

1% Energy 9% Rent / Operations

Attract + retain Maximize performance Build brand equity

Daylight

90%

Natural Ventilation

61%

Occupant Controls

71%

IAQ monitoring

66%

Green Spaces

83%

Other

16%

90% Personnel

Social and 1 2physical 3 environments are the determinant of health.

largest

Promote health

OWNERS VIEW THESE AS THE TOP BENEFITS OF HEALTHY BUILDINGS

79%

Cognitive Score Basic Activity Level

Applied Activity Level

Focused Activity Level

Positive impact on occupant satisfaction

Sleep Score Task Orientation

Crisis Response

Information Seeking

Information Usage

Breadth of Approach

Strategy

73% Positive impact on building leasing rate

63% Positive impact on building value

Average

2.00

GENETICS

LIFESTYLE / HEALTH BEHAVIORS

1.75

Score

MEDICAL CARE

1.50

1.25

PHYSICAL / SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT

1.00

0.75

Cognitive Domain

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

INDOOR HEALTH


THE IMPACT OF GREEN BUILDINGS ON COGNITIVE FUNCTION Results On average, cognitive scores were:

61% percent higher in GREEN BUILDING CONDITIONS 101% percent higher in ENHANCED GREEN BUILDING CONDITIONS COâ‚‚, VOCs AND VENTILATION RATE all had significant, independent impacts on cognitive function. Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

**Source: http://www.chgeharvard.org/resource/impact-green-buildingscognitive-function

INDOOR HEALTH


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


7

WASHINGTON million

4

OREGON million

40 4 1

CALIFORNIA million LOS ANGELES million SAN DIEGO million

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

The cost of growth has been heavy, hitting neighborhoods the hardest. Neighborhoods are the soul and lifeblood of cities. The world of city building has drastically changed, and it requires a more diverse and more integrated range of solutions to empower social vibrancy and restore ecological health. It is projected by 2050, 75% of the world’s population will increase from (today) 50% living in cities to 75%.

DENSITY


We seem to have a 2 vs 4 wheel transit mentality, when we all can share the road in a win-win situation. From Del Mar to Oceanside, cities are looking to slow traffic, widen bike lanes and implement other changes that encourage people to get out of their cars and use alternative forms of transportation. The reaction isn’t always pretty. Retail sales typically increase

10%-30% where bike lanes are added.

Communities around the world have embraced the reshaped road and agree that it’s more welcoming to cyclists, pedestrians and shoppers. Traffic experts say slower speeds on local roads add little time to a commute, at most two or three minutes while they greatly increase safety for everyone.

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

TWO WHEEL TRANSIT


M

TRANSPORTATION

ile

M 20

SINGLE OCCUPANT DRIVER

40

ile

BIKE / WALK PUBLIC TRANSIT CARPOOL MIXED MODE

M 10

DRIVE ALONE

ile

FREEWAYS METRO

T MILES | rdc-s111.com Long Beach,338 CA | 562.628.8000 104 TOM 37 KATIE K 30 SARAH G

T TRIPS TOM EVA KATIE K

4,232 T TIME 834 TOM 498 EVA 393 SARAH G

WALK / BIKE PUBLIC TRANSIT CARPOOL DRIVE OTHER

JOIN US TUESDAYS AT 12:00 FOR GROUP RIDES @ THE PROMENADE STATION

WALKING + CYCLING

MIXED MODE TRANSPORT

ile

PUBLIC TRANSIT

5

146 26 19 13

M

CARPOOL

LONG BEACH BIKESHARE

AVERAGE DISTANCE


Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN??


Cost of Living Index

Property Price to Income Ratio

80.91

71.52

9.66

26.27

21.9

62.13

76.74

65.5

7.46

30.55

27.05

57.97

75.45 70.58

83.02 80.77

8.2 8.14

28.42 30.23

25.97 20.03

64.24 85.41

68.72

76.65

54.98

8.26

32.63

37.46

88.04

75.37

74.85

73.06

7.6

34.92

13.38

35.83

123.17 62.72

51.24 64.61

68.22 70.31

75.42 49.19

3.26 8.85

34.58 30.44

31.19 28.91

67.95 92.19

Rank

Country

Quality of Life Index

Purchasing Power Index

Safety Index

1

Austria

190.37

95.66

80.75

2

Germany

189.74

124.88

67.97

3 4

Denmark New Zealand

184.92 184.74

98.76 89.87

78.87 61.22

5

Spain

183.65

87.87

6

Finland

182.93

114.97

7

United States

Health Care Index

Traffic Commute Time Pollution Index Index

Climate Index

8

Portugal

179.73 178.43

9

Australia

176.54

101.94

57.58

74.25

80.66

9.24

34.73

24.58

72.79

10

Slovenia

175.45

78.23

75.95

64.35

53.24

8.34

26.48

26.37

60.5

11 12

Netherlands Switzerland

175.23

86.52

70.11

82.5

72.47

8.52

33.9

27.62

61.87

173.54

95.35

77.55

71.04

122.06

14.04

28.3

20.77

69.32

13

United Kingdom

172.87

96.85

58.81

74.28

69.49

10

34.6

34.88

78.91

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Sweden Estonia Croatia Canada Ireland Cyprus Norway Czech Republic South Korea

172.74 171.09 170.63 167.18 166.9 166.64 165.93 165.41

107.23 68.48 60.71 108.01 103.52 95.92 105.58 76.22

53.35 77 72.2 60.75 54.23 67.54 54.31 69.82

70.64 71.3 65.49 69.23 53.33 54.23 74.19 74.09

75.88 49.5 48 70.16 76.98 54.07 106.31 41.22

11.77 10.54 10.91 6.4 7.02 5.21 7.9 10.7

31.6 26.71 28.45 36.24 35.01 20.32 31.32 31.98

17.87 17.71 33.34 26.54 27.18 54.77 19.45 41.04

59.13 44.56 82.02 44.31 70.18 71.01 49.32 65.32

23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Belgium France Israel Slovakia Poland Taiwan Greece Japan Saudi Arabia

162.49 160.52 160.25 157.88 152.55 150.21 150.08 148.32 147.49

102.38 91.02 87.29 94.47 64.75 71.75 118.57 58.24 102.52

74.73 55.49 56.34 70.99 69.82 68.47 82.76 59.68 79.11

83.2 78.92 78.62 74.78 62.63 61.46 81.14 53.92 78.63

75.41 75.36 74.89 77.74 44.9 38.15 61.38 55.87 85.28

12.38 6.96 11.58 10.87 9.85 10.12 12.87 8.33 12.68

34.18 36.26 35.81 36.52 36.03 34.55 32.69 31.6 46.81

52.73 48.92 40.15 61.71 43.51 50.33 62.91 52.05 41.01

61.2 75.16 73.91 81.01 65.06 62.53 24.48 87.25 31.91

32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42

South Africa Romania Italy Argentina United Arab Emirates Bosnia And Herzegovina Hungary Bulgaria Chile Serbia Qatar

146.41 144.72 143.04 142.52 139.59 139.27 139.14 138.82 138.2 136.2 133.43

138.05 98.96 53.44 71.83 58.4 116.77 51.29 47.52 51.4 61.28 40.8

76.35 24.28 72.05 55.34 37.37 79.34 59.03 61.61 59.82 52.5 61.38

60.41 61.72 53.11 66.31 73.3 60.49 61.49 53.46 54.03 60.97 53.86

48.37 43.12 35.63 83.7 52.57 67.98 35.05 42.77 36.49 50.09 33.79

2.85 3.58 10.79 12.39 12.07 5.6 11.35 11.2 9.07 10.67 17.87

36.31 42.98 31.97 36.38 37.95 35.05 26.63 33.09 27.92 35.7 29.93

74.18 63.56 50.9 51.57 53.33 58.52 60.69 43.99 63.12 67.67 55.29

17.96 88.74 64.45 82.6 90.67 8.86 73.29 66.49 77.05 89.39 82.66

43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

Lithuania Turkey Mexico Belarus Jordan Macedonia Colombia Lebanon

132.37 130.28 129.63 129.06 119.23 117.47 116.42 115.38 106.18

111.28 51.67 55.64 60.08 36.43 42.27 39.85 37.63 53.61

84.3 59.97 58.91 49.68 77.74 56.86 61.34 48.31 50.84

66.14 68.74 71.68 70.11 53.76 71.92 63.46 65.79 64.28

69.2 46.73 38.6 29.81 33.84 59.22 30.93 34.45 61.65

6.19 14.19 8.87 6.94 18.73 7.96 14.67 19.43 13.95

32.97 28 47.58 41.66 27.66 47.76 33.79 43.77 36.15

73.29 34.27 70.46 66.74 39.64 85.73 83.38 63.9 85.11

9.26 25.04 73.19 60.74 20.07 88.42 75.54 81.34 69.39

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com

QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX


Let’s connect to discuss your next... Sara Hickman, LEED AP, WELL AP Sustainability Director Retail Design Collaborative + Studio One Eleven @sara_hickman @sarahickman007 sara.hickman@rdc-s111.com

Long Beach, CA | 562.628.8000 | rdc-s111.com


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.