The Spectator
“The Pulse of the Student Body”
The Stuyvesant High School Newspaper
OPINIONS
A&E
Disaster in Detroit
A Not-So-Subtle Social Satire
Opinions writer Kristin Cheng discusses the state of public schools in Detroit and our nation as a whole and explains how to ameliorate it. see page
Volume 110 No. 6
see page
December 11, 2019
NEWSBEAT
By THOMAS STRASSER
stuyspec.com
Mr. Strasser is a teacher in the physics department.
Academy
Physics is an experimental Seoul Metropoli- science, and physics labs should tan Office of Education teach you experimental physics. visited Stuyvesant, meeting You should learn how to plan with Principal Eric Contreras, experiments, how to conduct English teacher Minkyu Kim, and evaluate them. You should school counselor Kristina Uy, learn to decide how many meaand sophomore WonJong surements you need and to conPark. The visit was arranged clude when you have enough by parent Sara Joo. data. You should learn how to best visualize your results and how to extract the most inforGerman Consul General mation from your graphs. You David Gill visited Stuyves- should learn to judge how reliant on November 21, giving able your measurement results a presentation titled “30 years are and how to evaluate when of the Peaceful Revolution and results differ significantly from the Fall of the Berlin Wall— The Path to Freedom and Ger- each other. You should learn to improve your experiments man Unity.” based on a thorough analysis of your results. In short, you At the Scarsdale Invitational, should learn what physicists do juniors Sarai Pridgen and in an experiment. Unfortunately, you do not Gallo Patel reached Octafinals for Lincoln-Douglas, learn this at Stuyvesant. Inwhile seniors Jeremy Lee, stead, you have to work your Alex Annenberg, and way through a set of prescribed Christopher Cho, ju- procedures: you are told in niors Justin Sword and great detail how experiments Eric Han, and sophomore are set up, which measurements Edward Khemelmakher should be taken, how many reached Octafinals for Public data points are needed, which Forum. data points are to be used, how results have to be plotted, and even which calculations should
Zoe Oppenheimer / The Spectator
The
By MADELYN MAO, KATIE NG, and ALICE ZHU
17
Your Physics Labs are a Disgrace
OP-ED
Juniors Zoe Piccirillo and Evelyn Ma were accepted to The Junior Academy at the New York of Sciences.
11
Arts & Entertainment writer Gavin McGinley reviews “Parasite,” a critically-acclaimed film that delivers with its talented cast and wonderful storytelling.
be used to get results. Do you think a physicist goes into her lab in the morning and opens a booklet that tells her every step of what she is supposed to do? Of course not. This is not how physics works, and it should not be the way physics labs are set up. Physics education research clearly shows that labs should focus on teaching experimental skills, and that is pretty much the opposite of what Stuyvesant is offering you. AP Physics 1 should have a strong lab focus; in fact, the AP Physics 1 exam specifically includes an experimental design question. Stuyvesant is not preparing you for this properly. Even though the physics class
this year is AP Physics 1, the Administration has just given you the exact same labs that students did in double periods for Regents physics last year. They did not modify the labs in any way to adjust them to single periods or make them align with the AP Physics lab requirements; a third of your labs do not even cover AP Physics 1 topics. Modern experimental physics relies heavily on computers, and physics labs in the 21st century should teach you how to utilize computers for data analysis. At Stuyvesant, we make you work with homemade, half-broken equipment straight from the 1970s. It’s not that we don’t have modern
equipment—we just don’t use it: last year, the Administration discarded boxes full of 20-yearold computer sensors that were never used. Most of these sensors were still in their original packaging, but they had grown obsolete in their two decades on the shelf, and did not work with modern computers. Stuyvesant purchased brand new sensors again last year. Why didn’t you get to use them? Why did you have to work with decadeold ticker tape machines and warped inclined planes instead? And as if this were not bad enough, your labs have the science wrong for key parts of the curriculum. Your lab booklet consistently misuses percent error as if it were an indicator of the quality of your result. If you are a scientist and you are the first person to measure a quantity, what would you use as the “expected” value? There is none—you are measuring this quantity for the first time. Still, scientists can express the quality of a measurement, and they use the concept of uncertainty to do so. If you are currently taking physics, let me illustrate with Lab 2, where you analyzed the ticker tape to find the acceleracontinued on page 2
The Math Team Breaks Records at PUMaC
Courtesy of Brian Sterr
The New York City Math Team (NYCMT) sent 19 Stuyvesant students and six Hunter College High School students to the Princeton University Mathematics Competition (PUMaC), a national student-run mathematics competition at Princeton University on November 16. Among the three teams of eight students from NYC, two of them placed in the top 10: team Tin Man placed third, and team Scarecrow placed 10th. In addition, there were seven finalists from NYC, most of whom are Stuyvesant students: sophomore Rishabh Das, juniors Srinath Mahankali and Theo Shiminovich, and Hunter College High School students Tovi Wen, Ethan Joo, Max Vaysburd, and Mario Tutuncu-Macias. The PUMaC competition consists of four parts: a power round, two individual tests, a team round, and a live round. For each section, every question gets progressively harder. The power round is a week-long, challenging, college-level proof-based contest with 25 pages of background information and questions. This year’s power round, a three-part graph theory and probability contest, was held the week prior to the other sections.
For the individual rounds, each member chooses two eightquestion tests from the topics of algebra, combinatorics, number theory, and geometry. The individual tests are based on a scale in which questions with fewer scorers and thus are of a higher difficulty have greater point value. The third round, the team round, is a 15-question, 40-minute contest where teams may submit answers to questions graded out of four, five, or six points.
Teams receive no penalty for an incorrect four-point question answer, a two-point penalty for every incorrect five-point question answer, and an eight-point penalty for every incorrect six-point question answer. In the final round, the live round, teams are given one hour to complete nine sets of three questions. All teams are situated in one large room, and all scores are updated on a large screen in the front as each set is submit-
ted. Teams may only receive one set at a time and cannot change their answers after moving on to the next set. The teams performed exceptionally well despite that several star members graduated last year. The top team placed third overall—the highest it has ever finished—and NYC was the only city in the nation to have two teams in the top 10. “We were sad to see [the seniors] go, and there were a few of us [who] were re-
ally concerned that without these strong mathematicians and leaders, we would not reach the same heights as we did last year. I think that this year shows that not only will we reach the same heights, but also we’ll do better. I’m very optimistic about [competitions] later on in the school year,” senior and captain Akash Das said. Math teacher Stan Kats, one of the head coaches of the NYCMT and the Stuyvesant math team, was thrilled by the results. He knows that while all the students have worked extremely hard, winning boils down to luck at a certain level. “I understand the Stuyvesant mentality—they always have to be the best—but that’s a really toxic mentality. It comes down to luck. Sometimes, you’re going to have a good day because you recognize the questions, but [other times], you’re not [going to] have that great of a day. Mostly what it means is that as long as you stay in the top five, you’re in the company of really outstanding national teams, and you’ll always have a chance to win,” he said. “And if it happens, great. If it doesn’t, I’m not going to be any less proud of the kids.” Kats was especially surprised by the number of finalists. In the past, the NYCMT has never had more than two finalists at continued on page 2