Issue 9, Volume 108

Page 1

The Spectator

“The Pulse of the Student Body”

The Stuyvesant High School Newspaper FEATURE

SPORTS

“Tom Brady Isn’t the MVP” The MVP award every year is meant to go to the player that is the most valuable asset to his team’s success for the season. Sports writer Sunan Tajwar argues it should be taken away from Brady. SEE PAGES 20

Volume 108 No. 9

NEWSBEAT

Unsung Heroes In a world plagued by conflict, it may be difficult to remember and acknowledge the people who help to keep the peace. To remedy this issue, freshmen Talia Kahan and Elizabeth Lee interview three Stuyvesant alumni who made the choice to fight for their country by joining the military. SEE PAGE 4

February 2, 2018

stuyspec.com

Big Changes to the Big Sib Program By MADDY ANDERSEN and ERIN LEE

The Stuyvesant Robotics FTC teams competed at the FTC QUALIFIER at Francis Lewis High School and were finalists. They also won the MOTIVATE AWARD.

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY INVI-

TATIONAL on Saturday, January 20. Senior KEVIN LI won

the tournament in the Lincoln Douglas division and senior PACY YAN came in second. Junior SHRAY TRIPATHI came in sixth in the Oratory division. Juniors NISHMI ABEYWEERA and LEO FLEISSIG were quarter finalists in the Public Forum division.

Senior SARAH CHEN’s book, The Witch’s Cat, was chosen to represent Stuyvesant at this year’s EZRA JACK KEATS BOOKMAKING COMPETITION.

Elena Sapelyuk / The Spectator

The Stuyvesant Speech and Debate Team competed at the

Big Sib Chairs Leila Storkamp, Kevin Li, Charlotte Ruhl, Max Onderdonk, and Aren Tucker sat down with faculty to discuss the program’s new bylaws and their content on January 11, 2018. The chairs worked with Principal Eric Contreras, Rodda John (’17), and the newly established faculty oversight committee, consisting of Assistant Principal of Pupil Personnel Services Casey Pedrick and various other faculty members. The changes now establish the process by which Big Sib Chairs, members, and homeroom leaders are chosen, along with the procedure for dismissing members, should the need arise. The Big Sib program for Stuyvesant was created in 1997, and aims to help underclassmen adjust and familiarize themselves with Stuyvesant’s community by providing mentors for the 850 incoming freshmen. The 150 members, or “Big Sibs,” offer support and advice regarding school work and the Stuyvesant lifestyle. “I often refer to our Big Sibs as being mini counselors to our freshmen,” Pedrick said. “It is very complementary to the work of our counseling department.” The Big Sib Program also organizes events such as homeroom picnics, Stuy Camp, and the Big Sib-Little Sib Dance to help underclassmen acquaint themselves with peers. The biggest change to the bylaws is laying out formal procedures and therefore legitimizing the program. Previously, the Big Sib Program only had a Code of Conduct that new Big Sibs were required to sign, so this new change was a large step in development for the program. The need for change was inspired last school year when the ARISTA executive board re-evaluated their own bylaws. “When the ARISTA executive board from the 2016-17 school year was revisiting their bylaws, it was in discussions with members of their executive board that we started thinking: ‘Wow, [the Big Sib program doesn’t] have those either, and we are

From left to right: Leila Storkamp, Kevin Li, Charlotte Ruhl, Aren Tucker, and Max Onderdonk.

very similar in size and mission to ARISTA,’” Pedrick said. In addition, sparked by the temporary removal of a Big Sib Chair last year due to inappropriate comments online, the Big Sib bylaws now include strict guidelines for what will occur during the removal of a chair. “In a removal there will be hearings so that [the Big Sib Chair] can present their side. In the worst possible scenario, if there is a removal of a chair, the process is more efficient,” Storkamp continued. “Going forward we wanted to establish a better way of dealing with circumstances if they may come about.” The new bylaws are also designed to help prevent such a situation from occurring in the first place. The regulations inform Big Sibs of their responsibilities and obligations in a way that eliminates misunderstandings. “Let’s say someone does something that could cause them to possibly be dismissed. That person is probably going to definitely want to know, ‘What [do] the bylaws say?’ So it lets them know that there are expectations for grade point, that you may be removed for any violations of the code of conduct,” Pedrick said. Additionally, these new regulations strengthen the Big Sib

Program’s relations with guidance, as both programs help incoming freshmen smoothly transition. “Communication between Big Sib Chairs and guidance is more direct, because at the end of the day guidance [plays] a very important role,” Storkamp said. During the application process for future Big Sib Chairs, two faculty members will now be present at every interview. “They can see this process directly rather than just hearing from us who we think is good,” Storkamp said. “Adults might offer some points that we may have missed from interviews.” In terms of the appointment of the Big Sib chairs themselves, only one faculty member sat in on every Big Sib chair interview. “We decided [...] that two faculty members would be in each of the Big Sib chair interviews so that we would be able to have a better, in-depth discussion about a candidate, rather than just having one person’s opinion,” Pedrick revealed. “Our hope there is that we can choose some really good leaders for the program, and put trust in them to choose fairly for the actual members at large.” These changes are the most recent in a wave of reform for the program. There have been changes to the Big Sib Program in the

past, such as when they lowered the required average from an 88 to an 85, allowing more students to apply. According to Storkamp, “It’s helpful for students who may have had a rough freshman year, but are working hard to improve their grades. They can still be a role model to other freshmen; they just might have had some bumps along the way.” With these new bylaws, future amendments to the program and its bylaws will be standardized—when coming to a decision, all members of the oversight faculty committee must approve of the change, along with a majority of the chairs. “You’re always learning and growing and rolling with the times and deciding what the organization needs in this day and age as opposed to before or after,” Pedrick said. “It’s always a good thing to keep things dynamic.” The Big Sibs are optimistic for the implementation of these new guidelines and the role of the program as a whole at Stuyvesant. .“It’s really good to be able to have the Big Sib organization, which has been around for quite some time, now be as organized and established as say ARISTA or the [Student Union] itself,” Pedrick said.

Stuyvesant Holds Second International Film Festival By CHLOE DOUMAR and CAROLINE MAGOC Stuyvesant held its second annual International Film Festival from January 8 to January 17. Hosted by the Language Department in the Murray Kahn Theater, this year’s festival showcased six foreign films, all recently screened, many of which targeted major social and political issues ranging from the Holocaust to transgender youth. The movies —“Thermae Romae” (2012), “Carol’s Journey” (2002), “Balzac and the Little Chinese Seamstress” (2002), “Emil

and the Detectives” (2001), “Life is Beautiful” (1997), and “My Life in Pink” (1997)—were shown in their original language, but subtitles were provided to assist students not fluent in that particular language. Japanese teacher Chie Helinski, Spanish teacher Anna Montserrat, Chinese teacher Julie Zhu, French and German teacher Rebecca Lindemulder, Italian and Spanish teacher Pasqua Rocchio, and French teacher Manuel Ramirez made up the committee that curated the screening. The first film, “Thermae Romae,” is a Japanese comedy

about an Ancient Roman architect, Lucius, who time-travels to modern-day Japan before returning to Rome with innovative techniques for building public baths. Originally a Japanese manga and eventually an anime and film, “Thermae Romae” was a lighthearted start to the film festival. “Carol’s Journey” was shown on January 9 and illustrated the difference between the liberal views in America and the conservative views in Spain. Carol, an American from Spain, visited her hometown with her mother during the Spanish Civil War. The movie documented the tragedies

of the Spanish Civil War which are still remembered today by many in Spain. The next day, “Balzac and the Little Chinese Seamstress” dramatized a socio-political struggle in a different light, depicting both the Cultural Revolution and a romance in the relationship between the illiterate Little Seamstress and the two boys Luo and Ma, bonding over banned Western novels. “I was extremely intrigued by [the movie] because it was able to successfully fuse a romance with the plight of many who suffered during the Cultural Revolution,

and yet it was still comedic in some parts,” sophomore Frank Yang said. “I think that the directors and filmmakers wanted you to feel that amidst this crisis, there’s still a speck of happiness that shines through.” “Emil and the Detectives” was the selection of Ms. Lindemulder, based on a 1929 children’s book following a young boy initially tasked with sending money to his grandmother. His money gets stolen, sending him and the local children in Berlin on a mission to retrieve it. continued on page 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.