Volume 105, Issue 2

Page 1

The Spectator

“The Pulse of the Student Body”

The Stuyvesant High School Newspaper

Volume CV  No. 2

October 6, 2014

• Former Parent Coordinator Harvey Blumm is now working as a guidance counselor. Andrew Wong is the new Parent Coordinator. • Tens of thousands of prodemocracy protesters block Hong Kong streets, maintaining pressure on China as it faces one of its biggest political challenges since the Tiananmen Square crackdown 25 years ago. • Substance Prevention and Recreational Knowledge, SPARK, named this week Smile Week in an effort to address the issue of depression at Stuyvesant. • A survey was given to freshmen asking how they feel about the lower cutoff score for minorities taking the Specialized High School Admissions Test. • The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) confirmed on September 30th that a Dallas patient had been diagnosed with Ebola, making it the first case of Ebola to be confirmed in the United States. • Speech and Debate competed at the Yale Invitational, and the Speech team ranked fourth overall. • The Borough of Manhattan Community College experienced a false alarm for a gas leak. Students at Stuyvesant were not allowed to exit the building until the situation was deemed safe.

Through the Lens of the School Budget: Transparency at Stuyvesant By Tina Jiang and Ariel Levy With the start of each school year comes a transition into a new school budget. The Department of Education (DOE) allocated a grand total of S18, 281,632 to Stuyvesant High School in the 2013-2014 school year. Below is a breakdown of this budget. DOE ALLOCATION FORMULA The DOE allocates funds to each public school based on “The Fair Student Funding Formula.” Every school receives an underlying amount of money for each student, based on the number of students and their needs. These funds are supplemented through several special categories, including Academic Intervention for students performing below average and struggling to graduate; English Language Learner for students still learning English as a second language; Special Education Services for students with disabilities; and Portfolio for students receiving a specific career or technical education. Stuyvesant receives S4,245.83 as a base rate for each of its 3,291

enrolled students, for a total of $13,951,781. While Stuyvesant does not receive Academic Intervention or Special Education Services funding, it does receive $8,249 for English Language Learners, and $3,384,955 in Specialized Academic funding. The DOE requires Stuyvesant to use this money specifically for these programs. DIVISIONS OF THE BUDGET The school budget can be broken down into two main components: Personnel costs and tax levy. Division 1-Personnel Costs Personnel costs consist of the salaries of administrators and faculty. $16,530,030, or 90.4 percent, of the total DOE budget is designated for personnel costs. A very rigid formula is used for personnel costs, allowing minimal, if any, room for improvisation. The salaries of administrators amount to $1,405,226. Principal Jie Zhang receives $150,926, the highest salary in the school. The rest of the personnel budget is used to pay faculty salaries. This costs the school $15,124,804 annually, represent-

Graphic on Page 2

Justin Strauss / The Spectator

Technical Vandalism

By Sharon Lin An incident of vandalism recently occurred near the Stuyvesant first floor stagecraft room by the backstage entrance to the theater. Spraypainted across a section of the floor was a message reading “Art Crew.” The brick wall on the outside of the Stuyvesant building had another message that read “August.” Both messages were relatively small, but nonetheless clearly visible.

Features

The painted words were discovered on Tuesday, September 16 by an administrator, who promptly notified the custodial staff. Although no students were incriminated, an investigation immediately ensued, led by Assistant Principal of Security and Student Affairs and Assistant Principal of Health and Physical Education Brian Moran. The administration declined to reveal details about the perpetrator of the crime, although they assured that there would Article on page 8.

12 Months of Freedom What happens after graduating from Stuyvesant? The answer isn’t always college, as proven by a couple of graduates who are taking gap years before re-entering the school scene. Read this feature on page 8.

be disciplinary action taken to prevent such an incident from ever occurring again. “Suspension is definitely possibly for [an action] like this,” Moran said. “Expulsion, not so much.” Head Custodial Engineer Fred Arnibold sent his staff over to the stagecraft room on Thursday, September 18, to wash the paint off of the floor and wall. “I’m not sure who did it or why—all I know is we received a call to clean up the area,” Arnibold said. The cleanup was finished within a day, with few traces left from the incident. On the day the vandalism occurred, it was discovered that the door leading into the school building was left ajar. In addition, the stagecraft room was left open, allowing anyone with knowledge of the room to enter and steal equipment. The art cabinet, a metal cabinet used to store paints and other art equipment (including spray cans) for use when designing sets for various school productions, is located near the front of room. Before this incident, the continued on page 2

“The Dumbest Person In The Room”

Eva I / The Spectator

Newsbeat

stuyspec.com

Math teacher Jim Cocoros tells a funny personal story that relates to the sum and difference formulas to his AP Calculus class.

continued on page 6

Stuyvesant’s School Survey Results

By Sharon Chao and Jan Wojcik

The New York City (NYC) School Survey is an annual questionnaire given to every student, parent, and teacher from grades 6-12 several weeks before spring break. The survey debuted in 2007, when the NYC Department of Education (DOE) wanted student and parent input about schools in order to create an overall perspective of a school’s environment and curriculum.

The questions are sorted into four categories: Instructional Core, Systems for Improvement, School Culture, and questions reported for informational purposes only. “Instructional Core” centers around the school’s curriculum, instruction, and assessment practices. Students were asked how much they agreed with statements like: “Most of the teaching staff at my school help me approach challenges by suggesting new strategies that I can use.” continued on page 3

Reevaluating Teacher Evaluations

By David Mascio and Gabriel Rosen

All students know who their best teachers are. Opinions on teacher quality have powered class choices and websites like RateMyTeachers for years. Yet these opinions have never had a bearing on New York City’s Department of Education (DOE) teacher evaluations. Starting this year, however, the DOE will be piloting the use of student surveys as part of a new teacher evaluation system. Two years ago, the DOE retired the “S/U” teacher evaluation system. Under the old system, an administrator would critique a teacher and then assign him or her a grade: satisfactory (S) or unsatisfactory (U). “It was a long-standing practice. I think the difference at Stuy was that historically, an extreme majority of teachers would receive a satisfactory rating. It was very hard to differentiate between a minimally satisfactory teacher and an outstanding teacher,” Principal Jie Zhang said when asked how effective the old system was for Stuyvesant. Playlist on page 20.

The passage of a state education law, 3012-c, in 2010 laid the groundwork for an overhaul of the “S/U” system. Replacing this system is a new evaluative program that will measure teachers based not only on their classroom work, but also on the performance of their students, and, tentatively, the opinions of their students. Under this new system, teachers will be rated on a fourlevel scale: ineffective, developing, effective, and highly effective. 60 percent of the score will come from teaching evaluations, and the other 40 percent from city and state measurements of student skills. A portion of the scores derived from teaching evaluations will include the opinions of students through the use of student surveys. Surveys will only be used for students and teachers in grades 3-12. The DOE plans to test one student survey type, known as the Tripod system, this spring. The Tripod student survey, developed by Harvard researchers, is grounded in a continued on page 2

A&E Teacher’s Picks

Check out this issue’s playlist on page 20, which features a number of favorite songs from iconic Stuyvesant teachers.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.