The Spectator The Stuyvesant High School Newspaper
Volume CVI No. 2
October 2, 2015
NEWSBEAT uidance counselor Jo Mahoney will replace former Assistant Principal of Mathematics Maryann Ferrara as faculty advisor of ARISTA; Ferrara retired last June.
O
ne hundred thirty-one Stuyvesant seniors were named National Merit Scholarship Semifinalists. Stuyvesant had more students receive this award than any other high school in New York State, and the second largest number of students of all high schools in the nation.
S
ophomore Shivasuryan Vummidi and biology teacher Dr. Jeffrey Horenstein attended the prestigious Lasker Foundation Award Ceremony for biomedical research and public service. Prior to the award ceremony, they were invited to have breakfast with Lasker Award winners and other students from around the country.
T
he Stuyvesant Speech and Debate team claimed third place in the overall standings of the Yale Invitation Tournament, from September 18 to 20. Seniors Pablo Blanco and Nino Dickerson won first place in Policy Debate, and sophomores David Doktorman and Isaac Segal finished as semifinalists. Senior Rishika Jikaria claimed third place in the Oratory category.
stuyspec.com
Which Ones Work? By Sonia Epstein A 2013 article in The Spectator, titled “Why Don’t They Work?” reported that on any given day that year, an average of only 65 percent of escalators were operating by eighth period. This statistic remains accurate today, when motionless escalators are a frequent sight. Though students lack the ability to improve the quality of the escalators, steps can be taken to improve students’ experiences with the escalators that are working. Such was the idea driving senior Krzysztof Hochlewicz’s new application, which monitors the escalators and reports which ones are working. The information is displayed on tablets that are mounted at the bottom of each escalator and linked to each other wirelessly. Past students in Software Development classes have attempted similar ideas, but were hindered by the inability to observe directly the escalators, making it difficult to determine whether they are working. Hochlewicz’s program uses the scroll wheel of a computer mouse as sensor to determine if the escalator is on. He plans to mount the mouse underneath the escalator’s handrail, where it will not obstruct student traffic. If the escalator is on, it will push against the scroll wheel. The tablet connected to that mouse will pick up that information, and the graphic of that escalator on the application’s interface
will turn green. The application then sends that information to a server. All the other tablets in the building fetch that information every 10 seconds and show that escalator as green too. If the escalator stops moving, the tablet detects that the scroll wheel is no longer moving. The graphic of the escalator will turn red, and a few seconds later that escalator will be depicted as off on all the other tablets in the school. Hochlewicz got permission from the administration and head custodian to mount the tablets by the two-to-four and four-to-six up escalators on Tuesday, September 29 to perform a test run of the program. The program ran smoothly from second period until Hochlewicz dismantled it at 4:30, with just a couple issues arising during the day. Around fourth period, the operating system on the tablet monitoring the four-to-six escalator crashed. “I looked it into it and I’m pretty sure it’s just a problem with the tablet, and not with the app I coded,” said Hochlewicz, noting that the application ran well on all of the other tablets. Additionally, Hochlewicz had difficulty positioning the tablets so that they were in range of the school Wi-Fi. “The new network actually has better coverage in Stuy’s building, so that’s what actually made the escalator monitoring system possible without using any kind of mobile hotspots,” Hochlewicz said. “[But] I’ll probably have to
Soham Ghoshal / The Spectator
G
“The Pulse of the Student Body”
work on modifying the tablets so they’ll have a stronger ability to [connect to the Wi-Fi].” The mice mounted crudely under the handrails with rubber bands and duct tape did not fall off during the test run. Hochlewicz hopes to 3-D print brackets to hold the mice with the help of a friend in robotics, to ensure that they will remain attached throughout the day. “In general I would call the test run a success. I was expecting to have at least some issues with the system and there were really no major ones, so that’s great news,” he said. After modifying his program to address the issues that arose during the test run, Hochlewicz plans to circulate a petition asking the administration to support his project. “There are some parts of it they might not like, like actually taping tablets
to the walls or mounting them full-time,” Hochlewicz said. “If these were to be set up fulltime then they would have to be plugged into wall outlets in the hallways and that’s something the administration would probably have an issue with.” For the test run, Hochlewicz bought back-up battery packs to support the tablets, which have roughly a two-hour battery life. If the system is fully implemented, one problem is that students could break or steal the tablets, which Hochlewicz plans to take down at night, but otherwise leave unattended during the day. Hochlewicz, however, doesn’t think this will be an issue. “I would have enough faith to hope that people wouldn’t just break continued on page 1
New SU Holds First Meeting and Passes New Constitution By Sharon Chao and Selina Zou The Student Union (SU) held its first meeting of the year on Friday, September 18, to vote on a revised Constitution and discuss goals for the upcoming school year. SU President Ares Aung, SU Vice President Matthew So, the Executive Branch, grade caucuses, and faculty advisor Matthew Polazzo attended the meeting. The Constitution details the responsibilities of each SU member, and the impeachment, amendment, and implementation protocols. This year is the first time it has been revised in eight years. Major changes include halfyear instead of full-year terms for Branch members and the elimination of unnecessary positions. Both Polazzo and Aung wanted to revise the Constitution. When Polazzo was Coordinator of Student Affairs (COSA), eight years ago, the Constitution was revised at the end of every year. “But, that [tradition] stopped during the time that I was not COSA,” Polazzo said. “Now, I feel that it’s best to begin the new year with a new Constitution.” Aung and So planned to
WHAT’S INSIDE? FEATURES OPINIONS
7
The Student Union Cabinet and Caucuses (left to right: Mary McGreal, Taylor Joines, David Kang, Namra Zulfiqar, Winston Venderbush, Enver Ramadani, Matthew So, Danny Poleshchuk, Ares Aung, Pallab Saha, Tahseen Chowdhury, Social Studies teacher Matthew Polazzo, Paulina Ruta, Chloe Delfau, Asim Kapparova, Krzystof Hochlewicz, and Astrid Malter) discuss the constitution at a meeting on Friday, September 18. Xin Italie / The Spectator
modify the Constitution due to student interest, such as sophomore Ryan Boodram’s May 28, 2015 Spectator article, “A Lesson in Constitutional Law for the SU.” “[The article] and all the 2015 election campaigns opened our eyes to the change that was
The Programmers: Everyday Superheroes How our schedules are put together, from A to Z.
being called for,” Aung said. Aung and So decided to write a new Constitution largely based on the old one. They wrote its skeleton, and members of the new Executive Branch added on after they were chosen over the summer.
Half-year terms for Branch members were originally in place when Polazzo was COSA the first time, but the policy changed after he left the position. The reversion back to half year-terms is to ensure a wide range of student opinions and to hold Branch
14
members more accountable for their work. “Half-year terms bring new perspectives to the SU twice a year instead of one. Also, it encourages Branch members to be more responsible because their seats during the second term are no longer guaranteed,” Aung said. The new Constitution also removed certain SU positions and clarified the roles of the ones that remained. The Directors and Assistant Directors of Maintenance and of Special Events positions were removed. “These roles didn’t really do much in the past, as in they were really titular and had no real meaning. Now, each position has actual responsibilities that are outlined very well [in the new Constitution],” senior and SU Chief of Staff David Kang said. Before voting on the new Constitution, senior and Technology Coordinator Krzysztof Hochlewicz voiced his concern about the impeachment protocol, which was not changed from the old Constitution. It states that only the Executive Council—composed of the Executive Branch and grade caucuses—can vote to continued on page 2
Forming A More (Im)perfect Union Critical analysis of the new constitution and its impact on student representation.