>-
::;:
c 0 .!l c C
~
C
Z W
...... W
::>
'"
c
c c
c
.2'
..c
'"'" ."E
--E00
0
>-
.~ c
.~c
'"ci ,
-. c
"0 >
c .~
•
." ."
c
Z 0
c
,• « u !.! ." • ..c u ;:::
c
~
...'"::>
c C
z>w
'0
::>
..91
'"
"0 u
a
>-
•
C>
ARCH ITECTURA L
EDUCATION
USA
IXHI.1t O. SlUDINT WOI. SPONSOIlD IT tHI UNnlO
$f,un
coo,nA"ON
IN.OIM ... TION SlIVICI WITH THE
o. lHI ASSOCIATION OF COlLEGIAn SCHOOLS OF .... CHlTlcrU ••• QllOANIZID IT 1H1 UNIVIISITV 0. MICHIGAN
FRED STEPHENSON 183. Barker Strut, lIwrlncl, Kusn VI 2·2!15 IUIDERIN& • MODEL IUIUlIHG •
'HOTO&RA~HY
• All WORK. DISPLAYS
In general, architectural education in the United States has two objectives; I} prepara· tion of students for their future responsibilities as memben of contemporary society, and 2) preparation for proficiency in the professional field of architecture. The particular balance of these objectives varies with time and place. Together they represent the prerequisites for the proper study of architecture if the requirements of changing patterns of living are to be met through effective utilization of scientific methods. Every program, in its way, provides for a knowledge and application of te<:hnological means to meet human needs. This process, called design, requires judgment, creative skill, and imagination. and is central to architectural education os well as to architecture. The two components represented by 1) the humanities and 2) the technological, when subjected to the process of design form the basis of architectural education in the United States. (panel 3) Design, and preporation for design, accounts for approximately half of the students' total undergraduote work. Beginning courses, identified as 'design fundamentals' are aimed at the development of visual perception and a knowledge of materials, structure,
form and their relationlhips in the organi1:ation of ~ace (panels" through 7). laler. emphasis is placed on the development of ability to analyze. evaluate and Int99rate the components af architectural design. Problems increase in technical and social complexity from the design of simple structures to large centen (panels 8 through 19), and the planning of small communities to vast regions (panels 20 through 27). One purpose of the exhibit hal been to express the enence of the work of the approximately 10,000 architectural students enrolled in schools across the United States. In the material exhibited, deloil has been eliminated to gain clarity and compactness. Projects utilizing models rather than drawings have been favored in the interests of format and scale. Within the limitations of reproduction, effort has been made to raftect accurately the content and intent of the original work. Whatever architecture Is, it is 01 leas' parriy a visual art, and its forms have an eloquence that enablel studentl of orchilecture to break through conventional barrien of communication and respond to the greeting' of their colleagues abroad.
IllIMOII II
IMlf
IMlf
.OLIM"
flCM
flCM
If"f.
PARTICIPATING SCHOOLS GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION AND COMPARATIVE DISTANCES
2
CURRICULUM COMPONENTS AND PATTERN OF INTEGRATION
3
路;
~ ~ ~
,
~
.-
/ AI
~
--
..-
design fundamentals north carolina state coJlege STUDY OF FORM AND STRUCTURE
models made of paper - structural value acquired by folding
'"
•
•
_-" 5"'J .
,
III
design fundamentals
university of california
STUDY OF TEXTURES AND SPACE MODULATORS
5
I
•
• • • •• •• • • • • ~
..
design fundamentals university of michigan STUDY OF FORM AND STRUCTURE
6
design fundamentals massachusetts institute of technology STUDY ON FORM AND STRUCTURE
7
•
-------- .---
design
north carolina state college
UNITS BASED ON ROTATION AND EXPANSION OF TETRAHEDRON
B
design
university of michigon
CAMPING SHELTER
9
design
university of michigan
SUMMER SHELTER
10
â&#x20AC;˘
design illinois institute of technology HOUse IN A COURT - INTERIOR
11
design
illinois institute of techno100Y
FJELD HOUSE -
12
AN EXHIBITION HAll
--~ r
, i
--=----•••• ~~~~-=-=
design illinois in sflfufe . STUDIES OF LOW of technology GROUP OF BUILDINGS CIVIC BUILDINGS
• Bill
__._.1
13
•
•
design
university of Michigan
NURSERY SCHOOL
__
14
•
•
• ••I
·
- •
•
design university of Michigan PLANNING STUDY FOR A SHOPPING CENTER
15
.. ..•
•
.'
•
,
I
L
I-- = ,"
l"I ,
~
I
t1
-,
, l
:'=1
~
.- r;:-pI~;--1:' :U • •
1."':
1
•,
t. design
harvard university
GRADUATE SCHOOL of city planning,
architecture, landscape architecture
16
/'
â&#x20AC;˘
design
harvard university
CONVENTION HALL
17
design north carolina state college STADIUM - double shell formed by precast concrete units
18
..' "'! '~I""W' ~
\1.
.
design north carolina state college COTTON MILL
19
,
-.
planning illinois institute of technology PLANNING PROPOSAL - HAWAII _ topography rainfall soil land use
/ 20
planning illinois institute of technology HOUSING PROJECT FOR CHICAGO PlANNING STUDY FOR STREATOR, ILlI路 NOIS - sloges of development
21
h
1:,
•
•
-
-
•
•
'1
•
• v
"
~
- ---.
,AM +«1
~\.c-<w ~..
• ,J . , '
..'
--
~
•
..., •
plonning horvard university LANDSCAPE SURVEY - growing season - soils and vegetation - soil inventory and analysis - visual analysis - microclimate - influence of climate on design
22
.....•
~
' -.,,-.. _.II.•
---~.
c
. .~ "
....;0.
L
i%~ 1
planning mossachusetts institute of technology CENTRAL AREA DEVELOPMENT LAWRENCE, MASSACHUSETTS
23
planning massachusetts institute of technology TRAFFIC ANALYStS AND SURVEY PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND
topography - density - transit routes time zones - transit desire lines
24
,.\..
.
.. -~~~. - - -~~~ ...:~.~ - ~ ~=;~- ~
~
- ._.-' _ ______ .J..' _ ::.--= =--,-
planning university of california SAN JOSE MISSION PROJECT - regionol exisfing conditions and assumptions general plan, interim stage - the neighborhood
25
\ .
- io...,{ -
design research university of michigan SPACE FRAME - designed to be mossproduced, bolted steel members and stock panels
26
planning research harvard university ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN
27
The exhibition was orgonized by Prof. Froncesco della Solo and the students of his graphic presentation doss, fall J 954.
, ,
...............
ebwAIlOS IIW1hERS,
.... """.IIIIo/MoooI ,
me.