dragos mircea nistor recent graduate portfolio
1
2
What is architecture? The most challenging thing when trying to deďŹ ne architecture, is being eloquent with a subject so vast covering almost every ďŹ eld of human thought. Here is my opinion using 1000 signs I feel that proper investment in education is not returning from the wealth generated by the growth of economy after the second world war. This is the main cause of many of today’s local and global crisis. Architecture is part of a group of disciplines in transition. It continues to be a service provided by a specialist to a client but in the same time, it becomes a tool of education, social interaction and space issues management. Architecture projects are commonly stared by volunteers, funded by alternative sources of income while people rely less and less on the municipalities to transform their surroundings. This new trajectory has similar effects like teaching kids to code or investing in youth owned business. It is education using the language of architecture. The effect is creating a generation more aware of their context and the issues of the built environment. Architecture for me is both a service of space design as it is voluntary contribution to education of my fellow citizens.
3
CV Mobile: +4 0729 974 961 Email: n.m.dragos@gmail.com Birth date: 10.08.1992
ºË¹·Ê¿ÅÄ·Â ÆÈÅŰ»Ɠ 2011-2017 Bachelor studies at Timisoara Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism; 2015-2016 Student at Technical University of Lodz, Poland, one semester Erasmus+ scholarship During my studies I got involved in a wide range of projects (urban planing, restoration, architectural design, heritage management, graphic design and others) in collaboration with other students, city authorities, different clients and stakeholders. I often take initiative to start, enhance or improve a project. I like to research and discover things by myself just as much as learning from more experienced people. As a statement of my willingness to adapt and learn from other people, I have engaged projects in 8 countries: Romania, Poland, Turkey, Norway, Finland, USA, Spain and New Zealand A few of my faculty and extra-curricular projects are entries to competitions. The ones with notable results are listed below with links: 2015 Europan 13 Runner-up in OS, Norway 2015 Krakow Oxygen Homes - Honorable Mention 2013 MILD Home & ECO Green Village - competition winner
Èż»ÉÉ¿ÅÄ·Â »Îƻȿ»Ä¹»Ɠ 2016 September - 2016 November Collaborator for the organization of Timisoara Architecture Biennial BETA In the autumn of 2016 I was part of a team of architects employed by the Timis County Chamber of Architects to manage the biggest local professional event in architecture. Our aim is to make BETA an euro-regional communication platform with events concerning education, the future of the profession and a critique on the city. 2016 February - 2016 June Intern at DProiect architecture studio In parallel with my fifth year of studies, I have been working with a local architecture studio specialized on restoration of old buildings. While there I worked on a proposal for the NEW MNIR competition in Bucharest. 2015 July - 2015 August
ÄÊ»ÈÄ ·Ê ÉʷĸË ·È¹¾¿Ê»¹ÊËÈ» Åů¹» VEN Architecture is a very professional and dynamic office from Turkey with offices in Ankara and Istanbul. Turkey is a country with a very different and rich culture and I feel very grateful to have the opportunity to research and design in that context. In the office I was part of a team of exceptional people and I managed to keep up with the work of more experienced architects. A part of the feedback I received from the office manager at the end of my internship: “Professionally, he had taken responsibility of any duty given, from basic works to very complicated ones. So he showed his interest and enthusiasm to learn. The outcome of his work is beyond expected. Socially, he had adapted very easily to the new country. He was in good communication with every employee in the office not only in working hours, but also after work.” 4
2013 - present Freelancing activity Working on-line on presentation projects (scale modeling and digital rendering) has thought me plenty about communicating efficiently, responsibility and time management. Samples of my work can be found in the portfolio. Feedback I got for the people I worked with was also very positive: “Dragos is professional in every sense of the word his work was just excellent. The office is thrilled” - Bernie O’Hagan, RMdesign, New Zealand “You will not find a better person to work with. I found Dragos to an man of high integrity that’s very conscientious about providing the client with the best possible finished product. Definitely a 5 star individual.” - Mike Goss, Texas USA
Èż»ÉÉ¿ÅÄ È»Â»Ì·ÄÊ ÉÁ¿ÂÂÉ ·Äº ·¹Ê¿Ì¿Ê¿»ÉƓ 2010 - Photography accreditation 2 year professional photography course and participation in exhibitions Graphic design info-graphics, presentations, rapport papers, logo, poster design, works for fundraising causes, event visual identity and other educational projects Digital software competence: Adobe suite: Acrobat, InDesign, Illustrator, Photoshop - advanced ArchiCAD - excellent Autodesk Revit - advanced Autodesk AutoCad - average Rhinoceros - advanced with Grasshopper - beginner MS Office - excellent Language skills Romanian - native English - C1
Ź¿·Â »Ä½·½»Ã»ÄÊ ·Äº ÌÅÂËÄÊ»»È¿Ä½Ɠ
2007 - 2011 Debater - part of the Regional Association for Debate, Oratory and Rhetorics Banat “ARDOR Banat” 2011 - 2015 Senior trainer at prestige high school debate club in hometown 2014 - 2015 High school debate program regional coordinator I’ve been engaged in teaching democratic values and methods of expression to high school students ever since I’ve stopped being one. To accomplish this I had to learn how to adapt my communication strategies, come up with interesting and engaging learning materials and coordinate large groups of people. More than 50 students every year have been in contact with the debate activity and I have contributed plenty in educating more than 30 that engaged in the long term program. Public speaking, argumentation, critical thinking, research and logical structure are only a few of the cognitive skills I’ve been teaching to the teenagers over time.
Personal interests A diverse range of activities and hobbies take up much of what’s left of my time after subtracting architecture. I am a proud novice at playng bass guitar, a passion sprung by my love for music, jazz and art in general. My bycicle is my weapon against daily busy city traffic and riding through nature is a perfect escape from stress. I like to be very “hands on” what I do, so I find bulding models, woodworking and prototyping very intresting and relaxing.
5
notable projects: urban planing, architecture, historical conservation Europan 13 Second Place
City of Os, Norway - the competition was focused on central part of the city, which despite its accessibility and recreational potential was dedicated for cars. Our proposal was appreciated for the capacity to recognize the place’s importance for the entire community and a design which kept the space open and available to all, opposed to more typical proposals aimed at densifying and overbuilding the space.
team: Alexandra Oprea, Bogdan Tudor, Denis Poloca, Alexandru Voica; in collaboration with DProiect studio- Bogdan Demetrescu and Oana Simionescu
MILD HOME Firs Place
National competition part of an EU project aimed at developing eco housing options. The task was to follow environmental sustainability in a complete project from detail to community planing in order to obtain viable architectural solutions for eco-friendly living.
team: Razvan Vingan
Krakow Oxygen Homes Honorable Mention
International call for ideas for a palliative care center in Krakow.
team: Razvan Vingan
New MNIR Entry
International competition for the restoration and refreshing of the museum concept for the National History Museum of Romania. The competition required organizing the 30.000sqm of interior space of the 120 year old building with more than 300 rooms and thousands of artifacts.
team: Alexandra Oprea, Alexandru Voica and DProiect studio: Bogdan Demetrescu, Paul Valeanu, Sergiu Sabau, Andreea Simici and Pepe Guerrero
Interventions in the historical fabric of Oravita Diploma Project
The city of Oravita used to be the capital of the AustroHungarian coal mining exploitation in Banat region of Romania. After the mines closed, economic collapse triggered a demographic downturn and the city was left with many architectural monuments and no one to use them. We come in the aid of the city authorities with site speciďŹ c plans and small interventions meant to help conserve the local atmosphere and revitalize the town.
team: Alexandra Oprea, Emanuel Tamas, Cristina Coste; supervised by Bogdan Demetrescu
6
involvement in cultural initiatives BETA Architecture Biennial Organising collaborator
The Timisoara Architecture Biennial (BETA) is striving to become more than a closed, local event for established architects. By inviting guests from Hungary, Serbia and other Eastern Europe countries we are trying to make Timisoara a hot-spot for sharing new ideas about the future of architecture, citizen initiative, bottom up developments and many other alternative ways of improving the urban environment.
Regional Debate and Public Speaking Association High school debate coach
During 4 years after I finished high school I have been training other students democratic values and argumentation skills. This was a voluntary activity made for my
team: Timis County Chamber of Architects
work experience architecture design, modeling and graphic design freelancing
Have been working for 2 years on Upwork freelancing platform with a 4.56 out of 5 average. Link for the profile with feedback: https://www.upwork. ¹ÅÃƭÅƭÆÈÅŰ»ÉƭËÉ»ÈÉƭͨʘʷʸʺʼʼ»ʻʿºʸˀ·ʿʾʼʷ¼»ƭ
Architecture Intern at VEN Istanbul summer internship
Summer internship with Erasmus + funding
partners: New Zealand - RMdesigns; USA - private client; Romania - Regina Maria hospital network, ARDOR Educational NGO
design board
7
ËÈÅÆ·Ä ʸʺƓ ȻƷȿĽ º»ÄÉ¿ÊÏ preserve community character reconsider density activate spatial limits redesign the center of the town
In order to create a complete living experience for the inhabitants, OS doesn’t need more built structures, but an increase in the number and diversity of functions and social interactions, making it a vibrant and active space of the community. Our proposal uses different mechanisms to soften the strong limits which bound the site. We aim to create events on their paths, so they are not perceived as obstacles but as opportunities for connecting with natural elements or people. In architectural terms, the site is a straight, man made platform. We devised a process to regenerate the space for public use which starts by introducing the people to the site and asking them to participate to the process. Most of the existing buildings are to be relocated. A complete overhaul of the square and it’s infrastructure will set the premises for further development, covering the area with a texture of pavement, green patches and wooden deck surface. To activate the stage, prefabricated wood pavilions are proposed in strategic positions, configurations and densities. The modules can be rented for small businesses or left open and transparent in order to house temporary functions. The development plan includes specific rules over how people choose to extend the constructions on the site in order to follow a desire character. The final layout and aspect of the square remains for the people to decide.
8
The true separating element between the two parts is the site itself, not the water. Europan site limit Current road path Intervention limit Vehicle function Built environment Cultural activities
Infrastructure grid
Perceptual links (views, terraces) Planted areas
New roads
Pavilion structures
Imaginary point grid
Accommodation buildings Mixed use/ofďŹ ce
9
General directions of the proposed intervention emphasize the natural course of the elements on the site. ¾» Æ˸¿¹ ÉÆ·¹» ¿É ¸»ÊÊ»È º»ŰÄ»º ¸Ï É÷ ¿ÄÊ»ÈÌ»ÄÊ¿ÅÄÉ in the adjacent limits until a coherent shape is obtained.
Aside from physical connections, our project is based on what you can sense or see without necessarily reaching it. We ËÉ» º¿Ů»È»ÄÊ º»Ì¿¹»É ÊÅ ½Ë¿º» ʾ» Æ»ÅÆ»ƠÉ attention towards an object with particular importance.
¾» ÆÈÅŰ» ż ʾ» ¿ÄÊ»ÈÌ»ÄÊ¿ÅÄÉ ¼ÅÂÂÅÍ Ê¾» ¾»¿½¾Ê ż ʾ» hillside, lowering towards the public space for a more human dimension
10
Proposed objects are connected to the hill side. Circulation from above is directed from the top terraces, between the volumes to the site surface
Space between the old buildings and the rock face will be activated by installations and events creating well º»ŰÄ»º »ÎʻȿÅÈ Æ˸¿¹ rooms
Ëȼ·¹» Ê»ÎÊËÈ»É Å¼ ʾȻ» º¿Ů»È»ÄÊ Á¿ÄºÉ Ϳ ¿Äʻȷ¹Ê ÅÄ Ê¾» É¿Ê» ·È»·Ɣ ŹÁ Ʒ̿ĽƑ ÉÆ»¹¿Ű¹·ÂÂÏ Å¼ urban character stretches from the hill base to the pavilions
11
MILD Home Competition of Ideas Modular; Intelligent; Low cost; DIY homes for a sustainable village Planning and layout strategy for the community Detailed solutions for low energy consumption homes
More modules can be added or subtracted according to the needs of each family.
Adapting the traditional house plan, with a double porch - the interior one serves as circulation distributor - more comfort
night zone
work zone
social zone
The welcoming courtyard: the neighbors which pas by can use as a social space to interact with the family living in the house The private courtyard: the dinning, the living, and the children’s room are focused towards the second courtyard, making a connection with nature and a visual link between the rooms The family retreat: most private exterior space Ventilation: the courts provide excellent air circulation trough the house, reducing the need for air conditioning in the summer
The middle volume changes place creating space for a courtyard. The three courtyards of each propriety have different privacy degrees Interior spaces are also better illuminated.
12
13
Krakow Oxygen Home cancer day care center well defined urban setting balance of compromise
2
1
3
Faced with the difficult task of choosing which area of the park to compromise for the new construction, we decided it must have a minimal impact on the perception of the site. A camouflage of mirrors is a tool often used to enlarge the boundaries of a space, but for this building it also has the role of making it disappear. The high tech shell is our response to the dilemma of housing a necessary function in a place where an object is not desired. The volume supports the need of privacy by candour. Lack of details allows for a perfect cover with the reflective surface. The decision to link the building to the free wall of the memorial house was made against the rules, in order to enclose a private space in the form of a courtyard. The old tree contained by the yard marks the entrance and acts as a link between the house and it’s exterior. The court yard is also the main source of light and a place for sport activities, lounging or relaxation. We chose a composite wood frame structure combined with masonry sheer walls. This structure supports the layer of insulation and mirror of the exterior and glass surfaces towards the courtyard. Cancer will be treatable someday and we hope our building will remain without a purpose. In this respect it must be easy to break down and disassemble or convert to another function. Wood was chosen for the warm and comfortable character.
The main circulation path through the park is the alley parallel to Garnkarska street. It is important to keep the people moving as far away from the building as possible so as to diminish the perceived height of the side wall of the Marie Curie memorial house, which is too big for the scale of the park. The proposed volume also acts to break the size of this wall and bring it to a more human scale. We chose to make a loop leading to the facade of the building so people can experience the mirrors in a playful manner if they wish. In the center of this loop, the main area of use keeps its rectangular shape though is no longer mineral, but green. This will focus the usual pedestrian activity around it and provide room for sitting on the grass, picnic, sport or group activities.
14
15
The new MNIR 120 year old building Museum of National History of Romania a critical updated way of showcasing the country’s history 96mil euro budget Main design directions for the MNIR Project 1. Introduction (Functional & Spatial Criterion) Our proposal for the new MNIR is born from two relations. On the one hand there is a need to preserve and display the valuable fabric of the old Palace of the Post, and, at the same time to refurbish the building into a modern institution setting, a platform capable to bring together different entities in order to research, expose and debate upon Romanian History. The core of the project lies in the interior covered courtyard, acting both as a public space and as a horizontal and vertical distribution space. The courtyard together with the foyer will be a free space, encouraging new connections through the building. 2. Museographic Proposal (Museographic Criterion) The museographic display will try to concentrate on rather histories than on History with capital ‘H’, on a continuously changing domain compatible to micronaratives. The visiting path starts with the Treasure collection. The exhibitions develop in a chronological sequence on the two upper floors. Along this path there will be three key spatial attractions, containing important exhibitions. As an iconic figure for the collection, the Thinker of Hamagia and his Wife, will take the main role of this layout, being placed in an elaborated scenographic setting of the restored double hight aula. A street level display window will be an interaction point for both visitors and passer-bies.
16
3. Restorative Proposal (Heritage Criterion) During its history, by several transformations and successive partitions, the old Post started to lose its initial clarity. Our approach begins with a process of selection of valuable and non-valuable building elements, trying to regain atmospheric qualities by revealing the main spaces and volumes, displaying at the same time elements from the main construction periods. A special care we kept to restore and reveal the historic skylights in order to enrich and embellish the exhibitions. 4. Urban Design Proposal (Urban Design Criterion) Because of the individual additive development of the city in it’s early times, the typical urban plaza is hard to ďŹ nd in Bucharest As the rejuvenated Old City Center shows, there is a need for new urban spaces to have a dialogue and manifest as a community. We cleared the courtyard, covered it, opened the two portals and put several independent functions (cafeteria, restaurant, auditorium, cafe) in order to invite people to use the museum as a meeting point, letting free big open spaces to call for future events to take place.
5. Structure Proposal (Structural Criterion) The new structure is detached by the old one, being a 3 story high underground pit composed by 2 rigid concrete boxes and a rectangular 7.5m grid of square columns, concrete made in the basement and steel made until the top of the roof. The shape tries to unify the very heterogeneous silhouette of the courtyard both in plan and section, covering the courtyard with a network of beams a with a lowered canopy like roof. The structure simulates a hipostyle hall, downscaling the space, and favoring frames over general perspectives. We also have chosen a grid due to lower costs, ease to build locally and functional practicality (for the basement storages levels) reasons. 6. Management Plan (Economic Criterion) Until completion of the building we imagine a 10 step plan in order to have a fully functional museum during the construction period. Building both the museum institution and the building, while receiving revenues would be ideal for our scenario.
17
The project contains over 300 rooms of many programs besides the permanent and temporary exhibitions: caffees, restaurants, multimedia hall, treasury, storage, research facilities and many others.
There is an antithetic discourse of a Beaux Artes building housing a national history museum. Our intervention was based on contradicting nationalist ideals but strengthening traditional values and identity.
18
19
Interventions in the historical fabric of Oravita one of the richest towns from the Habsburgic period first train station and railway in Romania, operational to this day shrinking city with 30% of the population gone Context I chose Oravita for my diploma project because of the challenging conditions it faces. Abandoned by state investments during the communist era, the city remained untouched since the pre world war period, housing 4 first class monuments and 46 second class monuments in a gorgeous mountain scenery. Shrinkage Population in Oravita went down from 15000 to 10000 inhabitants in a few years after 1989 Urban planing There is no strategy to manage any of the monuments, may of which remained in the propriety of the municipality after the fall of communism. New development is drawn towards the suburbs, leaving the valuable city center empty. ÈÅÀ»¹Ê ƾ·É» ʸƓ ÉÊÈ·Ê»½Ï In collaboration with the mayor and chief city architect we have developed a management plan to guide local decision makers towards a list of actions we decided that are necessary to be taken in order to limit the destruction of the monuments and establish the basis of a tourism strategy. Urban landscape conservation Oravita has many great individual monuments but what makes the city unique is the quality of the entire built layout and natural landscape. The conservation of this asset as understood in the charter of Viena, is of great importance. Management plan - document link We have developed a document containing more than 20 projects and 5 legislative measures to help the local decision makers with ideas about what to do in order to fight the effects of shrinkage and neglect of the urban space. Our approach was based on consulting references from cities like Regensburg or Sighisoara which are UNESCO WH and UNESCO guidelines to follow the best practice.
20
Project Phase 2: set an example Offering viable solutions for using the old buildings for new functions is a key aspect to changing people’s minds towards the town. In this respect, all the members working on the ďŹ rst phase will choose a different building for a project of adaptive reuse. The Polyclinic My building was built in 1729 and used to be the house of stonemasons brought by the Empire. The communist regime converted it into a polyclinic and it remained with no refurbishment for many years since. My task is to redesign the old building into a new medical institution passing modern day healthcare standards.
21
Architectural concept and milestones - redesign the interior layout in coherence with the program of a contemporary medical facility - clear up the clattered area of the plot and propose a landscaping design for the courtyard - redesign the extension which will house the radiology investigation sections - create an opportunity to show and explore certain areas of the house aimed for restoration - restoration, rehabilitation and adaptive reuse techniques were used in different areas of the project, making it a comprehensive learning experience and ensuring control over the composition Proposed design key features The layout of the house was changed from an apartment based oor plan to a centralized organization scheme, in which shared facilities like bathrooms, lockers, cleaning, storage, etc serve many individual ofďŹ ces. This meant upgrading from 5 existing medical specialties to 11, a pharmacy, educational and management space using approximatively the same usable area. To make the building comply with heath and ďŹ re regulations, adding another staircase and elevator shaft was necessary and the choice of materials appropriate for medical spaces was carefully selected. For certain areas glass elements were used to enclose the original structure of the house and proposed installations so that references to the old construction remain visible. A chromatic proposal for the facade restoration was made by analyzing layers of pain visible due in areas of high degradation.
22
23
24
Zoning map Different areas of the city are given particular status from tightly protected to loose in order to ease construction and development, and give some control to the municipality. Each area has a different set of rules.
The zoning protection areas were developed in sync with the vertical proďŹ le, to make sure we help maintain the overall landscape
existing
proposed
25
Timisoara Architecture Biennial BETA Euro-Regional communication platform Design, Education, Culture shared exhibitions with Serbian and Hungarian partners
The Timisoara architecture biennial (BETA) is an euro regional platform for dialogue and collaboration, whose main purpose is to improve the processes through which we build our cities.
My responsibilities were to coordinate and install traveling exhibitions from Hungary and Serbia: Yes, But there is a problem, by KEK Budapest and Energy Spots Belgrade, by BINA. These events happened in Timisoara and Brasov.
BETA 2016 aims to generate a responsible dialogue regarding architectural education, continuing education and the architectural practice, as well as to stimulate the engagement of and the professional use of dialogue and collaboration methods by the representatives of the administration, the professional body and the civic society.
Being part of the management team meant I was responsible for communicating with the curators and architects that designed the exhibitions, different material providers and leading a team of volunteers (students and young architects) The events attracted many people and for me it was a chance to learn about initiatives from countries very much like ours that solved similar problems.
The BETA website
26
27
Freelancing architecture design graphic design model making models built for RM Designs New Zealand
28
29
Design Board - fragments of other works architecture design graphic design model making
study model house by Max Dudler
30
study model abstract space Ist year
31
Design Board - fragments of other works
32 32
SPEECH
style content
CAPABLE JUST BRAVE
1
argument
2
argument
3
argument
2014
INTRO
RESPONSABLE
feedback: applauses, face gestures, smiles, attitude, attention. The lack of feedback is very relevant. It means that you are slowly losing the control of the audience.
a good speech means: -ideas should be understood -stimulates a change in the way people perceive a issue -generates positive or negative feelings from the public regarding the issue
informative speech
-you try to make the public emphasize with you issue -contains arguments (motives) for the public to believe you -personal
-you transmit some new information -contains details and briefings -not personal
76 teams
a good speech is NOT measured by: -the numbers in the audience -how funny you are -impressive figures of speech
demonstrativ speech
persuasive speech
228 debaters 3 days32 clubs
-informative speeches concentrated on specific characteristics of an object -accompanied by charts, graphs or slides verbal (message)
minutes spent debating
hours
8
Muntenia
days
regional distribution of the participating teams
Transilvania
Speakers
Reply
69.175
34.39
Teams
241.90
Average scores for each round: 242
paralanguage (tone of voice,rythm)
241 240
-attention getter -your introduction -statement towards the subject
-statement of fact -content -backing
-placing ideas into context -what do you wish the public think about when they go home?
Tell them
Tell them what you told them
eye contact
attitude
body language
www.concursan2.wordpress.com
Closing statement
Š Dragos Mircea Nistor 2013
nonverbal (face expresion,gestures,attitude)
Content
figures of speech
debate matches
CDIAS ARGO AES Banat
191
Average scores of the competition:
-stand-up comedy -the reaction and emotion of the public is more important than the content
Introduction
flow
11480
243
What is a speech made of?
Tell them what you are going to tell them
205
entertaining speech
How do we prepare a speech? Pick a subject Research the domain Get to know your audience
15 volunteers and organizers
50 judges
round: 1 competition average round average GOV average OPP average
GOV/OPP win ratio on the 5 rounds: www.concursan2.wordpress.com
2
3 63%
37%
GOV
1
OPP
4
GOV
5 66%
63%
61%
47%
39%
37%
OPP
GOV
2
53% 34%
3
OPP
GOV
4
OPP
GOV
5
OPP
Qualifying rounds motions:
Rounds:
THW abolish economic sanctions as an international policy tool
1;4 prep
THBT third world countries should nationalize energetic resources.
2;5 prep
THW rather campaign for encouraging male sexuality than discouraging female sexual exposure
Top 10
18.625% above average
Teams
ARGO Alexandru Mehedinti SAVA A Central-Le Domin ARGO-Solaris Frumoasa intre Stele Lazar 1 D.S.D.C. 1 CORD Ramnicu Sarat A Cantemir Underfuckers AES Campina Central 402
Speakers
Surdea Vlad Negoescu Victor Toader Claudiu Pavel Sonia Gradinaru Alexandru Tuca Irina Patrascoiu Daria Campeanu Lucian Mehedinti Alexandru Marincean Leonardo
1265 1262.5 1251.5 1268 1256 1248 1240 1239.5 1236 1236
Qualified teams evolution: D.S.D.C. 1 ARGO E Cantemir #DQ ARGO Solaris ARGO Alex Mehedinti Cantemir Lazar Viorele Lazar 1 ARGO All Foxies Central Le Domin Pache 2 Central 402 CORD Ramnicu Sarat A AES Campina Cantemir Under SAVA A CDIAS A
3 impro
72.9 72.8 72.8 72.7 72.5 72.2 72.1 72.1 72.1 72.1
14.625% above average
D.S.D.C. 1 ARGO Solaris ARGO Solaris
ARGO Solaris
ARGO Alex Mehedinti ARGO Alex Mehedinti ARGO All Foxies Central Le Domin Central Le Domin
ARGO
Solaris WINNERS
CORD Ramnicu Sarat A Central Le Domin AES Campina
SAVA A
SAVA A
Eliminating rounds motions: TH regrets the presence of anti-heroes in the media. THBT recently established democracies should ban religious parties. THBT Palestinians should abandon their quest for an independent state of Palestine and focus instead on a civil rights movement inside the state of Israel. THBT third world countries should nationalize energetic resources.
Rounds:
eighth impro quarter impro
semis impro final prep
33
Thank You
34