Should we abolish colleges?
The Fringe
Fashion Shoot
Their provisions are vastly unequal – time for reform?
Thespians of Cambridge, Overheard in Edinburgh
GANT’s autumn season: a new take on an old look
→ Comment, p.13
→ Part 2, p.6–7
→Part 2, p.10–11
The
06 October 2015 Vol. 17 Michaelmas Issue 1 www.tcs.cam.ac.uk
City blackout condemned as unsafe
Cambridge Student
Frontbench role for new MP: the first five months Anna Carruthers Deputy Investigations Editor Five months ago Labour’s Daniel Zeichner defeated the Liberal Democrat incumbent, Julian Huppert, by a narrow 599 votes. Since then, Zeichner has opposed the Welfare Bill, supported Yvette Cooper in the Labour leadership campaign and became Shadow Minister for Transport. Zeichner laid down a clear marker in his maiden speech to the Commons, describing Cambridge as a “tale of two cities” in which 12,000 people are earning below the living wage and average rents are double the national average. A self-described socialist, he was one of 48 MPs who rebelled against the Labour whip and opposed the Welfare Bill. This stance has not been welcomed by everyone. One third-year historian, who wishes to remain anonymous, told The Cambridge Student: “I think he’s a trade union slave and total arse.” Prior to his election, Zeichner served as a political officer at UNISON for 13 years. Zeichner has previously defended the Labour Party’s relationship with the unions, saying to Cambridge News it prevented politics’ domination by “an ever-shrinking circle of middle class people.” However, this socialist attitude did not translate into support for Jeremy Corbyn, but rather Yvette Cooper. On a joint visit with Cooper to Microsoft Research, Zeichner highlighted her focus on “high skilled jobs, productivity growth and new opportunities for everyone”. Yet when Corbyn was elected, Zeichner was appointed as Shadow Minister for Transport. The Cambridge University Conservative Association issued a statement arguing that such a position was bad for the city. Continued on page 4 →
Council to extinguish streetlights after cuts Elsa Maishman Deputy News Editor
S
tudents and JCRs across Cambridge have condemned plans to switch off lights on Cambridge’s streets between midnight and 6am from 1 April 2016. Due to government cuts, the county council must save £100 million over the next 5 years, £272,000 per year of which will come from the switch-off. The presidents of several JCRs have opposed the plans, including Murray Edwards, Trinity, Newnham, Trinity Hall and, reportedly, Jesus. Pembroke’s president, Will Popplewell, said it would “increase the danger towards students”. President of Cambridge University Students’ Union Priscilla Mensah told The Cambridge Student that CUSU will be working with students to campaign against the proposals, as “this costcutting endeavour exposes students to unnecessary vulnerability when students should always feel safe in this city.’’ Daniel Zeichner, Labour MP for Cambridge, has also urged the council to reconsider the plan, which he called “terrible for Cambridge”. However, the county council do not regard this proposal as a threat to public safety, based on “the evidence supplied from other local authorities” suggesting “no increase in crime or accident levels” after similar initiatives. Partial night lighting has been introduced by more than 60 other councils. A member of the Cambridge City Centre Policing Team suggested to TCS that it is net circumstances, not lighting alone, that encourage crime, and said they were “not personally
concerned about the proposal to turn off certain street lighting overnight.’’ Rumours that the University of Cambridge may step in and pay to keep the lights on in student areas remain unconfirmed, and a spokesperson stated only that the University “is committed to the safety of its students and will work with local authorities as appropriate as their plans develop.’’ A spokesperson for Cambridgeshire county council said: “We have already saved £218 million since 2009 and if we do not find further ways to save money we will have to make deeper cuts from services such as frontline social care looking after the most vulnerable in our society.” They say they “absolutely understand” concerns and are speaking with councils to find “local solutions.” They continued: “At the same time we are looking at using LEDs to save money ... and our PFI contract saves us £1 million a year. Further engagement with the public will start soon.” The streets on which lights are set to be turned off include routes between clubs, bars and student accommodation, such as Trinity Lane, Grange Road, and Chesterton Lane. Following a series of sexual assaults in November, The Tab launched a nearly 2,000-strong petition asking for better lighting in parks and green spaces “to ensure that when we walk through Cambridge at night, we feel safer and more secure.’’ The organisers were subsequently outraged to learn that the county council were already working on partial lighting plans.
Editorial Comment page 15 →
Trolley in hand, hair on point, the new year begins
Investigations pages 4-5 → Image: Tom Dorrington Editorial Comment page 15 →