The publication for Nursing and Residential Care Homes www.thecareruk.com £1.75
SUMMER 2016
where sold
Issue 33 REGULAR FEATURES
INSIDE
THIS
ISSUE
FEATURE
Hygiene & Kitchen Infection Technology Nurse Call Design & Control & Software Alarms Equipment Fire Safety Pages 22 - 23
Pages 24 - 26
Pages 26 - 27
Pages 28 - 29
Pages 30 - 31
Editor's Viewpoint
Laundry Medication Product Solutions Management Portfolio Pages 32-33
Page 34
Page 42
Furniture & Fittings
PAGE 2 35 - 41
Dementia Care & Training 43-44 Property, Finance
45 - 46
& Professional
Care Homes Receive 40% Nursing Care Increase from Department of Health The NhS contribution towards the costs of a place in a care home with nursing is being increased on an interim basis to £156.25. The rates for eligible care home residents assessed to require the help of a registered nurse will be as follows: • Standard rate will be increased to £156.25 per week • Higher rate will be increased to £215.04 per week (this is only relevant for those people who were already on the higher rate in 2007 when the single band was introduced) Registered nursing care for eligible nursing home residents is funded by the NHS and the weekly rate per patient is currently set at £112. The increase follows an independent review of the rate paid by the NHS to nursing homes (known as NHSfunded nursing care). The review, carried out by Mazars LLP, recommends that the NHS-funded nursing care rate should increase by 40% to £156.25. The government accepts the recommendation, which means that clinical commissioning groups will now pay a national rate of £156.25. The increase will be backdated to
1 April 2016 for individuals who were in receipt of NHSfunded nursing care from that time. The new rate is being paid on an interim basis while further work is done to review the element of the rate for agency nursing staff (which could lead to a reduction to the rate from 1 January 2017) and to consult on introducing regional variation from April 2017. Whilst welcoming the new rate Frank Ursell chief executive of the Registered Nursing Home Association (RNHA) said: “What’s the catch? We welcome the fact that a detailed review of actual nursing costs in care homes has led to an increase in the weekly amount to be paid – from £112 to £156.25, on the face of it, this is a step in the right direction. But we have concerns about the fact that the increase is described as an interim award, which according to the Department of Health could be reduced for some nursing home residents after further analysis of the figures. “There are also big question marks about where the money will come from. Is the government going to make an extra allocation of funds to NHS clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) so that they can pay the money to residents being cared for by nurses? Or are CCGs expected to find this from their existing resources? And how long will be it before payment of this overdue increase and the backdated amounts stretching back to the start of April will actually be made?”
He added: “These are not the only potential flies in the ointment. A majority of patients in many nursing homes qualify for local authority funding of all their fees. The NHS contribution is intended to meet the nursing element of those costs. So will cash-strapped local authorities pass over the whole of the award to the nursing homes concerned? Or will they try to hang on to it in order to protect their hard-pressed budgets?” “All these loose ends makes care providers necessarily cautious about the outcome of the review of nursing costs commissioned by the Department of Health, on which this award is now based. RNHA members are understandably asking questions. We look to the Department of Health to provide some answers as quickly as possible.” He concluded: “The Mazars report, which is based on a survey of nursing homes, has identified regional and other variations in costs. This is no surprise to anyone, because the cost of running a nursing home in London or the South East is necessarily higher than in many other parts of the country. “We hope that this will not turn into an excuse for the Department of Health, some months down the line, to withdraw the uplift on a selective basis. To do that would be both disappointing and unfair, not least because in our view the NHS contribution has been unrealistically low for a long time.”