October Issue

Page 1

ct

Girls’ JV and varsity Principal Steve golf hits the green— Gabriel’s opinion see more on on GLHS’s ranking Page 12 Page 7

Grand Ledge High School’s

The Comets’ Tale

Schools Rules broadcasts live from GLHS

Snack attack

Volume 47 Issue 2 October 2014 820 Spring St. Grand Ledge MI 517-925-5848

Non-homestead tax is up for renewal in upcoming election

New health standards take effect in schools

Gone are the days of chocolate bars, greasy chips and sour gummy NEWS EDITOR worms—at least in schools. When First Lady Michelle Obama passed the Safe Snacks in Schools initiative, it did away with any snacks that are over 200 calories or contain more than 35 percent fat calories, among other factors. The intention is to make students eat healthier. But the impact reaches farther than the students’ diets—and into the pocketbooks of the school programs. For students at GLHS, the school store is a staple hangout place for lunchtime. Although their merchandise includes spirit wear and GL trinkets, their staple products are the snacks they sell during school—including drinks, cookies, chips, popcorn, candy and Cliff Bars. Walk into the school now, the chips are replaced with Goldfish, the candy is obsolete and the lattes are no longer a part of the menu. Not only are students having their food options taken away, but Marketing teacher Marcee Laudick is afraid that students in her classes are missing out on opportunity. “Last year the school store spent over $7,000 sending kids to DECA,” Laudick said. “Those kids got scholarships to college, they got opportunities that they’re not going to have because I don’t think the profits are going to be there [to send them].” The student store has not only spent its profits on the marketing students, in the past they have donated money to the school plays, buying GLHS’ Winkey mascot and donating money to fund the electronic sign in front of the building. “The money stayed here and did things we’re not going to be able to do anymore,” Laudick said. Laudick says that about 60-70 percent of the profit in the school store comes from the candy and Arizona drinks that were sold before and after school as well as during lunch. Now that there are more regulations on foods, Laudick and her marketing students are going to have to come up with strategies to still get students in the store to buy snacks that are deemed acceptable. The student store already had many regulations they are not allowed to compete with the cafeteria, and for the past few years they have not been able to sell regular soda. A problem with this is the cost of healthy snacks, and the food choices that adolescents will tend to make as well. Laudick does not believe that the initiative will stop students from eating the way that they please, especially in an open-campus setting like GLHS. “If somebody wants to buy sour gummies I don’t think they’re going to come buy a granola bar from us—they’re just going to skip it,” Laudick said. “I don’t think we’re stopping them, we’re just not benefiting from the sales.” Health teacher Kellee Auge hopes that the nutrition standards will impact students’ choices now as well as into their adult lives. “I think it has potential, but it will not cure everything,” Auge said. “While students are at school if they have only healthy options to get then I think they will learn some healthy snacks that they actually do enjoy. There are actually studies that show if you feed kids better food they perform better in school.” Auge did admit that the swift passing of the standards that take away sugary snacks and drinks could negatively affect the school, who has little time to adjust. “Politicians put in these laws for anything school related and initially they look at it as being good but then it’s like a spider web,” Auge said. “They don’t realize how far it’s going to reach in the negative.” Instead, she thinks it should have been taken on a yearly basis, cutting out different snacks or sugary drinks every time. “I think whenever you are trying to introduce something like this you need to take it small steps in order to initiate change that is going to last,” Auge said. Through she is disappointed in the federal government’s passing of the legislation, Laudick is still hopeful that she and the marketing classes can make a profit this year. They are looking for that “one” product that will fit into the guidelines but will also be cheap enough and catch student interest to keep the store afloat. All of the marketing classes are also writing letters to Michelle Obama to express their dismay over the regulations and how it negatively affects their high school marketing experience. “Elect a president with a smart wife who has nothing to do and she’ll find something to do” Laudick said. “I feel like [Michelle Obama] is legislating as a Washington insider and deciding what’s good for school districts across the country, and I’m not sure that she’s really making any kind of an impact.”

Bry Leach ‘15

The taste test

Members of the publication staffs blindly tested “healthy” and “unhealthy” products for quality and taste

94 % in favor

vs.

Regular

81% in favor

vs.

Regular

88% in favor

6in favor % Oven Baked

vs.

19% in favor

On Nov. 4, voters of the Grand Ledge community will decide MANAGING EDITOR whether or not to approve the Non Homestead tax again. This tax is renewed every 10 years and affects businesses, not homeowners. The GLPS district depends on these funds for 16 percent of the budget. The budget is 37 million total between state and the Non Homestead funding—Non Homestead accounts for nearly 7 million of it. Every year the state funds roughly $7,200 per student, and if the Non Homestead tax does not pass then this number would be reduced to $1,333 per student. For GLHS that could mean cutting transportation and not having school funded programs. “This isn’t an increase; it is a renewal,” superintendent Dr. Brian Metcalf said. “A continuation.” In 1994, Proposal A was passed in Michigan. Proposal A took authority away from local communities and gave it to that state. It moved the majority of funding for schools away from homeowners responsibility to state funding, with the exception of businesses and second homes. “We don’t have a decision on how to fund most of our budget,” Metcalf said. “We have to rely on politicians to stick up for our district. The only other option is Non Homestead tax, but it will not ever be an increase, but without it we will not have that money ever.” This means that even though the burden of homeowners being responsible for school funding is gone, parents and the school board also do not have a lot of power to change the budget. So if the school board wanted to raise a tax and asked the community to vote on it, they would not have that ability because the school board does not have authority over how to get money. Since Proposal A was passed, there has not been a district in Michigan that has not passed the Non Homestead tax for a second time. One of the most important facts is that it is not an increase of money, it is a continuation of regular funding from the past 10 years. In 2000, the school district’s millage rate was reduced from 18 mills to 17.7 mills due to a Headlee Rollback. A Headlee Rollback occurs when local governments are required by law to reduce the millage rate when the growth on existing property is greater than the rate of inflation. As a result of a Headlee Rollback, school districts collect less revenue than is allowable under Proposal A. Now, Grand Ledge’s millage is at 16.7247 due to all the rollbacks, so the district is seeking renewal of 19.558 mills to balance out the total to equal 18 mills. “If the Non Homestead tax doesn’t pass, survival of the school would be a big deal,” principal Steve Gabriel said. If this tax is not passed the first time in November it will be on the ballot again, up until March. Sarah Clinkscales ‘15

Whole Grain

Regular

Page 6

Diet How to calculate a millage rate

If a business is worth $400,000, divide by 2. Then take that number ($200,000) and divide by $1,000 to get $200. Multiply that number by the mils: 19.558

12% in favor

A business worth $400,000:

$400,000 = $200,000 2

$1,000

According to the Michigan Department of Education NEWS EDITOR (MDE), GLHS is worse than 74 percent of schools in the state. Principal Steve Gabriel, however, would disagree. The 2013-2014 Top to Bottom scores, released at the end of August this year, show a ranking of every school in Michigan – from kindergarten to high school and even including GED centers that a district (like GLPS) might run. The list is compiled of important information regarding a school’s success: the individual school’s improvement over time, dropout rates, standardized test scores and attendance among other things. At the surface, the scores represent a school in it’s entirety and can be used to choose where to live or send a child to be educated. But delving in deeper, it bewilders some, such as Gabriel. When President George W. Bush signed the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, the State of Michigan was required to develop a system to rank schools. It set the stage for schools to not only focus on their best students and majority populations, but also the worst students and minorities. Although the ACT as a whole is not included in TTB scores,

certain components of the test are counted as part of the MME. For example, out of 60 math questions administered on day one of three for juniors’ testing, 45 of them will count towards their MME score when the state goes to grade schools. These are the questions regarding algebra and geometry, classes required by the Michigan Merit Curriculum. Pre-calculus and higher level math problems that are not required by state standards are omitted from the scores. A problem that many see with the Top to Bottom system is that it is hard to explain. Education consultant at the MDE Dan LaDue said the formula used to compose the scores is too complicated to describe over the phone. Gabriel is not even sure of the exact formula the state uses to generate the scores. A power-point he created to educate teachers on the subject lends some insight, but still leaves the nagging question: how is GLHS ranked so low? On the subject of improvement ACT scores and MME scores have both gone up at GLHS. The scores actually average about 20 percent higher than the state’s average. When Top to Bottom was introduced as a new grading system two years ago, they incorporated the NCLB principals - one way of doing this is by giving schools subcategories for

mills

= $3,911.60 annually

“Scorecard” ranks schools from top to bottom Bry Leach ‘15

x 19.558

their minority populations - breaking a school up further by ethnicity or disabilities when about 30 or more of their students fall into one of the subcategories. Along with that, all schools are given another subcategory solely for their bottom 30 percent of students. This is where GLHS falls short. For GLHS, 120 students were in the bottom 30 percent out of 401 tested in the MME last year. Of these students, none scored proficient in the social studies section. Whether it be because they did not know the material or because they did not try, on this thought to be “meaningless” exam that fell on the last day of a long three, the poor scores took a hit to GLHS’ rankings. “The more diverse your school is, the tougher it is to get it covered,” Gabriel said. “We get hurt by the student proficiency in subgroups and students who do not graduate in four years.” When there are more factors going into a school’s ranking, it can be harder to get a better score, and most of the higher ranking schools are in smaller districts - whereas GLPS covers 125 square miles, with students commuting to GLHS from Eagle, Charlotte and Lansing. According to LaDue, the Top to Bottom rankings are based on how other schools are doing, which is a key aspect that

Jump to page 12

Junior MME testing update Bry Leach ‘15 NEWS EDITOR

Changes are coming to the Michigan Merit Examination that is distributed to juniors this year. In the past, the assessment was set up as a straight three days of tests: the first day was the ACT, the second day WorkKeys and the third day the MME. This year, the program will be set up so that the ACT and WorkKeys are still on two consecutive days, however the MME will be distributed over six days throughout two weeks. The State of Michigan does not know exactly how it will require the testing to be done. Principal Steve Gabriel does not expect any answers until January. The MME is used for school funding and rankings.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.