Architecture Spring 2018 Design Excellence Winners

Page 1

A VIEW ACROSS THE RIVER TO THE LIFELINE LIFELINE: someone or something depends on or which provides a ESTUARY: the tidal mouth of a river. The Rio Salado being just a means of support. Key moments of intermittent life along the river from storm and waste drainage from surrounding communities.

fragment of what it is meant to be, the lifelines become the new estuary and points where water enters.

CONCEPT:

Re-thinking the way city and storm drainage enters the riverbed, the health of the river ecosystem improves as well as providing a much needed amenity through its latent potential of providing life to the non-existent river. By focusing on rehabilitating the LIFELINES the presence of water + shade draws the community to the river, mutually benefiting both entities. Extending these lifelines into the surrounding communities as ARTERIES it helps disrupt the existing industrial barriers along the river bank and breaking down the hard urban conditions unsuitable for pedestrians. These lifelines become the initial spark for future sustainable development. Existing nodes along the arterial lines engage users along all major points to access and engage the river. Each of these nodes corresponds to the existing urban conditions and encourages future development beneficial for the Rio Salado Ecosystem: Ecology and People.

thesis: from a crossing with no connection, to the

antithesis: the Rio Salado: an ALLEGORY of what

synthesis: with the water treatment becoming the

CATALYST for change and a draw to the river, the river returns to its natural riparian condition, as well as the lifeline becoming the opportunity for future sustainable development in the future.

creation of a node along the river bank. This is sparked by the existing LIFELINES in the riverbank that are harnessed to filter polluted city drainage and celebrate the emergence of water. Utilizing the underside of the existing bridge the shaded spaces can become social event spaces in the river.

is a river, now existing only through storm and waste drainage from surrounding communities creating both life and pollution. Existing condition is a crossing with no connection and a hard edge between varying communities and the riverbed.

C INSIDE LIFELINE PARK

B UNDER SHADED CANOPY OF BRIDGE PAVILION

A

PHX STORM WATER POLLUTANTS

A 11

A

S

R

T

L

V

I

E

R

B

BUSINESS 10

09

b

b

08

+

11

C

CONSTRUCTION

07

+

06

+

+

05

+

RESIDENTIAL

D 01

+

A

100

24TH STREET

13

300

Canopy: Shades, Sequesters Carbon + Nitrogen, Noise Buffer, Lighting, Solar + Water Collection

+

02

12

13

50

-Sediment -Chemical Storage -Concrete Washout -Sanitary Sewers -Tracking pollutants -Erosion -Excess Storm Runoff

03

13

+

12

04

+

+

10

-Chemical Storage -Sanitary Sewers age -Spills -Litter -Debris -Trash -Fuel -Vehicle Leaks

Event Pavilions: Fishing, Recreation, Community Events, Yoga, Rentable Space, Dining, Movies.

01

Entry + Event Space + Marketplace

02

Amphitheater

03

Sand Filter

04

Buffer Pond + Water Storage 1

05

Desert Landscape + Filtering Plants

06

Buffer Pond + Water Storage 2

07

Desert Landscape + Filtering Plants

08

Buffer Pond + Water Storage 3

09

Re-Introduced Riparian Habitat

10

Bridge Event Pavilions

11

Connection to Existing Trails

12

Future Sustainable Development

13

Bioswales to Channel Water

-Pool Backwash -Pool Discharge -Trash / Recycling -Pet Waste -Vehicle Leaks -Vehicle Washing -Lawn Watering -Household Chemicals -Spills

NATURAL -Rain -Trails -Air Pollutants -Invasive Species

CURRENT: FRAGMENTED + DAMAGED

FUTURE: CONTINUOUS + HEALTHY NATURAL CORRIDOR

5

50 25 SECTION B-B

ADE 622: Spring 2018 Advanced Architectural Studio IV

Student: Miles Foster Instructor: Marlene Imirzian


Thunderbird School of Global Management

In a thriving downtown core, the new structure captures the essence of a spacious suburban campus in an urban, vertical campus in the heart of Phoenix. The central spherical atrium rises four floors, creating visual connectivity across all programs. Passageways aligned to the surrounding urban fabric slice through the mass surrounding the atrium creating dramatic, canyon-esque entryways. On the fifth floor, a lush rooftop garden serves as a communal gathering space and a patio for the Thunderbird Pub that occupies the other half of the floor.

“Think Globally, Act Locally”

GR

EE

EXE

NR

CU

OO

F

TIV

E

3D Printed Void Model

Perspective Section

Material Palette Elevation Facade Study

Site Model

Site Plan + Level 1 Dining + Retail/Auditorium

Level 2-4 Masters Program/Admin

Level 5 Garden/Pub Level

Level 6 Executive Level/Gym

1” = 60’

1” = 40’

1” = 40’

1” = 40’

With the integrated project delivery method, the BIM model in Revit accurately displayed all the structural and mechanical systems.

BIM Systems Detail

Section Relief Model

ADE 522: Spring 2018 Advanced Architectural Studio II

Students: K. Parris, N. Raccosta, E. Sanchez, C. Strauss Instructor: Beau Dromiack


SUSTAINABILITY

COMMUNITY

CULTURE

DESIGN

1ST AVE

2ND AVE

3RD AVE

4TH ST

HADLEY ST

HISTORY

TONTO ST

DESIGN CONCEPT

CENTRAL AVENUE

AFFORDABILITY

6TH ST 5TH ST

SHERMAN ST

MONTEZUMA ST

CULTIVATE

CONTEXT MAP

The approach that I am making towards this project revolves around CULTIVATING the existing community by adding infill developments that fit well with the surrounding context. The key elements that I have utilized that help with cultivating are affordability, a sense of community and a good quality of life. All to often affordable housing projects miss the target on providing a sense of community while being affordable. NEXUS will provide this by having community gardens, communal gathering spaces, private backyards and patio spaces. A sense of pride and responsibility will exist at Nexus. The housing units are constructed with a modular system of 8’x16’ and 16’x16’ blocks that could be arranged as a studio/1 story, 1 bedroom/1 story , and 2 bedroom/2 story. The design is very simple, yet contemporary and pays respects to the southwest style.

SITE PLAN

SCALE: 1” = 20’ 5th avenue on-street parking (10 spaces)

community gardens

backyard

shade screen

backyard

sherman street

hadley street

shade screen

bike racks alley drive existing residential units

MODULAR SYSTEM UNIT A B

20’ 36’

36’

8’

8’

8’

UNIT C

B

B

K BA

L

8’ 16’

K BA

UNIT B

K BA

K BA L

L

8’

UNIT D BA B

L

Kitchen/Bath/WD

Plumbing Module

Bed

Living/Bed/Dining Module

Living

UNIT PLANS + SECTIONS

MATERIALS

SCALE: 1/8” = 1’- 0”

ROOF: ASPHALT SHINGLES

LEGEND 1 ENTRY

4 KITCHEN

7 BATHROOM

10 BEDROOM

2 LIVING ROOM

5 PANTRY

8 CLOSET

11 PRIVATE BACKYARD

3 DINING

6 W/D

9 MODULAR DRESSER

12 FLEX SPACE

ACCENT FEATURE: FIBER CEMENTED PANELS

EXT. WALL: STUCCO

UNIT A

UNIT B

UNIT C

608 SQ FT STUDIO 1 STORY

736 SQ FT 1 BEDROOM 1 STORY

736 SQ FT 1 BEDROOM 1 STORY

1

1

8 9

2

10

3

2

11

4

4

1ST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

2

1

7

6

11

10

4

6

11

7

1

SECTION

SECTION

ELEVATION

ELEVATION

ELEVATION

12

1,472 SQ FT 2 BEDROOM 2 STORY

2

1110 11

3

1

5

6

4

1

SECTION

10

12

2

11

10

7

7

8

2” ASPHALT SHINGLES ROOF FINISH 1/2” PLYWOOD SHEATHING 5 1/2” FIBER BATT. INSULATION 2X6 STUD @ 24” O.C. 1/2” GYPSUM CEILING FINISH

2ND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

1ST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

10

7

PRE-FAB CONSTRUCTION

8

8

11

1ST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

SECTION

UNIT D

6

4

1ST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

9

10

2

3

3

7

5

11

10

8

1

6

9

12

10

7

4

8

7

1/2” GYPSUM WALL 5 1/2” FIBER BATT INSULATION 1/2” PLYWOOD SHEATHING 3/8” METAL LATH FURRING 3/8” STUCCO EXT. FINISH

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 11

UNITS/AC:

10.1 DU/AC

LAND COST:

$510,000

CONSTRUCTION COST/ SQ FT:

$2,633,277.60

LOAN DOWN PAYMENT:

$789,983.38 (30%)

RENT/MONTH:

UNIT A: $871.38

FLOOR FINISH 1/2” PLYWOOD SHEATHING 5 1/2” FIBER BATT INSULATION 2X12 FLOOR JOIST @ 24” O.C. 1/2” PLYWOOD SHEATHING

UNIT B: $1054.83 UNIT C: $1054.83 UNIT D: $2,109.65

ELEVATION

ADE 512: Spring 2018 Core Architectural Studio II

Student: Rhonda Harvey Instructor: Scott Murff


Building Plan

First Floor Plan

Building Plan 1/12” = 1’0

First Floor Plan 1/12” = 1’0

Second Plan

Third Floor Plan

Second Floor Plan 1/12” = 1’0

Third Floor Plan 1/12 ” = 1’0

BBlurring lurring the the P Past ast

Hollow Core Roof

Hollow Core Roof

Horizontal C Beams

Horizontal C Beams

Horizontal C Beams + Perpendicular Beams

Horizontal C Beams + Perpendicualr Beams

Vertical C Beams + Perpendicular Beams

Vertical C Beams + Perpendicualr Beams

Vertical C Beams

Vertical C Beams

Circulation

Circulation

Hollow Core Floor + Circulation

Hollow Core Floor + Circulation

Hollow Core Floor

Hollow Core Floor

East Elevation

West Elevation

East Elevation 1/16” = 1’0

North Elevation North Elevation 1/16” = 1’0

West Elevation 1/16” = 1’0

North-South North-SouthSection Section 1/8” = 1’0

ADE 422: Spring 2018 Architectural Studio IV

East-West East-West Section 3/16” = 1’0

South Elevation South Elevation 1/16” = 1’0

Elevation

Students: Ariana Harrison, Lexi Sanchez, Nicholas Morton Instructor: Claudio Vekstein


C-CAST Precast Concrete Cantilevered C-Channels

CONTEXT Phoenix, and by extent the rest of the southwestern United States, was an early innovator in precast concrete building systems, able to cast year round and invent new types of blocking. This research center stands for a new era of precast experimentation, the building itself employing precast cantilevers to extend outward and spread new techniques for a new era of precast building. CONCEPT The form of the project takes a cue from the wings of the current Art Warehouse building, and frees them from their constraints on the ground, allowing the workspaces to stretch outwards towards The Design School and the School of Art. To achieve this structurally, the elements of a crane manage the weight and secure the pieces in the air.

A

A

A B

B

A

A B

B

Ground Plan 1/32”=1’-0”

B

First Floor Plan 1/32”=1’-0”

A B

Second Floor Plan 1/32”=1’-0”

SECTION A 1/8”=1’

SECTION A 1/8”=1’

SECTION B 1/8”=1’

SECTION B 1/8”=1’

ADE 422: Spring 2018 Architectural Studio IV

Students: O. Garcia, B. Huft, N. Lakaeva, A. Zanzucchi Instructor: Elena Rocchi


The Industrial Theater THEATER IN THE ROUND The strength of the existing structure’s design is in its central courtyard. The existing courtyard is kept empty so that each wing of the building is able to temporarily take over the center. The courtyard acts as a “stage”; it is an empty vessel for an infinite variety of functions. Our design chooses to superimpose this stage with all of the mechanical components that would be found in a theater: rigging, some operable walls, a hoist, and places from which to view the activity. The new program, which involves design and drafting, is suspended above the old program, which involves fabrication.

A SYNTACTIC SYSTEM OF SUPERIMPOSITION

Each main building element, a truss, a roof, a room, a catwalk, is broken down into units which can be prefabricated and then transported to the site.

ABSTRACT: The economic viability of precast concrete is incumbent upon the reuse of moulds, and hence, the use of repetition in building design.

The rules which govern the repetition of these units create a syntactic framework which can be applied to any existing building;

New projects can be imagined and realized quickly when their main components are pre-fabricated and then reticulated in new ways.

Each unit is designed so that it can be connected (through post-tensioning)laterally to another unit of the same type, or to the larger skeletal framework which supports it.

Our team views this repetition as the basis for a sophisticated, yet simple modular framework through which a new symbiotic program can superimpose and enhance existing structures and the day-to-day activities housed inside them.

DRAFTING STUDIO

TEXTILE STUDIO

ARCHIVES, OFFICES, AND W.C.

TO PARKING GARAGE

LECTURE HALLS

3D PRINT AND LASER LAB

ENTRANCE LOBBY

40’-0”

40’-0”

40’-0”

WOOD, CONCRETE & METAL SHOPS

OPEN FABRICATION COURTYARD

40’-0”

SECTION 4 - FACING SOUTH

37’-0”

13’-7”

24’-9”

25’-0”

25’-0”

25’-0”

23’-0”

26’-2”

13’-7”

24’-9”

25’-0”

25’-0”

25’-0”

23’-0”

26’-2”

SECTION 3 - FACING SOUTH

SECTION D - FACING EAST

SECTION 2 - FACING SOUTH

SECTION C - FACING EAST

SECTION 1 - FACING SOUTH

SECTION B - FACING EAST

NORTH ELEVATION

SECTION A - FACING EAST

37’-0”

40’-0”

Ground Floor

A

B

C

D

40’-0”

E

40’-0”

40’-0”

Mezzanine

A

B

C

D

E

Upper Floor

A

B

C

D

E

DS Bldg. Access

10th St Structure Access

ADE 422: Spring 2018 Architectural Studio IV

Students: Zachary Bundy, Abel Clutter, Louis Medina Instructor: Elena Rocchi


ADE 322: Spring 2018 Architectural Studio II

Student: Benjamin Lyons Instructor: Max Underwood


view from pavilions

existing site conditions : Situated on the coast of Point Loma, California, this coastal habitat belongs to Sunset Cliffs Natural Park.

With its rich ecology and beautiful scenery, the site naturally offers a series of moments, each with their own unique spatial qualities: clearings that vary in size, tunnels formed from dense overgrowth, a complex topography with hills that offer panoramic ocean views, and valleys that provide intimate gathering points.

Currently, this natural park is inaccessible to the community due to heavy runoff and lack of infrastructure.

n h o

st

j

programming : 1 1 entry points

lo

ma

2 community pavilions

la

3 café

nd

dr

4 gallery 5 bridge 6 amphitheater 7 temporary DMV 1/16” = 1’-0”

1 4 nease

resid

ence

hall

3

2 5

1

6

7

proposed infrastructure : In a sensitive response to the captivating landscape and existing site conditions, this project provides a fragmented infrastructure that aims to facilitate and enhance the interaction between visitor and park.

Referencing the naturally occuring spaces and views provided by the site, the architecture works in harmony with the rigid topography, materializing as either path, bridge, or gathering point. This infrastructure gestures visitors inward and guides them through the full park experience without restricting opportuny for further exploration.

In this way, the project is not about a rigid program of predetermined events. Rather, it becomes a shared space that enhances and emphasizes what is already there in the hope of fostering empathy and appreciation for the landscape and fellow visitors.

view from east bridge

ADE 322: Spring 2018 Architectural Studio II

Student: Christina Lufkin Instructor: Bryan Maddock


mix

at the beginning of the semester, we were asked to redesign the relationship between public service (dmv) and public space. this project is located in little italy, San Diego with a site that is only 100ft by 100ft. for the project, I decided to open up the public service (dmv) to the public. the purpose of the design is to delete or at least blur the boundary between the public service and public space. essentially most of the design is open to the regular public, even most parts of the dmv.

4rd floor 1/16”=1’-0”

typical dmv

0

8

16

32

0

8

16

32

0

8

16

32

0

8

16

32

0

8

16

32

reinvision of a future dmv

3rd floor 1/16”=1’-0”

section

2nd floor 1/16”=1’-0”

section

ground level

first platform

the platforms can serve as a waiting area for the dmv but also as a hang-out space for people visiting the site. to have activity in all of them I added a coffee place and a daycare on the top platform. this brings activity in the ground as well as in the platforms.

1st floor 1/16”=1’-0”

top platform

there is a market happening on Ceddar street every weekend. In order to attract people to the site, I allow food trucks to come in and in that way the site becomes an informal gathering space.

ground floor 1/16”=1’-0”

market axon

ADE 322: Spring 2018 Architectural Studio II

Student: Adrian Castro Martinez Instructor: Elizabeth McLean


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.