VOL. CLXXI NO. 52
PARTLY CLOUDY HIGH 46 LOW 21
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 2, 2014
HANOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE
STUDENTS OCCUPY PARKHURST
Filling Hanlon’s office, group demands point-by-point response to the ‘Freedom Budget’
SPORTS
SOFTBALL SWEEPS CORNELL, PRINCETON PAGE 8
ANNIE MA/THE DARTMOUTH STAFF
A group of about 35 students filled College President Phil Hanlon’s office Tuesday afternoon during his open office hours, with eight choosing to stay the night.
B y SEAN CONNOLLY The Dartmouth Staff
OPINION
MITIGATING MISCONCEPTIONS PAGE 4
THE MYTH OF MOBILITY PAGE 4
ARTS
STUDENT SPOTLIGHT: HALEY REICHER ’17 PAGE 7
A group of about 35 students from a range of campus communities entered College President Phil Hanlon’s office during his open office hours on Tuesday, stating their dissatisfaction to the administration’s March 6 reaction to the “Freedom Budget.” They demanded a point-by-point response to
B y SERA KWON AND MICHAEL QIAN The Dartmouth Staff
B y REBECCA ASOULIN
READ US ON
14 EVENTS TO ATTEND DURING 14S FOLLOW US ON
TWITTER @thedartmouth COPYRIGHT © 2014 THE DARTMOUTH, INC.
Parkhurst Hall. As students filed in to Hanlon’s outer office around 4 p.m., they were greeted by administrative assistants, who noted that they had been expecting them. Dean of the College Charlotte Johnson then told the students that she and Hanlon would be available to talk in a few minutes. When Johnson asked why the group was there, Dondei Dean ’17 spoke first.
“We’re here to see President Hanlon. You probably know most of us already, but, just to sum up, we are extremely dissatisfied with the response that he issued,” Dean said. “It was not on our terms. We are here to see him and demand a point-by-point response, and we are not going to leave until we get one.” Approximately 10 minutes later, the entire group was in-
vited into Hanlon’s office. Dean, acting as primary spokesperson, told the president that the students were “deeply enraged” by Hanlon’s response to the “Freedom Budget,” stating dissatisfaction with both the length of the administration’s press release, which they said encompassed only three points, and their choice not to respond SEE PARKHURST PAGE 5
Donation to fund Community expresses mixed reaction house for veterans The Dartmouth Staff
DARTBEAT
each of the student-authored document’s 70-plus demands for change regarding issues of diversity and inclusivity. Equipped with poster paper, sleeping bags and pizza, many students displayed the intention of spending the night. As of press time, about eight students planned to remain in Hanlon’s personal office overnight and about seven others intended to stay in the outer atrium of
A New Hampshire veterans advocacy organization plans to purchase a residence for veteran students at Dartmouth, thanks to a $375,000 donation, the organization announced last week. The donor, an unidentified veteran’s family, will contribute the money if the organization, Project VetCare, raises
an additional $100,000 to meet the house’s price before its May 31 closing date. Project VetCare plans to rent the proposed house, located on Lebanon Street about half a mile from the Hanover Co-op Food sSore, to three or four undergraduate veterans, chairman and co-founder Robert Chambers said. SEE VETERANS PAGE 3
Members of the College community expressed mixed opinions about the sit-in staged in College President Phil Hanlon’s office yesterday, with some faculty and students praising the demonstrators’ boldness and others criticizing their methods. Dozens of students convened in Parkhurst Hall yesterday afternoon for Hanlon’s open office hours. Upon entering the office, the group
demanded a point-by-point response to the “Freedom Budget” and said they would remain until Hanlon gave his opinion on each point and specified the steps he would take by next week to execute each demand. As of press time, seven faculty members had signed a statement written later that evening expressing solidarity with the protestors. The statement said protestors had generated a “moment of decision” for the Dartmouth community. “We can do what is expect-
ed — issue the typical condemnations and criticize the students’ actions as ‘unwise and untimely,’ just as ‘respectable’ figures condemned [Martin Luther] King’s principled and disruptive stance in Birmingham in 1963,” the statement read. “Or we can do something entirely uncharacteristic of an elite, cloistered institution such as ours — we can engage in self-reflection while moving to implement the students’ wellconsidered demands, seeking to understand how and why SEE REACTION PAGE 3