Vol. 109, Iss. 7 | Tuesday, April 16, 2019
The Flat Hat The Weekly Student Newspaper
Kathryn Bertine highlights sexism in the bicycling community
Flathatnews.com | Follow us:
Biking towar ds r e e d q n uali e g t
CLAIRE HOGAN // FLAT HAT ONLINE EDITOR
y
Friday, April 12, the College of William and Mary’s Bike Alliance hosted Kathryn Bertine, a professional cyclist, documentary filmmaker and advocate for gender equality. In her talk titled “The Power of No One,” Bertine chronicled her path from journalist to cyclist to activist, explained what she learned from her struggles and detailed how anyone can create positive change. Bertine started out as a writer for ESPN. In her column “So You Wanna Be An Olympian?” she wrote about what it was like for an average person to train for the Olympics. She chose the triathlon as her sport, and although she didn’t qualify for the Olympics, she fell in love with cycling. However, she saw many problems in the cycling world. “In the back of my head, I thought to myself, ‘You know, this cycling thing, I’m so in love with it, but there are a few problems in this sport,’” Bertine said. “… For example, why are women not invited to all the races the men are invited to? Why are women racing only half the distance of the races that the men do? And why are the prize winnings for the professionals just pennies on the dollar for women? None of this made any sense to me.” This inspired Bertine to become an activist for gender equality in the cycling world. She mainly focused her efforts on one goal: allowing women to race in the Tour de France. “The one thing that stood out to me was: in the most famous cycling race in the world, the Tour de France, where are the women?” Bertine said. “Why aren’t there any women? And why is nobody calling for change?” The Tour de France allowed women for a few years in the 1950s and 1980s, but the media largely ignored them, so they were cut from the competition. Bertine wanted to change that trend and decided to create a documentary entitled “Half the Road,” which portrays the struggles faced by women in cycling. Along with her documentary, she launched a petition entitled “Le Tour Entier” that lobbied for women to be included in the Tour de France. Within weeks, she had hundreds of thousands of signatures. Despite immense opposition, with enough pressure from the public, Bertine and other female professional cyclists were able to race at the 2014 Tour de France. Bertine went on to publish her film about women’s cycling, which won many awards from the filmmaking community. She was featured on the cover of Bicycling magazine in 2016. “I don’t have an Olympic medal; I don’t have an Olympic anything,” Bertine said. “I am no world champion; I am not wealthy; I am not famous, but Bicycling Magazine put me on the cover of the magazine because I stood up and used my voice for change. So if that’s possible, if I am able to do something like that, then we all are. We all are capable of using our voice and creating that change.” Bertine cited further examples of gender inequality in the cycling world, such as the gender pay gap. She recalled a recent incident of gender inequality in the cycling world earlier this year, when cyclist Nicole Hanselmann was forced to stop midrace when she caught up to the male cyclists. Normally, men and women race on the same track, but the women’s race starts later to allow for separation between the racers. In Hanselmann’s race, however, the women started only 10 minutes after the men, and Hanselmann was fast enough to catch up.
of The College of William and Mary
GRAPHIC BY EMMA FORD / THE FLAT HAT
The race organizers had to stop and restart the women’s race once she had reached the men’s position. Vice President of the William and Mary Cycling Club and competitive cyclist Gillian Bennett ’21 had similar experiences to Hanselmann’s. “I can totally relate to the story of getting stopped midrace to let the men’s field pass when I was trying to get on a breakaway, and that’s kind of unfortunate because then the whole field catches up, and all the work you just put in is gone because the men have to pass,” Bennett said. “I’ve been in a lot of races where I’ve passed a lot of the men who have started earlier than me too.” Bennett also discussed her experiences with being a woman in the College’s Cycling Club. “At the beginning of the semester, I was the only active female,” Bennett said. “Since then, I’ve gotten two other girls to join, which
is really cool. I’m very fortunate that I have a club that promotes my cycling just as equal to [the men’s], but I know [when] talking to other women in the sport, it isn’t always the case.” Another member of the College’s Bike Alliance Carolina Lopez ’20 has also experienced this inequality firsthand. “My sophomore year, when I was here, I joined the cycling team for one semester,” Lopez said. “I did feel that I wasn’t as welcome in the group as the rest of the guys. I think I also felt somewhat inadequate because I was going on rides with them. I did feel like I wasn’t enough.” Lopez also connected this inequality more broadly to all women’s sports. “I think with any sport, there’s more attention paid to the men’s events for some reason,” Lopez said. “There’s definitely still a disparity, which is why I was so excited that this event happened, so we could talk about that and have those discussions.”
ACADEMICS
Law school talk dispels misconceptions about affirmative action Associate Sociology Professor Deenesh Sohoni discusses policy’s continued political and social influences CHARLES COLEMAN FLAT HAT CHIEF STAFF WRITER
The recent university admissions scandal regarding bribery for selective university placements has renewed conversations over the college admissions process at the College of William and Mary. Some of these conversations pertain to the policy of affirmative action, and its role in the college admissions process in the modern era. In a lecture April 15, associate professor of sociology Deenesh Sohoni examined the history and role of affirmative action and delved into discussing the policy’s benefits and consequences. Sohoni’s talk, which was hosted by the College’s Asian Pacific American Law Association, focused on Asian Americans’ place in affirmative action. Ariana Cheng J.D. ’20 helped organize the event. Cheng shared the motivations behind having the talk, in light of the recent lawsuit against Harvard University.
Index Profile News Opinions Variety
Sports
“We’ve been discussing having a talk about affirmative action the entire year ... discussing [the] Asian American population and [its] divisiveness when it comes to affirmative action, and being muted as not a minority,” Cheng said. “That’s why we wanted to have the talk and view it from a legal framework as well.” In this lecture, Sohoni expressed that he believed affirmative action was still beneficial to Asian Americans, specifically those who still remain in underprivileged positions, and described how many individuals overlook other factors that influence admissions such as legacy, athletics and residency. Sohoni sought to explain the difficulty of establishing an exclusively merit-based system in admission to social institutions such as universities, and that noted that affirmative action continues to be an important factor in college admissions. Sohoni began his talk by looking into the original purpose of affirmative action, investigated why it was installed and attempted
to answer if its original intention was still valid. He provided historical context as well, referencing the policy’s creation as a desire to alleviate past discrimination of minority groups. “These are specifically race-conscious types of policies, and it seems to benefit underrepresented groups, and was originally seen as a counter to the effect of past discrimination and continuing structural discrimination,” Sohoni said. “The original framework of affirmative action focused on trying to correct historical disadvantages of groups, and this is where we’re going to see a shift in how affirmative action has come to be understood in higher education.” After originally being developed by President John Kennedy, affirmative action was strengthened by President Lyndon B. Johnson. While Johnson increased the legitimacy of affirmative action in political spheres, it was still devoid of a clear operational framework. However, Sohoni explained that affirmative
Inside Opinions 2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10
See AFFIRMATIVE ACTION page 3
Inside Sports
Student responses to environmental issues must prioritize individual action
Sunny High 72, Low 57
action was among the first policies that specifically designated what a minority was, and how it also acted as a preemptive measure against discrimination. Affirmative action has clearly evolved since the era of the civil rights movement, but Sohoni noted that it eventually began to evolve into a broader term that expanded beyond just racial dimensions. Sohoni spoke on how universities and other social institutions began to include all forms of diversity as important components of their bodies. “We have a shift now from the idea of affirmative action serving to help previously disadvantaged groups, to being a compelling interest in higher education that diversity is a positive force,” Sohoni said. “This also changes things to see discussions about other forms of diversity. … Different universities have moved away from conceptualizing this as an issue
Chloe Folmar ’22 says that strong rhetoric about environmental issues and concerns often do not translate into action on an individual level. page 6
Tribe lacrosse finds success
Junior goalkeeper Elsa Rall and freshman Midfielder Belle Martire discuss the leadership and team dynamics at work in a lacrosse team on the rise. page 10