TUESDAY
IMMIGRATION
THURSDAY
P2
Ohio State experts weigh in on the ways that immigration legislation could affect campus diversity.
DANCE
P4
Ohio State student puts education on hold to follow passion for dance.
MEN’S BASKETBALL
P8
Archie Miller and Chris Holtmann begin new era of OSU-Indiana matchup.
MEN’S VOLLEYBALL
P8
Christy Blough excelled as a setter, now he’s an integral part of coaching staff.
The student voice of the Ohio State University
Tuesday, January 30, 2018
thelantern.com
@TheLantern
Year 138, Issue No. 6
That name looks familiar When it comes to professor’s own texts, more motives than just self-gain KEVIN STANKIEWICZ Editor-in-Chief stankiewicz.16@osu.edu Jennifer Siegel knows how it looks — a professor assigning students a book they authored. She tries to avoid it as much as she can; since her first book was published in 2003, she’s done it just twice. Both were small seminars; both no more than 15 students. Each time, Siegel calculated the money she would receive in royalties and then brought in snacks for her students “just because I felt that my students shouldn’t be paying me.” “I’d love it if other people were assigning my books, that’s the goal,” said Siegel, a professor in the Department of History. “But I think that there is — it’s a gray area as to whether or not we should be assigning.” Controversy around professors assigning textbooks they authored to students isn’t new. But the issue often receives renewed focus at the start of each semes-
RIS TWIGG Assistant Photo Editor twigg.10@osu.edu
KEVIN STANKIEWICZ | EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Debate persists on whether faculty should assign textbooks they authored, but students and professors agree it’s often a case-by-case basis. ter as students see their syllabi and learn what books they need to buy. The reality is the answers to questions about ethics or about the instances in which it’s appropriate are not clear-cut, or easy to find. It’s often a case-by-case ba-
sis, students and professors said. At the end of the day, they said it comes down to trust. The issue is addressed in the Office of Academic Affairs’ “Policies and Procedures” handbook. It states faculty who plan on re-
quiring “a book or other material that would result in them receiving a royalty” must have it approved by their “chair/program director” and dean; and or, it must be reviewed and approved by “an TEXTBOOKS CONTINUES ON 3
Ohio State professors question merits, prominence of politics within EPA SUMMER CARTWRIGHT Campus Editor cartwright.117@osu.edu The Environmental Protection Agency relies on research by scientists to address climate, energy and pollution concerns in America. Typically, researchers will provide the EPA with recommendations on environmental policy. It’s a relatively simple process, Ramiro Berardo said, “except for the fact that it’s not.” Berardo, an assistant professor in environmental and natural-resources policy, said the increased political nature surrounding the agency has further complicated the not-so-simple relationship between science and policy. America’s current polarized atmosphere is also contributing to an increased influence of politics in scientific research, which is a costly move, Berardo said, because it amps up “bad” science, and hinders “good” science. He said “bad” science is now being used more than ever under the Trump administration and consists of studies and data that are
Energy Partners plan first round of conservation efforts
SUMMER CARTWRIGHT | CAMPUS EDITOR
Students Dana Jackson, Malcolm Guy and Madison Bell stand with professor Robyn Wilson during a press conference on Jan. 25, 2017. used specifically to support political claims regarding climate change and fossil fuel consumption. Politicians are working this way “not to inform their scientific decisions, but to buck up the decisions that they have come up with before the science was even produced,” he said. President Trump brought forth a slew of changes within the EPA since his inauguration. Most no-
tably, the administration has reduced the number of agency employees and prioritized different environmental goals. Trump has gone on record to disparage climate change, calling it “an expensive hoax.” Becky Mansfield, a professor in geography, said the current administration is demonstrating denialism by seeking out supporting, lackluster research in support of its views. This denialism, she
said, “has undermined current EPA regulations or potential EPA regulation.” “We can’t simply demand facts or pretend that all things that call themselves science are in fact good,” Mansfield said. “This is used to generate uncertainty and delay action. So there becomes these inherently political debates about what counts as good or sound science.” The Lantern made several requests for the EPA to comment. No requests were met with replies. Berardo and Mansfield appeared Thursday at a press conference held by Defend Our Future, a nonpartisan entity that works to raise awareness of climate change. They were among four Ohio State faculty members who spoke on behalf of scientists alarmed by the EPA’s practices. The conference was held in support of Robyn Wilson, an associate professor of risk analysis and decision science, who is suing the EPA for its newly introduced policy that forbids science EPA CONTINUES ON 6
Ohio State Energy Partners will present its first two energy conservation proposals to the Board of Trustees this week — including a $3.4 million lighting project and a $2.3 million upgrade to Dreese Laboratory’s heating and cooling system, according to Board documents released Monday. The lighting project will upgrade existing lighting to LEDs in 51 Columbus campus buildings in the next two fiscal years to reduce individual building energy consumption. These buildings include Ohio Stadium, Independence Hall and University Hall. A Dreese Laboratory proposal would reduce energy consumption within the building by 37 percent through upgrades in the next three fiscal years. Upgrades include enhancing the HVAC control system, insulating steam valves and adding a heat recovery chiller, which captures heat from the existing system that can be used for other purposes. The energy partnership was announced March 2017 and established July 2017. A major component of the partnership requires Ohio State Energy Partners to manage the university’s energy system and meet its sustainability goal of reducing campus energy consumption by 25 percent by 2025. In addition to the two energy conservation proposals, there will be work on infrastructure throughout campus. Updates to McCracken’s boiler system will soon be underway — pending approval. Electronic combustion controls and safety shutdown systems will be updated for $6.2 million, as well. College Avenue might be in line for a $1.8 million renovation of its utility systems. To go along with the university’s planned Arts District update, “the project will also address lifecycle renewal of steam and failed condensate return pipelines within the corridor,” according to Board documents. Endowments will be created through Ohio State Energy Partners’ $1.015 billion upfront payment to the university — $75
ENERGY CONTINUES ON 3