TUESDAY
THURSDAY
ENGINEERING
P2
An OSU student organization works to design and engineer innovative products for those with disabilities.
WGSS
P3
Women’s, gender, and sexuality studies faculty express the need to address sexual violence on campus.
DORMS
P4
Residents of North Campus dorms transform large windows into humorous works of art.
OFFENSIVE LINE
P8
Preparation leads to production with offensive line at OSU.
The student voice of the Ohio State University
Tuesday, September 13, 2016
thelantern.com
@TheLantern
Year 136, Issue No. 44
President Drake and the future SALLEE ANN RUIBAL Editor in Chief ruibal.1@osu.edu When University President Michael Drake sat down with The Lantern on Monday afternoon, his main message was one of communication. In addition, he looked to the future of traditions and diversity at Ohio State. Communication during student protest In April, student protesters staged a sit-in at Bricker Hall, where President Drake’s office is located. The coalition of student organizations involved included Real Food OSU, United Students Against Sweatshops, Still We Rise, OSU Coalition for Black Lives and the Committee for Justice in Palestine. One of the coalition’s main causes was transparency between students and the administration. “In one of the communications there was a particular statement that was made that students were subject to expulsion,” Drake said. “And that wasn’t true. It never would happen. It won’t happen. There are things students can do that would result in them being expelled. But you have to do something that makes you not able to be part of the community. Participating in a demonstration is not one of those things.” Drake said he found out about the comment — which was made by Jay Kasey, senior vice president for administration and plan-
University president emphasizes dialogue with community as a priority for the new year
ALEXA MAVROGIANIS | PHOTO EDITOR
University President Michael Drake sits with members of The Lantern staff. ning — after the fact. Drake also described the threats of arrest made during the sit-in as “a poor choice of words.” “We don’t want to arrest people,” Drake said. “We do it rarely and almost always it’s a bad day for everyone. If someone says a student was arrested, that’s always the beginning of a difficult sentence for me.”
Drake said there have been discussions with some of the involved groups, to hear what they have to say, throughout the spring and summer, as well as meetings that have occurred as recently as the past couple of days. “We try to be good listeners,” Drake said. “We really try. We try to be great listeners, actually. The particular outcome was one we
would avoid at all costs.” The Lantern reached out to several students involved in the protest, but did not immediately receive comment. Mirror Lake jump and university traditions After Ohio State student Austin Singletary died during the Mirror Lake jump last November, Undergraduate Student Government
passed legislation supporting the cessation of the tradition. “We care about tradition,” Drake said. “We like tradition. We believe in wearing traditions like an old suit of clothes rather than a suit of armor. We don’t want to be bound by things that aren’t working for us.” Drake added USG is currently working on a new tradition and way to enforce a ban on the jump, but said he couldn’t speak on any details. Diversity When asked about diversity on campus, Drake answered immediately. “It needs to get better,” he said. “In our university there’s a couple of things that we need to get better at and one is making sure we provide opportunity for people across the distribution that makes our country great to be able to take advantage of the real benefits that you and I have being affiliated with such an incredible institution.” Drake referred to his student job in medical school at the University of California, San Francisco, which involved outreach and diversity recruitment. He won an award for his work and it is displayed in his office. He said increasing diversity in higher education is “not a new quest” for him. “We can’t fix it overnight, but we can continue to try to be better,” Drake said.
@salleeannruibal
Debaters to represent candidates’ policies at OSU ABBY VESOULIS Lantern reporter vesoulis.3@osu.edu Ohio State students looking to satisfy their political appetites have the opportunity to listen to academic and private-sector international affairs professionals debate the prospects of presidential candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on Wednesday from 6 to 8 p.m. at the Moritz College of Law. The event, held by Ohio State’s chapter of the Alexander Hamilton Society, is expected to focus on the candidates’ foreign policies that have fueled such a “heated and visceral” election cycle said Martin Lopez, a fourth-year in political science and the president of the Alexander Hamilton Society. Nick Dowling — former director for European affairs at the National Security Council and
current president of government contractor IDS International — will be debating in favor of Clinton. Opposing will be Randall Schweller, an OSU political science professor and a founder of the neoclassical realism school of thought in the field of international relations. “One thing that we’re going to have to be careful about is that, given the nature of this election, there is probably going to be some degree of vindictiveness or hostility in some of the questioning (from the audience),” Lopez said. “And that is something we are probably going to try and temper.” Dowling, who said he is not involved in Clinton’s campaign and that he is speaking on behalf of himself, said he will draw on his professional experience in foreign policy and national security. “And in those areas, in particular, the strengths of Hillary Clin-
LANTERN FILE PHOTOS
Donald Trump & Hillary Clinton address their supporters at each of their respective rallies. ton over Donald Trump are profound,” Dowling said. Schweller said that in regards to foreign policy, he believes Trump is more of a realist than any presidential candidate talking foreign policy in many years, though he also disagreed with some of Trump’s platforms. “He is not the perfect vessel, but
he might be the right guy at the right time,” Schweller said. Schweller referred to Trump’s foreign policy as being somewhat state-centered, and one of “restraint, retrenchment and a return to offshore balancing.” When confronting the notion of international cooperation, Schweller said he believes Trump
will question the relative gains of any potential agreement. He said Trump will ask himself, “‘Who gains more from this, us or them?’ And if we don’t gain more, then he’s not going to do it.” Dowling spoke less of Clinton’s foreign policy, but cited Trump’s temperament as a concern that should keep him out of the Oval Office. Referring to him as a “bully,” Dowling said, “Do you want someone like that, with that temperament, with the nuclear codes and as commander in chief of our armed forces? I think that’s a very scary prospect.” Regarding Clinton’s ability to handle foreign and domestic affairs as a senator, secretary of state and first lady, Schweller said he does not think her track record is indicative of any substantial past or future successes. DEBATE CONTINUES ON 2