The Lion's Roar 31-1

Page 1

the LION’S

R AR

Non-Profit Organization U.S. Postage PAID Boston, MA Permit No. 54523

Volume 31, Issue 1 140 Brandeis Road Newton Centre, MA 02459

Newton South High School’s Student Newspaper · Newton, MA · Established 1984 · June 9, 2014

Evaluation Rubric

GRADING

THE TEACHER

By Nathaniel Bolter

photo by Max Baker

P

Students and faculty voice their concerns about the new teacher evaluation system, citing its various shortcomings, which include the infrequency of evaluations

hysics teacher Alexander Kraus looked down at the evaluation rubric and laughed. Indicator III-C, subsection 3 read, “Culturally Proficient Communication.” “As a physics teacher, [this] is just ridiculously hard to get into your classroom,” he said. This criterion, a product of the new teacher evaluation system, has become a metaphor for the evaluation system itself: better in theory than in execution. As the system makes its way towards the end of its second year, questions have arisen regarding how well and how often teachers are being evaluated, sparking discontent among faculty and students. The evaluation system was imple-

mented in the 2012-13 school year as a result of the federal Race to the Top initiative. Although the initiative set certain standards and provided models for what the evaluation system should look like, individual districts were left to decide the details and wording of the system. In the Newton Public Schools (NPS), evaluators — who, at South, are the department heads — are required to observe teachers with Professional Teacher Status (PTS), the high school version of tenure, at least twice throughout each two-year evaluation cycle. Department heads use these observations to fill out a 43-part rubric in an evaluation at the end of each year. World language department head Su-

zanne Murphy Ferguson, a member of the committee that adapted the national model for the NPS, said, however, that the ultimate goal of the new system is less bureaucratic than the rubric implies. “The guiding principle behind it ... is a good one ... it’s basically the idea that conversation is key to the whole process,” she said. “There’s a real emphasis put on teachers talking with other teachers and administrators talking with teachers as well.” According to Kraus, there is a general consensus among the faculty that the evaluation system is not being carried out along the guiding principle of starting a conversation. Instead, he said, some faculty members with PTS fear that the new system, which requires

at least one unannounced observation per two-year cycle, is being used as a “gotcha,” meaning department heads would show up for an observation at a bad time for the teacher, causing the teacher to receive a lower grade on the final evaluation than what is representative of their ability. Kim Marshall, a former principal of the Boston Public Schools who now works in education reform, has been advocating for an evaluation system that combines a rubric with frequent observations. She said that these “gotcha” moments should not be a problem if the system is executed correctly. “Every teacher is afraid of being caught EVALUATIONS, 2

“Eleanor & Park” chosen for One School One Book Bella Ehrlich & Daniel Sellers Sr. News Editor, News Contributor

The English department announced on April 29 that “Eleanor and Park” by Rainbow Rowell is the selection for next year’s One School One Book event, initiating discussion of the merits of choosing another young adult novel and of the purpose of the One School One Book event. “Eleanor and Park,” a book about two misfit teenagers falling in love, was chosen through a series of meetings held by a selection committee. The 15-person committee consisted of students, teachers, parents, community volunteers and

members of the Parent Teacher Student Organization (PTSO). Each committee member brought in a book of his or her personal choice, and the committee proceeded to narrow the list of 15 books down to three. Members then read each of those three books, and a final vote was held. According to English teacher and committee chair David Weintraub, several distinct goals influenced the selection of “Eleanor and Park,” one of which was the desire to choose a book with a female author. The six previous selections for One School One Book events were books written by male authors. “I think it’s more of a political statement on the part

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

DJ Business

Junior and sophomore cofound business, deejaying for a wide range of events. page

13

Ligerbots

Robotics team completes robot, makes strides at world championships.

page

17

of us as a school community, as in we value the voices of all people, whether they’re male or female,” he said. “Having a female author who is alive and who’s out there, who’s on Twitter, who’s beloved, who is really great and an important voice for young women all over the world — it provides that inspirational model for young women in this school community.” The committee also aimed to choose a book that was relatable to student experiences in order to motivate more student participation and engagement. For this reason, ONE SCHOOL ONE BOOK, 3

Team Success Boys volleyball team goes undefeated this season, advances to the playoffs. page

20

NEWS 2 GLOBAL 5 EDITORIALS 6 OPINIONS 9 CENTERFOLD 12 FEATURES 15 SPORTS 20


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.