Today
T
he Cardinals will have a companion in the air today, as the Blue Angels start Fleet Week over the city from 12:30 p.m. to 4 p.m. Keep your eyes on the sky during passing periods when you hike down to the T’s; you may spot a screeching, flipping jet hurtling across the firmament. No free mods to lie on your back on one of the school’s grassy knolls? Check out the Angels in their next performances at the same time on Saturday and Sunday in front of a bright blue sky. Be sure to cover your ears!
What’s What’s
Inside
News
Pages
1-9
■ Homecoming rally postponed to mid-November ■ New English elective class announced for next semester, partly inspired by affectionate chicken
Sports
11-15
Pages
■ Dragonboat team brings home the gold at Treasure Island ■ Unique fitness trends keep workout routines fresh
Columns
Page
16
■ Girl scoffs at threat of junior year after two weeks in wilderness
Opinion
Pages
17-19
■ Teen welcomes big-box retailers to city, sees benefit of revitalizing economy
■ Get the skinny on the
most groovy skinny jeans from when your mom was a teenager.
Page 10
Backpage
Spotlight
Lowell High School, Red Edition, Vol. 216 No. 2, October 7, 2011, www.thelowell.org
Lowell The
In the news In the news
Fashion blast to the past
Muggles head to Hogwarts ■ The Lowell is not Xenophilius
Lovegood’s The Quibbler — you may need to read this issue right-side up.
Page 20
Gas smell prompts school evacuation AMY CHAR
■
Classes disrupted for an hour, but no gas leak discovered
By Cooper Logan and Spencer Thirtyacre
T
he school was evacuated at around 10:55 a.m. on Oct. 3 due to multiple reports of a gas odor on campus, but after investigation, Pacific Gas and Electric and the fire department concluded there was not an ongoing problem, as they did not find the source. According to PG&E spokesman Joe Molica, the investigation was terminated due to a lack of evidence of a gas leak. “We used sophisticated natural gas leak detection equipment, but we couldn’t find evidence of gas escaping at the school or in the surrounding area, so we wrapped up the investigation,” Molica said. “We can’t speculate what was the cause of the smell. It could have been many reasons, like the sewer or water treatment plant.” The initial information was only that there was
a strong smell of gas and, some students feared the worst, with the 2010 San Bruno fire in mind. “I felt as if something really bad was happening,” sophomore Mitchell Szeto said. “I thought my school was going to blow up.” The administration began to receive reports from teachers at around 10:15 a.m. and principal Andrew Ishibashi called PG&E promptly. PG&E then arrived at 11:25. The fire department was called at around 10:50 a.m., and arrived at approximately 11 a.m. according to assistant principal of student support services Michael Yi. Ishibashi called for the evacuation of the building over the PA system after talking to the fire department and PG&E due to the possible danger. “I radioed security guards to make sure each floor was evacuated,” Ishibashi said. Most students were sent to the soccer field,
but some other classes were evacuated from Eucalyptus Drive to Rolph Nicol Playground. This varied from the normal fire drill evacuation procedure, which calls for students to evacuate to the far side of the fire access road and to the sidewalk in front of the school. Firefighters worked with Ishibashi to evaluate the situation. “The first thing the fire department did when they arrived was check the fire panel to assure themselves it wasn’t a fire,” Ishibashi said; a fire with a possible gas leak would have called for a different response. Ishibashi accompanied the firefighters and PG&E employees as they scoured the school. “The firemen smelled the gas as well, and we walked to where there was a strong smell,” Ishibashi said. However, they could not locate a source of the See EVACUATION on Page 8
caitriona smyth
daniel green
Teachers brought classes to designated evacuation sites in sports areas at the back of the school and the Rolph Nicol Playground at the beginning of Mods 9-10 on Oct. 3 (top). A fire truck arrives at campus at the end of Mods 9-10 to inspect the school for the source of a propane smell (bottom left). Later, firefighters walk back from the football field after speaking with construction workers in their search for the source (bottom right).
Budget dependent on state revenues By Elijah Alperin
T
he budget for the 2011-2012 school year is similar than last year’s projection due to California Governor Jerry Brown’s May budget revisions that pledge more money to K-12 education, unless projected revenues do not emerge. The school’s budget for the current school year is very similar to the one enacted in the 2010-2011 school year, with a minor surplus of $6,803, which has been allotted for extra hours for the school security guards, according to School Site Council chair Tom
Chambers. No services or teaching positions have been cut since last spring, according to Chambers. Last year the school planned for a nine percent budget deficit by designing a worst-case budget plan as well as a better-case plan, according to Chambers. In anticipation of the worst-case scenario, the Parent Teacher Student Association and Alumni Association raised upwards of $400,000 to help cover projected shortfalls. Because the school was able to enact the better budget scenario after the May revision by the state government, the money raised will be
saved for next year, according to Chambers. However, there is concern that the best-case scenario is at risk. Originally, state education funding seemed to be on track when Brown’s proposal — to raise the minimum amount of funding guaranteed to education under Proposition 98 by three billion dollars — was passed in May. Proposition 98, enacted in 1988 in order to regulate education funding, requires that a certain percentage of the state budget be allocated to K-12 education and community colleges.
State politicians tried to keep schools funded by approving Brown’s proposal, hence the current amount of education funding is greater than what the legislature approved in last year’s state budget. This increase is based on some funds being fronted, with a contingency, due to greater revenue estimates. In May, non-partisan state analysts estimated that the recovering economy would provide the $4 billion windfall in revenue that was needed to balance the budget, according to the California Legislative Analysts See BUDGET on Page 5