Make It Right New Orleans by The Now Institute

MIR Make It Right New Orleans

micro + MACRO m O r phosis

09 24 07

TABLE OF CONTENTS 01.0 NEW ORLEANS HISTORY

p03

02.0 MIR FLOATING HOUSE

02.1 DIAGRAMS

p13

02.2 PLANS

p19

02.3 ELEVATIONS

p22

02.4 SECTIONS

p23

02.5 DETAILS

p24

03.0 NEW ORLEANS FUTURE

p26

04.0 COST ESTIMATE

p30

Prior to European settlement little over 200 years ago, the area today known as New Orleans was occupied by Native American Indian populations for nearly 10,000 years. First visited by Europeans in 1541 when Spanish explorers discovered the Mississippi River, permanent European settlement began when the French claimed the territory in 1682. By the early 18th century, New Orleans city founder, Jean-Baptiste Le Moyne de Bienville, initiated the first urban development in what remains today the Vieux Carre. Decreed a city by Bienville in 1718, New Orleans was laid out by the French engineer, Adrien de Pauger, in a classic eighteenth-century symmetrical gridiron pattern consisting of 66 squares forming a parallelogram. Responding to the areaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s existing natural conditions, this early gridded development occurred on sites of natural high ground. In November 1721, New Orleans had a population of 470 people: 277 whites and 172 black and 21 Indian slaves.

Lake Pontchartrain

18th century New Orleans sustained damage from at least ten hurricanes of varying magnitude and impact.

PRE-1788

Development This Era Lower Ninth Ward katrina Flood Area MIR Site wetlands / open space 0

0.5

1.0

2.0

miles

Prior to European settlement a little over 200 years ago, the area known as New Orleans today was occupied by Native American Indian populations for nearly 10,000 years.

1682

Planners implement a gridded city plan in the French corridor. The French corridor site is selected because of its abuncance of natural high ground.

1718

1762 1722

Frenchman Robert Caralier and Sieur de La Salle claim the future area of New Orleans and the surrounding areas for King Louis of France.

A hurricane strikes the city. Much of the city is damaged.

September 22-24: a hurricane strikes the city destroying most structures. St. Louis Cathedral is destroyed.

1722

New Orleans is founded by the French as La Nouvelle-OrlĂŠans under direction of Jean-Baptiste Le Moyne de Bienville. The oldest cathedral in the US, St. Louis Cathedral, is built in New Orleans.

1740

Another smaller hurricane strikes the city.

1779 1776

New Orleans taken over by the Spanish.

The Great Fire of 1788: a large part of the city is burned to the ground. 856 buildings are destroyed.

1780 1779

A hurricane strikes the city. The storm is very violent and many structures and crops are destroyed.

1788 A large hurricane strikes the city. Structures and crops are destroyed.

In his book, “New Orleans: The Making of an Urban Landscape,” geographer, Peirce Lewis, described New Orleans as “an inevitable city on an impossible site.” In 1803, with the signing of the Louisiana Purchase Treaty, the United States acquired significant territories from France, including New Orleans, at roughly 3 cents per acre. New Orleans’ population in 1803 was approximately 8,000 including 4,000 whites, 2,700 slaves and 1,300 free blacks. In 1805, New Orleans was incorporated as a city and despite the numerous dangers and challenges presented by the area’s natural geography and geology, continued to urbanize with development expanding on high ground adjacent to the Mississippi River.

Lake Pontchartrain

“As the city expanded out of its original limits, one of the first new tracts of land to be added was the Faubourg Sainte Marie, a suburb lying on the uptown side of the Vieux Carré and separated from it by a broad “commons” (now Canal Street, New Orleans’ main street). The Faubourg Sainte Marie became the “American section” in the early 19th century and the hub of most business activities. Other faubourgs (outskirts, or suburbs) were laid out above and below the two nuclear settlements and across the river and were finally absorbed into the city by the 1870s.” - Encyclopedia Britannica

1789-1835

Development This Era Development Prior to 1789 Lower Ninth Ward katrina Flood Area MIR Site wetlands / open space 0

0.5

1.0

2.0

Battle of New Orleans 1815

miles

A hurricane strikes the city producing hail. People, cattle, and horses are killed in the storm.

1794

France regains control of New Orleans from Spain.

1803

1800 1794

Again, a large part of city burns to ground. 212 buildings are destroyed.

A hurricane strikes the city.

1800 A hurricane strikes the city.

Battle of New Orleans: Andrew Jackson leads French and Spanish settlers (with soldiers, slaves, militia, Indians and even pirates) to defeat British invaders.

1812 1811

US purchases Louisiana from Napoleon. New Orleans population is 10,000.

1830-31 1815

1821

A hurricane strikes just west of New Orleans and causes substantial damage to the city.

1834-35 1831

The Pontchartrain railroad is built.

U.S. government constructs the Jackson Barracks. Some say that Andrew Jackson, who did not trust New Orleans Creoles, planned the army barracks as a defense against attack from inside as well as outside the city.

As one of the nation’s key economic trade ports, New Orleans experienced a golden age of growth and prosperity through the middle of the 19th century. By 1840, the city was rated the fourth port in the world and the fourth largest city in the nation, with a population that exceeded 100,000. Despite this golden age, the city was not prepared to manage its growth and lacked adequate services and infrastructure for its population: drinking water came from the river or cisterns; no sewerage system existed; drainage was deficient; and flooding was common after heavy rains. Natural conditions in New Orleans, as a result, made both flooding and sanitary conditions into severe problems for the city’s inhabitants, with catastrophic consequences for public health.

Lake Pontchartrain

New Orleans sustained damage from a dozen notable hurricanes in the first half of the 19th century.

1836-1863

Development This Era Development Prior to 1836 Lower Ninth Ward katrina Flood Area MIR Site wetlands / open space 0

0.5

1.0

2.0

Streetcar 1835

miles

The St. Charles Avenue streetcar line starts running.

The new Basin Canal opens.

1837 1835

New Orleans becomes the nation’s 4th largest city (population is 102,000).

1840 1838

A large storm hits New Orleans and causes a storm surge of 8 feet on Lake Pontchartrain.

City reorganization: the wards of New Orleans redrawn; “Ninth Ward” is first designated.

1849 1840

1846

Public school system started.

A hurricane kills more than 400 people across Louisiana.

1853 1852

A Mississippi River levee breach upriver (Sauve’s Crevasse) creates worst flooding in city history. Flooding leaves 12,000 people homeless.

1856

1860 1860 1860

Yellow Fever outbreak of 1853: 9,000+ deaths in New Orleans with 40,000 of the 100,000 residents infected. Tens of thousands flee the city.

In the wake of the Civil War, New Orleans’ municipal debt limited the city from making sorely needed municipal improvements. Therefore, in the last 20 years of the 19th century, New Orleans made limited progress. Between 1840 and 1900 New Orleans dropped to 12th place in national rank of most populated cities. Despite this lull in prosperity and amidst less than ideal conditions, the city’s population increased to nearly 290,000 by the end of the century.

Lake Pontchartrain

After many years of minimal or failed efforts to improve municipal services and utilities, the 1890’s marked a critical decade for public utilities in New Orleans. Prominent citizens came to realize that without an adequate drainage and sewerage system and an adequate supply of drinking water, New Orleans’ economic growth would be stunted. In 1895, the city adopted the New Orleans Drainage Plan of 1895, which marked the advent of modern drainage in the city. “But the people cannot have wells, and so they take rain-water. Neither can they conveniently have cellars or graves, the town being built upon “made ground”; so they do without both, and few of the living complain, and none of the others.” - Life on the Mississippi, 1883 Mark Twain

Nearly thirty hurricanes hit New Orleans in the second half of the 19th century.

1864-1920

Development This Era Development Prior to 1864 Lower Ninth Ward katrina Flood Area MIR Site wetlands / open space 0

0.5

1.0

2.0

Buddy “King” Bolden

miles

New Orleans hosts the World’s Fair.

1870 1865 1868

1879 1871 1871

New Orleans annexes the City of Algiers.

1879

Several miles of levees along the Mississippi River are constructed. By 1920, over 15 million cubic yards of dirt have been moved.

1893 1882 1884 1886 1888

The Army Corps of Engineers is started.

1895-1920 1893-1915

Merging of the Drainage Commission with the Sewerage and Water Board for more efficient operations. This combined organization retained the title Sewerage and Water Board, and remains as such today.

1899 1897

A large Hurricane New Orleans Drainage Plan of 1895: over the kills over 2000 in next 20 years a complex system of drainage is Louisiana. created throughout the area.

1901 1903 Cypress swamp drained to create the Ninth Ward neighborhoods.

A hurricane kills 353 across Louisiana and causes $5 million in damage.

1905

The Industrial Canal is dredged, bisecting the Ninth Ward and creating the “Lower” Ninth.

1915 1906

1909

By 1905, over 22,000 acres of wetlands have been drained by pumps.

1918 1919 1920 The hurricane of 1915 creates long standing flooding in the Ninth Ward. 275 people are killed.

With advancement of civic infrastructure, including the continued construction of levees, came the seizing of opportunity to drain lower lying swamps and wetlands for expanded urban development and occupation.

Lake Pontchartrain

New Orleans experienced at least a dozen hurricanes in the first half of the 20th century

1921-1949

Development This Era Development Prior to 1921 Lower Ninth Ward katrina Flood Area MIR Site wetlands / open space 0

0.5

1.0

2.0

Louis Armstrong

miles

The Port of New Orleans finishes construction of the Industrial Canal. Its purpose is to provide navigation between the Mississippi River and Lake Pontchartrain.

1927 1923 1923 1926

Lake Vista and Lakeshore subdivisions are developed. Development starts to take place in low elevation areas across the city.

1928

1947 1930-40 1938

Flood of 1927. Called the worst flood in US history. It devastates 1,300,000 acres of land and leaves 300,000 people homeless.

50 years of intensive development begins in low elevation areas. These areas include parts of the Lower Ninth Ward, Edgelake / Little Woods, Lake Forest, and Lake Kenilworth, to name a few.

Lakefront improvement project creates the lakeside levee and seawall.

1940

Hurricane Flossy creates flooding in the Ninth Ward.

1950 1948

1950

A hurricane hits the city and creates a 12 foot storm surge. Jefferson Parish has severe flooding. 51 people are killed.

1957 1956

Only half of Ninth Ward is developed.

Hurricane Audrey strikes and kills hundreds of people.

In the 1950’s, New Orleans underwent significant physical improvements during Mayor DeLesseps S. Morrison’s administration. Improvements included railroad consolidation; new railroad terminal construction, street widening, and development of a civic center, including a new City Hall. Development continued to expand north and east towards Lake Pontchartrain into wetland areas. In 1950, the population of New Orleans had grown to 570,445. In 2005, prior to Hurricane Katrina, the population of the Greater New Orleans area reached 1.4 million with 485,000 residents located within city bounds.

Lake Pontchartrain

“Some 90,000 square miles of the Gulf Coast region were blanketed by federal disaster declarations – an area roughly the size of the United Kingdom” -U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2005

1950-2005

Development This Era Development Prior to 1950 Lower Ninth Ward katrina Flood Area MIR Site wetlands / open space 0

0.5

1.0

2.0

Jazz funeral

miles

Segregation is abolished on city buses in New Orleans.

Lakefront levee is raised to 12ft.

Lakefront levee is raised to 18ft.

1965 1958 1961 1964

Hurricane Katrina. Three sources of flooding to the Lower Ninth Ward: (east) water flowed in from Saint Bernard Parish(west) the Industrial Canal had two distinct major breachesa block in from Florida Avenue and back from Claiborne Avenue.

1986 1969

1969

1974

1977

1981 1985

Hurricane Betsy hits the city. A levee on the Industrial Canal collapses, flooding much of the Lower Ninth. Much of the damage from Betsy is never adequately repaired. The Corps begins building hurricane levees.

1985

1998 1988

1995

Holy Cross neighborhood is added to the National Register of Historic Places.

2005 2005

Hurricane George. Approximatly 14,000 take shelter in the Superdome. Outages leave 260,000 without power

Hurricane Rita. One month after Katrina, the Lower Ninth Ward, not yet dry from Katrina, is flooded again.

Hurricane Katrina was the most catastrophic natural disaster ever to take place in the history of the United States. The scale of the devastation measured in miles and encompassed enough land area to blanket Great Britain. 80% of New Orleans was covered in water, setting the scene for a dramatic evacuation of its occupants. In the wake of this flooding, 85% of the city’s population was dispersed and 62% of its housing stock was damaged or destroyed. Subsidence and erosion caused by human interventions exacerbated the catastrophe, while the uneven distribution of devastation further highlighted a pre-existing condition of socioeconomic and racial inequality. As of July 2007, approximately 67% of the city’s pre-Katrina population has returned with the lowest percentage of residents returning to areas, such as the Lower Ninth Ward, which were most adversely affected by flooding caused by Katrina.

CONTEMPORARY CONDITIONS

Despite the return of much of the city’s population, the future of New Orleans is uncertain. Two years after the hurricane, the city still suffers from an extraordinary deficiency in infrastructure and services, neither of which has been restored to pre-Katrina conditions. Despite the heightened national and international attention and tremendous influx of concern and consideration from leaders in politics, planning, architecture, economics, environmental science, and psychology focused on New Orleans in the wake of Katrina, the city lacks any coherent vision for rebuilding the city. Unless New Orleans is prepared to radically rethink its strategy for occupation of its territory, which has proven perilous time and again in the face of its location within a high risk environmental zone, the future of New Orleans will be threatened. Poised at this critical moment

in history, we, as a collective, need to identify the salient issues and critical factors that are keeping New Orleans, as a whole, from returning to the vibrant state for which it is so widely recognized. How can we create a vision for a sustainable future in New Orleans – one that recalibrates the city’s relationship with its environmental context? How can we articulate a plan for re-constituting New Orleans in a way that is fundamentally transformative, yet rooted in the long history, culture, and soul of the city? How can this plan, at both a macro scale and fine grain, respond to the city’s demographic, economic, political, social, historical and cultural conditions and needs? And finally, how can we, as a society, parlay our transformation of one of the most catastrophic natural disasters to face this nation, into an optimistic and visionary strategy that intelligently negotiates our relationship with the environment and serves as a model for communities facing similar challenges all over the world? As designers, we have chosen to exploit our strengths as outsiders—removed from local politics and conflicts of interest— while addressing the potential weakness of our naiveté by engaging local advisors in our process. This process has involved ongoing dialogues with pillars of the local architectural, political, and academic communities; compilation and analysis of both pre- and post-Katrina press, reports, proposals, and data; precedent studies of historical disasters and comparable world cities; and finally, the proposal of our own solution as a way to analyze and define the problem, and move the important dialogue about this city’s future forward.

“Geographers are leery of ascribing the causes of human endeavors solely to physical geography— the overly simplistic notion of environmental determinism has already been discussed—but in the case of topography in New Orleans, an undeniable cause-and-effect relationship exists between the lay of the land and the development of the city. For nearly two centuries, from the earliest European settlements at Bayou St. John in 1708 to the electrified metropolis of the early 1900s, New Orleans clung to the natural-levee uplands of the Mississippi River and its distributaries at the exclusion of the “back-of-town” lowlands, the lake shore, and surrounding marshes. The shape of this built environment—not just the bend in the river—earned New Orleans its enchanting old nickname, Crescent City. Natural levees were the only regularly dry swaths rising above the wetlands, and until the appropriate technology emerged for draining the swamps, the city was naturally constricted to their limits. Within this constriction, development was guided by myriad factors, including politics, economics, culture, transportation, and geographical distance, but for almost two hundred years, topography formed the first-tier rule guiding where New Orleanians built New Orleans.” - Richard Campanella, Time and Place in New Orleans: Past Geographies in the Present Day, 2002

NEW ORLEANS

1855

1916 1992 1982 1965 1985

1982 1879 1960

1974

1983 1969

1916 1979 1915 1909

primary HURRICANE HISTORY

FLOODING 0’-0” - 2’-0” 2’-0” - 4’-0” 4’-0” - 11’-0” Ridges Levees Urbanized Area Transportation katrina flood area Lower Ninth Ward

2005 New Orleans’ unique geographical context makes it prone to frequent hurricanes and tropical storms. On average a hurricane makes landfall every 2.8 years. Louisiana has few barrier islands but New Orleans, in particular, has a generally smooth Gulf of Mexico bottom and lack of coastal irregularities. This combined with the erosion and sinking of land, and the increased water levels of the Mississippi, create an ideal scenario for maximum wave damage and flooding throughout the city.

Hurricane Katrina left 80% of New Orleans covered in water. The areas that escaped flooding were predominately urbanized before the 1890’s, when the city’s population reached 250,000.

The estimated cost of buying out all flooded property is $9 Billion, less than one third of the cost of improving existing flood control systems. -2000 Census data

“Building Category 5 protection here, however, is an astronomically expensive and technically complex proposition. It would involve far more than just higher levees: There would have to be extensive changes to the city’s system of drainage canals and pumps, environmental restoration on a vast scale to replenish buffering wetlands and barrier islands, and even sea gates far out of town near the Gulf of Mexico. The cost estimates are still fuzzy, but the work would easily cost more than $32 billion, state officials say, and could take decades to complete.” - John Schwartz, International Herald Tribune, November 20, 2005

BLIGHTED AND ABANDONED PROPERTIES Blighted / Abandoned Green Space Urbanized Area Transportation katrina flood area Lower Ninth Ward

2005

Even before Hurricane Katrina, there were estimates of at least 2,275 abandoned properties throughout the older portions of the city. The devastation caused by the storm has increased this number, significantly impacting the available housing stock.

HOUSING VALUES $100,000+ $60,000 - 100,000 Below $60,000 No Information Transportation katrina flood area Lower Ninth Ward

2005

With the exception of a few areas, such as Lakeview, most of the least valuable properties are located in the worst flooded areas. The majority of housing in the Lower Ninth Ward is valued under $60,000.

51% 35%

39%

63% 53% 87%

34%

54%

85% 100%

56%

42% 75%

106% 95%

91%

20%

70% 99% 101%

POPULATION 2 TIMES BELOW THE POVERTY LINE 0% - 21% 22% - 38% 39% - 55% 56% - 73% 74% - 100% Transportation katrina flood area Lower Ninth Ward

PARISH DEMOGRAPHICS 46% + African American 71% + African American 46% + White 73% + White Mixed to 50% Asian Mixed to 22% Hispanic Transportation katrina flood area Lower Ninth Ward

2005

The distribution of catastrophic flooding caused by Hurricane Katrina further highlights a pre-existing situation of socio-economic and racial inequality. However, the overall mix of race throughout the city makes it one of the more culturally diverse urban areas in the world.

2005 The poverty rate in New Orleans prior to Hurricane Katrina was already 23.2%, almost twice the national rate of 12.7%. Despite somewhat integrated wealth distribution, areas of greatest poverty were still most significantly affected by flooding.

RETURNING POPULATION 91% - 100+% Pre Katrina 71% - 90% Pre Katrina 51% - 70% Pre Katrina 31% - 50% Pre Katrina 00% - 30% Pre Katrina Transportation katrina flood area Lower Ninth Ward

2007

Based on data from the US Postal Service, the July 2007 population index indicates a return of approximately 67% of the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s pre-Katrina inhabitants. Areas of extreme flooding, including the Lower Ninth Ward, are found to have the lowest percentage of returning residents.

The shotgun house, predominant throughout New Orleans, can be broken down into two primary components: the house itself, where the residents live; and the foundation, on which the house sits. The vibrant culture of New Orleans and the Ninth Ward is reflected in the unique and often colorful houses that the residents have always had a major hand in designing for themselves. To enable the residents of the Ninth Ward to once again craft their culture, we have reinvented the foundation upon which they can build. Our concept is twofold: 1. To design a foundation that enables the house to function independently of the basic infrastructure and public services that have yet to be adequately repaired in the Lower Ninth Ward and which are likely to fail again. 2. To create a new house that rests upon that foundation but is wholly integrated with the natural environment, respectful of New Orleans vernacular, and enriched with sustainable technologies.

HOUSE EVoLUTION

To accomplish this, the foundation of the house must be simultaneously specific and forgiving, like the chassis of a car. The chassis hosts all of the essential mechanical and technological equipment to provide the house with power, water, and fresh air. Additionally, the foundation should protect the house from future water and weather threats. To accomplish this, the foundation was engineered out of expanded polystyrene foam, which is encased in glass fiber reinforced concrete. This composite results in a strong, resilient foundation that will float with the rising flood water.

Unlike a typical car chassis, GMâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s skateboard chassis is engineered to support several car body types. Much in the same way the SABS foundation can support many different house top configurations.

Conceptualization

Specialization

The foundation of the house is reconceived as a chassis, embedded with technology and equipment essential for operation.

The chassis is designed to achieve complete integration with the systems it houses.

Safety

The chassis, which floats, also protects the house from flooding.

Exterior RenderingS

RESIDENCE ASSEMBLAGE A Chassis B Modular Framing C Residence Anchors

C 4 10

INCLUDED TECHNOLOGY + EQUIPMENT 1 Potable Water Storage 2 Rain Water Collection 3 Grey Water Storage 4 Solar Boiler 5 LP Generator 6 Solar Collectors 7 PV Panels 8 Waste Water Tank 9 LP Tank 10 LP Emergency Tank 11 Charge Controllers 12 Deep Cycle Battery Array 13 Fan Coil Condenser Unit 14 Whole House Fan

12 11

Assembly

The house represents the integration of prefabricated and site constructed modular building systems.

Sustainability

The form and design of the house is fully integrated with the mechanical and support systems that allow the home to function largely independent of traditional city infrastructure.

The chassis of the house is the primary element around which the rest of the house is organized and assembled. Consisting of a thickened raft slab, a service core, and a large roof top rain collector, it is designed to take maximum advantage of shop labor rates and quality control available through off-site fabrication. Constructed of polystyrene foam and glass fiber reinforced concrete, the pre-fabricated unit is shipped as a whole to the site with all required wall anchors, rough-ins, electrical and mechanical routing pre-installed. Sized for transportation on a standard flat bed trailer, all required system storage and internal infrastructure are installed in the shop. The unit is placed on site atop four stabilizing concrete pads located between a front and rear exterior deck, which act as the anchors for the house when in flood mode. The decks and their associated grade beams are constructed on site using local labor and conventional construction techniques. Finally, the modular wall framing, interior finish elements, prefabricated roofing, and remaining system components arrive on site for assembly in the field. The specific design and resultant form of the chassis allows for easy maintenance of all systems. LP and wastewater tanks are accessed from outside the house, while filters, batteries and mechanical components are accessed from within.

ELECTRIC POWER Powered items: Included Item

Model GTH18JBRWW / White JVM1790BKC/White SHE98MOxUC / White WSM2700HWW / White FE4A 20w 9w 27w 27w

Energy Rate (kWh/month) Family of 4 Quantity 34.16 1 12.75 1 15.9 1 27.33 1 216 1 3.6 7 0.81 2 4.86 2 2.43 3

Energy Use (kWh/month) 34.16 12.75 15.9 27.33 216 25.2 1.62 9.72 7.29

Refrigerator Microwave/Hood combo Dishwasher Washer/Dryer unit A/C fancoil unit Lights recessed CF downs Linear fluorescent cab Lights ceiling living room Lights ceiling bedroom

Brand GE GE Bosch GE Carrier Portfolio Bartco Shaper Shaper

Whole house fan

Quiet Cool QC-1500

0.45

0.9

UV water filtration Greywater filtration Water pressure pump

Mightypure MP22A BRAC W-125 Goulds Aquaboost II LB1035

6.75 0 8

1 1 1

6.75 0 8

Optimal IncludedTotals

Initial cost of item Size 760 67x33x30 / 18.0 cu.ft 869 17x16x30 / 1.7 cu.ft 1550 34x23x24 1170 76x31x27 / 2.7 cu.ft 298 5000 BTU 0 0 0 0

Weight 200 0 85 277 0 0 0 0 0

Energy Star Rating yes no yes yes no yes yes yes yes

Comments usage at .5hr per day over 30 days usage at 12hr per day over 30 days usage at 6hr per day over 30 days usage at 3hr per day over 30 days usage at 6hr per day over 30 days usage at 3hr per day over 30 days

1485 20x20x26

yes

usage at 10 hr per day over 30 days

550 22.5x4.5x8.125 1345 22x50 1065 17.5x18.5x6.75

11 95 55

no no no

6 gpm / 360 gph, POE filtration 33 gallon capacity complete system / up to 15 gpm

365.62

User/plug load assumption total (from below)

97.583

Total electrical load

463.203

Powered items: User/plug loads Item Coffee maker Espresso machine Toaster Mixer Hair dryer Iron Phone Printer Scanner Laptop Table/ambient lamp Bed reading lamp Floor/reading lamp Desk lamp Clock radio Vacuum TV flat screen DVD/CD Stereo w/ speakers iPod charger Cell phone charger Toothbrush

Brand Mr Coffee Braun Oster Kitchen Aid Conair Euro-Pro Panasonic Epson HP Dell IKEA IKEA IKEA IKEA Sony Dirt Devil Panasonic Panasonic Sony Apple Motorola Oral-B

Model FTX20 / Black TA1400 6332 / Black KSM75WH 196P / Metal G1465 KX-TGA600B Stylus photo R280 C4280 D531 FADO FAS SIFFERBO GLOBAL ICFC773 M085600 / Black TC32LX70 / Black PVD4763S SRS D2100 sold with iPod sold with phone e3000

Energy Rate (kWh/use unit) 0.9 1.55 0.025 0.03 0.09 1.4 0.072 0.03 0.03 0.065 0.06 0.2 0.011 0.026 0.005 0.36 0.132 0.014 0.104 0.085 0.007 0.036

Usage/ month 45 8 30 1 60 15 30 240 240 240 360 60 36 120 30 4 180 90 90 60 60 120

Energy Use (kWh/month) 40.5 12.4 0.75 0.03 5.4 21 2.16 7.2 7.2 15.6 21.6 12 0.396 3.12 0.15 1.44 23.76 1.26 9.36 5.1 0.42 4.32

Potential user/plug Totals Usage Assumptions Assumed user/plug Totals

Comments usage at 1.5 cycles per day over 30 days usage at 2 cycles per week over 30 days usage at 1 cycle per day over 30 days usage at 1 cycle per day over 30 days usage at 2 cycles per day over 30 days usage at .5 hr per day over 30 days continuous day load over 30 days usage at 8 hr per day over 30 days usage at 8 hr per day over 30 days usage at 8 hr per day over 30 days usage of 3 lamps at 4 hr per day over 30 days usage of 2 lamps at 1 hr per day over 30 days usage of 2 lamps at 6 hr per day over 30 days usage of 1 lamp at 4 hr per day over 30 days continuous day load over 30 days usage at .5 hr per day over 5 days usage at 6hr per day over 30 days usage at 3hr per day over 30 days usage at 3 hr per day over 30 days usage at 4hr per day over 15 days usage at 2hr per day over 30 days usage of 4 continuous day load over 30 days

195.166 50% 97.583

6 LP POWER Powered items: Included Item Oven LP tank for oven Generator LP tank for generator

Power in / Solar Power in / Propane Power Distribution

3 2

Power

An integrated photovoltaic solar system collects and stores the power for the home, allowing it to function off the grid. This system is supplemented by liquid propane fuel for cooking and an emergency generator.

POWER EQUIPMENT 1 PV Panels 2 Charge Controllers 3 Deep Cycle Battery Array 4 LP Generator 5 LP Tanks 6 LP Emergency Tank

Brand Model Premier GAK100 / Black Worthington 43.5 cylinders lb Briggs & Stratton 7KW / 040220 Worthington 420 cylinders lb

Energy Rate (BTU/month) Quantity 750,000 1 0 1 8,239,230 1 0 1

Energy Use (BTU/month) 750000 0 0 0

Optimal IncludedTotals

Initial cost Size 330 40X25X21 29.25x12 2200 30.5x22.5x32.5 52.5x30

Weight 120 34.4 280 272

Energy Star Rating no no no no

Comments one 40 lb tank propane/month 10.3 gal uses emerg tank - 90 gal/400 lbs 99.1 gal

750000

SOLAR ARRAY Solar items: Included Items PV panels Batteries Charge controller / inverter

Brand Uni-solar Surrette Outback

Model PVL-136 2 KS 33PS PS-2

Energy Rate per unit 136W 1766AH

System size

System size Quantity 581.25 sq ft 500kWh 12 2778AH 1 24Volt 500kWh

Usage

Sizing of the photovoltaic solar system considers the typical energy required for a family of four on a monthly basis, and the ability to function up to four days without sun

Initial cost of item Size 22375 216x15.5 @ 25 units 10776 15.5x8.5x25 @ 12 units 6400

Weight 208

Comments

WATER USAGE Water items: Included Item *Potable water tank *Wastewater tank *Wastewater tank *Solar water heating *Solar water pump *Solar water pump pv *Hot water tank (solar) *Dishwasher *Laundry *Toilet *Shower head Shower adult *Sink faucet *Bath sink Wash hands Brush teeth Shave *Bath faucet *Bath tub Bath adult Bath child *Kitchen sink faucet *Kitchen sink faucet Wash dishes/hand Plant watering

H20 Used Brand Model (gal/cycle) American Tank 0255-025 Company 0 American Tank 0416-060 Company 0 Monarch 500 gal 0 Thermodynamics SB64-9PV 0 Thermodynamics P50140 - 12VDC 0 Thermodynamics PV32 0 Thermodynamics TG454 0 Bosch see above 10.6 GE see above 36.3 Caroma double flush 4.8 ULTRAOXYGENICS 01-452 0 GAIAM GAIAM 20 American Standard 6056105 0 Pegasus PGS1437 0 American Standard 0.75 American Standard 1 American Standard 1.5 American Standard Tropic Bath Kit 0 Crane 118939 0 American Standard 20 American Standard 8 American Standard Colony Soft 2 Handle 0.5 American Standard 7143.803 0 American Standard 2.5 0.4

Usage days/ month 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 15 16 240 30 90 30 30 240 240 24 30 30 4 30 4 0 30 30

Monthly total greywater

1.2 0.6

30 30

Monthly total drinking water Greywater filtration system UV water filtration system

Comments 1140 gallon capacity / collapsible / 144x84x24 1250 gal, single compartment in ground / pumped weekly 500 gal, single compartment / emergency use / 5'8"x5'1"x4'5" 2 collector system pump / motor / TDL booster 80 gallon capacity / 24x60 dual flush 3 showers/day

2 min brush time 60x30x15.5 tub size fill to 20 gal ea bath fill to 8 gal ea bath 5 min wash time indoor plants/daily

36 18

na na

separate tank separate tank

BRAC W-125 Mightypure MP22A

-46.1 0

Monthly total water reuse

Initial cost 1200 1400 800 4563 633 754 796 sa sa 400 55 na 80 130 na na na 50 140 na na 97 115 na na

4556.8

Drinking water Making beverages

H20 Use Family of 4 (gal/mnth) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 580.8 1152 0 1800 0 0 180 240 36 0 0 80 240 2 0 75 12

30 30

-1383 0

1345 greywater diversion 645 POE filtration

-1383

Monthly included totals

3227.8

3057

DAILY MODE

EMERGENCY MODE

pumping valve removal

Water in / Solar Heat Water in / Potable Potable Water Distribution Grey Water Reclamation / Filtration Grey Water Reuse Waste Water Out WATER EQUIPMENT 1 Solar Collector 2 Rainwater Collector Tank 3 Uv water Filtration 4 Potable Water Tank 5 Solar Boiler Module + Tank 6 Greywater Filtration / Storage 7 Waste Water Tank

Water

A rain water collection system, and grey water recycling system, allow the home to collect, filter, and supply water to the occupants in the most efficient manner possible. External connections allow the home to function independently or be hooked up to available infrastructure.

removal

Black water Grey water tank

Grey water tank

toilet flush exterior use

F I LT E R S Y S T E M

toilet flush

F I LT E R S Y S T E M

RAIN WATER

Potable water tank WATER DELIVERY

Black water

family drink make beverages kitchen sink dishwasher washer/dryer shower bathtub bath sink

Usage

Design of the system is based on the efficient water usage required for a family of four on a monthly basis.

Potable water tank

kitchen sink bath sink

2 1

Ducted Air Path Warm Air Cool Air AIR HANDLING EQUIPMENT 1 Fan Coil Unit 2 Whole House Fan

Shading

Exterior shading in the form of large roof overhangs and exterior louvers aids to regulate, both the interior and exterior climate of the house.

Mechanical / Natural Ventilation

The house relies on passive ventilation through window placement and sizing that encourage cross-ventilation. Passive ventilation is supplemented by an active whole house fan system, which pulls air through, up, and out of the home. Finally, a more traditional HVAC unit is provided to cool each room individually on an as-needed basis.

Materialization

Areas of fiber reinforced concrete used in the house chassis and rain collector, are left exposed on ceilings and floors to store and transmit cool energy throughout the day.

1 2

2 3

1 2 3 4

Bedroom Kitchen Dining Living Room

FP 01 FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8”=1’-0”

N 0 1

10 FEET

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

Polished SABS Concrete Floor Ceramic Tile Modular Framed Walls Prefabricated SABS Structure Exterior Rolling Louver Shading Closet with Sliding Doors Sleeping Loft Above Sleeping Loft Access Ladder Integrated Shelving Unit Modular Casework Alternate Exterior Access Ramp Alternate Exterior Wheelchair Lift Exterior Deck with Gradebeams Cable Rail Guardrail Steel Guide Poles for House Anchor System Line of Rain Collector Above

RCP 01

REFLECTED CEILING PLAN SCALE: 1/8”=1’-0”

N 0 1

10 FEET

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.

Prefabricated SABS Rain Collector Exposed Joist Framing Light Fixture Fiber Reinforced Cement Board Soffit Steel Guide Poles for House Anchor System Painted Drywall Soffit Sleeping Loft Access Ladder Duct System Integrated into SABS Structure Service Chase Mechanical Loft Above Exterior Rolling Louver Shading

RP 01 ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8”=1’-0”

0 1

10 FEET

1. Standing Seam Metal Roofing 2. Prefabricated SABS Rain Collector 3. Prefabricated Ridgebeam and Tension Support Cable 4. Stretched Wire Mesh Fabric Filter 5. Photovoltaic Panel System 6. Solar Collector

ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8”=1’-0”

E 0 1

10 FEET

ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8”=1’-0”

W 0 1

10 FEET

ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8”=1’-0”

1. 2. 3. 4.

SC 01 SECTION SCALE: 1/8”=1’-0”

SC 02 0 1

10 FEET

SECTION SCALE: 1/8”=1’-0”

5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.

Prefabricated SABS Raft Slab Prefabricated SABS Rain Collector Standing Seam Metal Roofing Prefabricated Ridgebeam and Tension Support Cable Modular Windows Beyond Modular Framed Walls Rolling Pocket Door Sleeping Loft Mechanical Loft Fiber Reinforced Cement Board Soffit Steel Guide Poles for House Anchor System Exterior Deck with Gradebeams Cable Rail Guardrail Integrated Service Tanks Integrated Battery Storage Duct System Integrated into SABS structure Line of Grade

T.O. HEADER EL. 12’-0”

FINISH LOFT LEVEL EL. 8’-10 1/2”

INTERIOR Rendering

1. SABS Integrated Ridge Beam with Precast Galvanized Anchors for Ridge Cable 2. SS Tension Cable with Adjustable End Terminals 3. Stretched Wire Mesh Fabric Filter 4. Continuous Metal Flashing to Match Roofing 5. Saebi Alternative Building System (SABS) Expanded Polystyrene Core with ¼” Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete Shell 6. Photovoltaic Panel System 7. Standing Seam Metal Roofing 8. Plywood Sheathing 9. Finished Insulation Board 10. Exposed Roof Joists 11. Fiber Reinforced Cement Board Header Panel

12. 1” Overflow Drain Pipe 13. Fiber Reinforced Cement Board Soffit 14. Modular Wood Wall Framing with Plywood Sheathing and Building Paper 15. Sprayed Soy Foam Insulation 16. Swisspearl Carrat Fiber Reinforced Cement Board Panels with Integral Color Typical at all Designated Cement Board Locations. 17. Continuous Furring Channel 18. Mold Resistant Gypsum Wall Board 19. Continuous Galvanized Steel Angle Guide 20. Retractable Insect Screen 21. Bottom Rolling Adjustable Locking Louver Panel 22. Hurricane Resistant Insulated Window System

23. Blocking 24. SABS Integrated Curb with Cast Wall Anchor at 16”oc 25. SABS Raft Slab with Prefabricated and Cast Systems Support 26. Water Storage Tank Fixed to Raft Slab with Precast Anchors 27. Line of grade 28. Mechanical Duct Opening Beyond 29. Sleeping Loft Beyond 30. Integrated Shelving Unit 31. Painted Wood Wall Base

FINISH FLOOR LEVEL EL. 0’-0”

FINISH grade EL. -3’-0”

WALL SECTION DETAIL SCALE: 3/8”=1’-0”

Growing back smaller. We believe that controlled urban re-growth, coupled with a strategic return-to-nature, will revitalize and enrich New Orleans while paving the way for a more sustainable future.

A shrinking city is in fact a denser, richer, more vibrant city. New Orleans will not endure without a broad, macro-scale vision that addresses and synthesizes the region’s unique social, cultural, economic and ecological conditions. We have responded to the Make It Right Foundation’s initiative “…to be a catalyst for redevelopment of the Lower Ninth Ward, by building a neighborhood comprised of safe and healthy homes that are inspired by Cradle to Cradle thinking, with an emphasis on high quality design, while preserving the spirit of the community’s culture,” with what we consider a micro-scale solution to the region’s problems – a prototype for a single family dwelling that addresses the immediate and critical need for safe and healthy housing in the Lower Ninth Ward. Our design for this prototype proposes a self-sustaining structure designed to function independent of civic infrastructure and services and to survive the inevitable environmental dangers of the area without catastrophic damage and loss of life.

SOLAR SOUTH

SP 01 SITE PLAN

While our design provides an intelligent solution that can accelerate recovery in this specific district of the city, it is also connected to a much broader, longer term planning concept for the entire region. We envision that this prototype would facilitate a strategy for transforming and preparing New Orleans as a whole for a safer and healthier future. This macro-scale vision entails a radical, but gradual, return of much of the flooded areas to nature as wetlands and parklands with the simultaneous restoration of the city to its original high ground status.

Areas of the city that were settled prior to drainage of the regionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s wetlands, which ushered in the development of low lying areas, would be intensified. These historic areas of the city are naturally located on higher ground and are connected to the economic engines of New Orleansâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; future and the cultural traditions of its roots. The phased strategic plan delineating green spaces and urban zones is based on our analysis of the areas of extreme flood damage, estimates of returning population, and locations of existing and proposed infrastructure and services, transportation, parks, and thriving economic and cultural activity. Gradual depopulation and restoration of wetlands would follow a carefully considered and phased implementation plan:

Phase One: Respond to the immediate needs for safe and healthy housing through rapid deployment of the MIR floating house prototype throughout the Lower Ninth Ward, in the Eastern wetlands areas, and in all high risk areas as needed.

PHASE 1

wetlands restoration Lower Ninth Ward KATRINA Flood Area MIR House Developed Area Major Transportation wetlands / open space 0

0.5

1.0

2.0

miles

PHASE 1

Make It Right houses are placed in portions of the city that flooded during the hurricane.

As of July 2007, approximately

90,000 PEOPLE in

49.4 square miles of low elevation / high risk areas

-Greater New Orleans Community Data Center

Phase One will allow a significant percentage of the displaced population to return safely to a home with minimal dependence on infrastructure and services. With the introduction of a new housing prototype and the Cradle to Cradle approach to living, residents can begin to experience a more direct and productive relationship with nature and broaden their understanding of the delicate balance that exists between themselves and the environment in which they are living. Restoration of properties, in non-flooded neighborhoods, that were blighted or abandoned before Katrina will commence.

Phase Two: Encourage depopulation of the most dangerous and high risk development areas, per FEMA flood zones, through buyout programs that identify damaged and high risk properties and offer financial incentives to residents occupying these properties.* Coupled with the initiation of wetland restoration, this phase would consider preservation of all historically and culturally significant assets. Prior to and concurrent with this phase, restoration of the blighted and abandoned properties that exist on high ground would begin as a means of replenishing the housing stock. Much of mid-city is on high ground and consists of buildings that were abandoned prior to Hurricane Katrina. These projects will be revitalized and restored with a minimum of infrastructural costs to provide quick and ready housing to the relocating population at an affordable rate.

PHASE 2

wetlands restoration Lower Ninth Ward KATRINA Flood Area MIR House Developed Area Major Transportation wetlands / open space 0

0.5

1.0

2.0

miles

PHASE 2

Portions of highest risk (FEMA flood zone) areas are restored back into wetlands. The restoration starts with the highest risk and least historically and culturally significant areas.

city densification:

15,000 PEOPLE from

1.7 square miles of low elevation / high risk areas relocate to low risk areas.

*Taxpayer-funded buyout of damaged properties has already begun. The Louisiana Recovery Authority has overseen taxpayer-funded buyout of 19,000 storm-damaged homes, the majority of which are located in areas that sustained the worst flooding. Significant percentages of property owners who have sought aid from this program are opting for buyout rather than rebuild, indicating a trend toward relocation. (â&#x20AC;&#x153;Louisiana to buy 19,000 ruined homes,â&#x20AC;? Brad Heath, USA Today, September 17, 2007)

Phase Three: Continue to encourage depopulation of all high risk areas with a goal of reaching a density that is one-third the size of the original high risk population and occupies one quarter of low elevation/high risk areas. Conservation of significant historic and cultural assets such as the St. Bernard Area, Gentilly Terrace and the Lower Ninth Ward, would continue.

PHASE 3

wetlands restoration Lower Ninth Ward KATRINA Flood Area MIR House Developed Area Major Transportation wetlands / open space 0

0.5

1.0

2.0

miles

PHASE 3

More portions of high risk (FEMA flood zone) areas are restored back into wetlands. The restoration maintains historically and culturally significant areas such as the St. Bernard Area, Gentilly Terrace, and the Lower Ninth Ward.

city densification:

30,000 PEOPLE from

12.5 square miles of low elevation / high risk areas relocate to low risk areas.

Phase Four: Depopulation of the remaining at risk FEMA flood zone areas, including selected historic and cultural sites, would continue until the region has reached its optimal density levels. Determination of the exact configuration of this final phase would be premature at this stage. Careful evaluation of the regionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s important historical and cultural assets would have to take place in collaboration with historians, city officials, community representatives and planners before a final assessment is made about their preservation amidst the complete restoration of wetlands in these areas.

PHASE 4

wetlands restoration Lower Ninth Ward KATRINA Flood Area MIR House Developed Area Major Transportation wetlands / open space 0

0.5

1.0

2.0

miles

PHASE 4

The remaining at risk (FEMA flood zone) areas are restored back into wetlands. The city becomes a smaller, denser, more compact city, while responding to the ecological conditions of the area.

city densification:

20,000 PEOPLE from

11.1 square miles of low elevation / high risk areas relocate to low risk areas.

This macro-scale vision, which works in complete synergy with the micro-scale solution, introduces a more sustainable approach to living in the New Orleans environment. Considerate of social, economic, cultural and ecological conditions and needs, it is our hope that this strategy will gradually encourage residents who have resided in high risk zones to reconsider relocation to higher ground. Ultimately, this strategic planning concept aims to return New Orleans to an optimal state, one that accommodates the population, albeit in a denser and more compact urban environment, and that restores the regionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s natural attributes with the goal of creating a city that is sustainable, feasible, efficient and safe. History has already demonstrated that this particular region has an optimal density and occupation pattern at which it thrives and it is this configuration that we aspire to restore.

ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST OPINION Project Name: Project Location: Mid-Point of Construction Date: Design Phase: Estimate Date:

Make It Right New Orleans, Louisiana January 2008 Schematic Design September 24, 2007

UNIT SYSTEM / COMPONENT SITEWORK Utilities L.F. of Pipe Roads & Paving S.F. of Paving Site Improvements STRUCTURE Foundations Lump Sum Substructure S.F. of SOG Floor Decks S.F. of Deck Roof Deck S.F. of Deck EXTERIOR CLOSURE Walls S.F. of Wall Doors Each Windows & Glazed Walls S.F. of Opening Roofing S.F. of Roof INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION Doors & Frames Each Partitions S.F. of Partition Wall Finish S.F. of Wall Floor Finish S.F. of Floor Ceiling Finish S.F. of Ceiling EQUIPMENT Casework L.F. of Casework Kitchen Fixtures Each Specialties Each CONVEYING Elevators No of Stops SYSTEMS Plumbing No of Fixtures Heating/Cooling S.F. of Floor Electrical S.F. of Floor SUB-TOTAL SUBCONTRACTOR COSTS CONTRACTOR FEES GC's, Overhead & Profit TOTAL

% of SubC Costs

mOrphosis 0.860 1.030 1.000 0.886 FACTORED QUANTITY SUB-TOTAL SUB-TOTAL Architect: Location Factor Escalation Factor: Design Phase Factor: Total Adjustment Factor:

UNIT COST $ $

14.00 4.63

140 $ 1,960.00 412 $ 1,906.10 $ 3,000.00

$ 1,736.17 $ 1,688.42 $ 2,657.40

$ 9,187.50 64 $ 320.00 245 $ 4,305.59 1645 $ 15,421.88

$ 8,138.29 $ 283.46 $ 3,813.89 $ 13,660.70 $ $ $ $

$ $ $

5.00 17.57 9.38

$ $ $ $

18.29 800.00 117.33 16.12

1540 2 219 1720

$ $ $ $

$ $ $ $ $

710.00 5.13 1.22 10.00 1.30

6 696 2745 36 195

$ 4,260.00 $ 3,570.48 $ 3,336.30 $ 360.00 $ 253.50

$ 3,773.51 $ 3,162.73 $ 2,955.29 $ 318.89 $ 224.55

15 $ 3,597.50 3 $ 3,522.00 $ 31,910.00

$ 3,186.67 $ 3,119.79 $ 28,265.88

$ 239.83 $ 1,174.00 $

$ $ $

625.00 6.44 4.00

17%

0 $

28,170.03 1,600.00 25,694.50 27,733.25

24,953.01 1,417.28 22,760.19 24,566.11

8 $ 5,000.00 888 $ 5,720.00 888 $ 3,552.00 $ 184,380.63

$ 4,429.00 $ 5,066.78 $ 3,146.36

$ 31,344.71

$ 27,765.14

Construction Cost: S.F. Area: Cost / S.F.:

TOTAL 6,081.99

25,896.33

73,696.59

10,434.97

$ $

34,572.33

12,642.14

$ 163,324.36 $

27,765.14

$ 191,089.50

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

COST PER S.F. $ 6.85 1.96 1.90 2.99 $ 29.16 9.16 0.32 4.29 15.38 $ 82.99 28.10 1.60 25.63 27.66 $ 11.75 4.25 3.56 3.33 0.36 0.25 $ 38.93 3.59 3.51 31.83 $ $ 14.24 4.99 5.71 3.54 $ 183.92 $

191,089.50 888 215.19

% TOTAL 0.9% 0.9% 1.4% 4.3% 0.1% 2.0% 7.1% 13.1% 0.7% 11.9% 12.9% 2.0% 1.7% 1.5% 0.2% 0.1% 1.7% 1.6% 14.8% 0.0% 2.3% 2.7% 1.6%

3.2%

13.6%

38.6%

5.5%

30 18.1%

0.0% 6.6%

85.5%

31.27

14.5%

$ 215.19

100.0%

Reduced based on SABS sytem prefabrication and installation cost to be delivered under separate contract.

COST ESTIMATE

Morphosis Cost Database-07-09-24-expanded.xls ROM Totals

Page 1 of 1

COST DATABASE & UNIT QUANTITY TAKEOFF Project Name: Project Location: Mid-Point of Construction Date: Design Phase: Submittal Date Enclosed Floor Area (Gross Square Feet)

Make It Right New Orleans, Louisiana January 2008 Schematic Design September 24, 2007 888

COMPONENT Units SITEWORK Utilities Water Sanitary Roads & Paving Concrete Drive Concrete Sidewalk Pervious Paving Gravel Surface Site Improvements Landscaping STRUCTURE Foundations Piles, Pile Caps, Grade Beams Substructure 4" Concrete on Granular Base Floor Decks CIP Columns w/ Wd Joists, Plywd Deck & Insulation CIP Columns w/Mfg Wd Joists, Plywd Deck & Insul CIP Columns w/ Wood Joists & Redwood Deck Upper Floor Deck 2 x Wood Joists w/ Wood Deck Roof Deck Plywood on Wood Trusses w Soy Foam Insulation Plywood on Wood Joists w Soy Foam Insulation Structural Insulated Panels (OSB on Polyiso Insul)

L.F. of Pipe LF LF S.F. of Paving SF SF SF SF Lump Sum LS Lump Sum SF of Elevated Floor S.F. of SOG SF S.F. of Deck SF SF SF SF S.F. of Deck SF SF SF

EXTERIOR CLOSURE Walls S.F. of Wall Wall Substrate Building Paper on Gypsum Sheathing over 2 x 6 Wood StudFraming w/ full Foam Insulation and 1/2" GWB Interior Finish SF Structural Insulated Panels (OSB on Polyiso Insul) SF Wall Finish 1 Paint on Fiber Cement Board Galvalume Metal Siding Red Cedar Siding Wall Finish 2 Sealed Wood Lattice Work Metal Screen with Filagree Pattern Bamboo Blinds Doors COSTInsulated DATABASE & UNIT QUANTITY Six Panel Metal Door 3-0TAKEOFF x 7-0 Project 10-0 xName: 7-0 Decorative Overhead Garage Door Project Location: Pair 4-0 x 6-8 Flush HM Doors Mid-Point Construction Date:Set 6-0 x 7-0ofSliding Glass Door Design Phase: 3-0 x 7-0 Wood w/ Full Glass Lite Submittal Date Windows & Glazed Walls Enclosed Floor Area (Gross Square Feet) Windows

Fixed Single Hung Double Hung Awning Horizontal Slider Storefront Window Accessories Wood Shutters Morphosis Cost Database-07-09-24-expanded.xls Cost Database Decorative Metal Shutters Louvers 3-0 x 1-6 Gable End Louver Roofing Roof Membrane Standing Seam Metal over Building Paper Architectural Shingles over Building Paper Red Cedar Decking over Single Ply TPO Membrane Roof Accessories Gutters and Downspouts Concealed Gutters Ventilating Dormers 2-0 x 2-6 Roof Hatch 2-0 x 2-0 Skylight 3-0 x 7-0 Skylight Welded Wire Mesh Covering Soffits Cedar Plank Soffit on Wood Furring Painted Fiber Cement Board INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION Doors & Frames 3-0 x 6-8 HC Panel Door 2-6 x 6-8 HC Panel Door 2-6 x 6-8 HC Pocket Door 2-0 x 6-8 HC Panel Door Pair 2-0 x 6-8 Sliding Closet Doors Pair 1-6 x 6-8 Hinged Panel Doors Partitions 1/2" GWB on each side of 2 x 4 Wd Framing Wall Finish Ceramic Tile Paint Floor Finish Bamboo Flooring T&G Wood Ceramic Tile Linoleum Ceiling Finish Paint on 1/2" GWB EQUIPMENT Casework Tall Cabinet Base Cabintet, Counter and Wall Cabinet Base Cabinet & Counter

Morphosis Cost Database-07-09-24-expanded.xls Cost Database

SF SF SF SF SF SF Each Opening EA Make EA It Right New EA Orleans, Louisiana January 2008 EA Schematic Design EA September 24,Opening 2007 SF of Window 888 SF SF Units SF SF SF SF SF SF

COST DATABASE & UNIT QUANTITY TAKEOFF Project Name: Project Location: Mid-Point of Construction Date: Design Phase: Submittal Date Enclosed Floor Area (Gross Square Feet)

Architect: mOrphosis

Unit Cost

Complexity Adjusted Unit Factor Cost

SYSTEM Quanitity

Extended Cost

$15.00 $13.00

1.00 1.00

$15.00 $13.00

70 70

$1,050.00 $910.00

$4.55 $5.00 $2.05 $0.39

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

$4.55 $5.00 $2.05 $0.39

342 70 0 0

$1,556.10 $350.00 $0.00 $0.00

$3,000.00

1.00

$3,000.00

$30.00

1.25

$37.50

245

$9,187.50

$5.00

1.00

$5.00

$320.00

$16.80 $15.70 $14.75

1.00 1.00 1.00

$16.80 $15.70 $14.75

0 0 245

$0.00 $0.00 $3,613.75

$3.76

1.00

$3.76

184

$691.84

$10.00 $7.50 $15.00

1.00 1.25 1.00

$10.00 $9.38 $15.00

0 1,645 0

$0.00 $15,421.88 $0.00

0.90 1.00

$6.96 $12.00

1,540 0

$5.00 $7.00 $2.50

1.75 1.00 1.00

$8.75 $7.00 $2.50

1,923 90 0

$3.00 $15.00 $5.00

1.00 1.00 1.00

$3.00 $15.00 $5.00

0 0 0

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$800.00 $1,500.00 $700.00 $4,500.00 $1,200.00

2 0 0 0 0

$1,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$800.00 1.00 Architect: mOrphosis $1,500.00 1.00 $700.00 1.00 $4,500.00 1.00 $1,200.00 1.00

COMPONENT $35.00 0.90 $31.50 75 Adjusted Unit $45.00 Complexity 1.00 $45.00 0 Factor Cost Unit Cost $50.00 1.00 $50.00 Quanitity 0 $45.00 0.90 $40.50 144 $45.00 1.00 $45.00 0 $50.00 1.00 $50.00 0 0 330

$0.00 $16,500.00

$100.00

1.00

$100.00

$1,000.00

SF SF SF

$10.00 $2.50 $6.00

1.00 1.00 1.00

$10.00 $2.50 $6.00

1,720 0 0

$17,200.00 $0.00 $0.00

LF LF EA EA EA EA

$6.00 $8.00 $200.00 $500.00 $100.00 $420.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

$6.00 $8.00 $200.00 $500.00 $100.00 $420.00

0 0 0 1 0 0

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 $0.00 $0.00

$2.00

0.50

$1.00

452

$452.00

$2.00

1.00

$2.00

$5.00

1.75

$8.75

1,095

$9,581.25

$700.00 $650.00 $900.00 $600.00 $400.00 $300.00

1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.00

$700.00 $650.00 $990.00 $600.00 $440.00 $300.00

2 0 2 0 2 0

$1,400.00 $0.00 $1,980.00 $0.00 $880.00 $0.00

$5.70

0.90

$5.13

696

$3,570.48

$12.00 $0.90

1.00 1.00

$12.00 $0.90

78 2,667

$936.00 $2,400.30

L.F. of Casework LF LF LF

140

$1,960.00

$4.63

412

$1,906.10

$9,187.50 $5.00

$320.00

$17.57

245

$4,305.59

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

$3.50 $5.00 $10.00 $4.00

0 0 36 0

$0.00 $0.00 $360.00 $0.00

$1.30

1.00

$1.30

195

$253.50

$390.00 $270.00 $150.00

0.75 1.00 1.00

$292.50 $270.00 $150.00

3 8 0

1,645

$15,421.88

$877.50 $2,160.00 $0.00

Units LF EA EA Each

Unit Cost $120.00 $130.00 $150.00

SYSTEM

Complexity Adjusted Unit Factor Cost

Extended Cost

Carried but not required for daily operation Carried but not required for daily operation

Wall Cabinet Bathroom Vanity Closet Shelve & Rod Kitchen Fixtures

EA EA EA Lump Sum

$400.00 $600.00 $300.00

3.00 1.27 5.20

$1,200.00 $762.00 $1,560.00

1 1 1

$1,200.00 $762.00 $1,560.00

No of Treads No of Treads No of Treads

$150.00 $250.00 $279.00

0.50 1.00 1.00

$75.00 $250.00 $279.00

10 0 0

$750.00 $0.00 $0.00

Foundations required at exterior decks only.

Range Refrigerator Dishwasher Specialties Stairs 3-0 W Wood Stair and Handrails 3-0 W Concrete Stair with Steel Handrails Spiral Staircase Guardrails Wood top and bottom rail with wood ballusters

$45.00

1.00

$45.00

$0.00

Wrought Iron Filagree Pattern Decorative Columns 2-0 Diameter Doric 8 x 8" Turned wood Post Other Specialty Items

$200.00

0.50

$100.00

$4,400.00

EA EA

$190.00 $40.00

1.00 1.00

$190.00 $40.00

0 0

$0.00 $0.00

One pedestal pad each corner of floating house.

Carried for sleeping and mechanical loft.

1.00 1.00 1.00

Quanitity $120.00 0 $130.00 2 $150.00 2

$0.00 $260.00 $300.00

UNIT COST

QUANTITY

SUB-TOTAL

$1,174.00

$3,522.00

$31,910.00

1,540

SABS composite building system floating foundation Access ladder to sleeping loft 10" steel pipe extension anchor at each porch You Name it 4

$28,170.03

Deduction for modular framing. Allowance for Swisspearl integrally colored panels and furring strips.

$800.00

$117.33

219

COST DATABASE Dishwasher & UNIT QUANTITY TAKEOFF Project Name: Project Location: Laundry Mid-Point of Construction Date: Design Phase:Sink Bathroom Submittal Date Enclosed Floor Area (Gross Square Feet) Watercloset

$25,694.50

SUB-TOTAL

Bathtub Heating/Cooling SEER 15 Furnace

COMMENTS Deduction for consistent window type.

Ductwork, Air Devices and Thermostat Allowance for Louvertec rolling shutters. Page 1 of 4

$16.12

Chair Lift SYSTEMS Plumbing Fixtures 22 KW Instantaneous Water Heater Kitchen Sink (two compartment)

$1,600.00

Deduction for consistent window type. QUANTITY

CONVEYING Elevators Residential Elevator

1,720

$27,733.25

Electrical Morphosis Cost Database-07-09-24-expanded.xls Cost Database TOTALS

Allowance for air vents at generator.

COMMENTS

Allowance for that specified in power calcs, includes hood with integral microwave. Allowance for that specified in power calcs. Allowance for that specified in power calcs. Deduction for exterior and deck integration.

Carried for steel stanchion and cable rail. Deduction for factory fabrication and modularity.

Prefabricated off site as a single unit and delivered whole to site. Includes roof collector, embedded wall anchors, distribution and stub ups for electrical conduits, and rough-ins for plumbing lines, blockouts for electrical fixtures, and integrated ductwork.

Cost for non-collector locations only.

House each each Enter Unit Type

$26,610.00 $150.00 $1,200.00 $6.00

1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00

$26,610.00 $150.00 $2,400.00 $6.00

1 1 0 0

$26,610.00 $150.00 $0.00 $0.00

No of Stops Stops

$20,000.00

1.00

$20,000.00

$0.00

Stops

$10,000.00

1.00

$10,000.00

$0.00

$1,000.00

1.00

$1,000.00

$1,100.00

0.50

$550.00

Deductions for pre-fabricated off site rough-in.

EA Make It Right New EA Orleans, Louisiana January 2008 Schematic Design EA September 24, 2007 888 EA

$350.00 0.50 Architect: mOrphosis

$175.00

Deductions for pre-fabricated off site rough-in.

No of Fixtures

EA Units S.F. of Floor EA

$0.00

$0.00 Not carried. Could be alternate to access ramp.

$625.00

$5,000.00

$350.00

0.50

$175.00

Deductions for pre-fabricated off site rough-in.

$1,050.00

0.50

$525.00

$1,050.00

Deductions for pre-fabricated off site rough-in.

$1,300.00 0.50 $650.00 2 COMPONENT Adjusted Unit $1,500.00 Complexity 0.50 $750.00 1 Factor Cost Unit Cost Quanitity $3,500.00 1.00 $3,500.00 1

$1,300.00 $750.00 Extended Cost $3,500.00

S.F. of Floor

$5.00

0.50

$2.50

888

$2,220.00

S.F. of Floor

$8.00

0.50

$4.00

888

$3,552.00 $184,380.63

Deductions for pre-fabricated off site rough-in.

SYSTEM UNIT COST $6.44

QUANTITY 888

$4.00

888

SUB-TOTAL $5,720.00

Deductions for pre-fabricated off site rough-in. COMMENTS Carried for HVAC unit not specified. Deductions for pre-fabricated off site rough-in.

$3,552.00 Deductions for pre-fabricated off site rough-in. Page 3 of 4 $184,380.63

Cost for non-collector locations only.

Allowance for fabric filter mesh at roof collector location.

$0.00

$3.50 $5.00 $10.00 $4.00

COMMENTS

$3,000.00

$2,362.50 SYSTEM $0.00 Extended Cost $0.00 UNIT COST $5,832.00 $0.00 $0.00

$25.00 $50.00

S.F. of Floor SF SF SF SF S.F. of Ceiling SF

$14.00

$16,826.25 $630.00 $0.00

1.00 1.00

Each Opening EA EA EA EA EA EA S.F. of Partition SF S.F. of Wall SF SF

SUB-TOTAL

$10,713.78 $0.00

$25.00 $50.00

EA S.F. of Roof

QUANTITY

$9.38

Architect: mOrphosis

COMPONENT

UNIT COST

$18.29

$7.73 $12.00

Make It Right New Orleans, Louisiana January 2008 Schematic Design September 24, 2007 888

Allowance for Swisspearl integrally colored panels and furring strips. $710.00

$4,260.00

$5.13

696

$3,570.48

$1.22

2,745

$3,336.30

$10.00

$1.30

195

$253.50

$239.83

$3,597.50

Deduction for modular framing and layout.

Floor finish carried for bathrooms only. All other areas utilized polished concrete SABS $360.00 surface - included in SABS costing.

Allowance for open shelving at dining area.

Page 2 of 4

Morphosis Cost Database-07-09-24-expanded.xls Cost Database

Page 4 of 4