The San Juan Daily Star, the only paper with News Service in English in Puerto Rico, publishes 7 days a week, with a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday edition, along with a Weekend Edition to cover Friday, Saturday and Sunday.
In light of the recent declaration of a dengue epidemic by the island Department of Health, the Puerto Rico Vector Control Unit, a program of the Puerto Rico Science, Technology and Research Trust, is urging the public to take immediate preventive measures against the spread of dengue in the archipelago.
The directive -- Administrative Order 2024-589, signed Tuesday by Health Secretary Carlos Mellado López -- comes at a crucial time when community participation and individual actions are critical in combating the increase in cases.
Dengue, transmitted by the Aedes aegypti mosquito, poses a significant risk to public health. However, the prevention of the disease is possible through the adoption of simple and effective measures.
The Vector Control Unit emphasized the importance of eliminating mosquito breeding sites, avoiding the accumulation of water in containers and brushing the inside walls of containers to remove mosquito eggs, and eliminating tires and other containers that can serve as habitat for these vectors.
In addition, it is recommended that screens be installed on doors and windows, along with wearing appropriate clothing such as light-colored long sleeves and pants, and applying insect repellents as additional protective measures.
“The declaration of an epidemic is a call to action. Every person has the power to make a significant contribution to dengue prevention. By taking simple preventive measures, we can protect our families and communities from the spread of this virus,” said Dr. Julieanne Miranda, associate director of the Vector Control Unit, in a written statement. “Our team continues to work collaboratively with the Department of
Health on mosquito surveillance and control strategies, but community engagement is essential in this fight. Together, we can make a difference.”
Meanwhile on Tuesday, HealthproMed, a nonprofit organization and community health center, activated a plan to unite its efforts to prevent and combat dengue, and announced the availability of the dengue vaccine for the pediatric population, including minors who are part of the immigrant population.
HealthproMed Executive Director Ivonne Rivera, accompanied by the organization’s main clinical adviser, pediatrician Dr. Héctor Villanueva, announced that, following the declaration of the public health emergency due to dengue, “HealthproMed once again joins the efforts of the Puerto Rico Department of Health in protecting public health, this time against the Dengue epidemic.”
“Our commitment to public health is reflected in the work of our health professionals in the prevention and control of dengue,” Rivera said in a written statement. “So much so that we were honored last year by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Puerto Rico Department of Health for leading vaccination against dengue on the island.”
Villanueva detailed the indications for the dengue vaccine: “The dengue vaccine that we have available was approved for use in children aged 9 to 16 years with previous laboratory-confirmed infection, and who live in endemic areas like Puerto Rico.”
“It is part of the recommended vaccination schedule for children,” he said. “Dengvaxia, the only dengue vaccine approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and recommended for routine use by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, became available in 2022.”
Rivera added that most health plans cover routine recommended vaccines, which are eligible for the Medicaid program or covered for Plan Vital beneficiaries.
Dr. Melissa Marzán, the Health Department’s chief epidemiology officer of the Department of Health, reiterated the classification of the dengue epidemic as a public health emergency on the island.
“The latest report reveals an alarming increase in dengue cases, with an increase of 140% compared to the same period last year,” she said. “As of March 25, 2024, the Department of Health has reported 549 dengue cases under surveillance and 341 hospitalizations so far this year.”
More information about dengue vaccination at HealthproMed can be obtained by contacting 787-268-4171, ext. 4008.
Because the number of bodies being donated to science is dwindling, the Anatomical Donations Board of the University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus (RCM by its Spanish initials) is calling upon citizens to donate their bodies to help train the island’s future generation of health care professionals.
Donations Board Chairwoman Nivia Pérez Acevedo said that through the anatomical study of each donated body, around 420 students and health professionals receive training, education and the opportunity to carry out medical research each year.
“Each body is treated as a valuable gift that requires the highest care, respect, and gratitude for the selfless, altruistic gesture of donation,” said Pérez, who is also the interim associate dean of Biomedical Sciences at the School of Medicine and a professor in the RCM Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology. “Donating the body is an altruistic gesture that will benefit society through medicine and scientific research.”
As explained, the bodies donated to the board are used in medicine, dental medicine, physical and occupational therapy programs, master’s and doctoral programs in anatomy, sports and rehabilitation medicine, podiatry, pulmonology, obstetrics/gynecology, and training and research in medical residencies with emphasis on surgical and anatomical procedures, among others.
Despite its importance for teaching, the number of donations has decreased and in the past five years the
donations board has received 361 bodies in total. Of that amount, half were living donors, 24% were unclaimed bodies from the Institute of Forensic Sciences, 15% were donated by relatives of the deceased and 11% came from hospitals. There were no donations from nursing homes.
For this reason, Pérez called on citizens to make donations. In this way, not only RCM students will benefit, but also students from other institutions on the island such as Ponce Health Sciences, the Caguas School of Medicine and Central University of the Caribbean.
“Students gain invaluable experience and knowledge from the bodies donated to the Anatomical Donations Board,” Pérez said. “They acquire essential skills for their future practice by closely studying the structure of the
human body through direct contact since each body is different and unique. Each body donor becomes a source of knowledge.”
Those wishing to donate their bodies to science must know the following:
• Any person over 18 years of age in full use of their mental capacity can donate their body. There is no maximum age limit.
• You can register as a donor in several ways:
Call the board at 787-758-2525, ext. 1510 or 787751-5977.
Send an email to: juntadedonaciones.rcm@upr.edu
Visit the board from Monday to Friday, 8 a.m. to 3 p.m., at its UPR-RCM offices in the Dr. Guillermo Arbona Irizarry Building, 5th Floor Office A-543.
Start the process through the board’s donation form at https://www.123formbuilder.com/form-4574157/
• If you decide to donate your body, tell your family and friends. Carry your donor identification card with you. Tell your doctor and/or hospital that you are a body donor.
• Most religions support donation, considering it as a gift of life, health and knowledge for the benefit of all.
• A person’s family, caregiver or guardian can donate the body of a loved one to science once the doctor certifies the death.
• The results of studies carried out on bodies cannot be disclosed to family members or anyone else. They can only be considered for scientific evaluation and eventual publication in specialized journals, as long as the confidentiality of each donor’s identity is preserved.
In order to tackle domestic violence in Puerto Rico and expedite procedural transactions when a protection order is issued by responding quickly to the protection
of the victim, Sen. Keren Riquelme Cabrera announced Tuesday the filing of a package of measures, including Senate Bill 1445, to include in the Registry of Persons Convicted of Violations of the Prevention and the Intervention Act with the Domestic Violence (Law 54-1989) people who violate a protection order, as well as those convicted individuals who are in a diversion program.
The measure also creates a Rapid Response Code (QR Code), which will be displayed on signs located in public and private universities, along with other higher education entities, so that students can access the registry quickly.
“We are at an important moment in the fight against domestic violence, a social evil that we must eradicate,” Riquelme Cabrera said. “After evaluating a number of initiatives and proposals, we have developed these bills as part of a series of technological responses that are aimed at significantly improving prevention systems. The Registry of Violators of Law 54 is a cornerstone of prevention, which is why we are eliminating certain loopholes that it had, such as, for example, at this time it does not include people who violate a protection order [issued] under … Law
54. Likewise, it does not have those convicts who go to a diversion program; this legislation includes all of them.”
Acting Women’s Advocate Madeline Bermúdez Sanabria, highlighted the importance of augmenting the tools that help with the prevention of gender-based violence.
“Any initiative aimed at supporting victims of violence must be evaluated with the responsibility and sensitivity that this issue deserves,” she said. “Developing new tools that help a victim in seeking help and assistance is an initiative that we have always considered necessary and that has our support. We have seen how due to a lack of communication between the agencies, lives have unfortunately been lost, and this matter has to be addressed quickly, always making the well-being and safety of victims a priority. We are at a crucial moment and it is important that we all help eradicate this evil that affects our society so much.”
The registry was created by Law 59-2019 and currently has 1,769 convicts. The most common crime, with 610 instances, is the violation of Article 3.1 (ill treatment) in the form of a serious attempt.
TheJudge Daniel López González on Tuesday denied a request from lawyers representing suspended Ponce Mayor Luis Irizarry Pabón seeking to dismiss criminal and ethical charges against him, according to an announcement by the Office of the Special Independent Prosecutor (SIP Office).
Irizarry Pabón is facing charges for illicit enrichment under Article 251 of the Penal Code and for violating the Government Ethics Code. The decision means that the suspended mayor will now go to trial. The SIP Office filed charges against Irizarry Pabón for allegedly soliciting money from his employees to repay a $50,000 personal loan.
The resolution upheld that SIPs Zulma I. Fúster Troche, Ileana Agudo Calderón and Fabiola Acaró Porrata-Doria did not violate
requested by the defense is not evidence that benefits or is relevant or can exonerate the accused,” an extract of the document notes.
The mayor’s attorney, José Antonio Andreu Fuentes, had requested the dismissal of the case against Irizarry Pabón on the grounds that the affidavit of a witness before the Office of the Electoral Comptroller represents exculpatory evidence.
would have been no probable cause. Of course, and what the people gave was political funds.”
the canon of ethics. Lawyers for the mayor had accused them of failing to disclose information that could help their client.
“We have determined that the evidence
“Of course, because they hid the evidence in Rule 6 from us, because if they had given us that evidence in Rule 6, totally sculptural evidence, in all probability there would have been no probable cause,” Andreu Fuentes said at the time. “And those who were present here know that Rule 6 made this same statement, and by hiding the evidence from us, we could not have the document that proved it at hand. But if we had proven it, there
Fúster Troche had said: “What the defense is doing is an act of total desperation. Here, in the face of the forceful testimony that you heard this morning, what the defense does is use any excuse to take a breath and gain time. That’s what we’re seeing here, a delay of justice brought about by the defense in this case.”
She referred to testimony from Ponce’s former director of Municipal Public Works, Oscar Iván Nazario Segarra, who had described during the preliminary hearing how he paid the personal loan of $50,000 at the request of Irizarry Pabón.
The witnesses were excused until April 10, when the date was set for the continuation of the case in the preliminary hearing stage.
Political candidates from the Citizen Victory Movement (MVC by its Spanish initials) and Dignity Project (PD) who were disqualified from running in the election by a recent court ruling are filing an appeal today, the STAR learned. State Elections Commission (SEC) Interim Chairwoman Jessika Padilla Rivera, meanwhile, rejected rumors that she intervened in the court ruling that resulted in the disqualification of some six candidates from the MVC and PD.
“I would like to know what statements I made to any candidate, to any representative, even to the Electoral Commissioner, who was the one we work with weekly, what statements I made that could have misled any of the candidates or the Electoral Commissioner,” Padilla Rivera said in a radio interview. “I have not made any statements regarding whether or not the party had to collect endorsements, neither to them nor to any party.”
A judge recently disqualified the candidates because they had failed to obtain endorsements as required by the Electoral Code.
MVC Rep. Mariana Nogales Molinelli said she believes the Appeals Court, where they will go today, will reverse Judge Anthony Cuevas’ decision.
“I’m sure you’re going to see something that Judge Anthony Cuevas says and that I know exists, but I can’t tell you,” she said.
Padilla Rivera, meanwhile, refuted allegations made by former San Juan Mayor Héctor Luis Acevedo to the effect that the SEC has yet to register numerous young voters in the island’s public schools to vote. The government closed numerous Juntas de Inscripcion Permanente, or Permanent Voting Registration Board offices, limiting voting registration.
Padilla Rivera said the SEC has visited more than 100 educational institutions so far in 2024.
“I don’t know where Mr. Acevedo gets his information from. That information was not requested from the Commission,” she
said. “We have visited over 100 schools […], we have visited elderly homes, we have visited churches, fairs, on Saturdays we are registering voters. Currently, more than 18,873 students are enrolled to vote.”
Agriculture (DA) Secretary Ramón González Beiró announced on Tuesday that as a precautionary measure he has established additional requirements for issuing import permits for cattle and has stopped importations until the situation stabilizes, after being alerted by the federal government about the health of cattle in the states of Texas and Kansas with possible avian influenza infections.
“At this time, our staff has already inspected the cattle that we had previously received from Texas and the United States and there are no signs of infection so far,” González Beiró said in a written statement following the issuance of
Administrative Order 2024-27.
“Of course, we are in communication with federal agencies and are evaluating livestock to ensure the quality of the animals that are reaching our population.”
The DA chief said his agency has received communications from the Texas Animal Health Commission alerting them about the situation impacting the health of livestock. Some of the symptoms of the disease include decreased milk production, impact on the quality of milk produced, decreased feed intake, diarrhea and fever, among others. However, the risk to the population is low.
“As we constantly receive animals from the United States, we must take precautionary measures to prevent the entry of
the disease into Puerto Rico,” González Beiró said. “In view of this situation, under the provisions of Law 69 of June 18, 1957 and the import requirements established by the Department’s Agrological Laboratory, in addition to halting importation for the next few days until the situation improves, it will be necessary for the applicant for an Import Permit to comply with all the requirements established so far. In addition, it is necessary to report or certify the farm of origin of the cattle. All applications will be notified for consent before being approved.”
It should be noted that according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, tests carried out on livestock did not detect any change in the virus that could make it spread more easily to the population.
Amassive cargo ship leaving the Port of Baltimore lost power and issued a mayday call shortly before striking a major bridge early Tuesday, giving officials a brief chance to stop cars and try to evacuate the span before it fell into the river.
By Tuesday morning, six construction workers who had been fixing potholes on the Francis Scott Key Bridge remained missing as divers and other emergency workers on boats and helicopters continued to search for them. Two others had been rescued.
Gov. Wes Moore of Maryland called the episode a terrible accident. “We haven’t seen any credible evidence of a terrorist attack,” he said. The bridge is part of Interstate 695.
Initially, officials feared that drivers were submerged in their cars in the Patapsco River. But the warning from the Dali, a Singapore-flagged vessel, gave officials enough time to stop traffic at both ends of the bridge, according to several federal and Maryland officials.
The people who blocked traffic “undoubtedly saved lives,” President Joe Biden said from the White House on Tuesday. He added that the Coast Guard would continue search-and-rescue efforts and that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers would clear the channel
to help reopen Baltimore to ship traffic. “We’re going to rebuild that port together,” he said.
Here are more details:
— Moore declared a state of emergency and said his
office was in close communication with Pete Buttigieg, the U.S. transportation secretary. The National Transportation Safety Board said it was investigating.
Scott
in Baltimore, Md. on Tuesday, March 26, 2024. Six construction workers who had been fixing potholes on the Francis Scott Key Bridge remained missing on Tuesday afternoon as divers and other emergency workers on boats and helicopters searched for them. The National Transportation Safety Board, which is leading the inquiry, said its investigators were holding back while the search continued. (Erin Schaff/The New York Times)
— Despite the ship’s mayday call, the road repair crew remained on the bridge, with its vehicles parked on the span, authorities said. One of the two rescued construction workers was in the hospital Tuesday morning.
— The Dali, a 948-foot-long cargo vessel, hit a pillar of the bridge around 1:30 a.m., the ship’s owners said. All crew members, including two harbor pilots who were directing the vessel at the time of the crash, were accounted for, and there were no injuries on the ship, the owners said.
— The Dali had left Baltimore at 1 a.m. and was bound for Colombo, Sri Lanka, according to MarineTraffic, a maritime data platform.
— An inspection of the Dali last year at a port in Chile reported that the vessel had a deficiency related to “propulsion and auxiliary machinery.” The inspection, conducted on June 27 at the port of San Antonio, specified that the deficiency concerned gauges and thermometers. A spokesperson for the Dali’s owners declined to comment on the report.
— The bridge was named for Francis Scott Key, the Maryland-born author of the American national anthem, “The Star-Spangled Banner.” The structure opened in 1977. Some 30,000 commuters drive on it each day, Maryland officials said.
The New York judge presiding over one of Donald Trump’s criminal trials imposed a gag order Tuesday that prohibits him from attacking witnesses, prosecutors and jurors, the latest effort to rein in the former president’s wrathful rhetoric about his legal opponents.
The judge, Juan Manuel Merchan, imposed the order at the request of the Manhattan district attorney’s office, which brought the case against Trump. The district attorney, Alvin Bragg, has accused Trump of covering up a potential sex scandal during and after his 2016 campaign.
The ruling comes on the heels of Merchan setting an April 15 trial date, rejecting Trump’s latest effort to delay the proceeding. It will mark the first criminal prosecution of a former American president.
Trump recently clinched the Republican presidential nomination for the third time, and with three other criminal cases against him mired in delay, the Manhattan case could be the only one to go to trial before voters head to the polls in November.
Under the judge’s gag order, Trump cannot make, or
direct others to make, statements about witnesses’ roles in the case. Trump is also barred from commenting on prosecutors and court staff as well as their relatives — if the statements were intended to interfere with their work on the case.
In seeking the gag order last month, Bragg’s prosecutors highlighted Trump’s “long-standing history of attacking witnesses, investigators, prosecutors, judges and others involved in legal proceedings against him” — comments that the judge seized on in his ruling.
“His statements were threatening, inflammatory, denigrating,” Merchan wrote in the Tuesday order.
Trump, for example, has taken aim at Michael Cohen, his onetime fixer and one of Bragg’s main witnesses, calling him a “liar” and a “rat.”
In a rambling and angry post on his social media site Tuesday, Trump made an ominous reference to Cohen, claiming without explanation that his former fixer was “death.” He also referred to one of Bragg’s prosecutors in pejorative terms.
Both comments would now arguably violate the gag order. In another post, Trump took aim at Merchan and his family, claiming that the judge “hates me,” although those comments do not appear to cross the line the judge has now set.
An aerial view of the cargo ship that hit the Francis
Key Bridge
President Joe Biden, amping up a populist pitch in his reelection campaign, has repeatedly said he would raise taxes on the wealthy and corporations to make them pay their “fair share.”
Republicans say Biden has “an unquenchable thirst for taxing the American people.” His Republican opponent in the election, former President Donald Trump, said recently that Biden was “going to give you the greatest, biggest, ugliest tax hike in the history of our country.”
So it might come as a surprise that, in just over three years in office, Biden has cut taxes overall.
The math is straightforward. An analysis
( 787 ) 647-8225
Celebrando en este año 2024 mis 30 años de servicio en las bienes raíces. Agradezco y comparto este logro con mis amigos, clientes, colaboradores, y con mi familia, que siempre me han apoyado y confiado en mí... ¡Bendiciones!
VENTA DE PROPIEDADES CAGUAS-HACIENDA
SAN JOSE- SECCIÓN
CAUTIVA - Prop. de esquina modelo grande 4H, 5 1/2 B, family, cocina completamente equipada. Se vende con todos los muebles, enseres, y unidades de aire. Piscina, planta eléctrica. ¡Vive como en un resort!
VENTA APARTAMENTOS
credit for parents. It provided $1,400 direct checks for low- and middle-income Americans, which were technically advance payments on tax credits.
Biden has partly offset all of his tax cuts with a pair of major new levies. Corporations are now required to pay a tax when they buy back their own stock. Another tax requires large corporations to pay a minimum 15% federal income tax, even if they qualify for deductions that would have made them owe less.
The president has also directed tens of billions of dollars to the IRS to help crack down on high earners and corporations that evade paying the taxes they owe — an effort that will increase federal tax revenues but does not increase tax rates.
But the president has struggled to persuade Congress — including a sufficient number of Democrats, in the two years his party controlled the House and the Senate on his watch — to sign on to a fleet of other proposed tax increases.
$750,000 Precio
CAGUAS-URB. TURABO
GARDENS I- 4H, 2B, sala, comedor y amplia cocina, buen patio con pequeña terraza, marq ext. y balcón. $149,000
VENTA COMERCIAL
HUMACAO - PUEBLO
SAN JUAN -TERRAZAS
DE SAN JUAN 3H, 2B, 2 parking, fac. rec. con gimnasio y piscina con servicio de agua y luz siempre. $263,000 OMO
CAGUAS-CONDOMINIO
BORINQUEN PARKEstá ubicado en el primer piso. Tiene 3H, 1B, S,C,C, laundry, balcón, un parking (1), control de acceso
Oficina comercial en el primer nivel, ideal para médicos, abogados, contables, etc. y en el segundo nivel unidad de vivienda de 3H, 1 baño. $110,000 Aprovecha. ¡Llama para cita!
$100,000
TENGO CLIENTES CUALIFICADOS
POR LA BANCA PARA COMPRA Y EXTRAORDINARIOS CLIENTES PARA ALQUILER Y PARA COMPRAS CASH
prepared for The New York Times by the UrbanBrookings Tax Policy Center, a Washington think tank that studies fiscal issues, shows that the tax cuts Biden has signed for individuals and corporations are larger than the tax increases he has imposed on big corporations and their shareholders.
The analysis estimates that the tax changes Biden has ushered into law will amount to a net cut of about $600 billion over four years and slightly more than that over a full decade.
“It’s reasonable to conclude from those numbers that the Biden tax policy hasn’t been some kind of radical tax-raising program,” said Benjamin R. Page, a senior fellow at the center and author of the analysis.
The analysis strictly looks at changes to taxes over the course of Biden’s presidency, including some direct benefits to people and businesses that flow through the tax code. It does not measure the effects of inflation or certain regulations, which Republicans sometimes label “tax hikes” since they can raise costs for companies and individuals.
It also does not measure the social or economic benefits of Biden’s spending policies, or of his regulatory efforts meant to help consumers, like cracking down on so-called junk fees and limiting the cost of insulin and other medication.
Instead, the analysis provides a comprehensive look at what Biden has done to the tax
code, and how those policies add up.
It is clear by that measure that his record has not matched his own ambitions for taxing the rich and big companies — or Republicans’ attempts to caricature him as a tax-and-spend liberal.
That’s largely because Biden has struggled to pass his most ambitious tax-raising plans. “It’s what can be got through Congress and signed,” Page said. “They were subject to compromise.”
A White House spokesperson, Michael Kikukawa, said in an email that Biden was “proud to have cut taxes for the middle class and working families while cracking down on wealthy tax cheats and making big corporations pay more of their fair share.”
The president’s enacted tax cuts include incentives for companies to manufacture and install solar panels, wind turbines and other technologies meant to reduce fossil fuel emissions, which are a centerpiece of the climate law he signed in 2022. That law also contained tax cuts for people who buy certain low-emission technologies, such as electric vehicles and heat pumps.
Biden gave tax breaks to semiconductor factories as well, as part of a bipartisan advanced manufacturing bill he signed earlier that year.
The president also included temporary tax breaks for individuals and certain businesses in his 2021 economic stimulus bill, the American Rescue Plan. The legislation expanded a tax
Biden’s budget requests have been filled with ideas for taxing high earners and corporations. Those have failed to gain traction on Capitol Hill. His most recent budget includes about $5 trillion of tax increases spread over a decade, including long-standing Democratic plans like raising the corporate income tax rate to 28% from 21%.
Republicans assailed Biden for tax plans they say will cripple the economy. Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, chair of the Budget Committee, said in a hearing Thursday that Biden believed “in more government and more spending and more taxing as the answers to the problems that our country faces.”
Biden has emphasized his tax proposals in recent weeks, including during his State of the Union address. The president has repeatedly said he would not raise taxes on people earning less than $400,000 a year, while calling on millionaires and billionaires to pay more.
He has also vaunted his tax record, as he did last week in Las Vegas. “In 2020, 55 of the largest Fortune 500 companies made $40 billion in profits,” Biden said. “They paid zero in federal taxes. Not anymore.”
Biden was referring to the corporate minimum tax created by the Inflation Reduction Act, the 2022 law that also included the climate-related tax incentives. The Treasury Department has struggled to implement that tax, which companies faced for the first time last year.
The department does not yet have data on how many corporations will pay the tax for 2023, officials said this week.
U.S. stocks were little changed on Tuesday, giving up modest gains late in the session, as investors awaited economic data in a holiday-shortened week to gauge the Federal Reserve’s policy path.
Stocks struggled for upward momentum even as Tesla gained after CEO Elon Musk unveiled the electric-vehicle maker’s one-month trial of its Full Self-Driving technology to existing and new customers in the United States. The stock is up nearly 5% for the week but remains down nearly 28% for the year.
The focus remains on a key reading of the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCE), the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge. The data is due on Friday, when U.S. markets will be shut for the Good Friday holiday.
The index is expected to have risen 0.4% in February and 2.5% annually. Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy components, is estimated to have advanced 0.3% last month, keeping the annual pace at 2.8%, economists polled by Reuters said.
“The big number is Friday. That’s the number everyone’s going to pay attention to and whatever happens in the meantime is going to be noise, so I don’t anticipate a whole lot happening until we get that data point,” said Stephen Massocca, senior vice president at Wedbush Securities in San Francisco.
“The one thing that would be death, death for this market is if somehow something came out that led people to believe that the fed funds rate has not topped out yet. If for some reason people thought the Fed was even giving an inkling to raising rates further, stand out of the way.”
On the economic front, orders for long-lasting U.S. manufactured goods increased more than expected in February, while business spending on equipment showed tentative signs of recovery. In a separate report, the Conference Board said its consumer confidence index was little changed at 104.7 in March.
nalysts expect the PCE data to show inflation gathered heat in February, with prices rising by 0.4% after January’s 0.3% gain. However, so-called “core” price inflation, which strips away volatile food and energy prices, is seen cooling to 0.3% from 0.4%.
Year-on-year, headline and core PCE price indexes are expected land at 2.5% and 2.8%, respectively, still hovering within one percentage point of the Fed’s average annual 2% target.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 123.25 points, or 0.31%, to 39,352.65, the S&P 500 lost 8.37 points, or 0.16%, to 5,225.81 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 18.92 points, or 0.12%, to 16,409.90.
European stocks traded narrowly around unchanged after Friday’s record highs as market participants digested dovish sentiment from major central banks.
The pan-European STOXX 600 index rose 0.13% and MSCI’s gauge of stocks across the globe shed 0.11%.
According to preliminary data, the S&P 500 lost 14.09 points, or 0.27%, to end at 5,204.10 points, while the Nasdaq Composite lost 68.77 points, or 0.42%, to 16,320.64. The
Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 19.06 points, or 0.05%, to 39,294.58.
The three major U.S. indexes hit record highs last week after the Fed maintained its projection for three interest-rate cuts this year.
Markets have been slowly increasing expectations the central bank will cut rates by at least 25 basis points in June, currently pricing in a 70.4% chance, the CME’s FedWatch Tool showed, up from 59.2% last week.
Trump Media & Technology group surged as it kicked off its first day of trading after completing a reverse merger with a blank check firm.
By GENEVIEVE GLATSKY and ISAYEN HERRERA
First, it was María Corina Machado, a popular former legislator. Then, it was supposed to be Corina Yoris, a little-known philosophy professor. But now, an opposition coalition has been blocked from fielding any candidate to run against President Nicolás Maduro in elections scheduled for July.
The coalition of opposing political parties, the Democratic Unity Roundtable, had hoped that uniting behind a single candidate would make it a viable challenger to Maduro.
But on Monday, a national electoral commission controlled by allies of Maduro used a technical maneuver to prevent the coalition from putting a candidate on
the ballot. It was the last day for presidential candidates to register for the July vote.
As a result Maduro, whose repressive rule has left Venezuela in financial ruin and helped push out roughly one-fourth of its population, is increasingly likely to hold onto power.
The Democratic Unity Roundtable announced last week that it had agreed to put forward Yoris, 80, to run against Maduro in a show of unity after the country’s highest court in January had barred Machado from the ballot. The former lawmaker was widely considered to be a significant threat to Maduro.
The naming of Yoris briefly raised hopes that a free and fair election might be possible. But as the week progressed, Yoris said she was unable to access the digital platform set up by the country’s
electoral authority to register as a candidate.
Every authorized political organization in Venezuela is given a code to access the electoral platform. But both Yoris’ party, A New Era, as well as the Democratic Unity Roundtable coalition, said that their codes were not working, preventing them from registering not just Yoris but any candidate at all.
“We have exhausted all avenues,” said Yoris in a news conference Monday morning. “The whole country is left with no choice if I can’t sign up.”
As the day went on confusion ensued amid signs that behind the scenes the government was trying to pull the levers of power and ensure an electoral field that would give Maduro a better chance of winning.
Just minutes before the registration deadline, the New Era party inexplicably was allowed to register a different candidate: Manuel Rosales, the party’s founder and governor of the populous state of Zulia, whose entry into the race was seen by political analysts as rubber-stamped by Maduro.
“There is no doubt that Maduro wants to choose who to run against and is afraid to run against anyone who represents a threat to him,” said Tamara Taraciuk Broner, who researches Venezuela for the Inter-American Dialogue, a Washingtonbased research organization.
Rosales, in a speech Tuesday, said he intended to run a rigorous campaign, vowing to “lead the biggest rebellion of votes that has ever existed.”
Two other candidates registered Monday, bringing the total number running in the election to 12, including Maduro. Most are considered close to the president and none is regarded a serious challenger.
The confusion over who is and is not allowed to run is a deliberate tactic of the Maduro administration to sow distrust among the electorate and divide the vote, according to Rafael Uzcátegui, a sociologist and a director of the Peace Laboratory, a human rights organization based in Caracas, Venezuela.
Machado, in a news conference Tuesday, said Rosales had been chosen by the
government and that she was still throwing her support behind Yoris.
“These are very difficult hours, there are deep disappointments, there is a lot of anger, there is a lot of indignation. Many people feel that they were cheated.” she said. “What we warned for many months ended up happening: The regime chose its candidates.”
There could still be ways for the opposition to mount a challenge to Maduro. Machado could seek an extension of the deadline to register a candidate. Candidates can still name replacements in the coming weeks, leaving open the possibility that Rosales or someone else might step aside. A third option, said Dib, is that the opposition could unite around Rosales.
Despite the setbacks, Machado said the opposition was not giving up.
“Nobody is taking us out of the electoral route,” Machado said. “They are the ones who want to shut it down. They are the ones who want to take us out and they are not going to succeed.”
In October, Maduro signed an accord with the country’s opposition and agreed to work toward a free and fair presidential vote. Maduro said he would hold an election before the end of this year, and, in exchange, the United States, in a sign of good will, lifted some economic sanctions.
Days later, Machado won more than 90% of the vote to choose an opposition candidate, in a primary election run by a commission without the involvement of the government. The decisive results underscored her popularity and raised the prospect that she could beat Maduro in a general election.
Three months later, the country’s top court, filled with government loyalists, declared Machado ineligible to run over what the judges claimed were financial irregularities that occurred when she was a national legislator.
Six of Machado’s campaign aides have been arrested in recent weeks and six more have arrest warrants against them and are in hiding. Men on motorbikes have attacked supporters at her events.
The government has not commented on the opposition’s inability to register.
Corina Yoris, the opposition candidate endorsed by María Corina Machado, speaks at a news conference in Caracas, Venezuela, on Monday, March 25, 2024. The government’s moves to bar an opposition coalition from fielding a presidential candidate makes it more likely that President Nicolás Maduro can retain his repressive hold on power. (Adriana Loureiro Fernandez/The New York Times)Migrants were streaming across the U.S. southern border in record numbers, international rail bridges were abruptly shut down and official ports of entry closed.
Desperate for help in December, President Joe Biden called President Andrés Manuel López Obrador of Mexico, who told him to quickly send a delegation to the Mexican capital, according to several U.S. officials.
The White House rushed to do so. Soon after, Mexico beefed up enforcement. Illegal border crossings into the United States plummeted by January.
As immigration moves to the forefront of the U.S. presidential campaign, Mexico has emerged as a key player on an issue with the potential to sway the election, and the White House has worked hard to preserve López Obrador’s cooperation.
The administration says publicly that its diplomacy has been a success.
But behind closed doors, some senior Biden officials have come to see López Obrador as an unpredictable partner, who they say isn’t doing enough to consistently control his own southern border or police routes being used by smugglers to bring millions of migrants to the United States, according to several U.S. and Mexican officials. None of them would speak on the record about delicate diplomatic relations.
“We aren’t getting the cooperation we should be getting,” said John Feeley, former deputy chief of mission in Mexico from 2009 to 2012. Feeley said the two countries did more joint patrols and investigations to secure the border during the Obama administration.
“I know what it looks like when there is genuine cooperation,” Feeley said, “as opposed to what we have now, which is being touted as great cooperation but I think is bupkis.”
While in office, President Donald Trump used the threat of tariffs to coerce López Obrador into implementing his crackdown on migration.
Biden needs Mexico just as much, but has taken a different approach, focusing instead on avoiding conflict with the powerful and sometimes volatile Mexican leader in hopes it will preserve his cooperation.
“AMLO has correctly assessed his leverage and has acknowledged that we’re using ours,” said Juan Gonzalez, Biden’s former top Latin America adviser, using López Obrador’s nickname.
Liz Sherwood-Randall, U.S. homeland security adviser, said that the White House works “collaboratively at the highest levels with the government of Mexico,” adding: “President Lopez Obrador has been a critically important partner to President Biden.”
Since 2022, Mexico has added hundreds of immigration checkpoints and increased enforcement personnel tenfold, according to figures provided by the U.S. State Department. Mexico is also detaining more migrants than at any point in recent history.
A shelter for those seeking asylum in Tijuana, Mexico, on Feb. 14, 2024. Immigration is a key issue for voters in the U.S. election, giving Mexico immense power to potentially shape the vote. (Guillermo Arias/The New York Times)
Yet, the numbers arriving at the southern border have remained stubbornly high. There were more than 2 million illegal border crossings in each of the past two fiscal years, twice as many as in 2019, the busiest year for apprehensions under Trump.
The lull at the start of this year was still one of the highest January months on record for illegal crossings, according to U.S. federal data. Apprehensions ticked up again in February.
In Mexico, officials say they have reached the limit of what they are able to achieve in the face of an extraordinary influx that has overwhelmed their country, too.
López Obrador has pushed the White House to commit more development aid to Latin American countries, to address the issues that cause migrants to leave in the first place.
“We do want for the root causes to be attended to, for them to be seriously looked at,” he told CBS’ “60 Minutes” in an interview that aired Sunday. When asked whether he would continue to secure the border even if the United States didn’t do what he asked, López Obrador said, “Yes, because our relationship is very important.”
Migration has spiked because of factors difficult for any one government to control: persistent poverty, raging violence, the effects of climate change and the lingering impact of the coronavirus pandemic that have left people desperate for any chance at survival.
Yet Mexican officials also blame American policies, saying migrants have an incentive to come to the United States because the asylum system is so backlogged that migrants have a good chance of staying in the country for years until their case has been decided.
In recent months, the authorities in Tijuana have raided hotels and safe houses, increased security at official crossings and installed new checkpoints along a once-deserted section of the border near the city where migrants were passing through a gap in the wall.
Nothing worked for long.
The authorities’ crackdown has only put migrants in greater danger, aid groups say, leading smugglers to take people on riskier routes through the vast desert, where they often get lost and are found dehydrated.
One night in February, a smuggler dropped a group of 18 people miles from the border, telling them they would quickly find a gap in the wall. In the darkness, the group got lost and walked for hours until finally crossing into California and making it to a makeshift camp where migrants often squeeze into portable bathrooms for shelter.
Two-year-old Denver Gonzalez could not stop sobbing.
“I am cold, I want to sleep,” the boy screamed repeatedly, as his father wrapped his tiny frame in blankets donated by a local volunteer.
“You pressure them at one point, and they go to another place,” said David Pérez Tejada, head of the Baja California office of Mexico’s National Immigration Institute, referring to the smugglers. “It’s all a game of cat and mouse, and it is extremely difficult to control this.”
The White House has pushed the Mexican government to increase deportations, implement visa restrictions for more countries to make it difficult to enter Mexico and bolster security forces at its southern border.
Since 2022, the Mexican government has added hundreds of immigration checkpoints, bolstered security along train routes used by migrants to travel north and increased enforcement personnel tenfold, according to figures provided by the U.S. State Department. Mexico is also detaining more migrants than at any point in recent history.
Yet truckloads of migrants continue to drive up through the country, in part because smugglers often pay off the checkpoint authorities, U.S. officials say.
The Biden administration wants Mexico to increase deportations. Mexico’s foreign ministry said last week it had reached an agreement with Venezuela to deport migrants and help them find jobs.
The White House has also pressed Mexico to do more of what some officials call “decompression,” which involves transporting people away from the border to somewhere deep in the country.
“People are being detained by Mexican authorities and sent to random cities in the south,” said Erika Pinheiro, executive director of Al Otro Lado, or “To the Other Side,” a humanitarian group. “Forcing them to trek back north, pay bribes to authorities and take all those risks all over again is inhumane.”
An
flag
reflected in a side view mirror of a new Jeep SUV with Plug-In Hybrid Technology during an Environmental Protection Agency event in Washington, on March 20, 2024. The Biden camp elevated Trump’s ‘bloodbath’ rant against their car-industry policies and then set up the ripest possible policy target for his next round of attacks, Ross Douthat writes. (Pete Kiehart/The New York Times)
By ROSS DOUTHATIf you believe President Joe Biden’s aides and allies, he intends to fight the 2024 election primarily on the threat that Donald Trump poses to American democracy. In their view, this worked in 2020, when Biden promised to protect the “soul of the nation” from Trump’s depredations, and again in the 2022 midterms, when Biden made the threat to democracy his closing argument and Democrats then overperformed. So there’s no reason it can’t work just one more time.
By the time November rolls around, Biden’s longtime
Dr. Jesús R. Sánchez Colón DMD
Dra. Kim N. Ocasio Cabrera DMD Dentistas
Notifican el cierre permanente de su oficina ubicada en la Calle Baldorioty #4 esq. Celis Aguilera, en Caguas efectivo el 29 de Febrero de 2024. Nuestros pacientes podrán recoger sus expedientes en la oficina entre las 8:00 am y la 1:00 pm de lunes a viernes hasta el 4 de Abril del 2024.
AL TERMINAR ESTE PERIODO, LOS EXPEDIENTES NO RECOGIDOS SERÁN DESTRUIDOS.
Tel. 787-743-5767 • 787-744-2095 oficinadental2265@gmail.com
adviser Mike Donilon told The New Yorker’s Evan Osnos recently, “the focus will become overwhelming on democracy. I think the biggest images in people’s minds are going to be of Jan. 6.”
I have been unsure how seriously we should take this kind of talk. Biden’s argument about democratic norms did seem to pay off in some key races in 2022, but I’m less convinced that it made the difference in 2020, at least relative to Biden’s promise to be a steady hand and his reputation for ideological moderation. And either way, 2024 is a different context still, in which Biden appears to be struggling most with disaffected working-class voters, a constituency that you would expect to respond more strongly to material appeals than to highminded arguments about civics.
To the extent that the White House knows this, we should probably take quotes like Donilon’s with a grain of salt. Maybe he was just dispatched to manage Biden’s liberal base, to preach the gospel of anti-Trumpism to a liberal publication’s readers while someone else gets to work on the more traditional economic appeals to swing voters.
But the past week has given us a good illustration of what it would look like if the White House fully believed in Donilon’s argument, and regarded its invocations of Jan. 6 as a potent alternative to the usual forms of outreach and moderation.
First you had the zeal with which the president’s campaign latched onto Trump’s comments, at an Ohio rally, about the “blood bath” that would supposedly follow Biden’s reelection. In context, the term “blood bath” definitely referred to a predicted collapse of the U.S. auto industry if Biden gets another term, and arguably predicted some form of general chaos or disaster. But it was immediately elevated and interpreted by Biden (or his social media ghostwriter) as proof that Trump “wants another Jan. 6.”
Then, just as the great “blood bath” debate began dying down, Biden’s EPA announced sweeping new emissions rules intended to accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles, taking their sales from around 8% of the U.S. market today to 56% in 2032.
These rules have been in the works for some time, and from the point of view of climate activists and internal Democratic Party politics, their substance represents a political compromise, wherein the biggest shift is pushed off by a few years and hybrids as well as fully electric cars count toward the target.
From the point of view of swing-voter outreach in a presidential election year, however, the new rules seem like a pretty reckless bet. Explicitly seeking the rapid disappearance of the kinds of automobiles used by the vast majority of Americans would be politically fraught under any circumstances. It’s even more fraught in an election where states like Michigan hold the key to an Electoral College victory.
And it is especially fraught at a time when higher interest rates have made automobile loans more expensive for the American consumer — who is in effect now being told by an unpopular incumbent president: “If you like your car, I don’t
want you to keep it.”
To summarize: First, Trump made an apocalyptic statement about the effects of Biden’s policies on the auto industry. Then the Biden team eagerly overhyped that statement as proof of Trump’s unfitness. Then the Biden administration rolled out a plan to radically transform the auto industry, which even if it worked as intended would, as a newsroom colleague reported, “require enormous changes in manufacturing, infrastructure, technology, labor, global trade and consumer habits.”
In other words, the Biden camp elevated Trump’s rant against its car industry policies and then set up the ripest possible policy target for his next round of attacks.
This is probably just an instance of an administration’s political arm and its policy shop operating without any especially savvy coordination. But it’s a good case study of how a “Jan. 6 trumps everything” theory of 2024 could go badly wrong — by encouraging a fatal insouciance about the material concerns of working-class Americans on the theory that any Trumpian attempt to exploit those concerns can be preemptively defused by casting the former president as a fascist.
The path to a Biden victory involves making the case against Trump on anti-authoritarian grounds and material grounds at the same time. Whereas imagining that the antiauthoritarian card is powerful enough to let you get away with unpopular liberal activism on other issues seems like the likeliest path to a Biden defeat.say: Torture is not normal,” he tweeted Sunday. “Torture as a phenomenon should not
OPM y ADFAN orientarán a personas de edad avanzada sobre violencia de género
S
AN JUAN – Mediante un acuerdo colaborativo, la Oficina de la Procuraduría de las Mujeres (OPM) y el Departamento de la Familia aunaron esfuerzos para que la OPM brinde talleres de violencia de género en los Centro de Actividades Múltiples para Personas de Edad Avanzada (CAMPEA) en Aguadilla, Aguada, Arecibo, Bayamón, Cidra, Guayama, Juana Díaz, Lares y Yabucoa.
“La violencia de género se extiende a todos los grupos de población. Las personas de edad avanzada son un demográfico sumamente vulnerable que necesitan herramientas y recursos que los puedan ayudar a identificar este patrón y cómo denunciarlo. Agradezco a la secretaria de Departamento de la Familia por su acostumbrada disposición para ayudar mediante la educación y la orientación”, manifestó la licenciada Madeline Bermúdez Sanabria, procu -
radora interina de la Mujer en declaraciones escritas.
Los talleres irán dirigidos a: identificar factores de riesgo asociados con la violencia de género en este grupo demográfico, como la dependencia, el aislamiento social y la vulnerabilidad física; educar sobre las señales específicas de la violencia de género en los adultos mayores, como el aislamiento, la intimidación o el control financiero; proporcionar técnicas para abordar el tema de la violencia de género de manera empática, sensible y compasiva, facilitando una comunicación asertiva con los adultos mayores; informar sobre recursos disponibles para ayudar a los adultos mayores víctimas de género, incluyendo líneas de ayuda, albergues y servicios legales especializados para adultos mayores.
También, los seminarios tendrán el propósito de capacitar a los empleados y familiares para colaborar en empoderar a los adultos mayores afectados, brindándoles apoyo emocional y opciones para identificar ayuda, al igual que promover y fomentar el que las comunidades puedan identificar la violencia de género en adultos mayores y la importancia de referir e intervenir de inmediato.
Según el acuerdo colaborativo, la OPM también
adiestrará, mediante nueve talleres, a empleados del área de la Administración y Prevención a la Comunidad de (ADFAN) para que estos a su vez se conviertan en educadores y puedan ofrecer los talleres relacionados a la violencia de género en el adulto mayor, en modalidad “Train The Trainer”, con el propósito que puedan continuar ofreciendo los talleres en distintas fechas y localidades para ayudar a erradicar la violencia de género.
“En el Departamento de la Familia nos mantenemos desarrollando alianzas clave para atender los problemas que nos afectan como sociedad. La violencia de género es un problema que nos afecta a todos y eso incluye a nuestros adultos mayores. Por tal razón, es imprescindible continuar educando tanto a nuestros profesionales de servicio como a nuestros participantes en un tema tan relevante. Agradezco a la procuradora y a su equipo de trabajo por unirse al DF en este esfuerzo, que busca lograr combatir la violencia de género en la población de adultos mayores que reside en la Isla”, añadió por su parte la secretaria del Departamento de la Familia, Ciení Rodríguez.
Por su parte, la administradora de la Administración de Familias y Niños (ADFAN), Glenda Gerena Ríos, subrayó que “este acuerdo es un reflejo de nuestro compromiso con mejorar la calidad del cuidado de salud para nuestras poblaciones más vulnerables: los adultos mayores. El bienestar integral de adultos mayores es un derecho y una responsabilidad compartida. Juntos, podemos hacerle justicia a esta población, aportando al desarrollo de un sistema de cuidado que transforme vidas y fortalezca comunidades”.
CATAÑO – El gobernador Pedro Rafael Pierluisi Urrutia, junto al secretario del Departamento de la Vivienda, William Rodríguez Rodríguez y el director ejecutivo de la Autoridad de los Puertos, Joel Pizá Batiz, anunciaron el martes la asignación de 85.3 millones de dólares para la reconstrucción del muelle Army Terminal.
El proyecto se financiará tras la firma de un acuerdo entre Vivienda y Puertos mediante el Programa para la Mitigación en la Infraestructura (CDBG-MIT).
“Nuestros puertos son parte de la infraestructura crítica y necesaria para la economía y el bienestar de nuestra gente. Desempeñan un papel fundamental en la entrada y salida de barcos para el comercio, el recibo de mercancía clave, el turismo y hasta ayuda humanitaria en tiempos de emergencia. Por eso, es muy importante para mí administración mitigar la vulnerabilidad de nuestros puertos, los cuales son
propensos a recibir el impacto de eventos atmosféricos y del aumento del nivel del mar. Como parte de nuestros esfuerzos para proveer mayor resiliencia a nuestras instalaciones portuarias ante un potencial desastre futuro, hemos asignado fondos del programa de infraestructura de CDBG-MIT para atender estas necesidades”, sostuvo el gobernador en declaraciones escritas.
“El Departamento de la Vivienda y la Autoridad de Puertos estarán firmando un acuerdo de subrecipiente para financiar el proyecto de mejoras y reconstrucción del Army Terminal, el cual originalmente fue construido hace más de 80 años. Desde el proceso de diseño hasta su construcción y entrega final, tendrá un costo de 85.3 millones de dólares. Los trabajos tienen el objetivo de construir un muelle nuevo y reemplazar los daños de la instalación portuaria actual; mitigar los riesgos de daños futuros, incluyendo el aumento del nivel del agua; y fortalecer la línea vital del transporte marítimo proveyendo unas facilidades que cumplan
con los códigos de construcción actuales, así como los estándares de la industria”, añadió .
Wednesday,
The San Juan Daily Star
When voice actor Alison Sealy-Smith first received an email asking if she’d be interested in reprising her role as Storm, from “X-Men: The Animated Series,” she nearly marked the message as spam, shrugging it off as either a joke or a mistake. It had been three decades since she had worked on the action-adventure cartoon, which ran on Fox from 1992-97, and the idea that it would be returning, let alone returning with its original cast, seemed so unlikely that she could hardly entertain it.
“At first, it was strictly disbelief,” she said in a video interview. “It can’t be true. Disney is doing this again? It didn’t make any sense.”
Disney was indeed doing it again, and after three years in production, the original “X-Men: The Animated Series” has returned as “X-Men ’97,” a revival streaming on Disney+ that the studio is treating as a direct continuation of the ’90s show. The new series picks up where “The Animated Series” left off with its Season 5 finale in September 1997, with the loss of X-Men leader Professor X after an attack by anti-mutant lobbyist Henry Peter Gyrich. It is designed to look and feel, in essence, like Season 6, with the intervening 30-year gap hardly noticeable on screen.
“That was always the goal,” Jake Castorena, a supervising producer and director, said in an interview. “To go straight from the OG show to our show, and it feels connected.”
The level of fidelity is impressive, and early reviews have been effusive, with one critic describing it as “nostalgia handled perfectly.”
But the achievement has been slightly undermined by news that the showrunner, Beau DeMayo, had been fired by Marvel. The move was sudden: On March 11, publicists for Disney, Marvel’s corporate owner, canceled DeMayo’s planned interview for this article, saying his “scheduling has changed,” and the following day The Hollywood Reporter broke the news that he had been fired. Marvel and Disney did not provide an explanation for the move. DeMayo and his representatives did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
DeMayo hasn’t publicly addressed his departure, and the lack of information has fueled speculation online about the reasons for his termination. His former co-workers say they’re as clueless as anyone about what happened and why.
“I have absolutely no details whatsoever about what’s going on — that’s a paygrade about 50,000 rungs above my head,” Sealy-Smith said the morning after the news about DeMayo came
An X-Men action figure of the character Storm is seen at a home in the West Hollywood neighborhood of Los Angeles on July 20, 2022. After three years in production, the original “X-Men: The Animated Series” has returned as “XMen ’97,” a revival streaming on Disney+ that the studio is treating as a direct continuation of the 1990s show. (Carlos González/The New York Times)
out. “But I thoroughly enjoyed working with Beau. I loved his meticulously plotted storytelling.”
Brad Winderbaum, an executive producer on “X-Men ’97” and the head of TV, streaming and animation at Marvel Studios, acknowledged that beginning the series under the cloud of this controversy has been difficult. He reiterated that “the show speaks for itself.”
Winderbaum and the rest of the “X-Men ’97” team seemed eager to redirect the focus to the show and to the hard work that went into re-creating the original. Emulating the look and feel of a 30-year-old animated series was “much harder than it seems,” Winderbaum said.
“It’s counterintuitive,” he said. “You would think, we’ve got the template in front of us, so let’s just do that. But it’s actually like running a controlled experiment.”
The original show’s hand-drawn animation was constrained by time and budgetary concerns; to achieve that look, the
new team had to put technical limitations on itself, restricting the kinds of flourishes that are easy with computers.
“Here we are 30 years later, and we had to create these artificial parameters to inform the style,” Winderbaum said.
Getting the look exactly right also involved a lot of experimentation, including working with custom filters that could replicate the aesthetic of old-school VHS broadcasts.
“All of it was all meticulously planned out, frame by frame,” Castorena said. “From the color palettes we use to the atmosphere to the noise grain to the chromatic aberration on the sides of the screen just slightly.”
Before they even started producing episodes, he explained, they were hard at work tinkering with the style until it looked faithful to the original.
“It was a learning process,” he said. “It might look awesome but not quite right — too clean, too HD. It was a good challenge to find that sweet spot.”
DeMayo was the public face of “X-Men ’97” during its production. He was active on social media, frequently posting updates about the series on X, formerly Twitter, and Instagram, and often addressing questions and concerns from interested fans. He also maintained an OnlyFans account, though in a 2022 profile, Out magazine said that he was not “publishing any hard-core X-rated content.” (On his personal website, DeMayo described the OnlyFans account as “a place for me to continue growing and pushing my own boundaries when it comes to my body and sexuality.”)
Since his firing, the OnlyFans account has been removed, and DeMayo appeared to deactivate all of his social media accounts. His Instagram has since been reactivated, but most of the posts appear to have been deleted or archived.
Castorena, the supervising producer, said that he couldn’t speak for DeMayo, who had previously worked on the popular Netflix fantasy drama “The Witcher” and the Disney+ series “Moon Knight.”
“What I can say is that I absolutely appreciate and love the work that Beau gave the studio and the show and to the crew,” Castorena said. Calling this turn of events “bittersweet,” he said he hoped DeMayo’s departure wouldn’t overshadow the series itself.
“While, yes, this is big news, and while this has some sway for audiences, at the end of the day, the work is still the work,” he said. “The writing is still the writing, and the show is still the show.”
Préstamos
Borinquen Memorial Parks
Caguas y Carolina
María Socorro Tirado
Asesora de Servicios Funerales & Propiedades de Cementerio
Propiedades:
•Lote
•Nichos
Servicios
•Cremación
•Cremación
Winderbaum said that the second season was well on its way to completion and that a third season was currently in development. When asked if DeMayo’s departure would have any effect on the third season’s progress, he said that it’s “all still on track the same way.”
“Being Marvel — being a popular brand making stuff that hopefully people like — part of the cost of that is that the behind-the-scenes drama becomes a story as well,” he said. “All I can hope is that people are willing to just meet the show where it’s at.”
Frans de Waal, who used his study of the inner lives of animals to build a powerful case that apes think, feel, strategize, pass down culture and act on moral sentiments — and that humans are not quite as special as many of us like to think — died Thursday at his home in Stone Mountain, Georgia. He was 75.
The cause was stomach cancer, his wife, Catherine Marin, said.
A psychologist at Emory University in Atlanta and a research scientist at the school’s Yerkes National Primate Research Center, de Waal objected to the common usage of the word “instinct.” He saw the behavior of all sentient creatures, from crows to persons, existing on the same broad continuum of evolutionary adaptation.
“Uniquely human emotions don’t exist,” he argued in a 2019 New York Times guest essay. “Like organs, the emotions evolved over millions of years to serve essential functions.”
The ambition and clarity of his thought, his skills as a storyteller and his prolific output made him an exceptionally popular figure for a primatologist — or a serious scientist of any kind. Two of his books, “Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are?” (2016) and “Mama’s Last Hug: Animal Emotions and What They Tell Us About Ourselves” (2019), were bestsellers. In the mid-1990s, when he was speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich put de Waal’s first book, “Chimpanzee Politics” (1982), on a reading list for Republican House freshmen.
Novelists Claire Messud and Sigrid Nunez both told the Times that they liked his writing. Actress Isabella Rossellini hosted a talk with him in New York last year. Philosophers Christine Korsgaard and Peter Singer wrote long, considered responses to his ideas.
De Waal’s influence was such that the Times credited his work with unleashing “a torrent of discussion about animal sexuality” and helping to popularize the term “alpha male,” though neither of those accomplishments had much to do with the core of his thought.
His interest in what is shared across species, emotionally and morally, was kick-started in the mid-1970s, at the beginning of his career, when he saw one male chimpanzee raucously confront another, then calm down and extend his hand, palm up, in a peace offering, after which the apes embraced and groomed each other. After further research, he concluded that the episode showed a desire and ability to reconcile after fights.
He found further striking evidence that animals other than humans have empathy and a sense of fair play in the early 2000s, while working with psychologist Sarah Brosnan. The scholars designed an experiment in which two monkeys were awarded cucumbers for completing a task. Then one monkey was given a grape and the other was given a less tasty cucumber. The one that got the cucumber began refusing to cooperate, even hurling the vegetable back at the researcher. Some animals that got the better end of the deal declined their grape.
de Waal
Many of de Waal’s animal anecdotes were moving. He wrote about a bonobo named Kuni who once picked up an injured starling, climbed a tree, spread the bird’s wings and then released it, enabling it to fly. “She tailored her assistance to the specific situation of an animal totally different from herself,” de Waal wrote in his 2005 book, “Our Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are.”
These sorts of episodes indicated that primates had cognition, de Waal said. Other ape behaviors — young females getting maternal training, for example — indicated something even more impressive: that apes were capable of learning, remembering and passing down new skills across generations, meaning that different communities had their own cultures.
All this language was unusual among scientists, and some objected. Donna Haraway, a scholar not of primates but of primatologists, argued that de Waal tended to imagine a world in which “primates became model yuppies” — that he was, in other words, engaging in a kind of projection. A common argument against de Waal’s work was that he anthropo -
Tasa mínima, promedio ponderado, y máxima para préstamos personales pequeños otorgados para la semana que terminó el sábado, 23 de marzo de 2024
morphized nonhuman animals.
De Waal replied that the real problem was not anthropomorphism — apes and humans have many commonalities justifying comparison, with similar brains and psychological makeups — but instead a human exceptionalism that rejected even the possibility of humanlike behaviors in other animals, as well as animal-like traits in humans. He called this tendency “anthropodenial.”
For de Waal, his critics were missing out on good news: Morality turned out to be deeply rooted in our evolutionary past.
“I’d argue that biology constitutes our greatest hope,” he wrote in “The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society” (2009). “One can only shudder at the thought that the humaneness of our societies would depend on the whims of politics, culture or religion.”
Franciscus Bernardus Maria de Waal was born on Oct. 29, 1948, in ’s-Hertogenbosch, a city in the southern Netherlands, and grew up in nearby Waalwijk. His father, Jo, was a banker, and his mother, Cis (van Dongen) de Waal, ran the home, raising six sons.
Frans kept pet fish as a child, and by his college years he had a kitten named Plexie, which he said he took on regular interspecies play dates with a puppy.
When he was 22, Frans attended the wedding of his brother Wim, who was close friends with a young Frenchwoman he had met after they were randomly assigned as pen pals in school. Upon meeting, Frans and the Frenchwoman, Marin, fell in love instantly. A year later, they moved in together.
During Frans’ early years in academia, a job studying macaques led him to develop a specialty in apes. He began working as a researcher of chimpanzees at Arnhem Zoo, in the east of the Netherlands, in 1975. He earned his doctorate in biology from Utrecht University in 1977.
He and Marin married in 1980 to make it easier for them to move to the United States as a couple. The next year, de Waal took a job at the Wisconsin Primate Center at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
He published 13 books, and at his death he was writing another, about how our thinking about animals has evolved over time. John Glusman, the vice president and executive editor of W.W. Norton & Co., de Waal’s publisher, said in an email that the company planned to release it next year.
Frans
found further striking evidence that animals other than humans have empathy and a sense of fair play in the early 2000s, while working with psychologist Sarah Brosnan. (Universidad Veracruzana)
Two years ago, Amy Gruenhut developed a near-fatal brain infection that put her into a coma for nearly two weeks. Since then, she has gone from learning how to eat, speak and walk again to running four marathons.
Gruenhut had been a casual runner before the coma, but after she left the hospital, returning to the jogging paths of Central Park felt like a return to life itself.
Making progress required patience and willpower that seemed almost superhuman. But, like everyone, Gruenhut sometimes struggled to get out of bed and lace up her sneakers. For those moments, she amassed a group of workout buddies to encourage her to get moving.
“I didn’t want to stand them up,” Gruenhut, 44, said, adding, “They were making that commitment to me as well.”
Regardless of how inspired people are to achieve their health and fitness goals, many face barriers to putting in the time, reps or steps. But experts say the difference between quitting and not quitting often comes down to having a person, group, app or other outside force that nudges you to keep going.
Most accountability tricks aren’t universal: One person might find it motivating to share run times on the fitness app Strava; another might find it deeply stressful. The key is to shop around until you find a strategy that works for you.
Find a more committed buddy …
Making plans to exercise with any friend increases your chances of working out. But some experts say we benefit most from teaming up with one who’s more enthusiastic about working out than we are.
A new study on gym motivation, soon to be published in the journal Management Science, found that participants
marathons. Among other things, she credits her group of running buddies. (Peter Garritano/The New York Times)
who struggled to work out saw significant improvement when they buddied up with a regular gym-goer, said Rachel Gershon, the study’s lead author and an assistant professor of marketing at the University of California, Berkeley. … or one who needs an extra push.
If you’re the more dedicated workout buddy, you can benefit from serving as a motivator and teacher for a lessexperienced friend, said Ayelet Fishbach, a professor of be-
Préstamos
havioral science at the University of Chicago.
When you give advice, you’re not only making yourself accountable to the other person, you’re also reinforcing your own commitment by hearing yourself articulate how or why you do something, she said.
Keep mostly mum about your races.
Deciding to train for a race or another athletic event can provide both structure and accountability, experts said. But you are probably best off keeping your plans relatively private.
Sharing a lofty goal widely — on social media, for example — can backfire because it can cause you to “feel like you already achieved it,” said Gabriele Oettingen, a professor of psychology at New York University. Research has suggested that, for some people, talking about an upcoming goal can feel like a substitute for actually doing it: You get the same satisfaction without putting in the hard work.
Hold off on hyping your event until you’re close to the finish line, she said, both literally and figuratively.
Promise an instructor you’ll show up.
While paying a monthly gym membership propels some people to work out, it’s not enough for others: Only half of gym members go twice a week.
“If you don’t follow through, there is no real penalty,” said Dr. Kevin Volpp, the director of the Penn Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, other than feeling like you’ve wasted money.
To create more accountability, he said, forge a relationship with an instructor or trainer and say you’ll show up for a class or workout session at a specific time. Social accountability — not wanting to seem like a flake — can be a powerful motivator.
Use paper clips to track progress.
If you respond well to visual cues, Justin Ross, a clinical psychologist in Denver, recommends displaying a paperclip chain to track your workouts. Start with one clip, and every time you exercise, add a new one to the chain. Or make a rubber band ball.
When you’re feeling off, he said, these visual reminders “can help provide a little bit of that energy to get you started.”
Get paid.
If you need an extra incentive, sign up for an app that pays or rewards you for moving, said Heather Royer, a health economist at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
These apps track metrics such as minutes or miles through your phone or wearable fitness device, and offer discounts on products or even charitable donations in your name. They’re typically funded by corporate sponsors or commissions from partner brands.
Royer prefers Paceline, which offers gift cards and discounts for moving 150 minutes a week. Even though the payout itself is small — only around a dollar or two a week — it’s motivating for her.
“It’s enough that, come the end of the week, if I’m not yet at that goal, I’m doing workouts at 10 p.m.,” she said.
The San Juan Daily Star
LEGAL NOTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO MMG I PR CFL, LLC
Plaintiff, Vs. CECILIO MATTA MARQUEZ AND HIS WIFE NORMA IRIS FIGUEROA AGUIAR AND THE CONJUGAL PARTNERTSHIP CONSTITUTED BETWEEN THEM
Defendants.
CIVIL NO. 19-1587 (JAG) RE: COLLECTION OF MONIES, FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGE. NOTICE OF SALE. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO.
SS TO: CECILIO MATTA MARQUEZ, HIS WIFE, NORMA IRIS FIGUEROA AGUIAR AND THE CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP CONSTITUTED THEREIN.
Judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum of One hundred thirteen thousand five hundred sixty five dollars and forty six cents ($113,565.46) in principal, accrued interest in the amount of Thirteen thousand nine hundred forty four dollars and fifty five cents ($13,944.55) which continue to accrue at the rate of Twenty nine dollars and eighteen cents ($29.18) per diem until full payment of the debt, accrued late charges of Two thousand three hundred five dollars and eight cents ($2,305.08), property preservation in the amount of Three hundred eighty three dollars and sixty four cents ($383.64), force place insurance in the amount of Five hundred thirty nine dollars ($539.00) and any additional disbursements made by plaintiff on behalf of defendants in accordance with the mortgage deed, plus costs and attorney’s fees; Pursuant to the judgment, the undersigned Special Master was ordered to sell at public auction for United States currency in cash or certified check without appraisement or right of redemption to the highest bidder and at the Hallway benches in front of Courtroom #1 of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, Federico Degetau Federal Building, 150 Chardón Street, Hato Rey, San Juan, Puerto Rico or any other place designated by said Clerk, to cover the sums adjudged to be paid to the plaintiff, the
following property: URBANA: Solar identificado con el número “C” raya cuatro (C-4) en el plano de inscripción del barrio Las Cabezas de Fajardo, Puerto Rico, con una cabida de Cuatrocientos treinta punto mil ochocientos siete metros cuadrados (430.1807). En lindes por el NORTE, con el solar número “C” raya tres (C-3); por el SUR, con un camino público; por el ESTE, con carretera Insular número novecientos ochenta y siete (987); y por el OESTE, con el solar “S” raya dos (S-2). Enclava una casa de concreto armado y bloques de dos (2) plantas, dos (2) baños y balcón por su lateral derecho y frente. La primera planta consta de cuatro (4) apartamentos individualizados, con respectivos cuartos de baño, marquesina y un “laundry room” en el lado posterior. Finca 11864, inscrita al folio 136 del tomo 414 de Fajardo, inscripción 7ma, Registro de la Propiedad Sección de Fajardo. Physical address: 987 SR k.m. 4.2 Lot C4, Cabezas WD, Fajardo, P.R. 00738 WHEREAS, the property is subject to the following junior liens and/or attachments: LIS PENDENS issued in the Court of First Instance, Fajardo Section, under civil case number NSCI201100393 regarding collection of monies and foreclosure of mortgage filed by REO Properties Corp. vs. Cecilio Matta Marquez and Norma Iris Figueroa Aguilar and the conjugal partnership constituted therein, in reference to the mortgage recorded under the 7th inscription for the principal amount of $123,101.17 plus interest and other expenses, recorded on August 30, 2011 at entry 136 of volume 414 of Fajardo, property 14,864, Annotation A. Potential bidders are advised to verify the extent of preferential liens with holders thereof. It is understood that potential bidders acquire the property subject to any and all senior liens, including any existing statutory liens, which may encumber the property. It shall be understood that each bidder accepts as sufficient the title that prior and preferential liens to the one being foreclosed upon, including but not limited to any property tax liens (express, tacit, implied or legal) shall continue in effect it being understood further that the successful bidder accepts them and is subrogated in the responsibility for the same and the bid price shall not be applied toward cancellation of senior liens. The property will be acquired free and clear of all junior liens and encumbrances. THEREFORE, the first
Wednesday, March 27, 2024 15
public sale shall be held on the 26th day of April 2024 at 10:30 AM and the minimum bid that will be accepted is the sum of $124,000.00. In the event said first public auction does not produce a bidder and the property is not adjudicated, a second public auction shall be held on the 3rd day of May 2024 at 10:30 AM and the minimum bid that will be accepted is the sum of $82,666.67, 2/3 parts of the minimum bid for the 1st public sale. If said second auction does not result in the adjudication and sale of the property, a third auction will be held on the 10th day of May 2024, at 10:30 AM and the minimum bid that will be accepted is the sum of $62,000.00, ½ of the minimum bid for the 1st public sale. Upon confirmation of the sale, an order shall be issued canceling all junior liens. For further particulars, reference is made to the judgment entered by the Court in this case, which can be examined in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court during regular business hour and/or by accessing by internet the electronic court record system (PACER) at https://ecf.prd.uscourts.gov.
In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 7th of March of 2024. Aguedo de la Torre, Special Master.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL GENERAL DE JUSTICIA
TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA SALA SUPERIOR DE MAYAGÜEZ.
LUIS D. SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ
EXPARTE
Civil Núm.: MZ2023CV00965.
Sobre: EXPEDIENTE DE DOMINIO. EDICTO. ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA, EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS, EL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO. SS. A: PERSONA COLINDANTE, DUEÑOS ANTERIORES, HEREDEROS, CAUSAHABIENTES, PERSONA DESCONOCIDA O PERSONA IGNORADA Y CUALQUIER OTRA
PERSONA NATURAL O JURÍDICA CON INTERÉS
QUE CREA TENER ALGÚN DERECHO
REAL SOBRE ESTA PROPIEDAD O QUE CREA
Por la presente se notifica que Don Luis D. Santiago Rodríguez y Doña Yamilet Marrero han presentado una Petición ante este Honorable Tribunal para que se declare a su favor el dominio del siguiente inmueble: RUSTICA: Parcela de terreno marcada con el número uno (1) en el Plano de Inscripción radicada en el Barrio Guamá del término municipal de San Germán, con una cabida superficial de MIL CUATROCIENTOS NOVENTA Y CINCO PUNTO NUEVE MIL NOVECIENTOS NOVENTA Y CINCO METROS CUADRADOS (1,495.9997 MC). En lindes por el NORTE, con un área dedicada a uso público y solar número cuatro (4); por el SUR, con solar dedicado a uso público, y solar número cinco (5) y franja verde que lo separa de una quebrada; por el ESTE, con solar número tres (3) en el Plano de Inscripción y por el OESTE, un área dedicada a uso público y solar número cinco (5) y franja verde que separa de una quebrada. Dicho solar fue segregado de la finca 5,442, Folio 75, Tomo 163 de San German. --No consta estructura edificada en el solar. ---Catastro numero 310-099-294-01-000. La Abogada de la parte Peticionaria es la siguiente:
LCDA. CAREN A. RUIZ PEREZ RUA 19,900 #160 Ave. Universidad Interamericana TEL. (787) 264-4444 ruizcaren@yahoo.com
Y se le notifica a usted, que este Tribunal ha ordenado se le cite para que de verse perjudicado por la inscripción que se solicita pueda oponerse oportunamente a este expediente de dominio; advirtiéndole que de no presentar oposición dentro del término de veinte (20) días a contar desde la publicación de este edicto, los promoventes podrán obtener que se apruebe esta solicitud de Expediente de Dominio y se mande a inscribir a su nombre, en el Registro de la Propiedad de Puerto Rico, Sección de San Germán, el dominio del predio de terreno anteriormente descrito. De no tener representación legal, puede acceder a través del Sistema Unificado de Manejo y Administración de Casos (SUMAC), utilizando la siguiente dirección electrónica: https:// unircd.ramaiudicíal.pr. Este Tribunal ordenó que se publique la pretensión por tres (3) veces durante el término de veinte (20) días en un periódico de circulación general diaria, para que los que tengan algún dere-
cho real sobre el inmueble descrito, las personas ignoradas a quienes pueda perjudicar la inscripción, y en general, a todos los que desearen oponerse, puedan efectuarlo dentro del término de veinte (20) días a partir de la última publicación del presente escrito. Por tanto, libro la presente en Mayagüez, Puerto Rico hoy día 14 de marzo de 2024, bajo mi firma y sello oficial. Lic. Norma G. Santana Irizarry, Secretaria Regional. Alexandra Mane López, Secretaría Servicios a Sala.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA
SALA DE BAYAMON BOSCO CREDIT X, LLC, BY FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION AS SERVICER
Demandante Vs. DAVID FELICIANO MIRANDA; SUCESION MIGUELINA FELICIANO MIRANDA COMPUESTA POR EL FENECIDO VIUDO JOSE CINTRON ROMAN; JOHN DOE Y JANE DOE COMO POSIBLES HEREDEROS DESCONOCIDOS; SUCESION JOSE CINTRON ROMAN COMPUESTA POR JOHN ROE Y JANE ROE COMO POSIBLES HEREDEROS DESCONOCIDOS; CENTRO DE RECAUDACION DE INGRESOS MUNICIPALES
Demandados
CIVIL NUM. BY2023CV04154
SOBRE: COBRO DE DINERO Y EJECUCION DE HIPOTECA. EDICTO DE SUBASTA. ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA. EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS EE.UU. EL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO. SS.
A: LA PARTE DEMANDADA, AL (A LA) SECRETARIO(A) DE HACIENDA DE PUERTO RICO Y AL PÚBLICO
GENERAL:
Certifico y Hago Constar: Que en cumplimiento con el Mandamiento de Ejecución de Sentencia que me ha sido dirigido por el (la) Secretario(a) del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Bayamón, en el caso de epígrafe, venderé en pública subasta y al mejor postor, por separado, de contado y por moneda de curso legal de los Esta-
dos Unidos de América y/o Giro Postal y Cheque Certificado, en mi oficina ubicada en el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de Bayamón, Cuarto Piso, Oficina de Alguaciles de Subastas, el 9 de abril de 2024, a las 9:45 de la mañana, todo derecho título, participación o interés que le corresponda a la parte demandada o cualquiera de ellos en el inmueble hipotecado objeto de ejecución que se describe a continuación: “URBANA: Solar radicado en la Urbanización
Reparto Valencia, situada en el Barrio Hato Tejas del término municipal de Bayamón, Puerto Rico, con el número QUINCE (15) del Bloque F, área del solar: CIENTO NOVENTA Y DOS PUNTO CINCUENTA METROS CUADRADOS (192.50M/C), en lindes por el NORTE, en distancia de siete metros (7.00m) con la Calle Margarita; por el SUR, en una distancia de siete metros (7.00m) con los solares número Cincuenta y Cuatro (#54) y número Cincuenta y Cinco (#55); por el ESTE, en distancia de veintisiete punto cincuenta metros (27.50m), con el solar número Dieciséis (#16); y por el OESTE, en una distancia de veintisiete punto cincuenta metros (27.50m), con el solar número catorce (#14). Enclava en dicho solar una casa de concreto para residencia de una familia.Inscrita al folio 52 del tomo 833 de Bayamón Sur, finca número 37,535, Registro de la Propiedad de Bayamón, Sección I. La hipoteca antes descrita consta inscrita al folio 35 del tomo 1864 de Bayamón Sur, finca número 37,535, Registro de la Propiedad de Bayamón, Sección I, inscripción 5ª. Propiedad localizada en: REPARTO VALENCIA, 15-F CALLE MARGARITA, BAYAMÓN, PR 00959. Según figuran en la certificación registral, la propiedad objeto de ejecución está gravada por las siguientes cargas anteriores o preferentes: Nombre del Titular: N/A Suma de la Carga: N/A Fecha de Vencimiento: N/A Según figuran en la certificación registral, la propiedad objeto de ejecución está gravada por las siguientes cargas posteriores a la inscripción del crédito ejecutante: Nombre del Titular: N/A Suma de la Carga: N/A Fecha de Vencimiento: N/A Se entenderá que todo licitador acepta como bastante la titularidad de la propiedad y que todas las cargas y gravámenes anteriores y los preferentes al crédito ejecutante antes descritos, si los hubiere, continuarán subsistentes. El rematante acepta dichas cargas y gravámenes anteriores, y queda subrogado en la responsabilidad
de los mismos, sin destinarse a su extinción el precio del remate. Se establece como tipo de mínima subasta la suma de $70,000.00, según acordado entre las partes en el precio pactado en la escritura de hipoteca. De ser necesaria una segunda subasta por declararse desierta la primera, la misma se celebrará en mi oficina, ubicada en el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de Bayamón, Cuarto Piso, Oficina de Alguaciles de Subastas, el 16 de abril de 2024, a las 9:45 de la mañana, y se establece como mínima para dicha segunda subasta la suma de $46,666.67, 2/3 partes del tipo mínima establecido originalmente. Si tampoco se produce remate ni adjudicación en la segunda subasta, se establece como mínima para la tercera subasta, la suma de $35,000.00, la mitad (1/2) del precio pactado y dicha subasta se celebrará en mi oficina, ubicada en el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de Bayamón, Cuarto Piso, Oficina de Alguaciles de Subastas, el 23 de abril de 2024, a las 9:45 de la mañana. Dicha subasta se llevará a cabo para, con su producto satisfacer a la parte demandante, el importe de la Sentencia dictada a su favor ascendente a la suma de $59,127.55 por concepto de principal, más la suma de $20,349.69 en intereses acumulados 31 de octubre de 2023 y los cuales continúan acumulándose a razón de 7.00% anual hasta su total y completo pago; más la sumas de $2,295.22 en “escrow advances”; $1,350.82 en cargos por demora; $2,061.18 en adelantos corporativos; más la cantidad de 10% del pagare original en la suma de $7,000.00, para gastos, costas y honorarios de abogado. A tenor con la Regla 44.3 de Procedimiento Civil se condena a la parte demandada a pagar intereses aplicables sobre el importe de la presente sentencia incluyendo costas y honorarios de abogado, desde esta fecha y hasta que sea satisfecha. La venta en pública subasta de la referida propiedad se verificará libre de toda carga o gravamen posterior que afecte la mencionada finca, a cuyo efecto se notifica y se hace saber la fecha, hora y sitio de la PRIMERA, SEGUNDA Y TERCERA SUBASTA, si esto fuera necesario, a los efectos de que cualquier persona o personas con algún interés puedan comparecer a la celebración de dicha subasta. Se notifica a todos los interesados que las actas y demás constancias del expediente de este caso están disponibles en la
Secretaría del Tribunal durante horas laborables para ser examinadas por los (las) interesados (as). Y para su publicación en el periódico The San Juan Daily Star, que es un diario de circulación general en la isla de Puerto Rico, por espacio de dos semanas consecutivas con un intervalo de por lo menos siete (7) días entre ambas publicaciones, así como para su publicación en los sitios públicos de Puerto Rico. Expedido en Bayamón, Puerto Rico, hoy 26 de febrero de 2024. FRANCES
TORRES CONTRERAS, Alguacil Regional. Maribel Lanzar Velázquez, Alguacil Placa 735.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA
CENTRO JUDICIAL DE HUMACAO SALA SUPERIOR BRAVO TRAVEL, LLC
Parte Peticionaria EX PARTE
CIVIL NÚM. NG2021CV00105
SOBRE: EXPEDIENTE DE DOMINIO. EMPLAZAMIENTO POR EDICTO.
A: JUANA CACERES BURGOS Y JOSE GABRIEL GONZALEZ, O A SUS HEREDEROS DE ESTOS HABER FALLECIDO. A: JOHN DOE, JANE DOE Y RICHARD JOE
POR EL PRESENTE EDICTO se le notifica que la Peticionaria en el caso de epígrafe ha radicado en este Tribunal una petición sobre expediente de domino para inscribir la siguiente finca que no consta inmatriculada en el Registro de la Propiedad: “RUSTICA: Predio de terreno localizado en el Barrio Maizales del término municipal de Naguabo, Puerto Rico, compuesto de VEINTIDOS MIL CIENTO TREINTA Y UNO PUNTO SEIS TRES
TRES METROS CUADRADOS
(22,131.633 METROS CUADRADOS) EQUIVALENTES A CINCO PUNTO SEIS TRES
CERO CUERDAS (5.630 CUERDAS) colindando por el Norte, con Julián García; por el Sur con Juana Cáceres Burgos; por el Este, con Carlos Ortiz Félix, Carlos A. García De León, Joaquín García Rodríguez, José Gabriel González y Elba C. Hernández Del Valle; por el Oeste, con Emilio Cruz López. Se le emplaza conforme a la Regla 4.5 y 4.6 de las de Procedimiento Civil, mediante la publicación de un edicto, en tres ocasiones dentro del término de veinte días, en un periódico de circulación general
de Demanda de fecha 29 de abril de 2014, expedido en el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de San Juan, en el Caso
Civil número KCD2015-0659, sobre Cobro de Dinero y Ejecución de Hipoteca, seguido por el Banco Popular de Puerto Rico; versus Aida Maceira Sánchez; Conyugue desconocido de Aida Maceira Sánchez y la Sociedad Legal de Bienes Gananciales compuesta por ambos; Poseedor Desconocido y Estados Unidos de América, por la suma de $184,363.02, más intereses y otras sumas adicionales o en su defecto la venta en Pública Subasta, anotado el día 7 de abril de 2021, al tomo Karibe de Sabana Llana, finca número 10,863, Anotación “B”. La venta se llevará a cabo para con su producto satisfacer a Banco Popular de Puerto Rico por la hipoteca de $136,500.00 total o parcialmente. 1. La venta se llevará a cabo para con su producto satisfacer a Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, total o parcialmente el importe de la Sentencia emitida el 25 de septiembre de 2023, notificada y archivada en autos el 29 de septiembre de 2023. El importe de la Sentencia dictada en el caso de epígrafe, ascendente a las siguientes cantidades: $349,694.50. de principal, más intereses al 7% anual desde el 28 de febrero de 2022, una suma equivalente a $13,650.00 para costas, gastos y honorarios de abogados; una suma equivalente a $13,650.00 para cubrir cualquier adelanto que se hizo en virtud de la escritura de hipoteca; y una suma equivalente a $13,650.00 para cubrir intereses adicionales a los garantizados por ley. El precio mínimo de licitación con relación a la antes descrita propiedad y la fecha y hora de cada subasta es como sigue:
PRIMERA SUBASTA: Se celebrará el día 8 de abril de 2024 a las 9:00 de la mañana Precio mínimo: $136,500.00 Segunda Subasta: Se celebrará el día 15 de abril de 2024 a las 9:00 de la mañana Precio Mínimo: $91,000.00 Tercera Subasta: Se celebrará el día 22 de abril de 2024 a las 9:00 de la mañana Precio Mínimo: $68,250.00. Las subastas de dicha propiedad se llevarán a efecto en mi oficina situada en el local que ocupa este Tribunal en el Centro Judicial de San Juan, advirtiéndose que el que obtuviere la buena pro de dicha propiedad consignará en el acto del remate el importe de su oferta en moneda legal, en adición a los gastos de la subasta, siendo éste el mejor postor. En cualquier momento luego de haberse comenzado el acto de la subasta, el Alguacil podrá requerir de los licitadores que le evidencien la capacidad de pago de sus posturas. Se entenderá que todo licitador acepta como
dimiento, que se lleve a efecto el desalojo o lanzamiento del ocupante o ocupantes de la finca o de todos los que por orden o tolerancia del deudor la ocupen. El Registrador de la Propiedad cancelará, libre de derechos, todo gravamen posterior a la fecha en que se otorgó la hipoteca que ha sido ejecutada mediante esta acción, y procederá a la inscripción de la venta a favor del comprador en subasta libre de todo gravamen posterior a la fecha en que se otorgó la hipoteca que ha sido ejecutada mediante esta acción. Expido el presente edicto bajo mi firma y sello del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de San Juan. En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 28 de febrero de 2024. PEDRO HIEYE GONZÁLEZ, ALGUACIL TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA SALA SUPERIOR DE SAN JUAN. ***
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA SALA SUPERIOR DE CAGUAS
Demandante Vs. ANGEL PORFIRIO SOTO AYALA
Demandado
Civil Núm.: SJ2022CV10784.
Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO Y REPOSESIÓN DE GARANTÍA. EDICTO ANUNCIANDO
SUBASTA. El Alguacil que suscribe, funcionario del Tribunal de la Sala Superior de Caguas, Puerto Rico, por la presente anuncia y hace saber al público en general que en cumplimiento con la Sentencia dictada en este caso con fecha 19 de mayo de 2023, y según Orden y Mandamiento del 23 de octubre de 2023 librado por este honorable Tribunal, procederé a vender en pública subasta al mejor postor, y por dinero en efectivo, cheque certificado o giro postal a nombre del Alguacil del Tribunal con todo título derecho y/o interés de la parte demandada sobre el bien mueble que se describe a continuación: La primera subasta habrá de celebrarse el día 19 DE ABRIL DE 2024, A LAS 10:00 DE LA MAÑANA, para la venta del equipo que se describe a continuación: YEAR: 2015
MAKE: CATERPILLAR. MO-
DEL: 303ECR. SERIAL NUM-
BER: CAT303EEHHM00355.
DESCRIPTION: 2015 (USED)
CATERPILLAR 303ECR MINI
para la venta del equipo que se describe a continuación: YEAR:
2014. MAKE: CATERPILLAR.
MODEL: 246D. SERIAL NUM-
BER: CAT0246DCBYF01251.
DESCRIPTION: 2014 (USED)
CATERPILLAR 246D SKID STEER. HIGH FLOW. CLOSED CAB, A/C 1,230 HOURS (S/N: CATO246DCBYF01251).
La Sra. Ana Nieves, el Sr. Frank R. Silva Maldonado o el Sr. Ángel L. Calderón Panelli, de S. E. Warehouse, quienes fueron nombrados depositarios, cuya dirección es Barrio Navarro, Carretera 189, Km. 4, Hm. 6, Gurabo, PR (Salida de la Universidad del Turabo). Su número de teléfono es (787) 743-9001. La subasta será celebrada en esta dirección. Si no hubiese remate o adjudicación en alguna subasta y se declare desierta, se dará por terminado el procedimiento. Con el importe de esta venta se habrá de abonar al balance de la sentencia dictada en este caso el cual consiste en el pago de $27,053.39 de principal, incluyendo recargos al 27 de abril de 2023. Esta cantidad continúan acumulando intereses y recargos conforme a los términos del contrato hasta su completo pago. Se dispone que una vez celebradas la subasta y vendido el mueble relacionado, los adjudicatarios serán puestos en posesión del mueble vendido de inmediato. Por la presente también se notifica e informa a Fulano de Tal y Sutano de Tal, personas desconocidas que puedan tener derechos sobre los bienes objeto de este edicto. La Venta en Pública Subasta de los referidos muebles se verificarán libre de toda carga y gravamen que afecte el bien mueble vendido, a cuyo efecto se notifica y se hace saber la fecha, hora y sitio de la subasta, a los efectos de cualquier persona con algún interés puedan comparecer a la celebración de dicha subasta. Los autos y todos los documentos correspondientes al procedimiento del caso de epígrafe están disponibles en la Secretaría de este Tribunal durante horas laborables y para la concurrencia de los licitadores expido el presente Edicto que se publicará en un periódico de circulación diaria en toda la Isla de Puerto Rico y se fijará, además, en el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Alcaldía y la Colecturía de Rentas Internas del Municipio donde se celebrará la Subasta, por espacio dos (2) semanas y por lo menos una vez por semana. EN TES-
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE CAROLINA SALA SUPERIOR DE CAROLINA
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO DEMANDANTE V. SUCESIÓN DE RICARDO CORTÉS HUERTAS COMPUESTA POR SU HEREDERO CONOCIDO GILBERT CORTES T/C/C GILBERT CORTES HUERTAS Y OTROS
DEMANDADO(A)
CASO NÚM.: CA2023CV03702. (CIVIL: 407). SOBRE: COBRO DE DIORO ORDINARIO Y OTROS. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. JUAN C. FORTUÑO FASJCFORTUNO@FORTUNO-LAW. COM.
A: GILBERT CORTES TAMBIEN CONOCIDO COMO GILBERTO CORTES HUERTAS COMO HEREDERO CONOCIDO DE LA SUCESION DE RICARDO CORTES HUERTAS: FULANO DE TAL
Y SUTANA DE TAL COMO HEREDEROS DESCONOCIDOS DE DICHA SUCESION. (NOMBRE DE LAS PARTES QUE SE LE NOTIFICAN LA SENTENCIA POR EDICTO)
bastante el título del inmueble y las cargas o gravámenes anteriores y los preferentes al crédito del ejecutante, si los hubiere, continuarán subsistiendo, entendiéndose que el rematante los acepta y queda responsable de los mismos sin destinarse a su extinción el precio del remate. Se le apercibe a los tenedores de gravámenes posteriores al que se ejecuta que, para proteger cualesquiera derechos que tengan sobre el inmueble, deberán comparecer a la subasta, pues de no hacerlo así y de no igualar el precio de venta del gravamen hipotecario que se ejecuta, el Tribunal ordenará la cancelación de todos los gravámenes posteriores. La propiedad a ser ejecutada se adquiere libre de cargas y gravámenes posteriores. Si se declara desierta la tercera subasta se adjudicará la finca a favor del acreedor por la totalidad de la cantidad adeudada si ésta es igual o menor que el monto del tipo mínimo de la tercera subasta, si el Tribunal lo estima conveniente. Se abonará dicho monto a la cantidad adeudada si ésta es mayor. Los autos y todos los documentos correspondientes al procedimiento del caso de epígrafe están disponibles en la Secretaría del Tribunal Superior de Puerto Rico, Sala Superior de San Juan, durante horas laborables. Para conocimiento de la parte demandada y de toda persona que tenga interés inscrito con posterioridad a la inscripción del gravamen que se está ejecutando, si alguna, y para la concurrencia de licitadores y para el público en general el presente edicto se publicará en un diario de circulación general en el Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico una vez por semana por un término de dos (2) semanas con un intervalo de por lo menos siete (7) días entre cada publicación. Se fijará además, en tres (3) lugares públicos del Municipio donde ha de celebrarse la subasta, estos lugares serán la Alcaldía, el Tribunal y la Colecturía de dicho Municipio. Se notificará a la parte demandada copia del edicto de subasta mediante correo certificado con acuse de recibo a su dirección que obra en autos. Una vez efectuada la correspondiente venta judicial, otorgaré la escritura del traspaso al licitador victorioso, quien podrá ser la parte demandante, cuya oferta podrá aplicarse a la extinción parcial o total de la obligación reconocida por la Sentencia. Colocaré al licitador victorioso en posesión física de la Propiedad mediante el lanzamiento de los ocupantes en el término legal de veinte (20) días desde la fecha de la venta en pública subasta. Si transcurren los referidos veinte (20) días, el Tribunal podrá ordenar, sin necesidad de ulterior proce-
EXCAVATOR VITH 24” BUCKET AND 18” BUCKET; 91 HOURS (S/N: CAT303EEHHM00355). La SEGUNDA SUBASTA habrá de celebrarse el día 19 DE ABRIL DE 2024, A LAS 10:15 DE LA MAÑANA,
TIMONIO DE LO CUAL, expido el presente Edicto bajo mi firma y el sello de este Tribunal en Caguas, Puerto Rico, hoy día 25 de marzo de 2024. ÁNGEL
GÓMEZ GÓMEZ, ALGUACIL PLACA #593, ALGUACIL DEL TRIBUNAL DE CAGUAS.
AUTOS DE ESTE CASO, CON FECHA 25 DE MARZO DE 2024. EN CAROLINA, PUERTO RICO, EL 25 DE MARZO DE 2024. KANELLY ZAYAS
ROBLES, SECRETARIA. DENISSE MINERVA TORRES RUIZ, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA
CENTRO JUDICIAL DE CAGUAS SALA SUPERIOR DE CAGUAS
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO
Demandante V. GLORIA ESTHER
ROSARIO PEREZ T/C/C
GLORIA E. ROSARIO
PEREZ T/C/C GLORIA
ROSARIO PEREZ Y OTROS
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: CG2023CV03621. (Salón 701). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO Y OTROS. JUN C. FORTUÑO FASJCFORTUNO@FORTUNO-LAW. COM. CENTRO DE MEDIACIÓN DE CONFLICTOS - CMC-CAGUAS@ PODERJUDICIAL.PR. FULANO DE TAL Y SUTANA DE TAL COMO HEREDEROS
DESCONOCIDOS Y/O PARTES
CON INTERES EN LA SUCESION
- BO FARALLON SECTOR CAÑAS, BUZÓN 27614, CAYEY, PUERTO RICO 00736-4999.
GLORIA ESTHER ROSARIO PEREZ
T/C/C GLORIA E. ROSARIO PEREZ
T/C/C GLORIA ROSARIO PEREZ
EL SECRETARIO(A) QUE SUSCRIBE LE NOTIFICA A USTED QUE EL 08 DE MARZO DE 2024, ESTE TRIBUNAL HA DICTADO SENTENCIA, SENTENCIA PARCIAL O RESOLUCIÓN EN ESTE CASO, QUE HA SIDO DEBIDAMENTE REGISTRADA Y ARCHIVADA EN AUTOS DONDE PODRÁ USTED ENTERARSE DETALLADAMENTE DE LOS TÉRMINOS DE LA MISMA. ESTA NOTIFICACIÓN SE PUBLICARÁ UNA SOLA VEZ EN UN PERIÓDICO DE CIRCULACIÓN GENERAL EN LA ISLA DE PUERTO RICO, DENTRO DE LOS 10 DÍAS SIGUIENTES A SU NOTIFICACIÓN. Y, SIENDO O REPRESENTANDO USTED UNA PARTE EN EL PROCEDIMIENTO SUJETA A LOS TÉRMINOS DE LA SENTENCIA, SENTENCIA PARCIAL O RESOLUCIÓN, DE LA CUAL PUEDE ESTABLECERSE RECURSO DE REVISIÓN O APELACIÓN DENTRO DEL TÉRMINO DE 30 DÍAS CONTADOS A PARTIR DE LA PUBLICACIÓN POR EDICTO DE ESTA NOTIFICACIÓN, DIRIJO A USTED ESTA NOTIFICACIÓN QUE SE CONSIDERARÁ HECHA EN LA FECHA DE LA PUBLICACIÓN DE ESTE EDICTO. COPIA DE ESTA NOTIFICACIÓN HA SIDO ARCHIVADA EN LOS
notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 19 de marzo de 2024, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha 25 de marzo de 2024. En Caguas, Puerto Rico, el 25 de marzo de 2024.
LISILDA MARTÍNEZ AGOSTO, SECRETARIA. LIZ WHARTON ROSA, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ES ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE MAYAGÜEZ SALA SUPERIOR MAYAGÜEZ.
- BO FARALLON SECTOR CAÑAS, BUZÓN 27614, CAYEY, PUERTO RICO 00736-4999.
JOHANA SANTOS ROSARIO T/C/C JOHANNA SANTOS ROSARIOBO FARALLON SECTOR CAÑAS, BUZÓN 27614, CAYEY, PUERTO RICO 00736-4999.
MIGUEL ANGEL SANTOS ROSARIO
- JOHANNASANTOS2222@GMAIL. COM. SUCESION DE MIGUEL ANGEL SANTOS ORTIZ T/C/C MIGUEL
ANGEL SANTOS T/C/C MIGUEL A. SANTOS ORTIZ T/C/C MDIRECCIÓN DESCONOCIDA, CAYEY, PUERTO RICO 99999. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO.
A: FULANO DE TAL Y SUTANA DE TAL COMO HEREDEROS
DESCONOCIDOS Y/O
PARTES CON INTERES EN LA SUCESIÓN DE MIGUEL ANGEL SANTOS ORTIZ T/C/C MIGUEL
ANGEL SANTOS T/C/C
MIGUEL A. SANTOS ORTIZ T/C/C MIGUEL SANTOS ORTIZ Y EN LA SUESIÓN DE GLORIA
ESTHER ROSARIO
PEREZ T/C/C GLORIA E. ROSARIO PERO
T/C/C GLORIA ROSARIO PEREZ. (Nombre de las partes que se le The San Juan
ISMAEL
COLON SANTANA ZAIDA MARIA GUASCH SUAREZ
EX PARTE
CIVIL NÚM.: AÑ2023CV00125.
SALÓN: SOBRE: EXPEDIENTE DE DOMINIO, BAJO EL ART. 13 DE LA LEY 118, PROCEDIMIENTO EXPEDITO. EDICTO. ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA, EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS E.E.U.U., EL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PR. SS.
A: LAS PERSONAS IGNORADAS Y DESCONOCIDAS A
QUIENES PUDIERA
PERJUDICAR LA INSCRIPCIÓN DEL DOMINIO A FAVOR DE LA PARTE PETICIONARIA EN EL REGISTRO DE LA PROPIEDAD DE LA FINCA
QUE MÁS ADELANTE SE DESCRIBIRÁ Y A TODA PERSONA EN GENERAL QUE CON DERECHO
PARA ELLO DESEE
OPONERSE A ESTE
EXPEDIENTE
POR LA PRESENTE se les notifica para que comparezcan,
si lo creyeren pertinente, ante este Honorable Tribunal dentro de los veinte (20) días contados a partir de la última publicación de este edicto a exponer lo que a sus derechos convenga en el expediente promovido por la parte peticionaria para adquirir su dominio sobre la finca que se describe más adelante. Usted deberá presentar su posición a través del Sistema Unificado de Manejo y Administración de Casos (SUMAC), al cual puede acceder utilizando la siguiente dirección electrónica: https:// unired.ramajudicial.pr, salvo que se represente por derecho propio, en cuyo caso deberá presentar su alegación en la secretaría del Tribunal. Si usted deja de expresarse dentro del referido término, el Tribunal podrá dictar sentencia, previo a escuchar la prueba de valor de la parte peticionaria en su contra, sin más citarle ni oírle, y conceder el remedio solicitado en la petición, o cualquier otro, si el Tribunal, en el ejercicio de su sana discreción, lo entiende procedente. RUSTICA: Predio de terreno radicado en el Barrio Casey Arriba del término municipal de Añasco, Puerto Rico; con una cabida superficial de UNA (1) CUERDA. En lindes por el NORTE con terreno perteneciente al señor Félix Aponte; por el SUR y el OESTE, con remanente de la finca principal; y por el ESTE, con carretera estatal Cuatrocientos Seis (406). En dicho solar enclava residencia la que se describe a continuación: Casa construida en concreto techada de zinc; consta de tres (3) cuartos dormitorios, sala, cocina-comedor, baño y balcón con rejas. El abogado de la parte peticionaria es la Lcdo. Ernesto Rovira Gándara, PMB 767, 1353 Ave. Luis Vigoreaux, Guaynabo, PR 00966; Tel. (787)-758-3277; Email: erovira@partnerslegalservicespr.com Se le informa, además, que el Tribunal ha señalado vista en este caso para el 1 de abril de 2024, a las 2:00pm, mediante videoconferencia, a la cual usted puede comparecer asistido por abogado y presentar oposición a la petición. Este edicto deberá ser publicado en tres (3) ocasiones dentro del término de veinte (20) días, en un periódico de circulación general diaria, para que comparezcan si quieren alegar su derecho. Toda primera mención de persona natural y/o jurídica que se mencione en el mismo, se identificará en letra tamaño 10 puntos y negrillas, conforme a lo dispuesto en las Reglas de Procedimiento Civil, 2009. Se le apercibe que de no comparecer los interesados y/o partes citadas, o en su defecto los organismos públicos afectados en el término improrrogable de treinta (30) días a contar de la fecha de la última publicación del edicto, el Tribunal podrá
conceder el remedio solicitado por la parte peticionaria, sin más citarle ni oírle. En Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, a 11 de marzo de 2024. Lic. Norma G Santana Irizarry, Secretario(a) Regional. F/Evelyn Gonzalez Hernandez, Secretario(a) Auxiliar del Tribunal.
LEGAL NOTICE
ES ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE MAYAGÜEZ SALA SUPERIOR MAYAGÜEZ.
ISMAEL
COLON SANTANA
ZAIDA MARIA GUASCH SUAREZ
EX PARTE
CIVIL NÚM.: AÑ2023CV00125.
SALÓN: SOBRE: EXPEDIENTE DE DOMINIO, BAJO EL ART. 13 DE LA LEY 118, PROCEDIMIENTO EXPEDITO.
EDICTO. ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA, EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS E.E.U.U., EL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PR. SS.
SANTANDER COLINDANTE
POR LA PRESENTE se les
notifica para que comparezcan, si lo creyeren pertinente, ante este Honorable Tribunal dentro de los veinte (20) días contados a partir de la última publicación de este edicto a exponer lo que a sus derechos convenga en el expediente promovido por la parte peticionaria para adquirir su dominio sobre la finca que se describe más adelante. Usted deberá presentar su posición a través del Sistema Unificado de Manejo y Administración de Casos (SUMAC), al cual puede acceder utilizando la siguiente dirección electrónica: https:// unired.ramajudicial.pr, salvo que se represente por derecho propio, en cuyo caso deberá presentar su alegación en la secretaría del Tribunal. Si usted deja de expresarse dentro del referido término, el Tribunal podrá dictar sentencia, previo a escuchar la prueba de valor de la parte peticionaria en su contra, sin más citarle ni oírle, y conceder el remedio solicitado en la petición, o cualquier otro, si el Tribunal, en el ejercicio de su sana discreción, lo entiende procedente. RUSTICA: Predio de terreno radicado en el Barrio Casey Arriba del término municipal de Añasco, Puerto Rico; con una cabida superficial de UNA (1) CUERDA. En lindes por el NORTE con terreno perteneciente al señor Félix Aponte; por el SUR y el OESTE, con remanente de la finca principal; y por el ESTE, con carretera estatal Cuatrocientos Seis (406). En dicho solar enclava residencia la que se describe a continuación: Casa construida
en concreto techada de zinc; consta de tres (3) cuartos dormitorios, sala, cocina-comedor, baño y balcón con rejas. El abogado de la parte peticionaria es la Lcdo. Ernesto Rovira Gándara, PMB 767, 1353 Ave. Luis Vigoreaux, Guaynabo, PR 00966; Tel. (787)-758-3277; Email: erovira@partnerslegalservicespr.com Se le informa, además, que el Tribunal ha señalado vista en este caso para el 1 de abril de 2024, a las 2:00pm, mediante videoconferencia, a la cual usted puede comparecer asistido por abogado y presentar oposición a la petición. Este edicto deberá ser publicado en tres (3) ocasiones dentro del término de veinte (20) días, en un periódico de circulación general diaria, para que comparezcan si quieren alegar su derecho. Toda primera mención de persona natural y/o jurídica que se mencione en el mismo, se identificará en letra tamaño 10 puntos y negrillas, conforme a lo dispuesto en las Reglas de Procedimiento Civil, 2009. Se le apercibe que de no comparecer los interesados y/o partes citadas, o en su defecto los organismos públicos afectados en el término improrrogable de treinta (30) días a contar de la fecha de la última publicación del edicto, el Tribunal podrá conceder el remedio solicitado por la parte peticionaria, sin más citarle ni oírle. En Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, a 11 de marzo de 2024. Lic. Norma G Santana Irizarry, Secretario(a) Regional. F/Evelyn Gonzalez Hernandez, Secretario(a) Auxiliar del Tribunal.
LEGAL NOTICE
ES ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE MAYAGÜEZ SALA SUPERIOR MAYAGÜEZ.
ISMAEL COLON SANTANA
ZAIDA MARIA GUASCH SUAREZ
EX PARTE
CIVIL NÚM.: AÑ2023CV00125.
SALÓN: SOBRE: EXPEDIENTE DE DOMINIO, BAJO EL ART. 13 DE LA LEY 118, PROCEDIMIENTO EXPEDITO.
EDICTO. ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA, EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS E.E.U.U., EL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PR. SS.
A: GLORIA MARIA LUGO
PEREZ, INMEDIATOS ANTERIORES DUEÑOS Y/O HEREDEROS, DENOMINADOS FULANO DE TAL Y SUTANO DE TAL.
POR LA PRESENTE se les notifica para que comparezcan, si lo creyeren pertinente, ante
este Honorable Tribunal dentro de los veinte (20) días contados a partir de la última publicación de este edicto a exponer lo que a sus derechos convenga en el expediente promovido por la parte peticionaria para adquirir su dominio sobre la finca que se describe más adelante. Usted deberá presentar su posición a través del Sistema Unificado de Manejo y Administración de Casos (SUMAC), al cual puede acceder utilizando la siguiente dirección electrónica: https:// unired.ramajudicial.pr, salvo que se represente por derecho propio, en cuyo caso deberá presentar su alegación en la secretaría del Tribunal. Si usted deja de expresarse dentro del referido término, el Tribunal podrá dictar sentencia, previo a escuchar la prueba de valor de la parte peticionaria en su contra, sin más citarle ni oírle, y conceder el remedio solicitado en la petición, o cualquier otro, si el Tribunal, en el ejercicio de su sana discreción, lo entiende procedente. RUSTICA: Predio de terreno radicado en el Barrio Casey Arriba del término municipal de Añasco, Puerto Rico; con una cabida superficial de UNA (1) CUERDA. En lindes por el NORTE con terreno perteneciente al señor Félix Aponte; por el SUR y el OESTE, con remanente de la finca principal; y por el ESTE, con carretera estatal Cuatrocientos Seis (406). En dicho solar enclava residencia la que se describe a continuación: Casa construida en concreto techada de zinc; consta de tres (3) cuartos dormitorios, sala, cocina-comedor, baño y balcón con rejas. El abogado de la parte peticionaria es la Lcdo. Ernesto Rovira Gándara, PMB 767, 1353 Ave. Luis Vigoreaux, Guaynabo, PR 00966; Tel. (787)-758-3277; Email: erovira@partnerslegalservicespr.com Se le informa, además, que el Tribunal ha señalado vista en este caso para el 1 de abril de 2024, a las 2:00pm, mediante videoconferencia, a la cual usted puede comparecer asistido por abogado y presentar oposición a la petición. Este edicto deberá ser publicado en tres (3) ocasiones dentro del término de veinte (20) días, en un periódico de circulación general diaria, para que comparezcan si quieren alegar su derecho. Toda primera mención de persona natural y/o jurídica que se mencione en el mismo, se identificará en letra tamaño 10 puntos y negrillas, conforme a lo dispuesto en las Reglas de Procedimiento Civil, 2009. Se le apercibe que de no comparecer los interesados y/o partes citadas, o en su defecto los organismos públicos afectados en el término improrrogable de treinta (30) días a contar de la fecha de la última publicación del edicto, el Tribunal podrá conceder el remedio solicitado
por la parte peticionaria, sin más citarle ni oírle. En Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, a 11 de marzo de 2024. Lic. Norma G Santana Irizarry, Secretario(a) Regional. F/Evelyn Gonzalez Hernandez, Secretario(a) Auxiliar del Tribunal.
LEGAL NOTICE
EDICTO SOBRE RECUSACION DE ELECTORES POR MOTIVO DE DOMICILIO Y OTRAS CAUSALES
SAN JUAN 002
CITACION A VISTA A LOS SIGUIENTES ELECTORES
A: ANA VICTORIA ABRIL, NÚMERO ELECTORAL
6773071, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
8953, ÁNGEL E. ALOMAR NAVARRO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6350734, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8954, JULIO R. ALVAREZ RIVERA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1668817, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
8955, YAMILET APONTE CLAUDIO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6453065, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
8956, RICARDO J. ARRAIZA ROLON, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3796927, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8957, ADA ARROYO MENDEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL
2917654, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8958, JOAQUIN T. BELGODERE MUÑIZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4148181, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
8959, KIARA M. BERMUDEZ LOPEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6643595, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
8960, DEYANIRA Y BERRIOS MANZANO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6743235, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
8961, IOANNISELY BERRIOS TORRES, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6753421, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
8962, MARIAN A. CABRERA MAYSONET, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6535828, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
8964, CHRISTOPHER CAPO HERNÁNDEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6605260, NÚMERO DE
RECUSACIÓN 8965, MARITZA CARDONA HERNANDEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 0170735, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8966, JANICE CARTAGENA RIPOLL, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6716700, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8966, NICOLE CARTAGENA RIPOLL, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 671669, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8968, ZULAIRAM CARTAGENA TORRES, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6431382, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8969, DAVID COLON OLMO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1623125, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8970, VERONICA CORDERO CANDELARIA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3617302, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8971, MIGUEL A. CORREA NIVAR, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4451772, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8972, PAOLA E. CORTES GARCIA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6684349, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8973, ARCHIE CORTES VAZQUEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6753422, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8974, AMAURY DE JESUS GONZALEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6473348, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8975, IVAN A DE LA CRUZ COLON, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1117182, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8976, FRANCISCO W. DEL TORO MELENDEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1515490, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8977, CRISTINA M. DELIZ GONZALEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3859836, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8978, FELIX L. DIAZ BENVENUTTI, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3739536, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8980, SULYVETTE DIAZ SANTIAGO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL
6246580, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8981, LILLIAM M. FELICIANO SOLETO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 2659267, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8982, CARLOS J. FIDALGO ANGLERO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3261462, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8983, NERIDA FLORES COLON, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1670677, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8984, JULIO I FONTANEZ MORALES, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4281104, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8985, ANGELIS FRANQUI CLAUDIO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6749430, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8986, ROCIO G. GARCIA IRIZARRY, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6358923, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8987, MATILDA GAUDIER MOYA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 79443, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8988, JOSE GOMEZ GOMEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1768348, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8990, APOLONIA GONZALEZ CABRAL, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6220867, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8991, NOEMI GONZALEZ IRIZARRY, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4453363, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8992, ISABEL M. GONZALEZ MONTALVO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6524147, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8993, GLADYS E. GONZALEZ ORTIZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1918224, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8994, JEAN G. GONZALEZ RIPOLL, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6220039, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8995, LOIDA A. GONZALEZ RODRIGUEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6021146, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8996, ANA H. GONZALEZ SANTIAGO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL
4447121, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
8997, CARLOS H. GRAULAU MUENCHO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1622911, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8998, NATHALIA M. GUTIERREZ LAUZURIQUE, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 64336026, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 8999, LUIS F. GUZMAN DIAZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3737114, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9000, ESTEFANIA A. HERNANDEZ GOMEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6640823, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9001, MARJORIE A HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 2920164, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9002, ÁNGEL L. HUERTAS MUNOZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3177983, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9003, MERCEDES IRIZARRY MAYORAL, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1015354, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9004, BERTIN JEAN RENE, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6648506, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9005, BRYAN L. LAMBOY TORRES, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6319626, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9006, IRMA LEON PEREIRA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3585926, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9007, SUSAN LÓPEZ SAENZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3227862, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9008, NORALESI LORA NUNEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6110632, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9009, GABRIEL J LUGO MALDONADO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6253682, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9011, LAURA M. MACHADO GARCIA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6164708, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9012, NESTOR Y. MACHADO SOTOMAYOR, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 2874808, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9013, JCQUELINE MANZANO PILIER, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6738552, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9014, CAMILLE I. MARRERO QUINONEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6021557, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9015, JAVIER MARTIN GRILLE, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6159403, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9016, JAMES RENO MARTÍNEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6397824, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9017, MARYLIN MARTIR GOYA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1622014, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9018, ADDIE M. MATOS RODRIGUEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 360138, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9019, HECTOR R. MELENDEZ ALVARADO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4122180, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9020, GERMAN O. MIRABAL OSTOLAZA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4059047, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9021, CARLOS MIRANDA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1741254, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9022, RENE MOLINARY CINTRON, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3765156, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9023, ALICIA MONTALVO LUGO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3566385, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9024, GERARDO MORALES CARMONA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6760585, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9026, CARLOS A. MORALES MEDINA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6189574, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9027, IVONNE MORALES MONTALVO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1446830, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9028 Y CARLOS A. MORENO RODRIGUEZ, NÚMERO
solicitud de recusación de electores por motivo de domicilio y otras causales hacia su persona, y se ha señalado VISTA
PARA EL MIERCOLES, 10 DE ABRIL DE 2024 A LAS 5:30PM
EN LAS OFICINAS DE LA COMISION LOCAL, LOCALIZADAS EN: CALLE ARTERIAL B 550 DE HATO REY, PUERTO RICO. LA DIRECCION FISICA DE LA JUNTA DE INSCRIPCIO
PERMANENTE ES CALLE AR-
TERIAL B 550 DE SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO. EL NUMERO DE TELEFONO DE LA JUNTA DE INSCRIPCION ES EL 787777-8682. SE APERCIBE A
LOS ELECTORES QUE, DE NO COMPARECER A LA VIS-
TA EN LA FECHA Y HORA
SENALADA, SE PROCEDERA CON LA MISMA SIN MAS
CITARLE, NOTIFICARLE, NI
OIRLE. FIRMADA POR, JUAN
A. LEON GONZALEZ, PRE-
SIDENTE DE LA COMISION
LOCAL EL 18 DE MARZO DE 2024.
LEGAL NOTICE
EDICTO SOBRE RECUSA-
CION DE ELECTORES POR
MOTIVO DE DOMICILIO Y OTRAS CAUSALES
SAN JUAN 002
CITACION A VISTA A LOS SI-
GUIENTES ELECTORES A: ALEJANDRO MORIS FIGUEROA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL
6680571, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9030, WILLIAM MUNOZ SERRA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1622584, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9031, LAURA BEATRIZ MUÑIZ ROSADO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6056408, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9032, NAHOMY NAVARRO MIRANDA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL
3447107, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9033, ROBERT NIEVES , NÚMERO ELECTORAL
3456649, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9035, ABDIEL NIEVES RIOS, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6710356, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9036, NATHALEE M. NIEVES RIOS, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6710334, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9037, LAURA E. NUÑEZ RAMIREZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6591235, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9038, NORAIDA NUÑEZ LUGO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL
943676, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9039, MARCIO A. OLARIAGA PEREZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6767095, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9040, ENGRACIA ORTIZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 94379, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9041, JOSE D. PAGAN SIERRA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1622940, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9042, LUIS R. PAGAN SIERRA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1847429, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9044, EMANUEL PEREZ GANDIA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6607613, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9045, LACE DALIE PEREZ MOREL, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6771495, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9046, SCHEILA J. PEREZ REYES, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6109398, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9047, ALEXANDER PIÑERO TULIER, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6280762, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9048, GABRIELA QUIÑONEZ TORRES, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4491504, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9049, NATALIE RAMIREZ RUIZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6076933, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9050, ALBERTO E. REGIS BLAY, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4465605, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9051, SKYLAR REYNOLDS RAMOS, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6736805, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9052, MAILEEN MIA RIOS HERNANDEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3942268, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9053, ARCILIO RIVAS RODRIGUEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 51176, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9054, ADRIANA V. RIVERA FLORES, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 1622602, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9055, ABNER R.
RIVERA MANSO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6731509, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9056, RHAYZA SYD RIVERA ORTIZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6056646, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9057, RAYSA JARED RIVERA PAGAN, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6778222, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9058, CORALYS DEL RIVERA QUIÑONES, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6567628, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9059, MARÍA IDALI RODRIGUEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4417277, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9060, NINOCHKA M. RODRIGUEZ CAMACHO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6586765, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9061, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ NUNEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6702996, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9062, YIRELIZ MORA RODRIGUEZ RUIZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4456687, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9063, ERIC M. ROJAS GONZALEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6640364, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9064, JORGE JR ROMAN, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4537259, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9065, YELICE ADELA ROSADO RAMIREZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6794817, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9067, CARLOS OVIDIO RUIZ VEGA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 448512, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9068, CARMEN DELIA SALGADO SANTONI, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 448512, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9069, CHRISTIAN S SANCHEZ BAS, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6256658, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9070, GUSTAVO SANTIAGO ALCANTARA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 2528574, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9071, LUIS ÁNGEL
SANTIAGO CASTRELLO , NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6017956, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9072, MADELINE SANTIAGO ORTIZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4035328, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9073, MARGARITA SANTOS RODRIGUEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3777241, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9074, MARÍA DEL R. SEGARRA DIAZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 2980840, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9075, MILDRED SEGUNDO DIAZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 78922, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9076, MARISAURA SERRANO ABREU, NÚMERO ELECTORAL
4088183, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9077, JORGE SERRANO ESCOBAR, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 2910445, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9078, JORGE A. SERRANO SIERRA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6604572, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9079, MORAIMA SEVERINO GARCIA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6659215, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9080, CHRISTOPHER SHAW ALONSO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4279230, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9081, PAUL BAXTER SHORTER GARCIA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3642662, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9082, SANDRA SIERRA DIAZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 2997542, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9083, OMKUMER SUAREZ RAMOS, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6807139, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9084, PAOLA TORO ALVAREZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6658296, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9085, VERONICA A. TORO ALVAREZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6771381, NÚMERO DE
RECUSACIÓN 9086, LENID TORRES CRUZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6035918, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN
9087, ROBERTO A. TORRES CRUZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6168891, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9088, CARLOS JOSE TORRES LÓPEZ, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4238954, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9089, ALBERTO R TORRES MARRERO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 3408393, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9090, HECTOR VAZQUEZ FRANCISCO, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 6625973, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9092, MANUEL A. VELEZ SIERRA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 2839203, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9093 Y TAMAYRA VILLAHERMOSA VILLANUEVA, NÚMERO ELECTORAL 4308537, NÚMERO DE RECUSACIÓN 9094. POR LA PRESENTE, se notifica que ha sido presentada una solicitud de recusación de electores por motivo de domicilio y otras causales hacia su persona, y se ha señalado VISTA PARA EL JUEVES, 4 DE ABRIL DE 2024 A LAS 5:30PM
EN LAS OFICINAS DE LA COMISION LOCAL, LOCALIZADAS EN: CALLE ARTERIAL B 550 DE HATO REY, PUERTO RICO. LA DIRECCION FISICA DE LA JUNTA DE INSCRIPCIO PERMANENTE ES CALLE ARTERIAL B 550 DE SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO. EL NUMERO DE TELEFONO DE LA JUNTA DE INSCRIPCION ES EL 787777-8682. SE APERCIBE A LOS ELECTORES QUE, DE NO COMPARECER A LA VISTA EN LA FECHA Y HORA SENALADA, SE PROCEDERA CON LA MISMA SIN MAS CITARLE, NOTIFICARLE, NI OIRLE. FIRMADA POR, JUAN A. LEON GONZALEZ, PRESIDENTE DE LA COMISION LOCAL EL 18 DE MARZO DE 2024.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA
CENTRO JUDICIAL DE MAYAGÜEZ SALA SUPERIOR DE MAYAGÜEZ
FIRSTBANK
PUERTO RICO
Demandante V.
ELIEZER RIVERA LÓPEZ
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: MZ2022CV00336.
(Salón: 207). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO Y OTROS. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO.
MARJALIISA COLON VILLANUEVAMCOLON@WWCLAW.COM.
A: ELIEZER RIVERA
DAVID RIVERA LOPEZ.
(Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto)
EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 07 de marzo de 2024, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha 20 de marzo de 2024. En Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, el 20 de marzo de 2024. NORMA G. SANTANA IRIZARRY, SECRETARIA. EVELYN GONZÁLEZ HERNÁNDEZ, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA
CENTRO JUDICIAL DE BAYAMÓN SALA SUPERIOR DE BAYAMÓN
ORIENTAL BANK
Demandante V. SUCESIÓN FRANCISCO JUSTINO VEGA OLIVO
COMPUESTA POR FULANO DE TAL Y ZUTANO DE TAL, COMO HEREDEROS DESCONOCIDOS Y OTROS
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: BY2023CV01647. (Salón: 401). Sobre COBRO DE DINERO ORDIARIO Y OTROS. BALDOMERO A. COLLAZO TORRES - BCOLLAZO@LAWPR.COM.
FELIPE SOTO ORTIZ, FELIPESOTO74@YAHOO.COM. CENTRO DE RECAUDACIÓN DE INGRESOS MUNICIPALES (“CRIM”) - OFICINA ASESORAMIENTO LEGAL, PO BOX 195387, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO, 00919-5387.
SUCESIÓN FRANCISCO JUSTINO VEGA OLIVO COMPUESTA POR FULANO DE TAL Y ZUTANO DE TAL, COMO HEREDEROS DE - 1824 CHASE COMMON DR. NORCROSS, GEORGIA, ESTADOS UNIDOS, 30071.
NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO.
A: CENTRO DE RECAUDACIÓN DE INGRESOS
MUNICIPALES (“CRIM”), SUCESIÓN FRANCISCO
JUSTINO VEGA OLIVO COMPUESTA POR FULANO DE TAL Y ZUTANO DE TAL, COMO HEREDEROS
DESCONOCIDOS.
(Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto)
EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 12 de marzo de 2024, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha 18 de marzo de 2024. En Bayamón, Puerto Rico, el 18 de marzo de 2024. LAURA I. SANTA SÁNCHEZ, SECRETARIA. NÉLIDA OCASIO ORTEGA, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA
CENTRO JUDICIAL DE GUAYAMA SALA SUPERIOR DE GUAYAMA
ISLAND PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC COMO
AGENTE DE ACE ONE FUNDING, LLC
Demandante V. ANGEL M
MONTANEZ RAMOS
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: GM2023CV00625.
(Salón: 306 SALA MIXTA, DRUG COURT, CR, TR, VP). NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO ENMENDADA
KEVIN SÁNCHEZ CAMPANERO, KEVIN.SANCHEZ@ORF-LAW.COM.
A: ANGEL M MONTANEZ RAMOS. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 16 de enero de 2024, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha 18 de marzo de 2024. Notas de la Secretaría: SE ENMIENDA A LOS EFECTOS DE ELIMINAR AL DEMANDADO DE LA NOTIFICACIÓN. En Guayama, Puerto Rico, el 18 de marzo de 2024. MARISOL ROSADO RODRÍGUEZ, SECRETARIA. LUZ MARÍA GUZMÁN SANTIAGO, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA SALA DE BAYAMÓN COMPU-LINK CORPORATION DBA
CELINK Demandante Vs. SUCESIÓN DE JOSÉ ENRIQUE OCASIO RAMOS COMPUESTA POR MARLENE M. OCASIO, JOSÉ A. OCASIO SANTANA, NATALIA M. OCASIO
SANTANA, FULANO Y SUTANO DE TAL COMO
MIEMBROS DE NOMBRE DESCONOCIDO; SUCESIÓN DE NATALIA
SANTANA CENTENO COMPUESTA POR
MARLENE M. OCASIO, JOSÉ A. OCASIO
SANTANA, NATALIA M. OCASIO SANTANA, FULANO Y SUTANO DE TAL COMO
MIEMBROS DE NOMBRE DESCONOCIDO; CENTRO DE RECAUDACIÓN DE INGRESOS
MUNICIPALES; ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA
Demandados
Civil Núm.: BY2024CV01115. Sobre: EJECUCIÓN DE HIPOTECA - IN REM. EMPLAZAMIENTO POR EDICTO E INTERPELACIÓN. ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA, EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS EE.
UU., EL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO, SS. EMPLAZAMIENTO POR EDICTO.
A: NATALIA M. OCASIO SANTANA, FULANO Y SUTANO DE TAL COMO HEREDEROS DESCONOCIDOS, COMO HEREDEROS DE LA SUCESIÓN DE JOSÉ ENRIQUE OCASIO
RAMOS Y NATALIA
SANTANA CENTENO.
POR LA PRESENTE, se les emplaza y se les notifica que se ha presentado en la Secretaria de este Tribunal la Demanda del caso del epígrafe solicitando la ejecución de hipoteca y el cobro de dinero relacionado al pagaré suscrito a favor de Master Mortgage Corp., o a su orden, por la suma principal de $262,500.00, con intereses computados sobre la misma desde su fecha hasta su total y completo pago a razón de la tasa de interés de 3.488% anual, la cual será ajustada mensualmente, obligándose además al pago de costas, gastos y desembolsos del litigio, más honorarios de abogados en una suma de $26,250.00, equivalente al 10% de la suma principal original. Este pagaré fue suscrito bajo el affidávit número 2543 ante el notario David E. Vera Umpierre. Lo anterior surge de la hipoteca constituida mediante la escritura número 103 otorgada el 18 de noviembre de 2009, ante el misma notario público, inscrita al Folio 198 vuelto Tomo 1,508 de Bayamón Sur, finca número 66,466, inscripción 4ta. La hipoteca grava la propiedad que describe que describe a continuación: URBANA: Solar marcado con el número DIECIOCHO (18) del bloque H en el plano de inscripción de la URBANIZACIÓN PARQUE
SAN MIGUEL, localizado en el Barrio Pájaros del término municipal de Bayamón, Puerto Rico, tiene un área superficial de CUATROCIENTOS DIECISEIS (416) metros cuadrados, equivalentes a CERO punto CIENTO SEIS (0.106) cuerdas. Sus colindancias son las siguientes, por el NORTE, colinda en una distancia de TREINTA DOS (32) metros lineales, con el solar número DIECISIETE (17) del bloque H; por el SUR, colinda en una distancia con un largo de TREINTA y DOS (32) metros lineales, con el solar número DIECINUEVE
(19) del bloque H, por el ESTE, colinda en una distancia de TRECE (13) metros lineales, con la calle número SEIS (6); y por el OESTE, colinda en una distancia de TRECE (13) metros lineales, con el solar número OCHO (8) del bloque H. Afecto este solar a una servidumbre a CINCO (5) pies lineales, que discurre a todo lo largo de su colindancia Este, a favor de la Puerto Rico Telephone Company. Enclava una casa de concreto de una sola planta, diseñada para fines residenciales para una familia. Finca número 66,466, inscrita al folio 197 del tomo 1508 de Bayamón. Registro de la Propiedad de Puerto Rico, Sección I de Bayamón. Se apercibe y advierte a ustedes como personas desconocidas, que deberá presentar su alegación responsiva a través del Sistema Unificado de Administración y Manejo de Casos (SUMAC), al cual puede accesar utilizando la siguiente dirección: https://unired.ramajuducial.pr, salvo que se represente por Derechos Propio, en cuyo caso deberá presentar su alegación responsiva en la secretaria del Tribunal De no contestar la demanda radicando el original de la contestación ante la secretaria del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de San Juan, y notificar copia de la contestación de esta a la parte demandante por conducto de su abogada, GLS LEGAL SERVICES, LLC, Atención: Lcda. Ilia Cristina Ramírez Martínez Dirección: P.O. Box 367308, San Juan, P.R. 00936-7308, Teléfono: 787-758-6550, dentro de los próximos 60 días a partir de la publicación de este emplazamiento por edicto, que será publicado una sola vez en un periódico de circulación diaria general en la isla de Puerto Rico, se le anotará la rebeldía y se dictará sentencia, concediendo el remedio solicitando en la Demanda sin más citarle ni oírle. INTERPELACIÓN: Se les ORDENA a ustedes a que dentro del término legal de TREINTA (30) días, contados a partir de la fecha de la notificación de la presente Orden, acepten o repudien la participación que les corresponda en la herencia de José Enrique Ocasio Ramos y Natalia Santana Centeno a saber: Marlene M. Ocasio, José A. Ocasio Santana, Natalia M. Ocasio Santana, Fulano y Sutano de Tal como miembros de nombre desconocido. Se les APERCIBE que de no expresarse dentro de ese término de TREINTA (30) días en torno a su aceptación o repudiación de herencia, la herencia se tendrá por aceptada. También se les APERCIBE que luego del transcurso del término de TREINTA (30) días antes señalado contados a partir de la fecha de la notificación de la presente Orden, se presumirá
que han aceptado la herencia de los causantes José Enrique Ocasio Ramos y Natalia Santana Centeno; y, por consiguiente, responden por las cargas de dicha herencia conforme dispone el Artículo 1578 del Código Civil de Puerto Rico de 2020, según enmendado. Se ORDENA a la parte demandante a que, en vista de que la sucesión de José Enrique Ocasio Ramos y Natalia Santana Centeno a saber: Marlene M. Ocasio, José A. Ocasio Santana, Natalia M. Ocasio Santana, Fulano y Sutano de Tal como miembros de nombre desconocido; proceda a notificar la presente Orden mediante publicación de un edicto a esos efectos una sola vez en un periódico de circulación diaria general de la Isla de Puerto Rico. Expedido bajo mi firma selo de Tribunal hoy 19 de marzo de 2024. LCDA.
LAURA I. SANTA SÁNCHEZ, SECRETARIA REGIONAL. MILITZA MERCADO RIVERA, SUB-SECRETARIA.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA
CENTRO JUDICIAL DE MAYAGÜEZ SALA SUPERIOR DE MAYAGÜEZ
Demandante V. LYDIA IRIS
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: MZ2022CV01764.
(Salón: 103 SALA DE INVESTIGACIONES). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - REGLA 60. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO.
RAFAEL FABRE COLÓNRFABRE@MCMLAWPR.COM.
A: LYDIA IRIS VEGA LÓPEZ.
(Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 14 de marzo de 2024, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edic-
to. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha 19 de marzo de 2024. En Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, el 19 de marzo de 2024. NORMA G. SANTANA IRIZARRY, SECRETARIA. JOSSIE BOBE RODRÍGUEZ, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE CAGUAS SALA SUPERIOR DE CAGUAS
TRUST MORTGAGE CORP
Demandante V. SUN WEST MORTGAGE CORPORATION Y OTROS
Demandado(a) Caso Núm.: CG2023CV03969. (Salón: 701). Sobre: CANCELACIÓN O RESTITUCIÓN DE PAGARÉ EXTRAVIADO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO ENMENDADA. JORGE GARCIA RONDONJAFGRONDON@GMAIL.COM.
A: M&T BANK - BOX
69129 1800 WASHINGTON BLVD, 8TH FLOOR, BALTIMORE MARYLAND
21230; JOHN DOE Y RICHARD ROE. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 06 de febrero de 2024, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha 20 de marzo de 2024. Notas de la Secretaría: SE ENMIENDA POR ORDEN DE LA JUEZ EVYANNE MARTIR HERNANDEZ. En Caguas, Puerto Rico, el 20 de marzo de 2024. Lisilda Martínez Agosto, Secretaria. Eneida Arroyo Vélez, Secretaria Auxiliar Del Tribunal.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBU-
NAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE CAGUAS SALA SUPERIOR DE CAGUAS REVERSE MORTGAGE FUNDING LLC
Demandante V. MAGNA LUISA CRUZ RODRIGUEZ Y OTROS
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: CG2020CV00583. (Salón: 801). Sobre: EJECUCIÓN DE HIPOTECA: PROPIEDAD RESIDENCIAL. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO.
FRANCES L. ASENCIO GUIDOFRANCES.ASENCIO@GMLAW.COM.
A: MAGNA LUISA CRUZ RODRIGUEZ.
(Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 11 de enero de 2024, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha 19 de marzo de 2024. En Caguas, Puerto Rico, el 19 de marzo de 2024. LISILDA MARTÍNEZ AGOSTO, SECRETARIA. SANDRA TRINIDAD CAÑUELAS, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE MAYAGÜEZ COOPERATIVA DE AHORRO Y CRÉDITO DE CABO ROJO
Demandante V. PIERO HEBER
LEBRÓN RIVERA
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: SG2023CV00456. Salón: 0100). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - REGLA 60. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO ENMENDADA.
RAFAEL FABRE COLÓNRFABRE@MCMLAWPR.COM. A: PIERO HEBER LEBRÓN RIVERA.
(Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto)
EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 20 de febrero de 2024, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha 20 de marzo de 2024. Notas de la Secretaría. ENMENDADA A LOS FINES DE CORREGIR EL NOMBRE DEL DEMANDADO.
En San Germán, Puerto Rico, el 20 de marzo de 2024. NORMA G. SANTANA IRIZARRY, SECRETARIA. SOCORRO DE LOS A. VÉLEZ RODRÍGUEZ, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA
CENTRO JUDICIAL DE CAROLINA SALA SUPERIOR DE CAROLINA
SAMALIZ
RIVERA ROMAN
Demandante V. JADIEL ALBERTO
ESCALERA DIAZ Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: CA2023RF00613. (Salón: 303). Sobre: CUSTODIA - MONOPARENTAL O COMPARTIDA Y OTROS. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO ENMENDADA.
ROSA L. VÁZQUEZ LÓPEZ, ROSAVAZQUEZPR@HOTMAIL.COM.
A: JADIEL ALBERTO
ESCALERA DIAZ. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto)
EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 05 de marzo de 2024, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los The
10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha 12 de marzo de 2024. Notas de la Secretaria: SE ENMIENDA A LOS FINES DE CORREGIR LA CAUSAL SEGÚN LA MINUTA
DEL 5 DE MARZO DE 2024. En Carolina, Puerto Rico, el 12 de marzo de 2024. KANELLY ZAYAS ROBLES, SECRETARIA. SADYMAR ORTIZ MATOS, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE SAN JUAN SALA SUPERIOR DE SAN JUAN
IRIS ALAYLA
FIGUEROA BRITO
Demandante V.
CESAR EDUARDO
REYES SANTOS
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: SJ2024RF00055.
(Salón: 701 RF). Sobre: DIVORCIO - RUPTURA IRREPARABLE. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO.
IRIS ALAYLA FIGUEROA BRITOURB CAPARA TERRACE CALLE 1
SO #915 SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO 00921.
REYES SANTOS.
(Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 14 de marzo de 2024, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este
caso, con fecha 15 de marzo de 2024. En San Juan, Puerto Rico, el 15 de marzo de 2024. GRISELDA RODRÍGUEZ COLLADO, SECRETARIA. ENID TORRES RUIZ, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE CAGUAS SALA SUPERIOR DE CAGUAS TRUST MORTGAGE CORP
Demandante V. JOHN DOE Y OTROS Demandado(a) Caso Núm.: CG2023CV03973. (Salón: 701). Sobre: CANCELACIÓN O RESTITUCIÓN DE PAGARé EXTRAVIADO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO ENMENDADA. JORGE GARCIA RONDONJAFGRONDON@GMAIL.COM.
A: CITI MORTGAGE INC - POR BOX 6243
SIOUX FALLS SD 571176243; MR COOPER - 8950 CYPREESS WATERS BLVD
DALLAS TDX 75019; JOHN DOE Y RICHRD ROE - PERSONAS DESCONOCIDAS CON POSIBLE INTERES).
(Nombre de las panes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 31 de enero de 2024, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha 20 de marzo de 2024. Notas de la Secretaría: SE ENMIENDA LA NOTIFICACIÓN POR ORDEN DE LA JUEZ EVYANNE MARTIROLOGIO HERNANDEZ. En Caguas, Puerto Rico, el 20 de marzo de 2024. LISILDA MARTÍNEZ AGOSTO, SECRETARIA. ENEIDA ARROYO VÉLEZ, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
Fill in the empty fields with the numbers from 1 through 9.
Sudoku Rules:
Every row must contain the numbers from 1 through 9
Every column must contain the numbers from 1 through 9
Every 3x3 square must contain the numbers from 1 through 9
Before Game 2 of the 2023 American League Championship Series, Michael Brantley took swings on the field with the rest of the Houston Astros. His father, former major leaguer Mickey Brantley, watched from the stands. At one point, the son stepped back from the cage and looked into the seats. His father motioned to him that he was drifting, and told him to turn more aggressively.
“He’s not only my father — he’s been a pro hitting coach and he’s played,” Brantley said after the game. “He knows my swing better than anybody.”
But in that moment by the cage, two hitting coaches were also on hand, as well as a quality assurance coach and a game-planning coach. One personnel roster for the Astros listed 14 major league coaches in 2023: They were 14 potential sources of inspiration, but also 14 different personalities that a player like Brantley could interact with on game day. The San Francisco Giants had 15 coaches, by one count. In 2014, the last time San Francisco won the World Series, it had eight coaches, including manager Bruce Bochy.
coach, a dietitian, two strength coaches, two trainers, two hitting coaches, two pitching coaches, two advance scouts and even a manager of minor league advance scouting.
Changes in staffing at the major league level are being met with similar ones on the minor league level, as teams make an effort to ensure that players are used to the game-planning process throughout their development. One executive rattled off all of the staff members the team had in Class AAA as it tried to replicate the major league process: a manager, a bench
Coaches upon coaches upon coaches, and that does not include the offseason, which is full of fathers and outside trainers with their own opinions about how the player should try to improve.
This explosion in coaching has led to a cacophony in the modern player’s head.
“No matter what, someone’s talking to you, no matter where you go — social media, the ballpark, the training fields — everyone has the thing they want to communicate to you,” said the Giants’ two-way prospect Reggie Crawford, who as a pitcher and hitter has twice as many coaches to deal with than the average player. “You have to figure out what you want to put your time and energy into. There are a lot of voices.”
For veterans, the solution can be simple: Be your own coach (or be the CEO of all the coaches you employ).
“This year is the first year I’m my own hitting coach,” Cleveland Guardians outfielder Ramón Laureano said about his offseason, in which he bought weighted bats and devised a routine. “It takes time,
it can take seven, eight years, to be really good and really bad and know yourself enough to be your own coach.”
But there’s still a trick to it. You have to not only be ready to hear new things, but also retain some cynicism about the things you might hear.
“It’s always good to improve; I’m always open to new ideas,” San Diego Padres infielder Xander Bogaerts said. “If they say something, I don’t have to do it necessarily, but if it is something that might help, I’d like to hear about it.”
Veterans have the money and gravitas to hire their own coaches and follow their own plans. It can be tougher for a player coming through a minor league system, talking to coach after coach at every level. What happens when he runs into a coach telling him something that does not seem right for his game?
“Guys can fall victim to that when they’re younger because they are peoplepleasing and trying to be coachable,” Seattle Mariners outfielder Mitch Haniger said.
So, how do you not listen to your coaches and also not be labeled “uncoachable”? Players have an answer for this one.
“Create real personal relationships
so there’s something other than baseball to talk about,” said a minor leaguer who did not think his current coaches could help him. “With the old guys, especially, just getting them to tell their glory day stories. Feeds their egos and keeps me in good spirits. If you come with a thought-out plan and show effort, they usually don’t say anything.”
Giving players the keys to their future is also good for the organization and the outside coach, even when they come into conflict.
“If you can prove what you’re saying to the player and the team says no, the player is going to come back and say, ‘Can you provide me the information to show it to the team?’” said Driveline Baseball’s director of pitching, Chris Langin. “But if you can’t get the player to commit, they won’t show it to the team. You try to empower the player, by telling them what you think they should do and providing evidence.”
If the player cares enough, just having that intention to gather information will almost always be a good thing for his career. Even for a veteran such as Shane Bieber, who tried new voices this offseason and was surprised to hear (from Langin) that his curveball grip had somehow changed over the year, without the pitcher noticing.
“It was unintentional; it was amazing, but it was also a relief,” Bieber said.
As a player, the trick is to assimilate all that new knowledge into what you already knew, take the good, not the irrelevant, and do so while not irritating the coaches around you (especially if you are a prospect). And for the front office executive, the plan is to create an environment where all of this is encouraged, and the player can learn and be open and honest — but also somehow ends up with the coaching you want for them, from the mouth of one of your organization’s hundreds of coaches.
Simple? Doesn’t sound like it, but somehow it has to feel that way.
Xander Bogaerts of the Boston Red Sox hits a single in the fifth inning in Game 1 of the World Series against the Los Angeles Dodgers, at Fenway Park in Boston, Oct. 23, 2018. Bogaerts, now with the San Diego Padres, says he always appreciates input from coaches, but the 12th-year veteran decides for himself what to do with the advice. (Chang W. Lee/The New York Times)
