sin46th magzus.org

Page 1


Buying โ„ข

From the Editors of Consumer Reports


CONTENTS ELECTRONICS

82 Computers, Desktop 85 Computers, Laptop 93 Digital Cameras 100 Fitness Trackers 102 Headphones P. 102

P. 60

109 Printers, All-in-One 113 Printers, Regular 117 Smartphones

P. 48

P. 212

120 Smart Speakers 122 Smartwatches 124 Streaming Media 126 Tablets 129 TVs 141 Wireless Speakers AUTOS

146 Highs and Lows of the 2020 Models

QQ็พค: 970508760 3

Buying Advice at Your Fingertips

28 Generators

4

Ratings, Reliability & Owner Satisfaction

35 Lawn Tractors

6

Comparing Retailers

45 Microwaves

31 Lawn Mowers 38 Mattresses 48 Ranges

HOME

54 Refrigerators

12 Air Purifiers

60 Snow Blowers

14 Clothes Dryers

63 Vacuums

19 Cooktops

70 Wall Ovens

23 Dishwashers

73 Washing Machines

26 Gas Grills

80 Washer/Dryer Pairs

2

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

168 Rating the 2020 Models 183 Used Cars: The Most Reliable Models and the Ones to Avoid 192 Detailed Used-Car Reliability 212 Tire Ratings


Buying Advice at Your Fingertips The Consumer Reports Buying Guide for 2020 is your handy one-stop source for making informed, money-saving purchases. Consult it before you shop, then take it to the store or keep it beside your computer to help you compare brands. Hereโ€™s how to make the best use of this guide:

PACKED WITH HIGHLIGHTS from our exclusive buying advice and ratings for more than 2,000 product models, this little book will be an invaluable shopping tool for squeezing the most value from every dollar you spend. Preceding each ratings chart, youโ€™ll find a Quick Guide with buying advice for that product. You can access our full buying advice by using the website address provided with each category. But before you delve into the best stuff to buy, be sure to read about the best places to find itโ€”whether online or at a walk-in storeโ€”in the Comparing Retailers section, starting on page 6. Our surveys of thousands of Consumer Reports members provide invaluable insight into buying trends, plus the service, selection, and prices offered by dozens of retailers of appliances and electronics products. After youโ€™ve honed your shopping savvy, turn to the Product Ratings section, starting on page 11, for guidance from CRโ€™s experts on 34 product categories, in three sections: Home,

Electronics and Autos. Here youโ€™ll find exclusive ratings based on our tough in-house tests, and, for many products, brand predicted reliability and owner satisfaction estimates from our surveys of hundreds of thousands of CR members about breakages and problems theyโ€™ve had with various brands. In the market for a car? The Autos section, starting on page 145, has all the information you need to make the right decision on a new or used model. If youโ€™re buying new, start with a look at the Highs and Lows of the 2020 vehicles, check out the Standout Models in each category, and then move on to the full ratings. Used car buyers will find our expertsโ€™ picks for Best and Worst models, plus detailed reliability reports. Weโ€™ve even got ratings for more than 100 tire models. In todayโ€™s crowded marketplace, this guide can help cut through the endless options, helping you choose the best, safest productsโ€”and save money doing it. So keep it with you whenever you shop, and buy with confidence.

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

3


Ratings, Reliability & Owner Satisfaction The Quick Guides, product ratings, and brand reliability and owner satisfaction information that follow are designed to help you zero in on the model you want to buy. See the buying advice highlights in the Quick Guides to help you decide what you want from a product. Then go to the ratings charts to get the details on performance.

FOR SOME PRODUCT categories youโ€™ll find full ratings that include every currently available model we tested. For others, the ratings charts show a select models recommended for most people and models designated as CR Best Buys. To develop our ratings, we put all models within a category through weeks of testing, side by side, so that test results can be compared. We rank products by performance. Consumer Reports checked that the products rated in this Buying Guide were still available at press time. But depending on how long after publication you use this book, you might find a rating for a product thatโ€™s no longer available. Or you might not find a rating for a model thatโ€™s available because it hadnโ€™t been tested as of publication.

Introducing Our New Overall Score Consumer Reports evaluates a variety of factors for every product we testโ€” performance, predicted reliability, and owner satisfaction.

4

Now CR is incorporating data from those assessments into one Overall Score, as we did with our autos ratings starting in 2016. The result is a single integrated rating that will make it even easier for you to make a well-informed buying decision. We started with refrigerators and washers and dryers and are now applying our integrated Overall Score to all major appliances, many small appliances, home and garden products, and electronics we test. By combining the results of performance tests in our labs with the data we collect through surveys of CR members, our new Overall Score gives a holistic picture of product quality. One result of this is that models from brands with high reliability ratings might cluster at the top of the ratings while brands with poor reliability are penalized. We believe thatโ€™s a good thing because it more closely reflects your experience with a product.

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


$ 0

1

! 0

2

Bosch Ascenta 88 SHX3AR75UC Bosch 300 DLX 85 Series SHS863WD5N

$770

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4

Cycle time (min.)

Noise

Energy use

Features

95 SS/P 150

Ratings Key

1 0 POOR

$ CR BEST BUY

Overall scores are based on a scale of 0 to 100. We rate products using these symbols:

2 FAIR

These models offer the best combination of performance and price. All are recommended.

3 0 GOOD 4 0 VERY GOOD 5 0 EXCELLENT

Self-cleaning filter

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4

Test Results

Interior material

$540

Predicted reliability

Survey Results

Rank

Recommended

Price

Drying

Overall Score

Brand & Model

indicated by a gray dash (โˆ’), we assume the model has average reliability. Owner satisfaction. The same surveys provide data for this assessment, which asks CR members how likely theyโ€™d be to recommend the appliances they purchased. Here, too, a gray dash means insufficient data, and the product receives the category average by default.

Washing

Predicted reliability. Through our surveys, tens of thousands of CR members who purchased major appliances in the past 10 years tell us about their product experiences. Then we crunch the data to estimate the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand (not under a service contract)

will break or experience problems within five years. Products from brands that rate Fair or Poor for reliability canโ€™t earn recommended status from CR, regardless of performance or satisfaction, because consumers also expect their appliances to last. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating,

Owner satisfaction

SURVEY RESULTS IN THE CHARTS

SS

! RECOMMENDED These are high-performing models that stand out.

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

5


Comparing Retailers Our product testers can tell you which refrigerator or computer delivers the most value. But then you have to find the lowest price and the best service. To help you find the best places to shop, we survey tens of thousands of Consumer Reports members annually about their experiences buying appliances and electronics in-store and online.

Appliances

Electronics

Most purchases are still made in brick-and-mortar stores but about four out of five major and small appliance shoppers use the internet to research their product by doing things like checking prices and reading reviews. More than 6 out of 10 small and major appliance shoppers visit a retailerโ€™s website before making a purchase at its store or website. In our 2018 Spring Survey, over 46,000 CR members told us about more than 68,000 major and small appliance purchases they made from the Spring of 2017 through the Spring of 2018. This year weโ€™re able to rate 21 major appliance and 19 small appliance retail chains (30 overall, as some chains are rated in both categories). We also rate independent stores and manufacturersโ€™ websites as two separate groups in both appliance categories.

O verall, consumers are quite happy

6

with their shopping experience at electronic retailers, and online shoppers tend to be significantly more satisfied in all aspects of the transaction experience compared with their in-store shopping counterparts. But more than half of members in our ratings sample are still making their electronic purchases at walk-in retailers. Even so, youโ€™re likely to hit the mall for many electronics purchases if youโ€™re anything like the consumers we surveyed.

Research Can Yield a Good Price Doing online research for home products, such as large and small appliances, electronics and autos is useful, according to electronic products shoppers, researching the product online to determine the features they did or didnโ€™t need was the strategy used most often by members to help find the best price.

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


RE TA IL ERS

Appliance Retailers In order of reader score, within types.

0 5 5 0

5 0

โˆ’ โˆ’

โˆ’ โˆ’

0 3 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0

0 4 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0

0 5 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0

Shipping/ Delivery

0 5 5 0

Website usability

0 5 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0

In-store atmosphere

Selection

5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

Service

Price paid

Reader Survey Results Overall satisfaction score

Retailer

MAJOR APPLIANCES Abt

94

Famous Tate

93

Amazon.com

92

Manufacturersโ€™ websites

92

Costco

91

Nebraska Furniture Mart

91

Independents

90

Warnersโ€™ Stellian

89

Spencerโ€™s TV & Appliance

88

Grand Appliance & TV

88

Pacific Sales

88

R.C. Willey Home Furnishings

87

Ferguson

87

P.C. Richard & Son

87

Best Buy

86

Albert Lee Appliance

86

JCPenney

85

Loweโ€™s

85

Menards

85

Sears Hometown Stores

84

Home Depot

84

Bray & Scarff

84

Sears

83

1

2

WORSE

3

4

โˆ’

โˆ’ โˆ’ 3 0

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 4 0

0 5 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0

โˆ’

โˆ’

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 3 3 0

โˆ’ 3 0

โˆ’ 0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0

5

BET TER

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

7


Shipping/ Delivery

Website usability

0 5 5 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0

In-store atmosphere

Selection

4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 2 0

Service

Price paid

Reader Survey Results Overall satisfaction score

Retailer

SMALL APPLIANCES Abt

95

Amazon.com

92

QVC.com

92

Costco

92

Williams-Sonoma

91

Manufacturersโ€™ websites

90

JCPenney

90

Independents

89

Bed Bath & Beyond

89

Kohlโ€™s

88

BJโ€™s

87

Macyโ€™s

87

P.C. Richard & Son

87

Samโ€™s Club

87

Best Buy

86

Target

86

Menards

85

Home Depot

84

Loweโ€™s

83

Walmart

82

Sears

82

HOW WE SURVEY: Ratings are based on Consumer Reportsโ€™ 2018 Spring Survey of 46,273 CR members reporting on 68,234 appliance purchases made between the Spring of 2017 and the Spring of 2018. Reader Score represents shoppersโ€™ overall satisfaction with their retail experience. If

8

all respondents are completely satisfied with a particular retailer, the reader score would be 100; a score of 80 indicates that respondents are โ€œvery satisfied,โ€ on average. Differences of less than 4 points are not meaningful. The other attributes listed under Survey Results reflect average scores on a

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

โˆ’ 0 4 4 0 2 0 4 0 4 0

โˆ’ 0 4 3 0 2 0

โˆ’ 0 3 4 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0

โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 5 0

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 2 0

0 5 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0

โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’

โˆ’ 0 3 3 0 3 0

โˆ’ 3 0

โˆ’ 0 3 3 0 3 0

โˆ’ 0 3 3 0 2 0 2 0

scale from โ€œvery poorโ€ to โ€œexcellentโ€. Ratings are based on the experiences of CR members, who may not be representative of the general US population. Dashes ( ), indicate insufficient sample size to provide a rating or that an attribute is not applicable to a retailer.

โˆ’


RE TA IL ERS

Electronics Retailers In order of reader score, within types.

Walk-in retailer buying ease

0 4 5 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 0

0 5 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

NA

โˆ’

NA

3 0 0 4 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

NA

5 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 5 0 0 3 4 0 0 3 0

โˆ’ โˆ’

0 4 3 0

Web support

0 5 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 5 0 โˆ’ 0 4 0 4 5 0 0 5 0 5 โˆ’ 0 4 0 4 3 0 0 4 0 4 3 0 0 5 0 5 โˆ’ 0 4 0 5 โˆ’ 0 3 0 3 2 0 0 4 0 4 โˆ’ 0 4 0 4 3 0 0 4 0 4 3 0 0 5 0 5 โˆ’ 0 3 0 3 3 0 0 4 0 4 2 0 0 3 0 3 โˆ’ 0 4 0 4 2 0 0 3 0 3 โˆ’ 0 4 0 4 โˆ’ 0 3 0 3 โˆ’ 0 4 0 4 โˆ’ 0 3 0 3 3 0 0 3 0 3 2 0 0 3 0 3 2 0 0 3 0 3

Website usability

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0

Checkout ease

Customer service

Selection

4 0 4 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 0 4 3 0 4 0 0 4 3 0 3 0 3 0

Product quality

Price paid

Reader Survey Results Overall satisfaction score

Retailer

ONLINE STORES Crutchfield.com

96

BHPhotoVideo.com

96

Shopmyexchange.com

94

Apple.com

94

Adorama.com

93

Costco.com

93

Amazon.com

93

Abt.com

93

Target.com

92

Newegg.com

91

SamsClub.com

91

Bose.com

91

QVC.com

90

Staples.com

90

Independent websites

90

BestBuy.com

89

Woot.com

89

Walmart.com

89

HSN.com

88

Microsoft.com

87

Groupon.com

87

Samsung.com

87

HP.com

86

Lenovo.com

86

Dell.com

85

โˆ’ 0 3 2 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

WALK-IN STORES Abt Electronics

96

Army & Air Force Exchange

93

1

2

WORSE

3

4

5

BET TER

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

9


0 5 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0

0 4 3 0 5 0 0 5 3 โˆ’ 0 4 โˆ’ 0 4 0 0 4 โˆ’ 0 4

Walk-in retailer buying ease

0 5 5 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0

Web support

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0

Website usability

Product quality

0 4 4 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 2 0

Checkout ease

Selection

3 0 1 0 0 4 2 0 4 0 0 4 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 3 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

Customer service

Price paid

Reader Survey Results Overall satisfaction score

Retailer

WALK-IN STORES Continued Independent Stores

93

Apple Store

93

Navy Exchange

93

Bose

92

Costco

92

Video Only

92

Nebraska Furniture Mart

92

BJโ€™s

91

P.C. Richard & Son

90

Micro Center

89

GameStop

89

Fred Meyer Stores

88

Samโ€™s Club

88

Barnes & Noble

88

Target

88

Best Buy

87

Sears

87

Microsoft

86

Kohlโ€™s

86

Staples

85

Fryโ€™s Electronics

85

Office Depot/Office Max

85

Walmart

84

GUIDE TO THE R ATINGS:

Ratings are based on 88,021 purchases of electronics purchased by 56,289 Consumer Reportsโ€™ members between January 2016 and June 2017. Reader Score represents shoppersโ€™ overall satisfaction with their retail experience. If all respondents

10

are completely satisfied with a particular retailer, the reader score would be 100; a score of 80 indicates that respondents are โ€œvery satisfied,โ€ on average. Differences of less than 4 points are not meaningful. The other attributes listed under Survey Results reflect

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

โˆ’ 0 3 2 0 3 0 1 0

โˆ’ โˆ’ 3 โˆ’ 0 3 โˆ’ 0 4 0 0 4

โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 0 3 2 3 โˆ’ 0 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 3

โˆ’ โˆ’ 4 0 0 4

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 2 0 3 0 3 0

0 3 2 0 3 0 2 0

0 4 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0

average scores on a scale from โ€œvery poorโ€ to โ€œexcellentโ€. Ratings are based on the experiences of CR members, who may not be representative of the general US population. Dashes ( ), indicate insufficient sample sizes to provide a rating or that an attribute is not applicable to a retailer.

โˆ’


31 Lawn Mowers

60 Snow Blowers

14 Clothes Dryers

35 Lawn Tractors

63 Vacuums

19 Cooktops

38 Mattresses

70 Wall Ovens

23 Dishwashers

45 Microwaves

26 Gas Grills

48 Ranges

73 Washing Machines

28 Generators

54 Refrigerators

80 Washer/ Dryer Pairs

Home

12 Air Purifiers

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

11


QUI CK GUIDE

Air Purifiers The most effective portable air purifiers we tested were made for rooms 350 sq. ft. or larger. These models cleared the air quickly of dust, smoke, and pollen at their high and low speeds. What to Look For Most portable air purifiers use a fan to suck in air for filtration. Fanless models run more quietly, but those we tested worked poorly. Energy Star certified models can save you money on utility bills compared to standard models. Air purifiers with filter indicator lights let you know when the filter needs to be replaced. A washableโ€”and reusableโ€” prefilter collects large

BUYING ADVICE

particles before they reach the HEPA filter, possibly extending its life.

Air filters are certified based on room size and clean-air delivery rate (CADR), their cleaning speed. We judge a CADR of 240 and up excellent and below 100 poor.

What to Skip Models with electrostatic precipitators or ionizer technology could produce ozone, a lung irritant.

What Youโ€™ll Pay Portable air purifiers will run $50 to more than $1,000; plus filter replacements and the cost of energy required to run the machines 24 hours a day.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/air-purifiers.

Tested products in performance order.

Noise (high speed)

0 5 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0

0 4 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0

0 1 2 0 3 0 3 0 1 0

Annual cost ($)

Noise (low speed)

Test Results Dust/pollen/smoke removal (high)

Rank

Recommended

Price Dust/pollen/smoke removal (low)

Overall Score

Brand & Model

LARGE ROOM (350-650 SQ FT)

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 12

1

Blueair Classic 605

88

$750

2

Blueair Blue Pure 211+

85

$300

3

Honeywell HPA300

76

$250

4

Alen Breathsmart

72

$650

5

Honeywell 50250

69

$200

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

224 192 203 190 213


Dust/pollen/smoke removal (high)

Noise (low speed)

Noise (high speed)

0 3 3 0

0 2 2 0

121

$310

0 5 5 0

64

$230

3 0

5 0

3 0

2 0

231

64

$220

3 0

5 0

3 0

3 0

112

63

$220

3 0

4 0

3 0

2 0

187

62

$240

3 0

4 0

4 0

3 0

80

59

$200

3 0

4 0

4 0

3 0

80

Annual cost ($)

Dust/pollen/smoke removal (low)

Test Results

0 3 4 0

Rank

Recommended

Price

A IR P UR IF IERS

Overall Score

Brand & Model

LARGE ROOM (350-650 SQ FT) Continued

! 0

6

Idylis AC-2118

68

$306

7

SPT AC-2102

65

GermGuardian AC5900WCA Winix FresHome WACP450 Kenmore 83396

8 9 10

395

MEDIUM ROOM (150-350 SQ FT)

2

Honeywell AirGenuis 5 HFD-320 Honeywell Air Genius 4 HFD310

3

LG PuriCare AS401VGA1

54

$300

2 0

4 0

4 0

3 0

107

4

GermGuardian AC9200WCA

52

$300

2 0

4 0

4 0

2 0

222

5

Febreze FHT190W

51

$98

Sharp FP-F60UW

51

$241

7

Boneco P400

47

$300

8

Therapure TPP240

46

$120

9

Friedrich AP260

46

$250

0 4 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 3 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0

0 3 2 0 3 0 2 0 2 0

89

6

0 3 3 0 3 0 2 0 2 0

1

54 168 64 168

SMALL ROOM (LESS THAN 150 SQ FT) 1

Dyson Pure Cool Link

26

$500

Dyson TP04 Pure Cool

26

$550

0 1 1 0

0 2 2 0

0 5 4 0

0 2 2 0

102

2 3

Hamilton Beach TrueAir 04383

18

$55

1 0

1 0

4 0

3 0

25

HOW WE TEST: Dust/pollen/ smoke removal (high) indicates how well it removes particles at its highest speed. Dust/pollen/smoke removal (low) evaluates its ability to

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

remove particles at a lower speed (whichever one is closest to 50 decibels). Noise is measured using a decibel meter from 4 feet away at both high and low speeds. Annual Cost includes filter

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

107

replacements and the energy required to run the purifier 24 hours a day for an entire year. Overall Score is based on the performance of the product in all of our tests.

13


QUI CK GUIDE

Clothes Dryers Electric dryers are the bigger sellers, though decades of testing has revealed that gas and electric dryers perform similarly. Gas or electric, keep in mind that larger capacities let you dry more laundry at once. What to Look For

What to Skip

Moisture sensors detect the laundryโ€™s dampness and shut off the appliance when clothes are dry, cutting down on energy costs. This is easier on fabrics, too. Auto-dry cycles provide settings of less dry to more dry for damp ironing, and points in between. An extended-tumble setting without heat helps prevent wrinkles when you canโ€™t remove the load immediately.

Specialty cycles up the price. A choice of heat level, timed dry, and autodry, along with a few fabric types, should do.

BUYING ADVICE

If you intend to install the dryer near a bedroom, look for one that scored Very Good or Excellent in our tests for noise. Youโ€™ll hear it working, but it shouldnโ€™t disturb you.

What Youโ€™ll Pay Prices vary from $350 to $2,000, depending on type, capacity, and features. Gas dryers cost roughly $50 to $150 more than comparable electric models, but the likely savings in fuel costs should more than make up for the difference.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/dryers.

Tested products in performance order.

0 5 4 0 5 0 4 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 4 0

0 5 5 0 4 0 5 0

Claimed capacity (cu. ft.)

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0

Steam option

Noise

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0

Features Stainless-steel drum

Convenience

Test Results Drying performance

Survey Results Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

Predicted reliability

Overall Score

Brand & Model

0

0

7.3

0

0

9

0

7.3

0

9

ELECTRIC DRYERS

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 14

1

LG DLEX7600WE

91

$945

2

LG DLEX7700VE

91

$1,170

3

LG DLEX3570W

91

$1,100

4

LG DLEX9000V

90

$1,620

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

0


Features

Steam option

Claimed capacity (cu. ft.)

Stainless-steel drum

Noise

Convenience

Test Results Drying performance

Owner satisfaction

Predicted reliability

Survey Results

Rank

Recommended

Price

0

7.4

0

0

9.2

0

0

7.3

0

0

7.4

ELECTRIC DRYERS Continued 89

$800

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0

5

LG DLEX3700W

! 0

6

Maytag MEDB955FW

88

$1,185

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5

! 0

7

LG DLEX7900BE

87

$950

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4

! 0

8

LG DLE7100W

87

$720

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4

! 0

9

LG DLEX5000V

87

$1,345

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

! 0

10 LG DLEX8100V

87

$1,100

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

! 0

11 Kenmore Elite 61632

86

$1,150

! 0

12 LG DLEX3900W

86

$900

13 Kenmore Elite 61552

85

14 Kenmore 81382 Samsung 15 DV42H5600EW (Loweโ€™s)

1

7.3

0

9

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5

0

0

9.2

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4

0

0

7.4

$850

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5

0

0

7.3

85

$700

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4

0

0

7.3

84

$720

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5

0

0

7.5

16 LG DLEX4370W

84

$1,080

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

0

0

7.4

LG Signature 17 DLEX9500K

84

$1,810

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

0

0

9

18 Kenmore 81392

83

$680

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5

19 Kenmore Elite 81582

83

$850

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4

20 Kenmore 81182

83

$600

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4

21 LG DLEX5005K

83

$1,500

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4

0

22 Kenmore Elite 81782

82

$1,050

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5

0

Whirlpool 23 WED8500DW

82

$1,085

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4

24 Maytag MEDB765FW

81

$630

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

25 Kenmore 69132

81

$900

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4

Samsung 26 DV50K7500EW

81

$995

27 GE GFD48ESSKWW

80

$1,135

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

0

7.3

0

0

7.4

0

7.4

0

7.4

0

8.8

7.3

7.4 0

8.8

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4

0

0

7.5

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5

0

0

8.3

15

CL O T HE S DR Y ERS

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Steam option

Claimed capacity (cu. ft.)

Features Stainless-steel drum

Noise

Convenience

Test Results Drying performance

Survey Results Predicted reliability

Rank

Recommended

Price

Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

0

7

ELECTRIC DRYERS Continued Whirlpool 28 WED7300DW Whirlpool 29 WED7500GW

80

$550

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4

80

$810

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

30 Kenmore 67132

79

$730

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4

Samsung 31 DV45K6500EW Samsung 32 DVE50M7450W

78

$990

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

78

$600

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4

7.4

0

0

7

0

7.5

0

7.4

0

9

33 Kenmore Elite 81982

78

$1,000

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

0

Fisher & Paykel 34 AeroCare DE7027P1 Fisher & Paykel 35 AeroCare DE7027P2

78

$1,000

1 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4

0

0

7

78

$1,000

1 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4

0

0

7

0 5 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0

0

0

7.3

GAS DRYERS 1

LG DLGX7601WE

91

$1,035

2

LG DLGX7701VE

91

$1,540

3

LG DLGX3571W

91

$750

4

LG DLGY1902WE

91

$650

5

LG DLGX9001V

90

$1,710

6

LG DLGX3701W

89

$990

7

LG DLG7101W

87

$810

8

LG DLGX5001V

87

$1,440

9

LG DLGX8101V

87

$1,440

10 Maytag MGDB955FW

87

$1,260

11 Kenmore Elite 71632

87

$1,250

12 LG DLGX3901W

86

$1,000

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5 0

! 0

Samsung 13 DV42H5600GW (Loweโ€™s)

86

$1,000

! 0

14 Kenmore Elite 71552

85

$950

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 $ 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

16

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0

0 5 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0

0

0 0

0

9

0

7.3

0

7.3

0

9

0

7.4 7.3

0

0

7.4

0

9

0

0

9.2

0

0

9.2

0

0

7.4

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5

0

0

7.5

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5

0

0

7.3


Features

Steam option

Claimed capacity (cu. ft.)

Stainless-steel drum

Noise

Convenience

Test Results Drying performance

Owner satisfaction

Predicted reliability

Survey Results

Rank

Recommended

Price

0

8.8

0

0

7.4

0

0

7.4

0

7.3

GAS DRYERS Continued

! 0

15 Maytag MGDB855DW

85

$990

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

! 0

Whirlpool 16 WGD92HEFW

85

$830

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5

17 LG DLGX4371W

84

$1,170

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

18 Kenmore 91392

84

$800

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5

LG Signature 19 DLGX9501K

84

$1,900

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

0

9 7.4

20 Maytag MGD3500FW

83

$1,310

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

0

21 Maytag MGD5500FW

83

$960

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

0

7.4

0

0

7.4

0

7.4

22 Kenmore Elite 91582

83

$1,050

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4

23 Kenmore 91182

83

$700

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4

$1,600

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4

0

0

7.5

0

7.4

83

24 LG DLGX5006K

7.3

Samsung 25 DV50K7500GW

82

$1,100

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4

0

26 Kenmore Elite 91782

82

$1,150

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

0

27 Kenmore 79132

81

$1,000

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4

0

8.8

81

$1,100

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4

0

8.8

80

$1,080

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

0

0

7.5

80

$1,050

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4

0

0

7

$700

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4

0

7.4

79

$810

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

0

7

79

$900

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

28 29 30 31 32 33

1

0

Whirlpool WGD8500DW Samsung DV45K6500GW Fisher & Paykel AeroCare DG7027P2 Samsung DVG50M7450W Whirlpool WGD7300DW Whirlpool WGD7500GW

80

7.4

34 Kenmore 77132

79

$830

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

0

Whirlpool 35 WGD8700EC Samsung 36 DVG54M8750V

79

$1,345

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

0

8.8

79

$1,260

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

0

7.4

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

0

7

17

CL O T HE S DR Y ERS

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Overall Score

Test Results

Features

38 GE GFD48GSSKWW

$1,195

0

8.3

39 Kenmore Elite 91982

78

$1,100

0 3 2 0 0 4 4 0 0 5 3 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 4 0

0 0

0

9

Miele TWI180WP

84

$1,900

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

0

4.1

77

$900

0

4.0

77

$990

โˆ’ โˆ’ 4 0 0 5 0 4 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 5 0 0 4

0

4.0

Claimed capacity (cu. ft.)

7.4

79

Noise

0

Convenience

0

Drying performance

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

Owner satisfaction

$850

Predicted reliability

Steam option

Survey Results

Stainless-steel drum

Price

Rank

Recommended

Brand & Model

GAS DRYERS Continued Samsung 37 DVG52M8650W

79

COMPACT DRYERS

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

Samsung DV22K6800EW Samsung DVE22N6850X

4

GE DCVH480EKWW

72

$995

4.0

LG DLEC888W

71

$855

0 1 3 0 0 4 5 0 0 4 3 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 4 0

0

5

0

4.2

Bosch 800 Series WTG86402UC Fisher & Paykel DE4024P1 Whirlpool WHD5090GW Electrolux EFDE210TIW

70

$1,315

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

0

4.0

58

$920

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 0 4 0 2

0

4

55

$900

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3

0

53

$900

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 2 4 0 0 3 โˆ’ โˆ’ 2 0 0 4 3 0

0

4.0

0

4.0

6 7 8 9

10 Kenmore 81942 HOW WE TEST: Drying Performance combines performance on three types of laundry loads of different sizes and fabric mixes: A 12-lb. load, predominantly cotton (6-lb. mixed loads for compact models); an 8-lb. load of cotton/polyester-blend clothing; and a 3-lb. load of synthetic delicates, such as womenโ€™s pajamas, slips, and underwear. Convenience is judged on controls and ergonomics, such as ease

18

51

$975

of loading and unloading, servicing the lint filter. Noise level is determined by a panel of judges who listen while the machines dry an 8-pound load, judging both sound quality and volume. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines performance test results with survey data for combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

0

4.3

purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first five years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the clothes dryer they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’


COOK T OP S

QUI CK GUIDE

Cooktops Cooktops can be installed wherever counter space allowsโ€”including on an island. Gas and conventional smoothtop electric cooktops dominate the category, but prices are dropping for electric induction. What to Look For

What to Skip

All the models we test have at least one highpowered gas burner or electric element, necessary for quick heating. If you have a choice in fuel and want the visual feedback of a flame, a gas cooktop is for you; on the other hand, a smoothtop electric makes for easier cleaning. Induction speeds heating, thanks to an electromagnetic field that directly heats pans.

BUYING ADVICE

Buying by Btu. Short for โ€œBritish thermal unit,โ€ the measurement indicates gas used and heat generatedโ€” and doesnโ€™t guarantee better or faster cooking.

Many 30-inch cooktops now have five burners, rather than four, but know that using all five at once often requires some maneuvering.

What Youโ€™ll Pay A cooktop and wall oven can cost $2,000 or more; some top-rated ranges sell for less than half that.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/cooktops.

Tested products in performance order.

0 5 5 0 3 0 3 0

0 4 4 0 4 0 3 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0

No. of highpower burners No. of mediumpower burners No. of lowpower burners

Low heat

Rank

Survey Test Results Results Features

High heat

Rec.

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

1

Price

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

30-INCH GAS COOKTOPS

$ 0 1

Samsung NA30N7755TS

92

$1,600

2

Samsung NA30N6555TS

91

$1,260

3

Monogram ZGU30RSLSS

84

$1,730

4

KitchenAid KCGS350ESS

79

$1,080

5

Ikea Framtid 602.887.01 [ICS655DS]

78

$530

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

0 5 5 0 3 0 3 0

2

2

1

2

2

1

2

3

0

1

3

1

โ€“ โ€“ 0 3 0 5

1

3

1

19


Rank

No. of highpower burners No. of mediumpower burners No. of lowpower burners

Rec.

Low heat

Survey Test Results Results Features Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Price

High heat

Overall Score

Brand & Model

! 0

6

GE Profile PGP7030SLSS

77

$1,170

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5

2

2

1

! 0

7

Bosch 800 Series NGM8056UC

76

$1,370

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5

1

2

2

0 ! ! 0

8

Cafรฉ CGP9530SLSS

72

$1,530 $900

2

1

66

$880

2

1

1

11 Kenmore 32683

61

$1,200

2

2

1

12 Electrolux EW30GC60PS

54

$1,300

2

2

1

13 KitchenAid KCGS950ESS

54

$1,440

1

3

1

14 Maytag MGC7430DS

45

$700

2

1

1

15 KitchenAid KCGD500GSS 41

$1,800

2

1

1

38

$700

0 4 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 1 0

2

10 GE JGP3530SLSS

0 4 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0

1

72

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

2

GE JGP5030SLSS

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0

2

9

1

3

1

0 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0

0 5 5 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 4 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0

2

2

1

3

2

0

2

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

1

2

1

30-INCH GAS COOKTOPS Continued

16 Whirlpool WCG77US0HS

36-INCH GAS COOKTOPS

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 $ 0 ! 0

1

Samsung NA36N7755TS

92

$1,700

2

Thermador SGSX365FS

82

$1,900

3

Kenmore 32713

77

$1,605

4

GE Profile PGP9036SLSS

74

$1,400

5

Maytag MGC9536DS

74

$900

6

Cafรฉ CGP9536SLSS

72

$1,630

7

Frigidaire Gallery FGGC3645QS

71

$800

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4

2

8

Viking VGSU53616BSS

71

$2,320

2

1

Wolf CG365P/S

67

$2,000

0 3 2 0 0 4 0 5 3 0 0 5 4 0 0 3

3

9

2

3

0

Frigidaire Professional 10 FPGC3677RS

63

$1,100

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3

2

2

1

11 Miele KM3474GSS

53

$1,750

0

$1,600

4

0

1

13 KitchenAid KCGS556ESS

47

$1,260

1

2

2

14 LG LCG3611ST

46

$1,080

0 3 3 0 2 0 1 0

2

52

0 1 1 0 3 0 3 0

3

12 Jenn-Air JGC3536GS

2

2

1

$2,215

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 1

3

2

1

0 3 3 0 3 0 4 0

0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0

36-INCH GAS RANGETOPS 1

20

Kenmore Pro Slide-in 34913

49

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


GE JP5030SJSS

93

$900

2

GE Profile PP9030SJSS

93

$1,350

3

KitchenAid KECC604BBL

91

! 0

4

Samsung NZ30K7570RG/AA

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 $ 0 ! 0 $ 0

5 6

No. of highpower elements No. of mediumpower elements No. of lowpower elements

Rank

1

Low heat

Rec.

0 ! ! 0 ! 0

High heat

Survey Test Results Results Features Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Price

30-INCH ELECTRIC SMOOTHTOPS 1

0

3

2

2

1

$900

0 3 4 0 0 5 0 5 4 0 0 3 5 0 0 5 3 0 0 3 0 5 5 0

2

0

2

91

$1,250

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5

1

3

1

Kenmore Turbo-boil 45313

89

$1,385

3

$1,620

2

0

2

7

Whirlpool WCE97US0HB

87

$1,035

2

1

1

8

GE JP3030SJSS

86

$650

2

0

2

9

Whirlpool G7CE3034XP

85

$700

2

0

2

10 Frigidaire FFEC3024LB

83

$400

2

0

2

11 Maytag MEC8830HB

80

$765

1

2

1

12 Jenn-Air JEC4430BS

75

$1,600

2

0

2

13 GE JP3530SJSS

73

$880

2

1

1

14 Amana AEC6540KFB

66

$500

1

1

2

15 Whirlpool WCE55US0HB

65

$650

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0

0

89

0 3 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 3 0

2

KitchenAid KCED600GSS

1

1

2

0 3 3 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 2 0

0 5 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0

36-INCH ELECTRIC SMOOTHTOPS

! 0

1

Samsung NZ36K7570RG/AA

91

$1,400

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5

2

2

1

! 0

2

LG LCE3610SB

90

$1,000

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5

2

1

1

3

Bosch Benchmark Series NETP668SUC

86

$1,350

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5

1

3

1

0 4 3 0 1 0 4 0

0 5 4 0 5 0 3 0

2

1

2

2

0

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

! 0 ! 0

4

GE JP5036DJBB

85

$900

5

Whirlpool WCE55US6HB

79

$630

6

Jenn-Air JED4536GS

77

7

$2,200

65

GE PP7036SJSS

$1,170

0 3 2 0 2 0 3 0

0 4 4 0 5 0 4 0

30-INCH ELECTRIC INDUCTION COOKTOPS

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

1

2

POOR

Samsung NZ30K7880UG/AA Dacor Modernist DTI30M977BB

97

$2,000

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5

3

1

0

96

$3,230

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 0 5

3

1

0

Kenmore 43820

95

$1,820

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5

3

1

0

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

21

COOK T OP S

Overall Score

Brand & Model


No. of highpower elements No. of mediumpower elements No. of lowpower elements

Low heat

Survey Test Results Results Features Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Price

High heat

Overall Score

Brand & Model

30-INCH ELECTRIC INDUCTION COOKTOPS Continued 94

$1,450

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5

3

1

0

! 0

4

Kenmore 43800

$ 0

5

Frigidaire FFIC3026TB

93

$700

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5

2

2

0

6

Whirlpool GCI3061XB

92

$1,350

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5

2

0

2

7

Viking MVIC 6304BBG

82

$2,580

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 0 5

3

1

0

1

Bosch Benchmark Series NITP668SUC

98

$2,900

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

5

0

0

$2,250

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5

4

1

0

! 0

36-INCH ELECTRIC INDUCTION COOKTOPS

! 0 ! 0

2

Samsung NZ36K7880UG

96

! 0

3

Wolf CI365T/S

95

$2,670

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

3

2

0

$1,650

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5

4

1

0

! 0

4

Frigidaire FPIC3677RF

94

$ 0

5

Frigidaire FFIC3626TB

93

$950

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5

3

2

0

6

Thermador CIT36XKB

84

$5,300

2 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

2

1

1

7

Jenn-Air JIC4536XS

73

$2,100

1 0 0 2 0 4 0 5

5

0

0

HOW WE TEST: High Heat reflects how quickly the highest-powered burner or element heats a large pot of water to near-boiling. Low Heat reflects how well the lowest-powered burner or element holds a low heat, and how the most powerful element, set to low, holds tomato sauce below a boil.

22

Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first five years.

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the cooktop they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’


D I SH WA SHERS

QUI CK GUIDE

Dishwashers New dishwashers use far less energy and water than they did a decade ago, though cycle times can now exceed three hours. The models we recommend aced our washing tests and are relatively quiet. What to Look For

What to Skip

Soil

Drawer

sensors gauge how dirty the load is and determine the right amount of time and water needed to get everything clean, improving efficiency. An adjustable upper rack allows for flexibility when loading dishes. A rinse and hold option can help prevent soil from setting and keep odors under control while you wait for a full load.

BUYING ADVICE

models, which are more expensive and tend to use more energy and water than standard models.

Generally, the three basic wash cyclesโ€” light, normal, and heavyโ€” suffice for most dishwashing needs, even baked-on food.

What Youโ€™ll Pay A dishwasher with special wash zones, an LED-lit tub, digital displays, and special grime-fighting cycles can cost $1,000 or more. For models with fewer features, sparkling performance starts at around $600.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/dishwashers.

Tested products in performance order.

! 0

4

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

88

$630

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4

95 SS/P

85

$770

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4

150

SS

84

$1,800

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5

155

SS

84

$675

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4

150 SS/P

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

Self-cleaning filter

3

Interior material

! 0

Features Cycle time (min.)

2

Noise

! 0

Bosch Ascenta SHX3AR75UC Bosch 300 DLX Series SHS863WD5N Thermador DWHD660WFP Bosch 100 Series SHXM4AY55N

Energy use

Rank

1

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Washing

Recommended

$ 0

Survey Test Results Price Results

Drying

Overall Score

Brand & Model

23


155

SS

6

83

$700

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

125

SS

! 0

7

83

$2,300

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5

150

SS

! 0

8

82

$1,600

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5

150

SS

! 0

9

82

$1,150

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5

150

SS

! 0

10

82

$1,080

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

150

SS

! 0

11

82

$765

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4

155

SS

$ 0

12

81

$570

5 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3

115

P

$ 0

13

81

$380

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3

115

P

14 Kenmore 14573

80

$730

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

145

SS SS

Noise

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5

Energy use

Interior material

! 0

Bosch Benchmark SHX89PW55N KitchenAid KDTM354DSS Thermador DWHD770WFM Bosch Benchmark SHX88PZ55N Bosch 800 Series SHPM78ZO5N Miele Classic Plus G4977SCVISF Bosch 300 Series SHEM63W55N Whirlpool WDF540PADM Ikea Renlig IUD7070DS [288921]

Drying

$1,700

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Washing

Cycle time (min.)

5

Features

84

Rank

Recommended

! 0

24

Survey Test Results Price Results

15 Kenmore 14543

80

$750

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

145

Bosch 800 Series 16 SHPM78W55N KitchenAid 17 KDTM704ESS Miele Futura 18 Crystal G6665SCVISF

79

$900

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

160

SS

79

$1,710

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4

110

SS

78

$1,800

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

140

SS

19 Kenmore 14523

78

$700

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4

150

SS

Bosch 800 Series 20 SHXM98W75N KitchenAid 21 KDTM404ESS

78

$1,125

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5

160

SS

78

$1,100

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4

110

SS

22 Kenmore Elite 14793

77

$1,100

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4

145

SS SS

GE Profile 23 PDF820SSJSS

76

$1,030

4 0 0 2 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4

150

24 Kenmore Elite 14753

76

$980

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4

145

SS

Miele Dimension 25 G6785SCVISF Bosch 500 Series 26 SHPM65W55N

76

$2,000

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

145

SS

76

$855

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4

160

SS

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

Self-cleaning filter

Overall Score

Brand & Model

0

0

0


Interior material

75

$1,410

4 0 0 2 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5

155

SS

29 Cafรฉ CDT845P2NS1

75

$1,100

4 0 0 2 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5

155

SS

30 Bertazzoni DW24XT

75

$1,080

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4

135

SS

31 Kenmore 13473

75

$530

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3

160

P

74

$800

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4

130

SS

74

$810

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

135

SS

74

$750

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

135

SS

74

$965

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

135

SS SS

33 34 35

Thor Kitchen HDW2401SS KitchenAid KDPE204GPS KitchenAid KDPE234GPS KitchenAid KDTE304GPS

36 Kucht K6502D

74

$825

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4

140

Whirlpool 37 WDT730PAHZ

73

$630

5 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

140 SS/P

38 LG LDT7808BM

71

$1,125

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

145

SS

Whirlpool 39 WDF330PAHS Whirlpool 40 WDT970SAHZ Maytag 41 MDB4949SHZ

71

$500

5 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3

110

P

71

$600

5 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

145

SS

71

$550

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4

155

SS

HOW WE TEST: Washing is assessed by running the Normal or equivalent cycle to clean a full load of dishes with baked-on food. Drying performance is our assessment of how thoroughly a model dries plastic cups, the most stubborn in any load. Energy Use is energy and water use for our test cycle. A panel of testers judge Noise levels by listening to each machine through its entire cycle. Cycle

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

Time (min.), rounded to the nearest 5 minutes, is based on running the Normal or equivalent cycle to clean a full load. Under Features, in Interior Materials, SS= stainless steel, P=plastic. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly pur-

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

Self-cleaning filter

Cycle time (min.)

SS

Noise

160

Energy use

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3

Drying

$600

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Washing

75

GE Profile 28 PDT855SSJSS

Rank

Recommended

Features

27 Kenmore 13223

32

1

Survey Test Results Price Results

0

chased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first five years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the dishwasher they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brandlevel rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’

25

D I SH WA SHERS

Overall Score

Brand & Model


QUI CK GUIDE

Gas Grills You donโ€™t have to spend a fortune to get a grill that will consistently deliver great-tasting food. In fact, many midpriced grills now have side burners and other helpful perks once found exclusively on high-end models. What to Look For Burners

made of highquality stainless steel, cast iron, or cast brass, which usually carry a warranty of 10 years or longer. Stainless-steel and coated cast-iron grates for sturdiness and rust-resistance. A battery-powered electronic igniter.

pre-heating or better searing and cooking.

BUYING ADVICE

What Youโ€™ll Pay

You might not need as big a grill as you think: We found large grills can typically fit 28 or more 4-inch burgers at once. Medium models fit 18 to 28.

Plan on $300 to $700 for a grill that can handle most of your cooking needs. Several midsize grills that cost less than $600 outperformed models that cost hundreds of dollars more.

What to Skip Buying

by Btu. This measure alone doesnโ€™t guarantee faster

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/gas-grills.

Tested products in performance order.

Sturdiness

Test Results

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Preheat performance Evenness performance Indirect cooking Temperature range

Rank

Rec.

Survey Price Results

Convenience

Overall Score

Brand & Model

MIDSIZE GAS GRILLS (ROOM FOR 18 TO 28 BURGERS)

! 0

1

Weber Genesis II E-310

! 0

2

! 0

3

! 0

4

Weber Genesis II S-335 61006001 Weber Genesis II E-330 61012001 Weber Genesis II SE-335 61016201

! 0

5

Weber Summit S-470

26

77

$700

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 40 5

76

$1,050

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 50 5

75

$900

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 50 5

75

$1,000

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 5

75

$2,150

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 40 5

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Sturdiness

Convenience

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Preheat performance Evenness performance Indirect cooking Temperature range

Rank

Rec.

Test Results

MIDSIZE GAS GRILLS Continued

! 0

6

$ 0

7

! 0

8

Weber Spirit II S-310 45000001 Even Embers GAS8560AS Nexgrill Deluxe 7200896B (Home Depot) Nexgrill 720-0896C (Home Depot)

! 0

9

! 0

10 3 Embers GAS7480BS Napoleon Prestige 11 P500RSIB

! 0

74

$500

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 40 5

74

$375

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 40 3

73

$400

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 50 3

73

$700

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 50 5

72

$650

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 30 5

72

$1,400

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 40 5

LARGE GAS GRILLS (ROOM FOR 28 OR MORE BURGERS)

0 $ ! 0 ! 0

1

Monument Grills 77352

79

$500

2

Weber Summit E-670

79

$2,500

3

Weber Genesis II E-410

76

$1,000

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 5 0 0 4 0 5 4 00 3 0 5 5 0 0 4 0 4 4 0 0 5 0 55 0 5 0 0 5 3 0 0 5 0 4 4 0 0 40 5

! 0

4

76

$1,250

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 50 5

! 0

5

76

$2,050

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 30 5

Weber Genesis II S-435 62006001 Napoleon LEX730RSBIPSS

SMALL GAS GRILLS (ROOM FOR 18 OR FEWER BURGERS)

! 0

1

Weber Spirit II E-210 44020001

HOW WE TEST: To measure Evenness Performance, we use thermocouples to map the evenness of heating over the grillโ€™s surface at the highest and lowest setting using all main burnersโ€”plus the evenness after a 10-minute preheat. Preheat Performance evaluates the temperature after a 10-minute preheat, giving an indication of how quickly the grill reaches its maximum temperature. Temperature Range reflects how wide a temperature span the grill offers,

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

70

$400

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 40 5

comparing temperatures at the high and low setting using all main burners. Indirect Cooking indicates grill temperature when only one or two of the burners are on, to represent a cooking task where the food is placed between or alongside the direct flame. Convenience includes grate material, wheels or casters for moving the grill, and useful features such as electronic igniter. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first five years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the gas grill they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’

27

G A S GR IL L S

Survey Price Results

Overall Score

Brand & Model


QUI CK GUIDE

Generators The best portable generators cost about $1,000 and can power your fridge and other essentials. Larger home standby models can power central A/C and moreโ€”and start automatically if the power goes out. What to Look For Enough

wattage for your needs. Plan on at least 5,000 watts to cover the basics; 10,000 watts or more for central A/C, an electric range, and a washer/dryer. All stationary units have a propane or naturalgas hookup, which saves the storage and potential sourcing hassles of gasoline. Automatic low-oil shutoff, which protects the engine from internal damage. For portables, look for life-saving safety features like a carbon monoxide shut-off.

Choose a generator that complies with PGMA G300 or UL 2201 safety standards, marked on the packaging.

What to Skip Disregard big surge claims; the best units can handle the extra watts that some appliances draw when they cycle on.

What Youโ€™ll Pay A portable unit with 5,000 to 8,000 watts will run $600 to $1,500; stationary units start at $2,000 and can cost well above $3,500 (plus installation).

BUYING ADVICE Factor in an extra $500 to $900 to have a transfer/ interlock switch, which will safely connect the generator to your circuit breaker. Always operate a generator 20 feet from the house, with the exhaust pointed away. For more buying advice, go to CR.org/generators.

Tested products in performance order. Price

Test Results

gas

0

77

$1,050

5 0 0 z 0 2 0 4 0 5

8000

gas

0

73

$1,000

5 0 0 x 0 2 0 4 0 5

8000

gas

0

Electric start Fuel gauge

7000

CO safety technology

5 0 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 5

Ease of use

$1,150

Noise

78

Power quality

Fuel type

Features Claimed output (watts)

Power delivery

Overall Score

Rank

Rec.

Brand & Model

PORTABLE GENERATORS

! 0

1

! 0

2

Ryobi RY907022F DeWalt PMC168000

! 0

3

Generac 7675

28

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

0


Test Results

gas

65

$700

3 0 0 z 0 2 0 4 0 5

6250

gas

65

$1,000

5 0 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 b

7000

gas

64

$600

3 0 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 5

5000

gas

63

$1,000

5 0 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 b

7000

gas

0

60

$1,000

5 0 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 b

7000

gas

0

57

$1,600

5 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 b

6600

gas

57

$1,550

5 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 b

6000

gas

Electric start Fuel gauge

8000

CO safety technology

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 b

Ease of use

$1,380

Noise

73

Power quality

Fuel type

Features Claimed output (watts)

Power delivery

Price

Rank

Rec.

Overall Score

PORTABLE GENERATORS Continued Generac 4 XT8000EFI Champion 5 100592 Ryobi 6 RY907000FI Craftsman 7 030731 Generac 8 RS7000E DeWalt 9 DXGNR7000 NorthStar 10 165603 Yamaha 11 EF7200DE

0

0

0 0

0

0

0

LARGE HOME GENERATORS

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

! 0

4

! 0

5

NA NG 10000 LPG 11000 NA NG 11000 LPG 12500 NA NG 12000 LPG 14000 NA NG 13000 LPG 13000

LPG/ NG LPG/ NG LPG/ NG LPG/ NG

Generac 7031

93

$3,100

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5

Champion 100179 Kohler 14RESAL Cummins RS13A Briggs & Stratton 040546

93

$3,000

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5

93

$3,700

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5

91

$3,400

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5

90

$3,600

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 4

NA

NG 10800 LPG/ LPG 12000 NG

0

0 0 0 0

SMALL HOME GENERATORS Champion 100174 Generac Guardian 7030

94

$2,350

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5

NA

NG 7500 LPG/ LPG 8500 NG

0

92

$2,600

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5

NA

NG 8100 LPG/ LPG 9,000 NG

0

3

Winco PSS8B

92

$4,400

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5

NA

4

Kohler 8RESV 90

$2,400

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5

5

Briggs & Stratton 040445

$2,400

5 0 0 2 0 2 0 4

$ 0

1

! 0

2

! 0 ! 0

1

2

POOR

3

4

73

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

NG 7600 LPG/ LPG 8400 NG LPG/ NA NG 7000 LPG 8,000 NG NA

NG 7200 LPG/ LPG 8000 NG

0 0

0

29

GENER AT ORS

Brand & Model


Price

Test Results

gas

0

0

53

$3,600

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 b

5500

gas

0

0

34

$1,400

1 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 b

5000

gas

Electric start Fuel gauge

5500

CO safety technology

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 b

Ease of use

$4,000

Noise

68

Power quality

Fuel type

Features Claimed output (watts)

Power delivery

Overall Score

Rank

Rec.

Brand & Model

LARGE INVERTERS (220 VOLTS) 1 2 3

Honda EU7000is Yamaha EF6300ISDE Briggs & Stratton Q6500

0

MID-SIZED INVERTERS (110 VOLTS) 1 2 3 4

Honda EU3000is Predator 3500 Champion 100261 Honda EG2800i

77

$2,000

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 b

2800

gas

0

75

$770

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 b

3000

gas

0

72

$1,050

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 b

3100

gas

0

69

$1,000

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 b

2500

gas

0

0

RECREATIONAL INVERTERS (UNDER 2000 WATTS) 1 2 3 4 5 6

Yamaha EF2000isV2 Predator 62523 Honeywell 6066 Briggs & Stratton 030651 Ryobi RYI2300BT Champion 73536i

63

$900

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 b

1600

gas

0

63

$500

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 b

1600

gas

0

63

$600

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 b

2000

gas

62

$650

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 b

1700

gas

61

$600

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 b

1800

gas

61

$450

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 b

1700

gas

HOW WE TEST: Power Delivery indicates how much wattage models deliver and how well they handle surges in power demand over various loads. Power Quality evaluates a generatorโ€™s ability to deliver power smoothly, with consistent voltage. Noise is measured at 23 and 50 feet

30

from the generator. Ease of Use includes starting, transport (for portables), and helpful features such as fuel shutoff. Under Claimed Output (watts) and Fuel Type, LPG=propane and NG=natural gas. Price is approximate retail. Note: Portables have a run time of about 7 to 12 hours on a tank

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

0

of gas; stationary models run on natural gas indefinitely. CO safety technology is the ability of the generator to shut down in the presence of carbon monoxide in an enclosed space. Overall Score is based on the performance of the product in all of our tests.


L AW N MO W ERS

QUI CK GUIDE

Lawn Mowers Lawn size and slope should steer your decision. Most people opt for self-propelled gas mowers, which require regular upkeep and oil changes; self-propelled battery mowers require little more than blade sharpening. What to Look For If you have a small, level lawn, a less-expensive push mower will do the trick. If, on the other hand, your yard has hills, a selfpropelled mower (especially one with rear-wheel drive) will make the job easier. A blade-brake clutch, which stops the blade when you release the handlebar lever, allows the mower to safely idle while you, say, move a rock or empty the

BUYING ADVICE

grass clippings when bagging. A washout port that accepts a hose for easy deck cleaning.

We test how well each mower works in three cutting modes (mulching, bagging, and side-discharging). Find a model that earns high marks in your preferred mode.

What to Skip Larger engines donโ€™t guarantee better mowing, and high rear wheels donโ€™t always help with handling.

What Youโ€™ll Pay About $400 to $700 for gas self-propelled mowers; $350 to $600 for battery models; and about $300 for capable push gas mowers.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/mowers.

Tested products in performance order. Survey Price Results

Overall Score

! 0

2

Honda HRX217K6VKA

83

$600

5 0 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 3

! 0

3

Honda HRR216VYA

82

$500

5 0 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 4

! 0

4

Honda HRR216VLA

80

$500

5 0 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 4

$ 0

5

Honda HRR216VKA

79

$400

5 0 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 3

Noise at 25 ft.

5 0 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 3

Noise at ear

$850

Handling

86

Evenness

Honda HRX217K6HZA

Bagging

! 0

1

Mulching

Rank

Test Results

Recommended

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Side discharging

Brand/Model

GAS SELF-PROPELLED MOWERS

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

31


Noise at 25 ft.

Noise at ear

Handling

Evenness

Bagging

Test Results

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Side discharging

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

Mulching

Overall Score

Brand/Model

GAS SELF-PROPELLED MOWERS Continued Toro Super Recycler 20381 Toro Super Recycler 21381

73

$520

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 4

73

$550

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 3

Cub Cadet SC 700h

71

$550

Cub Cadet SC 900

70

$450

10 Honda HRS216K6 VKA

70

$400

0 4 3 0 0 4 4 0 0 5 0 5 4 0 0 2 0 4 3 0 0 4 NA 0 4 5 0 0 5 0 5 2 0 0 3 5 0 0 5 4 0 0 4 NA 5 0 0 4 0 3 4 0

! 0

Toro Recycler 11 SmartStow 20340

68

$400

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3

! 0

12 Toro Recycler 20333

67

$400

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 1

67

$450

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 1

67

$650

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2

66

$300

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3

! 0

6

! 0

7

0 ! ! 0 ! 0

8 9

! 0

Toro PoweReverse 13 Recycler SmartStow 20355 Husqvarna 14 HU800AWDX/BBC 15 Toro Recycler 20332 GAS PUSH MOWERS

! 0 0 ! ! 0 $ 0

1

Honda HRR216PKA

75

$430

2

Cub Cadet SC100 H

70

$300

3

Troy-Bilt TB160 XP

69

$280

4

Troy-Bilt TB110

67

$220

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0

0 5 4 0 3 0 3 0

! 0

5

Toro Recycler SmartStow 21329

66

$300

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2

6

Toro Recycler 21320

65

$270

7

Craftsman M110

62

$230

8

Remington RM110

60

$170

9

Lawn-Boy 17730

58

$240

0 3 3 0 5 0 3 0

Hyper Tough 10 961140035

44

$150

โˆ’ โˆ’ 2 0 NA NA 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5

11 Murray 11A-A2BF758

42

$190

2 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 2 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 4 0 2 0 3 0

0 5 4 0 4 0 4 0

0 4 3 0 3 0 2 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 4 0

0 4 4 0 4 0 5 0

0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0

0 4 4 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 4 0 0 3 4 0 0 5 0 2 4 NA 0 0 4 5 0 0 2 4 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 2 0

0 3 3 0 3 0 4 0 0 4 4 0 3 0 4 0

GAS WIDE-DECK SELF-PROPELLED MOWERS

0 $ ! 0

32

1

Troy-Bilt TB WC28

73

$850

2

Toro Timemaster 21199 73

$1,000

3

Troy-Bilt FLEX

47

$500

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

0 3 3 0 0 4 0 4 5 0 0 5 0 4 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 4 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 3 0 0 2 0 4 3 0 0 1 0 2


Mulching

Bagging

Evenness

Handling

Run time

Charge time

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Side discharging

Rank

Recommended

Test Results

0 4 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0

0 5 5 0 4 0 1 0 4 0

BATTERY PUSH MOWERS

$ 0 0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

1

4

Ryobi RY40180

61

$300

0 5 3 0 0 4 3 0 0 5 3 0 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 2 4 0 0 5 NA

5

Echo CLM-58V4AH

61

$520

โˆ’ โˆ’

6

GreenWorks MO60L410 [Item# 725987] (Loweโ€™s)

61

$430

3 0 0 5 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 2

7

Troy-Bilt TB510

60

$500

8

Snapper 1687884

57

$500

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 4 โˆ’ โˆ’ 2 0 0 3 3 0 0 4 5 0 0 3 4 0

9

GreenWorks 25302

56

$340

3 0 0 5

10 Stihl RMA 370

52

$690

1

EGO LM2101

71

$400

2

EGO LM2002

68

$400

3

Stihl RMA 510

67

$550

NA

NA

2 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 4

11 Husqvarna LE121P

52

$500

โˆ’ โˆ’ NA 0 2 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 2 0 4 โˆ’ โˆ’ 2 0 0 3 0 4 4 0 0 5 3 0 0 1

12 Neuton CEM6X4X

52

$400

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 1

Black+Decker 13 CM2060C Craftsman V60 14 CMCMW260P1

51

$400

2 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 1

50

$480

2 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 1

15 Oregon LM400-A6

48

$310

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 2 0 2

Black+Decker 16 CM2045

48

$340

2 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 2 0 2

17 Makita XML02PT

47

$400

18 DeWalt DCMW290H1

47

$400

โˆ’ โˆ’ NA NA 0 2 2 0 0 5 3 0 0 4 โˆ’ โˆ’ 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 5 0 0 2 2 0

Black+Decker 19 CM2040

47

$330

2 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 2 0 2

20 Redback 106648

46

$450

21 DeWalt DCMW220P2

45

$400

Sun Joe 22 iON16LM-HYB

44

$350

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 1 0 2 0 4 3 0 0 4 0 2 0 1 โˆ’ โˆ’ 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 5 0 0 2 0 1 NA โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 5 2 0 0 2

23 Earthwise 60420

43

$325

24 Sun Joe MJ401C-XR

41

$190

25 Worx WG779

38

$250

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

1 0 0 1 3 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 0 5 4 0 0 1 NA โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 5 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 3 NA 0 2 0 2 0 2 5 0 0 3 0 1

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

33

L AW N MO W ERS

Survey Price Results

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Charge time

Run time

Handling

Evenness

Bagging

Test Results

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Side discharging

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

Mulching

Overall Score

Brand & Model

BATTERY SELF-PROPELLED MOWERS

! 0

1

EGO LM2142SP

$ 0

2

EGO LM2102SP

79

$550

3

Kobalt (Loweโ€™s) KMP 6080-06

71

$570

โˆ’ โˆ’ 4 0 0 4 0 3 4 0 0 5 0 5 0 3 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 4 0 0 3 0 4 5 0 0 5 0 4 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 2 0 3 3 0 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 3

4

Ryobi RY40LM10

62

$600

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 1

5

Troy-Bilt TB610

61

$600

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

6

Ryobi RY40LM30

60

$450

3 0 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 1

7

GreenWorks MO80L510

59

$600

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3

8

Ryobi RY40190

57

$400

3 0 0 5

! 0

HOW WE TEST: For Mulching we measure how well mowers can churn grass into clippings that recede into the surrounding lawn. For Bagging, we determine how easy it is to attach and remove the bag, then record the weight of a full bag. For Side discharging, we measure how evenly grass clippings are cut and dispersed through the discharge chute, favoring models that donโ€™t leave big clumps of grass behind.

34

79

$750

Evenness is our measurement of how evenly the mower cuts. Handling is ease of using drive controls, pushing, pulling, U-turns, and other maneuvers. Engine Size (cc) is measured in cubic centimeters, unless otherwise specified. Price is approximate retail for mowers and attachments. Overall Score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

NA

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 1

the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first five years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the lawn mower they bought. In cases where we have insufficient data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’


L AW N T R A C T ORS

QUI CK GUIDE

Lawn Tractors Zero-turn-radius (ZTR) riding mowers have nimble levers for steering that provide handling and excellent maneuverability. Lawn tractors operate more like cars, offering more familiar steering. What to Look For

What to Skip

A washout port that accepts a hose for cleaning. A fuel gauge, or a clear fuel tank, thatโ€™s visible from the driversโ€™ seat. If storage space is tight, a more compact rear-engine rider might be the right fit. No matter which type of rider you choose, we prefer a high-back seat for added comfort and support.

Zero-turn-radius riders for steep slopesโ€”they can be difficult to steer and stop.

BUYING ADVICE

If youโ€™re torn between a tractor and a ZTR, consider a test drive. Some stores will let you rent a mower for the day.

What Youโ€™ll Pay Anywhere from $1,500 to more than $3,000 for tractors; $2,300-plus for many zero-turnradius mowers.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/tractors.

Tested products in performance order. Survey Results

Noise at 25 ft.

Noise at ear

Handling

Evenness

Bagging

Test Results

Mulching

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

Side discharging

Overall Score

Brand & Model

LAWN TRACTORS

! 0

2

John Deere X350-42 John Deere S240-48

$2,600

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2

! 0

3

John Deere E160

89

$2,300

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 1

$ 0

4

John Deere E130

86

$2,000

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 2

1

2

! 0

1

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

90

$3,200

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

89

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

35


Survey Results

Noise at 25 ft.

Noise at ear

Handling

Evenness

Bagging

Test Results

Mulching

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

Side discharging

Overall Score

Brand & Model

LAWN TRACTORS Continued

$ 0 ! 0

5

John Deere E140

85

$2,000

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 1

6

Husqvarna TS 354X 80

$3,500

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 1

7

John Deere E110

78

$1,700

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 1

Cub Cadet XT2 SLX50 Troy-Bilt Super Bronco 50 XP

77

$2,500

2 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

76

$1,900

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 1

10 Craftsman 27055

75

$3,300

2 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

11 Craftsman 27042

75

$2,200

2 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

Cub Cadet XT1 12 LT46

73

$1,700

2 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

13 Craftsman 27040

72

$2,000

2 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

14 Craftsman T240

72

$2,000

2 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

Cub Cadet XT1 15 LT42 EFI Cub Cadet XT1 16 LT42

67

$1,750

2 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

66

$1,500

2 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

8 9

LAWN TRACTORS ZERO-TURN John Deere Z345R-42 Toro MyRIDE TimeCutter MX5075 74768 Toro TimeCutter SS4225 74726 John Deere Z335E-42 John Deere Z375R-54

85

$2,800

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

84

$4,000

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

83

$2,500

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

83

$2,500

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

83

$3,500

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

5 0 0 5 0 1 0 1

! 0

1

! 0

2

$ 0

3

$ 0

4

! 0

5

! 0

6

John Deere Z355E

83

$2,900

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

5 0 0 5 0 1 0 2

! 0

7

Toro MX5000 74773 82

$3,000

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

5 0 0 5 0 1 0 1

! 0

8

Craftsman Z530

79

$2,700

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

9

Cub Cadet RZT SX 42

76

$3,000

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

! 0

36

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

NA

5 0 0 5 0 1 0 1


Noise at 25 ft.

Noise at ear

Bagging

$3,700

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 5

NA

5 0 0 5 0 1 0 1

74

$3,000

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 4

NA

5 0 0 4 0 1 0 1

68

$3,900

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 1

67

$2,700

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 1

14 Ryobi RY48ZTR75

66

$3,900

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3

15 Husqvarna Z242F

65

$3,000

1 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 1

Cub Cadet RZT 16 L 34 Cub Cadet RZT S 17 Zero (Electric) Husqvarna Z254 18 [Item# 806317] (Loweโ€™s)

62

$2,300

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1

61

$4,000

3 0 0 4 0 4

59

$3,000

1 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 1

Handling

Mulching

Evenness

Test Results Side discharging

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Survey Results

76

Rank

Recommended

Price

LAWN TRACTORS ZERO-TURN Continued

! 0

10 11 12 13

Cub Cadet Ultima ZT2-50 Troy-Bilt Mustang 50 Troy-Bilt Mustang 54 XP Ariens Zoom 42 915213

NA NA

5 0 0 3 0 5 0 5

REAR ENGINE RIDERS

! 0

1

Ryobi R48110 (Electric)

$ 0

2

Cub Cadet CC30 H

67

$1,300

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2

3

Cub Cadet CC30

60

$1,200

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 2

HOW WE TEST: For Side discharging, we measure how evenly grass clippings are cut and dispersed through the discharge chute, favoring models that donโ€™t leave big clumps of grass behind. We prioritize Mulching, our recommended method, and measure how well mowers can churn grass into clippings that readily recede into the surrounding lawn. For Bagging, we determine how easy it is to attach and remove the

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

71

$2,500

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2

bag, then record the weight of a full bag. Evenness is our measurement of how evenly the mower cuts. Handling is ease of using drive controls, making U-turns, and other maneuvers. Engine Power (hp) is measured in horsepower, unless otherwise specified. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first five years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the lawn tractor they bought. In cases where we have insufficient data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’

37

L AW N T R A C T ORS

Overall Score

Brand & Model


QUI CK GUIDE

Mattresses Foam beds-in-a-box get a lot of attention, but traditional innerspring mattresses remain the biggest sellers. No matter which type you prefer, the key to comfort is support. What to Look For

What to Skip

Use

A

our ratings to select a mattress that scores Very Good or Excellent for your size and sleep position. Return windows can range from a couple of weeks to 120 days. Make sure the retailer offers a refund or credit toward another mattress, in case you arenโ€™t totally happy with the one you selected.

BUYING ADVICE

layer of gel-infused foam, touted to provide a cooling effect, doesnโ€™t guarantee cooler sleep.

If possible, lie on any mattress youโ€™re considering, spending at least 10 to 15 minutes on each side, your back, and your stomach.

What Youโ€™ll Pay Youโ€™ll find a huge range of prices. But you donโ€™t have to spend much more than $1,000 for a comfortable, supportive mattressโ€”and you can certainly spend less.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/mattresses.

Tested products in performance order. Overall Score

Brand & Model

Price

Test Results

Firmness rating

Stabilization

Durability

Average back sleeper Large/tall back sleeper

Petite back sleeper

Average side sleeper Large/tall side sleeper

Petite side sleeper

Rank

Recommended

Support

INNERSPRING

! 0

1 Avocado Green

85

$1,400

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3

7

! 0

Casper The Casper 2 Hybrid Ethan Allen EA 3 Signature Platinum Plush

84

$1,500

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

3

83

$2,100

5 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

5

! 0 38

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Price

M ATTRESSES

Overall Score

Brand & Model

Test Results

Firmness rating

Stabilization

Durability

Average back sleeper Large/tall back sleeper

Petite back sleeper

Average side sleeper Large/tall side sleeper

Petite side sleeper

Rank

Recommended

Support

INNERSPRING Continued

! 0

Charles P. Rogers 4 Powercore Estate 5000

80

$1,500

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

6

$ 0

Bob-O-Pedic Hybrid 79 5 20038999003

$900

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

5

! 0

Avocado Green 6 Mattress Pillowtop

79

$1,800

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3

5

$ 0

Beautyrest Silver Open Seas 7 Luxury Firm 700600242-1050

79

$620

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

4

! 0

Sealy Posturepedic 8 Performance Copper II

78

$1,580

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3

4

$ 0

Beautyrest Silver 9 BRS900-TSS Medium 78 Firm Tight Top

$790

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4

4

! 0

Sealy Posturepedic 10 Premium Silver Chill

77

$2,000

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3

3

$ 0

Sealy Posturepedic 11 Lawson LTD Cushion Firm

77

$710

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

5

! 0

12 Voila Hybrid Medium 77

$1,200

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

6

! 0

Charles P. Rogers 13 Real Bed

77

$950

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

3

! 0

WinkBeds The 14 WinkBed Luxury Firm

77

$1,600

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

5

! 0

Serta iSeries Hybrid 15 500 14โ€ Cushion Firm 76

$1,900

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

5

$ 0

Denver Mattress 16 Doctorโ€™s Choice Plush

76

$580

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3

3

$ 0

17 Allswell Luxe Hybrid 75

$585

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

7

! 0

Charles P. Rogers 18 St. Regis Pillowtop

75

$1,160

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

6

! 0

Sealy Posturepedic 19 Performance Lawson 75 Euro Pillowtop

$1,670

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

6

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

39


Overall Score

Brand & Model

Price

Test Results

Firmness rating

Stabilization

Durability

Average back sleeper Large/tall back sleeper

Petite back sleeper

Average side sleeper Large/tall side sleeper

Petite side sleeper

Rank

Recommended

Support

INNERSPRING Continued Bedgear M3 1.0 Medium Firm Serta Perfect Sleeper Select Carverdale Sealy Posturepedic Essentials Trust II Classic Brands Sleep Trends Davy Kingsdown Crown Imperial Empire Denver Mattress Doctorโ€™s Choice Euro Top Nest Bedding Alexander Signature Hybrid Copper Infused Thermic Phase Change Cooling Fabric Saatva Flagship Luxury Firm Eurotop Shifman Metropolitan Delancy Collection Ethan Allen EA Signature Firm Hampton & Rhodes Decker 10.5โ€ Medium Hybrid Cushion Firm Helix Sleep Midnight Luxe

75

$2,000

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

5

75

$500

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

7

74

$1,100

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

4

74

$780

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

4

74

$1,800

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

3

74

$750

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5

3

74

$1,300

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

2

74

$1,100

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3

3

74

$2,570

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5

3

74

$2,000

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4

7

73

$700

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3

3

73

$1,745

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3

4

32 Purple 3

73

$2,200

33 Duxiana DUX 1001

73

$4,950

0 4 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 5 0 4 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 4 4 0 0 3 5 0 0 3

72

$3,500

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

4

72

$2,300

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3

4

72

$2,500

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

2

! 0

20

$ 0

21

! 0

22

$ 0

23

! 0

24

! 0

25

! 0

26

! 0

27

! 0

28

! 0

29

! 0

30

! 0

31

0 ! ! 0

Tempur-Pedic 34 Tempur-Flex Supreme Breeze Stearns & Foster 35 Lux Estate Cassatt Beautyrest Black 36 Mariela 40

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

3 4


Price

M ATTRESSES

Overall Score

Brand & Model

Test Results

Firmness rating

Stabilization

Durability

Average back sleeper Large/tall back sleeper

Petite back sleeper

Average side sleeper Large/tall side sleeper

Petite side sleeper

Rank

Recommended

Support

INNERSPRING Continued Tomorrow 37 SleepSystem

72

$990

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3

3

Sealy Posturepedic 38 Performance Kelburn II

72

$1,300

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3

5

MacyBed by Serta 39 Elite 13 โ€ Luxury Firm

72

$900

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

3

Leesa Hybrid 40 Mattress

72

$1,595

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

3

Serta Perfect 41 Sleeper Hybrid Weyburn

71

$900

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3

3

Serta Hotel Beds 42 Concierge Suite II

71

$1,100

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3

3

OrganicPedic by 43 OMI Stella

71

$2,000

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3

4

44 Amore Beds Hybrid

71

$950

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3

6

! 0

1 Essentia Stratami

81

$2,871

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

6

! 0

Reverie Dream 2 Supreme II Hybrid Sleep System Firm

81

$3,700

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

4

$ 0

Sleep on Latex Pure 3 Green Firm

81

$795

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

7

! 0

BedInABox 4 Tranquillium

79

$1,300

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

6

! 0

5 Tuft & Needle Mint

78

$895

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

4

$ 0

Novaform Serafina 6 Pearl Medium (Costco)

78

$800

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3

5

$ 0

Serta Luxury 12 โ€ Gel 7 Memory Foam

78

$500

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

7

! 0

8 Lull The Lull

78

$800

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

6

! 0

9 GhostBed GhostBed

77

$895

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

7

! 0

Dream Bed Lux 10 LX510

77

$2,700

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

2

FOAM

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

! RECOMMENDED

41


Overall Score

Brand & Model

Price

Test Results

Firmness rating

Stabilization

Durability

Average back sleeper Large/tall back sleeper

Petite back sleeper

Average side sleeper Large/tall side sleeper

Petite side sleeper

Rank

Recommended

Support

FOAM Continued

$ 0

Sleep Innovations 11 Marley

77

$430

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

7

0 ! ! 0

12 GhostBed Luxe

77

$1,475

13 Serta SleepToGo

$800

0 4 4 0 0 3 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 5 0 4 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 5 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 3

4

76 76

$750

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

4

76

$395

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 2

6

76

$1,000

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

3

75

$1,400

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

3

74

$1,900

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3

3

74

$900

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

6

74

$700

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

4

74

$330

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

5

74

$595

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

5

74

$400

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3

4

73

$230

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 2

7

Nest Bedding Love & Sleep Signature Sleep Gold Inspire Purple The Purple Mattress Sheex Performance Cooling Saatva Zenhaven Latex My Pillow 10 โ€ Mattress Ashley Sleep The Perfect 10 Spa Sensations by Zinus 12 โ€ Theratouch M-FMS-1200Q Tuft & Needle T&N Mattress Rivet M-MAT10000-QN-WHT Mainstays (Walmart) 12 Inch Memory Foam

5

! 0

14

! 0

15

! 0

16

! 0

17

! 0

18

! 0

19

! 0

20

$ 0

21

$ 0

22

! 0

23

! 0

24

0 ! ! 0

25 Nectar The Nectar

73

$795

73

$650

0 4 4 0 0 3 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 5 0 3 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 4 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 4

6

26 Tulo Medium

73

$3,700

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

3

73

$555

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3

7

! 0 ! 0

42

Reverie Dream Supreme II Hybrid 27 Sleep System Medium Dream Science by Martha Stewart 28 Collection 12 โ€ Memory Foam

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

3


Price

M ATTRESSES

Overall Score

Brand & Model

Test Results

Firmness rating

Stabilization

Durability

Average back sleeper Large/tall back sleeper

Petite back sleeper

Average side sleeper Large/tall side sleeper

Petite side sleeper

Rank

Recommended

Support

FOAM Continued

1

Serta Perfect 29 Sleeper 10 โ€ Brentwood Home 30 Sequoia Euro Top

72

$800

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

6

72

$1,150

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

5

31 Bear Queen OrganicPedic by 32 OMI Flora Nouveau Beautyrest 14โ€ 33 SurfaceCool Gel Bob-O-Pedic 34 MyBob Gel Leesa The Leesa 35 Mattress Novosbed Memory 36 Foam Eight The Smart 37 Mattress

71

$850

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

6

71

$4,445

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

4

71

$600

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 5

4

70

$1,100

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3

2

70

$995

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

4

69

$1,100

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3

4

69

$1,050

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 4

5

38 Luxi The Luxi Soft Yogabed Luxury 39 Foam Y10 Reverie Dream 40 Supreme II Hybrid Sleep System Soft Ashley Sleep 41 Chime Elite M67431 Dromma Triple 42 Layer Zinus Green Tea 43 Pressure Relief Sleep Innovations 44 Taylor 12 inch Gel Swirl Pure Talalay Bliss 45 Nature Novaform Comfort 46 Grande (Costco) Wright 1.27 Luxury 47 Memory Foam AmazonBasics 48 Memory Foam 10-Inch

69

$1,300

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4

4

69

$850

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

6

69

$3,700

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 4

3

69

$440

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3

5

69

$850

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

4

69

$340

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4

6

68

$470

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3

6

68

$3,000

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5

4

68

$600

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

6

68

$1,795

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

4

68

$245

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 2

2

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

43


Overall Score

Brand & Model

Price

Test Results

Firmness rating

Stabilization

Durability

Average back sleeper Large/tall back sleeper

Petite back sleeper

Average side sleeper Large/tall side sleeper

Petite side sleeper

Rank

Recommended

Support

FOAM Continued 49 Ikea Myrbacka

68

$500

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4

7

50 Puffy The Puffy

67

$1,150

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3

7

Eclipse Two-Sided 51 10 โ€ Firm

67

$350

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

4

52 Saatva Loom & Leaf

67

$1,300

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3

4

67

$1,779

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3

4

65

$760

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 3

2

65

$1,200

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 4

3

81

$2,600

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

4

80

$1,000

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5

7

70

$2,200

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3

4

67

$3,200

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

4

The Original 53 Mattress Factory Serenity Latex Classic Brands 54 Sleep Trends Sofia 55 Amerisleep AS3 ADJUSTABLE AIR

! 0

1

! 0

2 3 4

Sleep Number 360 p6 Smart Bed Sleep Number 360 c2 Smart Bed Personal Comfort A8 Bed Sleep Number 360 i8 Smart Bed

HOW WE TEST: Side Sleeper is the ability to keep a side sleeperโ€™s spine relatively horizontal. Back Sleeper is the ability to maintain the natural curve of a back sleeperโ€™s spine. In our support tests, we use a woman 4 feet 11ยฝ inches to 5 feet 1ยฝ inches, and 110 to 127.5 pounds for the Petite Sleeper scores, and a man

44

6 feet 2 inches to 6 feet 4 inches and 220 to 242 pounds for the Large/Tall Sleeper scores. The Average Sleeper is an average of the other two. Durability gauges a mattressโ€™ ability to keep its original shape, height, firmness, and support after a simulated eight to 10 years of use, including our passing a nearly 310-pound roller over each mattress 30,000 times.

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

A high score for Stabilization indicates little or no bouncing or vibration transferred. We rate Firmness on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the firmest. Price is approximate retail for a queen-size mattress without a box spring. Overall Score is based on the performance of the product in all of our tests.


MICROWAVES

QUI CK GUIDE

Microwaves Whether youโ€™ll set it on the kitchen counter, hide it in cabinetry, or install it over the range, start with a microwave that heats and defrosts evenly before considering specialty features and shortcuts. What to Look For

What Youโ€™ll Pay

A

Generally,

sensor helps prevent over- or under-cooking by measuring emitted steam to gauge when food is done.

What to Skip If

you mostly reheat food, you donโ€™t need a raft of preprogrammed shortcut keys. Features like browning and grilling add versatility, but you shouldnโ€™t expect a microwave to do either very well.

more affordable countertop models, which run between about $80 and $300, are best for kitchens with ample counter space. Be sure to check dimensions as you shop. Over-the-range microwaves can be had for $300 or less, though many cost upward of $400. These mounted appliances save space but donโ€™t vent as well as a capable range hood.

BUYING ADVICE The higher the wattage, the higher the cooking power. But differences of 100 watts or so arenโ€™t noticeable

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/microwaves

Tested products in performance order.

Venting (airflow)

Test Results Ease of use

Predicted reliability

Rank

Rec.

Survey Results

Price

Owner satisfaction Heating evenness Defrosting evenness Speed of heating Microwaving noise

Overall Score

Brand & Product

OVER-THE-RANGE MICROWAVES 1

Whirlpool WMH53521H

83

$400

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3

! 0

2

Whirlpool WMH75021HZ

82

$370

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3

! 0

3

GE PVM9005SJSS

80

$425

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4

! 0

4

Cafรฉ CVM721M2NS5

79

$855

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3

5

Frigidaire Professional FPBM3077RF

79

$595

4 0 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

! 0

! 0 1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

45


Venting (airflow)

Test Results Ease of use

Survey Results Predicted reliability

Rank

Rec.

Price

Owner satisfaction Heating evenness Defrosting evenness Speed of heating Microwaving noise

Overall Score

Brand & Product

OVER-THE-RANGE MICROWAVES Continued 6

GE JVM3160RFSS

79

$250

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4

! 0

7

KitchenAid KMHS120ESS

79

$585

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3

! 0

8

LG LMH2235ST

78

$450

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3

! 0

9

LG LMV2031ST

78

$350

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

! 0

10 Kenmore 83337

77

$405

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

! 0

Frigidaire Gallery 11 FGMV17WNVF

76

$380

4 0 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4

! 0

12 Kenmore Elite 80373

76

$745

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2

13 Frigidaire FFMV1645TD

73

$320

4 0 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3

Frigidaire Gallery 14 FGMV176NTD

73

$350

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4

15 Kenmore 80353

73

$535

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 2

$ 0

SMALL COUNTERTOP MICROWAVES 1

Avanti MO7191TW

65

$70

5 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 4

NA

MIDSIZED COUNTERTOP MICROWAVES LG NeoChef LMC1275SB Panasonic Genius Prestige NN-SD681S

84

$180

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4

NA

80

$180

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5

NA

3

General GEW1000E

77

$310

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 โˆ’ 0 4 0 5 0 4

NA

4

Panasonic NN-SN686S

75

$175

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 3

NA NA

$ 0

1

$ 0

2

5 6 7 8 9

Summit SCM1000SS

74

$320

Breville Quick Touch BMO734XL Samsung MG11H2020CT Samsung MC12J8035CT

71

$250

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 โˆ’ 0 5 4 0 0 4 โˆ’ โˆ’ 4 0 0 2 4 0 0 4 4 0

70

$160

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

NA

69

$500

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4

NA

Danby DMW111KBLDB

67

$90

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

NA

67

$105

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3

NA

Westinghouse 10 WCM11100SSB

46

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

NA


Survey Results

79

$200

5 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

NA

GE JES2051SN[SS]

79

$250

8

78

$220

9

LG LMC1575

77

$200

10 Kenmore Elite 79393

76

$250

0 3 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0

0 5 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0

NA

Panasonic NN-SD745S

0 4 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 4 5 0 0 2 4 0 0 4 4 0

NA

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

1

Panasonic NN-SE785S

86

$290

2

Panasonic NN-SD975S

83

$250

3

GE Profile JES2251SJ

81

$280

4

Panasonic NN-SD945S

81

$215

5

Panasonic NN-SN966S

81

! 0

6

Farberware Smart Sensor Cooking FMO16AHTBSA

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

7

Venting (airflow)

Ease of use

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0

Rank

0 5 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0

NA

$250

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

Rec.

Owner satisfaction Heating evenness Defrosting evenness Speed of heating Microwaving noise

Test Results

Predicted reliability

Price

LARGE COUNTERTOP MICROWAVES

11 Panasonic NN-SN736B

76

$190

12 Toshiba EC042A5C-BS

72

$195

13 GE Profile PES7227SLSS

71

$350

0 3 5 0 3 0 3 0 5 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0

0 5 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 3 3 0 0 3

0 4 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0

0 4 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 4 0

0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0

0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0

NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

BUILT-IN MICROWAVES 1

Sharp SMD3070AS

66

$1,100

2

Sharp Carousel R-1214

64

$380

HOW WE TEST: Heating Evenness reflects how evenly a model reheated a dish of cold mashed potatoes. Defrosting Evenness is based on how well the auto-defrost program defrosted a pound of frozen ground beef. Speed of Heating is based on the temperature rise of water heated. Microwaving Noise reflects how quiet the oven is while microwaving on high. Ease of Use includes how easy it is to set the microwave without referring to the instructions. Venting (airflow) is based on

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

the volume of air drawn in by the over-the-range modelโ€™s internal fan on the highest setting. Usable Capacity is the usable space based on our measurements and excludes the corner spaces for models with rotating turntables. Note that most OTR models allow you to turn off the rotation to fit large dishes. With the rotation off, measured capacity approximates claimed. But food might require extra tending and stirring. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines test results with survey data

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

NA

for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first five years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the microwave they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’

47

MICROWAVES

Overall Score

Brand & Product


QUI CK GUIDE

Ranges Electric smoothtop ranges remain the biggest sellers, but now, whether youโ€™re renovating your kitchen or replacing an old model, you have more options than ever, including induction and double-oven ranges. What to Look For

What to Skip

Start with your power sourceโ€”gas or electric. Dual-fuel ranges have an electric oven and gas cooktop burners, so they require a gas line and a 240-volt electric outlet. At least five oven-rack positions for flexibility when baking and roasting. For home cooks who host often, double ovens allow you to cook two dishes simultaneously, at different temperatures.

Shopping by Btu. Higher British thermal units donโ€™t guarantee faster heating in our tests.

BUYING ADVICE

Generally, more expensive pro-style ranges arenโ€™t the bestperforming models we test.

What Youโ€™ll Pay Anywhere from $700 to $3,000 for most ranges. Youโ€™ll find coil models for less than $700 and prostyle options that run more than $3,000.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/ranges.

Tested products in performance order. Survey Results

Self-cleaning

Oven capacity

Broiling

Baking

Test Results Cooktop low

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Price

Cooktop high

Overall Score

Brand & Model

ELECTRIC SMOOTHTOP, SINGLE OVEN (30-INCH)

0 ! $ 0

1

GE Profile PB911SJSS

85

$1,085

2

LG LRE3193ST

83

$1,000

0 3 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 4 4 0 0 5 0 5 4 0 0 3 5 0 0 5 4 0 0 5 5 0 NA

! 0

3

Frigidaire Gallery FGEF3036TD

81

$750

4 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5

0 ! ! 0

4

Kenmore Pro 92583

81

$2,250

5

LG LSE4613ST

81

$1,350

6

Samsung NE58F9500SS

80

$1,200

0 3 4 0 0 5 0 5 4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 4 0 0 3 5 0 0 5 0 4 5 0 0 5 0 3 3 0 0 3 0 5 5 0 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 4

48

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Survey Results

Cooktop low

Baking

Broiling

Oven capacity

Self-cleaning

Test Results

0 4 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0

0 4 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 3 0

0 4 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0

0 5 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0

Cooktop high

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Price

R A NGE S

Overall Score

Brand & Model

ELECTRIC SMOOTHTOP, SINGLE OVEN (30-INCH) Continued 7

GE JS760SLSS

78

$1,100

8

GE JB655SKSS

77

$600

9

LG LRE3194BD

77

$750

10 Whirlpool WEE510S0FS

77

$1,080

11 Samsung NE59J7630SS

75

$900

12 Samsung NE59N6650SS

75

$1,000

13 GE Adora JB755BJTS

73

$860

0 3 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 4 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0

14 Samsung NE59M4320SS 73

$650

15 Cafe CES700P2MS1

71

$1,600

16 Frigidaire FFEF3054TS

70

$675

17 GE JS645SLSS

70

$1,000

18 Electrolux EI30EF45QS

67

$2,205

19 Frigidaire FFEH3051VS

67

$1,000

20 Frigidaire FFEH3054US

67

$800

21 Whirlpool WFE515S0ES

67

$630

22 Frigidaire LGEF3046TF

66

$900

23 GE JBS60RKSS

66

$605

24 Maytag MER8800FZ

65

$900

25 Kenmore 95123

64

$1,300

26 Kenmore Elite 95223

64

$2,020

27 Samsung NE59M4310SS

63

$530

KitchenAid 28 KFEG500ESS

60

$1,250

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 1

29 Whirlpool WFE775H0HZ 60

$950

30 GE JB645RKSS

59

$630

0 2 5 0 0 4 5 0 0 3 3 0 0 5 0 1 5 0 0 3 5 0 0 3 2 0 0 3 5 0 0 5

Whirlpool 31 WFE320M0EW

59

$420

5 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 4

32 KitchenAid KSEB900ESS 58

$2,400

33 Whirlpool WFE975H0HV 58

$1,170

57

$550

34 Frigidaire FFEF3052TS

1

0 5 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

NA

0 4 5 0 4 0 NA

0 1 1 0 1 0 5 0

NA

0 2 3 0 0 4 0 5 3 0 0 5 0 4 0 1 5 0 0 2 5 0 0 3 0 4 4 0 0 5 0 1 4 0 0 2 0 4 4 0 0 2 0 3 3 0 NA 49


Survey Results

Self-cleaning

Oven capacity

Broiling

Baking

Test Results Cooktop low

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Price

Cooktop high

Overall Score

Brand & Model

ELECTRIC SMOOTHTOP, SINGLE OVEN (30-INCH) Continued 57

$1,200

36 Whirlpool WEE750H0HZ 55

$1,300

53

$800

35 Whirlpool WEE745H0FS

37 Whirlpool WFE520S0FS

0 2 5 0 0 4 0 3 3 0 0 5 0 5 0 1 5 0 0 2 4 0 0 3 0 4 4 0 0 5 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 5 5 0 0 3 0 2 4 0 0 3

ELECTRIC SMOOTHTOP, DOUBLE OVEN (30-INCH)

0 ! ! 0

1

Whirlpool WGE745COFS 82

$1,200

2

Samsung NE58F9710WS

81

$1,600

3

LG LDE4415ST

79

$1,620

4

GE JB860SJSS

78

$1,350

5

LG LTE4815ST

78

$1,700

6

Samsung NE59J7850WS

78

$1,400

0 5 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0

0 2 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 5 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0

0 4 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0

0 5 5 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5 0

0 5 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0

0 4 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0

7

Ikea Betrodd 602.885.60 72 [IES900DS]

$1,000

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4

8

Maytag MET8800FZ

72

$1,620

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3

ELECTRIC INDUCTION 1

GE Profile PHS930SLSS

85

$2,435

2

Kenmore Elite 95073

83

$1,590

0 3 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 0 5 4 0 0 3 5 0 0 5 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 5

! 0

3

Frigidaire Gallery FGIF3036TF

82

$1,080

4 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5

! 0

4

LG LSE4617ST

81

$2,400

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3

5

Samsung NE58K9560WS/AA

79

$2,200

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3

6

Frigidaire FFIF3054TS

78

$1,000

4 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5

! 0 0 !

GAS AND DUAL-FUEL, SINGLE OVEN (30-INCH)

! 0

1

Samsung NX58H9500WS

0 $ ! 0 $ 0 ! 0

2

Samsung NX58H5600SS 76

$680

3

LG LSD4913ST (dual-fuel) 75

$1,600

4

Samsung NX58K3310SS

75

$720

5

LG LRG4113ST

74

$1,170

0 5 4 0 5 0 4 0

! 0

6

Samsung Chef Collection 74 NX58M9960PS/AA

$4,000

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2

! 0

7

Samsung NX58M9420SS 74

$1,200

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3

50

79

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

$1,600

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 4 0 5 0 4 0

0 3 4 0 3 0 4 0

0 5 4 0 5 0 5 0

0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0

0 4 5 0 3 0 3 0

0 0 5 3 5 0 0 2 5 NA 0 5 0 0 3


Survey Results

$1,000

0 5 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0

0 5 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0

0 3 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0

0 4 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0

Self-cleaning

73

Oven capacity

$1,300

LG LRG3193ST

Broiling

73

9

Baking

GE JGS760SELSS

Cooktop low

Rank

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

8

Test Results Cooktop high

Rec.

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Price

R A NGE S

Overall Score

Brand & Model

GAS AND DUAL-FUEL, SINGLE OVEN (30-INCH) Continued

0 4 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0

0 3 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0

0 4 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0

3 0 NA

0 4 4 0 3 0

10 Samsung NX58M6630SS 73

$880

11 GE Profile PGS930SELSS 72

$2,340

12 GE PGB911ZEJSS

71

$1,500

13 LG LRG3061ST

70

$810

14 LG LSG4513ST

70

$1,600

! 0

Frigidaire Gallery 15 FGGF3036TDRF

69

$650

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5

! 0

16 GE JGB700SEJSS

69

$750

17 Frigidaire FFGF3054TS

67

$720

18 GE JGB660SEJSS

67

$680

19 GE JGBS66EEKES

67

$675

0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0

Bosch HDI8054U 20 (dual-fuel)

66

$2,500

21 GE JGBS62REKSS

66

$675

22 GE JGSS66EELES

65

$1,260

23 GE JGBS30REKSS

64

$450

24 GE JGBS60DEKWW

64

$400

25 Frigidaire FFGH3051VS

63

$850

26 Frigidaire FFGH3054US

63

$995

0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0

Frigidaire Gallery 27 FGGF3047TF

61

$980

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

28 Jenn-Air JGS1450FP

61

$3,000

Ikea Betrodd 29 002.885.58 [IGS505DS]

58

$800

โˆ’ โˆ’ 3 0 0 5 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 1 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 4 0 0 4 2 0 0 4 4 0

30 Kenmore 74423

56

$530

31 Kenmore 75123

55

$1,515

0 3 3 0 0 4 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 3 NA 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 3 5 0 0 3 5 0 1 0

KitchenAid 32 KSGG700ESS

55

$1,890

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 1

33 Frigidaire FFGF3052TS

54

$500

34 Maytag MGR8800F

52

$990

35 Electrolux EI30GF45QS

51

$2,385

0 3 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 2 0 3 3 0 NA 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 0 5 1 0 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 3 0 2 2 0 0 3 0 3

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 3 4 0 4 0 3 0

0 5 4 0 5 0 5 0

0 3 4 0 3 0 3 0

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0

NA

3 0

0 0 4 3 3 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 5 NA 0

3 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 NA 4 4 NA 0 4 NA 0 4 NA 0 3 NA 0 3 4 0 0

51


Survey Results

Self-cleaning

Oven capacity

Broiling

Baking

Test Results Cooktop low

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Price

Cooktop high

Overall Score

Brand & Model

GAS AND DUAL-FUEL, SINGLE OVEN (30-INCH) Continued KitchenAid 36 KFGG500ESS Bosch 800 Series 37 HGI8054UC

51

$1,215

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 1

50

$2,070

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 3

38 Kenmore Elite 42783

49

$3,500

39 Whirlpool WEG745H0FS 49

$1,300

40 Whirlpool WFG525S0HS 49

$765

0 3 3 0 0 3 0 1 4 0 0 5 0 5 0 1 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 0 4 3 0 0 5 0 1 3 0 0 3 0 3 4 0 0 4 0 2 4 0 0 4

48

$2,250

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 3

42 Whirlpool WFG745H0FS 48

$900

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 1

47

$1,500

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 1

44 Whirlpool WFG540H0ES 47

$1,000

45 Whirlpool WFG975H0HZ 47

$1,170

46 Kenmore 32673 Slide-in

$1,050

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0

Frigidaire Professional 41 FPGH3077RF Whirlpool 43 WEG750H0HZ

46

47 Whirlpool WFG550S0HZ 46

$945

48 Kenmore Pro 72583

43

$2,000

49 Amana AGR6603SF

42

$600

50 Frigidaire FFGF3012TW

42

$485

51 Maytag MGR6600FZ

42

$650

52 Kenmore 75113

41

$1,050

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 3 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0

0 2 2 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 2 0

0 4 5 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 4 0

0 3 3 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 2 0

0 5 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0

0 1 1 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 NA

0 3 5 0

GAS AND DUAL-FUEL, DOUBLE OVEN (30-INCH) LG Signature 84 LUTD4919SN (dual-fuel) Samsung NY58J9850WS 80 (dual-fuel) Cafe C2S950P2MS1 76 (dual-fuel)

$3,240

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5

$2,700

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3

$3,200

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

$2,130

$2,500

0 3 4 0 0 4 0 5 4 0 0 4 0 5 0 3 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 0 4 3 0 0 4 0 4 4 0 0 3 0 4 5 0 0 3 0 5 5 0 0 3

70

$1,400

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 2

63

$1,530

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 3

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

0 ! ! 0 ! 0

4

GE PGB980ZEJSS

76

5

LG LDG4315ST

76

$1,710

6

GE Profile PGS960SELSS 71

7

Samsung NX58M6850SG

8

GE JGB860SEJSS

! 0

52

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Survey Results

Self-cleaning

Oven capacity

Broiling

Baking

Cooktop low

Cooktop high

Test Results

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Price

R A NGE S

Overall Score

Brand & Model

PRO-STYLE GAS AND DUAL-FUEL (30-INCH)

! 0

1

! 0

2

KitchenAid KDRS407VSS 70 (dual-fuel) Monogram 68 ZGP304NRSS

3

Wolf DF304 (dual-fuel)

64

4

NXR DRGB3001

61

$1,700

5

Miele HR1124

59

$5,000

6

Thermador PRG304GH

58

$4,400

7

Wolf GR304

54

$4,900

8

Jenn-Air JGRP430WP

53

$4,000

$4,230

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

$5,000

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3

$6,400

3 0 0 5 3 0 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 3 0 0 5 0 4 3 0 0 5 0 3 1 0 0 3 0 3

4 0 0 5 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0

4 0 0 3 3 0 2 0 2 0 4 0

4 0 0 3 4 0 2 0 2 0 2 0

3 0 0 2 0 NA 3 4 0 0 4 3 NA 0 4 NA 0 3 0 0 4

PRO-STYLE GAS AND DUAL-FUEL (36-INCH)

! 0

1

! 0

2

KitchenAid KDRU763VSS 75 (dual-fuel) Monogram 74 ZDP364NDPSS (dual-fuel)

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

$8,100

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4

3

Thermador PRG366JG

67

$7,700

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 1

4

Kucht Pro Style KRG3618U

66

$3,000

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 NA

5

Wolf GR366

60

$6,000

6

NXR DRGB3602

59

$3,000

7

Viking VGR5366BSS

56

$6,400

3 0 0 5 3 0 5 0 0 3 0 2 0 5 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 0 5 3 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 2 0 0 5

HOW WE TEST: Cooktop High reflects how quickly the most powerful element heated a large pot of water to near-boil. Cooktop Low is how well the lowest-powered element held a low heat, as for melting chocolate, and how well the most powerful element, set on low, held tomato sauce below a boil. Baking reflects even browning of cakes and cookies in multirack baking tests. Broiling is even browning

1

$7,300

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

of a pan of burgers and highheat searing. Oven Capacity is our evaluation of usable space. Self-Cleaning is that cycleโ€™s effectiveness after the oven is coated with a mixture of eggs, lard, cheese, cherry pie filling, tomato puree, and tapioca. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

NA NA NA

likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first five years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the range they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brandlevel rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’

53


QUI CK GUIDE

Refrigerators Refrigerator design continues to evolve, and new models often boast high-tech features. But no matter which type you choose, everyday performance still matters mostโ€”and thatโ€™s what our tests capture. What to Look For Temperature-controlled

drawers to keep meat, fish, and other food at lower temperatures. In French-door models, look for half or foldable shelves for storing taller items as needed. Adjustable door bins also allow for customization and flexibility.

What to Skip Our

tests found that the amount of usable

BUYING ADVICE

storage capacity is often less than the amount claimed. We measure the interior capacity of each model, which youโ€™ll see in the ratings.

If youโ€™re replacing your existing fridge (rather than remodeling), check each modelโ€™s width, height, and depth, and make sure you have room for the door to open fully.

What Youโ€™ll Pay Standard top-freezers start around $500. Side-by-sides start around $800, while Frenchdoor models are $1,000 and up. Built-ins can run beyond $10,000.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/refrigerators.

Tested products in performance order.

Exterior depth (in.)

Exterior width (in.)

Exterior height (in.)

Features

Ease of use

Noise

Energy efficiency

Test Results Temperature uniformity Thermostat control

Predicted reliability

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

TOP-FREEZERS

! 0

1

Frigidaire Gallery FGTR2037TF

0 ! ! 0

2

LG LTCS20220S

3

LG LTCS24223S

4

Samsung RT18M6215SG

! 0 54

$880

5 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 30 1

70 30 33

78

$900 $1,000

0 3 5 0 0 3 4 0 0 5 5 00 2 5 0 0 3 3 0 0 4 5 0 0 52 0

66 30 33

78 78

$800

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 40 3

67 29 29

79

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

68 33 33


Exterior depth (in.)

Exterior width (in.)

Exterior height (in.)

Features

Ease of use

Noise

Energy efficiency

Test Results Temperature uniformity Thermostat control

Owner satisfaction

Predicted reliability

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

TOP-FREEZERS Continued Samsung RT21M6213SG Samsung RT21M6215SG Blomberg BRFT1522SS Frigidaire FFHT1832TS

78

$1,080

78

$900

76

68 33 32

$1,100

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 0 4 5 0 0 40 3 โˆ’ โˆ’ 3 0 0 4 0 5 4 00 3 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 5 0 0 4 0 42 0

75

$765

5 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 30 1

67 30 31

LG LTCS20120S

74

$810

5 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 50 2

67 30 34

Maytag MRT311FFFM Frigidaire FFTR1821TD Whirlpool WRT549SZDM Frigidaire Gallery FGTR1837TF Frigidaire FFTR2021TS Whirlpool WRT518SZFM

74

$900

5 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 30 2

66 33 31

73

$600

5 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 30 1

66 30 31

73

$810

5 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 40 1

66 30 33

72

$790

5 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 20 1

66 30 31

71

$600

5 0 0 1 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 30 1

69 30 33

71

$600

5 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 20 1

68 28 31

16 GE GTS21FSKSS

69

$700

4 0 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 30 1

67 32 32

Maytag 17 MRT711BZDM GE 18 GTE15CTHRWW

68

$990

5 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 40 1

66 33 32

67

$540

4 0 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 30 1

62 28 30

19 GE GTS18FSLSS

67

$680

4 0 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 30 1

66 33 32

Whirlpool 20 WRT511SZDM Frigidaire 21 FFHT1821TS

67

$900

5 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 40 1

66 33 32

66

$720

5 0 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 30 1

64 30 30

22 GE GTS18GSHSS

65

$675

4 0 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 30 1

68 28 29

! 0

5

! 0

6

! 0

7

! 0

8

! 0

9

! 0

10

$ 0

11

! 0

12

! 0

13

! 0

14

$ 0

15

68 33 32 68 28 26

BOTTOM-FREEZERS

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

1

2

POOR

Kenmore Elite 79043 Kenmore Elite 79023

89

$1,300

5 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 50 3

70 33 33

89

$2,000

5 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 50 3

69 30 34

LG LDCS24223S

89

$1,300

5 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 50 3

69 33 33

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

55

REF R I GER AT ORS

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Exterior depth (in.)

Exterior width (in.)

Exterior height (in.)

Features

Ease of use

Noise

Energy efficiency

Test Results Temperature uniformity Thermostat control

Predicted reliability

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

BOTTOM-FREEZERS Continued

$ 0

4

Kenmore 69313

85

$700

5 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 50 2

66 30 31

81

$1,170

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 30 2

69 33 31

79

$1,530

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 40 2

67 30 31

78

$1,170

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 30 2

66 30 31

! 0

5

! 0

6

! 0

7

Amana ABB2224BRM KitchenAid KRBR109ESS Amana ABB1924BRM

! 0

8

GE GDE25ESKSS

78

$1,575

4 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 40 3

69 33 35

9

KitchenAid KRBR102ESS

77

$1,530

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 30 2

69 33 31

10 GE GDE21ESKSS

75

$1,485

4 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 40 3

70 30 35

73

$2,300

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 40 3

68 32 28

73

$1,260

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 40 2

67 30 31

$2,160

79 24 26

! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

Fisher & Paykel 11 Active-Smart RF170WDRUX5 Whirlpool 12 WRB329DMBM

Haier 14 HRB15N3BGS Whirlpool 15 WRB322DMBM Blomberg 16 BRFB1822SSN Bertazzoni 17 REF31BEMXR

71

$945

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 5 0 0 3 4 00 3 โˆ’ โˆ’ 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 42 0

71

$1,260

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 30 2

69 33 31

67

$1,700

60 30 31

65

$1,610

โˆ’ โˆ’ 3 0 0 4 3 0 0 40 3 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 4 0 0 4 3 00 2

18 GE GLE12HSLSS

60

$1,305

4 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 50 2

70 24 26

Whirlpool 19 URB551WNGZ

57

$1,260

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 20 2

74 24 27

13 Bosch B11CB50SSS 71

68 28 24

69 32 27

THREE-DOOR FRENCH-DOORS 1

Kenmore Elite 74113

85

$2,700

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 50 5

69 36 36

2

LG LFXS32766S

85

$3,510

69 36 34

3

LG LFC24770ST

83

$1,710

0 3 3 0 0 5 5 0 0 4 5 00 5 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 54 0

! 0

4

Samsung RF28HDEDPWW

83

$2,200

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 50 4

69 36 34

! 0

5

LG LRFDS3006S

82

$2,700

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 50 5

71 36 34

! 0 0 ! $ 0

56

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

69 33 33


Exterior depth (in.)

Exterior width (in.)

Exterior height (in.)

Features

Ease of use

Noise

Energy efficiency

Test Results Temperature uniformity Thermostat control

Owner satisfaction

Predicted reliability

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

THREE-DOOR FRENCH-DOORS Continued

! 0 ! 0

6

GE GNE29GSKSS

81

$1,965

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 40 4

7

Kenmore Elite 73153

81

$2,200

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 50 4

69 36 34

70 36 34

$ 0

8

LG LFC22770ST

81

$1,620

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 50 3

68 30 33

! 0

9

LG LFXS30766S

81

$3,420

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 40 4

69 36 34

! 0

GE Cafรฉ 10 CYE22TSHSS

80

$2,790

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 40 5

70 36 30

! 0

11 GE GFD28GSLSS

80

$2,905

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 30 5

70 36 33

! 0

12 GE GFE28GSKSS

80

$1,800

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 40 5

70 36 34

! 0

13 GE GYE22HSKSS

80

$2,610

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 40 5

70 36 30

! 0

GE Profile 14 PYE22PSKSS

80

$3,160

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 40 5

70 36 30

15 Kenmore 70333

79

$1,800

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 40 4

69 36 32

Kenmore Elite 16 73163

79

$2,400

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 4

69 36 34

17 GE GFE26GSKSS

78

$1,980

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 40 5

70 36 35

18 Kenmore 71323

78

$1,600

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 50 4

68 30 33

19 LG LFXC24726S

78

$3,060

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 40 5

69 36 29

20 LG LFXS29766S

78

$3,060

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 5

69 36 35

FOUR-DOOR (OR MORE) FRENCH-DOORS

! 0

1

Kenmore Elite 72483

81

$2,500

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 5

69 36 36

2

LG LMXS30746S

79

$3,420

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 5

69 36 36

3

LG LMXS30796D

79

$3,000

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 40 4

71 36 36

4 5 6 7

1

2

POOR

LG LNXS30866D

79

$3,690

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 4

69 36 37

Samsung RF23M8070SR LG Signature LUPXS3186N Samsung RF22K9381SR

79

$2,200

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 50 5

70 36 29

78

$6,305

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 5

70 36 37

78

$2,795

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 50 4

72 36 29

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

57

REF R I GER AT ORS

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Exterior depth (in.)

Exterior width (in.)

Exterior height (in.)

Features

Ease of use

Noise

Energy efficiency

Test Results Temperature uniformity Thermostat control

Predicted reliability

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

FOUR-DOOR (OR MORE) FRENCH-DOORS Continued 8 9 10 11 12 13

Samsung RF23M8570SG Samsung RF28K9070SR Samsung RF28HMELBSR Samsung RF28JBEDBSR Samsung RF28N9780SR Samsung RF28R7351SG

78

$3,100

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 50 5

70 36 29

78

$2,600

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 4

71 36 35

77

$2,600

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 50 5

69 36 29

77

$3,600

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 50 5

70 36 34

77

$3,400

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 50 4

72 36 34

77

$2,400

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 50 5

70 36 34

77

$1,980

3 0 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 5

70 36 33

76

$1,500

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 5

69 36 34

74

$1,800

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 5

70 36 30

73

$1,800

3 0 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 30 5

70 36 33

SIDE-BY-SIDES

! 0

1

GE Profile PSS28KSHSS

! 0

2

LG LSXS26366S Kenmore Elite 51863 GE Profile PSE25KSHSS

! 0

3

! 0

4

! 0

5

LG LSXC22486S

73

$1,800

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 5

70 36 30

! 0

6

LG LSXS26326S

73

$1,300

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 40 5

69 36 34

! 0

7

Kenmore 51763

72

$1,300

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 40 5

69 36 34

8

Kenmore 51783

71

$1,200

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 30 5

69 36 29

9

KitchenAid KRSC503ESS

71

$2,790

2 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 40 5

71 36 28

10 GE GSS23HSHSS

69

$1,485

3 0 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 30 4

70 33 33

Whirlpool WRS586FIEM Whirlpool WRS588FIHZ Frigidaire FFSS2625TS GE Profile PZS22MSKSS

69

$1,530

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 40 4

69 36 33

69

$1,530

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 40 4

69 36 33

68

$1,080

3 0 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 30 3

70 36 32

68

$2,610

3 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 50 4

70 36 29

68

$1,980

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 5

70 36 30

11 12 13 14

15 LG LSXC22386S

58

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Exterior depth (in.)

Exterior width (in.)

Exterior height (in.)

Features

Ease of use

Noise

Energy efficiency

Test Results Temperature uniformity Thermostat control

Owner satisfaction

Predicted reliability

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

BUILT-INS

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

! 0

4

! 0

5

! 0

6

! 0

7

Thermador Freedom Collection Professional Series T36BT920NS Jenn-Air JF42NXFXDE Miele MasterCool KF1903SF Jenn-Air JB36NXFXRE Sub-Zero BI-42UFD/S Dacor Modernist DRF427500AP Sub-Zero IT36CI

Dacor Modernist 8 DRF367500AP Sub-Zero 9 BI42SIDSPH KitchenAid 10 KBFN502ESS KitchenAid 11 KBBR306ESS

83

$9,300

5 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 50 4

84 36 25

81

$9,400

4 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 50 3

83 42 26

81

$9,100

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 50 4

83 36 25

80

$7,400

4 0 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 50 4

83 36 26

79

$9,800

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 40 4

83 42 26

78

$10,500

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 50 3

85 42 25

78

$7600

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 50 1

83 36 25

77

$8,200

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 5

84 36 24

77

$11,345

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 40 4

84 42 26

76

$7,850

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 50 3

83 42 26

75

$6,900

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 50 4

83 36 26

HOW WE TEST: Temperature Uniformity is based on how well a model minimizes warm and cold spots. Thermostat Control looks at the applianceโ€™s ability to achieve and maintain a set temperature despite changes in room temperature. Energy Efficiency is energy consumption per cubic foot of measured usable storage space. Noise is measured

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

with compressors running. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first five years.

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the refrigerator they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’

59

REF R I GER AT ORS

Overall Score

Brand & Model


QUI CK GUIDE

Snow Blowers You donโ€™t need a behemoth model for efficient snow clearing. Youโ€™ll find compact, easier-handling machines work well on smaller driveways, while midsized models can dispatch drifts left by a heavy storm. What to Look For Belts. Youโ€™ll need one drive belt for single-stage machines and two for twostage models. Shear pins. On two-stage models, they protect the engine and transmission by breaking if the auger hits something too hard. Keep spares on hand. Interlocking safety grips. These allow one-handed

operation so that you can also operate the discharge chute control.

What Youโ€™ll Pay You can spend as little as $200 for a snow blower that will handle light dustings or well over $1,000 for a snow blower that takes care of heavier snowfalls.

BUYING ADVICE Bigger engines and wider clearing swaths are great, but some smaller machines can out-clear and out-throw the big boys for less money. For more buying advice, go to CR.org/snowblowers.

Tested products in performance order.

! 0

4

$ 0

5

Width (in.)

3

Noise

$ 0

Controls

2

Test Results

Handling

Rank

! 0

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Recommended

! 0

1

Survey Price Results

Removal speed Plow pile removal Throwing distance Surface cleaning

Overall Score

Brand & Model

THREE-STAGE GAS: BEST FOR HEAVY SNOW UP TO 18 INCHES

60

Cub Cadet 3X 30 โ€ PRO H Cub Cadet 3X 30 โ€ HD Troy-Bilt Vortex 2890 Cub Cadet 3X 26โ€ TRAC Troy-Bilt Vortex 2490

91

$2,600

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 2

30

91

$1,700

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 2

30

90

$1,200

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2

28

87

$1,800

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 2

26

83

$1,200

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2

24

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Width (in.)

Noise

Controls

Handling

Removal speed Plow pile removal Throwing distance Surface cleaning

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Test Results

TWO-STAGE GAS: BEST FOR HEAVY TO MEDIUM SNOW UP TO 16 INCHES

! 0

1

Ariens 926060

91

$3,100

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 2

28

Ariens Deluxe 30 EFI Toro Power Max HD 928 OAE 38840 Troy-Bilt Arctic Storm 30 Cub Cadet 2X 30 โ€™โ€™ HP Cub Cadet 2X 28 โ€ HP Toro Power Max 826 OXE 37799

91

$1,700

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2

30

91

$1,400

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 2

28

91

$1,500

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 2

30

89

$1,200

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2

30

87

$1,100

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 2

28

87

$1,050

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 2

26

Craftsman 88976

87

$1,600

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 2

30

$1,000

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 2

27

$1,100

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2

28

$1,000

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2

26

$1,000

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 2

28

! 0

2

! 0

3

! 0

4

$ 0

5

$ 0

6

$ 0

7

! 0

8

$ 0 ! 0

Briggs & Stratton 84 9 1227MDS Ariens Deluxe 28 82 10 254CC 921046 Cub Cadet 2X 81 11 26โ€ HP

$ 0

12 Troy-Bilt 2860

! 0

80

COMPACT TWO-STAGE GAS: BEST FOR MEDIUM SNOW UP TO 16 INCHES Toro Power Max 77 824 OE 37798 Briggs & Stratton 77 1696610 Honda 74 HSS724AW

$880

3 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 2

24

$730

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2

24

$2,200

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 2

24

Craftsman 88640 74

$800

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 2

24

73

$700

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3

24

$900

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 2

24

$880

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 2

24

$800

4 0 0 5 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 2

24

$ 0

1

$ 0

2

! 0

3

! 0

4

$ 0

5

Troy-Bilt 2410

! 0

6

! 0

7

! 0

8

1

2

POOR

Ariens Compact 72 24 920027 Briggs & Stratton 72 1696614 Ariens 920025

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

70

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

61

SNO W BL O W ERS

Survey Price Results

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Width (in.)

Noise

Controls

Test Results

Handling

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

Removal speed Plow pile removal Throwing distance Surface cleaning

Overall Score

Brand & Model

SINGLE-STAGE GAS: BEST FOR LIGHT TO MEDIUM SNOW UP TO 9 INCHES

! 0

1

! 0

2

$ 0

3

Toro 824 QXE 36003 Toro Power Clear 721 QZE 38744 Toro Power Clear 721 R-C 38751

! 0

4

Honda HS 720AS

72

$700

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2

20

Toro 724 QXE 36002 Troy-Bilt Squall 208XP Troy-Bilt Squall 179E Craftsman CMXGBAM1054540

69

$750

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2

24

67

$650

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2

21

64

$450

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2

21

64

$550

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2

21

! 0

5

$ 0

6

$ 0

7

! 0

8

76

$850

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 2

24

75

$700

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 2

21

74

$600

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2

21

SINGLE-STAGE ELECTRIC: BEST FOR LIGHT SNOW UP TO 6 INCHES 1

Toro Power Curve 50 1800 38381

1

EGO SNT2102

$250

5 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3

18

SINGLE-STAGE BATTERY: BEST FOR LIGHT SNOW UP TO 6 INCHES

! 0

60

HOW WE TEST: For Removal Speed, we time how long it takes models to clear a highly controlled mixture of wet sawdust. Plow-pile Removal is an assessment of how quickly, and thoroughly, models cut through a large mound of wet sawdust designed to simulate a plow pile. Throwing Distance is how far each model throws the mixture. Surface cleaning reflects how much of our mixture each model leaves behind on a blacktop driveway. Handling denotes how easy

62

$600 NA NA each machine is to push, pull, and turn. Controls is our assessment of how easy it is to change speeds, adjust the discharge chute, and move the handle-bar. Noise is measured in decibels at the ear of the operator; a rating lower than good means youโ€™ll need hearing protection. Price is approximate retail. Overall score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3

21

likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first five years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the snow blower they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction. NA means we have no data.

โˆ’


VA CUUMS

QUI CK GUIDE

Vacuums The best uprights deliver the most power for deepcleaning carpets, but canisters are easier to maneuver. Robotics and stick vacs offer supplemental floor-cleaning convenience. What to Look For

What to Skip

If deep-cleaning carpet is the most important thing on your list, go for an upright. Canisters do well when cleaning drapes and upholstery, on stairs, and under furniture. They let you move mostly the hose and wandโ€”instead of the entire machine. View robotic vacuums, as well as stick vacs, as maintenance cleaners; neither can replace your full-sized vacuum.

No need to splurge on extra cleaning tools. Those that come standard should suffice for most household cleaning jobs. We recommend against bagless models if you have asthma or allergies, because emptying the bin is usually a dusty, messy chore.

BUYING ADVICE

Even if you plan to order online, go to a store first. Push, pull, turn, and lift the vacuum cleaners youโ€™re considering to get a sense of how easy they are to use.

What Youโ€™ll Pay Capable bagless uprights start at about $170; figure $200-plus for most canisters and bagged uprights.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/ vacuums.

Tested products in performance order.

Noise

Pet hair

Handling

Hose suction Clean emissions

Test Results Bare floors

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Survey Price Results

Carpet

Overall Score

Brand & Model

BAGLESS UPRIGHT VACUUMS

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

1

2

POOR

Shark Navigator Powered Lift-Away NV586 (Target) Shark DuoClean Powered Lift-Away NV831 Shark DuoClean Powered Lift-Away Speed NV800

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

77

$300

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 3

76

$350

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 30 3

75

$300

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 40 3

! RECOMMENDED

63


Noise

Pet hair

Handling

Hose suction Clean emissions

Test Results Bare floors

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Survey Price Results

Carpet

Overall Score

Brand & Model

BAGLESS UPRIGHT VACUUMS Continued

! 0

4

Shark Rotator Professional Lift-Away NV501

75

$260

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 30 4

! 0

5

Shark Rotator Powered 74 Lift-Away Speed NV680

$260

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 50 4

! 0

6

Kenmore Pet Friendly CrossOver 31220

74

$250

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 50 3

! 0

7

Dyson Ball Animal 2

73

$500

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 3

! 0

8

Dyson Ball Multi Floor 2 73

$400

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 50 2

! 0

9

Shark APEX DuoClean Powered Lift-Away Speed AX912

73

$350

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 30 4

$ 0

Shark Navigator 10 Lift-Away NV352

72

$200

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 30 3

! 0

Shark APEX DuoClean 11 Zero-M Powered Lift-Away AZ1002

72

$400

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 50 3

$ 0

Shark Navigator 12 Professional Lift-Away NV356E

72

$200

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 30 3

! 0

Kenmore Elite Pet 13 Friendly CrossOver Ultra 31230

72

$350

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 50 3

! 0

Shark APEX 14 DuoClean Powered Lift-Away AX951

70

$400

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 30 4

Kenmore Progressive 15 10135

68

$150

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 50 3

Shark DuoClean Slim 16 NV201

68

$240

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 30 3

Dyson Cinetic Big Ball 17 Animal

67

$600

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 30 3

Dyson Cinetic Big Ball 18 Animal + Allergy

67

$700

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 30 3

Shark Navigator Pet 19 Pro ZU62

65

$230

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 50 3

Shark Navigator 20 Zero-M Lift-Away Speed ZU560

63

$220

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 50 3

Dyson Small Ball 21 Multi Floor

59

$400

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 30 4

64

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Noise

Pet hair

Handling

Hose suction Clean emissions

Bare floors

Test Results

Carpet

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

VA CUUMS

Survey Price Results

Overall Score

Brand & Model

BAGLESS UPRIGHT VACUUMS Continued Hoover WindTunnel 22 T-Series Rewind Bagless UH70120 Hoover React 23 Professional Pet Plus UH73220 Bissell Pet Hair Eraser 24 Lift-Off 2087

56

$130

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 50 3

55

$240

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 30 3

54

$270

2 0 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 50 3

25 Hoover React UH73100

54

$180

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 40 3

Hoover React Powered Reach Lite UH73400 Hoover PowerDrive Pet UH74210PC Shark ION P50 Cord-Free Powered Lift-Away IC162 Hoover Air Steerable UH72400 Hoover Total Home Pet UH74100 Hoover Air Pro UH72450 Hoover High Performance Swivel UH74200 Black+Decker AirSwivel BDASV102 Bissell PowerGlide Lift-Off Pet 2043 Bissell Pet Hair Eraser 1650 Dirt Devil Power Max Rewind Pet UD70187 Dirt Devil Endura Max XL UD70182 Dirt Devil Endura Max UD70174

53

$270

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 40 3

52

$200

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 50 3

52

$450

4 0 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 1 0 5 0 4 0 50 4

52

$190

2 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 40 3

51

$140

2 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 50 3

51

$230

2 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 50 3

50

$170

2 0 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 50 3

47

$80

1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 5 0 50 3

42

$170

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 50 2

42

$250

2 0 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 50 3

37

$85

1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 50 3

34

$95

1 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 50 3

33

$65

1 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 4 0 50 3

77

$350

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 40 3

76

$550

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 50 4

26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38

BAGGED UPRIGHT VACUUMS

$ 0

1

! 0

2

1

2

POOR

Kenmore Elite Pet Friendly 31150 Miele Dynamic U1 Cat & Dog

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

65


Noise

Pet hair

Handling

Hose suction Clean emissions

Test Results Bare floors

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Survey Price Results

Carpet

Overall Score

Brand & Model

BAGGED UPRIGHT VACUUMS Continued

$ 0 ! 0

3

Kenmore Pet Friendly 31140

74

$200

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 50 3

4

Kirby Avalir 2

71

$1,600

3 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 2 0 50 2

5

Oreck Elevate Command

60

$450

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 50 3

6

Oreck Elevate Conquer

60

$600

7

Oreck Magnesium

59

$500

0 3 2 0 0 4 5 0 0 2 5 0 0 5 5 00 3 2 0 0 3 4 0 0 5 2 0 0 5 5 0 0 43 0

Hoover WindTunnel Max UH30600 Hoover WindTunnel T-Series UH30300

57

$180

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 50 3

55

$140

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 50 3

53

$300

2 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 50 2

8 9

10 Oreck Elevate Control

BAGLESS CANISTER VACUUMS

! 0 $ 0

Miele Blizzard CX1 Cat & Dog

77

$900

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 50 4

2

Kenmore 22614

71

$350

3

Dyson Ball Multi Floor

60

$300

0 3 3 0 0 4 5 0 0 4 4 0 0 2 5 00 3 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 5 4 0 0 5 3 0 0 34 0

Dyson Big Ball Multi Floor Dyson Cinetic Big Ball Animal Canister

56

$400

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 40 4

54

$600

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 40 4

1

4 5

BAGGED CANISTER VACUUMS

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

! 0

4

! 0

5

$ 0

6

$ 0

7

$ 0

8

66

Miele Complete C3 Marin Miele Compact C2 Electro+ Miele Complete C3 Alize Kenmore Elite Pet Friendly UltraPlush 81714 Kenmore Elite Pet Friendly CrossOver 21814

84

$1,100

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 50 4

78

$700

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 50 4

77

$650

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 40 5

76

$400

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 50 3

75

$500

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 40 3

Kenmore 81614

74

$300

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 50 3

Kenmore 400 Series 81414 Kenmore 200 Series 81214

72

$200

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 50 3

72

$200

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 50 3

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Noise

Pet hair

Edges

Clean emissions

Bare floors

Test Results

Carpet

Rank

Rec.

Survey Results Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Price

VA CUUMS

Overall Score

Brand & Model

STICK VACUUMS (6 LBS. OR LESS) 1

LG CordZero A9 A906SM

86

$750

! 0

2

Kenmore Elite Complete 10441

77

$350

! 0

3

Kenmore Elite 10440

77

$300

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 0 5 5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 โˆ’ โˆ’ 4 0 0 5 0 4 5 0 0 5 0 4 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 5 0 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 4

4

Dyson V8 Absolute

75

$450

1 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5

5

Kenmore 10341

71

$150

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

71

$700

1 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3

71

$500

1 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3

70

$300

1 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4

67

$70

4 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 5

65

$70

4 0 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 5 0 5

60

$150

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5

56

$70

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5

53

$100

3 0 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

53

$100

3 0 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

15 Hoover Impulse BH53020

52

$180

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 4

16 Hoover Cruise BH52210

51

$180

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 5 0 4

Dirt Devil Simpli-Stik 17 SD20000RED

41

$30

4 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 4

18 Bissell Multi Reach 2151

38

$250

3 0 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4

! 0

6 7 8

Dyson Cyclone V10 Absolute Dyson Cyclone V10 Motorhead Dyson V7 Motorhead

Dirt Devil Accucharge 9 BD20035RED Dirt Devil Power 10 Swerve BD22050 11 Bissell Bolt 1954 Bissell Lift Off Floors 12 & More Pet 53Y8 Bissell PowerLifter Ion 13 Pet 2482 Bissell Adapt Ion Pet 14 2286A

STICK VACUUMS (GREATER THAN 6 LBS.)

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

! 0

4

1

2

POOR

Shark APEX DuoClean Corded ZS362 Shark SharkFlex DuoClean Ultra-Light Corded HV391

93

$250

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4

92

$300

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

Tineco Pure One S12

88

$600

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5

Bissell Air Ram 1984

87

$200

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

67


jxs

Survey Results

Noise

Pet hair

Edges

Clean emissions

Bare floors

Test Results

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Price

Carpet

Overall Score

Brand & Model

STICK VACUUMS (GREATER THAN 6 LBS.) Continued 5

Dirt Devil Power Stick SD12530

85

$100

4 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 5

6

Shark ION F80 CordFree MultiFLEX IF281

85

$450

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

7

Shark IONRocket UltraLight Cordless IR101

84

$280

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 5

8

Shark Rocket DeluxePro TruePet HV322

83

$230

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

! 0

9

Shark ION X40 CordFree Ultra-Light IR141

81

$300

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0

Shark Rocket Zero-M 10 Ultra-Light ZS352

81

$220

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4

! 0

11 Shark Rocket HV302

78

$180

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

$ 0

Dirt Devil Reach Max 12 Plus BD22510PC

78

$130

4 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 5 0 4

Hoover React Whole 13 Home Advantage BH53210

76

$250

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 4

Shark Navigator 14 Freestyle SV1106

76

$100

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

Black+Decker Smartech 15 HSVJ520JMBF27

75

$200

4 0 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 5

16 Dyson V11 Torque Drive

75

$700

1 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5

Test Results

Carpet

Rank

Rec

Price

Features Remote control Clearance (in.) Run time (min.)

Overall Score

Brand & Model

Noise

! 0

Navigation

! 0

Ease of use

! 0

Bare floors

$ 0

ROBOTIC VACUUMS

! 0

1

Samsung POWERbot R7065 VR2AM7065WS/AA

0 ! $ 0

2

LG Hom-Bot CR5765GD

89

3

Eufy 30C

89

68

90

$600

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

0

4.0 86

$1,000

0 5 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 4 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 5 0

0

3.5 72

0

2.9 58

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

$300


Remote control Clearance (in.) Run time (min.)

Features

Noise

Navigation

Ease of use

Bare floors

Test Results

Carpet

Rank

Rec

Price

ROBOTIC VACUUMS Continued 4

Eufy 11S

88

$220

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5

! 0

5

iRobot Roomba e5

87

$450

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0

6

Samsung POWERbot R7040

87

$450

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5

! 0

7

iRobot Roomba 890

86

$500

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5

8

Samsung POWERbot R7070

84

$700

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4

$ 0

! 0

0

2.9 60 3.6 56

0

4.0 49 3.5 60

0

4.0 54

$ 0

9

iRobot Roomba 690

84

$375

5 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5

3.5 72

! 0

10 iRobot Roomba 960

84

$700

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5

3.8 33

! 0

Shark Ion Robot 11 Vacuum Cleaning System S87 RV851WV

83

$500

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

3.5 50

! 0

12 iRobot Roomba i7+

81

$950

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

3.6 25

$ 0

13 Shark Ion 720

81

$350

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

$ 0

iRobot Roomba 618 14 (Walmart) Shark Ion 750 15 Connected

81

$270

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5

3.5 60

80

$350

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

3.6 61

16 iRobot Roomba 980

79

$900

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4

4.0 19

Neato Botvac D6 17 Connected Neato Botvac D7 18 Connected

77

$700

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

4.0 14

76

$800

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4

4.0 17

HOW WE TEST: In our cleaning tests, we lift embedded talc and sand from medium-pile carpet and suck up sand from bare floors. We use fine wood flour to see whether tools and attachments can maintain airflow and also to gauge emissionsโ€”how much dust the vacuum spews back into the air. Noise is based on measurements in decibels. Handling reflects how easy it

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

is to push, pull, and carry the vacuum. Pet Hair reflects how well the vacuum picks up pet hair from medium-pile carpet. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score Overall Score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

0

3.6 61

problems or break within the first five years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the vacuum they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’

69

VA CUUMS

Overall Score

Brand & Model


QUI CK GUIDE

Wall Ovens Flexibility is one of the main attractions of wall ovens. If youโ€™re renovating, you can install one anywhere (in an island base or into a cabinet), in a separate location from a standalone cooktop, and at any height. What to Look For Controls that are easy to reach and read. A score of Very Good or Excellent for baking and oven capacity, because these tests get at the function of this appliance. Five or more oven rack positions for more flexibility in arranging racks and bakeware. A covered heating element beneath the floor of the oven, which makes spill

BUYING ADVICE

cleanup easier and faster. Menu databases and other high-tech features may add convenience, but also can add considerably to the cost.

Measure your cutout space, then check the manual of the wall oven youโ€™re considering for its cutout dimensions.

What Youโ€™ll Pay Electric wall ovens start around $1,300 and can cost upwards of $3,000. (Separate cooktops start around $1,000.) Capable ranges can cost far less.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/ovens.

Tested products in performance order. Survey Results

Features

5 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5

30

0

! 0

2

Cafe CT9070SHSS

89

$3,600

5 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

30

0

! 0

3

KitchenAid KOSE500ESS

83

$2,300

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3

30

0

$ 0

4

Maytag MEW9530FZ

82

$1,300

4 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3

30

0

Self-cleaning

$1,640

Oven capacity

90

Broiling

LG LWS3063

Baking

1

Rank

! 0

Recommended

Convection mode

Test Results

Width (in.)

Predicted reliability

Price

Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

SINGLE ELEC TRIC WALL OVENS

70

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Features

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4

30

0

6

Jenn-Air JJW3430DS

77

$3,700

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3

30

0

7

Kenmore 49513

77

$1,350

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5

30

0

Whirlpool WOS51EC0AS Whirlpool WOS72EC0HS Electrolux EW30EW55PS Bosch 800 Series HBL8451UC KitchenAid KOSE900HSS Electrolux EI30EW38TS

77

$900

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5

30

76

$1,600

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3

30

0

74

$2,100

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

30

0

73

$2,160

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

30

0

73

$2,970

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 2

30

0

72

$1,900

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3

30

0

14 Kenmore Elite 48363

70

$2,550

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

30

0

15 Bosch HBLP451RUC

69

$3,100

3 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5

30

0

16 Bosch HBL5351UC

63

$1,620

3 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5

30

17 Thermador ME301JS

63

$2,700

3 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

30

0

18 Viking VESO5302SS

62

$4,300

1 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4

30

0

59

$1,900

3 0 0 2 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 4

30

0

58

$2,600

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

30

0

55

$5,250

1 0 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 4

NA

30

0

22 Amana AWO6313SFS

53

$990

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 4

30

GE Profile Twin-Flex 23 PT9200SLSS Frigidaire 24 FFEW3026TD

50

$2,700

5 0 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 4

30

49

$950

3 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 5

30

25 Viking RVSOE330SS

44

$3,210

1 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2

30

Self-cleaning

$2,600

Oven capacity

81

Broiling

5

Baking

Convection mode

Test Results

Width (in.)

Owner satisfaction

Predicted reliability

Survey Results

Samsung NV51K7770SG/AA

Rank

Recommended

Price

SINGLE ELECTRIC WALL OVENS Continued

! 0

8 9 10 11 12 13

Frigidaire 19 Professional FPEW3077RF Miele PureLine H 20 6281 BP Viking Professional 21 VSOF730SS

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

0

0

71

WA L L O V ENS

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Survey Results

Features

5 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5

30

0

! 0

2

Cafe CT9570SLSS

89

$5,530

5 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

30

0

83

$3,500

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3

30

0

81

$3,600

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4

30

0

Self-cleaning

$2,000

Oven capacity

90

Broiling

LG LWD3063ST

Baking

1

Rank

! 0

Recommended

Convection mode

Test Results

Width (in.)

Predicted reliability

Price

Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

DOUBLE ELEC TRIC WALL OVENS

! 0

3

! 0

4

KitchenAid KODE500ESS Samsung NV51K7770DG/AA

5

Jenn-Air JJW3830DS

77

$5,200

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3

30

0

6

Thermador ME302JS

63

$4,200

3 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

30

0

7

GE JT3500SFSS

52

$2,200

5 0 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 4

30

HOW WE TEST: Baking reflects whether cakes and cookies baked on two racks were evenly browned. Broiling is based on even browning of a pan of burgers, and high-heat searing ability. Oven Capacity measures usable space. Self-Cleaning gauges the self-cleaning cycleโ€™s effectiveness. Price is approximate retail. The

72

performance of double walloven models is based on the tested oven in the single electric wall oven category. Overall Score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

within the first five years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the wall ovens they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’


WA SHING M A CHINE S

QUI CK GUIDE

Washing Machines Todayโ€™s washers tend to boast larger capacities, so you can do more laundry at once. Youโ€™ll also find specialty cycles and WiFi-enabled models that provide added perks, like notifications when a load is finished. What to Look For Capacity

that matches your needs. Our tests found that washers with a claimed capacity over 4.5 cubic feet readily fit a king-sized comforter. Front-loaders spin at higher speeds, extracting more water and cutting drying time. Automatic dispensers dispense detergent, bleach, and fabric softener at just the right time. An extra rinse cycle if you or others in your household

are sensitive to detergent residue. The cycle also helps get rid of pet hair.

What Youโ€™ll Pay Capable washing machines that combine performance and value start around $600 or so. If space is tight, a 24-inch-wide compact washer might appeal, but the price may not be right. Youโ€™ll spend $800 to $2,300 on a compact washer, and roughly the same on a compact dryer.

BUYING ADVICE If your laundry room is near any bedrooms or the family room, narrow your search to washing machines that score Very Good or Excellent in our noise and vibration tests. For more buying advice, go to CR.org/washers.

Tested products in performance order.

Vibration

Noise

Gentleness

Test Results Water efficiency

Survey Results

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Washing performance

Rank

Recommended

Price

Energy efficiency

Overall Score

Brand & Model

FRONT-LOAD WASHERS

! 0

1

LG WM3900HWA

87

$900

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 4 0 4

$ 0

2

LG WM3500CW

86

$700

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4

! 0

3

LG WM9000HVA

86

$1,620

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

! RECOMMENDED

73


Vibration

Noise

Gentleness

Test Results Water efficiency

Survey Results

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Washing performance

Rank

Recommended

Price

Energy efficiency

Overall Score

Brand & Model

FRONT-LOAD WASHERS Continued

! 0

4

LG Signature WM9500HKA

! 0

5

LG WM3700HWA

85

$900

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4

! 0

6

LG WM3997HWA

84

$1,820

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4

! 0

7

Maytag MHW8200FW

83

$1,245

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

! 0

8

Kenmore Elite 41982

83

$1,000

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

! 0

82

$1,000

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

! 0

Electrolux 9 EFLS627UTT Maytag 10 MHW8630HC

82

$1,210

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4

! 0

11 LG WM8100HVA

82

$1,350

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

$ 0

82

$810

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4

$ 0

Maytag 12 MHW5630HW Maytag 13 MHW3505FW

82

$810

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5

! 0

14 Kenmore Elite 41072

82

$1,000

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

! 0

Samsung WF45R6300AW Electrolux EFLS527UIW Samsung WF50K7500AW Samsung FlexWash WV60M9900AV Samsung WF45K6500AW

82

$900

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3

81

$900

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

81

$1,170

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4

81

$1,500

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5

81

$800

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4

20 Kenmore Elite 41002

81

$1,425

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4

21 Kenmore Elite 41682

81

$850

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

22 Kenmore Elite 41782

81

$1,050

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4

23 Kenmore 41262

81

$600

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4

Speed Queen 24 FF7005WN

80

$1,900

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4

15 16 17 18 19

74

85

$1,800

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Vibration

Noise

Gentleness

Water efficiency

Test Results Energy efficiency

Survey Results

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Washing performance

Rank

Recommended

Price

FRONT-LOAD WASHERS Continued 79

$680

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

79

$810

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

79

$720

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3

77

$1,250

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

77

$900

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

76

$1,350

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4

76

$1,350

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 3

76

$900

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4

76

$1,000

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4

75

$805

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4

74

$900

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

36 GE GFW450SSMWW

68

$900

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 3

37 GE GFW480SSKWW

67

$1,110

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

38 Electrolux EFLW317TIW 53

$700

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 3

25 Kenmore 41392 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

Samsung WF42H5600AW (Loweโ€™s) Samsung WF42H5000AW Samsung FlexWash WV55M9600AW Samsung WF45M5500AW Whirlpool WFW9620HC Whirlpool WFW862CHC Whirlpool WFW6620HW Electrolux EFLW427UIW Whirlpool WFW7590FW Samsung WF45N5300AV

TOP-LOAD HIGH EFFICIENCY WASHERS

! 0

1

LG WT7900HBA

83

$950

5 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5

$ 0

2

LG WT7100CW

81

$720

5 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5

! 0

3

LG WT7600HWA

79

$1,035

5 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 5

! 0

4

LG WT7500CW

78

$945

5 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 5

! 0

5

LG WT7700HVA

76

$1,440

5 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 5

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

75

WA SHING M A CHINE S

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Vibration

Noise

Gentleness

Test Results Water efficiency

Survey Results

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Washing performance

Rank

Recommended

Price

Energy efficiency

Overall Score

Brand & Model

TOP-LOAD HIGH EFFICIENCY WASHERS Continued

! 0

6

Kenmore Elite 31552

75

$850

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 5

7

LG WT7300CW

72

$840

5 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 5

8

Kenmore Elite 31433

71

$900

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5

Whirlpool 9 WTW8700EC Maytag 10 MVWB835DW

70

$1,260

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5

70

$900

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5

11 Kenmore 28132

70

$850

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5

12 Kenmore 26132

70

$630

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5

13 Kenmore 27132

70

$730

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5

14 Kenmore 29132

70

$900

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5

Whirlpool 15 WTW8500DW Samsung 16 WA50R5400AW

70

$1,040

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

69

$750

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5

17 GE GTW860SSJWS

69

$1,035

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5

69

$1,170

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 5

68

$600

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 5

68

$1,170

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 5

68

$800

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5

68

$700

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 5

23 Kenmore Elite 31632

67

$1,150

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5

Whirlpool 24 WTW7500GW Samsung ActiveWash 25 WA52M8650AW Whirlpool 26 WTW7300DW

67

$810

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5

67

$900

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5

65

$720

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5

18 19 20 21 22

76

Samsung ActiveWash WA54M8750AV Samsung WA50M7450AW Maytag MVWB955FW Whirlpool WTW8000DW Samsung ActiveWash WA52M7750AW

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Vibration

Noise

Gentleness

Water efficiency

Test Results Energy efficiency

Survey Results

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Washing performance

Rank

Recommended

Price

TOP-LOAD HIGH EFFICIENCY WASHERS Continued Samsung 27 WA45M7050AW Maytag 28 MVWX655DW

65

$800

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5

64

$570

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 2 0 5

29 GE GTW500ASNWS

63

$700

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

Fisher & Paykel Aqua 30 Smart WL4027P1

63

$1,000

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

31 GE GTW680BSJWS

62

$580

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

32 GE GTW750CSLWS

60

$855

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 5

Whirlpool 33 WTW5000DW

60

$530

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 5

34 Kenmore 25132

60

$600

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5

Samsung 35 WA45N3050AW Whirlpool 36 WTW4950HW

58

$630

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5

56

$650

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 5

TOP-LOAD AGITATOR WASHERS Maytag MVWB965HC Maytag MVWB865GW

70

$1,280

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 5

64

$900

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

GE GTW465ASNWW

64

$655

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

! 0

4

GE GTW685BSLWS

62

$580

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 5

! 0

5

Maytag MVWB765FW

62

$680

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 5

! 0

6

Kenmore 22352

61

$580

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

7

Kenmore 20372

60

$730

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 5

8

GE GTW335ASNWW

60

$560

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

59

$550

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

59

$550

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 5

Maytag 9 MVWC565FW Frigidaire 10 FFTW4120SW

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

77

WA SHING M A CHINE S

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Vibration

Noise

Gentleness

Test Results Water efficiency

Survey Results

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Washing performance

Rank

Recommended

Price

Energy efficiency

Overall Score

Brand & Model

TOP-LOAD AGITATOR WASHERS Continued Insignia 11 NS-TWM41WH8A Whirlpool 12 WTW4955HW

58

$450

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5

58

$480

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 5

13 Maytag MVWC465HW

57

$490

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 5

14 GE GTW460ASJWW

55

$730

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 5

15 Kenmore 20362

55

$520

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 5

16 GE GTW755CSMWS

54

$675

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 5

Hotpoint 17 HTW240ASKWS

50

$390

4 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 5

18 GE GTW330ASKWW

47

$565

3 0 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 5

Fisher & Paykel 19 WA3927G1

45

$800

1 0 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 5

20 Kenmore 20232

41

$400

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 5

21 Roper RTW4516FW

39

$400

4 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 5

22 Amana NTW4516FW

38

$400

4 0 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 5

Whirlpool 23 WTW4816FW Speed Queen 24 AWNE9RSN115TW01

38

$450

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 5

31

$1,100

5 0 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 5

Miele WWH860WCS

83

$2,000

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3

Samsung WW22N6850QX Samsung WW22K6800AW Bosch 800 Series WAT28402UC Electrolux EFLS210TIW

83

$1,170

78

$900

โˆ’ โˆ’ 4 0 5 0 0 5 4 0 0 4 0 3 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 4 4 0 0 2

77

$1,310

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3

76

$900

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3

COMPACT WASHERS

! 0

1

! 0

2

$ 0

3

! 0

4

$ 0

5

78

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Vibration

Noise

Gentleness

Water efficiency

Test Results Energy efficiency

Survey Results

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction Washing performance

Rank

Recommended

Price

COMPACT WASHERS Continued

! 0

6

Kenmore 41942

73

$975

7

Fisher & Paykel WH2424P1

68

$950

โˆ’ โˆ’ 5 0 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 4 0 3 โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 4 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 2

8

LG WM1388HW

64

$905

5 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 2

9

GE WCVH4800KWW

61

$930

2 0 0 1 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3

10 Asko W6424W

44

$1,450

1 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2

Whirlpool 11 WFW5090GW

39

$1,150

1 0 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 1

HOW WE TEST: Washing Performance reflects the degree of stain removal from fabric using the most aggressive normal cycle. Energy Efficiency is based on the energy needed to heat the water using a warm wash and cold rinse, to run the washer, and to dry the remaining moisture left at the end of a cycle. Water Efficiency is based on total water used when washing our 8-pound load. Models that earn lower scores for Gentleness are

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

more likely to treat your clothes roughly, causing wear and tear. Noise reflects panelistsโ€™ judgments during the fill, agitate, drain, and spin cycles. Vibration reflects usage on a suspended wooden floor. Cycle Time (min.) is rounded to the nearest 5 minutes. Claimed Capacity is based on claimed tub volume. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first five years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the washing machine they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’

79

WA SHING M A CHINE S

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Washer-Dryer Pairs Here are our picks for six top-performing matching washer-dryer pairs across all the categories we test. See our Ratings for more.

FRONT-LOADERS

! 0 LG

! 0 Maytag

LG WM3700HWA washer LG DLEX3700W electric dryer Pair price: $1,700

MHW8630HC washer MED8630HC electric dryer Pair price: $2,420

86

79

HIGH-EFFICIENCY TOP LOADERS

! 0 LG

! 0 Kenmore Elite

WT7100CW washer DLE7100W electric dryer Pair price: $1,440

31552 washer 61552 electric dryer Pair price: $1,700

83

78

AGITATOR

COMPACT

! 0 Maytag

Miele

MVWB965HC washer MEDB955FC electric dryer Pair price: $2,460

WWH860WCS washer TWI180WP electric dryer Pair price: $3,900

75

80

83

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


85 Computers, Laptop 93 Digital Cameras 100 Fitness Trackers

102 Headphones 109 Printers, All-in-One 113 Printers, Regular 117 Smartphones 120 Smart Speakers

122 Smartwatches 124 Streaming Media 126 Tablets 129 TVs 141 Wireless Speakers

Electronics

82 Computers, Desktop

81


QUI CK GUIDE

Computers, Desktop Desktops typically offer more performance for the money than laptop. They can also be upgraded more easily than laptops, letting you increase power or add more features down the line. What to Look For

What to Skip

For less clutter and sleeker design, all-in-one desktops hide the computer hardware in a smaller package. A solid-state drive (which is faster than a traditional hard disk drive) will give you shorter load times and quick access to applications and other data. Some desktops include an additional hard disk drive of 1TB or more for extra storage space.

Upgrading beyond 16GB of memory, unless youโ€™re a big multitasker or video editor.

BUYING ADVICE

Save money on your purchase by using coupon and forum sites such as Ebates. com, FatWallet. com, and Tech bargains.com.

What Youโ€™ll Pay You can get a very good all-in-one for $500 to $900, but many fullerfeatured models cost more than $1,000.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/computers.

Tested products in performance order.

Storage (GB)

Memory (GB)

Features Display size ( in.)

Display

Ergonomics

Versatility

Performance

Survey Test Results Price Results

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Rank

Recommended

Brand & Model

ALL-IN-ONE DESKTOPS

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

82

Apple 27-inch iMac 88 5K Display (2019, MRQY2LL/A) Apple 21.5-inch iMac 86 with 4K Display MNDY2LL/A Apple 21.5-inch iMac 83 MMQA2LL/A

$1,800

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

27 8 1000

$1,500

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5

21.5 8 1000

$1,100

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5 5 0 21.5

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

8 1000


Storage (GB)

Memory (GB)

Features Display size ( in.)

Display

Ergonomics

Versatility

Performance

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Survey Test Results Price Results

COMP U T ERS , DE SK T OP

Overall Score

Brand & Model

ALL-IN-ONE DESKTOPS Continued HP 34B010

82

$2,060

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5

Asus Zen AiO ZN242GDT-08 Lenovo ideacentre 520-24ARR Lenovo IdeaCentre A340-24ICB HP Pavilion 27-a0013w Asus Vivo AiO V272UA-DS501T

80

$1,100

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 5 0 23.8 12

75

$550

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 23.8

8 1000

72

$865

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 23.8

8 1000

72

$720

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4

27 8 1000

69

$700

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4

27 8 1000

10 HP Pavilion 24-xa1014 68

$700

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 23.8

8

8 1000

! 0

4

! 0

5

$ 0

6 7 8 9

34 16 1256 1128

256

Acer Aspire 11 Z24-880-UR13 Dell Inspiron 12 5475-A957WHT HP Pavilion 13 24-xa0024

68

$600

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 23.8

67

$550

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 4

67

$950

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 23.8 12

14 HP 24-f0047c

61

$460

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 23.8

8 1000

Acer Aspire 15 C24-860-UR11 Lenovo ideacentre 16 A340-22IGM MSI Pro 20EX 17 8GL-004US

60

$650

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 5 23.8

8 1000

59

$400

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 4 21.5

4 1000

51

$500

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 2 0 3 0 4 4 0 19.5

4

18 HP 20-c424

40

$380

3 0 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 4 3 0 19.5

4 1000

Dell Inspiron 19 3275-A821BLK

40

$425

3 0 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 5 4 0 21.5

4 1000

24 8 1000 256

532

FULL-SIZE DESKTOPS

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

! 0

4

1

2

POOR

HP ENVY 795-0050

89

$1,340

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA NA 16 2256

HP Pavilion 595-p0084 Lenovo ideacentre 720-18ICB

84

$780

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA NA 16 1128

82

$1,300

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4

NA NA 16 2000

HP Omen 880-157c

82

$1,060

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4

NA NA 16 1256

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

83


Storage (GB)

Memory (GB)

Features Display size ( in.)

Display

Ergonomics

Versatility

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Survey Test Results Price Results

Performance

Overall Score

Brand & Model

FULL-SIZE DESKTOPS Continued Dell XPS 8930-7033BLK Dell Inspiron 5676-A719BLU Dell Inspiron 3670-5575BLK HP Pavilion 590-p0047c Dell Inspiron 3670-5656BLK

74

$900

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4

NA NA 8 1000

73

$880

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

NA NA 8 1000

73

$700

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4

NA NA 12 1128

73

$690

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4

NA NA 16 2000

71

$600

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4

NA NA 8 1256

10 HP 460-p274

68

$800

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

NA NA 8 1000

Acer Aspire 11 TC-885-UR18

65

$430

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

NA NA 8

5 6 7 8 9

256

COMPACT DESKTOPS

! 0

1

! 0

2 3 4

Intel NUC 8 Enthusiast Apple Mac Mini Core i5 Apple Mac Mini Core i3 Dell Inspiron 3472-PBLK

HOW WE TEST: Performance reflects speed while running productivity applications, multimedia applications, and 3D games. Versatility includes hardware, such as memory-card slots and A/V connections; software, such as security programs; and tech support and warranty provisions. Ergonomics represents the quality of the keyboard and

84

80

$1,080

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 4 0 NA NA

75

$1,100

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3

NA NA NA 8

256

69

$800

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3

NA NA NA 8

128

57

$280

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 4

pointing device, and accessibility of features. For all-in-ones, Display is our judgment of clarity, color, brightness, and viewing angle. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score is based on the performance of the product in all of our tests. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

NA 16 512

NA NA 4 1000

or break within the first three years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the computer they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’


COMP U T ERS , L A P T OP

QUI CK GUIDE

Computers, Laptop Some laptops offer features and capabilities that rival those of traditional desktops. Youโ€™ll find more thinand-light laptops than ever, and touch screens and solid-state drives are becoming more common. What to Look For

What to Skip

A convertible or detachable if you want a laptop/ tablet combo. A 10- to 13-inch model if you plan to carry the laptop around with you frequently. A 14- to 16-inch screen for a larger area to view photos or videos and a more comfortable keyboard fit. A 17- to 18-inch model for an entertainment-oriented desktop replacement.

A 4K display, unless you regularly edit hi-res photos or videos. These displays pack four times as many pixels as a 1080p display but typically at the cost of battery life.

BUYING ADVICE

If you want to customize a model, order ร  la carte from the manufacturerโ€™s website.

What Youโ€™ll Pay A well-equipped 15-inch laptop in the middle price range should cost you $600 to $1,000.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/computers.

Tested products in performance order.

Battery life - web (hr.)

Battery life - video (hr.)

Weight (lb.)

Display

Versatility

Performance

Portability

Test Results

Ergonomics

Predicted reliability

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

11

6

1.7

10- TO 11-INCH LAPTOPS 1 2

1

2

POOR

Microsoft Surface Go (64GB) Microsoft Surface Go (128GB)

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

54

$400

3 0 0 4 0 30 40 20 30 4

53

$550

3 0 0 4 0 30 40 20 30 5

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

10.25 5.75 1.7

85


Weight (lb.)

Battery life - video (hr.)

Battery life - web (hr.)

Display

Versatility

Performance

Portability

Test Results

Ergonomics

Predicted reliability

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

10- TO 11-INCH LAPTOPS Continued 3 4

Acer Spin 1 SP111-33-P1XD Asus VivoBook E203MATBCL432B

50

$330

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 20 40 2

50

$130

3 0 0 3 0 30 40 10 30 3

12

80

$2,000

5 0 0 5 0 40 40 50 40 5

16 7.25 3

79

$1,120

4 0 0 3 0 40 50 30 40 5

16.25 11 2.1

73

$1,100

5 0 0 5 0 40 40 30 30 5

11.5 7.5 2.7

72

$1,250

5 0 0 5 0 40 40 30 30 5

10 7.25 2.7

71

$880

3 0 0 3 0 40 50 40 40 4

14.75 9.25 2.7

70

$1,335

3 0 0 4 0 50 40 40 45 0 11.25 7.75

2.4

69

$1,645

3 0 0 4 0 50 40 30 40 5

12.5

2.8

69

$950

4 0 0 3 0 40 40 40 50 4

8.5 7.25 2.8

68

$1,600

3 0 0 3 0 40 40 40 40 5 11.25

68

$1,250

3 0 0 3 0 50 40 30 40 5

68

$900

3 0 0 4 0 50 40 30 40 4 10.75

68

$800

3 0 0 3 0 40 40 30 40 5 13.75 7.75

67

$750

3 0 0 4 0 50 40 30 30 4

11.5 7.25 2.7 7.5 2.2

12- TO 13-INCH LAPTOPS

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

! 0

4

! 0

5

! 0

6

! 0

7

! 0

8

! 0

9

! 0

10

! 0

11

! 0

12

! 0

13

86

Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch with Touch Bar (2019, Core i5) LG Gram 13 8th Gen Apple MacBook Air 13-inch (2019, MVFH2LL/A) Apple MacBook Air 13-inch HP Spectre 13-AE011DX Microsoft Surface Pro 6 (Core i7) Microsoft Surface Laptop 2 (Core i7) Samsung Notebook 9 Pro (2019) Dell XPS 13 (XPS93807066SLV) HP Spectre Folio Microsoft Surface Pro 6 (Core i5) Asus ZenBook UX331UA-AS51 Microsoft Surface Laptop (Core i7)

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

8

7

2.7

18.5 10.25 3.2 7.5 2.4 2.7

12.5 7.5 2.8


Weight (lb.)

Battery life - video (hr.)

Battery life - web (hr.)

Display

Versatility

Performance

Portability

Test Results

Ergonomics

Owner satisfaction

Predicted reliability

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

12- TO 13-INCH LAPTOPS Continued Microsoft Surface Book 2 Microsoft Surface Laptop 2 (Core i5) Lenovo ThinkPad L380 Yoga Samsung Notebook 7 Spin

67

$1,180

3 0 0 4 0 50 40 30 40 5

16 10.25 3.4

65

$1,305

3 0 0 4 0 40 40 30 30 5

12.75 8.25 2.8

64

$900

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 30 50 4

10.75 7.75 3.3

63

$720

4 0 0 3 0 50 30 30 40 4

HP Pavilion 18 13-AN0030WM

58

$500

3 0 0 3 0 40 40 30 30 2

HP Pavilion 13 19 AN0010NR

57

$530

3 0 0 3 0 30 30 30 40 4

Dell Inspiron 20 i7370-5725SLV HP Envy 21 13M-AG0002DX x360 Samsung 22 Notebook Flash

57

$850

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 40 40 4

8.75 4.75 3

55

$760

3 0 0 3 0 50 20 30 40 4

6.75 3.75 2.9

52

$400

4 0 0 3 0 40 30 10 30 4

9.25 7.25 3

Dell Inspiron 23 I7375

48

$580

3 0 0 3 0 40 20 30 40 3

7

Lenovo Yoga 24 C630

48

$800

3 0 0 3 0 50 50 10 40 4

14 14.25 2.6

25 HP Envy X2

38

$730

3 0 0 3 0 50 50 10 45 0 16.25 15.75 2.7

Asus NovaGo 26 TP370QL-6G128G 37

$630

3 0 0 3 0 50 50 10 40 4 15.75

Hyundai 27 Thinnote 13

37

$210

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 40 20 20 20 4

3.25 2.5 2.8

RCA Cambio 28 W122SC24T2

32

$230

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 40 20 10 30 4

3.5

! 0

14

! 0

15

16 17

9.5

6

3.2

10.25 6.5 2.8 9

5.5 2.8

4

3.5

11.5 3.1

2.5 2.9

14-INCH LAPTOPS

! 0

1

LG Gram 14 8th gen

77

$1,200

4 0 0 3 0 40 50 30 50 4 15.25 11.25 2.2

! 0

2

Asus ZenBook S UX392FN-XS71

70

$1,380

3 0 0 3 0 30 50 40 40 5

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

14 8.75 2.6

87

COMP U T ERS , L A P T OP

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Weight (lb.)

Battery life - video (hr.)

Battery life - web (hr.)

Display

Versatility

Performance

Portability

Test Results

Ergonomics

Predicted reliability

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

14-INCH LAPTOPS Continued 70

$1,200

3 0 0 3 0 40 40 40 40 5

68

$1,100

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 40 40 40 40 4 14.75

67

$945

3 0 0 3 0 40 40 40 40 5

67

$840

3 0 0 3 0 50 40 30 40 4

11

7

3.3

Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB

65

$900

3 0 0 3 0 50 40 30 40 4

12

7

3.4

8

Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-59NM

62

$750

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 30 40 3

11.5 7.25 3.6

9

Dell Inspiron i5482-7120SLV

61

$1,020

3 0 0 3 0 40 20 40 50 3

7.75 5.75 3.8

Asus 10 VivoBook Flip TP410UA-DS52T

61

$700

3 0 0 3 0 50 20 30 40 4

7

Acer Swift 3 11 SF314-52-517Z

59

$640

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 40 40 3

8.5

5

3.6

Asus VivoBook 12 X420UA-CBI5A

58

$400

3 0 0 3 0 30 40 40 30 3

10

7

3

Asus VivoBook 13 Flip TP401CADHM4T

57

$500

3 0 0 3 0 50 30 20 40 3

Acer Swift 1 14 SF114-32-P2PK

55

$380

3 0 0 3 0 40 50 20 30 4 13.75 10.75 2.9

HP 15 14-CF0006DX

53

$320

3 0 0 3 0 30 40 20 40 2

12

8

3.1

16 Avita Clarus

53

$660

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 40 20 30 30 4

5

4

3.4

Asus 17 X441BA-CBA6A

37

$165

3 0 0 3 0 40 20 10 30 2

6

! 0

3

! 0

4

! 0

5

! 0

6

! 0

7

88

MSI Prestige PS42 Modern-074 Huawei MateBook D Volta-W50D Acer Swift 5 SF514-52TP52LH Asus ZenBook Flip UX461UA-DS51T

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

8.75 6.75 2.8 9.5 3.4

9.25 5.25 2.1

4.75 3.5

9.25 6.75 3.2

3.75 3.7


Weight (lb.)

81

$1,770

4 0 0 3 0 50 50 50 50 4

11.25 7.75 3.4

80

$1,600

3 0 0 3 0 50 50 50 50 5

16.5 8.5 4.6

LG Gram 15

76

$1,530

4 0 0 3 0 40 50 30 50 4

13.5 11 2.5

5

MSI GS65 Stealth-006

74

$2,000

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 50 50 5

7.5

! 0

6

Dell XPS 15 8th gen

73

$1,600

3 0 0 3 0 50 40 50 40 5

9.25 5.25 4.4

! 0

7

Asus Q526FA-BI7T10

72

$900

3 0 0 3 0 50 40 40 54 0 10.75

$ 0

8

Lenovo Flex 15

72

$750

3 0 0 3 0 50 40 40 40 4 12.25 8.25

4.7

! 0

9

Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB

70

$745

3 0 0 3 0 50 40 40 40 4

9.75

4.2

! 0

Dell Inspiron 10 i7586-7205BLK HP Envy 11 15M-DR0011DX x360

69

$1,330

3 0 0 3 0 50 30 40 50 4

8.25 5.5 4.5

69

$850

3 0 0 3 0 50 40 40 40 4

11 7.25 4.2

! 0

12 Razer Blade 15

68

$2,200

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 30 30 50 40 5

7

! 0

Acer Predator 13 Helios 300 HP Pavilion 14 Gaming 15-CX0058WM HP Envy 15 15M-DS0011DX x360

68

$1,000

3 0 0 3 0 50 20 50 50 4

6.75 3.25 5.7

68

$830

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 40 50 4

8.25 4.5 5.2

67

$780

3 0 0 3 0 50 40 40 40 4

10 6.25 4.4

16 Dell G5 15

67

$1,110

3 0 0 3 0 30 30 50 50 4

9

Display

4

Versatility

7

Performance

15.5

Portability

5 0 0 5 0 40 50 50 30 5

Ergonomics

$2,400

Rank

82

Recommended

Battery life - video (hr.)

Test Results

Battery life - web (hr.)

Owner satisfaction

Predicted reliability

Survey Price Results

15- TO 16-INCH LAPTOPS

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

! 0

4

! 0

! 0

! 0 ! 0 ! 0

1

2

POOR

Apple MacBook Pro 15-inch with Touch Bar (2019, Core i7) Samsung Notebook 9 Pen (2019) HP Spectre 15-DF0023DX x360

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

6

4.4

7.5 4.3

7

5.75 4.5

5.5 6.2

89

COMP U T ERS , L A P T OP

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Battery life - video (hr.)

18 Dell G3 15

65

$850

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 50 50 4

8

4.75 5.3

19 Alienware 15 R4

64

$1,000

3 0 0 4 0 40 20 50 50 4

7

3.75 7.8

Acer Aspire 5 20 A515-52-53QM

64

$700

3 0 0 3 0 40 40 40 50 3

9.5

7.25 3.7

21 Dell G7 15

64

$1,080

3 0 0 3 0 30 30 50 40 4

7.25

5

5.9

22 HP 15-DA1005DX 63

$710

3 0 0 3 0 40 40 40 40 2

8

7

4.2

Weight (lb.)

! 0

Display

3 0 0 3 0 50 40 40 50 2

Versatility

$500

Performance

65

Portability

! 0

HP Pavilion 17 15-CS1063CL

Ergonomics

Rank

Battery life - web (hr.)

Test Results

Recommended

Predicted reliability

Survey Price Results Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

15- TO 16-INCH LAPTOPS Continued 4

Lenovo IdeaPad 23 S145-15IWL Hyundai 24 Kanabo HG156616E Lenovo IdeaPad 25 S340-15 Samsung 26 Notebook 5 (2018) Asus VivoBook 27 K570ZD-ES51

63

$730

3 0 0 3 0 40 40 40 40 3

62

$1,290

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 40 20 50 50 4

62

$400

3 0 0 3 0 50 30 30 40 4

6.5 4.25 3.8

61

$590

4 0 0 3 0 40 30 30 40 4

6.25 3.5 4.3

61

$635

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 30 40 4

6.75 4.25 4.2

Acer Aspire 3 28 A315-41-R5TS

57

$760

3 0 0 3 0 50 30 30 50 3

8.25 6.25 3.7 5

6

3.5 6.8

3.75 4.5

Dell Inspiron 57 29 i5570-3064BLU Samsung Odyssey Z 57 30 NP850XACX01US Lenovo IdeaPad 55 31 330S-15IKB

$470

3 0 0 3 0 50 30 30 50 3

6.25 4.5 4.9

$1,260

4 0 0 3 0 30 20 50 40 4

4.25 2.75 5.2

$580

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 30 30 2

5.75

Lenovo IdeaPad 55 32 330S-15ARR

$410

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 30 30 4

4.75 2.75 3.8

55

$580

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 30 50 2

5.25

33 HP 15-BS115DX

90

9.75 6.5

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

4

4

3.9

4.4


Battery life - video (hr.)

Weight (lb.)

4.6

Asus 35 X555QA-CBA12A 49

$400

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 20 40 3

5.75 3.25 4.1

36 HP 15-DB0011DX 47

$230

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 10 40 2

8.25 4.5 4.4

Lenovo IdeaPad 44 37 130-15AST

$300

3 0 0 3 0 40 20 10 40 3

Display

4

Versatility

6.25

Performance

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 30 50 3

Portability

$400

Ergonomics

Battery life - web (hr.)

Owner satisfaction

Predicted reliability

Test Results

Lenovo IdeaPad 54 34 L340-15API

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

15- TO 16-INCH LAPTOPS Continued

5

2.75 4.5

17- TO 18-INCH LAPTOPS

4 0 0 3 0 40 50 40 55 0 15.25

10 2.9

$880

3 0 0 3 0 50 30 50 50 5

6

73

$1,500

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 50 50 5

7.25 5.25 7.1

73

$1,060

3 0 0 3 0 50 30 50 50 4

7.25

5

5

73

$1,650

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 50 50 5

5.75

5

6.1

72

$930

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 50 40 5

8

70

$1,150

3 0 0 3 0 40 20 50 50 5

5.25 3.5

68

$2,400

3 0 0 3 0 30 30 50 50 5

5.5

66

$1,090

3 0 0 3 0 30 20 40 50 4

6.25 4.75 6.7

Dell Inspiron 10 i7786-7929SLV

65

$1,000

3 0 0 3 0 50 30 40 50 4

5.75

Dell Inspiron 17 11 3000 (2019)

65

$650

3 0 0 3 0 40 20 40 50 5

4.75 4.25 5.9

12 HP 17-BY1033DX

59

$530

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 30 40 3

6.5 5.25 5.3

! 0

1

LG Gram 17

77

$1,300

$ 0

2

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-51-56YW

74

! 0

3

Dell G7 17

! 0

4

! 0

5

$ 0

6

! 0

7

! 0

8

! 0

9

! 0 ! 0

1

2

POOR

Asus VivoBook Pro N705FD-DS77 Asus ROG Strix GL704GV-DS74 HP Pavilion Gaming 17-CD0020NR HP Omen 17-AN198MS Asus ROG Zephyrus GX701GW-DB76 HP Envy 17M-BW0013DX

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

9

5.7

4.75 6.2 8

4.5 5.8

5.5

6

91

COMP U T ERS , L A P T OP

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Weight (lb.)

Battery life - video (hr.)

Battery life - web (hr.)

Display

Versatility

Performance

Portability

Test Results

Ergonomics

Owner satisfaction

Survey Price Results Predicted reliability

Overall Score

Rank

Recommended

Brand & Model

17- TO 18-INCH LAPTOPS Continued Lenovo IdeaPad 59 13 L340-17IWL Dell Inspiron 14 i5775-A604GLD- 55 PUS Lenovo IdeaPad 49 15 330-17AST HOW WE TEST: Ergonomics represents the quality of the keyboard and pointing device, and accessibility of features. Portability is based on battery life under a mix of light and heavy tasks, size, and weight, including the keyboard dock for detachable laptops. Performance is based on performance while running productivity applications, multimedia applications, web browsing, and 3D games. Versatility includes hardware such as memory-card slots and AV connections, software such as security programs, and tech support and warranty provisions. Display covers display size, clarity, color, brightness, and glare. Battery life - web (hr) is the time it

92

$380

3 0 0 3 0 40 30 30 50 3

5.5 4.75 5.6

$570

3 0 0 3 0 40 20 30 50 4

4.5 2.75 6.1

$500

3 0 0 3 0 40 20 20 40 3

takes to deplete a fully charged battery while the laptop loads a sequence of web pages over WiFi. Bluetooth and 3G/4G are disabled and the screen is set to a specific brightness thatโ€™s usable indoors or outdoors. Battery life - video (hr) is the time it takes to deplete a fully charged battery while the laptop loops a 4K video. Bluetooth and 3G/4G are disabled and the screen is set to a specific brightness that is usable indoors or outdoors. Weight (lbs) of the laptop as you would carry it around, including the battery but without the power adapter or a removable CD/DVD drive. Detachable laptops include the weight of the keyboard. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score is based on the

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

4

2.5 5.5

performance of the product in all of our tests. Scores are comparable between the 14-, 15-, and 16-inch models. Scores for the remaining size categories are not comparable to other size categories. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first three years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the laptop they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’


D I G I TA L C A MER A S

QUI CK GUIDE

Digital Cameras Consumers are placing increasing demands on cameras, and manufacturers are meeting those needs by adding more capabilities, including wireless connectivity. An easily accessible video mode lets you record high-quality video. A lens with a wide maximum aperture opening helps capture images in lowlight situations. WiFi connectivity allows faster uploading.

What to Look For

An SLR or mirrorless model with interchangeable lenses maximizes versatility. A point-and-shoot model has fewer features, but can still take high-quality images. A zoom lens that includes a wide-angle optionโ€”look for a 28mm or even widerโ€” is ideal for panoramic landscapes or large group portraits. An optical or electronic viewfinder helps you conserve battery power or compose photos when bright light washes out your LCD. An LCD screen provides an alternative to a conventional viewfinder. Look for one that pivots for easier viewing. Touch screen capability offers easy menu interaction.

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

What to Skip Buying solely based on megapixel count: Higher resolution doesnโ€™t ensure better photographs. An extended warranty; digital cameras have been very reliable overall in our subscriber surveys.

BUYING ADVICE If you donโ€™t intend to change the lens on your camera, consider an advanced point-and-shoot, with a fixed lens. Some models have large image sensors with excellent optics and lots of features.

What Youโ€™ll Pay For basic point-and-shoots, expect to spend $100 to $400. For advanced pointand-shoots, $300 to $1,200. For mirrorless cameras, $350 to $3,300. For SLRs, $400 to $3,700.

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/cameras.

93


Tested products in performance order.

Viewfinder Image stabilization

LCD quality

Ease of Use

Flash photos

Test Results Video quality

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Survey Price Results Image quality

Overall Score

Brand & Model

ADVANCED POINT AND SHOOT

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

$ 0

4

$ 0

5

! 0

6

! 0

7

$ 0

8

! 0

9

! 0 ! 0

10 11

Sony Cyber-shot RX10 II Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VI Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 II Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II Sony Cyber-shot RX100 IV Sony Cyber-shot RX1R II Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VA Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V

87

$1,000

5 0 0 5 4 00 50 30 40 50 5 0 5

86

$1,300

5 0 0 5 4 00 50 30 40 50 5 0 5

85

$1,600

5 0 0 5 4 00 50 30 40 50 5 0 5

84

$700

4 0 0 4 5 00 40 50 40 5 NA 0 4

84

$495

5 0 0 5 4 00 50 40 40 4 NA 0 5

83

$1,200

5 0 0 5 4 00 50 30 40 50 5 0 5

83

$895

5 0 0 5 4 00 40 30 40 50 4 0 5

83

$650

4 0 0 4 5 00 40 40 40 5 NA 0 5

82

$800

5 0 0 5 4 00 50 50 40 50 5 0 5

82

$3,300

82

$995

5 0 0 5 4 00 50 40 40 50 5 0 3

82

$900

5 0 0 5 4 00 40 30 40 50 5 0 5

5 0 0 5 4 00 5

NA

40 0 40 5 0 5

! 0

12

! 0

13

82

$900

5 0 0 5 4 00 50 40 40 50 5 0 5

! 0

14 Canon PowerShot G3 X 81

$925

4 0 0 4 4 00 40 40 40 5 NA 0 4

! 0

15 Sony Cyber-shot RX10

81

$700

5 0 0 5 4 00 50 40 40 40 5 0 5

$ 0

Panasonic Lumix 16 DMC-LX100

80

$630

5 0 0 5 4 00 40 40 40 50 5 0 5

! 0

17 Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)

80

$905

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 40 40 40 40 50 5 0 4

0 !

Panasonic Lumix 18 DMC-FZ1000 II

80

$895

5 0 0 5 4 00 40 30 40 50 5 0 3

! 0

19 Fujifilm X100F

80

$1,300

4 0 0 3 4 00 30 40 50 50 5 0 5

! 0

Canon PowerShot 20 G1 X Mark III Sony Cyber-shot 21 RX100 III

80

$1,100

4 0 0 4 4 00 30 40 40 50 5 0 5

80

$650

5 0 0 5 4 00 50 50 40 40 5 0 4

$ 0 94

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


$4,000

4 0 0 4 5 00 5

50 0 50 5 0 4

88

$2,100

4 0 0 5 5 00 4

NA

50 0 50 5 0 5

87

$1,700

4 0 0 5 4 00 40 30 50 50 5 0 5

87

$1,300

4 0 0 5 4 00 50 30 50 50 5 0 5

87

$2,200

3 0 0 5 5 00 5

86

$750

86

$3,400

4 0 0 4 4 00 5

NA

40 0 50 5 0 5

85

$3,200

5 0 0 4 5 00 4

NA

40 0 40 5 0 4

85

$2,200

4 0 0 4 4 00 5

NA

40 0 50 5 0 5

85

$1,100

4 0 0 5 4 00 40 40 40 50 5 0 4

85

$2,800

3 0 0 5 5 00 5

84

$800

84

$1,700

4 0 0 5 4 00 3

NA

50 0 50 5 0 4

84

$1,000

3 0 0 5 5 00 4

NA

40 0 40 5 0 5 40 0 50 5 0 5 40 0 50 5 0 5

Viewfinder Image stabilization

50 0 50 5 0 5

NA

LCD quality

Flash photos

NA

Ease of Use

Video quality

Image quality

4 0 0 4 4 00 5

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

$2,600

Rank

Rec.

Test Results

MIRRORLESS

! 0 ! 0

1 2

! 0

3

! 0

4

! 0

5

! 0

6

0 $

7

! 0

8

! 0

9

! 0

10

$ 0

11

! 0

12

$ 0

13

! 0

14

$ 0

15

Nikon Z6 w/ 24-70mm S 89 Nikon Z7 w/ 24-70mm S 89 Fujifilm X-Pro2 w/ XF 23mm Fujifilm X-T3 w/ 18-55mm Fujifilm X-H1 w/ XF 16-55mm Sony Alpha A7 III w/ 28-70mm OSS Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 w/ 14-140mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. Power O.I.S. Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 w/ 24-105mm Canon EOS R w/ 24-105 IS USM Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5 w/ 12-60mm Fujifilm X-T2 w/ XF 1855mm f2.8-4 R LM OIS Sony Alpha A7R III w/ FE 85mm Fujifilm X-T20 w/ 16-50mm OIS Fujifilm X-Pro2 w/ XF 18-55mm Sony Alpha A7 II w/ FE 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 w/ 12-60mm

NA

40 0 50 5 0 5

4 0 0 4 4 00 50 40 50 50 5 0 4

NA

40 0 50 5 0 5

4 0 0 5 4 00 30 40 40 50 5 0 5

! 0

16

83

$1,900

4 0 0 4 4 00 4

NA

! 0

Panasonic Lumix 17 DMC-GH5 w/ 42.5mm f1.7

83

$1,500

4 0 0 4 4 00 4

NA

$ 0

Fujifilm X-E3 18 w/ 18-55mm OIS

83

$1,000

4 0 0 5 4 00 40 30 40 40 5 0 2

! 0

Panasonic Lumix 19 DMC-GX8 w/ 14-42mm

82

$1,195

4 0 0 4 4 00 4

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

NA

40 0 50 5 0 5

95

D I G I TA L C A MER A S

Survey Price Results

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Viewfinder Image stabilization

LCD quality

Ease of Use

Flash photos

Test Results Video quality

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Survey Price Results Image quality

Overall Score

Brand & Model

MIRRORLESS Continued

! 0

Fujifilm X-T20 w/ 1820 55mm OIS

82

$1,000

4 0 0 5 4 00 30 40 40 50 5 0 2

0 !

Panasonic Lumix DC21 G95 w/ 12-60mm

82

$1,200

4 0 0 4 4 00 40 30 40 40 4 0 5

$ 0

Panasonic Lumix 22 DMC-G85 w/ 12-60mm f/3.5-5.6 Power OIS

81

$700

4 0 0 4 4 00 40 40 40 50 5 0 5

! 0

Fujifilm X-T30 w/ XF 23 18-55mm

81

$1,300

4 0 0 5 4 00 30 40 40 50 5 0 4

0 $

Panasonic Lumix DMC- 81 24 G7K w/ 14-42mm

$500

4 0 0 4 4 00 40 30 40 50 5 0 5

! 0

Canon EOS RP w/ RF 25 24-105mm

81

$2,200

5 0 0 4 4 00 4

NA

40 0 40 5 0 4

! 0

Sony Alpha A7S w/ T FE 81 26 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS

$2,000

3 0 0 5 4 00 5

NA

40 0 40 5 0 3

$ 0

Canon EOS M50 w/ 27 EF-M 15-45mm IS STM

80

$900

5 0 0 4 4 00 40 30 40 50 5 0 4

0 !

Fujifilm X-T2 w/ XF 28 56mm F1.2 R APD

80

$1,100

4 0 0 5 4 00 40 40 40 50 5 0 2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 w/ 12-32mm 79 29 F3.5-5.6 ASPH. Mega OIS

$995

4 0 0 4 4 00 40 40 40 40 5 0 5 5 0 0 4 4 00 30 40 40 50 5 0 5

96

Canon EOS M5 w/ 1830 150mm IS STM

79

$1,000

Sony Alpha A7 w/ FE 31 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

79

$800

Olympus OM-D E-M1 II 32 w/ 12-40mm 1:2.8 PRO

79

$1,700

2 0 0 4 4 00 40 40 40 50 5 0 5

Canon EOS M5 w/ M 33 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM

78

$800

5 0 0 4 4 00 30 40 40 50 5 0 4

Fujifilm X-E2S w/ XF 34 18-55mm

78

$700

4 0 0 5 4 00 30 30 40 50 5 0 4

Canon EOS M6 w/ 1535 45mm IS STM

78

$700

5 0 0 4 4 00 30 40 40 5 NA 0 5

Canon EOS M100 w/ 36 15-45mm IS STM

78

$450

5 0 0 4 4 00 30 40 40 5 NA 0 5

Sony Alpha a6400 w/ E 78 37 18-135mm

$1,300

3 0 0 5 4 00 50 30 40 40 5 0 5

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

3 0 0 5 4 00 5

NA

40 0 40 5 0 5


Viewfinder Image stabilization

LCD quality

Flash photos

NA

Ease of Use

Video quality

Image quality

4 0 0 3 4 00 5

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Test Results

SLR Sony Alpha 99 II w/ 85mm F2.8 SAM

83

2

Nikon D3500 w/ 50mm

81

3

Nikon D7200 w/ 18-55mm

! 0

! 0

1

$ 0

$3,200

40 0 50 5 0 5

$500

4 0 0 5 4 00 40 40 40 40 5 0 5

81

$900

4 0 0 5 4 00 40 30 40 40 5 0 5

4

Nikon D500 w/ AF-S 50mm 1:1.8G

81

$1,800

$ 0

5

Canon EOS 77D w/ 1855mm IS STM

81

$850

! 0

6

Canon EOS 6D Mark II w/ 24-105mm IS STM

80

$1,900

$ 0

7

Canon EOS 800D Rebel 80 T7i w/ 50mm

$715

5 0 0 5 4 00 40 40 40 50 4 0 4

! 0

8

Nikon D7500 w/ AF-S 50mm

80

$1,150

4 0 0 5 4 00 40 50 40 50 5 0 5

9

Nikon D7200 w/ 18105mm VR

79

$700

4 0 0 5 4 00 50 40 40 40 5 0 4

Canon EOS 800D Rebel 10 T7i w/ 18-55mm IS STM 79

$800

5 0 0 5 4 00 30 40 40 50 4 0 4

Canon EOS 200D Rebel 11 SL2 w/ 18-55mm IS STM 79

$600

5 0 0 5 4 00 40 50 40 50 5 0 5

Nikon D7200 w/ 1812 140mm VR

79

$700

4 0 0 5 4 00 50 40 40 40 5 0 4

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV 13 w/ EF 85mm 1:1.8 USM

79

$3,000

Canon EOS 760D Rebel 79 14 T6s w/ 18-135mm IS STM

$750

5 0 0 5 4 00 40 40 40 40 4 0 5

! 0

1

361667513

4 0 0 5 4 00 5

NA

40 0 50 5 0 3

5 0 0 5 4 00 30 40 40 50 4 0 5 5 0 0 5 4 00 4

5 0 0 5 4 00 5

NA

NA

40 0 50 5 0 5

40 0 50 5 0 3

Canon EOS 7D Mark II 15 w/ EF 50mm 1.8 STM

79

$1,800

5 0 0 5 4 00 40 50 40 50 5 0 2

Canon EOS 80D w/ 1816 135mm IS USM

78

$1,400

5 0 0 5 4 00 40 50 40 50 5 0 3

Canon EOS 6D Mark II 17 w/ EF 85mm

78

$1,500

5 0 0 5 4 00 4

Nikon D5500 w/ 1818 55mm VR II

78

$795

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

NA

40 0 50 5 0 3

4 0 0 5 4 00 40 30 40 50 4 0 5

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

97

D I G I TA L C A MER A S

Survey Price Results

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Image stabilization

LCD quality

Ease of use

Video quality

Test Results Flash photos

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Survey Price Results Image quality

Overall Score

Brand & Model

RUGGED/WATERPROOF POINT AND SHOOT

! 0

1

Olympus TG-5

69

$400

3 0 0 4 3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

0 !

2

Nikon CoolPix W300

69

$390

4 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

! 0

98

3

Canon PowerShot D30

65

$330

3 0 0 3 4 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5

4

Fujifilm Finepix XP140

64

$230

4 0 0 3 3 0 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 2

5

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

62

$170

4 0 0 3 3 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5

6

Ricoh WG-6

61

$400

5 0 0 3 3 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 2

7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

60

$125

4 0 0 3 3 0 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

8

Fujifilm Finepix XP130

57

$130

4 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5

9

Ricoh WG-60

56

$240

5 0 0 3 2 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 1

Panasonic Lumix 10 DMC-TS25

55

$150

4 0 0 3 3 0 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 5

Panasonic Lumix 11 DC-TS7

55

$295

4 0 0 3 2 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 5

12 Ricoh WG-50

48

$230

5 0 0 3 2 0 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 1

13 Nikon CoolPix W100

40

$160

4 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 1

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


LCD quality Image stabilization Battery life (shots)

Ease of use

Video quality

Flash photos

Test Results Image quality

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Rec.

Survey Price Results

SUPERZOOM

$ 0

1

Canon PowerShot SX730 HS

77

$380

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

250

! 0

2

Panasonic Lumix ZS80

77

$445

4 0 0 4 0 3

3 0 0 4 0 3 0 4

380

$ 0

3

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

75

$300

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

250

! 0

4

Nikon Coolpix P1000

74

$1,000

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2

250

! 0

5

Nikon Coolpix P900 72

$600

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 4

360

! 0

6

Canon PowerShot SX540 HS

71

$350

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3

205

! 0

7

Sony Cyber-shot HX99

71

$450

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3

370

! 0

8

Nikon Coolpix B600 71

$325

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2

280

! 0

9

Sony Cyber-shot HX400V

70

$400

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 1

300

$ 0

Canon PowerShot 10 SX530 HS

70

$250

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3

210

! 0

Sony Cyber-shot 11 WX500

70

$350

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3

400

HOW WE TEST: Megapixels refers to the number of pixels, in millions, on the sensor. Image Quality combines several tests, including regular photos, low-light photos, and flash photos as well as color tests, among others. Video Quality mostly reflects footage shot in regular and low light, with audio quality and macro (close-up) capability also considered. Flash Photos tests the quality of the built-in flashโ€™s light output and evenness of illumination. Ease

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

of Use is our evaluation of the cameraโ€™s controls, manual, response time, and focusing. LCD Quality is a judgment of images viewed under various lighting conditions. Image Stabilization is our evaluation of the cameraโ€™s ability to compensate for handheld camera shake. Battery Life (Shots) is as the manufacturer states. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction.

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

NA

Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first four years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the digital camera they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’

99

D I G I TA L C A MER A S

Overall Score

Brand & Model


QUI CK GUIDE

Fitness Trackers Fitness trackers range from simple to sophisticated, with prices to match. Hereโ€™s how to find the right one to fit your budget, fitness, lifestyle, and fashion sense.

What to Look For Most trackers are designed to be worn on the wrist. Look for a greater variety of materials, shapes, and colors. Preview the trackerโ€™s companion app to make sure it fits your needs. Battery life can stretch from one day to up to a year depending on the sophistication of the device. Most are rechargeable, but some run on the coin cell batteries often used in cameras and calculators. If you like to swim, it

BUYING ADVICE

should be waterproof. Double-check that the device works with your smartphone or computer.

What to Skip GPS. You can get the same benefit by carrying your smartphone and activating a free app, such as RunKeeper. Most models over $200. At that price, you might as well buy a smartwatch.

If you simply want to know how many steps youโ€™re taking each day, you can save money by buying a simpler device.

What Youโ€™ll Pay Expect

to pay $25 for a basic model and $200 for a fully featured model.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/ fitness-trackers

Versatility

Water resistance

Heart-rate monitor accuracy Step count accuracy

Ease of pairing

Ease of use

Test Results

Rank

Recommended

Price Ease of interaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

Readability in bright light Readability in low light

Tested products in performance order.

BUILT-IN DATA READOUT

! 0

1

Samsung Gear Fit2 Pro

$ 0

2

Garmin Forerunner 35

100

85

$200

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5

84

$130

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Versatility

Readability in bright light Readability in low light

Water resistance

Heart-rate monitor accuracy Step count accuracy

Ease of pairing

Ease of interaction

Test Results

Ease of use

Rank

Recommended

Price

BUILT-IN DATA READOUT Continued 3

Fitbit Charge 3

76

$150

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

$ 0

4

Samsung Galaxy Fit

76

$100

4 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

$ 0

5

Fitbit Inspire HR

73

$100

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

! 0

6

73

$130

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

$ 0

7

Garmin Vivosmart 4 Withings Pulse HR

71

$80

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 4

8

Garmin Vivofit 4

71

$80

5 0 0 5 0 5 NA 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 2

9

Fitbit Inspire

69

$70

4 0 0 4 0 5 NA 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3

10 Garmin Vivofit 3

62

$55

4 0 0 5 0 3 NA 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 2

Letscom I 11 D115 Plus HR Garmin 12 Vivofit jr. 2 Samsung Galaxy 13 Fit e

56

$30

4 0 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3

56

$70

4 0 0 4 0 5 NA 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 1

43

$60

4 0 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 3

! 0

HOW WE TEST: Ease of Use is composite score of ergonomics, ease of interaction, syncing, pairing, and readability of the display in bright light and low light. Ease of Interaction is the ease of accessing core functions; performing key tasks such as accessing messages, calendars, alarms, etc.; interacting with the device menu and app interface; taking activity measurements; reading activity results from the display; and responsiveness of touch screen or other

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

control-interaction methods. Ease of Pairing is an assessment of the steps necessary for pairing the tracker with another device for the first time. Heart-Rate-Monitor Accuracy measures how accurately the fitness tracker measured our testers actual heart rate. Step-Count Accuracy measures how accurately the fitness tracker counted our testers actual steps. Water Resistance measures how resistant the watch is to submersion in water as tested by subjecting

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

the device to a water pressure equivalent to the depth the manufacturer claims the fitness tracker can withstand. Readability in Bright Light such as on a sunny day. Versatility indicates features that increase a fitness trackers utilities or capabilities. These include the number of sensors it has, if time can be displayed on the tracker, GPS tracking and other useful features. Price is approximate. Overall Score is based on the performance of the product in all of our tests.

101

F I T NE S S T R A CK ER S

Overall Score

Brand & Model


QUI CK GUIDE

Headphones Headphones come in all sizes and types, from tiny earbuds to big, over-the-ear DJ-style models. Theyโ€™re indispensable for listening to music on the go or for watching videos on a tablet, laptop, or smartphone. What to Look For Clear, accurate sound and sufficient volume. A comfortable fit. An isolating design that physically blocks sound or headphones with active noise-canceling technology if you donโ€™t want to be disturbed by outside noise. Wireless headphones if you donโ€™t want cords tangling or flapping. A model that doubles as a headset if you want the ability to answer or place

BUYING ADVICE

calls without taking your phone out of your pocket or backpack.

What to Skip Paying a high price just to get a big-brand name.

What Youโ€™ll Pay You can find decent earbuds for as little as $20. Decent over-ear and onear models start around $50wbut can cost $100 or more. Expect to pay more for wireless connectivity and active noise-cancellation.

If you want the best sound, especially for serious music listening, we recommend one of the top-rated corded models in our ratings. For more buying advice, go to CR.org/headphones.

Tested products in performance order.

Design

Sensitivity

Type

Test Results

Sound quality

Rank

Recommended

Price Noise reduction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

HOME/STUDIO NOISE-CANCELING HEADPHONES

! 0

1 2

102

Audio-Technica SonicPro ATH-MSR7NC Audio-Technica ATH-ANC50iS

81

$180

5 0 0 5

Medium high/ Over-ear medium high

Closed

42

$100

2 0 0 4

Medium high/ Over-ear low

Closed

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Type

Design

Sensitivity

Noise reduction

Test Results

Sound quality

Rank

Recommended

Price

HE A DP HONE S

Overall Score

Brand & Model

Earbud

Isolating

On-ear

Closed

On-ear

Closed

Earbud

Isolating

PORTABLE NOISE-CANCELING HEADPHONES

! 0

1

Bose QuietComfort 20

74

$250

4 0 0 5

2

JVC HA-NC250

63

$100

4 0 0 3

3

JVC HA-NC120

57

$45

3 0 0 2

Medium high/ medium Medium high/ low High/high

WIRELESS PORTABLE NOISE-CANCELING HEADPHONES Bose QuietControl 30 JBL Everest Elite 150NC

87

$300

5 0 0 5

NA

74

$200

4 0 0 5

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

Sony WF-1000X

69

$200

4 0 0 4

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

4

Sony WI-SP600N

69

$150

4 0 0 4

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

! 0

5

Sony WF-SP700N 69

$180

4 0 0 4

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

6

Audio-Technica ATH-ANC100BT

$100

4 0 0 5

68

Medium high/ Ear-insert Isolating medium high

WIRELESS HOME/STUDIO STYLE NOISE-CANCELING HEADPHONES

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

! 0

4

! 0

5

! 0

6

$ 0

7

$ 0

8

! 0

9

1

2

POOR

Bose QuietComfort 35 Series II Bose Noise Cancelling Headphones 700 Microsoft Surface Sony WH-1000XM2 Sony WH-1000XM3 beats by dre Beats Studio3 Wireless JBL LIVE 650BTNC Monoprice BT-300ANC Bowers & Wilkins PX

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

87

$350

5 0 0 5

87

$400

75

Medium/ medium

Over-ear

Closed

5 0 0 5

Low/medium Over-ear

Closed

$350

4 0 0 5

75

$350

4 0 0 5

75

$350

4 0 0 5

Medium/ Over-ear medium high High/high/ Over-ear medium high High/high/ Over-ear medium high

73

$280

4 0 0 5

73

$130

4 0 0 5

72

$50

4 0 0 5

70

$400

4 0 0 5

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

Medium

Over-ear

Medium/ Over-ear medium Medium high/ Over-ear medium Medium high/ Over-ear medium high

Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed

103


Design

Type

Test Results

Sound quality

Rank

Recommended

Price

Sensitivity

Overall Score

Brand & Model

PORTABLE STEREO HEADPHONES 1MORE E1001 Triple Driver 1MORE Quad Driver

86

$75

5 0

Medium

Ear-insert Isolating

86

$150

5 0

Medium high

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

Audeze iSine 10

86

$350

5 0

High

Ear-insert

! 0

4

Klipsch X12i

80

$350

4 0

High

Ear-insert Isolating

! 0

5

80

$150

4 0

Medium high

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

6

Westone ADV Alpha Scosche SportFlex 3

76

$15

4 0

Very high

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

7

Phiaton MS 100 BA

71

$40

4 0

High

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

8

Pioneer SE-CH9T

71

$80

4 0

High

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

9

Sennheiser Momentum In-Ear

71

$80

4 0

High

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

10 Shure SE112

71

$50

4 0

Very high

Ear-insert Isolating

! 0

Westone AM PRO 11 20 Bowers & Wilkins 12 C5 series 2 Panasonic 13 RP-TCM125

71

$340

4 0

Very high

Ear-insert

66

$150

4 0

High

Ear-insert Isolating

4 0

Medium high

Ear-insert Isolating

! 0 $ 0

66

$15

Nonisolating

Non-isolating

WIRELESS PORTABLE STEREO HEADPHONES

! 0

1

! 0

2

$ 0

3

$ 0

4

! 0

5

! 0

6

! 0

7

104

Samsung Galaxy Buds Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E6 1MORE iBFree Sport Anker SoundCore Liberty Air Bose SoundSport Wireless Jabra Elite Active 65t JBL UA True Wireless Flash

86

$130

5 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

80

$300

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

76

$60

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

76

$80

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

76

$150

4 0

NA

76

$190

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

76

$170

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

Earbud

Isolating


Design

Type

Sensitivity

Test Results

Sound quality

Rank

Recommended

Price

HE A DP HONE S

Overall Score

Brand & Model

WIRELESS PORTABLE STEREO HEADPHONES Continued $150

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

76

$50

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

76

$80

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

76

$55

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

71

$150

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

71

$200

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

71

$130

4 0

NA

15 Jabra Elite 25e

71

$80

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

! 0

16 Jabra Elite Sport

71

$220

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

17 Jaybird Run

71

$80

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

18 Jaybird Tarah

71

$80

4 0

NA

$ 0

19 Jaybird X3

71

$90

4 0

NA

! 0

20 Jaybird X4

71

$130

4 0

NA

$ 0

21 JBL E25BT

71

$60

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

22 MEE audio X10

71

$80

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

71

$50

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

71

$170

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

71

$100

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

71

$105

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

71

$70

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

! 0

8

$ 0

9

$ 0

10

$ 0

11

! 0

12

! 0

13

! 0

14

$ 0

$ 0

23

! 0

24

$ 0

25

$ 0

26

$ 0

27

1

2

POOR

JLab Audio Epic Air 76 JLab Audio JBuds Air Optoma NuForce BE6i SOL Republic Shadow Wireless 1MORE Triple Driver BT Audio-Technica Sonic Sport ATH-Sport7TW Bose SoundSport Free Wireless

Monoprice True Wireless Earphones IPX4 Monster Elements Wireless In-Ear Samsung Gear IconX 2018 Sennheiser CX Sport SOUL Electronics Run Free Pro

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

Earbud

Earbud

Isolating

Isolating

Ear-insert Isolating Earbud

Isolating

105


Type

Design

Test Results

Sound quality

Rank

Recommended

Price

Sensitivity

Overall Score

Brand & Model

WIRELESS PORTABLE STEREO HEADPHONES Continued

$ 0 $ 0 ! 0

1MORE StylishรŠTrue 66 28 Wireless beats by dre 66 29 BeatsX V-Moda Forza 66 30 Metallo Wireless

$100

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

$100

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

$130

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

31 Fitbit Flyer

66

$50

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

House of Marley 32 Smile Jamaica BT JBL Endurance 33 DIVE JBL Endurance 34 SPRINT

66

$20

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

66

$90

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

66

$50

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

35 JBL Reflect Mini 2

66

$100

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

JVC HA-FX9BT 36 Gumy Wireless

66

$20

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

37 MEE audio X7 Plus

66

$60

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

Optoma NuForce 38 BE Sport3

66

$55

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0

39 Skullcandy Indy

66

$80

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

! 0

Skullcandy Push 40 Truly Wireless Earbuds

66

$130

4 0

NA

Ear-insert Isolating

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

WIRELESS HOME/STUDIO STYLE STEREO HEADPHONES

! 0

1

Bang & Olufsen BeoPlay H4

! 0

2

Grado GW100

76

$250

4 0

Medium high

On-ear

Open air

Klipsch Reference On-Ear Bluetooth Marshall Monitor Bluetooth Audio-Technica ATH-DSR7BT Bose SoundLink around-ear headphones II Bowers & Wilkins P5 Wireless

76

$250

4 0

Medium

On-ear

Closed

76

$140

4 0

Medium

Over-ear

Closed

71

$300

4 0

NA

Over-ear

Closed

71

$230

4 0

Medium high Over-ear

Closed

71

$300

4 0

Medium high

Closed

! 0

3

$ 0

4

! 0

5

! 0

6

! 0

7

106

76

$250

4 0

Low

Over-ear

Closed

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

On-ear


Design

Sensitivity

Type

Test Results

Sound quality

Rank

Recommended

Price

HE A DP HONE S

Overall Score

Brand & Model

WIRELESS HOME/STUDIO STYLE STEREO HEADPHONES Continued

$ 0 ! 0 $ 0 ! 0

Jabra Move Style 8 Edition V-Moda Crossfade 9 2 Wireless Audio-Technica 10 ATH-SR5BT beats by dre Solo3 11 Wireless

71

$100

4 0

71

$280

4 0

66

$150

4 0

Medium

On-ear

Closed

66

$240

4 0

High

On-ear

Closed

66

$150

4 0

Medium high Over-ear

Closed

66

$100

4 0

Medium high Over-ear

Closed

66

$180

4 0

15 JBL E55BT

60

$100

3 0

Marshall Major 16 III BT

60

$140

3 0

17 Phiaton BT460

60

$130

3 0

$105

3 0

Low

Over-ear

Closed

$120

3 0

High

On-ear

Closed

$120

3 0

Low

On-ear

Closed

46

$80

3 0

NA

On-ear

Closed

41

$80

3 0

Medium

Over-ear

Closed

41

$75

3 0

Medium

On-ear

Closed

40

$80

2 0

NA

Over-ear

Closed

40

$75

2 0

Medium high

On-ear

Closed

40

$130

2 0

NA

On-ear

Closed

36

$200

2 0

$ 0

12 JBL LIVE 500BT

$ 0

Sennheiser HD 13 4.40BT Skullcandy Hesh 3 14 Wireless

! 0

Skullcandy Crusher 51 18 Wireless Audio-Technica 46 19 SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Plantronics 46 20 Backbeat FIT 505 21 UrbanEars Hellas 22 23 24 25 26

Skullcandy Hesh 2 Wireless UrbanEars Plattan ADV Wireless JLab Audio Flex Sport Marshall Major II Bluetooth Sony MDR-XB650BT

27 MEE audio Matrix3

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

Medium

On-ear

Medium high Over-ear

Low

Closed Closed

Over-ear

Closed

Medium high Over-ear

Closed

Low

On-ear

Medium high Over-ear

Medium high Over-ear

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

Closed Closed

Closed

107


Sensitivity

Design

Test Results

Sound quality

Rank

Recommended

Price

Type

Overall Score

Brand & Model

HOME/STUDIO STYLE STEREO HEADPHONES

! 0

1

! 0

2

Grado Prestige SR325e Grado Prestige SR225e

! 0

3

$ 0 ! 0

91

$295

5 0

Medium high Over-ear

Open air

88

$200

5 0

Medium high Over-ear

Open air

HiFiMan HE-400S

88

$300

5 0

Low

Over-ear

Open air

4

Grado Prestige SR80e

86

$100

5 0

Medium high

On-ear

Open air

5

Shure SRH1440

81

$300

5 0

Low

Over-ear

Open air

80

$150

4 0

Medium high

On-ear

Open air

76

$80

4 0

Medium high

On-ear

Open air

! 0

6

$ 0

7

Grado Prestige SR125e Grado Prestige SR60e

! 0

8

Sony MDR-1AM2

76

$300

4 0

High

Over-ear

Closed

! 0

Audio-Technica 9 ATH-M50x Monoprice 10 Monolith M650

71

$150

4 0

Medium

Over-ear

Closed

66

$150

4 0

Medium

Over-ear

Open air

$ 0

11 Skullcandy Grind

66

$30

4 0

Medium high

On-ear

Closed

! 0

12 Sony MDR-1A

66

$300

4 0

Medium

Over-ear

Closed

! 0

HOW WE TEST: Sound Quality represents the tonal accuracy, clarity, detail, ambience, and dynamics of the audio reproduced by the headphones. Sensitivity

108

assesses how loudly wireconnected headphones will play for a given audio input signal level; for wireless models, we judge sensitivity using the optional wired

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2019

connection. An isolating design blocks some outside noise. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score is based on the performance of the product in all of our tests.


PR IN T ERS , A L L-IN - ONE

QUI CK GUIDE

Printers, All-in-One All-in-ones are by far the most popular type of printer on the market. The reason? They let you not only print but also copy, scan, and, for some models, fax.

What to Look For

What to Skip

Low

An

ink replacement costs (ink cost per year). An all-in-one inkjet if you want color printing and a versatile model that excels at printing your photos, scans and other functions. A black-and-white laser all-in-one for high reliability, excellent text quality, fast print speed, and a low cost per pageโ€”provided you donโ€™t need to print in color.

BUYING ADVICE

inkjet with a single cartridge for color inks, because separate color cartridges may be more economical, depending on what you print. High replacement ink costs. You can compare printers using our ink costs for year spec.

Today, most printers come with built-in WiFi that enables you to print photos and documents from computers and mobile devices on a home network.

What Youโ€™ll Pay Laser all-in-ones start at a little more than $100. Inkjet all-in-ones cost $25 and up.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/printers.

Tested products in performance order. Test Results

Text speed (ppm)

Ink cost/year ($)

2 0 0 5 0 4

18.8

71

79

$250

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

3 0 0 5 0 4

20

40

79

$280

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

2 0 0 5 0 4

23.1 29

Graphics quality Maintenance ink use

NA

Text speed

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

Text quality

$140

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Scan quality

Specs

79

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

Photo quality

Overall Score

Brand &Model

ALL-IN-ONE BLACK AND WHITE LASER PRINTERS

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

1

2

POOR

Brother HL-L2395DW Canon imageClass MF267dw Brother MFC-L5700DW

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

109


Ink cost/year ($)

Text speed (ppm)

Specs

Scan quality

Graphics quality Maintenance ink use

Photo quality

Test Results

Text speed

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

Text quality

Overall Score

Brand &Model

ALL-IN-ONE BLACK AND WHITE LASER PRINTERS Continued

! 0

4

! 0

5

! 0

6

! 0

7

! 0

8

! 0

9

! 0

10

! 0

11

0 $

12

! 0

13

0 $

14

! 0

15

! 0

16

Canon imageCLASS MF269dw Brother MFC-L2750DW Brother DCP-L5500DN Canon imageCLASS MF424dw Canon imageCLASS MF264dw Canon imageCLASS MF249dw Brother MFC-L2740DW Brother MFC-L2720DW Brother MFC-L2710DW Canon imageCLASS D1520 Canon imageCLASS MF232w Brother MFC-L2685DW Canon imageCLASS MF236n

79

$230

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

2 0 0 5 0 4

27.3 40

79

$200

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

2 0 0 5 0 4

14.3 32

79

$270

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

2 0 0 5 0 4

23.1 29

79

$350

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

2 0 0 5 0 4

23.1 52

78

$175

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

2 0 0 5 0 4

20

52

78

$155

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

2 0 0 5 0 4

20

44

78

$200

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

2 0 0 5 0 4

16.7 54

77

$205

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

2 0 0 5 0 4

18.8 30

77

$140

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

2 0 0 5 0 4

16.7 44

76

$365

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

2 0 0 5 0 4

23.1 29

75

$100

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

2 0 0 5 0 4

15.8 43

75

$140

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

3 0 0 5 0 4

15.8 59

75

$195

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5

NA

2 0 0 5 0 4

17.6 40

ALL-IN-ONE COLOR LASER PRINTERS

! 0

1

! 0

2

0 $

3

0 $

4

! 0

5

110

Canon imageCLASS MF642Cdw Brother MFC-L8900CDW Brother MFC-L3750CDW Brother MFC-L3710CW HP Color LaserJet Pro M477FDW

69

$350

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4

13.6 124

69

$530

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 4

15.8 126

68

$300

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 4

10.7 121

68

$300

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 4

10.7 121

67

$430

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 4

15.8 116

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Ink cost/year ($)

Text speed (ppm)

Specs

Scan quality

Graphics quality Maintenance ink use

Photo quality

Text speed

Test Results

Text quality

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

ALL-IN-ONE COLOR LASER PRINTERS Continued

! 0

6

$ 0

7 8 9 10 11 12 13

HP Color LaserJet Pro MFP M477fnw HP Color LaserJet Pro MFP M281fdw Canon imageCLASS MF733Cdw HP Color LaserJet Pro MFP M180nw Canon imageCLASS MF632Cdw Canon imageCLASS MF634Cdw Samsung ProXpress C3060FW Samsung Xpress C480FW

66

$370

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 4

17.6 149

66

$350

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 4

14.3 95

64

$330

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 4

18.8 206

62

$240

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 4

10.7 110

62

$350

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 4

12

106

61

$275

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 4

12

115

56

$425

1 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4

54

$280

1 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5

16.7 38 12

251

ALL-IN-ONE INKJET PRINTERS 69

$100

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

10.7 101

68

$300

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

8.3

68

$70

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5

9.1 108

67

$150

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 4

9.4

74

65

$380

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

10

97

65

$205

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

9.1

27

65

$40

3 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

8.8 108

65

$100

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

8.3 132

64

$400

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4

7.5

10 HP Deskjet 2635 64

$30

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

8.6 124

$ 0

1

$ 0

2

$ 0

3

$ 0

4

! 0

5

$ 0

6

$ 0

7

! 0

8

! 0

9

$ 0 1

Brother MFC-J895DW Canon Pixma G4210 Canon Pixma MX532 Brother MFC-J985DW HP OfficeJet 250 Mobile Brother MFCJ775DW XL Canon Pixma MG3620 Canon Pixma MX492 Canon Pixma G4200

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

6

5

111

PR IN T ERS , A L L-IN - ONE

Overall Score

Brand &Model


Overall Score

Survey Price Results

Ink cost/year ($)

117

12 HP Envy 4520

63

$100

3 0 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4

9.1

171

HP Officejet 3830 Canon Pixma G3200 HP Officejet 3833 Canon PIXMA TS5120 Brother MFC-J491DW Brother MFC-J497DW

63

$50

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

10

154

63

$230

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4

8.3

5

63

$100

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

8.6 154

62

$45

3 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 4

9.4

61

$80

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

10.7 78

61

$80

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

10.7 78

19 HP DeskJet 2652 61

$40

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

8.6

61

$130

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 4

9.4 187

60

$100

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 4

10

117

60

$60

3 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 4

8.1

122

Scan quality

9.4

Graphics quality Maintenance ink use

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4

Photo quality

$100

Text speed

64

Text quality

! 0

HP Envy Photo 11 7155

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Text speed (ppm)

Specs

Rank

Test Results

Recommended

Brand &Model

ALL-IN-ONE INKJET PRINTERS Continued

13 14 15 16 17 18

HP Envy Photo 20 7855 AiO HP Envy Photo 21 7158 AiO Canon PIXMA 22 TR4520

HOW WE TEST: Photo Quality reflects a photoโ€™s appearance. Text Quality assesses clarity and crispness of black text. Text Speed reflects how quickly the model can print text on five plain, letter-sized pages. Thirty seconds or less is excellent; 31 to 60 seconds is very good; 61 to 90 seconds is good; 91 to 120 seconds is fair; and longer than 120 seconds is poor. Graphics Quality assesses the appearance of color graphics produced by the printer. Black-andwhite lasers were judged on black-and-white graphics.

112

Maintenance Ink Use reflects the amount of extra ink used by an inkjet printer to maintain its print heads. Scan Quality is for color photos, graphics, and text scanned at each modelโ€™s default settings. Text speed (ppm) is our measure of how fast the printer can print pages of monochrome text. Ink cost/year ($) is the estimated cost (in dollars) for ink or toner in a year of typical use, based on our tests and how members told us they print. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines test results with survey data

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

93

141

for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first four years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the printer they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash (โˆ’), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.


P R I N T ER S , REGUL A R

QUI CK GUIDE

Printers, Regular If you donโ€™t need to scan, copy, or faxโ€”or you own other machines to do those tasksโ€”a regular printer may be the most cost efficient option for you. Models start at around $100. BUYING ADVICE

Theyโ€™re costlier than their monochrome counterparts and unsuited for photos. Regular inkjet printers, which get unfavorable ratings for reliability and owner satisfaction.

What to Look For A laser printer if you want a reliable printer and fast, low-cost, top-quality blackand-white text. An inkjet if you want the most versatile printer. You can print color photos and graphics as well as text. A black-and-white laser if you want reliability and to maximize long-term savings.

A low price tag may not be what it seems. Ink costs can often rack up hundreds of dollars more as the years go by.

What Youโ€™ll Pay Color inkjets can cost as little as $45 and up to $350, and monochrome laser printers can cost less than $100, and upwards of $500.

What to Skip

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/printers.

Regular color laser printers arenโ€™t always a good choice.

Tested products in performance order.

Ink cost/year ($)

Features

Maintenance ink use Text speed (ppm)

Photo quality

Graphics quality

Test Results

Text speed

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

Text quality

Overall Score

Brand & Model

BLACK AND WHITE LASER PRINTERS HP LaserJet Pro M501dn Brother HL-L2370DW

81

$400

2 5 5 5 5 0

NA

5 23.1 19

80

$115

5 5 5 5 2

NA

5 17.6 60

!

1

!

2

!

3

Lexmark B2338dw

80

$140

โˆ’ โˆ’ 550 2 NA 5

4

Brother HL-L6300DW

80

$360

5 5 5 5 3

! 1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

NA

21.4 58

5 25 28 113


Ink cost/year ($)

Features

Maintenance ink use Text speed (ppm)

Photo quality

Graphics quality

Test Results

Text speed

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

Text quality

Overall Score

Brand & Model

BLACK AND WHITE LASER PRINTERS Continued

$ $ ! ! ! ! !

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Brother HL-L2350DW Brother HL-L2315DW Brother HL-L5200DW Brother HL-L6250DW Brother HL-L6200DW HP Laserjet Pro M402n Brother HL-L2340DW Brother HL-L5100DN HP Laserjet Pro M203dw Samsung Xpress M2020W HP Laserjet Pro M15w HP LaserJet Pro M118dw Canon imageCLASS LBP162dw Canon imageCLASS LBP113w HP LaserJet Pro M102w Canon imageClass LBP251dw

80 78 77 77 77 76 76 75 75 73 72 72 72 70 70 67

$120

5 5 5 5 0 2

NA

5 16.7 48

$90

5 5 5 5 2

NA

5 15.8 49

$160

5 5 5 5 0 2

NA

5 23.1 29

$300

5 5 5 5 2

NA

5 25 19

$200

5 5 5 5 0 2

NA

5 25 19

$190

5 5 5 5 2

NA

5 25 19

$120

5 5 5 5 0 1

NA

5 15 55

$185

5 5 5 5 2

NA

5 23.1 29

$130

5 5 5 5 0 1

NA

5 16.7 37

$70

4 3 5 5 3

NA

5 14.3 56

$80

5 5 5 5 0 1

NA

5 14.3 67

$90

5 5 5 5 1

NA

5 18.8 42

$160

5 3 5 5 0 2

NA

5 21.4 60

$160

5 3 5 5 2

NA

5 15.8 52

$100

5 5 4 5 0 2

NA

5 15.8 49

$325

5 3 3 5 2

NA

5 18.8 71

COLOR LASER PRINTERS

$

1

$

2

!

3 4

114

HP Color LaserJet Pro M452nw Brother HL-L3230CDW HP Color Laserjet Pro M254dw

70

$240

5 4 5 5 4 0 2 5 15 104

68

$230

4 5 5 5 4 1 5 10.3 119

66

$300

1 5 12 116 5 4 5 5 4 0

Lexmark C2325dw

63

$270

3 2 5 5 4 3 5 11.1 121

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Ink cost/year ($)

Features

Maintenance ink use Text speed (ppm)

Photo quality

Graphics quality

Text speed

Test Results

Text quality

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

COLOR LASER PRINTERS Continued 5 6 7 8 9

Brother HL-L8360CDW Brother HL-L3270CDW Brother HL-L8260CDW Brother HL-L3210CW Samsung Xpress C1810W

63

$350

4 5 5 5 3 0 1 5 16.7 122

63

$200

4 5 5 5 4 0 1 5 12.5 186

60

$330

4 5 3 5 3 1 5 15 134

59

$180

4 5 5 5 3 0 1 5 10.7 127

59

$280

2 1 5 5 5 2 5 10.3 91

57

$200

4 5 5 5 4 0 1 5 10.3 157

Canon imageCLASS 57 11 LBP612Cdw

$280

5 2 5 2 4 1 5 2.8 110

57

$450

3 0 2 5 5 5 0 2 5 15 44

1

HP Officejet 200 Mobile

61

$300

2 2 4 5 5 3 4 10 122

2

Canon Pixma iP110

59

$150

3 2 4 4 3 4 2 8.3 146

3

Canon Pixma TS702

59

$100

3 2 4 5 0 2 5 0 1 12.5 110

4

Canon Pixma iX6820

55

$155

3 2 4 5 5 4 1 12 155

5

Canon Pixma TS302 53

$45

3 2 3 4 4 0 2 3 8.3 130

10 Brother HL-3140CW

12 Lexmark CS410dn INKJET PRINTERS

Canon Pixma iP8720 Canon Maxify iB4020

53

$190

3 2 5 5 5 4 1 11.5 231

52

$110

3 0 2 4 5 0 2 3 0 1 18.8 85

8

HP Tango

52

$150

2 2 5 3 2 3 4 4.5 139

9

HP Officejet Pro 6230 52

$130

2 0 0 2 4 5 0 2 4 0 1 11.1 126

10 HP AMP 100

50

$70

2 2 2 4 3 3 4 8.3 156

Canon Maxify 11 iB4120 Epson Workforce 12 WF-100

50

$110

2 4 5 3 3 0 1 20 113 3 0

49

$200

1 2 3 4 3 4 4 5.2 182

6 7

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

115

P R I N T ER S , REGUL A R

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Ink cost/year ($)

Features

Maintenance ink use Text speed (ppm)

Photo quality

Graphics quality

Test Results

Text speed

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Survey Price Results

Text quality

Overall Score

Brand & Model

INKJET PRINTERS Continued Epson Workforce 13 Pro WF-C5210 Epson WorkForce 14 WF-7210 15 Canon Pixma TS202 Canon Pixma 16 iP7220 Epson 17 Expression Photo HD- XP-15000 HP OfficeJet Pro 18 8210 HOW WE TEST: Photo Quality reflects a photoโ€™s appearance. Text Quality assesses clarity and crispness of black text. Text Speed reflects how quickly the model can print text on five plain, letter-sized pages. Thirty seconds or less is excellent; 31 to 60 seconds is very good; 61 to 90 seconds is good; 91 to 120 seconds is fair; and longer than 120 seconds is poor. Graphics Quality assesses the appearance of color graphics produced by the printer, or black-and-white graphics

116

49

$170

1 0 0 2 3 5 4 3 0 1 12.5 84

49

$200

1 2 4 5 4 3 2 12.5 63

49

$35

3 0 2 0 2 4 3 0 2 3 8.3 125

48

$100

3 2 2 5 4 4 1 12 236

45

$300

1 0 0 2 3 4 3 4 0 1 5.7 226

45

$150

2 2 4 5 4 3 1 15.8 97

for black-and-white lasers. Maintenance Ink Use reflects the amount of extra ink used by an inkjet printer to maintain its print heads. Text speed (ppm) is our measure of how fast the printer can print pages of monochrome text. Ink cost/ year ($) is the estimated cost (in dollars) for ink or toner in a year of typical use, based on our tests and how members told us they print. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction.

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first four years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the printer they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash (โˆ’), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.


SM A R T P HONE S

QUI CK GUIDE

Smartphones Smartphones are do-it-all companions for texting, email, and social networking, along with playing music, shooting photos and video, and directing us with GPS. Today, consumers have more good options than ever. What to Look For The phoneโ€™s operating system. Both Appleโ€™s iOS and Googleโ€™s Android are good. For most people, it comes down to personal preference. A display large enough for viewing web pages, maps, and videos but not so big that it makes the phone difficult to handle comfortably.

What to Skip Phone insurance and extended warranties, which,

generally speaking, are not worth it when you weigh cost, high deductibles, and low chance of using them.

What Youโ€™ll Pay The two-year contract price with subsidy is largely a thing of the past. You can either pay full retail up front (often $800 or more for premium phones) or make installment payments over time, generally about $15-$40 per month for two years.

BUYING ADVICE Make sure you can read the phoneโ€™s display in bright sunlight, especially for texting and web surfing.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/smartphones.

Tested products in performance order.

Rank

! 0

1

Samsung Galaxy S10+

90

$800

5 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5

Pass

! 0

2

Apple iPhone XS Max

90

$1,100

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

Pass

! 0

3

Samsung Galaxy S10

90

$850

5 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5

Pass

! 0

4

Apple iPhone XS

89

$1,000

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

Pass

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

Ease of use

Recommended

Water resistance test

Test Results Battery life Camera: Rear image quality Camera: Rear 1080p video quality Camera: Selfie image quality Display

Survey Results Predicted reliability

Price

Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

! RECOMMENDED

117


Water resistance test

Ease of use

Test Results Battery life Camera: Rear image quality Camera: Rear 1080p video quality Camera: Selfie image quality Display

Survey Results Predicted reliability

Rank

Recommended

Price

Owner satisfaction

Overall Score

Brand & Model

$ 0

5

Samsung Galaxy S10e

88

$550

5 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5

Pass

! 0

6

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G

88

$1,300

5 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5

Pass

! 0

7

Samsung Galaxy Note9

87

$950

5 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5

Pass

! 0

8

Apple iPhone XR

87

$750

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

Pass

! 0

9

Apple iPhone 8 Plus

87

$700

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

Pass

$ 0

10 OnePlus 6T

86

$550

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5

NA

! 0

11 Apple iPhone 8

86

$600

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

Pass

! 0

Samsung 12 Galaxy S9+

86

$700

5 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5

Pass

! 0

Samsung 13 Galaxy S9

85

$600

5 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5

Pass

! 0

14 OnePlus 7Pro

85

$700

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5

NA

$ 0

15 OnePlus 6

84

$470

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 5

NA

! 0

Google Pixel 16 3 XL

79

$600

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

Pass

! 0

17 LG G8 ThinQ

78

$650

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

Pass

! 0

LG V50 ThinQ 18 5G

78

$1,150

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5

Pass

! 0

19 LG V40 ThinQ

75

$800

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5

Pass

! 0

20 LG G7 ThinQ

74

$400

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4

Pass

! 0

21 LG V35 ThinQ

74

$400

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5

Pass

Huawei Mate 22 10 Pro

72

$350

2 0 0 1 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 4

Pass

23 Sony Xperia XZ2

71

$500

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

Pass

24 Nokia 6.1

71

$190

5 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

NA

Motorola 25 Moto Z3

71

$480

4 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

NA

118

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Water resistance test

Ease of use

Test Results Battery life Camera: Rear image quality Camera: Rear 1080p video quality Camera: Selfie image quality Display

Owner satisfaction

Predicted reliability

Rank

Recommended

Survey Results

Sony Xperia 26 XZ2 Premium

70

$600

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

Pass

Sony Xperia 27 XZ2 Compact

70

$450

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

Pass

28 HTC U12+

68

$580

2 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5

Pass

29 Razer Phone

68

$340

4 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 4

NA

30 Motorola One

67

$280

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 4

NA

31 Google Pixel 3

65

$500

4 0 0 5 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

Pass

32 BlackBerry Key2

64

$500

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 4 0 4

NA

33 Nokia 3.1

58

$120

5 0 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 4

NA

HOW WE TEST: Battery Life represents tests under nominal cell-network signals, including battery consumption, performing tasks that involve voice, data, display, and other factors. Camera: Rear Image Quality tests still-image quality using the rear facing (main) camera. It is based on objective and subjective judgments of test images, which includes evaluating resolution, dynamic range, color accuracy, and visual noise. Camera: Rear 1080p Video Quality is based on the judgments of trained panelists who viewed recorded video images shot at the highest quality setting available (1080p max.) in multiple lighting

1

Price

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

conditions. Camera: SelfieImage Quality tests still-image quality using the front facing (selfie) camera. (See Camera: Rear Image Quality for complete description.) Display rates the overall quality of the display, including its color, clarity, off-angle viewing, and touch-responsiveness. Ease of Use includes subjective and objective ratings of the convenience of using the menu, web browser, camera, testing, buttons, and unlocking the phone via a finger and facial recognition. Price is the lowest approximate retail cost for the smallest capacity available when purchased without a contract or an agreement.

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

Overall Score combines test results with survey data for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first two years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the smartphone they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’

119

SM A R T P HONE S

Overall Score

Brand & Model


QUI CK GUIDE

Smart Speakers Sure, smart speakers can play music or tell you a joke, but increasingly these versatile devices are functioning as the hub of a connected home because they can control other smart products. What to Look For An operating system thatโ€™s compatible with smart home devices that you own or plan to buy in the future, from a simple smart lightbulb to an entire connected kitchen suite. Versatility and ease of use are key because a smart speakerโ€™s requests are handled by cloud-based servers, so thereโ€™s little difference in basic performance between the cheapest and most expensive models.

BUYING ADVICE

Sound quality should be a deciding factor because most consumers use their smart speakers to listen to music. A screen can be handy, but even models with these visual aids are designed to be voice-controlled.

If you want better sound quality, try pairing a budget smart speaker with a non-smart wireless speaker that sounds great.

What to Skip Expensive models without exceptional sound.

What Youโ€™ll Pay

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/smartspeakers.

Prices

range from less than $50 to as much as $400.

Tested products in performance order. Overall Score

Test Results

Optional multiroom sharing

Google Home Max

76

$270

4 0 0 4 0 5

0

0

$ 0

2

Amazon Echo Show (2nd Generation)

69

$230

3 0 0 4 0 5

0

0

! 0

3

Bose Home Speaker 500

65

$400

4 0 0 5 0 3

0

$ 0

4

Sonos One

64

$170

4 0 0 4 0 3

0

0

$ 0

5

Sonos One (Gen 2)

64

$200

4 0 0 4 0 3

0

0

120

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

Versatility

1

Ease of use

$ 0

Sound quality

Adjustable tone settings

Features

Rank

Price

Recommended

Brand & Model


Test Results

$500

3 0 0 4 0 3

! 0

7

Sony SRS-XB501G

62

$300

3 0 0 4 0 4

! 0

8

JBL Link 500

62

$200

3 0 0 4 0 3

0

! 0

9

JBL Link 300

62

$125

3 0 0 4 0 3

0

$ 0

10

Amazon Echo Plus (2nd Generation)

62

$150

3 0 0 4 0 5

! 0

11

JBL Link View

61

$250

3 0 0 4 0 3

! 0

12

Riva Concert

61

$200

3 0 0 4 0 5

0

! 0

13

60

$400

3 0 0 4 0 3

0

0

! 0

14

Marshall Stanmore II Voice Amazon Echo Sub Bundle w/ 2 Echo (2nd Gen)

60

$250

3 0 0 2 0 5

0

0

! 0

15

JBL Link 20

59

$100

3 0 0 4 0 3

! 0

16

Cavalier Audio The Maverick

59

$250

3 0 0 4 0 3

0

0

! 0

17

Apple HomePod

59

$300

4 0 0 4 0 3

0

0

! 0

18

iHome AVS16

58

$150

3 0 0 4 0 3

0

! 0

19

Harman Kardon Allure

58

$250

3 0 0 4 0 3

! 0

20

Ultimate Ears MEGABLAST

57

$250

3 0 0 3 0 3

! 0

21

Phorus PS10

56

$80

3 0 0 4 0 3

0

! 0

22

55

$130

3 0 0 4 0 3

0

! 0

23

55

$100

3 0 0 4 0 4

0

Pioneer Elite Smart Speaker F4 Amazon Echo (2nd Generation)

HOW WE TEST: Sound Quality measures a speakerโ€™s ability to reproduce music in a realworld environment. Ease of

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

Use measures how difficult it was to set up a speaker and how intuitively it functioned in everyday use. Versatility tallies the useful features of each

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

Optional multiroom sharing

63

Adjustable tone settings

Klipsch The Three

Versatility

6

Ease of use

! 0

Sound quality

Rank

Features

Recommended

Price

0 0

0

0

0 0

0

0

model. Price is most frequent or approximate price in retail. Overall Score is based on the results of all our tests.

121

SM A R T SP E A K ERS

Overall Score

Brand & Model


QUI CK GUIDE

Smartwatches Smartwatches are great for keeping tabs on everything from your daily step count to sports scores and your local weather. Hereโ€™s how to find the right smartwatch for you. What to Look For

What to Skip

Some models focus on sports and fitness, while others focus on having more varied types of apps. Make sure to pick a model thatโ€™s compatible with your smartphone. Some models work with a variety of phones, but Apple Watches only work with iPhones, and Samsung smartwatches work best with that companyโ€™s phones.

BUYING ADVICE

What Youโ€™ll Pay

Not every model is water-resistant. Make sure yours is before jumping in the pool.

If youโ€™re into fitness, go with a sports-focused smartwatch. Some dressier models have limited fitness features.

Expect to pay about $200 for a basic model and up to $650 for a fully featured one. For more buying advice, go to CR.org/smartwatches.

Tested products in performance order. Overall Score

! 0

2

$ 0

3

122

Apple Watch Series 4 (44mm) Aluminum case GPS + Cellular Apple Watch Series 4 (40mm) Stainless Steel case GPS + Cellular Apple Watch Series 4 (44mm) Aluminum case GPS

82

$530

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

82

$700

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

82

$400

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

Readability in bright light Readability in low light Step count accuracy Heart-rate monitor accuracy Water resistance test

Rank

1

Ease of use

Recommended

! 0

Ease of pairing

Test Results

Ease of interaction

Price

Brand & Model


Test Results

80

$300

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

80

$200

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

77

$400

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5

77

$330

5 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

$ 0

5

! 0

6

$ 0

7

Apple Watch Series 3 (38mm) Aluminum case GPS + Cellular Apple Watch Series 3 (38mm) Aluminum case GPS Garmin Vivoactive 3 Music LTE Samsung Galaxy Watch (42mm)

$ 0

8

Fitbit Ionic

76

$250

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

$ 0

Samsung Gear S3 9 Frontier Samsung Galaxy 10 Watch Active Fossil Venture HR 11 Gen 4

75

$300

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

73

$200

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

72

$260

4 0 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 5

12 Garmin Vivoactive 3

72

$270

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5

13 Samsung Gear Sport 71

$280

4 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

71

$850

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5

70

$395

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 1 0 5

70

$600

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

69

$450

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

14 15 16 17

Garmin fenix 5 Plus (47mm) Michael Kors Access Womenโ€™s Sofie HR Garmin fenix 5X Sapphire Garmin Forerunner 645 Music

HOW WE TEST: Ease of Use is a composite score of ease of interaction, pairing, connecting to charger, mobile compatibility, and readability of the display in bright light and low light. Ease of Interaction is the ease of accessing core functions, performing key tasks, such as accessing messages,

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

calendars, alarms, etc.; interacting with the device menu and app interface; taking activity measurements; reading results from the display; and responsiveness of touchscreen or other control interaction methods. Ease of Pairing is an assessment of the steps necessary for pairing the smartwatch with another device for

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

Ease of pairing

4

Ease of interaction

Rank

$ 0

Ease of use

Recommended

Readability in bright light Readability in low light Step count accuracy Heart-rate monitor accuracy Water resistance test

Price

the first time. Heart-Rate Monitor Accuracy measures how accurately the smart watch measured our testersโ€™ actual heart rate. Step Count Accuracy measures how accurately the smartwatch counted our testersโ€™ actual steps. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score is based on the results of all our tests.

123

SM A R T WAT CHE S

Overall Score

Brand & Model


QUI CK GUIDE

Streaming Media Binge-watching TV shows has become an all-American pastime. Streaming devices are an ideal solution for those who donโ€™t have a smart TV, or who want better performance or services not available on their TV. What to Look For 4K With HDR. All the major streaming player brands now offer at least one 4K model that supports high dynamic range (HDR) content. WiFi Protected Setup (WPS) means you donโ€™t have to manually select a network SSID or enter a password. Instead, it involves simply pressing one button on the router and another on the device to be securely connected.

BUYING ADVICE

Dual-Band WiFi. Newer models now support the 802.11ac standard, which has the potential to deliver stronger, faster signals, but only if your wireless router also supports it. Voice control. More models now let you search for and play content using voice commands.

We prefer devices with universal search, which can search across multiple services to find shows, without favoring one service over another.

What Youโ€™ll Pay Basic 1080p models now cost $30 to $40; expect to pay $40 to $80 or more for 4K models that support HDR.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/streamingmedia.

Tested products in performance order.

First time setup

Connectivity

Everyday use

Test Results

Picture quality

Rank

Recommended

Price

Features

Overall Score

Brand & Model

4K STREAMING MEDIA DEVICES

! 0

1

Roku Ultra (2018)

83

$100

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3

! 0

2

Amazon Fire TV Cube

82

$100

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5

$ 0

3

Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K

81

$50

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5

124

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


First time setup

Connectivity

Everyday use

Features

Picture quality

Test Results

Rank

Recommended

Price

4K STREAMING MEDIA DEVICES Continued

! 0

4

Google Chromecast Ultra

80

$70

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4

! 0

5

Apple TV 4K (32GB)

77

$180

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3

$ 0

6

Roku Streaming Stick +

77

$60

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2

$ 0

7

Roku Premiere+ (2018)

76

$50

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3

$ 0

8

Roku Premiere (2018)

72

$40

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2

HD STREAMING MEDIA DEVICES

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

$ 0

4

Google Chromecast (3rd generation) Amazon Fire TV Stick with Alexa Voice Remote

76

$35

5 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4

74

$40

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4

Roku Streaming Stick 2017

72

$40

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2

Roku Express (2017)

69

$30

5 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2

HOW WE TEST: Picture Quality includes image clarity, color accuracy, and contrast of streaming video. Features reflects the presence or absence of features, including

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

how many streaming services it can access. Everyday Use reflects how easy the device is to use on a daily basis. Connectivity reflects the type and amount of connections.

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

First-time Setup reflects how easy it is to set up the device. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score is based on the results of all our tests.

125

S T RE A MING MED I A

Overall Score

Brand & Model


QUI CK GUIDE

Tablets Lightweight and highly portable, tablets are made to be carried wherever you go. Most have 7- to 10-inch screens, but larger models are available as well.

What to Look For

What to Skip

A 10-inch screen for web surfing, video, and gaming; a 7-inch screen for portability; or an 11- or 12-inch screen and detachable keyboard for work (but watch the weight!). Excellent performance if you want to play more than simple games. The same operating system as your other devices if you want to sync across hardware. A rich variety of apps authorized by the OS maker.

A 4G model, unless you need โ€œeverywhere accessโ€ and will pay extra for it.

BUYING ADVICE

Look for a compatible keyboard if youโ€™re planning to do a lot of typing.

What Youโ€™ll Pay At least $250 for a good 10-inch Android tablet with 32 gigabytes of storage and WiFi-only access. An equivalent iPad costs $330. Some smaller Android tablets that we rate Very Good start at less than $200.

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/tablets.

Tested products in performance order. Survey Results

Versatility

Photo and Video

Specific tasks

Convenience

Test Results

Display

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

Performance

Overall Score

Brand & Model

9-INCH SCREEN AND LARGER TABLETS

! 0

1

Apple iPad Pro 11 (4G, 64GB) - 2018

87

$950

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3

! 0

2

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (64GB) - 2018

86

$1,000

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3

! 0

3

Apple iPad Pro 11 (64GB) - 2018

86

$800

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3

126

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Survey Results

Versatility

Photo and Video

Specific tasks

Convenience

Display

Test Results

Performance

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

TA BL E T S

Overall Score

Brand & Model

9-INCH SCREEN AND LARGER TABLETS Continued 4

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (4G, 64GB) - 2018

85

$1,150

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3

5

Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (SM-T830), (64GB)

83

$550

5 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

6

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T820 (32GB)

82

$520

5 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5

! 0

7

Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (SM-T835), (4G, 64GB)

82

$570

5 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4

! 0

8

Apple iPad 9.7 (4G, 32GB) - 2018

81

$400

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3

! 0

9

Apple iPad Air (64GB) - 2019

81

$500

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3

$ 0

Apple iPad 9.7 10 (32GB) - 2018

80

$200

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 3

! 0

Samsung Galaxy 11 Tab S5e (64GB)

79

$400

5 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5

$ 0

Samsung Galaxy 12 Tab A 2019

75

$230

5 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4

! 0

Samsung Galaxy 13 Tab A 2019 (4G)

75

$280

5 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4

$ 0

Samsung Galaxy Tab 14 A 10.1 SM-T580 (16GB)

75

$200

5 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

15 Lenovo Tab P10

73

$280

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4

Google Pixel Slate 16 (Core i5, 128GB)

73

$880

3 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3

Amazon Fire HD 10 17 (32GB)

70

$150

5 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3

Lenovo Tab M10 18 (32GB)

67

$200

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4

Lenovo Tab 4 10 19 (TB-X304F) (16GB)

61

$150

3 0 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3

Acer Iconia One 10 20 B3-A50-K4TY

54

$150

3 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3

21 Walmart Onn

47

$80

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3

! 0 ! 0 ! 0

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

127


Survey Results

Versatility

Photo and Video

Specific tasks

Convenience

Test Results

Display

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

Performance

Overall Score

Brand & Model

8-INCH SCREEN AND SMALLER TABLETS

! 0

1

Apple iPad Mini (64GB) - 2019

82

$400

5 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3

2

Amazon Fire 7 (16GB) - 2019

66

$50

5 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3

3

Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (16GB)

66

$80

5 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3

4

Lenovo Tab 4 8 (TB-8504F) (16GB, 2GB RAM)

66

$130

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4

5

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 7.0 SM-T280 (8GB)

64

$130

5 0 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3

6

Amazon Fire Kids Edition (16GB)

60

$90

5 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 3

HOW WE TEST: Performance rates the speed of actions and visual smoothness when running apps with complex graphics. Display Quality of the screen, including color, viewing angle, brightness and outdoor readability. Convenience rates the ease of using the buttons, keyboard, and touchscreen, or interacting with apps. Specific Tasks is based on the ease of performing a variety of scenarios, including reading books, playing media, and using email and the Web, as well as the quality of produced

128

photos and videos. Photo and Video Quality of the photos taken from the front and rear cameras, and videos taken from the rear (main) camera. Based on evaluations of items such as color accuracy, visual noise, and video sound quality, as viewed on and off the tablet. Features such as autofocus, flash, and available resolution are also taken into account. Versatility is the presence of useful features, such as ports, and quality of the build. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines test results with survey data

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first three years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the tablet they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’


T Vs

QUI CK GUIDE

TVs Most larger-sized sets are now 4K TVs with high dynamic range (HDR) capability. Most are also smart TVs with access to streaming online content.

BUYING ADVICE

dollars are fine, even for 4K. An extended warranty; TVs from major brands have been very reliable. A smart TV if you already own or prefer a streaming media player.

What to Look For A 4K set with decent HDR, which can display greater contrast and a wider range of colors, if you seek the latest tech and want to future-proof your purchase. A 1080p TV only if youโ€™re looking for a smaller screen size, because thereโ€™s no longer a premium to get the higher 4K resolution.

Ask whether the retailer offers a 30-day price-match guarantee, which protects you if the price drops after you buy.

What Youโ€™ll Pay As little as $250 for a 55-inch 4K set; 65-inch 4K models now start as low as $500. But top-performing larger-sized models can still cost $2,000 or even more.

What to Skip Pricey HDMI cables; highspeed cables costing a few

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/tvs.

Tested products in performance order. Survey Results

Versatility

Motion blur

Sound quality

Viewing angle

HDR

Test Results

Ultra HD performance

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

HD picture quality

Overall Score

Brand & Model

60-INCH AND LARGER TVs

! 0

1

Sony XBR-65A9G

90

$3,800

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5

! 0

2

LG OLED65C8PUA 89

$2,500

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5

! 0

3

LG OLED65C9PUA 89

$2,800

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

129


Survey Results

Versatility

Motion blur

Sound quality

Viewing angle

HDR

Test Results

Ultra HD performance

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

HD picture quality

Overall Score

Brand & Model

60-INCH AND LARGER TVs Continued

! 0

4

Sony XBR-65A8G

89

$3,500

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

! 0

5

LG OLED65B8PUA

88

$2,300

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5

! 0

6

LG OLED65E9PUA

88

$3,800

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5

! 0

7

LG OLED65C9AUA

88

$2,750

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5

! 0

8

Samsung QN65Q90R

86

$2,500

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0

9

Sony XBR-65Z9F

86

$3,500

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5

! 0

85

$2,000

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

84

$4,500

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0

Samsung 10 QN65Q80R Samsung 11 QN65Q900R Sony 12 XBR-65X900F

81

$1,500

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0

13 LG 65SM9500PUA 80

$2,695

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5

! 0

14 LG 65SM9000PUA 80

$1,300

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

! 0

80

$1,500

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0

Samsung 15 QN65Q70R Sony 16 XBR-65X950G

80

$1,800

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 5

$ 0

17 LG 65SM8600AUA 78

$1,070

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

! 0

Samsung 18 QN65Q7DR

77

$1,500

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0

19 LG 65SM8600PUA 77

$1,200

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

76

$1,300

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5

75

$1,050

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5

75

$1,080

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5

75

$1,300

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0

! 0

20

! 0

21

! 0

22

! 0

23

130

Samsung QN65Q6DR Samsung UN65RU8000 Samsung UN65RU800D Samsung QN65Q60R

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Survey Results

Versatility

Motion blur

Sound quality

Viewing angle

HDR

Ultra HD performance

Test Results HD picture quality

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

T Vs

Overall Score

Brand & Model

60-INCH AND LARGER TVs Continued 74

$1,300

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

73

$2,200

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5

$ 0

Sony 24 XBR-65X850G Samsung 25 QN75Q6DR Samsung 26 UN65RU7300

73

$750

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5

$ 0

27 LG 65UK6500AUA

72

$600

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4

$ 0

28

72

$600

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4

! 0

29

72

$1,000

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

$ 0

30

72

$700

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5

$ 0

31

Samsung UN65NU6900 Sony XBR-65X800G Samsung UN65RU7100 Samsung UN65RU7200

71

$700

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4

! 0

32 LG 70UM7370PUA

71

$840

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 5

! 0

Samsung 33 UN75RU710D

70

$1,280

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5

$ 0

34 LG 65UM7300PUA 70

$700

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

69

$1,300

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5

36 LG 65UM7300AUE 69

$680

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

Samsung 37 UN65NU6950

69

$600

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4

38 TCL 65R615

69

$730

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 4

39 Vizio PX65-G1

68

$2,000

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

40 LG 60UK6090PUA

68

$550

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

41 LG 75UK6190PUB

67

$1,000

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4

42 TCL 65S517

65

$600

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

43 TCL 75S425

64

$1,000

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

! 0 ! 0

Samsung 35 UN75RU7200

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

131


Survey Results

Versatility

Motion blur

Sound quality

Viewing angle

HDR

Test Results

Ultra HD performance

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

HD picture quality

Overall Score

Brand & Model

60-INCH AND LARGER TVs Continued 44 Vizio P759-G1

64

$2,000

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

45 Vizio P659-G1

63

$1,250

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

46 Vizio P75-F1

63

$1,600

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

47 Vizio M658-G1

60

$900

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

48 Vizio V655-G9

59

$550

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

49 Vizio M657-G0

57

$800

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 4

50 Vizio V705-G3

55

$800

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

51 Philips 65PFL5604

54

$490

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 3

52 Vizio V605-G3

54

$500

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

53 Hisense 65R7E1

53

$550

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 4

54 Hisense 65R6E1

53

$450

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4

NA

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

55- TO 59-INCH TVs

! 0

1

Sony XBR-55A9G

90

$2,800

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5

! 0

2

LG OLED55B9PUA

87

$1,595

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5

! 0

3

LG OLED55C9AUA 87

$1,750

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

! 0

4

LG OLED55B8PUA

87

$1,300

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5

! 0

5

LG OLED55C9PUA 86

$1,800

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

! 0

6

Samsung QN55Q80R

84

$1,600

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0

7

LG 55SM9000PUA

80

$1,100

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

8

Sony XBR-55X900F

79

$1,200

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0 132

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Survey Results

Versatility

Motion blur

Sound quality

Viewing angle

HDR

Ultra HD performance

Test Results HD picture quality

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

T Vs

Overall Score

Brand & Model

55- TO 59-INCH TVs Continued 79

$1,300

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 5

78

$1,200

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0

Sony XBR-55X950G Samsung 10 QN55Q7DR Samsung 11 QN55Q70R

77

$1,200

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0

12 LG 55SM8100AUA

77

$750

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5

! 0

13 LG 55SM8600PUA

76

$850

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

! 0

76

$1,000

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5

! 0

Samsung 14 QN55Q60R Samsung 15 QN55Q6DR

75

$1,000

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5

$ 0

16 LG 55SK8000AUB

75

$600

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 5

! 0

17

75

$750

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5

$ 0

18

74

$550

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5

! 0

19

74

$930

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

! 0

20

73

$800

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

! 0

21

73

$730

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

$ 0

22

73

$550

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5

$ 0

23

72

$500

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5

$ 0

24

72

$500

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4

! 0

25

Samsung UN55RU8000 Samsung UN58RU7100 Sony XBR-55X850G Sony XBR-55X800E Samsung UN55RU800D Samsung UN55RU7300 Samsung UN55RU7100 Samsung UN55RU7200 Skyworth 55XA8000

72

$1,300

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 5 0 3 0 1 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4

$ 0

26 LG 55UM7300PUA

72

$440

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5

$ 0

27 LG 55UK6500AUA

70

$400

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4

$ 0

Samsung 28 UN55NU6900

70

$430

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4

2

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

! 0 ! 0

1

9

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

133


Survey Results

Versatility

Motion blur

Sound quality

Viewing angle

HDR

Test Results

Ultra HD performance

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

HD picture quality

Overall Score

Brand & Model

55- TO 59-INCH TVs Continued

$ 0

29 LG 55UM7300AUE

70

$400

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

$ 0

Samsung 30 UN58RU710D Samsung 31 UN55NU6950

70

$530

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 5

70

$430

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

32 TCL 55R617

69

$530

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 4

33 TCL 55R615

69

$500

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 4

34 TCL 55S517

63

$400

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

35 TCL 55S515

62

$380

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

Sharp 36 LC-55Q7000U Sharp 37 LC-55LBU711U

61

$450

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 4

61

$450

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

38 Vizio M558-G1

60

$700

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

39 Hisense 55H8F

59

$450

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 5

40 Vizio M557-G0

58

$600

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 4

41 Vizio M55-F0

58

$550

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

42 Vizio V555-G1

57

$400

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 4

43 Philips 55PFL5703

57

$350

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 3

44 Vizio V556-G1

56

$430

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 4

Insignia 45 NS-55D510NA19

56

$250

3 0 0 2 0 4

46 Philips 55PFL5604

56

$400

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 3

47 Hitachi 55R80

54

$350

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 5

48 Hisense 55R7E

54

$300

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 4

$ 0

134

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

NA

NA NA

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 3

3 0 0 2 0 2 0 2


Survey Results

Versatility

Motion blur

Sound quality

Viewing angle

HDR

Ultra HD performance

Test Results HD picture quality

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

T Vs

Overall Score

Brand & Model

55- TO 59-INCH TVs Continued 49 Hisense 55R6E

53

$300

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

50 Hitachi 58C61

52

$330

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

Insignia 51 NS-55D420NA20

51

$330

3 0 0 2 0 4

52 Polaroid 55T7U

47

$270

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 3

77

$1,000

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5

77

$1,000

4 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5

75

$800

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 5

75

$1,000

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5

74

$800

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 5

73

$400

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 5

73

$380

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 5

73

$400

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 4

72

$650

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5

NA

1 0 0 2 0 3 0 2

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 2

46- TO 52-INCH TVs Samsung QN49Q70R Sony XBR-49X900F Samsung QN49Q6DR Samsung QN49Q7DR Samsung QN49Q60R Samsung UN50RU7200 Samsung UN50RU710D Samsung UN50RU7100 Samsung UN49RU8000

! 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

! 0

4

! 0

5

$ 0

6

$ 0

7

$ 0

8

! 0

9

! 0

10 LG 49SM8600PUA

72

$650

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5

$ 0

11 LG 50UM7300PUA 71

$360

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 5

$ 0

12 LG 50UM7300AUE

70

$330

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 5

! 0

Sony 13 XBR-49X800G Samsung 14 UN50NU6900 Sony 15 KDL-48W650D

69

$700

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

69

$330

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 4

68

$450

4 0 0 5 0 5

2

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

$ 0 $ 0 1

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 135


Survey Results

Versatility

Motion blur

Sound quality

Viewing angle

HDR

Test Results

Ultra HD performance

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

HD picture quality

Overall Score

Brand & Model

46- TO 52-INCH TVs Continued

$ 0

136

Samsung 16 UN50NU6950

67

$330

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

17 TCL 50S421

63

$280

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

18 TCL 50S423

63

$270

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

Toshiba 19 49LF421U19

62

$280

3 0 0 3 0 4

20 TCL 49S517

62

$320

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 4

Toshiba 21 50LF711U20

61

$380

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

22 TCL 49S515

61

$300

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 4

Insignia 23 NS-50D510NA19 Sharp 24 LC-50LB601U Sharp 25 LC-50LBU711U

61

$280

3 0 0 2 0 4

NA NA

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 2

60

$330

3 0 0 3 0 3

NA NA

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4

59

$400

3 0 0 3 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

26 Hisense 50H8F

59

$380

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 5

27 Vizio M507-G1

57

$470

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

28 Philips 50PFL5604 57

$300

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3

Insignia 29 NS-50DF710NA19

56

$270

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

30 Hisense 50R7E

55

$270

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

31 TCL 49S405

54

$300

3 0 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 5

Magnavox 32 50MV349R Element 33 E4SC5018RKU

48

$270

3 0 0 1 0 3

46

$200

2 0 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 5

34 Hitachi 50C61

45

$250

3 0 0 2 0 2 0 4

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

NA NA

NA NA

NA

4 0 0 3 0 2 0 4

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 2


Survey Results

Versatility

Motion blur

Sound quality

Viewing angle

HDR

Ultra HD performance

Test Results HD picture quality

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

T Vs

Overall Score

Brand & Model

39- TO 43-INCH TVs Sony XBR-43X800G Samsung UN43LS03NA Samsung UN43RU7200 Samsung QN43Q6DR

72

$600

4 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

68

$1,250

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

67

$330

3 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 5

66

$700

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

5

LG 43UK6500AUA

65

$290

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4

$ 0

6

Samsung UN43NU6900

64

$280

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4

$ 0

7

LG 43UM7300PUA

64

$300

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5

! 0

8

Samsung UN43RU7100

64

$330

3 0 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

LG 43LM5700PUA

62

$250

3 0 0 5 0 4

10 TCL 43S517

61

$260

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 4

11 TCL 43S421

61

$220

3 0 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 4

12 LG 43LM5000PUA

60

$210

3 0 0 5 0 4

NA NA

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 2

Toshiba 13 43LF421U19

60

$270

3 0 0 3 0 4

NA NA

2 0 0 3 0 3 0 4

14 TCL 43S425

60

$220

3 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

15 Vizio V405-G9

58

$240

2 0 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 4

16 Vizio V436-G1

57

$300

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

Toshiba 17 43LF621U19 Insignia 18 NS-43D420NA20

57

$250

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

57

$200

3 0 0 2 0 4

19 Vizio V435-G0

57

$280

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4

20 Philips 43PFL5703 57

$230

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 3

! 0

1

! 0

2

$ 0

3

! 0

4

$ 0

9

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

NA

1 0 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4

NA NA

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 2

137


Survey Results

Versatility

Motion blur

Sound quality

Viewing angle

HDR

Test Results

Ultra HD performance

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

HD picture quality

Overall Score

Brand & Model

39- TO 43-INCH TVs Continued 21 Philips 43PFL5604 56

$270

3 0 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4

Insignia 22 NS-43DF710NA19

56

$270

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

23 Vizio D40F-G9

56

$200

2 0 0 3 0 5

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

24 TCL 43S325

54

$200

3 0 0 4 0 3

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

25 TCL 43S405

53

$220

3 0 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 5

Hisense 26 43H4030F

53

$230

2 0 0 3 0 3

27 Hisense 43R7E

53

$220

2 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4

28 RCA RTR4360

51

$200

2 0 0 1 0 4

NA NA

3 0 0 2 0 2 0 4

Insignia 29 NS-39D310NA19

50

$130

3 0 0 2 0 3

NA NA

3 0 0 2 0 2 0 2

30 RCA RTU4300

49

$160

2 0 0 1 0 3 0 3

Magnavox 31 40ME338V

48

$170

3 0 0 1 0 4

32 Hitachi 43C61

47

$200

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 3

Element 33 ELST4316S

47

$200

2 0 0 1 0 4

Westinghouse 34 WG43UX4100

42

$280

2 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 4

Westinghouse 35 WD39HB2108

41

$180

2 0 0 1 0 4

NA NA

NA NA

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

NA

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 3

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 2

NA

2 0 0 1 0 3 0 2

NA NA

4 0 0 2 0 2 0 3

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 3

32-INCH TVs

! 0

1

Samsung UN32N5300

65

$250

3 0 0 5 0 4

NA

! 0

2

LG 32LM620BPUA

62

$200

3 0 0 5 0 4

NA NA

! 0

3

LG 32LM570BPUA

62

$170

3 0 0 5 0 4

NA

138

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

2 0 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4 4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

1 0 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4


Survey Results

Versatility

Motion blur

Sound quality

Viewing angle

HDR

Ultra HD performance

Test Results HD picture quality

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

T Vs

Overall Score

Brand & Model

32-INCH TVs Continued 4

Samsung UN32J4000

62

$170

3 0 0 5 0 4

NA NA

4 0 0 2 0 2 0 2

! 0

5

Samsung UN32M4500

61

$180

3 0 0 5 0 5

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 2 0 4

$ 0

6

Toshiba 32LF221U19

60

$140

3 0 0 3 0 4

NA NA

2 0 0 3 0 3 0 4

$ 0

7

LG 32LM500BPUA

59

$130

3 0 0 5 0 4

NA NA

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 2

8

Sanyo FW32R19F

56

$130

3 0 0 3 0 3

NA NA

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

9

Insignia NS-32DF310NA19

56

$170

3 0 0 2 0 4

NA NA

2 0 0 3 0 3 0 4

10 TCL 32S327

54

$150

3 0 0 4 0 3

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

11 Hisense 32H5590F

54

$130

2 0 0 3 0 4

NA NA

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

12 Vizio D32h-F1

53

$140

2 0 0 3 0 4

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 1 0 4

Toshiba 13 32L310U20

52

$130

3 0 0 3 0 4

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2

14 Vizio D32h-G9

52

$140

2 0 0 3 0 4

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

Insignia 15 NS-32D220NA20

51

$100

3 0 0 2 0 4

NA NA

2 0 0 3 0 3 0 2

16 Philips 32PFL4664

50

$130

3 0 0 2 0 3

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 2 0 4

17 JVC LT32MAW388

49

$130

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 3

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 2 0 4

18 Hisense 32H4030F 47

$130

2 0 0 3 0 3

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

Element 19 ELEFW328C

$100

2 0 0 1 0 3

NA NA

2 0 0 1 0 2 0 2

! 0

35

29-INCH AND SMALLER TVs

$ 0

1

LG 28LM400B-PU

61

$115

3 0 0 5 0 4

NA NA

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 2

! 0

2

LG 24LM520S-WU

58

$150

3 0 0 5 0 4

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

139


Survey Results

Versatility

Motion blur

Sound quality

Viewing angle

HDR

Test Results

Ultra HD performance

Predicted reliability Owner satisfaction

Rank

Recommended

Price

HD picture quality

Overall Score

Brand & Model

29-INCH AND SMALLER TVs Continued

$ 0

3

LG 24LF454B

57

$100

3 0 0 5 0 4

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 1

$ 0

4

Insignia NS-24D310NA19

57

$90

3 0 0 2 0 4

NA NA

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 2

5

Vizio D24h-G9

50

$120

2 0 0 3 0 4

NA NA

2 0 0 2 0 3 0 4

6

Onn ONA24HB19E02

49

$90

โˆ’ โˆ’ 0 4

NA NA

2 0 0 1 0 3 0 2

HOW WE TEST: HD Picture Quality assesses detail, color accuracy, and contrast using signals from special test patterns, a Blu-ray player, a cable box, or other high-quality video playback device. All signals are routed through an HDMI input. Ultra HD Performance, which includes HDR performance, evaluates a modelโ€™s ability to deliver the best UHD experience from various 4K sources. Viewing Angle evaluates picture quality for clarity and color accuracy at various horizontal and vertical viewing angles.

140

Sound Quality is measured from the setโ€™s built-in speakers using test equipment, with additional subjective testing by a listening panel. Motion Blur evaluates how well the display can present a blurfree image during motion scenes. Versatility indicates features that increase a TVโ€™s utilities or capabilities. These include access to the internet, UHD capabilites, number of HDMI and USB inputs, and other useful features. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score combines test results with survey data

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

for predicted reliability and owner satisfaction. Predicted reliability estimates the likelihood that newly purchased models from a given brand will develop problems or break within the first five years. Owner satisfaction reflects the proportion of CR members who are extremely likely to recommend the TV they bought. In cases where we have insufficient survey data to provide a brand-level rating, indicated by a gray dash ( ), we assume the model has average reliability and satisfaction.

โˆ’


W IREL E S S SP E A K ER S

QUI CK GUIDE

Wireless Speakers Wireless speakers use Bluetooth and WiFi connectivity to let you stream your favorite tunes without a collection of separate components or a tangle of cables.

What to Look For A home model, which usually requires AC power and often connects to your home network via a robust WiFi connection, can usually fill a decent-size room with sound without distorting. A portable mode with a rechargeable battery and Bluetooth pairing to your smartphone, ideal for streaming music while youโ€™re on the go. A weatherproof portable model is great for outdoor

BUYING ADVICE

use, and can travel from the deck to the beach. Sound quality separates top speakers from lesser models; thatโ€™s why our testers weigh it most heavily in our ratings. A USB port will let you charge a phone or tablet.

If you buy online, check the return policy so that you can exchange it if youโ€™re not happy with the sound quality.

What to Skip Portable models with limited battery life that will restrict their use.

What Youโ€™ll Pay

For more buying advice, go to CR.org/wirelessspeakers.

Prices range from less than $100 to more than $400.

Tested products in performance order. Features Adjustable tone settings Optional multi-room sharing Updatable software/firmware

Versatility

Test Results

Sound quality

Rank

Recommended

Price

Ease of use

Overall Score

Brand & Model

HOME

$ 0

1

74

Edifier S1000DB

$350

5 0 0 4 0 3

0

NA 0

0

0

0

! 0

2

Denon Heos 7 HS2

74

$400

4 0 0 4 0 5

0

! 0

3

Sonos Play:5 (2015)

73

$500

4 0 0 3 0 4

0

$ 0

4

Edifier R2000DB

73

$250

4 0 0 4 0 3

0

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

141


Features Adjustable tone settings Optional multi-room sharing Updatable software/firmware

Versatility

Test Results

Sound quality

Rank

Recommended

Price

Ease of use

Overall Score

Brand & Model

HOME Continued

! 0

5

Devialet New Phantom 71

$1,690

4 0 0 4 0 4

! 0

6

Denon HEOS 5 HS2

69

$400

4 0 0 3 0 4

! 0

7

Wren Sound V5US

64

$400

$ 0

8

Sonos Play:1

63

! 0

9

Master & Dynamic MA770

$ 0

10

! 0 $ 0 $ 0

0

0

0

0

0

4 0 0 4 0 4

0

0

0

$150

4 0 0 4 0 3

0

0

0

62

$1,800

4 0 0 4 0 4

0

0

Paradigm PW 600

61

$270

4 0 0 3 0 4

0

0

11

MartinLogan Crescendo X

61

$1,000

4 0 0 3 0 5

0

0

0

12

Fluance Fi50

61

$200

4 0 0 4 0 3

0

NA

13

Edifier E30 Spinnaker Bluetooth Speaker System

61

$250

4 0 0 3 0 3

14

Como Audio Solo

60

$300

3 0 0 5 0 5

15

Denon HEOS 1 HS2

60

$180

16

Bluesound Pulse Mini

60

17

Bose SoundTouch 20 Series III WiFi

18

NA

0

0

0

0

3 0 0 4 0 4

0

0

0

$500

3 0 0 4 0 4

0

0

0

60

$350

3 0 0 4 0 4

0

0

Naim Mu-So QB

60

$800

3 0 0 3 0 4

0

0

Klipsch Heritage Wireless The Three House of Marley One Foundation

60

$500

3 0 0 3 0 4

0

0

59

$785

3 0 0 3 0 5

0

0

21

Sony SRS-ZR7

58

$300

3 0 0 3 0 5

0

0

0

22

Marshall Stanmore

58

$250

3 0 0 5 0 3

0

23

Edifier Luna (e25)

58

$200

4 0 0 3 0 3

24

Audioengine HD3

56

$350

3 0 0 3 0 3

NA

25

Definitive Technology W7

54

$100

3 0 0 3 0 4

0

19 20

142

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

0


Features Adjustable tone settings Optional multi-room sharing Updatable software/firmware

Versatility

Ease of use

Test Results

Sound quality

Rank

Recommended

Price

HOME Continued 26

Bose SoundTouch 10

54

$200

3 0 0 4 0 4

27

Tivoli Audio Sphera

45

$250

28

Audioengine B2

45

JLab Audio Block Party Monster SuperStar Monster Blaster

0

0

0

3 0 0 3 0 4

0

0

$200

3 0 0 3 0 3

NA

60

$150

3 0 0 4 0 4

0

60

$220

3 0 0 4 0 4

0 0

PORTABLE

$ 0

1

! 0

2

! 0

3

Marshall Kilburn

60

$200

3 0 0 5 0 3

! 0

4

JBL Boombox

60

$450

3 0 0 4 0 3

$ 0

5

Creative iRoar Go

60

$130

3 0 0 4 0 4

$ 0

6

JBL Pulse 3

60

$200

3 0 0 5 0 3

Bose SoundLink Color II Harman Kardon Onyx Studio 5

60

$130

3 0 0 4 0 3

59

$155

3 0 0 4 0 3

Ion Tailgater Sport

59

$100

3 0 0 5 0 4

$220

3 0 0 4 0 3

$ 0

7

$ 0

8

$ 0

9

0

NA NA

0

0 0

NA

0 0

NA

0

! 0

10

JBL Xtreme 2

59

! 0

11

Sony SRS-XB41

58

$150

3 0 0 4 0 4

0

$ 0

12

Marshall Stockwell

58

$150

3 0 0 5 0 4

0

! 0

13

Harman Kardon Onyx Studio 4

58

$180

3 0 0 4 0 3

NA

0

$ 0

14

JBL Charge 4

58

$150

3 0 0 4 0 3

NA

0

$ 0

15

Sony SRS-XB31

58

$150

3 0 0 4 0 4

0

$ 0

16

57

$110

3 0 0 3 0 4

0

! 0

17

57

$300

3 0 0 4 0 3

0

! 0

18

Creative Sound Blaster Roar Pro Bose Soundlink Revolve+ Bose Soundlink Revolve

57

$200

3 0 0 4 0 3

0

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

0 0

NA

0

143

W IREL E S S SP E A K ER S

Overall Score

Brand & Model


Features Adjustable tone settings Optional multi-room sharing Updatable software/firmware

Versatility

Test Results

Sound quality

Rank

Recommended

Price

Ease of use

Overall Score

Brand & Model

PORTABLE Continued

$ 0

19

JBL by Harman Flip 4

57

$100

3 0 0 4 0 3

! 0

20

JBL Control X Wireless

56

$400

3 0 0 4 0 3

$ 0

21

Ultimate Ears Megaboom

56

$110

3 0 0 3 0 4

0

NA

0

! 0

22

Libratone Zipp

56

$300

3 0 0 3 0 4

0

0

0

! 0

23

Kicker Bullfrog Jump

56

$330

3 0 0 4 0 4

0

NA

! 0

24

Ultimate Ears Megaboom 3

55

$170

3 0 0 3 0 3

0

$ 0

25

KEF Muo

53

$150

3 0 0 4 0 3

26

Vizio Crave 360 (SP50-D5)

53

$140

3 0 0 2 0 4

27

JBL Xtreme

52

$180

28

Edifier MP700

52

29

Ultimate Ears Boom 3

30

JBL Charge 3

! 0

NA

0

NA 0

0

0

3 0 0 3 0 3

NA

0

$100

3 0 0 3 0 3

NA

51

$150

3 0 0 3 0 3

51

$100

3 0 0 3 0 3

0

NA

0

NA

31

Kicker Bullfrog BF100

48

$125

3 0 0 4 0 4

32

Beats by Dr. Dre Pill+

48

$130

3 0 0 4 0 3

0

33

Bose Soundlink Micro

47

$100

3 0 0 4 0 3

0

34

Altec Lansing Super LifeJacket

46

$150

3 0 0 3 0 4

0

35

Libratone ONE Click

46

$200

3 0 0 3 0 4

0

36

Fugoo Style XL

45

$170

3 0 0 3 0 3

0

37

Bowers & Wilkins T7

43

$350

3 0 0 3 0 3

0

HOW WE TEST: Sound Quality measures tonal accuracy and ability to reproduce fine sonic

144

0

detail. Ease of Use refers to setup and use of controls. Versatility is based on useful

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

0

NA

0

0

features. Price is approximate retail. Overall Score is based on the results of all our tests.


168 Rating the 2020 Models

183 Used Cars: The Most Reliable Models & the Ones to Avoid

192 Detailed Used-Car Reliability 212 Tire Ratings

Autos

146 Highs and Lows of the 2020 Models

BUYING GUIDE 2019 CONSUMER REPORTS

145


The Highs and Lows of the 2020 Models THIS OVERVIEW OF the highs and lows of all the major 2020 models can start you on your search for a new car, minivan, SUV, or pickup truck. Each listing includes the positive and negative attributes for the model. A majority of the highs and lows are based on our experiences with tested vehicles, and the findings are applicable to the 2020 modelyear vehicles. In some cases, there are models that we havenโ€™t put through our formal testing. But we spent time with them by renting a version from the manufacturer and evaluating it at our Auto Test Center. After reading the overviews, turn to our vehicle ratings (starting on page 168) to see how individual models

146

rank according to their Overall Score, which accounts for a vehicleโ€™s performance in our road tests, results from our reliability and owner satisfaction surveys, the availability of a frontal crash-prevention systemโ€” forward-collision warning (FCW) and automatic emergency braking (AEB), pedestrian detectionโ€”and, if applicable, safety tests done by the government and outside agencies. The ratings include Consumer Reportsโ€™ predicted reliability rating, an indication of how problematic we expect a model is likely to be. Itโ€™s based on our latest Annual Auto Survey, where we asked owners about any serious problems they had with their vehicles in the previous 12 months. Turn to page 192 for more information on reliability.

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Highs

Lows

Acura ILX Premium

Standard safety features

Stiff ride, loud cabin, access, controls, overpriced for what you get

Acura MDX Tech

Fit and finish, easy third-row access, rear seat, headlights

Reliability, controls, transmission, agility, suspension noise, rear visibility

Acura RDX Tech

Handling, acceleration, stopping distances, front-seat comfort, fit and finish

Reliability, controls, gear selector, engine noise, brake pedal feel

Acura RLX Tech

Spacious and plush interior, seat comfort, braking

Ride, agility, complicated controls, suspension noise

Acura TLX 2.4L

Powertrain, braking

Annoying audio controls, lacks panache

Acura TLX SH-AWD

Acceleration, braking

Transmission; annoying controls, including gear selector; lacks panache

Alfa Romeo Stelvio Ti

Handling, style, character

Controls, visibility, tight rear seat, limited seat adjustments, touchy brake pedal

Alfa Romeo Giulia Ti (AWD)

Agility, steering, character

Reliability, controls, rear seat, limited driverโ€™s seat adjustments

Audi A3 Premium

Handling, feels solid, braking

Rear seat, some controls, headlights

Audi A4 Premium Plus

Ride, handling, quietness, transmission, fit and finish, front-seat comfort

Controls, including gear selector, take getting used to; tight rear seat

Audi A6

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Audi A8 3.0T

Ride, quietness, transmission, interior room, seat comfort, fit and finish

Controls require a learning curve, scant in-cabin storage

Audi E-Tron Premium Plus

Ride, acceleration, fit and finish, no tailpipe emissions, quietness, low running costs

Long charging times, limited range

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

147

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Make & Model


Make & Model

Highs

Lows

Audi Q3

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Audi Q5 Premium Plus

Ride, quietness, seat comfort

Gear selector, controls require a learning curve

Audi Q7 Premium Plus

Powertrain, quietness, handling, braking, high-tech features, luxury interior, towing capacity

Controls and gear selector take getting used to, rear visibility

Audi TT 2.0T

Agility, braking, front-seat comfort, fit and finish, hatchback versatility, high-tech features

Controls take getting used to, ride, access, tiny rear seat

BMW 330i xDrive

Handling, acceleration, braking, transmission, fuel economy, front-seat comfort, fit and finish

Controls, overzealous lane keeping assist

BMW 530i xDrive

Ride, quietness, transmission, seat comfort, fit and finish

Reliability, gear selector

BMW 750i xDrive

Ride, quietness, powertrain, seat comfort, room, fit and finish

Narrow trunk; controls, including gear selector

BMW i3 Giga Rex

Agility, ability to extend EV range with small gas engine

Short range, seats only four, rearseat access, cargo space, stingy instrumentation, gear selector

BMW M240i

Acceleration, handling, braking, front-seat comfort, quietness, reliability

Rear-seat room, some controls

BMW X1 xDrive28i

Fuel economy, transmission, braking

Reliability, road noise, narrow front seats, stiff ride, blind spot warning unavailable

BMW X2 xDrive28i

Handling, responsive engine and transmission, fit and finish, front-seat comfort

Reliability, visibility, ride, road noise, blind spot warning unavailable

BMW X3 xDrive30i

Handling, braking, transmission, quietness, front-seat comfort, fit and finish

Unintuitive gear selector

BMW X4

Handling, braking, transmission, front-seat comfort

Coupelike profile sacrifices utility

BMW X5 xDrive40i

Ride, quietness, acceleration, transmission, braking, seat comfort, fit and finish

Controls require a steep learning curve

148

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Highs

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Make & Model

Lows

BMW X6

Handling, luxurious interior

Stiff ride, coupelike profile sacrifices utility, visibility

BMW X7 xDrive40i

Ride, quietness, acceleration, transmission, seat comfort, fit and finish

Controls require a steep learning curve

BMW Z4 sDrive30i

Handling, braking, acceleration, seat comfort, fit and finish, quick top operation

Ride, top-up visibility, controls, overzealous lane keeping assist

Buick Enclave Premium

Ride, braking, quietness, interior room, powertrain, infotainment system

Reliability, confusing gear selector, fuel economy, cheap manual sunroof shade, no standard AEB

Buick Encore Preferred II

Ride, quietness, braking, maneuverability

Acceleration, driving position, narrow cabin, rear visibility, no standard AEB

Buick Envision Premium

Simple controls, easy access

Lacks agility, unsettled ride, low dash vents

Buick Regal Essence (2.0T, AWD)

Ride, powertrain, braking, controls, front-seat comfort, hatchback versatility

Interior ambience

Cadillac CT4

Havenโ€™t evaluated new model yet

Cadillac CT5

Havenโ€™t evaluated new model yet

Cadillac CT6 Luxury (3.6, AWD)

Agility, ride, braking, quietness, seat comfort, interior room, fit and finish

Reliability, controls, low dash vents, scant in-cabin storage

Cadillac Escalade Premium

Quietness, fit and finish, frontseat comfort, towing capacity, headlights

Reliability, stiff ride, handling, braking, fuel economy, unintuitive infotainment system, tiny thirdrow seat, no standard AEB

Cadillac XT4 Premium Luxury

Handling, transmission, braking, fit and finish, front-seat comfort

Engine noise, ride

Cadillac XT5 Luxury

Plush interior, seat comfort, quietness

Reliability, stiff ride, unintuitive gear selector, visibility

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

149


Make & Model

Highs

Lows

Cadillac XT6 Premium Luxury

Ride, quietness, transmission

Fuel economy, missing luxury features

Chevrolet Blazer Leather (V6)

Acceleration, braking, transmission, quietness, controls

Visibility, low dash vents

Chevrolet Bolt Premier

Long range for an electric car, acceleration, agility, quietness

Charging times, brake pedal feel, ride, seat comfort, gear selector

Chevrolet Camaro 2SS (V8)

Acceleration, handling, braking, styling

Reliability, visibility, tight interior, low dash vents, no AEB offered

Chevrolet Colorado LT (diesel)

Maneuverability, towing and payload capacities, fuel economy, damped tailgate

Reliability, ride, uncomfortable seats and driving position, no AEB offered

Chevrolet Colorado LT (V6)

Maneuverability, towing and payload capacities, damped tailgate

Reliability, ride, uncomfortable seats and driving position, no AEB offered

Chevrolet Corvette

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Chevrolet Equinox LT (1.5T)

Interior room, ride, quietness, controls, infotainment system

So-so acceleration, interior fit and finish

Chevrolet Impala Premier (V6)

Ride, handling, braking, quietness, spacious cabin and trunk

Rear visibility

Chevrolet Malibu 1LT (1.5T)

Ride, quietness, controls

Reliability, raspy 1.5-liter turbo, front-seat comfort, so-so visibility

Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid

Fuel economy, ride, quietness, controls

Reliability, front-seat comfort, so-so visibility

Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LT (5.3L V8)

Interior room, deep bed, quietness

Ride, step-in height

Chevrolet Sonic LT (1.8L)

Braking, trunk, quick and quiet for class

Darty steering, narrow driving position, seat comfort, no AEB offered

150

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Highs

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Make & Model

Lows

Chevrolet Spark 1LT

Easy to park, braking, fuel economy

Acceleration, ride, noise, seat comfort, driving position

Chevrolet Suburban Premier

Utility, quietness, fit and finish, easy-to-use infotainment system, cargo and towing capacities

Step-in height, maneuverability, feels underpowered, fuel economy

Chevrolet Tahoe LT

Quietness, fit and finish, easy-touse infotainment system, cargo and towing capacities

Handling, stiff ride, feels underpowered, step-in height, fuel economy

Chevrolet Traverse Premier (V6)

Ride, roominess, braking, quietness, controls, access

Reliability, advanced safety features only on pricier trims, cheap manual sunroof shade

Chevrolet Trax LT

Easy to park, decent room within a small footprint

Reliability, acceleration, ride, engine noise, rear visibility, front seats, fussy touch-screen radio, no AEB offered

Chrysler 300 C (V8)

Acceleration, transmission, ride, quietness, seat comfort, fit and finish

Reliability

Chrysler 300 Limited (V6)

Acceleration, transmission, ride, quietness, seat comfort, fit and finish

Reliability

Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid Platinum

Interior space, ride, quietness, Uconnect infotainment system, access, fuel economy

Reliability, Hybrid loses Stow โ€˜n Go seating/cargo flexibility

Chrysler Pacifica Touring L

Interior space and flexibility, ride, quietness, Uconnect infotainment system, access

Reliability, coarse-sounding engine

Dodge Challenger R/T Plus (V8)

Braking, exhaust sound, infotainment system, habitable rear seat, brawn

Ride, noise, visibility, no AEB offered

Dodge Charger R/T Plus (V8)

V8 sound and power, transmission, easy-to-use infotainment system

Visibility, access, reliability

Dodge Charger SXT (V6)

Transmission, quietness, ride, interior room, feature content

Visibility, access, reliability

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

151


Make & Model

Highs

Lows

Dodge Durango GT (V6)

Ride, quietness, transmission, interior space, access, front-seat comfort, usable third-row seat, towing capacity

Reliability, rear visibility, maneuverability, fuel economy

Dodge Grand Caravan SXT

Ride, quietness, foldaway secondrow seats, cargo flexibility

Poor IIHS small-overlap crashtest results, fuel economy, cornering limits, unrefined transmission, radio controls

Fiat 124 Spider Lusso

Agility, manual shifter, fuel economy, easy manual top

Ride, noise, tight quarters, access, cumbersome infotainment system, no AEB offered

Fiat 500L

Roomy interior, handy size, access

Reliability, poor IIHS small-overlap crash-test results, stiff ride, touchy brake pedal, front seats, driving position, no AEB offered

Fiat 500X Easy

Maneuverability, upscale features

Reliability, ride, transmission, noise, idle vibration, touchy brake pedal, visibility, front-seat comfort

Ford EcoSport SES (2.0L)

Handling agility, easy controls, access

Ride, noise, acceleration, cargo space, transmission, no AEB offered

Ford Edge SEL (2.0 EcoBoost)

Quietness, handling, braking, interior room

Driving position

Ford Escape

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Ford Expedition MAX Limited

Quietness, acceleration, controls, interior room

Ford Explorer

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Ford F-150 XLT (2.7 V6 EcoBoost)

Quiet cabin, acceleration, towing and payload capacities, lots of clever features

152

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

Ride, handling, fuel economy

Jittery ride, lackluster handling, braking


Highs

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Make & Model

Lows

Ford Fusion Hybrid SE

Fuel economy, agility, ride, quietness, fun to drive, powertrain

Reliability, visibility, touchy brakes, rear seat, small trunk opening

Ford Fusion SE (1.5T)

Agility, ride, quietness, fun to drive, braking

Reliability, visibility, rear seat, small trunk opening

Ford Fusion Titanium (2.0T)

Agility, ride, quietness, fun to drive, braking

Reliability, visibility, rear seat, small trunk opening

Ford Mustang GT Premium (V8)

Handling, acceleration, braking, interior details, exhaust sound

Reliability, fuel economy, rear seat, ride

Ford Mustang Premium (2.3 EcoBoost)

Handling, braking, interior details

Reliability, rear seat, noise, raspy engine sound

Ford Ranger XLT

Relatively fuel efficient, maneuverable size

Ride, controls, high step-in

Genesis G70 Elite (2.0T, AWD)

Handling, controls, fit and finish

Tight quarters, gear selector, stopping distance

Genesis G80 3.8 (AWD)

Ride, braking, quietness, slick powertrain, fit and finish

Gear selector

Genesis G90 Premium (3.3T, AWD)

Powertrain, ride, quietness, interior room

Fuel economy, unintuitive gear selector, low dash vents

GMC Acadia Denali

Quietness, ride, rear-seat room, controls, easy-to-use infotainment system

Reliability, fuel economy, missing some common features

GMC Canyon SLE (diesel)

Maneuverability, towing and payload capacities, fuel economy, damped tailgate

Reliability, ride, uncomfortable seats and driving position, no AEB offered

GMC Canyon SLE (V6)

Maneuverability, towing and payload capacities, damped tailgate

Reliability, ride, uncomfortable seats and driving position, no AEB offered

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

153


Make & Model

Highs

Lows

GMC Sierra 1500 SLE (5.3L V8)

Interior room, deep bed, quietness

Ride, step-in height

GMC Terrain SLE (2.0T)

Acceleration, braking

Loud cabin, stiff ride, agility, visibility, fit and finish, unintuitive gear selector

GMC Yukon SLT

Quietness, fit and finish, easy-touse infotainment system, cargo and towing capacities

Handling, stiff ride, feels underpowered, step-in height, fuel economy

GMC Yukon XL SLT

Utility, quietness, fit and finish, easy-to-use infotainment system, cargo and towing capacities

Handling, stiff ride, step-in height, maneuverability, feels underpowered, fuel economy

Honda Accord EX (1.5T)

Ride, handling, fuel economy, controls

Low stance hurts access

Honda Accord Hybrid EX

Fuel economy, ride, trunk space

Low stance hurts access, unintuitive gear selector

Honda Civic EX-T

Fuel economy, ride, handling, interior storage

Awkward access, front-seat comfort, complicated infotainment for EX and higher trims

Honda Civic LX

Fuel economy, ride, handling, interior storage

Awkward access, front-seat comfort

Honda Civic Si

Handling, braking, fuel economy, value

Ride, controls, access

Honda Clarity Plug-in Hybrid

Acts as an EV for short distances, ride, interior room

Reliability, clumsy handling, front-seat comfort, confusing controls, small gas tank for long trips

Honda CR-V EX (1.5T)

Fuel economy, roomy interior, access

Cumbersome infotainment system on EX and higher trims

Honda Fit EX

Fuel economy, interior room, versatility, handling, access, reliability

Ride, noise, confusing uplevel audio system

Honda HR-V LX

Fuel economy, roomy interior, storage, secure handling

Ride, noise, acceleration, frontseat comfort, rear door handles

154

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Highs

Lows

Honda Insight EX

Fuel economy, ride

Gear selector, controls, front-seat comfort, low stance hurts access

Honda Odyssey EX-L

Ride, quietness, interior room and flexibility, kid-friendly tech

Reliability, unintuitive gear selector

Honda Passport EX-L

Acceleration, interior room, quietness, standard advanced safety features

Gear selector, ride

Honda Pilot EX-L

Roomy interior, visibility, access, smooth powertrain

Clumsy handling, controls, 9-speed automatic with push-button gear selector on high-end versions

Honda Ridgeline RTL

Ride, quietness, clever in-bed storage and dual-mode tailgate, fuel economy

Complex optional radio, low towing capacity, rear access, shallow bed

Hyundai Accent SEL

Controls, fuel economy, braking

Stiff ride, loud cabin, seat comfort, interior room

Hyundai Elantra GT (2.0L)

Handling, braking, transmission, controls, hatchback versatility

Ride, noise

Hyundai Elantra SEL

Relatively roomy, easy controls, fuel economy, long warranty

Engine noise, ride, front-seat comfort

Hyundai Ioniq SEL

Fuel economy, controls, cargo versatility, long warranty

Braking, agility, hesitation off the line

Hyundai Kona EV Limited

Long range for an electric car, acceleration, agility, low running costs, no emissions

Charging times, gear selector

Hyundai Kona SEL (2.0L)

Agility, braking, controls, fuel economy

Ride, noise, acceleration

Hyundai Palisade SEL

Powertrain, interior room, access

Agility, gear selector

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

155

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Make & Model


Make & Model

Highs

Lows

Hyundai Santa Fe Limited (2.0T)

Handling, controls, rear-seat room

Hyundai Sonata

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Hyundai Tucson SE (2.0L)

Room, agility, braking, long warranty

Reliability, acceleration, engine noise

Hyundai Tucson SEL (2.4L)

Controls, braking

Reliability, humdrum interior, fuel economy for class

Hyundai Veloster Turbo R-spec

Handling, braking, manual shifter, controls

Ride, noise, visibility

Hyundai Venue

Havenโ€™t evaluated new model yet

Infiniti Q50 3.0t Luxe (AWD)

Acceleration, agility, braking, visibility

Cumbersome infotainment system, small trunk

Infiniti Q70 Luxe

Acceleration, transmission, agility, braking, fit and finish

Busy dashboard, ride and quietness not up to par for class

Infiniti QX30 Essential

Fit and finish, handling, braking

Stiff ride, road noise, cramped interior, visibility, uneven power delivery, some controls

Infiniti QX50 Essential

Quietness, fit and finish, braking

Confusing controls, short on agility

Infiniti QX60 Pure

Plush interior, roomy cabin, quietness, fit and finish, access, front-seat comfort, controls

Agility, rear visibility, fuel economy

Infiniti QX80 Luxe

Powertrain, quietness, rear seat, fit and finish, cargo capacity, towing, off-road, standard AEB

Handling, fuel economy, access, NHTSA crash-test results

Jaguar E-Pace S

Handling, fit and finish, standard advanced safety equipment

Reliability, uneven power delivery, ride, visibility, controls

156

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

Uneven power delivery with turbo engine


Highs

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Make & Model

Lows

Jaguar F-Pace Prestige

Agility, acceleration, braking, transmission, rear seat

Reliability, ride, noise, rear visibility, so-so infotainment system, wimpy A/C

Jaguar I-Pace HSE

Acceleration, handling, quietness, fit and finish, low running costs, no emissions

Controls, long charging times, limited range, brake pedal feel

Jaguar XE Premium (25t AWD)

Handling agility, steering

Tight quarters, seat comfort, controls, interior short on luxury grade

Jaguar XF Prestige (V6, AWD)

Ride, agility, acceleration, braking, transmission, front-seat comfort

Controls, expensive to get advanced safety features, weak A/C

Jaguar XJL Portfolio

Acceleration, transmission, handling, ride, quietness, seat comfort, fit and finish

Fuel economy, trunk, some controls, access, rear visibility, unintuitive shifter

Jeep Cherokee Limited (2.0T)

Interior room, controls, braking

Sluggish off the line, uncooperative transmission, ride, agility, engine noise

Jeep Compass Latitude

Controls, access

Reliability, feels underpowered, touchy brake pedal, lacks agility, ride, engine noise, rear seat

Jeep Gladiator Sport

Powertrain, towing capacity, character

Handling, wind noise, ride

Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited (V6)

Quietness, ride, off-road and towing capabilities, seat comfort, fit and finish, easy-to-use Uconnect system

Fuel economy

Jeep Renegade Latitude

Styling, upscale features

Reliability, ride, transmission, visibility, front-seat comfort, grabby brakes, idle vibration

Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sahara

Off-road ability, strong powertrain with the V6 engine

Stiff ride, lots of wind noise, awkward access, fuel economy

Kia Cadenza Premium

Acceleration, smooth powertrain, quietness, braking, interior room, controls

Reliability, lacks agility

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

157


Make & Model

Highs

Lows

Kia Forte LXS

Controls, fuel economy

Ride, noise, seat comfort, fit and finish

Kia Niro EV

Robust range for an EV, quick acceleration, cargo versatility, no tailpipe emissions

Limited range, long charging times, limited availability

Kia Niro EX

Fuel economy, cargo versatility, easy controls

Braking, agility, hesitation off the line, front-seat comfort, ride

Kia Optima LX (2.4L)

Roomy interior, seat comfort, controls, braking

Low dash vents

Kia Rio S

Controls, fuel economy

Stiff ride, loud cabin, seat comfort, interior room

Kia Sedona EX

Powertrain, second-row comfort, fit and finish, reliability

Clumsy handling, stiff ride, lacks expected minivan flexibility

Kia Sorento EX (V6)

Smooth V6 powertrain, intuitive controls, ride, quietness, has a third-row seat

Tight third-row seat

Kia Soul EX

Braking, controls, access, passenger space

Ride, loud engine

Kia Sportage LX (2.4L)

Handling, powertrain, room, easy controls

Rear visibility

Kia Stinger Premium (2.0T, AWD)

Handling, front-seat comfort, hatchback versatility

Ride, tight rear seat, difficult access, visibility

Kia Telluride EX

Ride, quietness, braking, interior room, controls, well-equipped for price

Agility

Land Rover Defender

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

158

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Highs

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Make & Model

Lows

Land Rover Discovery Sport HSE

Access, rear seat, some off-road ability

Transmission, uneven power delivery, ride, handling, controls, rear visibility

Land Rover Discovery HSE

Acceleration, ride, quietness, front-seat comfort, fit and finish

Agility, fuel economy, controls, low rear seat, third-row access

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SE

Fit and finish, front-seat comfort, agility, braking

Ride, controls, visibility, brand reliability, hesitation when accelerating from a stop

Land Rover Range Rover Sport HSE (3.0L)

Handling, acceleration, fit and finish, towing and off-road capabilities

Stiff ride, controls, fussy shifter, fuel economy

Land Rover Range Rover Velar S

Handling, fit and finish, standard automatic emergency braking

Stiff ride, distracting controls, visibility, fuel economy

Land Rover Range Rover HSE (3.0L)

Ride, quietness, acceleration, interior room, fit and finish, visibility, seat comfort, off-road and towing capabilities

Agility, fuel economy, controls

Lexus ES 350

Ride, quietness, front-seat comfort, fit and finish

Controls, rear seat

Lexus GS 350

Quietness, ride, powertrain, front-seat comfort, fit and finish, visibility, reliability

Fussy controls

Lexus GX 460

Powertrain, quietness, ride, fit and finish, front-seat comfort, off-road ability, towing

Fuel economy, agility, tight thirdrow seat, side-hinged tailgate

Lexus IS 300 (AWD)

Reliability

Cramped interior and driving position, ride, road noise, lackluster handling, fuel economy, controls, access

Lexus LS 500 (AWD)

Acceleration, quietness, transmission, driverโ€™s seat comfort, fit and finish

Controls, rear-seat space for class, small trunk

Lexus NX 300

Handling, maneuverability, reliability

Tight quarters, visibility, fussy touchpad controller, in-cabin storage

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

159


Make & Model

Highs

Lows

Lexus NX 300h

Fuel economy, handling, maneuverability, reliability

Tight quarters, visibility, fussy touchpad controller, in-cabin storage

Lexus RX 350

Ride, quietness, powertrain, fit and finish

Agility, wet stopping distances, distracting controls, rear visibility

Lexus RX 350L

Ride, quietness, powertrain, fit and finish

Distracting controls, tiny third-row seat

Lexus RX 450h

Quietness, ride, fuel economy, fit and finish

Agility, wet stopping distances, distracting controls, rear visibility

Lexus UX 250h

Fuel economy, transmission, quietness

Controls, tight interior, rear seat

Lincoln Aviator

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Lincoln Continental Select (2.7T, AWD)

Ride, quietness, acceleration, braking, interior room

Lincoln Corsair

Havenโ€™t evaluated new model yet

Lincoln MKZ 2.0 EcoBoost

Handling, ride, quietness

Reliability, visibility, snug interior, hidden exterior trunk release, gear selector

Lincoln MKZ Hybrid

Handling, ride, quietness, fuel economy

Reliability, visibility, snug interior, hidden exterior trunk release, gear selector

Lincoln Nautilus (2.7T)

Ride, handling, quietness, acceleration, fit and finish

Fuel economy, gear selector, small text in instrument cluster

Lincoln Navigator Select

Quietness, powertrain, rear-seat and third-row-seat room

Front-seat comfort, unintuitive gear selector, clumsy handling, fuel economy

Maserati Ghibli S Q4

Exhaust sound, steering feedback, braking, acceleration, transmission, fit and finish

Ride, initial turbo lag, fuel economy, rear seat, access, touchy brake pedal, fussy gear selector

Mazda CX-3 Touring

Handling, fuel economy

Noise, tight rear seat and cargo room, visibility, ride with 18-inch wheels

160

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

Confusing gear selector, controls, front-seat comfort


Highs

Lows

Mazda CX-30

Havenโ€™t evaluated new model yet

Mazda CX-5 Touring (2.5L)

Ride, quietness, handling

So-so rear visibility, controls have a learning curve

Mazda CX-9 Touring

Ride, handling, quietness, high-end versions feel upscale

Controls have a learning curve, rear visibility, tight driving position

Mazda MX-5 Miata Club

Agility, manual shifter, fuel economy, easy manual top, reliability

Ride, noise, tight quarters, cumbersome infotainment system, access

Mazda3 Select

Fit and finish, quietness, braking, fuel economy

Controls, base trim lacks advanced safety features

Mazda6 Touring (2.5L)

Handling, ride

Relatively tight quarters

Mercedes-Benz A220 (4MATIC)

Handling, fit and finish, front-seat comfort

Ride, controls, hesitation accelerating from a stop, cramped rear seat

Mercedes-Benz C300 (4MATIC)

Ride, handling, acceleration, quietness, front-seat comfort, fit and finish

Controls, including gear selector

Mercedes Benz CLA

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Mercedes-Benz E300 (4MATIC)

Agility, braking, quietness, frontseat comfort, fit and finish

Reliability, controls, tight rear seat, rear access

Mercedes-Benz GLA250

Acceleration, braking, fuel economy, fit and finish

Ride, noise, uneven power delivery, rear seat, visibility, controls

Mercedes-Benz GLC300

Ride, agility, fit and finish, front-seat comfort

Reliability, controls, engine noise

Mercedes-Benz GLE 450

Acceleration, seat comfort, fit and finish

Controls

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

161

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Make & Model


Make & Model

Highs

Lows

Mercedes-Benz S550 (4MATIC)

Most comfortable riding car, quietness, acceleration, braking, interior room, seat comfort, fit and finish

Fuel economy, complicated and distracting controls

Mini Cooper Countryman S

Handling, braking, powertrain, seat comfort, fit and finish, character

Ride, noise, controls

Mini Cooper S

Handling, fuel economy, manual shifter, engine sound

Rear seat, some controls, premium fuel

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross SE

Access, rear seat

Controls, agility, visibility, front-seat comfort, acceleration, cargo space

Mitsubishi Mirage ES

Fuel economy, turning circle, relatively roomy rear seat, hatchback versatility, feature content

Handling, noise, vibration, acceleration, feels cheap and insubstantial

Mitsubishi Outlander SEL (4-cyl.)

Standard third-row seat, access, visibility

Agility, acceleration, engine noise, unsettled ride, no A/C vents for rear passengers

Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

Versatility, good seating position

Ride, handling, noisy cabin

Nissan 370Z Touring (coupe)

Acceleration, handling, braking, fit and finish

Ride, noise, visibility, access

Nissan Altima 2.5 SV

Controls, fuel economy

Agility, ease of entry

Nissan Armada Platinum

Smooth and powerful powertrain, quietness, towing capacity, fit and finish

Agility, unsettled ride, fuel economy, NHTSA crash-test results

Nissan Kicks SV

Fuel economy, controls, visibility

Acceleration, fit and finish, front-seat comfort, agility

Nissan Leaf SL

Low running cost, quietness, power delivery, access

Charging times, short range, driving position, lack of agility

162

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Highs

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Make & Model

Lows

Nissan Leaf Plus

Running cost, range, quietness

Agility, charging times

Nissan Maxima Platinum

Acceleration, controls, fit and finish

Ride, steering, engine noise, access, snug driving position, visibility, rear-seat room

Nissan Murano SL

Plush interior, access, easy infotainment system

Visibility, overly light steering, agility, towing capacity

Nissan Pathfinder SL

Roominess, controls, access

Handling, fuel economy, rear visibility, second-row thigh support

Nissan Rogue Sport SV

Access, fuel economy, controls

Acceleration, rear-seat comfort, rear visibility

Nissan Rogue SV

Ride, access, spacious interior, optional surround-view camera

Engine noise, cloth front seat lacks support

Nissan Sentra SV

Braking, fuel economy, spacious rear seat, access

Ride, noise, fit and finish, front-seat comfort

Nissan Titan SV (V8)

Acceleration, braking, roomy cab, light tailgate

Reliability, ride, fit and finish, no AEB offered

Nissan Versa

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Porsche 718 Boxster (base)

Acceleration, handling, braking, fit and finish, quick top operation that works on the move

Ride, noise, access, some controls, visibility with closed top

Porsche Cayenne Base

Handling, quietness, fit and finish, seat comfort

Controls, ride, uneven power delivery

Porsche Macan S

Handling, powertrain, ride, quietness, braking, front-seat comfort, fit and finish, towing capacity

Rear visibility, modest cargo area, controls, fuel economy

Porsche 911

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Ram 1500 Big Horn (5.7L V8)

Ride, quietness, transmission, cabin room, controls

High step-in

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

163


Make & Model

Highs

Lows

Subaru Ascent Limited

Ride, quietness, interior room, visibility, braking, controls, usable third-row seat

Agility

Subaru BRZ Premium

Driving fun, handling, braking, fuel economy, reliability

Ride, noise, access, vestigial rear seating, no AEB offered

Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid

Ride, fuel economy, controls

Engine noise, battery robs cargo space, limited electric-only range

Subaru Crosstrek Premium

Ride, braking, controls, fuel economy, reliability

Acceleration, engine noise, driverโ€™s seat short on lumbar support

Subaru Forester Premium

Fuel economy, roomy interior, great visibility, easy controls

Engine noise

Subaru Impreza Premium

Ride, braking, fuel economy, relatively roomy interior, controls

Front-seat comfort

Subaru Legacy

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Subaru Outback

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Subaru WRX Premium

Acceleration, cornering grip, braking, four-door practicality, visibility

Reliability, ride, constant engine drone, stiff clutch, clunky shifter, turbo lag

Tesla Model 3 Long Range

Instant power, handling agility, front-seat comfort, low running costs, driving range

Reliability, stiff ride, distracting controls, rear seat, long charging times

Tesla Model S 100D

Energy efficiency, acceleration, handling, luggage capacity

Reliability, long charging times, access, rear-seat comfort, visibility, controls

Tesla Model X 100D

Acceleration, handling, front-seat comfort, fit and finish, energy consumption, running cost, standard forward collision warning

Reliability, limited range, long charging times, fussy doors, ride, wind noise, rear visibility, controls

164

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


T HE 2020 MODEL S

Make & Model

Highs

Lows

Toyota 4Runner SR5

Off-road ability, power-retractable rear window, reliability

Fuel economy, handling, ride, driving position, fit and finish, access

Toyota 86

Driving fun, handling, braking, fuel economy, reliability

Ride, noise, access, vestigial rear seating, no AEB offered

Toyota Avalon Hybrid XLE

Hybrid fuel economy, ride, interior room, controls, trunk space

Lower stance hurts access

Toyota C-HR XLE

Fuel economy, controls, reliability

Slow acceleration, wind noise, rear visibility, rear access, unsupportive driverโ€™s seat

Toyota Camry Hybrid LE

Fuel economy, ride, controls

Low stance hurts access

Toyota Camry LE (4-cyl.)

Fuel economy, braking, ride, controls

High-rpm engine noise, transmission refinement, low stance hurts access

Toyota Corolla Hatchback SE

Handling, fuel economy, controls, braking

Ride, engine noise, tight rear seat

Toyota Corolla LE

Fuel economy, ride, controls

Acceleration, rear seat, access

Toyota Corolla LE Hybrid

Fuel economy, ride, controls

Acceleration, rear seat, access

Toyota Highlander

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Toyota Land Cruiser

Ride, quietness, powertrain, fit and finish, front- and second-row seat comfort, off-road capability, towing capacity

Fuel economy, agility, tight third-row seat

Toyota Mirai

Long range for an EV, relatively quick fill-ups, ride, emits only water vapor

Seats only four, clumsy handling, limited hydrogen infrastructure, cargo space

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

165


Make & Model

Highs

Lows

Toyota Prius LE

Fuel economy, hatchback versatility, ride, reliability

Rear visibility, acceleration, seat comfort, insubstantial for price, odd gear selector and gauges

Toyota Prius Prime Premium

Fuel economy, no range anxiety, ride, hatchback versatility, reliability

Complex infotainment screen, no rear wiper

Toyota RAV4 Hybrid XLE

Fuel economy, access

Ride, fit and finish

Toyota RAV4 XLE

Fuel economy, access

Engine noise, ride, fit and finish

Toyota Sequoia Limited

Powertrain, accommodations, towing and off-road capabilities, storage, power-retractable rear window

Fuel economy, agility, braking, unsettled ride, high step-in, long reach to some controls, too easy to turn off DRL

Toyota Sienna XLE

Ride, interior space and flexibility, rear seat, reliability

Transmission smoothness, agility, fit and finish, too easy to turn off DRL

Toyota Supra

Havenโ€™t evaluated redesign yet

Toyota Tacoma SR5 (V6)

Fuel economy, resale value, off-road capability

Ride, handling, braking, noise, driving position, seat comfort, too easy to turn off DRL

Toyota Tundra SR5 (5.7L V8)

Powertrain, towing, low-effort tailgate, reliability

Ride, visibility, braking, fuel economy, no full-time 4WD, poor IIHS passenger-side small-overlap crash-test results

Toyota Yaris LE

Fuel economy, agility, reliability

Noise levels, infotainment learning curve, tight rear seat, wet braking

Volkswagen Arteon SEL (AWD)

Handling, fit and finish, front-seat comfort, hatchback versatility, easy controls

Engine noise

166

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Highs

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Make & Model

Lows

Volkswagen Atlas SEL (V6)

Accommodations, third-row seat comfort and access, nimbler than size suggests, ride, quietness, controls

Reliability, acceleration trails competition

Volkswagen Golf SE

Ride, handling, quietness, braking, easy infotainment system, hatchback versatility

Pricey

Volkswagen GTI Autobahn

Agility, seat comfort, quiet cabin, hatchback versatility

Reliability

Volkswagen Jetta SE

Fuel economy, controls, relatively roomy cabin

Low dash vents

Volkswagen Passat

Interior room, rear seat, trunk, access, agility, braking

Transmission refinement at low speeds

Volkswagen Tiguan SE

Generous interior, easy controls, access, visibility

Reliability, acceleration

Volvo S60 T5 Momentum

Braking, quietness, front-seat comfort, fit and finish

Ride, controls

Volvo S90 T6 Momentum (AWD)

Seat comfort, fit and finish

Reliability, ride comfort, coarse engine noise, unintuitive controls

Volvo XC40 T5 Momentum

Interior ambience, comfortable front seats

Stiff ride, controls, annoying gear selector, engine noise

Volvo XC60 T5 Momentum

Seat comfort, fit and finish, braking, standard advanced safety equipment

Stiff ride, controls

Volvo XC90 T6 Momentum

Quietness, seat comfort, fit and finish, visibility, braking, high-beam headlights

Reliability, stiff ride, unintuitive controls

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

167


Rating the 2020 Models INCLUDED HERE ARE ratings on 236 vehicles that Consumer Reports has recently tested. Within each category, they are ranked by their overall score.

To earn our Recommendation !, vehicles must do well in our Overall Score, which accounts for a vehicleโ€™s performance in our road tests, results from our reliability and owner satisfaction surveys, the availability of a frontal crash-prevention system, and, if applicable, safety tests that were conducted by the government or the insurance industry. Price as tested is the sticker price at the time of purchase of our test vehicle, including typical equipment. Survey results include predicted reliability, which is our forecast of how well a new car will likely hold up based

168

on its recent history from our Annual Auto Survey. Owner satisfaction is the percentage of members who say they would definitely buy or lease their vehicle again. Reliability and owner satisfaction predictions for new or redesigned models are based on the manufacturerโ€™s history, and the previous generation of the vehicle or similar models. Overall MPG is what a vehicle achieved in CRโ€™s own fuel-economy tests, comprising a mix of city and highway driving. Our road-test score is based on results from more than 50 tests and evaluations at our 327-acre test facility including acceleration, braking, emergency handling, usability, fit and finish, noise, ride, and safety systems.

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


T HE 2020 MODEL S

Standout Models by Category C A RS Subcompact & Compact $14,000-$22,000 Best Overall: Subcompact Honda Fit Toyota Yaris (sedan) Best Overall: Compact Subaru Impreza Toyota Corolla (including Hybrid) Kia Soul Hyundai Elantra GT Honda Civic Mazda3 Toyota Corolla Hatchback Fuel-Efficient Honda Insight Toyota Prius Toyota Corolla (sedan, hybrid, and hatchback) Volkswagen Jetta Hyundai Elantra Kia Forte Electric Cars/Plug-In Hybrids Kia Niro EV Toyota Prius Prime Chevrolet Bolt Hyundai Kona Electric

Midsized $22,000-$33,000 Best Overall Toyota Camry Kia Optima Mazda6 Honda Accord Volkswagen Passat Fuel-Efficient Toyota Camry (including Hybrid) Honda Accord (including Hybrid) Nissan Altima

Large $35,000-$45,000 Best Overall Toyota Avalon Hybrid Nissan Maxima

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

169


C A RS

Continued

Luxury Compact $35,000-$45,000 Best Overall Volkswagen Arteon Audi A4 BMW 3 Series Buick Regal Fun to Drive Audi A4 BMW 3 Series

Luxury Midsized $40,000-$60,000 Best Overall Lincoln Continental Genesis G80 Lexus ES Lexus GS Great Value Genesis G80

Luxury Large $70,000-$110,000 Best Overall BMW 7 Series Mercedes-Benz S-Class Audi A8 Great Value Genesis G90

Sports Cars $30,000-$60,000+ Best Overall BMW M240i Porsche 718 Boxster Fun Coupes Subaru BRZ Toyota 86 Hyundai Veloster Audi TT Roadsters Porsche 718 Boxster Mazda MX-5 Miata BMW Z4

170

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


T HE 2020 MODEL S

SU Vs Subcompact & Compact $25,000-$35,000 Best Overall: Subcompact Subaru Crosstrek Hyundai Kona Nissan Rogue Sport Honda HR-V Best Overall: Compact Subaru Forester Mazda CX-5 Honda CR-V Toyota RAV4 Kia Sportage Nissan Rogue Fuel-Efficient Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid Subaru Forester Honda CR-V Toyota RAV4 Hybrid Sporty Mazda CX-5

Midsized $30,000-$45,000 Best Overall (two-row) Hyundai Santa Fe Nissan Murano Ford Edge Best Overall (three-row) Subaru Ascent Kia Telluride Mazda CX-9 Kia Sorento Honda Pilot

Large $60,000-$75,000 Best Overall Ford Expedition Toyota Sequoia Chevrolet Suburban

Luxury Entry-Level & Compact $35,000-$45,000 Best Overall Mini Cooper Countryman Lexus NX Audi Q5 BMW X3 Porsche Macan

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

171


SU Vs

Continued

Fuel-Efficient Lexus NX 300h Lexus UX 250h Fun to Drive Audi Q5 BMW X3 Porsche Macan Mini Cooper Countryman

Luxury Midsized $50,000-$75,000 Best Overall (two-row) Audi E-Tron BMW X5 Lexus RX Lincoln Nautilus Best Overall (three-row) Audi Q7 Lexus RX 350L Infiniti QX60 Fuel-Efficient Lexus RX 450h Sporty Audi Q7 BMW X5

Luxury Large $60,000-$85,000 Best Overall BMW X7

MINI VA NS $35,000-$45,000 Best Overall Toyota Sienna Kia Sedona

P ICKUP TRUCKS $35,000-$50,000+ Best Compact Pickup Honda Ridgeline Best Full-Sized Pickup Ford F-150

172

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Test Results

Owner satisfaction

Road-test score

! 0

Kia Niro EV

79

$47,270

4 0

4 0

81

122 โ„

! 0

Toyota Prius Prime Premium

78

$29,889

5 0

5 0

74

133 โ„/ 50 โ‚ฌ

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

Hyundai Kona Electric Limited

78

$42,330 $27,323

75

52

Honda Insight EX

71

$24,955

Chevrolet Bolt Premier

71

$43,155

0 5 5 0 4 0 5 0

120 โ„

78

0 4 5 0 4 0 3 0

76

Toyota Prius LE

! 0

BMW i3 Giga Rex

70

$51,095

5 0

Hyundai Ioniq SEL

68

$25,035

Kia Niro EX

66

$26,805

Toyota Mirai

65

$58,335

Nissan Leaf SL

64

$38,115

Honda Fit EX

72

$19,025

Toyota Yaris LE

65

$17,570

Hyundai Accent SEL

63

$18,435

Chevrolet Sonic LT (1.8L)

61

$17,290

Kia Rio S

60

$17,220

Chevrolet Spark 1LT

48

$16,660

Mitsubishi Mirage ES

31

$16,050

Subaru Impreza Premium

76

$23,410

Kia Soul EX

76

$25,320

Toyota Corolla LE Hybrid

75

$24,129

Toyota Corolla LE

74

$23,530

Hyundai Elantra GT (2.0L)

74

$23,265

Volkswagen Golf SE

74

$25,315

Rec.

As tested

Predicted reliability

Overall mpg

Survey Results

Price

CARS: COMPACT ELECTRIC AND HYBRIDS

69

54

76

119 โ„

3 0

70

113 โ„/ 29 โ‚ฌ

0 4 4 0 4 0 3 0

0 4 4 0 3 0 5 0

67

52

65

43

0 5 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0

61

67 โ„

62

112 โ„

0 3 3 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0

67

33

60

35

64

33

66

28

61

33

47

33

29

37

0 3 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0

85

30

76

28

69

48

68

33

79

28

82

28

CARS: SUBCOMPACT

0 ! ! 0

CARS: COMPACT

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

โ„Miles-per-gallon equivalent (MPGe). โ‚ฌMiles per gallon while running on gas engine.

1

2

WORSE

3

4

5

BET TER

! RECOMMENDED

173

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Overall Score

Make and Model


Road-test score

Overall mpg

Test Results

Owner satisfaction

As tested

Rec.

Survey Results

Price

Predicted reliability

Overall Score

Make and Model

0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 1 0

0 4 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0

75

30

76

32

66

36

75

31

78

34

66

33

64

29

67

34

64

32

62

31

50

27

0 4 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0

0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0

89

47

86

32

79

28

86

28

89

31

86

47

81

31

83

22

0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0

81

24

80

39

80

29

79

41

4 0

110 โ„/ 72 39 โ‚ฌ

CARS: COMPACT Continued

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

Mazda3 Select

74

$24,115

Honda Civic LX

72

$20,275

Toyota Corolla Hatchback SE

72

$24,263

Honda Civic EX-T

72

$23,035

Volkswagen Jetta SE

69

$23,325

Hyundai Elantra SEL

69

$20,090

Toyota C-HR XLE

68

$23,892

Kia Forte LXS

68

$20,165

Nissan Kicks SV

64

$21,050

Nissan Sentra SV

61

$20,125

Fiat 500L

30

$24,595

Toyota Camry Hybrid LE

88

$28,949

Toyota Camry LE (4-cyl.)

86

$26,364

Mazda6 Touring (2.5L)

84

$26,590

Kia Optima LX (2.4L)

84

$25,860

Honda Accord EX (1.5T)

82

$28,345

Honda Accord Hybrid EX

80

$29,780

Nissan Altima 2.5 SV

76

$29,330

Ford Fusion Titanium (2.0T)

71

$33,180

Ford Fusion SE (1.5T)

70

$27,720

Ford Fusion Hybrid SE

69

$28,290

Chevrolet Malibu 1LT (1.5T)

59

$26,790

Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid

59

$30,735

CARS: MIDSIZED

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

Honda Clarity Plug-in Hybrid

54

$34,290

โ„Miles-per-gallon equivalent (MPGe). โ‚ฌMiles per gallon while running on gas engine.

174

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

1 0


0 5 4 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0

0 3 4 0 2 0 0 3 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 4 0

Overall mpg

0 5 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 0

Test Results Road-test score

Owner satisfaction

Survey Results Predicted reliability

Rec.

As tested

Price

93

42

91

22

81

25

CARS: LARGE

0 ! ! 0 ! 0

Toyota Avalon Hybrid XLE

98

$38,643

Chevrolet Impala Premier (V6)

84

$39,110

Nissan Maxima Platinum

80

$41,995

Dodge Charger R/T Plus (V8)

68

$40,375

Chrysler 300 C (V8)

67

$45,650

Chrysler 300 Limited (V6)

67

$38,335

Dodge Charger SXT (V6)

66

$34,510

Kia Cadenza Premium

62

$36,945

Audi A3 Premium

68

$31,495

Acura ILX Premium

64

$30,820

Mercedes-Benz A220 4MATIC

54

$43,385

Volkswagen Arteon SEL (AWD)

82

$43,475

Audi A4 Premium Plus

80

$48,890

BMW 330i xDrive

77

$52,995

Buick Regal Essence (2.0T, AWD)

77

$39,715

Acura TLX 2.4L

74

$35,920

Mercedes-Benz C300 (4MATIC)

74

$47,560

Genesis G70 Elite (2.0T, AWD)

73

$43,115

Acura TLX SH-AWD

71

$42,345

Infiniti Q50 3.0t Luxe (AWD)

69

$48,775

Kia Stinger Premium (2.0T, AWD)

67

$40,400

Tesla Model 3 Long Range

65

$59,000

Volvo S60 T5 Momentum

61

$47,110

Lexus IS 300 (AWD)

60

$48,149

85

20

84

20

83

22

82

22

91

24

0 3 1 0 3 0

77

27

61

28

64

27

0 4 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 1 0

91

24

88

27

86

29

87

23

79

27

85

26

74

23

75

25

85

22

CARS: LUXURY ENTRY-LEVEL

CARS: LUXURY COMPACT

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

1

2

WORSE

3

4

5

BET TER

75

23

82

130 โ„

71

26

56

20

! RECOMMENDED

175

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Overall Score

Make and Model


Road-test score

Overall mpg

Test Results

Owner satisfaction

As tested

Rec.

Survey Results

Price

Predicted reliability

Overall Score

Make and Model

0 1 1 0

0 4 3 0

70

27

69

25

CARS: LUXURY COMPACT Continued Alfa Romeo Giulia Ti (AWD)

48

$48,890

Jaguar XE Premium (25t AWD)

39

$47,378

CARS: LUXURY MIDSIZED

! 0

Lincoln Continental Select (2.7T, AWD)

89

$55,590

5 0

4 0

83

20

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

Genesis G80 3.8 (AWD)

84

$52,450 $48,855

84

25

Lexus GS 350

83

$58,858

83

21

Infiniti Q70 Luxe

78

$53,825

90

21

Cadillac XTS Premium

73

$57,200

82

22

BMW 530i xDrive

71

$65,210

94

26

Acura RLX Tech

71

$55,345

75

23

Lincoln MKZ 2.0 EcoBoost

70

$41,990

88

23

Lincoln MKZ Hybrid

70

$41,990

88

34

Mercedes-Benz E300 (4MATIC)

65

$69,585

85

24

Cadillac CT6 Luxury (3.6, AWD)

62

$64,485

95

22

Volvo S90 T6 Momentum (AWD)

56

$61,855

73

23

Maserati Ghibli S Q4

48

$89,010

71

19

Jaguar XF Prestige (V6, AWD)

46

$66,586

0 5 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 3 0

20

84

0 4 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0

89

Lexus ES 350

83

21

Mercedes-Benz S550 (4MATIC)

87

$114,475 $110,645

99

21

Audi A8 3.0T

0 4 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0

18

87

0 4 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 1 0

96

BMW 750i xDrive

96

21

CARS: ULTRA LUXURY

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

86

$97,595

Genesis G90 Premium (3.3T, AWD) 81

$71,550

Tesla Model S100D

78

$100,200

Lexus LS 500 (AWD)

73

$103,899

Jaguar XJL Portfolio

47

$81,575

โ„Miles-per-gallon equivalent (MPGe). โ‚ฌMiles per gallon while running on gas engine.

176

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

89

18

97

102 โ„

72

20

82

19


Road-test score

Overall mpg

Test Results

Owner satisfaction

Survey Results Predicted reliability

Rec.

As tested

Price

0 3 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 3 0

0 4 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0

98

25

95

26

84

26

86

29

85

20

84

19

70

20

0 4 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 2 0

0 5 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3 0

80

34

79

30

78

30

83

29

81

23

74

34

80

30

82

29

76

31

SPORTS/SPORTY CARS OVER $40,000

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

BMW M240i

89

$50,400

Porsche 718 Boxster (base)

86

$69,790

Audi TT 2.0T

78

$50,600

BMW Z4 sDrive 30i

77

$59,195

Chevrolet Camaro 2SS (V8)

70

$47,020

Ford Mustang GT Premium (V8)

64

$43,295

Dodge Challenger R/T Plus (V8)

59

$40,860

SPORTS/SPORTY CARS UNDER $40,000

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

Mazda MX-5 Miata Club

79

$29,905

Subaru BRZ Premium

79

$27,117

Toyota 86

78

$25,025

Hyundai Veloster Turbo R-spec

76

$23,785

Nissan 370Z Touring

74

$38,565

Honda Civic Si

71

$24,775

Mini Cooper S

70

$29,945

Volkswagen GTI Autobahn

69

$31,730

Fiat 124 Spider Lusso

64

$29,985

Ford Mustang Premium (2.3 EcoBoost)

59

$33,080

2 0

4 0

76

25

Subaru WRX Premium

53

$29,742

1 0

3 0

75

26

Toyota Sienna XLE

78

$38,424

21

74

$34,795

0 4 3 0

79

Kia Sedona EX

0 4 5 0

70

20

Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid Platinum

62

$48,380

1 0

4 0

88

84 โ„/ 27 โ‚ฌ

Chrysler Pacifica Touring L

60

$38,245

21

59

$37,295

72

17

Honda Odyssey EX-L

58

$40,300

0 4 2 0 4 0

85

Dodge Grand Caravan SXT

0 1 3 0 1 0

82

22

MINIVANS

0 ! ! 0

1

2

WORSE

3

4

5

BET TER

! RECOMMENDED

177

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Overall Score

Make and Model


Survey Results

Test Results

Owner satisfaction

Road-test score

! 0

Subaru Crosstrek Premium

87

$25,905

5 0

4 0

87

29

! 0

Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid

84

$36,685

5 0

4 0

82

90 โ„/ 33 โ‚ฌ

0 ! ! 0 ! 0

Hyundai Kona SEL (2.0L)

73

$25,025 $25,655

72

26

Honda HR-V LX

67

$22,045

66

29

Ford EcoSport SES (2.0L)

58

$28,130

61

24

Mazda CX-3 Touring

58

$25,800

64

28

Jeep Renegade Latitude

44

$27,525

56

24

Chevrolet Trax LT

43

$25,560

55

25

Fiat 500X Easy

35

$26,600

0 3 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 0

26

68

0 4 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 1 0

71

Nissan Rogue Sport SV

50

23

Subaru Forester Premium

89

$29,341

28

82

$29,530

80

24

Toyota RAV4 Hybrid XLE

80

$34,193

76

37

Honda CR-V LX (2.4L)

78

$26,245

83

27

Honda CR-V EX (1.5T)

77

$28,935

82

28

Toyota RAV4 XLE

77

$32,109

72

27

Kia Sportage LX (2.4L)

75

$26,720

78

23

Nissan Rogue SV

74

$29,920

74

24

Chevrolet Equinox LT (1.5T)

68

$33,730

78

25

Volkswagen Tiguan SE

67

$31,645

84

25

Hyundai Tucson SE (2.0L)

65

$25,920

76

24

Jeep Cherokee Limited (2.0T)

65

$37,655

68

23

Hyundai Tucson SEL (2.4L)

64

$28,530

75

22

Mitsubishi Outlander SEL (4-cyl.)

64

$28,405

59

24

GMC Terrain SLE (2.0T)

60

$36,950

0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 3 0

90

Mazda CX-5 Touring (2.5L)

0 4 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 3 0

67

22

Rec.

As tested

Predicted reliability

Price

Overall mpg

Overall Score

Make and Model

SUVs: SUBCOMPACT

SUVs: COMPACT

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

โ„Miles-per-gallon equivalent (MPGe). โ‚ฌMiles per gallon while running on gas engine.

178

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Overall mpg

0 3 1 0

0 2 2 0

57

24

56

24

0 5 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 4 0

0 5 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 4 0

93

22

97

21

78

22

80

22

80

20

83

18

72

18

95

20

84

20

55

18

0 4 3 0 4 0 3 0

0 4 3 0 3 0 4 0

80

21

84

22

77

21

76

21

$49,780

2 0

4 0

84

24

67

$43,290

2 0

4 0

83

19

67

$41,375

2 0

4 0

80

18

35

$48,400

2 0

5 0

36

18

Ford Expedition MAX Limited

72

$75,430 $54,005

60

15

Nissan Armada Platinum

67

$63,020

0 5 4 0 2 0

16

69

0 4 4 0 3 0

73

Toyota Sequoia Limited

69

14

Rec.

As tested

Road-test score

Test Results

Owner satisfaction

Survey Results Predicted reliability

Price

SUVs: COMPACT Continued Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross SE

53

$28,470

Jeep Compass Latitude

41

$30,870

Subaru Ascent Limited

96

$43,867

Kia Telluride EX

90

$40,855

Kia Sorento EX (V6)

78

$41,925

Mazda CX-9 Touring

78

$40,470

Honda Pilot EX-L

74

$40,655

Dodge Durango GT (V6)

67

$43,525

Nissan Pathfinder SL

66

$40,470

Chevrolet Traverse Premier (V6)

65

$49,945

Volkswagen Atlas SEL (V6)

62

$44,165

Toyota 4Runner SR5

59

$37,425

Hyundai Santa Fe Limited (2.0T)

80

$37,200

Ford Edge SEL (2.0 EcoBoost)

78

$42,610

Nissan Murano SL

77

$42,065

Honda Passport EX-L

73

$39,937

Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited (diesel)

70

Chevrolet Blazer Leather (V6) Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited (V6) Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sahara

SUVs: MIDSIZED (3-ROW)

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

SUVs: MIDSIZED (2-ROW)

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

SUVs: LARGE

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 1

2

WORSE

3

4

5

BET TER

! RECOMMENDED

179

T HE 2020 MODEL S

Overall Score

Make and Model


Overall Score

Survey Results

Overall mpg

0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0

0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0

74

16

67

16

67

16

67

16

0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 0

0 4 4 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0

82

25

71

37

69

23

70

26

77

25

71

25

74

26

71

24

78

23

69

21

$56,997

1 0

3 0

58

20

81

$53,745

74

24

Lexus NX 300h

77

$51,224

71

29

Porsche Macan S

77

$63,290

84

19

Audi Q5 Premium Plus

76

$51,570

83

24

Volvo XC60 T5 Momentum

73

$50,040

79

23

Acura RDX Tech

67

$43,995

80

22

Buick Envision Premium

66

$45,380

69

21

Infiniti QX50 Essential

65

$51,380

0 5 2 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0

24

$43,284

0 3 5 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 2 0

92

79

77

22

Rec.

As tested

Road-test score

Test Results

Owner satisfaction

Price

Predicted reliability

Make and Model

SUVs: LARGE Continued

! 0

Chevrolet Suburban Premier

66

$69,790

Chevrolet Tahoe LT

64

$60,100

GMC Yukon SLT

64

$62,125

GMC Yukon XL SLT

61

$67,370

Mini Cooper Countryman S

77

$39,535

Lexus UX 250h

75

$37,740

Buick Encore Preferred II

69

$30,555

Mercedes-Benz GLA250

64

$42,210

BMW X2 xDrive28i

64

$45,895

Infiniti QX30 Essential

62

$43,745

BMW X1 xDrive28i

61

$44,745

Volvo XC40 T5 Momentum

59

$41,510

Cadillac XT4 Premium Luxury

57

$49,430

Jaguar E-Pace S

43

$48,070

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SE

41

BMW X3 xDrive30i Lexus NX 300

SUVs: LUXURY ENTRY-LEVEL

0 ! ! 0

SUVs: LUXURY COMPACT

0 ! ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

โ„Miles-per-gallon equivalent (MPGe). โ‚ฌMiles per gallon while running on gas engine.

180

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Overall mpg

Test Results Road-test score

Survey Results Owner satisfaction

Rec.

As tested

Price

Predicted reliability

Overall Score

Make and Model

0 2 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0

0 3 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 1 0

81

22

74

24

76

20

76

21

72

20

58

21

SUVs: LUXURY COMPACT Continued Mercedes-Benz GLC300

58

$49,105

Alfa Romeo Stelvio Ti

58

$52,040

Cadillac XT5 Luxury

55

$51,025

Land Rover Range Rover Velar S

53

$59,503

Jaguar F-Pace Prestige

43

$53,895

Land Rover Discovery Sport HSE

36

$49,895

SUVs: LUXURY MIDSIZED

! 0

BMW X5 xDrive40i

88

$68,730

3 0

5 0

98

23

! 0

Audi Q7 Premium Plus

87

$68,695

4 0

5 0

96

20

! 0

Lexus RX 450h

82

$57,565

4 0

4 0

80

29

! 0

Audi E-Tron Premium Plus

81

$80,450

3 0

5 0

84

74.1 โ„

! 0

Lexus RX 350L

81

$56,518

4 0

4 0

80

20

! 0

Lexus RX 350

79

$51,630

4 0

4 0

77

22

! 0

Infiniti QX60 Pure

78

$51,920

4 0

2 0

79

19

! 0

Lexus GX 460

75

$58,428

4 0

3 0

70

17

! 0

Lincoln Nautilus (2.7T)

75

$54,945

3 0

3 0

84

18

Porsche Cayenne Base

70

$79,280

2 0

4 0

87

21

Acura MDX Tech

67

$51,410

2 0

2 0

79

21

Mercedes-Benz GLE 450

66

$75,090

2 0

4 0

80

20

GMC Acadia Denali

64

$51,585

2 0

3 0

83

19

Volvo XC90 T6 Momentum

62

$56,805

1 0

3 0

84

20

Cadillac XT6 Luxury

60

$62,515

1 0

4 0

82

18

1

Jaguar I-Pace HSE

58

$86,841

2 0

5 0

76

76 โ„

Tesla Model X 100D

55

$109,200

1 0

5 0

77

87 โ„

Land Rover Range Rover Sport HSE (3.0L)

50

$74,040

1 0

4 0

72

18

Land Rover Discovery HSE

49

$69,260

1 0

2 0

71

17

2

WORSE

3

4

5

BET TER

! RECOMMENDED

181

T HE 2020 MODEL S

E23G671


Overall Score

0 3 4 0 3 0 3 0 1 0

0 5 4 0 2 0 5 0 4 0

94

22

68

14

68

15

65

16

87

18

$88,545

1 0

3 0

78

17

$87,360

1 0

3 0

61

16

74

$36,480

55

20

Chevrolet Colorado LT (V6)

49

$34,300

61

18

GMC Canyon SLE (V6)

49

$35,835

61

18

Chevrolet Colorado LT (diesel)

48

$39,295

60

24

GMC Canyon SLE (diesel)

48

$40,895

60

24

Jeep Gladiator Sport

45

$46,405

52

18

Toyota Tacoma SR5 (V6)

45

$34,364

0 5 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3 0

20

$40,355

0 3 3 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 0

83

58

42

19

Ford F-150 XLT (2.7 V6 EcoBoost)

67

$52,535 $53,120

83

17

Toyota Tundra SR5 (5.7L V8)

63

$44,245

0 4 5 0 4 0

19

64

0 3 2 0 4 0

74

Ram 1500 Big Horn (5.7L V8)

59

15

Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LT (5.3L V8)

58

$50,225

2 0

4 0

76

17

GMC Sierra 1500 SLE (5.3L V8)

58

$52,100

51

$44,370

0 4 3 0

17

Nissan Titan SV (V8)

0 2 1 0

76 70

16

Rec.

As tested

Overall mpg

Test Results Road-test score

Survey Results Owner satisfaction

Price

Predicted reliability

Make and Model

SUVs: LUXURY LARGE

0 ! ! 0

BMW X7 xDrive40i

85

$84,095

Toyota Land Cruiser

75

$84,820

Infiniti QX80 Luxe

65

$63,395

Lincoln Navigator Select

65

$86,480

Buick Enclave Premium

56

$55,680

Land Rover Range Rover HSE (3.0L)

52

Cadillac Escalade Premium

43

Honda Ridgeline RTL Ford Ranger XLT

PICKUP TRUCKS: COMPACT

! 0

PICKUP TRUCKS: FULL-SIZED

! 0

182

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


jixiansheng

Best and Worst Used Cars NEED NEW WHEELS BUT donโ€™t want to spend a fortune? Buying used is a good way to get the biggest bang for your buck. Itโ€™s simple: After one year a new car has likely depreciated more than 20 percent off of its sticker price; after three years, it may be worth barely half its sticker price. But picking out a good used car from the sea of bad ones has never been easy. You want a vehicle thatโ€™s reliable, affordable, and equipped with modern safety features. You also want to make sure itโ€™s been maintained properly, and that it hasnโ€™t been in a crash. The process can feel overwhelming, but it doesnโ€™t have to be. Weโ€™ve created this handy guide to help you find the small cars, sedans, and SUVs that are most likely to fulfill your needs without breaking down and

soaking you in repair bills. In the Reliable list, each model performed well in our road tests when it was new and had above-average reliability for the model years shown. In addition, each offered electronic stability control (ESC) as a standard feature. In addition to the cars we recommend, we also included lists of used cars that proved to be particularly troublesomeโ€” and that you should avoid considering. Even for the used cars that we recommend, there can be stinkersโ€” because of a bad day at the factory or a former owner who didnโ€™t care much for car maintenance and ended up neglecting the car. Thatโ€™s why you should pay for a thorough inspection by a certified mechanic before you sign on the dotted line, so there are no surprises down the road.

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

183


Best of the Best Used Cars UNDER $10,000

COMPACT CARS Toyota Matrix 2010 Scion xB 2009-10, โ€˜12

The Matrix is a reliable and spacious compact hatchback, with fairly nimble handling, but a ride that is borderline jittery. AWD was optional. The Toyota-made xB is a reliable, small box of a car that delivers a ton of room. MIDSIZED CARS Mazda6 2009-12

Mazdaโ€™s midsized sedan is a sporty four-door, with nimble handling, good

steering feel, and a supple ride. Reliability is excellent and the four-cylinder engine is fuel-efficient. $10,000โ€“15,000

SUBCOMPACT CARS Honda Fit 2016

Although itโ€™s a bit noisy, the Honda Fit is a standout for reliable, fuel-efficient transportation. Its small footprint makes it easy to park and maneuver, and a flexible interior means itโ€™s a practical choice among subcompact cars.

COMPACT CARS Toyota Corolla 2014-16

Dependable, fuel-efficient transportation is the Corollaโ€™s strength. There isnโ€™t anything flashy, but the interior is comfortable and roomy, and reliability is excellent. MIDSIZED CARS Acura TSX 2011-12 Toyota Camry 2012-14

You can stick to your budget and still get a reliable premium car if you choose the slick-handling TSX, which is a sporty car based on the European Honda Accord. The Camry is a solid choice because of its outstanding relia-

Honda Fit

Used Cars to Avoid

184

Acura MDX โ€˜16, TLX โ€˜15-16 Alfa Romeo Giulia โ€˜17 Audi A4 โ€˜09-11, Q5 โ€˜11, Q7 โ€˜15 BMW 1 Series โ€˜11, โ€˜13, 2 Series โ€˜18, 3 Series โ€˜09, โ€˜11, โ€˜18, 5 Series

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

โ€˜10-12, โ€˜17, X1 โ€˜16, X3 โ€˜11-13, X5 โ€˜11-13 Buick Enclave โ€˜0912, โ€˜18, Encore โ€˜14 Regal โ€˜11, Verano โ€˜16 Cadillac ATS โ€˜16, CT6 โ€˜17, CTS โ€˜16, DTS โ€˜10, Escalade โ€˜15-17, SRX โ€˜13-14,

XT5 โ€˜17-18, XTS โ€˜13-15 Chevrolet Camaro โ€˜17, Colorado โ€˜17-18, Corvette โ€˜18, Cruze โ€˜11-14, Equinox โ€˜10-11, HHR โ€˜09, Malibu โ€˜10-11, โ€˜16, Silverado 1500 โ€˜17, Silverado


USED C A RS

Toyota Prius

bility, strong value, and fuel-efficient powertrains. SMALL SUVS Honda CR-V 2011-13

This SUV is one of the most popular on the market thanks to its strong resale value, agile handling, excellent reliability, and fuel-efficient powertrains. Curtain airbags and ESC are standard. MIDSIZED SUVS Acura RDX 2011

The RDX has a host of standard safety features and very good reliability. Itโ€™s roomy inside and easy to get in and out of. The SUV has agile handling, but its ride is stiff.

2500HD โ€˜11, โ€˜14, โ€˜16-18, Silverado 3500HD โ€˜15, โ€˜17, Sonic โ€˜12-13, Suburban โ€˜15, Tahoe โ€˜09, โ€˜15, Traverse โ€˜0911, โ€˜18, Trax โ€˜17, Volt โ€˜15, โ€˜17 Chrysler 200 โ€˜15,

$15,000โ€“20,000

COMPACT CARS Toyota Prius 2015

The Prius has always proved that you donโ€™t have to give up space or ride comfort to get stellar gas mileageโ€”its 44 mpg overall is better than any vehicle that doesnโ€™t plug in. MIDSIZED CARS Honda Accord 2014-16 Lexus CT 200h 2013-15 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 2011-12

With its cavernous backseat, a responsive suspension, and impressive fuel efficiency, the Accord is a dependable used sedan. The Lexus CT is based

300 โ€˜13-14, โ€˜17, Pacifica โ€˜17-18, Town & Country โ€˜09-11 Dodge Challenger โ€˜17, Charger โ€˜17, Dart โ€˜13, Durango โ€˜11-12, โ€˜15-16, Grand Caravan โ€˜09-11, Journey โ€˜14-15

on the Prius, but with a nicer interior and more responsive handling. Reliability is excellent, but the car has a small rear seat and cargo area. If you want a bit more luxury for your money, the E-Class is plush, quiet, quick, and fun to drive. WAGONS Toyota Venza 2014-15

Part wagon, part SUV, the Venza has a quiet, roomy interior and a generous cargo area. Handling is secure, though not sporty. Reliability is rock-solid.

Fiat 500 โ€˜12-13, โ€˜15 Ford C-MAX โ€˜18, Expedition โ€˜10, โ€˜13, Explorer โ€˜15-16, F-150 โ€˜18, F-350 โ€˜11, โ€˜15, โ€˜18, Fiesta โ€˜11-12, โ€˜14-15, Focus โ€˜12-17, Fusion โ€˜17, Mustang โ€˜15-17, Transit โ€˜16

Continued on next page

GMC Acadia โ€˜09-16, Canyon โ€˜17-18, Sierra 1500 โ€˜17, Sierra 2500HD โ€˜11, โ€˜14, 1618, Sierra 3500HD โ€˜15, โ€˜17, Terrain โ€˜10-11, Yukon โ€˜09, โ€˜15, Yukon XL โ€˜15 Honda Clarity โ€˜18,

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

185


Lexus LS 460

SMALL AND MIDSIZED SUVS Toyota RAV4 2014-16 Toyota 4Runner 2010-11

These models are two different takes on SUVs, both with stellar reliability. The compact RAV4 is available with four- and six-cylinder engines, both of which are very fuel-efficient. It is great for urban and suburban families, and its nimble, secure handling is a plus. On the other hand, the rugged 4Runner is a serious off-roader with a well-finished and quiet interior, smooth V6 or V8 engine, and an available third-row seat.

Used Cars to Avoid Continued

186

$20,000โ€“25,000

SEDANS Toyota Avalon 2016-18 Lexus LS 2011

For less than the price of a new, compact sedan, you can buy one of these slightly older models that offer more space. The Avalon features a generously sized cabin and luxury features for a nonluxury price. The LS is the flagship of the Lexus line. A competent cruiser that floats over bumps and ruts, itโ€™s supremely comfortable, and emphasizes quietness and luxury over sportiness. Both sedans offer optional hybrid powertrains.

Odyssey โ€˜18 Ridgeline โ€˜18 Hyundai Genesis โ€˜10 Sonata โ€˜11, Tucson โ€˜16-17 Infiniti JX โ€˜13, Q50 โ€˜17, Q70 โ€˜15, QX60 โ€˜14 Jaguar F-Pace โ€˜17, 18 Jeep Cherokee

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

WAGONS Toyota Prius V 2016-17

Longer and more versatile than a standard Prius, the V still returns excellent fuel economy despite its extra weight and larger size. This efficient hybrid takes the best attributes of the Prius, but adds a roomier rear seat and expanded cargo capability. SMALL AND MIDSIZED SUVS Mazda CX-5 2018 Toyota Highlander 2014-15

Mazdaโ€™s small SUV is also sporty. It has taut, agile handling and well-weighted steering,although the ride is choppy and the cabin

โ€˜14-16, Compass โ€˜18, Grand Cherokee โ€˜1115, Liberty โ€˜12, Patriot โ€˜14-15, Renegade โ€˜15-16, Wrangler โ€˜09, โ€˜11-13, Wrangler JK โ€˜18 Kia Cadenza โ€˜17, Optima โ€˜12

Lincoln MKZ โ€˜17 Mazda 5 โ€˜10, CX-3 โ€˜17 Mercedes-Benz C-Class โ€˜15, โ€˜18, E-Class โ€˜09, โ€˜18, GLC โ€˜16-17, GL-Class โ€˜14, โ€˜16, M-Class โ€˜10, S-Class โ€˜16 Mini Cooper 09-14,


PICKUPS Honda Ridgeline 2013-14

The Ridgeline is an excellent alternative to a traditional pickup truck. It has a carlike ride, an innovative composite cargo bed, a lockable weatherproof trunk under the bed, and a powerful V6. It isnโ€™t designed for serious off-roading or hauling, and its fuel economy isnโ€™t better than

larger trucks, but if you donโ€™t need to tow more than 5,000 pounds, consider buying one. $25,000โ€“30,000

MIDSIZED AND LARGE CARS Lexus ES 2016-17 Lexus GS 2014-15

The ES takes the platform of the reliable Toyota Camry and adds luxury appointments, road-tripworthy front seats, and a quiet cabin. The GS is a true sports sedan with ample power and superb handling, but it also boasts a supple ride and a roomy, luxurious cabin.

USED C A RS

gets loud. Reliability is very good. The Highlander is a roomy three-row SUV available with four- and six-cylinder gas engines as well as V6-powered hybrid version. It has a quiet interior, room for seven, straightforward controls, and top-notch reliability.

MIDSIZED AND LARGE SUVS Lexus RX 2015 Toyota Sequoia 2013

The RX offers a quiet, luxurious cabin; fuelefficient gas and hybrid powertrains; a plush ride; and stellar reliability. The big Sequoia SUV can seat up to eight passengers and has a refined V8 powertrain. PICKUPS Toyota Tundra 2015-16

The reliable Tundra gets impressive off-road and towing abilities. Its V8 engine provides plenty of power with competitive fuel economy. A damped tailgate is a nice convenience feature.

Toyota Tundra

โ€˜16, CooperClubman โ€˜09-14, โ€˜16,Cooper Countryman โ€˜12, โ€˜14 Mitsubishi Outlander โ€˜15, Outlander Sport โ€˜15 Nissan Leaf โ€˜16, Pathfinder โ€˜14-15, Quest โ€˜12, Rogue โ€˜09,

Sentra โ€˜13, โ€˜15, Titan โ€˜17, Versa Hatchback โ€˜10 Porsche Boxster โ€˜14, Cayenne โ€˜13, โ€˜16, Macan โ€˜15 Ram 1500 โ€˜16, โ€˜18, 2500 โ€˜12-16, 3500 โ€˜16-17

Saturn Outlook โ€˜09 Vue โ€˜09 Subaru Impreza โ€˜09, Legacy โ€˜09, WRX โ€˜15-16 Tesla Model S โ€˜17-18, Model X โ€˜16-18 Volkswagen Atlas โ€˜18, Golf โ€˜18,

GTI โ€˜16, โ€˜18, Jetta โ€˜11, โ€˜13, Jetta SportWagen โ€˜12, Passat โ€˜14, โ€˜18, Tiguan โ€˜09, โ€˜11-13, Touareg โ€˜14 Volvo C70 โ€˜11, โ€˜13, S90 โ€˜17, XC90 โ€˜16-17

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

187


Reliable Used Cars for Every Budget THESE ARE THE MOST reliable 2009 to 2018 models available, according to our Annual Auto Survey. These lists show vehicles in five price categories. Each tested well when new and has had aboveaverage reliability.

To help you buy the newest vehicleโ€” with the most up-to-date safety featuresโ€”

that your budget allows, we show the first year that each model offered electronic stability control (ESC) as a standard or optional feature. Models highlighted in dark gray have multiple years of much-better-thanaverage reliability, according to our survey.

Prices Make & Model

ESC (โ€™09-18)

$5K$10K

$10K$15K

$15K$20K

$20K$25K

$25K$30K

Opt. in

Std. from

โ€˜09-13

โ€˜16

โ€˜17-18 โ€˜16

โ€˜17

-

-

โ€˜11

-

-

โ€˜09

-

CARS: SUBCOMPACT Honda Fit Hyundai Accent Nissan Versa Hatchback Toyota Corolla iM Toyota Prius C

โ€˜11-12

-

โ€˜12-14 โ€˜15-16

โ€˜10, โ€˜12

-

-

โ€˜17

Ford Focus

โ€˜09-11

-

-

-

Honda Civic

โ€˜09-11 โ€˜12-14

โ€˜15

โ€˜18

Hyundai Elantra

โ€˜09, โ€˜11 โ€˜14-17

-

-

Toyota Yaris Toyota Yaris iA

-

-

โ€˜12

โ€˜10

โ€˜12

-

all โ€˜10

โ€˜09

โ€˜10

โ€˜09

โ€˜12

โ€˜09

โ€˜11

-

all

โ€˜09

โ€˜11

-

all

all

all โ€˜10

CARS: COMPACT

Kia Forte

โ€˜12

โ€˜14-16

โ€˜18

Kia Soul

โ€˜10-13

โ€˜16

โ€˜18

Mazda3

โ€˜09-13 โ€˜14-15 โ€˜16-17

โ€˜18

Nissan Leaf

โ€˜11, โ€˜13 โ€˜14-15

โ€˜17

Pontiac Vibe

โ€˜09-10

-

-

-

-

Scion xB

โ€˜09-10, โ€˜12

โ€˜15

-

-

-

-

-

-

โ€˜15-16

โ€˜18

-

-

all

โ€˜09-13 โ€˜14-16 โ€˜17-18

โ€˜09

โ€˜10

Subaru Impreza Toyota Corolla Toyota Matrix Toyota Prius Volkswagen Jetta

188

all

all

-

-

โ€˜09

โ€˜10

โ€˜09-10 โ€˜11-14

โ€˜15

โ€˜16-17

โ€˜18

โ€˜09

โ€˜10

โ€˜15-16

โ€˜17

-

-

-

all

โ€˜10

-

-

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


$5K$10K

$10K$15K

ESC (โ€™09-18)

$15K$20K

$20K$25K

$25K$30K

Opt. in

Std. from

โ€˜17-18

โ€˜09

โ€˜10

-

all

โ€˜09

โ€˜10

-

all

โ€˜09

โ€˜10

-

all

-

all

CARS: MIDSIZED AND LARGE โ€˜12

-

โ€˜15

Ford Taurus

โ€˜09-11

โ€˜12

โ€˜14, โ€˜16

-

Honda Accord

โ€˜09-11 โ€˜12-13 โ€˜14-16

โ€˜17

Chevrolet Impala

โ€˜16

โ€˜17

-

โ€˜13

โ€˜16

โ€˜09-12

โ€˜14

-

-

Hyundai Azera

-

โ€˜13

โ€˜14, โ€˜16

-

Hyundai Sonata

โ€˜09

โ€˜15

โ€˜16

โ€˜18

Kia Optima

-

-

โ€˜14-15

โ€˜18

Mazda6

โ€˜09-12

โ€˜14

โ€˜15-17

โ€˜18

Nissan Altima

โ€˜10, โ€˜12

-

โ€˜16-17

โ€˜18

-

โ€˜16-17

Nissan Maxima

โ€˜11

Subaru Legacy

โ€˜10-11 โ€˜12, โ€˜14 โ€˜16-17

Toyota Avalon

โ€˜09-10 โ€˜11-12 โ€˜13-15 โ€˜16-18

Toyota Camry

โ€˜09-11 โ€˜12-14 โ€˜15-17

Volkswagen Passat

-

-

-

โ€˜18 โ€˜18

all all all all all

all all

CARS: LUXURY Acura ILX Acura TL Acura TSX

โ€˜09-10 โ€˜11-12 โ€˜13-14

-

-

โ€˜15-16

โ€˜17

โ€˜15

โ€˜16

โ€˜12-13

โ€˜15

โ€˜16

Buick Regal

-

-

โ€˜15-16

โ€˜17

Buick Verano

โ€˜12

โ€˜13-15

-

-

โ€˜09-10 โ€˜11-12

โ€˜13

-

Audi A4 BMW 3 Series Buick LaCrosse

Infiniti G Infiniti M Lexus CT 200h Lexus ES Lexus GS Lexus IS Lexus LS Lincoln MKZ Mercedes-Benz C-Class Mercedes-Benz E-Class Volvo S60

-

-

โ€˜11-12 โ€˜13-15

โ€˜09, โ€˜11-12

-

โ€˜11, โ€˜13

โ€˜09-12

โ€˜13

-

-

-

โ€˜14-15 โ€˜16-17 โ€˜13

โ€˜14-15

โ€˜10

โ€˜11-13 โ€˜14-15

โ€˜16

-

โ€˜09-10

โ€˜12

-

-

โ€˜11

all all all all all all all all all all all all all all

-

-

-

all

โ€˜10-11 โ€˜13-14

-

โ€˜16

all

-

โ€˜11-12

โ€˜13

-

โ€˜13

-

โ€˜16

โ€˜17

-

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

all all

189

USED C A RS

Prices Make & Model


Prices Make & Model

ESC (โ€™09-18)

$5K$10K

$10K$15K

$15K$20K

$20K$25K

$25K$30K

Opt. in

Std. from

-

-

โ€˜12

-

โ€˜14

โ€˜16 โ€˜17

-

all

โ€˜15 โ€˜15

โ€˜16

โ€˜10-12

โ€˜13

โ€˜15

โ€˜16

โ€˜10

-

โ€˜12

-

โ€˜13

โ€˜10

โ€˜15

โ€˜16

โ€˜09

โ€˜12

-

-

-

all

-

all

SPORTS CARS/CONVERTIBLES Audi A5 BMW 2 Series BMW 4 Series Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Corvette Ford Mustang Mazda MX-5 Miata

โ€˜09-10 โ€˜11-14

-

-

โ€˜13

โ€˜11

-

-

โ€˜15

โ€˜16

Kia Sedona

โ€˜12

-

โ€˜14

Honda Odyssey

-

โ€˜15-16

โ€˜17

Mazda5

โ€˜13

โ€˜14-15

-

-

-

Subaru Outback

-

โ€˜11-12

โ€˜14

โ€˜16

โ€˜17

Scion FR-S Subaru BRZ

โ€˜13

all all all all

all

WAGONS AND MINIVANS Honda Accord Crosstour Honda Crosstour

Toyota Prius V Toyota Sienna Toyota Venza Volvo XC70

โ€˜12-13 โ€˜14-15 โ€˜16-17

-

โ€˜11-13 โ€˜14-15

โ€˜16

โ€˜18

โ€˜09-13 โ€˜14-15

โ€˜16

-

-

โ€˜12

all all all โ€˜10 all all all all all

SUVs: SMALL Audi Q3 Ford Escape Honda CR-V

-

-

-

-

โ€˜16-17

โ€˜12

โ€˜15-16

โ€˜18

-

โ€˜09-10 โ€˜11-13 โ€˜14-15 โ€˜16-17

โ€˜18

โ€˜10-11

-

-

Honda HR-V

-

-

โ€˜16

โ€˜17

Hyundai Tucson

โ€˜11

โ€˜12-13

โ€˜14

-

Kia Sportage

โ€˜09

-

โ€˜15-16

โ€˜18

Mazda CX-5

-

โ€˜13-14 โ€˜15-17

โ€˜18

-

Honda Element

Mini Cooper Countryman Mitsubishi Outlander Mitsubishi Outlander Sport Nissan Rogue

190

-

โ€˜15

โ€˜16

โ€˜17

-

โ€˜17-18

โ€˜17

โ€˜18

โ€˜13

-

โ€˜17

-

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

-

all all all all all all all all all all all all


ESC (โ€™09-18)

$5K$10K

$10K$15K

$15K$20K

$20K$25K

$25K$30K

Opt. in

Std. from

-

-

โ€˜16 โ€˜15

โ€˜17

โ€˜18 โ€˜18

-

all

โ€˜16-17

โ€˜09-10 โ€˜11-13 โ€˜14-16 โ€˜17-โ€˜18

-

-

โ€˜12-13

โ€˜15

โ€˜14

โ€˜16

-

all

SUVs: SMALL Continued Subaru Forester Subaru XV/Crosstrek Toyota RAV4

-

โ€˜14

โ€˜09-10

Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class

-

Nissan Murano

โ€˜11

โ€˜12-14

-

โ€˜12

Volkswagen Tiguan

โ€˜15, โ€˜17

all all all

SUVs: MIDSIZED AND LARGE Acura MDX Acura RDX Chevrolet Equinox Chevrolet Tahoe Ford Flex GMC Terrain GMC Yukon Honda Pilot Hyundai Santa Fe Hyundai Santa Fe Sport Infiniti QX50 Kia Sorento Lexus NX Lexus RX Lincoln MKX Mazda CX-9

Nissan Xterra Toyota 4Runner Toyota FJ Cruiser Toyota Highlander Toyota Sequoia

โ€˜11

โ€˜13

-

โ€˜15-17

-

โ€˜12

โ€˜13

โ€˜12

-

โ€˜17

-

โ€˜15-17

-

โ€˜12

โ€˜13

โ€˜11-12

-

โ€˜14-15

-

-

โ€˜15

โ€˜16-17

โ€˜18

โ€˜15-16 โ€˜17-18

-

โ€˜16-17

-

-

โ€˜16-17 โ€˜18 โ€˜15

โ€˜09-10 โ€˜11-12 โ€˜13-14

โ€˜15

-

โ€˜13

โ€˜14

-

โ€˜15

โ€˜17

โ€˜11

-

โ€˜16

โ€˜18

โ€˜15

-

-

โ€˜15

โ€˜10-11 โ€˜12-13 โ€˜14-15

-

-

โ€˜14

โ€˜09-11 โ€˜12-13 โ€˜14-15 โ€˜16-17

-

โ€˜10

-

โ€˜13

โ€˜09-11

โ€˜12

โ€˜13-14

โ€˜09-10 โ€˜11-13

โ€˜15

-

-

all all all all all all all all all all all all all all all all all all all all all all

PICKUP TRUCKS Honda Ridgeline Nissan Frontier Toyota Tacoma Toyota Tundra

-

โ€˜09-12 โ€˜13-14 โ€˜09

โ€˜15

โ€˜11-12 โ€˜13-14 โ€˜15-16

-

all

โ€˜09

โ€˜12

-

all

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

all

191

USED C A RS

Prices Make & Model


Detailed Used Car Reliability THESE CHARTS GIVE YOU a modelโ€™s complete reliability picture for its used versions (2013 through 2018). The detailed reliability ratings are based on our Annual Car Reliability Survey, for which we received responses on more than half-a-million vehicles. The Annual Car Reliability Survey is sent to subscribers of Consumer Reports and ConsumerReports.org. Respondents reported on any serious problems they had with their vehicles in any of the trouble spots included in the following

HOW TO USE THE CHARTS

To check on the reliability history of a particular yearโ€™s model, start with the Used Car Verdict. This score shows whether the model had more or fewer problems overall than the average model of that year, calculated from the total number of problems reported by subscribers in all trouble spots. Because problems with the engine, major; engine cooling; transmission, major; and drive system can be serious and expensive to repair, our calculations give extra weight to problems in those areas. To assess a used car in more detail, look at the individual ratings for each of the 17 trouble spots. They will pinpoint a modelโ€™s strengths and weaknesses. Ratings are based on

192

charts, during the previous 12 months. These were considered serious because of cost, failure, safety, or downtime. Because high-mileage vehicles tend to have more problems than low-mileage ones, problem rates are standardized to minimize differences related to mileage. The 2018 models were generally less than 6 months old at the time of the survey and had been driven an average of about 3,000 miles. Models with insufficient data are noted with a column of asterisks (*).

the percentage of survey respondents who reported problems for that trouble spot, compared with the average of all vehicles for that year. Models that score a 1 are not necessarily unreliable, but they have a higher rate of problems than the average model. Similarly, models that score a 5 are not necessarily problemfree but had relatively few problems compared with other models. Because problem rates in some trouble spots are very low, we do not assign a 1 or a 2 unless the modelโ€™s problem rate exceeds 3 percent. If a problem rate is below 2 or 1 percent, it will be assigned a 4 or a 5 respectively. Newer vehicles should have few, if any, problems. In some cases a model may

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

score 4 and 5 in most categories, but the verdict is a 3 or lower because it still has more problems than the average model. Model years with insufficient data are noted with a column of asterisks (*). A model year in bold identifies the year it was introduced or underwent a major redesign. TROUBLE SPOTS

Engine, Major Engine rebuild or replacement, cylinder head, head gasket, turbo or supercharger, timing chain or timing belt. Engine, Minor Oil leaks, accessory belts and pulleys, engine mounts, engine knock or ping. Engine Cooling Radiator, cooling fan, antifreeze leaks, water pump, thermostat, overheating. Transmission, Major Trans


rack and pinion), power steering, wheel balance, springs or torsion bars, bushings, electronic or air suspension. Brakes Premature wear, pulsation or vibration, squeaking, master cylinder, calipers, rooters, antilock brake system (ABS), parking brake, brake failure. Exhaust Muffler, pipes, catalytic converter, exhaust manifold, leaks. Paint/Trim Paint (fading, chalking, cracking, peeling), loose trim or moldings, rust. Noises/Leaks Squeaks or rattles, seals and/or weather stripping, air or water leaks, wind noise. Body Hardware Windows,

locks and latches, tailgate, hatch or trunk, doors or sliding doors, mirrors, seat controls, safety belts, sunroof, convertible top, glass defect. Power Equipment and Accessories Cruise control, clock, warning lights, body control module, keyless entry, wiper motor or washer, tire pressure monitor, interior or exterior light, horn, gauges, 12V power plug, alarm or security system. In-Car Electronics Audio systems, entertainment systems, navigation system, backup camera/sensors, communication system.

AVERAGE PROBLEM RATES MODEL YEARS

TROUBLE SPOTS

Engine, Major

13 14 15 16 17 18 1

1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Engine, Minor

1

1

Engine, Cooling

1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

1

1 <1 <1

Trans., Major

1

1

1 <1 <1 <1

Trans., Minor

1

1

1

1

1 <1

Drive System

2

1

1

1

1 <1

Fuel System

2

1

1

1

1 <1

Electrical

1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Climate System

2

2

2

1

1 <1

Suspension

2

2

1

1

1 <1

2

2

1

1

1 <1

Brakes Exhaust

<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Paint/Trim

2

1

1

1

1 <1

Noises/Leaks

2

2

2

2

1

Body Hardware

1

1

1

1 <1 <1

Power Equipment

3

3

2

2

1

1

In-Car Electronics

3

3

3

3

2

1

1

This chart shows the average rates of problems for all vehicles in our survey. For example, in 2013, fewer than one percent of vehicles had exhaust problems on average. Models with fewer problems will score a 5 or 4; models with more problems will score a 2 or 1.

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

193

USED C A R REL I A B IL I T Y

mission rebuild or replacement, torque converter, premature clutch replacement. Transmission, Minor Gear selector or linkage, coolers and lines, rough shifting, slipping transmission, leaks, transmission computer, transmission sensor or solenoid, clutch adjustment, hydraulics (clutch master or slave cylinder). Drive System Driveshaft or axle, CV joint, differential, transfer case, 4WD/ AWD components, driveline vibration, traction control, stability control (ESC), electrical failure. Fuel System Checkengine light, sensors (includes O2 or oxygen sensor), emission-control devices (includes EGR), engine computer, fuel cap, fuel gauge/sender, fuel-injection system, fuel pump, fuel leaks, stalling or hesitation. Electrical Alternator, starter, hybrid battery and related systems, regular battery, battery cables, engine harness, coil, ignition switch, electronic ignition, distributor or rotor failure, spark plugs and wires failure. Climate System Blower (fan) motor, A/C compressor, condenser, evaporator, heater system, automatic climate control, refrigerant leakage, electrical failure. Suspension Shocks or struts, ball joints, tie rods, wheel bearings, alignment, steering linkage (includes


TROUBLE SPOTS

Acura MDX

Acura RDX

Acura TL, TLX

Acura TSX

Audi A3 โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 40 50 50 50 5

0 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 30 50 5 0 40 30 50 10 40 5 0 50 40 50 30 50 5 0 50 50 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 30 40 50 5 0 40 40 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 40 5 0 40 20 40 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 40 5 0 40 30 40 40 40 5 0 20 10 30 30 30 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 40 50 5 0 20 30 40 50 50 5 0 20 40 30 20 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 20 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 20 50 40 5 0 40 40 50 30 20 4

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 30 40 50 5 0 20 50 10 10 20 4 0 40 40 30 30 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 40 5 0 20 40 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 30 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 40 40 40 50 5 0 10 50 40 30 50 5 0 20 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 30 50 5 0 30 30 30 30 10 1

0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 30 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 30 5 0 30 4 0 20 5 0 50 5 0 40 3 0 30 1 0 40 1 0 40 5 0 40 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 40 30 40 10 30 3

0 40 40 30 40 40 4

0 30 40 10 10 30 4

0 40 5

Audi A4

Audi A5

Audi A6

Audi Q3

Audi Q5

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

50 40 50 5 *0 50 50 40 5 *0 40 50 50 5 *0 50 40 50 5 *0 50 40 40 5 *0 40 50 50 5 *0 20 30 50 4 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 40 40 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 20 50 50 5 *0 40 50 40 4 *0 40 50 50 5 *0 10 30 20 5 *0 40 40 10 5 *0 0 30 20 30 3

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 40 50 50 50 50 5

0 40 50 50 5

0 30 50 50 5

0 30 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 20 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 30 20 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 20 40 50 50 5 0 20 20 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 40 5 0 50 30 50 50 40 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 40 50 50 40 5 0 30 40 40 40 40 4

0 30 50 30 5 0 20 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 2 0 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 30 4 0 40 50 50 5 0 20 50 20 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 4 0 40 50 50 5 0 30 50 30 5 0 40 50 40 4

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 30 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 40 5 0 10 10 20 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 40 50 5 0 20 10 10 10 30 2 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 40 5 0 40 40 30 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 40 5 0 40 40 40 40 50 5 0 40 40 40 20 30 5

0 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 5 0 50 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 50 3 0 20 10 10 2

0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 10 10 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 30 30 50 50 5 0 30 30 40 50 50 5 0 20 20 30 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 50 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 30 30 10 4

USED-CAR VERDICTS

* 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0

0 40 50 50 50 50 5

0 30 20 40 50 40 3

0 30 50 30 5

0 4

0 40 30 30 20 20 2

0 30 40 50 3

0 20 30 30 40 50 3

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

0 5

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

194

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Engine, Major Engine, Minor Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip. In-Car Elec. USED-CAR VERDICTS

Audi Q7

BMW 1 Series, 2 Series

BMW 3 Series

BMW 4 Series

BMW 5 Series

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

0 3

0 50 50 50 5

0 30 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 5

0 40 50 50 50 50 5

0 1 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5

0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 4 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 30 5 0 50 50 50 4 0 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 50 3 0 50 40 40 4

0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 40 40 5 0 30 10 50 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 30 40 40 4 0 10 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 50 30 40 4 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 10 30 40 50 4 0 40 10 50 40 30 4

0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 30 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 5 0 20 20 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 5 0 10 30 30 40 5 0 40 40 50 30 5

0 10 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 20 50 30 40 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 40 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 20 50 30 10 4 0 30 30 40 40 40 5

0 50 30 50 1

0 20 20 40 40 30 1

0 30 40 40 40 5

0 30 30 50 30 10 2

0 50 4

0 50 5

* * 50 4*0 50 5 *0 50 4*0 50 5 *0 50 5*0 50 5 *0 50 5*0 50 5 *0 50 5*0 50 5 *0 30 1*0 50 5 *0 50 4*0 50 5 *0 40 3*0 50 5 *0 50 5*0 50 5 *0 30 1*0 30 5 *0 40 5*0 50 5 *0 40 5*0 50 5 *0 50 1*0 50 4 *0 50 2*0 50 5 *0 30 1*0 40 5 *0 50 1*0 20 5 *0 0 40 1

0 30 5

0 1

*

*

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

BMW i3

BMW X1

BMW X3

BMW X5

Buick Enclave

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

0 10 50 50 50 50 5

0 40 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Major

0 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 40 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 20 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 3 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 10 5 0 40 5

0 40 50 50 30 40 5 0 10 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 40 5 0 50 40 40 30 50 5 0 30 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 50 40 40 30 5 0 50 50 50 10 50 5 0 40 50 30 10 40 5 0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 30 50 50 40 5 0 20 40 10 30 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 40 10 30 2 0 50 30 50 20 30 5

0 10 30 40 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 40 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 20 40 40 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 30 10 10 20 40 3 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 30 40 40 30 5 0 30 30 30 30 20 5

0 10 20 50 40 50 5 0 10 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 50 40 50 40 5 0 10 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 50 50 50 40 5 0 40 40 50 50 40 5 0 40 10 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 30 40 30 5 0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 50 5

0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 3 0 50 40 50 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 10 30 40 5 0 10 40 30 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 30 50 40 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 40 30 50 40 4 0 40 20 30 40 40 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

* * 5* *0 5* *0 5* *0 5* *0 4* *0 5* *0 5* *0 5* *0 5* *0 5* *0 5* *0 5* *0 5* *0 5* *0 5* *0 5* *0

0 40 50 50 50 50 5

0 30 5

0 5

0 20 50 30 10 30 3

0 10 30 30 50 40 3

0 10 40 40 40 20 4

0 30 30 30 30 40 1

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

1

2

WORSE

3

4

0 5

5

BET TER

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

195

USED C A R REL I A B IL I T Y

TROUBLE SPOTS


TROUBLE SPOTS

Buick Encore

Buick Envision

Buick LaCrosse

Buick Regal

Buick Verano

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 30 40 40 50 5

0 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 10 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 40 50 5 0 50 30 40 50 50 5 0 50 40 30 50 50 5 0 10 30 10 50 40 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 30 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 30 30 40 50 50 5 0 50 30 40 50 50 5 0 40 20 50 50 40 5 0 30 50 20 30 40 5

0 10 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 20 5 0 40 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 40 5 0 40 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 20 40 5 0 30 40 5

0 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 4 0 40 40 50 50 5 0 10 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 50 4 0 40 40 40 30 5 0 40 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 4 0 30 40 50 40 5 0 30 30 40 30 4 0 30 40 30 30 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 40 10 20 30 40 5

0 40 30 5

0 40 30 40 40 3

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 30 30 50 5

* * 30 50 40 5* *0 50 50 50 5* *0 50 50 40 5* *0 50 50 50 5* *0 30 50 50 5* *0 50 50 50 5* *0 10 50 40 5* *0 40 50 50 5* *0 50 50 50 5* *0 10 50 50 3* *0 50 50 50 5* *0 50 20 50 5* *0 50 20 50 4* *0 50 50 50 4* *0 30 50 30 4* *0 10 20 20 3* *0

0 50 50 50 1

0 20 40 40 4

0 40 50 50 1

0 50 50 50 1 0 50 50 50 1 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 1 0 40 50 50 5 0 20 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 5 0 50 40 40 5 0 50 50 40 5 0 30 10 50 1 0 20 40 50 4

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

Cadillac ATS

Cadillac CTS

Cadillac Escalade

Cadillac SRX

Cadillac XTS

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

* * 20 40 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 10 30 5* *0 10 10 2* *0 10 40 2* *0 50 50 5* *0 40 40 5* *0 10 10 5* *0 10 50 4* *0 10 30 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 10 40 5* *0 10 10 2* *0 10 30 5* *0 10 10 5* *0 10 10 5* *0

0 50 40 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 5

0 40 40 40 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 4 0 10 30 50 5 0 30 30 40 5 0 30 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 20 30 50 4 0 20 10 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 30 30 3 0 20 50 40 4 0 20 30 40 5 0 10 10 10 3 0 10 10 10 1

0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 30 5 0 50 30 50 40 2 0 30 30 40 40 5 0 50 30 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 30 40 40 5 0 10 10 10 50 3 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 30 50 5 0 50 30 40 50 5 0 40 40 10 40 3 0 30 50 50 40 5 0 10 10 10 20 4 0 10 10 40 10 4

0 10 10 1

0 10 10 30 3

0 10 10 10 30 3

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 30 50 5

0 50 50 50 4

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 40 20 10 1 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 3 0 50 30 30 1 0 10 50 30 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 10 30 50 1 0 40 40 10 4 0 50 50 50 4 0 50 50 50 3 0 50 50 50 1 0 40 50 30 1 0 50 50 40 1 0 50 30 40 5 0 10 10 10 1

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 40 30 20 1

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 3 0 50 50 50 3 0 10 40 50 3 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 2 0 20 20 20 3 0 20 50 50 4 0 50 40 50 4 0 20 40 20 5 0 40 20 50 5 0 50 50 50 4 0 50 30 40 4 0 20 20 10 2

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 30 30 50 1

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

196

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

0 50 50 5

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Chevrolet Bolt

Chevrolet Camaro

Chevrolet Colorado

Chevrolet Corvette

Chevrolet Cruze

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 30 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 3 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 10 5

0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 4 0 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 1 0 50 50 50 50 3 0 50 20 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 30 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 10 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 2 0 30 50 40 40 1 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 30 30 5 0 10 20 10 30 2

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 30 5

0 50 30 50 40 1

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

0 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 40 30 40 50 50 5

0 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 30 5 0 40 30 40 3 0 40 40 30 5 0 20 30 30 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 40 5 0 10 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 4 0 10 20 40 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 30 20 50 5 0 50 50 50 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 40 50 4 0 50 30 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 20 5 0 40 30 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 20 5 0 50 50 50 40 50 4 0 40 20 40 50 20 5 0 40 10 40 40 50 5

0 10 10 50 40 50 5 0 20 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 20 50 5 0 20 40 50 50 50 5 0 30 10 10 30 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 40 50 40 40 5 0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 40 5 0 10 20 10 40 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 30 10 40 40 5 0 50 50 20 30 40 5

0 20 30 10 1

0 50 50 40 20 30 1

0 10 10 30 30 30 5

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

Chevrolet Equinox

Chevrolet Impala

Chevrolet Malibu

Chevrolet Silverado 1500

Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 30 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 30 50 50 40 50 5

0 40 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 40 50 50 50 4

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 50 5 0 40 40 30 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 30 40 40 5 0 20 30 30 20 40 4

0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 10 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 30 40 5 0 10 30 40 50 50 5 0 10 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 40 20 20 20 40 5 0 50 30 30 30 50 5

0 30 50 50 30 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 40 5 0 30 40 50 30 40 4 0 20 40 50 50 40 5 0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 40 5 0 30 40 50 50 40 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 40 50 5 0 30 50 40 10 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 30 20 40 5 0 50 50 40 20 40 5

0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 30 30 30 5 0 40 30 30 40 40 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 10 30 40 50 5 0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 40 50 40 50 5 0 30 30 50 30 30 5 0 40 40 50 40 50 5 0 40 30 30 40 40 5 0 40 40 20 30 40 5

0 50 20 50 40 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 30 5 0 40 30 50 30 20 5 0 10 10 10 40 10 4 0 50 30 50 50 50 4 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 20 50 10 50 2 0 20 40 50 40 30 5 0 40 20 30 50 50 4 0 40 40 40 50 40 4 0 50 20 30 20 30 1 0 50 30 40 50 50 5 0 40 30 30 30 30 4 0 50 40 20 40 30 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 30 30 40 50 50 3

0 20 30 40 30 40 4

0 20 40 50 10 20 3

0 30 20 30 20 10 3

0 30 10 30 10 10 1

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

1

2

WORSE

3

4

5

BET TER

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

197

USED C A R REL I A B IL I T Y

TROUBLE SPOTS


TROUBLE SPOTS

Chevrolet Suburban

Chevrolet Tahoe

Chevrolet Traverse

Chevrolet Trax

Chevrolet Volt

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 20 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 30 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 30 40 50 5 0 50 50 10 40 50 5 0 30 30 20 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 10 30 40 5 0 30 40 10 40 40 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 30 50 40 3 0 50 40 40 30 50 4 0 50 40 50 40 40 5 0 50 40 10 10 40 5 0 40 50 10 20 40 2

0 50 40 40 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 10 50 50 5 0 40 50 10 40 40 5 0 40 50 30 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 10 40 50 5 0 30 50 20 40 40 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 10 40 50 5 0 20 30 20 30 30 3 0 20 10 40 50 50 5 0 40 10 20 20 50 5 0 50 40 30 10 30 5

0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 40 50 50 40 4 0 40 50 20 50 50 5 0 50 50 30 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 10 10 40 5 0 10 30 40 40 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 40 30 50 5 0 10 40 40 30 50 4 0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 40 30 40 40 5 0 30 40 50 40 50 4

0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 40 50 5 0 50 10 5 0 50 50 5 0 40 10 5 0 50 50 1 0 40 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 40 40 1 0 40 50 5 0 40 50 5 0 30 50 5 0 30 50 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 40 30 10 20 30 5

0 40 20 10 30 30 5

0 20 40 20 30 40 1

0 30 20 1

Chrysler 300

Chrysler Pacifica

Chrysler Town & Country

Dodge Challenger

Dodge Charger

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 30 30 30 20 30 5 0 50 50 40 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 20 30 30 40 5 0 50 30 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 40 20 50 50 5 0 40 40 20 50 50 5 0 20 30 10 40 40 4 0 20 50 20 20 20 5 0 40 30 10 30 10 3

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS Engine, Major

0 40 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 30 50 30 3 0 10 30 50 40 4 0 20 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 50 40 3 0 40 20 50 40 5 0 20 20 10 50 3 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 4 0 50 50 30 50 3 0 50 50 40 50 4 0 10 10 50 30 3 0 10 10 20 50 1

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 10 10 50 30 1

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 50 5

0 50 50 50 5

0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 30 4 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 30 4 0 20 1

0 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 20 30 40 4 0 50 50 40 5 0 40 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 10 30 10 4 0 40 50 40 4 0 20 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 40 4 0 20 30 20 3 0 50 50 50 4 0 20 10 30 2 0 40 40 30 3

0 10 1

0 30 30 30 3

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

198

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 50 50 5

* * 50 50 5* *0 30 50 1* *0 50 20 5* *0 20 20 3* *0 20 50 3* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 1* *0 50 50 5* *0 20 50 3* *0 50 40 5* *0 50 50 1* *0 30 50 1* *0 10 50 1* *0 0 20 40 1

5*0 50 5* *0 5*0 50 3* *0 5*0 30 5* *0 5*0 50 5* *0 5*0 50 3* *0 5*0 50 3* *0 5*0 40 3* *0 5*0 50 5* *0 2*0 50 5* *0 2*0 50 3* *0 2*0 50 3* *0 5*0 50 5* *0 5*0 10 5* *0 5*0 50 5* *0 5*0 40 5* *0 2*0 40 1* *0 2*0 20 1* *0 0 3

0 30 1


Dodge Durango

Dodge Grand Caravan

Ford C-MAX

Ford Edge

Ford Escape

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 40 40 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 50 40 50 10 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 30 50 50 5 0 10 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 10 20 20 50 5 0 30 40 50 10 50 4 0 30 40 40 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 30 50 50 5 0 10 40 30 10 50 3 0 30 50 30 50 50 5 0 10 20 10 10 30 5 0 10 10 40 30 40 2

0 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 5 0 20 30 40 40 4 0 50 50 40 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 30 10 40 4 0 40 50 40 40 5 0 20 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 40 40 5 0 20 30 20 30 3 0 50 50 50 40 4 0 20 10 30 20 4 0 40 40 30 30 4

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 20 40 50 2 0 50 40 30 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 2 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 2 0 40 50 10 30 50 4 0 40 30 10 30 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 2 0 30 20 30 30 40 5 0 10 10 10 20 40 5

0 50 50 30 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 10 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 20 50 5 0 10 30 30 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 30 40 30 4 0 40 50 40 40 50 5 0 20 20 40 20 40 5 0 30 20 30 10 50 4

0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 40 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 40 50 5 0 30 40 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 30 40 30 40 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 20 30 30 40 40 5 0 10 30 30 20 40 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 20 20 10 10 20 4

0 30 30 30 30 3

0 30 30 30 30 50 1

0 30 30 30 20 40 3

0 20 20 40 40 30 4

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

Ford Expedition

Ford Explorer

Ford F-150

Ford F-250

Ford Fiesta โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 40 50 50 50 50 5

0 40 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 40 30 30 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 40 5 0 40 50 40 20 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 30 40 50 5 0 30 40 50 10 40 5 0 40 20 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 10 30 50 50 5 0 30 30 30 10 40 5 0 10 20 10 50 50 5 0 20 50 30 50 30 4 0 10 30 30 30 20 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 40 50 5 0 30 40 40 40 50 5 0 30 50 40 40 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 30 30 40 40 5 0 20 20 20 30 50 5 0 20 20 40 50 50 5 0 20 10 10 30 40 5 0 10 20 10 20 40 5 0 10 20 30 30 50 3 0 20 40 20 30 40 5 0 30 30 30 30 40 5 0 10 10 30 30 40 4

0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 50 4 0 30 40 40 40 40 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 30 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 40 30 40 40 5 0 40 50 30 40 50 5 0 30 30 30 30 40 4 0 30 30 30 20 40 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 20 30 20 20 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 30 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 50 5 0 50 30 50 30 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 20 5 0 50 50 50 40 40 5 0 50 50 50 40 40 5 0 10 40 40 30 40 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 10 20 20 30 30 4

0 20 20 10 10 30 5

0 20 30 30 30 30 1

0 30 40 30 30 30 5

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

1

2

WORSE

3

4

30 5* *0 30 5* *0 40 2* *0 10 1* *0 10 1* *0 10 4* *0 40 2* *0 40 5* *0 10 1* *0 40 4* *0 20 4* *0 50 4* *0 10 5* *0 50 1* *0 40 5* *0 10 5* *0 10 1* *0 0 10 1*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

5

BET TER

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

199

USED C A R REL I A B IL I T Y

TROUBLE SPOTS


TROUBLE SPOTS

Ford Flex

Ford Focus

Ford Fusion

Ford Mustang

Ford Taurus

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 5

0 40 50 50 40 20 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 40 5

0 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 20 40 5 0 20 50 50 40 5 0 40 50 50 50 5 0 10 50 40 20 3 0 10 30 30 40 4 0 10 30 40 20 5 0 50 50 40 50 5 0 30 30 20 50 5 0 20 50 30 10 1 0 40 30 20 50 5 0 30 10 50 30 5 0 10 20 50 50 3

0 30 30 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 10 10 30 5 0 10 10 10 10 20 5 0 10 10 30 50 40 5 0 30 50 40 40 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 2 0 40 30 30 40 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 40 5 0 30 30 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 40 5 0 50 40 40 50 40 5 0 30 30 20 40 40 5 0 50 30 20 50 50 5 0 10 30 30 40 40 5 0 30 10 30 30 50 5

0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 30 10 10 10 10 3 0 50 30 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 40 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 30 50 10 5 0 10 30 20 40 20 5

0 50 30 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 50 5 0 30 40 40 40 50 5 0 10 50 50 30 40 5 0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 20 10 10 30 5 0 10 40 40 30 40 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 30 20 20 5 0 10 20 40 40 30 5 0 40 50 40 10 40 5 0 40 40 20 10 40 5 0 40 50 20 30 30 5

0 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 5 0 40 50 40 5 0 20 50 30 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 50 5 0 20 50 10 3 0 40 30 40 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 20 3 0 30 20 20 3 0 20 30 50 5 0 30 10 40 4 0 10 10 50 1

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 20 30 30 20 4

0 10 10 10 10 10 3

0 30 20 30 40 10 2

0 20 30 10 10 10 5

0 30 40 30 5

Genesis G80

Genesis G90

GMC Acadia

GMC Canyon

GMC Sierra 1500

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS Engine, Major

0 50 5

0 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 5

0 40 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 30 5 0 50 1

0 40 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 4 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 40 5 0 50 5

0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 40 5 0 20 50 40 50 40 5 0 50 50 30 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 10 20 40 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 5 0 30 30 20 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 40 30 50 4 0 10 30 30 40 20 2 0 10 50 50 40 50 5 0 10 10 10 10 20 5 0 10 20 30 10 20 5

0 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 30 5 0 40 30 40 3 0 40 40 30 5 0 20 30 30 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 40 5 0 10 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 4 0 10 20 40 5

0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 30 30 30 5 0 40 30 30 40 40 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 10 30 40 50 5 0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 40 50 40 50 5 0 30 30 50 30 30 5 0 40 40 50 40 50 5 0 40 30 30 40 40 5 0 40 40 20 30 40 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 30 5

0 20 5

0 10 10 10 10 20 4

0 20 30 10 1

0 30 20 30 20 10 3

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

200

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


GMC Sierra 2500HD

GMC Terrain

GMC Yukon

GMC Yukon XL

Honda Accord

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 40 50 50 50 4

0 30 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 20 50 40 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 30 5 0 40 30 50 30 20 5 0 10 10 10 40 10 4 0 50 30 50 50 50 4 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 20 50 10 50 2 0 20 40 50 40 30 5 0 40 20 30 50 50 4 0 40 40 40 50 40 4 0 50 20 30 20 30 1 0 50 30 40 50 50 5 0 40 30 30 30 30 4 0 50 40 20 40 30 5

0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 50 5 0 40 40 30 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 30 40 40 5 0 20 30 30 20 40 4

0 50 40 40 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 10 50 50 5 0 40 50 10 40 40 5 0 40 50 30 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 10 40 50 5 0 30 50 20 40 40 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 10 40 50 5 0 20 30 20 30 30 3 0 20 10 40 50 50 5 0 40 10 20 20 50 5 0 50 40 30 10 30 5

0 50 30 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 30 40 50 5 0 50 50 10 40 50 5 0 30 30 20 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 10 30 40 5 0 30 40 10 40 40 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 30 50 40 3 0 50 40 40 30 50 4 0 50 40 50 40 40 5 0 50 40 10 10 40 5 0 40 50 10 20 40 2

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 30 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 30 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 30 30 30 50 5 0 30 30 30 20 30 4

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 30 10 30 10 10 1

0 30 30 40 50 50 3

0 40 20 10 30 30 5

0 40 30 10 20 30 5

0 50 40 40 40 50 3

Honda Civic

Honda Crosstour

Honda CR-V

Honda Fit

Honda HR-V โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 4

0 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 30 50 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 30 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 30 40 5 0 40 40 50 10 20 4

0 50 4 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 20 4 0 50 5 0 20 4 0 10 5 0 40 5 0 10 4 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 30 5 0 50 5 0 30 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 40 30 5 0 40 50 40 40 20 4

0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5

0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 4 0 30 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 5

0 40 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 30 50 4 0 40 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 40 5 0 40 40 5 0 50 50 5 0 30 50 5 0 40 50 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 50 50 50 30 30 5

0 30 5

0 50 50 50 50 40 4

0 4

0 30 40 50 5

0 40 50 3

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

1

2

WORSE

3

4

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

5

BET TER

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

201

USED C A R REL I A B IL I T Y

TROUBLE SPOTS


TROUBLE SPOTS

Honda Odyssey

Honda Pilot

Honda Ridgeline

Hyundai Elantra

Hyundai Genesis

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 40 50 50 50 50 5

0 20 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 5

0 50 5

0 40 50 50 50 50 5

0 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 20 50 50 40 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 40 50 5 0 10 10 30 50 30 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 40 50 5 0 30 30 40 30 50 5 0 40 30 50 40 50 5 0 30 30 40 40 30 3 0 40 40 40 40 30 1

0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 40 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 10 20 20 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 30 40 5 0 30 50 30 40 40 5 0 50 40 40 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 40 5 0 40 30 30 10 30 5

0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 30 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 30 5 0 40 5 0 40 5 0 30 5 0 50 5

0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 3 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 30 5 0 40 5 0 30 5 0 30 4

0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 40 50 5 0 20 10 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 50 5 0 40 20 50 40 40 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 20 40 50 40 50 5 0 30 50 30 50 50 4

0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 1

50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 4 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 30 5 *0 40 2 *0 40 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 2 *0 20 2 *0 40 5 *0 10 3 *0 20 3 *0

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 30 30 50 40 30 1

0 30 50 40 30 30 4

0 50 5

0 30 1

0 30 40 40 40 50 2

0 3

0 30 3

Hyundai Ioniq

Hyundai Santa Fe

Hyundai Santa Fe Sport

Hyundai Sonata

Hyundai Tucson

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 5

0 50 40 50 50 50 5

0 20 40 40 50 50 5

0 30 30 40 50 50 5

0 40 30 30 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 30 5 0 50 5

0 50 50 40 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 40 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 40 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 20 20 50 50 5 0 20 20 50 40 50 5

0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 20 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 30 50 50 5 0 20 40 40 50 50 5 0 20 30 40 40 40 5

0 30 40 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 30 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 10 30 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 30 30 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 20 40 50 50 4 0 30 30 40 40 40 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 10 20 5 0 50 40 50 10 40 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 20 10 20 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 20 20 50 40 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 40 5 0 30 30 30 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 10 50 5 0 30 40 50 40 40 4

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 30 5

0 30 20 40 50 40 5

0 30 30 40 50 40 5

0 30 20 40 40 30 4

0 40 40 30 10 10 3

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

202

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Infiniti JX, QX60

Infiniti M, Q70

Infiniti Q50

Jaguar F-Pace

Jeep Cherokee

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 40 50 50 50 5

0 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 40 30 50 40 5 0 50 40 40 40 5 0 10 10 30 40 5 0 50 10 20 50 5 0 50 30 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 30 30 50 5 0 50 20 40 40 5 0 10 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 20 10 5 0 10 10 10 10 3 0 30 10 50 10 5 0 20 20 30 50 4 0 10 30 40 10 1

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 10 10 20 20 5

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 5

0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 1 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 5 0 1

* * 5* *0 5* *0 5* *0 5* *0 2* *0 2* *0 5* *0 5* *0 1* *0 1* *0 2* *0 2* *0 2* *0 2* *0 2* *0 5* *0

0 4

0 1

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 50 50 20 50 5

0 40 5

0 50 50 50 50 5

0 30 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 20 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 30 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 10 30 3 0 40 40 30 40 5 0 40 10 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 40 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 4 0 30 40 50 40 5 0 40 40 20 40 5 0 10 20 10 30 4

0 50 4 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 20 2 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 40 4 0 40 4 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 20 5 0 10 4 0 30 5 0 10 5 0 10 1

0 40 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 5 0 10 30 50 50 5 0 10 10 20 40 5 0 10 20 20 40 5 0 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 40 30 50 5 0 10 50 50 40 5 0 30 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 5 0 10 40 20 40 5 0 40 40 50 50 5 0 10 20 20 30 5 0 20 20 40 30 5

0 20 30 20 10 4

0 10 1

0 10 10 10 20 5

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

Jeep Grand Cherokee

Jeep Renegade

Jeep Wrangler

Kia Cadenza

Kia Forte

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

0 50 40 40 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 4

0 40 30 40 50 50 5 0 30 50 40 50 50 5 0 20 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 40 30 50 50 5 0 20 30 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 20 40 40 50 50 5 0 20 40 40 50 50 5 0 10 30 40 50 40 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 30 10 10 20 5 0 10 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 50 40 50 5 0 20 30 30 20 50 5

0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 3 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 4 0 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 3 0 40 50 50 4 0 30 10 40 3 0 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 4 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 10 50 5 0 10 30 50 4 0 50 40 50 5 0 40 10 50 4 0 20 10 50 5

0 10 30 20 50 40 2

0 30 30 50 1

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 30 20 50 40 5 0 10 30 40 40 40 5 0 30 20 40 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 20 30 50 50 5 0 10 30 40 50 50 5 0 10 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 30 40 40 40 5 0 10 40 30 30 30 5 0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 10 10 30 30 40 5 0 40 10 20 30 40 3

0 50 50 5 0 10 10 4 0 40 50 5 0 50 50 4 0 20 20 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 30 40 5 0 50 50 5 0 10 40 5 0 30 50 5 0 10 50 5 0 10 10 3 0 20 30 5 0 10 10 1 0 10 30 2

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 10 10 10 30 20 2

0 10 10 2

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

1

2

WORSE

3

4

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 30 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 40 50 40 50 5 *0 40 50 40 50 5 *0 50 50 50 40 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 40 5 *0 30 50 50 40 5 *0 40 40 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 40 40 50 40 5 *0 30 50 50 50 3 *0 40 50 40 50 5 *0 20 50 30 20 5 *0 10 40 30 40 5 *0 0 40 50 40 20 5

5

BET TER

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

203

USED C A R REL I A B IL I T Y

TROUBLE SPOTS


TROUBLE SPOTS

Kia Niro

Kia Optima

Kia Sedona

Kia Sorento

Kia Soul

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

0 50 50 40 50 50 5

Engine, Major

0 50 5

0 20 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 30 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5

0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 40 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 40 50 5 0 30 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 20 40 30 50 5 0 50 10 30 30 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 50 40 40 5 0 20 20 30 30 40 5

* * 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 40 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 40 5* *0 20 20 5* *0 40 20 5* *0 10 20 5* *0 50 40 5* *0

0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 30 40 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 30 50 40 50 5 0 30 40 30 40 50 5 0 10 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 20 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 40 50 5 0 10 10 30 30 50 5 0 40 10 30 40 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 30 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 50 4 0 50 30 50 40 50 5 0 20 30 40 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 30 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 30 40 30 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 10 30 40 50 5 0 30 50 40 50 40 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 30 5

0 30 40 40 30 30 5

0 40 40 5

0 20 20 30 40 40 5

0 40 30 30 50 30 5

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

0 50 50 5

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

Kia Sportage

Lexus CT 200h

Lexus ES

Lexus GS

Lexus GX โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 2

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 30 30 40 5

0 50 50 50 20 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 40 30 40 40 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 30 20 50 4 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 30 20 40 5 0 50 50 40 30 50 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

* 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 40 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 40 30 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 30 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 40 50 5 *0 40 10 40 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0

0 50 50 5

40 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 40 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 20 20 50 50 3 *0 50 30 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 40 50 50 5 *0 40 40 40 50 3 *0 50 50 30 50 4 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 40 40 50 50 5 *0

0 3

0 50 50 30 5

0 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 30 50 4

0 50 50 50 50 3

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

0 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 4 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 4 0 50 50 5 0 30 30 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 4 0 30 40 3 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 40 50 1

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

204

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Lexus IS

Lexus LS

Lexus NX

Lexus RX

Lincoln MKC

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 4 0 10 40 50 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 30 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 10 4 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 30 20 5 0 50 50 50 40 5 0 40 10 50 30 4 0 40 20 10 20 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 50 50 50 40 3

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 4 0 20 40 50 40 4 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 4 0 20 50 30 50 4

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 30 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 3 0 50 50 50 5 0 30 20 30 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 30 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 50 5 0 40 40 50 40 40 5

0 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 10 5 0 20 50 50 5 0 10 10 40 5 0 30 20 20 5

0 50 50 50 4

0 50 50 50 40 40 5

0 20 40 20 4

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

Lincoln MKX

Lincoln MKZ

Mazda 3

Mazda 5

Mazda 6 โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 3 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 30 3 0 50 5 0 30 5 0 50 5 0 30 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 20 5 0 40 5 0 30 3 0 30 5

0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 30 50 5 0 50 50 30 40 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 40 40 5 0 10 10 10 10 50 5 0 30 30 40 40 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 30 40 50 50 5 0 20 30 50 40 30 5 0 40 30 30 50 50 5 0 50 20 10 30 10 5 0 10 30 30 30 30 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 20 20 10 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 40 30 5 0 40 10 20 20 30 5

0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 40 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 40 50 5 0 30 40 5 0 40 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 40 10 4 0 50 40 5 0 50 50 2 0 50 50 1

USED-CAR VERDICTS

* 50 50 5 *0 50 50 5 *0 50 50 5 *0 50 50 5 *0 40 50 5 *0 40 50 5 *0 50 50 5 *0 50 50 4 *0 40 50 5 *0 50 50 5 *0 50 50 5 *0 50 50 5 *0 20 10 5 *0 30 50 5 *0 30 30 5 *0 20 40 5 *0

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 40 50 50 50 5 *0 10 20 40 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 30 30 30 50 5 *0 30 40 50 50 5 *0 40 50 50 50 5 *0 40 40 50 50 5 *0 20 40 20 30 5 *0

0 40 5

0 30 20 4

0 30 30 20 20 10 5

0 50 50 40 40 50 5

0 50 50 5

0 40 40 40 50 5

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

1

2

WORSE

3

4

0 50 50 5

5

BET TER

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

205

USED C A R REL I A B IL I T Y

TROUBLE SPOTS


TROUBLE SPOTS

Mazda CX-3

Mazda CX-5

Mazda CX-9

Mazda MX-5 Miata

MercedesBenz C-Class

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 5

0 40 50 30 50 50 4

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 40 50 5 0 40 40 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 40 5 0 10 10 5 0 50 30 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 40 40 5 0 40 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 30 20 4 0 30 30 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 50 40 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 30 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 50 5 0 40 20 30 20 40 5

0 50 50 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 40 5 0 20 10 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 30 40 5 0 30 20 50 20 50 5 0 10 50 10 20 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 30 40 30 40 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 30 4 0 50 30 40 10 30 4

0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 2 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 5 0 50 30 10 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 5 0 50 10 50 50 1 0 50 50 50 50 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 20 10 5

0 50 40 50 50 50 5

0 30 30 50 30 40 5

0 50 50 50 50 3

MercedesBenz E-Class

MercedesBenz GLA

Mercedes-Benz GLK, GLC

Mercedes-Benz M-Class, GLE

MercedesBenz S-Class

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 30 50 30 50 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 4 0 50 50 30 50 50 4 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 30 50 50 4 0 40 40 20 30 40 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 30 20 20 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 4 0 40 30 10 30 50 3 0 40 50 10 20 30 4 0 40 50 10 40 30 1

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 40 50 50 5

0 50 40 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 40 40 50 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 50 5 0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 50 40 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 40 4 0 30 30 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 40 20 2 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 20 40 40 20 4 0 40 40 40 40 10 4

0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 30 50 5 0 50 30 30 5 0 40 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 20 30 50 4 0 10 50 50 5 0 50 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 10 10 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 20 20 50 5 0 40 50 50 5

0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 40 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 20 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 40 40 5 0 50 30 20 10 10 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 10 20 5 0 50 40 50 50 40 5 0 30 30 30 20 50 4 0 40 40 50 30 20 4

0 20 40 50 40 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 20 20 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 30 50 5 0 40 40 50 40 40 5 0 40 20 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 50 30 5 0 50 40 50 20 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 20 30 40 20 5 0 20 40 30 30 10 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 40 30 50 50 20 1

0 30 20 40 5

0 30 30 40 10 10 3

0 40 30 50 40 20 3

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

206

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 40 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 30 50 5 *0 30 30 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 30 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 30 40 5 *0 10 30 50 5 *0 40 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 30 50 5 *0 10 30 50 3 *0 50 30 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 10 50 40 1 *0 0 30 10 50 5


Mini Cooper

Mini Cooper Countryman

Mitsubishi Outlander

Nissan Altima

Nissan Frontier

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

* 30 40 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 30 50 50 5 *0 10 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 40 50 50 5 *0 30 50 50 5 *0 50 50 10 5 *0 10 10 50 5 *0 40 50 50 5 *0 40 10 50 5 *0 10 50 50 5 *0 40 10 50 5 *0 10 50 50 5 *0 20 30 50 5 *0

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 30 50 40 50 5 0 30 40 40 40 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 30 30 50 50 5 0 30 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 30 30 50 40 5 0 30 10 20 50 20 5 0 40 30 40 50 50 5 0 40 20 30 50 50 5 0 40 20 40 50 50 5

0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 40 50 5 0 30 50 50 40 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 20 50 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 50 5 0 10 40 30 30 20 5 0 50 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 40 30 50 5

0 10 30 50 5

0 30 30 30 40 50 5

0 50 30 50 30 30 3

Engine, Major

0 30 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 10 30 50 30 50 5 0 20 20 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 30 40 40 40 50 5 0 10 20 50 40 50 5 0 30 50 50 30 40 5 0 40 50 40 30 50 5 0 40 10 40 50 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 50 5 0 20 50 40 20 30 5 0 40 30 50 50 40 5 0 10 10 40 40 40 5 0 40 50 50 40 40 4

* 20 50 50 50 4 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 10 40 50 50 5 *0 20 50 40 40 5 *0 30 50 50 50 5 *0 40 50 50 50 4 *0 40 50 50 50 5 *0 20 50 50 50 5 *0 40 50 50 50 5 *0 30 40 30 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 50 5 *0 50 40 50 50 5 *0 50 50 40 50 5 *0 30 40 10 50 5 *0 40 50 40 50 2 *0

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 10 10 40 10 30 5

0 10 50 40 40 3

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

0 50 50 50 50 5

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 50 50 50 5

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

Nissan Juke

Nissan Leaf

Nissan Maxima

Nissan Murano

Nissan Pathfinder

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 5

0 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 10 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 10 10 20 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 4 0 50 50 50 20 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 10 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 30 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 30 5

0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 30 4 0 50 4 0 50 5 0 20 2 0 10 5 0 50 5 0 20 4 0 50 4 0 50 3 0 10 1 0 50 2

0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 4 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 4 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 2

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 40 40 5 0 30 40 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 40 40 5 0 30 40 40 30 50 5 0 50 50 30 40 40 5 0 30 30 30 50 40 5 0 40 50 40 40 40 5

0 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 5 0 20 10 20 40 5 0 40 10 30 10 4 0 40 40 20 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 10 40 4 0 40 30 50 50 4 0 20 40 40 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 20 10 30 4 0 30 20 10 10 5 0 20 30 40 40 5 0 10 30 40 30 5 0 10 50 30 50 2

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 5

0 50 40 40 10 50 3

0 30 3

0 40 4

0 50 40 30 50 30 5

0 20 10 10 20 3

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

1

2

WORSE

3

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

4

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

5

BET TER

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

207

USED C A R REL I A B IL I T Y

TROUBLE SPOTS


TROUBLE SPOTS

Nissan Rogue

Nissan Sentra

Porsche 911

Porsche Macan

Ram 1500

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 40 50 5

0 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 10 30 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 20 40 5 0 50 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 50 40 5 0 40 10 20 20 50 4 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 30 40 50 5 0 50 10 30 40 40 4

0 40 50 50 30 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 50 20 40 5 0 10 40 30 50 5 0 10 50 30 30 5 0 30 50 30 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 30 50 5 0 30 50 50 30 4 0 10 40 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 5 0 10 20 10 40 5 0 10 40 30 10 5 0 30 50 30 40 5 0 20 50 20 50 5 0 10 50 10 40 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 40 30 30 30 40 3

0 10 50 10 20 5

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 20 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 4 0 50 5 0 40 4 0 50 5 0 50 5

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 50 5

* 50 5 *0 30 4 *0 40 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 30 5 *0

0 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 40 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 20 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 10 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 5 0 40 50 50 4 0 40 50 40 2 0 30 30 30 5

0 50 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 40 50 5 0 30 50 50 40 50 4 0 40 20 20 40 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 40 50 5 0 30 40 40 40 40 4 0 50 50 50 50 40 5 0 30 50 50 40 50 5 0 30 40 30 30 50 5 0 30 40 30 30 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 40 5 0 10 30 10 20 40 5 0 10 10 40 20 40 3

0 30 3

0 10 30 40 2

0 30 30 20 10 30 1

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

Ram 2500

Subaru Forester

Subaru Impreza

Subaru Legacy

Subaru Outback

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 10 40 50 50 50 5

0 40 50 50 50 50 5

0 30 50 50 50 50 5

0 30 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 40 50 50 30 50 5 0 10 20 30 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 40 50 5 0 40 30 20 30 50 5 0 10 40 40 40 40 5 0 10 30 10 20 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 30 30 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 30 40 40 4 0 10 40 50 50 30 4 0 10 20 30 50 50 4 0 20 30 50 30 40 5 0 10 20 50 50 50 4 0 50 30 30 50 50 5 0 50 10 20 20 50 5 0 30 20 40 40 30 3

0 30 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 50 30 5 0 40 30 40 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 40 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 30 30 40 5 0 40 20 20 40 40 5

0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 30 40 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 40 40 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 30 30 30 30 5 0 40 40 40 20 10 2

0 10 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 4 0 30 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 30 50 30 30 40 5 0 50 30 40 30 20 2

0 20 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 40 50 5 0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 30 40 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 30 30 10 20 30 4 0 30 40 30 30 30 1

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 10 10 10 10 20 3

0 30 20 30 40 40 5

0 20 30 40 50 30 4

0 30 50 30 40 50 4

0 30 40 30 40 40 3

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

208

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Subaru XV, Crosstrek

Tesla Model 3

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 50 5 0 40 10 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 30 40 50 40 5 0 20 10 50 50 50 5 0 10 40 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 40 5 0 20 20 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 30 40 50 50 5 0 30 30 30 40 40 2

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 20 20 40 50 50 5

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

0 5

Tesla Model S

Tesla Model X

Toyota 4Runner

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

* 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 5 *0 4 *0 5 *0 3 *0 5 *0 4 *0

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 30 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 40 40 4 0 20 30 40 50 20 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 40 40 1 0 30 10 40 30 20 5 0 20 20 20 30 20 4 0 10 30 10 20 20 5 0 10 10 30 40 20 1

0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 40 50 2 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 30 20 5 0 30 40 5 0 40 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 30 10 1 0 20 10 1 0 10 10 5 0 20 10 5 0 10 10 1

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 50 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 50 40 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 10 10 40 50 5

0 2

0 30 20 30 30 10 1

0 10 10 1

0 40 50 50 50 50 3

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

Toyota Avalon

Toyota Camry

Toyota Corolla

Toyota Highlander

Toyota Prius

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 30 20 40 40 4

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 40 50 50 5 0 40 50 30 40 40 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 50 1

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 40 4 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 40 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 40 50 5 0 40 10 10 30 40 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 40 50 4

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 4

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 40 50 50 40 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 4

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

1

2

WORSE

3

4

5

BET TER

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

209

USED C A R REL I A B IL I T Y

TROUBLE SPOTS


TROUBLE SPOTS

Toyota Prius C

Toyota Prius Prime

Toyota Prius V

Toyota RAV4

Toyota Sequoia

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 3 0 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 5 0 30 50 40 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 50 50 50 5

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

0 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 5

0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 40 5

0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 40 5 0 40 40 10 40 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 20 30 40 40 5

0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 3

50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 50 5* *0 50 30 5* *0 40 40 4* *0 50 50 5* *0 40 40 5* *0 40 50 5* *0 50 20 5* *0 10 40 5* *0 20 50 1* *0

0 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 5

0 50 40 5

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

Toyota Sienna

Toyota Tacoma

Toyota Tundra

Toyota Venza

Volkswagen Beetle

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 50 5

0 20 50 50 50 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 30 40 50 50 5 0 40 30 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 50 5 0 40 20 20 40 30 4 0 40 30 20 40 50 5 0 40 30 20 30 40 5 0 40 40 30 40 40 5

0 50 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 30 30 5 0 40 50 50 30 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 30 50 40 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 40 50 40 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 40 40 4 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 40 50 5 0 50 40 50 40 40 5

0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 40 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 40 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 40 50 40 40 5 0 40 10 30 40 40 4

0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 40 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 40 40 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 4 0 50 50 5 0 50 40 5 0 40 40 2

0 50 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 5 0 20 50 40 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 5 0 50 20 50 50 5 0 40 10 40 40 5 0 40 50 30 50 5 0 10 50 40 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 5 0 10 10 50 10 5 0 10 50 40 10 5 0 50 20 20 10 5 0 50 50 30 50 1 0 30 50 50 10 4

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 50 40 40 50 30 5

0 50 50 50 30 20 3

0 50 50 50 50 40 5

0 50 50 5

0 20 30 30 30 4

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

210

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Volkswagen Golf

Volkswagen Golf Alltrack

Volkswagen GTI

Volkswagen Jetta

Volkswagen Passat

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

* 50 40 50 5 *0 40 40 50 5 *0 50 40 50 5 *0 50 30 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 20 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 30 40 50 1 *0 50 40 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 30 10 20 5 *0 40 40 50 5 *0 20 20 30 5 *0 40 50 40 5 *0

0 50 50 50 50 5

0 50 40 50 50 50 5

0 30 10 40 1

0 10 30 40 40 5

Engine, Major

0 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4

* 50 50 40 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 40 30 50 5 *0 30 50 50 3 *0 30 30 50 3 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 20 50 40 3 *0 40 30 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 40 50 50 5 *0 50 50 50 5 *0 40 10 40 5 *0 40 40 50 5 *0 20 30 50 5 *0 40 50 40 5 *0

0 50 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

0 4

0 20 20 40 1

0 40 4

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

0 50 50 50 5

0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 4 0 50 5 0 50 4 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 50 5 0 50 5 0 30 4 0 50 5 0 40 5 0 40 5

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 50 50 50 5

0 10 50 40 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 20 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 50 5 0 10 40 50 50 5 0 10 40 50 50 5 0 10 50 40 40 4 0 40 10 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 30 5 0 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 5 0 30 30 40 40 5 0 40 50 50 40 5 0 10 30 50 40 5 0 30 50 40 30 4

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 40 50 4 0 10 10 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 10 20 20 50 50 5 0 20 40 40 40 50 3 0 30 40 30 40 50 5 0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 30 30 40 5 0 40 20 40 50 50 5 0 10 10 40 30 40 5 0 20 10 30 40 50 5 0 20 10 30 40 50 1

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

TROUBLE SPOTS

Volkswagen Tiguan

Volvo S60

Volvo XC60

Volvo XC70

Volvo XC90 โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

โ€˜13 โ€˜14 โ€˜15 โ€˜16 โ€˜17 โ€˜18

Engine, Major

0 10 50 50 40 50 5

0 50 50 30 50 5

0 50 40 50 50 50 5

0 5

Engine, Minor

In-Car Elec.

0 30 30 50 50 30 5 0 30 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 10 50 50 40 50 5 0 10 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 20 20 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 50 50 50 5 0 10 50 50 30 20 4 0 50 40 50 40 50 5 0 30 30 50 20 50 3 0 20 50 50 40 20 4

0 50 10 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 40 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 5 0 50 10 50 50 5 0 50 10 40 40 4 0 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 50 40 50 4 0 40 50 40 50 4 0 30 50 50 50 4 0 30 10 20 40 4 0 40 20 20 20 2

0 50 30 40 50 50 5 0 50 50 40 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 50 50 5 0 40 30 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 30 50 50 5 0 50 50 30 40 50 4 0 40 30 40 40 50 5 0 30 30 30 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 40 40 40 20 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 40 40 50 40 50 5 0 20 40 50 50 40 5 0 30 40 40 50 50 5 0 30 30 20 10 50 5 0 20 40 20 50 50 5

0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 5

USED-CAR VERDICTS

* 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 40 5 *0 50 4 *0 50 4 *0 40 5 *0 50 4 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 2 *0 30 5 *0 50 5 *0 50 5 *0 20 5 *0

0 10 40 50 30 40 2

0 40 20 30 40 4

0 40 30 20 30 50 3

0 3

0 30 4

Engine Cooling Trans., Major Trans., Minor Drive System Fuel System Electrical Climate System Suspension Brakes Exhaust Paint/Trim Noises/Leaks Body Hardware Power Equip.

NEW-CAR PREDICTION

1

2

WORSE

3

4

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

0 20 5

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

40 50 5 *0 40 50 5 *0 50 50 5 *0 50 50 5 *0 50 50 5 *0 40 30 5 *0 50 20 5 *0 40 10 5 *0 10 30 5 *0 20 40 5 *0 10 30 5 *0 50 50 5 *0 40 30 5 *0 10 40 5 *0 50 40 5 *0 10 10 5 *0 10 10 3 *0 0 10 10 3

5

BET TER

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

211

USED C A R REL I A B IL I T Y

TROUBLE SPOTS


Buying Tires

Tires have a direct impact on your carโ€™s handling, braking, ride comfort, and fuel economy. More important, their cornering grip, braking distances, and resistance to hydroplaning all affect your safety on the road.

CONSUMER REPORTS TESTS 50 or more tire models each year, with each going through as many as 14 rigorous tests. Weโ€™ve found that you generally get what you pay for. No matter the type, tires that combine the best grip with the longest tread life may cost a little more but will probably be worth it in the long run. For example, a $130 tire that will last twice as long as an $87 tire is a better buy, assuming all other factors are equal. Still, the cheaper tire may be just fine if you wonโ€™t be keeping your car for long. When buying new tires, we recommend sticking to the same type and size tire that originally came on your car. First, check the ratings for models that provide good braking and handling capabilities, as well as good resistance to hydroplaning (when there is too much water between your tire and the pavement), which can help you avoid an accident. After that, look for those rated highly in areas important to you, such as winter grip, tread life, ride comfort, and rolling resistance. We have found that some tires with lower rolling resistance allowed our test cars to get 1 or 2 more mpg than tires

212

with the highest rolling resistance. But the mileage you get with brandnew, low-rolling resistance tires may initially be worse than the old tires you are replacing. This is because tires with tens of thousands of miles of wear have less tread and behave more like low-rolling resistance tires. Our latest tests include the projected wear-out mileage of a tire. To determine longevity, we test tread life at a contract lab in Texas, where each tire is driven at least 16,000 miles or more on public roads. Weโ€™ve been conducting this test for several years. Our tread-life estimates let you compare the expected miles-to-wear-out for the specific tires we tested, but your actual experience will vary by how and where you drive, and what vehicle you use, among other factors. Many tires have a pro-rated treadwear warranty, but the tread-life mileage in the following charts will give you a direct comparison. Remember that if you buy tires online, you may have to pay for shipping and for mounting and balancing when the tires arrive.

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


ALL-SEASON CAR These are the tires that come standard on many cars, minivans, and SUVs.

Best for: Year-round traction, long tread life, and a comfortable ride. But they may lack the precise handling and grip of performance tires. Speed rating: Most are S (112 mph), T (118 mph), or H (130 mph). Treadwear warranty: Typically 65,000 to 90,000 miles. PERFORMANCE ALL-SEASON CAR They come standard on many newer cars.

Best for: Improved handling and grip over allseason tires on wet roads, but often have shorter treadwear than many allseason tires. Speed rating: Typically V (149 mph). Treadwear warranty: Typically 40,000 to 75,000 miles. ULTRA-HIGHPERFORMANCE ALL-SEASON CAR Found on sports cars, sports sedans, and some lower-priced sporty models.

Best for: Wet and dry braking and handling. But they trade some winter performance for ultimate warm-weather grip. Speed rating: Z (more than 149 mph), W (168 mph), or Y (186 mph). Treadwear warranty: None or 40,000 to 60,000 miles. ALL-WEATHER CAR Designed for year-round use. Better snow traction than all-season tires, but may wear out faster.

Best for: Year-round use, and where snow and ice are common challenges. Speed rating: W (168 mph) or V (149 mph). Treadwear warranty: Typically 55,000 to 60,000 miles. WINTER/SNOW AND PERFORMANCE WINTER/SNOW CAR Specially made for use in freezing temperatures and on snow and ice.

Best for: Maintaining traction on snow and ice. But fast wear and so-so wet and dry braking make them most suitable only for cold-weather use. Speed rating: Q (99 mph and higher). Treadwear warranty: Usually none.

T IRE S

Types and Features ALL-SEASON SUV These tires deliver the ride comfort, quietness, and long tread life of a car allseason tire but in the sizes to fit crossover SUVs.

Best for: Year-round traction, long tread life, and a comfortable ride. Speed rating: H (130 mph). Treadwear warranty: Typically 60,000 to 75,000 miles. ALL-SEASON AND ALL-TERRAIN TRUCK Designed for the rigors of truck use.

Best for: All-terrain models are designed for on-road and light-duty off-pavement use; allseason models are made primarily for on-road use. Speed rating: ALL-TERRAIN: S (112 mph) or T (118 mph). ALL-SEASON: S (112 mph), T (118 mph), H (130 mph), or V (149 mph). Treadwear warranty: ALL-TERRAIN: Typically 50,000 to 60,000 miles. ALL-SEASON: Typically 50,000 to 80,000 miles.

BUYING GUIDE 2020 CONSUMER REPORTS

213


Best balance of long tread life and mostly good all-weather performance:

All-Season Tires

General Altimax RT43 Michelin Defender T+H

Tested products in performance order.

Rolling resistance

H

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3

90,000

66

T

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

95,000

66

T

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4

80,000

66

T

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

80,000

Nexen Aria AH7

66

T

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

90,000

Yokohama Avid Ascend BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport Hankook Kinergy PT

65

T

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

100,000

63

T

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2

75,000

63

T

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3

80,000

Kumho Solus TA11 61

T

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5

75,000

60

T

4 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4

85,000

60

T

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5

70,000

60

H

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

75,000

58

T

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5

60,000

58

T

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

60,000

Tested tread life (miles)

80,000

Noise

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4

Ride

T

67

Ice braking

70

Handling

General Altimax RT43 Michelin Defender T+H Continental TrueContact Tour Falken Sincera SN201 A/S Falken Sincera SN250 A/S

Wet braking

Dry braking

Snow traction

Other

Speed rating

Recommended

Three-Season Winter Comfort Driving Driving

Hydroplaning resistance

Overall Score

Brand & Model

ALL-SEASON

! 0 ! 0

Pirelli P4 Four Seasons Plus Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus Toyo Versado Noir Firestone Champion Fuel Fighter Firestone All Season

214

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


T IRE S

Best balance of long tread life and year-round performance:

Performance All-Season Tires

Michelin CrossClimate +* Continental PureContact LS

Tested products in performance order.

Tested tread life (miles)

Other Rolling resistance

Noise

Ride

Ice braking

Snow traction

Hydroplaning resistance

Handling

Dry braking

Speed rating

Recommended

Three-Season Winter Comfort Driving Driving

Wet braking

Overall Score

Brand & Model

PERFORMANCE ALL-SEASON (INCL. ALL-WEATHER, NOTED WITH *)

! 0 ! 0

1

Michelin CrossClimate +* Continental PureContact LS General Altimax RT43 Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady* Michelin Premier A/S Pirelli Cinturato P7 All Season Plus Vredestein Quatrac 5*

75

W

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

75,000

71

V

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3

90,000

66

V

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4

70,000

64

V

3 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3

75,000

64

V

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3

80,000

64

V

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

70,000

62

V

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5

50,000

Atlas Force HP

61

V

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

65,000

Falken Sincera SN250 A/S BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport Firestone Firehawk AS

61

V

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3

75,000

60

V

4 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3

80,000

60

V

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 2

60,000

Nokian WRG4*

59

V

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3

60,000

Yokohama Avid Ascend Bridgestone Turanza Serenity Plus

59

V

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3

75,000

59

V

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3

65,000

2

WORSE

3

4

5

BET TER

! RECOMMENDED

215


Tested tread life (miles)

Other Rolling resistance

Noise

Ride

Ice braking

Snow traction

Hydroplaning resistance

Handling

Wet braking

Speed rating

Recommended

Three-Season Winter Comfort Driving Driving

Dry braking

Overall Score

Brand & Model

PERFORMANCE ALL-SEASON (INCL. ALL-WEATHER, NOTED WITH *) Continued

216

Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season Bridgestone DriveGuard Uniroyal Tiger Paw AWP3

58

V

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 4

80,000

56

V

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3

55,000

56

V

4 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4

65,000

Nokian Entyre 2.0

55

V

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3

70,000

Cooper CS5 Ultra Touring

55

V

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 2

60,000

Kumho Solus TA71

54

V

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3

50,000

Toyo Extensa HP II Sumitomo HTR Enhance L/X

54

V

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4

55,000

53

V

5 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 3

65,000

Toyo Celsius*

53

V

3 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3

60,000

Falken Ziex ZE950 A/S Maxxis Bravo HP-M3

51

V

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3

55,000

46

V

3 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 4

65,000

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Tested products in performance order.

Tested tread life (miles)

Other Rolling resistance

Noise

Ride

Ice braking

Snow traction

Hydroplaning

Handling

Wet braking

Speed rating

Recommended

Three-Season Winter Comfort Driving Driving

Dry braking

Overall Score

Brand & Model

ULTRA-HIGH-PERFORMANCE ALL-SEASON

! 0 ! 0 ! 0

1

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ General G-MAX AS-05 BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S Vredestein Quatrac Pro Pirelli P Zero All Season Plus Continental ExtremeContact DWS06 Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS

66

Y

5 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 2

55,000

66

W

5 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 2

65,000

66

W

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 2

65,000

66

Y

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 2

60,000

64

Y

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 2

55,000

64

Y

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 2

50,000

63

W

5 0 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 1

40,000

Kumho Ecsta PA51

62

W

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 1

50,000

Cooper Zeon RS3-G1 Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S Hankook Ventus S1 noble 2

61

Y

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 2

55,000

60

Y

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 3

75,000

57

W

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 3

55,000

Nexen Nfera AU7

56

W

Nitto Motivo

54

W

Atlas Force UHP

54

Y

Nokian zLine A/S

50

W

Laufenn S Fit AS

50

W

0 4 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0

45,000

Vogue Tyre Signature V

49

W

2

WORSE

3

4

5

BET TER

0 3 2 0 3 0 2 0 1 0

0 3 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0

0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0

0 3 3 0 1 0 1 0 3 0

0 3 3 0 2 0 2 0 3 0

0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0

0 4 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0

0 3 2 0 2 0 3 0 4 0

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 2

60,000 40,000 55,000 60,000 45,000

! RECOMMENDED

217

T IRE S

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ General G-MAX AS-05 Vredestein Quatrac Pro

Best balance of long tread life and mostly good all-weather performance

Ultra-HighPerformance All-Season Tires


Winter/Snow Tires

Best balance of winter and three-season performance: Cooper Discoverer True North Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2

Continental WinterContact SI Michelin X-Ice XI3 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3

Tested products in performance order.

Rolling resistance

T

2 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5

NA

69

H

2 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4

NA

! 0

Michelin X-Ice XI3 68

H

2 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 5

NA

! 0

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 General Altimax Arctic 12 Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 Falken HS449 Eurowinter Dunlop Winter Maxx 2 Toyo Observe G3-Ice Uniroyal Tiger Paw Ice & Snow 3 BFGoodrich Winter T/A KSI Yokohama Ice Guard iG52c Falken Espia EPZ II

68

R

2 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 4

NA

67

T

2 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 3

NA

67

H

2 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 2 0 4

NA

64

H

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 3

NA

63

T

2 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 3

NA

62

T

2 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 5

NA

61

T

2 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 3

NA

61

T

2 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 2 0 4

NA

60

T

2 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 1 0 4

NA

60

T

2 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3

NA

Tested tread life (miles)

70

Noise

NA

Ride

2 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3

Ice braking

H

Handling

70

Wet braking

Dry braking

Snow traction

Other

Speed rating

Recommended

Three-Season Winter Comfort Driving Driving

Hydroplaning resistance

Overall Score

Brand & Model

WINTER/SNOW CAR

! 0 ! 0 ! 0

218

Cooper Discoverer True North Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 Continental WinterContact SI

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


T IRE S

Performance Winter/Snow Tires

Best balance of winter performance and dry grip: Vredestein Wintrac Pro Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4

Tested products in performance order.

Rolling resistance

V

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 2

NA

71

V

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 2

NA

70

W

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 3

NA

70

V

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 3

NA

67

V

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3

NA

66

V

3 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3

NA

66

V

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3

NA

Tested tread life (miles)

72

Noise

NA

Ride

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2

Ice braking

W

Handling

78

Wet braking

Dry braking

Snow traction

Other

Speed rating

Recommended

Three-Season Winter Comfort Driving Driving Hydroplaning

Overall Score

Brand & Model

PERFORMANCE WINTER/SNOW

! 0 ! 0

Vredestein Wintrac Pro Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Nexen Winguard Sport 2 Yokohama Blue Earth Winter V905 Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 Toyo Observe GSi-6 HP Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

GUIDE TO THE R ATINGS:

Overall Score is based on more than a dozen tests, with braking, handling, and hydroplaning resistance more heavily weighted for many tires. Braking tests on ice are from 10 mph; on dry and wet pavement, from 60 to

1

2

WORSE

3

4

5

BET TER

0 mph. Handling combines how well a tire performed in the wet-handling test, steering feel, and an emergency handling maneuver. Hydroplaning denotes a tireโ€™s ability to resist skimming along the surface of standing water. Snow Traction tests denote how far a vehicle

has to travel to accelerate from 5 to 20 mph on moderately, packed snow. Ride and Noise are evaluated subjectively on rough and smooth roads. Rolling Resistance, as measured by a dynamometer, is a factor in fuel economy.

! RECOMMENDED

219


Best balance of long tread life and mostly good all-weather performance:

All-Season SUV Tires

Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max Kumho Crugen Premium

Bridgestone Dueler H/L 422 Ecopia Sumitomo HTR Enhance C/X

Tested products in performance order.

Rolling resistance

V

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4

60,000

68

H

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5

65,000

68

T

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 3

60,000

66

H

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4

75,000

Nitto NT 421Q

66

H

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2

65,000

Toyo Open Country Q/T Yokohama Geolandar G055

66

H

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3

65,000

64

H

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4

75,000

Toyo Celsius CUV

64

H

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 3

75,000

Tested tread life (miles)

68

Noise

40,000

Ride

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 5

Ice braking

H

Handling

70

Wet braking

Dry braking

Snow traction

Other

Speed rating

Recommended

Three-Season Winter Comfort Driving Driving

Hydroplaning resistance

Overall Score

Brand & Model

ALL-SEASON SUV

! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

220

Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max Kumho Crugen Premium Bridgestone Dueler H/L 422 Ecopia Sumitomo HTR Enhance C/X Hankook Dynapro HP2

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020


Continental Cross Contact LX20 EcoPlus Michelin Premier LTX

Firestone Destination LE 2 Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus Michelin Defender LTX M/S

Tested products in performance order.

Rolling resistance

H

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 5

40,000

72

S

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

65,000

72

T

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 4

65,000

72

T

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

85,000

70

T

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4

55,000

70

T

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 3

65,000

68

T

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5

60,000

68

T

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 4

70,000

68

H

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

70,000

Laufenn X Fit HT

68

T

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4

70,000

Bridgestone Dueler LTH

66

T

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 3

75,000

Nokian WR G3 SUV 66

Tested tread life (miles)

74

Noise

65,000

Ride

4 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 4

Ice braking

T

Handling

74

Wet braking

Dry braking

Snow traction

Other

Speed rating

Recommended

Three-Season Winter Comfort Driving Driving

Hydroplaning

Overall Score

Brand & Model

ALL-SEASON TRUCK

! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0

Continental Cross Contact LX20 EcoPlus Michelin Premier LTX Firestone Destination LE 2 Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus Michelin Defender LTX M/S Cooper Discoverer SRX General Grabber HTS60 Kumho Crugen HT51 Hankook Dynapro HT Nexen Roadian HTX RH5

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus GT Radial Savero HT2 Uniroyal Laredo Cross Country Tour Maxxis 770 Bravo H/T

1

2

WORSE

3

4

5

BET TER

V

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 5

55,000

66

T

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

65,000

66

S

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 5

65,000

64

T

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3

65,000

64

T

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4

60,000

! RECOMMENDED

221

T IRE S

Best balance of long tread life and mostly good all-weather performance:

All-Season Truck Tires


Best balance of long tread life and good on- and off-road performance:

All-Terrain Truck Tires

Continental TerrainContact A/T Michelin LTX A/T 2

Goodyear Wrangler TrailRunner AT Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 Nexen Roadian AT Pro RA8 Falken WildPeak A/T AT3W

Tested products in performance order.

Rolling resistance

Michelin LTX A/T 2

72

S

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 5

85,000

! 0

Goodyear Wrangler TrailRunner AT Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 Nexen Roadian AT Pro RA8 Falken WildPeak A/T AT3W

68

T

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3

50,000

68

T

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 2

60,000

68

S

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 3

75,000

68

T

3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3

70,000

Nokian Rotiiva AT

66

T

66

T

0 2 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 5 3 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 2 3 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 4 4 0

60,000

Laufenn X Fit AT Hankook Dynapro AT-M

66

T

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4

85,000

Pirelli Scorpion ATR 66

T

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3

60,000

64

T

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3

60,000

64

S

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3

55,000

64

S

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3

55,000

62

S

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3

75,000

62

T

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 3

55,000

60

S

4 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3

65,000

58

T

3 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3

45,000

Tested tread life (miles)

! 0

Noise

65,000

Ride

4 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 2

Ice braking

S

Handling

! 0

Continental 72 TerrainContact A/T

Wet braking

Dry braking

Snow traction

Other

Speed rating

Recommended

Three-Season Winter Comfort Driving Driving

Hydroplaning

Overall Score

Brand & Model

ALL-TERRAIN TRUCK

! 0 ! 0 ! 0

Cooper Discoverer A/ T3 Cooper Discoverer A/TW Firestone Destination A/T Toyo Open Country A/T II GT Radial Adventuro AT3 Maxxis 771 Bravo A/T Kumho Road Venture AT51 222

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020

75,000


Statement of Ownership, Management, and Circulation (Required by 39 U.S.C. 3685) 1. Publication Title: Consumer Reports. 2. Publication No: 0010-7174. 3. Filing Date: Sept. 10, 2019. 4. Issue Frequency: Monthly, except two issues in December. 5. No. of Issues Published Annually: 13. 6. Annual Subscription Price: $30. 7. Complete Mailing Address of Known Office of Publication: Consumer Reports Inc., 101 Truman Avenue, Yonkers, NY 10703-1044. 8. Complete Mailing Address of Headquarters or General Business Office of Publisher: Consumer Reports Inc., 101 Truman Avenue, Yonkers, NY 10703-1044. 9. Full Names and

Complete Mailing Addresses of Publisher, Editor, and Managing Editor. Publisher: Consumer Reports Inc., 101 Truman Avenue, Yonkers, NY 10703-1044. President and CEO: Marta L. Tellado; Editorin-Chief: Diane Salvatore; Managing Editor: Kevin Doyle. 10. Owner: (If the publication is published by a nonprofit organization, its name and address must be stated.) Full Name: Consumer Reports Inc., a nonprofit organization. Complete Mailing Address: 101 Truman Avenue, Yonkers, NY 10703-1044. 11. Known Bondholders, Mortgagees,

and Other Security Holders Owning or Holding 1 Percent or More of Total Amount of Bonds, Mortgages, or Other Securities: None. 12. For Completion by Nonprofit Organizations Authorized to Mail at Special Rates: The purpose, function, and nonprofit status of this organization and the exempt status for federal income tax purposes has not changed during preceding 12 months. 13. Publication Title: Consumer Reports. 14. Issue Date for Circulation Data Below: October 2019.

15. Extent and Nature of Circulation: Print Magazine, U.S. and Canada

Average no. copies each issue during past 12 mo.

No. copies of single issue published nearest to filing date

a. Total no. of copies (net press run) b. Paid circulation 1. Mailed outside-county paid subscriptions stated on Form 3541 2. Mailed in-county paid subscriptions stated on Form 3541 3. Sales through dealers, carriers, street vendors, counter sales, and other non-USPS paid distribution 4. Other classes mailed through the USPS c. Total paid distribution (sum of 15b(1), (2), (3), and (4)) d. 1. Free or Nominal Rate Outside-County Copies included on PS Form 3541 2. Free or Nominal Rate In-County included on PS form 3541 3. Free or Nominal Rate Copies Mailed at Other Classes Through the USPS (e.g. First-Class Mail) 4. Free or Nominal Rate Distribution Outside the Mail (Carriers or other means) e. Total free distribution (sum of 15d(1) and (4)) f. Total distribution (sum of 15c and 15e) g. Copies not distributed h. TOTAL (sum of 15f and 15g) i. Percent paid and/or requested circulation

3,776,624

3,618,922

3,368,127 0

3,187,873 0

36,355 0

35,000 0

3,404,482

3,222,873

1,411 0 0

1,312 0 0

9,508 10,920 3,415,401 361,223 3,776,624 99.68%

6,990 8,302 3,231,175 387,747 3,618,922 99.74%

I certify that the statements made by me above are correct and complete. Dawn Nelson, Senior Marketing Director

1

2

POOR

3

4

5

EXCELLENT

!

$

RECOMMENDED

CR BEST BUY

223


About Consumer Reports CONSUMER REPORTS is an independent, nonprofit organization founded in 1936 that works side by side with consumers to create a safe, fair, and transparent marketplace. To achieve our mission, we test thousands of products and services in our labs each year and survey hundreds of thousands of consumers about their experiences with products and services. We pay for all the products we rate. We donโ€™t accept paid advertising. In addition to our rigorous research, investigative journalism, and consumer advocacy, we work with other organizations, including media, consumer groups, research and testing consortiums, and phil-

anthropic partners. We also license our content and data, as well as work with business partners to offer shopping and other consumer services, and may receive fees from these programs. We maintain a strict separation between our commercial operations and our testing and editorial operations. Our testing and editorial teams decide which products to test and review; our external business partners or other third parties do not dictate or control these decisions. Lastly, these partnerships and programs do not constitute CRโ€™s endorsement of any products or services. For more information go to CR.org/about.

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020 VOLUME 84, No. 13 Consumer Reports magazine (ISSN 0010-7174) is published monthly, except twice in December, by Consumer Reports, 101 Truman Avenue, Yonkers, NY 10703-1044. Periodicals postage paid at Yonkers, N.Y., and at other mailing offices. Canadian postage paid at Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. Canadian publications registration number 2665247-98, agreement number 40015148. Consumer Reportsยฎ is a registered trademark in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Contents of this issue copyright ยฉ 2019 by Consumer Reports. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is forbidden without prior written permission (and is never permitted for commercial purposes). CR is a member of Consumers International. Mailing lists: CR rents or exchanges its customer postal list so it can be provided to other publications, companies, and nonprofit organizations. If you wish your name deleted from lists and rentals, send your address label with a request for deletion to Consumer Reports, P.O. Box 2127, Harlan, IA 51593-0316. Subscribers: Send address changes to P.O. Box 2109, Harlan, IA 51593-0298. If the Post Office alerts us that your magazines are undeliverable, we have no further obligation to fulfill your magazines unless we have a corrected address within two years. POSTMASTER Send all UAA to CFS (see DMM 507.1.5.2); NON-POSTAL AND MILITARY FACILITIES Send address corrections to Consumer Reports, P.O. Box 2109, Harlan, IA 51593-0298. Canada Post: If copies are undeliverable return to Consumer Reports, P.O. Box 481, Station Main, Markham, ON L3P 0C4. Back issues: Single copies of 12 preceding issues, $7.95 each; Buying Guide, $14.49 each (includes shipping and handling). Write Back Issues, Consumer Reports, Customer Relations, 101 Truman Ave., Yonkers, NY 10703-1044.

224

CONSUMER REPORTS BUYING GUIDE 2020



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Createย aย flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.